1 Ethics and Morality Ethos (Greek) and Mores (Latin) are terms having to do with custom, habit, and behavior. Ethics is the study of morality. This definition raises two questions: (a) What is morality? (b) What is the study of morality?
2 What is Morality? Morality can be defined as: A system of rules for guiding human conduct, and principles for evaluating those rules. Two points are worth noting in this definition: (i) Morality is a system; and (ii) It is a system comprised of moral rules and principles. Moral rules can be understood as "rules of conduct," which are very similar to "policies." Rules of conducts Principles
3 Rules of Conduct as Policies Policies range from formal laws to "informal, implicit guidelines for actions" (Moor, 1999) Moor suggests that every act can be viewed as an instance of a policy. There are two kinds of rules of conduct: (1) Directives for guiding our conduct as individuals (at the micro-level) Don t Steal, Do not harm others (2) Social Policies framed at the macro-level Software that used to invade the privacy of others
4 Directives Directives are rules (of conduct) that guide our actions and thus direct us to behave in certain ways. Rules such as "Do not steal" and "Do not harm others" are both examples of rules of conduct that direct us in our individual moral choices at the "micro-ethical" level (i.e., the level of individual behavior). micro-ethical level Rules that guide our action
5 Social Policies Other rules of conduct guide our actions at the "macro-ethical" level by helping us frame social policies. Rules such as "proprietary software should not be copied" or "software that can be used to invade the privacy of users should not be developed" are examples of rules of conduct that arise out of our social policies. A correlation between directives and social policies (e.g., rules involving stealing). macro-ethical level Rules that help us frame our social policies
6 Principles The rules of conduct in a moral system are evaluated against standards called principles. For example, the principle of "social utility," which is concerned with promoting the greatest good for the greatest number, can be used to evaluate a social policy such as "proprietary software should not be copied without permission." Rules of conduct (proprietary information) Rules of conduct Rules of conduct Social utility Principles of evaluation
7 Principles (continued) In the previous example, the social-utility principle Example: Policy pertaining to proprietary software can be justified on the above moral grounds. A certain policy could be justified (on utilitarian grounds) by showing that following the rule for not allowing the unauthorized copying of software would produce more overall social utility (greater good for society). Rules of conduct (proprietary information) Rules of conduct Rules of conduct Social utility Principles of evaluation based on Utilitarian ground
8 Figure 2-1: Basic Components of a Moral System Rules of Conduct (Action-guiding rules, in the form of either directives or social policies) two types Principles of Evaluation (Evaluative standards used to justify rules of conduct) Examples include principles such as of social utility and justice as fairness Rules for guiding the actions of individuals (micro-level ethical rules) Examples include directives such as:"do not steal" and "Do not harm others." Rules for establishing social policies (macro-level ethical rules) Examples include social policies such as: "Software should be protected and "Privacy should be respected."
9 Four features of a moral s system Public: everyone must know what the rules are Informal: No formal authoritative judges presiding over it Rationality: A moral system is rational and accessible to ordinary peoples Impartial: Morals rules are ideally designed to apply equitably to all participants
10 Values The term value comes from the Latin valere, which translates roughly into having worth or being of worth. Values can be conceived as objects of our desires or interests. Examples of values include very general notions such as: happiness, love, freedom, etc. Moral principles are ultimately derived from a society's system of values.
11 Intrinsic vs. Instrumental Values Philosophers distinguish between two types of values: intrinsic instrumental values. Any value that serves some further end or good is called an instrumental values are tied to some external standard. Example: Automobiles, computers, and money. Intrinsic values are valued for their own sake Examples: life and happiness.
12 Core Values Another approach to cataloguing values is to distinguish core values, some of which may or may not also be intrinsic values, from other kinds of values. Moor (1998), for example, believes that values such as life, happiness, and autonomy are core values Not all core values are also moral values. Core values None Core values
13 Moral vs. Non-Moral Values Morals and values are not necessarily identical. Values can be either moral or non-moral. Reason informs us that it is in our interest to promote values that consistent with our own survival, happiness, and flourishing as individuals. When used to further only our own self-interests, these values are not necessarily moral values.
