Reid Against Skepticism
|
|
- Marybeth Bailey
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Thus we see, that Descartes and Locke take the road that leads to skepticism without knowing the end of it, but they stop short for want of light to carry them farther. Berkeley, frightened at the appearance of the dreadful abyss, starts aside and avoids it. But the author of the Treatise of Human Nature, more daring and intrepid, without turning aside to the right hand or to the left, like Virgil's Alecto, shoots directly into the gulf Reid Against Skepticism 1. The Skeptical Project: Reid sketches the progression of the skeptical project of the modern era, from Descartes to Hume (a contemporary of Reid). Briefly: Descartes introduces the Method of Doubt, finds that he is certain of nothing except his own existence. Yet, ultimately, Descartes concluded that we could still know that objects exist as we perceive them (via his proof of God s existence). Locke distinguishes between primary and secondary qualities, and argues that the sensations of secondary qualities do not resemble anything in the objects, and exist only in our minds. Yet, bodies still have primary qualities as we perceive them. Berkeley, using Locke s arguments, concludes that the sensations of PRIMARY qualities ALSO do not resemble anything in the objects themselves, and exist only in minds. So, material bodies are reduced to an unintelligible nothingness. Yet, Berkeley did not even think to question the existence of other immaterial beings (God, and other minds). Further, by invoking God, he concluded that we could still be confident in the regularity and continued existence of things in the world. Hume accepts all of the above, but undermines also the concepts of causation and laws of nature, as well as the proofs for God s existence. He doubts other minds He even doubts the persistence of his OWN mind over time, saying that perhaps he is nothing more than a bundle of sensations! This is full-blown skepticism. Yet, Hume admits that he does not live it; rather, he must ignore it all in his daily life. Metaphysical Lunacy: This path toward complete skepticism is a necessary result of the Cartesian system, Reid says. Modern philosophy has led us into metaphysical lunacy. If this is wisdom, let me be deluded with the vulgar! 2. Matter as a First Principle: So, what went wrong? Two things. Let s look at the first. The First Principle of Modern Philosophy: First, note that there is one tenet that was NOT questioned by the modern philosophers: That our thoughts, our sensations, and everything of which we are conscious, have a real existence, is admitted in this system as a first principle, but everything else must be made evident by the light of reason. From Descartes to Hume, no one ever doubted their APPEARANCES the inner, mental world of impressions. But, why stop there? Can t we call even those into doubt? No, says the skeptic. Why not? Because they cannot help it. You see, EVERY system has to take 1
2 SOMETHING as a given. There must be SOME starting point. (For instance, NONE of these philosophers ever thought to question the law of non-contradiction; i.e., the axiom which says that any assertion of the form <P and Not-P> cannot possibly be true.) All reasoning must be from first principles. And for first principles no other reason can be given but this: That, by the constitution of our nature, we are under a necessity of assenting to them. Reason can neither make nor destroy them, nor can it do anything without them. A mathematician cannot prove the truth of his axioms, nor can he prove anything, unless he takes them for granted. A historian or a witness can prove nothing unless it is taken for granted that the memory and senses may be trusted. A natural philosopher [which, during Reid s time, included philosophy AND science] can prove nothing unless it is taken for granted that the course of nature is steady and uniform. Note that we choose our first principles based on a NECESSITY. Certain assumptions about reality impose themselves on our minds, and we cannot proceed without them! First Principles of Common Sense: But, says Reid, belief in the external, material world is just as unavoidable and necessary as our belief in our conscious experiences. On Reid s view, the very nature of sensation includes with it a judgment or belief in the real, external existence of the thing being perceived. He writes, every operation of the senses, in its very nature, implies judgment or belief, as well as simple apprehension. When I perceive a tree before me, my faculty of seeing gives me not only a notion or simple apprehension of the tree, but a belief of its existence, and of its figure, distance, and magnitude; and this judgment or belief is included in the very nature of the perception. Belief in the existence of external things is not something we DEDUCE from our experiences. It is not as if we are inside of our heads examining mere images or representations, and then say to ourselves, A-ha! These images must be images of THINGS that are really OUT THERE! No. Rather, belief in the existence of external objects is just a given a part of the very nature of what it is to have sensations. For instance, if I experience a pain in my toe, I am not MERELY experiencing bare ideas; i.e., as if I am having a mere pain-seeming and a mere toe-seeming. Rather, these sensations point BEYOND themselves to the actual EXISTENCE of a toe, and are NECESSARILY accompanied by a BELIEF in the toe s existence. This belief isn t arrived at via reason. Rather, it is a natural and irresistible accompaniment of perception. In short, the existence of an external world should be included among our first principles. 2
