Aristotle: In order to investigate the ideal constitution, we have first to figure out the best way to live.
|
|
- Chad Allison
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Neo-Aristotilean (contemporary moral philosophy) centers on three things: 1. A rejection of traditional enlightenment moral theories like Kantianism and utilitarianism 2. A claim that another look at the ethical concerns and projects of ancient Greek thought might help us past the impasse into which enlightenment moral theories have left us 3. More particularly, an attempt to reinterpret Aristotle s ethical work for the late twentieth century so as to transcend this impasse. Lecture 21 - Justice, Community, and Membership Kant s reply to Aristotle It s one thing to support a fair-framework of rights, within which people can pursue their own conceptions of the good life. It s something else, that runs the risk of coercion, to base law or any particular conception of the good life. Aristotle: In order to investigate the ideal constitution, we have first to figure out the best way to live. Kant: Constitutions and laws and rights should not embody, or affirm, or promote any particular way of life. That s at odds with freedom. Aristotle: The whole purpose of the polis is to shape character, to cultivate the virtue of citizens, to inculcate civic excellence, to make possible a good way of life. Kant: The purpose of law, the purpose of a constitution, is not to inculcate or to promote virtue. It s to set up a fair framework of rights within which citizens may be free to pursue their own conceptions of the good for themselves. Underlying these differences are two different accounts of what it means to be a free person. For Aristotle: We re free as long as we have the capacity to realize our potential. That leads us to the question of fit (fit between persons and the roles that are appropriate to them.) For Kant: Freedom is the ability to act autonomously. As free person, we aren t responsible for any traditions or history that we haven t chosen for ourselves. We re unbound to any moral ties prior to our choosing them. We are the authors of the only obligations that constrain us.
2 The communitarian critics* of Kantian and Rawlsian liberalism acknowledge that there is something powerful and inspiring in that account of freedom, but they argue that it misses something. It misses a whole dimension of moral life and even political life. It can t account for certain moral and political obligations that we commonly recognize and even prize. These include obligations of: membership, loyalty, solidarity, and other moral reasons that we can t trace to an act of consent. * Alasdair MacIntyre gives an account, a narrative conception of the self. What has this to do with community and belonging? Alasdair MacIntyre: Once you accept this narrative concept of moral reflection, you will notice that we can never seek for the good or exercise the virtues only qua (as) individual... NARRATIVE CONCEPTION (picture of the encumbered self): we all approach our own circumstances as bearers of a particular social identity. I am someone s son or daughter, a citizen of this or that city. I belong to this clan, that tribe, this nation. Hence, what is good for me has to be the good for someone who inhabits these roles. I inherit from the past of my family, my city, my tribe, my nation a variety of debts, inheritances, expectations and obligations. These constitute the given of my life, my moral starting point. This is, in part, what gives my life its moral particularity. It s a conception of the self that sees the self as claimed or encumbered, at least to some extent, by the history the tradition or communities of which it is a part. The Narrative Concept of Self is at odds with individualism - which says, I am what I myself choose to be. But this ignores collective responsibility. All of these attitudes, that amount to historical amnesia (e.g., 21 C. whites to slavery, young Germans to the Holocaust), amount to a kind of moral abdication. Once you see that who we are, and what it means to sort out our obligations, can t be separated and shouldn t be separated from the life histories that define us.
3 The two different accounts of moral and political obligation that arise depending on which accounting of the person one accepts. Liberal Conception (Rawls) - moral and political obligations arise in one of two ways: 1. There are natural duties that we owe human beings, as such, duties for respect to persons qua (as) persons. These obligations are universal. 2. There are voluntary obligations, obligations that we owe to particular others, in so far, as we have agreed (whether through a promise, or a deal, or a contract). Communitarian Conception (MacIntyre) - Says there is another category, in addition to the Liberal View Obligations of solidarity, or loyalty, or membership. Construing all obligations as either natural duties or voluntary obligations, fails to capture obligations of either membership or solidarity. Loyalties whose moral force consists partly in the fact that living by them is inseparable from understanding ourselves as the particular persons we are. a.examples of obligations of membership that are particular, but don t necessarily flow from consent, but rather from membership, narrative, one s situation.community. i. Family - parents and children - saving one s child or parent over a stranger s ii. Religious Connection - Airlift rescue of Ethiopean Jews from drought by the Israelis. iii.national Patriotism - Franklin, TX Franklin, Mexico - US citizens support only those in Franklin, TX What about competing obligations? Universal obligation first Particular obligation then up to universals. The narrative of citizenship is a constructed one and false. Lottery of birth put me into the USA Sentimental/emotional attachment vs. moral obligation
