A rule that guarantees the right solution to a problem. Usually by using a formula. They work but are sometimes impractical.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "A rule that guarantees the right solution to a problem. Usually by using a formula. They work but are sometimes impractical."

Transcription

1 Trial and Error Characterized by repeated, varied attempts which are continued until success, or until the agent stops trying. Typically good for problems where you have multiple chances to get the correct solution. However, this is not a good technique for problems that don t give you multiple chances to find a solution. For those

2 Formal Reasoning It is the kind of thinking you find in an intelligence test. The information needed for reaching a solution is specified clearly. There is a single right or best answer. 2

3 Formal Reasoning 1-Algorithm A rule that guarantees the right solution to a problem. Usually by using a formula. They work but are sometimes impractical. Example: To solve a problem in long division you just apply a series of operations that you have learned. 3

4 Formal Reasoning 1-Algorithm Algorithms, which are very time consuming, exhaust all possibilities before arriving at a solution. Computers use algorithms. S P L O Y O C H Y G If we were to unscramble these letters to form a word using an algorithmic approach, we would face 907,208 possibilities. 4

5 Formal Reasoning 2-Logic Deductive Reasoning Drawing conclusions from a set of observations or premises. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Inductive Reasoning Draw conclusions but could be conceivably wrong. You draw specific conclusions from general premises. 5

6 Formal Reasoning 2-Logic Deductive Reasoning Inductive Reasoning Example: All human beings are mortal. I am a human being. If the premises are true Then, I am mortal. Example: Most people with season tickets must love music. John has season tickets. Then, John probably loves music. 6

7 Formal Reasoning 2- Logic Deductive Reasoning Examples: 1. All oranges are fruits 2. All fruits grow on trees 3. Therefore, all oranges grow on trees The soccer game is on either Thursday or Friday. I just found out that the game is not on Thursday, so the game must be on Friday. If the two premises really are true, then there is no possible way that the conclusion could be false. Inductive Reasoning Example: All the tigers observed in a particular region have yellow black stripes, therefore all the tigers native to this region have yellow stripes My dog has never bitten me, so dogs don t bite. Even if all the premises are true, it is still possible that the conclusion is false.

8 January has always been cold here in Siberia. Today is January 14, so it is going to be another cold day in Siberia. This argument is inductive. The premises makes the conclusion likely, but they do not guarantee that the conclusion is true. To put the point another way, it is possible that the premises of this argument could be true and the conclusion could still be false. One can, for example, imagine a freak warm day in Siberia on January 14.

9

10 Informal Reasoning In informal reasoning problems, there may be no clearly correct solutions. Disagreement may exist about basic premises. Information may be incomplete. Many view points may compete. 10

11 Informal Reasoning 1-Heuristics A rule-of-thumb strategy that often allows us to make judgments and solve problems efficiently. Who would you trust to A short cut (that can be baby-sit your child? prone to errors). Examples: A doctor who wants to determine the best kind of treatment. A factory owner who wants to boost production.

12 Heuristics S P L O Y O C H Y G S P S P L Y O C H Y O C L H O G Y Put a Y at the end, and see if the word begins to make sense. 12

13 Informal Reasoning 2-Dialectical Thinking Consider thesis and antithesis simultaneously to arrive at synthesis. (most advanced critical thought process.) Example: It is what juries are supposed to do in order to arrive to a verdict. You consider argument for and against the defendant s guilt. You consider point and counter point. 13

14 Barriers to Reasoning What are some obstacles to problem solving?

15 Barriers to Reasoning 1- Availability Heuristic Exaggerating the Improbable Estimating the likelihood of events based on their availability in memory. We assume such events are common. Vivid cases in the news often cause an availability heuristic. Example: If it happened in the past, then it will happen now. I had an accident on the freeway, then I can t drive on the freeway because I will get in an accident. (The memory of the accident is the most available. ) 15

16

17 Does this look good? Wait, what??? P R O T O T Y P E

18 Barriers to Reasoning 2- Representativeness Heuristic Who went to Harvard? My friend Dan is a smart dude, but did not go to Harvard (but he looks like he did). If I tell you that Sonia Dara is a Sports Illustrated swimsuit model, you would make certain quick judgments (heuristics) about her like about her interests or intelligence. She is an economics / human evolutionary biology major at Harvard University. Judging a situation based on how similar the aspects are to the prototypes the person holds in their mind. Like thinking everyone from Decatur is preppy, or someone with glasses is nerdy, or a blonde is not smart.

