1 Russell s Problems of Philosophy IT S (NOT) ALL IN YOUR HEAD J a n u a r y 1 9 Today : 1. Review Existence & Nature of Matter 2. Russell s case against Idealism 3. Next Lecture
2 2.0 Review Existence & Nature of Matter The Question of Chapters 2 & 3 1. Is there any such thing as matter? 2. If so, what is its nature? 2 Sensible start answering (1) our indubitable sense-data! How to go from sense-data to existence of matter? Not via deductive proof no Cartesian certainty Via abduction (inference to the best explanation) Data = the things we know directly (our sense data) One hypothesis that explains this data is that there are physical objects which, via interactions with other physical objects, cause our sensations This hypothesis provides the best explanation of sensations Ergo, our sense-data provides good grounds for believing in matter!
3 2.0 Review Existence & Nature of Matter Two Questions for this argument I. Why think the external world hypothesis is better than one that denies the existence of matter (e.g. Idealism)? 3 The external world hypothesis better explains the continuity of intraand inter-subjective experience; also (i) fits with common sense idea of cat (dog) moving across the room, rather than popping into/out of existence, and (ii) our communicative practices II. What are the criteria for determining which hypothesis is best? The external world hypothesis seems to be the simplest, when we take into account the need to explain our sensations
4 2.0 Review Existence & Nature of Matter 4 Upshot although [the non-existence of matter] is not logically impossible, there is no reason whatever to suppose it is true; and it is in fact a less simple hypothesis, viewed as a means of accounting for the facts of our own life, than the common-sense hypothesis that there really are objects, independent of us, whose action on us causes our sensations. (PoP, 10) Some Questions to consider: What is simplicity? Why should we expect the world to be simple, rather than complex? How do we know that we ve consider all the relevant alternative hypotheses? Should missing one undercut our confidence our answer?
5 2.0 Review Existence & Nature of Matter Russell thinks the external world hypothesis is an instinctive belief one supplied by (our?) nature Further, he claims that I. Knowledge must be systematic one belief must be mutually interlocked with other beliefs to form a whole (holistic, rather than atomistic) II. 5 The only justifiable reason to reject an instinctive belief is another instinctive belief Of course, both of these points are questionable [Question to think about: what role do they play in Russell s argument? Why does it matter for Russell that belief in the external world is instinctive?]
6 2.0 Review Existence & Nature of Matter The Key Points from Chpt. 2 I. We have reason to affirm the simplest theory that explains the deliverances of our senses How should we understand simplicity here? II. Knowledge must be systematic one belief must be mutually interlocked with other beliefs to form a whole (holistic, rather than atomistic) A system of beliefs can be interlocking but wrong (e.g. a set of beliefs about a fictional world) III.The only justifiable reason to reject an instinctive belief is another instinctive belief Plenty of instinctive beliefs have turned out to be false 6
7 2.0 Review Existence & Nature of Matter Chapter 3 addresses (2) that is, it aims to answer: 7 What is the nature of this real table, which persists independently of my perception of it? (PoP, 13) Russell s answer physical science tells us matter s nature! however, it can only tell us structural information about reality, not about what things are like intrinsically Map Analogy a map captures the structure of the territory it describes; the relations of the map s symbols convey information about the relations of the things depicted, not their natures Thus we find that although the relations of physical objects have all sorts of knowable properties, derived from their correspondence with the relations of sense-data, the physical objects themselves remain unknown in their intrinsic nature, so far at least as can be discovered by the senses (PoP)
8 2.0 Review Existence & Nature of Matter What we can come to know about the external world via our sense-data Temporal order (e.g. before and after), not duration Spatial order (e.g. arrangement of parts), not shape (Potentially) Difference/similarity 8 What we can not come to know about the external world via our sense-data Any intrinsic properties of physical objects What we can possibly know from our sense data is what is preserved across circumstantial variation The only stuff that is like that is structural
9 2.0 Review Existence & Nature of Matter What have we learned so far? I. Our knowledge of the external world comes via our senses; what the senses deliver directly is our sense data 9 II. III. IV. Sense data does not reveal directly the properties of physical objects (due to the relativity of appearances), but the patterns of sense data provide us with signs of the pattern of material things that cause them We ve good reason to suppose there is a correspondence between sense data and physical objects because the external world hypothesis is the best explanation for our sense data While we can t confront the external world directly, it speaks to us via the structure of our sense data, which is immediately given