4 SELF-TEST QUESTION 1 Which of the following best captures Kant s critique of Aristotle? a) It is a mistake to support a fair framework of rights within which people can pursue their own conceptions of the good life.b) It is a mistake to try to figure out what justice comes to.c) It is a mistake to base law or principles of justice on any one particular conception of the good life. d) All of the above.e) None of the above. QUESTION 2 Based on the lecture presentation, which of the following best captures what Alasdair MacIntyre calls the narrative conception of the self? a) "I am what I myself choose to be."b) "I cannot be held responsible for what my father did, unless I choose to assume such responsibility."c) "I cannot be held responsible for what my country does or has done in the past, unless I choose to assume such responsibility."d) "The self is encumbered, at least to some extent, by the history, the tradition, the communities of which it is a part. We cannot make sense of our lives, as a moral matter, in thinking what we ought to do without attending to these features about us." e) All of the above. QUESTION 3 According to the communitarian, there are not only natural duties (owed to all human beings as human beings) and voluntary obligations (incurred by voluntary consent (e.g. a promise) and owed to a particular person or a particular group of persons) but also obligations of solidarity/loyalty/membership. Which of the following, according to the communitarian, are true of these obligations of solidarity/loyalty/ membership? a) Their moral force consists partly in the fact that living by them is inseparable from understanding ourselves as the particular persons we are.b) They cannot be traced to an act of consent.c) They are owed to a particular person or a particular group of persons (but not to all human beings as human beings).d) All of the above. e) None of the above. Lecture 22 - Dilemmas of Loyalty 1. Consider strong objections to whether there are obligations of membership or solidarity. 2. Then, can those objections be met? Student objections from last lecture: If obligations flow from community membership, and I belong to several communities, won t there be conflictions? The examples of parents and children or the French resistance fighter refusing to bomb his own village, are pointing to matters of emotion and sentiment not true moral obligation. Patriotism understood as an obligation of membership, or solidarity beyond consent. Rawls says, It s one thing if someone runs for office or enlists in the army. They re making a voluntary choice. There is no particular obligations, strictly speaking, for citizens generally. Because it s not clear what is the requisite binding action and who has performed it. A case where loyalty outweighs the universal principles of justice will prove patriotism as an obligation of membership is wrong.
5 I wouldn t turn in my room mate, if I caught him/her cheating. Billy Bulger, politician, has a brother Whitey Bulger. When Billy Bulger before the Grand Jury, he refused to give info on him. Robert E. Lee on the Union side, opposed cessation. Upon being offered the commanding Generalship of the Union army, he said: The Communitarian would say there is something admirable in that. We can t make sense of Lee s dilemma, as a moral dilemma, unless we acknowledge that his claim of loyalty, arising from his sense of narrative, is a moral and not just sentimental tug. It s perfectly possible to accept obligations to one s family or country, provided honoring those obligations doesn t require you to violate any of the natural duties (requirements of universal respect - i.e., for person qua (as) persons). No injustices, and acknowledging and within the framework of universal duties. Obligations of membership are really collective selfishness, why should we honor them. It s really a kind of prejudice. One of the worries underlying these multiple objections to the idea of loyalty or membership having independent moral weight, is that it seems to argue that there is no way to finding principles of justice that are detached from conceptions of the good life, as they may be lived in any particular community. Communitarian Argument Suppose the priority of the right over the good can t be sustained? Suppose, instead, that justice and rights, unavoidably, are bound up with conceptions of the good. Does that mean that justice is a creature of convention, of the values that happen to prevail in any community at any given time? Communitarian Critic - Michael Walzer believes that justice is a matter of faithfulness or fidelity to the shared understanding, or conventions that prevail in any society, at any given time.
6 SELF-TEST Eyes on the Prize - video clip of 1950s southern Americans. Situated American southerners who believe in the shared understanding of segregation. They make arguments tying justice to shared loyalty and tradition in any given society. QUESTION 1 According to Kantian/Rawlsian liberalism, one's loyalty to country... a)... is a vice to be overcome.b)... cannot trump natural duties owed to all human beings as human beings. c)... always trumps natural duties owed to all human beings as human beings.d)... cannot be conceived of in terms of liberal ideas of consent and reciprocity.e) All of the above. QUESTION 2 How would a communitarian, such as MacIntyre or Sandel, respond to the claim that our loyalties to family and country are contingent attachments that should carry no moral weight? a) They may be contingent, but people tend to care a lot about them, which indicates their moral worth.b) Although I inherit my family and country by chance, such loyalties are parts of a meaningful narrative and, in this sense, not contingent. c) We ought always to follow such