REASONS FOR DECISION OF ROBERT BURGENER HEARING JUNE 26 and 27, 2006
|
|
- Gloria Black
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF ROBERT BURGENER, A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA REASONS FOR DECISION OF ROBERT BURGENER HEARING JUNE 26 and 27, 2006 On June 26-27, 2006, a hearing committee comprised of Peter Michalyshyn, Q.C. (Chair), Vivian Stevenson, Q.C., and Wilf Willier convened at the Law Society offices in Edmonton, Alberta to inquire into the conduct of Robert Burgener ("The Member"). The Member was represented by Robert Gillespie. The Law Society was represented by Lindsay MacDonald, Q.C.. The Member was present throughout the hearing. JURISDICTION AND PRELIMINARY MATTERS Jurisdiction was established by Exhibits 1-4. At the outset of the Hearing, an originally appointed Member, Michelle Crighton, Q.C., was substituted by Ms. Stevenson owing to the Member's expression of concern for a reasonable apprehension of bias regarding Ms. Crighton. That aside, no objection was made to the composition of the panel. No private hearing application was made and as such the Hearing proceeded in public. CITATIONS The Member faced 1 citation as set out in Exhibit 2, as follows. 1. IT IS ALLEGED that you failed to be candid with the Law Society of Alberta in your responses, particularly, in denying you were present and in denying you overheard a third party make improper representations as to the third party's identity, and thereby breached Chapter 3, Rule 3 of the Code of Professional Conduct, and that such conduct is conduct deserving of sanction. EVIDENCE A binder of Exhibits marked 1-29 was entered by consent. A variety of other exhibits were entered during the hearing. The Hearing Committee heard testimony of D.D.P., the Member, and J.M. Evidence of D.P. On or about Thursday, November 7, 2002 the Member and M. attended the C. G. on Calgary Trail in Edmonton. The restaurant was sparsely populated and quiet. The two sat in a booth in the lounge near the door. They were waited upon after a couple of minutes by a server, D.P. Robert Burgener Hearing Committee Report June 26-27, 2006 Prepared for Public Distribution August 8, 2007 Page 1of 6
2 Page 2 of 6 D.P. testified the Member and M. entered the restaurant together. They were dressed similarly, in golf shirts, without coats. It was near the beginning of her shift which would have started between 4:30-5:00 p.m. She had never met the two before. D.P. asked the two if they wanted a drink. Rather than order, she was asked if a Mr. T. was present in the lounge. She responded by stating no, they had just missed T. She then asked if she could let T. know who stopped by. One of the men, M., responded that yes, tell T. that J. F. or F. was here. There was some mention of `securities'. A note was written out with the visitor's name. Ms. D.P. placed the note in her pouch. Although earlier in her evidence D.P. was uncertain which of the two initially asked for R.T., later in her testimony she stated she had no recollection of the second, taller man saying anything at all. She described the overall conversation as "nondescript". She focused on the blond man as he was doing most of the talking. D.P. described M. as blond-haired, shorter than his companion, and with a cherubic face. The companion, the Member, was described as somewhat taller, with brown hair graying on the edges. D.P. knew T. as he was a regular at C.G. She also knew him to be involved in a publicly-traded company and thus to her the reference to 'securities' made sense. She was intrigued by the exchange with the two men. She believed it would be good for a story to tell when she next saw T. D.P. could not say if the two addressed her as "we are looking for" versus "I am looking for". Nevertheless, she had the "impression" they were both there looking for the same person, R. T. The two men sat in a horseshoe-shaped booth. They were about 3 1/2 feet apart from one another. The Member was to her left, M. to her right. She stood between them. She had no difficulty hearing and taking part in the conversation with M. She noted the Member to be looking straight ahead, as though at M. She could say nothing with regard to the Member's actual awareness of the conversation. The two left shortly after D.P. advised T. was not present. They were in the restaurant not more than 10 minutes. D.P. was uncertain just when T. next attended the restaurant. It may have been the next day, it may have been a week later. In any case, on his next visit she approached him with information of the two men looking for him, one of whom identified himself as F. or F. She gave T. the message which was still in her apron. (D.P. had no idea what became of the message she handed to T.) T. immediately responded by asking her what the two looked like. Before she could answer, he stated "oh wait, let me guess", then proceeded to describe the two men. D.P. confirmed T. s description. T. told her he knew the men. He told her he knew neither of them was J.F. He told her both were trying to create problems for him. Later that same evening, T. was still in the restaurant in the company of others when T. brought to D.P.'s attention the presence of the Member and J.M. T. asked D.P. to confirm they were the two she had seen earlier. She confirmed they were. (In the course of the Hearing, it was admitted that the two men identified by D.P. on the first occasion were the same two men she identified on the second occasion.) Exhibit 9(1) was D.P.'s typed statement of January 20, With regard to the statement, she testified that T. stated he intended to do something about what T. alleged was impersonation. He told her he may need her to sign a statement. She agreed to do so. She then repeated to T. Robert Burgener Hearing Committee Report June 26-27, 2006 Prepared for Public Distribution August 8, 2007 Page 2of 6
