Discussion Notes for Bayesian Reasoning
|
|
- Sara Malone
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Discussion Notes for Bayesian Reasoning Ivan Phillips - Bayes Theorem tells us how we ought to update our beliefs in a set of predefined theories in light of new evidence. It is considered by many to be the gold standard of rational inference. It s not rational to believe a theory just because it is possible. The theory must be inductively probable for it to be rationally believable. There are many side questions surrounding how we come up with theories, and how we ought to set our prior beliefs, but this presentation will keep things simple. To illustrate the theorem, we ll work through a simple probability problem without the theorem. A Dice Game Suppose I have a 4-sided die and a 20-sided die (a dodecahedron). The 4-sided die is a 4-sided pyramid with triangular sides, numbered 1 through 4. The 20-sided die is a dodecahedron with sides numbered I take one of these dice at random, and roll it. At this stage you have no idea which of the two dice I rolled. However, you have two theories: T4 = The theory that I chose to roll the 4-sided die. T20 = The theory that I chose to roll the 4-sided die. Here is where we introduce our first key concept: the prior probability. Prior probability represents your confidence or degree of belief in each theory. Since you know that I rolled at least one die, but you don t know which, your confidence is evenly split between each theory, and your prior probability is 0.5 (or 50%). By convention,m we write this as and P (T4) = 0.5 P (T20) = 0.5 Now, I give you a little more information. I report to you that I rolled a 3. Which die did I probably roll? Obviously, either of the dice could possibly give me a 3 because both dice have a side labeled 3. However, we re not asking whether the theories are possibly true, but which theory is probably true. Humans find probability calculations difficult, and it s often easier for us to work things out in terms of frequencies. To do this, just imagine that we play this game very many times. Let s suppose we play this same game 200 times. When I randomly select between the two dice, I will select the 4-sided die 50% of the time and
2 the 20-sided die 50% of the time. That means that, in 200 plays, I will select the 4-sided die 100 times and the 20-sided die 100 times. In 100 rolls of the 4-sided die, I will roll a three 25 times. In 100 rolls of the 20-sided die, I will roll a three just 5 times. The relative likelihood of seeing our evidence in each theory will be used to update our beliefs based on the evidence. This information has a name in Bayesian reasoning. It s called a likelihood function, and it expresses the probability of seeing some evidence in a given theory. P (3 T4) = 25/100 = 25% This equation says that the probability of getting the evidence (rolling a 3) given T4 is 25%. Similarly: P (3 T20) = 5 / 100 = 5% Okay, back to our calculation. Overall, 200 plays will result in my rolling a three 30 times, 25 of which will be on the 4-sided die. As a result, I can say that 83.3% of the time, a three is rolled on the 4-sided die. In terms of a formula, I am calculating my updated probability or confidence in T4: P(3 T4) P(3 T4) + P(3 T20) = 25% P (T 4 3) = 25% + 5% = 8 3.3% This ratio gives me a conditional probability of T4 being true given the evidence that a three was rolled. This is how inductive inference works. Based on our knowledge (or ignorance) of the world, and based upon our theories, we can shift our confidence in our theories when we get new evidence. Initially, we were no more confident in T4 than in T20, but after hearing that a three was rolled, we are now 83.3% confident in T4, and only 16.6% confident in T20. Now, suppose I continue the game. I will roll the same die I selected last time, and report what I have rolled. Obviously, things have now changed. You expect a low number more than you expect a high number. If I roll a 3 again, you will be even more confident that the theory T4 is true. With each round of evidence, our prior belief in each theory has to be taken into account. This brings us to Bayes Theorem: P (T 1 E) = P(T ) P(E T ) 1 1 P(T ) P(E T ) + P(T ) P(E T ) This assumes that T1 and T2 are our only theories, and that they are mutually exclusive. The E represents our evidence. Bayesian reasoning is usually presented as an iterative process. We start with our prior probabilities, P(T1) and P(T2). We get some evidence, E, and compute our new confidence in each theory, P(T1 E) and P(T2 E). When we go into the next round of experimentation, our conditional probabilities become our new prior probabilities.
