Neo-Darwinian Teleological Redundancy Sarah Crawford California State University, Fresno
|
|
- Shauna Pope
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Neo-Darwinian Teleological Redundancy California State University, Fresno The discoveries of modern science have fundamentally reshaped our understanding of the world in many surprising ways. Science has increased our experience of the world. With modern technology the vast expanses of the universe as well as the smallest microcosms of space are within our range of experience. The explosion of new data produced in the last half century has tempted many to make claims about the origins of the universe and nature of God. This practice is not new, as David Hume, an 18th century philosopher generally thought to be one of the greatest thinkers of western philosophy, questioned his contemporaries who did the same. In more recent history a group of scientists and intellectuals united by an atheistic worldview have begun to utilize the discoveries of science to attempt to make claims about the existence of God and the creation of the world. These attempts are nothing more than a thinly veiled continuation of the skeptical enquiry born of enlightenment-era philosophical discourse. The self-proclaimed new breed of atheists is in fact doing nothing new at all: the scientific discoveries are new, but the framework of skepticism and reason has not changed since Hume's day. Below are a few major arguments from David Hume, Daniel Dennett, Victor Stenger, and Richard Dawkins that show how science provides us with exciting opportunities to study the world but cannot produce knowledge pertaining to the transcendent nature of the universe. David Hume is one of the most celebrated thinkers in Western history. While not an atheist in his public life and works, Hume's skepticism and espousal of rational enquiry as the best means of examining the world and deriving meaning kept him at odds with the religious establishment of his day. Many of his contemporaries found his writings to be subversive and even atheistic. Though his works appear antithetical to the majority of the religious writings of his day, Hume is guilty of no more than applying the principles of rational enquiry and empiricism to religious works and institutions. A firm believer in an omnipotent and omnibenevolent deity Hume, however, did not believe the teleological argument could cogently prove the existence or nonexistence of such a god in any meaningful way. In fact, Hume believed that the nature of the world is inconsistent with humankind's preconceived notions as to what a universe designed by a being of such characteristics would entail. Hume describes his doubts about the argument from design in his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion: "It must, I think, be allowed, that, if a very limited intelligence, whom we shall suppose utterly unacquainted with the universe, were assured, that it were the production of a very good, wise, and powerful Being, however finite, he would, from his conjectures, form beforehand a different notion of it from what we find it to be by experience; nor would he ever imagine, merely from these attributes of the cause, of which he is informed, that the effect could be so full of vice and misery and disorder, as it appears in this life." (Hume 1998, 105) Hume admits that there is a fundamental problem with the benevolent and omnipotent nature of the creator and the state of the world. He finds that authors of Theodicy neglect to take into
2 18 account the incredible nature of God's mind when accounting for the evils, both natural and moral, in the world. We know from experience that flaws in design can be made better if a wholly new design is drawn up through superior skill and ingenuity. This is, of course, the nature of human progress on the macro level. "But still you would assert in general, that, if the architect had had skill and good intentions, he might have formed such a plan of the whole, and might have adjusted the parts in such a manner, as would have remedied all or most of these inconveniences." (Hume 1998, 106) The crux of the matter is Hume's deep mistrust of human nature and reliance upon skepticism and empiricism as means to transcend the ignorance of the true nature of the world that has been a problem for people since the beginning of thought. This is one of Hume's greatest gifts to philosophy and indeed Western thought, he states in his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion that "All that belongs to human understanding, in this deep ignorance and obscurity, is to be sceptical, or at least cautious; and not to admit of any hypothesis, whatever; much less, of any which is supported by no appearance of probability." (Hume 1998, 107) It seems that the ultimate negative response to an argument is one in which a person espousing the same worldview as that which the argument supposedly supports claims that the argument does only the opposite. As you can see, Hume believes that the teleological argument casts as much doubt upon the existence of a creator God as it provides for the existence of such a god; he states: "But let us still assert, that as this goodness is not antecedently established, but must be inferred from the phenomena, there can be no grounds for such an inference, while there are so many ills in the universe, and while these ills might so easily have been remedied, as far as human understanding can be allowed to judge on such a subject." (Hume 1998, 113) The matter at hand for Hume is thus: while it is perfectly reasonable to see analogous designs in the veins of a leaf and the blood-filled capillaries of a human being, therein lies the seeds of the argument's own destruction. For, if one can find clues that point to some cosmic creativity, that same person can also find flaws and ugly patches not readily indicative of a perfect creator, and in fact what one would expect to see from purely natural origins. Hume states: "What a noble privilege is it of human reason to attain the knowledge of the supreme Being; and, from the visible works of nature, be enabled to infer so sublime a principle as its supreme Creator? But turn the reverse of the medal. Survey most nations and most ages. Examine the religious principles, which have, in fact, prevailed in the world. You will scarcely be persuaded, that they are any thing [sic] but sick men's dreams " (Hume 1995, 32) Hume believes that ultimately one should be able to see the evidence of the creator God not just in the workings of nature but also in human societies and institutions. In doing so he delivers one final crushing blow to the teleological argument. It is telling that a great theist and believer in enlightened enquiry can cast so much doubt on an argument for God's existence which attempts to prove using those very same principles that God does in fact exist. Let us now move forward a few hundred years to our contemporary period. Modern science has taken human beings to new and fantastic places. Scientists have electron microscopes capable of taking pictures of individual atoms and molecules. Biologists cut and paste biological molecules containing genetic information into organisms large and small. Advances in nanotechnology have allowed scientists to manipulate individual atoms. On a grander scale physicists and cosmologists have used sophisticated equipment to see into the furthest reaches of
