Some Ethical Theories

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Some Ethical Theories"

Transcription

1 Some Ethical Theories Some Distinctions Ethical principles can be categorized according to whether they take judgments of value or judgments of obligation to be primary 1

2 I. Species of Moral Judgment I. Judgments of Obligation X is right You ought to do X You have a duty to do X Where X is normally the performance of some action. Judgments of obligation concern the Right II. Judgments of Value X is a good thing (or X is a bad thing ) X is valuable (or X is nugatory ) X, yum! (or Yuck, X! ) Judgments of value concern the Good Deontological Theories Deon < Greek duty, obligation Deontological ethical theories take judgments about obligations to be primary value considerations are not fundamental (and, according to a strictly deontological theory, simply irrelevant) to whether or not some action is right or wrong. E.g., Kantian ethics. Such theories are sometimes said to maintain the priority of the right to the good 2

3 Consequentialist Theories Consequentialist theories (e.g., utilitarianism) take judgments about what is right (i.e., our obligations) to be derivable from and dependent on judgments of value. So, e.g., if pleasure is good (i.e. valuable), then an action which helps to bring about more pleasure is, ceteris paribus, a permissible action. Such theories could be said to maintain the priority of the good to the right Consequentialist theories are thus a species of teleological theory telos < Greek goal Something to Notice If the moral rightness or wrongness of any act is dependent on the good (or bad) consequences that that act brings about, then it would seem that there can be no such thing as an inherently immoral act. Instead, the rightness or wrongness of any action will always depend on the goodness or badness of the consequences the action brings about. This may an acceptable implication, but, as we ll see, it seems to be in tension with some basic intuitions about what moral rightness is supposed to be like. 3

4 II. Monistic vs. Pluralistic Theories Ethical theories can be further sub-divided with respect to whether the theory takes one thing or a bunch of things to be primary Theories of Obligation Monistic E.g., Kantian ethics; There is only one fundamental duty (obligation) conform to the categorical imperative (In a nutshell: act so that the principle implied by your action could be willed without contradiction to be a rule for everybody else) Pluralistic E.g., Ross s Ethics of Duty; we have a number of duties (Ross thinks there are at least 7), all of which are equally fundamental, though any of them can be overridden by others. 4

5 Theories of Value Monistic According to hedonic U (as described by Bentham) there is only one thing that is intrinsically valuable, namely pleasure or, what amounts to the same thing, the absence of pain. G. E. Moore Pluralistic G.E. Moore s intuitionism (which we will not be studying in this course) there is an indefinitely large number of good things in the world, each of which possesses it goodness as a unique, non-natural property (I.e., according to Moore, the goodness of friendship and the goodness of listening to Mozart s Die Zauberflote, etc., etc. cannot be compared by any common measure) Conflicts Among Obligations If you hold a pluralistic theory of obligation, like Ross s, what should you do when two or more obligations seem to conflict? Example: Ross: We have both a fundamental duty to not to injure others (the duty of non-maleficence) and a fundamental duty to keep our promises (the duty of fidelity). Both duties are held to be equally fundamental; neither can be reduced to the other. But these duties might conflict: Your friend asks you to promise to never tell anyone what she is about to tell you. Her confession? A product she is responsible for marketing is defective and can become extremely dangerous even under conditions of normal use. Which duty do you act on? 5

6 Conflicts Among Values Similarly, if one holds a pluralistic theory of value. What do you do when two or more values conflict or cannot be pursued together? (A Somewhat Contrived) Example: Assume (plausibly) that both freedom from manipulation (as an aspect of the presumably desirable condition of autonomy) and pleasure are intrinsically good. Then what about advertising that is both entertaining and manipulative? If we were to ban such ads, on the grounds that they are manipulative, we would be denying ourselves some modest pleasures. If we allow them, on the grounds that they are modestly pleasurable, we forego the value for freedom from manipulation. Utilitarianism 6

7 Utilitarianism (U) In a nutshell, the view that an action is right (i.e., is morally permissible) if it brings about more utility (for everyone affected) than any other alternative action. Its familiar slogan: The greatest happiness of the greatest number Put a bit more precisely: Utilitarianism is a monistic, teleological theory of ethical obligation. It holds that there is it holds that there is ultimately only one fundamental obligation, namely maximize utility! Notes on the History of U For our purposes, utilitarianism can be said to have been founded by Jeremy Bentham ( ) The theory was greatly refined and developed by John Stuart Mill ( ) Both Bentham and Mill were active social and political reformers, both wrote and campaigned in aid of legislation (Bentham, penal reform; Mill, women s suffrage, Irish land reform) 7

8 this practical focus is not accidental. Bentham s major work is entitled Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789). As his title implies, for Bentham the determinations of moral philosophy will be and ought to be of use in setting a practical political agenda. Mill, for his part, wrote numerous pamphlets on social and political questions and served as an MP. Of particular note, his The Subjection of Women (with Harriet Taylor Mill, 1869) is one of the major documents of modern liberal feminism. Objectivity For a moral theory to function as a practical guide to social and political questions, Bentham and Mill reckon, that theory must be as objective as possible. Utility is understood to be the sort of thing that we ought to be able determine, at least in principle, by observation, measurement, and inductive reasoning. Libertarian Complication: Mill famously held that each sane adult is the best judge of what is in her interests. Yet, utilitarianism is easily compatible with paternalism: It may be that the best objective account of utility is given by experts. 8

9 Utility Broadly speaking, the term utility stands for whatever is understood to be intrinsically valuable on a utilitarian theory of value. Intrinsically valuable: Valuable for its own sake. Instrumentally valuable: Valuable as a means to obtain something else (e.g., money, possessions) Candidates for intrinsic value have included: pleasure (hedonic U, Bentham), happiness (eudaimonistic U, Mill), welfare, preference satisfaction (some contemporary utilitarians) So, for Mill: Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness (Utilitarianism, 1863, ch. 2) We might object: Other things are intrinsically valuable things besides happiness, such as, power, love or respect. Mill responds: everything we desire becomes part of happiness. I.e.: Happiness isn t just the feeling of being happy, it is eudaimonia ( thrivingness ): A complex phenomenon composed of many parts, including virtue, respect and power. 9

