Corporate Epistemology
|
|
- Blaise Payne
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Corporate Eptemology Competing Philosophies of Truth in Business And How They Influence Knowledge Management A Perspective Developed by Joseph M. Firestone, Ph.D. and Mark W. McElroy In Concert With the Knowledge Management Consortium International, Inc. November, 2003 Copyright 2003 by Executive Information Systems, Inc. and Mark W. McElroy
2 Introduction Performance in business nothing more than in use What passes for therefore of enormous importance outcomes depend on its quality Knowledge can be seen as beliefs or claims that we regard as true Different approaches, or philosophies, for determining truth can be found in business Knowledge Management practices vary accordingly What we need, then, a view of the competing philosophies of truth in use i.e., the competing corporate eptemologies Copyright 2003 by Executive Information Systems, Inc. and Mark W. McElroy
3 Competing Eptemologies Truth Empiricm Foundationalm Coherentm Idealm Religious Managerial Rationalm Justificationm (Floating Foundationalm) Expert-Based Paradigmatic Communitarian Managerial Fallibilm Copyright 2003 by Executive Information Systems, Inc. and Mark W. McElroy Coherentm Instrumentalm Pragmatm Individualt Solidart Criticalm Cultural Paradigmatic Communitarian Htorical Critical Rationalm Critical Scientific
4 Glossary Coherentm: The view that a true belief or statement one that coheres maximally with pre-exting true beliefs or statements. Communitarianm: A form of Justificationm which makes an appeal to a consensus or communityheld view as a bas for justifying as either true and certain, or at least probable. Criticalm: A view of inquiry which holds that all human fallible and should be regarded as such (see Fallibilm), and that we are rational only to the extent that we hold our beliefs and our claims open to criticm and testing in order to eliminate the errors in them. Criticalm stands in opposition to Foundationalm and Justificationm in that it holds that there are no true and certain beliefs or formulations, and that no beliefs or claims can be or need be justified, but only subjected to error elimination through criticm. Critical Rationalm: The orientation of Karl R. Popper which holds that all human fallible and should be regarded as such (see Fallibilm), and that we are rational only to the extent that we hold our beliefs and our claims open to criticm and testing in order to eliminate the errors in them. It based on the idea that "all life problem-solving" and that problem solving a process of creating trials (between competing claims) and engaging in error elimination (criticm of these competing claims relying on the use of deductive reasoning and empirical testing where possible). Critical rationalm stands in opposition to foundationalm and justificationm, and broader than falsificationm, which relates to empirical testing of claims only. Critical Scientific : A point of view that subscribes to eptemological realm, fallibilm, criticalm, and the importance of measuring "truthlikeness", while continuing to assert the role of some forms of inductive inference in science. Cultural : The view that relative to the world-view embodied in the knower s culture. Empiricm: An eptemology that asserts that all our derived from the foundation of our experience, and justified true belief. Idealm: The view that truth maximal coherence with fundamental truths given by the mind. Copyright 2003 by Executive Information Systems, Inc. and Mark W. McElroy
5 Glossary (2) : The view that a true theory corresponds to the facts. Expert-Based Justificationm: The idea that in organizations justifiable by expert authority Fallibilm: A viewpoint that sees all human as irreparably fallible and incapable of being proven or shown to be certain or justified. Floating Foundationalm: A form of Foundationalm that seeks to ground upon a subjective commitment to a belief, theory, paradigm, or type of group solidarity which, themselves, are not justified, but which are regarded by their subscribers as though they are (Notturno, 2000). Foundationalm: A justificationt form of eptemology which claims that we can justify our and show it to be certain by appealing to some underlying, bedrock set of truths or authority (e.g., Cartesian Rationalm and Brith Empiricm). Htorical : The view that truth relative to the worldview charactertic of a htorical period Individualt : The view that truth relative to an individual s belief. Instrumentalm: The doctrine that theories have no truth value but are merely tools for prediction and application. Justificationm: The view that justified true belief, and that we can and should attempt to justify our as infallibly true by demonstrating that it. The widespread acceptance of fallibilm has recently watered down th idea of justificationm, so that those who hold to it now believe that need only be justified as highly probable rather than infallibly true. Th comproming of the idea of justification has given re to Floating Foundationalm (see above). Managerial Justificationm: The idea that in organizations fallible but may be justified by managerial authority. Managerial : The idea that in organizations corresponds to the facts and justified by managerial authority. Copyright 2003 by Executive Information Systems, Inc. and Mark W. McElroy