3 Neo-Darwinian Teleological Redundancy 19 space and time. Pulsars, quasars, dark matter, up-quarks, down-quarks, strange quarks, and other such concepts have enriched the modern lexicon. Springing from this soup of new discoveries are a self-proclaimed new breed of atheists. These militant critics of religion have charged onto the public field of battle under the banners of reason and science in defense of a naturalistic worldview. These atheists have championed Darwin's theory of evolution and have used it to cast doubt upon religious institutions past and present. For clarity's sake I've labeled them neo-darwinian atheists in contrast to pre-darwinian skeptics like Hume. Daniel Dennett is one of self-titled four horsemen of atheism (Dawkins 2010), a group which also includes Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, and Christopher Hitchens. Dennett is a philosopher currently working at Tufts University. In the last few years his research has been devoted primarily to studying cognition and how information in the form of 'memes', or the socio-cultural equivalent of the gene, are passed on from generation to generation and culture to culture. In Darwin's Dangerous Idea, published in 1991, Dennett develops the impact Darwin's theory has had upon the scientific and philosophical communities. Specifically he addresses early reactions to the Origin of the Species regarding the moral implications that the theory has for human beings. In the book he states: "In the wake of Darwin's publication of Origin of Species, Friedrich Nietzsche rediscovered what Hume had already toyed with: the idea that an eternal recurrence of blind, meaningless variation- chaotic, pointless shuffling of matter and law- would inevitably spew up worlds whose evolution through time would yield the apparently meaningful stories of our lives." (Dennett 1996, 181) He goes on to show that evolution represents a challenge to religious adherents because seeming proof of the natural origin of human beings appears to entail moral nihilism and the inherent meaningless of human lives. Now, Dennett spends much time later in his book showing that there is no conceptual relationship between the espousal of evolution and moral nihilism, but he accepts this view as a natural response to the theory. The implications of evolution in regard to the teleological argument are various. Dennett briefly cites Paley's watchmaker analogy wherein the universe is made to be analogous to a watch and therefore necessitates a creative designer. Dennett states that evolution provides a naturalistic explanation for the apparent design of the universe and living things, quote: "When we looked through Darwin's eyes at the actual processes of design of which we and all the wonders of nature are the products to date, we found that Paley was right to see these effects as the result of a lot of design work, but we found a non-miraculous account of it: a massively parallel, and hence prodigiously wasteful, process of mindless, algorithmic design-trying, in which, however, the minimal increments of design have been thriftily husbanded, copied, and re-used for billions of years." (Dennett 1996, 184) In Dennett's view this at present satisfactorily answers the problem of the teleological argument for the existence of God. Evolution is the natural explanation for apparently supernatural origins purported by the argument.
4 20 I note that Dennett's rebuttal of the teleological argument is nothing new: it is the same criticism that Hume brought to light centuries ago. Even though modern evolutionary science can provide a naturalistic explanation for living things the inference between what science tells us about the world and the proof that it lacks a creator is still just as weak as one that tries to make an inference that there is a God. Another modern critic of the design argument is Victor Stenger, a cosmologist who believes that science has successfully proven that there is no God. Through the systematic application of scientific principles, Stenger attempts to show in his many books that science, while not ultimately proving that God does not exist, proves beyond a reasonable doubt that there is no God because there is no discernable evidence for God. In Stenger's most recent book, The New Atheism, he spends much time arguing with the proponents of intelligent design theory, who may be called the neo-creationist complement to the neo-darwinian atheists. Like Dennett, Stenger states that because the origin of living things can be shown to be natural, doubt is cast upon proving the existence of God via teleological arguments, quote: "The argument from design was originally a god of the gaps argument, when science had no explanation for how the complexity of life arose naturally. When, fifty years after Paley, in 1859 Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace showed how complex biological systems can evolve from simpler ones by means of natural selection, the argument from design evolved from a god of the gaps into an argument from ignorance." (Stenger 2009, 98) In his book, Stenger goes on to reveal the specious reasoning involved in the claims of irreducible complexity used by the intelligent design movement. Like Hume, Stenger also believes that if designed, the universe is ultimately not the best possible artifact, especially considering that the artificer is supposedly orders of magnitude more competent then the best of human architects. In a delicious modern twist, he shows this to be true in his 2007 book God: The Failed Hypothesis, in which he states: "Some evolutionists have tried to counter the Paley claim with what might be called the argument from bad design, pointing out all the ways that a competent engineer could improve upon what nature has given us." (Stenger 2007, 68-9) According to Stenger using new information from biophysics it is possible to show how humans can be improved with the elongation of certain bones and muscles as well as encephalopodic eyes that eliminate blind spots. It goes to show that Hume's original claim that the universe is evidence of a bad designer as well as a good designer has been shown true through the work of science hundreds of years later. The heart of the newest attacks on the teleological argument is an assumption that progress in the sciences has given modern humans a privileged position from which to make claims about the divine. Another atheist famous for using advances in science, specifically biology, against the teleological argument is Oxford professor Richard Dawkins. Dawkins is one of the most famous, or, depending on your own world view, infamous atheists of the 20th century. He has written many books defending the mechanisms of evolution as the cause of the apparent design we see in organisms today. His latest book, The Greatest Show on Earth, is just one more book in a long series that attempts to show that reason and scientific inquiry are superior to faith and religious ideologies. Dawkins uses evidence from evolutionary biology to close the holes that the proponents of intelligent design attempt to poke in the theory of evolution, he writes:
5 Neo-Darwinian Teleological Redundancy 21 "Eyes and nerves, sperm tubes, sinuses and backs are poorly designed from the point of view of individual welfare, but the imperfections make perfect sense in the light of evolution. The same applies to the larger economy of nature. An intelligent creator might be expected to have designed not just the bodies of individual animals and plants but also whole species, entire ecosystems." (Dawkins 2009, 375) Dawkins uses data from various advances in biology in his expansive book to show that the 'bad design' that Hume and others have spent time elaborating upon casts doubt upon a perfect creator God but makes sense within the context of evolution as the propulsive method by which life has sprung into existence. He also sheds light upon the existence of natural evil in the world when he states: "Parasites probably cause even more suffering than predators, and understanding their evolutionary rationale adds to, rather than mitigates, the sense of futility we experience when we contemplate it." (Dawkins 2009, 391) Certainly parasites cause much suffering in the world for humans and other animals. While this concept is not fully developed by Dawkins, it goes to show that the evils of the world that Hume talked about as a theist are still problematic for secular thinkers as well. But what accounting does Dawkins provide for our moral squeamishness when confronted with the suffering of other human beings? He provides an explanation in his other recent book, The God Delusion, and I quote: "Natural selection, in ancestral times when we lived in small and stable bands like baboons, programmed into our brains altruistic urges, alongside sexual urges, hunger urges, xenophobic urges and so on." (Dawkins 2008, 253) Evolutionary theory is very powerful in that it provides explanations not just for the development of complex organisms from simple ones but for the development of complex ideas and institutions such as ethics. The proponents of the new atheism are excited by these developments and wish to take the tenets of evolution and apply them to various fields such as ethics and consciousness. Critics have suggested that the theory has been applied too broadly, and to perhaps exercise restraint by avoiding using evolutionary theory to pick the best strawberry jam or predict whether it will rain. Hume's skepticism serves us as we venture further into the twenty-first century. While it seems by its very inductive nature to be the ideal philosophical stance for post-enlightenment rational thinkers, the teleological argument fails to provide a cogent argument for either the theistic or the atheistic conclusion. While theists try to argue that the nature of living things is evidence for supernatural design their reasoning is just as specious as those atheist thinkers who claim that the nature of living things is evidence for the non-existence of God. The burden of proof most definitely falls upon the theist who uses the argument to make a positive claim. This releases the neo-darwinian atheists from any true irrational culpability. However, time spent and pages spent on nothing more than refuting the teleological arguments are a waste. Victor Stenger is the most guilty, as he has made the strongest claim of all- that science can prove the non-existence of God, that God as a hypothesis for explaining the existence and properties of the world is irredeemably flawed. Darwin's theory of evolution has fundamentally changed the biological sciences, as well as sociology, cognition, and other academic fields. This being said, making Darwin the central figure of an atheist movement smacks of the cultish thinking that atheists should wish to escape from. Charismatic figures such as Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dennett seem to be inadvertently paving the way for a quasi-religion centered around Darwin and science.
6 22 As far as science takes us, we must remember that although science has proven to be the best tool that humanity has to study the nature of the world which surrounds us, the implications of the various facts and theories mined from data must still come under the scrutiny of rational enquiry and skepticism. Only through this enlightenment practice can we keep the darker parts of our own nature at bay and advance as a community and a species. REFERENCES Dawkins, R. The God Delusion. New York: Mariner Books, Dawkins, R. The Greatest Show on Earth. New York: Free Press, Dennett, D.C. Darwin's Dangerous Idea Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon & Schuster, Hume, D. Dialogues and Natural History of Religion. Oxford World's Classics. New York: Oxford UP, Hume, D. "The Natural History of Religion" James Fieser, (accessed 22 Sept ) Stenger, V.J. God: The Failed Hypothesis. New York: Prometheus Books, Stenger, V.J. The New Atheism. New York: Prometheus Books, 2009.
In today s workshop. We will I. Science vs. Religion: Where did Life on earth come from?
Since humans began studying the world around them, they have wondered how the biodiversity we see around us came to be. There have been many ideas posed throughout history, but not enough observable facts
More informationGround Work 01 part one God His Existence Genesis 1:1/Psalm 19:1-4
Ground Work 01 part one God His Existence Genesis 1:1/Psalm 19:1-4 Introduction Tonight we begin a brand new series I have entitled ground work laying a foundation for faith o It is so important that everyone
More information12/8/2013 The Origin of Life 1
"The Origin of Life" Dr. Jeff Miller s new book, Science Vs. Evolution, explores how science falls far short of being able to explain the origin of life. Hello, I m Phil Sanders. This is a Bible study,
More informationThe Debate Between Evolution and Intelligent Design Rick Garlikov
The Debate Between Evolution and Intelligent Design Rick Garlikov Handled intelligently and reasonably, the debate between evolution (the theory that life evolved by random mutation and natural selection)
More informationHas not Science Debunked Biblical Christianity?
