STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
|
|
- Charlene Fields
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Alca Condominium Association, Inc., Petitioner v. Case No Nancy Wear, Respondent. / FINAL ORDER Pursuant to notice, the undersigned arbitrator of the Division of Florida Land Sales, Condominiums, and Mobile Homes convened a formal hearing in this case on May and July 6, 2004, at the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Florida, with the Arbitrator and both parties present. During the hearing, both parties presented the testimony of witnesses and the tendered several documents into evidence. The parties submitted proposed recommended orders after the conclusion of the hearing. This order is entered after consideration of the complete record in this matter. APPEARANCES For Petitioner: Lilliana M. Farinas-Sabogal, Esquire Becker & Poliakoff, P.A. 121 Alhambra Plaza 10 th Floor Coral Gables, Florida
2 For Respondent: Nancy C. Wear, Esquire 1234 South Dixie Hwy. Suite 337 Coral Gables, Florida STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE Whether the respondent, through her behavior, has created a nuisance by immoral, improper, offensive or unlawful use of the condominium property or has done any act that obstructs or interferes with the owners, occupants, employees or guests of other units, in violation of article X of the declaration of condominium and the rules and regulations of the association. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On August 2, 2003, Alca Condominium Association, Inc. (petition/association) filed a petition for arbitration naming Nancy Wear (respondent/unit owner) as the respondent. As the arbitrator was unable to serve respondent with the petition for arbitration, the arbitrator entered an order requiring service on September 4, On September 22, 2003, the association personally served the respondent. On October 15, 2003, the association filed an amended petition. On October 19, 2003, the respondent filed a motion to dismiss. The association filed a response on October 23, On December 17, 2003, the arbitrator issued an order denying in part the respondent s motion to dismiss and ordered the respondent to file an answer to the amended petition. On January 26, 2004, the respondent served a second motion to dismiss, a motion for attorney s fees and a motion to disqualify association s counsel. On February 16, 2004, the association filed a response to the second motion to dismiss, motion for 2
3 attorney s fees and motion to disqualify association s counsel. On March 4, 2004, the arbitrator entered an order denying the motions and requiring the respondent to file an answer. The respondent filed an answer on March 20, A formal hearing was held on May and July 6, 2004, at the University of Miami in Coral Gables. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Alca Condominium is a condominium within the meaning of Florida Statutes section The Alca Condominium Association, Inc. is the entity responsible for the administration and operation of the Alca Condominium. 2. Nancy Wear is the fee simple owner of unit 307 and has resided in her unit since approximately The association presented the testimony of Taryn Davis, the owner of unit 114, who has resided at the condominium since Ms. Davis testified that the first time she met the respondent, the respondent screamed at her regarding her feeding of feral cats and acted hostile towards her. Ms. Davis testified that she was scared of respondent. 4. Ms. Davis further testified that respondent has discarded her unwanted mail on the by the mailboxes and in the hallways of the condominium property for several months. Although the Ms. Davis had not seen the respondent discard the mail, she testified that the mail had the respondent s unit number on it. Ms. Davis said she found the littering annoying. She also testified that she had seen several 3
4 of the respondent s signs, some reading Alcatraz, posted on the common area walls and she felt the postings were unsightly. 5. Ms. Davis also testified that she had attended meetings in the condominium and that respondent was disruptive and did not allow the regular business of the meetings to continue while she was there. Ms. Davis testified that she did not take issue with respondent s desire to be involved with the condominium, but rather with her behavior. 6. Throughout her testimony, Ms. Davis stated that she was fearful, scared and frightened of the respondent. She testified that the respondent disturbed her, made her feel uncomfortable, and that she felt harassed by the respondent. Ms. Davis testified that the respondent s actions have interfered with the peaceful possession of her unit and have affected her comfort level at the condominium. Finally, Ms. Davis testified that she believed that the respondent s actions would continue to affect her this way in the future. 7. The association presented the testimony of Maria Salazar, the owner of unit 309, who has resided in the condominium since approximately She was a board member for approximately six years, though she is not a current member of the board. 8. The first time Ms. Salazar met the respondent, the respondent was screaming and swearing at her. 9. Ms. Salazar testified that she had witnessed the respondent s postings on the common area hallways and the respondent s defacing of official board postings 4
5 in the common areas. She testified that she removed certain of respondent s postings from the common areas because she found them embarrassing. She testified that before the respondent moved in, the association had never had a problem with defacing or removal of official board postings. She testified that just a few weeks before the final hearing, she witnessed respondent removing an official board posting from the common areas. 10. Ms. Salazar also testified regarding a number of experiences she had with the respondent related to workers and employees. She recalled an incident where the association had hired a worker to polish the floors of the common areas and that the respondent interfered with the worker and did not allow him to complete his work. She also testified as to another incident where the respondent verbally assaulted a carpenter that Ms. Salazar hired to do work in her unit. She witnessed the respondent screaming at the carpenter regarding where the carpenter could park (he was parking in Ms. Salazar s parking space with her permission). Ms. Salazar testified that the respondent had caused so many problems interfering with tenants and workers, that she had difficulty recalling them all; that it was a continuous problem. 11. Ms. Salazar also recalled the respondent accosting a tenant because the tenant had an expired auto tag, which the respondent deemed unacceptable. 12. Ms. Salazar testified that food trays left by her front door had been taken on several occasions. Ms. Salazar testified that on one occasion she 5
6 witnessed the respondent running down the hallway after throwing the food containers, taken from Ms. Salazar s front door, down the hall. 13. Ms. Salazar testified that she also witnessed the respondent s mail discarded on the common areas in front of the mailboxes and upstairs in the common areas on numerous occasions. 14. Ms. Salazar testified that the condominium is not as peaceful as it was before the respondent moved in and that the respondent has affected her comfort level at the condominium. She also testified that she believed that the respondent s improper behavior and actions will continue in the future. 15. The Association also presented the testimony of Maria Avila, the owner of unit 304, who has resided at the condominium since approximately Ms. Avila testified that as a result of the respondent s behavior, living at the condominium is now uncomfortable. 16. Ms. Avila testified that the respondent s behaviors were aggressive and annoying. Ms. Avila testified that the respondent s aggressive behavior toward people that were providing services to the condominium or its residents, and her screaming and arguing with others caused her discomfort. 17. Ms. Avila specifically testified as to an incident where a worker came to give her an estimate for some work to be done at the condominium and that the respondent began offending him and interfering with their conversation in a harassing way. When the worker left he advised Ms. Avila that he would not agree to do the work because of the incident with the respondent. Ms. Avila has also 6
