Atheism. Challenging religious faith. Does not endorse any ethical or political system or values; individual members may.
|
|
- Carmella Jefferson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The UK s first and only distinctively atheist organization. Democratically constituted, not-for-profit company. Sole object: the advancement of atheism. Implies: the active challenge of religious faith. Religious faith is a bad thing per se. Does not endorse any ethical or political system or values; individual members may. First and only UK affiliate to Atheist Alliance International. Appeals to atheists who are not humanists and humanists who regard atheism as important in its own right.
2 Arrangement of discussion:- The meaning and philosophical basis of atheism. The evolutionary origin of faith and religion. The evolutionary origin of morality. The relationship between atheism and morality. The distinction between atheism and humanism.
3 Definition of atheism Oxford English Dictionary: disbelief in the existence of God or gods. Disbelief: inability or refusal to accept that something is true or real. Etymology: late 16th century, from French athéisme, from Greek ἄθεος, a- without + theos god, or not God. At least the word approximately captures the intended sense. But any definition begs the question:- What is or are the God or gods in the existence of which atheism is the disbelief? We cannot decide whether or not something exists without knowing the nature of the entity in question.
4 Theological Non-cognitivism The most fundamental and powerful atheological argument. The word God does not symbolize anything intelligible. God-talk is nonsense. Depends what theists mean by God. A transcendent object. Transcendent : apart from and not subject to the limitations of the material universe.
5 What then, brethren, shall we say of God? For if you have been able to understand what you would say, it is not God. If you have been able to comprehend it, you have comprehended something else instead of God. If you have been able to comprehend him as you think, by so thinking you have deceived yourself. Augustine of Hippo This then is not God, if you have comprehended it; but if this is God, you have not comprehended it.
6 Theological Non-cognitivism The most fundamental and powerful atheological argument. The word God does not symbolize anything intelligible. God-talk is nonsense. Depends what we mean by God. A transcendent object. Transcendent : apart from and not subject to the limitations of the material universe. Evidence is not an issue. Not necessarily anthropomorphic, or even animate. Transcendent object usually endowed with human attributes, including mind.
7 Our minds are our brains, and hence are ultimately just stupendously complex machines ; the difference between us and other animals is one of huge degree, not metaphysical kind. Daniel Dennett Professor of Philosophy Tufts University
8 There is nothing special about the substances from which living things are made. Living things are collections of molecules, like everything else. What is special is that these molecules are put together in much more complicated patterns than the molecules of nonliving things, and this putting together is done by following programs, sets of instructions for how to develop, which the organisms carry around inside themselves. Richard Dawkins First Professor for the Public Understanding of Science University of Oxford
9 The Nature of God As with humans, so with God. Under theological non-cognitivism, God is any transcendent object. Not necessarily either an anthropomorphic or an animate object. Can be any transcendent object or process. Can be natural law. This catches Buddhism and other allegedly non-theistic philosophies. It also catches quasi-religions such as spiritualism, astrology, alternative therapies etc.
10 The Nature of Belief The word God does not symbolize anything intelligible. God-talk is nonsense. God-talk is the profession of belief. Belief: the expression of emotion or feeling. Blind evolutionary instinct. Not rational choice. The biological cause of that instinct.
11 The God Delusion, A biological explanation for religion. Darwinian explanation. Richard Dawkins First Professor for the Public Understanding of Science University of Oxford
12 Breaking the Spell, A biological explanation for religion. A memetic explanation. The only way of reconciling the ant colony and corporation models of religion. Daniel Dennett Professor of Philosophy Tufts University
13 The Selfish Gene, Coined the term meme. Replicator of cultural evolution, analogous to gene in biological evolution. Not to propose a new theory or found a new science. Merely to make the point of universal Darwinism evolution is a universal algorithm. Richard Dawkins First Professor for the Public Understanding of Science University of Oxford
14 Viruses of the Mind, Characterized religious faith as mind virus. Faith : some deep, inner conviction that something is true, or right, or virtuous: a conviction that doesn t seem to owe anything to evidence or reason, but which, nevertheless, feels totally compelling and convincing. Richard Dawkins First Professor for the Public Understanding of Science University of Oxford
15 The Meme Machine, 1999 Developed science of Memetics further than anyone. Religions are particularly tenacious memes. Recently lost the plot? Susan Blackmore Visiting Professor of Psychology University of Plymouth
16 Meme Is it a valid concept? Not yet certain what memes are.
17 On the Origin of Species, Unaware of genes (Mendel, 1866). Darwin and Mendel both unaware of DNA (Crick and Watson, 1953). Charles Darwin
18 Memes Is it a valid concept? Do they exist at all? Not yet certain what memes are. However, in co-operation theory, game-theoretic strategies and reputation dynamics certainly exist, and are certainly memes. Memes have all the characteristics of living organisms. Memes propagate from mind to mind. They evolve complexity and diversity by a Darwinian process. They have a symbiotic relationship with and have co-evolved with human minds. They always function to maximize their fitness and ensure their own survival. They function to foster the survival and fitness of their hosts, human minds.
