1 Philosophy of Science Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
2 Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics Sept. 5 No Class Sept. 12 Philosophy of Religion Sept. 19 Philosophy of Science Sept. 26 Ethics: What is Right?; Aesthetics: What is Beauty? October 3 Human Nature; Final Exam
3 Literally, it is a love of wisdom phileo is Greek for love, sophos means wisdom. Philosophy is the critical examination of our foundational beliefs concerning the nature of reality, knowledge and truth; and our moral and social values. Philosophy is the means and process by which we examine our lives and the meaning in our lives. Philosophy is the attempt to think rationally and critically about life s most important questions in order to obtain knowledge and wisdom about them.
4 Most people today (at least in the West) know science provides us with knowledge, and many would view it as an especially trustworthy kind of knowledge. In fact, as a result of its very visible successes, science has for most of the Western world become the dominant paradigm and worldview as a means of finding ultimate truth and meaning. Science and religion have one extremely important thing in common they are both concerned with the search for the truth. just different aspects of the truth. Sir John Polkinghorne
5 How is science to be defined? Science could be defined as systematic inquiry into the natural world which aims to organize, predict and explain empirical data. Assuming that empirical data comes both through direct sensory experience and through analytical tools, how does this differ from other disciplines like history or journalism which also seem to fit the definition? Attempts to define science as based on repeatability of experiments or testability of hypotheses do not fit scientific fields that deal in past events archeology, paleontology, astrophysical cosmology, etc. So even defining science is not easy.
6 If you can t see, feel or hear something, it doesn t exist! reflects the view that only what can be empirical verified can be known. This science over all approach is scientism. But scientism is self-defeating because its demand that all knowledge be empirically verified cannot itself be empirically verified. In addition, science also rests on numerous assumptions that cannot be empirically verified: 1. The laws of thought. 2. The general reliability of sense perception. 3. The law of causality. 4. The uniformity of nature. 5. Values, that support scientific reporting, etc.
7 Regarding the relationship between science and truth, there are two fundamental perspectives: 1. Scientific Realism is the view that scientific theories properly aim to give a true account of the physical world. 2. Scientific Nonrealism insists that science is not ultimately about truth, and is not concerned with providing accurate descriptions of reality.
8 Scientific Realism is the view that scientific theories properly aim to give a true account of the physical world. Inductivism proposes that a scientist begins by simply observing and gathering data, followed by generalizations about those observations, leading to an hypothesis or theory which explains the data, followed by experiments to test the theory, which produces more data until the theory is proven either true or false. The central claims of inductionism are that observation precedes theory; theories are formulated strictly in terms of the experimental data; and science is or can be a rational process.
9 Despite its attractions, inductivism has two primary problems: 1. It naively assumes the possibility of theory neutral observation. Studies have shown that people tend to observe and interpret data in light of preconceptions, no matter how fair-minded they try to be. 2. It is unclear how much confirming experimental data is required to demonstrate the truth of a particular theory. When is a scientist justified in moving from the claim that a theory is CONFIRMED to the much stronger statement that a theory is TRUE? A fundamental problem is that science routinely reasons from particular observations to universal conclusions, assuming the uniformity of nature and making assumptions about the future based on the past. (v. David Hume)
10 Falsification is the idea that science can (or should be) more in the business of proving what is false than proving what is true, in order to make a clear delineation between science and pseudo-sciences, since the latter cannot be verified. The criterion of falsification insists that statements or systems of statements, in order to be ranked as scientific, must be capable of conflicting with possible, or conceivable, observations. This is because scientific theories are never fully proven, but some can be deemed superior because of their ability to resist refutation through vigorous testing. (IOW, it only takes ONE false test result to prove something is not true, but every positive test result just leaves open the possibility that some future test might prove the theory false so it s easier to test for falseness than for truth.)
11 Therefore, the logic of science is about modus tollens: If P then Q. Not-Q. Therefore, not-p. Scientists must resist the logical fallacy of affirming the consequent: If P then Q. Q. Therefore P.
12 Scientific Nonrealism insists that science is not ultimately about truth, and is not concerned with providing accurate descriptions of reality. Instrumentalism proposes that the point of science is in its practical achievements, and not in any effort to demonstrate truth. Science is an inquiry system for the solution of problems and the adequacy of individual theories is a function of how many significant empirical problems they solve. Instrumentalism works if science is seen as a discipline entirely inspired by practical concerns, but goes wrong in emphasizing practicality to the exclusion of truth.