10 Act vs. Rule Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness Note that Mill s formula is ambiguous. Is it the case that (i) an action is right if this sort of action tends to promote happiness or (ii) an action is right if this particular action will promote happiness? Rule Utilitarianism (RU): Adopt the rule, the general type of action, that will maximize utility in the long run Act Utilitarianism (AU): Choose the action that will maximize utility in each individual case Equality & Impartiality For classical U we are to maximize utility (minimize disutility) for everyone affected in aggregate. Bentham: Each is to count for one, none to count for more than one. Mill: I must again repeat what the assailants of utilitarianism seldom have the justice to acknowledge, that the happiness which forms the utilitarian standard of what is right in conduct is not the agent s own happiness, but that of all concerned. As between others, utilitarianism requires him to be as strictly impartial as a disinterested benevolent spectator. This commitment to equality and impartiality is a rather attractive feature of utilitarianism. It is also one of the main grounds for the popularity of utilitarian theory as a basis for social and political policy. 10

11 Who Is Everyone? In the world of business, one way of identifying everyone affected is to speak of stakeholders (supposedly a deliberate corruption of shareholders ) i.e., everyone who has a direct or indirect stake in the outcome of the decision. Peter Singer For contemporary utilitarians (e.g., Peter Singer), everyone affected may be extended to include every sort of being that can feel pain (i.e., not just human beings, but non-human animals as well) Alternative A Alternative B Stakeholder #1 Stakeholder #2 Stakeholder #3 Stakeholder #4 Stakeholder #5 Net Outcomes: [(5 x ) (2 x )] [(5 x ) (4 x )] Note that the distribution of benefits among stakeholders can vary greatly. Maximizing aggregate benefits does not necessarily maximize benefits for any particular stakeholder 11

12 Some Problems with Utilitarianism 1. Utility Comparisons and Commensurability A basic assumption for any U theory is that utility can be measured, both to allow for aggregation and to make different utilities commensurable. In practice, however, this has proves to be quite difficult to accomplish in any full satisfactory way. Cost/Benefit Analysis Cost/Benefit analysis (and, when dealing with probabilities, Risk/Benefit analysis), an historical offspring of U, addresses this problem by measuring utility in monetary terms (i.e., dollars). Some objections: Can everything assigned a monetary value? (Including rights, the environment, due process?) What about cases where monetary compensation can t be given to the right parties? (E.g., wrongful death, past generations.) To some people, even to begin to speak in purely monetary terms seems morally repugnant. 12

13 2. Special Duties and Relationships To many people it seems wrong to be (merely) impartial (or disinterested ) toward those with whom you enjoy some sort of special relationship (e.g., family, friends) and perfect strangers. E.g. Peter Singer RU may accept that special duties and relationships can count to some extent in the utilitarian calculus, just like everything else. But they have no special probative value of their own. 3. Punishing the Innocent / Ignoring Persons Perhaps most damning to the cause: U is apparently prepared to accept cases of (what we would otherwise call) injustice provided that the utilitarian calculus is satisfied. E.g., McCloskey s example: preventing a riot by falsely accusing an innocent man. John Rawls: U does not take seriously the distinction between persons 13

14 4. Free Riders There is a temporary local energy shortage. Your local government has asked that businesses voluntarily curtail production by 50% in order to conserve energy. Counting on compliance among your neighbors, you choose to cut production by only 25%. You justify your action on utilitarian grounds After all, the relatively small amount of extra energy that you use in production (beyond what rationing would allow), is unlikely by itself to have any appreciable negative effects. On the other hand, 25% more production than you would otherwise have will definitely have a favourable impact on your company s profits, your employees income, etc Making an exception of yourself in this way is often termed being a free rider. (Someone else has paid for the transportation, you ride for free) Free ridership is a general problem for any number of normative theories, but perhaps especially so for AU, since it seems to suggest that, in some cases, becoming a free rider may be morally permissible (possibly even a moral duty). Perhaps the main objection to free ridership is something like: What if everyone did that? This is a question of great probative force for many of us. It suggests that unless everyone could do what I propose to do without adversely affecting the aggregate utility, then it would be wrong for anyone to behave in the same manner. 14

15 Kantian Ethics What if everyone did that? Kantian Ethics (KE) As we have seen, a fundamental concern for utilitarians is the (empirical, scientific) objectivity of normative judgments. Immanuel Kant ( ), by contrast, is preeminently concerned with the moral authority of reason (i.e., reason alone, without reference to experience). In the Critique of Practical Reason (1788), Kant says that he aims to construct a pure moral philosophy, perfectly cleared of everything which is only empirical, and which belongs to anthropology. 15

16 Kant s approach to this task leads to type of ethical theory very different from utilitarianism (as we shall see); but these two types of ethical theory need not be seen as fundamentally opposed in any social or political sense. For Kant, reason is something possessed by every moral agent; so an ethical theory founded on reason is committed to ideals of equality and impartiality essentially similar to those of utilitarians. Indeed, Kant s philosophy and utilitarianism both feed into the standard liberal view of a society composed of free individuals. The Theory In contrast to utilitarianism, Kant s theory is strictly deontological. For Kant, the rightness or wrongness of an action has nothing to do with the consequences that the act brings about. Instead, we should evaluate an action with respect to what kind of action it is: An action done from duty has its moral worth, not in the purpose that is to be attained by it, but in the maxim according to which the action is determined. The moral worth depends, therefore, not on the realization of the object of the action, but merely on the principle of volition according to which, without regard to any objects of the faculty of desire, the action has been done. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785, Ellington trans.) 16