3 Some Intuitive Principles Bayesian inference can be summed up intuitively in three principles. The first principle, as illustrated above, is this: All things being equal, that the theory that makes more definite, restrictive predictions is more likely to be true when the data falls in line with those predictions. A corollary being that theories that are vague or more prediction-less are less likely to be true, even if they are compatible with more possible outcomes. When we iterate this inference process, we can become very confident in a theory. If I roll the selected die another 9 times (a total of 10 rolls), and all 10 rolls are reported as being between one and four (inclusive), you are now extremely confident that I selected the 4-sided die. In fact, the probability of rolling four or less in 10 consecutive rolls of a 20-sided die is approximately 1 in 10 million. This leads us to our second principle: All things are not equal! Evidence accumulates, and can make us extremely confident in our theory. Finally, once we reach a very high level of confidence, we start to question counterevidence more carefully. If I roll the selected die an 11th time, and report that I rolled a 14, it naively appears that the game is up, and I know for certain that the selected die was the 20-sided die. However, this conclusion is incorrect. How confident are we that the reports you are hearing are true? How confident are you that I read the die correctly, that I spoke my report correctly, and that you heard my report correctly? These highly improbable errors are negligible when our confidence in a theory is relatively low. Let s suppose that the probability of you mishearing my report is 1 in a million. This has a negligible effect on the first conclusion, changing the initial 83.3% estimate by around 1 part in a million. Similarly, if my first roll was a 14, our naive posterior probability would be 100% in favor of the 20-sided die, and this, too, only changes by 1 part in a million. However, once we have overwhelming evidence for the 4-sided die being the selected die, it becomes potentially more likely that we misheard the report than that our well-established theory is incorrect. Thus, our third principle is this: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence! To resolve this problem, we need more empirical data. We need more control over the experiment to ensure that false positives are not corrupting our conclusion.
4 Evidence What counts as evidence? The evidence can be anything we experience. We re not limited to the five senses. Induction and Deduction The process as described here results in an inductive inference. Inductive inference is an inference from the specific to the general. Induction takes data, and infers a rule that is probably true, but not necessarily true. However, the process of inductive inference relies on deduction. Deduction takes a general rule and infers specifics that are necessarily true if the general rule is true. If my 4-sided die is a fair die, then we expect (in the statistical sense) 100 rolls to be split evenly across each of the 4 possibilities, i.e., 25 ones, 25 twos, 25 threes and 25 fours. This is true by definition of a 4-sided die. In general, our likelihood functions, P(E T), are deductive calculations. They are necessarily true based on the definitions of our theories. Note: we teach deduction in high schools, but induction is rarely ever taught in a formal way, even at the graduate level. Abduction The dice game example problem is simplified to make the method of inference easy to see. However, in the real world, situations are usually more complex, and we re not served our theories on a silver platter. Instead, we look at data, and must invent theories that will be plugged into our Bayesian inference. This process of invention is usually called abduction, and it requires intelligence and creativity. Creativity is needed to invent the theory, and intelligence is needed to check its self-consistency. Prior to the scientific theory of evolution, the only known way of getting complexity was through design. By the time Charles Darwin set out on his voyages, it had already been observed that species appeared to have evolved over long periods of time. Charles Darwin recognized that inheritance, natural selection and mutation could result in an evolutionary process that creates new species and causes others to become extinct. This step of establishing a candidate theory, of establishing that a theory could work, is regarded as separate from the inductive inference that the theory is most likely to be true. Thus, invention of theories in this fashion is not a case of either deduction or Bayesian induction. It s probably best classified as a case of abduction.
5 Discussion Questions Does it make sense to say that I believe that P is true, but I don t think P is probable.? If it does not make sense, then any proper belief has to be tied to some statement of probability, even if that statement is vague. What shall we say about theories that make no predictions? If a theory makes no predictions, isn t it identical to the Null Hypothesis, i.e., the hypothesis that there is no relationship between phenomena? The Monty Hall Problem The Monty Hall problem has a very counterintuitive answer: Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what's behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat. He then says to you, "Do you want to pick door No. 2?" Is it to your advantage to switch your choice? Bayes Theorem makes the correct answer easier to see. How does Bayesian Reasoning relate to Occam s Razor? Jefferys and Berger (1991) state "a hypothesis with fewer adjustable parameters will automatically have an enhanced posterior probability, due to the fact that the predictions it makes are sharp".
Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference
1 2 3 4 5 6 Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference of opinion. Often heated. A statement of
More informationCS485/685 Lecture 5: Jan 19, 2016
CS485/685 Lecture 5: Jan 19, 2016 Statistical Learning [RN]: Sec 20.1, 20.2, [M]: Sec. 2.2, 3.2 CS485/685 (c) 2016 P. Poupart 1 Statistical Learning View: we have uncertain knowledge of the world Idea:
More informationThe end of the world & living in a computer simulation
The end of the world & living in a computer simulation In the reading for today, Leslie introduces a familiar sort of reasoning: The basic idea here is one which we employ all the time in our ordinary
More informationRichard Carrier, Ph.D.
Richard Carrier, Ph.D. www.richardcarrier.info LOGIC AND CRITICAL THOUGHT IN THE 21ST CENTURY What s New and Why It Matters BREAKDOWN Traditional Principles of Critical Thinking Plus a Dash of Cognitive
More informationCSSS/SOC/STAT 321 Case-Based Statistics I. Introduction to Probability
CSSS/SOC/STAT 321 Case-Based Statistics I Introduction to Probability Christopher Adolph Department of Political Science and Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences University of Washington, Seattle
More informationNPTEL NPTEL ONINE CERTIFICATION COURSE. Introduction to Machine Learning. Lecture-59 Ensemble Methods- Bagging,Committee Machines and Stacking
NPTEL NPTEL ONINE CERTIFICATION COURSE Introduction to Machine Learning Lecture-59 Ensemble Methods- Bagging,Committee Machines and Stacking Prof. Balaraman Ravindran Computer Science and Engineering Indian
More information6.041SC Probabilistic Systems Analysis and Applied Probability, Fall 2013 Transcript Lecture 21
6.041SC Probabilistic Systems Analysis and Applied Probability, Fall 2013 Transcript Lecture 21 The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare
More informationDetachment, Probability, and Maximum Likelihood
Detachment, Probability, and Maximum Likelihood GILBERT HARMAN PRINCETON UNIVERSITY When can we detach probability qualifications from our inductive conclusions? The following rule may seem plausible:
More informationGeorgia Quality Core Curriculum
correlated to the Grade 8 Georgia Quality Core Curriculum McDougal Littell 3/2000 Objective (Cite Numbers) M.8.1 Component Strand/Course Content Standard All Strands: Problem Solving; Algebra; Computation
More informationINTRODUCTION TO HYPOTHESIS TESTING. Unit 4A - Statistical Inference Part 1
1 INTRODUCTION TO HYPOTHESIS TESTING Unit 4A - Statistical Inference Part 1 Now we will begin our discussion of hypothesis testing. This is a complex topic which we will be working with for the rest of
More informationConditional Probability, Hypothesis Testing, and the Monty Hall Problem
Conditional Probability, Hypothesis Testing, and the Monty Hall Problem Ernie Croot August 29, 2008 On more than one occasion I have heard the comment Probability does not exist in the real world, and
More informationLogical (formal) fallacies
Fallacies in academic writing Chad Nilep There are many possible sources of fallacy an idea that is mistakenly thought to be true, even though it may be untrue in academic writing. The phrase logical fallacy
More informationThe Debate Between Evolution and Intelligent Design Rick Garlikov
The Debate Between Evolution and Intelligent Design Rick Garlikov Handled intelligently and reasonably, the debate between evolution (the theory that life evolved by random mutation and natural selection)
More informationCHAPTER 17: UNCERTAINTY AND RANDOM: WHEN IS CONCLUSION JUSTIFIED?
CHAPTER 17: UNCERTAINTY AND RANDOM: WHEN IS CONCLUSION JUSTIFIED? INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS Deduction the use of facts to reach a conclusion seems straightforward and beyond reproach. The reality
More informationMcDougal Littell High School Math Program. correlated to. Oregon Mathematics Grade-Level Standards
Math Program correlated to Grade-Level ( in regular (non-capitalized) font are eligible for inclusion on Oregon Statewide Assessment) CCG: NUMBERS - Understand numbers, ways of representing numbers, relationships
More informationOutline. The argument from so many arguments. Framework. Royall s case. Ted Poston
Outline The argument from so many arguments Ted Poston poston@southalabama.edu University of South Alabama Plantinga Workshop Baylor University Nov 6-8, 2014 1 Measuring confirmation Framework Log likelihood
More informationTHE ROLE OF COHERENCE OF EVIDENCE IN THE NON- DYNAMIC MODEL OF CONFIRMATION TOMOJI SHOGENJI
Page 1 To appear in Erkenntnis THE ROLE OF COHERENCE OF EVIDENCE IN THE NON- DYNAMIC MODEL OF CONFIRMATION TOMOJI SHOGENJI ABSTRACT This paper examines the role of coherence of evidence in what I call
More information1. The focus of the course is on the theoretical and conceptual underpinnings of evolution by natural selection and genetic drift
L567 Evolution 2006 First meeting 1. The focus of the course is on the theoretical and conceptual underpinnings of evolution by natural selection and genetic drift 2. Exploration of the basic models in
More information2nd International Workshop on Argument for Agreement and Assurance (AAA 2015), Kanagawa Japan, November 2015
2nd International Workshop on Argument for Agreement and Assurance (AAA 2015), Kanagawa Japan, November 2015 On the Interpretation Of Assurance Case Arguments John Rushby Computer Science Laboratory SRI
More informationChapter 20 Testing Hypotheses for Proportions
Chapter 20 Testing Hypotheses for Proportions A hypothesis proposes a model for the world. Then we look at the data. If the data are consistent with that model, we have no reason to disbelieve the hypothesis.
More informationEVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY (L567), Fall Instructor: Curt Lively, JH 117B; Phone ;
EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY (L567), Fall 2015 Instructor: Curt Lively, JH 117B; Phone 5-1842; email (clively@indiana.edu). DATE TOPIC (lecture number on web) Aug. 25 Introduction, and some history (1) Aug. 29
More informationBayesian Probability
Bayesian Probability Patrick Maher September 4, 2008 ABSTRACT. Bayesian decision theory is here construed as explicating a particular concept of rational choice and Bayesian probability is taken to be
More informationUncommon Priors Require Origin Disputes
Uncommon Priors Require Origin Disputes Robin Hanson Department of Economics George Mason University July 2006, First Version June 2001 Abstract In standard belief models, priors are always common knowledge.
More informationLearning not to be Naïve: A comment on the exchange between Perrine/Wykstra and Draper 1 Lara Buchak, UC Berkeley
1 Learning not to be Naïve: A comment on the exchange between Perrine/Wykstra and Draper 1 Lara Buchak, UC Berkeley ABSTRACT: Does postulating skeptical theism undermine the claim that evil strongly confirms
More informationNICHOLAS J.J. SMITH. Let s begin with the storage hypothesis, which is introduced as follows: 1
DOUBTS ABOUT UNCERTAINTY WITHOUT ALL THE DOUBT NICHOLAS J.J. SMITH Norby s paper is divided into three main sections in which he introduces the storage hypothesis, gives reasons for rejecting it and then
More informationSins of the Epistemic Probabilist Exchanges with Peter Achinstein
Sins of the Epistemic Probabilist Exchanges with Peter Achinstein Deborah G. Mayo 1 Achinstein s Sins As Achinstein notes, he and I agree on several key requirements for an adequate account of evidence:
More informationLecture 9. A summary of scientific methods Realism and Anti-realism
Lecture 9 A summary of scientific methods Realism and Anti-realism A summary of scientific methods and attitudes What is a scientific approach? This question can be answered in a lot of different ways.
More informationIntroductory Statistics Day 25. Paired Means Test
Introductory Statistics Day 25 Paired Means Test 4.4 Paired Tests Find the data set textbooks.xlsx on the Moodle page. This data set is from OpenIntro Stats. In this data set we have 73 textbooks that
More informationHPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Revision Guide (all topics)
HPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Revision Guide (all topics) General Questions What is the distinction between a descriptive and a normative project in the philosophy of science? What are the virtues of this or that
More information6.041SC Probabilistic Systems Analysis and Applied Probability, Fall 2013 Transcript Lecture 3
6.041SC Probabilistic Systems Analysis and Applied Probability, Fall 2013 Transcript Lecture 3 The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare
More informationInductive inference is. Rules of Detachment? A Little Survey of Induction
HPS 1702 Junior/Senior Seminar for HPS Majors HPS 1703 Writing Workshop for HPS Majors A Little Survey of Inductive inference is (Overwhelming Majority view) Ampliative inference Evidence lends support
More informationStatistics, Politics, and Policy
Statistics, Politics, and Policy Volume 3, Issue 1 2012 Article 5 Comment on Why and When 'Flawed' Social Network Analyses Still Yield Valid Tests of no Contagion Cosma Rohilla Shalizi, Carnegie Mellon
More informationStatistical Inference Without Frequentist Justifications
Statistical Inference Without Frequentist Justifications Jan Sprenger November 29, 2008 Abstract Statistical inference is often justified by long-run properties of the sampling distributions, such as the
More informationA Quick Review of the Scientific Method Transcript
Screen 1: Marketing Research is based on the Scientific Method. A quick review of the Scientific Method, therefore, is in order. Text based slide. Time Code: 0:00 A Quick Review of the Scientific Method
More informationI thought I should expand this population approach somewhat: P t = P0e is the equation which describes population growth.