6 Glossary (3) Paradigmatic Justificationm: The idea that in organizations justified by its conformance to the criteria of evaluation given by the organization s dominant paradigm of inquiry. Paradigmatic : The idea that truth relative to the results of evaluations conforming to the criteria of evaluation given by the organization s dominant paradigm of inquiry. Pragmatm: The view that truth a function of the utility of a belief or claim, and that all of our beliefs and claims are both fallible and based on presuppositions. Rationalm: An eptemology characterized by both justificationm and foundationalm, expounded most notably by Rene Descartes, which held that could be justified by reason or intellect alone, and not by sensory perception or experience. : A form of justificationm (see Justificationm) that regards all truth and certainty as personal, local, and relative to an individual or a collective i.e., anti-foundationalt, but not antijustificationt. Religious : An eptemology characterized by both justificationm and foundationalm, which holds that can be justified by religious faith alone and not by reason or intellect, or by sensory perception or experience. Solidart : The idea that truth relative to the consensus of one s group, community, organization, culture or other collective. Theory of Truth: A formulation that defines the term "Truth." Theory of : A normative theory that specifies how one ought to comparatively evaluate claims in relation to truth or falsity, "truthlikeness," coherence, utility, simplicity or some other -related goal. Copyright 2003 by Executive Information Systems, Inc. and Mark W. McElroy
7 So What?
8 Here s What.. Most mainstream businesses and their managers are Fallibilt (i.e., they admit the fallibility of their own and avoid the view that can be had with certainty) th a good thing But within the Fallibilt thread, there are divions KM diverges accordingly: Some Fallibilts inst on adopting beliefs and claims as if they were justifiably true, even though they admit with certainty unavailable to us (these are Justificationts of the Floating Foundationalt kind) Other Fallibilts stick to their uncertainty roots and hold, instead, to a view that what we must do continuously hold our beliefs and claims open to criticm (these are Criticalts) Corporate KM KM strategies will will dramatically differ differ (and (and should), depending, in in part, part, on on whether or or not not their their eptemologies are are Floating Foundationalt or or Criticalt! Copyright 2003 by Executive Information Systems, Inc. and Mark W. McElroy
9 What Do Most Organizations Do?
10 The Mainstream Management View Truth Empiricm Foundationalm Coherentm Idealm Religious Managerial Rationalm Justificationm (Floating Foundationalm) Expert-Based Paradigmatic Communitarian Managerial Fallibilm Copyright 2003 by Executive Information Systems, Inc. and Mark W. McElroy Coherentm Instrumentalm Pragmatm Individualt Solidart Criticalm Cultural Paradigmatic Communitarian Htorical Critical Rationalm Critical Scientific
11 The Mainstream View Admits that our fallible, but says we must carry on as though it weren t by endowing managers (or other authorities) to create that others regard as true A form of Justificationm that requires us to suspend our dbelief in the fallibility of What Mark Notturno calls Floating Foundationalm a form of Foundationalm with ironically no foundation! Says that hatched by authorities justifiably true Leads to adoption of falsehoods more often because the beliefs and claims of authorities go untested Fraught with rk! The The corporate eptemologies of of most most firms firms are are fundamentally Justificationt! Copyright 2003 by Executive Information Systems, Inc. and Mark W. McElroy
12 What We Propose
13 The New Knowledge Management (TNKM) View Truth Empiricm Foundationalm Coherentm Idealm Religious Managerial Rationalm Justificationm (Floating Foundationalm) Expert-Based Paradigmatic Communitarian Managerial Fallibilm Copyright 2003 by Executive Information Systems, Inc. and Mark W. McElroy Coherentm Instrumentalm Pragmatm Individualt Solidart Criticalm Cultural Paradigmatic Communitarian Htorical Critical Rationalm Critical Scientific
14 What s the Advantage to Criticalm? Quality of higher, since assumption of justifiable truth abandoned in favor of holding continuously open to criticm and accountable for its errors A powerful form of rk management, since all actions taken in business are nothing more than in use (i.e., higher-quality leads to lower-rk actions ) Since it broadly participatory in production, it shifts responsibility for it from the few to the many a larger pool of creativity and innovation Correspondingly higher levels of transparency and inclusiveness lead to more satfied and trusting stakeholders Copyright 2003 by Executive Information Systems, Inc. and Mark W. McElroy Firms Firms that that take take Criticalt positions in in their their eptemologies are are fundamentally more more adaptive because they they never never view view their their as as being being true true with with certainty!
