DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE 13 DHC 11
|
|
- Jonathan Garrett
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAKE BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR 13 DHC 11 E-X-C-E-R-P-T THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, ) ) PARTIAL TESTIMONY Plaintiff, ) OF ) KIMBERLY ROBB -vs- ) (relating to firing ) of Faris Dixon) DAVID C. SUTTON, Attorney, ) ) Sept. 17, 2014 Defendant. ) The North Carolina State Bar 217 E. Edenton Street Raleigh, North Carolina May 5 through May 9, 2014 June 9, 10, 11, 2014 July 18, 2014 September 16, 17, 18, 2014 Hearing Panel: CHAIRMAN: ATTORNEY MEMBER: PUBLIC MEMBER: Fred M. Morelock Post Office Box 1151 Raleigh, North Carolina Irvin W. Hankins, III Three Wachovia Center 401 S. Tryon Street, Suite 3000 Charlotte, North Carolina Karen B. Ray 119 Hickory Hill Road Mooresville, North Carolina Reported by: Amy L. Poythress, CVR-M 3404 Morningside Drive Tel: 919/ Raleigh, NC TriangleRep@aol.com
2 2 A P P E A R A N C E S Appearing on Behalf of the Plaintiff: Carmen Hoyme Bannon Mary D. Winstead Deputy Counsel The North Carolina State Bar 217 E. Edenton Street (27601) Post Office Box (27611) Raleigh, North Carolina cbannon@ncbar.gov mwinstead@ncbar.gov Appearing on behalf of the Defendant: David C. Sutton, Pro se Sutton Law Offices, P.A. 105-B Regency Boulevard Greenville, North Carolina (252) lawyer1@davecsuttonlaw.com Quoted material is verbatim and may/may not reflect a direct quote Proper nouns may be spelled phonetically
3 3 1 P R O C E E D I N G 2 [Court Reporter's Note: The following is partial 3 testimony of Kimberly Robb, taken on September 17, , in the Disciplinary Hearing Commission 5 proceeding regarding The North Carolina State Bar 6 versus David C. Sutton, Attorney.] 7 [Witness Kimberly Robb was called as a witness by 8 the State Bar at 3:09 p.m.; she was duly sworn and 9 was on direct examination by Ms. Winstead until a 10 recess was taken from 3:41 p.m. to 3:51 p.m.] 11 [Recess - 3:41 p.m. to 3:51 p.m.] 12 CHAIRMAN MORELOCK: We're back on the 13 record. 14 CROSS-EXAMINATION 15 BY MR. SUTTON: 3:51 p.m. 16 Q Ms. Robb, the Lopez case, haven't you 17 testified previously that it wasn't a particularly 18 strong case for the prosecution? 19 A That's correct. 20 Q And even good prosecutors lose cases. 21 A Yes, sir. 22 Q And if it's not a particularly strong 23 case, there's a fair chance you might not get a 24 beyond a reasonable doubt, right? 25 A That, or what we usually try to do, which
4 4 1 I did in this case, was offer to plea to a 2 misdemeanor to try to resolve it. 3 Q And you understood that he was a 4 registered nurse and he couldn't take that because 5 he would lose his license at his job at the hospital 6 in this case, right? 7 A I don't remember that. I'm sure there 8 were reasons that that happened. I knew he was a 9 registered nurse because he works for my husband. 10 Q I was going to say, your husband is a 11 doctor. If somebody is convicted of sexual 12 assaulting a minor, are they going to allow them to 13 be a nurse at that hospital? 14 A I don't know what their rules are. He 15 doesn't work at the hospital. 16 Q Okay. Your husband doesn't? 17 A No. 18 Q But you do know that Mr. Lopez was a 19 registered nurse. 20 A I do. 21 Q And Mr. Lopez -- you didn't even ever make 22 that offer to me, though, did you, Ms. Robb? 23 MS. WINSTEAD: Objection. 24 CHAIRMAN MORELOCK: How is that relevant? 25 MR. SUTTON: Well, she brought it up. She
5 5 1 said that -- the thrust of all the witnesses, 2 and it's obvious that it's a joint cooperative 3 effort, is to say I make things longer, I don't 4 work with people. She said that she tried to 5 work it out when, in fact, she never made that 6 offer to me. 7 I think I'm entitled to ask it because 8 they -- 9 CHAIRMAN MORELOCK: Overruled. 10 MR. SUTTON: Thank you. 11 A He had prior counsel, Witt Powell, and 12 Wayland Sermons, and Mark Owens, and all of us had 13 conversations and they told me that he would not 14 take it. 15 Q Exactly. So by the time he got to me, he 16 had gone through multiple attorneys, and you had 17 made the offer and through his previous attorneys he 18 had turned it down. 19 A That's correct. 20 Q So obviously it didn't make sense to offer 21 it again knowing he turned it down more 22 than -- probably more than once before. 23 A Yes, with all the other attorneys. 24 Q Okay. So -- okay. So there was no 25 argument or anything about a plea between you and I
6 6 1 in this case; it was just going to trial. 2 A That's the best I can remember. 3 Q Now, ma'am, if it wasn't a particularly 4 strong case, is there anything unusual about the 5 fact that it came back not guilty, talking about the 6 Lopez case? 7 MS. WINSTEAD: Objection. 8 CHAIRMAN MORELOCK: Overruled. 9 A No. 10 Q Well, the Bar is trying to prove that 11 somehow I did something, I suppose, I don't know 12 exactly, that I MS. WINSTEAD: Objection. 14 CHAIRMAN MORELOCK: Overruled. 15 Q -- that I did something that obstructed or 16 impeded justice, and if it wasn't a particularly 17 strong case and he got found not guilty, you can't 18 say that anything I did affected the outcome of the 19 case, can you? 20 A I absolutely can say that it did. 21 Q I thought you just said it wasn't a 22 particularly strong case and it wouldn't be unusual 23 for a not-particularly-strong case to come back not 24 guilty. 25 A Your behavior left every one of those