13 Both realists and instrumentalists affirm that science is ultimately a rational discipline, properly based on evidence and objective reasoning. But Thomas Kuhn argued that in actual practice the discipline of science is far from rational in any objective sense of the term Scientific observation of the world is theory-laden, meaning all observations are processed through and influenced by prior scientific and/or personal paradigms, so neutral observation is impossible. Scientific progress occurs not by accumulation of data, but by paradigm shifts. When data emerges that does not fit the reigning paradigm and cannot be resolved within that paradigm, a scientific revolution occurs. Each paradigm contains its own standard of rationality, so there can be no debate across paradigm boundaries which is why science is not a rational enterprise.
14 Scientific Anarchism is an even more skeptical approach, saying science is not constrained by methodological rules, so anything goes (with a strong emphasis on human freedom). Each paradigm has its own rationality, so Anarchism sees no way to compare or assess scientific theories objectively. So it s impossible to show one scientific theory as offering a better explanation than others, or even as being better than nonscientific explanations. This leads to near complete subjectivity in science what remains are our subjective wishes in a mythology that can t be shown to be better than nonscientific mythologies. Science reigns supreme because its practitioners are unable to understand, and unwilling to condone, different ideologies, because they have the power to enforce their wishes.
15 Realism as an approach to science struggles because of a necessary reliance on inductive reasoning. Nonrealist views, on the other hand, cannot account for the practical success of science. Given the wondrous things science has accomplished, it s hard to account for these without believing science more or less describes or corresponds to the physical world, and in that way does represent truth. But science is also about other things and serves other functions; to that extent nonrealism has some validity. It would appear the best approach is a humble realist view of science, acknowledging that science does offer truth values, even though typically serving other functions, and that scientists, like the rest of us, are fallen and so have only a limited awareness of truth.
16 Given that the laws of nature gravity, nuclear forces, conservation of matter & energy, thermodynamics, aerodynamics, etc. appear as constant phenomena, how are we to understand their relationship to the scientific endeavor? Regularity View says that natural laws are a summary of what has happened and what will continue to happen how nature works, with the question of why they work as they do being seen as illegitimate or meaningless. Instrumentalist View takes the pragmatic approach that apparent universality of nature laws is not of primary importance, but focuses instead on where science goes from there, using natural laws as tools. Necessitarian View suggests the laws of nature are not just how the world does behave, but how it must behave, or even that the laws of nature are logically necessary.
17 1. Laws of nature as constants are necessary for life to exist without gravity, thermodynamics and other laws human life (or any life) would not be possible. 2. Since natural laws are necessary for human survival, they may be seen as evidence of the existence of a purposeful, intelligent, powerful and benevolent mind at work behind the scenes. 3. If natural laws are the product of a benevolent God, we can be sure they will continue meaning that the future will be consistent with the past. 4. Therefore, given the dependence of science on the assumption of natural laws as constants, it can be seen that rational scientific investigation inherently presupposes reliance upon God, and that all scientific inquiry implicitly demonstrates this faith. The question is not whether scientists exhibits faith, but what kind of faith is being exhibited.
18 Two kinds of Naturalism Those who object to bringing theological convictions into the practice of science do so for one of two reasons: Metaphysical naturalists believe only the physical world exists no supernatural beings of any kind. Methodological naturalists believe science should be practiced without reference to theological concepts (even if the supernatural does exist), because the goal of science is to explain natural phenomenon in terms of other natural phenomenon, without recourse to theological premises. Functional integrity is a type of methodological naturalism that insists the cosmos has within itself all that is needed to explain itself, and that even if God did create the universe, there is now no need to reference the supernatural as an element in scientific inquiry.
19 Reflections on Methodological Naturalism This does prevent the God-of-the-Gaps approach, dominant in the past, in which God could be appealed to as an explanation for anything unknown or mysterious, without further scientific effort. But just because errors of this sort were made in the past does not mean legitimate theological considerations, exercised with appropriate discipline, cannot now be part of science. (A principle tenet of Intelligent Design.) Functional integrity, in trying to eliminate theological premises in science, is self-defeating in that it is, itself, a theological premise based in a particular view of God and his relationship to the world. Why should we accept functional integrity, especially given the strong testimony of Scripture that God remains active in the world he created?