loyalties, even if it means committing injustices.d) Although we should consider such loyalties when judging how to act in our private lives, such loyalties should not ground political obligation.e) Insofar as such attachments have desirable political effects, they carry moral weight. QUESTION 3 According to the communitarian, Robert E. Lee's loyalty to Virginia is best understood as... a)... a sentiment that has nothing to do with morality.b)... a moral obligation of membership/ loyalty/solidarity. c)... a natural universal duty to humanity.d) All of the above.e) None of the above. Lecture 23 - Debating Same-Sex Marriage The southern segregationists in the video Eyes on the Prize spoke of their traditions and the narrative of their lives needing protection (i.e., segregation). Is this a fatal idea to the notion to the narrative conception of the self? Defending the narrative conception of the person as opposed to the Kant and Rawls conception - to defend that there are obligations of solidarity and membership. Then, there being such obligations lends force to the idea that arguments about justice can t be detached, after all, from questions of the good. Two different ways in which justice might be tied to the good, and argue for one of them: 1.Montesquieu gives us the most honest account of where the relentless universalizing tendency (of duties we have to human beings, as such)
7 leads the moral imagination. If our encompassing loyalty should always take precedence over the particular, then the distinction between friends and strangers should ideally be overcome. Our concern for our friends over strangers would be a kind of prejudice, a measure of our distance from our concern for the universal. a. Such world would be difficult to recognize as a human world. b. It reflects the fact that we learn to love humanity, not in general,but through its particular expressions. What are its consequences for justice? How is justice tied to the good? Relativists - To think about rights, to think about justice, look to the values that happen to prevail in any given community at any given time. Don t judge them by some outside standard, but instead, conceive justice as being faithful to the shared understandings of a particular tradition. Problem - it makes justice wholly conventional, a product of circumstance. And this deprives justice of its critical character. Non-relativists - Principles of justice depend for their justification on, not on the values that happen to prevail at any given moment in a certain place, but instead on the moral worth or the intrinsic good of the ends rights serve. The case for recognizing a right depends on showing that it honors or advances some important human good. This is not strictly speaking Communitarian, if by Communitarian you mean just giving over to a particular community the definition of justice. The challenge here is, how can we reason about the good? People hold different opinions about the good. Is it necessary, when arguing about justice to argue about the good? Sandel says, Yes. To prove this he starts a discussion on same-sex marriage, because it draws on deeply contested ideals, morally and religiously. The question is: Is there a way for society as a whole to sort out this issue without passing judgment on these moral or religious questions (about the moral possibility of homosexuality, about the proper ends of marriage as a social institution), so that the state can recognize same-sex marriage.
8 SELF-TEST Christian argument - sex is for procreation and the union of man and woman. Response: Do you masterbate? Response: Should the state be involved in me marrying myself? The state shouldn t be in the business of recognizing, or honoring, or affirming any particular telos or purpose of marriage or of human sexuality. So maybe the state should get out of the business of recognizing marriage at all. Question: Unless you adopt the position of no state recognition of marriage, is it possible to decide the question of same-sex marriage without taking a stand on the moral and religious issues over the proper telos of marriage? QUESTION 1 Which of the following capture Professor Sandel's understanding of the link between justice and the good? a) Professor Sandel rejects the idea that there is a link between justice and the good.b) Reasoning about the good/ about purposes and ends is an unavoidable feature of arguing about justice. c) The conception of the good that happens to prevail in a given society at a given time should determine justice and people s rights.d) Principles of justice depend for their justification on the moral worth or the instrinsic good of the ends rights serve.e) b) and d). QUESTION 2 According to Professor Sandel, the same-sex marriage debate connects to Aristotle s theory of distributive justice in which of the following ways: a) The debate typically involves teleological reasoning.b) The debate highlights the honorific dimension of justice.c) To defend same-sex marriage is to take a stand on the good of marriage.d) All of the above. e) None of the above. QUESTION 3 Which of the following positions on same-sex marriage is consistent with the priority of the right over the good? a) Insofar as same-sex couples and traditional couples are equally capable of realizing loving and committed relationships, they should both be granted marriages.b) The state should leave the distribution of marriages to the private sphere so as not to incite controversial religious debates. c) The political community should grant marriages to all couples who plan to realize the virtue
9 of child rearing.d) So long as the state grants identical legal rights to same-sex couples and heterosexual couples, the state may promote the worth of heterosexual relationships by reserving for them alone the title of marriage.e) (b) and (d).