7 7 1 jurors, every one of those witnesses, probably your 2 clients, the court reporter, the clerk, with a 3 distaste that they had probably never experienced 4 before, and an opinion of the court system that was 5 much, much poorer than it was when they walked in 6 there. 7 Q Well, Ms. Robb, maybe it's a matter of 8 perspective. When I was asking you about the 9 administration of justice, it was a criminal case 10 where a jury determines guilt or innocence, and 11 maybe I should have phrased my question better. 12 Are you saying that -- given that you said 13 it wasn't a particularly strong case, and that not 14 particularly strong prosecution cases come back not 15 guilty, you can't say that anything I did affected 16 the jury coming back not guilty, can you? 17 A I can't say that, no, I cannot say that. 18 I think that your behavior did affect the outcome. 19 I think your -- you interrupted me so many times in 20 my closing argument that I couldn't even get my 21 argument across to the jury. 22 Q Ma'am A Now, whether it would have made a 24 difference, I don't know. But it was unnecessary. 25 Q And that's my point. Whether you liked it
8 8 1 or not, whether it was unnecessary, you can't say 2 that it had any affect on the outcome of the jury 3 verdict. 4 A I wasn't on the jury, so I wouldn't know. 5 Q So -- and that's been kind of my 6 objections all along, is you don't have any idea 7 whether anything I did affected any legal decision 8 by the jury. 9 A I don't have any knowledge about that. I 10 do know that I still have people come up and ask me 11 about you and your behavior in that trial. 12 Q Have any of the jurors ever come up and 13 said, "Ms. Robb, I found not guilty because Sutton's 14 horrendous conduct"? 15 A I remember hearing something about -- I do 16 remember hearing that closer to when the trial was, 17 that they felt like your behavior was so outlandish 18 that they felt sorry for your client. 19 Q So A And even your own client's wife said that. 21 Q So they felt so sorry -- my behavior was 22 so outlandish you think they found him not guilty? 23 A I think it went towards your side; I do. 24 Q I was so bad that they found him not 25 guilty?
9 9 1 A Your behavior was so bad. 2 Q So the jury -- you're saying that people 3 came and said the jurors thought my behavior was 4 awful, so they found my client not guilty. 5 A I think they felt sorry for your client. 6 Q So you think 12 people disobeyed the law 7 that they are given by the jury [sic], their solemn 8 oath? 9 A By the judge, you mean? 10 Q Yeah, by the judge, excuse me. 11 A I think that if it was a close case, and 12 it was, I knew that went into it; that your behavior 13 more than likely made them feel sorry for your 14 client. I even felt sorry for your client, to be 15 honest with you. 16 Q How many cases, Ms. Robb, have you 17 surmised that the jurors were so affected by the 18 misbehavior of defense counsel that they came back 19 not guilty? 20 MS. WINSTEAD: Objection. 21 CHAIRMAN MORELOCK: Sustained. 22 Q Ms. Robb, this case was set to go to trial 23 once before it actually went to trial, with me as 24 counsel; I don't know how many times before that. 25 But do you recall that?
10 10 1 A At least once. I do recall that. 2 ATTY MEMBER HANKINS: By "this case," are 3 you referring to the Lopez case? 4 MR. SUTTON: Yes, sir, Mr. Hankins. 5 Q And, ma'am, why did you think it was 6 proper for you to call my personal physician when I 7 was out sick? 8 MS. WINSTEAD: Objection. 9 CHAIRMAN MORELOCK: Overruled. 10 A When you did not show up, your paralegal 11 brought a note that you were sick. Judge William 12 Griffin was the judge. Judge Griffin, as he is, 13 he's hard on everybody in the courtroom, or was, he 14 ordered me to call your physician to verify whether 15 or not you actually could not come to court. He 16 ordered me. A superior court judge standing in 17 front of me. I was in the courtroom, I used the 18 clerk's phone. 19 Q Ma'am, isn't it true that when the 20 discussion of me being out sick -- oh, excuse me. 21 Scratch that. 22 My client was physically in the courtroom, 23 correct? 24 A I believe he was. 25 Q And, ma'am, when it was discussed in open
11 11 1 court that I was out sick, you and Judge Griffin 2 were generally laughing it up about my allegedly 3 being out sick, right? 4 A I never laughed in front of Judge Griffin. 5 He scared me. 6 Q Ma'am, were you there when Judge Griffin 7 said that if he had to come get me on a stretcher 8 the trial was going to start the next day? 9 A I sure did. 10 Q Were you there also when he said there was 11 going to be a trial for Mr. Lopez with or without 12 David Sutton there? 13 A That sounds like something he would say. 14 Q Were there people there to witness this? 15 A Yes. 16 Q Do you think that had a positive impact on 17 the impression of the public upon our profession? 18 MS. WINSTEAD: Objection. 19 CHAIRMAN MORELOCK: Sustained. 20 Q Ma'am, in going back to the public 21 perception in Pitt County, tell me how, Ms. Robb, 22 you can tell the difference between any negative 23 perception generated by what I've done versus all 24 the horrid press about you firing Faris Dixon. 25 A I didn't fire Faris Dixon. He resigned.