17 Maxims By maxim Kant means the general principle or rule that describes what one takes oneself to be doing in an action. In effect, the maxim of an action is what you would specify if you (honestly) answered the question What rule is implied by my action? Example: You are in a financial jam and you lie on a loan application to obtain money that would otherwise not be available to you. The maxim of such an action might be something like If I can avoid financial trouble by lying, I shall do so. Or, more accurately, for Kant: It is morally OK to lie. Note that, in practice, the maxim of an action may be (and indeed typically is) merely implicit. The maxim of your action may become evident to you only upon reflection after the action is performed or, perhaps, never at all. Still, Kant suggests that my willingness to act on a specific maxim expresses my commitment to a general rule, i.e., a commitment that extends beyond this particular case to cover myself or anyone else in a situation that is similar in the relevant respects. This claim is not as strange as it might seem: At least in part, it follows from an everyday principle that Waluchow terms the generalizability of reasons 17

18 The Generalizability of Reasons Consider the following dialogue: Me: You: Me: You: The Audwagen Serpent is a really great car. It has plenty of power with its 300 horsepower V6. Yet, it gets better than 60 MPG on the highway. And it is safe: It has roll cage construction and side-panel airbags. So what do you think of the Volksdi Locust? It s a piece of crap. But the Locust has a V6 engine that gives better than 300 horsepower, it gets 62 MPG highway, and it has roll cage construction and side-panel airbags? Logical Consistency Anyone can recognize that my position in the dialogue is inconsistent (even if they don t have that word to describe it). If a certain level of power and fuel efficiency, together with certain safety features, are jointly sufficient to make one model of car a good car, then it follows that I must be willing to say that any model of car that has the same properties is a good car. Either that or I have to supply at least one additional criterion of what makes for a good car. Note that the principle at work above applies to anyone who offers up a (purportedly) sufficient reason for anything. It is a matter of logic, not anything specific to people or cars. 18

19 How does this relate to ethics? Well Either the maxim of an action provides a sufficient reason for performing that action or it doesn t. If it doesn t, then you had no sufficient reason for acting the way you did, that is, your action was irrational (or non-rational). If you act on a maxim, then you are effectively committing yourself to a universal moral rule, since, if that maxim provides sufficient reason for you to act in that way, then logical consistency dictates that it ought to provide sufficient reason for anyone else in a relevantly similar situation. The Categorical Imperative (CI) According to Kant only one fundamental duty need be observed by any rational agent in order to guarantee that her action is moral namely, will that your actions conform to the categorical imperative. Kant offered at least three different formulations of the CI. Each formulation, however, is said by Kant to be strictly equivalent to each of the others. That is, each will pick out the same actions as morally wrong and each will allow the same actions as morally permissible. It can sometimes be a bit difficult to see how this strict equivalence is supposed to work. The idea of equivalent tests for the same property, however, seems clear enough. (Think: Lab equipment) 19

20 First Formulation I ought never to act except in such a way that I can at the same time will without contradiction that my maxim should become a universal law of nature. Although it might not look like it at first glance, the first formulation is, in effect, a test for logical consistency An Example (related to Kant s own, but in somewhat different terms): If, when I say I promise to pay you back, I know, according to the maxim of my action, that I mean I m not going to pay you back (I m just saying that I will), there is a clear contradiction: I promise = I don t promise (p = ~p) If whenever anyone says I promise they are entitled to mean, in effect, I don t promise, then clearly there can be no such thing as promise keeping. Making false promises cannot be willed to be a universal law of nature without creating a contradiction. 20

21 Second Formulation Act in such a way that I will always treat humanity, whether in my own person or in the person of another, never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end. For Kant all (but only) rational beings are genuine participants in the realm of morality. And it is precisely our rationality and our autonomy (our ability to and our requirement that we give the law unto ourselves ) which makes us the sort of creatures that are worthy of respect. So why should we never other people merely as means? Because, as a rational being, you wouldn t accept as legitimate any reason that was offered up for some action that you couldn t accept for yourself. Therefore, it would be inconsistent for you to treat another rational being any differently than you would want to be treated. In short, rational beings, for Kant, are creatures that both give and require respect. 21

22 Third Formulation So act as if you were through your maxims a law-making member of a kingdom of ends. That is, treat others as autonomous agents, capable of self-directed, rational action. Treat yourself and every other rational being as jointly constituting a community of moral agents, each of who, as ends in themselves, can accept only those laws which they have given and accepted for themselves. Some Problems with the CI Test It is uncompromising and inflexible e.g. The Axwielding Murderer at the Door 22

23 It offers little help when duties conflict (Hegel: It is excessively abstract and thus lacks substantive content) e.g., Save lives when you can and Never lie in some situations (as in the case above) may both be legitimate duties, yet suggest different courses of action. By itself, the CI will be of little help in choosing. Kant s answer to such charges is, if not very helpful, at least consistent (as you would expect from Kant). It is, in effect: The perfect moral life is a regulative ideal, not something that we can actually expect to achieve So, think of the CI not so much as a practical rule generator, but as guide to or prefiguring of what an ideal moral life might look like. 23

24 W.D. Ross s Ethics of Duty Another sort of a deontological theory W. D. Ross William David Ross ( ) was a persistent critic of utilitarian views. One of his main objections to the theory was that utilitarians fail to take proper account of the many different values at work in human life and that this lead to distorted account of moral relationships 24

25 Other people are not just possible benefactors of my actions, they may also stand to me in the relation of promisee to promiser, creditor to debtor, or wife to husband, of child to parent, of fellow countryman to fellow countryman, and the like (The Right and the Good, 1930, 3). Ross provides a list of fundamental prima facie duties that, he thinks, helps to clarify the various duties and moral relationships involved in everyday moral thinking Ross s List of Prima Facie Duties 1. Duties resting previous actions of our own. These include: (a) duties of fidelity arising from explicit or implicit promises; (b) duties of reparation, resting on previous wrongful acts of ours and requiring that we compensate, as best we can, the victims of our wrongful conduct. 2. Duties resting on the services of others; duties of gratitude that require that we return favour for favour. 3. Duties involving the fair distribution of goods; duties of justice that require fair sharing of goods to be distributed. 4. Duties to improve the condition of others; duties of beneficence 5. Duties to improve our own condition; duties of self-improvement. 6. Duties not to injure others; duties of non-maleficence 25