10 10 Idealism the doctrine that whatever exists, or at any rate whatever can be known to exist, must be in some sense mental (PoP) While flying in the face of common sense, Idealism is not to be dismissed as obviously absurd Russell s epistemological story prevents him from dismissing Idealism given that all we can get is structural information, we don t know that physical objects aren t intrinsically mental common sense leaves us completely in the dark as to the true intrinsic nature of physical objects, and if there were good reason to regard them as mental, we could not legitimately reject this opinion merely because it strikes us as strange. The truth about physical objects must be strange. (PoP)
11 The Idealist Problem Idealism is a thesis about the intrinsic nature of physical objects (i.e, that, intrinsically, they re mental) 11 We only have structural knowledge of physical objects, not about their intrinsic natures So, given what we ve secured so far, nothing proves Idealism is wrong Russell concedes that sense-data is partly mental our sense-data cannot be supposed to have an existence independent of us, but must be, in part at least, in the mind, in the sense that their existence would not continue if there were no seeing or hearing or touching or smelling or tasting. (PoP) Given the Conflicting Appearances Argument, this makes sense!
12 But Russell disputes the claim that nothing else but sensedata can be known by us 12 [Berkeley] shows that all we know immediately when we perceive the tree consists of ideas in his sense of the word, and he argues that there is not the slightest ground for supposing that there is anything real about the tree except what is perceived. It s being, he says, consists in being perceived. (PoP) Berkeley argued we can only solve the sceptical problem by closing the gap between our ideas of objects and the objects themselves A. Eliminate ideas and allow for direct perception of external objects B. Eliminate objects and treat ideas as the real thing Since we only immediately grasp ideas, Berkeley goes for (A)
13 13 Berkeley s Solution - Simplify to the two things we can be certain of the mind & the idea! In short, adopt a mind-only metaphysics! Berkeley s Key Claim To be is to be perceived (esse est percipi) Of course, there s one obvious problem with this story
14 According to Berkeley, things don t pop out of existence when we re not around to perceive it because God s always perceiving everything! For Berkeley, the persistence and regularity of the objects we perceive is an everyday proof of God s existence 14 Thus apart from minds and their ideas there is nothing in the world, nor is it possible that anything else should ever be known, since whatever is known is necessarily an idea. (PoP)
15 15 God in the Quad by Ronald Knox There was a young man who said, "God Must think it exceedingly odd If he finds that this tree Continues to be When there's no one about in the Quad." REPLY Dear Sir: Your astonishment's odd: I am always about in the Quad. And that's why the tree Will continue to be, Since observed by Yours faithfully, GOD.
16 16 Russell doesn t offer a direct critique of Berkeley s argument instead, he thinks the argument he gives is sufficiently strong to obviate the need to discuss Berkeley s actual arguments for Idealism It s also worth noting that idea and sense data are not strictly synonymous [Berkeley] gives the name idea to anything which is immediately known, as, for example, sense-data are known. But the term is not wholly confined the sense-data. There will also be things remembered or imagined, for which such things also have immediate acquaintance at the moment of remembering or imagine. All such immediate data [Berkeley] calls ideas. (PoP)
17 A Quite Aside on Berkeley s Idealism Hang on a minute how can Berkeley block scepticism if he allows idea to also include imagined things? 17 More pointedly, how does Berkeley tell the difference between real and imaginary ideas? Berkeley a real idea must be sufficiently lively, strong, vivid, affecting, distinct, orderly, steady, & coherent For Berkeley, these aren t marks of reality they are constitutive of it! To be real just is to be an idea with these qualities
18 Russell initiates his attack by highlighting an ambiguity While ideas are in our minds, we can mean different things by this We speak of bearing a person in mind, not meaning that the person is in our minds, but that a thought of him is in our minds. (PoP, #) Distinguish between The thought (the psychological episode) What the thought is about (the content/subject matter) 18 These are clearly distinct! I can have someone in mind to invite to dinner, but this doesn t mean they re a psychological episode! I can forget to invite them they went out of my mind but this doesn t mean that they ceased to exist!
