PHI2391: Logical Empiricism I 8.0
|
|
- Phillip Matthews
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PHI2391: Logical Empiricism I 8.0 Hume and Kant! Remember Hume s question:! Are we rationally justified in inferring causes from experimental observations?! Kant s answer: we can give a transcendental deduction of why we must do so! Of course both agree that we do think causally, the question is! By what right do we think causally? Kant s Answer(s)! Kant s answer:! Psychological interpretation:! Without the categories (causality, substance, etc.), I wouldn t have a consciousness! The world would just be a mass of sensations, with no order! There would be no subject, because mind would be fragmented! Compare: Anthropic Principle in contemporary physics Kant s Answer(s)! Science-theoretical:! A world that was not interpreted by means of the categories and pure mathematics would not be unified! If there is to be a unified world, then! Since all objects appear in space and time, and,! Time and space have distinct parts! They can only be unified if! The parts are filled with substances that causally interact Kant s Answer(s)! Science-theoretical:! Time and space can only be unified if their parts are filled with substances that causally interact! Example (Einsteinian simultaneity):! When can I tell something on my video screen is live?! Only when I cause what I see to change. How can I know that events in the Rideau Centre are 1&
2 ! Only when I cause what I see to change.! How can I know that events in the Rideau Centre are happening now?! Under what circumstances is a body orbiting Pluto part of my world? Science-theoretical answer! There can be no guarantee that the world will be comprehensible as a unified mathematical system! But, if there is to be a body of knowledge corresponding to the whole of nature! Then it must have this mathematical, nomological (lawgoverned) structure Space-time and mathematics! So far have talked about the categories that synthetise intuitions! What gets synthesised - the intuitions - are sensations in space and time! They are in space and time, meaning! In space their shape, magnitude, and relation to one another is determined [B37, p. 174]! simultaneity or succession would not come into perception if time did not ground them a priori. Only under its presupposition can one represent that several things exist at one and the same time (simultaneously) or in different times (successively). [B46, p. 178]! Compare: Einstein on EPR Mathematics is synthetic a priori! Kant claims that all mathematical propositions are synthetic a priori! Arithmetic [Introduction B15, p. 142; Axioms of Intuition B205, p. 288]]:! 7+5=12 may seem analytic! Then it should be the case that the concepts 7, 5, and + parts of the the concept 12. But (says Kant) they are not! So 7+5=12 is synthetic! But we know it a priori! So it is synthetic a priori Mathematics is synthetic a priori Geometry [B16, p.145]: 2&
3 Mathematics is synthetic a priori! Geometry [B16, p.145]:! The concepts shortest and straightest do not contain one another (one concerns distance, the other direction)! But we know a priori (says Kant) that a straight line is the shortest distance between two points! So the proposition is synthetic a priori How is it possible that mathematics be synthetic a priori?! Kant sees a problem that his predecessors can t solve! They believe that space exists as a property of things in themselves! One group (the mathematical investigators ) believes that space is a thing that exists on its own (so it s a substance)! Another group (the metaphysicians ) believe that it is a property of things that exist on their own (substances, Leibnizian monads) How can mathematics be synthetic a priori?! Mathematician-physicists like Newton must assume two eternal and infinite self-subsisting non-entities [TA B56, p. 184]! They can explain why mathematics holds of physical objects - they are in space and time! But (so Kant) they become confused when attempting to explain how there could be anything beyond space and time (e.g. God and angels)! More importantly, they must explain in what sense these things exist, since they seem to be a pure emptiness (thus non-entities ) How can mathematics be synthetic a priori?! Metaphysicians like Leibniz think that space and time are human constructions! We have confused knowledge of things (monads), and we organise this confused knowledge with space and time! But, in the things themselves, space and time are not present How can mathematics be synthetic a priori?! Leibniz (and presumably Hume) must dispute the validity of a priori mathematical doctrines [B57]! Why? Because space and time are confused creatures of the imagination [B57], i.e. we make them up 3&
4 ! Why? Because space and time are confused creatures of the imagination [B57], i.e. we make them up! How could we have precise knowledge of something confused?! If S&T were merely inductive generalizations of observations, how can we explain the Law of Inertia?! Don t bodies have to obey (Euler) the straight lines and follow inertial paths? How can mathematics be synthetic a priori?! Kant claims his theory solves all these problems:! Mathematics is true of things insofar as they are objects of possible experience! So: insofar as they are represented in pure space and time, the forms of experience! We know it a priori, because we know the structure of our own minds! NB Kant also admits that mathematics doesn t hold of things in themselves! But he can explain why it holds of all objective experience Importance of Kantian Doctrines! 19th c. philosophy, and thus philosophy of science profoundly affected by Kant! But also science itself:! Kantian theories (apparently) lay to rest questions about absolute space and mathematics! Important assumptions: there are synthetic a priori truths! There are intuitions (raw data) at the basis of mathematics that are - in being spatial - essentially the same as our everyday intuitions Importance of Kantian Doctrines! Kant gives a non-metaphysical explanation of the task of science! We are built to explain events in space-time in terms of causal relations between events! Our reason imagines a total system in which all events that occur could be predicted as instances of general mathematical laws! This completed system is an ideal (Kant s term) towards which we strive 4&