14 Moral Values Once we bring in the notion of impartiality, we begin to take the "moral point of view." We articulate a system of values having to do with notions such as autonomy, fairness, justice, etc., which are moral values. Our core moral values are, in turn derived from certain core non-moral values.
15 Figure 2-2: Components of a Moral System Grounds for justifying moral principles Religion Philosophy Law Moral principles and rules Principles of Evaluation Rules of Conduct Source of moral rules Core Values
16 Figure 2-3: Components of a Moral System: An Expanded View Grounds for Justifying the Moral Principles Religion (Obedience to Divine Command) Philosophical Ethics (Ethical Theory and Logical Argumentation) Law (Obedience to (a legal system) Moral Principles Source of the Moral rules Moral Principles Principles such as social utility, duty, obligation, etc. are used as standards to evaluate and justify rules of conduct. Rules of Conduct Moral rules are derived from basic moral values (macro-level rules or policies such as "protect privacy ; micro-level rules or directives such as "do not cheat"). Basic Moral Values Moral values are derived from core non-moral values by using the notion of impartiality. (Examples include autonomy and respect for persons. Core Non-Moral Values Non-moral values originate from desires and typically involve rational self interests. (Examples include: survival, security, pleasure, etc.)
17 Three Schemes for Grounding the Evaluative Rules in a Moral System The principles are grounded in one of three different kinds of schemes: Religion Law Philosophical Ethics. Consider how a particular moral principle can be justified from the vantage-points of each scheme. Example: do not steal.
18 Approach #1: Grounding Moral Principles in a Religious System Consider the following rationale for why stealing is morally wrong: Stealing is wrong because it offends God or because it violates one of God's (Ten) Commandments. It violates the commands of a divine authority.
19 Approach #2: Grounding Moral Principles in a Legal System An alternative rationale would be: Stealing is wrong because it violates the law. Here the grounds for determining why stealing is wrong are not tied to religion. If stealing violates a law in a particular nation or jurisdiction, The act of stealing can be declared to be wrong independent of any religious beliefs that one may or may not happen to have.
20 Approach #3: Grounding Moral Principles in a Philosophical System of Ethics A third way of approaching the question is: Stealing is wrong because it is wrong independent of any form of external authority or any external sanctions. On this view, the moral "rightness" or "wrongness" of stealing is not grounded in some external authoritative source. Does not appeal to an external authority, either theological or legal, for justification.
21 Approach # 3 Continued Many philosophers and ethicists argue that, independent of supernatural or legal authorities, reason alone is sufficient to show that stealing is wrong. They argue that reason can inform us that there is something either in the act of stealing itself or in the consequences that result from this kind of act that makes stealing morally wrong.
22 Approach # 3 Continued In the case of both law and religion, specific sanctions against stealing exists in the form of punishment. In the case of (philosophical) ethics, the only sanction would be in the form of social disapprobation (disapproval) and possibly social ostracism. But there is no punishment in a formal sense. External conditions or factors, in the form of sanctions, are irrelevant.
23 Ethicists vs. Moralists Ethicists study morality from the perspective of philosophical methodology; they appeal to logical arguments to justify their positions. Moralists often claim to have all of the answers regarding morality. Many moralists also exhibit characteristics that have been described as "preachy" and "judgmental." Some moralists may have a particular moral agenda to advance.
24 Ethicists and Moralists (Continued) Ethicists, who use the philosophical method in their analysis and investigation of moral issues, must remain open to different sides of a dispute. An ethicist s primary focus is on the study of morality and the application of theories. Ethicists approach the study of moral issues and controversies by way of standards that are both rational (based on logic) and impartial (open to others to verify).
25 Bernard Gert s Scheme of a Moral Morality is a system. System It is like a game, but more like an informal game (e.g., a game of cards) It is public (open and accessible to all) It is rational (open to reason) It should be impartial (e.g., a blindfold of justice ).