19 Representativeness Heuristic Linda is 31, single, outspoken and very bright. She majored in philosophy in college. As a student, she was deeply concerned with discrimination and other social issues, and she participated in antinuclear demonstrations. Which statement is more likely? a. Linda is a bank teller b. Linda is a bank teller and a feminist activist. 19

20 The Availability and Representativeness Heuristics

21 Barriers to Reasoning 3- Framing and the Tendency to Avoid Loss How an issue is framed can significantly affect decisions and judgments. Examples: If you take chemotherapy, you ll lose your hair. (People will respond cautiously) If you take the medication for high blood pressure, you ll be OK. (People will go for it) 21

22 Barriers to Reasoning 4- Confirmation Bias We are much more likely to notice information that supports our beliefs than we are to notice information that contradicts it. Examples: A reporter who is writing an article on an important issue may only interview experts that support her or his views on the issue. One who believes in astrology will believe when the horoscope is right and ignore when it is wrong. 22

23 Barriers to Reasoning 5/6- Belief Bias / Belief Perseverance Our beliefs are, once established, likely to continue. (It's hard to get people to change their minds about candidates, sports teams, musical groups, abortion, etc.) In part, belief perseverance is maintained because of confirmation bias and belief bias. Examples: You continue smoking even though research shows it is definitely connected to lung cancer. You hear that Amy Gadala is talking smack about you, so you think that Amy is a jerk. Later you find out that she wasn t talking smack about you. You may find it hard to shake your feeling that Amy is a jerk. 23

24 Belief Perseverance All Cowboy fans who still believe that things are going to get better are suffering from belief perseverance. Seriously, there are people who refuse to believe the moon landing happened, that Elvis is dead, or that the holocaust occurred. These people continue to hold on to their belief, even with mountains of evidence to the contrary. Their belief perseveres

25 Barriers to Reasoning 7- Fixation or Mental set An inability to see a problem from a fresh perspective. When a person approaches a problem one particular way, usually a way that has been successful in the past. (rigidity.) The Matchstick Problem: How would you arrange six matches to form four equilateral triangles? 25 From Problem Solving by M. Scheerer. Copyright 1963 by Scientific American, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

26 The Matchstick Problem: Solution From Problem Solving by M. Scheerer. Copyright 1963 by Scientific American, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 26

27 The Mind Can Refuse to Make Connections Q. How do you put a bear in a refrigerator? A. Open the door, put the bear in, close the door. Q. How do you put a lion in the refrigerator? A. Open the door, take out the bear, put the lion in. Q. Noah is hosting an animal conference. All animals but one attend. Which one? A. The lion who is freezing his butt off in the refrigerator Q. You want to cross a river that is inhabited by crocodiles. How do you do it? A. Swim across the crocs are at the conference.

28 Mental Set Using no more than four lines, can you connect all nine dots without lifting your pencil from the paper? 28

29 (Mental Sets Continued) Tendency to fall into established thought patterns. Most people will use solutions or past experience to try to solve new problems ( they think "what worked in the past is bound to work now"). To overcome mental sets you must think outside the box literally!

Formal Reasoning 2-Logic

Formal Reasoning 2-Logic Formal Reasoning 2-Logic Deductive Reasoning Drawing conclusions from a set of observations or premises. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Inductive Reasoning Draw conclusions

More information

How can you combat your mental set? With lateral thinking.

How can you combat your mental set? With lateral thinking. How can you combat your mental set? With lateral thinking. An old money-lender offered to cancel a merchant s debt and keep him from going to prison if the merchant would give the money-lender his lovely

More information

Logical (formal) fallacies

Logical (formal) fallacies Fallacies in academic writing Chad Nilep There are many possible sources of fallacy an idea that is mistakenly thought to be true, even though it may be untrue in academic writing. The phrase logical fallacy

More information

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion.

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion. ACADEMIC SKILLS THINKING CRITICALLY In the everyday sense of the word, critical has negative connotations. But at University, Critical Thinking is a positive process of understanding different points of

More information

Rule Rationality: A Synthesis of Behavioral and Mainstream Economics

Rule Rationality: A Synthesis of Behavioral and Mainstream Economics Rule Rationality: A Synthesis of Behavioral and Mainstream Economics Bob Aumann Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality The Hebrew University, Jerusalem CORE, Universite Catholique de Louvain 9 May

More information

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING 1 REASONING Reasoning is, broadly speaking, the cognitive process of establishing reasons to justify beliefs, conclusions, actions or feelings. It also refers, more specifically, to the act or process

More information

TESTIMONY FROM YOUR OWN WITNESSES: DIRECT EXAMINATION STRATEGIES

TESTIMONY FROM YOUR OWN WITNESSES: DIRECT EXAMINATION STRATEGIES TESTIMONY FROM YOUR OWN WITNESSES: DIRECT EXAMINATION STRATEGIES JAMES L. MITCHELL Payne Mitchell Law Group 2911 Turtle Creek Blvd, Suite 1400 Dallas, Texas 75219 214/252-1888 214/252-1889 (fax) jim@paynemitchell.com