Has not Science Debunked Biblical Christianity? Martin Ester March 1, 2012 Christianity 101 @ SFU The Challenge of Atheist Scientists Science is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge
More informationChapter 2--How Do I Know Whether God Exists?
Chapter 2--How Do I Know Whether God Exists? 1. Augustine was born in A. India B. England C. North Africa D. Italy 2. Augustine was born in A. 1 st century AD B. 4 th century AD C. 7 th century AD D. 10
More informationScientific Dimensions of the Debate. 1. Natural and Artificial Selection: the Analogy (17-20)
I. Johnson s Darwin on Trial A. The Legal Setting (Ch. 1) Scientific Dimensions of the Debate This is mainly an introduction to the work as a whole. Note, in particular, Johnson s claim that a fact of
More informationThe New Atheism. Part 1 of 2: Engaging the New Atheism
Part 1 of 2: Engaging the New Atheism with,, Release Date: December 2013 Welcome to The Table, where we discuss issues of God and Culture and today, our topic is the new Atheism, and I m Darrel Bock, Executive
More informationGod After Darwin. 3. Evolution and The Great Hierarchy of Being. August 6, to 9:50 am in the Parlor All are welcome!
God After Darwin 3. Evolution and The Great Hierarchy of Being August 6, 2006 9 to 9:50 am in the Parlor All are welcome! God Our Father, open our eyes to see your hand at work in the splendor of creation,
More informationPhilosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Science Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationGod After Darwin. 1. Evolution s s Challenge to Faith. July 23, to 9:50 am in the Parlor All are welcome!
God After Darwin 1. Evolution s s Challenge to Faith July 23, 2006 9 to 9:50 am in the Parlor All are welcome! Almighty and everlasting God, you made the universe with all its marvelous order, its atoms,
More informationA Fine Tuned Universe The Improbability That God is Improbable
A Fine Tuned Universe The Improbability That God is Improbable The debate over creation in biology has increasingly led scientist to become more open to physics and the Christian belief in a creator. It
More informationAtheism. Challenging religious faith. Does not endorse any ethical or political system or values; individual members may.
The UK s first and only distinctively atheist organization. Democratically constituted, not-for-profit company. Sole object: the advancement of atheism. Implies: the active challenge of religious faith.
More informationCHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND
CHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND I. Five Alleged Problems with Theology and Science A. Allegedly, science shows there is no need to postulate a god. 1. Ancients used to think that you
More informationReligion and Science: The Emerging Relationship Part II
Religion and Science: The Emerging Relationship Part II The first article in this series introduced four basic models through which people understand the relationship between religion and science--exploring
More informationDiscussion Questions Confident Faith, Mark Mittelberg. Chapter 9 Assessing the Six Faith Paths
Chapter 9 Assessing the Six Faith Paths 113. Extra credit: What are the six faith paths (from memory)? Describe each very briefly in your own words. a. b. c. d. e. f. Page 1 114. Mittelberg argues persuasively
More informationInformation and the Origin of Life
Information and the Origin of Life Walter L. Bradley, Ph.D., Materials Science Emeritus Professor of Mechanical Engineering Texas A&M University and Baylor University Information and Origin of Life Information,
More informationDarwin s Theologically Unsettling Ideas. John F. Haught Georgetown University
Darwin s Theologically Unsettling Ideas John F. Haught Georgetown University Everything in the life-world looks different after Darwin. Descent, diversity, design, death, suffering, sex, intelligence,
More informationTHE GOD OF QUARKS & CROSS. bridging the cultural divide between people of faith and people of science
THE GOD OF QUARKS & CROSS bridging the cultural divide between people of faith and people of science WHY A WORKSHOP ON FAITH AND SCIENCE? The cultural divide between people of faith and people of science*
More informationImpact Hour. January 10, 2016
Impact Hour January 10, 2016 Why People Don t Believe: 1. The Power of Religion 2. Reason To Fear 3. Religion and Violence: A Closer Look 4. Is Christianity Irrational and Devoid of Evidence? 5. Is Christianity
More informationHuman Nature & Human Diversity: Sex, Love & Parenting; Morality, Religion & Race. Course Description
Human Nature & Human Diversity: Sex, Love & Parenting; Morality, Religion & Race Course Description Human Nature & Human Diversity is listed as both a Philosophy course (PHIL 253) and a Cognitive Science
More informationWritten by Rupert Sheldrake, Ph.D. Sunday, 01 September :00 - Last Updated Wednesday, 18 March :31
The scientific worldview is supremely influential because science has been so successful. It touches all our lives through technology and through modern medicine. Our intellectual world has been transformed
More informationScience and religion: Is it either/or or both/and? Dr. Neil Shenvi Morganton, NC March 4, 2017
Science and religion: Is it either/or or both/and? Dr. Neil Shenvi Morganton, NC March 4, 2017 What people think of When you say you believe in God Science and religion: is it either/or or both/and? Science
More informationReligious and Scientific Affliations