3 How or when I got such first principles upon which I build all my reasoning, I know not, for I had them before I can remember. But I am sure they are parts of my constitution, and that I cannot throw them off. That our thoughts and sensations must have a subject, which we call our self, is not therefore an opinion got by reasoning, but a natural principle. That our sensations of touch indicate something external, extended, figured, hard or soft, is not a deduction of reason, but a natural principle. The belief of it, and the very conception of it, are equally parts of our constitution. If we are deceived in it, we are deceived by him that made us, and there is no remedy. The Role of Reason: When we pursue knowledge and reason, the end-goal is not to tear down all that we thought we knew by doubting even the seemingly most firm of presuppositions. Rather, the role of reason is to RECONCILE and MAKE SENSE of those things which are, by necessity of our very nature, immediately most obvious and apparent to us! As belief in an external world is among those things whose acceptance are necessitated by our very nature, we should do our best to reconcile reason to it: it is better since we cannot get rid of the vulgar notion and belief of an external world, to reconcile our reason to it as well as we can. In short, in order to reconcile philosophy with our unavoidable common sense notions, we must take the existence of the external world as a GIVEN. It must be one of our STARTING principles not something to be proven. (Consider also that the modern system was a movement to REPLACE the Medieval system, which was seen as absurd. Material objects mysteriously impressed themselves upon our minds, making our minds literally take on the exact FORM of those objects, as happens when a seal is pressed upon hot wax. But, is that really MORE absurd than a system which rejects the existence of material objects!?) 3. Direct Realism: Reid is arguing in favor of common sense. The universal assumption of everyone other than the skeptical philosophers is that, when we have sensations, we are directly sensing THINGS out there in the world. The skeptics claimed instead that what we directly perceive are merely some mental IMAGES or REPRESENTATIONS of things but never the things themselves. Reid says that the skeptics have taken this Representationalist Theory of Perception (or, as he calls it, the Ideal System ) as a given, such that anyone who believes otherwise must produce their proof. But, Reid believes that he has shifted the burden of proof back onto the Representationalist. How in the heck does it make MORE sense to say that what we directly perceive are mere IMAGES of things rather than THINGS? 3
4 [Note: Though Reid doesn t quite put his finger on it, he may have some inkling of the following worry: It almost seems as if the Representationalist is saying that there are little images inside of my head, and that *I* am the thing who LOOKS AT those images. Like this: But, then, how do I perceive those images? Won t I somehow have to observe them? (e.g., with some sensory faculty?) If so, then isn t it really the case that I don t perceive the images directly, but rather some IMAGES OF those images? But, wait Then, etc. And we re off on an infinite regress. Like this: Long story short, it s not obvious that a Representational account of perception is any clearer than an account which states that we observe objects DIRECTLY.] Descartes and those after made one huge mistake: The error I mean is that we can know nothing about body or its qualities but as far as we have sensations which resemble those qualities. Reid protests: to my apprehension, I immediately perceive external objects ; that is, we DIRECTLY perceive objects, UNmediated by the senses. 4
5 Against the Table Argument: Recall that both Hume and Berkeley argued that, because the sensation of the size and shape of a table change in the observer, while the actual size and shape of the table are supposed to be things that do NOT change, it must be that size and shape are only ideas in the mind too (just like secondary qualities). To Reid s mind, this was supposed to be the best evidence against the view that we directly perceive objects, immediately. Reply: Imagine that there really IS a table out there, and we DO directly perceive it. What would we EXPECT our perception of it to be like? Reid says, Tell me the REAL, objective size and shape of the table. Then give me some location outside of that table. With this information, we can calculate with certainty the exact apparent size and shape of the table which any observer in that location would perceive! Asks Reid: Is not this a strong argument that it is the real table you see? The apparent magnitude of the table changes depending on the observer s location, sure. But, given how geometry works, what else would you EXPECT to happen!? [Reid s Thought Experiment: Reid thinks that we come to know that there are external objects by perceiving their primary qualities. But, we seem to perceive them in a very mysterious way neither by sensation NOR reflection. Consider: The Blind Man: Imagine a blind man who begins as a blank slate. We give him various sensations ONLY of touch: e.g., we prick him with a needle; then press something against his skin; then drag an object slowly across his skin; and so on. Would such a