15 The Tree Truth Foundationalm Fallibilm Copyright 2003 by Executive Information Systems, Inc. and Mark W. McElroy Coherentm Coherentm Instrumentalm Pragmatm The Corporate Battleground Is Here Idealm Individualt Solidart Empiricm Religious Managerial Rationalm Justificationm (Floating Foundationalm) Which to embrace? Criticalm Cultural Paradigmatic Communitarian Htorical Expert-Based Paradigmatic Communitarian Managerial Critical Rationalm Critical Scientific
16 Knowledge Management Implications Foundationalm Fallibilm Truth Coherentm Coherentm Instrumentalm Pragmatm Idealm Individualt Solidart Empiricm Religious Managerial Rationalm Justificationm (Floating Foundationalm) Criticalm Cultural Paradigmatic Communitarian Htorical Expert-Based Paradigmatic Communitarian Managerial Critical Rationalm Critical Scientific Copyright 2003 by Executive Information Systems, Inc. and Mark W. McElroy Justificationt Justificationt KM: KM: Relies Relies on on appeals appeals to to authority authority as as bas bas of of organizational organizational Business Business and and both both controlled controlled and and dominated dominated by by management management Knowledge Knowledge less less participatory participatory Knowledge Knowledge produced produced rkier rkier Criticalt Criticalt KM: KM: Sees Sees all all as as truly truly fallible fallible Business Business controlled controlled and and dominated dominated by by management; management; not not Knowledge Knowledge produced produced of of higher higher quality quality Knowledge Knowledge Claim Claim ethic ethic strong strong KM KM mostly mostly about about maintaining maintaining openness openness and and rigor rigor in in production production
17 Summary and Conclusions Most practices in KM are Justificationt in orientation While rejecting the idea of truth with certainty, they carry on as though they don t (e.g., produced by managers treated as if it were true with certainty) Justificationm introduces and intensifies rk Crticalm, by contrast, institutionalizes a Fallibilt ethic and rewards testing and evaluation of claims Criticalm lowers rk and improves quality of performance by acting as a quality control system for KM has become a powerful new form of rk management and should be positioned accordingly! Copyright 2003 by Executive Information Systems, Inc. and Mark W. McElroy
18 The End Contact Info Joe Firestone, Executive Information Systems, Inc Mark McElroy, Macroinnovation Associates, LLC
A Review of Norm Geisler's Prolegomena
A Review of Norm Geisler's Prolegomena 2017 by A Jacob W. Reinhardt, All Rights Reserved. Copyright holder grants permission to reduplicate article as long as it is not changed. Send further requests to
More informationHume. Hume the Empiricist. Judgments about the World. Impressions as Content of the Mind. The Problem of Induction & Knowledge of the External World
Hume Hume the Empiricist The Problem of Induction & Knowledge of the External World As an empiricist, Hume thinks that all knowledge of the world comes from sense experience If all we can know comes from
More informationThe Human Science Debate: Positivist, Anti-Positivist, and Postpositivist Inquiry. By Rebecca Joy Norlander. November 20, 2007
The Human Science Debate: Positivist, Anti-Positivist, and Postpositivist Inquiry By Rebecca Joy Norlander November 20, 2007 2 What is knowledge and how is it acquired through the process of inquiry? Is
More informationThere are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.
INTRODUCTION TO LOGICAL THINKING Lecture 6: Two types of argument and their role in science: Deduction and induction 1. Deductive arguments Arguments that claim to provide logically conclusive grounds
More informationThe Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism
The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism Issues: I. Problem of Induction II. Popper s rejection of induction III. Salmon s critique of deductivism 2 I. The problem of induction 1. Inductive vs.
More informationSAMPLE COURSE OUTLINE PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS GENERAL YEAR 11
SAMPLE COURSE OUTLINE PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS GENERAL YEAR 11 Copyright School Curriculum and Standards Authority, 2014 This document apart from any third party copyright material contained in it may be
More informationRichard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING
1 REASONING Reasoning is, broadly speaking, the cognitive process of establishing reasons to justify beliefs, conclusions, actions or feelings. It also refers, more specifically, to the act or process
More informationSummary Kooij.indd :14
Summary The main objectives of this PhD research are twofold. The first is to give a precise analysis of the concept worldview in education to gain clarity on how the educational debate about religious
More informationRobert Kiely Office Hours: Monday 4:15 6:00; Wednesday 1-3; Thursday 2-3
A History of Philosophy: Nature, Certainty, and the Self Fall, 2014 Robert Kiely oldstuff@imsa.edu Office Hours: Monday 4:15 6:00; Wednesday 1-3; Thursday 2-3 Description How do we know what we know? Epistemology,
More informationIntroduction to Deductive and Inductive Thinking 2017
Topic 1: READING AND INTERVENING by Ian Hawkins. Introductory i The Philosophy of Natural Science 1. CONCEPTS OF REALITY? 1.1 What? 1.2 How? 1.3 Why? 1.4 Understand various views. 4. Reality comprises
More informationThe problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Defining induction...
The problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 2 2.0 Defining induction... 2 3.0 Induction versus deduction... 2 4.0 Hume's descriptive
More informationThe Unbearable Lightness of Theory of Knowledge:
The Unbearable Lightness of Theory of Knowledge: Desert Mountain High School s Summer Reading in five easy steps! STEP ONE: Read these five pages important background about basic TOK concepts: Knowing
More informationPhilosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Science Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationEthics is subjective.
Introduction Scientific Method and Research Ethics Ethical Theory Greg Bognar Stockholm University September 22, 2017 Ethics is subjective. If ethics is subjective, then moral claims are subjective in
More informationSUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 1
SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 1 Textbook: Louis P. Pojman, Editor. Philosophy: The quest for truth. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN-10: 0199697310; ISBN-13: 9780199697311 (6th Edition)
More informationIs Truth the Primary Epistemic Goal? Joseph Barnes
Is Truth the Primary Epistemic Goal? Joseph Barnes I. Motivation: what hangs on this question? II. How Primary? III. Kvanvig's argument that truth isn't the primary epistemic goal IV. David's argument
More informationThis handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first.
Michael Lacewing Three responses to scepticism This handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first. MITIGATED SCEPTICISM The term mitigated scepticism
More informationCourses providing assessment data PHL 202. Semester/Year
1 Department/Program 2012-2016 Assessment Plan Department: Philosophy Directions: For each department/program student learning outcome, the department will provide an assessment plan, giving detailed information
More informationInquiry, Knowledge, and Truth: Pragmatic Conceptions. Pragmatism is a philosophical position characterized by its specific mode of inquiry, and
Inquiry, Knowledge, and Truth: Pragmatic Conceptions I. Introduction Pragmatism is a philosophical position characterized by its specific mode of inquiry, and an account of meaning. Pragmatism was first
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T AGENDA 1. Review of Epistemology 2. Kant Kant s Compromise Kant s Copernican Revolution 3. The Nature of Truth KNOWLEDGE:
More informationIntro to Philosophy. Review for Exam 2
Intro to Philosophy Review for Exam 2 Epistemology Theory of Knowledge What is knowledge? What is the structure of knowledge? What particular things can I know? What particular things do I know? Do I know
More informationDoes Deduction really rest on a more secure epistemological footing than Induction?
Does Deduction really rest on a more secure epistemological footing than Induction? We argue that, if deduction is taken to at least include classical logic (CL, henceforth), justifying CL - and thus deduction
More informationRethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View
http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319532363 Carlo Cellucci Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View 1 Preface From its very beginning, philosophy has been viewed as aimed at knowledge and methods to
More informationChrist-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking
Christ-Centered Critical Thinking Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking 1 In this lesson we will learn: To evaluate our thinking and the thinking of others using the Intellectual Standards Two approaches to evaluating
More informationKing and Kitchener Packet 3 King and Kitchener: The Reflective Judgment Model
: The Reflective Judgment Model Patricia Margaret Brown King: Director, Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education, University of Michigan Karen Strohm Kitchener Professor in the Counseling
More informationScientific Method and Research Ethics
Different ways of knowing the world? Scientific Method and Research Ethics Value of Science 1. Greg Bognar Stockholm University September 28, 2018 We know where we came from. We are the descendants of
More informationWhy Good Science Is Not Value-Free
Why Good Science Is Not Value-Free Karim Bschir, Dep. of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zurich FPF 2017 Workshop, Zurich Scientific Challenges in the Risk Assessment of Food Contact Materials
More informationFrom the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
From the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Epistemology Peter D. Klein Philosophical Concept Epistemology is one of the core areas of philosophy. It is concerned with the nature, sources and limits
More informationPhilosophy 427 Intuitions and Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2011
Philosophy 427 Intuitions and Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2011 Class 10 Reflections On Reflective Equilibrium The Epistemological Importance of Reflective Equilibrium P Balancing general
More informationHOBBES S DECEIVING GOD: THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THOMAS HOBBES AND RENE DESCARTES. Gabriela Gorescu. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of