5 ! This completed system is an ideal (Kant s term) towards which we strive! The ideal system has an a priori core which Kant calls [Metaphysical Foundations, p.4ff.] the pure part of science Importance of Kantian Doctrines! Kant s system lays down model for future philosophy of science! Pure logic and mathematics form the a priori core of science! They lay down basic patterns of reasoning! These patterns allow us to think about the data of our experience - to draw conclusions! And to predict Emergence of logical empiricism! Question: Is Kant right to say that mathematics is synthetic a priori?! Two fundamental 19th c. developments:! Emergence of new logics (Boole, Peano, Frege)! Emergence of new geometries (Gauss, Bolyai, Lobachevsky, Helmholtz, Lie) Emergence of logical empiricism! Emergence of new logics led to new possibility:! Perhaps Kant though that arithmetic was analytic because his logic was too weak! Improved logic of relations, with quantification, opens new possibilities Logicism! Leads to foundation of new school of thought: logicism (Frege, Russell)! Logicists explicitly opposed to Kant:! Mathematics is not synthetic a priori! The essential concepts of arithmetic can be defined in pure logic Logicism: definition of number! Definition of number 2! 2 = the class of all classes A s.t.! ( x,y,z)((xεa & yεa & zεa & x y) z=x v z=y)! Means: For all x,y,z, such that x and y are in A, and are not identical (=the same), 5&
6 identical (=the same),! then any other z that is in A is identical to either x or y! Now I can define equations as statement asserting the identity of classes! The concept 7+5 may not contain 12 Logicism: definition of number! But from the concepts of 7, +, 5, and 12 we can logically deduce the equation! NB Only concepts, not intuitions are required! Arithmetic expresses conceptually necessary truths! This is just what Kant denied (assuming conceptually necessary = analytic ) Logicism & Empiricism! Why does this matter?! How many ingredients go into science?! Logic, Mathematics, Theory of induction, general empirical laws, experimental data! Some are logical, some empirical! But for Kant there had been mixed knowledge: pure, but intuitional Logicism & Empiricism! British proponent of logicism: Bertrand Russell! Prominent student: Ludwig Wittgenstein! Difficult to assess influence on: Vienna Circle [Schlick, Carnap, Feigl, Frank, Gödel, Hahn, Menger, Neurath, Waismann, et alia]! We will due a fusion of Carnap and Wittgenstein Logicism & Empiricism! This fusion is similar to the hypothetico-deductive model in PS 2.2! It is the first truly modern theory of science! Advocated in general outlines by Wittgenstein in his Tractatus Logico-philosophicus! Developed into fully articulated theory by Carnap in his Logical Structure of the World! Characterised by a clean separation between logical and empirical elements of science Carnap-Wittgenstein Theory 6&
7 Carnap-Wittgenstein Theory! Fundamental division: language and world! World consists of facts! Language of propositions! Correspondence theory: the propositions are true or false when the corresponding facts exist or not! But propositions are logically articulated Kinds of propositions! Propositions are divided in 2 kinds:! Elementary propositions: consist of concatenations of names! Molecular propositions: consist of logical connections between (truth-functions of) elementary propositions! Truth-functions: and, or, if-then, not, etc. Elementary propositions! Elementary propositions express observations or empirical information! In Wittgenstein s version: elementary propositions are concatenations of primitive names! The names stand for primitive objects, which are indestructible! When a group of objects is configured as its corresponding set of names in the elementary propositions says it is! Then the proposition is true Elementary propositions! In later versions of this theory, e.g. Carnap and Neurath,! Elementary propositions are loosened! First, the doctrine of simple and unchanging objects is rejected! Finally, the doctrine of correspondence itself is weakened Molecular propositions! Most propositions - scientific or otherwise - are not elementary! They are molecular : they are composed of elementary propositions! Composed in a truth-functional sense! So if P and Q are elementary propositions, P & Q is molecular! A molecular proposition asserts that some elementary 7&
8 31 32! A molecular proposition asserts that some elementary propositions depend on one another logically Molecular propositions! E.g. If Pa then Qa says:! Whenever Pa is true, Qa is true! I.e. If Pa then Qa is true so long as we do not have the following case:! Pa is true and Qa is false Molecular propositions! Often expressed as a truth-table : Molecular propositions! The truth-table shows the logical dependence of the molecular proposition on its components! Note that in the truth-table, we do not say whether the components are elementary or not! We can engage in recursive construction of molecular propositions, e.g. P (Q R)! We get a nesting of truth-functions, thus of truth-tables! But: the truth or falsity of the molecular proposition depends entirely on the truth or falsity of the elementary propositions! The values of all the elementary propositions = The World Meaning! Since the molecular proposition depends on the elementary ones! We can say:! The meaning of the elementary propositions is the elementary fact they refer to! The meaning of the molecular propositions is the truthdependency they assert among the elementary ones! Important consequence:! Molecular propositions don t mean anything more than can be said with elementary ones Meaning and logic! The definition of molecular prop s as truth-functional 8&
