Parmenides. The Assault on A Posteriori Knowledge
|
|
|
- Rosamund Bishop
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Parmenides The Assault on A Posteriori Knowledge
2 Orientation to Parmenides Parmenides of Elea (born c. 515), in present day Velia, near Naples Diogenes Laertius tells us that Parmenides was a student of Xenophanes, but did not follow him. Presumably this means that he did not join him in his scepticism. If so, Diogenes is correct: Parmenides is no sceptic.
3 The A Priori/A Posteriori Distinction The Character of this Distinction This is an epistemological distinction. The Distinction One has a priori knowledge that p iff one knows p by reason or conceptual resources alone (that is, the extra-mental world makes no contribution to the justification of p). A posteriori knowledge is knowledge that is not a priori. N.b. this is a point about justification, not genesis.
4 Parmenides and the Assault A Posteriori Knowledge 1. If we have any a posteriori knowledge, then we are able to know that there are plurality and change. 2. We are not able to know that there are plurality and change. 3. Hence, we have no a posteriori knowledge. 4. We do, however, have knowledge. 5. So, (given that the a priori/a posteriori distinction is exclusive and exhaustive), all of our knowledge is a priori.
5 Some Startling Pronouncements (1) For in no way may this prevail, that things that are not are; but hold your thought back from the route of inquiry and do not let habit, rich in. experience, compel you along this route to direct an aimless eye and an echoing ear and tongue, but judge by logos the much contested examination [or proof] spoken by me (8 = DK B6 = Sexts AM7.114)
6 Some Startling Pronouncements (2) Just one story of a route remains: that it is [or: it is; being is]. Of this there are signs aplenty, that what is is ungenerated and imperishable, a whole of a single kind, unbroken, complete. Nor was it ever, nor will it be, since it is now, all together one, holding together. For what generation will you seek out for it? How and from what did it grow? From what-is-not [or from non-being] I will allow you neither to say nor to think; for it is not to be said or thought that it is not [or: is not; or non-being is]. (8 = DK B8 = Simp., Comm. in Ar. Pays ff)
7 Some Startling Pronouncements (3) Thus generation has been extinguished and perishing cannot be investigated. Nor is it divisible, since it is all alike and is not at all more in any way, which would keep it from holding together, nor at all less, but is full of what-is. (8 = DK B8 = Simp., Comm. in Ar. Phys ff)
8 Some Startling Pronouncements (4) It is right both to say and to think that what-is is [or: it is what-is; or that being is]; for it can be, but nothing is not; these things I bid you to ponder. For I hold you back from this mode of inquiry, and then from that on which mortals, knowing nothing, wander two-headed; for helplessness in their breasts steers their wandering mind. They are borne along deaf and blind alike, dazed, hordes without judgment, for whom to be and not to be are thought to be the same and not the same, and the path of all is backward-turning. (6 = DK B6 = Comm. in Ar. Phys , )
9 Dominant Claim There is no generation ex nihilo. This is a priori impossible. Indeed, it is not even possible to conceive such a thing.
10 Two Presuppositions The Relational Theory of Thinking (RT): Every instance of thinking involves a thinker standing in relation to something thought. The Co-extensivity of Thinking and Being (CTB): It is possible to think any arbitrary o if, and only if, o exists.
11 Three Consequences Thinking of nothing is impossible. This would violate RT. There being absolutely nothing is impossible. This is guaranteed by CTB: non-being is only if we can think of non-being, but we cannot Generation ex nihilo is impossible. For there is generation ex nihilo only if there is non-being (nihil) and there is and could not be non-being.
12 The Dominant Parmenidean Argument 1. It is not possible to think nothing. 2. It is possible to conceive of generation only if it is possible to think nothing. 3. Hence, it is not possible to conceive of generation. 4. It is possible to conceive of alteration only if it is possible to conceive of generation. 5. It is, by (3), not possible to conceive of generation. 6. Hence, it is not possible to conceive of alteration. 7. It is possible for there to be alteration only if it is possible to conceive of alteration. 8. Hence, it is impossible for there to be alteration. N.b. We can now run the argument once more, substituting distinctnesss for generation and plurality for alteration.
