SEARCHING FOR ANSWERS
|
|
|
- Mavis Shaw
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MONDAY, APRIL 16
2 SEARCHING FOR ANSWERS What does Detective Nye do in Las Vegas? What is Capote s purpose? (remember, purpose is not only how he is telling the story, but why he is telling it in this particular way)
3 AGENDA Discuss In Cold Blood Floyd Wells & Answers DO: Analyze authorial purpose and intent. HW: ICB page 198 (Wed)
4 OUTCOME D BENCHMARK 1 Lab Day Wednesday (Lab 228) You will need: Your topic 2 articles picked out Use the lab time to write not research (if you still are looking for articles, you will be making more homework for yourself)
5 PURPOSE OF SECTION TITLES Part 1 The Last to See Them Alive What happened in this section? Why did Capote include this information together? Part 2 Persons Unknown What happened in this section? Why did Capote include this information together?
6 WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF STARTING THE SECTION CALLED ANSWERS WITH INTRODUCING FLOYD WELLS? Consider the intersection between Capote s section titles, and the overall narrative that section is focusing on. Is Capote foreshadowing what will happen in this section? Why would he do that?
7 WHO IS FLOYD WELLS? Based on your reading, who is Floyd Wells? Consider how he is described by Capote as well as the other characters. Why is he mentioned now? How does this contrast with his brief, previous mention by Perry?
8 FLOYD VS. JAY Compare the police s interview of Floyd with Jay s in Serial Why is Floyd talking now? What is his ethos? How do the police treat him?
9 TUESDAY, APRIL 17
10 AGENDA Serial Episode 5: Route Talk DO: Analyze and evaluate rhetorical appeals and evidence. HW: Finish Route Talk Have 2 annotated bib sources for lab time tomorrow (Lab 228)
11 SERIAL SO FAR Using your evidence tracker and notes, consider: What is the case against Adnan? What is the case for Adnan s innocence? Primary physical evidence Primary theories (motive, opportunity, etc.)
12 KOENIG S PROBLEMS What are some of the issues Koenig faces in her investigation? How is she overcoming them? Are any insurmountable? Is so, what does that mean for her (and us)?
13 WHAT IS IN THE POWER OF PROOF? What is more valid? A likely story? Or a provable one? Consider the different testimonies (Jenn vs. Jay vs. Adnan)
14 ROUTE TALK Koenig puts the evidence to the test; as we listen, update your evidence tracker and consider how Koenig focus on logos over pathos in this episode Can she prove the case without having to rely on Adnan or Jay? Why would she need to do that in the first place?
15
16 TOMORROW Bring all materials to Lab 228 Make sure you are ready to work! Due date is Tuesday, April 24 at 7:05 AM
17 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 18 Lab Day in Lab 228
18 THURSDAY, APRIL 19
19 AGENDA Closing the Clutter Case an intro Serial Episode 6: The Case Against Adnan Syed DO: Analyze and evaluate rhetorical appeals and evidence. HW: Finish The Case Against Adnan Syed ICB through 217
20 CAN YOU PUT THEM AWAY? (NEXT WEEK)
21 TRUE CRIME INVESTIGATIONS Sarah Koenig is meticulously investigating and reinvestigating the murder of Hae Lee, as well as the court case convicting Adnan. Each piece of evidence then becomes suspect until corroborated Can she prove Adnan did it? Can she exonerate him?
22 IN COLD BLOOD 2HBI While reading, you know Dick and Perry murdered the Clutters, but can you prove it? In teams, you will comb through the book, and find evidence admissible in court. You must prove that Dick and Perry: Had the means to do it (the tools/material) The opportunity to do it (they were there in Holcomb during the murder window)
23 EVIDENCE Physical evidence Collected at the scene Tied back to Dick and Perry not by Capote, but by the KBI Testimony Puts Dick and Perry in Holcomb Demonstrates they had the opportunity and means to commit the crime
24 TIE IT TOGETHER! Step 1 Collect evidence Write each piece of evidence on a notecard, with the page number you found it on Step 2 Create a timeline of the murders What happened to the Clutters? How do you know? Step 3 Place Dick & Perry at the scene Demonstrate they had means and opportunity
25
26 CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE & BAD EXCUSES Why wasn t he worried? Why didn t Adnan call or page her? Hae s letter I m going to kill The Neighbor Boy saw a body
27 CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE & BAD EXCUSES Cathy s testimony how does her story compare to Jay s? Adnan s? The cell phone records? What does Jenn say?