I thought I should expand this population approach somewhat: P t = P0e is the equation which describes population growth. To head off the most common objections:! This does take into account the death
More informationMISSOURI S FRAMEWORK FOR CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT IN MATH TOPIC I: PROBLEM SOLVING
Prentice Hall Mathematics:,, 2004 Missouri s Framework for Curricular Development in Mathematics (Grades 9-12) TOPIC I: PROBLEM SOLVING 1. Problem-solving strategies such as organizing data, drawing a
More informationNow you know what a hypothesis is, and you also know that daddy-long-legs are not poisonous.
Objectives: Be able to explain the basic process of scientific inquiry. Be able to explain the power and limitations of scientific inquiry. Be able to distinguish a robust hypothesis from a weak or untestable
More informationPHLA10 Reason and Truth Exercise 1
Y e P a g e 1 Exercise 1 Pg. 17 1. When is an idea or statement valid? (trick question) A statement or an idea cannot be valid; they can only be true or false. Being valid or invalid are properties of
More informationThe argument from so many arguments
The argument from so many arguments Ted Poston May 6, 2015 There probably is a God. Many things are easier to explain if there is than if there isn t. John Von Neumann My goal in this paper is to offer
More information11 Beware of Syllogism: Statistical Reasoning and Conjecturing According to Peirce
isaac levi 11 Beware of Syllogism: Statistical Reasoning and Conjecturing According to Peirce 1. probable deduction Peirce wrote extensively on deduction, induction, and hypothesis beginning with the Harvard
More informationCausation and Free Will
Causation and Free Will T L Hurst Revised: 17th August 2011 Abstract This paper looks at the main philosophic positions on free will. It suggests that the arguments for causal determinism being compatible
More informationPOLS 205 Political Science as a Social Science. Making Inferences from Samples
POLS 205 Political Science as a Social Science Making Inferences from Samples Christopher Adolph University of Washington, Seattle May 10, 2010 Chris Adolph (UW) Making Inferences from Samples May 10,
More informationScientific Realism and Empiricism
Philosophy 164/264 December 3, 2001 1 Scientific Realism and Empiricism Administrative: All papers due December 18th (at the latest). I will be available all this week and all next week... Scientific Realism
More informationIntroduction to Statistical Hypothesis Testing Prof. Arun K Tangirala Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Introduction to Statistical Hypothesis Testing Prof. Arun K Tangirala Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture 09 Basics of Hypothesis Testing Hello friends, welcome
More informationProject: The Power of a Hypothesis Test
Project: The Power of a Hypothesis Test Let s revisit the basics of hypothesis testing for a bit here, shall we? Any hypothesis test contains two mutually exclusive hypotheses, H 0 and H 1 (AKA, H A ).
More informationModule - 02 Lecturer - 09 Inferential Statistics - Motivation
Introduction to Data Analytics Prof. Nandan Sudarsanam and Prof. B. Ravindran Department of Management Studies and Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
More informationReasoning about the future: Doom and Beauty
Synthese (2007) 156:427 439 DOI 10.1007/s11229-006-9132-y ORIGINAL PAPER Reasoning about the future: Doom and Beauty Dennis Dieks Published online: 12 April 2007 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007
More informationELLIOTT SOBER, Evidence and Evolution: The Logic behind the Science. Cambridge:
Critical Notice ELLIOTT SOBER, Evidence and Evolution: The Logic behind the Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. INGO BRIGANDT Department of Philosophy University of Alberta Edmonton,
More informationThe Problem of Induction. Knowledge beyond experience?