26 Why these seven duties? Ross does not claim that the list is exhaustive, but he does think that it is simply self-evident that all the duties included are, in fact, fundamental duties. And if someone disagrees (say, about the duty of selfimprovement)? Ross: I can only ask them to reflect again, in the hope that they will ultimately agree that they know. If you persist in your disagreement, you must be morally blind. 26

Ethical Theories. A (Very) Brief Introduction

Ethical Theories. A (Very) Brief Introduction Ethical Theories A (Very) Brief Introduction Last time, a definition Ethics: The discipline that deals with right and wrong, good and bad, especially with respect to human conduct. Well, for one thing,

More information

Kant, Deontology, & Respect for Persons

Kant, Deontology, & Respect for Persons Kant, Deontology, & Respect for Persons Some Possibly Helpful Terminology Normative moral theories can be categorized according to whether the theory is primarily focused on judgments of value or judgments

More information

Chapter 2 Normative Theories of Ethics

Chapter 2 Normative Theories of Ethics Chapter 2 Normative Theories of Ethics MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. Consequentialism a. is best represented by Ross's theory of ethics. b. states that sometimes the consequences of our actions can be morally relevant.

More information

Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT

Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT KANT S OBJECTIONS TO UTILITARIANISM: 1. Utilitarianism takes no account of integrity - the accidental act or one done with evil intent if promoting good ends

More information

Definitions: Values and Moral Values

Definitions: Values and Moral Values Definitions: Values and Moral Values 1. Values those things that we care about; those things that matter to us; those goals or ideals to which we aspire and by which we measure ourselves and others in

More information

Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? A Dilemma: - My boss. - The shareholders. - Other stakeholders

Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? A Dilemma: - My boss. - The shareholders. - Other stakeholders Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? - My boss - The shareholders - Other stakeholders - Basic principles about conduct and its impacts - What is good for me - What

More information

Suppose... Kant. The Good Will. Kant Three Propositions

Suppose... Kant. The Good Will. Kant Three Propositions Suppose.... Kant You are a good swimmer and one day at the beach you notice someone who is drowning offshore. Consider the following three scenarios. Which one would Kant says exhibits a good will? Even

More information

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Philosophy 1100: Ethics Philosophy 1100: Ethics Topic 7: Ross Theory of Prima Facie Duties 1. Something all our theories have had in common 2. W.D. Ross 3. The Concept of a Prima Facie Duty 4. Ross List of Prima Facie Duties

More information

Lecture 12 Deontology. Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics

Lecture 12 Deontology. Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics Lecture 12 Deontology Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics 1 Agenda 1. Immanuel Kant 2. Deontology 3. Hypothetical vs. Categorical Imperatives 4. Formula of the End in Itself 5. Maxims and

More information

Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics

Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics TRUE/FALSE 1. The statement "nearly all Americans believe that individual liberty should be respected" is a normative claim. F This is a statement about people's beliefs;

More information

Moral Philosophy : Utilitarianism

Moral Philosophy : Utilitarianism Moral Philosophy : Utilitarianism Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a moral theory that was developed by Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873). It is a teleological or consequentialist

More information

W.D. Ross ( )

W.D. Ross ( ) W.D. Ross (1877-1971) British philosopher Translator or Aristotle Defends a pluralist theory of morality in his now-classic book The Right and the Good (1930) Big idea: prima facie duties Prima Facie Duties

More information

Mill s Utilitarian Theory

Mill s Utilitarian Theory Normative Ethics Mill s Utilitarian Theory John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism The Greatest Happiness Principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they

More information

FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS. by Immanuel Kant

FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS. by Immanuel Kant FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS SECOND SECTION by Immanuel Kant TRANSITION FROM POPULAR MORAL PHILOSOPHY TO THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS... This principle, that humanity and generally every

More information

KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill)

KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill) KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill) German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was an opponent of utilitarianism. Basic Summary: Kant, unlike Mill, believed that certain types of actions (including murder,

More information

In-Class Kant Review Dialogue 1

In-Class Kant Review Dialogue 1 1 Kant Review Dialogue 1 Micah Tillman 05 April, 2010, slightly revised 18 March, 2011 Tedrick: Hey Kant! In-Class Kant Review Dialogue 1 Why, hello there Fredward. Tedrick: It s Tedrick. Fredward is my

More information

Benjamin Visscher Hole IV Phil 100, Intro to Philosophy

Benjamin Visscher Hole IV Phil 100, Intro to Philosophy Benjamin Visscher Hole IV Phil 100, Intro to Philosophy Kantian Ethics I. Context II. The Good Will III. The Categorical Imperative: Formulation of Universal Law IV. The Categorical Imperative: Formulation

More information

PHIL 202: IV:

PHIL 202: IV: Draft of 3-6- 13 PHIL 202: Core Ethics; Winter 2013 Core Sequence in the History of Ethics, 2011-2013 IV: 19 th and 20 th Century Moral Philosophy David O. Brink Handout #9: W.D. Ross Like other members

More information

24.02 Moral Problems and the Good Life

24.02 Moral Problems and the Good Life MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 24.02 Moral Problems and the Good Life Fall 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. Three Moral Theories

More information

-- did you get a message welcoming you to the cours reflector? If not, please correct what s needed.

-- did you get a message welcoming you to the cours reflector? If not, please correct what s needed. 1 -- did you get a message welcoming you to the coursemail reflector? If not, please correct what s needed. 2 -- don t use secondary material from the web, as its quality is variable; cf. Wikipedia. Check

More information

Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule

Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule UTILITARIAN ETHICS Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule A dilemma You are a lawyer. You have a client who is an old lady who owns a big house. She tells you that

More information

SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6

SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6 SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6 Textbook: Louis P. Pojman, Editor. Philosophy: The quest for truth. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN-10: 0199697310; ISBN-13: 9780199697311 (6th Edition)

More information

Chapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS CHAPTER OBJECTIVES. After exploring this chapter, you will be able to:

Chapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS CHAPTER OBJECTIVES. After exploring this chapter, you will be able to: Chapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS MGT604 CHAPTER OBJECTIVES After exploring this chapter, you will be able to: 1. Explain the ethical framework of utilitarianism. 2. Describe how utilitarian

More information

Kantian Deontology - Part Two

Kantian Deontology - Part Two Kantian Deontology - Part Two Immanuel Kant s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals Nathan Kellen University of Connecticut October 1st, 2015 Table of Contents Hypothetical Categorical The Universal

More information

Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Spring 2011 Russell Marcus

Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Spring 2011 Russell Marcus Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Spring 2011 Russell Marcus Class 26 - April 27 Kantian Ethics Marcus, Introduction to Philosophy, Slide 1 Mill s Defense of Utilitarianism P People desire happiness.