13 So, what do we know? It is right both to say and to think that what is is [or: it is what-is; or being is]; for it can be, but nothing is not; these things I bid you to ponder. (6 = DK B6 = Comm. in Ar. Phys )
A Second Wave. Staking out the Terrain
A Second Wave Staking out the Terrain Parmenides and the Assault A Posteriori Knowledge 1. If we have any a posteriori knowledge, then we are able to know that there are plurality and change. 2. We are
Lecture 3 Parmenides and Anaxagoras
Lecture 3 Parmenides and Anaxagoras Patrick Maher Scientific Thought I Fall 2009 Parmenides Introduction He was from Elea in Italy; see map. Probably born about 515 BC. We have fragments of a poem he wrote.
Ancient Greek Philosophy
Period covered: 5 th Century BCE to 2 nd Century CE Classical Period: Beginning of the 5 th century BCE (Persian War) to the last quarter of the 4 th century BCE (death of Alexander the ( Great Pre-socratics:
Chapter 1 Emergence of being
Chapter 1 Emergence of being Concepts of being, essence, and existence as forming one single notion in the contemporary philosophy does not figure as a distinct topic of inquiry in the early Greek philosophers
Presocratics By James Warren Acumen, Pp. v ISBN: Pbk
Presocratics By James Warren Acumen, 2007. Pp. v + 224. ISBN: 978-1-84465-092-7. Pbk 14.99. James Warren s Presocratics is the latest instalment in Acumen s introductory series on Ancient Philosophies.
Logic. A Primer with Addendum
Logic A Primer with Addendum The Currency of Philosophy Philosophy trades in arguments. An argument is a set of propositions some one of which is intended to be warranted or entailed by the others. The
3. So, what-is-not cannot be the reason for saying that what-is was, or will be [i.e., what what-is grew out of or will grow into].
![3. So, what-is-not cannot be the reason for saying that what-is was, or will be [i.e., what what-is grew out of or will grow into].](/thumbs/79/80274869.jpg "3. So, what-is-not cannot be the reason for saying that what-is was, or will be [i.e., what what-is grew out of or will grow into].")
January 22, 2016 1 Stage 1 goes something like this: 1. What-is-not cannot be said or thought. 2. If something can t be said or thought, then it cannot be the reason for saying something else. 3. So, what-is-not
DISCUSSION PRACTICAL POLITICS AND PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY: A NOTE
Practical Politics and Philosophical Inquiry: A Note Author(s): Dale Hall and Tariq Modood Reviewed work(s): Source: The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 117 (Oct., 1979), pp. 340-344 Published by:
Science. January 27, 2016
Science January 27, 2016 1 2 Anaxagoras For our purposes, Anaxagoras is interesting as a follower of Parmenides and Zeno. Many of the fragments from Anaxagoras appear to be paraphrases of Parmenides. E.g.:
THEISM AND BELIEF. Etymological note: deus = God in Latin; theos = God in Greek.
THEISM AND BELIEF Etymological note: deus = God in Latin; theos = God in Greek. A taxonomy of doxastic attitudes Belief: a mental state the content of which is taken as true or an assertion put forward
LOOKING BACK AT THE CREATION OF MAN
The Whole Counsel of God Study 11 LOOKING BACK AT THE CREATION OF MAN If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body. So also it is written, The first MAN, Adam, became a living soul. The last
Wright on response-dependence and self-knowledge
Wright on response-dependence and self-knowledge March 23, 2004 1 Response-dependent and response-independent concepts........... 1 1.1 The intuitive distinction......................... 1 1.2 Basic equations
KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire.
KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON The law is reason unaffected by desire. Aristotle, Politics Book III (1287a32) THE BIG IDEAS TO MASTER Kantian formalism Kantian constructivism
Varieties of Apriority
S E V E N T H E X C U R S U S Varieties of Apriority T he notions of a priori knowledge and justification play a central role in this work. There are many ways in which one can understand the a priori,
Introduction to Philosophy
Introduction to Philosophy PHIL 2000--Call # 41480 Kent Baldner Teaching Assistant: Mitchell Winget Discussion sections ( Labs ) meet on Wednesdays, starting next Wednesday, Sept. 5 th. 10:00-10:50, 1115
Transition: From A priori To Anselm
Transition: From A priori To Anselm A PRIORI KNOWLEDGE: Philosophy and Sense Experience We said: Philosophical questions cannot be answered solely by appeal to sense experience. If we can answer a question
THIS IS HOW WE DO IT PT 21 Fall Growth Group Notes Week 1 PASTOR BOB RICE: SUNDAY SEPTEMBER 16, with all lowliness and gentleness, with
THIS IS HOW WE DO IT PT 21 Fall Growth Group Notes Week 1 PASTOR BOB RICE: SUNDAY SEPTEMBER 16, 2018 Main Text: Matthew 16:13-19 13 When Jesus came into the region of Caesarea Philippi, He asked His disciples,
! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! Key figure: René Descartes.
! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! What is the relation between that knowledge and that given in the sciences?! Key figure: René
Understanding Truth Scott Soames Précis Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Volume LXV, No. 2, 2002
1 Symposium on Understanding Truth By Scott Soames Précis Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Volume LXV, No. 2, 2002 2 Precis of Understanding Truth Scott Soames Understanding Truth aims to illuminate
Moral Relativism and Conceptual Analysis. David J. Chalmers
Moral Relativism and Conceptual Analysis David J. Chalmers An Inconsistent Triad (1) All truths are a priori entailed by fundamental truths (2) No moral truths are a priori entailed by fundamental truths
Grounding and Analyticity. David Chalmers
Grounding and Analyticity David Chalmers Interlevel Metaphysics Interlevel metaphysics: how the macro relates to the micro how nonfundamental levels relate to fundamental levels Grounding Triumphalism
PHYSICS by Aristotle
PHYSICS by Aristotle Book 3 1 NATURE has been defined as a principle of motion and change, and it is the subject of our inquiry. We must therefore see that we understand the meaning of motion ; for if
VERIFICATION AND METAPHYSICS
Michael Lacewing The project of logical positivism VERIFICATION AND METAPHYSICS In the 1930s, a school of philosophy arose called logical positivism. Like much philosophy, it was concerned with the foundations
Projection in Hume. P J E Kail. St. Peter s College, Oxford.
Projection in Hume P J E Kail St. Peter s College, Oxford Peter.kail@spc.ox.ac.uk A while ago now (2007) I published my Projection and Realism in Hume s Philosophy (Oxford University Press henceforth abbreviated
1/8. Reid on Common Sense
1/8 Reid on Common Sense Thomas Reid s work An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense is self-consciously written in opposition to a lot of the principles that animated early modern
Is there a distinction between a priori and a posteriori
Lingnan University Digital Commons @ Lingnan University Theses & Dissertations Department of Philosophy 2014 Is there a distinction between a priori and a posteriori Hiu Man CHAN Follow this and additional
Putnam: Meaning and Reference
Putnam: Meaning and Reference The Traditional Conception of Meaning combines two assumptions: Meaning and psychology Knowing the meaning (of a word, sentence) is being in a psychological state. Even Frege,
Intro. The need for a philosophical vocabulary
Critical Realism & Philosophy Webinar Ruth Groff August 5, 2015 Intro. The need for a philosophical vocabulary You don t have to become a philosopher, but just as philosophers should know their way around
ICELAND. Yet for the sake of the cross I will not forget you. For the sake of my son I will not abandon you.