9 ! The definition of molecular prop s as truth-functional combinations of elementary ones leads to 2 special classes of m. propositions:! Tautologies and Contradictions ( Is Metaphysics Meaningless? pp )! Tautologies are always true, whatever the values of their components! Contradictions are always false, whatever etc.! NB that the negation of every tautology is a contradiction and vice versa Tautologies! The class of tautologies is of particular interest! It includes propositions such as! P (Q P)! P v ~P! (P & (P Q)) Q! These are proposition that Russell and Frege called the logical propositions! For Russell and Frege, these propositions were theorems following from basic logical axioms Tautologies! Wittgenstein s definition of a tautology is a semantic as opposed to a syntactic definition of logical truth! Semantics = having to do with meaning! Tautologies are propositions that say (Gr. legein, logos) the same (tautos) thing! In the Carnap-Wittgenstein theory, this has a definite significance Tautologies! The tautologies (and contradictions) are the propositions that do not depend on the elementary propositions! So if the elementary propositions are observation-statements! The tautologies are statements that:! (1) Are true! (2) Make no empirical claims! They are therefore strictly speaking meaningless Tautologies & mathematics! Theory gets special importance from the logicist background Frege and Russell have (almost) reduced mathematics to 9&
10 ! Theory gets special importance from the logicist background! Frege and Russell have (almost) reduced mathematics to logic! Wittgenstein defines logic as a special class of propositions, that are in fact meaningless! So mathematics becomes meaningless! Strange result! Mathematics & meaninglessness! Isn t it absurd to say that mathematics is meaningless?! Not necessarily: meaning is being used in a particular sense! What is meaningful is what corresponds to a world-element that may or may not exist! Meanings describe the possibility of the existence of an empirical datum! In Kantian terms, meanings refer to possible intuitions Mathematics & meaninglessness! When we say mathematics is meaningless, we mean that! It lacks any empirical content: it makes no claims about what is actually the case! As in Kant, mathematics and logic are formal characteristics of thought, or language! But unlike in Kant, mathematics has no synthetic content! It is a purely general, and in this sense empirically vacuous body of knowledge Empirical content! The logico-mathematical propositions are opposed to the empirical ones! These do make statements about observations - what is actually going on! So the other pole of the theory concerns the status of these observation-statements, or elementary propositions! Wittgenstein declined to explain what they were! Some evidence that they were primitive observation statements à la Kant Observation statements! Vienna Circle wants to apply the theory (Witt s conclusions purely negative)! First stage: abandon the metaphysical components of Wittgenstein s theory 10&
11 44! First stage: abandon the metaphysical components of Wittgenstein s theory! Wittgenstein himself opposed to metaphysics! Here means: stop talking about elementary facts and objects! Stop talking about the world-elements! That s all metaphysics is (talk of world-elements) Observation statements! Carnap and Neurath: We don t need the elementary facts! All that matters for the theory is the elementary propositions! They can be singled out without supplementary hypotheses about the world! Call these elementary statements protocol-sentences ( On the Logical Positivists pp ) 11&
Chapter 31. Logical Positivism and the Scientific Conception of Philosophy
Chapter 31 Logical Positivism and the Scientific Conception of Philosophy Key Words: Vienna circle, verification principle, positivism, tautologies, factual propositions, language analysis, rejection of
More information145 Philosophy of Science
Logical empiricism Christian Wüthrich http://philosophy.ucsd.edu/faculty/wuthrich/ 145 Philosophy of Science Vienna Circle (Ernst Mach Society) Hans Hahn, Otto Neurath, and Philipp Frank regularly meet
More informationLENT 2018 THEORY OF MEANING DR MAARTEN STEENHAGEN
LENT 2018 THEORY OF MEANING DR MAARTEN STEENHAGEN HTTP://MSTEENHAGEN.GITHUB.IO/TEACHING/2018TOM THE EINSTEIN-BERGSON DEBATE SCIENCE AND METAPHYSICS Henri Bergson and Albert Einstein met on the 6th of
More informationPhilosophy of Mathematics Kant
Philosophy of Mathematics Kant Owen Griffiths oeg21@cam.ac.uk St John s College, Cambridge 20/10/15 Immanuel Kant Born in 1724 in Königsberg, Prussia. Enrolled at the University of Königsberg in 1740 and
More informationFrom Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction
From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction Let me see if I can say a few things to re-cap our first discussion of the Transcendental Logic, and help you get a foothold for what follows. Kant
More informationTractatus Logico-Philosophicus (abridged version) Ludwig Wittgenstein
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (abridged version) Ludwig Wittgenstein PREFACE This book will perhaps only be understood by those who have themselves already thought the thoughts which are expressed in
More informationClass #17: October 25 Conventionalism
Philosophy 405: Knowledge, Truth and Mathematics Fall 2010 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #17: October 25 Conventionalism I. A Fourth School We have discussed the three main positions in the philosophy
More informationVerificationism. PHIL September 27, 2011
Verificationism PHIL 83104 September 27, 2011 1. The critique of metaphysics... 1 2. Observation statements... 2 3. In principle verifiability... 3 4. Strong verifiability... 3 4.1. Conclusive verifiability
More informationRemarks on the philosophy of mathematics (1969) Paul Bernays
Bernays Project: Text No. 26 Remarks on the philosophy of mathematics (1969) Paul Bernays (Bemerkungen zur Philosophie der Mathematik) Translation by: Dirk Schlimm Comments: With corrections by Charles
More informationHPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Introduction to the Philosophy of Science
HPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Introduction to the Philosophy of Science Logical positivism/empiricism Adam Caulton adam.caulton@gmail.com Wednesday 27 August 2014 Maybe of interest... Bad Science blog www.badscience.net
More informationHas Logical Positivism Eliminated Metaphysics?
