CMSI Handout 3 Courtesy of Marcello Antosh
|
|
- Loren Melton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CMSI Handout 3 Courtesy of Marcello Antosh 1 Terminology Maxims (again) General form: Agent will do action A in order to achieve purpose P (optional: because of reason R). Examples: Britney Spears will neglect her children in order to have more time to do drugs, because she likes doing drugs. Paris Hilton will donate to charity in order to improve her image, because she wants to improve her image. Oprah Winfrey will donate to charity in order to help the needy, because it is the right thing to do. 2 Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals: Second Section 2.1 The Basics Kant s method: as in the First Section, his method is still analytic and a priori. He is still trying to see what follows analytically (i.e. conceptually or by meaning alone) from notions such as duty, good will, autonomy of the will, and the Categorical Imperative (445). Kant s goal: To discuss the content of the Categorical Imperative in further detail (412). Kant is not yet trying to justify the Categorical Imperative (445). That is, he is not yet trying to explain why the Categorical Imperative is a requirement of reason or why it binds the wills of rational agents. (He does that in the Third Section, which we will not read.) How Kant will achieve this goal: He will identify three formulations of the Categorical Imperative. Kant thinks that, although these formulations are equivalent, each one emphasizes a different feature of the Categorical Imperative (436). 2.2 Imperatives ( ) Ignore Kant for a moment and think of some things that you judge that you absolutely must do, morally. For instance, suppose your mother, father, sibling, and best friend were all about to be run over by a train and the only way they could be saved is if you pulled some lever, thereby 1
2 diverting the train onto a different set of tracks. Imagine what you might think in such a situation: I must pull this lever! I must save my loved ones! That, intuitively, is an imperative. A perfectly rational or Good Will (i.e. a Divine or Holy Will) is a will that is necessarily determined entirely by reason. That is, it is not possible for such a will to be determined even in part by something other than reason, such as an inclination that is contrary to reason. Imperatives, i.e. oughts, do not apply to such a will. Why? Because it is not possible for such a will to do something contrary to reason or duty since such a will just does what the Categorical Imperative requires (414). Think: is always matches ought. An imperfectly rational or Good Will (i.e. one that actual people have) is a will that is not necessarily determined entirely by reason. It is possible for such a will to be determined by inclinations that are contrary to reason (e.g. disgruntled employees seek revenge out of rage, even when there is no good reason to do so). Think: is doesn t always match ought. An imperative is the formula of a command of reason and is expressed by an ought (we can add: or a must, have to, should, etc.). Imperatives say that something would be good to do or refrain from doing, but they say it to a will that does not always therefore do something simply because it has been represented to the will as something good to do (413). There are two kinds of imperatives: Hypothetical and Categorical. All imperatives say that doing something would be good (414). Hypothetical Imperatives say that doing/omitting something would be good as a means to something else. They make conditional or hypothetical requirements on the will. An example: If you want to impress the opposite sex, you ought to learn to bust moves as well as Usher or flirt as well as R. Kelly. Such a requirement applies to you only if the condition/hypothesis in the ifclause applies to you. Categorical Imperatives say that doing/omitting something would be good in and of itself. They make unconditional or categorical requirements on the will. An example: You ought not kill others for fun. Such a requirement applies to you no matter what. (Part of Kant s goal in the Third Section is to try to offer an argument that there really are such categorical imperatives.) Two non-moral types of hypothetical imperatives: of skill, of prudence ( ). (Not too important.) Kant s Question: How are all these imperatives possible? Or: why should one let his/her actions be determined by these imperatives? Or: why should one act in accord with these requirements of reason? Or: why is it that these imperatives are rationally binding? (417) Answer for hypothetical imperatives: In the case of hypothetical imperatives, Kant says the answer is easy. It is analytically true that, if you will some end, E, and if the only way to attain E is to will means, M, then in willing E one ought (i.e. is rationally required) to also will M. Of course, figuring out which particular means are required to attain certain ends must be discovered empirically, and is therefore synthetic. What s analytic about this answer is the 2
