1 TitleKant's Concept of Happiness: Within Author(s) Hirose, Yuzo Happiness and Personal Growth: Dial Citation Philosophy, Psychology, and Compara Issue Date URL Right The copyright of papers included in author. Type Article Textversion publisher Kyoto University
2 43 Kant's Concept of Happiness: Within and Beyond Usefulness YUZOHIROSE Graduate School of Education, Kyoto University INTRODUCTION There is still tenacious criticism of Kant's notion that he placed greater priority on following moral law rather than on pursuing happiness. In a well-known statement about this problem over happiness to Kant, Schiller stated: 'Scruples of Conscience. Ever I ask my friends to oblige, and, unluckily, like it; For then conscience asks: where does the virtue come in? Conclusion. Only one method I see, do what you can to despise them; Then you may sulkily yield all that a conscience demands' (Schiller, 1901, p. 330). Schiller thought that Kant wanted us to choose either morality or happiness in our actions. Schiller oversimplified the human act, but there are still researchers who think that Kant denied the value of happiness in the end. 1 However, Kant never said that happiness is valueless; rather, he affirmed the necessity of happiness in human life. Paton recognized Kant's view of happiness as follows: 'The common view that Kant underrated the value of happiness is a complete mistake: if anything, he rated it too high' (Paton, 1947, p. 43). Then, what does Paton's view imply and what on earth is happiness in Kant's mind? In this paper, I attempt to clarify the complex concepts of happiness in Kant's thought 2 and suggest that Kant condemned only the principle of happiness and supported two concepts of happiness in different dimensions. Through this consideration, a systematic notion on how to think about happiness in human development and in an educational context will be shown. BASIC FEATURES OF HAPPINESS IN KANT It is remarkable that almost all philosophers who are opposed to many other themes agree that human beings are pursuing their own happiness as the ultimate end of their life. Kant accepts this general notion as the major premise in discussing happiness. In Critique of Practical Reason, Kant indicates that 'To be happy is necessarily the demand of every rational but finite being and therefore an unavoidable determining ground of its faculty of desire' (Kant, 1996, p. 159). However, we cannot correctly know or suggest what happiness is in general. We can give some examples of something that is similar to happiness, such as health, honor or wealth, but we cannot regard wealth as the same as happiness. Happiness depends on people and that is why happiness is quite undeterminable and accidental. That is 'one can form no determinate and sure concept of the sum of satisfaction of all inclinations under the name of happiness' (p. 54).
3 44 YUZO HIROSE Furthermore, we often wish to be happy, but we cannot completely express what we really wish or want. We often find that happiness can bring disappointment because we feel we are still not happy. Through this assumption, one's happiness changes from time to time and place to place and also according to one's development. HAPPINESS AS SENSITIVE CONTENTMENT Kant considers happiness as obscure, but to regard it as such is obvious and certain. With respect to this point, Kant does not give up trying to describe the concept of happiness. Kant suggests, 'it is just in this idea [happiness] that all inclinations unite in one sum' (p. 54), and also 'a rational being's consciousness of the agreeableness of life uninterruptedly accompanying his whole existence is happiness' (p. 156). Thus, according to Kant, the concept of happiness can be summarized as sensitive contentment of totality of inclination such as pleasure and desire.. We now should pay attention to two things. First, Kant shows that happiness is not contentment of simple inclination or pleasure but that of the sum of inclination. In this argument, 'sum of inclination' does not mean 'sum of all inclination we can count in general' but 'sum of all inclination that one person has in mind'. We occasionally meet the person who insists that fulfilling only particular inclinations makes one happy, but indeed the person attempts to fulfill the sum of one's total inclinations. Following Kant's train of thought, if the person is an actor and wants to grow to be an attractive actor, to have family and to spend good times with them, to earn decent money, and to be healthy, happiness for that person means satisfying all these desires and not any more (it is not necessary to satisfy the inclination