3 Page 3 of 6 what occurred. Mr. T. typed up a draft statement. D.P. made some changes, then signed off on a final version being dated January 20, Evidence of the Member The Member testified he recalled none of the events in question. That said, he did not dispute he may have been with M., his long time friend and client, on the occasion identified by D.P. As noted, it was admitted that he was in the C.G. on a second occasion, also with M. The Member was first put on notice of T.'s complaint in April 4, 2003 correspondence from Complaints Officer Richard Hilborn, Q.C. It appears that attached to Hilborn's correspondence was a series of letters from T. to the Law Society dated November 11 and 13, 2002, a second November 13, 2002, then April 3, 2003 attaching the January 20, 2003 D.P. statement. The Member replied April 8, He professed some inability to understand T.'s particular complaint, but did distill that T. was complaining about comments he alleged were made by M. to an employee of the C.G. Nothing more was said of the alleged incident. The balance of the Member's reply deals with other issues, particularly T.'s bona fides. Hilborn replied to the Member's April 8, 2003 letter by seeking the Member's specific reply to the allegation that he was present when M. allegedly impersonated another individual. The Member replied May 1, His reply was unequivocal: "I have not been present when, nor have overheard, Mr. M. make any representations to anyone as alleged in the complaints made by Mr. T." In his evidence before the Hearing Committee, the Member was somewhat less unequivocal, testifying that he could not recall being present or overhearing the comments attributed to Mr. M. As the complaint continued to unfold, and as further allegations were made against him, the Member maintained the denial originally set out in his May 1, 2003 letter to the Law Society. Evidence of M. M. testified that before being approached by the Law Society almost two years after the alleged November 7, 2002 incident, he had no notice of the matters in issue other than the Member's advice that the Law Society wished to speak with him about Mr. T. and the C.G. Nevertheless, M. had a vivid and detailed recollection of the first occasion he and the Member were in the C.G. M. testified that on November 7, 2002 he arrived in Edmonton from Calgary intending to meet the Member at the C.G. It was around supper time. The sun had set and the temperature was below freezing. He was dressed formally in jacket and tie. M. cruised the restaurant parking lot looking for the Member's vehicle. Not seeing it, he entered the restaurant lounge. It was quiet. He sat at a booth to the right of the entrance. He had a glass of water while waiting for the Member. He had a brief conversation with the server, presumably D.P. Robert Burgener Hearing Committee Report June 26-27, 2006 Prepared for Public Distribution August 8, 2007 Page 3of 6
4 Page 4 of 6 Not much later, the Member entered the lounge. The two decided not to stay. Before leaving the Member excused himself to use the washroom. M. testified it was at that time - the Member having absented himself - that he asked D.P. to tell R.T. that J.F. was looking for him. M. denied he identified himself as J.F. He denied writing a note. He stated the conversation with D.P. was the one and only time he said words to the effect `J.F. was looking for T.'. M. acknowledged his comment was meant to needle T. as he believed the reference to J. F., an investigator with the A.S.C., would be a sore point with T. M. made no secret of his hostility toward Mr. T., then or now. He admitted to "having my own agenda" with T. Exhibited before the Hearing Committee (#34) was M.'s recorded statement to the Law Society. The statement was not entered for the truth of its contents, but rather for impeachment purposes. In some respects the statement is distinctly at odds with M.'s testimony. For example, in the statement M. says he made the J.F. remark before the Member even arrived at the lounge. He stated the Member came in some 5-10 minutes later. He refers to having a drink at the bar. On two occasions in the statement he refers to "we" entering the lounge. M. testified he had reviewed the statement before giving evidence. He testified everything in the statement was true. ARGUMENT Counsel for the Law Society says the Member failed to be candid in his May 1, 2003 letter in which he denied unequivocally any awareness of M.'s alleged impersonation. Counsel urged the Hearing Committee to accept the evidence of D.P. over M. that the Member was present when M. made the alleged remark, and to infer from all the circumstances that the Member must have heard the alleged remark. Counsel for the Law Society further urged the Hearing Committee to draw an inference against the Member as a result of his initial reply of April 8, 2003 to the Law Society wherein the Member denied he could distill a complaint from Mr. T.'s "letters". Counsel for the Member argued the Member's responses to the Law Society were appropriate and candid, particularly in view of the alleged uncertainty of T.'s complaint. Counsel urged the Hearing Committee to reject the evidence of D.P. over that of M., and of course to accept the Member's evidence that he had no recollection of the alleged remark. DECISION At the close of the Law Society's case, counsel for the Member applied for a non-suit on the basis of a lack of evidence. After submissions, the Hearing Committee unanimously rejected the application on the basis that some evidence existed from which an inference could be made the Member was less than candid in his responses to the Law Society in respect of these matters. Having heard all the evidence and having heard argument including submissions as to the appropriate test, the Hearing Committee is unanimous that the citation against the Member should be dismissed. The test is proof on a balance of probabilities, but to a higher degree given the law society's allegation of deceit: Ringrose v. College of Physician and Surgeons of Alberta, [1978] 2 W.W.R. 534 (Alta. C.A.); Law Society of Alberta v. Estrin (1992), 4 L. R. (3r) 373 (C.A.). Robert Burgener Hearing Committee Report June 26-27, 2006 Prepared for Public Distribution August 8, 2007 Page 4of 6