19 Mind Viruses Coined by Richard Dawkins in Viruses of the Mind, Developed by Richard Brodie in Virus of the Mind: The New Science of the Meme, All mind viruses are memes. Are all memes mind viruses? Not settled. Analogy, with biological viruses, is not exact. Any meme? Only parasitic memes?
20 The God Virus, Darrel Ray
21 The God Virus, 2009 Builds on Dawkins Viruses of the Mind. Does not attempt to show what the God Virus actually is. Shows that the God Virus paradigm provides an explanation for many religious phenomena. The God Virus always functions to maximize its fitness to ensure its own survival. It functions to foster the fitness and survival of its hosts, human minds. It fosters human group solidarity in circumstances in which host survival (and hence host fitness) most directly depends on hosts joining forces in groups. But
22 The God Virus disables critical thinking skills. It makes people believe things that are demonstrably false or contradictory. It make people believe that their morality, and nobody else s, is commanded by God and, therefore, absolute and intrinsic. It makes people believe that their particular group is chosen by God. That s why religious faith is a bad thing per se. Faith : the God Virus. Religion : a social system, the participants in which exhibit faith.
23 What is the origin of the God Virus? It has evolved from something else. Theism has evolved from moralism. A moral statement, I ought to do X, becomes:- 1. I believe God exists, 2. God commands X. An ought becomes an is. The Ought Virus.
24 The Is-Ought Gap Hume s thesis (1739):- An ought statement cannot be deduced from an is statement. An ought statement can only be deduced from another ought statement. David Hume
25 The Is-Ought Gap People instinctively loath and detest this idea. Most recently and notably, Sam Harris in The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, Sam Harris 1967-
26 The Is-Ought Gap Hume s thesis rigorously proved (with minor modifications) by Gerhard Schurz in The Is-Ought Problem: An Investigation in Philosophical Logic, Gerhard Schurz Professor of Theoretical Philosophy Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf
27 The Is-Ought Gap Moore s Naturalistic Fallacy :- It is a fallacy that ethical conclusions can be drawn from natural facts. George Edward Moore Professor of Mental Philosophy and Logic University of Cambridge
28 President of the British Humanist Association, Father of ethical non-cognitivism. Sentences which simply express moral judgements do not say anything. They are pure expressions of feeling and as such do not come under the category of truth and falsehood. Alfred Jules Ayer Wykeham Professorship in Logic University of Oxford
29 The Is-Ought Gap Fact-value distinction. Descriptive-normative distinction. Qualitatively different. An ought statement is the expression of an emotion or feeling. Not rational choice. Blind evolutionary instinct. The biological cause of that instinct.
30 Co-operation Theory Robert Axelrod: The Evolution of Cooperation, 1984 Robert Axelrod Professor of Political Science and Public Policy University of Michigan
31 Co-operation Theory Shows that, in a population of self-seeking egoists, co-operation can emerge even if there is no central authority to police their actions. The essence of co-operation is altruism. Based on evolutionary game theory. Basic element: game-theoretic strategy. Applied in pair-wise interactions between individual organisms. Group-level features emerge from individual-level actions. Game-theoretic strategies are the product of Darwinian evolution. They are memes or mind viruses.
32 Altruism The essence of co-operation is altruism. An act is altruistic if it confers a benefit to another individual in spite of accruing a cost to the altruist. Examples:- Refraining from killing Refraining from causing pain and suffering Refraining from taking goods Abstaining from having sex Donating goods
33 Kin altruism Explained and successfully modelled by Dawkins selfish gene paradigm. Occurs in many species. Particular striking in the eusocial behaviour of bees, ants, termites, naked mole rats. It is the product of Darwinian evolution at the genetic level.
34 Direct reciprocal altruism Captured in the principle: You scratch my back, and I ll scratch yours. Explained and successfully modelled by evolutionary game theory. Found almost exclusively in primates. Based on Iterated Prisoners Dilemma game. Tit-for-tat emerges as the most successful strategy. It is:- Nice Retaliating Non-envious Forgiving
35 Indirect reciprocal altruism Captured in the principle:- You scratch my back and I ll scratch someone else s. I scratch your back and someone else will scratch mine. Explained and successfully modelled by evolutionary game theory. Exclusive to and a defining attribute of human beings. Constitutes the biological basis of morality.
36 Indirect reciprocal altruism Direct reciprocity is like an economy based on barter. Indirect reciprocity resembles the invention of money as the medium of exchange. The money that feeds the engines of indirect reciprocity is reputation. Reputation assignment rules, or reputation dynamics are moral norms. Moral norms are the product of Darwinian evolution. They are memes or mind viruses.
37 Indirect reciprocal altruism Moral norms are not universal. They are group-specific. The capacity for moral norms is:- a human universal. exclusive to and a defining attribute of human beings.
38 Indirect reciprocal altruism Moral norms are group-specific. Moral norms are shared by all individuals within, and are uniform throughout, a given group. Within a given group, there is a plethora of individual behavioural strategies. Individual behavioural strategies, groups and moral norms co-evolve. Groups, and their attendant moral norms, emerge from individual-level actions.