26 Table 2-1 Four Features of Gert s Moral System Public Informal Rational Impartial The rules are known to all of the members. The rules are informal, not like formal laws in a legal system. The system is based on principles of logical reason accessible to all its members. The system is not partial to any one group or individual.
27 Discussion Stoppers as "Roadblocks" to Moral Discourse Discussion stoppers can be articulated in terms of the following four questions: 1. People disagree about morality; so how can we reach agreement on moral issues? 2.Who am I/Who are we to judge others and to impose my/our values on others? 3. Isn't morality simply a private matter? 4. Isn't morality simply a matter that different cultures and groups should determine for themselves?
28 Discussion Stopper # 1: People Disagree on Solutions to Moral Issues People who hold this view fail to recognize: (i) Experts in other fields of study, such as science and math., also disagree on what the correct answers to certain questions are. (ii) There is common agreement about answers to some moral questions. (iii) People do not always distinguish between "disagreements about factual matters" and "disagreements on general principles" in disputes involving morality.
29 Discussion Stopper # 1: People Disagree on Solutions to Moral Issues Experts in may field disagree on fundamental issues Example: Linux is a better OS than Window C++ is a better programming language than JAVA Light is composed of particles and other claim that light is composed of waves Parameters and rules must be satisfied in order for a particular claim to qualify as acceptable in debates
30 Common agreement on some moral issues Common agreement on some moral issues: People have demonstrated considerable agreement on answers to some moral principles Example: death penalty abortion Disagreement about principles vs. disagreement about facts Richared De George (1999) has pointed out that is analyzing moral issues we need to be very careful to distinguish our disagreement about moral principles and factual values Example: Unauthorized exchange of proprietary information is a form of stealing
31 Discussion Stopper # 2: Who am I to Judge Others? We need to distinguish between: Persons Making Judgments and Persons Being Judgmental, and Judgments Involving Condemnations vs. Judgments Involving Evaluations Also, we are sometimes required to make judgments about others.
32 Discussion Stopper # 2: Who am I to Judge Others? Person making a judgment about Linux is a better operating system than window. Judgmental is a behavioral trait exhibited by those who strongly opinionated or who tend to speak disparagingly of anyone who holds a positions on some topic that is different from their own Two types of judgments: Involving condemnation Involving evaluation
33 Discussion Stopper # 3: Ethics is Simply a Private Matter Many people assume that morality is essentially personal in nature Morality must be simply a private matter. Private morality" is essentially an oxymoron or contradictory notion. Morality is a public phenomenon (Gert). Example: stealing is morally wrong
34 Discussion Stopper # 4: Morality is Simply a Matter for Individual Cultures to Decide According to this view, a moral system is dependent on, or relative to, a particular culture or group. There are some very serious problems with this view, which is called ethical relativism. Two positions involving relativism: cultural relativism and moral relativism.
35 Discussion Stopper #4 Continued - Cultural Relativism At the base of cultural relativism is the following assumption: (A) Different cultures have different beliefs about what constitutes morally right and wrong behavior. This assumption (A) is essentially descriptive in nature.
36 Cultural Relativism Continued (the view that different groups have different conceptions about what is morally right and morally wrong behavior) is widely accepted Other social scientists have suggested that all cultures may possess certain universal core moral values.
37 Cultural Relativism Continued Even if Cultural Relativism (assumption A) is true, does it logically imply the further claim? (B) What is morally right or wrong for members of a culture or group can be determined only by that culture or group. Note that (B), unlike (A), is a normative claim. Also note that to move from (A) to (B) is to move from cultural relativism to moral relativism.
38 Moral Relativism Moral relativism asserts that no universal standard of morality is possible because Different people have different beliefs about what is right and wrong. From this inference, relativists appear to further suggest that, in matters of morality, anything goes. But this principle of reasoning is problematic because it is essentially incoherent and inconsistent.