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 7714 Volume 3 Issue 11 ǁ November. 2014 ǁ PP.38-42 Has Logical Positivism Eliminated Metaphysics?
More informationWHAT IS HUME S FORK? Certainty does not exist in science.
WHAT IS HUME S FORK? www.prshockley.org Certainty does not exist in science. I. Introduction: A. Hume divides all objects of human reason into two different kinds: Relation of Ideas & Matters of Fact.
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 28 Lecture - 28 Linguistic turn in British philosophy
More informationWhat is the Nature of Logic? Judy Pelham Philosophy, York University, Canada July 16, 2013 Pan-Hellenic Logic Symposium Athens, Greece
What is the Nature of Logic? Judy Pelham Philosophy, York University, Canada July 16, 2013 Pan-Hellenic Logic Symposium Athens, Greece Outline of this Talk 1. What is the nature of logic? Some history
More informationIII Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier
III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier In Theaetetus Plato introduced the definition of knowledge which is often translated
More informationPHILOSOPHICAL RAMIFICATIONS: THEORY, EXPERIMENT, & EMPIRICAL TRUTH
PHILOSOPHICAL RAMIFICATIONS: THEORY, EXPERIMENT, & EMPIRICAL TRUTH PCES 3.42 Even before Newton published his revolutionary work, philosophers had already been trying to come to grips with the questions
More informationKant s Transcendental Exposition of Space and Time in the Transcendental Aesthetic : A Critique
34 An International Multidisciplinary Journal, Ethiopia Vol. 10(1), Serial No.40, January, 2016: 34-45 ISSN 1994-9057 (Print) ISSN 2070--0083 (Online) Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v10i1.4 Kant
More informationAyer on the criterion of verifiability
Ayer on the criterion of verifiability November 19, 2004 1 The critique of metaphysics............................. 1 2 Observation statements............................... 2 3 In principle verifiability...............................
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 20 Lecture - 20 Critical Philosophy: Kant s objectives
More information24.01 Classics of Western Philosophy
1 Plan: Kant Lecture #2: How are pure mathematics and pure natural science possible? 1. Review: Problem of Metaphysics 2. Kantian Commitments 3. Pure Mathematics 4. Transcendental Idealism 5. Pure Natural
More informationFIL 4600/10/20: KANT S CRITIQUE AND CRITICAL METAPHYSICS
FIL 4600/10/20: KANT S CRITIQUE AND CRITICAL METAPHYSICS Autumn 2012, University of Oslo Thursdays, 14 16, Georg Morgenstiernes hus 219, Blindern Toni Kannisto t.t.kannisto@ifikk.uio.no SHORT PLAN 1 23/8:
More informationChapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge
Key Words Chapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge Empiricism, skepticism, personal identity, necessary connection, causal connection, induction, impressions, ideas. DAVID HUME (1711-76) is one of the
More informationWittgenstein s Logical Atomism. Seminar 8 PHIL2120 Topics in Analytic Philosophy 16 November 2012
Wittgenstein s Logical Atomism Seminar 8 PHIL2120 Topics in Analytic Philosophy 16 November 2012 1 Admin Required reading for this seminar: Soames, Ch 9+10 New Schedule: 23 November: The Tractarian Test
More informationKANT S EXPLANATION OF THE NECESSITY OF GEOMETRICAL TRUTHS. John Watling
KANT S EXPLANATION OF THE NECESSITY OF GEOMETRICAL TRUTHS John Watling Kant was an idealist. His idealism was in some ways, it is true, less extreme than that of Berkeley. He distinguished his own by calling
More informationImmanuel Kant, Analytic and Synthetic. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics Preface and Preamble
+ Immanuel Kant, Analytic and Synthetic Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics Preface and Preamble + Innate vs. a priori n Philosophers today usually distinguish psychological from epistemological questions.
