2 What is a rule? 'Rules' exist in many contexts. Not just legal rules or moral rules but many different forms of rules in many different situations. The academic writers Twinings and Miers defined a rule as a 'general norm mandating or guiding conduct'. So, a rule simply determines the way we behave... whether that is because we voluntary follow them (morals) or whether it is because we are 'forced' to follow them (laws).
3 Many rules are neither morally binding or legally enforceable and yet are followed anyway. However, the academic writer Hart believed that the defining characteristic of a rule is enforceability.
4 Rules are generally obeyed for one of three reasons: 1) Rules carry with them a sense of moral obligation. This can be seen in relation to many crimes. Most crimes are seen as morally unacceptable behaviour and also reflect many religious moral codes... for example, The Ten Commandments.
6 So, should the law be the ultimate guardians of our morals? In the case of Shaw v DPP (1962) the judges believed that it was their duty to act against immoral behaviour. This then seems to suggest that there should be a very close relationship between the law and morals.
7 2) The rule is followed because it is relevant and reasonable. Parliamentary law (Acts of Parliament) is supreme but even this will eventually be abandoned if it is seen as irrelevant or unfair The introduction and subsequent abandonment of the poll tax in the Local Government Finance Act 1988 is a prime example of this. The demonstrations and eventual riot against the poll tax highlighted the unreasonableness of the law. The idea that the law must be 'reasonable' is surely a moral idea... again, suggesting a close relationship between the law and morality.
8 3) Rules are followed because a penalty may be imposed. This is why people follow rules and laws that they do not necessarily agree with.
9 The basic nature of morals. The moral values of society or a community tend to lay down a framework for how people should behave. But concepts of morality differ from culture to culture despite all cultures generally agreeing on and outlawing extreme behaviour such as murder and rape. We all share a moral code that will differ from person to person depending on what we think is acceptable or unacceptable behaviour.
10 The Morality Game. Do you think it is moral to do the following? 1) Is it morally acceptable to murder? 2) Is it morally acceptable to steal? 3) Is it morally acceptable for same sex couples to marry? 4) Is it morally acceptable to have an abortion? 5) Is it morally acceptable to take illegal drugs? 6) Is euthanasia morally acceptable?
11 So, morality will differ from individual to individual. What affect will that have on the law of a country? The law of a country will generally reflect the morality of the majority of the population but the law is now less likely to reflect a common religious moral code.
12 This move away from a religious moral code can be seen when considering adultery. It is against the traditional religious moral code of Christianity to commit adultery and yet it is not illegal in England and Wales. The law shows its disapproval of adultery by allowing it as a reason for divorce. The moral opinion that adultery is wrong is shared by the community and yet it is not against the law. Is this starting to suggest that law and morality are separate concepts and should not influence one another?
13 Since the 1960s England and Wales has seen a move away from traditional religious beliefs being reflected in the law. Both abortion and homosexuality were legalised in 1967 for example. However, the law is quick to recognise that just because certain moral viewpoints may not be reflected in the law this does not make the moral belief wrong.
14 Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA (1986) Mrs Gillick was a staunch Roman Catholic who was against her local health authority giving free contraceptive advice to girls under 16. the HL found in favour of the health authority (on a majority of 3:2). The HL stated that this did not make Gillick's moral belief wrong, they simply had to choose which was the most appropriate moral stance to approve of.
15 Another religious moral belief is that human life is sacred and under English law euthanasia is still unacceptable... although there does appear to be evidence of a shift in moral attitudes towards euthanasia. In the cases of Arthur (1981) and Cox (1992) doctors did show a moral acceptance of the need for euthanasia in cases where terminally ill patients are suffering.
16 R (on the application of Pretty) v DPP (2001) Mrs Pretty applied to the courts for a judicial declaration so that if her husband helped her to commit suicide he would not be prosecuted. The HL refused.
17 A more limited/passive form of 'euthanasia' is legally accepted in England and Wales and that is the removal of life support systems, as ruled in Airdale NHS Trust v Bland (1993). Some groups believe that is also immoral however as it denies the sanctity of life.
18 Contemporary examples of euthanasia and the moral shift in opinion can be seen in the cases of Tony Nicklinson and Paul Lamb. Both these men are (our have in Nicklinson's case) fighting for the right for a doctor to be legally allowed to end their lives when the time is right.