39 Moral Relativism Continued Two cultures, Culture A and Culture B, adjoin each other geographically. The members of Culture A are fairly peaceful people, tolerant of the diverse believe found in all other cultures. And they believe that all culture should essentially mind their own business when it comes to matters involving morality. Those in Culture B, on the contrary, dislike and hostile to those outside their culture. Culture B has recently developed a new computer system for delivering chemical weapons that it plans to use in military attacks on other cultures, including Culture A
40 Table 2-2 Summary of Logical Flaws in the Discussion Stoppers Stopper #1 Stopper #2 Stopper #3 Stopper #4 People disagree on solutions to moral issues. Who am I to judge others? Ethics is imply a private matter. Morality is simply a matter for individual cultures to decide. 1. Fails to recognize that experts in many areas disagree on key issues in their fields. 1. Fails to distinguish between the act of judging and being a judgmental person. 1. Fails to recognize that morality is essentially a public system. 1. Fails to distinguish between descriptive and normative claims about morality. 2. Fails to recognize that there are many moral issues on which people agree. 3. Fails to distinguish between disagreements about principles and disagreements about facts. 2. Fails to distinguish between judging as condemning and judging as evaluating. 3. Fails to recognize that sometimes we are required to make judgments 2. Fails to note that personally-based morality can cause major harm to others. 3. Confuses moral choices with individual or personal preferences. 2. Assumes that people can never reach common agreement on some moral principles. 3. Assumes that a system is moral because a majority in a culture decides it is moral.
Philosophical Ethics The nature of ethical analysis Discussion based on Johnson, Computer Ethics, Chapter 2. How to resolve ethical issues? censorship abortion affirmative action How do we defend our moral
CS305 Topic Introduction to Ethics Sources: Baase: A Gift of Fire and Quinn: Ethics for the Information Age CS305-Spring 2010 Ethics 1 What is Ethics? A branch of philosophy that studies priciples relating
THE ALLYN & BACON GUIDE TO WRITING SEVENTH EDITION JOHN D. RAMAGE, JOHN C. BEAN, AND JUNE JOHNSON PART 2: WRITING PROJECTS CHAPTER 13 WRITING A CLASSICAL ARGUMENT Chapter 13 Learning Objectives In this
Chapter Two Determining Moral Behavior Quote Integrity is doing the right thing--even if nobody is watching - Unknown Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas 1 - Identify the facts 2 Identify relevant values and concepts
A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7 Kantian Deontology Deontological (based on duty) ethical theory established by Emmanuel Kant in The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Part of the enlightenment
5 [name] [course] [teaching assistant s name] [discussion day and time] [question being answered] [date turned in] Cultural Relativism In James Rachels s chapter The Challenge of Cultural Relativism, he
Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? - My boss - The shareholders - Other stakeholders - Basic principles about conduct and its impacts - What is good for me - What
QUIZ 1 ETHICAL ISSUES IN MEDIA, BUSINESS AND SOCIETY WHAT IS ETHICS? Business ethics deals with values, facts, and arguments. Q2) The test of an ethical argument lies in the fact that others need to be
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CD5590 LECTURE 1 Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic Department of Computer Science and Engineering Mälardalen University 2005 1 Course Preliminaries Identifying Moral
Relativism and Subjectivism The Denial of Objective Ethical Standards Starting with a counter argument 1.The universe operates according to laws 2.The universe can be investigated through the use of both
Psychological and Ethical Egoism Wrapping up Error Theory Psychological Egoism v. Ethical Egoism Ought implies can, the is/ought fallacy Arguments for and against Psychological Egoism Ethical Egoism Arguments
UTILITARIAN ETHICS Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule A dilemma You are a lawyer. You have a client who is an old lady who owns a big house. She tells you that
Basic Concepts and Skills! Critical Thinking tests rationales,! i.e., reasons connected to conclusions by justifying or explaining principles! Why do CT?! Answer: Opinions without logical or evidential