University of York, UK
Justice and the Public Sphere: A Critique of John Rawls Political Liberalism Wanpat Youngmevittaya University of York, UK Abstract This article criticizes John Rawls conception of political liberalism,
More informationCommunitarianism I. Charles Taylor s Anti-Atomism. Dr. Clea F. Rees. Centre for Lifelong Learning Cardiff University
Charles Dr. Clea F. Rees ReesC17@cardiff.ac.uk Centre for Lifelong Learning Cardiff University Autumn 2011 Outline Advertisement: Free Christmas Lecture! Overview and Introduction Argument Structure Two
More informationMoral Communities in a Pluralistic Nation
From the SelectedWorks of Eric Bain-Selbo September 21, 2008 Moral Communities in a Pluralistic Nation Eric Bain-Selbo Available at: https://works.bepress.com/eric_bain_selbo/7/ Moral Communities in a
More informationPractical Rationality and Ethics. Basic Terms and Positions
Practical Rationality and Ethics Basic Terms and Positions Practical reasons and moral ought Reasons are given in answer to the sorts of questions ethics seeks to answer: What should I do? How should I
More informationTake Home Exam #2. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert
PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert Name: Date: Take Home Exam #2 Instructions (Read Before Proceeding!) Material for this exam is from class sessions 8-15. Matching and fill-in-the-blank questions
More informationWhat is the "Social" in "Social Coherence?" Commentary on Nelson Tebbe's Religious Freedom in an Egalitarian Age
Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development Volume 31 Issue 1 Volume 31, Summer 2018, Issue 1 Article 5 June 2018 What is the "Social" in "Social Coherence?" Commentary on Nelson Tebbe's Religious
More informationSANDEL ON RELIGION IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE
SANDEL ON RELIGION IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE Hugh Baxter For Boston University School of Law s Conference on Michael Sandel s Justice October 14, 2010 In the final chapter of Justice, Sandel calls for a new
More informationJudging Subsistence Rights by their Duties Eric Boot
Judging Subsistence Rights by their Duties Eric Boot Introduction Though Kant is often considered one of the fonts of inspiration for the human rights movement, the book in which he speaks most of rights
More informationKANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill)
KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill) German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was an opponent of utilitarianism. Basic Summary: Kant, unlike Mill, believed that certain types of actions (including murder,
More informationGS SCORE ETHICS - A - Z. Notes
ETHICS - A - Z Absolutism Act-utilitarianism Agent-centred consideration Agent-neutral considerations : This is the view, with regard to a moral principle or claim, that it holds everywhere and is never
More informationPhilosophical Ethics. The nature of ethical analysis. Discussion based on Johnson, Computer Ethics, Chapter 2.
Philosophical Ethics The nature of ethical analysis Discussion based on Johnson, Computer Ethics, Chapter 2. How to resolve ethical issues? censorship abortion affirmative action How do we defend our moral
More informationSUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6
SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6 Textbook: Louis P. Pojman, Editor. Philosophy: The quest for truth. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN-10: 0199697310; ISBN-13: 9780199697311 (6th Edition)
More informationThe Philosophy of Education. An Introduction By: VV.AA., Richard BALEY (Ed.) London: Continuum
John TILLSON The Philosophy of Education. An Introduction By: VV.AA., Richard BALEY (Ed.) London: Continuum John TILLSON II Época, Nº 6 (2011):185-190 185 The Philosophy of Education. An Introduction 1.
More informationThe Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy from Robert Wolff, In Defense of Anarchism (1970)
The Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy from Robert Wolff, In Defense of Anarchism (1970) 1. The Concept of Authority Politics is the exercise of the power of the state, or the attempt to influence
More informationLecture 12 Deontology. Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics
Lecture 12 Deontology Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics 1 Agenda 1. Immanuel Kant 2. Deontology 3. Hypothetical vs. Categorical Imperatives 4. Formula of the End in Itself 5. Maxims and
More informationChapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics
Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics TRUE/FALSE 1. The statement "nearly all Americans believe that individual liberty should be respected" is a normative claim. F This is a statement about people's beliefs;
More informationActual Message: Let s pray! Prayer:
1 Actual Message: Introduction: Well, People of God. We re continuing to talk about things that, taken together, can help us make sense of how to live well in the world the way it is, with all the things
More informationKant. Deontological Ethics
Kant 1 Deontological Ethics An action's moral value is determined by the nature of the action itself and the agent's motive DE contrasts with Utilitarianism which says that the goal or consequences of
More informationDeontological Ethics. Kant. Rules for Kant. Right Action
Deontological Ethics Kant An action's moral value is determined by the nature of the action itself and the agent's motive DE contrasts with Utilitarianism which says that the goal or consequences of an
More informationKANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire.
KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON The law is reason unaffected by desire. Aristotle, Politics Book III (1287a32) THE BIG IDEAS TO MASTER Kantian formalism Kantian constructivism
More informationVirtue Ethics. Chapter 7 ETCI Barbara MacKinnon Ethics and Contemporary Issues Professor Douglas Olena
Virtue Ethics Chapter 7 ETCI Barbara MacKinnon Ethics and Contemporary Issues Professor Douglas Olena Introductory Paragraphs 109 Story of Abraham Whom do you admire? The list of traits is instructive.
More informationPhilosophy Courses Fall 2011
Philosophy Courses Fall 2011 All philosophy courses satisfy the Humanities requirement -- except 120, which counts as one of the two required courses in Math/Logic. Many philosophy courses (e.g., Business
More informationDavid Ethics Bites is a series of interviews on applied ethics, produced in association with The Open University.
Ethics Bites What s Wrong With Killing? David Edmonds This is Ethics Bites, with me David Edmonds. Warburton And me Warburton. David Ethics Bites is a series of interviews on applied ethics, produced in
More informationETHICS IN ENGINEERING. Lecture 2/4
ETHICS IN ENGINEERING Lecture 2/4 REVIEW OF TOPIC FROM LECTURE 1 You are an employer at a large multinational software firm. You put an ad on Monster.com for software engineers to design a new product.
