RECIPIENT ENCODING IN SOUTHERN SELKUP ANJA HARDER, UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "RECIPIENT ENCODING IN SOUTHERN SELKUP ANJA HARDER, UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG"

Debra Turner
5 years ago
Views:

1 RECIPIENT ENCODING IN SOUTHERN SELKUP ANJA HARDER, UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG

2 OUTLINE 1) INTRODUCTION 2) SOUTHERN SELKUP TEXT CORPUS 3) DITRANSITIVE TYPOLOGY 4) MONOTRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS 5) DITRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS 6) SUMMARY

3 INTRODUCTION

4 INTRODUCTION constructions with the verb meaning to giveʼ form ditransitive constructions like in (1) (1) Mary gave John a book A gent R eceiver T heme agent participant causes an object/theme to pass into the possession of an animate receiver.

5 SOUTHERN SELKUP TEXT CORPUS

6 SOUTHERN SELKUP TEXT CORPUS SELkupSpokenLanguage Corpus (SELSLC) DFG project: Syntactic description of the Southern and Central Selkup dialects: a corpusbased investigation Northern Selkup Southern Selkup

7 DITRANSITIVE TYPOLOGY

8 DITRANSITIVE TYPOLOGY I ditransitive verbs: physical transfer verbs like give, bring, send, etc. cognitive or mental transfer verbs like tell, show, teach

9 DITRANSITIVE TYPOLOGY II alignment = the comparison of the properties of arguments across constructions three major alignment types according to Malchukov at al. (2010) P P P T R T R T R indirective alignment secondary object aligment neutral alignment Figure: Malchukov et al (2010). Ditransitive constructions: a typological overview. In: Malchukov, A. I. Studies in ditransitive constructions: a comparative handbook. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter. p. 5

10 DITRANSITIVE TYPOLOGY III (2) P T R indirective alignment [dative constructions] (3) (T = P R)

11 DITRANSITIVE TYPOLOGY IV P (4) monotransitive T R secondary object aligment [primary object constructions] (5) ditransitive (R = P T)

12 DITRANSITIVE TYPOLOGY V (6) P T R neutral alignment [double object constructions] (7) (T = P = R)

13 MONOTRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS

14 MONOTRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS I monotransitive constructions compared to intransitive constructions accusative alignment (A = S P) ergative alignment (A S = P) neutral alignment (A = S = P) transitive intransitive -> agent-like argument (A) -> patient-like argument (P) -> single argument (S)

15 MONOTRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS II (8) direct object in accusative case accusative alignment (A = S P) indirective alignment type

16 DITRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS SOUTHERN SELKUP

17 DITRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS IN SOUTHERN SELKUP I the theme is almost always encoded with the accusative case the recipient is encoded with the dative/allative case, if it is expressed by a noun the recipient is encoded with the dative case, if it is expressed by a pronoun ditransitive constructions occur almost always only with objective conjugation

18 DITRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS IN SOUTHERN SELKUP II Recipient is expressed with a noun (9)

19 DITRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS IN SOUTHERN SELKUP III Recipient is expressed with a pronoun (10)

20 DITRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS IN SOUTHERN SELKUP IV Russian loanwords (11)

21 DITRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS NORTHERN SELKUP

22 DITRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS IN NORTHERN SELKUP I the nominal recipient is always encoded with the dative/ allative case -> the theme has accusative case the pronominal recipient is usually encoded with the accusative case -> the theme has instrumental case there are examples where the pronominal recipient is encoded with the lative case -> the theme has accusative case the choice of the case marker seems so depend on the information structure of the sentence and not on the definiteness of the direct object -> further research subjective and objective conjugation

23 DITRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS IN NORTHERN SELKUP II nominal recipient (12)

24 DITRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS IN NORTHERN SELKUP III pronominal recipient (accusative case) (13) indirective alignment (T = P R) pronominal recipient (lative case) (14) secondary object alignment (R = P T)

25 SUMMARY

26 SUMMARY I the agent does not obligatory have to be lexically overt (15) (16)

27 SUMMARY II in Southern Selkup the recipient does not obligatory have to be lexically overt, but may be referred to from the context (17)

28 SUMMARY III in Northern Selkup the recipient has to be lexically overt (18)

29 SUMMARY IV In the Southern dialects also the theme can be lexically covert (19) recipient known from the context theme encoding agent encoding

30 SUMMARY V Table 1: Overt and covert Recipient in Northern and Southern Selkup

31 (20) SUMMARY VI If the agent is lexically overt, it is always encoded with the nominative case, i.e. the unmarked form (21)

32 SUMMARY VII The nominal recipient is marked with dat/all case (22) (23)

33 SUMMARY VIII In Southern Selkup the pronominal recipient is always encoded with the dative case (24)

34 SUMMARY VIX In Northern Selkup the pronominal recipient is encoded with the accusative case or the dative case (13) (14)

35 SUMMARY X In Southern Selkup the theme is usually encoded (25) with the accusative case In Northern Selkup the encoding of the theme alternates depending on the recipient encoding

36 SUMMARY XI Table 2: Recipient encoding in Northern and Southern Selkup recipient dative construction primary object construction Northern Selkup N R DAT/ALL [T=P] ACC PRO R DAT [T=P] ACC T INSTR [R=P] ACC Central / Southern Selkup N PRO R DAT/ALL [T=P] ACC R DAT [T=P] ACC

37 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

The role of animacy and definiteness in the clitic-dp nexus

The role of animacy and definiteness in the clitic-dp nexus Author Eisenchlas, Susana, Laughren, Mary Published 2006 Conference Title Selected papers from the 2005 conference of the Australian Linguistic