THE The blood of my son, poured out for you at such a price wasted. I gave you the gift closest to my heart, and I trusted it to you. You have let the gift be lost. The cross, flown so proudly, my son
Is Innate Foreknowledge Possible to a Temporal God?
Is Innate Foreknowledge Possible to a Temporal God? by Kel Good A very interesting attempt to avoid the conclusion that God's foreknowledge is inconsistent with creaturely freedom is an essay entitled
Epistemology. Diogenes: Master Cynic. The Ancient Greek Skeptics 4/6/2011. But is it really possible to claim knowledge of anything?
Epistemology a branch of philosophy that investigates the origin, nature, methods, and limits of human knowledge (Dictionary.com v 1.1). Epistemology attempts to answer the question how do we know what
sentences in which they occur, thus giving us singular propositions that contain the object
JUSTIFICATION AND RELATIVE APRIORITY Heimir Geirsson Abstract There is obviously tension between any view which claims that the object denoted is all that names and simple referring terms contribute to
SUPPOSITIONAL REASONING AND PERCEPTUAL JUSTIFICATION
SUPPOSITIONAL REASONING AND PERCEPTUAL JUSTIFICATION Stewart COHEN ABSTRACT: James Van Cleve raises some objections to my attempt to solve the bootstrapping problem for what I call basic justification
Flourished c. 502 BC. 91
Heraclitus Flourished c. 502 BC. 91 Heraclitus (Herakleitos, circa 542-480 BC) is famous for the expression panta rhei, all things flow, and for his cryptic way of expressing his thoughts, as well as his
THALES. The Project of Pre-Socratic Philosophy. The arch! is WATER. Why did Thales posit WATER as the arch!? PRE-SOCRATIC - Lecture Notes
PRE-SOCRATIC - Lecture Notes THALES The Project of Pre-Socratic Philosophy One plausible way to characterize the over-all project of pre-socratic philosophy is to say that they sought to provide a rational
Does Deduction really rest on a more secure epistemological footing than Induction?
Does Deduction really rest on a more secure epistemological footing than Induction? We argue that, if deduction is taken to at least include classical logic (CL, henceforth), justifying CL - and thus deduction
INTRODUCTION TO PRESOCRATICS
INTRODUCTION TO PRESOCRATICS INTRODUCTION TO PRESOCRATICS A THEMATIC APPROACH TO EARLY GREEK PHILOSOPHY WITH KEY READINGS GIANNIS STAMATELLOS A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication This edition first
1. What is Philosophy?
[Welcome to the first handout of your Introduction to Philosophy Mooc! This handout is designed to complement the video lecture by giving you a written summary of the key points covered in the videos.
NATURALISED JURISPRUDENCE
NATURALISED JURISPRUDENCE NATURALISM a philosophical view according to which philosophy is not a distinct mode of inquiry with its own problems and its own special body of (possible) knowledge philosophy
Received: 30 August 2007 / Accepted: 16 November 2007 / Published online: 28 December 2007 # Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
Acta anal. (2007) 22:267 279 DOI 10.1007/s12136-007-0012-y What Is Entitlement? Albert Casullo Received: 30 August 2007 / Accepted: 16 November 2007 / Published online: 28 December 2007 # Springer Science
A Response to the OPC Committee on the Doctrine of Justification
A Response to the OPC Committee on the Doctrine of Justification Ralph Allan Smith The Orthodox Presbyterian Church s Committee on the Doctrine of Justification recently made available their upcoming report
Ephesians 6 Children, parents and armour! Leader s version For a one hour study, either do q1-7 or q8-17, then the * 'How can I live...?