3 abstract conceptual relationship between willing the required means to whatever end one adopts (417). Think: Given how the world works, since bringing about means M is required in order to bring about end E, then, if I choose to bring about end E, then I am rationally required to also choose to bring about means M. It would be some kind of conceptual mistake, or a mistake of reason not to will the required means to the end that I adopt. Answer for categorical imperatives: In the case of categorical imperatives, the answer is a pain in the ass (420). It is not analytically true that there is some categorical imperative that commands all rational agents to act in some way. Instead, this is synthetically true, says Kant, and his argument is in the Third Section. 2.3 Different Formulations of the Categorical Imperative ( ) *The Universal Law version of the Categorical Imperative: Act only on that maxim that you can will to be a universal law (421, and Temkin s handout). The Intuitive Idea of the Universal Law version of the Categorical Imperative: What if everyone who wanted to achieve purpose P performed act A? Would it still be possible for me to do so? If not, then acting on my maxim ( perform act A in order to achieve purpose P ) would be wrong. Why? Because the only way I would be able to achieve purpose P by performing act A is if everyone else didn t act like me, the jackass, parasite, free-rider. If everyone did act like me, many of us would fail to achieve what we set out to do. So, for me to be successful in acting on this maxim, I basically have to cheat, free-ride, or make a special exception for myself by acting on this maxim while everyone else doesn t act on it. But it s wrong for someone to make a special exception for oneself in this way - it s not fair, it s not just. Kant s (Universal Law) Impermissibility Test Step 1: Identify your proposed maxim: I will do act A in order to achieve purpose P. Step 2: Make your maxim a universal law: Every agent who wills purpose P does act A. Step 3: Imagine that you are in a world, call it Kant s World, in which the universal law from Step 2 holds. Step 4: Now, imagine that you are willing to act on your maxim from Step 1 in Kant s World. Step 5: Finally, consider whether some kind of contradiction (see below) arises when you will to act on your maxim in Kant s World. Step 6: If some kind of contradiction arises, then you have discovered some moral duty (see below). If no contradiction arises, then, according to Kant s moral theory, it is morally permissible to act on your maxim. Two kinds of contradictions that may arise: (1) Contradiction in Conception: If, in Kant s World (Step 5), you cannot even conceive of willing your maxim without some kind of contradiction, then you have a perfect (narrow, strict) duty to refrain from acting on it. I.e. some particular act or omission is absolutely required of you, like not murdering or lying or stealing. 3
4 (2) Contradiction in the Will: If, in Kant s World (Step 5), you cannot rationally will your maxim in Kant s World (Step 5), then you have an imperfect (broad, meritorious) duty to refrain from acting on it. I.e. some acts or omissions of a particular kind are required of you, like giving to charity or developing one s talents, but the duty doesn t specify exactly what you are to do about it. For example, I have to give some to charity, but which charities or how much I have to give aren t specified. Problem for Kant: What kind of contradiction? Consider two possible interpretations of (1). (1a) Logical Contradiction Interpretation: There is a logical contradiction in willing to act on your maxim in Kant s World. (1b) Practical Contradiction Interpretation: Willing to act on your maxim in Kant s World would be self-defeating in some way, or it would no longer be practical to act on your proposed maxim in order to achieve your purpose. Objections to the Universal Law version of the Categorical Imperative Failure to Condemn Objection: Think of some maxim that has the following two features: (i) it passes Kant s Impermissibility Test, but (ii) if someone followed this maxim, this person would do something that is obviously wrong, immoral, or impermissible. Revenge maxim: I will kill anyone who betrays me in order to get revenge. Condemns Too Much Objection: Think of some maxim that has the following two features: (i) it fails Kant s Impermissibility Test, but (ii) if someone followed this maxim, this person would do something that is obviously not wrong, not immoral, or not impermissible. Polite maxim: When traveling down narrow hallways, I will allow others to pass by first, to be polite. *Persons as Ends version of the Categorical Imperative: Act in such a way that you treat all persons [i.e. rational beings] as ends in themselves, and never merely as a means to my own ends (429, Temkin s Handout). The (obscure) argument for the Persons as Ends version of the Categorical Imperative ( ) (i) Every action aims at an end. (ii) If there is a categorical imperative, then there must be some end that is unconditionally valuable and holds for all rational beings. (iii) This end can t be an object of inclination or an inclination itself, since these both vary across each rational being. (iv) The only other possible end is rational nature/agency itself, so this is the unconditionally valuable end that holds equally for all rational beings; each rational being must adequately respect each other s rational agency. We do this by following the Persons as Ends version of the Categorical Imperative. 4
5 Examples of acting against persons, or treating persons merely as a means; these relate to our perfect duties ( ). Examples of positively respecting rational agency; these relate to our imperfect duties (430). Autonomy version of the Categorical Imperative: Act only so that each time you will, you could regard yourself as giving a universal law through your maxim. (432, 440) Autonomy = being bound to a law that you give to yourself (432, 440). Heteronomy = being bound to a law by an inclination or because you have some other end (441). Kant thinks we act freely (autonomously) only if we act in accordance with the categorical imperative. 2.4 Kant s Criticism of other moral theories. ( , ) Kant basically says, "yo, those other theories are whack!" 5
Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals
Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals G. J. Mattey Spring, 2017/ Philosophy 1 The Division of Philosophical Labor Kant generally endorses the ancient Greek division of philosophy into
More informationSummary of Kant s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals
Summary of Kant s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Version 1.1 Richard Baron 2 October 2016 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Availability and licence............ 3 2 Definitions of key terms 4 3
More informationKantian Deontology - Part Two
Kantian Deontology - Part Two Immanuel Kant s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals Nathan Kellen University of Connecticut October 1st, 2015 Table of Contents Hypothetical Categorical The Universal
More informationKANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill)
KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill) German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was an opponent of utilitarianism. Basic Summary: Kant, unlike Mill, believed that certain types of actions (including murder,
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2013 Russell Marcus
Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2013 Russell Marcus Class 28 -Kantian Ethics Marcus, Introduction to Philosophy, Slide 1 The Good Will P It is impossible to conceive anything at all in
More informationLecture 12 Deontology. Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics
Lecture 12 Deontology Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics 1 Agenda 1. Immanuel Kant 2. Deontology 3. Hypothetical vs. Categorical Imperatives 4. Formula of the End in Itself 5. Maxims and
More informationSuppose... Kant. The Good Will. Kant Three Propositions
Suppose.... Kant You are a good swimmer and one day at the beach you notice someone who is drowning offshore. Consider the following three scenarios. Which one would Kant says exhibits a good will? Even
More informationDuty and Categorical Rules. Immanuel Kant Introduction to Ethics, PHIL 118 Professor Douglas Olena
Duty and Categorical Rules Immanuel Kant Introduction to Ethics, PHIL 118 Professor Douglas Olena Preview This selection from Kant includes: The description of the Good Will The concept of Duty An introduction
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Spring 2011 Russell Marcus
Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Spring 2011 Russell Marcus Class 26 - April 27 Kantian Ethics Marcus, Introduction to Philosophy, Slide 1 Mill s Defense of Utilitarianism P People desire happiness.
More informationHumanities 4: Lectures Kant s Ethics
Humanities 4: Lectures 17-19 Kant s Ethics 1 Method & Questions Purpose and Method: Transition from Common Sense to Philosophical Understanding of Morality Analysis of everyday moral concepts Main Questions:
More informationKANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire.
KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON The law is reason unaffected by desire. Aristotle, Politics Book III (1287a32) THE BIG IDEAS TO MASTER Kantian formalism Kantian constructivism
More informationFUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS. by Immanuel Kant
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS SECOND SECTION by Immanuel Kant TRANSITION FROM POPULAR MORAL PHILOSOPHY TO THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS... This principle, that humanity and generally every
More informationCategorical Imperative by. Kant
Categorical Imperative by Dr. Desh Raj Sirswal Assistant Professor (Philosophy), P.G.Govt. College for Girls, Sector-11, Chandigarh http://drsirswal.webs.com Kant Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant (1724 1804)
More informationBenjamin Visscher Hole IV Phil 100, Intro to Philosophy
Benjamin Visscher Hole IV Phil 100, Intro to Philosophy Kantian Ethics I. Context II. The Good Will III. The Categorical Imperative: Formulation of Universal Law IV. The Categorical Imperative: Formulation
More informationDEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS
DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS In ethical theories, if we mainly focus on the action itself, then we use deontological ethics (also known as deontology or duty ethics). In duty ethics, an action is morally right
More information[Forthcoming in The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, ed. Hugh LaFollette. (Oxford: Blackwell), 2012] Imperatives, Categorical and Hypothetical
[Forthcoming in The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, ed. Hugh LaFollette. (Oxford: Blackwell), 2012] Imperatives, Categorical and Hypothetical Samuel J. Kerstein Ethicists distinguish between categorical
More informationPhilosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Spring 2011 Class 26 - April 29 Kantian Ethics. Hamilton College Russell Marcus
Philosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Spring 2011 Class 26 - April 29 Kantian Ethics Hamilton College Russell Marcus I. Good Will, Duty, and Inclination The core claim of utilitarianism is that the
More informationKant The Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals (excerpts) 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes. Section IV: What is it worth? Reading IV.2.