28 THE SMOKING GUN Why is the Nisha call so problematic?
29 MONDAY, APRIL 23 Final Lab Day for Annotated Bib
Episode 15: We the people of the jury 08/09/2015 Speakers: Bob Ruff, Ann Brocklehurst, Becky Ruff EPISODE DESCRIPTION
Episode 15: We the people of the jury 08/09/2015 Speakers: Bob Ruff, Ann Brocklehurst, Becky Ruff EPISODE DESCRIPTION In this episode, Bob interviews/debates author and blogger Ann Brocklehurst. Bob and
EXCLUSIVE: PROSECUTOR IN SERIAL 1 CASE GOES ON THE RECORD
EXCLUSIVE: PROSECUTOR IN SERIAL 1 CASE GOES ON THE RECORD BY NATASHA VARGAS-COOPER AND KEN SILVERSTEIN * @natashavc * @KenSilversteinl 01/07/2015 It was pretty much a run-of-the-mill domestic violence
Episode 2: Thoughts & Theories After Undisclosed Episode 2 05/10/2015 Speaker: Bob Ruff EPISODE DESCRIPTION
Episode 2: Thoughts & Theories After Undisclosed Episode 2 05/10/2015 Speaker: Bob Ruff EPISODE DESCRIPTION Following the release of Undisclosed Episode & Addendum 2, Bob reveals the theory that he sent
Transcript of Undisclosed Podcast Adnan s PCR Hearing: Day 1 February 3, 2016
Transcript of Undisclosed Podcast Adnan s PCR Hearing: Day 1 February 3, 2016 [0:00] Rabia Chaudry: Hi, and welcome to a little live update of Undisclosed. We are at the Baltimore City Circuit Court. Um,
Episode 20: Fact Trumps Theory 09/13/2015 Speaker: Bob Ruff EPISODE DESCRIPTION
Episode 20: Fact Trumps Theory 09/13/2015 Speaker: Bob Ruff EPISODE DESCRIPTION In this episode, Bob continues on with his investigation of Don. At the close of the show, the future of The Serial Dynasty
Everyone likes to argue!
The Argument Essay Everyone likes to argue! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqfkti6gn9y https://www.ted.com/talks/daniel_h_cohen_for_argument_s_sake#t -7565 The Argument Essay The basic structure of an
Corporate Team Training Session # 2 June 8 / 10
3 rd Annual Great Corporate Debate Corporate Team Training Session # 2 June 8 / 10 Stephen Buchanan Education Consulting Outline of Session # 2 Persuasion topics Great Corporate Debate Review Contest,
The State s Case. 1. Why did fire investigators believe the cause of the fire wasn t accidental?