to an honor or other things in this case). Therefore, 'sum of all inclination' is a subjective opinion. Kant refers to this point in his Lectures on Ethics as follows: 'All happiness and unhappiness are dependent on us and on the way our sense accepts it. If we consider this happiness in our lives, we will notice that the essence of happiness is a delusion' (Kant, 1924, p. 182). Second, Kant discusses that a concept of happiness is derived from sensitive and empirical matters. Kant indicates that 'all the elements that belong to the concept of happiness are without exception empirical, that is, they must be borrowed from experience' (Kant, 1996, p. 70). We cannot order to be happy with strict necessity because happiness is constituted with material elements, and we need empirical and contingent wisdom in order to insight and realize the happiness. Generally speaking, in philosophical discussions, happiness is thought of as the ultimate end of human life, which is related to the ethical realm. Therefore, happiness is often identified with good. In Kant's discussion, however, happiness is explicitly distinguished from morality in our actions. If we pursue our sensitive happiness, we must depend on substantial matters. On the other hand, in realizing morality, we should follow autonomously moral law without thinking of any substantial motivation in our maxim. According to Kant, the former leads us to the principle of happiness in which we put our motivation for happiness at the highest level and subordinate the motivation of moral law to that of happiness. 3 The latter leads us to a moral principle in which we give motivation of moral law top priority. Therefore, the difference between principle of happiness and moral principle does not come from the substance of motivation but comes from a subordinate relationship. 4
4 Kant's Concept of Happiness: Within and Beyond Usefulness 45 However, this distinction does not mean that we should eradicate our inclination to happiness. Fundamentally, we cannot do this. Kant affirms the inclination to happiness but denies the principle of happiness. In Kant's view, 'The distinction of the doctrine of happiness from the doctrine of morals... is the first and most important business incumbent upon the Analytic of pure practical reason' (p. 214). HAPPINESS IN THE HIGHEST GOOD Happiness as self-contentment As we saw above, to pursue sensitive happiness is affirmed as long as it exists in a condition of morality, thus not in the principle of happiness but in moral principle. In this state, for the first time, we are allowed to satisfy the sum of our inclination. However, we do not only have this sensitive contentment but also have one which is related to the state where we put morality on the highest level and our sensitive happiness second. If we are autonomously conscious of morality without eliminating our pursuing sensitive happiness, which is only forgiven under the condition of morality, we will have another contentment. we can understand how consciousness of this ability of a pure practical reason (virtue) can in fact produce consciousness of mastery over one's inclination, hence of independence from them and... thus can produce a negative satisfaction with one's state, that is, contentment, which in its source is contentment with one's person (p. 235). In this sense, there are two kinds of contentment in Kant's thought: (1) contentment of sensitive and susceptible inclination, and (2) contentment of personality (morality). He calls the latter self-contentment (Selbstzufriedenheit) (p. 234), for it is not linked to sensitive inclination. We often try to satisfy our own sensitive inclination, but we are not always satisfied with that state. Suppose that we are extremely satisfied with our life with respect to health, wealth, and skill, through making anyone else poor. Can we then really be satisfied and happy? This question itself shows us that happiness as the contentment of inclination does not make people happy enough. In other words something others are required. Kant indicates that it is contentment of personality. In the above case, if we regard others not only as a means but also as an end, we will be sufficiently satisfied with our life. Therefore Kant's concept of happiness consists of two kinds of contentment: sensitive contentment and self-contentment. This happiness is regarded as happiness in the highest good. Happiness as a component of the highest good Kant puts morality under another term 'virtue' in the context of a real human action, suggesting that virtue is further identified with the 'worthiness to be happy' (p. 228).