Religious and Scientific Affliations As found on the IDEA Center website at http://www.ideacenter.org Introduction When discussing the subject of "origins" (i.e. the question "How did we get here?", people
More informationA Response to Richard Dawkins The God Delusion
A Response to Richard Dawkins The God Delusion In the past few years, there have been several extremely popular books criticizing religious faith and the possibility of the existence of God. Possibly the
More informationThe Role of Science in God s world
The Role of Science in God s world A/Prof. Frank Stootman f.stootman@uws.edu.au www.labri.org A Remarkable Universe By any measure we live in a remarkable universe We can talk of the existence of material
More informationThe Answer from Science
Similarities among Diverse Forms Diversity among Similar Forms Biology s Greatest Puzzle: The Paradox and Diversity and Similarity Why is life on Earth so incredibly diverse yet so strangely similar? The
More informationA Biblical Perspective on the Philosophy of Science
A Biblical Perspective on the Philosophy of Science Leonard R. Brand, Loma Linda University I. Christianity and the Nature of Science There is reason to believe that Christianity provided the ideal culture
More informationWhy is life on Earth so incredibly diverse yet so strangely similar? Similarities among Diverse Forms. Diversity among Similar Forms
Similarities among Diverse Forms Diversity among Similar Forms Biology s Greatest Puzzle: The Paradox and Diversity and Similarity Why is life on Earth so incredibly diverse yet so strangely similar? 1
More informationReligious Studies. Name: Institution: Course: Date:
Running head: RELIGIOUS STUDIES Religious Studies Name: Institution: Course: Date: RELIGIOUS STUDIES 2 Abstract In this brief essay paper, we aim to critically analyze the question: Given that there are
More informationThe Clock without a Maker
The Clock without a Maker There are a many great questions in life in which people have asked themselves. Who are we? What is the meaning of life? Where do come from? This paper will be undertaking the
More informationDarwin s Tree of Life. In the first edition of his book On the Origin of Species, Charles Darwin included one,
Nada Amin 21L.448 Essay 3 Page 1 of 10 Darwin s Tree of Life In the first edition of his book On the Origin of Species, Charles Darwin included one, and only one, illustration: a taxa chart, which helps
More informationEvolution and the Mind of God
Evolution and the Mind of God Robert T. Longo rtlongo370@gmail.com September 3, 2017 Abstract This essay asks the question who, or what, is God. This is not new. Philosophers and religions have made many
More informationDid God Use Evolution? Observations From A Scientist Of Faith By Dr. Werner Gitt
Did God Use Evolution? Observations From A Scientist Of Faith By Dr. Werner Gitt If you are searched for the book Did God Use Evolution? Observations from a Scientist of Faith by Dr. Werner Gitt in pdf
More informationtime but can hardly be said to explain them. [par. 323]
Review of "Who Made God: Searching for a theory of everything" By Edgar Andrews (Darlington, England: EP Books, 2009), kindle edition Andrews has produced a book which deserves a wide readership especially
More informationChristianity and Science. Understanding the conflict (WAR)? Must we choose? A Slick New Packaging of Creationism
and Science Understanding the conflict (WAR)? Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, is a documentary which looks at how scientists who have discussed or written about Intelligent Design (and along the way
More informationLesson 2 The Existence of God Cause & Effect Apologetics Press Introductory Christian Evidences Correspondence Course
Lesson 2 The Existence of God Cause & Effect Apologetics Press Introductory Christian Evidences Correspondence Course THE EXISTENCE OF GOD CAUSE & EFFECT One of the most basic issues that the human mind
More informationSESSION 1. Science and God
SESSION 1 Science and God I was convinced that science and faith were at odds and that science definitely had the edge in the credibility department... And rather than facing an unyielding despair that
More informationTime is limited. Define your terms. Give short and conventional definitions. Use reputable sources.
FIVE MINUTES WITH A DARWINIST: EXPOSING THE FLUFF IN EVOLUTION Approaching the Evolutionist Without religious books Without revelation Without faith F.L.U.F.F. Evolution is more air than substance. Focus
More informationOutline Lesson 5 -Science: What is True? A. Psalm 19:1-4- "The heavens declare the Glory of God" -General Revelation
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY'S t elpyoect Th~ Outline Lesson 5 -Science: What is True? I. Introduction A. Psalm 19:1-4- "The heavens declare the Glory of God" -General Revelation B. Romans 1:18-20 - "God has made
More informationArgument from Design. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. David Hume
Argument from Design Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion David Hume Dialogues published posthumously and anonymously (1779) Three Characters Demea: theism, dogmatism, some philosophical arguments for
More informationA level Religious Studies at Titus Salt
Component 2 Philosophy of Religion Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive This theme considers how the philosophy of religion has, over time, influenced and been influenced by developments
More information1. Atheism We begin our study with a look at atheism. Atheism is not itself a religion.
