Your Worship, if I may refer the Court to the decision. of the Cape Provincial Division in Bell vs van Rensburq NO
|
|
- Collin Jordan
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 questioning of witnesses. Your Worship, if I may refer the Court to the decision of the Cape Provincial Division in Bell vs van Rensburq NO 1971 (3) 5ALR at p.693, a judgment of Mr Acting Justice Baker, your Worship will find that at page 707/8 of the report, reference is made to "die Verslag van die Kommissie van Ondersoek na Onluste in Durban". This was a Commission of Enquiry presided over by Appellate Judge van den Heever in Now this was obviously an important Commission. Now what happened there (10 was that some of the parties who attended this Enquiry wanted permission to cross-question witnesses, and his Lordship disallowed that opportunity, and in writing his report ultimately dealt with his reasons for doing so, and his Lordship said at page 708 sir: "In sommige gevalle het die advokate wat voor ons verskyn het en die sterkste aangedring het op die reg om getuies aan kruisverhoor te onderwerp uiters onbeholpe vertoon in die eenvoudige prosedure om n getuie te ondervra.. ( 2 0 Well I hope this is not of application to these proceedings sir. But his Lordship went on to say - "..0m sommige toe te laat om getuies onder kruisverhoor te neem sou willekeurige diskriminasie gewees het, maar as iedereen toegelaat moes word om elke ander getuie aan kruisverhoor te onderwerp, kon n mens net sowel n gepeupel onbedrewe swaardskermers in n donker kamer op mekaar losgelaat het. Daar sou groot lawaai, maar geen lig gewees het nie. Daar sou niks aan waarheid gewend kon word nie, en ons sittings (30 sou onmoontlik lank geduur het." Now/
2 Now I'm quoting this passage sir, why? Because I want to stress the fact that his Lordship, in coming to the decision to which I have referred sir, considered that it was necessary in the public interest that the sitting should not be unduly protracted, and that nothing should be permitted which would not contribute t o w a r d s. a a n die waarheid gewend kon word nie..". Now your Worship, in this case, a lot of evidence has already been led which we know is similar fact evidence, and some more evidence of that kind is being tendered at this ( stage. Your Worship we have already addressed you sir, at length, on the question of similar fact evidence, and we've also quoted the Metropolitan case to you sir, and we have also quoted to you from Hoffman's book on Evidence. Now I am merely alluding to this question at this stage, the question of similar fact evidence, because I would like to draw your attention once again to the fact that at page 21 of this text-book the authors say: "The disadvantage of receiving similar fact evidence is, in general, a waste of time which may be involved ( in examining collateral issues of the same kind as the main issue which the Court has to decide. " Now your Worship, I am talking of the same kind as the main issue which the Court has to decide. Your Worship I am talking about this question of the wastage of time. That it is necessary, for any presiding officer, in proceedings of the present nature, and in court cases and in Commissions of Enquiry, to be guarding against the fact that there is not an unnecessary waste of time, and a protraction which really serves no good purpose. ( Now your Worship, I think our learned friends in their argument/
3 argument have conceded that you have a discretion presently sir, in deciding what to do about these affidavits which have been tendered, and it was also said sir that you must exercise your discretion in a judicial manner; with that of course we agree. Now your Worship, we submit that you are enjoined sir, in exercising your discretion, to be mindful of the fact that you must contain these proceedings within reasonable limits, and ensure that the conduct of the Inquest does not pass out of your hands. This is something which is (10 stressed in the Timol case your Worship, and we would remind you sir, with great respect, of the fact that every witness in these proceedings is your witness sir, and not that of any party and we would submit sir that this is a critical stage, where your Worship's hold on this Inquest is being tested and being brought in jeopardy. Now your Worship it is necessary once again to turn to the events preceding your Worship's ruling of the 22nd of January, and in that connection sir, - 2nd of June - we would refer you to what appears at page 485 of the record. (20 Your Worship will recall that during the testimony of Sergeant Blom, the question of the admissibility of further statements came to the fore, and this is what fell from your Worship's lips at that stage: "Mr Bizos, sorry to interrupt, I think you have made a few valid points, but I think at this stage I want you to consider to hand in those statements as soon as possible." Our learned friend obviously has been referring to the fact that there would be certain further statements to be handed (30 to you sir. Now/
4 Now our learned friends then said they are ready to be handed in; "COURT - Affidavits? I want to read through the affidavits, and I want to consider the contents of the affidavits, I think that might place me in a much better position to decide on the admissibility of the questions, and whether the questions should be allowed or not. If the affidavits are not available at this state, I intend to let the witness stand down because that will assist me to make a Ruling on that type of cross-examination." Now your Worship, at page 487 your Worship said the following "..If necessary Mr Bizos, but I think I will be placed in a much better position if you give me all the information available to you, and then I'll be in the same position, I think it's much better." "We'll get it before you your Worship in proper form as soon as we possibly can", this is what my learned friend said, and we then also asked permission to say something sir, and we said the following : "Sir, save that I think we should also like to stress the fact that it has really become necessary for my learned friends now to produce the statements on which they have been working as far as we know, for a very long time, sir we wrote a letter to them which was also sent to you on the 1st of June this year, in connection with this aspect of the matter, and we also deem it extremely necessary, from the point of view that we will have to take instructions, we don't want to delay these proceedings." Our/
5 Our learned friends then went on at page at least, sorry sir, the Court then said ; "I hope so Mr Bizos, because I want to indicate to you if I consider it necessary to have all the statements available before I make any decision, any ruling in this matter, I will let this matter stand down until I've got all information the parties intend to hand in, all the information the parties intend to hand in. Nobody wants to delay the proceedings, but we must all try to co-operate and get it over as soon as pos- (10.sible." Now your Worship, at page 489 your Worship again referred to the question of further affidavits and said the following: "Mr Bizos, there is something I would like to mention. You did submit certain statements, but you also indi - cated that you intend to hand in more statements, more affidavits. I think it is rather difficult for me to decide on the matter, I haven't got all the statements. Is there a time limit within which you can submit all the statements you intend to submit for (20 consideration? That will place me in a much better position to control the examination of all the witnesses to be called in this matter". My learned friends then answer as follows: "..I want to assure you sir that every reasonable step is being taken to submit all the statements that we now know would be available. There are however sir certain practical difficulties..." and he then mentions the fact that there was to be contact with Mr de Vries, and that - who knows that at least one (30 case an arrangement is being made as soon as possible for him/