19 Diversity of moral views. Perhaps one of the biggest problems surrounding whether the law should uphold moral values is that whilst people do share moral values there are many that differ. French sociologist, Durkheim, suggested that it was almost impossible to find a single set of moral values that would be acceptable to everyone.
20 Even when a particular moral code is generally accepted by everyone there can also be disagreement as to its finer points. It is generally accepted that any kind of killing is wrong and yet there are strong, opposing moral views on whether abortion is the taking of a human life or a woman exercising rights over her own body.
21 This differing moral attitude can also be seen in the abortion law of different countries. In England the abortion law acts a kind of defence for doctors who carry out the abortion as long as certain conditions are met. For example, the pregnancy is more damaging to the woman than a termination would be. In the USA, following a case called Roe v Wade (1973), an abortion is the constitutional right of all women as declared by the Supreme Court.
22 Differences between law and morality. So, despite the fact that the law does reflect morality and that some law even develops from morality there are some significant differences between the two. 1) Morality develops over a long period of time... whereas law can be introduced or changed instantly. Morality cannot be deliberately changed, it evolves slowly over time and changes with the will of the people. Law can be altered deliberately. Illegal behaviour can be decriminalised over night and vice versa.
23 2) Morality depends on voluntary codes of conduct... whereas law is more officially enforceable. Breaches of moral codes carry no official sanction or punishment. Morality relies on an individual's own sense of guilt and shame for enforceability. Law however, makes certain behaviour obligatory with sanctions and punishment.
24 3) Breaches in moral rules are not subject to formal adjudication but the law is ruled over by a formal legal system (the courts).
25 The relationship between law and morals. Law and morality are both normative. This means they both dictate the way people are expected to behave. Law appears to be based on moral positions but these moral positions are not necessarily accepted by everyone, as previous evidence has shown. So, how closely should law and morality influence one another?
26 Firstly, it is relatively easy to find examples of how changes in morality have eventually led to changes in the law. In the case of R v R (1991) the HL made rape in marriage illegal. The moral viewpoint that it was wrong for a husband to be able to rape his wife had been generally accepted by society a long time before This is an example of a law change being, eventually, changed as a result of the influence of moral change and so demonstrates a close relationship between law and morals.
27 But, can a law change lead to a moral change? In "The Legislation of Morality" sociologist Troy Duster examined drug use in America in the late 19th/early 20th centuries. Before The Harrison Act 1914, which began to control the distribution of opiates and narcotics, drug use was primarily connected to the upper middle classes who could afford to buy and use these drugs. As a result there was no real social stigma or bad moral opinion attached to drug use.
28 The tighter controls introduced by the Harrison Act did not make the demands for the drugs to decrease. Drug users therefore had to buy their drugs from drug dealers and the use of drugs began to become associated with the working/criminal classes. A social stigma therefore started to develop and the moral opinion towards drug use changed. This is an example of a law change influencing a moral change... and again, is another example of a close relationship between law and morality.
29 Natural law and Positivism. Natural lawyers believe that law and morality are closely connected. They believe in a 'higher law' or a 'divine law' that is superior to all man-made law. If law does not reflect this 'higher law' and is not in itself 'moral', then it has no authority and can be ignored.
30 St. Thomas Aquinas believed that this 'higher law' came from God and any law without moral content was a "perversion of law". It follows from this that Aquinas believed that if a law was not a true law then we need not obey it. Law and morality then should coincide and reflect each other exactly. Thus, again, demonstrating that they are not separate concepts and should have a very close relationship.
31 Positivism, however, is the opposite. Positivism emphasises the separation of law and morality into 2 separate concepts. Whether a law is moral or not positivists believe that it must be obeyed until the legislature (law making body) changes it. Therefore, it does not matter if a law sanctions something that is immoral or governs something that people do not agree with.
32 Jeremy Bentham proposed the Utilitarian principle that law should create "the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people". Therefore, it is immaterial if some people disagree with a law on moral grounds as long as the majority do agree. Bentham's pupil, Austin, stated that law was the command of the sovereign (Parliament) backed by the threat of punishment. Therefore it does not matter whether a law is moral or not it must be followed. Hans Kelsen went so far as to state that there is no necessary connection between law and morals, and that the law does not need moral validation in order to be legitimate.