39 Indirect reciprocal altruism Indirect reciprocity provides the mechanism that distinguishes us humans from all other living species on Earth. The evolution of cooperation by indirect reciprocity leads to reputation building, morality judgement and complex social interactions with ever-increasing cognitive demands. Indirect reciprocity provided the selective challenge driving the cerebral expansion in human evolution. Dennett: the difference between us and other animals is one of huge degree, not metaphysical kind. That degree is in cerebral expansion, language, intelligence and cognitive capacity.
40 Moral Norms Reputation assignment rules or reputation dynamics Example:- Stern-Judging helping a good individual or refusing help to a bad individual leads to a good reputation, whereas refusing help to a good individual or helping a bad one leads to a bad reputation. Help good people and refuse help otherwise, and we shall be nice to you; otherwise, you will be punished. Implacable punishment goes side-by-side with prompt forgiving. In computer simulations, Stern-Judging outstrips all other reputation dynamics. Stern-Judging is found to be ubiquitous in the real world.
41 Moral Norms But:- Just because Stern-Judging is ubiquitous in human affairs, it does not follow that it ought to be adopted. It is an empirical fact, having evolved by a Darwinian process. It is ubiquitous, but not necessarily universal. It represents an approximate and simplified model of reality. It is massively ambiguous, its outcome, in terms of actual actions, depending upon initial and boundary conditions. Even if it were precise, universal and unambiguous, it is what it is; not what it ought to be.
42 The Ought Virus A moral norm is a meme or mind virus which infects the minds of individuals. I call it the Ought Virus. The Ought Virus engenders a moral emotion or feeling which is expressed as an ought statement. It always functions to maximize its fitness to ensure its own survival. It functions to foster the fitness and survival of its hosts, human minds. It fosters human group solidarity in circumstances in which host survival (and hence host fitness) most directly depends on hosts joining forces in groups. It does this by definition, since a group is a network of individuals, each in pairwise co-operation with the next, which emerges from individual-level interactions. But.
43 The Ought Virus The Ought Virus creates the illusion, in the minds it infects, that the moral emotions or feelings it engenders are absolute and intrinsic. In truth, they are an empirical fact, the product of Darwinian evolution. But the illusion of God, as commander of moral norms, fosters the illusion that they are absolute and intrinsic. So evolved the God Virus, a close relative of the Ought Virus.
44 Groups A moral norm corresponds to a group. Empirical fact and theoretical necessity. A group is a network of individuals, each in pair-wise co-operation with the next. Groups evolve by a Darwinian process, and co-evolve with moral norms. Group-level structure emerges from individual-level interactions. But the illusion of God, as commander of moral norms, fosters the illusion that a group is chosen by God.
45 Atheism and Humanism Is humanism the same thing as atheism? If it is, why call it humanism? Why not call it atheism? Atheism is an essential component of humanism. It does not follow that atheism is a subset of humanism. Is humanism a corollary of atheism? Nothing can be derived from atheism alone. Additional suppositions are required. If those suppositions include the existence of universal human values, did those values exist before the evolution of human beings?
46 Human Values There are no universal human values. If they were, there would have to be some form of God to command them. God: any transcendent object, not necessarily anthropomorphic or even animate. Human values are the product of Darwinian evolution. Human values always contain an element of blind evolutionary instinct. Not exclusively rational choice.
47 Human Values Human values are group-specific. The capacity for human values is a human universal. Human values are what they are, not what they ought to be. No one set of human values is:- absolute and intrinsic superior to any other. The set values we hold has evolved to make us believe that it is. But
48 Intra-group conflict Human values are group-specific. Within a given group, values are all the same. Therefore, any conflict is about facts, not values, and can be resolved by a process of rational choice.
49 Inter-group conflict Between groups, if they come into contact, values are different and conflict is irreconcilable. The God Virus makes people believe things that are demonstrably false or contradictory. Therefore, conflicts of value appear to be conflicts of fact. The God Virus operates as a barrier to entry for values from one group to another. Without the God Virus, different values can compete with each other across group boundaries. Values and groups are not static but are continually co-evolving. The God Virus is religious faith. Religious faith inhibits the co-evolution of values and groups. is the solution to inter-group conflict.
50
Hume's Is/Ought Problem. Ruse and Wilson. Moral Philosophy as Applied Science. Naturalistic Fallacy
Ruse and Wilson Hume's Is/Ought Problem Is ethics independent of humans or has human evolution shaped human behavior and beliefs about right and wrong? "In every system of morality, which I have hitherto
More informationHume s Is/Ought Problem. Ruse and Wilson. Moral Philosophy as Applied Science. Naturalistic Fallacy
Ruse and Wilson Hume s Is/Ought Problem Is ethics independent of humans or has human evolution shaped human behavior and beliefs about right and wrong? In every system of morality, which I have hitherto
More informationDarwinian Morality. Why aren t t all the atheists raping and pillaging? Ron Garret (Erann( Gat) September 2004
Darwinian Morality Why aren t t all the atheists raping and pillaging? Ron Garret (Erann( Gat) September 2004 Morality without God? If there is no God, there are no rights and wrongs that transcend personal
More informationMorality, Suffering and Violence. Ross Arnold, Fall 2015 Lakeside institute of Theology
Morality, Suffering and Violence Ross Arnold, Fall 2015 Lakeside institute of Theology Apologetics 2 (CM5) Oct. 2 Introduction Oct. 9 Faith and Reason Oct. 16 Mid-Term Break Oct. 23 Science and Origins
More informationHuman Nature & Human Diversity: Sex, Love & Parenting; Morality, Religion & Race. Course Description
Human Nature & Human Diversity: Sex, Love & Parenting; Morality, Religion & Race Course Description Human Nature & Human Diversity is listed as both a Philosophy course (PHIL 253) and a Cognitive Science
More informationPerspectives on Imitation
Perspectives on Imitation 402 Mark Greenberg on Sugden l a point," as Evelyn Waugh might have put it). To the extent that they have, there has certainly been nothing inevitable about this, as Sugden's
More informationThe view that all of our actions are done in self-interest is called psychological egoism.