HOBBES S DECEIVING GOD: THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THOMAS HOBBES AND RENE DESCARTES Gabriela Gorescu Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2015 APPROVED: Richard
More informationA Quick Review of the Scientific Method Transcript
Screen 1: Marketing Research is based on the Scientific Method. A quick review of the Scientific Method, therefore, is in order. Text based slide. Time Code: 0:00 A Quick Review of the Scientific Method
More informationTheory of knowledge prescribed titles
Theory of knowledge prescribed titles November 2009 and May 2010 Your theory of knowledge essay for examination must be submitted to your teacher for authentication. It must be written on one of the ten
More informationAn Epistemological Position: Knowledge by Sensation is the only Knowledge that can be regarded as Truth. Leon Reynolds
An Epistemological Position: Knowledge by Sensation is the only Knowledge that can be regarded as Truth Leon Reynolds Introduction Most Empiricists from Locke through Russell to the present have... taken
More informationVol. II, No. 5, Reason, Truth and History, 127. LARS BERGSTRÖM
Croatian Journal of Philosophy Vol. II, No. 5, 2002 L. Bergström, Putnam on the Fact-Value Dichotomy 1 Putnam on the Fact-Value Dichotomy LARS BERGSTRÖM Stockholm University In Reason, Truth and History
More informationPhilosophy 427 Intuitions and Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2011
Philosophy 427 Intuitions and Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2011 Class 4 The Myth of the Given Marcus, Intuitions and Philosophy, Fall 2011, Slide 1 Atomism and Analysis P Wittgenstein
More informationFalsification or Confirmation: From Logic to Psychology
Falsification or Confirmation: From Logic to Psychology Roman Lukyanenko Information Systems Department Florida international University rlukyane@fiu.edu Abstract Corroboration or Confirmation is a prominent
More informationHoong Juan Ru. St Joseph s Institution International. Candidate Number Date: April 25, Theory of Knowledge Essay
Hoong Juan Ru St Joseph s Institution International Candidate Number 003400-0001 Date: April 25, 2014 Theory of Knowledge Essay Word Count: 1,595 words (excluding references) In the production of knowledge,
More informationClass 4 - The Myth of the Given
2 3 Philosophy 2 3 : Intuitions and Philosophy Fall 2011 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class 4 - The Myth of the Given I. Atomism and Analysis In our last class, on logical empiricism, we saw that Wittgenstein
More informationTHE SEMANTIC REALISM OF STROUD S RESPONSE TO AUSTIN S ARGUMENT AGAINST SCEPTICISM
SKÉPSIS, ISSN 1981-4194, ANO VII, Nº 14, 2016, p. 33-39. THE SEMANTIC REALISM OF STROUD S RESPONSE TO AUSTIN S ARGUMENT AGAINST SCEPTICISM ALEXANDRE N. MACHADO Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) Email:
More informationDEMOCRACY, DELIBERATION, AND RATIONALITY Guido Pincione & Fernando R. Tesón
1 Copyright 2005 Guido Pincione and Fernando R. Tesón DEMOCRACY, DELIBERATION, AND RATIONALITY Guido Pincione & Fernando R. Tesón Cambridge University Press, forthcoming CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION CONTENTS
More informationKANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire.
KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON The law is reason unaffected by desire. Aristotle, Politics Book III (1287a32) THE BIG IDEAS TO MASTER Kantian formalism Kantian constructivism
More informationSkepticism is True. Abraham Meidan
Skepticism is True Abraham Meidan Skepticism is True Copyright 2004 Abraham Meidan All rights reserved. Universal Publishers Boca Raton, Florida USA 2004 ISBN: 1-58112-504-6 www.universal-publishers.com
More informationEpistemology. Theory of Knowledge
Epistemology Theory of Knowledge Epistemological Questions What is knowledge? What is the structure of knowledge? What particular things can I know? What particular things do I know? Do I know x? What
More informationIntro. The need for a philosophical vocabulary
Critical Realism & Philosophy Webinar Ruth Groff August 5, 2015 Intro. The need for a philosophical vocabulary You don t have to become a philosopher, but just as philosophers should know their way around
More informationMaster of Arts Course Descriptions
Bible and Theology Master of Arts Course Descriptions BTH511 Dynamics of Kingdom Ministry (3 Credits) This course gives students a personal and Kingdom-oriented theology of ministry, demonstrating God
More informationScientific errors should be controlled, not prevented. Daniel Eindhoven University of Technology
Scientific errors should be controlled, not prevented Daniel Lakens @Lakens Eindhoven University of Technology 1) Error control is the central aim of empirical science. 2) We need statistical decision
More informationThe Rightness Error: An Evaluation of Normative Ethics in the Absence of Moral Realism
An Evaluation of Normative Ethics in the Absence of Moral Realism Mathais Sarrazin J.L. Mackie s Error Theory postulates that all normative claims are false. It does this based upon his denial of moral
More information! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! Key figure: René Descartes.
! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! What is the relation between that knowledge and that given in the sciences?! Key figure: René
More informationcomplete state of affairs and an infinite set of events in one go. Imagine the following scenarios:
-1- -2- EPISTEMOLOGY AND METHODOLOGY 3. We are in a physics laboratory and make the observation that all objects fall at a uniform Can we solve the problem of induction, and if not, to what extent is it
More informationA Wesleyan Approach to Knowledge
Olivet Nazarene University Digital Commons @ Olivet Faculty Scholarship - Theology Theology 9-24-2012 A Wesleyan Approach to Knowledge Kevin Twain Lowery Olivet Nazarene University, klowery@olivet.edu
More informationDo we have knowledge of the external world?
Do we have knowledge of the external world? This book discusses the skeptical arguments presented in Descartes' Meditations 1 and 2, as well as how Descartes attempts to refute skepticism by building our
More informationPhilosophy Epistemology. Topic 3 - Skepticism
Michael Huemer on Skepticism Philosophy 3340 - Epistemology Topic 3 - Skepticism Chapter II. The Lure of Radical Skepticism 1. Mike Huemer defines radical skepticism as follows: Philosophical skeptics
More informationWriting Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008)
Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008) Module by: The Cain Project in Engineering and Professional Communication. E-mail the author Summary: This module presents techniques
More informationArguing with Libertarianism without Argument : Critical Rationalism and how it applies to Libertarianism
Arguing with Libertarianism without Argument : Critical Rationalism and how it applies to Libertarianism J C Lester (18-11-17) Abstract Introduction This is a response to Libertarianism without Argument.
More informationTCA:ICT? Thinking Critically About: "Is Christianity True?"
TCA:ICT? Thinking Critically About: "Is Christianity True?" Thinking Critically About: Is Christianity True? Podcast #3: What is Christianity? Introduction to Your Host My Name: Bradley Bowen My Role:
More informationSydenham College of Commerce & Economics. * Dr. Sunil S. Shete. * Associate Professor
Sydenham College of Commerce & Economics * Dr. Sunil S. Shete * Associate Professor Keywords: Philosophy of science, research methods, Logic, Business research Abstract This paper review Popper s epistemology
More informationRealism and the success of science argument. Leplin:
Realism and the success of science argument Leplin: 1) Realism is the default position. 2) The arguments for anti-realism are indecisive. In particular, antirealism offers no serious rival to realism in
More informationA Christian Philosophy of Education
A Christian Philosophy of Education God, whose subsistence is in and of Himself, 1 who has revealed Himself in three persons, is the creator of all things. He is sovereign, maintains dominion over all
More informationVideo Reaction. Opening Activity. Journal #16
Justification / explanation Interpretation / inference Methodologies / paradigms Verification / truth / certainty Argument / evaluation Evidence / data / facts / support / proof Limitations / uncertainties
More informationLogic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Logic, Truth & Epistemology Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationKnowledge and Authority
Knowledge and Authority Epistemic authority Formally, epistemic authority is often expressed using expert principles, e.g. If you know that an expert believes P, then you should believe P The rough idea
More informationTuesday, September 2, Idealism
Idealism Enlightenment Puzzle How do these fit into a scientific picture of the world? Norms Necessity Universality Mind Idealism The dominant 19th-century response: often today called anti-realism Everything
More informationA Warning about So-Called Rationalists
A Warning about So-Called Rationalists Mark F. Sharlow Have you ever heard of rationalism and rationalists? If so, have you wondered what these words mean? A rationalist is someone who believes that reason
More informationFoundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology
1. Introduction Ryan C. Smith Philosophy 125W- Final Paper April 24, 2010 Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology Throughout this paper, the goal will be to accomplish three
More informationPhilosophy. Aim of the subject
Philosophy FIO Philosophy Philosophy is a humanistic subject with ramifications in all areas of human knowledge and activity, since it covers fundamental issues concerning the nature of reality, the possibility
More informationMY PURPOSE IN THIS BOOK IS TO PRESENT A
I Holistic Pragmatism and the Philosophy of Culture MY PURPOSE IN THIS BOOK IS TO PRESENT A philosophical discussion of the main elements of civilization or culture such as science, law, religion, politics,