7 witnessed the respondent being aggressive toward the lawn service people that work for the association and toward movers assisting residents move in and out of the building. 18. Ms. Avila also testified that the respondent has placed postings on the common areas. Ms. Avila testified that on one occasion the respondent glued a posting to a wall and that the removal of the posting caused damage to the common property. 19. Ms. Avila testified that the respondent would not allow the regular conduct of board business to occur at board meetings because she failed to follow the rules and regulations for conduct at board meetings and she would not let others speak. 20. Finally, Ms. Avila testified that the respondent s actions affected her comfort level in the condominium, that the respondent interfered with the peaceful possession of her unit and that of her neighbors and that the respondent s actions would continue in the future. 21. The Association also presented the testimony of Donald Morris, the owner of unit 303, who has lived in the condominium since Mr. Morris testified that he had noticed a build up of old mail in front of the respondent s apartment door from time to time. 23. Mr. Morris testified that he witnessed the respondent interrupt association meetings and was annoyed by her derogatory remarks and constant interruptions at some of the meetings he attended. 7
8 24. Mr. Morris testified that he witnessed the respondent interfere with and upset an air conditioning repairman who had parked in his parking space (though he did not object to the repairman parking there). 25. The Association presented the testimony of Dan De Aguero, who has lived at the condominium since Mr. De Aguero has been a board member for a number of years and is a current board member. 26. Mr. De Aguero testified that the respondent had glued an unauthorized posting on the condominium wall that had caused damage to the common area hallway. Mr. De Aguero testified that although the Association made a demand on the respondent that pay for the damage done to the wall as a result of the posting, the respondent has never remitted payment. Mr. De Aguero testified that the respondent had defaced official board postings. He further testified that the respondent had asked him to leave one of her unofficial postings up for 24 hours. 27. Mr. De Aguero testified that the respondent had discarded unwanted mail on the common areas. He indicated that there was so much of the respondent s unwanted mail that the board of directors began collecting it in boxes and keeping it in the meeting room as proof of her actions. He testified that he was annoyed with the litter and that he received complaints from other owners about it. 28. Mr. De Aguero testified that the respondent disrupted board meetings and the board was unable to continue with the regular conduct of the business. He testified that the respondent's disruptive behavior continued after the board 8
9 enacted rules and regulations regarding unit owner conduct at board meetings. These rules were enacted based upon the respondent s disruptive behavior at the board meetings. 29. Mr. De Aguero testified that the respondent had aggressively confronted and interfered with the association s lawn service workman. He testified as to other incidents regarding the respondent s aggressive behavior toward the lawn service workers as well as other residents and guests of the Association. 30. Mr. De Aguero testified that the respondent s actions annoyed him and disturbed him. He testified that the respondent s actions interfered with his peaceful possession of the property. 31. Finally, the Association presented the testimony of Steven Smith, a unit owner and the current president of the Association, who has resided in the condominium since After becoming a board member, Mr. Smith testified that the respondent raised several concerns that she had with the operation of the condominium. Mr. Smith testified that his issues with the respondent were not the substance of her concerns, but rather the manner in which she raised them. 32. Mr. Smith testified regarding the respondent s postings on the common areas and the respondent s defacing of official board postings. Despite his verbal and written demands that the respondent cease posting unauthorized items and defacing postings, she continued to do so. Mr. Smith also testified as to the damage caused by at least one of the respondent s posting on the common area hallway. 9
10 33. Mr. Smith testified that on numerous occasions the respondent had discarded her unwanted mail on the common areas of the condominium. He testified that on more than one occasion, a neighbor asked for his assistance in picking up the respondent s litter from their balcony area. He testified that as recently as within the month preceding the final hearing he observed litter addressed to the respondent in front of her front door. 34. Mr. Smith testified that the respondent regularly disrupts board meetings and fails to follow the rules and regulations of the association regarding board meetings. 35. Mr. Smith testified to numerous confrontations between the respondent and association workers, residents and guests. Mr. Smith testified that on two separate occasions, the respondent accused him of trespassing because the garden hose he was using to wash his car was crossing over her parking space. 36. Mr. Smith testified that the respondent has interfered with the peaceful possession of his unit and that he was annoyed and disturbed by her behaviors. 37. The respondent testified on her own behalf. The respondent testified that she has been an attorney for approximately thirty years and has lived in several condominiums over the years. The respondent did not dispute most of the testimony presented by the association s witnesses and stipulated that many of the instances of behavior and facts testified to by the petitioner s witnesses were true. 10
11 38. The respondent testified that she has been singled out by the Association for this action and that no one at the condominium has any complaints about her. 39. The respondent admitted that she placed the unauthorized postings on the condominium walls and that she took official board postings down so that she could have a copy of them. 40. The respondent also admitted that she defaced the official postings, but testified that she never covered any of the original writing with her comments. 41. The respondent admitted that she returned demand letters from the association s attorney unopened. 42. The respondent testified that the problems she perceives at the condominium are Her business and that She is entitled to answers. The respondent testified that workers coming onto the condominium property need constant supervision and that she feels compelled to provide supervision where the association or other unit owners are not. 43. The Association presented 73 exhibits. The Association s exhibits include board and member meeting minutes that describe the residents complaints regarding the respondent, interruptions and disruptions by the respondent and unit owner discussion regarding whether to file an action to enforce the governing documents against the respondent. The exhibits also include letters from unit owners expressing concern regarding the respondent s violation of the governing 11