20 Reflections on Methodological Naturalism Some methodological naturalists would insists that functional integrity is not required that instead science should be seen as a sort of game, with specific rules and that those rules are violated when theological considerations are introduced. But who says those are the rules, and that the game must be played in that particular, non-god way? Is this not simply an inference at the start that supernatural considerations are always illegitimate in the context of science? Who made that a rule? In fact, it can be said that scientists deal with supernatural aspects all the time the principles of logic, mathematics, the laws of thought, abstract concepts of infinity, etc. all are non-concrete and so could be considered supernatural ( above nature ).
21 Theistic science seeks to take theological considerations into account when doing science. Alvin Plantinga: The rational thing is to use all you know in trying to understand a given phenomenon. For example, advocates of Intelligent Design propose two kinds of biological complexity in support of a theistic science approach: Irreducible complexity is the presence of complex interactive parts that combine to perform a necessary function, and from which no component could be removed without making the entire system completely nonfunctional. (That such a system could not be produced by continuous improvement on some initial function defies evolution by natural selection.) Specified complexity refers to the aligning of an event and a pattern in such a way that they indicate intentionality such as the way the complex sequencing within DNA molecules (pattern) are exactly necessary for human life to occur (event).
22 Theistic science seeks to avoid the God-of-thegaps by trying to ensure an intelligent cause (God) is only appealed to when it is impossible for a given phenomenon to have a natural cause. The challenge is how to know when a given phenomenon can be judged as not being explicable by natural means. How far must a scientist go before all natural explanations are considered exhausted? Critically important is that theistic science can be open to ALL evidence that is found through scientific inquiry (God could have used some for of evolution in Creation), while methodological naturalists are by definition prevented from any consideration of non-natural causes.
Philosophy of Religion Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
Logic, Truth & Epistemology Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
Sydenham College of Commerce & Economics * Dr. Sunil S. Shete * Associate Professor Keywords: Philosophy of science, research methods, Logic, Business research Abstract This paper review Popper s epistemology
Module 1: Science as Culture Demarcation, Autonomy and Cognitive Authority of Science Lecture 6 Demarcation, Autonomy and Cognitive Authority of Science In this lecture, we are going to discuss how historically
Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method Professor Tim Mazzarol UWA Business School MGMT6791 UWA Business School DBA Program email@example.com
Philosophy of Ethics Philosophy of Aesthetics Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology
Philosophy of Science Professor Stemwedel Spring 2014 Important concepts and terminology metaphysics epistemology descriptive vs. normative norms of science Strong Program sociology of science naturalism
HPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Revision Guide (all topics) General Questions What is the distinction between a descriptive and a normative project in the philosophy of science? What are the virtues of this or that
Phil 1103 Review Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science? 1. Copernican Revolution Students should be familiar with the basic historical facts of the Copernican revolution.
The Nature of Science: Methods for Seeking Natural Patterns in the Universe Using Rationalism and Empiricism Mike Viney Fascination with science often starts at an early age, as it did with me. Many students
Christian Evidences CA312 LESSON 06 of 12 Victor M. Matthews, STD Former Professor of Systematic Theology Grand Rapids Theological Seminary This is lecture 6 of the course entitled Christian Evidences.
CLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH I. Challenges to Confirmation A. The Inductivist Turkey B. Discovery vs. Justification 1. Discovery 2. Justification C. Hume's Problem 1. Inductive
The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism Issues: I. Problem of Induction II. Popper s rejection of induction III. Salmon s critique of deductivism 2 I. The problem of induction 1. Inductive vs.
CHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND I. Five Alleged Problems with Theology and Science A. Allegedly, science shows there is no need to postulate a god. 1. Ancients used to think that you
The Human Science Debate: Positivist, Anti-Positivist, and Postpositivist Inquiry By Rebecca Joy Norlander November 20, 2007 2 What is knowledge and how is it acquired through the process of inquiry? Is
Lecture 9 A summary of scientific methods Realism and Anti-realism A summary of scientific methods and attitudes What is a scientific approach? This question can be answered in a lot of different ways.