The State s Case Directions: Complete the questions below as you watch Chapter 2: The State s Case from the FRONTLINE film Death by Fire. Then discuss the questions that follow with your group. As soon
Corporate Team Training Session # 2 May 30 / June 1
5 th Annual Great Corporate Debate Corporate Team Training Session # 2 May 30 / June 1 Stephen Buchanan Education Consulting Outline of Session # 2 Great Corporate Debate Review Contest, Rules, Judges
Automated voice This is a Global-Tel link prepaid call from Adnan Syed an inmate at a Maryland Correctional facility
EPISODE 7: THE OPPOSITE OF THE PROSECUTION Ira Glass Previously, on Serial... Detective Did anyone else use the phone? Jay Yeah, um, Adnan, I remember he was talking to a girl, he put me on the phone with
Episode 4: Are you scared you should be. 05/24/2015 Speaker: Bob Ruff EPISODE DESCRIPTION
Episode 4: Are you scared you should be. 05/24/2015 Speaker: Bob Ruff EPISODE DESCRIPTION Bob discusses updates in the case, following Undisclosed Episode 3 Addendum. With new information, he's narrowing
Episode 22: Tactics 09/27/2015 Speaker: Bob Ruff EPISODE DESCRIPTION
Episode 22: Tactics 09/27/2015 Speaker: Bob Ruff EPISODE DESCRIPTION In this episode, Bob analyzes Debbie's interview transcripts in an attempt to figure out what exactly Ritz and MacGillivary were up
Argumentative Writing. 9th Grade - English Language Arts Ms. Weaver - Qrtr 3/4
Argumentative Writing 9th Grade - English Language Arts Ms. Weaver - Qrtr 3/4 Unit Objectives IWBAT - Write an argumentative essay that supports claims in an analysis of a topic and uses valid reasoning,
Annotated Works Consulted
Annotated Works Consulted Step One Find the sources Tip: Find more than 12 sources, because some may not be as informative or ontopic as they first appear. Keeping Your Research Organized Keep a folder
UNDISCLOSED: FIVE LEGAL LESSONS FROM THE CASE OF ADNAN SYED
UNDISCLOSED: FIVE LEGAL LESSONS FROM THE CASE OF ADNAN SYED Rabia Chaudry * Wednesday, September 16, 2015 Texas Tech University School of Law Lanier Auditorium I. INTRODUCTION... 363 II. THE FIVE LESSONS
Episode 17: Suspect-Roy S. Davis III 08/23/2015 Speakers: Bob Ruff and Shaun T EPISODE DESCRIPTION
Episode 17: Suspect-Roy S. Davis III 08/23/2015 Speakers: Bob Ruff and Shaun T EPISODE DESCRIPTION In this episode, Bob focuses in on suspect Roy S. Davis III. Bob analyzes and fact checks evidence sent
SO we know will read through the lens of finding the theme in each text. That is our main focus. Since we know that the theme is the lesson the
SO we know will read through the lens of finding the theme in each text. That is our main focus. Since we know that the theme is the lesson the author wants us to take away, then as we read we will be
Explanations. - Provide an explanation of how your evidence supports your point
Claim - Expresses your position or stand on the issue (YOUR OPINION ON A TOPIC) - States precisely what you believe (and perhaps WHY you believe it) - This is the viewpoint you want readers to accept or
Grab an Everything s an Argument book off the shelf by the flags. INTRO TO RHETORIC
Grab an Everything s an Argument book off the shelf by the flags. INTRO TO RHETORIC Everything is an Argument You are bombarded with them all the time! The average American sees over 3000 advertisements
THE COURT: All right. Call your next witness. MR. JOHNSON: Agent Mullen, Terry Mullen. (BRIEF PAUSE) (MR. MULLEN PRESENT)
not released. MR. WESTLING: Yes. I was just going to say that. THE COURT: ll right. Call your next witness. MR. JOHNSON: gent Mullen, Terry Mullen. (BRIEF PUSE) (MR. MULLEN PRESENT) THE COURT: Sir, if
Persuasive/ Argumentative writing
Persuasive/ Argumentative writing Learning targets I can write arguments to support claims using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence. I can introduce precise claims, distinguish the claim
Bar Mock Trial Competition 2017/18. Student Role Guide: Barrister England, Wales and Northern Ireland
Bar Mock Trial Competition 2017/18 England, Wales and Northern Ireland Introduction In any trial, two students from your team will play the role of prosecution or defence barristers. The work must be shared
Condcnsclt! Page 1. 6 Part 9. I don't think I could have anticipated the snow. 7 and your having to be here at 1:30 any better than I did.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND STATE OF MARYLAND, V. ADNAN SYEO, BEFORE: Defendant. Indictment Nos. 199100-6 REPORTER'S OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS (Trial on the Merita) Baltimore.