Egoism For the last two classes, we have been discussing the question of whether any actions are really objectively right or wrong, independently of the standards of any person or group, and whether any
More informationWhy Computers are not Intelligent: An Argument. Richard Oxenberg
1 Why Computers are not Intelligent: An Argument Richard Oxenberg I. Two Positions The strong AI advocate who wants to defend the position that the human mind is like a computer often waffles between two
More informationIntroduction to Cognitivism; Motivational Externalism; Naturalist Cognitivism
Introduction to Cognitivism; Motivational Externalism; Naturalist Cognitivism Felix Pinkert 103 Ethics: Metaethics, University of Oxford, Hilary Term 2015 Cognitivism, Non-cognitivism, and the Humean Argument
More informationWHY ACCEPT THE PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM?
CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE PO Box 8500, Charlotte, NC 28271 Effective Evangelism: JAE393 WHY ACCEPT THE PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM? by Paul A. Nelson This article first appeared in the Effective Evangelism
More informationChapter 2--How Do I Know Whether God Exists?
Chapter 2--How Do I Know Whether God Exists? 1. Augustine was born in A. India B. England C. North Africa D. Italy 2. Augustine was born in A. 1 st century AD B. 4 th century AD C. 7 th century AD D. 10
More informationLook at this famous painting what s missing? What could YOU deduce about human nature from this picture? Write your thoughts on this sheet!
* Look at this famous painting what s missing? What could YOU deduce about human nature from this picture? Write your thoughts on this sheet! If there is NO GOD then. What is our origin? What is our purpose?
More informationPsychological and Ethical Egoism
Psychological and Ethical Egoism Wrapping up Error Theory Psychological Egoism v. Ethical Egoism Ought implies can, the is/ought fallacy Arguments for and against Psychological Egoism Ethical Egoism Arguments
More informationAre Humans Always Selfish? OR Is Altruism Possible?
Are Humans Always Selfish? OR Is Altruism Possible? This debate concerns the question as to whether all human actions are selfish actions or whether some human actions are done specifically to benefit
More informationEnding The Scandal. Hard Determinism Compatibilism. Soft Determinism. Hard Incompatibilism. Semicompatibilism. Illusionism.
366 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Semicompatibilism Narrow Incompatibilism
More informationPhilosophy 281: Spring 2011 Monday, Wednesday, Friday, am, Room W/1/62
* U N I V E R S I T Y * O F * M A S S A C H U S E T T S * B O S T O N * DARWIN & THE PROBLEMS OF PHILOSOPHY Philosophy 281: Spring 2011 Monday, Wednesday, Friday, 10-10.50am, Room W/1/62 Prof. Adam Beresford
More informationIntroductory Kant Seminar Lecture
Introductory Kant Seminar Lecture Intentionality It is not unusual to begin a discussion of Kant with a brief review of some history of philosophy. What is perhaps less usual is to start with a review
More informationRoots of Dialectical Materialism*
Roots of Dialectical Materialism* Ernst Mayr In the 1960s the American historian of biology Mark Adams came to St. Petersburg in order to interview К. М. Zavadsky. In the course of their discussion Zavadsky
More informationTHE CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP by Lars Bergström
From: Who Owns Our Genes?, Proceedings of an international conference, October 1999, Tallin, Estonia, The Nordic Committee on Bioethics, 2000. THE CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP by Lars Bergström I shall be mainly
More informationIntelligent Design. What Is It Really All About? and Why Should You Care? The theological nature of Intelligent Design
Intelligent Design What Is It Really All About? and Why Should You Care? The theological nature of Intelligent Design Jack Krebs May 4, 2005 Outline 1. Introduction and summary of the current situation
More informationPrentice Hall Biology 2004 (Miller/Levine) Correlated to: Idaho Department of Education, Course of Study, Biology (Grades 9-12)
Idaho Department of Education, Course of Study, Biology (Grades 9-12) Block 1: Applications of Biological Study To introduce methods of collecting and analyzing data the foundations of science. This block
More informationTheocentric Morality?