THE HISTORIC ALLIANCE OF CHRISTIANITY AND SCIENCE By Kenneth Richard Samples The influential British mathematician-philosopher Bertrand Russell once remarked, "I am as firmly convinced that religions do
Chapter 2 The evolution of the meaning of SCIENCE SCIENCE came from the latin word SCIENTIA which means knowledge. ANCIENT SCIENCE (before the 8 th century) In ancient Greece, Science began with the discovery
The Role of Science in God s world A/Prof. Frank Stootman firstname.lastname@example.org www.labri.org A Remarkable Universe By any measure we live in a remarkable universe We can talk of the existence of material
Screen 1: Marketing Research is based on the Scientific Method. A quick review of the Scientific Method, therefore, is in order. Text based slide. Time Code: 0:00 A Quick Review of the Scientific Method
Branden Fitelson Philosophy 125 Lecture 1 Philosophy 125 Day 1: Overview Welcome! Are you in the right place? PHIL 125 (Metaphysics) Overview of Today s Class 1. Us: Branden (Professor), Vanessa & Josh
UNIT 1 SYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY Contents 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Research in Philosophy 1.3 Philosophical Method 1.4 Tools of Research 1.5 Choosing a Topic 1.1 INTRODUCTION Everyone who seeks knowledge
Introduction to Cognitivism; Motivational Externalism; Naturalist Cognitivism Felix Pinkert 103 Ethics: Metaethics, University of Oxford, Hilary Term 2015 Cognitivism, Non-cognitivism, and the Humean Argument
The Foundation for Adventist Education Institute for Christian Teaching Education Department General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists INTELLIGENT DESIGN: FRIEND OR FOE FOR ADVENTISTS? Leonard Brand,
A Biblical Perspective on the Philosophy of Science Leonard R. Brand, Loma Linda University I. Christianity and the Nature of Science There is reason to believe that Christianity provided the ideal culture
NATURALISED JURISPRUDENCE NATURALISM a philosophical view according to which philosophy is not a distinct mode of inquiry with its own problems and its own special body of (possible) knowledge philosophy
An Introduction to Science Scientific Thinking and the Scientific Method by Steven D. Schafersman Department of Geology Miami University January, 1997 http://www.muohio.edu/~schafesd/documents/intro-to-sci.htmlx
There are two books laid before us to study, to prevent our falling into error; first, the volume of Scriptures, which revealed the will of God; then the volume of the Creatures, which expresses His power.
Critical Realism & Philosophy Webinar Ruth Groff August 5, 2015 Intro. The need for a philosophical vocabulary You don t have to become a philosopher, but just as philosophers should know their way around
Digital Collections @ Dordt Study Guides for Faith & Science Integration Summer 2017 Are There Philosophical Conflicts Between Science & Religion? (Participant's Guide) Lydia Marcus Dordt College Follow
Let s explore a controversial topic DHMO (aka Dihydrogen monoxide) DHMO.org Dihydrogen-monoxide (Transtronics site) Coalition to Ban DHMO Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide! DHMO Chemical Danger Alert - The Horror
Lecture 6 Realism and Anti-realism Kuhn s Philosophy of Science Realism and Anti-realism Science and Reality Science ought to describe reality. But what is Reality? Is what we think we see of reality really
THE GOD OF QUARKS & CROSS bridging the cultural divide between people of faith and people of science WHY A WORKSHOP ON FAITH AND SCIENCE? The cultural divide between people of faith and people of science*
The Illusion of Scientific Realism: An Argument for Scientific Soft Antirealism Peter Carmack Introduction Throughout the history of science, arguments have emerged about science s ability or non-ability
Naturalized Epistemology Quine PY4613 1. What is naturalized Epistemology? a. How is it motivated? b. What are its doctrines? c. Naturalized Epistemology in the context of Quine s philosophy 2. Naturalized
Morality, Miracles & Prophecy March 6, 2015 Ross Arnold, Winter 2015 Lakeside institute of Theology Apologetics (CM4) Jan. 30 Introduction to Apologetics Feb. 6 Reliability of Witnesses Feb. 13 The Existence
Do we have knowledge of the external world? This book discusses the skeptical arguments presented in Descartes' Meditations 1 and 2, as well as how Descartes attempts to refute skepticism by building our
Unit 3: Philosophy as Theoretical Rationality INTRODUCTORY TEXT. Perhaps the most unsettling thought many of us have, often quite early on in childhood, is that the whole world might be a dream; that the