5 Page 5 of 6 The Hearing Committee is unanimous that the Member knew or ought to have known by the Law Society's initial letter of April 4, 2003 what conduct was being complained of. As such, the Member's April 8, 2003 reply could have been more responsive. However, the Hearing Committee draws no inference adverse to the Member as a result of his April 8, 2003 letter, particularly in light of the fact that upon the law society's further request of April 30, 2003, on May 1, 2003 the Member unequivocally addressed the complaint. The Hearing Committee is unanimous that insufficient evidence exists that the Member lied in his May 1, 2003 response, or in his subsequent avowals of that response. The Hearing Committee does not rely on M.'s evidence to reach its conclusion. Indeed, where the evidence of M. conflicts with that of D.P., the Hearing Committee prefers the latter. D.P.'s evidence was not perfect. For example, there was some uncertainty with regard to whether in fact she took a note of the name of Mr. F., put the note in her apron, then days later brought the note to T.'s attention. No note was referred to in D.P.'s statement of January 20, And in his several letters to the law society, T. himself never raised the note, except on May 5, 2003, when he said "!t is indeed unfortunate that she (D.P.) didn't let him write the message down". This frailty aside, the Hearing Committee is nevertheless impressed with D.P.'s recollection of M.'s statements. She had reason to remember the event for she knew T., and she thought he would be interested in it. She recorded her memory of the event within a couple of months of the event. Of all those giving evidence, she was the most neutral witness. In contrast, M.'s apparently vivid recollection of events is implausible given the passage of time between November, 2002, and the time he was asked to provide a recorded statement to the law society on October 20, He freely admitted his antipathy for T. And as noted, on a few issues M.'s testimony before the Hearing Committee was at odds with his own statement, notwithstanding that fact he had earlier testified the statement was true. At the end of the day the Hearing Committee finds M. and the Member were at the C.G. on or about November 7, 2002, then again shortly afterwards. On November 7, while both men sat at a table to the right of the door of the lounge M. told D.P. he was J.F., and would she tell T. that J.F. was looking for him. While the Member was present when this occurred, there was no direct evidence that he paying any particular attention. There were no outward signs that he heard M., or was somehow part of the ruse. There was no evidence the "impersonation" would have been of any consequence to the Member. Aside from direct evidence, the Hearing Committee is not prepared to draw an inference from the circumstances that the Member must have heard M.'s remarks, or could not have forgotten them. The latter is plausible given the Member's evidence that he was often in M.'s company, often at the C.G., and that it was some five months after the incident when he was first asked to recall the circumstances. Having considered all of the evidence, the Hearing Committee is unanimous that the evidence falls short of the required high standard to convict the Member for lying to the law society, and as such the citation against Mr. Burgener is dismissed. Robert Burgener Hearing Committee Report June 26-27, 2006 Prepared for Public Distribution August 8, 2007 Page 5of 6
6 Page 6 of 6 EXHIBITS Subsequent to the end of the hearing it came to the attention of the Chair that no order was sought, and no order was thus made, with regard to Exhibits. The Chair convened a telephone conference November 6, 2006 at which time, following submissions of counsel, it was decided that all Exhibits in the Hearing be kept private with the exception of the jurisdictional Exhibits (1-5), and with the exception of a series of photographs of the C.G. (Exhibit 30). Dated this of November, Peter B. Michalyshyn, Q.C. (Chair) Vivian R. Stevenson, Q.C. Wilf Willier Robert Burgener Hearing Committee Report June 26-27, 2006 Prepared for Public Distribution August 8, 2007 Page 6of 6
The Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report
The Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, and in the matter of a hearing regarding the conduct of Mary Jo Rothecker, a member of the Law Society of
More informationLAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT. IN THE MATTER OF the Legal Profession Act (the LPA ); and
File No. HE20070047 LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT IN THE MATTER OF the Legal Profession Act (the LPA ); and IN THE MATTER OF a Hearing regarding the conduct of Calum J. Bruce, a Member
More informationTHE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO.
Indexed as: Frith (Re) THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO IN THE MATTER OF a Hearing directed by the Complaints Committee of the College of Physicians and Surgeons
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 107 Filed: 04/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1817
Case: 1:13-cv-05014 Document #: 107 Filed: 04/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1817 J. DAVID JOHN, United States of America, ex rel., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
More informationBEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY. and MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFF S ASSOCIATION
BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY and MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFF S ASSOCIATION Case 625 No. 67051 (Michalski Grievance) Appearances: Timothy R.
More information: Brian Stirling, Acting Chairman Suzy Hackett, Robert Haynes, Jeffery Masters, Timothy Meyer, Thomas TJ Thornberry
: Brian Stirling, Acting Chairman Suzy Hackett, Robert Haynes, Jeffery Masters, Timothy Meyer, Thomas TJ Thornberry : Sean Howard : Suzy Russell, License & Permit Supervisor Kelly Fernandez, Board Attorney
More informationMarc James Asay v. Michael W. Moore
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO JULY TERM, 2011
Note: Decisions of a three-justice panel are not to be considered as precedent before any tribunal. ENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 2010-473 JULY TERM, 2011 In re Grievance of Lawrence Rosenberger
More informationTestimony of Detective Jimmy Patterson (2)
Testimony of Detective Jimmy Patterson (2) THE COURT: Mr. Mosty, are you ready? 20 MR. RICHARD C. MOSTY: Well, that 21 depends on what we're getting ready to do. 22 THE COURT: Well. All right. Where 23
More informationIN THE MATTER OF a Proceeding under the Certified General Accountants of Ontario Act, 1983 and By-Law Four
IN THE MATTER OF a Proceeding under the Certified General Accountants of Ontario Act, 1983 and By-Law Four IN THE MATTER OF Alan Hogan, a member of the Certified General Accountants of Ontario BETWEEN:
More informationChapter 33 Fr Quinton* 100
Chapter 33 Fr Quinton* 100 Introduction 33.1 Fr Quinton is a member of a religious order. He was born in 1935 and ordained in 1960. He worked abroad for a number of years and then returned to Ireland.