6 him to be present for the statement to be taken and soforth sir, but your Worship then at page 490 repeated yourself sir, in the following words: "I would also like to indicate that I do consider to postpone the matter to give you an opportunity to get all the statements to place me in a better position to judge on the admissibility of the examinattion." Lower down on the page your Worship said the following; "..There is one course I would not like to take, and that is to recall witnesses, if it can be avoided. (10 Now I am not saying that I am going to postpone the matter, but that is a possibility I am considering, because I want to be placed in a proper position, having all the information before me when I consider the course of examination to be allowed or not." Hr Bizos, my learned friend then says sir; "It is something that we understand after all, it was our submission your Worship will have noticed in our Heads of Argument, the question of admissibility will have to be decided on the part of all the information (20 before your Worship, but we are trying our best". Then we say sir: "May we also say something on this aspect your Worship? Your Worship, we do regard the present stage of these proceedings as somewhat of a cross-roads situation. As a result of the statements which have been handed in it might be necessary for us, depending on your decision sir, to explore various avenues, to consult with people, to take statements, and to deal with issues which we regard as side issues, and which we regard as really (30 irrelevant to these proceedings, but depending on your /
7 your decision sir, we might have to do that, and we haven't commenced anything in that direction simply because we are awaiting your decision in this regard sir, so also for that particular reason it is vital that there should be a stage where we have all the affidavits, and know where we are going." "COURT - Thankyou Mr Schabort, in the meantime as far as this witness is concerned, I have decided to allow Mr Bizos to cross-examine." (jq Now your Worship, at page 499 there was an issue ensueing from the fact that we made an objection concerning questions based on a statement, the admissibility of which had not yet been decided by.the Court, and flowing from that objection sir, at page 499 your Worship said the following: Your Worship then as a matter of fact, stood the witness down, in the following words: "I do not intend to give my ruling on this question whether this question is to be allowed or not now. The witness will stand down. My request is that all..." (20 and in the record the word "all" is underlined sir, obviously because of the stress placed on that word by your Worship,...My request is that all the affidavits to be obtained from other persons for consideration, be obtained and submitted to me as soon as possible because I am satisfied at this stage we have reached the stage that I will have to indicate whether I am going to allow the statements of other detainees or not. I think that will affect the course of the further examination of all the witnesses to come to the witness box, and I (30 do not intend to take this decision at this stage, because/
8 and/ cause I haven't got all the statements. I want to be placed in a proper position to place myself in a better position to make proper Rulings. I do appreciate that there are some difficulties to obtain these statements. I am afraid, although I appreciate the difficulty, I will have to direct the course of the proceedings, and I need the statements. If time is needed to obtain the statements I will adjourn the proceedings until Counsel for the family indicate to me that they are ready to submit the statements and (10 I will consider the statements immediately, and I will be giving a ruling on the admissibility of the statements immediately as soon as possible thereafter." Now your Worship, it is this part of the record, and these very important facts to which we must draw your attention sir, and to which our learned friends have not even alluded in the slightest manner. Your Worship, the statements were then filed and your Worship was called upon, I think it was on the 22nd of June, or whenever it w as, to consider and give a Ruling, and your (20 Worship has given a Ruling and that Ruling has been implemented sir to the letter. We have had all those codetainees whose evidence your Worship allowed, and - to come and give evidence sir, they have given evidence, and a number of police officers have also been called to give evidence in rebuttal, in refuting some of the things said. Now your Worship, we must submit to you that your Worship has set a deadline, for purposes of the lodging of affidavits, from co-detainees, as your Worship was perfectly entitled to do, as any judicial officer in your Worship's position (30 would have had the right to do, and your Worship has done so,
9 and this was not done without taking into consideration some difficulties that were being experienced by our learned friends, some difficulties which were overcome by them before they filed their last affidavit prior to the deadline set by your Worship, and your Worship we would submit that there is no reason and that no good reason has actually been advanced, why this Court should at this stage, set a new deadline, or extend the previous deadline to a new date. This Inquest sir has now taken up more than - well I think we saw in the newspapers about 34 days already, it (10 could be more than that, court days, over a period of approximately 6 months, and the completion thereof sir, even without the evidence of additional co-detainees will necessarily require a further substantial period of time. In fact sir, we would submit that this Inquest has reached the stage, where it has virtually become prohibitive of re-opening. Your Worship must consider the following, if the proposed co-detainee witnesses are called, at least nine police officers who have already testified, must be recalled, now your Worship I could give you their names, (20 but we have counted them, and if there is any dispute about this, then it would be very easy to find their names in the various affidavits and to draw your attention to them, but we submit sir that it will be necessary to recall at least nine police officers, who have already testified before you. At least 20 further police officers, who have been implicated will have to be called, in order sir, to traverse fully and thoroughly the disputes created by the acceptance of the fresh affidavits. The Inspector of detainees will have to be recalled, (30 and then sir, and we also have an interest in placing all evidence/
10 evidence before you that we could place before you sir, in order to try the issues created by the fresh affidavits, we submit sir that it would be necessary for us to consider whether to ask you to call additional police officers whose names do not feature in these affidavits. Doctors, magistrates, and poss-ibly even co-detainees as we might deem desirable to consult and call in order to traverse the accusations and allegations made. Now your Worship we know how much time has already been spent on considering the evidence of the co-detainees (10 so f ar. Our learned friend this morning questioned Mr Smith. Now your Worship, we submit with respect, if this particular issue of - if the issues concerning Mr Naidoo must be tried properly before you. Then your Worship we submit we have every right to ask you sir to also call Lieutenant Botes and call Warrant Officer Booysen, and call Lieutenant Steyn and several other people sir, it slipped my mind now. Well your Worship however that number would be multiplied many more times sir, should all these other persons now be per- (20 mitted to give evidence. Your Worship has now seen and heard, in examination and lengthy cross-examination by our learned friends, and by ourselves and by Counsel for the State the main characters in this matter. Officer de Bruyn, Persons like Lieutenant Whitehead, Warrant Sergeant van Schalkwyk, Warrant Officer Kerr, Warrant Officer Deetlefs, Dr Floyd and a number of codetainees. The Court has seen statements, notes produced by the deceased. The Court has also had a lot of evidence of the deceased's appearance during his detention, (30 including the period immediately before his death, and expert evidence/
11 evidence is still to be adduced, a lot of similar fact evidence your Worship, and hearsay evidence of the deceased's utterances have also been admitted. We submit with respect sir, that the issues before the Court have been properly investigated, and highlighted from all angles, and one may pose the queston whether the evidence of 8 more detainees, and scores of policemen and other witnesses, will really make any meaningful contribution to assist the Court in arriving at a decision. Your Worship (10 but that unfortunately, is not the last word. There is no guarantee that a fresh order, limiting the number of witnesses to be called, will not lead to a new spate of affidavits. Who says that our learned friends will not attempt to present some more affidavits at a later stage? On what basis will the Court then be able to refuse to call the witnesses, if witnesses are called at this stage? Your Worship, with due respect, this Inquest has, in our respectful submission, already assumed in some ways the (20 proportions of an enquiry into detention in general. A lot of evidence has for instance been canvassed on issues concerning the general conditions of detention and regulations relevant thereto. Furthermore sir, with regard to the evidence now before the Court, there is already room for a number of further witnesses to be called if the issues must be tried on the evidence of each and every one mentioned or implicated in that evidence, and I here allude to the example that I have given you sir, of Mr Naidoo's evidence. (30 Your Worship has already rejected the affidavits of Mr Ndao/