Kant The Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals (excerpts) 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes Section IV: What is it worth? Reading IV.2 Kant s analysis of the good differs in scope from Aristotle s in two ways. In
More informationKant. Deontological Ethics
Kant 1 Deontological Ethics An action's moral value is determined by the nature of the action itself and the agent's motive DE contrasts with Utilitarianism which says that the goal or consequences of
More informationDeontological Ethics. Kant. Rules for Kant. Right Action
Deontological Ethics Kant An action's moral value is determined by the nature of the action itself and the agent's motive DE contrasts with Utilitarianism which says that the goal or consequences of an
More information38 Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. [Ak 4:422] [Ak4:421]
38 Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals [Ak 4:422] [Ak4:421] what one calls duty is an empty concept, we can at least indicate what we are thinking in the concept of duty and what this concept means.
More informationIMMANUEL KANT Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals [Edited and reduced by J. Bulger, Ph.D.]
IMMANUEL KANT Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals [Edited and reduced by J. Bulger, Ph.D.] PREFACE 1. Kant defines rational knowledge as being composed of two parts, the Material and Formal. 2. Formal
More informationKant's Moral Philosophy
Kant's Moral Philosophy I. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (178.5)- Immanuel Kant A. Aims I. '7o seek out and establish the supreme principle of morality." a. To provide a rational basis for morality.
More informationFrom the Categorical Imperative to the Moral Law
From the Categorical Imperative to the Moral Law Marianne Vahl Master Thesis in Philosophy Supervisor Olav Gjelsvik Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Arts and Ideas UNIVERSITY OF OSLO May
More informationMill s Utilitarian Theory
Normative Ethics Mill s Utilitarian Theory John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism The Greatest Happiness Principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they
More informationHello again. Today we re gonna continue our discussions of Kant s ethics.
PHI 110 Lecture 29 1 Hello again. Today we re gonna continue our discussions of Kant s ethics. Last time we talked about the good will and Kant defined the good will as the free rational will which acts
More informationUnifying the Categorical Imperative* Marcus Arvan University of Tampa
Unifying the Categorical Imperative* Marcus Arvan University of Tampa [T]he concept of freedom constitutes the keystone of the whole structure of a system of pure reason [and] this idea reveals itself
More informationIs Morality Rational?