More informationGood Morning. Now, this morning is a Hearing of an application. on behalf of 5 individuals on whom orders to provide written statements have
Wednesday, 4 April 2018 (10.00 am) Good Morning. Now, this morning is a Hearing of an application on behalf of 5 individuals on whom orders to provide written statements have been served and the application
More information1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 3 J.F., et al., ) 4 Plaintiffs, ) 3:14-cv-00581-PK ) 5 vs. ) April 15, 2014 ) 6 MULTNOMAH COUNTY SCHOOL ) Portland, Oregon DISTRICT
More informationIN THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SAN JUAN COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH. Case No. v. Judge WILLIE GRAYEYES,
PETER STIRBA (Bar No. 3118) MATTHEW STROUT (Bar No. 16732) STIRBA, P.C. 215 South State Street, Suite 750 P.O. Box 810 Salt Lake City, UT 84110-0810 Telephone: (801) 364-8300 Fax: (801) 364-8355 Email:
More informationBURLINGTON TAXI LICENSING APPEALS PANEL BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MINUTES OF MEETING December 11, 2013
MINUTES SUBJECT TO CORRECTION BY THE BURLINGTON TAXI LICENSING APPEALS PANEL. CHANGES, IF ANY, WILL BE RECORDED IN THE MINUTES OF THE NEXT MEETING OF THE TAXI LICENSING APPEALS PANEL. MEMBERS PRESENT:
More informationPanel: Mr. Peter Leaver QC (United Kingdom), President; Mr. Hans Nater (Switzerland); Mr. Olli Rauste (Finland)
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS ad hoc Division (O.G. Salt Lake City) 02/007, Korean Olympic Committee (KOC) / International Skating Union (ISU), Panel: Mr. Peter
More informationCondcnsclt! Page 1. 6 Part 9. I don't think I could have anticipated the snow. 7 and your having to be here at 1:30 any better than I did.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND STATE OF MARYLAND, V. ADNAN SYEO, BEFORE: Defendant. Indictment Nos. 199100-6 REPORTER'S OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS (Trial on the Merita) Baltimore.
More informationBYLAWS OF COMMUNITY HARVEST CHURCH (Also noted in this document as the Church) ARTICLE I MEMBERSHIP
BYLAWS OF COMMUNITY HARVEST CHURCH (Also noted in this document as the Church) ARTICLE I MEMBERSHIP This church shall comprise people who profess faith in the Lord Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, and
More informationRe: Voluntary attempt to resolve case #IS
JIM GIBBONS Governor MENDY K. ELLIOTT Director STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY REAL ESTATE DIVISION OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN FOR OWNERS IN COMMON-INTEREST COMMUNITIES 2501 E. Sahara
More informationBuilding Board CITY OF PUNTA GORDA, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 26, 2017, 9:00 AM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS W. MARION AVENUE, PUTNA GORDA FL 33950
Building Board CITY OF PUNTA GORDA, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 26, 2017, 9:00 AM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 326 W. MARION AVENUE, PUTNA GORDA FL 33950 NOTE: Anyone wishing to address the Council on any agenda item
More informationAPPEARANCES. Law Office of James C. White, P.C Emperor Blvd., Suite 400 Durham, NC 27703
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF DURHAM IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 14DHR04338 Mount Zion Daycare And Kimberly Brandon Petitioner v. NC Department of Health and Human Services Respondent
More informationSection 8 - The Clergy Discipline Measure
The Diocese of Exeter Bishop s Guidelines for the Ordained Ministry Section 8 - The Clergy Discipline Measure The Clergy Discipline Measure came fully into force on 1 st January 2006. It provides a new
More informationBEFORE THE HEARING BOARD OF THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION ANSWER
BEFORE THE HEARING BOARD OF THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION In the Matter of: GEORGE STEPHEN KOIS, Commission No. 2015PR00047 Attorney-Respondent, No. 1501429. ANSWER NOW
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION. Liquor License Appeal of Citation Notice to Bar- 40 Pa.Code 5.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION JENNY S TAVERN, INC., Appellant v. No. 09-1453 PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT, Appellee Donald G.