Episode 12: What We Know
Episode 12: What We Know -Square Space Ad- -MailChimp Ad- Ira Glass Previously, on Serial Jay He left his cell phone in the car with me, told me he d call me. Detective Ritz And now at this point, do you
RHETORICAL ARGUMENTS E T H O S, L O G O S, P A T H O S
RHETORICAL ARGUMENTS E T H O S, L O G O S, P A T H O S I CAN Determine how an author uses rhetoric to convince an audience to act on something. Understand how rhetorical devices contribute to meaning LOGOS
Good Day! Ms. Gilluly
Good Day! Ms. Gilluly Learning Target: SWBAT express their opinions regarding the morality of humankind in relation to the big ideas of Lord of the Flies, by means of class discussion. Getting Started:
Michael Ross: Case Files
Michael Ross: Case Files The Primary Witness Shamsuddin Mahmood was murdered on 2 nd June 1994. Twelve years later, on 2 nd September 2006, a man by the name of William Grant walked in to Kirkwall police
Anticipatory Guide. Explanation. Statement. I Agree. Disagree
Name: Current Unit Anticipatory Guide Date: Team: Read each statement to yourself and place a checkmark next to your answer ( I Agree or I Disagree ). Provide an explanation for your response. You will
Can t we just be good enough to please God? Romans 3:10 25 A sermon by Peter Budd Sunday 21 st March 2010, St. Andrew s Cheadle Hulme
Can t we just be good enough to please God? Romans 3:10 25 A sermon by Peter Budd Sunday 21 st March 2010, St. Andrew s Cheadle Hulme Can t we just be good enough to please God? That s the question we
THOMPSON KILLER WAS WHITE, NOT BLACK:
Michael Goodwin, creator of the sport of Supercross, was convicted in 2007 of ordering the murders of Mickey Thompson, 1960 s- 70 s Indy and off road racing legend, and his wife Trudy in 1988. Goodwin
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR 10-936 CLEVELAND EVANS, VS. STATE OF ARKANSAS, APPELLANT, APPELLEE, Opinion Delivered February 3, 2011 APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. CR 2008-5049, HON.
Words Never Lie Have We Taught our Children to Lie? BUT PEOPLE DO Secrets of Linguistic Lie Detection. Is It Easy To Lie?
2 Words Never Lie BUT PEOPLE DO Secrets of Linguistic Lie Detection "No mortal can keep a secret. If his lips are silent, he chatters with his fingertips; betrayal oozes out of him at every pore." Sigmund
New Testament Exegesis Outline Template by Rev. D. E. Norczyk
New Testament Exegesis Outline Template by Rev. D. E. Norczyk Sermon Set: Grace Providence Church Sermon Number: 2014 - Sermon Series: So That You May Believe Sermon Title: Sermon Text: John Sermon Date:
Cross-Examination. Peter B. Wold. Wold Morrison Law. Barristers Trust Building. 247 Third Avenue South. Minneapolis, MN
Peter B. Wold Wold Morrison Law Barristers Trust Building 247 Third Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55415 612-341-2525 pwold@wold-law.com CROSS-EXAMINATION: SCIENCE AND TECHNIQUES Larry S. Pozner Roger J.
I think the odds of you getting the charming sociopath-- you re just not that lucky.
Episode 8: The Deal With Jay Ira Glass Previously, on Serial Deirdre Enright I think the odds of you getting the charming sociopath-- you re just not that lucky. Adnan Syed With Jay, it was more so kinda
Inductive Logic. Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.
Inductive Logic Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence. An inductive leap is the intellectual movement from limited facts to a general conviction. The reliability
higher power. And guess what? He s been sober for ten years? Did the doorknob work for him? Does that make it true? Is putting your faith in the
2 Peter 1:16-21 Why do you choose to believe the Bible? How can you live your life, how can you put your faith in a book written by men? Well, I ve recently read a couple of other books that tell me about
J. W A R N E R W A L L A C E
J. W A R N E R W A L L A C E COLD CASE HOMICIDE DETECTIVE AND CHRISTIAN APOLOGIST I was an atheist for 35 years. I was passionate in my opposition to Christianity, and I enjoyed debating my Christian friends.