Ephesians 6 Children, parents and armour! Leader s version For a one hour study, either do q1-7 or q8-17, then the * 'How can I live...?' questions Check in with the group sitting in a semi-circle go round
Parmenides PHIL301 Prof. Oakes Winthrop University updated: 9/5/12 3:03 PM
Parmenides PHIL301 Prof. Oakes Winthrop University updated: 9/5/12 3:03 PM Parmenides and Philosophy - Parmenides represents a watershed in the history of Western philosophy. - The level of logical sophistication
15 Does God have a Nature?
15 Does God have a Nature? 15.1 Plantinga s Question So far I have argued for a theory of creation and the use of mathematical ways of thinking that help us to locate God. The question becomes how can
Plato s Euthyphro. G. J. Mattey. Winter, 2006 / Philosophy 1. Our first text will be from Plato and centered around his teacher Socrates ( BC).
Plato s Euthyphro G. J. Mattey Winter, 2006 / Philosophy 1 The First Principle Our first text will be from Plato and centered around his teacher Socrates (469-399 BC). Before Socrates (and during his life)
An Inferentialist Conception of the A Priori. Ralph Wedgwood
An Inferentialist Conception of the A Priori Ralph Wedgwood When philosophers explain the distinction between the a priori and the a posteriori, they usually characterize the a priori negatively, as involving
"I BELIEVE IN GOD THE FATHER ALMIGHTY, CREATOR OF HEAVEN AND EARTH"
Studia theologica I, 3/2003, 118-122 "I BELIEVE IN GOD THE FATHER ALMIGHTY, CREATOR OF HEAVEN AND EARTH" in the view of St Augustine and St Thomas Aquinas Andrei GOŢIA 1. St Augustine. The Doctor of Hippo
Defending Contingentism in Metaphysics
JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: SESS: OUTPUT: Thu Feb :: 0 SUM: C dialectica Vol., N (0), pp. DOI:./j.-.0.0.x Defending Contingentism in Metaphysics Kristie Miller Abstract Metaphysics is supposed to tell us
Immanuel Kant, Analytic and Synthetic. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics Preface and Preamble
+ Immanuel Kant, Analytic and Synthetic Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics Preface and Preamble + Innate vs. a priori n Philosophers today usually distinguish psychological from epistemological questions.
Chance, Chaos and the Principle of Sufficient Reason
Chance, Chaos and the Principle of Sufficient Reason Alexander R. Pruss Department of Philosophy Baylor University October 8, 2015 Contents The Principle of Sufficient Reason Against the PSR Chance Fundamental
PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS & THE ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE
PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS & THE ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE Now, it is a defect of [natural] languages that expressions are possible within them, which, in their grammatical form, seemingly determined to designate
Can A Priori Justified Belief Be Extended Through Deduction? It is often assumed that if one deduces some proposition p from some premises
Can A Priori Justified Belief Be Extended Through Deduction? Introduction It is often assumed that if one deduces some proposition p from some premises which one knows a priori, in a series of individually
spring 05 topics in philosophy of mind session 7
24.500 spring 05 topics in philosophy of mind session 7 teatime self-knowledge 24.500 S05 1 plan self-blindness, one more time Peacocke & Co. immunity to error through misidentification: Shoemaker s self-reference
David Hume on the cosmological argument and the argument from design in the Dialogues