12 12 1 And part of what I do, I'm going to have bad press, 2 Mr. Sutton. I accept that. 3 Q But he resigned after you let the press 4 know that you had initiated an SBI investigation of 5 him, right? 6 MS. WINSTEAD: Objection. 7 A No. 8 CHAIRMAN MORELOCK: Sustained. 9 Q Ms. Robb, without going into the details 10 of Mr. Dixon's thing, is it not fair to say that 11 there is extreme anger within the community in Pitt 12 County over the situation with Faris Dixon? 13 MS. WINSTEAD: Objection. 14 CHAIRMAN MORELOCK: Sustained. 15 Q How can you tell the difference, ma'am, 16 between the public's negative image for anything 17 that I may have done and things that other people in 18 the profession have done that's been in the press? 19 A Everybody does things that are perhaps 20 perceived differently. I'd need more specifics 21 about what you're talking about. 22 Q Ma'am, you read the paper, you're there. 23 You know what's on the chat boards. It's obvious 24 they don't want me to go into details. You know 25 that the stories about me are one of many stories in
13 13 1 Pitt County that reflect negatively on our 2 profession. 3 And I'm asking you how it is that you can 4 sit here and say that what I have done has affected 5 that versus the other negative stories in the press 6 that involve you, for example, in Pitt County? 7 A I was asked about your behavior in the 8 Lopez trial, specifically. 9 Q Ma'am, are you saying that you think my 10 behavior in the Lopez trial in -- you said 2007 but 11 if I tell you October of 2008, does that sound about 12 right? 13 A I can't remember. 14 Q So are you saying that my behavior six 15 years ago is affecting opinion today? 16 A No, I think the things that you did in the 17 last year to -- year to two years have affected it, 18 yes. I thought you were referring to her question 19 about the Lopez case. 20 Q Now, you made the decision to have me 21 arrested, right? 22 A No, sir. 23 Q Who did? 24 A Anthony Futrell. I was on vacation, 25 Mr. Sutton.
14 14 1 Q Weren't you on the phone with him? 2 A I was on the phone with whom? 3 Q The sheriff, your office, whomever, 4 listening to the tape, making comments on it. 5 MS. WINSTEAD: Objection. 6 CHAIRMAN MORELOCK: Overruled. 7 A Mr. Sutton, Paula Dance called me while I 8 was on vacation, and when she called me I was at the 9 landfill with my husband's dually truck. If you 10 know anything about a dually truck, they are very, 11 very loud. I said, "Paula, I can't hear you. I 12 can't hear the recording. You're going to have to 13 call somebody in my office." 14 Q But you didn't have anything to do with 15 it. 16 A No, sir. I couldn't hear the tape. I 17 said, "Talk to Anthony or Clark." So she either 18 talked to Anthony and Clark, or Anthony or Clark. 19 Q Ma'am, so you had no involvement with the 20 case. 21 A Of course I had involvement with the case, 22 Mr. Sutton, but I did not, quote, "have you 23 arrested." I couldn't even hear Q I've never accused you of that, have I? 25 A You just asked me if I had you arrested.
15 15 1 Q I asked you if you made the decision. 2 A No, the decision was made by Anthony 3 Futrell. 4 Q And, ma'am, after that decision was made, 5 did you come to realize or -- scratch that. 6 At the time you talked to Ms. Dance, did 7 you realize that there was a court date set seven 8 days later? 9 MS. WINSTEAD: Objection. 10 CHAIRMAN MORELOCK: Overruled. 11 A For what? 12 Q The underlying case, the child abuse case 13 with Deputy Dolenti. 14 A I knew that there was a hearing date 15 because I had been involved in the Waters case. 16 Q Did you know it was exactly seven days 17 later? 18 A No, sir. Like I said, I was on vacation, 19 I was trying to enjoy myself. 20 Q And, if you know, do you know if 21 Mr. Futrell was privy to that knowledge whenever he 22 made his decision? 23 MS. WINSTEAD: Objection. 24 CHAIRMAN MORELOCK: Overruled. 25 A I don't know. I assume so. I mean, I
16 16 1 assume any investigator would explain the whole 2 situation. 3 Q Have you talked with him since then about 4 it? Mr. Futrell? 5 MS. WINSTEAD: Objection. 6 CHAIRMAN MORELOCK: Overruled. 7 A Yes, I have. 8 Q Do you know if he knew? 9 MS. WINSTEAD: Objection. 10 CHAIRMAN MORELOCK: Overruled. 11 A I didn't ask him that specific question. 12 It wasn't important to me. 13 [End of Excerpt.]
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH vs. Case No. 05 CF 381
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2 3 STATE OF WISCONSIN, 4 PLAINTIFF, 05 CF 381 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381 6 STEVEN A. AVERY, 7 DEFENDANT. 8 DATE: September 28, 2009 9 BEFORE:
More information2 THE COURT: All right. Please raise your. 5 having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: 6 THE COURT: All right, sir.