The Problem of Induction Knowledge beyond experience? Huygens method One finds in this subject a kind of demonstration which does not carry with it so high a degree of certainty as that employed in geometry;
More informationHIGH CONFIRMATION AND INDUCTIVE VALIDITY
STUDIES IN LOGIC, GRAMMAR AND RHETORIC 46(59) 2016 DOI: 10.1515/slgr-2016-0036 Universidade Nova de Lisboa HIGH CONFIRMATION AND INDUCTIVE VALIDITY Abstract. Does a high degree of confirmation make an
More informationThe Birthday Problem
The Birthday Problem In 1939, a mathematician named Richard von Mises proposed what we call today the birthday problem. He asked: How many people must be in a room before the probability that two share
More informationA Statistical Scientist Meets a Philosopher of Science: A Conversation between Sir David Cox and Deborah Mayo (as recorded, June, 2011)
RMM Vol. 2, 2011, 103 114 Special Topic: Statistical Science and Philosophy of Science Edited by Deborah G. Mayo, Aris Spanos and Kent W. Staley http://www.rmm-journal.de/ Sir David Cox and Deborah Mayo
More informationJudgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial
Name Period Assignment# Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hzzgxnyl5i 1) What is the main claim of Intelligent Design advocates? 2) Kevin Padian claims that Intelligent
More informationTime is limited. Define your terms. Give short and conventional definitions. Use reputable sources.
FIVE MINUTES WITH A DARWINIST: EXPOSING THE FLUFF IN EVOLUTION Approaching the Evolutionist Without religious books Without revelation Without faith F.L.U.F.F. Evolution is more air than substance. Focus
More informationExperimental Design. Introduction
Ecologists generally, and marine biologists in particular, do not spend sufficient time, at least according to the available literature, in introspection about the nature of the science that they do Underwood
More informationA Fine Tuned Universe The Improbability That God is Improbable
A Fine Tuned Universe The Improbability That God is Improbable The debate over creation in biology has increasingly led scientist to become more open to physics and the Christian belief in a creator. It
More informationGrade 6 correlated to Illinois Learning Standards for Mathematics
STATE Goal 6: Demonstrate and apply a knowledge and sense of numbers, including numeration and operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division), patterns, ratios and proportions. A. Demonstrate
More information145 Philosophy of Science
Scientific realism Christian Wüthrich http://philosophy.ucsd.edu/faculty/wuthrich/ 145 Philosophy of Science A statement of scientific realism Characterization (Scientific realism) Science aims to give
More informationPhilosophy Epistemology Topic 5 The Justification of Induction 1. Hume s Skeptical Challenge to Induction
Philosophy 5340 - Epistemology Topic 5 The Justification of Induction 1. Hume s Skeptical Challenge to Induction In the section entitled Sceptical Doubts Concerning the Operations of the Understanding
More informationExplanationist Aid for the Theory of Inductive Logic
Explanationist Aid for the Theory of Inductive Logic A central problem facing a probabilistic approach to the problem of induction is the difficulty of sufficiently constraining prior probabilities so
More informationPHIL / PSYC 351. Thinking and Reasoning
PHIL / PSYC 351 Thinking and Reasoning The Instructors My name is Jonathan Livengood. I am an assistant professor of philosophy. My primary area of specialization is philosophy of science. Jonathan Livengood
More informationSix Sigma Prof. Dr. T. P. Bagchi Department of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
Six Sigma Prof. Dr. T. P. Bagchi Department of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Lecture No. #05 Review of Probability and Statistics I Good afternoon, it is Tapan Bagchi again. I have
More informationPhil 1103 Review. Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science?
Phil 1103 Review Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science? 1. Copernican Revolution Students should be familiar with the basic historical facts of the Copernican revolution.