12 Ndao, Kgatshalia and Narsu. These witnesses failed at the propitious time, to supply the essential material in their affidavits upon which the Court could decide to call them. We submit that they have furnished inadequate reasons for not presenting the Court with all the available data at the time. Mr van Heerden was afforded a perfect opportunity, in detention, as a person detained, as a State witness, to furnish a statement to the Deputy Attorney- General, but he elected not to do so. Now, at this late stage sir, he suddenly pops up as a man who purports to be able to give material evidence on various aspects. We would submit that this bold farce of this nature at this stage, should not be suffered. He should not be permitted at this stage to divert this enquiry into directions which could have been explored in good time, had the allegations been made at the proper time. As regards Miss Hogan, here again your Worship there is some explanation for the fact that she has not given a statement before, but we submit sir, that both her explanation - well that her explanation is inadequate, and in any event sir, that this Court will simply have to retry issues already decided by a criminal court. There has been a prosecution sir, concerning the alleged assaults on her, that case has been tried. In the case of Mr Kwetha(?) this Court has already taken a decision, and we submit no good reasons have been advanced for a different decision at this stage. Your Worship, our learned friends opened their address to you this morning, by making some general observations - yes, well your Worship my attention has been drawn to the fact that we haven't seen the affidavits of Mr Denis van Heerden/
13 Heerden, Ruth Becker, and Dr Ivor Cohen, as well as - well then as far as Dr Jacobson is concerned, there is no affidavit apparently sir. Now your Worship as regards these general observations, the point was made that because we asked some of the police witnesses whether there was a system, that it seems to indicat that we are under the impression sir, that if they say there wasn't a system, then that's the end of the matter. Now sir, we agree that this Court will decide whether there was a system, and we don't say that the witnesses can decide that for this Court by their simple denials. A submission of that nature sir would be ludicrous. As regards the other point made, namely that there was one team who interrogated people and treated them unlawfully in various places, your Worship I - we sincerely believe sir that it is not necessary for us to address you again on this aspect of the case- We deny most strongly sir, that there was anything like one team who interrogated the deceased and these various other people. Your Worship, it is only necessary to remind you sir of the fact that Warrant Officer - at least, that Lieutenant Whitehead was only involved with Dr Aggett and Dr Floyd, and your Worship - or let me rather approach it from this angle; because of the fact that there was one police officer, in the person of Major Cronwright, who was the personnel head of all the investigators, it is sought to find the necessary link between the various, let's call them teams sir. Now we have already addressed you on this particular aspect sir and we have submitted that the fact that there is one commanding officer in a given situation, that that is not enough to find a basis for similar fact evidence. Your/
14 Your Worship, your Worship is mindful of the fact that there - and we have an affidavit which has been received from Brigadier Muller in which he sets out sir, details of the number of police officers involved in this big investigation, and the number of detainees and we know sir that of about 50 or actually 57 detainees at the relevant time, so far evidence or affidavits of only about 10 to 15 people have been produced. Now your Worship, there must be a system. It must be possible for you sir by logic to draw an inference that (10 the deceased was treated the way Hr Smithers says he was treated, because of similar fact evidence. Now we say sir that it is simply not possible to draw that logical conclusion, on the available data, and on the affidavits presently tendered to you. Now your Worship, in conclusion, it is quite true that there is Mr Ntonga whose affidavit apparently could not have been obtained before I think in early August, the codetainee who was in the Eastern Cape, detained there. Now your Worship, as regards that particular detainee and as (20 regards all the others, we submit sir that you are, with due respect, in charge of this Inquest, that you have set a date for purposes of your Ruling on the question of the admissibility of affidavits of this nature, and evidence, that you were obviously then alert to the fact that there were possibly many other co-detainees of the deceased who had not by then been approached by the lawyers for the family or who had not been in the position by then, to come forward and tender evidence. Your Worship, we have seen from newspaper reports, (30 and I think it is probably common knowledge, that in recent times/
15 times, I believe it's a Petition or something of that kind, has been presented to the Minister in which reference is made of accusations by very many co-detainees of alleged assaults on them. Now your Worship we say, that for purposes of this Inquest it was necessary for your Worship, it was practical and it was expedient, in the public interest and in the interests of those immediately involved, to draw a line somewhere, and your Worship has done that, with due notice to all of us, that that date and that day would have to come, when your Worship would want to be in possession of all the affidavits. Now that day came in June, and that day passed in June, and we submit sir, with great respect, that it is too late now for our learned friends, that it would lead to too many disturbances in these proceedings if there must be a virtual re-opening of this Inquest at this stage. It would not be warranted, it would be in conflict with your own Ruling sir, and we would accordingly urge upon you to disallow these affidavits. As regards Dr Jacobson sir, and the affidavits that we haven't seen, it's very difficult for us to say what they contain, as far as - well your Worship we would leave the position of Dr Jacobson in your hands. COURT I have received two statements coming from Dr Jacobson Mr Schabort, I don't know whether you have received any copy of any of these statements? ADV SCHABORT No sir, we haven't. COURT The one I received this morning, that was obtained on my request, and is with Mr de Vries, and I think he will give you a copy as soon as possible. ADV SCHABORT Yes sir. We might perhaps just indicate sir, that as far as Dr Jacobson is concerned, we haven't
16 Now/ seen his affidavit, and subject of course to what is actually contained in his affidavit, we won't dispute sir, that certain reports were made to him, such as those featuring in the documents which have already been placed before you sir, his certificates issued at the time, but other than that I don t think I can take that much further. COURT ADV BIZDS Thankyou Mr Schabort. I promise to finish sir, if your Worship gives me 5 or 7 minutes. COURT 5 Minutes Mr Bizos. I think that's too long, but (10 not more than 5. ADV BIZOS As your Worship pleases. Your Worship I am glad that my learned friend referred to the record because I think the answer to a certain extent to many of his objections are to be found in the record itself, I would refer your Worship to page 490 of the record, where your Worship is discussing the question of the statements, and you say: "What I would suggest with the greatest..." COURT You know I - I beg your pardon Mr Bizos - it is not necessary to read the record to me, I will read through the (20 record. ADV BIZOS Yes, no there is this sir that I want to draw attention, it's of the very nature of an enquiry sir, and may I just say sir for instance, someone as a result of a newspaper or other information, makes vital information to us, available to us tomorrow for the first time, I am sure your Worship will not reject it for that, and your Worship says that is something different, entirely different, "No, no of course sir, this is why - but I want to assure your Worship that we are trying our best to (30 continue as soon as possible..".