More informationCh V: The Vienna Circle (Moritz Schlick, Rudolf Carnap, and Otto Neurath)[title crossed out?]
Part II: Schools in Contemporary Philosophy Ch V: The Vienna Circle (Moritz Schlick, Rudolf Carnap, and Otto Neurath)[title crossed out?] 1. The positivists of the nineteenth century, men like Mach and
More informationExcerpt from J. Garvey, The Twenty Greatest Philosophy Books (Continuum, 2007): Immanuel Kant s Critique of Pure Reason
Excerpt from J. Garvey, The Twenty Greatest Philosophy Books (Continuum, 2007): Immanuel Kant s Critique of Pure Reason In a letter to Moses Mendelssohn, Kant says this about the Critique of Pure Reason:
More informationContents EMPIRICISM. Logical Atomism and the beginnings of pluralist empiricism. Recap: Russell s reductionism: from maths to physics
Contents EMPIRICISM PHIL3072, ANU, 2015 Jason Grossman http://empiricism.xeny.net lecture 9: 22 September Recap Bertrand Russell: reductionism in physics Common sense is self-refuting Acquaintance versus
More informationRationalism. A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt
Rationalism I. Descartes (1596-1650) A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt 1. How could one be certain in the absence of religious guidance and trustworthy senses
More informationKant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge
Kant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge Statements involving necessity or strict universality could never be known on the basis of sense experience, and are thus known (if known at all) a priori.
More information17. Tying it up: thoughts and intentionality
17. Tying it up: thoughts and intentionality Martín Abreu Zavaleta June 23, 2014 1 Frege on thoughts Frege is concerned with separating logic from psychology. In addressing such separations, he coins a
More informationPhilosophy 308 The Language Revolution Russell Marcus Hamilton College, Fall 2014
Philosophy 308 The Language Revolution Russell Marcus Hamilton College, Fall 2014 Class #14 The Picture Theory of Language and the Verification Theory of Meaning Wittgenstein, Ayer, and Hempel Marcus,
More informationRethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View
http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319532363 Carlo Cellucci Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View 1 Preface From its very beginning, philosophy has been viewed as aimed at knowledge and methods to
More informationAyer and the Vienna Circle
Ayer and the Vienna Circle Richard Zach October 29, 2010 1/20 Richard Zach Ayer and the Vienna Circle Outline 1 The Vienna Circle 2 Ayer s Logical Positivism 3 Truth and Analyticity 4 Language, Truth and
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 21 Lecture - 21 Kant Forms of sensibility Categories
More informationNegative Facts. Negative Facts Kyle Spoor
54 Kyle Spoor Logical Atomism was a view held by many philosophers; Bertrand Russell among them. This theory held that language consists of logical parts which are simplifiable until they can no longer
More informationSydenham College of Commerce & Economics. * Dr. Sunil S. Shete. * Associate Professor
Sydenham College of Commerce & Economics * Dr. Sunil S. Shete * Associate Professor Keywords: Philosophy of science, research methods, Logic, Business research Abstract This paper review Popper s epistemology
More informationNotes on Bertrand Russell s The Problems of Philosophy (Hackett 1990 reprint of the 1912 Oxford edition, Chapters XII, XIII, XIV, )
Notes on Bertrand Russell s The Problems of Philosophy (Hackett 1990 reprint of the 1912 Oxford edition, Chapters XII, XIII, XIV, 119-152) Chapter XII Truth and Falsehood [pp. 119-130] Russell begins here
More informationKant and his Successors
Kant and his Successors G. J. Mattey Winter, 2011 / Philosophy 151 The Sorry State of Metaphysics Kant s Critique of Pure Reason (1781) was an attempt to put metaphysics on a scientific basis. Metaphysics
More informationAyer and Quine on the a priori
Ayer and Quine on the a priori November 23, 2004 1 The problem of a priori knowledge Ayer s book is a defense of a thoroughgoing empiricism, not only about what is required for a belief to be justified
More informationThis handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first.
Michael Lacewing Three responses to scepticism This handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first. MITIGATED SCEPTICISM The term mitigated scepticism
More informationClass #14: October 13 Gödel s Platonism
Philosophy 405: Knowledge, Truth and Mathematics Fall 2010 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #14: October 13 Gödel s Platonism I. The Continuum Hypothesis and Its Independence The continuum problem
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC AND LANGUAGE OVERVIEW FREGE JONNY MCINTOSH 1. FREGE'S CONCEPTION OF LOGIC
PHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC AND LANGUAGE JONNY MCINTOSH 1. FREGE'S CONCEPTION OF LOGIC OVERVIEW These lectures cover material for paper 108, Philosophy of Logic and Language. They will focus on issues in philosophy
More informationCory Juhl, Eric Loomis, Analyticity (New York: Routledge, 2010).