12 documents or nuisance like behavior. The exhibits include letters from third parties concerning the respondent s behavior toward them and demand letters from the association and its attorneys asking the respondent to comply with the governing documents and cease and desist from creating a nuisance. 44. The association s witnesses presented testimony that the respondent had mailed them letters containing inaccurate information regarding the association. These mailings, while often misleading, were not of such frequency and did not contain language that could be deemed harassing or threatening such that the mailings could be deemed a nuisance. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The instant dispute involves the rigors of community living. The respondent, while a member of the association, cannot accept that living in a community association means that she will not always get what she wants. The respondent often identifies things or issues that she wishes to change or to have addressed. She brings these concerns to the attention of the board, which is elected by the unit owners to handle these types of matters. Where the board chooses not to implement any changes to problems identified by the respondent, she does not simply take no for an answer. The testimony of the witnesses was that the respondent will simply continue to harass and bully the board, other unit owners, guests and association employees until her demands are met. While a unit owner, as part of a community association, has certain political rights regarding the operation of the association, including the right to present a dissenting opinion, the 12
13 respondent s actions in the instant case easily cross the line between dissent and nuisance. The testimony presented by the witnesses in this matter demonstrates that the respondent exhibits a great deal of animosity towards other unit owners, tenants, their guests and association employees, which manifests as disruptive and aggressive behavior. The respondent s actions of discarding her unwanted mail, harassing and bullying of association employees and guests, disruption of board meetings, removal of personal property from the hallways and the gluing of postings to the condominium walls are all actions that cross the line of what is acceptable behavior. The testimony presented by association, together with the exhibits, supports the claim that the respondent actively engages in conduct that is intended to disturb, annoy and interfere with other unit owners or occupants. In fact, the respondent s own testimony is clear that she engages in these behaviors because the board does not address her complaints to her satisfaction. The testimony presented by association, together with the exhibits, and indeed even the respondent s own admissions support the claim that the respondent purposefully posted signs along the common area hallways and that she purposefully discarded her unwanted mail in the common areas in protest to the boards refusal to place a garbage can in the hallway. The testimony presented by the association, together with the exhibits, supports the claim that the respondent disrupts board meetings and does not follow the properly promulgated rules and regulations related to unit owner conduct at meetings. 13
14 The arbitrator finds the association s witnesses on these issues of the respondent s alleged conduct to be credible. All of the witnesses called by the association described the respondent s aggressions toward association employees, guests, unit owners and workers in a similar fashion and described similar encounters with the respondent. All of the witnesses called by the association described the litter and the conduct at meetings similarly. Most of the witnesses testified as to the postings placed upon the condominium walls. Additionally, the respondent admitted to placing and gluing postings to the condominium walls and to writing upon the official board postings. Article X of the declaration states in pertinent part: (3) No nuisances shall be allowed upon the condominium property nor any use or practice which is the source of nuisances to residents or which interferes with the peaceful possession and proper use of the property by its residents. All parts of the condominium property shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition and no rubbish, refuse nor garbage allowed to accumulate nor any fire hazard allowed to exist.... (5) Lawful Use. No immoral, improper, offensive or unlawful use shall be made of the condominium property or any part thereof... (6) Signs. No For Sale or For Rent signs or other displays or advertising shall be maintained or permitted on any part of the common elements, or apartments. The rules and regulations, of Alca Condominium Association, Inc. state in pertinent part: 8. All garbage and refuse is to be deposited only in the facilities provided in the building for that purpose
15 18. No apartment unit owner or resident shall direct, supervise or in any manner attempt to assert any control over any of the employees of the Association, nor shall he attempt to send any of such employees upon private business of such apartment owner or resident. The rules and regulations enacted by the board at the September 9, 2001, Board of Directors meeting state in pertinent part: A. Every unit owner or his authorized representative shall have the right to participate in meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees subject to the following rules. B. Statements by unit owners at meetings shall be restricted solely to items designated on the agenda of that meeting. No other statements shall be permitted except as may be authorized by the Board or Committee. C. A unit owner will be permitted to speak only in reference to the agenda item for which he has requested permission to speak prior to the Board meeting, or except as authorized by the Board or committee chairman. A request for permission to speak on a particular agenda item shall be made by an owner in writing or by telephoning the Association office to register the request prior to the commencement of the Board meeting. An owner who has not submitted a request for permission to speak on an agenda item prior to the commencement of the meeting, may, at the Board or committee chairman's discretion, be permitted to speak after the Board has concluded the business on the agenda, but prior to the adjournment of the meeting. No owner may speak on any item for more than 3 minutes. The respondent asserts that the activities complained of ceased several months prior to the filing of the arbitration matter and therefore the allegations regarding them are moot. While the testimony presented indicates that respondent has ceased some of the activities described since the initiation of this proceeding, the arbitrator finds that these activities demonstrate an ongoing pattern and will continue unless prohibited in the future. The association presented the testimony of witnesses to the respondent littering in front of her apartment and to the 15