More information

Quiz 1. Criticisms of consequentialism and Kant. Consequentialism and Nonconsequentialism. Consequentialism in practice. Must Choose Best Possible Act

Quiz 1. Criticisms of consequentialism and Kant. Consequentialism and Nonconsequentialism. Consequentialism in practice. Must Choose Best Possible Act Quiz 1 (Out of 4 points; 5 points possible) Ethical Theory (continued) In one clear sentence, state one of the criticisms of consequentialism discussed in the course pack. (up to 2 bonus points): In one

More information

Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley

Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I Participation Quiz Pick an answer between A E at random. What answer (A E) do you think will have been selected most frequently in the previous poll? Recap: Unworkable

More information

Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT

Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT A NOTE ON READING KANT Lord Macaulay once recorded in his diary a memorable attempt his first and apparently his last to read Kant s Critique: I received today

More information

How should I live? I should do whatever brings about the most pleasure (or, at least, the most good)

How should I live? I should do whatever brings about the most pleasure (or, at least, the most good) How should I live? I should do whatever brings about the most pleasure (or, at least, the most good) Suppose that some actions are right, and some are wrong. What s the difference between them? What makes

More information

Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2013 Russell Marcus

Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2013 Russell Marcus Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2013 Russell Marcus Class 28 -Kantian Ethics Marcus, Introduction to Philosophy, Slide 1 The Good Will P It is impossible to conceive anything at all in

More information

Kantianism: Objections and Replies Keith Burgess-Jackson 12 March 2017

Kantianism: Objections and Replies Keith Burgess-Jackson 12 March 2017 Kantianism: Objections and Replies Keith Burgess-Jackson 12 March 2017 Kantianism (K): 1 For all acts x, x is right iff (i) the maxim of x is universalizable (i.e., the agent can will that the maxim of

More information

GS SCORE ETHICS - A - Z. Notes

GS SCORE ETHICS - A - Z.   Notes ETHICS - A - Z Absolutism Act-utilitarianism Agent-centred consideration Agent-neutral considerations : This is the view, with regard to a moral principle or claim, that it holds everywhere and is never

More information

Critical Reasoning and Moral theory day 3

Critical Reasoning and Moral theory day 3 Critical Reasoning and Moral theory day 3 CS 340 Fall 2015 Ethics and Moral Theories Differences of opinion based caused by different value set Deontology Virtue Religious and Divine Command Utilitarian

More information

24.01: Classics of Western Philosophy

24.01: Classics of Western Philosophy Mill s Utilitarianism I. Introduction Recall that there are four questions one might ask an ethical theory to answer: a) Which acts are right and which are wrong? Which acts ought we to perform (understanding

More information

Deontological Ethics

Deontological Ethics Deontological Ethics From Jane Eyre, the end of Chapter XXVII: (Mr. Rochester is the first speaker) And what a distortion in your judgment, what a perversity in your ideas, is proved by your conduct! Is

More information

Ethical Theory. Ethical Theory. Consequentialism in practice. How do we get the numbers? Must Choose Best Possible Act

Ethical Theory. Ethical Theory. Consequentialism in practice. How do we get the numbers? Must Choose Best Possible Act Consequentialism and Nonconsequentialism Ethical Theory Utilitarianism (Consequentialism) in Practice Criticisms of Consequentialism Kant Consequentialism The only thing that determines the morality of

More information

Moral Theory. What makes things right or wrong?

Moral Theory. What makes things right or wrong? Moral Theory What makes things right or wrong? Consider: Moral Disagreement We have disagreements about right and wrong, about how people ought or ought not act. When we do, we (sometimes!) reason with

More information

A Review on What Is This Thing Called Ethics? by Christopher Bennett * ** 1

A Review on What Is This Thing Called Ethics? by Christopher Bennett * ** 1 310 Book Review Book Review ISSN (Print) 1225-4924, ISSN (Online) 2508-3104 Catholic Theology and Thought, Vol. 79, July 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.21731/ctat.2017.79.310 A Review on What Is This Thing

More information

KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire.

KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire. KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON The law is reason unaffected by desire. Aristotle, Politics Book III (1287a32) THE BIG IDEAS TO MASTER Kantian formalism Kantian constructivism

More information

Kantian Deontology. A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7. Paul Nicholls 13P Religious Studies

Kantian Deontology. A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7. Paul Nicholls 13P Religious Studies A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7 Kantian Deontology Deontological (based on duty) ethical theory established by Emmanuel Kant in The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Part of the enlightenment

More information

Ethical non-naturalism

Ethical non-naturalism Michael Lacewing Ethical non-naturalism Ethical non-naturalism is usually understood as a form of cognitivist moral realism. So we first need to understand what cognitivism and moral realism is before

More information

The fact that some action, A, is part of a valuable and eligible pattern of action, P, is a reason to perform A. 1

The fact that some action, A, is part of a valuable and eligible pattern of action, P, is a reason to perform A. 1 The Common Structure of Kantianism and Act Consequentialism Christopher Woodard RoME 2009 1. My thesis is that Kantian ethics and Act Consequentialism share a common structure, since both can be well understood

More information

The form of relativism that says that whether an agent s actions are right or wrong depends on the moral principles accepted in her own society.