Cory Juhl, Eric Loomis, Analyticity (New York: Routledge, 2010). Reviewed by Viorel Ţuţui 1 Since it was introduced by Immanuel Kant in the Critique of Pure Reason, the analytic synthetic distinction had
More informationPhilosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2014
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2014 Class #26 Kant s Copernican Revolution The Synthetic A Priori Forms of Intuition Marcus, Modern Philosophy,
More informationA Priori Knowledge: Analytic? Synthetic A Priori (again) Is All A Priori Knowledge Analytic?
A Priori Knowledge: Analytic? Synthetic A Priori (again) Is All A Priori Knowledge Analytic? Recap A Priori Knowledge Knowledge independent of experience Kant: necessary and universal A Posteriori Knowledge
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T AGENDA 1. Review of Epistemology 2. Kant Kant s Compromise Kant s Copernican Revolution 3. The Nature of Truth REVIEW: THREE
More informationSAMPLE. Science and Epistemology. Chapter An uneasy relationship
Chapter 14 Science and Epistemology In this chapter first we will bring our story more or less up-to-date, and second we will round out some issues concerning the concepts of knowledge and justification;
More informationUnit 2. WoK 1 - Perception. Tuesday, October 7, 14
Unit 2 WoK 1 - Perception Russell Reading - Appearance and Reality The Russell document provides a basic framework for looking at the limitations of our senses. In small groups, discuss and record what
More informationConventionalism and the linguistic doctrine of logical truth
1 Conventionalism and the linguistic doctrine of logical truth 1.1 Introduction Quine s work on analyticity, translation, and reference has sweeping philosophical implications. In his first important philosophical
More informationMETHODENSTREIT WHY CARL MENGER WAS, AND IS, RIGHT
METHODENSTREIT WHY CARL MENGER WAS, AND IS, RIGHT BY THORSTEN POLLEIT* PRESENTED AT THE SPRING CONFERENCE RESEARCH ON MONEY IN THE ECONOMY (ROME) FRANKFURT, 20 MAY 2011 *FRANKFURT SCHOOL OF FINANCE & MANAGEMENT
More informationSupplementary Section 7S.11
Supplementary Section 7S.11 Atomism and Color Incompatibility The question of the scope and importance of deductive logic is a perennial topic for philosophers of logic. Some philosophers see logic as
More informationBasic Considerations on Epistemology (1937) Paul Bernays
Bernays Project: Text No.?? Basic Considerations on Epistemology (1937) Paul Bernays (Grundsätzliche Betrachtungen zur Erkenntnistheorie, 1937) Translation by: Volker Peckhaus Comments: 279 The doctrines
More informationSaving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy
Res Cogitans Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 20 6-4-2014 Saving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy Kevin Harriman Lewis & Clark College Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.pacificu.edu/rescogitans
More informationLogical positivism, the enfant terrible of twentieth-century philosophy, began around
Sophia Project Philosophy Archives LOGICAL POSITIVISM George Nakhnikian Logical positivism, the enfant terrible of twentieth-century philosophy, began around 1922 with the meetings of a group subsequently
More informationWittgenstein on The Realm of Ineffable
Wittgenstein on The Realm of Ineffable by Manoranjan Mallick and Vikram S. Sirola Abstract The paper attempts to delve into the distinction Wittgenstein makes between factual discourse and moral thoughts.
More informationPhilosophy A465: Introduction to Analytic Philosophy Loyola University of New Orleans Ben Bayer Spring 2011
Philosophy A465: Introduction to Analytic Philosophy Loyola University of New Orleans Ben Bayer Spring 2011 Course description At the beginning of the twentieth century, a handful of British and German
More informationCHAPTER III KANT S APPROACH TO A PRIORI AND A POSTERIORI
CHAPTER III KANT S APPROACH TO A PRIORI AND A POSTERIORI Introduction One could easily find out two most influential epistemological doctrines, namely, rationalism and empiricism that have inadequate solutions
More informationGROUP A WESTERN PHILOSOPHY (40 marks)
GROUP A WESTERN PHILOSOPHY (40 marks) Chapter 1 CONCEPT OF PHILOSOPHY (4 marks allotted) MCQ 1X2 = 2 SAQ -- 1X2 = 2 (a) Nature of Philosophy: The word Philosophy is originated from two Greek words Philos
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T AGENDA 1. Review of Epistemology 2. Kant Kant s Compromise Kant s Copernican Revolution 3. The Nature of Truth KNOWLEDGE:
More informationKant s Misrepresentations of Hume s Philosophy of Mathematics in the Prolegomena
Kant s Misrepresentations of Hume s Philosophy of Mathematics in the Prolegomena Mark Steiner Hume Studies Volume XIII, Number 2 (November, 1987) 400-410. Your use of the HUME STUDIES archive indicates
More informationBertrand Russell Proper Names, Adjectives and Verbs 1
Bertrand Russell Proper Names, Adjectives and Verbs 1 Analysis 46 Philosophical grammar can shed light on philosophical questions. Grammatical differences can be used as a source of discovery and a guide
More informationAbsolute Totality, Causality, and Quantum: The Problem of Metaphysics in the Critique of Pure Reason. Kazuhiko Yamamoto, Kyushu University, Japan
Absolute Totality, Causality, and Quantum: The Problem of Metaphysics in the Critique of Pure Reason Kazuhiko Yamamoto, Kyushu University, Japan The Asian Conference on Ethics, Religion & Philosophy 2017
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 7c The World
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 7c The World Idealism Despite the power of Berkeley s critique, his resulting metaphysical view is highly problematic. Essentially, Berkeley concludes that there is no
More information1/7. The Postulates of Empirical Thought
1/7 The Postulates of Empirical Thought This week we are focusing on the final section of the Analytic of Principles in which Kant schematizes the last set of categories. This set of categories are what
More informationIn The California Undergraduate Philosophy Review, vol. 1, pp Fresno, CA: California State University, Fresno.