The University of British Columbia Philosophy 100 updated March 4, 2008 Theocentric Morality? Richard Johns The divine command theory, we have seen from Plato s Euthyphro, cannot be a complete theory of
More informationGround Work 01 part one God His Existence Genesis 1:1/Psalm 19:1-4
Ground Work 01 part one God His Existence Genesis 1:1/Psalm 19:1-4 Introduction Tonight we begin a brand new series I have entitled ground work laying a foundation for faith o It is so important that everyone
More informationDepartment of Philosophy
The University of Alabama at Birmingham 1 Department of Philosophy Chair: Dr. Gregory Pence The Department of Philosophy offers the Bachelor of Arts degree with a major in philosophy, as well as a minor
More informationSOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS Michaelmas 2017 Dr Michael Biggs. 7. Evolution. SociologicalAnalysis.shtml!
SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS Michaelmas 2017 Dr Michael Biggs 7. Evolution http://users.ox.ac.uk/~sfos0060/ SociologicalAnalysis.shtml! Recapitulation How to explain outbreaks of collective protest? Exogenous
More informationPHILOSOPHY (PHIL) Philosophy (PHIL) 1. PHIL 56. Research Integrity. 1 Unit
Philosophy (PHIL) 1 PHILOSOPHY (PHIL) PHIL 2. Ethics. 3 Units Examination of the concepts of morality, obligation, human rights and the good life. Competing theories about the foundations of morality will
More informationConsider... Ethical Egoism. Rachels. Consider... Theories about Human Motivations
Consider.... Ethical Egoism Rachels Suppose you hire an attorney to defend your interests in a dispute with your neighbor. In a court of law, the assumption is that in pursuing each client s interest,
More informationLewis quoted Haldane: The Human Quest for Knowledge
The Human Quest for Knowledge the horrid doubt always arises whether the convictions of man s mind, which has been developed from the mind of the lower animals, are of any value or at all trustworthy.
More informationHere s a very dumbed down way to understand why Gödel is no threat at all to A.I..
Comments on Godel by Faustus from the Philosophy Forum Here s a very dumbed down way to understand why Gödel is no threat at all to A.I.. All Gödel shows is that try as you might, you can t create any
More informationArgument from Agape ART LINDSLEY INSTITUTE FOR FAITH, WORK & ECONOMICS
Argument from Agape ART LINDSLEY INSTITUTE FOR FAITH, WORK & ECONOMICS Introduction John 13:34-35: A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this
More informationTHE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCIENCE, RELIGION AND ARISTOTELIAN THEOLOGY TODAY
Science and the Future of Mankind Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Scripta Varia 99, Vatican City 2001 www.pas.va/content/dam/accademia/pdf/sv99/sv99-berti.pdf THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCIENCE, RELIGION
More informationAt the end of Charles Darwin s famous book, The Origin of Species, there is a beautiful paragraph in
At the end of Charles Darwin s famous book, The Origin of Species, there is a beautiful paragraph in which he contemplates an entangled bank, clothed with many plants of many kinds, with birds singing
More informationIII Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier
III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier In Theaetetus Plato introduced the definition of knowledge which is often translated
More informationPhilosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Science Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationPhilosophical Ethics. Distinctions and Categories
Philosophical Ethics Distinctions and Categories Ethics Remember we have discussed how ethics fits into philosophy We have also, as a 1 st approximation, defined ethics as philosophical thinking about
More informationHas not Science Debunked Biblical Christianity?
Has not Science Debunked Biblical Christianity? Martin Ester March 1, 2012 Christianity 101 @ SFU The Challenge of Atheist Scientists Science is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge
More informationInformation and the Origin of Life
Information and the Origin of Life Walter L. Bradley, Ph.D., Materials Science Emeritus Professor of Mechanical Engineering Texas A&M University and Baylor University Information and Origin of Life Information,
More informationReligious Studies. Name: Institution: Course: Date:
Running head: RELIGIOUS STUDIES Religious Studies Name: Institution: Course: Date: RELIGIOUS STUDIES 2 Abstract In this brief essay paper, we aim to critically analyze the question: Given that there are
More informationImpact Hour. January 10, 2016
Impact Hour January 10, 2016 Why People Don t Believe: 1. The Power of Religion 2. Reason To Fear 3. Religion and Violence: A Closer Look 4. Is Christianity Irrational and Devoid of Evidence? 5. Is Christianity
More informationChristianity and Science. Understanding the conflict (WAR)? Must we choose? A Slick New Packaging of Creationism
and Science Understanding the conflict (WAR)? Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, is a documentary which looks at how scientists who have discussed or written about Intelligent Design (and along the way
More informationRationality in Action. By John Searle. Cambridge: MIT Press, pages, ISBN Hardback $35.00.
106 AUSLEGUNG Rationality in Action. By John Searle. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001. 303 pages, ISBN 0-262-19463-5. Hardback $35.00. Curran F. Douglass University of Kansas John Searle's Rationality in Action
More informationEvolution and the Mind of God
Evolution and the Mind of God Robert T. Longo rtlongo370@gmail.com September 3, 2017 Abstract This essay asks the question who, or what, is God. This is not new. Philosophers and religions have made many
More informationThe New Atheism. Part 1 of 2: Engaging the New Atheism
Part 1 of 2: Engaging the New Atheism with,, Release Date: December 2013 Welcome to The Table, where we discuss issues of God and Culture and today, our topic is the new Atheism, and I m Darrel Bock, Executive
More informationAnnotated List of Ethical Theories
Annotated List of Ethical Theories The following list is selective, including only what I view as the major theories. Entries in bold face have been especially influential. Recommendations for additions
More informationRoyal Institute of Philosophy
Royal Institute of Philosophy The Law of the Jungle: Moral Alternatives and Principles of Evolution Author(s): J. L. Mackie Reviewed work(s): Source: Philosophy, Vol. 53, No. 206 (Oct., 1978), pp. 455-464
More informationTheme 1: Ethical Thought, AS. divine command as an objective metaphysical foundation for morality.