More informationPHI 1700: Global Ethics
PHI 1700: Global Ethics Session 13 March 22 nd, 2016 O Neill, A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics So far in this unit, we ve seen many different ways of judging right/wrong actions: Aristotle s virtue
More informationPhil 114, April 24, 2007 until the end of semester Mill: Individual Liberty Against the Tyranny of the Majority
Phil 114, April 24, 2007 until the end of semester Mill: Individual Liberty Against the Tyranny of the Majority The aims of On Liberty The subject of the work is the nature and limits of the power which
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY FALL 2013 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS
DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY FALL 2013 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS PHIL 2300-004 Beginning Philosophy 11:00-12:20 TR MCOM 00075 Dr. Francesca DiPoppa This class will offer an overview of important questions and topics
More informationA CONSEQUENTIALIST RESPONSE TO THE DEMANDINGNESS OBJECTION Nicholas R. Baker, Lee University THE DEMANDS OF ACT CONSEQUENTIALISM
1 A CONSEQUENTIALIST RESPONSE TO THE DEMANDINGNESS OBJECTION Nicholas R. Baker, Lee University INTRODUCTION We usually believe that morality has limits; that is, that there is some limit to what morality
More informationPeter Singer, Practical Ethics Discussion Questions/Study Guide Prepared by Prof. Bill Felice
Peter Singer, Practical Ethics Discussion Questions/Study Guide Prepared by Prof. Bill Felice Ch. 1: "About Ethics," p. 1-15 1) Clarify and discuss the different ethical theories: Deontological approaches-ethics
More informationfactors in Bentham's hedonic calculus.
Answers to quiz 1. An autonomous person: a) is socially isolated from other people. b) directs his or her actions on the basis his or own basic values, beliefs, etc. c) is able to get by without the help
More informationPhilosophical approaches to animal ethics
Philosophical approaches to animal ethics What this lecture will do Clarify why people think it is important to think about how we treat animals Discuss the distinction between animal welfare and animal
More informationNotes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning
Notes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning The final chapter of Moore and Parker s text is devoted to how we might apply critical reasoning in certain philosophical contexts.
More informationIn Kant s Conception of Humanity, Joshua Glasgow defends a traditional reading of
Glasgow s Conception of Kantian Humanity Richard Dean ABSTRACT: In Kant s Conception of Humanity, Joshua Glasgow defends a traditional reading of the humanity formulation of the Categorical Imperative.
More informationDEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS
DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS In ethical theories, if we mainly focus on the action itself, then we use deontological ethics (also known as deontology or duty ethics). In duty ethics, an action is morally right
More informationEvaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule
UTILITARIAN ETHICS Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule A dilemma You are a lawyer. You have a client who is an old lady who owns a big house. She tells you that
More informationLegend has it that a custodian put an image of a fly in a urinal in Amsterdam s Schiphol
Strings Attached: Untangling the Ethics of Incentives By Ruth W. Grant Princeton University Press, 187pp, 16.95 ISBN 978-0691151601 Published 23 November 2011 Legend has it that a custodian put an image
More informationNietzsche and Aristotle in contemporary virtue ethics
Ethical Theory and Practice - Final Paper 3 February 2005 Tibor Goossens - 0439940 CS Ethics 1A - WBMA3014 Faculty of Philosophy - Utrecht University Table of contents 1. Introduction and research question...
More informationSocratic and Platonic Ethics
Socratic and Platonic Ethics G. J. Mattey Winter, 2017 / Philosophy 1 Ethics and Political Philosophy The first part of the course is a brief survey of important texts in the history of ethics and political
More informationSuppose... Kant. The Good Will. Kant Three Propositions
Suppose.... Kant You are a good swimmer and one day at the beach you notice someone who is drowning offshore. Consider the following three scenarios. Which one would Kant says exhibits a good will? Even
More informationARISTOTLE, THE POLITICS
Lecture 18 - Aristotle - Justice and Virtue ARISTOTLE, THE POLITICS A short overview of the reading: Many rights-oriented philosophers believe that distributive justice is not a matter of rewarding virtue
More informationA Review on What Is This Thing Called Ethics? by Christopher Bennett * ** 1
310 Book Review Book Review ISSN (Print) 1225-4924, ISSN (Online) 2508-3104 Catholic Theology and Thought, Vol. 79, July 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.21731/ctat.2017.79.310 A Review on What Is This Thing
More informationFoundations of Bioethics
introductory lectures in bioethics Foundations of Bioethics Paul Menzel Pacific Lutheran University (philosophy, emeritus) Visiting Professor of Bioethics, CUHK 17 October 2015 Centre for Bioethics, CUHK
More informationJoseph Kahiga Kiruki, Moi University Jason T. Eberl, IUPUI
Joseph Kahiga Kiruki, Moi University Jason T. Eberl, IUPUI Communalistic Predominant among African communities Confined to specific communities bounded by Tribe Culture Race Gender Religion Class Transcendentalist
More informationShort Answers: Answer the following questions in one paragraph (each is worth 4 points).