More informationThe influence of Religion in Vocational Education and Training A survey among organizations active in VET
The influence of Religion in Vocational Education and Training A survey among organizations active in VET ADDITIONAL REPORT Contents 1. Introduction 2. Methodology!"#! $!!%% & & '( 4. Analysis and conclusions(
More informationIntroduction: Paradigms, Theism, and the Parity Thesis
Digital Commons @ George Fox University Rationality and Theistic Belief: An Essay on Reformed Epistemology College of Christian Studies 1993 Introduction: Paradigms, Theism, and the Parity Thesis Mark
More informationJohn Locke. British Empiricism
John Locke British Empiricism Locke Biographical Notes: Locke is credited as the founder of the British "Common Sense" movement, later known as empiricism - he was also the founder of the modern political
More informationA-LEVEL Religious Studies
A-LEVEL Religious Studies RST3B Paper 3B Philosophy of Religion Mark Scheme 2060 June 2017 Version: 1.0 Final Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the relevant
More informationAcademic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion.
ACADEMIC SKILLS THINKING CRITICALLY In the everyday sense of the word, critical has negative connotations. But at University, Critical Thinking is a positive process of understanding different points of
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy Levels 1 and 2
Unit 1: The Origins of Philosophy Suggested Duration: about 10 days Introduction to Philosophy Levels 1 and 2 Access the SAS content at: www.pdesas.org Standards, Big Ideas, and Essential Questions Concepts
More informationSYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY. Contents
UNIT 1 SYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY Contents 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Research in Philosophy 1.3 Philosophical Method 1.4 Tools of Research 1.5 Choosing a Topic 1.1 INTRODUCTION Everyone who seeks knowledge
More informationUNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHY 110A,
1 UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHY 110A, Introduction to Philosophy: Knowledge and Reality Lectures: Monday, Wednesday, Friday, 9:30-10:20am (AL 124) Professor: Nicholas Ray (nmray@uwaterloo.ca)
More informationHabermas and Critical Thinking
168 Ben Endres Columbia University In this paper, I propose to examine some of the implications of Jürgen Habermas s discourse ethics for critical thinking. Since the argument that Habermas presents is
More informationPARTICIPATION, RATIONAL INQUIRY, AND THE JUSTIFICATION OF DEMOCRACY
PARTICIPATION, RATIONAL INQUIRY, AND THE JUSTIFICATION OF DEMOCRACY Polycarp Ikuenobe DEMOCRACY IS A FORM OF government whereby people are allowed to participate equally in the affairs of government. People
More informationPresuppositional Apologetics
by John M. Frame [, for IVP Dictionary of Apologetics.] 1. Presupposing God in Apologetic Argument Presuppositional apologetics may be understood in the light of a distinction common in epistemology, or
More informationThe Problem of the External World
The Problem of the External World External World Skepticism Consider this painting by Rene Magritte: Is there a tree outside? External World Skepticism Many people have thought that humans are like this
More informationTruth and Evidence in Validity Theory
Journal of Educational Measurement Spring 2013, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 110 114 Truth and Evidence in Validity Theory Denny Borsboom University of Amsterdam Keith A. Markus John Jay College of Criminal Justice
More informationCHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND
CHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND I. Five Alleged Problems with Theology and Science A. Allegedly, science shows there is no need to postulate a god. 1. Ancients used to think that you
More informationChapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS CHAPTER OBJECTIVES. After exploring this chapter, you will be able to:
Chapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS MGT604 CHAPTER OBJECTIVES After exploring this chapter, you will be able to: 1. Explain the ethical framework of utilitarianism. 2. Describe how utilitarian
More informationPhilosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2010
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2010 Class 3 - Meditations Two and Three too much material, but we ll do what we can Marcus, Modern Philosophy,
More informationCRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS
Fall 2001 ENGLISH 20 Professor Tanaka CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS In this first handout, I would like to simply give you the basic outlines of our critical thinking model
More informationMINISTRY LEADERSHIP. Objectives for students. Master's Level. Ministry Leadership 1