The form of relativism that says that whether an agent s actions are right or wrong depends on the moral principles accepted in her own society. Glossary of Terms: Act-consequentialism Actual Duty Actual Value Agency Condition Agent Relativism Amoralist Appraisal Relativism A form of direct consequentialism according to which the rightness and

More information

Philosophical Ethics. Distinctions and Categories

Philosophical Ethics. Distinctions and Categories Philosophical Ethics Distinctions and Categories Ethics Remember we have discussed how ethics fits into philosophy We have also, as a 1 st approximation, defined ethics as philosophical thinking about

More information

Computer Ethics. Normative Ethics Ethical Theories. Viola Schiaffonati October 4 th 2018

Computer Ethics. Normative Ethics Ethical Theories. Viola Schiaffonati October 4 th 2018 Normative Ethics Ethical Theories Viola Schiaffonati October 4 th 2018 Overview (van de Poel and Royakkers 2011) 2 Ethical theories Relativism and absolutism Consequentialist approaches: utilitarianism

More information

Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System

Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System Ethics and Morality Ethics: greek ethos, study of morality What is Morality? Morality: system of rules for guiding

More information

THE CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP by Lars Bergström

THE CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP by Lars Bergström From: Who Owns Our Genes?, Proceedings of an international conference, October 1999, Tallin, Estonia, The Nordic Committee on Bioethics, 2000. THE CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP by Lars Bergström I shall be mainly

More information

DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS

DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS In ethical theories, if we mainly focus on the action itself, then we use deontological ethics (also known as deontology or duty ethics). In duty ethics, an action is morally right

More information

24.03: Good Food 3 April Animal Liberation and the Moral Community

24.03: Good Food 3 April Animal Liberation and the Moral Community Animal Liberation and the Moral Community 1) What is our immediate moral community? Who should be treated as having equal moral worth? 2) What is our extended moral community? Who must we take into account

More information

Philosophical Ethics. The nature of ethical analysis. Discussion based on Johnson, Computer Ethics, Chapter 2.

Philosophical Ethics. The nature of ethical analysis. Discussion based on Johnson, Computer Ethics, Chapter 2. Philosophical Ethics The nature of ethical analysis Discussion based on Johnson, Computer Ethics, Chapter 2. How to resolve ethical issues? censorship abortion affirmative action How do we defend our moral

More information

Categorical Imperative by. Kant

Categorical Imperative by. Kant Categorical Imperative by Dr. Desh Raj Sirswal Assistant Professor (Philosophy), P.G.Govt. College for Girls, Sector-11, Chandigarh http://drsirswal.webs.com Kant Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant (1724 1804)

More information

Basics of Ethics CS 215 Denbigh Starkey

Basics of Ethics CS 215 Denbigh Starkey Basics of Ethics CS 215 Denbigh Starkey 1. Introduction 1 2. Morality vs. ethics 1 3. Some ethical theories 3 a. Subjective relativism 3 b. Cultural relativism 3 c. Divine command theory 3 d. The golden

More information

Kant's Moral Philosophy

Kant's Moral Philosophy Kant's Moral Philosophy I. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (178.5)- Immanuel Kant A. Aims I. '7o seek out and establish the supreme principle of morality." a. To provide a rational basis for morality.

More information

24.03: Good Food 2/15/17

24.03: Good Food 2/15/17 Consequentialism and Famine I. Moral Theory: Introduction Here are five questions we might want an ethical theory to answer for us: i) Which acts are right and which are wrong? Which acts ought we to perform

More information

Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics

Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics 2012 Cengage Learning All Rights reserved Learning Outcomes LO 1 Explain how important moral reasoning is and how to apply it. LO 2 Explain the difference between facts

More information

Humanities 4: Lectures Kant s Ethics

Humanities 4: Lectures Kant s Ethics Humanities 4: Lectures 17-19 Kant s Ethics 1 Method & Questions Purpose and Method: Transition from Common Sense to Philosophical Understanding of Morality Analysis of everyday moral concepts Main Questions:

More information

Summary of Kant s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals

Summary of Kant s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Summary of Kant s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Version 1.1 Richard Baron 2 October 2016 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Availability and licence............ 3 2 Definitions of key terms 4 3

More information

Ethical Reasoning and the THSEB: A Primer for Coaches

Ethical Reasoning and the THSEB: A Primer for Coaches Ethical Reasoning and the THSEB: A Primer for Coaches THSEB@utk.edu philosophy.utk.edu/ethics/index.php FOLLOW US! Twitter: @thseb_utk Instagram: thseb_utk Facebook: facebook.com/thsebutk Co-sponsored

More information

A primer of major ethical theories

A primer of major ethical theories Chapter 1 A primer of major ethical theories Our topic in this course is privacy. Hence we want to understand (i) what privacy is and also (ii) why we value it and how this value is reflected in our norms

More information

Philosophical Ethics. Consequentialism Deontology (Virtue Ethics)

Philosophical Ethics. Consequentialism Deontology (Virtue Ethics) Consequentialism Deontology (Virtue Ethics) Consequentialism Deontology (Virtue Ethics) Consequentialism the value of an action (the action's moral worth, its rightness or wrongness) derives entirely from

More information

Altruism. A selfless concern for other people purely for their own sake. Altruism is usually contrasted with selfishness or egoism in ethics.

Altruism. A selfless concern for other people purely for their own sake. Altruism is usually contrasted with selfishness or egoism in ethics. GLOSSARY OF ETHIC TERMS Absolutism. The belief that there is one and only one truth; those who espouse absolutism usually also believe that they know what this absolute truth is. In ethics, absolutism

More information

Deontology. Immanuel Kant ( ) Founder of Deontology

Deontology. Immanuel Kant ( ) Founder of Deontology Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Founder of Deontology The right act is that which is in accordance with the correct moral rule (GK. deon) or principle (Kant calls these maxims ) Rejects hedonism Rejects consequentialism

More information

CMSI Handout 3 Courtesy of Marcello Antosh

CMSI Handout 3 Courtesy of Marcello Antosh CMSI Handout 3 Courtesy of Marcello Antosh 1 Terminology Maxims (again) General form: Agent will do action A in order to achieve purpose P (optional: because of reason R). Examples: Britney Spears will

More information

Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley

Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I Participation Quiz Pick an answer between A E at random. (thanks to Rodrigo for suggesting this quiz) Ethical Egoism Achievement of your happiness is the only moral

More information

Ethics is subjective.