33 Legal realism. The positivists ascertain that laws are just rules that need to be followed which is not an idea shared by legal realists. Oliver Wendell Holmes, who wrote 'The Common Law' in 1923 suggests that if this was the case there would be no need for lawyers or court proceedings. If there was no moral attachment to laws at all then the discretionary powers of judges when it came to sentencing for example, would not be needed. Aggravating and mitigating factors could be described as moral factors that make a punishment better or worse for a defendant based on their good or bad behaviour. So, there must be a link or relationship between the two concepts.
34 The Hart/Devlin debate. In 1957 the Wolfenden Committee was asked to examine a range of moral issues. The committee recommended the legalisation of both prostitution and homosexuality, and this caused great controversy as a result.
35 Professor Hart approved of the recommendations and argued that law and morality were separate concepts. To him morality was simply a matter of purely private judgement and that the state had no right to interfere in private morality. He also believed it was wrong to punish people who had not harmed others (homosexuality). But he also argued that society could not exist without a form of morality that mirrors the legal rules.
36 Lord Devlin felt that society required the observance of certain moral principles... and, even if public opinion surrounding these principles changed, the law should still uphold them. He believed that judges had the right to protect and preserve some sort of common morality. This was shown in the case of...
37 Shaw v DPP (1962) The D published the "Ladies Directory", which was a list of prostitutes with photographs and information on the kinds of sexual activity that they would participate in. The D was convicted of conspiracy to corrupt public morals. The judges invented this crime in order to uphold the morality of the country. They believed their job was to be society's moral guardians.
38 Despite changes to public morality and certain types of behaviour becoming more acceptable there are still many examples of cases that are decided with a more Devlin way of thinking...
39 Brown (1993) A group of consensual sado-masochistic homosexuals were jailed as the HL ruled that their behaviour was a breach of the criminal law. The HL were imposing a certain standard of acceptable behaviour on society. This case, however, is contradicted slightly by...
40 Wilson (1997) Here the CA accepted that a man branding his initials on to his wife's buttocks would not lead to a criminal conviction because his wife had consented. The court believed that this was a private matter between a husband and wife that the law could not interfere with.
41 How different are the circumstances in Wilson to those in Brown? It would be interesting to see if a situation like Brown would have the same outcome nowadays between homosexual men in a civil partnership or marriage.
Briefing Paper Modern Jurisprudence Dworkin s Deadly Attack on Legal Positivism November 2012 Introduction This paper will explore whether Dworkin (Professor of Jurisprudence at University of Oxford) has
Louisiana Law Review Volume 35 Number 5 Special Issue 1975 ON GUILT, RESPONSIBILITY AND PUNISHMENT. By Alf Ross. Translated from Danish by Alastair Hannay and Thomas E. Sheahan. London, Stevens and Sons
The Catholic Lawyer Volume 26 Number 2 Volume 26, Spring 1981, Number 2 Article 4 September 2017 Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law Henry Cohen Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl
Religious Studies Year 9 GCSE Religious Studies Curriculum Map Term 1 Term 2 Term 3 Christian Ethics Christian Ethics Christian Ethics Crime: Causes, Deterrence, Retribution, Rehabilitation, Capital Punishment,
In defence of the four freedoms : freedom of religion, conscience, association and speech Understanding religious freedom Religious freedom is a fundamental human right the expression of which is bound
What Is Legal Moralism? Petersen, Thomas Søbirk Published in: Sats DOI: 10.1515/sats.2011006 Publication date: 2011 Document Version Early version, also known as pre-print Citation for published version