More information

This report is organized in four sections. The first section discusses the sample design. The next

This report is organized in four sections. The first section discusses the sample design. The next 2 This report is organized in four sections. The first section discusses the sample design. The next section describes data collection and fielding. The final two sections address weighting procedures

More information

Artificial Intelligence Prof. Deepak Khemani Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Artificial Intelligence Prof. Deepak Khemani Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras (Refer Slide Time: 00:26) Artificial Intelligence Prof. Deepak Khemani Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture - 06 State Space Search Intro So, today

More information

Introducing Our New Faculty

Introducing Our New Faculty Dr. Isidoro Talavera Franklin University, Philosophy Ph.D. in Philosophy - Vanderbilt University M.A. in Philosophy - Vanderbilt University M.A. in Philosophy - University of Missouri M.S.E. in Math Education

More information

Inductive Reasoning.

Inductive Reasoning. Inductive Reasoning http://toknow-11.wikispaces.com/file/view/snowflake_logic.png/291213597/snowflake_logic.png Inductive reasoning is which we reason from particular, observed phenomena to generalizations.

More information

I Don't Believe in God I Believe in Science

I Don't Believe in God I Believe in Science I Don't Believe in God I Believe in Science This seems to be a common world view that many people hold today. It is important that when we look at statements like this we spend a proper amount of time

More information

IDHEF Chapter 2 Why Should Anyone Believe Anything At All?

IDHEF Chapter 2 Why Should Anyone Believe Anything At All? IDHEF Chapter 2 Why Should Anyone Believe Anything At All? -You might have heard someone say, It doesn t really matter what you believe, as long as you believe something. While many people think this is

More information

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument?

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument? . What is the purpose of argumentation? Argumentation 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument? According to Toulmin (964), the checking list can be outlined as follows: () The Claim

More information

CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior.

CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior. Logos Ethos Pathos Chapter 13 CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior. Persuasive speaking: process of doing so in

More information

Topics and Posterior Analytics. Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey

Topics and Posterior Analytics. Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey Topics and Posterior Analytics Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey Logic Aristotle is the first philosopher to study systematically what we call logic Specifically, Aristotle investigated what we now

More information

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker. Lecture 8: Refutation Philosophy 130 October 25 & 27, 2016 O Rourke I. Administrative A. Schedule see syllabus as well! B. Questions? II. Refutation A. Arguments are typically used to establish conclusions.

More information

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises Deduction Deductive arguments, deduction, deductive logic all means the same thing. They are different ways of referring to the same style of reasoning Deduction is just one mode of reasoning, but it is

More information

Introduction to Logic. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Introduction to Logic. Instructor: Jason Sheley Introduction to Logic Instructor: Jason Sheley In this section we will learn: What is the difference between Deduction and Induction? Why use different types of logic? What is a valid argument? Invalid?

More information

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities Lecture 8: Refutation Philosophy 130 March 19 & 24, 2015 O Rourke I. Administrative A. Roll B. Schedule C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know D. Discussion

More information

WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL?

WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL? WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL? Beliefs don t trump facts in the real world. People almost invariably arrive at their beliefs not on the basis of proof but on the basis of what they find attractive.

More information

x Philosophic Thoughts: Essays on Logic and Philosophy

x Philosophic Thoughts: Essays on Logic and Philosophy Introduction In this volume I have collected together many of my essays on philosophy, published in a wide range of venues from 1979 to 2011. Part I, the first group of essays, consists of my writings

More information

Unless otherwise noted, Scripture quotations are from the New King James Version of the Bible.

Unless otherwise noted, Scripture quotations are from the New King James Version of the Bible. First printing: October 2011 Copyright 2011 by Answers in Genesis USA. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission of the publisher,

More information

Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction

Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction Alice Gao Lecture 6, September 26, 2017 Entailment 1/55 Learning goals Semantic entailment Define semantic entailment. Explain subtleties of semantic entailment.

More information

Understanding Truth Scott Soames Précis Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Volume LXV, No. 2, 2002

Understanding Truth Scott Soames Précis Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Volume LXV, No. 2, 2002 1 Symposium on Understanding Truth By Scott Soames Précis Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Volume LXV, No. 2, 2002 2 Precis of Understanding Truth Scott Soames Understanding Truth aims to illuminate

More information

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals Argument and Persuasion Stating Opinions and Proposals The Method It all starts with an opinion - something that people can agree or disagree with. The Method Move to action Speak your mind Convince someone

More information

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one? Argument What is it? How do I make a good one? Argument Vs Persuasion Everything s an argument, really. Argument: appeals strictly by reason and logic Persuasion: logic and emotion The forum of your argument

More information

Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language,

Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language, Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language, rhythmic patterns of speech, etc. Logical Argument Appeals

More information

Introduction to Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments

Introduction to Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments Introduction to Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments 1. HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT Example 1. Socrates must be mortal. After all, all humans are mortal, and Socrates is a human. What does the author of this

More information

The paradox we re discussing today is not a single argument, but a family of arguments. Here are some examples of this sort of argument:

The paradox we re discussing today is not a single argument, but a family of arguments. Here are some examples of this sort of argument: The sorites paradox The paradox we re discussing today is not a single argument, but a family of arguments. Here are some examples of this sort of argument: 1. Someone who is 7 feet in height is tall.