5 46 YUZO HIROSE However, virtue is not the same as happiness, but is equivalent to happiness. If we have both virtue and happiness, we can reach the highest good. Kant states: Now, inasmuch as virtue and happiness together constitute possession of the highest good in a person, and happiness distributed in exact proportion to morality (as the worth of a person and his worthiness to be happy) constitutes the highest good of a possible world, the latter means the whole, the complete good, in which, however, virtue as the condition is always the supreme good, since it has no further condition above it, whereas happiness is something that, though always pleasant to the possessor of it, is not of itself absolutely and in all respects good but always presupposes morally lawful conduct as its condition (p. 229). We can understand this quotation with regard to happiness as follows: (1) The highest good has its elements-virtue and happiness. As we relate this to what was stated above, virtue is the worthiness of being happy. (2) Happiness is not first element of the highest good but the second. This shows that when we act for the highest good, we cannot possess happiness as the determining ground of will but moral law because, if we act with happiness in determining ground of will, we will depend on substantial things, which is contradictory to moral action. Especially with regard to determining ground of will, virtue and happiness are asymmetrical, although both constitute the highest good. In Kant's view both virtue and happiness are equivalent but quite different species, and even with the same subject, both restrict and conflict with each other. THE MEANING OF HAPPINESS IN THE HIGHEST GOOD It is very curious that Kant placed happiness as a part of the highest good. Kant could have thought that the highest good was equal to following moral law, but he did not. In these discussions about happiness, it seems that Kant was arguing about how to live in the real world, not in a simplified ideal world. We human beings cannot avoid pursuing happiness, which is not only sensitive but also in the highest good. Then, what is the meaning of this happiness in the highest good? I will discuss especially the following point: happiness with virtue acts on us quite differently from sensitive happiness, that is, to break the chains of usefulness in our life. This shows the modem significance of Kant's discussion about happiness. In order to clarify features of happiness in the highest good, I will contrast happiness in the highest good with sensitive happiness. (a) To pursue sensitive happiness only depends on a hypothetical imperative. When we act from pursuing our sensitive happiness, we depend on substantial matters that are empirical and accidental. In this state, we act with contingent wisdom based on experience. Therefore, we need empirical wisdom from this real world. To act with the following empirical matters means that the action does not have objective necessity. It means in Kant's context that we follow a hypothetical imperative, which does not have necessity like the categorical imperative does.
6 Kant's Concept of Happiness: Within and Beyond Usefulness 47 We cannot regard this action, which is considered pursuing sensitive happiness, as an ultimate end because it intends to the action in which we will have happiness in the highest good. In other words, the action of only pursuing sensitive happiness becomes the means to achieve the ultimate end. Therefore, if we pursue sensitive happiness, we have to follow the hypothetical imperative, which provides us the means to reach the ultimate end. (b) Happiness in the highest good is related to the categorical imperative. As we saw above, happiness in the highest good includes self-contentment of one's own personality, which occurs from following moral law. In Kant's discussion, morality emerges when one has the motivation for following moral law that determines ground of will; particularly that moral law is a categorical imperative and orders us to follow moral law straightforwardly. Happiness in the highest good comes after acting to follow moral law. In this sense, happiness in the highest good is of course not a categorical imperative but is connected with it. (c) The meaning of happiness as the ultimate end. Then, what does the notion of happiness, which is related to categorical imperative, mean? If we are conscious of happiness in the highest good, we can describe the realm of the ultimate end itself, and, in this regard, that consciousness breaks our ordinary chains of usefulness, which are found in hypothetical thinking and action. To be conscious of and to pursue happiness in the highest good accompanied by virtue have a categorical character and do not take ordinary usefulness, sensitive happiness, and hypothetical action into consideration. We usually, or rather always, do something in order to profit from the motivation of sensitive happiness. In this situation, we are in the chains of usefulness. A consciousness of happiness in the highest good breaks these chains and demands us to relate to things not as a means but as itself. For example, if we relate to others when pursuing our sensitive happiness, we regard others as a means to realize our sensitive happiness. Without thinking about that happiness, however, we can confront others in sincerity. This corresponds to the second categorical imperative, 'So act that you use humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means' (p. 80). In this way, we come to be able to relate to others and also to the world itself, which is analogous with an experience of beauty. In Critique of the Power of Judgment Kant states that the experience of beauty is a concern without any interest. 5 To break the chains of usefulness can be found in many other philosophical discussions. To break those chains with unconditionally cannot eliminate a danger, such as killing people. In Kant's context, we can go one step further, that is, to show the appropriate direction of breaking such chains, which is related to happiness in the highest good. (d) The relationship between sensitive happiness and happiness in the highest good. As we saw in (c), a consciousness of and an act to happiness in the highest good break the chains of usefulness, but Kant does not deny the chains themselves or sensitive happiness. As we saw above, in the second categorical imperative Kant does not deny treating humanity in others as a means in itself, but he demands us at the same time to do it as an end. Kant accepts those chains on one hand, but, on the other hand, he demands us to break those chains. If we are not in such chains, we cannot reach happiness in the highest good, either. Therefore, to pursue sensitive happiness