16 respondent removing an official board posting just weeks before the final hearing. As a result, these issues have not completely ceased to recur. Also, the association presented testimony of witnesses who stated that the respondent s incidents of disturbance and nuisance would cease for a month or two and then recur. Additionally, almost every witness for the association testified that they believed that the respondent s interference with their peaceful possession of the property would continue in the future. Finally, even though it is not addressed in the pleadings, the respondent has asserted that her conduct is protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution. The right to free speech is not absolute at all times and under all circumstances. See Santa Monica Condominium Association, Inc. v. O Connor, Arb. Case No , Final Order (July 31, 2002). Certain categories of speech are specifically deemed not to be protected by the First Amendment. See Id., citing RAV v. City of St. Paul, Minn., 112 S.Ct (1992) (other citations omitted). Further, the acts complained of, for the most part, do not constitute speech, but conduct. Where the purpose of conduct is the personal abuse of another, the conduct is not communication that falls under the protection of the First Amendment. Id. (citations omitted). The testimony and evidence is clear that the respondent s conduct is abusive and harassing and occurs where the respondent does not get her way. This is not protected by the Constitution. Accordingly, the defense that the respondent s behavior is protected by the First Amendment fails. 16
17 Based upon the totality of the evidence submitted, the arbitrator finds that the respondent engaged in the conduct complained of in violation of the above referenced provisions of the declaration and rules and regulations. The respondent s affirmative defenses are not supported by the testimony or other evidence or are not legally cognizable. Accordingly, the respondent has willfully violated the provisions of article X of the declaration and the rules and regulations of the association. Based upon the foregoing, it is ORDERED and ADJUGDED that the respondent has created a nuisance and willfully violated the cited provisions of article X of the declaration of condominium and the cited provisions of the rules and regulations of the association. The respondent shall immediately cease harassing, interfering with, confronting, screaming, offending, or verbally assaulting the residents of the condominium, their guests and workers and association employees; discarding her unwanted mail on the common areas, gluing signs to the condominium walls, posting signs in unauthorized locations, defacing signs and removing official signs of the association; disrupting board meetings; and any other actions which are intended to annoy, irritate or harass others. The respondent shall in the future comply with the cited provisions of article X of the declaration of condominium and the cited rules and regulations of the association. DONE AND ORDERED this 10 th day of August 2004, at Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. 17
18 RIGHT TO TRIAL DE NOVO Richard M. Coln, Arbitrator Department of Business and Professional Regulation Arbitration Section 1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, FL PURSUANT TO SECTION , FLORIDA STATUTES, THIS DECISION SHALL BE BINDING ON THE PARTIES UNLESS A COMPLAINT FOR TRIAL DE NOVO IS FILED BY AN ADVERSELY AFFECTED PARTY IN A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION IN THE CIRCUIT IN WHICH THE CONDOMINIUM IS LOCATED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF MAILING OF THIS ORDER. THIS FINAL ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE FINAL AGENCY ACTION AND IS NOT APPEALABLE TO THE DISTRICT COURTS OF APPEAL. ATTORNEY S FEES As provided by s , F.S., the prevailing party in this proceeding is entitled to have the other party pay its reasonable costs and attorney s fees. Rule 61B , F.A.C., requires that a party seeking an award of costs and attorney s fees must file a motion seeking the award not later than 45 days after rendition of this final order. The motion must be actually received by the Division within this 45-day period and must conform to the requirements of rule 61B , F.A.C. The filing of an appeal of this order does not toll the time for the filing of a motion seeking prevailing party costs and attorney s fees. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, this 10 th day of August 2004, to: Lilliana M. Farinas-Sabogal, Esquire Becker & Poliakoff, P.A. 121 Alhambra Plaza 10 th Floor Coral Gables, Florida Nancy C. Wear, Esquire 1234 South Dixie Hwy. Suite
19 Coral Gables, Florida Richard M. Coln, Arbitrator 19
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION PALM COLONY CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
More informationBEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA AMENDED NOTICE OF FORMAL CHARGES
BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE: CYNTHIA A. HOLLOWAY NO.: 00-143 / Florida Supreme Court AMENDED NOTICE OF FORMAL CHARGES TO: The Honorable
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION. Liquor License Appeal of Citation Notice to Bar- 40 Pa.Code 5.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION JENNY S TAVERN, INC., Appellant v. No. 09-1453 PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT, Appellee Donald G.
More informationPowell v. Portland School District. Chronology
Powell v. Portland School District Chronology October 15, 1996 During school hours, a Boy Scout troop leader is allowed to speak to Harvey Scott Elementary school students, encouraging them to join the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC-002579 VIRGINIA M. CARNESI, vs. Petitioner, FERRY PASS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, PENSACOLA DISTRICT OF THE ALABAMA WEST FLORIDA UNITED METHODIST CONFERENCE,
More informationJohn M. O Connor, Esq. ANDERSON KILL & OLICK, P.C.
John M. O Connor, Esq. ANDERSON KILL & OLICK, P.C. Edward Barocas, Legal Director American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey Foundation P.O. Box 750 Newark, NJ 07101 973-642-2084 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Stephen G. Montoya (#01) MONTOYA JIMENEZ, P.A. The Great American Tower 0 North Central Avenue, Ste. 0 Phoenix, Arizona 0 (0) - (fax) - sgmlegal@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationThe Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report
The Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, and in the matter of a hearing regarding the conduct of Mary Jo Rothecker, a member of the Law Society of
More informationASSEMBLIES OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST
ASSEMBLIES OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST JUDICIAL PROCEDURE Printed: February 2006 ASSEMBLIES OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST JUDICIAL PROCEDURE Printed: February 2006 JUDICIAL PROCEDURE INTRODUCTION The purpose of
More informationFirst Congregational Church Safe Church Policy (updated ) Safe Church Policy Concerning Abuse Prevention
First Congregational Church Safe Church Policy (updated 2-2017) Safe Church Policy Concerning Abuse Prevention Policy Prohibiting Abuse, Exploitation and Harassment As a community of Christian faith, First
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION AT THE CROSS FELLOWSHIP BAPTIST CHURCH INC ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. ) CITY OF MONROE, NORTH CAROLINA,
More informationAN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 93 ( CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS ) OF THE MANALAPAN TOWNSHIP CODE Ordinance No.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 93 ( CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS ) OF THE MANALAPAN TOWNSHIP CODE Ordinance No. 2008-02 Adopted February 27, 2008 WHEREAS, the Township of Manalapan
More informationRespondent. PETITIONERS Vickers, UCE, Ready
SUPREME COURT DAVID VICKERS as PRESIDENT OF UPSTATE CITIZENS FOR EQUALITY, INC.; DOUG READY Petitioners, COUNTY OF ONEIDA STATE OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PETITION Pursuant to Article 78 of NY CPLR -vs- Index
More informationBEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY. and MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFF S ASSOCIATION
BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY and MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFF S ASSOCIATION Case 625 No. 67051 (Michalski Grievance) Appearances: Timothy R.