17 Now my learned friend sir, with the greatest respect, has told your Worship that we should have filed the affidavits then. The passages that he read to your Worship were recorded on the 14th of June. The - Ntonga was released on the 18th of August sir, van Heerden was released on the 6 th of July. Chikani was released on the 7th of July, Hogan has given an explanation, and I submit with respect sir that if one of the parties to the proceedings has witnesses in detention, it can hardly be held to blame for another party for not having filed affidavits timeously. (10 As far as Mr van Heerden is concerned sir, with the greatest respect to my learned friend, he could not have chosen a worse expression than that Mr Van Heerden had a perfect opportunity to make an affidavit. Your Worship knows, that even though this was a consultation with his legal representative sir, on the affidavits before your Worship, the information was handed over to Major Cronwright according to the latest affidavit placed before your Worship. With the greatest respect sir, that can hardly... COURT Do you want to come back at 2.00 o'clock Mr Bizos? (20 ADV BIZOS COURT ADV BIZOS Another two minutes if I may sir. Two minutes Mr Bizos. With the greatest respect sir, that is hardly the best opportunity. There has been no argument advanced to your Worship sir in relation to the non-similar fact evidence, the four witnesses that give direct evidence, and whatever your Worship's reservations may be, in relation to Kgatshalia, Ndao and the third person, there can be no doubt in relation to the others in my respectful submission. I submit further sir that the Bell and van Rensburq (30 case has no application, if it's any authority for the proposition/
18 sition is, sir that your Worship may receive the affidavits, and not allow cross-examination in my respectful submission sir, there can be no doubt, in view of the fact that the witnesses were kept in detention that your Worship will allow the - yes your Worship and it's - I am just reminded sir, that Mr van Heerden just didn't pop up, in my learned friend's words, he took the trouble of te l l i n g the Deputy Attorney- General whilst in detention, that he had vital information. Your Worship, for reasons which appear to have been wellfounded, he was not prepared to make an affidavit whilst in detention. COURT Mr Bizos, isn't it a possibility that you might explain to me why the attorney or Counsel who advised Mr van Heerden did not approach me or inform me? ADV BIZOS I don't know your Worship, I really don't know why he did not - why your Worship was not approached, but sir, with the greatest respect... COURT I was not informed, I was not informed why he refused to make the statement, not by the attorney or Counsel who advised him, according to his statement. ADV BIZOS Well your Worship, I don't know, I cannot answer for my colleagues, but it was made quite clear sir that access would not be given to us, so that what your Worship has to judge is have we been remiss in any way in getting the statement. If your Worship had sent the investigating officer, or anyone else I don't know what would have happened, but assume for a moment sir that your Worship should have been informed by his Counsel, that is no reason for excluding vital evidence as to what might have happened... COURT ADV BIZOS I think it is just a matter of courtesy Mr Bizos. Your Worship, I will convey, the personality
19 of the persons concerned are well known to me, they are my colleagues and I will convey your Worship's remark in that regard sir, I am sure that no discourtesy was intended. The police sir, claim absolute control over Mr van Heerden, and I would believe sir, in defence of my colleagues, that they probably thought that your Worship, as the courts have no power to interfere with a detainee, that your Worship had no power, and maybe that is why they may have been led into error, but I will most certainly convey your Worship's remark to my friends. COURT Thankyou Hr Bizos. Mnr de Vries, die verklarings wat ontvang is van Dr Jacobson en dan ook die wat mnr Bizos hulle ingehandig het, en Dr Cohen, sal u dit beskikbaar stel aan die partye asseblief, sodat almal weet waaroor dit gaan. ADV DE VRIES Dit sal gedoen word. HOF Baie dankie - we have already discussed the matter of going on with this matter after today, I am not available on Thursday and Friday, Mr Bizos is not available 3 days next week, and we have decided to postpone t his matter until the 25th of October, 1982 in the same courtroom. AT THIS STAGE MATTER REMANDED TO 25th OCTOBER 1982
20 Historical Papers, Wits University Collection Number: AK2216 AGGETT, Dr Neil, Inquest, 1982 PUBLISHER: Publisher:- Historical Papers Research Archive Location:- Johannesburg 2013 LEGAL NOTICES: Copyright Notice: All materials on the Historical Papers website are protected by South African copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, or otherwise published in any format, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner. Disclaimer and Terms of Use: Provided that you maintain all copyright and other notices contained therein, you may download material (one machine readable copy and one print copy per page) for your personal and/or educational non-commercial use only. People using these records relating to the archives of Historical Papers, The Library, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, are reminded that such records sometimes contain material which is uncorroborated, inaccurate, distorted or untrue. While these digital records are true facsimiles of paper documents and the information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be accurate and reliable, Historical Papers, University of the Witwatersrand has not independently verified their content. Consequently, the University is not responsible for any errors or omissions and excludes any and all liability for any errors in or omissions from the information on the website or any related information on third party websites accessible from this website. This document is part of a collection deposited at the Historical Papers Research Archive at The University of the Witwatersrand. 07:52:17 AM]
RULING ON ADMISSION OF AFFIDAVITS BY COURT. On the 2nd March, 1982 the first date of the hearing
ON1 THE 25th OCTOBER 19B2 ON RESUMPTION : APPEARANCES AS BEFORE RULING ON ADMISSION OF AFFIDAVITS BY COURT On the 2nd March, 1982 the first date of the hearing in public of this Inquest, the presiding
More informationNow, I want to know, who is in charge of the dockets, who. brings the dockets to the Prosecutor? I do.
- 7189 - Always? Now, I want to know, who is in charge of the dockets, who brings the dockets to the Prosecutor? I do. Always? Never Sgt. Kruger? Well, once it is with the Prosecutor I am finished with
More informationYou are welcome to do that. Thank you sir. Ve would like you to receive
H. Muller. PART-HEARD MATTER 159/82 DATE : 25.6.1982 BY THE COURT: I have read through the documents handed in by this witness yesterday and I am. satisfied that the documents may be handed in if anybody
More informationProfessor Murray,
- 5389 - It arises particularly out of the witness' last answer in regard to the whole of this witness' evidence as it now goes on. This witness is now purporting to interpret to Your Lordships this document.
More information~ &/'!... //. ~N. ~~r"c9~~, ~.9'~~ Aqtq DA.. J3. TSALA EA BECOA~A" (" Friend of the Bec:boaaa ").
TSALA EA BECOA~A" (" Friend of the Bec:boaaa "). Published every Saturday at Kimberley in Sechuana and English. Circulates throughout the Union of ~uth Africa, the Protectorates, Rhodesia, United Kingdom,
More information13 SA. C C JOHANNESBURG. 1. Conscientious Objectors' Support Group (COSG) 2. Black Sash. 3. National Union of South African Students (NUSAS)
JOHANNESBURG 1. Conscientious Objectors' Support Group (COSG) 3. National Union of South African Students (NUSAS) 4. National Education Union of South Africa (NEUSA) 5. Catholic War and Peace 6. Young
More informationMrs. Melitafa and Nombulelo Melitafa LRC Oral History Project 2 September 2008
1 Mrs. Melitafa and Nombulelo Melitafa LRC Oral History Project 2 September 2008 Client erpreter: Rufus Poswa Grahamstown This is an interview with Mrs. Melitafa and Nombulelo (daughter of Mrs. Melitafa)
More informationCase Name: R. v. Koumoudouros. Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Branita Koumoudouros. [2005] O.J. No Certificate No.