More information1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH vs. Case No. 05 CF 381
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2 3 STATE OF WISCONSIN, 4 PLAINTIFF, 05 CF 381 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381 6 STEVEN A. AVERY, 7 DEFENDANT. 8 DATE: September 28, 2009 9 BEFORE:
More informationBefore: MR JUSTICE FOSKETT Between : (A PROTECTED PARTY BY HER MOTHER & LITIGATION FRIEND, SHELLEY DUFFY)
Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWHC 867 (QB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Case No: HQ13X05526 TLQ/14/0710 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 27/03/2015 Before:
More informationMaking a Formal Complaint Advice for Congregations & the Wider Community
Making a Formal Complaint Advice for Congregations & the Wider Community Introduction Clergy in the Diocese of Liverpool are expected to maintain high standards of conduct and behaviour. From time to time
More informationFinancial Crisis Inquiry Commission Agenda Item 9 for Telephonic Business Meeting of October 12, 2010 Clayton and Moody s Letters MEMORANDUM
Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Agenda Item 9 for Telephonic Business Meeting of October 12, 2010 Clayton and Moody s Letters MEMORANDUM To: Wendy Edelberg, Executive Director From: Tom Krebs Re: Letters
More informationCOOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD. Docket # 1850 DECISION
COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD Sheriff of Cook County vs. Jacquelyn G. Anderson Cook County Deputy Sheriff Docket # 1850 DECISION THIS MATTER COMING ON to be heard pursuant to notice, the Cook County
More informationReport of the Board of Trustees. In the Matter of Professor Fei Wang
Report of the Board of Trustees In the Matter of Professor Fei Wang December 14, 2018 Introduction This matter is before the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois (the Board ) pursuant to Article
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Docket No. CR ) Plaintiff, ) Chicago, Illinois ) March, 0 v. ) : p.m. ) JOHN DENNIS
More informationThe First Church in Oberlin, United Church of Christ. Policies and Procedures for a Safe Church
The First Church in Oberlin, United Church of Christ Policies and Procedures for a Safe Church Adopted by the Executive Council on August 20, 2007 I. POLICY PROHIBITING ABUSE, EXPLOITATION, AND HARASSMENT.
More information-and- WAYNE HENNESSEY DECISION OF THE REGULATORY COMMISSION. Hennessey, a first team goalkeeper and Welsh International who plays for Crystal
IN THE MATTER OF THE REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION Before: William Norris QC Francis Duku Alan Hardy B E T W E E N:- THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION -and- WAYNE HENNESSEY DECISION OF THE REGULATORY
More informationTHE BYLAWS THE CHINESE CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF NEW JERSEY PARSIPPANY, NEW JERSEY. Approved by GA on Oct
THE BYLAWS OF THE CHINESE CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF NEW JERSEY PARSIPPANY, NEW JERSEY Approved by GA on Oct. 21 2007 ORIGINALLY ISSUED: 1975 FIRST REVISION: 1983 SECOND REVISION: 1991 THIRD REVISION: 1999 FOURTH
More informationATTACH A COPY OF BAPTISMAL CERTIFICATE (NOT birth certificate)
SACRAMENT OF CONFIRMATION REGISTRATION This form must be completed and returned to the STM PARISH OFFICE before August 4, 2017 Please include $50.00 Registration Fee to help cover program costs. If financial
More information- 6 - Brown interviewed Kimball in the police station that evening and Kimball was cooperative and volunteered the following information:
- 6 - CONSTABLE M. BROWN CROWN WITNESS#1 Police Constable M. Brown (Brown) is 35 years old. Brown spent 7 years on traffic duty and for the last seven years has been on the homicide squad. Most of Brown's
More informationIn-house transcript of the First Pre-Inquest Review in the 2 nd Inquest touching the death of Jeremiah Duggan
In-house transcript of the First Pre-Inquest Review in the 2 nd Inquest touching the death of Jeremiah Duggan Held at: Date Barnet Coroners Court 22 June 2010 at 9.30am In attendance: Coroner, Andrew Walker
More informationLIABILITY LITIGATION : NO. CV MRP (CWx) Videotaped Deposition of ROBERT TEMPLE, M.D.
Exhibit 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Page 1 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----------------------x IN RE PAXIL PRODUCTS : LIABILITY LITIGATION : NO. CV 01-07937 MRP (CWx) ----------------------x
More informationRECTIFICATION. Summary 2
Contents Summary 2 Pro Life All Party Parliamentary Group: Resolution letter 3 Letter from the Commissioner to Dr Nicolette Priaulx, 24 October 16 3 Written Evidence received by the Parliamentary Commissioner
More informationPowell v. Portland School District. Chronology
Powell v. Portland School District Chronology October 15, 1996 During school hours, a Boy Scout troop leader is allowed to speak to Harvey Scott Elementary school students, encouraging them to join the
More informationSeth Penalver v. State of Florida
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationCOLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF SASKATCHEWAN TO COUNCIL
November 16, 2011 NUMBER 278_11 COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF SASKATCHEWAN TO COUNCIL FROM: Registrar SUBJECT: DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE DECISION DR. ALI NOVEMBER 2011 Please find the above noted information
More informationGuidelines for Handling Abuse Allegations against a Church Leader. A. Why a Procedure for Handling Abuse Allegations Is Necessary
Guidelines for Handling Abuse Allegations against a Church Leader Note: Following is a consolidation of guidelines that CRC Synods have adopted over time, as a supplement to the Church Order, to equip
More informationPilate's Extended Dialogues in the Gospel of John: Did the Evangelist alter a written source?