Agenda. 1. Revolutionary Songs. 2. Discuss Ch. 6 & Propaganda Practice
Agenda 1. Revolutionary Songs 2. Discuss Ch. 6 & 7 3. Propaganda Practice Song Lyrics & Annotated Bibliographies Those of you who have performed: Have you given Ms. Aguirre or me your song lyrics & Annotated
ARGUMENT AS INQUIRY: QUESTIONING A TEXT
ARGUMENT AS INQUIRY: QUESTIONING A TEXT Adapted from Reading Rhetorically (A Reader for Writers), 2nd edition by Virginia A. Chappell and Alice M. Gillam and Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings,
Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language,
Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language, rhythmic patterns of speech, etc. Logical Argument Appeals
The Timely Justice Act: Is it Fair Justice. Florida also leads the nation in the number of exonerations from death row, twenty-four to be exact
Christine Cooper - Page 1 of 5 Christine Cooper Instructor Lynn Wallace ENC1101 24 November 2014 Research Essay The Timely Justice Act: Is it Fair Justice According to the American Civil Liberties Union
White Paper: Innocent or Inconclusive? Analyzing Abolitionists Claims About the Death
White Paper: Innocent or Inconclusive? Analyzing Abolitionists Claims About the Death Penalty Michael Conklin 1 This is a brief analysis of the death penalty innocence issue, using the July 2018 book The
Center on Wrongful Convictions
CASE SUMMARY CATEGORY: DEFENDANT S NAME: JURISDICTION: RESEARCHED BY: Exoneration Steve Smith Cook County, Illinois Rob Warden Center on Wrongful Convictions DATE LAST REVISED: September 24, 2001 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Allen Geralds v. State of Florida SC SC07-716
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior.
Logos Ethos Pathos Chapter 13 CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior. Persuasive speaking: process of doing so in
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DAVID SMITH, II, Appellant, v. Case No.
STATE OF MAINE CHRISTIAN NIELSEN. [ 1] Christian Nielsen appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the
![STATE OF MAINE CHRISTIAN NIELSEN. [ 1] Christian Nielsen appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the](/thumbs/79/79698952.jpg "STATE OF MAINE CHRISTIAN NIELSEN. [ 1] Christian Nielsen appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the")
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2008 ME 77 Docket: Oxf-07-645 Argued: April 8, 2008 Decided: May 6, 2008 Reporter of Decisions Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, ALEXANDER, LEVY, SILVER, and MEAD,
Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS
Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS Rhetorical Appeals Ethos Appeals to credibility Pathos Appeals to emotion Logos Appeals to logic Structure of an Analysis/Argument Arguments operate under logic Your
ACTS: FIRST SECTIONAL EXAM REVIEW Acts 1 9
ACTS: FIRST SECTIONAL EXAM REVIEW Acts 1 9 Luke: General Introduction 1. OVERALL COMPOSITION. Be aware of the issues surrounding the canonical final form of the book of Acts. 1.1. Luke-Acts. Explain why
MR. RICHARD C. MOSTY: May it please 25 the Court, ladies and gentlemen of the jury. I think that Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 42
MR. RICHARD C. MOSTY: May it please 25 the Court, ladies and gentlemen of the jury. I think that 42 1 when we talked to all of y'all, that at some point, one of 2 the defense lawyers, Mr. Mulder, or myself,
This transcript was exported on Apr 09, view latest version here.
Speaker 2: Speaker 3: Previously on Score: Behind the Headlines. And as a big NBA fan, I grew up with the vague knowledge that Jordan's dad had been killed. And I always assumed that it was, in some ways,
Logical Appeal (Logos)
Logical Appeal (Logos) Relies on sound reasoning, facts, statistics Uses evidence well Analyzes cause-effect relationships Uses patterns of inductive and deductive reasoning Pitfall: failure to clearly
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE COMPLAINT. Count I. Murder 2nd Degree ( Y )
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE POLICE NO. : 17-058838 PROSECUTOR NO. : 095440950 STATE OF MISSOURI, ) PLAINTIFF, ) vs. ) PATRICK L. BARKWELL ) 11409 E. Anderson, ) Sugar
1 EVALUATING CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE
1 EVALUATING CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE In this paper, we study something called corroborative evidence. A typical example would be a case where a witness saw the accused leaving a crime scene, and physical
Date of last example: Never Today/yesterday Last week Last month Last year Before the last year
e) I consciously attempt to welcome bad news, or at least not push it away. (Recent example from Eliezer: At a brainstorming session for future Singularity Summits, one issue raised was that we hadn't
Ivan and Zosima: Existential Atheism vs. Existential Theism
Ivan and Zosima: Existential Atheism vs. Existential Theism Fyodor Dostoevsky, a Russian novelist, was very prolific in his time. He explored different philosophical voices that presented arguments and
Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?