Page 1 Case Name: R. v. Koumoudouros Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Branita Koumoudouros [2005] O.J. No. 5055 Certificate No. 68643727 Ontario Court of Justice Hamilton, Ontario B. Zabel J. Heard:
More informationINTERVIEW WITH LARA FOOT 5 TH JULY GRAHAMSTOWN INTERVIEWER VANESSA COOKE
INTERVIEW WITH LARA FOOT 5 TH JULY 2014 1900 GRAHAMSTOWN INTERVIEWER VANESSA COOKE VC: Just relax VC: Lara what first made you interested in theatre? LF: The Market Theatre. VC:Really? LF: Ja, no really.
More informationMarc James Asay v. Michael W. Moore
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION). THE STATE versus NELSON MANDELA AND OTHERS.
A.H.V. 7. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION). BEFORE: The Honourable Mr. Justice de Wet. PRETORIA: 14 th December, 1963. (Judge President). In the matter of: THE STATE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Docket No. CR ) Plaintiff, ) Chicago, Illinois ) March, 0 v. ) : p.m. ) JOHN DENNIS
More informationYes, and then I went on sir, to instructions. I first used the word "code1, and then. I went on to instructions and guide-lines.
mentioned it twice. ADV SCEABORT: ADV BIZOS: A code of conduct for interrogators. Yes, and then I went on sir, to instructions and guide-lines. I first used the word "code1, and then I went on to instructions
More informationT 7 3 H A B A N G U, B. BOKALA, L. VOGELMAN, PROF. MOHAMED. N.PAHAD, D. -HftTHE AND M. - C H I K A N E. C.
THE HEGlOHM. EXECUTIVE qe UPf HfcETX-Wfc Vtftf) OKI PRESENT * :*' - 5s'. «L».: v-'-t 1. executive' Ws. " S ' " u T 7 3 H A B A N G U, B. BOKALA, L. VOGELMAN, PROF. MOHAMED. N.PAHAD, D. -HftTHE AND M. -
More informationXABA. Why did you knock at the kitchen door? I thought. that it would not be as safe in the shack as in the house.
25.52-696 - XABA Why did you knock at the kitchen door? I thought that it would not be as safe in the shack as in the house. So why did you not wait for the door to be opened? Because this Hippo was coming
More informationTuesday, February 12, Washington, D.C. Room 2247, Rayburn House Office Building, commencing at 10
1 RPTS DEN DCMN HERZFELD COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT ND GOVERNMENT REFORM, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTTIVES, WSHINGTON, D.C. TELEPHONE INTERVIEW OF: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 Washington, D.C. The telephone interview
More information/10/2007, In the matter of Theodore Smith Associated Reporters Int'l., Inc. Page 1419
1 2 THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 3 4 In the Matter of 5 NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION v. 6 THEODORE SMITH 7 Section 3020-a Education Law Proceeding (File
More informationTestimony of Detective Jimmy Patterson (2)
Testimony of Detective Jimmy Patterson (2) THE COURT: Mr. Mosty, are you ready? 20 MR. RICHARD C. MOSTY: Well, that 21 depends on what we're getting ready to do. 22 THE COURT: Well. All right. Where 23
More informationGood Morning. Now, this morning is a Hearing of an application. on behalf of 5 individuals on whom orders to provide written statements have
Wednesday, 4 April 2018 (10.00 am) Good Morning. Now, this morning is a Hearing of an application on behalf of 5 individuals on whom orders to provide written statements have been served and the application
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/01/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 431 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2018
1 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: CIVIL TERM : PART 17 2 -------------------------------------------------X LAWRENCE KINGSLEY 3 Plaintiff 4 - against - 5 300 W. 106TH ST. CORP.
More informationIN THE MATTER OF : NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE CERTIFICATES OF : STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS JOSEPH MAZZARELLA : ORDER OF REVOCATION
IN THE MATTER OF : NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE CERTIFICATES OF : STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS JOSEPH MAZZARELLA : ORDER OF REVOCATION : DOCKET NO: 0405-276 At its meeting of June 9, 2005, the State
More informationFrom Article at GetOutOfDebt.org
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 17 CLAIM NO. 131 OF 16 BETWEEN: SITTE RIVER WILDLIFE RESERVE ET AL AND THOMAS HERSKOWITZ ET AL BEFORE: the Honourable Justice Courtney Abel Mr. Rodwell Williams, SC
More informationLIABILITY LITIGATION : NO. CV MRP (CWx) Videotaped Deposition of ROBERT TEMPLE, M.D.
Exhibit 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Page 1 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----------------------x IN RE PAXIL PRODUCTS : LIABILITY LITIGATION : NO. CV 01-07937 MRP (CWx) ----------------------x
More informationthe Royal Newfoundland Constabulary Public Complaints Regulations
IN THE MATTER OF a complaint pursuant to the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary Public Complaints Regulations AND IN THE MATTER OF a Public Complaint Adjudication pursuant to the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary
More informationInterview with David Maseko. David Maseko
David Maseko Abstract David Maseko was born in 1936. This interview dips into his life and his time in the trade unions from the early 1970s until he retired. Maseko was introduced to trade unions through
More informationCHURCHES ALTERNATIVE NATIONAL SERVICE PROGRAMME
CANSP' CHURCHES ALTERNATIVE NATIONAL SERVICE PROGRAMME C.A.N.S.P P.O.Box 125 OBSERVATORY 7935 12 December 1988 Dear Friend INTRODUCTION OF THE PROGRAMME I am writing to you on behalf of a number of individuals
More informationThe Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report
The Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, and in the matter of a hearing regarding the conduct of Mary Jo Rothecker, a member of the Law Society of
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CR-0-2027-JF ) 5 Plaintiff, ) ) San Jose, CA 6 vs. ) October 2, 200 ) 7 ROGER VER, ) ) 8
More informationADDENDUM 3 DISCIPLINARY POLICY. Revision Date: 25 August 2014
ADDENDUM 3 DISCIPLINARY POLICY Revision Date: 25 August 2014 This policy is the copyright property of Clovelly Country Club (CCC) and may only be reproduced, duplicated or published for the pursuit of
More informationERICA DUGGAN HM CORONER FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GREATER LONDON
Claim No: CO/2682/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL Thursday, 20 May 2010 BEFORE: LORD JUSTICE ELIAS MR JUSTICE
More informationEvidence Transcript Style Essay - Bar None Review Essay Handout QUESTION 3
QUESTION 3 Walker sued Truck Co. for personal injuries. Walker alleged that Dan, Truck Co.'s driver, negligently ran a red light and struck him as he was crossing the street in the crosswalk with the "Walk"
More informationCurtis L. Johnston Selman v. Cobb County School District, et al June 30, 2003
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2 ATLANTA DIVISION 3 JEFFREY MICHAEL SELMAN, Plaintiff, 4 vs. CASE NO. 1:02-CV-2325-CC 5 COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 6 COBB COUNTY BOARD
More informationANATOMY OF A LIE: THE EVIDENCE OF LES BROWN
1 ANATOMY OF A LIE: THE EVIDENCE OF LES BROWN I now bring this to a close. In so doing, in respect of a man who has suffered a barrage of criticism, I take a moment to pay tribute to the dedication, determination,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WITWATERSRAND LOCAL DIVISION)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WITWATERSRAND LOCAL DIVISION) CASE NO. 3464/86 JOHANNESBURG 1986.05.15 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE GOLDSTONE In the matter between: THE KRUGERSDORP RESIDENTS
More informationLOS ANGELES - GAC Meeting: WHOIS. Let's get started.