Fr. Copleston vs. Bertrand Russell: The Famous 1948 BBC Radio Debate on the Existence of God Father Frederick C. Copleston (Jesuit Catholic priest) versus Bertrand Russell (agnostic philosopher) Copleston:
Argument and Persuasion Stating Opinions and Proposals The Method It all starts with an opinion - something that people can agree or disagree with. The Method Move to action Speak your mind Convince someone
Annotated List of Ethical Theories The following list is selective, including only what I view as the major theories. Entries in bold face have been especially influential. Recommendations for additions
PHIL 5983: Naturalness and Fundamentality Seminar Prof. Funkhouser Spring 2017 Week 11: Chalmers, Constructing the World Notes (Chapters 6-7, Twelfth Excursus) Chapter 6 6.1 * This chapter is about the
Practical Rationality and Ethics Basic Terms and Positions Practical reasons and moral ought Reasons are given in answer to the sorts of questions ethics seeks to answer: What should I do? How should I
AN OUTLINE OF CRITICAL THINKING LEVELS OF INQUIRY 1. Information: correct understanding of basic information. 2. Understanding basic ideas: correct understanding of the basic meaning of key ideas. 3. Probing:
Ethical Relativism 1. Ethical Relativism: In this lecture, we will discuss a moral theory called ethical relativism (sometimes called cultural relativism ). Ethical Relativism: An action is morally wrong
ON NORMATIVE ETHICAL THEORIES: SOME BASICS From the dawn of philosophy, the question concerning the summum bonum, or, what is the same thing, concerning the foundation of morality, has been accounted the
Human Nature & Human Diversity: Sex, Love & Parenting; Morality, Religion & Race Course Description Human Nature & Human Diversity is listed as both a Philosophy course (PHIL 253) and a Cognitive Science
45 Faults and Mathematical Disagreement María Ponte ILCLI. University of the Basque Country firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract: My aim in this paper is to analyse the notion of mathematical disagreements
Introduction to Moral Reasoning TO M REGAN 1. Some Ways Not to Answer Moral Questions Moral Judgments and Personal Preferences: Some people like classical music; others do not. Some people think bourbon
TEACHER S NOTES INTRO Each student has to choose one of the following topics. The other students have to ask questions on that topic. During the discussion, the student has to lie once. The other students
Revised, 8/30/08 Part I: The Structure of Philosophy Philosophy as the love of wisdom The basic questions and branches of philosophy The branches of the branches and the many philosophical questions that
Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Natural Law Forum 1-1-1968 On Humanity and Abortion;Note John O'Connor Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/nd_naturallaw_forum Part of
Charles Saunders Peirce (1839-1914) Few persons care to study logic, because everybody conceives himself to be proficient enough in the art of reasoning already. But I observe that this satisfaction is
Philosophy 3G03E: Ethics September-December 2009 Instructor: Dr. D. L. Hitchcock Lectures: Tuesdays 19:00 to 20:50, Arthur Bourns Building (ABB) 163 Optional tutorials: Tuesdays 21:00 to 21:50, ABB 163
Absolute truth or relative terms? Apologetics to believe 1 On an Airline flight... What have we become? 3 4 And What is Truth? 5 Absolute truth or relative terms? And what is truth? 6 Absolute truth or
I. COURSE DESCRIPTION Syllabus for PRM 660- Practical Theology for Charismatic Ministry 3 Credit Hours July 8-12, 2013 A course designed to help implement the promises of God and to build the Kingdom of
Why Hypothesis? Unit 3 Science and Hypothesis All men, unlike animals, are born with a capacity "to reflect". This intellectual curiosity amongst others, takes a standard form such as "Why so-and-so is
Grade 11 correlated to the Georgia Quality Core Curriculum 9 12 English/Language Arts Course: 23.05100 American Literature/Composition C2 5/2003 2002 McDougal Littell The Language of Literature Grade 11
COURSE SYLLABUS: ACTS AND ROMANS Instructor Ph.D. Candidate: Department of New Testament Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL Contact Information email@example.com (706) 424 1319 Course Description This course