Debate and Debate Adjudication Rachmat Nurcahyo,M.A. Yogyakarta State University National Polythecnic English Debate Competition 2012, Tual Maluku Tenggara Overview What is Competitive Debate Understanding
National Law University, Delhi From the SelectedWorks of Mubashshir Sarshar 2008 LAW AND MORALITY Mubashshir Sarshar, National Law University, Delhi Available at: http://works.bepress.com/mubashshir/3/
HART ON THE INTERNAL ASPECT OF RULES John D. Hodson Introduction, Polycarp Ikuenobe THE CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN PHILOSOPHER John Hodson, examines what H. L. A. Hart means by the notion of internal aspect
Three Ethics Reasoning Assessment (TERA) Lene Arnett Jensen, Clark University email@example.com This is a survey of your moral views. Please read the questions and instructions carefully. The instructions
1 Fourfold Communication as a Way to Cooperation Ordinary conversation about trivial matters is often a bit careless. We try to listen and talk simultaneously, although that is very difficult. The exchange
The Character of God and the Sexual Prohibitions of the Mosaic Law Leviticus 18:19-26 Nick Wilson This morning we are continuing our series on homosexuality and the church. Where last week we discovered
A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7 Kantian Deontology Deontological (based on duty) ethical theory established by Emmanuel Kant in The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Part of the enlightenment
AS UTILITARIANISM EXAMPLE EXAM ANSWERS The general principles of Utilitarianism: consequential or teleological thinking in contrast to deontological thinking: The greatest happiness principle; AO1 Explain
Legal English- Supporting your Arguments Part One: Questions to make people support their arguments Listen to your partner give their ideas (e.g. those they prepared for homework) and ask for more support
THE DECRIMINALISATION OF THE PUBLIC VILIFICATION OF RELIGION AND OF PORNOGRAPHY A POSITION PAPER AUGUST 2015 www.thechurchinmalta.org Executive Summary Religious belief plays an important role in society,
PURE THEORY OF LAW 1. The Pure theory of Law which is also known as Vienna School of Legal Thought was propounded by Hans Kelson, a professor in Vienna (Austria) University. 2. Though the first exposition
KELSEN'S "LAW AND PEACE." G. W. PATON. Hans Kelsen's recent work! provides an opportunity for considering both the contributions made to jurisprudence by the pure 8cience of law and also the value of this
26 M a r r i a g e a n d t h e H o m e LESSON 2Before Marriage God s standards of right and wrong are intended to make His sons and daughters fit and able to live to the fullest. First Corinthians 9:24
Legal Positivism A N I NTRODUCTION Polycarp Ikuenobe Legal positivism represents a view about the nature of law. It states that there is no necessary or conceptual connection between law and morality and
TEACHER S MANUAL Our Moral Life in Christ Author: Rev. Peter V. Armenio General Editor: Rev. James Socias MIDWEST THEOLOGICAL FORUM Woodridge, Illinois CONTENTS ix Abbreviations Used for the Books of the
Scheme (Results) Summer 2012 GCSE Religious Studies (5RS01) Religion and life based on a study of Christianity and at least one other religion Edexcel and BTEC Qualifications Edexcel and BTEC qualifications
Sex, Religion, Abortion, and Justice A Sermon by Rev. Rob Keithan Rev. Keithan is a faith organizing and training consultant specializing in reproductive health, rights and justice issues as well as congregational
University of Oxford Faculty of Law January 2009 Jurisprudence a guide through the subject WELCOME TO our unique syndicate lecture series designed to guide you through some of the central issues of Jurisprudence
CAN WE HAVE MORALITY WITHOUT GOD AND RELIGION? Stephen Law It s widely held that morality requires both God and religion. Without God to lay down moral rules, talk of right and wrong can reflect nothing
Hillcrest Christian School dba HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 17531 Rinaldi Street Granada Hills, CA 91344 818-368-7071 COACHING EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Your interest in Heritage Christian School is appreciated.