More informationEstablishing premises
Establishing premises This is hard, subtle, and crucial to good arguments. Various kinds of considerations are used to establish the truth (high justification) of premises Deduction Done Analogy Induction
More informationModule 02 Lecture - 10 Inferential Statistics Single Sample Tests
Introduction to Data Analytics Prof. Nandan Sudarsanam and Prof. B. Ravindran Department of Management Studies and Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
More informationPhilosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Science Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationThis report is organized in four sections. The first section discusses the sample design. The next
2 This report is organized in four sections. The first section discusses the sample design. The next section describes data collection and fielding. The final two sections address weighting procedures
More informationA Layperson s Guide to Hypothesis Testing By Michael Reames and Gabriel Kemeny ProcessGPS
A Layperson s Guide to Hypothesis Testing By Michael Reames and Gabriel Kemeny ProcessGPS In a recent Black Belt Class, the partners of ProcessGPS had a lively discussion about the topic of hypothesis
More informationDoubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. Voltaire
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. Voltaire James G. Scott Statistical Modeling: AGentle Introduction Copyright 2010 12 James G. Scott www.mccombs.utexas.edu/faculty/james.scott
More informationChapter 1. Introduction
Chapter 1 Introduction My earlier book on philosophy of probability, [Burdzy (2009)], was focused on finding the best scientific formulation of the foundations of probability. This book presents much of
More informationBeyond Intelligent Design
Beyond Intelligent Design A sermon preached at Niles Congregational United Church of Christ on Sunday, February 12, 2006, by the Rev. Jeffrey Spencer. Scripture: Mark 1:40-45 Copyright 2006, Jeffrey Spencer
More informationProbability Distributions TEACHER NOTES MATH NSPIRED
Math Objectives Students will compare the distribution of a discrete sample space to distributions of randomly selected outcomes from that sample space. Students will identify the structure that emerges
More informationCertainty, probability and abduction: why we should look to C.S. Peirce rather than GoÈ del for a theory of clinical reasoning
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 3, 3, 201±206 Certainty, probability and abduction: why we should look to C.S. Peirce rather than GoÈ del for a theory of clinical reasoning Ross Upshur BA(Hons)
More informationThe Answer from Science
Similarities among Diverse Forms Diversity among Similar Forms Biology s Greatest Puzzle: The Paradox and Diversity and Similarity Why is life on Earth so incredibly diverse yet so strangely similar? The
More informationECE 5424: Introduction to Machine Learning
ECE 5424: Introduction to Machine Learning Topics: (Finish) Model selection Error decomposition Bias-Variance Tradeoff Classification: Naïve Bayes Readings: Barber 17.1, 17.2, 10.1-10.3 Stefan Lee Virginia
More informationWhy is life on Earth so incredibly diverse yet so strangely similar? Similarities among Diverse Forms. Diversity among Similar Forms
Similarities among Diverse Forms Diversity among Similar Forms Biology s Greatest Puzzle: The Paradox and Diversity and Similarity Why is life on Earth so incredibly diverse yet so strangely similar? 1
More informationBoxes and envelopes. 1. If the older child is a girl. What is the probability that both children are girls?
Boxes and envelopes Please answer all questions in complete sentences. Consider the following set-up. Mr. Jones has two children. For these questions, assume that a child must be either a girl or a boy,
More informationMain idea The most important part of a love relationship is that we honestly reveal who we are, what we are thinking, and what we are feeling.
LOVE STORY PSALM 19 Main idea The most important part of a love relationship is that we honestly reveal who we are, what we are thinking, and what we are feeling. I. GOD REVEALS HIMSELF TO US IN CREATION
More informationPHIL 155: The Scientific Method, Part 1: Naïve Inductivism. January 14, 2013
PHIL 155: The Scientific Method, Part 1: Naïve Inductivism January 14, 2013 Outline 1 Science in Action: An Example 2 Naïve Inductivism 3 Hempel s Model of Scientific Investigation Semmelweis Investigations
More informationShould it be allowed to win Jeopardy?
Computing & the universe Imagine a powerful computer that behaves like a human Is it conscious? Should it be allowed to win Jeopardy? 1 Imagine a computer simulating a universe Could it be our universe?
More informationBayesian Probability
Bayesian Probability Patrick Maher University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign November 24, 2007 ABSTRACT. Bayesian probability here means the concept of probability used in Bayesian decision theory. It
More informationScientific Dimensions of the Debate. 1. Natural and Artificial Selection: the Analogy (17-20)
I. Johnson s Darwin on Trial A. The Legal Setting (Ch. 1) Scientific Dimensions of the Debate This is mainly an introduction to the work as a whole. Note, in particular, Johnson s claim that a fact of
More informationEvidential Support and Instrumental Rationality
Evidential Support and Instrumental Rationality Peter Brössel, Anna-Maria A. Eder, and Franz Huber Formal Epistemology Research Group Zukunftskolleg and Department of Philosophy University of Konstanz
More informationAgainst Coherence: Truth, Probability, and Justification. Erik J. Olsson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Pp. xiii, 232.