19 Russell s objection to Berkeley s argument for Idealism is that it equivocates between these two different notions 19 To argue that the tree itself must be in our minds is like arguing that a person whom we bear in mind is himself in our mind (PoP) The second step of Russell s critique is that we need an argument to show that sense-data are mental While the presence of a sense-datum relies upon several factors, including there being a mind it doesn t follow that the sense-datum is itself mental We saw that Berkeley was right in treating the sense-data which constitute our perception of the tree as more or less subjective, in the sense that they depend upon us as much as upon the tree, and would not exist if the tree were not being perceived. But this is an entirely different point from the one which Berkeley seeks to prove (PoP)
20 Furthering this, Russell notes that the arguments he has given don t prove that sense-data are mental they only show that the existence of sense-datum depends upon the relation of our sense organs to some physical object 20 That is to say, they proved that a certain colour will exist, in a certain light, if a normal eye is placed at a certain point relatively to the table. They did not prove that the colour is in the mind of the percipient. (PoP) According to Russell, Berkeley confuses act and object Suppose you kick your friend (you horrible, horrible person!) The action is the something you did namely, kicking your friend; the object is the something you did the action to namely, your friend
21 Russell uses this distinction to block Berkeley s argument: Distinguish the mental act of apprehending from the object that is apprehended (the sense-data) just because the act is mental doesn t mean the object is! Upshot Berkeley has not given us a reason to think that the objects of our sensations are themselves mental Russell says that we need to respect the act/object distinction, if we re to understand the mental: 21 The question of the distinction between act and object in our apprehending of things is vitally important, since our whole power of acquiring knowledge is bound up with it. The faculty of being acquainted with things other than itself is the main characteristic of a mind. Acquaintance with objects essentially consists in a relation between the mind and something other than the mind; it is this that constitutes the mind s power of knowing things.
22 Russell goes on to dismiss the argument that what has no practical significance for us cannot be real This may be a limitation on our part, rather than the thing itself It may have a theoretical significance for us He also dismisses the argument that we cannot know anything exists that we cannot itself know because it equivocates between two notions of knowledge Knowledge of Truths the sort of knowledge which is opposed to error, the sense in which that we know is true, the sense in which applies to our beliefs and convictions, i.e., what are called judgements. Knowledge by Acquaintance applies to our knowledge of things, which we may call acquaintance. This is the sense in which we know sense-data Wissen & Kennen (German), savoir & connaitre (French) 22
23 What is the difference between these two relations? 23 Knowledge of Truth relates judging subject to a truth ( that clause) Acquaintance relates perceiving subject to a thing (e.g. a sense-datum) To grasp the difference, we need to get what truth is the topic of Chapter 12! In light of this distinction, the argument becomes something like, We can never truly judge that something which we are not acquainted with exists Then the argument clearly fails since true judgment and acquaintance are different kinds of relations, relating different kinds of entities, it does not follow that the former obtains if the latter does No reason to hold that the obtaining of true judgement tracks the obtaining of acquaintance relations you can make true judgement without acquantiance!
24 3.0 Next Lecture 24 Tuesday 24 January 12:00 13:00 Joseph Black Building 419 Knowledge by Acquaintance & by Description Reading: Russell Problems of Philosophy, Chapter 5 Take care and see you on Tuesday!