Science and the Future of Mankind Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Scripta Varia 99, Vatican City 2001 www.pas.va/content/dam/accademia/pdf/sv99/sv99-berti.pdf THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCIENCE, RELIGION
PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY Paper 9774/01 Introduction to Philosophy and Theology Key Messages Most candidates gave equal treatment to three questions, displaying good time management and excellent control
-1- -2- EPISTEMOLOGY AND METHODOLOGY 3. We are in a physics laboratory and make the observation that all objects fall at a uniform Can we solve the problem of induction, and if not, to what extent is it
Christ-Centered Critical Thinking Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking 1 In this lesson we will learn: To evaluate our thinking and the thinking of others using the Intellectual Standards Two approaches to evaluating
A Warning about So-Called Rationalists Mark F. Sharlow Have you ever heard of rationalism and rationalists? If so, have you wondered what these words mean? A rationalist is someone who believes that reason
PHILOSOPHY INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY MEANING NATURE SCOPE GOALS IMPORTANCE BRANCHES EPOCH WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? WHERE IT BEGINS? REMEMBER In studying PHILOSOPHY one should KNOW the : 1. Contextualize/ation
PHILOSOPHICAL HOLISM M. Esfeld Department of Philosophy, University of Konstanz, Germany Keywords: atomism, confirmation, holism, inferential role semantics, meaning, monism, ontological dependence, rule-following,
TOPIC: Lecture 4.2 Aquinas Phil Religion Aquinas Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God. Critiques of Aquinas arguments. KEY TERMS/ GOALS: Cosmological argument. The problem of Infinite Regress.
Introduction to Political Science What is Science? Reading Ole J. Forsberg, Ph.D. University of Tennessee What is Science? Ole J. Forsberg What is a science? Science is a method of inquiry whose objectives
Science and Faith: Discussing Astronomy Research with Religious Audiences Anton M. Koekemoer (Space Telescope Science Institute) *DISCLAIMER: THE VIEWS EXPRESSED IN THIS TALK PURELY REFLECT MY OWN PERSONAL
A Brief History of Thinking about Thinking Thomas Lombardo "Education is nothing more nor less than learning to think." Peter Facione In this article I review the historical evolution of principles and
Academic Integration in Engineering and Technology Edwin Chong Electrical & Computer Engineering Colorado State University NFLC'06, June 23 2006 What is Academic Integration Exploring the interface between
Chapter 1 - Introduction to Ecology What is Ecology??? From the Greek Oikos = House Ology = study of Ecology = the study of the relationship between organisms and their environment quite a large area of
Ayer on the criterion of verifiability November 19, 2004 1 The critique of metaphysics............................. 1 2 Observation statements............................... 2 3 In principle verifiability...............................
by John M. Frame [, for IVP Dictionary of Apologetics.] 1. Presupposing God in Apologetic Argument Presuppositional apologetics may be understood in the light of a distinction common in epistemology, or
METHODENSTREIT WHY CARL MENGER WAS, AND IS, RIGHT BY THORSTEN POLLEIT* PRESENTED AT THE SPRING CONFERENCE RESEARCH ON MONEY IN THE ECONOMY (ROME) FRANKFURT, 20 MAY 2011 *FRANKFURT SCHOOL OF FINANCE & MANAGEMENT
The Problem of the External World External World Skepticism Consider this painting by Rene Magritte: Is there a tree outside? External World Skepticism Many people have thought that humans are like this
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 21 Lecture - 21 Kant Forms of sensibility Categories
Chapter 1 What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life Why Study Philosophy? Defining Philosophy Studying philosophy in a serious and reflective way will change you as a person Philosophy Is
III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier In Theaetetus Plato introduced the definition of knowledge which is often translated
Jack Himelright wrote: I read an essay of yours, and there are two points which I feel essential to raise. The essay is here: http://www2.unijena.de/svw/metheval/projekte/symposium2006/material/poster_barukcic_causation_and_the_law_of_independence.pdf
Aaron Leung Philosophy 290-5 Week 11 Handout Van Fraassen: Arguments Concerning Scientific Realism 1. Scientific Realism and Constructive Empiricism What is scientific realism? According to van Fraassen,