PHILOSOPHY 431 Is Morality Rational? Topic #3 Betsy Spring 2010 Kant claims that violations of the categorical imperative are irrational acts. This paper discusses that claim. Page 2 of 6 In Groundwork
More informationLecture 6 Kantianism. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley
Lecture 6 Kantianism Participation Quiz Pick an answer between A E at random. What answer (A E) do you think will have been selected most frequently in the previous poll? Recap: Unworkable Ethical Theories
More informationAn Epistemological Assessment of Moral Worth in Kant s Moral Theory. Immanuel Kant s moral theory outlined in The Grounding for the Metaphysics of
An Epistemological Assessment of Moral Worth in Kant s Moral Theory Immanuel Kant s moral theory outlined in The Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals (hereafter Grounding) presents us with the metaphysical
More informationA Categorical Imperative. An Introduction to Deontological Ethics
A Categorical Imperative An Introduction to Deontological Ethics Better Consequences, Better Action? More specifically, the better the consequences the better the action from a moral point of view? Compare:
More informationTHE NATURE OF NORMATIVITY IN KANT S PHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC REBECCA V. MILLSOP S
THE NATURE OF NORMATIVITY IN KANT S PHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC REBECCA V. MILLSOP S I. INTRODUCTION Immanuel Kant claims that logic is constitutive of thought: without [the laws of logic] we would not think at
More informationAUTONOMY, TAKING ONE S CHOICES TO BE GOOD, AND PRACTICAL LAW: REPLIES TO CRITICS
Philosophical Books Vol. 49 No. 2 April 2008 pp. 125 137 AUTONOMY, TAKING ONE S CHOICES TO BE GOOD, AND PRACTICAL LAW: REPLIES TO CRITICS andrews reath The University of California, Riverside I Several
More informationDeontological Ethics
Deontological Ethics From Jane Eyre, the end of Chapter XXVII: (Mr. Rochester is the first speaker) And what a distortion in your judgment, what a perversity in your ideas, is proved by your conduct! Is
More informationLecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley
Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I Participation Quiz Pick an answer between A E at random. What answer (A E) do you think will have been selected most frequently in the previous poll? Recap: Unworkable
More informationFreedom as Morality. UWM Digital Commons. University of Wisconsin Milwaukee. Hao Liang University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Theses and Dissertations
University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations May 2014 Freedom as Morality Hao Liang University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.uwm.edu/etd
More informationDeontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT
Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT KANT S OBJECTIONS TO UTILITARIANISM: 1. Utilitarianism takes no account of integrity - the accidental act or one done with evil intent if promoting good ends
More informationA CONTRACTUALIST READING OF KANT S PROOF OF THE FORMULA OF HUMANITY. Adam Cureton
A CONTRACTUALIST READING OF KANT S PROOF OF THE FORMULA OF HUMANITY Adam Cureton Abstract: Kant offers the following argument for the Formula of Humanity: Each rational agent necessarily conceives of her
More informationThe Impossibility of Evil Qua Evil: Kantian Limitations on Human Immorality
Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Philosophy Theses Department of Philosophy 7-31-2006 The Impossibility of Evil Qua Evil: Kantian Limitations on Human Immorality Timothy
More informationNOTE ON KANT'S GROUNDWORK, PP PHILOSOPHY 13 FALL, 2004 Dick Arneson
1 NOTE ON KANT'S GROUNDWORK, PP. 1-40 PHILOSOPHY 13 FALL, 2004 Dick Arneson SECTION I. Kant argues in this section to the conclusion that we believe that we are bound by the categorical imperative. That
More informationIn Kant s Conception of Humanity, Joshua Glasgow defends a traditional reading of
Glasgow s Conception of Kantian Humanity Richard Dean ABSTRACT: In Kant s Conception of Humanity, Joshua Glasgow defends a traditional reading of the humanity formulation of the Categorical Imperative.
More informationDuty Based Ethics. Ethics unit 3
Duty Based Ethics Ethics unit 3 Divine command as a source of duty Stems from the monotheistic (Judeo/Christian/ Islamic) tradition An act is good if it is commanded by God, bad if it is forbidden by God.
More informationLecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley
Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I Participation Quiz Pick an answer between A E at random. (thanks to Rodrigo for suggesting this quiz) Ethical Egoism Achievement of your happiness is the only moral
More informationCMSI Handout 4 Courtesy of Marcello Antosh
CMSI Handout 4 Courtesy of Marcello Antosh 1 Clarification about imperatives To understand what imperatives are, first think of commands like these: (i) Shut the door! (ii) Clean your room! (iii) Don t
More informationDeontology. Immanuel Kant ( ) Founder of Deontology
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Founder of Deontology The right act is that which is in accordance with the correct moral rule (GK. deon) or principle (Kant calls these maxims ) Rejects hedonism Rejects consequentialism
More informationExcerpts from Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals Numbered as the class handout is numbered
Excerpts from Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals Numbered as the class handout is numbered 1. Nothing can possibly be conceived in the world, or even out of it, which can be called
More information(naturalistic fallacy)
1 2 19 general questions about the nature of morality and about the meaning of moral concepts determining what the ethical principles of guiding the actions (truth and opinion) the metaphysical question
More informationKant and his Successors
Kant and his Successors G. J. Mattey Winter, 2011 / Philosophy 151 The Sorry State of Metaphysics Kant s Critique of Pure Reason (1781) was an attempt to put metaphysics on a scientific basis. Metaphysics
More informationHappiness and Personal Growth: Dial.