7 48 YUZO HIROSE or to seek useful matters for oneself is a necessary condition to obtain happiness in the highest good. From an ideal point of view, the two notions of happiness are quite different, but, from the point of view relevant to real human life and development, sensitive happiness lies as a base only from which people can advance toward happiness in the highest good. CONCLUSION It is often thought that Kant denies the value of happiness and entirely opposes utilitarianism. However, Kant only denies the principle of happiness, and he approves of both sensitive happiness and happiness in the highest good, which consists of sensitive component and self-component. The most essential and important notion in Kant's discussion about happiness is that happiness in the highest good is connected with virtue, and, therefore, that happiness has a categorical character and breaks the hypothetical and ordinary chains of usefulness. This framework of breaking such chains can also be seen in Kant's discussion about beauty, sublimity, judgment and religion. However, it is also crucial that, in notion, sensitive happiness and happiness in the highest good are quite different, but, in reality, we cannot reach the latter without the former. It is not a choice between two things. Both are required. Some people often pursue only sensitive happiness, like pleasure, without thinking about happiness in the highest good, and others directly pursue happiness in the highest good, without fulfilling their sensitive happiness like a stoic. Kant warns that both cannot reach happiness in the highest good, the ultimate end of human life. In an educational context, happiness tends to be regarded as unconditional good for children. Parents and teachers try to provide children with happiness, but, if they do so blindly, they may cause children to be put in chains of usefulness or be egoistic. It seems that Kant supplies a clue for thinking about these problems. 6 NOTES Slote, who supports virtue ethics eagerly, considers Kant's ethic to devalue the happiness or wellbeing of an agent. (Slote, 1992, pp. 3-57). 2 Strictly speaking, Kant argues happiness to be primary in an ethical context (as in Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Moral and Critique of practical reason); however, the contents of the discussions about happiness can be seen in an educational context, for he treats happiness as the notion about how to live in this world or how to reach the realm of happiness in the highest good. 3 Kant regards this principle of self-love as egoism. Kant states in Anthropology, 'the moral egoist limits all ends to himself, sees no use in anything except that which is useful to himself, and as a eudaemonist puts the supreme determining ground of his will simply in utility and his own happiness, not in the thought of duty' (Kant, 2007, p. 241). 4 Kant mentions that 'the distinction between a good man and one who is evil cannot lie in the difference between the incentives which they adopt into their maxim (not in the content of the maxim), but rather must depend upon subordination (the form of the maxim), i.e., which of the two incentives he makes the condition of the other' (Kant, 1960, p. 31). While a good man acts by following a moral principle, an evil man principle of happiness. 5 In Critique of the Power of Judgment, Kant states: 'Everyone must admit that a judgment about beauty in which there is mixed the least interest is very partial and not a pure judgment of taste. One
8 Kant's Concept of Happiness: Within and Beyond Usefulness 49 must not be in the least biased in favor of the existence of the thing, but must be entirely indifferent in this respect in order to play the judge in matters of taste' (Kant, 2000, p. 91). 6 Especially Kant implies that geographical education plays a significant role in thinking about education for happiness, for it contains the elements that are relevant to both sensitive happiness and happiness in the highest good (May, 1970, pp ). REFERENCES Hill, T. (1999) Happiness and Human Flourishing in Kant's Ethics, Social Philosophy & Policy 16.1, pp Johnston, J. (2007) Moral law and moral education: Defending Autonomy, Journal of Philosophy of Education 41.2, pp Kant, I. (1924) Eine Vorlesung Kants fiber Ethik, Hrsg. P. Menzer (Berlin R. Heise). Kant, I. (1960) Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone, trans. T. M. Green and H. H. Hudson (New York, Harper & Tow Publishers,). Kant, I. (1996) The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy, trans. M. J. Gregor (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press). Kant, I. (2000) The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. P. Guyer & E. Matthew (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press). Kant, I. (2007) The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Anthropology, History, and Education, trans. R. B. Louden (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press). May, J. A. (1970) Kant's Concept of Geography and it's Relation to Recent Geographical Thought (Tronto, University of Tronto Press). Paton, H. J. (1947) The Categorical Imperative: a Study in Kant's Moral Philosophy (Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press). Schiller, F. (1901) The Poems of Schiller, trans. E. P. Arnold-Forster (London, William Heinemann). Slote, M. (1992) From Morality to Virtue (Oxford, Oxford University Press). Wike, V. S. (1994) Kant on Happiness in Ethics (Albany, NY, State University of New York Press).