38 1 THE WITNESS: Yes, sir. 2 THE COURT: All right. Please raise your 3 right hand. 4 CHARLES BRODSKY, 5 having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: 6 THE COURT: All right, sir. You may take 7
More informationPage 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA Page 1 STATE OF ALASKA, Plaintiff, vs. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. 3AN-06-05630 CI VOLUME 18 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS March 26, 2008 - Pages
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA : v. : : :
0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HARRISBURG DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CASE NO. v. MURRAY ROJAS -CR-00 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS JURY TRIAL TESTIMONY
More informationMarc James Asay v. Michael W. Moore
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationCOUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Plaintiff, Defendant. hearing before the Honorable Daniel C. Moreno, one of
STTE OF MINNESOT DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIL DISTRICT State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, v. Chrishaun Reed McDonald, District Court File No. -CR-- TRNSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS Defendant. The
More informationUNOFFICIAL, UNEDITED, UNCERTIFIED DRAFT
0 THIS UNCERTIFIED DRAFT TRANSCRIPT HAS NOT BEEN EDITED OR PROOFREAD BY THE COURT REPORTER. DIFFERENCES WILL EXIST BETWEEN THE UNCERTIFIED DRAFT VERSION AND THE CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPT. (CCP (R)() When prepared
More information>> ALL RISE. [BACKGROUND SOUNDS] >> SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. PLEASE BE SEATED. >> GOOD MORNING. >> WE'RE IN PLANK V. STATE.
>> ALL RISE. [BACKGROUND SOUNDS] >> SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. PLEASE BE SEATED. >> GOOD MORNING. >> WE'RE IN PLANK V. STATE. >> GOOD MORNING AND MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT. MY NAME IS COLLEEN
More informationPAGES: 1-24 EXHIBITS: 0. Sanjeev Lath vs. City of Manchester, NH DEPOSITION OF PATROL OFFICER AUSTIN R. GOODMAN
1 PAGES: 1-24 EXHIBITS: 0 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HILLSBOROUGH SS SUPERIOR NORTH DOCKET NO. 216-2016-CV-821 Sanjeev Lath vs., NH DEPOSITION OF This deposition held pursuant to the New Hampshire Rules of
More informationTHE COURT: All right. Call your next witness. MR. JOHNSON: Agent Mullen, Terry Mullen. (BRIEF PAUSE) (MR. MULLEN PRESENT)
not released. MR. WESTLING: Yes. I was just going to say that. THE COURT: ll right. Call your next witness. MR. JOHNSON: gent Mullen, Terry Mullen. (BRIEF PUSE) (MR. MULLEN PRESENT) THE COURT: Sir, if
More informationCondcnsclt! Page 1. 6 Part 9. I don't think I could have anticipated the snow. 7 and your having to be here at 1:30 any better than I did.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND STATE OF MARYLAND, V. ADNAN SYEO, BEFORE: Defendant. Indictment Nos. 199100-6 REPORTER'S OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS (Trial on the Merita) Baltimore.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Docket No. CR ) Plaintiff, ) Chicago, Illinois ) March, 0 v. ) : p.m. ) JOHN DENNIS
More informationA & T TRANSCRIPTS (720)
THE COURT: ll right. Bring the jury in. nd, Mr. Cooper, I'll ask you to stand and be sworn. You can wait till the jury comes in, if you want. (Jury present at :0 a.m.) THE COURT: Okay, Mr. Cooper, if you'll
More informationUNOFFICIAL/UNAUTHENTICATED TRANSCRIPT. [The R.M.C. 803 session was called to order at 1246, MJ [Col SPATH]: These commissions are called to order.
0 [The R.M.C. 0 session was called to order at, December.] MJ [Col SPATH]: These commissions are called to order. All parties who were present before are again present. Get the witness back up, please.
More informationORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF KEN ANDERSON VOLUME 2
CAUSE NO. 86-452-K26 THE STATE OF TEXAS ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff(s) Page 311 VS. ) WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS MICHAEL MORTON Defendant(s). ) 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION
More information>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET WILL BE THE FLORIDA BAR V. ROBERT ADAMS. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE, AND MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT,
>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET WILL BE THE FLORIDA BAR V. ROBERT ADAMS. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE, AND MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, I'M WILLIAM JUNK, AND I'M HERE WITH RESPONDENT, MR.
More informationSandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 3205
Volume 25 1 IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 2 DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 3 4 5 6 THE STATE OF TEXAS } NO. F-96-39973-J 7 VS: } & A-96-253 8 DARLIE LYNN ROUTIER } Kerr Co. Number 9 10 11 12 13 STATEMENT
More informationDaniel Lugo v. State of Florida SC
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationCase 2:13-cr FVS Document 369 Filed 05/09/14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SPOKANE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SPOKANE DIVISION 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. :-CR-000-FVS ) RHONDA LEE FIRESTACK-HARVEY, ) LARRY LESTER
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CR-0-2027-JF ) 5 Plaintiff, ) ) San Jose, CA 6 vs. ) October 2, 200 ) 7 ROGER VER, ) ) 8
More informationThe Florida Bar v. Jorge Luis Cueto
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. CR-S KJD(LRL) ) vs. ) ) IRWIN SCHIFF, CYNTHIA NEUN, ) and LAWRENCE COHEN, )
0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA THE HON. KENT J. DAWSON, JUDGE PRESIDING UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. CR-S-0--KJD(LRL) ) vs. ) ) IRWIN SCHIFF, CYNTHIA NEUN, ) and
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA
0 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD of ETHICS, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) CASE NO: 0CV-00 ) TERENCE SWEENEY, ) Defendant. ) MOTION FOR COMPLAINT HEARD BEFORE HONORABLE
More informationGAnthony-rough.txt. Rough Draft IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND 2 FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Rough Draft - 1 GAnthony-rough.txt 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND 2 FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA 3 ZENAIDA FERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ, 4 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 5 vs. CASE NO.:
More informationsaw online, change what you're telling us today? MR. GUY: Thank you, ma'am. MR. GUY: Yes, sir. MR. STROLLA: Yes, Your Honor. (Witness excused.