More information

Nested Testimony, Nested Probability, and a Defense of Testimonial Reductionism Benjamin Bayer September 2, 2011

Nested Testimony, Nested Probability, and a Defense of Testimonial Reductionism Benjamin Bayer September 2, 2011 Nested Testimony, Nested Probability, and a Defense of Testimonial Reductionism Benjamin Bayer September 2, 2011 In her book Learning from Words (2008), Jennifer Lackey argues for a dualist view of testimonial

More information

#002-F Painting #1 Affirmation

#002-F Painting #1 Affirmation #002-F Painting #1 Affirmation: I am consumed by the light and dark of my life. I am engulfed by the darkness that holds me close. It protects me, acting as a constant reminder for where I come from and

More information

World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Natural- ism , by Michael C. Rea.

World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Natural- ism , by Michael C. Rea. Book reviews World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism, by Michael C. Rea. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004, viii + 245 pp., $24.95. This is a splendid book. Its ideas are bold and

More information

2014 Examination Report 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS

2014 Examination Report 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS The Extended Investigation Critical Thinking Test assesses the ability of students to produce arguments, and to analyse and assess

More information

Topics. Evaluating. arguments. 1 Introduction. PHI 1101, Section I (P. Rusnock) 2 Evaluating Premises. Introduction

Topics. Evaluating. arguments. 1 Introduction. PHI 1101, Section I (P. Rusnock) 2 Evaluating Premises. Introduction Topics ( and Critical Thinking, Chapter 2) Fall 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 : 1 : 2 Now that we know how to identify and their parts, we move to our next question: how can we tell if an argument is a strong one?

More information

Critical Reasoning for Beginners: Four. Marianne Talbot Department for Continuing Education University of Oxford Michaelmas 2009

Critical Reasoning for Beginners: Four. Marianne Talbot Department for Continuing Education University of Oxford Michaelmas 2009 Critical Reasoning for Beginners: Four Marianne Talbot Department for Continuing Education University of Oxford Michaelmas 2009 Last week we learned how to analyse arguments and set them out logic-book

More information

correlated to the Massachussetts Learning Standards for Geometry C14

correlated to the Massachussetts Learning Standards for Geometry C14 correlated to the Massachussetts Learning Standards for Geometry C14 12/2003 2004 McDougal Littell Geometry 2004 correlated to the Massachussetts Learning Standards for Geometry Note: The parentheses at

More information

Thinking and Reasoning

Thinking and Reasoning Syllogistic Reasoning Thinking and Reasoning Syllogistic Reasoning Erol ÖZÇELİK The other key type of deductive reasoning is syllogistic reasoning, which is based on the use of syllogisms. Syllogisms are

More information

Other Logics: What Nonclassical Reasoning Is All About Dr. Michael A. Covington Associate Director Artificial Intelligence Center

Other Logics: What Nonclassical Reasoning Is All About Dr. Michael A. Covington Associate Director Artificial Intelligence Center Covington, Other Logics 1 Other Logics: What Nonclassical Reasoning Is All About Dr. Michael A. Covington Associate Director Artificial Intelligence Center Covington, Other Logics 2 Contents Classical

More information

2017 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions

2017 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions National Qualifications 07 07 Philosophy Higher Finalised Marking Instructions Scottish Qualifications Authority 07 The information in this publication may be reproduced to support SQA qualifications only

More information

A New Parameter for Maintaining Consistency in an Agent's Knowledge Base Using Truth Maintenance System

A New Parameter for Maintaining Consistency in an Agent's Knowledge Base Using Truth Maintenance System A New Parameter for Maintaining Consistency in an Agent's Knowledge Base Using Truth Maintenance System Qutaibah Althebyan, Henry Hexmoor Department of Computer Science and Computer Engineering University

More information

Lecture 4.2 Aquinas Phil Religion TOPIC: Aquinas Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God. Critiques of Aquinas arguments.

Lecture 4.2 Aquinas Phil Religion TOPIC: Aquinas Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God. Critiques of Aquinas arguments. TOPIC: Lecture 4.2 Aquinas Phil Religion Aquinas Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God. Critiques of Aquinas arguments. KEY TERMS/ GOALS: Cosmological argument. The problem of Infinite Regress.