Pilate's Extended Dialogues in the Gospel of John: Did the Evangelist alter a written source? By Gary Greenberg (NOTE: This article initially appeared on this web site. An enhanced version appears in my
More informationTESTIMONY OF MANNING c. CLEMENTS
Mr. BOOKHOUT. One was about lo:35 a.m., and the second one was about 6 :30 p.m. Mr. STERN. You do not now recall any separate interview at about 129 on Saturday? Mr. BOOKHOUT. I don t specidcally recall
More informationDep t of Environmental Protection v. Moriates OATH Index No. 1633/14 (July 8, 2014)
Dep t of Environmental Protection v. Moriates OATH Index No. 1633/14 (July 8, 2014) Evidence failed to show that respondent was absent without leave or insubordinate when she mistakenly appeared at 10:00
More informationGERALD COHEN ATTORNEY I ARBITRATOR 745 CRAIG RD. SUITE 105 CREVE COEUR (ST. LOUIS) MISSOURI Aprilj,$' Bill
PHONE: (314 432-2662 FAX: (314 432-6336 GERALD COHEN ATTORNEY I ARBITRATOR 745 CRAIG RD. SUITE 105 CREVE COEUR (ST. LOUIS MISSOURI 63141 Aprilj,$' 2014 Douglas S. Goldring Assistant General Counsel Federal
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Stephen G. Montoya (#01) MONTOYA JIMENEZ, P.A. The Great American Tower 0 North Central Avenue, Ste. 0 Phoenix, Arizona 0 (0) - (fax) - sgmlegal@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More information) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETI'S. 2 SUFFOLK, ss SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT (Consolidated CA No ) 3
)0001 1 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETI'S 2 SUFFOLK, ss SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT (Consolidated CA No. 02-1296) 3 4 JAMES M. HOGAN, et al., Plaintiffs, 5 VS. 6 THE ROMAN CATHOLIC 7 ARCHBISHOP OF BOSTON, a
More informationThe Episcopal Electoral Model in the Church in Wales and the Scottish Episcopal Church
The Episcopal Electoral Model in the Church in Wales and the Scottish Episcopal Church Introduction There is regular commentary in the Church of Ireland on the Episcopal Electoral Model employed by the
More informationThe Baptist Confession of Faith. Chapter 27 Of the Communion of Saints
The Baptist Confession of Faith Chapter 27 Of the Communion of Saints Communion of Saints I. Chapter 27, Paragraph 1 1. Based on Union with Christ 2. Communion with each other in united body II. Chapter
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION IN RE: PRIVATE CRIMINAL : COMPLAINT OF : NO. MD-042-2014 GERALD J. SMITH : Seth Miller, Esquire Cynthia A. Dyrda-Hatton Gerald
More informationARBITRATION DECISION AND AWARD. In the Matter of the Arbitration ) GRIEVANT : Class Action Class Action -between ) Donald Hynes
ARBITRATION DECISION AND AWARD A-c In the Matter of the Arbitration ) GRIEVANT : Class Action Class Action -between ) Donald Hynes POST OFFICE : UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ) Pomona, CA and ) Case Nos
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Alca Condominium Association, Inc., Petitioner
More informationHIGH COURT BISHO JUDGMENT
HIGH COURT BISHO CASE No. CC 16/99 In the matter between: THE STATE versus CHEMIST NONTSHINGA JUDGMENT EBRAHIM J: The accused, Chemist Nontshinga, has been arraigned on one count of murder and a count
More informationFirst Congregational Church Safe Church Policy (updated ) Safe Church Policy Concerning Abuse Prevention
First Congregational Church Safe Church Policy (updated 2-2017) Safe Church Policy Concerning Abuse Prevention Policy Prohibiting Abuse, Exploitation and Harassment As a community of Christian faith, First
More informationBuilding Board CITY OF PUNTA GORDA, FLORIDA OCTOBER 24, 2017, 9:00 AM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS W. MARION AVENUE, PUTNA GORDA FL 33950
Building Board CITY OF PUNTA GORDA, FLORIDA OCTOBER 24, 2017, 9:00 AM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 326 W. MARION AVENUE, PUTNA GORDA FL 33950 NOTE: Anyone wishing to address the Council on any agenda item may
More informationAdditions are underlined. Deletions are struck through in the text.
Amendments to the Constitution of Bethlehem Evangelical Lutheran Church of Encinitas, California Submitted for approval at the Congregation Meeting of January 22, 2017 Additions are underlined. Deletions
More informationADDENDUM 3 DISCIPLINARY POLICY. Revision Date: 25 August 2014
ADDENDUM 3 DISCIPLINARY POLICY Revision Date: 25 August 2014 This policy is the copyright property of Clovelly Country Club (CCC) and may only be reproduced, duplicated or published for the pursuit of
More informationFILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 11/16/ :25 AM
FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 11/16/2016 09:25 AM STATE OF NEW YORK CICERO TOWN COURT COUNTY OF ONONDAGA INDEX NO. 2016EF4347 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 36 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/16/2016 TOWN OF CICERO, Petitioner, MOTIONS
More informationPITTSBURGH. Issued: March 1993 Revised: October 2002 Updated: August 2003 Updated: August 2006 Updated: March 2008 Updated: April 2014
Issued: March 1993 Revised: October 2002 Updated: August 2003 Updated: August 2006 Updated: March 2008 Updated: April 2014 CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH Clergy Sexual Misconduct The teaching of the Church,
More informationSpecial Court Monitoring Program Update #84a Trial Chamber I - RUF Trial 21 July, by Alison Thompson Senior Researcher
Page 1 of 5 U.C. BerkeleyWar Crimes Studies Center Sierra Leone Trial Monitoring Program Weekly Report Special Court Monitoring Program Update #84a Trial Chamber I - RUF Trial 21 July, 2006 by Alison Thompson
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO CLARENCE R. MARSHALL ) CASE NO. CV 11 771202 ) Plaintiff-appellant ) JUDGE JOHN P. O'DONNELL ) vs. ) ) MM EMS, LLC, et al. ) JOUNRAL ENTRY AFFIRMING )
More informationPress Conference Announcing Recusal from Investigation into Russian Influence in the U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
Jeff Sessions Press Conference Announcing Recusal from Investigation into Russian Influence in the U.S. Presidential Election Campaign delivered 2 March 2017, DOJ Conference Center, Washington, D.C. [AUTHENTICITY
More informationGUIDELINES FOR CHURCH VISITS IN THE FREE REFORMED CHURCHES OF AUSTRALIA ADOPTED BY SYNOD 1998
APPENDIX 3 GUIDELINES FOR CHURCH VISITS IN THE FREE REFORMED CHURCHES OF AUSTRALIA ADOPTED BY SYNOD 1998 (Re: Article 44 of the Church Order 1 ) PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS Footnotes amended according to Article
More informationMR. NELSON: Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the Court, counsel: I m somewhat caught up in where to begin. I think perhaps the first and most
MR. NELSON: Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the Court, counsel: I m somewhat caught up in where to begin. I think perhaps the first and most important one of the most important things to say right now
More informationCOACHING EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION
Hillcrest Christian School dba HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 17531 Rinaldi Street Granada Hills, CA 91344 818-368-7071 COACHING EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Your interest in Heritage Christian School is appreciated.