Ethics is subjective. Introduction Scientific Method and Research Ethics Ethical Theory Greg Bognar Stockholm University September 22, 2017 Ethics is subjective. If ethics is subjective, then moral claims are subjective in

More information

PHIL%13:%Ethics;%Fall%2012% David%O.%Brink;%UCSD% Syllabus% Part%I:%Challenges%to%Moral%Theory 1.%Relativism%and%Tolerance.

PHIL%13:%Ethics;%Fall%2012% David%O.%Brink;%UCSD% Syllabus% Part%I:%Challenges%to%Moral%Theory 1.%Relativism%and%Tolerance. Draftof8)27)12 PHIL%13:%Ethics;%Fall%2012% David%O.%Brink;%UCSD% Syllabus% Hereisalistoftopicsandreadings.Withinatopic,dothereadingsintheorderinwhich theyarelisted.readingsaredrawnfromthethreemaintexts

More information

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

PHI 1700: Global Ethics PHI 1700: Global Ethics Session 13 March 22 nd, 2016 O Neill, A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics So far in this unit, we ve seen many different ways of judging right/wrong actions: Aristotle s virtue

More information

Foundations of Bioethics

Foundations of Bioethics introductory lectures in bioethics Foundations of Bioethics Paul Menzel Pacific Lutheran University (philosophy, emeritus) Visiting Professor of Bioethics, CUHK 17 October 2015 Centre for Bioethics, CUHK

More information

A CONTRACTUALIST READING OF KANT S PROOF OF THE FORMULA OF HUMANITY. Adam Cureton

A CONTRACTUALIST READING OF KANT S PROOF OF THE FORMULA OF HUMANITY. Adam Cureton A CONTRACTUALIST READING OF KANT S PROOF OF THE FORMULA OF HUMANITY Adam Cureton Abstract: Kant offers the following argument for the Formula of Humanity: Each rational agent necessarily conceives of her

More information

Autonomous Machines Are Ethical

Autonomous Machines Are Ethical Autonomous Machines Are Ethical John Hooker Carnegie Mellon University INFORMS 2017 1 Thesis Concepts of deontological ethics are ready-made for the age of AI. Philosophical concept of autonomy applies

More information

Post-Islamist Approach to Veiling: Islamic Hijab from an Ethical Perspective. Queen s University, March 2015

Post-Islamist Approach to Veiling: Islamic Hijab from an Ethical Perspective. Queen s University, March 2015 Post-Islamist Approach to Veiling: Islamic Hijab from an Ethical Perspective Queen s University, March 2015 . Unlike Islamists such as Ali Shariati and Ruhollah Khomeini, post-islamist reformists do believe

More information

Tuesday, September 2, Idealism

Tuesday, September 2, Idealism Idealism Enlightenment Puzzle How do these fit into a scientific picture of the world? Norms Necessity Universality Mind Idealism The dominant 19th-century response: often today called anti-realism Everything

More information

INTRODUCTORY HANDOUT PHILOSOPHY 13 FALL, 2004 INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY---ETHICS Professor: Richard Arneson. TAs: Eric Campbell and Adam Streed.

INTRODUCTORY HANDOUT PHILOSOPHY 13 FALL, 2004 INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY---ETHICS Professor: Richard Arneson. TAs: Eric Campbell and Adam Streed. 1 INTRODUCTORY HANDOUT PHILOSOPHY 13 FALL, 2004 INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY---ETHICS Professor: Richard Arneson. TAs: Eric Campbell and Adam Streed. Lecture MWF 11:00-11:50 a.m. in Cognitive Science Bldg.

More information

THE ETHICS OF STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION: WINTER 2009

THE ETHICS OF STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION: WINTER 2009 Lying & Deception Definitions and Discussion Three constructions Do not lie has the special status of a moral law, which means that it is always wrong to lie, no matter what the circumstances. In Kant

More information

MILL. The principle of utility determines the rightness of acts (or rules of action?) by their effect on the total happiness.

MILL. The principle of utility determines the rightness of acts (or rules of action?) by their effect on the total happiness. MILL The principle of utility determines the rightness of acts (or rules of action?) by their effect on the total happiness. Mill s principle of utility [A]ctions are right in proportion as they tend to

More information

Philosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Spring 2011 Class 26 - April 29 Kantian Ethics. Hamilton College Russell Marcus

Philosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Spring 2011 Class 26 - April 29 Kantian Ethics. Hamilton College Russell Marcus Philosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Spring 2011 Class 26 - April 29 Kantian Ethics Hamilton College Russell Marcus I. Good Will, Duty, and Inclination The core claim of utilitarianism is that the

More information

An Epistemological Assessment of Moral Worth in Kant s Moral Theory. Immanuel Kant s moral theory outlined in The Grounding for the Metaphysics of

An Epistemological Assessment of Moral Worth in Kant s Moral Theory. Immanuel Kant s moral theory outlined in The Grounding for the Metaphysics of An Epistemological Assessment of Moral Worth in Kant s Moral Theory Immanuel Kant s moral theory outlined in The Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals (hereafter Grounding) presents us with the metaphysical

More information

Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals

Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals G. J. Mattey Spring, 2017/ Philosophy 1 The Division of Philosophical Labor Kant generally endorses the ancient Greek division of philosophy into

More information

Backward Looking Theories, Kant and Deontology

Backward Looking Theories, Kant and Deontology Backward Looking Theories, Kant and Deontology Study Guide Forward v. Backward Looking Theories Kant Goodwill Duty Categorical Imperative For Next Time: Rawls, Selections from A Theory of Justice Study

More information

Ethics Prof. Vineet Sahu Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur

Ethics Prof. Vineet Sahu Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur Ethics Prof. Vineet Sahu Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur Module No. #01 Lecture No. #08 Deontological Theories Immanuel Kant Now, continuing to talk about,

More information

Sidgwick on Practical Reason

Sidgwick on Practical Reason Sidgwick on Practical Reason ONORA O NEILL 1. How many methods? IN THE METHODS OF ETHICS Henry Sidgwick distinguishes three methods of ethics but (he claims) only two conceptions of practical reason. This

More information

Computer Ethics. Normative Ethics and Normative Argumentation. Viola Schiaffonati October 10 th 2017

Computer Ethics. Normative Ethics and Normative Argumentation. Viola Schiaffonati October 10 th 2017 Normative Ethics and Normative Argumentation Viola Schiaffonati October 10 th 2017 Overview (van de Poel and Royakkers 2011) 2 Some essential concepts Ethical theories Relativism and absolutism Consequentialist

More information

Hello again. Today we re gonna continue our discussions of Kant s ethics.