Russell s Problems of Philosophy KNOWLEDGE: A CQUAINTANCE & DESCRIPTION J a n u a r y 2 4 Today : 1. Review Russell s against Idealism 2. Knowledge by Acquaintance & Description 3. What are we acquianted
Realism and its competitors Scepticism, idealism, phenomenalism Perceptual Subjectivism Bonjour gives the term perceptual subjectivism to the conclusion of the argument from illusion. Perceptual subjectivism
Ayer on the argument from illusion Jeff Speaks Philosophy 370 October 5, 2004 1 The objects of experience.............................. 1 2 The argument from illusion............................. 2 2.1
George Berkeley The Principles of Human Knowledge Review To be is to be perceived Obvious to the Mind all those bodies which compose the earth have no subsistence without a mind, their being is to be perceived
Berkeley s Idealism Idealism Matter doesn t exist, but the external world still does. All reality is mental, consisting only of minds and their ideas. Ideas are passive, whereas minds are active. Every
That Thing-I-Know-Not-What by [Perm #7903685] The philosopher George Berkeley, in part of his general thesis against materialism as laid out in his Three Dialogues and Principles of Human Knowledge, gives
Russell s Problems of Philosophy UNIVERSALS & OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THEM F e b r u a r y 2 Today : 1. Review A Priori Knowledge 2. The Case for Universals 3. Universals to the Rescue! 4. On Philosophy Essays
Do the ideas in our mind resemble the qualities in the objects that caused these ideas in our minds? Mind s Eye Idea Object Does this resemble this? In Locke s Terms Even if we accept that the ideas in
1/10 Primary and Secondary Qualities and the Ideas of Substance This week I want to return to a topic we discussed to some extent in the first year, namely Locke s account of the distinction between primary
Key Words Chapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge Empiricism, skepticism, personal identity, necessary connection, causal connection, induction, impressions, ideas. DAVID HUME (1711-76) is one of the
General Philosophy Dr Peter Millican,, Hertford College Lecture 4: Two Cartesian Topics Scepticism, and the Mind 2 Last Time we looked at scepticism about INDUCTION. This Lecture will move on to SCEPTICISM
TOPIC: Lecture 7.2 Berkeley Lecture Berkeley will discuss why we only have access to our sense-data, rather than the real world. He will then explain why we can trust our senses. He gives an argument for
1/12 The A Paralogisms The character of the Paralogisms is described early in the chapter. Kant describes them as being syllogisms which contain no empirical premises and states that in them we conclude
1 Recap Perception and Mind-Dependence: Lecture 2 (Alex Moran, apm60@ cam.ac.uk) According to naïve realism: (1) the objects of perception are ordinary, mindindependent things, and (2) perceptual experience
The Problems of Philosophy By Russell PREFACE In the following pages I have confined myself in the main to those problems of philosophy in regard to which I thought it possible to say something positive
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 7b The World Kant s metaphysics rested on identifying a kind of truth that Hume and other did not acknowledge. It is called A. synthetic a priori B. analytic a priori C.
THE PROBLEMS OF PHILOSOPHY THE PROBLEMS OF PHILOSOPHY Bertrand Russell PresssBooks.com The Problems of Philosophy, by Bertrand Russell. This book was produced using PressBooks.com, a simple book production
Bertrand Russell, Problems of Philosophy CHAPTER I APPEARANCE AND REALITY IS there any knowledge in the world which is so certain that no reasonable man could doubt it? This question, which at first sight
Intro to Philosophy Phil 110 Lecture 14: 2-22 Daniel Kelly I. Mechanics A. Upcoming Readings 1. Today we ll discuss a. Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding b. Berkeley, Three Dialogues Between
The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Problems of Philosophy, by Bertrand Russell (#4 in our series by Bertrand Russell) Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be sure to check the copyright laws
A Multitude of Selves: Contrasting the Cartesian and Nietzschean views of selfhood One s identity as a being distinct and independent from others is vital in order to interact with the world. A self identity
The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism Issues: I. Problem of Induction II. Popper s rejection of induction III. Salmon s critique of deductivism 2 I. The problem of induction 1. Inductive vs.