person acquire the ideas of extension or motion? Reid thinks not. Such experiments may give a certain succession of feelings as the colic may do but no feelings nor any combination of feelings can ever resemble space or motion. (Reid s focus on touch here is no coincidence. Think about it: Taste, smell, and hearing are ONLY ever the perception of secondary qualities. Sight and touch are the only means by which one can perceive primary qualities; i.e., that there IS in fact an external, extended, solid thing in the world. But, clearly, blind people still come to know about the sizes, shapes, and motions of external objects. So, sight isn t REQUIRED. Thus, a blind person has only ONE inlet through which they might perceive primary qualities namely, touch. By focusing on such a case, Reid hopes to gain a better understanding of how this happens.) So, we have these ideas of primary qualities like size, shape, and motion. Those before Reid all held that ALL of our ideas were ultimately just sensory experiences (or else experiences of mental operations like doubting, believing, etc.). But, Reid believes that he has just shown that the ideas of size, shape, and motion are NOT identical to or 5
6 reducible to any sensory experience. Neither do they seem to be obtainable by inward reflection. Yet, we have them! (But, recall, sensation and reflection were supposed to be the ONLY two ways in which we can acquire ideas!) So, where in the heck did they come from? Reid thinks that experience must, in some cases, directly access things themselves so that we have experiences of qualities that are not themselves identical to any sensation. (Recall that, above, he said that external objects just sort of assert themselves, by their very nature imposing a belief in their external existence; and also imposing ideas of primary qualities like size, shape, and motion upon us.) Reid believes himself to have refuted those before him: Extension, figure, motion If any one of them can be shown to be an idea of sensation, or to have the least resemblance to any sensation, I lay my hand upon my mouth, and give up all pretense to reconcile reason to common sense in this matter, and must suffer the ideal skepticism to triumph. But if, on the other hand, they are not ideas of sensation, nor like to any sensation, then the ideal system is a rope of sand, and all the labored arguments of the skeptical philosophy against a material world and against the existence of everything but impressions and ideas proceed upon a false hypothesis. Reid concludes: Our conceptions of extension, shape and motion are not ideas of sensation or of reflection, so the mere fact that they exist overturns the whole ideal system by which the material world has been tried and condemned. The conception of extension, motion and the other attributes of matter can t be the effect of error or prejudice; it must be the work of nature. And the power or faculty through which we acquire those conceptions must be something other than any power of the human mind that has been explained by philosophers up to now, because it isn t sensation and isn t reflection. ] Conclusion: Reid thinks he has demonstrated that we DO in fact perceive external objects DIRECTLY (for, something external imposes ideas of primary qualities as well as belief in external objects upon us). This view is called Direct Realism. Contrast this with Descartes and Locke, who were Realists that is, they DID believe in the existence of external objects but they believed that we never perceive those objects directly. (Rather, we only ever perceive the ideas that they cause in us.) This is Indirect Realism. Then there is Berkeley s view. Berkeley REJECTS the existence of external objects, so he is not a realist. Rather, his view is Idealism, or the view that all that external objects are merely ideas. These ideas (and the minds that perceive them) are all that exist. Next time, we will examine Immanuel Kant s view, who in a way marries all three of these views together into Empirical Realism / Transcendental Idealism. 6
Direct Realism from Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense by Thomas Reid (1764)
Direct Realism from Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense by Thomas Reid (1764) PART I INTRODUCTION SECTION VII THE SYSTEM OF ALL THESE AUTHORS IS THE SAME, AND LEADS TO SKEPTICISM
More informationThomas Reid, An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense (1764)
7 Thomas Reid, An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense (1764) It is fair to say that Thomas Reid's philosophy took its starting point from that of David Hume, whom he knew and
More informationThe British Empiricism
The British Empiricism Locke, Berkeley and Hume copyleft: nicolazuin.2018 nowxhere.wordpress.com The terrible heritage of Descartes: Skepticism, Empiricism, Rationalism The problem originates from the
More informationIntro to Philosophy. Review for Exam 2
Intro to Philosophy Review for Exam 2 Epistemology Theory of Knowledge What is knowledge? What is the structure of knowledge? What particular things can I know? What particular things do I know? Do I know
More informationThomas Reid on ideas and our knowledge of the external world
Thomas Reid on ideas and our knowledge of the external world inquiry into the human mind and the principles of commonsense, chapter 5, sections 7 and 8 Prof. Mark Steen Phil 112 Spring 2013 Commonsense
More informationBerkeley, Three dialogues between Hylas and Philonous focus on p. 86 (chapter 9) to the end (p. 93).