More informationSCIENCE DRIVE AND TOWERVIEW ROAD BOX DURHAM, NC (919) FACSIMILE (919) CO-DIRECTORS
WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS CLINIC DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW SCIENCE DRIVE AND TOWERVIEW ROAD BOX 90360 DURHAM, NC 27708 0360 (919) 613 7133 FACSIMILE (919) 613 7262 JAMES E. COLEMAN, JR. JARVIS JOHN EDGERTON
More informationBEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA AMENDED NOTICE OF FORMAL CHARGES
BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE: CYNTHIA A. HOLLOWAY NO.: 00-143 / Florida Supreme Court AMENDED NOTICE OF FORMAL CHARGES TO: The Honorable
More informationAMENDMENTS TO THE MODEL CONSTITUTION FOR CONGREGATIONS
AMENDMENTS TO THE MODEL CONSTITUTION FOR CONGREGATIONS AS APPROVED BY THE 2016 CHURCHWIDE ASSEMBLY Prepared by the Office of the Secretary Evangelical Lutheran Church in America October 3, 2016 Additions
More informationBEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SOUTH MILWAUKEE. and COUNCIL #10
BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SOUTH MILWAUKEE and COUNCIL #10 Case 46 No. 59774 (Grievance Regarding One-day Suspension of R_ C_) Appearances:
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE T. HENLEY GRAVES SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHO USE RESIDENT JUDGE ONE THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 GEORGETOWN, DE 19947
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE T. HENLEY GRAVES SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHO USE RESIDENT JUDGE ONE THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 GEORGETOWN, DE 19947 James D. Nutter, Esquire 11 South Race Street Georgetown,
More informationUNIVERSITY TRIBUNAL THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO. IN THE MATTER OF charges of academic dishonesty filed October 12, 2016
Case No.: 892 UNIVERSITY TRIBUNAL THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO IN THE MATTER OF charges of academic dishonesty filed October 12, 2016 AND IN THE MATTER OF the University of Toronto Code of Behaviour on Academic
More informationTHE INTERNAL TESTIMONY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT THE BIBLE IS GOD S WORD?
CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE PO Box 8500, Charlotte, NC 28271 Feature Article: JAF6395 THE INTERNAL TESTIMONY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT THE BIBLE IS GOD S WORD? by James N. Anderson This
More informationDISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE 13 DHC 11
1 NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAKE BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR 13 DHC 11 E-X-C-E-R-P-T THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, ) ) PARTIAL TESTIMONY Plaintiff, ) OF )
More informationDecision. Lee A. Gronikowski appeared on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics. Stephen B. Sacharow appeared on behalf of respondent.
S~Jp_I~E~ME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. DRB 02-432 IN THE MATTER OF RAYMOND T. LEBON AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Decision Argued: Decided: February 6, 2003 May 2, 2003 Lee A. Gronikowski
More information>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET WILL BE THE FLORIDA BAR V. ROBERT ADAMS. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE, AND MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT,
>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET WILL BE THE FLORIDA BAR V. ROBERT ADAMS. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE, AND MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, I'M WILLIAM JUNK, AND I'M HERE WITH RESPONDENT, MR.