TitleKant's Concept of Happiness: Within Author(s) Hirose, Yuzo Happiness and Personal Growth: Dial Citation Philosophy, Psychology, and Compara 43-49 Issue Date 2010-03-31 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/143022
More informationKant, Deontology, & Respect for Persons
Kant, Deontology, & Respect for Persons Some Possibly Helpful Terminology Normative moral theories can be categorized according to whether the theory is primarily focused on judgments of value or judgments
More informationPHI 1700: Global Ethics
PHI 1700: Global Ethics Session 13 March 22 nd, 2016 O Neill, A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics So far in this unit, we ve seen many different ways of judging right/wrong actions: Aristotle s virtue
More informationDownload: Two clips from Star Trek. The needs of the many and The needs of the one found in Course Content Kant folder.
TOPIC: Philosophy 1000 Lecture Introduction to Kant s deontology of Categorical Imperatives. KEY TERMS/ GOALS: Conformity with duty vs. motive from duty. Deontology. Kant s focus on agent s motives rather
More informationAyer s linguistic theory of the a priori
Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori phil 43904 Jeff Speaks December 4, 2007 1 The problem of a priori knowledge....................... 1 2 Necessity and the a priori............................ 2
More informationA Review on What Is This Thing Called Ethics? by Christopher Bennett * ** 1
310 Book Review Book Review ISSN (Print) 1225-4924, ISSN (Online) 2508-3104 Catholic Theology and Thought, Vol. 79, July 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.21731/ctat.2017.79.310 A Review on What Is This Thing
More informationMoral Argumentation from a Rhetorical Point of View
Chapter 98 Moral Argumentation from a Rhetorical Point of View Lars Leeten Universität Hildesheim Practical thinking is a tricky business. Its aim will never be fulfilled unless influence on practical
More informationDeontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT
Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT A NOTE ON READING KANT Lord Macaulay once recorded in his diary a memorable attempt his first and apparently his last to read Kant s Critique: I received today
More informationGroundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals
Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals Immanuel Kant Copyright 2010 2015 All rights reserved. Jonathan Bennett [Brackets] enclose editorial explanations. Small dots enclose material that has been added,
More informationDEONTOLOGY AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY
Current Ethical Debates UNIT 2 DEONTOLOGY AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY Contents 2.0 Objectives 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Good Will 2.3 Categorical Imperative 2.4 Freedom as One of the Three Postulates 2.5 Human
More informationthat the only way a belief can be justified is if it is based on sufficient evidence. However,
1 Should there exist a criteria for formulating and justifying a belief? W.K. Clifford believes that the only way a belief can be justified is if it is based on sufficient evidence. However, William James
More informationTo link to this article:
This article was downloaded by: [University of Chicago Library] On: 24 May 2013, At: 08:10 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office:
More informationGS SCORE ETHICS - A - Z. Notes
ETHICS - A - Z Absolutism Act-utilitarianism Agent-centred consideration Agent-neutral considerations : This is the view, with regard to a moral principle or claim, that it holds everywhere and is never
More informationKantian Deontology. A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7. Paul Nicholls 13P Religious Studies
A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7 Kantian Deontology Deontological (based on duty) ethical theory established by Emmanuel Kant in The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Part of the enlightenment
More informationAutonomous Machines Are Ethical
Autonomous Machines Are Ethical John Hooker Carnegie Mellon University INFORMS 2017 1 Thesis Concepts of deontological ethics are ready-made for the age of AI. Philosophical concept of autonomy applies
More informationKantianism: Objections and Replies Keith Burgess-Jackson 12 March 2017
Kantianism: Objections and Replies Keith Burgess-Jackson 12 March 2017 Kantianism (K): 1 For all acts x, x is right iff (i) the maxim of x is universalizable (i.e., the agent can will that the maxim of
More informationIntroduction to Cognitivism; Motivational Externalism; Naturalist Cognitivism
Introduction to Cognitivism; Motivational Externalism; Naturalist Cognitivism Felix Pinkert 103 Ethics: Metaethics, University of Oxford, Hilary Term 2015 Cognitivism, Non-cognitivism, and the Humean Argument
More informationSidgwick on Practical Reason
Sidgwick on Practical Reason ONORA O NEILL 1. How many methods? IN THE METHODS OF ETHICS Henry Sidgwick distinguishes three methods of ethics but (he claims) only two conceptions of practical reason. This