TOPIC: Lecture 7.2 Berkeley Lecture Berkeley will discuss why we only have access to our sense-data, rather than the real world. He will then explain why we can trust our senses. He gives an argument for
More information1/8. Descartes 3: Proofs of the Existence of God
1/8 Descartes 3: Proofs of the Existence of God Descartes opens the Third Meditation by reminding himself that nothing that is purely sensory is reliable. The one thing that is certain is the cogito. He
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 7c The World
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 7c The World Idealism Despite the power of Berkeley s critique, his resulting metaphysical view is highly problematic. Essentially, Berkeley concludes that there is no
More information1/8. Reid on Common Sense
1/8 Reid on Common Sense Thomas Reid s work An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense is self-consciously written in opposition to a lot of the principles that animated early modern
More informationMind s Eye Idea Object
Do the ideas in our mind resemble the qualities in the objects that caused these ideas in our minds? Mind s Eye Idea Object Does this resemble this? In Locke s Terms Even if we accept that the ideas in
More informationOf Skepticism with Regard to the Senses. David Hume
Of Skepticism with Regard to the Senses David Hume General Points about Hume's Project The rationalist method used by Descartes cannot provide justification for any substantial, interesting claims about
More informationGREAT PHILOSOPHERS: Thomas Reid ( ) Peter West 25/09/18
GREAT PHILOSOPHERS: Thomas Reid (1710-1796) Peter West 25/09/18 Some context Aristotle (384-322 BCE) Lucretius (c. 99-55 BCE) Thomas Reid (1710-1796 AD) 400 BCE 0 Much of (Western) scholastic philosophy
More informationJohn Locke. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
John Locke An Essay Concerning Human Understanding From Rationalism to Empiricism Empiricism vs. Rationalism Empiricism: All knowledge ultimately rests upon sense experience. All justification (our reasons
More informationChapter 16 George Berkeley s Immaterialism and Subjective Idealism
Chapter 16 George Berkeley s Immaterialism and Subjective Idealism Key Words Immaterialism, esse est percipi, material substance, sense data, skepticism, primary quality, secondary quality, substratum
More informationAn Inquiry into the Human Mind
An Inquiry into the Human Mind Thomas Reid Copyright Jonathan Bennett 2017. All rights reserved [Brackets] enclose editorial explanations. Small dots enclose material that has been added, but can be read
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 7b The World
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 7b The World Kant s metaphysics rested on identifying a kind of truth that Hume and other did not acknowledge. It is called A. synthetic a priori B. analytic a priori C.
More informationHume on Ideas, Impressions, and Knowledge
Hume on Ideas, Impressions, and Knowledge in class. Let my try one more time to make clear the ideas we discussed today Ideas and Impressions First off, Hume, like Descartes, Locke, and Berkeley, believes
More informationEpistemology. Diogenes: Master Cynic. The Ancient Greek Skeptics 4/6/2011. But is it really possible to claim knowledge of anything?
Epistemology a branch of philosophy that investigates the origin, nature, methods, and limits of human knowledge (Dictionary.com v 1.1). Epistemology attempts to answer the question how do we know what
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2017
Introduction to Philosophy PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2017 Beginnings of Philosophy: Overview of Course (1) The Origins of Philosophy and Relativism Knowledge Are you a self? Ethics: What is
More informationLecture 7.1 Berkeley I
TOPIC: Lecture 7.1 Berkeley I Introduction to the Representational view of the mind. Berkeley s Argument from Illusion. KEY TERMS/ GOALS: Idealism. Naive realism. Representations. Berkeley s Argument from
More informationKant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge
Kant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge Statements involving necessity or strict universality could never be known on the basis of sense experience, and are thus known (if known at all) a priori.
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T AGENDA 1. Review of Epistemology 2. Kant Kant s Compromise Kant s Copernican Revolution 3. The Nature of Truth REVIEW: THREE
More informationGeorge Berkeley. The Principles of Human Knowledge. Review
George Berkeley The Principles of Human Knowledge Review To be is to be perceived Obvious to the Mind all those bodies which compose the earth have no subsistence without a mind, their being is to be perceived
More informationIntroductory Kant Seminar Lecture
Introductory Kant Seminar Lecture Intentionality It is not unusual to begin a discussion of Kant with a brief review of some history of philosophy. What is perhaps less usual is to start with a review
More informationBy submitting this essay, I attest that it is my own work, completed in accordance with University regulations. Minh Alexander Nguyen
DRST 004: Directed Studies Philosophy Professor Matthew Noah Smith By submitting this essay, I attest that it is my own work, completed in accordance with University regulations. Minh Alexander Nguyen
More informationProjection in Hume. P J E Kail. St. Peter s College, Oxford.