More information

HW3- Sets & Arguments (solutions) Due: Tuesday April 5, 2011

HW3- Sets & Arguments (solutions) Due: Tuesday April 5, 2011 HW #3-SOLUTIONS Topics: Sets, categorical propositions, Venn diagrams, analyzing arguments, and critical thinking Please show your work and clearly indicate your answer. Although you are welcome to compare

More information

1/7. The Postulates of Empirical Thought

1/7. The Postulates of Empirical Thought 1/7 The Postulates of Empirical Thought This week we are focusing on the final section of the Analytic of Principles in which Kant schematizes the last set of categories. This set of categories are what

More information

Stop Chasing Carrots: Healing Self-Help Deceptions With A Scientific Philosophy Of Life PDF

Stop Chasing Carrots: Healing Self-Help Deceptions With A Scientific Philosophy Of Life PDF Stop Chasing Carrots: Healing Self-Help Deceptions With A Scientific Philosophy Of Life PDF Every year, Americans spend more than $10 billion on self-help products. Psychologist and philosophers agree,

More information

What is a distributed system? A first course in Distributed Computing... A first course in Distributed Computing... Principle of Distributed Computing

What is a distributed system? A first course in Distributed Computing... A first course in Distributed Computing... Principle of Distributed Computing Principle of Distributed Computing Lorenzo Alvisi Cong Ding Youer Pu What is a distributed system? A distributed system is one in which the failure of a computer you didn t even know existed can render

More information

Proof as a cluster concept in mathematical practice. Keith Weber Rutgers University

Proof as a cluster concept in mathematical practice. Keith Weber Rutgers University Proof as a cluster concept in mathematical practice Keith Weber Rutgers University Approaches for defining proof In the philosophy of mathematics, there are two approaches to defining proof: Logical or

More information

Inference in Cyc. This is the final lesson in the Inference Tutorial. It will focus on microtheories and forward/backward inference.

Inference in Cyc. This is the final lesson in the Inference Tutorial. It will focus on microtheories and forward/backward inference. Inference in Cyc Logical Aspects of Inference Incompleteness in Searching Incompleteness from Resource Bounds and Continuable Searches Efficiency through Heuristics Inference Features in Cyc This is the

More information

Unit VI: Davidson and the interpretational approach to thought and language

Unit VI: Davidson and the interpretational approach to thought and language Unit VI: Davidson and the interpretational approach to thought and language October 29, 2003 1 Davidson s interdependence thesis..................... 1 2 Davidson s arguments for interdependence................

More information

1.5 Deductive and Inductive Arguments

1.5 Deductive and Inductive Arguments M01_COPI1396_13_SE_C01.QXD 10/10/07 9:48 PM Page 26 26 CHAPTER 1 Basic Logical Concepts 19. All ethnic movements are two-edged swords. Beginning benignly, and sometimes necessary to repair injured collective

More information

Quick Write # 11. Create a narrative for the following image

Quick Write # 11. Create a narrative for the following image Welcome to class Quick Write # 11 Create a narrative for the following image Day 17 Agenda Quick Write # 11 Peer editing Review Autobiographical Narrative reading Book Club presentations Peer Editing

More information

Test Item File. Full file at

Test Item File. Full file at Test Item File 107 CHAPTER 1 Chapter 1: Basic Logical Concepts Multiple Choice 1. In which of the following subjects is reasoning outside the concern of logicians? A) science and medicine B) ethics C)

More information

Putnam: Meaning and Reference

Putnam: Meaning and Reference Putnam: Meaning and Reference The Traditional Conception of Meaning combines two assumptions: Meaning and psychology Knowing the meaning (of a word, sentence) is being in a psychological state. Even Frege,

More information

(Refer Slide Time 03:00)

(Refer Slide Time 03:00) Artificial Intelligence Prof. Anupam Basu Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Lecture - 15 Resolution in FOPL In the last lecture we had discussed about

More information

2016 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions

2016 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions National Qualifications 06 06 Philosophy Higher Finalised Marking Instructions Scottish Qualifications Authority 06 The information in this publication may be reproduced to support SQA qualifications only

More information

Chapter 3: Basic Propositional Logic. Based on Harry Gensler s book For CS2209A/B By Dr. Charles Ling;

Chapter 3: Basic Propositional Logic. Based on Harry Gensler s book For CS2209A/B By Dr. Charles Ling; Chapter 3: Basic Propositional Logic Based on Harry Gensler s book For CS2209A/B By Dr. Charles Ling; cling@csd.uwo.ca The Ultimate Goals Accepting premises (as true), is the conclusion (always) true?