More informationTuesday, September 2, Idealism
Idealism Enlightenment Puzzle How do these fit into a scientific picture of the world? Norms Necessity Universality Mind Idealism The dominant 19th-century response: often today called anti-realism Everything
More informationMaximalism vs. Omnism about Reasons*
Maximalism vs. Omnism about Reasons* Douglas W. Portmore Abstract: The performance of one option can entail the performance of another. For instance, I have the option of baking a pumpkin pie as well as
More informationMcCLOSKEY ON RATIONAL ENDS: The Dilemma of Intuitionism
48 McCLOSKEY ON RATIONAL ENDS: The Dilemma of Intuitionism T om R egan In his book, Meta-Ethics and Normative Ethics,* Professor H. J. McCloskey sets forth an argument which he thinks shows that we know,
More informationSUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6
SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6 Textbook: Louis P. Pojman, Editor. Philosophy: The quest for truth. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN-10: 0199697310; ISBN-13: 9780199697311 (6th Edition)
More informationIn-Class Kant Review Dialogue 1
1 Kant Review Dialogue 1 Micah Tillman 05 April, 2010, slightly revised 18 March, 2011 Tedrick: Hey Kant! In-Class Kant Review Dialogue 1 Why, hello there Fredward. Tedrick: It s Tedrick. Fredward is my
More informationEthics Prof. Vineet Sahu Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur
Ethics Prof. Vineet Sahu Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur Module No. #01 Lecture No. #08 Deontological Theories Immanuel Kant Now, continuing to talk about,
More informationThe Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself
The Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself The humanity formulation of the Categorical Imperative demands that every person must Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or
More informationThe Groundwork, the Second Critique, Pure Practical Reason and Motivation
金沢星稜大学論集第 48 巻第 1 号平成 26 年 8 月 35 The Groundwork, the Second Critique, Pure Practical Reason and Motivation Shohei Edamura Introduction In this paper, I will critically examine Christine Korsgaard s claim
More informationImportant dates. PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since David Hume ( )
PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since 1600 Dr. Peter Assmann Spring 2018 Important dates Feb 14 Term paper draft due Upload paper to E-Learning https://elearning.utdallas.edu
More informationPsychological Aspects of Social Issues
Psychological Aspects of Social Issues Chapter 6 Nonconsequentialist Theories Do Your Duty 1 Outline/Overview The Ethics of Immanuel Kant Imperatives, hypothetical and categorical Means-end principle Evaluating
More informationExcerpts from Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals Numbered as the class handout is numbered
Excerpts from Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals Numbered as the class handout is numbered 1. Nothing can possibly be conceived in the world, or even out of it, which can be called
More information24.02 Moral Problems and the Good Life
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 24.02 Moral Problems and the Good Life Fall 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. Three Moral Theories
More informationhypothetical imperatives: scope and jurisdiction
Mark Schroeder University of Southern California February 1, 2012 hypothetical imperatives: scope and jurisdiction 1 hypothetical imperatives vs. the Hypothetical Imperative The last few decades have given
More informationChoosing Rationally and Choosing Correctly *
Choosing Rationally and Choosing Correctly * Ralph Wedgwood 1 Two views of practical reason Suppose that you are faced with several different options (that is, several ways in which you might act in a
More informationEthical non-naturalism
Michael Lacewing Ethical non-naturalism Ethical non-naturalism is usually understood as a form of cognitivist moral realism. So we first need to understand what cognitivism and moral realism is before
More informationKant s Pragmatism. Tobias Henschen. This paper offers a definition of the term pragmatic, as it is used in Kant s Critique of Pure
Kant s Pragmatism Tobias Henschen Abstract This paper offers a definition of the term pragmatic, as it is used in Kant s Critique of Pure Reason. The definition offered does not make any reference to the
More informationKent Academic Repository
Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Kong, Camillia (2012) The Normative Source of Kantian Hypothetical Imperatives. International Journal of Philosophical Studies,
More informationChapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics
Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics TRUE/FALSE 1. The statement "nearly all Americans believe that individual liberty should be respected" is a normative claim. F This is a statement about people's beliefs;
More informationKANT ON THE UNITY OF THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL REASON.