A Distinction Without a Difference? The Analytic-Synthetic Distinction and Immanuel Kant s Critique of Metaphysics Brandon Clark Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo Abstract: In this paper I pose and answer the
More informationImportant dates. PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since David Hume ( )
PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since 1600 Dr. Peter Assmann Spring 2018 Important dates Feb 14 Term paper draft due Upload paper to E-Learning https://elearning.utdallas.edu
More informationAyer s linguistic theory of the a priori
Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori phil 43904 Jeff Speaks December 4, 2007 1 The problem of a priori knowledge....................... 1 2 Necessity and the a priori............................ 2
More informationContemporary Theology I: Hegel to Death of God Theologies
Contemporary Theology I: Hegel to Death of God Theologies ST503 LESSON 19 of 24 John S. Feinberg, Ph.D. Experience: Professor of Biblical and Systematic Theology, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. In
More information2.1 Review. 2.2 Inference and justifications
Applied Logic Lecture 2: Evidence Semantics for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic Formal logic and evidence CS 4860 Fall 2012 Tuesday, August 28, 2012 2.1 Review The purpose of logic is to make reasoning
More informationMust we have self-evident knowledge if we know anything?
1 Must we have self-evident knowledge if we know anything? Introduction In this essay, I will describe Aristotle's account of scientific knowledge as given in Posterior Analytics, before discussing some
More informationHume on Ideas, Impressions, and Knowledge
Hume on Ideas, Impressions, and Knowledge in class. Let my try one more time to make clear the ideas we discussed today Ideas and Impressions First off, Hume, like Descartes, Locke, and Berkeley, believes
More informationAbsolute Totality, Causality, and Quantum: The Problem of Metaphysics in the Critique of Pure Reason
International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE) Volume 4, Issue 4, April 2017, PP 72-81 ISSN 2349-0373 (Print) & ISSN 2349-0381 (Online) http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0404008
More informationHow Do We Know Anything about Mathematics? - A Defence of Platonism
How Do We Know Anything about Mathematics? - A Defence of Platonism Majda Trobok University of Rijeka original scientific paper UDK: 141.131 1:51 510.21 ABSTRACT In this paper I will try to say something
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 22 Lecture - 22 Kant The idea of Reason Soul, God
More informationClass 33 - November 13 Philosophy Friday #6: Quine and Ontological Commitment Fisher 59-69; Quine, On What There Is
Philosophy 240: Symbolic Logic Fall 2009 Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays: 9am - 9:50am Hamilton College Russell Marcus rmarcus1@hamilton.edu I. The riddle of non-being Two basic philosophical questions are:
More informationEach copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.
Tractatus 6.3751 Author(s): Edwin B. Allaire Source: Analysis, Vol. 19, No. 5 (Apr., 1959), pp. 100-105 Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of The Analysis Committee Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3326898
More informationINDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE
INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE Péter Érdi Henry R. Luce Professor Center for Complex Systems Studies Kalamazoo College, Michigan and Dept. Biophysics KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics of
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALICUT SCHOOL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION. (2011 Admn. onwards) VI Semester B.A. PHILOSOPHY CORE COURSE CONTEMPORARY WESTERN PHILOSOPHY
UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT SCHOOL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION (2011 Admn. onwards) VI Semester B.A. PHILOSOPHY CORE COURSE CONTEMPORARY WESTERN PHILOSOPHY Question Bank & Answer Key Choose the correct Answer from
More informationThe Greatest Mistake: A Case for the Failure of Hegel s Idealism
The Greatest Mistake: A Case for the Failure of Hegel s Idealism What is a great mistake? Nietzsche once said that a great error is worth more than a multitude of trivial truths. A truly great mistake
More informationPHILOSOPHY 4360/5360 METAPHYSICS. Methods that Metaphysicians Use
PHILOSOPHY 4360/5360 METAPHYSICS Methods that Metaphysicians Use Method 1: The appeal to what one can imagine where imagining some state of affairs involves forming a vivid image of that state of affairs.