saw online, change what you're telling us today? No, sir. MR. GUY: Thank you, ma'am. THE COURT: ll right. May she be excused? MR. GUY: Yes, sir. MR. STROLL: Yes, Your Honor. THE COURT: ll right. Thank
More informationAT THE BEGINNING, DURING OR AFTER. SO IF IF SOMEONE IS STEALING SOMETHING, AS YOUR CLIENT HAS BEEN ALLEGED TO HAVE DONE, AND IS CAUGHT AND IN THE
>>> THE NEXT CASE IS ROCKMORE VERSUS STATE OF FLORIDA. >> YOU MAY PROCEED. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, MY NAME IS KATHRYN RADTKE. I'M AN ASSISTANT PUBLIC DEFENDER AND I REPRESENT
More information>> THE NEXT CASE IS STATE OF FLORIDA VERSUS FLOYD. >> TAKE YOUR TIME. TAKE YOUR TIME. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY.
>> THE NEXT CASE IS STATE OF FLORIDA VERSUS FLOYD. >> TAKE YOUR TIME. TAKE YOUR TIME. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> GOOD MORNING. MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
More information>> ALL RISE. SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. PLEASE BE SEATED. >> GOOD MORNING TO BOTH OF YOU. THE LAST CASE THIS WEEK IS CALLOWAY V.
>> ALL RISE. SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. PLEASE BE SEATED. >> GOOD MORNING TO BOTH OF YOU. THE LAST CASE THIS WEEK IS CALLOWAY V. STATE OF FLORIDA. >> GOOD MORNING, MY NAME IS SCOTT SAKIN,
More information1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 3 November 1, Friday 5 8:25 a.m. 6 7 (Whereupon, the following 8 proceedings were held in
Volume 16 1 IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 2 DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 3 4 5 6 THE STATE OF TEXAS } NO. F-96-39973-J 7 VS: } & A-96-253 8 DARLIE LYNN ROUTIER } Kerr Co. Number 9 10 11 12 13 STATEMENT
More informationState of Florida v. Victor Giorgetti
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationNorman Blake McKenzie v. State of Florida SC >> THE NEXT CASE ON THE COURT'S AGENDA IS MCKENZIE VERSUS STATE. >> MR. QUARLES LET'S HEAR ABOUT
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationA P P E A R A N C E S FOR THE PLAINTIFF: MR. DIRRELL S. JONES (BY TELEPHONE) ASSISTANT DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL State Bar of Texas Office of the Chief
CUSE NO. 380-01407-2013 COMMISSION FOR LWYER )( IN THE DISTRICT COURT DISCIPLINE, )( )( Plaintiff, )( )( VS. )( 380th JUDICIL DISTRICT )( TY CLEVENGER, )( )( Defendant. )( COLLIN COUNTY, TEXS ---------------------------------------------------------------
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. CR-S KJD(LRL) ) vs. ) ) IRWIN SCHIFF, CYNTHIA NEUN, ) and LAWRENCE COHEN, )
0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA THE HON. KENT J. DAWSON, JUDGE PRESIDING UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. CR-S-0--KJD(LRL) ) vs. ) ) IRWIN SCHIFF, CYNTHIA NEUN, ) and
More information>> PLEASE RISE. >> FLORIDA SUPREME COURT IS NOW IN SESSION. >> WE NOW TAKE UP THE SECOND CASE ON OUR DOCKET WHICH IS MEISTER VERSUS RIVERO.
>> PLEASE RISE. >> FLORIDA SUPREME COURT IS NOW IN SESSION. >> WE NOW TAKE UP THE SECOND CASE ON OUR DOCKET WHICH IS MEISTER VERSUS RIVERO. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, LYNN WAXMAN REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER.
More informationTestimony of Detective Jimmy Patterson (2)
Testimony of Detective Jimmy Patterson (2) THE COURT: Mr. Mosty, are you ready? 20 MR. RICHARD C. MOSTY: Well, that 21 depends on what we're getting ready to do. 22 THE COURT: Well. All right. Where 23
More information4 THE COURT: Raise your right hand, 8 THE COURT: All right. Feel free to. 9 adjust the chair and microphone. And if one of the
154 1 (Discussion off the record.) 2 Good afternoon, sir. 3 THE WITNESS: Afternoon, Judge. 4 THE COURT: Raise your right hand, 5 please. 6 (Witness sworn.) 7 THE WITNESS: Yes, sir. 8 THE COURT: All right.
More information/10/2007, In the matter of Theodore Smith Associated Reporters Int'l., Inc. Page 1419
1 2 THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 3 4 In the Matter of 5 NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION v. 6 THEODORE SMITH 7 Section 3020-a Education Law Proceeding (File
More informationAPPELLATE COURT NO. COURT OF APPEALS
1 APPELLATE COURT NO. 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE OF THE ANTHONY SHAWN MEDINA, VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF TEXAS Appellant, Appellee. 11 CAUSE NO. 726088 12 APPEAL FROM THE 228TH DISTRICT
More informationClosing Argument in Guilt or Innocence
Closing Argument in Guilt or Innocence 12 THE COURT: Let the record reflect 13 that all parties in the trial are present and the jury is 14 seated. Mr. Glover. 15 MR. CURTIS GLOVER: May it please the 16
More informationUNOFFICIAL/UNAUTHENTICATED TRANSCRIPT. [The R.M.C. 803 session was called to order at 1602, MJ [Col SPATH]: These commissions are called to order.