Humanities 2702 Fall 2007 Midterm Exam There are two sections: a short answer section worth 24 points and an essay section worth 75 points you get one point for writing your name! No materials (books,
More informationTowards Richard Rorty s Critique on Transcendental Grounding of Human Rights by Dr. P.S. Sreevidya
Towards Richard Rorty s Critique on Transcendental Grounding of Human Rights by Dr. P.S. Sreevidya Abstract This article considers how the human rights theory established by US pragmatist Richard Rorty,
More informationSummary of Kant s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals
Summary of Kant s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Version 1.1 Richard Baron 2 October 2016 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Availability and licence............ 3 2 Definitions of key terms 4 3
More informationKant's Moral Philosophy
Kant's Moral Philosophy I. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (178.5)- Immanuel Kant A. Aims I. '7o seek out and establish the supreme principle of morality." a. To provide a rational basis for morality.
More informationAristotle's Theory of Friendship Tested. Syra Mehdi
Aristotle's Theory of Friendship Tested Syra Mehdi Is friendship a more important value than honesty? To respond to the question, consider this scenario: two high school students, Jamie and Tyler, who
More informationIdentities and Reasons (Comment on T.M. Scanlon s Ideas of Identity and their Normative. Status ) John Skorupski
1 Identities and Reasons (Comment on T.M. Scanlon s Ideas of Identity and their Normative Status ) John Skorupski Tim Scanlon s lecture discusses what kind of reasons one s identity may give rise to. It
More informationShort Answers: Answer the following questions in one paragraph (each is worth 5 points).
HU2700 Spring 2008 Midterm Exam Answer Key There are two sections: a short answer section worth 25 points and an essay section worth 75 points. No materials (books, notes, outlines, fellow classmates,
More informationKant's Liberalism: A Reply to Rolf George
Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Osgoode Digital Commons Articles & Book Chapters Faculty Scholarship 1988 Kant's Liberalism: A Reply to Rolf George Leslie Green Osgoode Hall Law School of York
More informationMULTICULTURALISM AND FUNDAMENTALISM. Multiculturalism
Multiculturalism Hoffman and Graham identify four key distinctions in defining multiculturalism. 1. Multiculturalism as an Attitude Does one have a positive and open attitude to different cultures? Here,
More informationIntroduction. The Rediscovery of Citizenship
Introduction The Rediscovery of Citizenship During an interview on the first anniversary of September 11th, author David Halberstam was suddenly moved to remark, I used to say I was a New Yorker. Now I
More informationChapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS CHAPTER OBJECTIVES. After exploring this chapter, you will be able to:
Chapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS MGT604 CHAPTER OBJECTIVES After exploring this chapter, you will be able to: 1. Explain the ethical framework of utilitarianism. 2. Describe how utilitarian
More informationAdam Smith and the Limits of Empiricism
Adam Smith and the Limits of Empiricism In the debate between rationalism and sentimentalism, one of the strongest weapons in the rationalist arsenal is the notion that some of our actions ought to be
More informationUtilitarianism: For and Against (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973), pp Reprinted in Moral Luck (CUP, 1981).
Draft of 3-21- 13 PHIL 202: Core Ethics; Winter 2013 Core Sequence in the History of Ethics, 2011-2013 IV: 19 th and 20 th Century Moral Philosophy David O. Brink Handout #14: Williams, Internalism, and
More informationThe ontology of human rights and obligations
The ontology of human rights and obligations Åsa Burman Department of Philosophy, Stockholm University asa.burman@philosophy.su.se If we are going to make sense of the notion of rights we have to answer
More informationAsian Philosophy Timeline. Confucius. Human Nature. Themes. Kupperman, Koller, Liu
Confucius Timeline Kupperman, Koller, Liu Early Vedas 1500-750 BCE Upanishads 1000-400 BCE Siddhartha Gautama 563-483 BCE Bhagavad Gita 200-100 BCE 1000 BCE 500 BCE 0 500 CE 1000 CE I Ching 2000-200 BCE
More informationTHEOLOGY IN THE FLESH
1 Introduction One might wonder what difference it makes whether we think of divine transcendence as God above us or as God ahead of us. It matters because we use these simple words to construct deep theological
More informationETHICAL POSITIONS STATEMENT
ETHICAL POSITIONS STATEMENT 2 GCU ETHICAL POSITIONS STATEMENT Grand Canyon University s ethical commitments derive either directly or indirectly from its Doctrinal Statement, which affirms the Bible alone
More informationKantian Deontology. A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7. Paul Nicholls 13P Religious Studies
A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7 Kantian Deontology Deontological (based on duty) ethical theory established by Emmanuel Kant in The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Part of the enlightenment
More informationSection 1 of chapter 1 of The Moral Sense advances the thesis that we have a
Extracting Morality from the Moral Sense Scott Soames Character and the Moral Sense: James Q. Wilson and the Future of Public Policy February 28, 2014 Wilburn Auditorium Pepperdine University Malibu, California
More informationSTATEMENT OF EXPECTATION FOR GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY FACULTY
STATEMENT OF EXPECTATION FOR GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY FACULTY Grand Canyon University takes a missional approach to its operation as a Christian university. In order to ensure a clear understanding of GCU
More informationPHIL 202: IV:
Draft of 3-6- 13 PHIL 202: Core Ethics; Winter 2013 Core Sequence in the History of Ethics, 2011-2013 IV: 19 th and 20 th Century Moral Philosophy David O. Brink Handout #9: W.D. Ross Like other members
More informationOn the Rawlsian Anthropology and the "Autonomous" Account
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Critical Reflections Essays of Significance & Critical Reflections 2017 Mar 31st, 10:30 AM - 11:00 AM On the Rawlsian Anthropology and the "Autonomous" Account
More informationEthics (ETHC) JHU-CTY Course Syllabus
(ETHC) JHU-CTY Course Syllabus Required Items: Ethical Theory: An Anthology 5 th ed. Russ Shafer-Landau. Wiley-Blackwell. 2013 The Fundamentals of 2 nd ed. Russ Shafer-Landau. Oxford University Press.