David Hume on the cosmological argument and the argument from design in the Dialogues A systematic exposition Abstract In the Dialogues concerning Natural Religion (1779), published a few years after his
Time travel and the open future
Time travel and the open future University of Queensland Abstract I argue that the thesis that time travel is logically possible, is inconsistent with the necessary truth of any of the usual open future-objective
Important dates. PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since David Hume ( )
PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since 1600 Dr. Peter Assmann Spring 2018 Important dates Feb 14 Term paper draft due Upload paper to E-Learning https://elearning.utdallas.edu
Constructing the World
Constructing the World Lecture 3: The Case for A Priori Scrutability David Chalmers Plan *1. Sentences vs Propositions 2. Apriority and A Priori Scrutability 3. Argument 1: Suspension of Judgment 4. Argument
UC Berkeley, Philosophy 142, Spring 2016
Logical Consequence UC Berkeley, Philosophy 142, Spring 2016 John MacFarlane 1 Intuitive characterizations of consequence Modal: It is necessary (or apriori) that, if the premises are true, the conclusion
Naturalized Epistemology. 1. What is naturalized Epistemology? Quine PY4613
Naturalized Epistemology Quine PY4613 1. What is naturalized Epistemology? a. How is it motivated? b. What are its doctrines? c. Naturalized Epistemology in the context of Quine s philosophy 2. Naturalized
Chapter 5: Freedom and Determinism
Chapter 5: Freedom and Determinism At each time t the world is perfectly determinate in all detail. - Let us grant this for the sake of argument. We might want to re-visit this perfectly reasonable assumption
Against the Contingent A Priori
Against the Contingent A Priori Isidora Stojanovic To cite this version: Isidora Stojanovic. Against the Contingent A Priori. This paper uses a revized version of some of the arguments from my paper The
Theological Voluntarism: Objections and Replies Keith Burgess-Jackson 7 January 2017
Theological Voluntarism: Objections and Replies Keith Burgess-Jackson 7 January 2017 Theological Voluntarism (TV): 1 For all acts x, x is right iff x conforms 2 to God s will. 3 Commentary: The theory
Watch a testimony of how powerful God s Word is in a simple Gospel tract: Spread the good news. Soli Deo Gloria.
THE DESIGN FOR HUMAN SEXUALITY A GOSPEL TRACT FOR SERVICE MEMBERS WHO STRUGGLE WITH SEXUALLY IMMORAL CONDUCT (LGBTQ, FORNICATION, ADULTERY, INCEST & BESTIALITY) Important Note: If you are a service member
Genesis 1:1-2; IN THE BEGINNING
1 Genesis 1:1-2; IN THE BEGINNING In every theology textbook I have ever seen, the question was asked, Who should study theology? Is it just for theologians? I say it isn t. Theology is defined as the
Philosophical Logic. LECTURE SEVEN MICHAELMAS 2017 Dr Maarten Steenhagen
Philosophical Logic LECTURE SEVEN MICHAELMAS 2017 Dr Maarten Steenhagen ms2416@cam.ac.uk Last week Lecture 1: Necessity, Analyticity, and the A Priori Lecture 2: Reference, Description, and Rigid Designation
Unit 1 Philosophy of Education: Introduction INTRODUCTION
Unit 1 Philosophy of Education: Introduction INTRODUCTION It is not easy to say what exactly philosophy is, how to study it, or how to do it. Philosophy, like all other field, is unique. The reason why
THE HISTORIC ALLIANCE OF CHRISTIANITY AND SCIENCE
THE HISTORIC ALLIANCE OF CHRISTIANITY AND SCIENCE By Kenneth Richard Samples The influential British mathematician-philosopher Bertrand Russell once remarked, "I am as firmly convinced that religions do
Plato s Euthyphro. G. J. Mattey. Spring, 2017 / Philosophy 1. Our first text will be from Plato and centered around his teacher Socrates ( BC).