hij Teacher Resource Bank GCE Religious Studies Unit 1A: Religion and Ethics 1 Scheme of Work Copyright 2008 AQA and its licensors. All rights reserved. The Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (AQA)
Citation: 21 Isr. L. Rev. 113 1986 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Sun Jan 11 12:34:09 2015 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's
The Ulster Medical Journal, Volume 66, No. 2, pp. 80-85, November 1997. Conflicts in Resuscitation: Ethical Dilemmas Paper presented at a joint meeting of Ulster Medical Society and Ulster Neuropsychiatric
SUPPORT MATERIAL FOR 'DETERMINISM AND FREE WILL ' (UNIT 2 TOPIC 5) Introduction We often say things like 'I couldn't resist buying those trainers'. In saying this, we presumably mean that the desire to
Articles of Faith Grace Bible Church, Coeur d Alene, ID Adopted May 3, 2009 In the following Articles of Faith, all Scripture references are to be interpreted as translated in the Authorized (King James)
Nature Nurture Norms And Free Will by Braswell D. Deen, Jr. www.evolutionornot.com Nature nurture norms, and, the utilization of a person's free will Were once upon a time in all the schools about equally
ABOUT MORALITY AND THE NATURE OF LAW JOSEPH RAZ I. ON THE NECESSARY CONNECTION TEST Two innocent truisms about the law lie behind much of the difficulty we have in understanding the relations between law
What Do You Believe? Matthew 28:1-10 ~ April 16, 2017 (Easter Sunday) ~ Heritage Lutheran Church What do you believe? Did OJ do it? On October 3, 1995 a jury in Los Angeles Superior Court ruled that OJ
Kelsen s Legal Monism and the Future of the European Constitution Draft, August 2011 Lars Vinx Department of Philosophy Bilkent University firstname.lastname@example.org In recent years, much of the debate on the
Name:. Form:. Yr11 Philosophy and Ethics Religious Studies B (OCR) GCSE Medical Ethics B603 Religion and Medical Ethics You will need to have knowledge and understanding of: Attitudes to abortion Attitudes
The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam Adopted and Issued at the Nineteenth Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers in Cairo on 5 August 1990. The Member States of the Organization of the Islamic
JUDGING OTHERS (Matthew 7) by Blues Bibleden - Tuesday, February 23, 2016 http://www.bibleden.com/?page_id=572 Reading: Matthew 7: 1-6 (NLT) Do not judge others, and you will not be judged. 2 For you will
2015 IFCA International Statement on Biblical vs. Same-Sex Marriage The members and churches of the IFCA International maintain their historical commitment to God s Word, the Bible as the final and supreme
EDITORIAL NOTE: SOME NAMES AND/OR DETAILS IN THIS JUDGMENT HAVE BEEN ANONYMISED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT TAURANGA CRI-2015-087-000856  NZDC 10353 THE QUEEN v GODFREY TE RITO TAMIHANA TUKAKI DESMOND
Discerning Same-Sex Marriage in the PC(USA) First Things First We cannot address such matters without first sharing the following beliefs: All of us stand under the truth that, All have sinned and fallen
1 Immanuel Baptist Church Membership Covenant The Immanuel Baptist Church membership covenant was created out of a desire to inform and equip members of IBC as to their responsibilities to the church and
Introduction to Moral Reasoning TO M REGAN 1. Some Ways Not to Answer Moral Questions Moral Judgments and Personal Preferences: Some people like classical music; others do not. Some people think bourbon
MILL ON LIBERTY 1. Problem. Mill s On Liberty, one of the great classics of liberal political thought, is about the nature and limits of the power which can legitimately be exercised by society over the
Rite of Christian Initiation for Children The Association for Catechumenal Ministry LESSON #4 The Last Seven Commandments Objective: The students will learn that all the Commandments from the Fourth Commandment
by Mark A. Finley Taking a Stand for the Ten Commandments It may seem surprising, but the Ten Commandments are creating a lot of controversy these days. In November of 2003, the chief justice of the Alabama
Christian Discernment We are confronted with ethical choices and moral complexity. We must apply biblical principles to these social and political issues. And we must avoid the pitfalls and logical fallacies
THE POSITION OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND THE STANCE OF THE CATHOLIC BISHOPS OF CANADA ON THE GIVING OF ASSISTANCE IN DYING Submission by the President of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops to the
Invention 43 During test Found test hard Saw Jeff cheating After test Got angry Wanted to tell Dismissed idea In college Understand implications of cheating Understand goals of education Exercise 7 Continue
Paper Topic You might want to revise by Done? Tick Y/N 1 Muslim Beliefs: The nature of Allah, Tawhid, the 6 articles of faith (Sunni), and 5 roots of Usal ad Din (Shi'a) 1 Muslim Beliefs: Prophethood (Risalah),
abcdefghijklm = påüççäë=aáêéåíçê~íé = pìééçêí=ñçê=ié~êåáåö=aáîáëáçå= Directors of Education, Managers of grant aided schools and Proprietors of independent schools sáåíçêá~=nì~ó= bçáåäìêöü=bes=snn= = qéäééüçåéw=mnpnjoqq=mvmv=
The Journal Of Peace, Prosperity & Freedom Ben O Neill Natural Law and the Liberal (Libertarian) Society [An abridged version of this article was delivered as a speech at the Australian Mises Seminar on
Sermon: Sanctity of Life Dr. Peter Hammond They sacrificed their sons and their daughters to demons. They shed innocent blood, the blood of their sons and daughters...the land was desecrated by their blood.