0 [The R.M.C. 0 session was called to order at 0, February.] MJ [Col SPATH]: These commissions are called to order. All parties present before the recess are again present. Defense Counsel, you may call
More information1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 2 HARRISBURG DIVISION
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 2 HARRISBURG DIVISION 3 TAMMY KITZMILLER, et al., : CASE NO. Plaintiffs : 4:04-CV-02688 4 vs. : DOVER SCHOOL DISTRICT, : Harrisburg,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE. ) Case No.: 3:17-CR-82. Defendants. )
IN THE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. RANDALL KEITH BEANE, ) HEATHER ANN TUCCI-JARRAF, ) ) Defendants. ) ) APPEARANCES: ) Case No.:
More informationClosing Arguments in Punishment
Closing Arguments in Punishment Defense S. Preston Douglass THE COURT: Thank you, Mr. Glover. 20 Mr. Douglass? 21 MR. S. PRESTON DOUGLASS: Yes, sir. 22 Thank you, Judge. 23 May it please the Court? 24
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE. ) Case No.: 3:17-CR-82. Defendant. )
IN THE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. HEATHER ANN TUCCI-JARRAF, ) ) Defendant. ) ) APPEARANCES: ) Case No.: :-CR- ) PROCEEDINGS BEFORE
More information5 INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE NO Case No: SC JUDGE RICHARD H. ALBRITTON, JR / 7
1 1 2 3 BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION 4 5 INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE NO. 04-239 Case No: SC05-851 6 JUDGE RICHARD H. ALBRITTON, JR. --------------------------------------/ 7 8 9
More information(Witness sworn.) THE COURT: Let's proceed. NAT TOVAR, having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION
State call officer Tovar. THE BAILIFF: witness has not been sworn. Your Honor, this THE COURT: Raise your right hand, please. 0 0 (Witness sworn.) THE COURT: Let's proceed. NAT TOVAR, having been first
More informationCase 1:06-cv WYD-MJW Document 150 Filed 09/12/08 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 110
Case 1:06-cv-01135-WYD-MJW Document 150 Filed 09/12/08 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 558 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 2 Civil Action No. 06-cv-01135-WYD-MJW 3 ALLSTATE INSURANCE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Vol. - 1 THE NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION ) FOR THE HOMELESS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) CASE NO. :0-CV-00 ) JON HUSTED, in his
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/01/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 431 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2018
1 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: CIVIL TERM : PART 17 2 -------------------------------------------------X LAWRENCE KINGSLEY 3 Plaintiff 4 - against - 5 300 W. 106TH ST. CORP.
More informationCASE NO.: BKC-AJC IN RE: LORRAINE BROOKE ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. /
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Page 1 CASE NO.: 07-12641-BKC-AJC IN RE: LORRAINE BROOKE ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. / Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A. 100 Southeast 2nd Avenue
More informationLucious Boyd v. State of Florida
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff, : -against- : U.S. Courthouse Central Islip, N.Y. REHAL, :
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X JESSE FRIEDMAN, : Plaintiff, : CV 0 -against- : U.S. Courthouse Central Islip, N.Y. REHAL, : : TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION
More informationCurtis L. Johnston Selman v. Cobb County School District, et al June 30, 2003
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2 ATLANTA DIVISION 3 JEFFREY MICHAEL SELMAN, Plaintiff, 4 vs. CASE NO. 1:02-CV-2325-CC 5 COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 6 COBB COUNTY BOARD
More information2 CASE NAME: PRECISION DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS. 3 YURI PLYAM, ET AL. 4 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2011
1 1 CASE NUMBER: BC384285 2 CASE NAME: PRECISION DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS. 3 YURI PLYAM, ET AL. 4 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2011 5 DEPARTMENT 17 HON. RICHARD E. RICO, JUDGE 6 REPORTER: SYLVIA
More informationMichael Duane Zack III v. State of Florida
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS *
COMMONWELTH OF MSSCHUSETTS Volume: Pages: - Exhibits: None BRISTOL, ss. SUPERIOR COURT DEPRTMENT OF THE TRIL COURT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * COMMONWELTH OF MSSCHUSETTS * * vs. * * RON HERNNDEZ
More information1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, JURY TRIAL TRIAL - DAY 23 5 vs. Case No.
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2 3 STATE OF WISCONSIN, 4 PLAINTIFF, JURY TRIAL TRIAL - DAY 23 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381 6 STEVEN A. AVERY, 7 DEFENDANT. 8 DATE: MARCH 14,
More informationPastor's Notes. Hello
Pastor's Notes Hello We're looking at the ways you need to see God's mercy in your life. There are three emotions; shame, anger, and fear. God does not want you living your life filled with shame from
More information1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 3 J.F., et al., ) 4 Plaintiffs, ) 3:14-cv-00581-PK ) 5 vs. ) April 15, 2014 ) 6 MULTNOMAH COUNTY SCHOOL ) Portland, Oregon DISTRICT
More informationThis transcript was exported on Apr 09, view latest version here.