Plato s Euthyphro G. J. Mattey Spring, 2017 / Philosophy 1 The First Principle Our first text will be from Plato and centered around his teacher Socrates (469-399 BC). Before Socrates (and during his life)
Infallibility and Church Authority:
Infallibility and Church Authority: The Spirit s Gift to the Whole Church by Kenneth R. Overberg, S.J. It s amazing how many people misunderstand the doctrine of infallibility and other questions of church
VAGUENESS. Francis Jeffry Pelletier and István Berkeley Department of Philosophy University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
VAGUENESS Francis Jeffry Pelletier and István Berkeley Department of Philosophy University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Vagueness: an expression is vague if and only if it is possible that it give
Externalism, Self-Knowledge and Transmission of Warrant
In M.J. Frápolli and E. Romero (eds), Meaning, Basic Self-Knowledge, and Mind: Essays on Tyler Burge (Stanford: CSLI Publications), 99 124. Externalism, Self-Knowledge and Transmission of Warrant Martin
24.09 Minds and Machines spring an inconsistent tetrad. argument for (1) argument for (2) argument for (3) argument for (4)
24.09 Minds and Machines spring 2006 more handouts shortly on website Stoljar, contd. evaluations, final exam questions an inconsistent tetrad 1) if physicalism is, a priori physicalism is 2) a priori
Introduction to Philosophy PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2017
Introduction to Philosophy PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2017 Beginnings of Philosophy: Overview of Course (1) The Origins of Philosophy and Relativism Knowledge Are you a self? Ethics: What is
Scripture, nature, and Spirit Powerful configuration of two books and plus power
Scripture, nature, and Spirit Powerful configuration of two books and plus power David T. Yue / Search for Answers Grace Fellowship Church / 3-30-2014 BIG AND OFT UNSPOKEN QUESTIONS BIG AND OFT UNSPOKEN
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
pdf version of the entry Presocratic Philosophy http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/presocratics/ from the Summer 2011 Edition of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Edward N. Zalta
John Paul II Catholic High School The Journey: A Spiritual Roadmap for Modern Pilgrims by Peter Kreeft
John Paul II Catholic High School Moral Theology The Journey: A Spiritual Roadmap for Modern Pilgrims by Peter Kreeft Welcome to the Junior year summer reading program! Our book for this summer prepares
Millian responses to Frege s puzzle
Millian responses to Frege s puzzle phil 93914 Jeff Speaks February 28, 2008 1 Two kinds of Millian................................. 1 2 Conciliatory Millianism............................... 2 2.1 Hidden
Kantian Deontology. A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7. Paul Nicholls 13P Religious Studies
A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7 Kantian Deontology Deontological (based on duty) ethical theory established by Emmanuel Kant in The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Part of the enlightenment
The Bayesian and the Dogmatist
The Bayesian and the Dogmatist Brian Weatherson There is a lot of philosophically interesting work being done in the borderlands between traditional and formal epistemology. It is easy to think that this
The Ontological Argument
The Ontological Argument Arguments for God s Existence One of the classic questions of philosophy and philosophical argument is: s there a God? Of course there are and have been many different definitions
METHODENSTREIT WHY CARL MENGER WAS, AND IS, RIGHT
METHODENSTREIT WHY CARL MENGER WAS, AND IS, RIGHT BY THORSTEN POLLEIT* PRESENTED AT THE SPRING CONFERENCE RESEARCH ON MONEY IN THE ECONOMY (ROME) FRANKFURT, 20 MAY 2011 *FRANKFURT SCHOOL OF FINANCE & MANAGEMENT
10 Commandments from The Large Catechism
10 Commandments from The Large Catechism 1st Commandment You are to have no other gods. (LC) We are to fear, love, and trust God above all things. (SC) Ex. 20:3; Deut. 5:7 You shall have no other gods
The Ontological Argument
Running Head: THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 1 The Ontological Argument By Andy Caldwell Salt Lake Community College Philosophy of Religion 2350 THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 2 Abstract This paper will reproduce,
24.01 Classics of Western Philosophy
1 Plan: Kant Lecture #2: How are pure mathematics and pure natural science possible? 1. Review: Problem of Metaphysics 2. Kantian Commitments 3. Pure Mathematics 4. Transcendental Idealism 5. Pure Natural
The Cosmological Argument: A Defense
Page 1/7 RICHARD TAYLOR [1] Suppose you were strolling in the woods and, in addition to the sticks, stones, and other accustomed litter of the forest floor, you one day came upon some quite unaccustomed
Spinoza, the No Shared Attribute thesis, and the
Spinoza, the No Shared Attribute thesis, and the Principle of Sufficient Reason * Daniel Whiting This is a pre-print of an article whose final and definitive form is due to be published in the British
Alternative Conceptual Schemes and a Non-Kantian Scheme-Content Dualism
Section 39: Philosophy of Language Alternative Conceptual Schemes and a Non-Kantian Scheme-Content Dualism Xinli Wang, Juniata College, USA Abstract D. Davidson argues that the existence of alternative
In Search of the Ontological Argument. Richard Oxenberg
1 In Search of the Ontological Argument Richard Oxenberg Abstract We can attend to the logic of Anselm's ontological argument, and amuse ourselves for a few hours unraveling its convoluted word-play, or
Doing all Things Well Mark 7: 31-37
Doing all Things Well Mark 7: 31-37 In our text today we find Jesus on a journey, making His way from the Gentile cities of Tyre and Sidon to the Sea of Galilee. He had taken a route that brought Him through