1. Introduction 1.1. Formal deductive logic 1.1.0. Overview In this course we will study reasoning, but we will study only certain aspects of reasoning and study them only from one perspective. The special
Revised final draft A Critique of Friedman s Critics Milton Friedman s essay The methodology of positive economics  is considered authoritative by almost every textbook writer who wishes to discuss
Religion and Science: The Emerging Relationship Part II The first article in this series introduced four basic models through which people understand the relationship between religion and science--exploring
Argumentative Analogy versus Figurative Analogy By Timo Schmitz, Philosopher As argumentative analogy or simply analogism (ἀναλογισµός), one calls the comparison through inductive reasoning of at least
Review Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion) Arguably, the main task of philosophy is to seek the truth. We seek genuine knowledge. This is why epistemology
Macalester Journal of Philosophy Volume 16 Spring 2007 Issue 1 Spring 2007 Article 9 5-1-2007 "Are Eyebrows Going to Be Talked of in Connection with the Eye of God?" Wittgenstein and Certainty in the Debate
Lesson 2 The Existence of God Cause & Effect Apologetics Press Introductory Christian Evidences Correspondence Course THE EXISTENCE OF GOD CAUSE & EFFECT One of the most basic issues that the human mind
1 Symposium on Understanding Truth By Scott Soames Précis Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Volume LXV, No. 2, 2002 2 Precis of Understanding Truth Scott Soames Understanding Truth aims to illuminate
Revised final draft On the futility of criticizing the neoclassical maximization hypothesis The last couple of decades have seen an intensification of methodological criticism of the foundations of neoclassical
2 3 Philosophy 2 3 : Intuitions and Philosophy Fall 2011 Hamilton College Russell Marcus I. Holism, Reflective Equilibrium, and Science Class 6 - Scientific Method Our course is centrally concerned with
Rule-Following and the Ontology of the Mind Michael Esfeld (published in Uwe Meixner and Peter Simons (eds.): Metaphysics in the Post-Metaphysical Age. Papers of the 22nd International Wittgenstein Symposium.
265 SCIENCE AND CHRISTIANITY IN HARMONY? L. J. Gibson Geoscience Research Institute Science has achieved great success as a method of learning about and controlling nature. Probably every person on earth
chapter 36 Learning from Mistakes Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn In 1666 a young scientist was sitting in a garden when an apple fell to the ground. This made him wonder why apples fall straight down, rather
Morality, Suffering and Violence Ross Arnold, Fall 2015 Lakeside institute of Theology Apologetics 2 (CM5) Oct. 2 Introduction Oct. 9 Faith and Reason Oct. 16 Mid-Term Break Oct. 23 Science and Origins
YFIA205 Basics of Research Methodology in Social Sciences Lecture 1. Science, Knowledge and Theory Jyväskylä 3.11.2014 Petteri Niemi Philosophy of Science There is no such thing as philosophy-free science;
A Review of Norm Geisler's Prolegomena 2017 by A Jacob W. Reinhardt, All Rights Reserved. Copyright holder grants permission to reduplicate article as long as it is not changed. Send further requests to
MARK KAPLAN AND LAWRENCE SKLAR RATIONALITY AND TRUTH Received 2 February, 1976) Surely an aim of science is the discovery of the truth. Truth may not be the sole aim, as Popper and others have so clearly
Hume Hume the Empiricist The Problem of Induction & Knowledge of the External World As an empiricist, Hume thinks that all knowledge of the world comes from sense experience If all we can know comes from
Component 2 Philosophy of Religion Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive This theme considers how the philosophy of religion has, over time, influenced and been influenced by developments
FIL 4600/10/20: KANT S CRITIQUE AND CRITICAL METAPHYSICS Autumn 2012, University of Oslo Thursdays, 14 16, Georg Morgenstiernes hus 219, Blindern Toni Kannisto email@example.com SHORT PLAN 1 23/8:
Instructor's Manual for Gregg Barak s Integrating Criminologies. Prepared by Paul Leighton (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1997) * CHAPTER 4 Theory and Practice: On the Development of Criminological Inquiry OVERVIEW
IDHEF Chapter 2 Why Should Anyone Believe Anything At All? -You might have heard someone say, It doesn t really matter what you believe, as long as you believe something. While many people think this is