Speaker 2: Speaker 3: Previously on Score: Behind the Headlines. And as a big NBA fan, I grew up with the vague knowledge that Jordan's dad had been killed. And I always assumed that it was, in some ways,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA I N D E X T O W I T N E S S E S TAMMY KITZMILLER, et al : : CASE NO. v. : :0-CR-00 : DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, : et al : FOR
More information10 BEFORE: 11 HONORABLE REENA RAGGI, U.S.D.J. and a Jury APPEARANCES:
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 3 ----------------------------------X 4 : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : CR-01-56 5 : v. : U.S. Courthouse 6 : Brooklyn, New York JOHN DeROSS
More information>> GOOD MORNING, JUSTICES, COUNSEL. I'M NANCY RYAN REPRESENTING DONALD WILLIAMS. THIS IS ANOTHER APPEAL FROM A MURDER CONVICTION AND DEATH SENTENCE.
>> GOOD MORNING, JUSTICES, COUNSEL. I'M NANCY RYAN REPRESENTING DONALD WILLIAMS. THIS IS ANOTHER APPEAL FROM A MURDER CONVICTION AND DEATH SENTENCE. THIS IS A CASE WHERE REAL AND SERIOUS PROBLEMS TOOK
More informationTHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : vs. : : TIMOTHY Da'SHAUN TAYLOR : : CR 0 Detention Hearing in the above matter held
More informationMark Allen Geralds v. State of Florida SC SC07-716
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationDana Williamson v. State of Florida SC SC
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationSTIDHAM: Okay. Do you remember being dispatched to the Highland Trailer Park that evening?
Testimony of James Dollahite in Misskelley trial Feb 1994 STIDHAM: Would you please state your name for the Court? DOLLAHITE: James Dollahite. STIDHAM: And where are you employed Officer Dollahite? DOLLAHITE:
More informationCase 3:10-cv GPC-WVG Document Filed 03/07/15 Page 1 of 30 EXHIBIT 5
Case 3:10-cv-00940-GPC-WVG Document 388-4 Filed 03/07/15 Page 1 of 30 EXHIBIT 5 Case 3:10-cv-00940-GPC-WVG Document 388-4 Filed 03/07/15 Page 2 of 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More information>> ALL RISE. >> SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. >> OKAY. GOOD MORNING. THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS BROOKINS V. STATE. COUNSEL?
>> ALL RISE. >> SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. >> OKAY. GOOD MORNING. THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS BROOKINS V. STATE. COUNSEL? >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, YOUR HONOR, I'M BAYA HARRISON,
More informationOPEN NINTH: CONVERSATIONS BEYOND THE COURTROOM WOMEN IN ROBES EPISODE 21 APRIL 24, 2017 HOSTED BY: FREDERICK J. LAUTEN
0 OPEN NINTH: CONVERSATIONS BEYOND THE COURTROOM WOMEN IN ROBES EPISODE APRIL, HOSTED BY: FREDERICK J. LAUTEN 0 (Music.) >> Welcome to another episode of "Open Ninth: Conversations Beyond the Courtroom"
More informationSTATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RENO, NEVADA TRANSCRIPT OF ELECTRONICALLY-RECORDED INTERVIEW JOHN MAYER AUGUST 4, 2014 RENO, NEVADA
STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RENO, NEVADA TRANSCRIPT OF ELECTRONICALLY-RECORDED INTERVIEW JOHN MAYER AUGUST, RENO, NEVADA Transcribed and proofread by: CAPITOL REPORTERS BY: Michel Loomis
More informationRobert Eugene Hendrix v. State of Florida
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationVicki Zito Mother of Trafficking Victim
Vicki Zito Mother of Trafficking Victim Alright, just to get a quick check on a pulse of the room, how many of you are here because you have to be? Honesty is absolutely expected. Okay, that's cool. How
More informationHILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PUBLIC
Filing # 7828 E-Filed 09//2018 07:41 : PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT CRIMINAL NO. l5-oo6cfano STATE OF FLORIDA, VS. JOHN N. JONCHUCK,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X RACHELI COHEN AND ADDITIONAL : PLAINTIFFS LISTED IN RIDER A, Plaintiffs, : -CV-0(NGG) -against- : United States
More information>> NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS DEMOTT VERSUS STATE. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT. COUNSEL, MY NAME IS KEVIN HOLTZ.
>> NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS DEMOTT VERSUS STATE. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT. COUNSEL, MY NAME IS KEVIN HOLTZ. I REPRESENT THE PETITIONER, JUSTIN DEMOTT IN THIS CASE THAT IS HERE
More informationCOLUMBIA'S FIRST BAPTIST FACES LAWSUIT OVER FORMER DEACON'S CONDUCT
1 of 8 1/17/2014 6:06 PM State, The (Columbia, SC) 2002-05-26 Section: FRONT Edition: FINAL Page: A1 COLUMBIA'S FIRST BAPTIST FACES LAWSUIT OVER FORMER DEACON'S CONDUCT RICK BRUNDRETT and ALLISON ASKINS
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : DAUPHIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. : OF V. :
0 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : DAUPHIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. : TIMOTHY MARK CURLEY : No. CP--MD--0 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF :
More informationPlease rise. Hear ye, hear ye, hear ye. The Supreme Court of Florida is now in session. All who have cause to plea, draw near, give attention, and
Please rise. Hear ye, hear ye, hear ye. The Supreme Court of Florida is now in session. All who have cause to plea, draw near, give attention, and you shall be heard. God save these United States, the
More informationCase 4:02-cr JHP Document 148 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 08/22/08 Page 1 of 48
Case :0-cr-000-JHP Document Filed in USDC ND/OK on 0//0 Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) -vs- MICHAEL JEFFREY
More informationDavid Dionne v. State of Florida
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2006
TAYLOR, J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2006 ANDRE LEON LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D05-1958 [ June 21, 2006 ] Andre Lewis appeals
More informationThe Florida Bar v. Kayo Elwood Morgan SC
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationCardinal Bernard F. Law - Day 6 10/16/2002
\ Pagel 1 OF MASSACHUSETTS 2 COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX 3 GREGORY FORD, et al., Plaintiff, 4 Superior Court vs. Civil Action 5 No. 02-0626 BERNARD CARDINAL LAW, a/k/a, 6 CARDINAL BERNARD F. LAW, Defendants. 7...