Deontological Ethics From Jane Eyre, the end of Chapter XXVII: (Mr. Rochester is the first speaker) And what a distortion in your judgment, what a perversity in your ideas, is proved by your conduct! Is
Socratic and Platonic Ethics G. J. Mattey Winter, 2017 / Philosophy 1 Ethics and Political Philosophy The first part of the course is a brief survey of important texts in the history of ethics and political
Christopher W. Tindale Trent University Judging Coherence in the Argumentative Situation 1. Intro: Coherence and Consistency Things are coherent if they stick together, are connected in a specific way,
Debate and Debate Adjudication Rachmat Nurcahyo,M.A. Yogyakarta State University National Polythecnic English Debate Competition 2012, Tual Maluku Tenggara Overview What is Competitive Debate Understanding
Argument Writing Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job promotion as well as political and personal decision-making
Louisiana Law Review Volume 35 Number 5 Special Issue 1975 ON GUILT, RESPONSIBILITY AND PUNISHMENT. By Alf Ross. Translated from Danish by Alastair Hannay and Thomas E. Sheahan. London, Stevens and Sons
ECO Leadership Competencies ECO Leadership Competencies in ECO To be faithful to ECO s mission to build flourishing churches that make disciples of Jesus Christ, we have compiled an initial set of competencies
Diametros 26 (December 2010): 23-43 MORAL DISAGREEMENT CONCERNING ABORTION 1 - Bernard Gert - Introduction Even though it is seldom explicitly stated, it seems to be a common philosophical view that either
Utilitarianism 1. What is Utilitarianism?: This is the theory of morality which says that the right action is always the one that best promotes the total amount of happiness in the world. Utilitarianism
Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS Rhetorical Appeals Ethos Appeals to credibility Pathos Appeals to emotion Logos Appeals to logic Structure of an Analysis/Argument Arguments operate under logic Your
CLIMBING THE MOUNTAIN SUMMARY CHAPTER 1 REASONS 1 Practical Reasons We are the animals that can understand and respond to reasons. Facts give us reasons when they count in favour of our having some belief
In Defense of Radical Empiricism Joseph Benjamin Riegel A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
BRITISH PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION AQA PHILOSOPHY UNIT 3: MORAL PHILOSOPHY September 2013 Introduction This topic concerns philosophical aspects of right and wrong and the idea of value. Moral philosophy
I. COURSE DESCRIPTION Syllabus for GTHE 551 Systematic Theology I - ONLINE 3 Credit Hours Fall 2014 An introduction to Christian theology and an examination of the doctrines of revelation, God, creation,
Social Context Professional Skills in Computer Science Lecture 21: Legal, Social, Ethical and Professional Issues (1) Ullrich Hustadt Department of Computer Science School of Electrical Engineering, Electronics,
CREATING THRIVING, COHERENT AND INTEGRAL NEW THOUGHT CHURCHES USING AN INTEGRAL APPROACH AND SECOND TIER PRACTICES Copyright 2007 Gary Simmons Summary of Doctoral Research Study conducted by Gary Simmons,
REL 6387/LAS 6938: RELIGIONS IN LATIN AMERICA Spring 2017 Tues. 4, Thurs. 4/5 Instructor: Anna Peterson Tel. 273-2936; fax 392-7395; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Office: 105 Anderson Hall (Mailbox in 107 Anderson)
FORMING ETHICAL STANDARDS Ethical standards of any type require a devotion to ethical action, and ethical action often comes in conflict with our instinct to act in our own self-interest. This tendency
Meta-ethical approaches Theory that believes objective moral laws do not exist; a non-cognitivist theory; moral terms express personal emotional attitudes and not propositions; ethical terms are just expressions
MILL The principle of utility determines the rightness of acts (or rules of action?) by their effect on the total happiness. Mill s principle of utility [A]ctions are right in proportion as they tend to
Why economics needs ethical theory by John Broome, University of Oxford In Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honour of Amartya Sen. Volume 1 edited by Kaushik Basu and Ravi Kanbur, Oxford University
A Brief History of Thinking about Thinking Thomas Lombardo "Education is nothing more nor less than learning to think." Peter Facione In this article I review the historical evolution of principles and
National Incubator for Community-Based Jewish Teen Education Initiatives Qualitative Research on Jewish Teens From Theory to Outcomes: Jewish Teen Education and Engagement Outcomes Background and Executive