Against Coherence: Page 1 To appear in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Against Coherence: Truth, Probability, and Justification. Erik J. Olsson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. Pp. xiii,
More informationA Warning about So-Called Rationalists
A Warning about So-Called Rationalists Mark F. Sharlow Have you ever heard of rationalism and rationalists? If so, have you wondered what these words mean? A rationalist is someone who believes that reason
More informationJeffrey, Richard, Subjective Probability: The Real Thing, Cambridge University Press, 2004, 140 pp, $21.99 (pbk), ISBN
Jeffrey, Richard, Subjective Probability: The Real Thing, Cambridge University Press, 2004, 140 pp, $21.99 (pbk), ISBN 0521536685. Reviewed by: Branden Fitelson University of California Berkeley Richard
More informationScientific Method and Research Ethics Questions, Answers, and Evidence. Dr. C. D. McCoy
Scientific Method and Research Ethics 17.09 Questions, Answers, and Evidence Dr. C. D. McCoy Plan for Part 1: Deduction 1. Logic, Arguments, and Inference 1. Questions and Answers 2. Truth, Validity, and
More informationTHE TENDENCY TO CERTAINTY IN RELIGIOUS BELIEF.
THE TENDENCY TO CERTAINTY IN RELIGIOUS BELIEF. BY ROBERT H. THOULESS. (From the Department of Psychology, Glasgow University.) First published in British Journal of Psychology, XXVI, pp. 16-31, 1935. I.
More informationFLAME TEEN HANDOUT Week 18 Religion and Science
FLAME TEEN HANDOUT Week 18 Religion and Science What you believe How do you define religion? What is religion to you? How do you define science? What have you heard about religion and science? Do you think
More informationContent Area Variations of Academic Language
Academic Expressions for Interpreting in Language Arts 1. It really means because 2. The is a metaphor for 3. It wasn t literal; that s the author s way of describing how 4. The author was trying to teach
More informationChapter 2 Science as a Way of Knowing: Critical Thinking about the Environment
Chapter 2 Science as a Way of Knowing: Critical Thinking about the Environment Understanding What Science Is Scientific understanding of life and its environment is based on scientific method. Science
More informationTHE HYPOTHETICAL-DEDUCTIVE METHOD OR THE INFERENCE TO THE BEST EXPLANATION: THE CASE OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION BY NATURAL SELECTION
THE HYPOTHETICAL-DEDUCTIVE METHOD OR THE INFERENCE TO THE BEST EXPLANATION: THE CASE OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION BY NATURAL SELECTION JUAN ERNESTO CALDERON ABSTRACT. Critical rationalism sustains that the
More informationHindu Paradigm of Evolution
lefkz Hkkjr Hindu Paradigm of Evolution Author Anil Chawla Creation of the universe by God is supposed to be the foundation of all Abrahmic religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam). As per the theory
More informationCh01. Knowledge. What does it mean to know something? and how can science help us know things? version 1.5
Ch01 Knowledge What does it mean to know something? and how can science help us know things? version 1.5 Nick DeMello, PhD. 2007-2016 Ch01 Knowledge Knowledge Imagination Truth & Belief Justification Science
More informationMLLunsford, Spring Activity: Conditional Probability and The Law of Total Probability
MLLunsford, Spring 2003 1 Activity: Conditional Probability and The Law of Total Probability Concepts: Conditional Probability, Independent Events, the Multiplication Rule, the Law of Total Probability
More informationIIE-2015 Workshop December 12 20, K P Mohanan. Types of Reasoning
K P Mohanan Types of Reasoning As mentioned elsewhere (in other documents distributed as part of IIE-2015), what is presented to students as knowledge in school and college textbooks and classrooms is
More informationRevista Economică 66:3 (2014) THE USE OF INDUCTIVE, DEDUCTIVE OR ABDUCTIVE RESONING IN ECONOMICS
THE USE OF INDUCTIVE, DEDUCTIVE OR ABDUCTIVE RESONING IN ECONOMICS MOROŞAN Adrian 1 Lucian Blaga University, Sibiu, Romania Abstract Although we think that, regardless of the type of reasoning used in
More informationLars Johan Erkell. Intelligent Design
1346 Lars Johan Erkell Department of Zoology University of Gothenburg Box 463, SE-405 30 Göteborg, Sweden Intelligent Design The theory that doesn t exist For a long time, biologists have had the theory
More informationLesson 09 Notes. Machine Learning. Intro
Machine Learning Lesson 09 Notes Intro C: Hi Michael. M: Hey how's it going? C: So I want to talk about something today Michael. I want to talk about Bayesian Learning, and I've been inspired by our last
More informationFalsification or Confirmation: From Logic to Psychology
Falsification or Confirmation: From Logic to Psychology Roman Lukyanenko Information Systems Department Florida international University rlukyane@fiu.edu Abstract Corroboration or Confirmation is a prominent
More information