Breaking Down Barriers: How to Debate Sample of The Basics Section Written by Jim Hanson with Brian Simmonds, Jeff Shaw and Ross Richendrfer Breaking Down Barriers: How to Debate Sample of The Basics Section
Adult Bible Study in Simplified English Study Guide WRITER Janet Roberts BAPTISTWAY PRESS Dallas, Texas baptistwaypress.org The Corinthian Letters Important Instructions for an Imperfect Church Adult Bible
Bible Teachings Series II A Bible study about the proper use of sex God Created Man and Woman God Created Man and Woman A Bible study about the gift of sex and its proper use Multi-Language Publications
Apostasy and Conversion Kishan Manocha In the context of a conference which tries to identify how the international community can strengthen its ability to protect religious freedom and, in particular,
Chapter 15 Elements of Argument: Claims and Exceptions Debate is a process in which individuals exchange arguments about controversial topics. Debate could not exist without arguments. Arguments are the
RE Knowledge Organiser: Justice in Islam Key Terms Definitions Non religious attitude to justice Atheists and Humanists believe that justice is important because it ensures that: Justice Laws Due allocation
6 th Commandment Unbroken Love Memory Work: Learn the books of the New Testament from Matthew 2 Thessalonians Teaching Time The sixth commandment: Do not commit ADULTERY. What does this mean? (see Catechism
THE PURE THEORY OF LAW Hans Kelsen Introduction, Polycarp Ikuenobe THE GERMAN LEGAL THEORIST AND philosopher Hans Kelsen provides a positivist account of law. He does this by employing the method of what
Peace Bonds & Restraining Orders Public Legal Education and Information Service of New Brunswick Public Legal Education and Information Service of New Brunswick (PLEIS-NB) is a non-profit organization.
Phil 108, August 10, 2010 Punishment Retributivism and Utilitarianism The retributive theory: (1) It is good in itself that those who have acted wrongly should suffer. When this happens, people get what
Hillcrest Christian School dba HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 17531 Rinaldi Street Granada Hills, CA 91344 818-368-7071 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Your interest in Heritage Christian School
KNOW SUMMARY OF TEACHINGS! 1 Use these wherever you can! Remember, you cannot get full marks for your answer unless you use key concepts and religious vocabulary. Many of these teachings can be used in
Living by Separate Laws: Halachah, Sharia and America Shabbat Chukkat 5777 June 30, 2017 Rabbi Barry H. Block In 1960, when John F. Kennedy ran for President, many Americans questioned whether our country
UTILITARIAN ETHICS Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule A dilemma You are a lawyer. You have a client who is an old lady who owns a big house. She tells you that
KELSEN'S THEORY OF GRUNDNORM Mridushi Swarup* This article is an attempt to explain as to what is meant by Kelsons theory of grundnorm, in what way are they effective, its functions and whether the concept
Levels of Teaching within the Catholic Church Prepared by the St. Thomas Aquinas Center for Apologetics Oblates and Missioners of St. Michael Definition of Infallibility of Teachings There are three ways
SLIDE 1 Theories of Adjudication: Legal Formalism A theory of adjudication is a theory primarily about what judges do when they decide cases in courts of law. American legal realism was a legal movement,
Hope s Haven, 661 E. Market St. Williamstown, PA 17098 570-850-9443; email@example.com 2018 CAMP STAFF APPLICATION FOR RETURNING STAFF Directions: This application is for returning staff only. If
Primary Source #1 Source: Magna Carta, June 15, 1215. As quoted by C. Stephenson, Sources of English Constitutional History. (New York: Harper and Row, 1937), pp 115-26. Editorial comment (Stephenson),
Grievance and Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Congregations 1.0 Introduction The Congregation is committed to providing a safe environment where the dignity of every individual is respected and therefore