1 1. Atheism We begin our study with a look at atheism. Atheism is not itself a religion. What is atheism Atheism is the view that God does not exist. The word comes from the Greek atheos which when we
More informationJASMIN HASSEL University of Münster
215 JASMIN HASSEL University of Münster Christian Kummer. Der Fall Darwin. Evolutionstheorie contra Schöpfungsglaube. Pattloch: München, 2009. [Christian Kummer. The Case of Darwin. Theory of Evolution
More informationLook at this famous painting what s missing? What could YOU deduce about human nature from this picture? Write your thoughts on this sheet!
* Look at this famous painting what s missing? What could YOU deduce about human nature from this picture? Write your thoughts on this sheet! If there is NO GOD then. What is our origin? What is our purpose?
More informationIntelligent Design. What Is It Really All About? and Why Should You Care? The theological nature of Intelligent Design
Intelligent Design What Is It Really All About? and Why Should You Care? The theological nature of Intelligent Design Jack Krebs May 4, 2005 Outline 1. Introduction and summary of the current situation
More informationThe Advancement: A Book Review
From the SelectedWorks of Gary E. Silvers Ph.D. 2014 The Advancement: A Book Review Gary E. Silvers, Ph.D. Available at: https://works.bepress.com/dr_gary_silvers/2/ The Advancement: Keeping the Faith
More informationIntelligent Design. Kevin delaplante Dept. of Philosophy & Religious Studies
Intelligent Design Kevin delaplante Dept. of Philosophy & Religious Studies kdelapla@iastate.edu Some Questions to Ponder... 1. In evolutionary theory, what is the Hypothesis of Common Ancestry? How does
More informationThe Qualiafications (or Lack Thereof) of Epiphenomenal Qualia
Francesca Hovagimian Philosophy of Psychology Professor Dinishak 5 March 2016 The Qualiafications (or Lack Thereof) of Epiphenomenal Qualia In his essay Epiphenomenal Qualia, Frank Jackson makes the case
More informationFeb 3 rd. The Truth Project
February 3, 2013 January Jan 6 th The Truth Project Who is God? Part 1 Jan 13 th The Truth Project Who is God? Part 2 Jan 20 th The Truth Project What is True? Part 1 Jan 27 th The Truth Project What is
More informationFALSE DICHOTOMY FAITH VS. SCIENCE TRUTH
1 E V I D E N C E F G O D O R 2 A S K E P T I C S L O O K A T SCIENCE We have names for people who have many beliefs for which there is no ra5onal jus5fica5on. When their beliefs are extremely common we
More informationDARWIN and EVOLUTION
Rev Bob Klein First UU Church Stockton February 15, 2015 DARWIN and EVOLUTION Charles Darwin has long been one of my heroes. Others were working on what came to be called evolution, but he had the courage
More informationWelcome back to week 2 of this edition of 5pm Church Together.
Welcome back to week 2 of this edition of 5pm Church Together. Last week we started considering some rational theistic proofs for the existence of God with particular reference to those intellectual barriers
More informationDARWIN and EVOLUTION
Rev Bob Klein First UU Church Stockton February 11, 2018 DARWIN and EVOLUTION The Theory of Evolution has been under siege from Fundamentalist Christians almost from the moment it was first described early
More informationAre There Philosophical Conflicts Between Science & Religion? (Participant's Guide)
Digital Collections @ Dordt Study Guides for Faith & Science Integration Summer 2017 Are There Philosophical Conflicts Between Science & Religion? (Participant's Guide) Lydia Marcus Dordt College Follow
More informationHow To Be An Intellectually Fulfilled Atheist (Or Not) By William A. Dembski, Jonathan Wells
How To Be An Intellectually Fulfilled Atheist (Or Not) By William A. Dembski, Jonathan Wells How to Be an Intellectually Fulfilled Atheist (or Not) by William A Dembski, Jonathan Wells, Ph.D. starting
More informationUNIT 3 - PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION Does Reason Support Or Challenge Belief In God?