1 of 7 11/01/08 13 KANT ON THE UNITY OF THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL REASON. by PAULINE KLEINGELD Kant famously asserts that reason is one and the same, whether it is applied theoretically, to the realm of
More informationDeontology. Marianne Talbot University of Oxford Department for Continuing Education
Deontology Marianne Talbot University of Oxford Department for Continuing Education 1 Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) schriftman.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/immanu... 2 Kant believed that morality is a system
More informationKant s Hypothetical Imperative
Kant s Hypothetical Imperative by Kelin A. Emmett A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy University of Toronto Copyright
More informationA Comparative Study of the Ethics of Christine M. Korsgaard and Jean-Paul Sartre
Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Philosophy Theses Department of Philosophy 7-18-2008 A Comparative Study of the Ethics of Christine M. Korsgaard and Jean-Paul Sartre Michael
More information1/5. The Critique of Theology
1/5 The Critique of Theology The argument of the Transcendental Dialectic has demonstrated that there is no science of rational psychology and that the province of any rational cosmology is strictly limited.
More informationNormative Ethical Theories
Normative Ethical Theories I. Normative Ethics A Normative Ethical Theory is a philosophical theory about the fundamental principles of morality. A fundamental principle of morality is a moral obligation
More informationTHE FREEDOM OF THE WILL By Immanuel Kant From Critique of Pure Reason (1781)
THE FREEDOM OF THE WILL By Immanuel Kant From Critique of Pure Reason (1781) From: A447/B475 A451/B479 Freedom independence of the laws of nature is certainly a deliverance from restraint, but it is also
More informationPlato s Republic Book 3&4. Instructor: Jason Sheley
Plato s Republic Book 3&4 Instructor: Jason Sheley What do we want out of a theory of Justice, anyway? The Trolley Problem The trolley problem: A trolley is running out of control down a track. In its
More informationKANT S EXAMPLES. Robert Paul Wolff. Introduction, David Stewart
KANT S EXAMPLES Robert Paul Wolff Introduction, David Stewart KANT RARELY GAVE EXAMPLES in his writings to illustrate the principles for which he argues. There are several reasons for this, among the most
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC AND LANGUAGE OVERVIEW FREGE JONNY MCINTOSH 1. FREGE'S CONCEPTION OF LOGIC
PHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC AND LANGUAGE JONNY MCINTOSH 1. FREGE'S CONCEPTION OF LOGIC OVERVIEW These lectures cover material for paper 108, Philosophy of Logic and Language. They will focus on issues in philosophy
More informationTwo Kinds of Ends in Themselves in Kant s Moral Theory
Western University Scholarship@Western 2015 Undergraduate Awards The Undergraduate Awards 2015 Two Kinds of Ends in Themselves in Kant s Moral Theory David Hakim Western University, davidhakim266@gmail.com
More informationInstrumental reasoning* John Broome
Instrumental reasoning* John Broome For: Rationality, Rules and Structure, edited by Julian Nida-Rümelin and Wolfgang Spohn, Kluwer. * This paper was written while I was a visiting fellow at the Swedish
More informationPhilosophy of Mathematics Kant
Philosophy of Mathematics Kant Owen Griffiths oeg21@cam.ac.uk St John s College, Cambridge 20/10/15 Immanuel Kant Born in 1724 in Königsberg, Prussia. Enrolled at the University of Königsberg in 1740 and
More informationThe fact that some action, A, is part of a valuable and eligible pattern of action, P, is a reason to perform A. 1
The Common Structure of Kantianism and Act Consequentialism Christopher Woodard RoME 2009 1. My thesis is that Kantian ethics and Act Consequentialism share a common structure, since both can be well understood
More informationThe practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense*
The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense* 1 Defensa de la interpretación práctica del imperativo categórico 2 Cristian Dimitriu** CONICET - Argentina Abstract The article compares
More information