More informationHayden Bible Fellowship
Hayden Bible Fellowship Constitution This Constitution sets forth the principles and guidelines by which this church shall be governed. Article I Name The name of this church is Hayden Bible Fellowship,
More informationCase Notes. Religious Schools and Equal Opportunity: Lessons from Goldberg v Korsunski Carmel School
Case Notes Religious Schools and Equal Opportunity: Lessons from Goldberg v Korsunski Carmel School Kate Offer, Law School, University of Western Australia The decision of the Equal Opportunity Tribunal
More informationGraduate Assistant (GA) for Counseling and Christian Formation
Graduate Assistant (GA) for Counseling and Christian Formation The graduate assistantship for counseling and Christian Formation is open to graduate counseling students at John Brown University. The GA
More informationINTERVIEW of Sally A. Fields, Esq. SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
INTERVIEW of Sally A. Fields, Esq. for the SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE April 23, 2001 10:00 a.m. Committee Room 2 State House Annex Trenton, New Jersey PRESENT AT INTERVIEW: Michael Chertoff, Esq. (Special
More informationA Layperson s Guide to Hypothesis Testing By Michael Reames and Gabriel Kemeny ProcessGPS
A Layperson s Guide to Hypothesis Testing By Michael Reames and Gabriel Kemeny ProcessGPS In a recent Black Belt Class, the partners of ProcessGPS had a lively discussion about the topic of hypothesis
More informationMichael Ross: Case Files
Michael Ross: Case Files The Primary Witness Shamsuddin Mahmood was murdered on 2 nd June 1994. Twelve years later, on 2 nd September 2006, a man by the name of William Grant walked in to Kirkwall police
More informationCase Name: R. v. Singh. Between Regina, and Joga Singh Sahota. [2011] B.C.J. No BCPC W.C.B. (2d) CarswellBC 362
Page 1 Case Name: R. v. Singh Between Regina, and Joga Singh Sahota [2011] B.C.J. No. 305 2011 BCPC 42 92 W.C.B. (2d) 780 2011 CarswellBC 362 File No. 54579 Registry: North Vancouver British Columbia Provincial
More informationCase 2:13-cr FVS Document 369 Filed 05/09/14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SPOKANE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SPOKANE DIVISION 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. :-CR-000-FVS ) RHONDA LEE FIRESTACK-HARVEY, ) LARRY LESTER
More informationEMPLOYEE RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION AT WORK
EMPLOYEE RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION AT WORK PRESENTED BY: MARK GOULET & MELANIE CHARLESTON 2 Let s Organize This Talk.. Context matters: Applicable Laws Limitations on Employee Religious Expression Real Life
More information"Can We Have a Word in Private?": Wittgenstein on the Impossibility of Private Languages
Macalester Journal of Philosophy Volume 14 Issue 1 Spring 2005 Article 11 5-1-2005 "Can We Have a Word in Private?": Wittgenstein on the Impossibility of Private Languages Dan Walz-Chojnacki Follow this
More informationthe Royal Newfoundland Constabulary Public Complaints Regulations
IN THE MATTER OF a complaint pursuant to the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary Public Complaints Regulations AND IN THE MATTER OF a Public Complaint Adjudication pursuant to the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary
More informationVII. Legislation. VII Legislation
VII. Legislation RS 207 SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY (Adopted 06-09-2012) WHEREAS An ad hoc group of clergy consisting of Kathy Barnhart, Keith Dunn, Gretchen Hulse, Cindy Schneider, Paul Taylor and Bob Zilhaver
More informationCANON 10 CLERICAL APPOINTMENTS, EXCHANGES, RETIREMENTS AND TERMINATIONS
CANON 10 CLERICAL APPOINTMENTS, EXCHANGES, RETIREMENTS AND TERMINATIONS 1. Clerical Appointments All clerical appointments within the Diocese are made by the Bishop. 2. Clerical Vacancies a) Filling a
More informationREDEEMER CHURCH OF SOUTH HILLS
REDEEMER CHURCH OF SOUTH HILLS CHURCH BYLAWS Article I Congregational Meetings Section 1 Notice of Meetings Section 2 Annual and Semi-Annual Meetings Section 3 Method of Calling Meetings Section 4 Responsibility
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA
0 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD of ETHICS, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) CASE NO: 0CV-00 ) TERENCE SWEENEY, ) Defendant. ) MOTION FOR COMPLAINT HEARD BEFORE HONORABLE
More informationFrom Article at GetOutOfDebt.org
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 17 CLAIM NO. 131 OF 16 BETWEEN: SITTE RIVER WILDLIFE RESERVE ET AL AND THOMAS HERSKOWITZ ET AL BEFORE: the Honourable Justice Courtney Abel Mr. Rodwell Williams, SC
More informationMCAD ruling supports black Worcester officers passed over for promotion
MCAD ruling supports black Worcester officers passed over for promotion Pat Yancey of Worcester, president of the Worcester chapter of the NAACP, with her husband George. "I feel they need to settle this
More informationA FULL TIME PASTOR OPENING
Christ Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church 317 East Hamilton Avenue Flint, Michigan 48505 (810) 238-9605 (Office) (810) 238-8109 (Fax) A FULL TIME PASTOR OPENING Christ Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church
More informationBased on the translation by E. M. Edghill, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak.
On Interpretation By Aristotle Based on the translation by E. M. Edghill, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak. First we must define the terms 'noun' and 'verb', then the terms 'denial' and 'affirmation',
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In re Estate of JOSEPH G. BERG, JR., Deceased. LUCILLE WOLCOTT and LAWRENCE BERG, Petitioners-Appellants, UNPUBLISHED March 13, 2007 v No. 272255 Bay County Probate Court
More informationCASE NO.: BKC-AJC IN RE: LORRAINE BROOKE ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. /
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Page 1 CASE NO.: 07-12641-BKC-AJC IN RE: LORRAINE BROOKE ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. / Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A. 100 Southeast 2nd Avenue
More informationMasonic Etiquette. Learn the Do's and Don'ts of Masonic Etiquette
Masonic Etiquette Learn the Do's and Don'ts of Masonic Etiquette Masonic Etiquette, for the most part, is merely good manners and respect for your lodge, its members, its Worshipful Master and the convention
More information:J, C~~?4tA~ SAVELieH
In the Matter of an Arbitration between LOCAL UNION NO. 1245 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, Complainant, and PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Respondent. ------------- Suspension of:
More information