More information

Introduction Symbolic Logic

Introduction Symbolic Logic An Introduction to Symbolic Logic Copyright 2006 by Terence Parsons all rights reserved CONTENTS Chapter One Sentential Logic with 'if' and 'not' 1 SYMBOLIC NOTATION 2 MEANINGS OF THE SYMBOLIC NOTATION

More information

Preaching Discipleship: Higher Standards Matthew 5:17-31 February 13, 2011

Preaching Discipleship: Higher Standards Matthew 5:17-31 February 13, 2011 Preaching Discipleship: Higher Standards Matthew 5:17-31 February 13, 2011 Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell

More information

Critical Thinking - Wk 3. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Critical Thinking - Wk 3. Instructor: Jason Sheley Critical Thinking - Wk 3 Instructor: Jason Sheley Quick Quiz Give an example of a statement. Give an example of sentence that is not a statement. Give an example of an argument Validity, Truth, Soundness,

More information

Calm Living Blueprint Podcast

Calm Living Blueprint Podcast This morning I held a fresh lemon in my hands. I ran my fingers over the bright yellow skin, noting all the little dimples. I lifted it to my nose and inhaled the delicious lemony aroma. Then I placed

More information

As noted, a deductive argument is intended to provide logically conclusive support for its conclusion. We have certainty with deductive arguments in

As noted, a deductive argument is intended to provide logically conclusive support for its conclusion. We have certainty with deductive arguments in As noted, a deductive argument is intended to provide logically conclusive support for its conclusion. We have certainty with deductive arguments in that if the premises of the argument are true, then

More information

ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments

ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments ARGUMENTS Arguments arguments 1 Argument Worksheet 1. An argument is a collection of propositions with one proposition, the conclusion, following from the other propositions, the premises. Inference is

More information

Discussion Notes for Bayesian Reasoning

Discussion Notes for Bayesian Reasoning Discussion Notes for Bayesian Reasoning Ivan Phillips - http://www.meetup.com/the-chicago-philosophy-meetup/events/163873962/ Bayes Theorem tells us how we ought to update our beliefs in a set of predefined

More information

PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS

PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS ATAR course examination, 2017 Question/Answer booklet PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS Please place your student identification label in this box Student number: In figures In words Time allowed for this paper Reading

More information

Now consider a verb - like is pretty. Does this also stand for something?

Now consider a verb - like is pretty. Does this also stand for something? Kripkenstein The rule-following paradox is a paradox about how it is possible for us to mean anything by the words of our language. More precisely, it is an argument which seems to show that it is impossible

More information

PHIL 155: The Scientific Method, Part 1: Naïve Inductivism. January 14, 2013

PHIL 155: The Scientific Method, Part 1: Naïve Inductivism. January 14, 2013 PHIL 155: The Scientific Method, Part 1: Naïve Inductivism January 14, 2013 Outline 1 Science in Action: An Example 2 Naïve Inductivism 3 Hempel s Model of Scientific Investigation Semmelweis Investigations

More information

The Development of Laws of Formal Logic of Aristotle

The Development of Laws of Formal Logic of Aristotle This paper is dedicated to my unforgettable friend Boris Isaevich Lamdon. The Development of Laws of Formal Logic of Aristotle The essence of formal logic The aim of every science is to discover the laws

More information

Leading Children Towards a Life with God

Leading Children Towards a Life with God Leading Children Towards a Life with God I m a worrier by nature. You can ask my wife. I m sure she can make a whole list of silly things I worry about. I haven t always been like this, at least I don

More information

Introduction to Philosophy

Introduction to Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy PHIL 2000--Call # 41480 Kent Baldner Teaching Assistant: Mitchell Winget Discussion sections ( Labs ) meet on Wednesdays, starting next Wednesday, Sept. 5 th. 10:00-10:50, 1115

More information

In general, the simplest of argument maps will take the form of something like this:

In general, the simplest of argument maps will take the form of something like this: #6 Model Argument Maps 1 Argument Mapping 6: Model Argument Maps Most of the following discussion provides model or prototype argument maps that can be applied to any argument that takes a similar form.

More information

Establishing premises

Establishing premises Establishing premises This is hard, subtle, and crucial to good arguments. Various kinds of considerations are used to establish the truth (high justification) of premises Deduction Done Analogy Induction

More information

EVALUATING CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE. Douglas Walton Department of Philosophy, University of Winnipeg, Canada

EVALUATING CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE. Douglas Walton Department of Philosophy, University of Winnipeg, Canada EVALUATING CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE Douglas Walton Department of Philosophy, University of Winnipeg, Canada Chris Reed School of Computing, University of Dundee, UK In this paper, we study something called

More information

The Development of Knowledge and Claims of Truth in the Autobiography In Code. When preparing her project to enter the Esat Young Scientist

The Development of Knowledge and Claims of Truth in the Autobiography In Code. When preparing her project to enter the Esat Young Scientist Katie Morrison 3/18/11 TEAC 949 The Development of Knowledge and Claims of Truth in the Autobiography In Code Sarah Flannery had the rare experience in this era of producing new mathematical research at

More information

Informalizing Formal Logic

Informalizing Formal Logic Informalizing Formal Logic Antonis Kakas Department of Computer Science, University of Cyprus, Cyprus antonis@ucy.ac.cy Abstract. This paper discusses how the basic notions of formal logic can be expressed

More information

The dinosaur existed for a few literal hours on earth!