More informationJohn Charvet - The Nature and Limits of Human Equality
John Charvet - The Nature and Limits of Human Equality Schuppert, F. (2016). John Charvet - The Nature and Limits of Human Equality. Res Publica, 22(2), 243-247. DOI: 10.1007/s11158-016-9320-7 Published
More informationThe philosophy of human rights II: justifying HR. HUMR 5131 Fall 2017 Jakob Elster
The philosophy of human rights II: justifying HR HUMR 5131 Fall 2017 Jakob Elster What do we justify? 1. The existence of moral human rights? a. The existence of MHR understood as «natual rights», i.e.
More informationTHE EIGHT KEY QUESTIONS HANDBOOK
THE EIGHT KEY QUESTIONS HANDBOOK www.jmu.edu/mc mc@jmu.edu 540.568.4088 2013, The Madison Collaborative V131101 FAIRNESS What is the fair or just thing to do? How can I act equitably and treat others equally?
More informationMILL. The principle of utility determines the rightness of acts (or rules of action?) by their effect on the total happiness.
MILL The principle of utility determines the rightness of acts (or rules of action?) by their effect on the total happiness. Mill s principle of utility [A]ctions are right in proportion as they tend to
More informationFrom the Categorical Imperative to the Moral Law
From the Categorical Imperative to the Moral Law Marianne Vahl Master Thesis in Philosophy Supervisor Olav Gjelsvik Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Arts and Ideas UNIVERSITY OF OSLO May
More informationPsychological and Ethical Egoism
Psychological and Ethical Egoism Wrapping up Error Theory Psychological Egoism v. Ethical Egoism Ought implies can, the is/ought fallacy Arguments for and against Psychological Egoism Ethical Egoism Arguments
More informationAn Introduction to Ethics / Moral Philosophy
An Introduction to Ethics / Moral Philosophy Ethics / moral philosophy is concerned with what is good for individuals and society and is also described as moral philosophy. The term is derived from the
More informationAltruism. A selfless concern for other people purely for their own sake. Altruism is usually contrasted with selfishness or egoism in ethics.
GLOSSARY OF ETHIC TERMS Absolutism. The belief that there is one and only one truth; those who espouse absolutism usually also believe that they know what this absolute truth is. In ethics, absolutism
More informationBackward Looking Theories, Kant and Deontology
Backward Looking Theories, Kant and Deontology Study Guide Forward v. Backward Looking Theories Kant Goodwill Duty Categorical Imperative For Next Time: Rawls, Selections from A Theory of Justice Study
More informationChapter 2: Reasoning about ethics
Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics 2012 Cengage Learning All Rights reserved Learning Outcomes LO 1 Explain how important moral reasoning is and how to apply it. LO 2 Explain the difference between facts
More informationA lonelier contractualism A. J. Julius, UCLA, January
A lonelier contractualism A. J. Julius, UCLA, January 15 2008 1. A definition A theory of some normative domain is contractualist if, having said what it is for a person to accept a principle in that domain,
More informationThe Need for Metanormativity: A Response to Christmas
The Need for Metanormativity: A Response to Christmas Douglas J. Den Uyl Liberty Fund, Inc. Douglas B. Rasmussen St. John s University We would like to begin by thanking Billy Christmas for his excellent
More informationCONVENTIONALISM AND NORMATIVITY
1 CONVENTIONALISM AND NORMATIVITY TORBEN SPAAK We have seen (in Section 3) that Hart objects to Austin s command theory of law, that it cannot account for the normativity of law, and that what is missing
More informationThe Social Nature in John Stuart Mill s Utilitarianism. Helena Snopek. Vancouver Island University. Faculty Sponsor: Dr.
Snopek: The Social Nature in John Stuart Mill s Utilitarianism The Social Nature in John Stuart Mill s Utilitarianism Helena Snopek Vancouver Island University Faculty Sponsor: Dr. David Livingstone In
More informationNW: So does it differ from respect or is it just another way of saying respect?