Theme 1: Ethical Thought, AS A. Divine Command Theory Meta-ethical theory - God as the origin and regulator of morality right or wrong as objective truths based on God s will/command, moral goodness is
More informationDennett's Reduction of Brentano's Intentionality
Dennett's Reduction of Brentano's Intentionality By BRENT SILBY Department of Philosophy University of Canterbury Copyright (c) Brent Silby 1998 www.def-logic.com/articles Since as far back as the middle
More informationDARWIN and EVOLUTION
Rev Bob Klein First UU Church Stockton February 15, 2015 DARWIN and EVOLUTION Charles Darwin has long been one of my heroes. Others were working on what came to be called evolution, but he had the courage
More informationAre There Philosophical Conflicts Between Science & Religion? (Participant's Guide)
Digital Collections @ Dordt Study Guides for Faith & Science Integration Summer 2017 Are There Philosophical Conflicts Between Science & Religion? (Participant's Guide) Lydia Marcus Dordt College Follow
More informationUC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works
UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Disaggregating Structures as an Agenda for Critical Realism: A Reply to McAnulla Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4k27s891 Journal British
More information145 Philosophy of Science
Naturalism Christian Wüthrich http://philosophy.ucsd.edu/faculty/wuthrich/ 145 Philosophy of Science The Big Picture Thesis (Naturalism) Naturalism maintains that philosophical inquiry is continuous with
More informationPhilosophy & Religion
Philosophy & Religion What did philosophers say about religion/god? Kongfuzi (Confucius) - Chinese philosopher - secular humanism. Role of free will and choice in moral decision making. Aristotle - golden
More informationTempleton Fellowships at the NDIAS
Templeton Fellowships at the NDIAS Pursuing the Unity of Knowledge: Integrating Religion, Science, and the Academic Disciplines With grant support from the John Templeton Foundation, the NDIAS will help
More informationExtraterrestrial involvement with the human race
!1 Extraterrestrial involvement with the human race William C. Treurniet and Paul Hamden, August, 2018 Summary. Beings from the high-vibration extraterrestrial Zeta race explained via a medium that they
More informationREASON AND PRACTICAL-REGRET. Nate Wahrenberger, College of William and Mary
1 REASON AND PRACTICAL-REGRET Nate Wahrenberger, College of William and Mary Abstract: Christine Korsgaard argues that a practical reason (that is, a reason that counts in favor of an action) must motivate
More informationEXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers
EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers Diagram and evaluate each of the following arguments. Arguments with Definitional Premises Altruism. Altruism is the practice of doing something solely because
More informationDANIEL DENNETT, MEMES AND RELIGION Reasons for the Historical Persistence of Religion
DANIEL DENNETT, MEMES AND RELIGION Reasons for the Historical Persistence of Religion GUILLERMO ARMENGOL Chair of Science, Technology and Religion, Universidad Comillas In the work which appeared in 2006
More informationChapter 2: Commitment
Chapter 2: Commitment Outline A. Modular rationality (the Gianni Schicchi test). Its conflict with commitment. B. Puzzle: our behaviour in the ultimatum game (more generally: our norms of fairness) violate
More informationChapter 7. GR Logic. Chapter 8. GR Applications. Chapter 9. GR Frameworks
Chapter 7. GR Logic Chapter 8. GR Applications Chapter 9. GR Frameworks GR justifications GR rights and virtues Religion Evolution Natural law Hobbes Why accept GR and the other consistency norms? Objective
More informationOxford Scholarship Online
University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship Online Religious Faith and Intellectual Virtue Laura Frances Callahan and Timothy O'Connor Print publication date: 2014 Print ISBN-13: 9780199672158
More informationVol. II, No. 5, Reason, Truth and History, 127. LARS BERGSTRÖM
Croatian Journal of Philosophy Vol. II, No. 5, 2002 L. Bergström, Putnam on the Fact-Value Dichotomy 1 Putnam on the Fact-Value Dichotomy LARS BERGSTRÖM Stockholm University In Reason, Truth and History
More informationIntegrated Studies 002: Human Morality and Emotions University of Pennsylvania Spring 2017
Teaching Team Information Integrated Studies 002: Human Morality and Emotions University of Pennsylvania Spring 2017 Professor Robert Kurzban, Solomon Lab C23, kurzban@psych.upenn.edu, 215-898-4977 Office
More informationScience and Religion: Exploring the Spectrum
Science and Religion: Exploring the Spectrum Summary report of preliminary findings for a survey of public perspectives on Evolution and the relationship between Evolutionary Science and Religion Professor
More informationAltruism. A selfless concern for other people purely for their own sake. Altruism is usually contrasted with selfishness or egoism in ethics.