Ethical Consistency and the Logic of Ought Mathieu Beirlaen Ghent University In Ethical Consistency, Bernard Williams vindicated the possibility of moral conflicts; he proposed to consistently allow for
9 Knowledge-Based Systems Throughout this book, we have insisted that intelligent behavior in people is often conditioned by knowledge. A person will say a certain something about the movie 2001 because
The Order of Salvation Various theologians have given specific terms to a number of these events, and have often listed them in a specific order in which they believe that they occur in our lives. Such
I. COURSE DESCRIPTION Syllabus for GBIB 625-48 Gospel and Letters of John 3 Credit hours May 6-10, 2013 An exegetical study of the Gospel and Epistles of John. The study explicates the literary and theological
How Subjective Fact Ties Language to Reality Mark F. Sharlow URL: http://www.eskimo.com/~msharlow ABSTRACT In this note, I point out some implications of the experiential principle* for the nature of the
Divine Command Theory Moral Reasoning Ethical Relativism Natural Law Arguments Universalism What s the problem? Can one ground one s moral values on anything that would be true for all people at all times,
Realism and Idealism Internal realism Owen Griffiths email@example.com St John s College, Cambridge 12/11/15 Easy answers Last week, we considered the metaontological debate between Quine and Carnap. Quine
Computer Ethics(1) (1) IT Engineering II Instructor: Ali B. Hashemi Main Points Computer Ethics Set of rules or standards of behavior for dealing with computer technology Academic field of study Examples
J. L. Mackie The Subjectivity of Values The following excerpt is from Mackie s The Subjectivity of Values, originally published in 1977 as the first chapter in his book, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.
I Holistic Pragmatism and the Philosophy of Culture MY PURPOSE IN THIS BOOK IS TO PRESENT A philosophical discussion of the main elements of civilization or culture such as science, law, religion, politics,
Logical Mistakes, Logical Aliens, and the Laws of Kant's Pure General Logic Chicago February 21 st 2018 Tyke Nunez 1 Introduction (1) Normativists: logic's laws are unconditional norms for how we ought
Introduction to Ethics Ethics is Practical! But men must know, that in this theatre of man s life, it is reserved only for God and angels to be lookers on. Francis Bacon (1561-1626) Advancement of Learning,
Ludwig Feuerbach The Essence of Christianity (excerpts) 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes updated: 10/23/13 9:10 AM Section III: How do I know? Reading III.6 The German philosopher, Ludwig Feuerbach, develops a humanist
1 THE NATURE AND VALUE OF CRITICAL THINKING This book is a practical guide to critical thinking. It might seem unnecessary to be reading a guide to something you do all the time and are probably already
Sparks Notes Summary of Mills Sparks Notes Summary of Mills On Liberty, Chapter 2 1 On Liberty by John Stuart Mill From http://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/onliberty/index.html Context John Stuart Mill
Self-Evidence and A Priori Moral Knowledge Colorado State University BIBLID [0873-626X (2012) 33; pp. 459-467] Abstract According to rationalists about moral knowledge, some moral truths are knowable a
Mill s Utilitarianism I. Introduction Recall that there are four questions one might ask an ethical theory to answer: a) Which acts are right and which are wrong? Which acts ought we to perform (understanding
Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT KANT S OBJECTIONS TO UTILITARIANISM: 1. Utilitarianism takes no account of integrity - the accidental act or one done with evil intent if promoting good ends
Ethical Relativism Situational Ethics Actions often cannot be evaluated in a vacuum. Suppose someone moves their hand rapidly forward, is that action right or wrong? The answer seems to depend on other
1 Ethics and Ethical Reasoning WHY STUDY ETHICS? We live in a dangerous world. Whether it is more dangerous than in times past is an open question. One can think, for example, of the thirteenth century
criticalthinking.org http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/the-critical-mind-is-a-questioning-mind/481 The Critical Mind is A Questioning Mind Learning How to Ask Powerful, Probing Questions Introduction