金沢星稜大学論集第 48 巻第 1 号平成 26 年 8 月 35 The Groundwork, the Second Critique, Pure Practical Reason and Motivation Shohei Edamura Introduction In this paper, I will critically examine Christine Korsgaard s claim
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS SECOND SECTION by Immanuel Kant TRANSITION FROM POPULAR MORAL PHILOSOPHY TO THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS... This principle, that humanity and generally every
[Forthcoming in The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, ed. Hugh LaFollette. (Oxford: Blackwell), 2012] Imperatives, Categorical and Hypothetical Samuel J. Kerstein Ethicists distinguish between categorical
Western University Scholarship@Western 2015 Undergraduate Awards The Undergraduate Awards 2015 Two Kinds of Ends in Themselves in Kant s Moral Theory David Hakim Western University, firstname.lastname@example.org
Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals G. J. Mattey Spring, 2017/ Philosophy 1 The Division of Philosophical Labor Kant generally endorses the ancient Greek division of philosophy into
A CONTRACTUALIST READING OF KANT S PROOF OF THE FORMULA OF HUMANITY Adam Cureton Abstract: Kant offers the following argument for the Formula of Humanity: Each rational agent necessarily conceives of her
Glasgow s Conception of Kantian Humanity Richard Dean ABSTRACT: In Kant s Conception of Humanity, Joshua Glasgow defends a traditional reading of the humanity formulation of the Categorical Imperative.
PHI 110 Lecture 29 1 Hello again. Today we re gonna continue our discussions of Kant s ethics. Last time we talked about the good will and Kant defined the good will as the free rational will which acts
Humanities 4: Lectures 17-19 Kant s Ethics 1 Method & Questions Purpose and Method: Transition from Common Sense to Philosophical Understanding of Morality Analysis of everyday moral concepts Main Questions:
Kant The Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals (excerpts) 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes Section IV: What is it worth? Reading IV.2 Kant s analysis of the good differs in scope from Aristotle s in two ways. In
Lecture 12 Deontology Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics 1 Agenda 1. Immanuel Kant 2. Deontology 3. Hypothetical vs. Categorical Imperatives 4. Formula of the End in Itself 5. Maxims and
KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON The law is reason unaffected by desire. Aristotle, Politics Book III (1287a32) THE BIG IDEAS TO MASTER Kantian formalism Kantian constructivism
Suppose.... Kant You are a good swimmer and one day at the beach you notice someone who is drowning offshore. Consider the following three scenarios. Which one would Kant says exhibits a good will? Even
University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations May 2014 Freedom as Morality Hao Liang University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.uwm.edu/etd
An Epistemological Assessment of Moral Worth in Kant s Moral Theory Immanuel Kant s moral theory outlined in The Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals (hereafter Grounding) presents us with the metaphysical
Rationalism I. Descartes (1596-1650) A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt 1. How could one be certain in the absence of religious guidance and trustworthy senses
Kantianism: Objections and Replies Keith Burgess-Jackson 12 March 2017 Kantianism (K): 1 For all acts x, x is right iff (i) the maxim of x is universalizable (i.e., the agent can will that the maxim of
Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics TRUE/FALSE 1. The statement "nearly all Americans believe that individual liberty should be respected" is a normative claim. F This is a statement about people's beliefs;
Shortened Title: Kant and Respect Title: Kant s Account of Respect: A bridge between rationality and anthropology Dr. Jane Singleton University of Hertfordshire School of Humanities de Havilland Campus