LOS ANGELES GAC Meeting: WHOIS Sunday, October 12, 2014 14:00 to 15:00 PDT ICANN Los Angeles, USA CHAIR DRYD: Good afternoon, everyone. Let's get started. We have about 30 minutes to discuss some WHOIS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION IN RE SPRINGFIELD GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION ) ) ) ) CASE NO. -MC-00 SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 0 JULY, TRANSCRIPT
More informationThe recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page
Page 1 Transcription Hyderabad GNSO Next-Gen RDS PDP Working Group Friday, 04 November 2016 at 10:00 IST Note: Although the transcription is largely accurate, in some cases it is incomplete or inaccurate
More informationPAGES: 1-24 EXHIBITS: 0. Sanjeev Lath vs. City of Manchester, NH DEPOSITION OF PATROL OFFICER AUSTIN R. GOODMAN
1 PAGES: 1-24 EXHIBITS: 0 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HILLSBOROUGH SS SUPERIOR NORTH DOCKET NO. 216-2016-CV-821 Sanjeev Lath vs., NH DEPOSITION OF This deposition held pursuant to the New Hampshire Rules of
More informationaccount of the meeting. I refer next, my lords, to the meeting of the
22,668. MR. HOEXTER urge hpon your lordships that his explanation about his 1 movements at that meeting may not be reasonably true.' (f) Accused's evidence in cross examination: Accused said he did not
More information- 6 - Brown interviewed Kimball in the police station that evening and Kimball was cooperative and volunteered the following information:
- 6 - CONSTABLE M. BROWN CROWN WITNESS#1 Police Constable M. Brown (Brown) is 35 years old. Brown spent 7 years on traffic duty and for the last seven years has been on the homicide squad. Most of Brown's
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE HONORABLE NEIL V. WAKE, JUDGE
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Joseph Rudolph Wood III, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV --PHX-NVW Phoenix, Arizona July, 0 : p.m. 0 BEFORE: THE HONORABLE
More informationINQUIRY INTO THE BOIPATONG MASSACRE VEREENIGING DATE; /06 HIS LORDSHIP MR JUSTICE R J GOLDSTONE. ADV D' J ROSSOUW (SC) (Vice Chairman)
$1.3, INQUIRY INTO THE BOIPATONG MASSACRE VEREENIGING DATE; 1992-08-05/06 MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION: HIS LORDSHIP MR JUSTICE R J GOLDSTONE ADV D' J ROSSOUW (SC) (Vice Chairman) ADV M N S SITHOLE ASSESSOR:
More informationApologies: Julie Hedlund. ICANN Staff: Mary Wong Michelle DeSmyter
Page 1 ICANN Transcription Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation Subteam A Tuesday 26 January 2016 at 1400 UTC Note: The following is the output of transcribing from an audio recording Standing
More informationP, lie IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WITWATERSRAND LOCAL DIVISION) In the matter between:
0 0 0 6 2 8 P, lie IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WITWATERSRAND LOCAL DIVISION) In the matter between: KRUGERSDORP RESIDENTS' ORGANISATION DIKEME JOSHUA MAGOTLA BETHUEL MONGWAKETSI JACOB SAFATSA
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC12-2495 INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE, RE: JUDITH W. HAWKINS NO. 11-550 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationDISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE 13 DHC 11
1 NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAKE BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR 13 DHC 11 E-X-C-E-R-P-T THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, ) ) PARTIAL TESTIMONY Plaintiff, ) OF )
More informationUNCLASSIFIED//FOUO. Tribunal President: Translator, please pass the translated copy back and forth.
Detainee's Sworn Statement- ISN 561 I am not an enemy of the United States of America. I am against the Pakistanis. I think they sold me to you and all of these wrong accusations were made by the Pakistanis.
More information1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH vs. Case No. 05 CF 381
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2 3 STATE OF WISCONSIN, 4 PLAINTIFF, 05 CF 381 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381 6 STEVEN A. AVERY, 7 DEFENDANT. 8 DATE: September 28, 2009 9 BEFORE:
More informationOpinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its seventy-third session, 31 August 4 September 2015
United Nations General Assembly Distr.: General 17 September 2015 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
More informationIn-house transcript of the First Pre-Inquest Review in the 2 nd Inquest touching the death of Jeremiah Duggan
In-house transcript of the First Pre-Inquest Review in the 2 nd Inquest touching the death of Jeremiah Duggan Held at: Date Barnet Coroners Court 22 June 2010 at 9.30am In attendance: Coroner, Andrew Walker
More informationBefore: HIS HONOUR JUDGE CROWTHER QC SITTING WITH JUSTICES R E G I N A. - v - MAURICE KIRK
IN T ROWN OURT AT ARI Indictment No.A20140005 The Law ourts athays Parks ardiff 10 3P 8 th April 2014 efore: IS ONOUR JU ROWTR Q SITTIN WIT JUSTIS --------------- R I N A - v - MAURI KIRK ---------------
More informationPowell v. Portland School District. Chronology
Powell v. Portland School District Chronology October 15, 1996 During school hours, a Boy Scout troop leader is allowed to speak to Harvey Scott Elementary school students, encouraging them to join the
More informationMarshall Lee Gore vs State of Florida
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationCASE NO.: BKC-AJC IN RE: LORRAINE BROOKE ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. /
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Page 1 CASE NO.: 07-12641-BKC-AJC IN RE: LORRAINE BROOKE ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. / Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A. 100 Southeast 2nd Avenue
More informationAT CARDIFF The Law Courts Cathays Park Cardiff CF10 3PG. Before: HIS HONOUR THE RECORDER OF CARDIFF R E G I N A.