GLOSSARY OF ETHIC TERMS Absolutism. The belief that there is one and only one truth; those who espouse absolutism usually also believe that they know what this absolute truth is. In ethics, absolutism
More informationSYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY. Contents
UNIT 1 SYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY Contents 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Research in Philosophy 1.3 Philosophical Method 1.4 Tools of Research 1.5 Choosing a Topic 1.1 INTRODUCTION Everyone who seeks knowledge
More informationThe Role of Science in God s world
The Role of Science in God s world A/Prof. Frank Stootman f.stootman@uws.edu.au www.labri.org A Remarkable Universe By any measure we live in a remarkable universe We can talk of the existence of material
More informationEthical non-naturalism
Michael Lacewing Ethical non-naturalism Ethical non-naturalism is usually understood as a form of cognitivist moral realism. So we first need to understand what cognitivism and moral realism is before
More informationHindu Paradigm of Evolution
lefkz Hkkjr Hindu Paradigm of Evolution Author Anil Chawla Creation of the universe by God is supposed to be the foundation of all Abrahmic religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam). As per the theory
More informationMoral Objectivism. RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary
Moral Objectivism RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary The possibility, let alone the actuality, of an objective morality has intrigued philosophers for well over two millennia. Though much discussed,
More informationDescartes to Early Psychology. Phil 255
Descartes to Early Psychology Phil 255 Descartes World View Rationalism: the view that a priori considerations could lay the foundations for human knowledge. (i.e. Think hard enough and you will be lead
More informationPlantinga, Van Till, and McMullin. 1. What is the conflict Plantinga proposes to address in this essay? ( )
Plantinga, Van Till, and McMullin I. Plantinga s When Faith and Reason Clash (IDC, ch. 6) A. A Variety of Responses (133-118) 1. What is the conflict Plantinga proposes to address in this essay? (113-114)
More informationTWO VERSIONS OF HUME S LAW
DISCUSSION NOTE BY CAMPBELL BROWN JOURNAL OF ETHICS & SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY DISCUSSION NOTE MAY 2015 URL: WWW.JESP.ORG COPYRIGHT CAMPBELL BROWN 2015 Two Versions of Hume s Law MORAL CONCLUSIONS CANNOT VALIDLY
More informationWho is a person? Whoever you want it to be Commentary on Rowlands on Animal Personhood
Who is a person? Whoever you want it to be Commentary on Rowlands on Animal Personhood Gwen J. Broude Cognitive Science Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York Abstract: Rowlands provides an expanded definition
More informationDepartment of Philosophy TCD. Great Philosophers. Dennett. Tom Farrell. Department of Surgical Anatomy RCSI Department of Clinical Medicine RCSI
Department of Philosophy TCD Great Philosophers Dennett Tom Farrell Department of Philosophy TCD Department of Surgical Anatomy RCSI Department of Clinical Medicine RCSI 1. Socrates 2. Plotinus 3. Augustine
More informationNeo-Darwinian Teleological Redundancy Sarah Crawford California State University, Fresno
Neo-Darwinian Teleological Redundancy California State University, Fresno The discoveries of modern science have fundamentally reshaped our understanding of the world in many surprising ways. Science has
More informationSTUDY GUIDES - IS THERE A GOD?
STUDY GUIDES - IS THERE A GOD? There s not just any God, people talk about all sorts of Gods but there is only one God, one true God and I believe it to be the God of the Bible. Ken Ham Founder & CEO,
More informationVerificationism. PHIL September 27, 2011
Verificationism PHIL 83104 September 27, 2011 1. The critique of metaphysics... 1 2. Observation statements... 2 3. In principle verifiability... 3 4. Strong verifiability... 3 4.1. Conclusive verifiability
More informationThe Divine Nature. from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 3-11) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian J.
The Divine Nature from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 3-11) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian J. Shanley (2006) Question 3. Divine Simplicity Once it is grasped that something exists,
More informationTHE UNBELIEVABLE TRUTH ABOUT MORALITY
THE UNBELIEVABLE TRUTH ABOUT MORALITY Bart Streumer b.streumer@rug.nl 9 August 2016 Forthcoming in Lenny Clapp (ed.), Philosophy for Us. San Diego: Cognella. Have you ever suspected that even though we
More informationAyer on the criterion of verifiability
Ayer on the criterion of verifiability November 19, 2004 1 The critique of metaphysics............................. 1 2 Observation statements............................... 2 3 In principle verifiability...............................