Thus we see, that Descartes and Locke take the road that leads to skepticism without knowing the end of it, but they stop short for want of light to carry them farther. Berkeley, frightened at the appearance
Chapter V HUME'S THEORY THE question which I am about to discuss is this. Under what circumstances (if any) does a man, when he believes a proposition, not merely believe it but also absolutely know that
III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier In Theaetetus Plato introduced the definition of knowledge which is often translated
The Problems of Philosophy i The Problems of Philosophy The Problems of Philosophy ii The Problems of Philosophy Bertrand Russell YOGeBooks: Hollister, Mo 65672 The Problems of Philosophy iii YOGeBooks
Contents EMPIRICISM PHIL3072, ANU, 2015 Jason Grossman http://empiricism.xeny.net lecture 9: 22 September Recap Bertrand Russell: reductionism in physics Common sense is self-refuting Acquaintance versus
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 4 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M AGENDA 1. Quick Review 2. Arguments Against Materialism/Physicalism (continued)
KANT S EXPLANATION OF THE NECESSITY OF GEOMETRICAL TRUTHS John Watling Kant was an idealist. His idealism was in some ways, it is true, less extreme than that of Berkeley. He distinguished his own by calling
! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! What is the relation between that knowledge and that given in the sciences?! Key figure: René
1/10 The Fourth Paralogism and the Refutation of Idealism The Fourth Paralogism is quite different from the three that preceded it because, although it is treated as a part of rational psychology, it main
Kant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge Statements involving necessity or strict universality could never be known on the basis of sense experience, and are thus known (if known at all) a priori.
Aporia vol. 26 no. 2 2016 Objects of Perception and Dependence Introduction What is consciousness? Although it is possible to offer explanations of consciousness in terms of the physical, some of the important
Quaerens Deum: The Liberty Undergraduate Journal for Philosophy of Religion Volume 1 Issue 1 Volume 1, Issue 1 (Spring 2015) Article 4 April 2015 Infinity and Beyond James M. Derflinger II Liberty University,
Descartes Method of Doubt Philosophy 100 Lecture 9 PUTTING IT TOGETHER. Descartes Idea 1. The New Science. What science is about is describing the nature and interaction of the ultimate constituents of
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 21 Lecture - 21 Kant Forms of sensibility Categories
Philosophical Issues, 14, Epistemology, 2004 SKEPTICISM, ABDUCTIVISM, AND THE EXPLANATORY GAP Ram Neta University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill I. Introduction:The Skeptical Problem and its Proposed Abductivist
The Preface(s) to the Critique of Pure Reason It doesn t take long in reading the Critique before we are faced with interpretive challenges. Consider the very first sentence in the A edition: Human reason
A Priori Bootstrapping Ralph Wedgwood In this essay, I shall explore the problems that are raised by a certain traditional sceptical paradox. My conclusion, at the end of this essay, will be that the most
S E V E N T H E X C U R S U S Varieties of Apriority T he notions of a priori knowledge and justification play a central role in this work. There are many ways in which one can understand the a priori,
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2011 Class 19 - April 5 Finishing Berkeley Marcus, Modern Philosophy, Slide 1 Three Main Berkeley Topics 1. Arguments
Lecture 25 Hume on Causation Patrick Maher Scientific Thought II Spring 2010 Ideas and impressions Hume s terminology Ideas: Concepts. Impressions: Perceptions; they are of two kinds. Sensations: Perceptions
Introduction to Cognitivism; Motivational Externalism; Naturalist Cognitivism Felix Pinkert 103 Ethics: Metaethics, University of Oxford, Hilary Term 2015 Cognitivism, Non-cognitivism, and the Humean Argument
1/8 Reid on Common Sense Thomas Reid s work An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense is self-consciously written in opposition to a lot of the principles that animated early modern
A Note on Straight-Thinking A supplementary note for the 2nd Annual JTS/CGST Public Ethics Lecture March 5, 2002(b), adj. 2009:03:05 G.E.M. of TKI Arguments & Appeals In arguments, people try to persuade