Page 1 of 10 10b Learn how to evaluate verbal and visual arguments. Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me? Download transcript Three common ways to
Test Item File. Full file at
Test Item File 107 CHAPTER 1 Chapter 1: Basic Logical Concepts Multiple Choice 1. In which of the following subjects is reasoning outside the concern of logicians? A) science and medicine B) ethics C)
.1E: Right now I am saying things that could really get me in trouble. JE: 1 am saying things that could really get me in trouble.
HARDCOPY 11/16/93 - JOHN ELROD TRANSCRIPT Legend: BA = Bill Adams; BN = Barry Nolan (anchor); HC = Hardcopy announcer; JE = John Elrod; LE = Lindy Elrod; Mary La Fontaine; OS = Oliver Stone; TRAILER: HC:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 98-CF-273. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (F )
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
Seek God Ministries Website:
Seek God Ministries Website: www.seekgod.org Email: seekgod.support@gmail.com Ministry Update August 20, 2016 I never stop giving thanks for you as I remember you in my prayers. I pray that the God of
The Case for Christianity
The Case for Christianity But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts, and alwaysbe ready togive a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you, with meekness and fear; (1Peter 3:15)
Teach Writing Thinkingly Classroom Ideas that forge forceful arguments
Teach Writing Thinkingly Classroom Ideas that forge forceful arguments By Rob Whyte Which way is the bus going? Aim of Session 1. Learn an inquiry method framework 2. Practice creating thoughtful arguments
Letter from Birmingham Jail Rhetorical Analysis. Luis Audelio Unzueta. The University of Texas at El Paso
Running head: LETTER FROM BIRMINGHAM ANALYSIS 1 Letter from Birmingham Jail Rhetorical Analysis Luis Audelio Unzueta The University of Texas at El Paso LETTER FROM BIRMINGHAM ANALYSIS 2 During the civil
BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE ALASKA POLICE STANDARDS COUNCIL DECISION
BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE ALASKA POLICE STANDARDS COUNCIL In the Matter of: ) ) THOMAS KAWIKA LEE ) OAH No. 16-0555-POC ) APSC No. 2015-13 I. Introduction
Argumentative Writing
Argumentative Writing Anca T-Hummel NBCT-AYA/ELA taus-hummel@phoenixunion.org Joanna Nichols I.L. English jnichols@phoenixunion.org ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY The argumentative essay is a genre of writing that
My name is John Cameron. I am a retired Cold Case Homicide Detective for the Great Falls Police
1 Chapter The following letters were written between June of 2010 and March of 2011 between serial killer Edward Wayne Edwards, retired Great Falls Police Detective John Cameron and Cameron s colleague,
Creating a Persuasive Speech
Creating a Persuasive Speech Argumentation - Review Every argument needs to have three parts: Claim Your main idea/point Evidence Support from other sources (may fall within logos, pathos and/or ethos)
To Kill a Mockingbird: The Trial
Name: Class Hr: To Kill a Mockingbird: The Trial Directions: Answer the following questions. Include the page numbers of where you find your answers. Chapter 16 1. What does Atticus mean when he says the
AP English III LANGUAGE & COMPOSITION Summer Reading Assignment
AP English III LANGUAGE & COMPOSITION Summer Reading Assignment SYNOPSES You will need to purchase your own copy of Thank You for Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach Us About
Case Name: R. v. Singh. Between Regina, and Joga Singh Sahota. [2011] B.C.J. No BCPC W.C.B. (2d) CarswellBC 362
![Case Name: R. v. Singh. Between Regina, and Joga Singh Sahota. [2011] B.C.J. No BCPC W.C.B. (2d) CarswellBC 362](/thumbs/71/66145380.jpg "Case Name: R. v. Singh. Between Regina, and Joga Singh Sahota. [2011] B.C.J. No BCPC W.C.B. (2d) CarswellBC 362")
Page 1 Case Name: R. v. Singh Between Regina, and Joga Singh Sahota [2011] B.C.J. No. 305 2011 BCPC 42 92 W.C.B. (2d) 780 2011 CarswellBC 362 File No. 54579 Registry: North Vancouver British Columbia Provincial
State of Florida v. Rudolph Holton
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
Rhetoric and Argument. Techniques of and definitions associated with persuasive speaking and writing.