The dinosaur existed for a few literal hours on earth! Interpreting science from the perspective of religion The dinosaur existed for a few literal hours on earth! October 28, 2012 Henok Tadesse, Electrical Engineer, BSc Ethiopia E-mail: entkidmt@yahoo.com

More information

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCIENCE, RELIGION AND ARISTOTELIAN THEOLOGY TODAY

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCIENCE, RELIGION AND ARISTOTELIAN THEOLOGY TODAY Science and the Future of Mankind Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Scripta Varia 99, Vatican City 2001 www.pas.va/content/dam/accademia/pdf/sv99/sv99-berti.pdf THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCIENCE, RELIGION

More information

SYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY. Contents

SYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY. Contents UNIT 1 SYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY Contents 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Research in Philosophy 1.3 Philosophical Method 1.4 Tools of Research 1.5 Choosing a Topic 1.1 INTRODUCTION Everyone who seeks knowledge

More information

Home Health Education Service Telephone: Fax:

Home Health Education Service Telephone: Fax: Magabook Canvass Home Health Education Service PO Box 1147, Decatur, GA 30031-1177 Telephone: (404) 299-1621 Fax: 404-501-9771 Email: magabook@hhesbiblestory.com 2 4 Simple Keys to Success 1 Memorize Canvass

More information

A dialogical, multi-agent account of the normativity of logic. Catarin Dutilh Novaes Faculty of Philosophy University of Groningen

A dialogical, multi-agent account of the normativity of logic. Catarin Dutilh Novaes Faculty of Philosophy University of Groningen A dialogical, multi-agent account of the normativity of logic Catarin Dutilh Novaes Faculty of Philosophy University of Groningen 1 Introduction In what sense (if any) is logic normative for thought? But

More information

PHI 244. Environmental Ethics. Introduction. Argument Worksheet. Argument Worksheet. Welcome to PHI 244, Environmental Ethics. About Stephen.

PHI 244. Environmental Ethics. Introduction. Argument Worksheet. Argument Worksheet. Welcome to PHI 244, Environmental Ethics. About Stephen. Introduction PHI 244 Welcome to PHI 244, About Stephen Texts Course Requirements Syllabus Points of Interest Website http://seschmid.org, http://seschmid.org/teaching Email Policy 1 2 Argument Worksheet

More information

Qualitative and quantitative inference to the best theory. reply to iikka Niiniluoto Kuipers, Theodorus

Qualitative and quantitative inference to the best theory. reply to iikka Niiniluoto Kuipers, Theodorus University of Groningen Qualitative and quantitative inference to the best theory. reply to iikka Niiniluoto Kuipers, Theodorus Published in: EPRINTS-BOOK-TITLE IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult

More information

! Introduction to the Class! Some Introductory Concepts. Today s Lecture 1/19/10

! Introduction to the Class! Some Introductory Concepts. Today s Lecture 1/19/10 ! Introduction to the Class! Some Introductory Concepts Today s Lecture 1/19/10 Philosophy 230! Introduction to Formal Logic! Ticket # 13823 Adding the Class See me after class to be put on a waiting list.

More information

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens. INTRODUCTION TO LOGICAL THINKING Lecture 6: Two types of argument and their role in science: Deduction and induction 1. Deductive arguments Arguments that claim to provide logically conclusive grounds

More information

Truth and Evidence in Validity Theory

Truth and Evidence in Validity Theory Journal of Educational Measurement Spring 2013, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 110 114 Truth and Evidence in Validity Theory Denny Borsboom University of Amsterdam Keith A. Markus John Jay College of Criminal Justice

More information

Appeal to Authority (Ad Verecundiam) An Appeal to Authority is a fallacy with the following form:

Appeal to Authority (Ad Verecundiam) An Appeal to Authority is a fallacy with the following form: Appeal to Authority (Ad Verecundiam) An Appeal to Authority is a fallacy with the following form: 1) Person A is (claimed to be) an authority on subject S. 2) Person A makes claim C about subject S. 3)

More information

PASTOR-MINISTRY LEADER RELATIONSHIP

PASTOR-MINISTRY LEADER RELATIONSHIP PASTOR-MINISTRY LEADER RELATIONSHIP Someone has aptly said, The nice thing about teamwork is that you always have others on your side. In effective Royal Rangers outposts, the pastor and the outpost coordinator