KCHU 228 Intro to Philosophy Unit 3 Study Guide - Part 2 UNIT 3 - PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION Does Reason Support Or Challenge Belief In God? IV. INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS FOR & AGAINST THEISM A. ARGUMENTS FROM BIOLOGICAL
More informationTHE GENESIS CLASS ORIGINS: WHY ARE THESE ISSUES SO IMPORTANT? Review from Last Week. Why are Origins so Important? Ideas Have Consequences
ORIGINS: WHY ARE THESE ISSUES SO IMPORTANT? Review from Last Week Three core issues in the debate. o The character of God o The source of authority o The hermeneutic used There are three basic ways to
More informationCoptic Orthodox Diocese of the Southern United States Evangelism & Apologetics Conference. Copyright by George Bassilios, 2014
Coptic Orthodox Diocese of the Southern United States Evangelism & Apologetics Conference Copyright by George Bassilios, 2014 PROPONENTS OF DARWINIAN EVOLUTION IMPACT ON IDEOLOGY Evolution is at the foundation
More informationLonergan on General Transcendent Knowledge. In General Transcendent Knowledge, Chapter 19 of Insight, Lonergan does several things:
Lonergan on General Transcendent Knowledge In General Transcendent Knowledge, Chapter 19 of Insight, Lonergan does several things: 1-3--He provides a radical reinterpretation of the meaning of transcendence
More informationScience, Evolution, and Intelligent Design
Science, Evolution, and Intelligent Design Part III: Intelligent Design and Public Education Précis Presented to The Roundtable in Ideology Trinity Baptist Church Norman, OK Richard Carpenter November
More informationDarwinist Arguments Against Intelligent Design Illogical and Misleading
Darwinist Arguments Against Intelligent Design Illogical and Misleading I recently attended a debate on Intelligent Design (ID) and the Existence of God. One of the four debaters was Dr. Lawrence Krauss{1}
More informationOf Mice and Men, Kangaroos and Chimps
! Of#Mice#and#Men,#Kangaroos#and#Chimps! 1! Of Mice and Men, Kangaroos and Chimps By Mark McGee Atheists are always asking me for evidence that proves God exists. They usually bring up evolution as proof
More informationAtheism: A Christian Response
Atheism: A Christian Response What do atheists believe about belief? Atheists Moral Objections An atheist is someone who believes there is no God. There are at least five million atheists in the United
More informationThe Odd Couple. Why Science and Religion Shouldn t Cohabit. Jerry A. Coyne 2012 Bale Boone Symposium The University of Kentucky
The Odd Couple Why Science and Religion Shouldn t Cohabit Jerry A. Coyne 2012 Bale Boone Symposium The University of Kentucky The problem Accomodationism: The widespread view that science and faith are
More informationThere is a God. A Much-Maligned Convert
There is a God Note: Antony Flew died in April 2010, approximately two years after this article was written. To our knowledge, he never entered into a saving faith in Jesus Christ. That is a point of great
More informationPhilosophy 281: Spring 2011 Monday, Wednesday, Friday, am, Room W/1/62
* U N I V E R S I T Y * O F * M A S S A C H U S E T T S * B O S T O N * DARWIN & THE PROBLEMS OF PHILOSOPHY Philosophy 281: Spring 2011 Monday, Wednesday, Friday, 10-10.50am, Room W/1/62 Prof. Adam Beresford
More informationTHE INESCAPABILITY OF GOD
CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE PO Box 8500, Charlotte, NC 28271 Feature Article: JAF2405 THE INESCAPABILITY OF GOD by James N. Anderson This article first appeared in the CHRISTIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL, volume
More informationPostmodernism. Issue Christianity Post-Modernism. Theology Trinitarian Atheism. Philosophy Supernaturalism Anti-Realism
Postmodernism Issue Christianity Post-Modernism Theology Trinitarian Atheism Philosophy Supernaturalism Anti-Realism (Faith and Reason) Ethics Moral Absolutes Cultural Relativism Biology Creationism Punctuated
More informationIn Search of the Ontological Argument. Richard Oxenberg
1 In Search of the Ontological Argument Richard Oxenberg Abstract We can attend to the logic of Anselm's ontological argument, and amuse ourselves for a few hours unraveling its convoluted word-play, or
More informationChapter Summaries: Introduction to Christian Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1
Chapter Summaries: Introduction to Christian Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1 In chapter 1, Clark reviews the purpose of Christian apologetics, and then proceeds to briefly review the failures of secular
More informationA History of Western Thought Why We Think the Way We Do. Summer 2016 Ross Arnold
A History of Western Thought Why We Think the Way We Do Summer 2016 Ross Arnold A History of Western Thought Why We Think the Way We Do Videos of lectures available at: www.litchapala.org under 8-Week
More informationNON-RELIGIOUS PHILOSOPHIES OF LIFE AND THE WORLD Support Materials - GMGY
People express non-religious philosophies of life and the world in different ways. For children in your class who express who express a non-religious worldview or belief, it is important that the child
More informationWhose God? What Science?: Reply to Michael Behe
Whose God? What Science?: Reply to Michael Behe Robert T. Pennock Vol. 21, No 3-4, May-Aug 2001, pp. 16-19 In his review of my book Tower of Babel: The Evidence against the New Creationism that he recently
More informationImpact Hour. May 15, 2016
Impact Hour May 15, 2016 Why People Don t Believe: 1. The Power of Religion 2. Reason To Fear 3. Religion and Violence: A Closer Look 4. Is Christianity Irrational and Devoid of Evidence? 5. Is Christianity
More informationModule 1-4: Spirituality and Rationality
Module M3: Can rational men and women be spiritual? Module 1-4: Spirituality and Rationality The New Atheists win again? Atheists like Richard Dawkins, along with other new atheists, have achieved high
More informationEvolution? What Should We Teach Our Children in Our Schools?
EvolBriefE5x1 A Theological Brief Evolution? What Should We Teach Our Children in Our Schools? By Martinez Hewlett & Ted Peters In this Theological Brief we take the position that a religious commitment
More informationUnless otherwise noted, Scripture quotations are from the New King James Version of the Bible.
First printing: October 2011 Copyright 2011 by Answers in Genesis USA. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission of the publisher,
More informationWhence Evil? M. Andorf. Presented to the Fermi Society of Philosophy. December
Whence Evil? M. Andorf Presented to the Fermi Society of Philosophy. December 8 2017. Motivation In our meetings we frequently bring up the idea of beauty. As physicists we delight in the elegance of the
More informationWe [now turn to the question] of the existence of God. By God I shall understand a
Sophia Project Philosophy Archives Arguments for the Existence of God A. C. Ewing We [now turn to the question] of the existence of God. By God I shall understand a supreme mind regarded as either omnipotent
More informationToday s Lecture. Preliminary comments on the Problem of Evil J.L Mackie
Today s Lecture Preliminary comments on the Problem of Evil J.L Mackie Preliminary comments: A problem with evil The Problem of Evil traditionally understood must presume some or all of the following:
More informationTheme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS
A. Inductive arguments cosmological Inductive proofs Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS the concept of a posteriori. Cosmological argument: St Thomas Aquinas first Three Ways 1.