Rhetoric and Argument Techniques of and definitions associated with persuasive speaking and writing. Why do we argue? Human beings are engaged in explaining and defending their own actions and beliefs
BIBLE RADIO PRODUCTIONS
BIBLE RADIO PRODUCTIONS www.bibleradio.org.au BIBLE ADVENTURES SCRIPT: A1603 ~ The Wise Men Visit. Welcome to Bible Adventures. Help for today. Hope for tomorrow. Jesus is Lord of all. One of the most
EVALUATING CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE. Douglas Walton Department of Philosophy, University of Winnipeg, Canada
EVALUATING CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE Douglas Walton Department of Philosophy, University of Winnipeg, Canada Chris Reed School of Computing, University of Dundee, UK In this paper, we study something called
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRANDY NICOLE WILLIAMS NO KA-1839-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Apr 4 2014 14:46:44 2012-KA-01839-COA Pages: 18 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRANDY NICOLE WILLIAMS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2012-KA-1839-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
DOWNSTATE ILLINOIS INNOCENCE PROJECT. Latent print on Findley Bridge
DOWNSTATE ILLINOIS INNOCENCE PROJECT INSTITUTE FOR LEGAL AND POLICY STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT SPRINGFIELD Public Affairs Center, Room 429 One University Plaza Springfield, Illinois 62703-5407 Phone:
Jurors, Former Prosecutors and Judges Urge Governor Warner to Grant Clemency to Norfolk Four
For Immediate Release Contact: Laura Burstein, 202-557-7584 January 4, 2006 Amy Levey, 202-557-7513 Jurors, Former Prosecutors and Judges Urge Governor Warner to Grant Clemency to Norfolk Four Cite Evidence
Philosophy 2: Introduction to Philosophy Section 2511, Room SOCS 205, 7:45-9:10am El Camino College Fall, 2014
Philosophy 2: Introduction to Philosophy Section 2511, Room SOCS 205, 7:45-9:10am El Camino College Fall, 2014 Instructor: Dr. Felipe Leon Phone: (310) 660-3593 ext.5742 Email: fleon@elcamino.edu Office:
The Kohlberg Dilemmas By Lawrence Kohlberg From Moral Judgment Interviews 1958
Name: Class: The Kohlberg Dilemmas By Lawrence Kohlberg From Moral Judgment Interviews 1958 Lawrence Kohlberg (1927-1987) was an American psychologist best known for his theory of the stages of moral development.
All About Writing Standard #1: Standard Progression and Research Base
All About Writing Standard #1: Standard Progression and Research Base 6 th 12 th Argument Writing (Underlined portions indicate what is new to the grade level) Grades 6-8 Grades 9-10 Grades 11-12 Write
Affirmative Defense = Confession
FROM: http://adask.wordpress.com/2012/08/19/affirmative-defense-confession/#more-16092: Affirmative Defense = Confession Dick Simkanin Sem is one of the people who comment regularly on this blog. Today,
Route 66. Lesson Bible Text Lesson Objectives Developmental Activities Life Application. Completing charts Writing descriptions
Route 66 S C O P E & S E Q U E N C E Lesson Bible Text Lesson Objectives Developmental Activities Life Application I Define and discuss biblical inspiration List reasons for believing in the Bible s authority
INVESTIGATIVE REPORT (May 10, 1993) TRIPLE HOMICIDE BYERS/MOORE/BRANCH CASE FILE NUMBER DATE OF REPORT:
INVESTIGATIVE REPORT (May 10, 1993) TRIPLE HOMICIDE BYERS/MOORE/BRANCH CASE FILE NUMBER 93050666 DATE OF REPORT: 05-10-93 ON 05-10-93, DAMIEN WAYNE ECHOLS WHO IS ALSO KNOWN AS MICHAEL WAYNE HUTCHISON CAME
I m sure your new roommates are totally normal people, and you have nothing to worry about unlike the fellow in the Tell-tale heart.