IN T ROWN OURT AT ARI Indictment No: T20097445 The Law ourts athays Park ardiff 10 3P 13 th November 2009 efore: IS ONOUR T RORR O ARI --------------- R I N A - v - MAURI JON KIRK --------------- MR R
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff, : -against- : U.S. Courthouse Central Islip, N.Y. REHAL, :
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X JESSE FRIEDMAN, : Plaintiff, : CV 0 -against- : U.S. Courthouse Central Islip, N.Y. REHAL, : : TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION
More information4 THE COURT: Raise your right hand, 8 THE COURT: All right. Feel free to. 9 adjust the chair and microphone. And if one of the
154 1 (Discussion off the record.) 2 Good afternoon, sir. 3 THE WITNESS: Afternoon, Judge. 4 THE COURT: Raise your right hand, 5 please. 6 (Witness sworn.) 7 THE WITNESS: Yes, sir. 8 THE COURT: All right.
More informationWelkom by ons Aanddiens! Kom geniet n koppie koffie in die saal na die diens!
Welkom by ons Aanddiens! Kom geniet n koppie koffie in die saal na die diens! Strength will rise as we wait upon the Lord We will wait upon the Lord We will wait upon the Lord (repeat) EVERLASTING GOD
More information1. After a public profession of faith in Christ as personal savior, and upon baptism by immersion in water as authorized by the Church; or
BYLAWS GREEN ACRES BAPTIST CHURCH OF TYLER, TEXAS ARTICLE I MEMBERSHIP A. THE MEMBERSHIP The membership of Green Acres Baptist Church, Tyler, Texas, referred to herein as the "Church, will consist of all
More informationJohn Erroll Ferguson vs State of Florida
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More information1741. Majoor Cronwright gese het ek moet Dr. Aggett on- dervra, het ek eers ek dink, twee dae, gespandeer
1741. Majoor Cronwright gese het ek moet Dr. Aggett on- dervra, het ek eers ek dink, twee dae, gespandeer om agtergrond omtrent hom in te win en toe het ek begin met Dr. Agg-ett se ondervr aging. So that
More informationGenesis and Analysis of "Integrated Auxiliary" Regulation
The Catholic Lawyer Volume 22, Summer 1976, Number 3 Article 9 Genesis and Analysis of "Integrated Auxiliary" Regulation George E. Reed Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl
More informationAce the Bold Face Sample Copy Not for Sale
Ace the Bold Face Sample Copy Not for Sale GMAT and GMAC are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council which neither sponsors nor endorses this product 3 Copyright, Legal Notice
More informationCase 1:17-mj JCB Document 2-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 10 AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIAL AGENT MICHAEL L. RYAN IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
Case 1:17-mj-07179-JCB Document 2-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 10 AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIAL AGENT MICHAEL L. RYAN IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT I, Special Agent Michael L. Ryan, being duly sworn, depose and
More information(TRA~SV~~LSE PROVI~SIALE AFDELI~G) A~DER SY EDELE REGTER VAN DIJKHORST E~
I~; DIE HOOGGEREGSHOF V_-\...~ SL"ID-AFRIKA 1/s.r. 2. \ (TRA~SV~~LSE PROVI~SIALE AFDELI~G) ;;: \ \ T.'"'70\n.IER. r, c Lp~
More informationCase 2:13-cr FVS Document 369 Filed 05/09/14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SPOKANE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SPOKANE DIVISION 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. :-CR-000-FVS ) RHONDA LEE FIRESTACK-HARVEY, ) LARRY LESTER
More informationIN THE MATTER OF a Proceeding under the Certified General Accountants of Ontario Act, 1983 and By-Law Four
IN THE MATTER OF a Proceeding under the Certified General Accountants of Ontario Act, 1983 and By-Law Four IN THE MATTER OF Alan Hogan, a member of the Certified General Accountants of Ontario BETWEEN:
More informationUNCLASSIFIED/FOUO. Tribunal President: (Indicating to the Recorder) He'll explain that in just a minute.
Summarized Unsworn Detainee Statement The Tribunal President read the hearing instructions to the detainee. The detainee confirmed that he tmderstood the process and had one question. The question is as
More informationNo Plaintiff and Appellant, Defendant and Respondent.
No. 12593 IN TJ3E SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1974 THE STATE OF MONTANA, -vs - Plaintiff and Appellant, HAROLD BRYAN SMITH, Defendant and Respondent. Appeal from: District Court of the Second
More informationUNOFFICIAL, UNEDITED, UNCERTIFIED DRAFT
0 THIS UNCERTIFIED DRAFT TRANSCRIPT HAS NOT BEEN EDITED OR PROOFREAD BY THE COURT REPORTER. DIFFERENCES WILL EXIST BETWEEN THE UNCERTIFIED DRAFT VERSION AND THE CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPT. (CCP (R)() When prepared
More informationHILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PUBLIC
Filing # 7828 E-Filed 09//2018 07:41 : PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT CRIMINAL NO. l5-oo6cfano STATE OF FLORIDA, VS. JOHN N. JONCHUCK,
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, 2008
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. NICHOLAS ALLEN MONTIETH Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardeman County 07-01-0431
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 98-CF-273. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (F )
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationIN PIE HOOGGEREGSHOF VAN SUID-AFRIKA (TRANSVAALSE PROVINSIALE AFDELING)
IN PIE HOOGGEREGSHOF VAN SUID-AFRIKA (TRANSVAALSE PROVINSIALE AFDELING) SAAKNOMMER: CC 482/85 DELMAS 1986-09-22 DIE STAAT teen; PATRICK MABPYA BALEKA EN 21 ANDER VOOR: SY EDELE REGTER VAN DIJKHORST EN
More informationPROGRESS HEARING IN THE MATTER OF: HYPONATRAEMIA RELATED DEATHS HELD AT THE HILTON HOTEL, BELFAST
PROGRESS HEARING IN THE MATTER OF: HYPONATRAEMIA RELATED DEATHS HELD AT THE HILTON HOTEL, BELFAST ON FRIDAY, 30 TH MAY 2008 1 [COMMENCED] 11.10 MR J O'HARA: Good morning everybody. Thank you for coming.
More informationfight the African drivers of the lorries. to ask you to defend me against these. small "boys, (he was referring to the
- 54 - own p-ople. That is what they want to do, the big rasoals". You will have to fight the African drivers of the lorries " "I stand here today not to ask you to defend me against these small "boys,
More informationBEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY. and MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFF S ASSOCIATION
BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY and MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFF S ASSOCIATION Case 625 No. 67051 (Michalski Grievance) Appearances: Timothy R.
More informationAFL ANTI-DOPING TRIBUNAL WEDNESDAY, 28 JANUARY 2015 DAY THIRTEEN (TRANSCRIPT-IN-CONFIDENCE)
AFL ANTI-DOPING TRIBUNAL WEDNESDAY, JANUARY DAY THIRTEEN (TRANSCRIPT-IN-CONFIDENCE) - - - - - MR DAVID JONES MR JOHN NIXON MR WAYNE HENWOOD COUNSEL ASSISTING: MR JUSTIN HOOPER - - - - - MR J. GLEESON QC
More informationUNOFFICIAL/UNAUTHENTICATED TRANSCRIPT. [The Military Commission was called to order at 1457, MJ [COL POHL]: Commission is called to order.