More informationDifferent people are going to be testifying. comes into this court is going to know. about this case. No one individual can come in and
Different people are going to be testifying during this trial. Each person that testifies that comes into this court is going to know certain things about this case. No one individual can come in and tell
More informationFlorida Board of Bar Examiners Re: W.F.H.
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More information>> OKAY. CASE NUMBER TWO IS MCMILLIAN VERSUS STATE. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, ANN FINNELL ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT,
>> OKAY. CASE NUMBER TWO IS MCMILLIAN VERSUS STATE. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, ANN FINNELL ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT, JUSTIN MCMILLIAN. YOUR HONOR, WE'RE HERE TODAY ON INEFFECTIVE
More informationAPPELLATE COURT NO. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
," T'''', ~. APPELLATE COURT NO. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS ANTHONY SHAWN MEDINA, Appellant, VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. 0 CAUSE NO. 0 APPEAL FROM THE TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS
More information73/J1' ORIGINAL SEP CAUSE NO THE STATE OF TEXAS VS. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, TEXAS RODNEY REED 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CAUSE NO. 0 /J' THE STATE OF TEXAS VS. RODNEY REED X X X X X N THE DSTRCT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, TEXAS ST JUDCAL DSTRCT 0 REPORTER'S RECORD GULT/NNOCENCE PHASE PRE-TRAL HEARNG APRL 0, VOLUME OF ORGNAL
More informationCAMERON SANDERS and KEVIN S. SANDERS, Plaintiffs,
CAMERON SANDERS and KEVIN S. SANDERS, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 16-2012-CA-008487-XXXX-MA DIVISION: CV-H vs. Plaintiffs, NEWPORT UNIT
More informationSTATE OF ALABAMA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF MOBILE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CRIMINAL OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT ON APPEAL
STATE OF ALABAMA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF MOBILE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CRIMINAL STATE OF ALABAMA, V. RODNEY KARL STANBERRY, CASES NO. CC-92-2313, 92-2314 and 92-2315 Defendant REPORTER'S
More informationTrial Roles. Attorney Witness Research Assistant Jury Prepare testimony with witnesses Prepare questions for crossexamination
Before Trial Trial Roles Attorney Witness Research Assistant Jury Prepare testimony with Prepare questions for crossexamination Write opening and closing statements Prepare testimony with attorneys Work
More information>> ALL RISE. >> SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. PLEASE BE SEATED. >> BEFORE WE PROCEED WITH OUR NEXT CASE WE HAVE STUDENTS HERE FROM THE
>> ALL RISE. >> SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. PLEASE BE SEATED. >> BEFORE WE PROCEED WITH OUR NEXT CASE WE HAVE STUDENTS HERE FROM THE TRINITY SCHOOL OF CHILDREN. AM I CORRECT? AND WHAT GRADE
More informationTestimony of William Parker
Testimony of William Parker THE COURT: All right. Today is 20 Thursday, January 30th, 1997. 21 All right. Let the record reflect 22 that these proceedings are being held outside of the 23 presence of the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Case :-cv-00-tds-jep Document Filed 0// Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA JOAQUIN CARCAÑO, et al., ) :CV ) Plaintiffs, ) ) V. ) ) PATRICK McCRORY, in
More informationBoth Hollingsworth and Schroeder testified that as Branch Davidians, they thought that God's true believers were
The verdict isn't in yet, but the fate of the 11 Branch Davidians being tried in San Antonio will probably turn on the jury's evaluation of the testimony of the government's two star witnesses, Victorine
More informationDeposition of Karl Willers taken 11/21/14 Weldon & Associates (952)
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 3 4 5 File No. 13-CV-266 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 Forest Olivier et al., 8 Plaintiffs, 9 vs. 10 11 Karl Willers et al., 12 Defendants.
More informationMINUTES SPECIAL MEETING MUNICIPAL COUNCIL BOROUGH OF RED BANK MAY 22, :00 P.M.
MINUTES SPECIL MEETING MUNICIPL COUNCIL BOROUGH OF RED BNK MY 22, 2007 5:00 P.M. MYOR MENN: Good evening. Welcome to the Red Bank Special Council Meeting. It is now 5:12 p.m. This is a special hearing
More information. NO. B - CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY NO, 4 - CARR FIREARMS PUB ST/Pl vs. vs. vs.
COMMONWEALTH vs. JIMEL LAWSON COMMONWEALTH vs. JEHMAR GLADDEN COMMONWEALTH vs. TERRENCE LEWIS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL TRIALS DIVISION ----- OCTOBER
More informationPage 1. Page 2. Page 4 1 (Pages 1 to 4) Page 3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 162ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT J.S., S.L., L.C. vs. Plaintiffs, VILLAGE VOICE MEDIA HOLDINGS, L.L.C., D/B/A BACKPAGE.COM; CAUSE NO. DC-16-14700 BACKPAGE.COM, L.L.C.;
More information