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION SARASOTA VILLAGE GARDENS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
More informationThe First Church in Oberlin, United Church of Christ. Policies and Procedures for a Safe Church
The First Church in Oberlin, United Church of Christ Policies and Procedures for a Safe Church Adopted by the Executive Council on August 20, 2007 I. POLICY PROHIBITING ABUSE, EXPLOITATION, AND HARASSMENT.
More informationIN THE MATTER OF : NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE CERTIFICATES OF : STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS JOSEPH MAZZARELLA : ORDER OF REVOCATION
IN THE MATTER OF : NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE CERTIFICATES OF : STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS JOSEPH MAZZARELLA : ORDER OF REVOCATION : DOCKET NO: 0405-276 At its meeting of June 9, 2005, the State
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012 Opinion filed February 15, 2012. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D11-1526 Lower Tribunal
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2010
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2010 Opinion filed December 29, 2010. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D10-1509 Lower Tribunal No.
More informationAppealed from the 23rd Judicial District Court in and for the Parish of Assumption State of Louisiana Docket Number Jeffrey Michael Heggelund
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2007 CA 2535 PATRICIA BROOKS AND LEO BROOKS VERSUS FATHER OLIVER OBELE AND CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BATON ROUGE Judgment
More information(Article I, Change of Name)
We, the ministers and members of the Church of God in Christ, who holds the Holy Scriptures as contained in the old and new Testaments as our rule of faith and practice, in accordance with the principles
More informationInvestigative Report Automotive Repair Discount November 10, 2015
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL PALM BEACH COUNTY John A. Carey Inspector General Inspector General Accredited Enhancing Public Trust in Government Investigative Report 2015-0008 Automotive Repair Discount
More informationARBITRATION DECISION AND AWARD. In the Matter of the Arbitration ) GRIEVANT : Class Action Class Action -between ) Donald Hynes
ARBITRATION DECISION AND AWARD A-c In the Matter of the Arbitration ) GRIEVANT : Class Action Class Action -between ) Donald Hynes POST OFFICE : UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ) Pomona, CA and ) Case Nos
More informationOpening Ceremonies 1. Welcome/Introductions Ray dewolfe 2. Serious Moment of Reflection/Pledge of Allegiance Corey Thomas
See Page Two for Continuation of Agenda South Salt Lake City Council REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Public notice is hereby given that the South Salt Lake City Council will hold a Regular Meeting on Wednesday,
More informationFILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 11/16/ :25 AM
FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 11/16/2016 09:25 AM STATE OF NEW YORK CICERO TOWN COURT COUNTY OF ONONDAGA INDEX NO. 2016EF4347 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 36 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/16/2016 TOWN OF CICERO, Petitioner, MOTIONS
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document May 1 2018 16:12:56 2017-KA-01170-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RODNEY WAYNE SMITH APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-01170 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More information55 North 3 rd St., Bangor, PA HOPE (4673)
First United Methodist Church 55 North 3 rd St., Bangor, PA 18013 610-588-HOPE (4673) firstumcbangor@yahoo.com www.firstumcbangor.com APPLICATION FOR USE OF CHURCH BUILDING Name of Organization: Religious/Denomination
More informationv. CASE NO CC-00816
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS CASE NO. 2011-CC-00816 SONJA CANNON APPELLANT v. CASE NO. 2011-CC-00816 MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY AND SANDERSON FARMS, INC. APPELLEES
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RONNIE AND DIANNE ROBERTSON APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO CA BRIEF OF APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Oct 7 2014 13:06:15 2014-CA-00332 Pages: 10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RONNIE AND DIANNE ROBERTSON APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO. 2014-CA-00332 JEAN MESSER CATALONATTO AND
More informationCase 1:12-cv RJS Document 8 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8
Case 112-cv-08170-RJS Document 8 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------- X U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION,
More informationIN COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED NOTICE. August 19, No STAN SMITH, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED August 19, 1997 A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS.
More informationPresent: Hassell, C.J., Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, and Lemons, JJ., and Russell, S.J.
Present: Hassell, C.J., Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, and Lemons, JJ., and Russell, S.J. JOSEPH JAKABCIN, ET AL. OPINION BY SENIOR JUSTICE CHARLES S. RUSSELL v. Record No. 050722 April 21, 2006 TOWN OF
More informationSCENARIOS IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOL: DID THE TEACHER GO TOO FAR?
SCENARIOS IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOL: DID THE TEACHER GO TOO FAR? INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY OF CHRISTIAN TEACHER EDUCATORS MAY 27,2009 Sam Stewart, Assistant Professor Teacher Education Program Abilene Christian
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC12-2495 INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE, RE: JUDITH W. HAWKINS NO. 11-550 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationFAITH EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH MEMORIAL PRAYER GARDEN 886 North Shore Drive Forest Lake, Minnesota RULES AND PROCEDURES
FAITH EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH MEMORIAL PRAYER GARDEN 886 North Shore Drive Forest Lake, Minnesota 55025 RULES AND PROCEDURES Effective: March, 2008 I -ESTABLISHMENT AND ADMINISTRATION A. Establishment.