More informationCharles Robert Darwin ( ) Born in Shrewsbury, England. His mother died when he was eight, a
What Darwin Said Charles Robert Darwin Charles Robert Darwin (1809-1882) Born in Shrewsbury, England. His mother died when he was eight, a traumatic event in his life. Went to Cambridge (1828-1831) with
More informationGetting To God. The Basic Evidence For The Truth of Christian Theism. truehorizon.org
Getting To God The Basic Evidence For The Truth of Christian Theism truehorizon.org A True Worldview A worldview is like a set of glasses through which you see everything in life. It is the lens that brings
More informationChurch of God Big Sandy, TX Teen Bible Study. The Triumph of Design & the Demise of Darwin Video
Church of God Big Sandy, TX Teen Bible Study The Triumph of Design & the Demise of Darwin Video Information compiled from video by Jonathan Stahl Saturday, September 23, 2000 Contents Triumph of Design
More informationHAS SCIENCE BURIED GOD? STUDY GUIDE
HAS SCIENCE BURIED GOD? STUDY GUIDE THE PARTICIPANTS RICHARD DAWKINS, FRS at the time of this debate held the position of Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at the University
More informationThe Science of Creation and the Flood. Introduction to Lesson 7
The Science of Creation and the Flood Introduction to Lesson 7 Biological implications of various worldviews are discussed together with their impact on science. UNLOCKING THE MYSTERY OF LIFE presents
More informationReview Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion)
Review Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion) Arguably, the main task of philosophy is to seek the truth. We seek genuine knowledge. This is why epistemology
More informationThe Design Argument A Perry
The Design Argument A Perry Introduction There has been an explosion of Bible-science literature in the last twenty years. This has been partly driven by the revolution in molecular biology, which has
More informationMorality, Suffering and Violence. Ross Arnold, Fall 2015 Lakeside institute of Theology
Morality, Suffering and Violence Ross Arnold, Fall 2015 Lakeside institute of Theology Apologetics 2 (CM5) Oct. 2 Introduction Oct. 9 Faith and Reason Oct. 16 Mid-Term Break Oct. 23 Science and Origins
More informationINTELLIGENT DESIGN & NATURAL REVELATION S2
Design Episode 90 INTELLIGENT DESIGN & NATURAL REVELATION S2 I. KEY THOUGHTS 1. Definition of Intelligent Design S4 DEF: BELIEF that the beauty, complexity, and functionality in nature reflect rationality
More informationScience and Religion: Exploring the Spectrum
Science and Religion: Exploring the Spectrum Summary report of preliminary findings for a survey of public perspectives on Evolution and the relationship between Evolutionary Science and Religion Professor
More informationRoots of Dialectical Materialism*
Roots of Dialectical Materialism* Ernst Mayr In the 1960s the American historian of biology Mark Adams came to St. Petersburg in order to interview К. М. Zavadsky. In the course of their discussion Zavadsky
More informationPost-Modernism and Science: Challenges to 21 st Century Christian Witness
Post-Modernism and Science: Challenges to 21 st Century Christian Witness This article 1 will explore the interconnections between post-modernism, science and Christian witness in order to point towards
More informationRezensionen / Book reviews
Research on Steiner Education Volume 4 Number 2 pp. 146-150 December 2013 Hosted at www.rosejourn.com Rezensionen / Book reviews Bo Dahlin Thomas Nagel (2012). Mind and cosmos. Why the materialist Neo-Darwinian
More informationINTELLIGENT DESIGN: FRIEND OR FOE FOR ADVENTISTS?
The Foundation for Adventist Education Institute for Christian Teaching Education Department General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists INTELLIGENT DESIGN: FRIEND OR FOE FOR ADVENTISTS? Leonard Brand,
More informationPresuppositional Apologetics
by John M. Frame [, for IVP Dictionary of Apologetics.] 1. Presupposing God in Apologetic Argument Presuppositional apologetics may be understood in the light of a distinction common in epistemology, or
More informationTHE IMPACT OF DARWIN S THEORIES. Darwin s Theories and Human Nature
Darwin s Theories and Human Nature I. Preliminary Questions: 1. Is science a better methodology to discover truth about human nature? 2. Should secular, scientific, claims to a prescription of what is
More informationCreation and Evolution: What Should We Teach? Author: Eugenie C. Scott, Director Affiliation: National Center for Science Education
Creation and Evolution: What Should We Teach? Author: Eugenie C. Scott, Director Affiliation: National Center for Science Education Bio: Dr. Eugenie C. Scott is Executive Director of the National Center
More informationEvidence and Transcendence
Evidence and Transcendence Religious Epistemology and the God-World Relationship Anne E. Inman University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana Copyright 2008 by University of Notre Dame Notre Dame,
More information