More information

Critical Thinking is:

Critical Thinking is: Logic: Day 1 Critical Thinking is: Thinking clearly and following rules of logic and rationality It s not being argumentative just for the sake of arguing Academics disagree about which departments do

More information

IS THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD A MYTH? PERSPECTIVES FROM THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

IS THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD A MYTH? PERSPECTIVES FROM THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE MÈTODE Science Studies Journal, 5 (2015): 195-199. University of Valencia. DOI: 10.7203/metode.84.3883 ISSN: 2174-3487. Article received: 10/07/2014, accepted: 18/09/2014. IS THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD A MYTH?

More information

Sermon or Lesson: 1 Timothy 6:20-21 (NIV based) [Lesson Questions included]

Sermon or Lesson: 1 Timothy 6:20-21 (NIV based) [Lesson Questions included] Sermon or Lesson: 1 Timothy 6:20-21 (NIV based) [Lesson Questions included] TITLE: Guardians Of Sound Doctrines In Our Churches And Ministries BACKGROUND: READ: 1 Timothy 6:3-5: - - God directly and strongly

More information

Do Not Judge One Another Text: Selected Scriptures Series: The One Another Statements in the New Testament [#10] Lyle L. Wahl March 13, 2011

Do Not Judge One Another Text: Selected Scriptures Series: The One Another Statements in the New Testament [#10] Lyle L. Wahl March 13, 2011 Introduction Do Not Judge One Another Text: Selected Scriptures Series: The One Another Statements in the New Testament [#10] Lyle L. Wahl March 13, 2011 This is our tenth week on the One Another statements

More information

1/6. The Resolution of the Antinomies

1/6. The Resolution of the Antinomies 1/6 The Resolution of the Antinomies Kant provides us with the resolutions of the antinomies in order, starting with the first and ending with the fourth. The first antinomy, as we recall, concerned the

More information

Thursday, November 30, 17. Hegel s Idealism

Thursday, November 30, 17. Hegel s Idealism Hegel s Idealism G. W. F. Hegel Hegel Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831) was perhaps the last great philosophical system builder. His distinctively dynamic form of idealism set the stage for other

More information

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments 1 Agenda 1. What is an Argument? 2. Evaluating Arguments 3. Validity 4. Soundness 5. Persuasive Arguments 6.

More information

Chapter 1 Why Study Logic? Answers and Comments

Chapter 1 Why Study Logic? Answers and Comments Chapter 1 Why Study Logic? Answers and Comments WARNING! YOU SHOULD NOT LOOK AT THE ANSWERS UNTIL YOU HAVE SUPPLIED YOUR OWN ANSWERS TO THE EXERCISES FIRST. Answers: I. True and False 1. False. 2. True.

More information

9 Knowledge-Based Systems

9 Knowledge-Based Systems 9 Knowledge-Based Systems Throughout this book, we have insisted that intelligent behavior in people is often conditioned by knowledge. A person will say a certain something about the movie 2001 because

More information

Apologetics Through Uncommon Research

Apologetics Through Uncommon Research Apologetics Through Uncommon Research The Case for Christ: A Journalist's Personal Investigation of the Evidence for Jesus Lee Strobel (Author) - (Copyright 1998 / 2016) Retracing his own spiritual journey

More information

Appendix: The Logic Behind the Inferential Test

Appendix: The Logic Behind the Inferential Test Appendix: The Logic Behind the Inferential Test In the Introduction, I stated that the basic underlying problem with forensic doctors is so easy to understand that even a twelve-year-old could understand

More information

Esther 2:2-8:17. Queen Esther saves her people. My God is Number One Great Big God Wherever, Whatever

Esther 2:2-8:17. Queen Esther saves her people. My God is Number One Great Big God Wherever, Whatever OVERVIEW CARD Key Question: Bottom Line: Memory Verse: Bible Story Focus: Who is always with you? God is always with me. Be strong and courageous. Do not be afraid When God is with me, I can be strong.

More information

Foundations of Non-Monotonic Reasoning

Foundations of Non-Monotonic Reasoning Foundations of Non-Monotonic Reasoning Notation S A - from a set of premisses S we can derive a conclusion A. Example S: All men are mortal Socrates is a man. A: Socrates is mortal. x.man(x) mortal(x)

More information

Philosophy (PHILOS) Courses. Philosophy (PHILOS) 1

Philosophy (PHILOS) Courses. Philosophy (PHILOS) 1 Philosophy (PHILOS) 1 Philosophy (PHILOS) Courses PHILOS 1. Introduction to Philosophy. 4 Units. A selection of philosophical problems, concepts, and methods, e.g., free will, cause and substance, personal

More information