More informationSTATEMENT OF BISHOP EMERITUS DONALD TRAUTMAN As he has done his entire career, Bishop Trautman sends his prayerful support to all victims of clergy
STATEMENT OF BISHOP EMERITUS DONALD TRAUTMAN As he has done his entire career, Bishop Trautman sends his prayerful support to all victims of clergy sexual abuse. Bishop Trautman shares the Grand Jury s
More informationATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MANUFACTURED HOUSING DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MANUFACTURED HOUSING DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM In the Matter of the NOTICE OF NON-VIOLATION Complaint of Howard Bishop Against RCW 59.30.040 Pleasant Valley
More informationCurtis L. Johnston Selman v. Cobb County School District, et al June 30, 2003
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2 ATLANTA DIVISION 3 JEFFREY MICHAEL SELMAN, Plaintiff, 4 vs. CASE NO. 1:02-CV-2325-CC 5 COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 6 COBB COUNTY BOARD
More informationIN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH
Richard D. Burbidge (#0492) rburbidge@bmgtrial.com Jefferson W. Gross (#8339) jwgross@bmgtrial.com Aida Neimarlija (#12181) aneimarlija@bmgtrial.com BURBIDGE MITCHELL & GROSS 215 South State Street, Suite
More informationVII. Legislation. VII Legislation
VII. Legislation RS 207 SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY (Adopted 06-09-2012) WHEREAS An ad hoc group of clergy consisting of Kathy Barnhart, Keith Dunn, Gretchen Hulse, Cindy Schneider, Paul Taylor and Bob Zilhaver
More informationST. OLYMPIA ORTHODOX CHURCH OF POTSDAM BYLAWS PREAMBLE
ST. OLYMPIA ORTHODOX CHURCH OF POTSDAM BYLAWS PREAMBLE SECTION 0.01 Name The name of the parish is St. Olympia Orthodox Church of Potsdam (hereinafter referred to as the "parish"). The parish was incorporated
More informationAPPEARANCES. Law Office of James C. White, P.C Emperor Blvd., Suite 400 Durham, NC 27703
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF DURHAM IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 14DHR04338 Mount Zion Daycare And Kimberly Brandon Petitioner v. NC Department of Health and Human Services Respondent
More informationGERALD COHEN ATTORNEY I ARBITRATOR 745 CRAIG RD. SUITE 105 CREVE COEUR (ST. LOUIS) MISSOURI Aprilj,$' Bill
PHONE: (314 432-2662 FAX: (314 432-6336 GERALD COHEN ATTORNEY I ARBITRATOR 745 CRAIG RD. SUITE 105 CREVE COEUR (ST. LOUIS MISSOURI 63141 Aprilj,$' 2014 Douglas S. Goldring Assistant General Counsel Federal
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2006 EDDIE MCHOLDER, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D04-3957 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion filed January 13, 2006 Appeal
More informationPITTSBURGH. Issued: March 1993 Revised: October 2002 Updated: August 2003 Updated: August 2006 Updated: March 2008 Updated: April 2014
Issued: March 1993 Revised: October 2002 Updated: August 2003 Updated: August 2006 Updated: March 2008 Updated: April 2014 CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH Clergy Sexual Misconduct The teaching of the Church,
More informationName: First Middle Last. Other names used (alias, maiden, nickname): Current Address: Street/P.O. Box City State Zip Code
Grace Evangelical Presbyterian Church Children s Ministry Application Please answer each question. The information on this application will not be disclosed to unauthorized persons. Name: First Middle
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ROBERT MARTIN HANNEWALD, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED March 1, 2011 v No. 295589 Jackson Circuit Court SCOTT A. SCHWERTFEGER, RONALD LC No. 09-002654-CZ HOFFMAN,
More informationSent via U.S. Mail and Facsimile ( )
April 22, 2011 President Wim Wiewel Portland State University 341 Cramer Hall 1721 SW Broadway Portland, Oregon 97201 Sent via U.S. Mail and Facsimile (503-725-4499) Dear President Wiewel: The Foundation
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:04CV-338-H ELECTRONICALLY FILED
Case 3:04-cv-00338-JGH Document 146-1 Filed 04/01/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:04CV-338-H ELECTRONICALLY FILED JAMES H. O BRYAN,
More informationBYLAWS OF WHITE ROCK BAPTIST CHURCH
BYLAWS OF WHITE ROCK BAPTIST CHURCH 80 State Road 4 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544 Incorporated in the State of New Mexico under Chapter 53 Article 8 Non-Profit Corporations Registered under IRS regulations
More informationIn champaign county court 101 E. Main st. Urbana IL James F. Osterbur 2191 county road 2500 E. St. Joseph IL
In champaign county court 101 E. Main st. Urbana IL 61873 James F. Osterbur 2191 county road 2500 E. St. Joseph IL 61873 www.justtalking3.info versus State of ILLINOIS Gifford, IL; police department dated
More informationLAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT. IN THE MATTER OF the Legal Profession Act (the LPA ); and
File No. HE20070047 LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT IN THE MATTER OF the Legal Profession Act (the LPA ); and IN THE MATTER OF a Hearing regarding the conduct of Calum J. Bruce, a Member
More informationBuilding Board CITY OF PUNTA GORDA, FLORIDA OCTOBER 24, 2017, 9:00 AM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS W. MARION AVENUE, PUTNA GORDA FL 33950
Building Board CITY OF PUNTA GORDA, FLORIDA OCTOBER 24, 2017, 9:00 AM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 326 W. MARION AVENUE, PUTNA GORDA FL 33950 NOTE: Anyone wishing to address the Council on any agenda item may
More informationUnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk
NO. 1543812; 1543813 Filed18March06A9:00 ChrisDaniel-DistrictClerk HarrisCounty EA001_17192 By:LGODLEY STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 263 rd DISTRICT COURT v. Leon Jacob HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS NOTICE OF INTENTION
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/06/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-00849 Document 1 Filed 10/06/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION U.S. Pastor Council, Plaintiff, v. City of Austin; Steve Adler, in
More informationFINAL ORDER. Robert Jones. Stephen Peck to 133 S. Peoria
City of Chicago COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS 740 N. Sedgwick, Suite 400, Chicago, IL 60654 J 12n44-4111 (Voice), J 12n44-I081 (Fax), 312n44-1088 (TDD) IN THE MATTER OF: Robert Jones CaseNo.: 11-P-75 Complainant,
More informationUSA v. Glenn Flemming
2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-22-2013 USA v. Glenn Flemming Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 12-1118 Follow this and additional
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,499 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, CLETE ADAM HARGIS, Appellant.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 116,499 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CLETE ADAM HARGIS, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Sedgwick District Court;
More informationIN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH
Roger H. Hoole (5089) HOOLE & KING, L.C. 4276 South Highland Drive Salt Lake City, UT 84124 Telephone: (801) 272-7556 Facsimile: (801) 272-7557 Attorneys for Plaintiff Richard Holm IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT MOUNT ZION MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 11-0961 MOUNT ZION MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH VERSUS AMEAL JONES, SR. ********** APPEAL FROM THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF RAPIDES, NO. 240,167
More informationCase 6:15-cv JA-DCI Document 97 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID 4760
Case 6:15-cv-01098-JA-DCI Document 97 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID 4760 DAVID WILLIAMSON, et al.,, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION Plaintiffs,
More informationCornerstone Schools of Alabama, Inc th Street North, Birmingham, Alabama (205) ~ Fax (205) Application for Employment
Cornerstone Schools of Alabama, Inc. 118 55 th Street North, Birmingham, Alabama 35212 (205) 591-7600 ~ Fax (205) 769-0063 Application for Employment Date Social Security # Type of Employment Applied For:
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Cute Little Cake Shop v. State of Ohio Unemp., 2015-Ohio-527.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101691 CUTE LITTLE CAKE SHOP
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION IN RE: PRIVATE CRIMINAL : COMPLAINT OF : NO. MD-042-2014 GERALD J. SMITH : Seth Miller, Esquire Cynthia A. Dyrda-Hatton Gerald
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. SEAN SHIELDS; and ASHLEE SHIELDS, by and through her father and next friend, SEAN SHIELDS, v. Plaintiffs, KIOWA COUNTY
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: FEBRUARY 4, 2011; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2009-CA-002226-MR JOANNE SMITH APPELLANT APPEAL FROM HART CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE GEOFFREY P. MORRIS,
More informationCase 2:11-cv GP Document 12 Filed 09/29/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:11-cv-05827-GP Document 12 Filed 09/29/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WEBMD HEALTH CORP. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 11-5827 ) ANTHONY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Docket No. CR ) Plaintiff, ) Chicago, Illinois ) March, 0 v. ) : p.m. ) JOHN DENNIS
More informationFEB Upon consideration of the Motion to Proceed filed in the above cause, and. now being sufficiently advised in the premises,
Colorado Supreme Court 2 East 14th Ave., Fourth Floor Denver, CO 80203 Original Proceeding in Unauthorized Practice of Law, 09UPL03 5 Petitioner: The People of State of Colorado, FEB 012010 ATTORNEY REGULATION
More informationFINAL ORDER AND OPINION REVERSING TRIAL COURT. Appellant, Donald Dale Smith, Jr. ( Smith ), timely appeals the trial court s judgment for
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA DONALD DALE SMITH, JR., Appellant, CASE NO.: 2015-AP-00006-A-O Lower Court Case: 2014-MM-012298-A-O v. STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationS10A1598. WALLER et al. v. GOLDEN et al. Craig and Jena Golden s neighbors, the Wallers, appeal from a
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: February 28, 2011 MELTON, Justice. S10A1598. WALLER et al. v. GOLDEN et al. 1 Craig and Jena Golden s neighbors, the Wallers, appeal from a Superior Court of Henry
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA
0 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD of ETHICS, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) CASE NO: 0CV-00 ) TERENCE SWEENEY, ) Defendant. ) MOTION FOR COMPLAINT HEARD BEFORE HONORABLE
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN BEFORE THE WISCONSIN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION. Complainant, Respondents.
STATE OF WISCONSIN BEFORE THE WISCONSIN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION PAUL F.X. SCHWARTZ, vs. Complainant, REV. DANE RADECKI; PREMONTRE HIGH SCHOOL, INC.; NOTRE DAME de la BAIE ACADEMY, INC. and the
More informationPRESBYTERY OF SAN FERNANDO SEXUAL CONDUCT POLICY. As God who called you is holy, be holy yourselves in all your conduct. 1 Peter 1:15.