Multiculturalism Bites Nancy Fraser on Recognition David Edmonds: In Britain, Christmas Day is a national holiday, but Passover or Eid are not. In this way Christianity receives more recognition, and might
More informationMoral Philosophy : Utilitarianism
Moral Philosophy : Utilitarianism Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a moral theory that was developed by Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873). It is a teleological or consequentialist
More informationTo link to this article:
This article was downloaded by: [University of Chicago Library] On: 24 May 2013, At: 08:10 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office:
More informationThe Nottingham eprints service makes this work by researchers of the University of Nottingham available open access under the following conditions.
Burns, Tony (2007) Aristotle, Cicero and cosmopolitan political thought. In: Cosmopolitanism: Past and Present, 6-9 June 2007, University of Dundee. (Unpublished) Access from the University of Nottingham
More information-Montaigne, Essays- -Epicurus, quoted by Diogenes Laertius-
ETHICS: AN INTRODUCTION PHI 125-650 Fall 2016 M -W 10:00 11:15 If, like truth, the lie had but one face, we would be on better terms. For we would accept as certain the opposite of what the liar would
More informationBishop s Report To The Judicial Council Of The United Methodist Church
Bishop s Report To The Judicial Council Of The United Methodist Church 1. This is the form which the Judicial Council is required to provide for the reporting of decisions of law made by bishops in response
More informationPhil 114, Wednesday, April 11, 2012 Hegel, The Philosophy of Right 1 7, 10 12, 14 16, 22 23, 27 33, 135, 141
Phil 114, Wednesday, April 11, 2012 Hegel, The Philosophy of Right 1 7, 10 12, 14 16, 22 23, 27 33, 135, 141 Dialectic: For Hegel, dialectic is a process governed by a principle of development, i.e., Reason
More informationAdmin Identifying ethical issues Ethics and philosophy The African worldview Ubuntu as an ethical theory
23 July 2014 Admin Identifying ethical issues Ethics and philosophy The African worldview Ubuntu as an ethical theory Please sign a register before you leave Make sure you catch up anything if you missed
More informationQ2) The test of an ethical argument lies in the fact that others need to be able to follow it and come to the same result.
QUIZ 1 ETHICAL ISSUES IN MEDIA, BUSINESS AND SOCIETY WHAT IS ETHICS? Business ethics deals with values, facts, and arguments. Q2) The test of an ethical argument lies in the fact that others need to be
More informationA. The Three Main Branches of the Philosophical Study of Ethics. 2. Normative Ethics
A. The Three Main Branches of the Philosophical Study of Ethics 1. Meta-ethics 2. Normative Ethics 3. Applied Ethics 1 B. Meta-ethics consists in the attempt to answer the fundamental philosophical questions
More informationLecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley
Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I Participation Quiz Pick an answer between A E at random. (thanks to Rodrigo for suggesting this quiz) Ethical Egoism Achievement of your happiness is the only moral
More informationMaking Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? A Dilemma: - My boss. - The shareholders. - Other stakeholders
Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? - My boss - The shareholders - Other stakeholders - Basic principles about conduct and its impacts - What is good for me - What
More informationETHICS AND RELIGION. Prof. Dr. John Edmund Hare
Ethics and Religion 49 Prof. Dr. John Edmund Hare ETHICS AND RELIGION The topic for today is three ways in which we can establish the dependence of morality upon religion. I will give these three ways
More informationDepartment of Philosophy. Module descriptions 2017/18. Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules
Department of Philosophy Module descriptions 2017/18 Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules Please be aware that all modules are subject to availability. If you have any questions about the modules,
More informationPhilosophical Ethics. Consequentialism Deontology (Virtue Ethics)
Consequentialism Deontology (Virtue Ethics) Consequentialism Deontology (Virtue Ethics) Consequentialism the value of an action (the action's moral worth, its rightness or wrongness) derives entirely from
More informationReason Papers Vol. 36, no. 1
Gotthelf, Allan, and James B. Lennox, eds. Metaethics, Egoism, and Virtue: Studies in Ayn Rand s Normative Theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2011. Ayn Rand now counts as a figure
More informationDefending Rawls on the Self: A Response to the Communitarian Critique. Bernard Matolino
Defending Rawls on the Self: A Response to the Communitarian Critique Bernard Matolino Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Philosophy, University
More informationBenjamin Visscher Hole IV Phil 100, Intro to Philosophy
Benjamin Visscher Hole IV Phil 100, Intro to Philosophy Kantian Ethics I. Context II. The Good Will III. The Categorical Imperative: Formulation of Universal Law IV. The Categorical Imperative: Formulation
More informationLegal Subjectivity and the Basis of Citizenship in Aristotle's Philosophy of Law
The University of Nottingham From the SelectedWorks of Dr Burns April 1, 2009 Legal Subjectivity and the Basis of Citizenship in Aristotle's Philosophy of Law Dr Burns, University of Nottingham Available
More informationThinking Ethically: A Framework for Moral Decision Making
Thinking Ethically: A Framework for Moral Decision Making Developed by Manuel Velasquez, Claire Andre, Thomas Shanks, S.J., and Michael J. Meyer Moral issues greet us each morning in the newspaper, confront
More information