Projection in Hume P J E Kail St. Peter s College, Oxford Peter.kail@spc.ox.ac.uk A while ago now (2007) I published my Projection and Realism in Hume s Philosophy (Oxford University Press henceforth abbreviated
More informationJohn Locke on Perception (1690)
John Locke on Perception (1690) 1. Primary vs. Secondary Qualities: Let s consider the properties of material objects: Ideas: Locke uses the term idea as the general label for all objects of consciousness.
More informationNotes on Hume and Kant
Notes on Hume and Kant Daniel Bonevac, The University of Texas at Austin 1 Hume on Identity Hume, an empiricist, asks the question that his philosophical stance demands: nor have we any idea of self, after
More informationImportant dates. PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since David Hume ( )
PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since 1600 Dr. Peter Assmann Spring 2018 Important dates Feb 14 Term paper draft due Upload paper to E-Learning https://elearning.utdallas.edu
More informationCommon sense dictates that we can know external reality exists and that it is generally correctly perceived via our five senses
Common sense dictates that we can know external reality exists and that it is generally correctly perceived via our five senses Mind Mind Body Mind Body [According to this view] the union [of body and
More informationdoes. All reality is mental, consisting only of minds and their ideas. Ideas are passive, whereas minds are active. Every idea needs a mind to be in.
Berkeley s Idealism Idealism Matter doesn t exist, but the external world still does. All reality is mental, consisting only of minds and their ideas. Ideas are passive, whereas minds are active. Every
More informationCritique of Cosmological Argument
David Hume: Critique of Cosmological Argument Critique of Cosmological Argument DAVID HUME (1711-1776) David Hume is one of the most important philosophers in the history of philosophy. Born in Edinburgh,
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 14 Lecture - 14 John Locke The empiricism of John
More informationAugustine, On Free Choice of the Will,
Augustine, On Free Choice of the Will, 2.3-2.15 (or, How the existence of Truth entails that God exists) Introduction: In this chapter, Augustine and Evodius begin with three questions: (1) How is it manifest
More information1/10. The Fourth Paralogism and the Refutation of Idealism
1/10 The Fourth Paralogism and the Refutation of Idealism The Fourth Paralogism is quite different from the three that preceded it because, although it is treated as a part of rational psychology, it main
More informationRealism and its competitors. Scepticism, idealism, phenomenalism
Realism and its competitors Scepticism, idealism, phenomenalism Perceptual Subjectivism Bonjour gives the term perceptual subjectivism to the conclusion of the argument from illusion. Perceptual subjectivism
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 7a The World
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 7a The World What s real? This chapter basically concern the question: What is real? Of course, everything is real in some sense of the word. Your dreams, hallucinations,
More informationFrom Descartes to Locke. Consciousness Knowledge Science Reality
From Descartes to Locke Consciousness Knowledge Science Reality Brains in Vats What is the point? The point of the brain in a vat story is not to convince us that we might actually be brains in vats, But
More informationReview Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion)
Review Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion) Arguably, the main task of philosophy is to seek the truth. We seek genuine knowledge. This is why epistemology
More informationEmpiricism. HZT4U1 - Mr. Wittmann - Unit 3 - Lecture 3
Empiricism HZT4U1 - Mr. Wittmann - Unit 3 - Lecture 3 What can give us more sure knowledge than our senses? How else can we distinguish between the true & the false? -Lucretius The Dream by Henri Rousseau
More informationExcerpt from J. Garvey, The Twenty Greatest Philosophy Books (Continuum, 2007): Immanuel Kant s Critique of Pure Reason
Excerpt from J. Garvey, The Twenty Greatest Philosophy Books (Continuum, 2007): Immanuel Kant s Critique of Pure Reason In a letter to Moses Mendelssohn, Kant says this about the Critique of Pure Reason:
More informationJohn Locke. British Empiricism
John Locke British Empiricism Locke Biographical Notes: Locke is credited as the founder of the British "Common Sense" movement, later known as empiricism - he was also the founder of the modern political
More information1/12. The A Paralogisms
1/12 The A Paralogisms The character of the Paralogisms is described early in the chapter. Kant describes them as being syllogisms which contain no empirical premises and states that in them we conclude
More informationKant s Copernican Revolution
Kant s Copernican Revolution While the thoughts are still fresh in my mind, let me try to pick up from where we left off in class today, and say a little bit more about Kant s claim that reason has insight
More informationDo we have knowledge of the external world?