Dealing with Guilt Psalm 51: 1-10, Colossians 2:8-12, 20-23 Friends, if you are a book-worm and you like to read classic literature like Shakespeare, Jane Austen, Fyodor Dostoyevski, or Catcher in the
CONTEMPORARY MORAL PROBLEMS LECTURE 14 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT PART 2
CONTEMPORARY MORAL PROBLEMS LECTURE 14 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT PART 2 1 THE ISSUES: REVIEW Is the death penalty (capital punishment) justifiable in principle? Why or why not? Is the death penalty justifiable
CSSS/SOC/STAT 321 Case-Based Statistics I. Introduction to Probability
CSSS/SOC/STAT 321 Case-Based Statistics I Introduction to Probability Christopher Adolph Department of Political Science and Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences University of Washington, Seattle
The Murder of Pedro Corzo. January 9, 2004 Dateland, Maricopa County, Arizona
The Murder of Pedro Corzo January 9, 2004 Dateland, Maricopa County, Arizona Dateland, Maricopa Co., Arizona Imagine a lone man driving down a gravel road in the desert country of rural Maricopa County,
Court of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued May 26, 2011 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-10-00680-CR JOSE SORTO JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 412th District Court
How to Study the Bible, Part 2
How to Study the Bible, Part 2 2017-02-23 at SGC Review - Observation 15 minutes 1. The Fish story (6 minutes) 2. Review homework from 1 Corinthians 13 3. Tools & Tips for making observations - Pen and
Serial: The Presumption of Guilt
University of Baltimore Law Review Volume 44 Issue 3 Summer 2015 Article 3 2015 Serial: The Presumption of Guilt Staff Editors University of Baltimore School of Law Follow this and additional works at:
Comments on "Lying with Conditionals" by Roy Sorensen
sorensencomments_draft_a.rtf 2/7/12 Comments on "Lying with Conditionals" by Roy Sorensen Don Fallis School of Information Resources University of Arizona Pacific Division Meeting of the American Philosophical
Apologetics Through Uncommon Research
Apologetics Through Uncommon Research The Case for Christ: A Journalist's Personal Investigation of the Evidence for Jesus Lee Strobel (Author) - (Copyright 1998 / 2016) Retracing his own spiritual journey
Virtual Academy Honors/AP Summer Reading Requirement VIRTUAL ACADEMY Honors/AP Summer Reading Requirement
VIRTUAL ACADEMY Honors/AP Summer Reading Requirement 2017-2018 Assignment to be completed during the summer break: 1. Choose one of the novels from the appropriate grade list. (library or purchase) 2.
INTRODUCTION. The State of Minnesota submits this memorandum of law to address the evidence
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF BECKER DISTRICT COURT SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Criminal Kenneth Eugene Andersen, Petitioner, vs., Respondent. Court File No. STATE S MEMORANDUM OF LAW FOLLOWING
Seffner Christian Academy
Seffner Christian Academy 11605 US Hwy 92 East Seffner, Florida 33584 www.scacrusaders.com (813) 626-0001 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY (2/11/09) Date Received 1 st Interview Date By 2 nd Interview Date By Transcripts
The Mystery of Sam Smiley
Becoming a Detective: The Mystery of Sam Smiley A body, identified as Sam Smiley, has just been found under suspicious circumstances. Your task is to unravel the mystery of Sam Smiley s demise. Just like
JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL JEROME WILLIAMS, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-KA-0800-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT
13. What are the various reactions of the guests after hearing the accusations?
Chapters 1-3 Questions 1. What attributes of the characters help you understand something about their backgrounds? 2. Agatha Christie opens the novel with a shifting point of view unusual in the mystery