More informationPHLA10 Reason and Truth Exercise 1
Y e P a g e 1 Exercise 1 Pg. 17 1. When is an idea or statement valid? (trick question) A statement or an idea cannot be valid; they can only be true or false. Being valid or invalid are properties of
More informationWilliam Hasker s discussion of the Thomistic doctrine of the soul
Response to William Hasker s The Dialectic of Soul and Body John Haldane I. William Hasker s discussion of the Thomistic doctrine of the soul does not engage directly with Aquinas s writings but draws
More informationA Review on What Is This Thing Called Ethics? by Christopher Bennett * ** 1
310 Book Review Book Review ISSN (Print) 1225-4924, ISSN (Online) 2508-3104 Catholic Theology and Thought, Vol. 79, July 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.21731/ctat.2017.79.310 A Review on What Is This Thing
More informationSearle vs. Chalmers Debate, 8/2005 with Death Monkey (Kevin Dolan)
Searle vs. Chalmers Debate, 8/2005 with Death Monkey (Kevin Dolan) : Searle says of Chalmers book, The Conscious Mind, "it is one thing to bite the occasional bullet here and there, but this book consumes
More informationA Graphical Representation of the Reconstructionist World-View (with a Mixture of Science Thrown in for Good Measure) by Ronald W. Satz, Ph.D.
A Graphical Representation of the Reconstructionist World-View (with a Mixture of Science Thrown in for Good Measure) by Ronald W. Satz, Ph.D. Introduction Compared with books or papers in science and
More informationHas Nagel uncovered a form of idealism?
Has Nagel uncovered a form of idealism? Author: Terence Rajivan Edward, University of Manchester. Abstract. In the sixth chapter of The View from Nowhere, Thomas Nagel attempts to identify a form of idealism.
More informationMorality and the Senses. One Does Not Equal the Other
Morality and the Senses One Does Not Equal the Other By Matthew Bixby Critical Thinking and Writing Phil. 111 Mark McIntire Thesis: By use of valid syllogistic reasoning and analytic proof for premises
More informationNaturalist Cognitivism: The Open Question Argument; Subjectivism
Naturalist Cognitivism: The Open Question Argument; Subjectivism Felix Pinkert 103 Ethics: Metaethics, University of Oxford, Hilary Term 2015 Introducing Naturalist Realist Cognitivism (a.k.a. Naturalism)
More informationChapter 12: Areas of knowledge Ethics (p. 363)
Chapter 12: Areas of knowledge Ethics (p. 363) Moral reasoning (p. 364) Value-judgements Some people argue that moral values are just reflections of personal taste. For example, I don t like spinach is
More informationChalmers, "Consciousness and Its Place in Nature"
http://www.protevi.com/john/philmind Classroom use only. Chalmers, "Consciousness and Its Place in Nature" 1. Intro 2. The easy problem and the hard problem 3. The typology a. Reductive Materialism i.
More informationA religion infects a mind and reprograms the mind to reproduce the religion.
What is religion? Religions are replicators not unlike viruses. Consider for a moment what a virus does. A virus invades and takes over replicating machinery from the original purpose and causes that machinery
More informationStructure and essence: The keys to integrating spirituality and science
Structure and essence: The keys to integrating spirituality and science Copyright c 2001 Paul P. Budnik Jr., All rights reserved Our technical capabilities are increasing at an enormous and unprecedented
More informationSession 1 The Nature of Faith Session 2 God Session 3 Humanity Session 4 Jesus Christ Session 5 Salvation
Comparing the Faiths of Atheistic Materialism, Pantheism (Hinduism & Buddhism), Deism, and Monistic Theism (Judaism & Islam), with the Christian Faith. Session 1 The Nature of Faith Session 2 God Session
More informationConsciousness might be defined as the perceiver of mental phenomena. We might say that there are no differences between one perceiver and another, as
2. DO THE VALUES THAT ARE CALLED HUMAN RIGHTS HAVE INDEPENDENT AND UNIVERSAL VALIDITY, OR ARE THEY HISTORICALLY AND CULTURALLY RELATIVE HUMAN INVENTIONS? Human rights significantly influence the fundamental
More informationout in his Three Dialogues and Principles of Human Knowledge, gives an argument specifically
That Thing-I-Know-Not-What by [Perm #7903685] The philosopher George Berkeley, in part of his general thesis against materialism as laid out in his Three Dialogues and Principles of Human Knowledge, gives
More informationWhat s God got to do with it?
What s God got to do with it? In this address I have drawn on a thesis submitted at Duke University in 2009 by Robert Brown. Based on this thesis I ask a question that you may not normally hear asked in
More informationTHE GOD OF QUARKS & CROSS. bridging the cultural divide between people of faith and people of science
THE GOD OF QUARKS & CROSS bridging the cultural divide between people of faith and people of science WHY A WORKSHOP ON FAITH AND SCIENCE? The cultural divide between people of faith and people of science*
More informationINTRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS: QUESTIONS AND SOLUTIONS TERESA KWIATKOWSKA
INTRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS: QUESTIONS AND SOLUTIONS TERESA KWIATKOWSKA...it is possible to perform noble deeds even without being ruler of land and see: one can do virtuous acts with quite moderate
More informationCan Rationality Be Naturalistically Explained? Jeffrey Dunn. Abstract: Dan Chiappe and John Vervaeke (1997) conclude their article, Fodor,
Can Rationality Be Naturalistically Explained? Jeffrey Dunn Abstract: Dan Chiappe and John Vervaeke (1997) conclude their article, Fodor, Cherniak and the Naturalization of Rationality, with an argument
More information(naturalistic fallacy)
1 2 19 general questions about the nature of morality and about the meaning of moral concepts determining what the ethical principles of guiding the actions (truth and opinion) the metaphysical question
More information