Do we have knowledge of the external world? This book discusses the skeptical arguments presented in Descartes' Meditations 1 and 2, as well as how Descartes attempts to refute skepticism by building our
More information1/10. Primary and Secondary Qualities and the Ideas of Substance
1/10 Primary and Secondary Qualities and the Ideas of Substance This week I want to return to a topic we discussed to some extent in the first year, namely Locke s account of the distinction between primary
More informationJohn Locke No innate ideas or innate knowledge
John Locke 1632-1704 No innate ideas or innate knowledge Locke: read and enjoyed Descartes (though he had many disagreements with him). Worked as a doctor (physician), and a government official. Wrote
More informationWhy There s Nothing You Can Say to Change My Mind: The Principle of Non-Contradiction in Aristotle s Metaphysics
Davis 1 Why There s Nothing You Can Say to Change My Mind: The Principle of Non-Contradiction in Aristotle s Metaphysics William Davis Red River Undergraduate Philosophy Conference North Dakota State University
More informationMind and Body. Is mental really material?"
Mind and Body Is mental really material?" René Descartes (1596 1650) v 17th c. French philosopher and mathematician v Creator of the Cartesian co-ordinate system, and coinventor of algebra v Wrote Meditations
More informationGeneral Philosophy. Dr Peter Millican,, Hertford College. Lecture 4: Two Cartesian Topics
General Philosophy Dr Peter Millican,, Hertford College Lecture 4: Two Cartesian Topics Scepticism, and the Mind 2 Last Time we looked at scepticism about INDUCTION. This Lecture will move on to SCEPTICISM
More informationKantian Realism. Jake Quilty-Dunn. Kantian Realism 75
Kantian Realism Kantian Realism 75 ant's claims that the objects of perception are appearances, "mere representations," and that we can never K perceive things in themselves, seem to mark him as some sort
More informationIdealism from A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, Part I by George Berkeley (1720)
Idealism from A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, Part I by George Berkeley (1720) 1. It is evident to anyone who takes a survey of the objects of human knowledge, that they are either
More informationKant and his Successors
Kant and his Successors G. J. Mattey Winter, 2011 / Philosophy 151 The Sorry State of Metaphysics Kant s Critique of Pure Reason (1781) was an attempt to put metaphysics on a scientific basis. Metaphysics
More informationWelcome back to our third and final lecture on skepticism and the appearance
PHI 110 Lecture 15 1 Welcome back to our third and final lecture on skepticism and the appearance reality gap. Because the material that we re working with now is quite difficult and involved, I will do
More informationLecture 25 Hume on Causation
Lecture 25 Hume on Causation Patrick Maher Scientific Thought II Spring 2010 Ideas and impressions Hume s terminology Ideas: Concepts. Impressions: Perceptions; they are of two kinds. Sensations: Perceptions
More informationImmanuel Kant, Analytic and Synthetic. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics Preface and Preamble
+ Immanuel Kant, Analytic and Synthetic Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics Preface and Preamble + Innate vs. a priori n Philosophers today usually distinguish psychological from epistemological questions.
More informationFrom Descartes to Locke. Sense Perception And The External World
From Descartes to Locke Sense Perception And The External World Descartes Third Meditation Descartes aim in the third Meditation is to demonstrate the existence of God, using only what (after Med. s 1
More informationFrom Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction
From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction Let me see if I can say a few things to re-cap our first discussion of the Transcendental Logic, and help you get a foothold for what follows. Kant
More informationNew Chapter: Epistemology: The Theory and Nature of Knowledge
Intro to Philosophy Phil 110 Lecture 14: 2-22 Daniel Kelly I. Mechanics A. Upcoming Readings 1. Today we ll discuss a. Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding b. Berkeley, Three Dialogues Between
More informationLecture 4: Transcendental idealism and transcendental arguments
Lecture 4: Transcendental idealism and transcendental arguments Stroud s worry: - Transcendental arguments can t establish a necessary link between thought or experience and how the world is without a
More informationClass 18 - Against Abstract Ideas Berkeley s Principles, Introduction, (AW ); (handout) Three Dialogues, Second Dialogue (AW )
Philosophy 203: History of Modern Western Philosophy Spring 2012 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class 18 - Against Abstract Ideas Berkeley s Principles, Introduction, (AW 438-446); 86-100 (handout) Three
More informationTreatise I,iii,14: Hume offers an account of all five causes: matter, form, efficient, exemplary, and final cause.