Dualism: What s at stake? Dualists posit that reality is comprised of two fundamental, irreducible types of stuff : Material and non-material Material Stuff: Includes all the familiar elements of the physical
The Physical World Author(s): Barry Stroud Source: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. 87 (1986-1987), pp. 263-277 Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The Aristotelian
24.500 spring 05 topics in philosophy of mind session 7 teatime self-knowledge 24.500 S05 1 plan self-blindness, one more time Peacocke & Co. immunity to error through misidentification: Shoemaker s self-reference
Chapter 5: Freedom and Determinism At each time t the world is perfectly determinate in all detail. - Let us grant this for the sake of argument. We might want to re-visit this perfectly reasonable assumption
Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 50 (1999), 425 429 DISCUSSION Pictures, Proofs, and Mathematical Practice : Reply to James Robert Brown In a recent article, James Robert Brown () has argued that pictures and
The late Professor G. F. Stout Editorial Preface Memoir by]. A. Passmore List of Stout's Works BOOK ONE INTRODUCTORY Chapter I portrait frontispiece page xix ETHICAL NEUTRALITY AND PRAGMATISM xxv I The
H SPECIMEN S85/76/ National Qualications ONLY Philosophy Paper Date Not applicable Duration hour 5 minutes Total marks 50 SECTION ARGUMENTS IN ACTION 30 marks Attempt ALL questions. SECTION KNOWLEDGE AND
John Locke An Essay Concerning Human Understanding From Rationalism to Empiricism Empiricism vs. Rationalism Empiricism: All knowledge ultimately rests upon sense experience. All justification (our reasons
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 3 D A Y 2 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M AGENDA 1. Quick Review 2. Arguments Against Materialism/Physicalism
Précis of Empiricism and Experience Anil Gupta University of Pittsburgh My principal aim in the book is to understand the logical relationship of experience to knowledge. Say that I look out of my window
From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction Let me see if I can say a few things to re-cap our first discussion of the Transcendental Logic, and help you get a foothold for what follows. Kant
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 14 Lecture - 14 John Locke The empiricism of John
Philosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 6: Theories of Justification: Foundationalism versus Coherentism Part 2: Susan Haack s Foundherentist Approach Susan Haack, "A Foundherentist Theory of Empirical Justification"
1. The Scope of Skepticism Philosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 4: Skepticism Part 1: The Scope of Skepticism and Two Main Types of Skeptical Argument The scope of skeptical challenges can vary in a number
Philosophy 240: Symbolic Logic Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2011 Class 27: October 28 Truth and Liars Marcus, Symbolic Logic, Fall 2011 Slide 1 Philosophers and Truth P Sex! P Lots of technical
Knowledge Internalism and Externalism What is Knowledge? Uncontroversially: Knowledge implies truth S knows that it s Monday > it s Monday Almost as uncontroversially: Knowledge is a kind of belief S knows
Examining the nature of mind Michael Daniels A review of Understanding Consciousness by Max Velmans (Routledge, 2000). Max Velmans is Reader in Psychology at Goldsmiths College, University of London. Over
Michael Lacewing The knowledge argument PROPERTY DUALISM Property dualism is the view that, although there is just one kind of substance, physical substance, there are two fundamentally different kinds
Res Cogitans Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 20 6-4-2014 Saving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy Kevin Harriman Lewis & Clark College Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.pacificu.edu/rescogitans
Fundamentals of Metaphysics Objective and Subjective One important component of the Common Western Metaphysic is the thesis that there is such a thing as objective truth. each of our beliefs and assertions
Wright on response-dependence and self-knowledge March 23, 2004 1 Response-dependent and response-independent concepts........... 1 1.1 The intuitive distinction......................... 1 1.2 Basic equations