Kant and his Successors G. J. Mattey Winter, 2011 / Philosophy 151 The Sorry State of Metaphysics Kant s Critique of Pure Reason (1781) was an attempt to put metaphysics on a scientific basis. Metaphysics
Duty and Categorical Rules Immanuel Kant Introduction to Ethics, PHIL 118 Professor Douglas Olena Preview This selection from Kant includes: The description of the Good Will The concept of Duty An introduction
Benjamin Visscher Hole IV Phil 100, Intro to Philosophy Kantian Ethics I. Context II. The Good Will III. The Categorical Imperative: Formulation of Universal Law IV. The Categorical Imperative: Formulation
This article was downloaded by: [University of Chicago Library] On: 24 May 2013, At: 08:10 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office:
INTENTIONALITY, NORMATIVITY AND COMMUNALITY IN KANT S REALM OF ENDS Stijn Van Impe & Bart Vandenabeele Ghent University 1. Introduction In the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Kant claims that there
Philosophy of Religion The Role of Love in the Thought of Kant and Kierkegaard Daryl J. Wennemann Fontbonne College email@example.com ABSTRACT: Following Ronald Green's suggestion concerning Kierkegaard's
SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6 Textbook: Louis P. Pojman, Editor. Philosophy: The quest for truth. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN-10: 0199697310; ISBN-13: 9780199697311 (6th Edition)
Current Ethical Debates UNIT 2 DEONTOLOGY AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY Contents 2.0 Objectives 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Good Will 2.3 Categorical Imperative 2.4 Freedom as One of the Three Postulates 2.5 Human
Philosophical Proof of God: Derived from Principles in Bernard Lonergan s Insight May 2014 Robert J. Spitzer, S.J., Ph.D. Magis Center of Reason and Faith Lonergan s proof may be stated as follows: Introduction
Sidgwick on Practical Reason ONORA O NEILL 1. How many methods? IN THE METHODS OF ETHICS Henry Sidgwick distinguishes three methods of ethics but (he claims) only two conceptions of practical reason. This
Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT KANT S OBJECTIONS TO UTILITARIANISM: 1. Utilitarianism takes no account of integrity - the accidental act or one done with evil intent if promoting good ends
CMSI Handout 3 Courtesy of Marcello Antosh 1 Terminology Maxims (again) General form: Agent will do action A in order to achieve purpose P (optional: because of reason R). Examples: Britney Spears will
Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Philosophy Theses Department of Philosophy 7-31-2006 The Impossibility of Evil Qua Evil: Kantian Limitations on Human Immorality Timothy
Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I Participation Quiz Pick an answer between A E at random. (thanks to Rodrigo for suggesting this quiz) Ethical Egoism Achievement of your happiness is the only moral
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CD5590 LECTURE 1 Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic Department of Computer Science and Engineering Mälardalen University 2005 1 Course Preliminaries Identifying Moral
IMMANUEL KANT Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals [Edited and reduced by J. Bulger, Ph.D.] PREFACE 1. Kant defines rational knowledge as being composed of two parts, the Material and Formal. 2. Formal
PHILOSOPHY 214 KANT AND HIS CRITICS TUESDAYS AND THURSDAYS, 2:00 3:20PM PROF. KATE MORAN (firstname.lastname@example.org) OFFICE HOURS FRIDAYS, 10AM 12PM COURSE OVERVIEW This is a graduate level course that examines
NOTES CJ CPR CPrR G MM ABBREVIA TIONS Critique of Judgment (1790) Critique oj Pllre Reason (1781) Critique of Practical Reason (1788) Groundwork of the Metaphysic oj Morals (178S) The Metaphysic oj Morals
1/5 The Critique of Theology The argument of the Transcendental Dialectic has demonstrated that there is no science of rational psychology and that the province of any rational cosmology is strictly limited.
Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics 2012 Cengage Learning All Rights reserved Learning Outcomes LO 1 Explain how important moral reasoning is and how to apply it. LO 2 Explain the difference between facts
Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals by Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant was born in 1724 in Königsberg, Prussia, (now Germany) where he spent his entire life, never traveling more than about
Royal Institute of Philosophy J. S. Mill's "Proof" of the Principle of Utility Author(s): R. F. Atkinson Source: Philosophy, Vol. 32, No. 121 (Apr., 1957), pp. 158-167 Published by: Cambridge University
Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I Participation Quiz Pick an answer between A E at random. What answer (A E) do you think will have been selected most frequently in the previous poll? Recap: Unworkable
University of Tabriz-Iran Philosophical Investigations Vol. 11/ No. 21/ Fall & Winter 2017 Kant and Demystification of Ethics and Religion * Qodratullah Qorbani ** Associate Professor of Philosophy, Kharazmi
Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014 Origins of the concept of self What makes it move? Pneuma ( wind ) and Psyche ( breath ) life-force What is beyond-the-physical?
1. Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014 2. Origins of the concept of self What makes it move? Pneuma ( wind ) and Psyche ( breath ) life-force What is beyond-the-physical?
Finding Obligations Within Second-Personal Engagement: A Critique of Christine Korsgaard's Normative Theory A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial
The Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself The humanity formulation of the Categorical Imperative demands that every person must Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or
Kantian Review, 20, 2,301 311 KantianReview, 2015 doi:10.1017/s1369415415000060 Accessing the Moral Law through Feeling owen ware Simon Fraser University Email: email@example.com Abstract In this article
THE NATURE OF NORMATIVITY IN KANT S PHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC REBECCA V. MILLSOP S I. INTRODUCTION Immanuel Kant claims that logic is constitutive of thought: without [the laws of logic] we would not think at
Ayer and Quine on the a priori November 23, 2004 1 The problem of a priori knowledge Ayer s book is a defense of a thoroughgoing empiricism, not only about what is required for a belief to be justified
25 Animals in the Kingdom of Ends Heather M. Kendrick Department of Philosophy and Religion Central Michigan University firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract Kant claimed that human beings have no duties to animals
Kantian Deontology - Part Two Immanuel Kant s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals Nathan Kellen University of Connecticut October 1st, 2015 Table of Contents Hypothetical Categorical The Universal
38 Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals [Ak 4:422] [Ak4:421] what one calls duty is an empty concept, we can at least indicate what we are thinking in the concept of duty and what this concept means.
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Founder of Deontology The right act is that which is in accordance with the correct moral rule (GK. deon) or principle (Kant calls these maxims ) Rejects hedonism Rejects consequentialism
Issue 1 Spring 2016 Undergraduate Journal of Philosophy Kant On The A Priority of Space: A Critique Arjun Sawhney - The University of Toronto pp. 4-7 For details of submission dates and guidelines please
Philosophical Books Vol. 49 No. 2 April 2008 pp. 125 137 AUTONOMY, TAKING ONE S CHOICES TO BE GOOD, AND PRACTICAL LAW: REPLIES TO CRITICS andrews reath The University of California, Riverside I Several
PHILOSOPHY 431 Is Morality Rational? Topic #3 Betsy Spring 2010 Kant claims that violations of the categorical imperative are irrational acts. This paper discusses that claim. Page 2 of 6 In Groundwork
Kant s Pragmatism Tobias Henschen Abstract This paper offers a definition of the term pragmatic, as it is used in Kant s Critique of Pure Reason. The definition offered does not make any reference to the
Lonergan on General Transcendent Knowledge In General Transcendent Knowledge, Chapter 19 of Insight, Lonergan does several things: 1-3--He provides a radical reinterpretation of the meaning of transcendence
Answers to quiz 1. An autonomous person: a) is socially isolated from other people. b) directs his or her actions on the basis his or own basic values, beliefs, etc. c) is able to get by without the help