HUME Treatise I,iii,14: Hume offers an account of all five causes: matter, form, efficient, exemplary, and final cause. Beauchamp / Rosenberg, Hume and the Problem of Causation, start with: David Hume
More informationDo you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014
Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014 Origins of the concept of self What makes it move? Pneuma ( wind ) and Psyche ( breath ) life-force What is beyond-the-physical?
More informationPhilosophy Epistemology. Topic 3 - Skepticism
Michael Huemer on Skepticism Philosophy 3340 - Epistemology Topic 3 - Skepticism Chapter II. The Lure of Radical Skepticism 1. Mike Huemer defines radical skepticism as follows: Philosophical skeptics
More informationChapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge
Key Words Chapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge Empiricism, skepticism, personal identity, necessary connection, causal connection, induction, impressions, ideas. DAVID HUME (1711-76) is one of the
More informationTeleological: telos ( end, goal ) What is the telos of human action? What s wrong with living for pleasure? For power and public reputation?
1. Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014 2. Origins of the concept of self What makes it move? Pneuma ( wind ) and Psyche ( breath ) life-force What is beyond-the-physical?
More informationLogic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Logic, Truth & Epistemology Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationFrom the fact that I cannot think of God except as existing, it follows that existence is inseparable from God, and hence that he really exists.
FIFTH MEDITATION The essence of material things, and the existence of God considered a second time We have seen that Descartes carefully distinguishes questions about a thing s existence from questions
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy
Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2014 Russell Marcus Class #3 - Illusion Descartes, from Meditations on First Philosophy Marcus, Introduction to Philosophy, Fall 2014 Slide 1 Business P
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T AGENDA 1. Review of Epistemology 2. Kant Kant s Compromise Kant s Copernican Revolution 3. The Nature of Truth KNOWLEDGE:
More informationClass #3 - Illusion Descartes, from Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes, The Story of the Wax Descartes, The Story of the Sun
Philosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Fall 2014 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #3 - Illusion Descartes, from Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes, The Story of the Wax Descartes, The
More information24.01 Classics of Western Philosophy
1 Plan: Kant Lecture #2: How are pure mathematics and pure natural science possible? 1. Review: Problem of Metaphysics 2. Kantian Commitments 3. Pure Mathematics 4. Transcendental Idealism 5. Pure Natural
More informationCartesian Rationalism
Cartesian Rationalism René Descartes 1596-1650 Reason tells me to trust my senses Descartes had the disturbing experience of finding out that everything he learned at school was wrong! From 1604-1612 he
More informationFrom Brains in Vats.
From Brains in Vats. To God; And even to Myself, To a Malicious Demon; But, with I am, I exist (or Cogito ergo sum, i.e., I think therefore I am ), we have found the ultimate foundation. The place where
More informationPHILOSOPHY EPISTEMOLOGY ESSAY TOPICS AND INSTRUCTIONS
PHILOSOPHY 5340 - EPISTEMOLOGY ESSAY TOPICS AND INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS 1. As is indicated in the syllabus, the required work for the course can take the form either of two shorter essay-writing exercises,
More informationCartesian Rationalism
Cartesian Rationalism René Descartes 1596-1650 Reason tells me to trust my senses Descartes had the disturbing experience of finding out that everything he learned at school was wrong! From 1604-1612 he
More informationBERKELEY S COMMON SENSE APPROACH TO LOCKE S THEORY OF INFERENTIAL KNOWLEDGE *
BERKELEY S COMMON SENSE APPROACH TO LOCKE S THEORY OF INFERENTIAL KNOWLEDGE * Berkeley s immaterial hypothesis has spawned a broad spectrum of diverging interpretations, ranging from the notion that the
More informationPhilosophy of Mathematics Kant
Philosophy of Mathematics Kant Owen Griffiths oeg21@cam.ac.uk St John s College, Cambridge 20/10/15 Immanuel Kant Born in 1724 in Königsberg, Prussia. Enrolled at the University of Königsberg in 1740 and
More informationPrimary and Secondary Qualities. John Locke s distinction between primary and secondary qualities of bodies has
Stephen Lenhart Primary and Secondary Qualities John Locke s distinction between primary and secondary qualities of bodies has been a widely discussed feature of his work. Locke makes several assertions
More informationKANT S EXPLANATION OF THE NECESSITY OF GEOMETRICAL TRUTHS. John Watling
KANT S EXPLANATION OF THE NECESSITY OF GEOMETRICAL TRUTHS John Watling Kant was an idealist. His idealism was in some ways, it is true, less extreme than that of Berkeley. He distinguished his own by calling
More informationPhilosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2015
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2015 Class #18 Berkeley Against Abstract Ideas Marcus, Modern Philosophy, Slide 1 Business We re a Day behind,
More information1. What is Philosophy?