Ministry Leadership 1 MINISTRY LEADERSHIP Studies in ministry leadership are designed to provide an exposure to, and an understanding of, pastoral ministry and transformational leadership in the varied
More information12 Keys Evaluation Guide
12 Keys Evaluation Guide This guide was developed by Kennon L. Callahan, an expert in long-range planning for local congregations, and drawn from his book, Twelve Keys to an Effective Church. He has served
More informationPhilosophy 2: Introduction to Philosophy Section 4170 Online Course El Camino College Spring, 2015
Philosophy 2: Introduction to Philosophy Section 4170 Online Course El Camino College Spring, 2015 Instructor: Dr. Felipe Leon Phone: (310) 660-3593 ext.5742 Email: fleon@elcamino.edu Office: SOCS 108
More informationWhole Person Caring: A New Paradigm for Healing and Wellness
: A New Paradigm for Healing and Wellness This article is a reprint from Dr. Lucia Thornton, ThD, RN, MSN, AHN-BC How do we reconstruct a healthcare system that is primarily concerned with disease and
More informationBusiness Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method
Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method Professor Tim Mazzarol UWA Business School MGMT6791 UWA Business School DBA Program tim.mazzarol@uwa.edu.au
More informationA Statement of Seventh-day Adventist Educational Philosophy
A Statement of Seventh-day Adventist Educational Philosophy 2001 Assumptions Seventh-day Adventists, within the context of their basic beliefs, acknowledge that God is the Creator and Sustainer of the
More informationExplanatory Indispensability and Deliberative Indispensability: Against Enoch s Analogy Alex Worsnip University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Explanatory Indispensability and Deliberative Indispensability: Against Enoch s Analogy Alex Worsnip University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Forthcoming in Thought please cite published version In
More informationBuilding Systematic Theology
1 Building Systematic Theology Study Guide LESSON FOUR DOCTRINES IN SYSTEMATICS 2013 by Third Millennium Ministries www.thirdmill.org For videos, manuscripts, and other resources, visit Third Millennium
More information7. The Universal Audience
7. The Universal Audience 31 dialogue or the person engaged in deliberation can be considered as a particular audience, with reactions that are known to us, or at least with characteristics we can study.
More informationIntroduction. A. The Myths of the Modern Mindset. Prayer
Class #2: Thinking God's Thoughts: Philosophy of Special Revelation Shoring up the Foundation: Biblical Authority in an Age that Questions Everything 9/30/2012 Introduction Prayer Q1: Isn't accepting the
More informationWhat is the "Social" in "Social Coherence?" Commentary on Nelson Tebbe's Religious Freedom in an Egalitarian Age
Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development Volume 31 Issue 1 Volume 31, Summer 2018, Issue 1 Article 5 June 2018 What is the "Social" in "Social Coherence?" Commentary on Nelson Tebbe's Religious
More informationA Note on Straight-Thinking
A Note on Straight-Thinking A supplementary note for the 2nd Annual JTS/CGST Public Ethics Lecture March 5, 2002(b), adj. 2009:03:05 G.E.M. of TKI Arguments & Appeals In arguments, people try to persuade
More information1/12. The A Paralogisms
1/12 The A Paralogisms The character of the Paralogisms is described early in the chapter. Kant describes them as being syllogisms which contain no empirical premises and states that in them we conclude
More informationMcDougal Littell High School Math Program. correlated to. Oregon Mathematics Grade-Level Standards
Math Program correlated to Grade-Level ( in regular (non-capitalized) font are eligible for inclusion on Oregon Statewide Assessment) CCG: NUMBERS - Understand numbers, ways of representing numbers, relationships
More informationPhilosophy. The unexamined life is not worth living. Plato. O More College of Design Mission Statement
Philosophy The unexamined life is not worth living. Plato Spring 2017 Wednesdays 5:00 7:40 pm Dr. Clancy Smith clancysmith@omorecollege.edu O More College of Design Mission Statement O More College of
More informationPHIL 251 Varner 2018c Final exam Page 1 Filename = 2018c-Exam3-KEY.wpd
PHIL 251 Varner 2018c Final exam Page 1 Your first name: Your last name: K_E_Y Part one (multiple choice, worth 20% of course grade): Indicate the best answer to each question on your Scantron by filling
More informationTheo-Web. Academic Journal of Religious Education Vol. 11, Issue Editorial and Summary in English by Manfred L. Pirner
Theo-Web. Academic Journal of Religious Education Vol. 11, Issue 1-2012 Editorial and Summary in English by Manfred L. Pirner This Editorial is intended to make the major contents of the contributions
More information