Immanuel Kant: The Copernican Revolution The CopernicanRevolution Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) The Critique of Pure Reason (1781) is Kant s best known work. In this monumental work, he begins a Copernican-like
Russell KNOWLEDGE BY ACQUAINTANCE AND KNOWLEDGE BY DESCRIPTION Russell asserts that there are three types of things that we know by acquaintance. The first is sense-data. Another is universals. What are
How Do We Know Anything about Mathematics? - A Defence of Platonism Majda Trobok University of Rijeka original scientific paper UDK: 141.131 1:51 510.21 ABSTRACT In this paper I will try to say something
Intro to Philosophy Review for Exam 2 Epistemology Theory of Knowledge What is knowledge? What is the structure of knowledge? What particular things can I know? What particular things do I know? Do I know
Philosophy of Mathematics Kant Owen Griffiths email@example.com St John s College, Cambridge 20/10/15 Immanuel Kant Born in 1724 in Königsberg, Prussia. Enrolled at the University of Königsberg in 1740 and
SENSE-DATA 29 SENSE-DATA G. E. Moore Moore, G. E. (1953) Sense-data. In his Some Main Problems of Philosophy (London: George Allen & Unwin, Ch. II, pp. 28-40). Pagination here follows that reference. Also
Notes on Bertrand Russell s The Problems of Philosophy (Hackett 1990 reprint of the 1912 Oxford edition, Chapters XII, XIII, XIV, 119-152) Chapter XII Truth and Falsehood [pp. 119-130] Russell begins here
Introduction to Philosophy Instructor: Jason Sheley Quiz: True or False? (if false, explain why) 1. Descartes investigates whether there is a God because he needs to rule out a source for his doubts concerning
Review Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion) Arguably, the main task of philosophy is to seek the truth. We seek genuine knowledge. This is why epistemology
On A New Cosmological Argument Richard Gale and Alexander Pruss A New Cosmological Argument, Religious Studies 35, 1999, pp.461 76 present a cosmological argument which they claim is an improvement over
17. Tying it up: thoughts and intentionality Martín Abreu Zavaleta June 23, 2014 1 Frege on thoughts Frege is concerned with separating logic from psychology. In addressing such separations, he coins a
Michael Lacewing Three responses to scepticism This handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first. MITIGATED SCEPTICISM The term mitigated scepticism
Introduction to Philosophy PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2017 Beginnings of Philosophy: Overview of Course (1) The Origins of Philosophy and Relativism Knowledge Are you a self? Ethics: What is
PHILOSOPHY 4360/5360 METAPHYSICS Methods that Metaphysicians Use Method 1: The appeal to what one can imagine where imagining some state of affairs involves forming a vivid image of that state of affairs.
AMONG THE HINDU THEORIES OF ILLUSION BY RASVIHARY DAS the many contributions of the Hindus to Logic and Epistemology, their discussions on the problem of iuusion have got an importance of their own. They
Abstract: Divisibility, Logic, Radical Empiricism, and Metaphysics We will explore the problem of the manner in which the world may be divided into parts, and how this affects the application of logic.
1/8 Descartes 3: Proofs of the Existence of God Descartes opens the Third Meditation by reminding himself that nothing that is purely sensory is reliable. The one thing that is certain is the cogito. He
GREAT PHILOSOPHERS: Thomas Reid (1710-1796) Peter West 25/09/18 Some context Aristotle (384-322 BCE) Lucretius (c. 99-55 BCE) Thomas Reid (1710-1796 AD) 400 BCE 0 Much of (Western) scholastic philosophy
1 The Rejection of Skepticism Abstract There is a widespread belief among contemporary philosophers that skeptical hypotheses such as that we are dreaming, or victims of an evil demon, or brains in a vat
Davis 1 Why There s Nothing You Can Say to Change My Mind: The Principle of Non-Contradiction in Aristotle s Metaphysics William Davis Red River Undergraduate Philosophy Conference North Dakota State University
From Brains in Vats. To God; And even to Myself, To a Malicious Demon; But, with I am, I exist (or Cogito ergo sum, i.e., I think therefore I am ), we have found the ultimate foundation. The place where
A Man to Be Wrestled With LONERGAN AND THE QUESTION OF KNOWLEDGE COLIN BROWN THERE ARE SOME ARTISTS, writers and scholars whose work receives widespread recognition only late in life. Bemard Lonergan belongs