[Welcome to the first handout of your Introduction to Philosophy Mooc! This handout is designed to complement the video lecture by giving you a written summary of the key points covered in the videos.
More informationKant, Hume, and the Notion of Material Substance
Kant, Hume, and the Notion of Material Substance By Cameron David Brewer B.A., Ursinus College, 2002 M.A., University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago 2006 THESIS Submitted as partial fulfillment of the
More informationThe Critique of Berkeley and Hume. Sunday, April 19, 2015
The Critique of Berkeley and Hume George Berkeley (1685-1753) Idealism best defense of common sense against skepticism Descartes s and Locke s ideas of objects make no sense. Attack on primary qualities
More information1/9. The First Analogy
1/9 The First Analogy So far we have looked at the mathematical principles but now we are going to turn to the dynamical principles, of which there are two sorts, the Analogies of Experience and the Postulates
More informationHume. Hume the Empiricist. Judgments about the World. Impressions as Content of the Mind. The Problem of Induction & Knowledge of the External World
Hume Hume the Empiricist The Problem of Induction & Knowledge of the External World As an empiricist, Hume thinks that all knowledge of the world comes from sense experience If all we can know comes from
More informationThe CopernicanRevolution
Immanuel Kant: The Copernican Revolution The CopernicanRevolution Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) The Critique of Pure Reason (1781) is Kant s best known work. In this monumental work, he begins a Copernican-like
More informationA Fundamental Thinking Error in Philosophy
Friedrich Seibold A Fundamental Thinking Error in Philosophy Abstract The present essay is a semantic and logical analysis of certain terms which coin decisively our metaphysical picture of the world.
More informationto representationalism, then we would seem to miss the point on account of which the distinction between direct realism and representationalism was
Intentional Transfer in Averroes, Indifference of Nature in Avicenna, and the Issue of the Representationalism of Aquinas Comments on Max Herrera and Richard Taylor Is Aquinas a representationalist or
More informationOne of the many common questions that are asked is If God does exist what reasons
1 of 10 2010-09-01 11:16 How Do We Know God is One? A Theological & Philosophical Perspective Hamza Andreas Tzortzis 6/7/2010 124 views One of the many common questions that are asked is If God does exist
More informationWhat one needs to know to prepare for'spinoza's method is to be found in the treatise, On the Improvement
SPINOZA'S METHOD Donald Mangum The primary aim of this paper will be to provide the reader of Spinoza with a certain approach to the Ethics. The approach is designed to prevent what I believe to be certain
More informationHistory of Modern Philosophy. Hume ( )
Hume 1 Hume (1711-1776) With Berkeley s idealism, some very uncomfortable consequences of Cartesian dualism, the split between mind and experience, on the one hand, and the body and the physical world
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 21 Lecture - 21 Kant Forms of sensibility Categories
More informationSyllabus. Primary Sources, 2 edition. Hackett, Various supplementary handouts, available in class and on the course website.
Philosophy 203: History of Modern Western Philosophy Spring 2012 Tuesdays, Thursdays: 9am - 10:15am SC G041 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Office: 202 College Hill Road, Upstairs email: rmarcus1@hamilton.edu
More informationThis handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first.
Michael Lacewing Three responses to scepticism This handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first. MITIGATED SCEPTICISM The term mitigated scepticism
More informationJohn Locke Innate ideas and innate knowledge
John Locke 1632-1704 Innate ideas and innate knowledge Read and enjoyed Descartes (though he had many disagreements with him). Worked as a doctor (physician), and a government official. Wrote Two Treatises
More informationPerception and Mind-Dependence: Lecture 2
1 Recap Perception and Mind-Dependence: Lecture 2 (Alex Moran, apm60@ cam.ac.uk) According to naïve realism: (1) the objects of perception are ordinary, mindindependent things, and (2) perceptual experience
More informationPhilosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2010
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2010 Class 3 - Meditations Two and Three too much material, but we ll do what we can Marcus, Modern Philosophy,
More informationRussell s Problems of Philosophy
Russell s Problems of Philosophy IT S (NOT) ALL IN YOUR HEAD J a n u a r y 1 9 Today : 1. Review Existence & Nature of Matter 2. Russell s case against Idealism 3. Next Lecture 2.0 Review Existence & Nature
More informationPhilosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2014
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2014 Class #26 Kant s Copernican Revolution The Synthetic A Priori Forms of Intuition Marcus, Modern Philosophy,
More information