Deontological Ethics From Jane Eyre, the end of Chapter XXVII: (Mr. Rochester is the first speaker) And what a distortion in your judgment, what a perversity in your ideas, is proved by your conduct! Is
1 -- did you get a message welcoming you to the coursemail reflector? If not, please correct what s needed. 2 -- don t use secondary material from the web, as its quality is variable; cf. Wikipedia. Check
On happiness in Locke s decision-ma Title (Proceedings of the CAPE Internatio I: The CAPE International Conferenc being ) Author(s) Sasaki, Taku Citation CAPE Studies in Applied Philosophy 2: 141-151 Issue
PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert Name: Date: Take Home Exam #2 Instructions (Read Before Proceeding!) Material for this exam is from class sessions 8-15. Matching and fill-in-the-blank questions
Categorical Imperative by Dr. Desh Raj Sirswal Assistant Professor (Philosophy), P.G.Govt. College for Girls, Sector-11, Chandigarh http://drsirswal.webs.com Kant Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant (1724 1804)
Idealism Enlightenment Puzzle How do these fit into a scientific picture of the world? Norms Necessity Universality Mind Idealism The dominant 19th-century response: often today called anti-realism Everything
PHI 1700: Global Ethics Session 13 March 22 nd, 2016 O Neill, A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics So far in this unit, we ve seen many different ways of judging right/wrong actions: Aristotle s virtue
Autonomous Machines Are Ethical John Hooker Carnegie Mellon University INFORMS 2017 1 Thesis Concepts of deontological ethics are ready-made for the age of AI. Philosophical concept of autonomy applies
Phil 114, Wednesday, April 11, 2012 Hegel, The Philosophy of Right 1 7, 10 12, 14 16, 22 23, 27 33, 135, 141 Dialectic: For Hegel, dialectic is a process governed by a principle of development, i.e., Reason
Chapter 2 Determining Moral Behavior MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. A structured set of principles that defines what is moral is referred to as: a. a norm system b. an ethical system c. a morality guide d. a principled
Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Spring 2011 Russell Marcus Class 26 - April 27 Kantian Ethics Marcus, Introduction to Philosophy, Slide 1 Mill s Defense of Utilitarianism P People desire happiness.
Mark B. Rasmuson For Harrison Kleiner s Kant and His Successors and Utah State s Fourth Annual Languages, Philosophy, and Speech Communication Student Research Symposium Spring 2008 This paper serves as
Res Cogitans Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 20 6-4-2014 Saving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy Kevin Harriman Lewis & Clark College Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.pacificu.edu/rescogitans
Introduction to Ethics Auburn University Department of Philosophy PHIL 1020 Fall Semester, 2015 Syllabus Instructor: Email: Version 1.0. The schedule of readings is subject to revision. Students are responsible
Deontological Ethics Kant An action's moral value is determined by the nature of the action itself and the agent's motive DE contrasts with Utilitarianism which says that the goal or consequences of an
Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals Immanuel Kant Copyright 2010 2015 All rights reserved. Jonathan Bennett [Brackets] enclose editorial explanations. Small dots enclose material that has been added,
Author meets Critics: Nick Stang s Kant s Modal Metaphysics Kris McDaniel 11-5-17 1.Introduction It s customary to begin with praise for the author s book. And there is much to praise! Nick Stang has written
Instrumental reasoning* John Broome For: Rationality, Rules and Structure, edited by Julian Nida-Rümelin and Wolfgang Spohn, Kluwer. * This paper was written while I was a visiting fellow at the Swedish
Philosophy of Ethics Philosophy of Aesthetics Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology
LOVEpapq_1369 313..331 KANTIAN PRACTICAL by MELISSA SEYMOUR FAHMY Abstract: In the Doctrine of Virtue Kant stipulates that Love is a matter of feeling, not of willing...soaduty to love is an absurdity.
261 The Role of Sympathy in Kant s Philosophy of Moral Education Michael B. Mathias University of Rochester Immanuel Kant argues in the Doctrine of Virtue in the Metaphysics of Morals that To be beneficent,
1 FINAL EXAM SHORT-ANSWER QUESTIONS PHILOSOPHY 13 FALL, 2004 Your name Your TA s name Time allowed: one and one-half hours. This section of the exam counts for one-half of your exam grade. No use of books