1 Why should you care about metametaphysics?
1 Why should you care about metametaphysics? This introductory chapter deals with the motivation for studying metametaphysics and its importance for metaphysics more generally. The relationship between
In Part I of the ETHICS, Spinoza presents his central
TWO PROBLEMS WITH SPINOZA S ARGUMENT FOR SUBSTANCE MONISM LAURA ANGELINA DELGADO * In Part I of the ETHICS, Spinoza presents his central metaphysical thesis that there is only one substance in the universe.
Front Matter -- Quaker Religious Thought, no. 102
Quaker Religious Thought Volume 102 Article 1 1-1-2004 Front Matter -- Quaker Religious Thought, no. 102 Paul Anderson panderso@georgefox.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/qrt
Excerpt from J. Garvey, The Twenty Greatest Philosophy Books (Continuum, 2007): Immanuel Kant s Critique of Pure Reason
Excerpt from J. Garvey, The Twenty Greatest Philosophy Books (Continuum, 2007): Immanuel Kant s Critique of Pure Reason In a letter to Moses Mendelssohn, Kant says this about the Critique of Pure Reason:
Can Christianity be Reduced to Morality? Ted Di Maria, Philosophy, Gonzaga University Gonzaga Socratic Club, April 18, 2008
Can Christianity be Reduced to Morality? Ted Di Maria, Philosophy, Gonzaga University Gonzaga Socratic Club, April 18, 2008 As one of the world s great religions, Christianity has been one of the supreme
Minds and Machines spring The explanatory gap and Kripke s argument revisited spring 03
Minds and Machines spring 2003 The explanatory gap and Kripke s argument revisited 1 preliminaries handouts on the knowledge argument and qualia on the website 2 Materialism and qualia: the explanatory
WITTGENSTEIN ON EPISTEMOLOGICAL STATUS OF LOGIC 1
FILOZOFIA Roč. 68, 2013, č. 4 WITTGENSTEIN ON EPISTEMOLOGICAL STATUS OF LOGIC 1 TOMÁŠ ČANA, Katedra filozofie FF UCM, Trnava ČANA, T.: Wittgenstein on Epistemological Status of Logic FILOZOFIA 68, 2013,
It was changed over the years what we read now bears no relation to any original
Autumn 2017 Can we really trust the bible? (17 September 2017, Paul Langham) Reading: 2 Timothy 3:14-16 Introduction: St Paul left his gospel partner Timothy to lead the church in Ephesus. We join his
F7 (DK 28B7; KRS; C7)
Describe how Parmenides conceptions of being / what-is and non-being / what-isnot led him to conclude that reality is just one thing. How should his monistic approach be understood? Within his poem On
Not-So-Well-Designed Scientific Communities. Inkeri Koskinen, University of Helsinki
http://social-epistemology.com ISSN: 2471-9560 Not-So-Well-Designed Scientific Communities Inkeri Koskinen, University of Helsinki Koskinen, Inkeri. Not-So-Well-Designed Scientific Communities. Social
AN EPISTEMIC PARADOX. Byron KALDIS
AN EPISTEMIC PARADOX Byron KALDIS Consider the following statement made by R. Aron: "It can no doubt be maintained, in the spirit of philosophical exactness, that every historical fact is a construct,