Adopted 11/26/96 PRESBYTERY OF SAN FERNANDO SEXUAL CONDUCT POLICY I. SCRIPTURAL AND THEOLOGICAL BASIS As God who called you is holy, be holy yourselves in all your conduct. 1 Peter 1:15. Tend the flock
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P APPEAL OF: DAVID SANTUCCI No EDA 2014
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 SAMUEL V. SANTUCCI AND VINCENT SANTUCCI, JR. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DAVID SANTUCCI, VINCENT J. SANTUCCI, SR., AND ELITE MUSHROOM
More informationIMMACULATE CONCEPTION RELIGIOUS EDUCATION PARENT-STUDENT HANDBOOK
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION RELIGIOUS EDUCATION PARENT-STUDENT HANDBOOK Dear Parents, I, and all the teaching staff, at Immaculate Conception Church, warmly welcome you to our Religious Education Program. We
More informationGrievance and Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Congregations
Grievance and Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Congregations 1.0 Introduction The Congregation is committed to providing a safe environment where the dignity of every individual is respected and therefore
More informationv No Washtenaw Circuit Court
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S ALFONSO IGNACIO VIGGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED August 15, 2017 v No. 334522 Washtenaw Circuit Court AL-AZHAR F. PACHA and ALPAC, INC.,
More informationDecided: February 6, S16A1781. SMITH v. THE STATE. Appellant Christopher Rayshun Smith was tried and convicted of murder
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: February 6, 2017 HUNSTEIN, Justice. S16A1781. SMITH v. THE STATE. Appellant Christopher Rayshun Smith was tried and convicted of murder and related offenses in
More informationSPECIAL MEETING AGENDA. June 25, 2018
GARLAND COUNTY QUORUM COURT SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA June 25, 2018 A special meeting of the Garland County Quorum Court will be held in the County Courtroom June 25, 2018 at 6:00 p.m., 501 Ouachita Ave,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Dockets.Justia.com Dawkins v. Phelps et al Doc. 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE BRYAN L. DAWKINS, v. Petitioner, PERRY PHELPS, Warden, and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE
More informationCOACHING EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION
Hillcrest Christian School dba HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 17531 Rinaldi Street Granada Hills, CA 91344 818-368-7071 COACHING EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Your interest in Heritage Christian School is appreciated.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED June 24, 2014 v No. 315267 Grand Traverse Circuit Court STEVEN RICHARD, LC No. 13-011510-FH Defendant-Appellant.
More informationPolicy: Validation of Ministries
Policy: Validation of Ministries May 8, 2014 Preface The PC(USA) Book of Order provides that the continuing (minister) members of the presbytery shall be either engaged in a ministry validated by that
More informationBEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SOUTH MILWAUKEE. and COUNCIL #10
BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SOUTH MILWAUKEE and COUNCIL #10 Case 46 No. 59774 (Grievance Regarding One-day Suspension of R_ C_) Appearances:
More informationSummary of Registration Changes
Summary of Registration Changes The registration changes summarized below are effective September 1, 2017. Please thoroughly review the supporting information in the appendixes and share with your staff
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION ) JOHN DOE, ) Civil Action ) Plaintiff, ) File No. ) v. ) ) Complaint for Declaratory BARROW COUNTY, GEORGIA;
More informationFILED AUG Q APPELLANT RODERICK G. FORIEST NO KA-2025 APPELLEE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TIlE STATE OF MlS~gp" RODERICK G. FORIEST VS. FILED AUG Q 72008 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COUR{ COURT OF APPEALS APPELLANT NO. 2007-KA-2025 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationd. terminate the call of a minister of Word and Service in conformity with the constitution of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America;
Yellow is new added to the constitution, all required from ELCA model constitution Red is removed from the constitution, all required from ELCA model constitution Blue is new added to the constitution,
More informationand proceedings previously filed and had herein, and good and sufficient cause appearing,
FAMILY COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------X In The Matter of SMITH CHILDREN Children Under EighteenYears of
More informationCase 3:16-cv RLY-MPB Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1
Case 3:16-cv-00054-RLY-MPB Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA EVANSVILLE DIVISION KIMBALL INTERNATIONAL, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, )
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D05-619
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2005 ANN SMITH, A/K/A ANNIE MAY SMITH, WARD, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D05-619 NATHAN D. SMITH, II, PETITIONER, ET AL., Appellee.
More informationMINNESOTA SWIMMING, INC. BOARD OF REVIEW
MINNESOTA SWIMMING, INC. BOARD OF REVIEW Mark and Carla Bartusch, et al, ) Petitioners, ) ) vs. ) Statement of Decision ) John Sfire, Ellen Youngers, and ) Jim Stewart, ) Respondents. ) ) ) This matter
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 16, 2009 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 16, 2009 Session RICHARD JOHNSON v. SHAD CARNES Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. 57285 J. Mark Rogers, Judge No. M2008-02373-COA-R3-CV
More informationMEMORANDUM. Interested Parishes in the Episcopal Diocese of Louisiana. From: Covert J. Geary, Chancellor of the Diocese
MEMORANDUM To: Interested Parishes in the Episcopal Diocese of Louisiana From: Covert J. Geary, Chancellor of the Diocese Re: Checklist of Procedures for Incorporation of Parishes Check off each item when
More informationCOOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD. Docket # 1850 DECISION
COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD Sheriff of Cook County vs. Jacquelyn G. Anderson Cook County Deputy Sheriff Docket # 1850 DECISION THIS MATTER COMING ON to be heard pursuant to notice, the Cook County
More informationINTRODUCTION TO GUIDELINES FOR CHURCH DISCIPLINE
INTRODUCTION TO GUIDELINES FOR CHURCH DISCIPLINE We believe that loving church discipline is one of the greatest blessings and privileges of belonging to a Christian church. The following Guidelines were
More informationINTERNATIONAL CHURCHES OF CHRIST A California Nonprofit Religious Corporation An Affiliation of Churches. Charter Affiliation Agreement
INTERNATIONAL CHURCHES OF CHRIST A California Nonprofit Religious Corporation An Affiliation of Churches Charter Affiliation Agreement I PARTIES This Charter Affiliation Agreement dated June 1, 2003 (the
More informationCONSTITUTION AND RULES OF PROCEDURE OF CHRIST CHURCH HILLCREST. (Church of England in South Africa)
CONSTITUTION AND RULES OF PROCEDURE OF CHRIST CHURCH HILLCREST (Church of England in South Africa) 1 To the glory of God. It is hereby declared that the congregation of Christ Church, Hillcrest, is a Constituent
More informationAn Equal Opportunity Employer. MLFD Application
This Application will be given every consideration, but its receipt does not imply that the applicant will be interviewed or accepted. Please complete each section of this application. (Print in ink or
More information