0 0 [The Military Commission was called to order at, January 0.] MJ [COL POHL]: Commission is called to order. All parties are again present who were present when the Commission recessed. To put on the
More informationBefore DEPUTY DISTRICT JUDGE OBHI. PARKING EYE LIMITED (Claimant) -v- PAUL D. HEGGIE (Defendant) PROCEEDINGS APPEARANCES:
IN THE BARNSLEY COUNTY COURT The County Court Westgate Barnsley 13th December 2013 Before DEPUTY DISTRICT JUDGE OBHI PARKING EYE LIMITED (Claimant) -v- PAUL D. HEGGIE (Defendant) PROCEEDINGS APPEARANCES:
More informationLAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT. IN THE MATTER OF the Legal Profession Act (the LPA ); and
File No. HE20070047 LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT IN THE MATTER OF the Legal Profession Act (the LPA ); and IN THE MATTER OF a Hearing regarding the conduct of Calum J. Bruce, a Member
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2012 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2012
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 0/0/0 INDEX NO. /0 NYSCEF DOC. NO. - RECEIVED NYSCEF: 0/0/0 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY - CIVIL TERM - PART ----------------------------------------------x
More informationGuidelines for Handling Abuse Allegations against a Church Leader. A. Why a Procedure for Handling Abuse Allegations Is Necessary
Guidelines for Handling Abuse Allegations against a Church Leader Note: Following is a consolidation of guidelines that CRC Synods have adopted over time, as a supplement to the Church Order, to equip
More informationIt is thus a logical and basic premise that all assemblies in God s name, also church council meetings, proceed in an orderly way.
MEETING PROCEDURE INTRODUCTION 1 Corinthians 14:33 says that God is not a God of disorder. It is thus a logical and basic premise that all assemblies in God s name, also church council meetings, proceed
More informationThe Actual Reality Trust Ardentinny Outdoor Education Centre Argyll Please reply to: 1/1 Barcapel Avenue Newton Mearns G77 6QJ
PROPOSED REPORT BY THE STANDARDS COMMISSIONER ON THE COMPLAINT AGAINST COUNCILLOR MICHAEL BRESLIN (LA/AB/1758/JM) Witness Statement by Dr C M Mason, MBE Appendix 4 The Actual Reality Trust Ardentinny Outdoor
More informationAdministrative law - consultative body appointed by Minister- judicial review of its powers and activities.
HCJ 282/61 Mahmud El-Saruji v. Minister of Religious Affairs 1 H.C.J. 282/61 MAHMUD EL-SARUJI et al. v. MINISTER OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS AND THE MOSLEM COUNCIL. ACRE In the Supreme Court sitting as the High
More informationMissouri Court of Appeals
Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District Division Two BRIAR ROAD, L.L.C., ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) No. SD29930 ) vs. ) ) LEZAH STENGER HOMES, INC., ) ) Defendant-Appellant. ) AFFIRMED APPEAL FROM
More informationTarget 1. Ensure proper focus of your investigations
Target 1. Ensure proper focus of your investigations Follow directions given by the Intake Committee and your supervisors. Address issues within the scope of the case. This topic is entirely subjective.
More informationState of Minnesota County of Olmsted
State of Minnesota County of Olmsted District Court 3rd Judicial District Prosecutor File No. 11005953 Court File No. 55-CR-11-1054 State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, COMPLAINT Order of Detention VS. MICHAEL
More informationAnthony Mangan an Order to Show Cause. The Order was predicated on charges of
IN THE MATTER OF : NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE CERTIFICATES OF : STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS ANTHONY MANGAN : ORDER OF SUSPENSION : DOCKET NO: 0506-142 At its meeting of April 11, 2002, the State
More informationARBITRATION AWARD. Panellist: Gail McEwan Case Reference No.: WECT Date of award: 31 January In the arbitration between: and
ARBITRATION AWARD Panellist: Gail McEwan Case Reference No.: WECT10067-14 Date of award: 31 January 2015 In the arbitration between: DAKALO MATEMBEIE Union/Employee party and TOTAL SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LIMITED
More informationThe Florida Bar v. Jorge Luis Cueto
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationUNDERCOVER POLICING INQUIRY
In the matter of section 19(3) of the Inquiries Act 2005 Applications for restriction orders in respect of the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstrations
More informationUNOFFICIAL/UNAUTHENTICATED TRANSCRIPT. [The R.M.C. 803 session was called to order at 1602, MJ [Col SPATH]: These commissions are called to order.
0 [The R.M.C. 0 session was called to order at 0, February.] MJ [Col SPATH]: These commissions are called to order. All parties present before the recess are again present. Defense Counsel, you may call
More informationAN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 93 ( CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS ) OF THE MANALAPAN TOWNSHIP CODE Ordinance No.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 93 ( CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS ) OF THE MANALAPAN TOWNSHIP CODE Ordinance No. 2008-02 Adopted February 27, 2008 WHEREAS, the Township of Manalapan
More information>> ALL RISE. SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. PLEASE BE SEATED. >> GOOD MORNING TO BOTH OF YOU. THE LAST CASE THIS WEEK IS CALLOWAY V.
>> ALL RISE. SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. PLEASE BE SEATED. >> GOOD MORNING TO BOTH OF YOU. THE LAST CASE THIS WEEK IS CALLOWAY V. STATE OF FLORIDA. >> GOOD MORNING, MY NAME IS SCOTT SAKIN,
More informationWHO'S IN CHARGE? HE'S NOT THE BOSS OF ME. Reply. Dear Professor Theophilus:
WHO'S IN CHARGE? HE'S NOT THE BOSS OF ME Dear Professor Theophilus: You say that God is good, but what makes Him good? You say that we have been ruined by trying to be good without God, but by whose standard?
More informationLovereading Reader reviews of Kill The Next One by Federico Axat
Lovereading Reader reviews of Kill The Next One by Federico Axat Below are the complete reviews, written by Lovereading members. Chris Bertenshaw Excellent thriller that keeps you guessing until the end.
More information>> ALL RISE. HEAR YE HEAR YE, HEAR YE. THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. ALL WHO HAVE CAUSE TO PLEAD, DRAW NEAR, GIVE ATTENTION AND YOU
>> ALL RISE. HEAR YE HEAR YE, HEAR YE. THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. ALL WHO HAVE CAUSE TO PLEAD, DRAW NEAR, GIVE ATTENTION AND YOU SHALL BE HEARD. GOD SAVE THESE UNITED STATES, THE GREAT
More informationORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF KEN ANDERSON VOLUME 2
CAUSE NO. 86-452-K26 THE STATE OF TEXAS ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff(s) Page 311 VS. ) WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS MICHAEL MORTON Defendant(s). ) 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION
More information