More information1/12. The A Paralogisms
1/12 The A Paralogisms The character of the Paralogisms is described early in the chapter. Kant describes them as being syllogisms which contain no empirical premises and states that in them we conclude
More informationAnalytic Philosophy IUC Dubrovnik,
Analytic Philosophy IUC Dubrovnik, 10.5.-14.5.2010. Debating neo-logicism Majda Trobok University of Rijeka trobok@ffri.hr In this talk I will not address our official topic. Instead I will discuss some
More informationPhilosophy (PHILOS) Courses. Philosophy (PHILOS) 1
Philosophy (PHILOS) 1 Philosophy (PHILOS) Courses PHILOS 1. Introduction to Philosophy. 4 Units. A selection of philosophical problems, concepts, and methods, e.g., free will, cause and substance, personal
More informationEthical non-naturalism
Michael Lacewing Ethical non-naturalism Ethical non-naturalism is usually understood as a form of cognitivist moral realism. So we first need to understand what cognitivism and moral realism is before
More informationKant s Pragmatism. Tobias Henschen. This paper offers a definition of the term pragmatic, as it is used in Kant s Critique of Pure
Kant s Pragmatism Tobias Henschen Abstract This paper offers a definition of the term pragmatic, as it is used in Kant s Critique of Pure Reason. The definition offered does not make any reference to the
More information1/6. The Resolution of the Antinomies
1/6 The Resolution of the Antinomies Kant provides us with the resolutions of the antinomies in order, starting with the first and ending with the fourth. The first antinomy, as we recall, concerned the
More informationEpistemology Naturalized
Epistemology Naturalized Christian Wüthrich http://philosophy.ucsd.edu/faculty/wuthrich/ 15 Introduction to Philosophy: Theory of Knowledge Spring 2010 The Big Picture Thesis (Naturalism) Naturalism maintains
More informationA Problem for the Kantian-style Critique of the Traditional Metaphysics By Eugen Zelenak
A Problem for the Kantian-style Critique of the Traditional Metaphysics By Eugen Zelenak 0. Introduction For centuries, metaphysics was one of the most respected disciplines. During the modern era and
More informationClass 36 - November 19 Philosophy Friday #7: The Color Incompatibility Problem Katz, The Problem in Twentieth-Century Philosophy
Philosophy 240: Symbolic Logic Fall 2010 Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays: 9am - 9:50am Hamilton College Russell Marcus rmarcus1@hamilton.edu I. Wittgenstein s Logical Atomism Class 36 - November 19 Philosophy
More informationClass #9: Kant Our in class discussion of these notes will be lamentably abbreviated, focused on the first three sections.
Philosophy 405: Knowledge, Truth and Mathematics Fall 2014 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #9: Kant Our in class discussion of these notes will be lamentably abbreviated, focused on the first three
More informationClasses # Logical Empiricism and the Verification Theory
Philosophy 308: The Language Revolution Fall 2014 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Classes #13-14 - Logical Empiricism and the Verification Theory I. Wittgenstein and the Logical Empiricists We started
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy
1 Introduction to Philosophy What is Philosophy? It has many different meanings. In everyday life, to have a philosophy means much the same as having a specified set of attitudes, objectives or values
More informationAn Empiricist Theory of Knowledge Bruce Aune
An Empiricist Theory of Knowledge Bruce Aune Copyright 2008 Bruce Aune To Anne ii CONTENTS PREFACE iv Chapter One: WHAT IS KNOWLEDGE? Conceptions of Knowing 1 Epistemic Contextualism 4 Lewis s Contextualism
More informationSemantic Entailment and Natural Deduction
Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction Alice Gao Lecture 6, September 26, 2017 Entailment 1/55 Learning goals Semantic entailment Define semantic entailment. Explain subtleties of semantic entailment.
More informationPhilosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2011
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2011 Class 28 - May 5 First Antinomy On the Ontological Argument Marcus, Modern Philosophy, Slide 1 Business P
More information- We might, now, wonder whether the resulting concept of justification is sufficiently strong. According to BonJour, apparent rational insight is
BonJour I PHIL410 BonJour s Moderate Rationalism - BonJour develops and defends a moderate form of Rationalism. - Rationalism, generally (as used here), is the view according to which the primary tool
More informationThe Appeal to Reason. Introductory Logic pt. 1
The Appeal to Reason Introductory Logic pt. 1 Argument vs. Argumentation The difference is important as demonstrated by these famous philosophers. The Origins of Logic: (highlights) Aristotle (385-322
More information1/9. The First Analogy
1/9 The First Analogy So far we have looked at the mathematical principles but now we are going to turn to the dynamical principles, of which there are two sorts, the Analogies of Experience and the Postulates
More informationThe Representation of Logical Form: A Dilemma
The Representation of Logical Form: A Dilemma Benjamin Ferguson 1 Introduction Throughout the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus and especially in the 2.17 s and 4.1 s Wittgenstein asserts that propositions
More information