Hello again. Today we re gonna continue our discussions of Kant s ethics. PHI 110 Lecture 29 1 Hello again. Today we re gonna continue our discussions of Kant s ethics. Last time we talked about the good will and Kant defined the good will as the free rational will which acts

More information

Deontology, Rationality, and Agent-Centered Restrictions

Deontology, Rationality, and Agent-Centered Restrictions Florida Philosophical Review Volume X, Issue 1, Summer 2010 75 Deontology, Rationality, and Agent-Centered Restrictions Brandon Hogan, University of Pittsburgh I. Introduction Deontological ethical theories

More information

Happiness and Personal Growth: Dial.

Happiness and Personal Growth: Dial. TitleKant's Concept of Happiness: Within Author(s) Hirose, Yuzo Happiness and Personal Growth: Dial Citation Philosophy, Psychology, and Compara 43-49 Issue Date 2010-03-31 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/143022

More information

Duty and Categorical Rules. Immanuel Kant Introduction to Ethics, PHIL 118 Professor Douglas Olena

Duty and Categorical Rules. Immanuel Kant Introduction to Ethics, PHIL 118 Professor Douglas Olena Duty and Categorical Rules Immanuel Kant Introduction to Ethics, PHIL 118 Professor Douglas Olena Preview This selection from Kant includes: The description of the Good Will The concept of Duty An introduction

More information

Notes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning

Notes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning Notes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning The final chapter of Moore and Parker s text is devoted to how we might apply critical reasoning in certain philosophical contexts.

More information

Q2) The test of an ethical argument lies in the fact that others need to be able to follow it and come to the same result.

Q2) The test of an ethical argument lies in the fact that others need to be able to follow it and come to the same result. QUIZ 1 ETHICAL ISSUES IN MEDIA, BUSINESS AND SOCIETY WHAT IS ETHICS? Business ethics deals with values, facts, and arguments. Q2) The test of an ethical argument lies in the fact that others need to be

More information

Annotated List of Ethical Theories

Annotated List of Ethical Theories Annotated List of Ethical Theories The following list is selective, including only what I view as the major theories. Entries in bold face have been especially influential. Recommendations for additions

More information

#NLCU. The Ethical Leader: Rules and Tools

#NLCU. The Ethical Leader: Rules and Tools The Ethical Leader: Rules and Tools #NLCU March 12, 2017 Washington, DC Dr. Scott Paine Director, Leadership Development and Education Florida League of Cities Agenda So What is Ethics? Sample Ethical

More information

No Love for Singer: The Inability of Preference Utilitarianism to Justify Partial Relationships

No Love for Singer: The Inability of Preference Utilitarianism to Justify Partial Relationships No Love for Singer: The Inability of Preference Utilitarianism to Justify Partial Relationships In his book Practical Ethics, Peter Singer advocates preference utilitarianism, which holds that the right

More information

Utilitarianism pp

Utilitarianism pp Utilitarianism pp. 430-445. Assuming that moral realism is true and that there are objectively true moral principles, what are they? What, for example, is the correct principle concerning lying? Three

More information

The Pleasure Imperative

The Pleasure Imperative The Pleasure Imperative Utilitarianism, particularly the version espoused by John Stuart Mill, is probably the best known consequentialist normative ethical theory. Furthermore, it is probably the most

More information

Kant The Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals (excerpts) 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes. Section IV: What is it worth? Reading IV.2.

Kant The Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals (excerpts) 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes. Section IV: What is it worth? Reading IV.2. Kant The Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals (excerpts) 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes Section IV: What is it worth? Reading IV.2 Kant s analysis of the good differs in scope from Aristotle s in two ways. In

More information

Take Home Exam #2. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

Take Home Exam #2. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert Name: Date: Take Home Exam #2 Instructions (Read Before Proceeding!) Material for this exam is from class sessions 8-15. Matching and fill-in-the-blank questions

More information

Tools Andrew Black CS 305 1

Tools Andrew Black CS 305 1 Tools Andrew Black CS 305 1 Critical Thinking Everyone thinks, all the time Why Critical Thinking? Much of our thinking is biased, distorted, partial, uninformed, or down-right prejudiced. This costs us

More information

Lecture 2: What Ethics is Not. Jim Pryor Guidelines on Reading Philosophy Peter Singer What Ethics is Not

Lecture 2: What Ethics is Not. Jim Pryor Guidelines on Reading Philosophy Peter Singer What Ethics is Not Lecture 2: What Ethics is Not Jim Pryor Guidelines on Reading Philosophy Peter Singer What Ethics is Not 1 Agenda 1. Review: Theoretical Ethics, Applied Ethics, Metaethics 2. What Ethics is Not 1. Sexual

More information

Carritt, E. F. Anthony Skelton

Carritt, E. F. Anthony Skelton 1 Carritt, E. F. Anthony Skelton E. F. Carritt (1876 1964) was born in London, England. He studied at the University of Oxford, at Hertford College, and received a first class degree in Greats in 1898.

More information

factors in Bentham's hedonic calculus.

factors in Bentham's hedonic calculus. Answers to quiz 1. An autonomous person: a) is socially isolated from other people. b) directs his or her actions on the basis his or own basic values, beliefs, etc. c) is able to get by without the help

More information

Chapter 2 Determining Moral Behavior

Chapter 2 Determining Moral Behavior Chapter 2 Determining Moral Behavior MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. A structured set of principles that defines what is moral is referred to as: a. a norm system b. an ethical system c. a morality guide d. a principled

More information