RULING ON ADMISSION OF AFFIDAVITS BY COURT. On the 2nd March, 1982 the first date of the hearing
|
|
- Ferdinand Simon
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ON1 THE 25th OCTOBER 19B2 ON RESUMPTION : APPEARANCES AS BEFORE RULING ON ADMISSION OF AFFIDAVITS BY COURT On the 2nd March, 1982 the first date of the hearing in public of this Inquest, the presiding magistrate remarked; "..I don't want to be dogmatic about this but I think it would be very helpful if you could furnish such statements as you propose to place before me by the 26th March, would that be suitable to everybody?" (101 Mr Bizos responded - It is a good date to work to your Worship, but as your Worship has indicated, there may be difficulty, but we will certainly try whatever statements we have readily available to us, to file them with your Worship before or On that date." On the same date Mr Bizos indicated that the lawyers for the Aggett family wanted to obtain statements from fellowdetainees of the late Dr Aggett, which might throw light on the circumstances of his death. It appears from a copy (201 of a telex dated 3rd March, 1982, addressed to the Minister of Law and Order, that the persons they had in mind were Auret van Heerden, Keith Coleman, Elizabeth Floyd, Phiros Kgatshalia, Sisa Njikelane and Thomasile Kwetha. In this telex it was requested, inter alia, that an assurance be given by you that no detainee at present in the custody of the South African Police, will be approached or interrogated in connection with the information which he has or gives in connection with the Inquest. In reply to the aforementioned telex, the Minister oberserved inter alia; (30^ "..If you are in possession of any relevant information/
2 mation which you believe would assist the magistrate in holding a meaningful enquiry, you are requested to convey the information to the investigating officer concerned. He will institute a proper investigation and submit his findings to the Public Prosecutor as prescribed by Section A of the Inquest Act, 1959." It appears from further correspondence that the lawyers for the family were not prepared to approach the investigating officer, see for instance the telex sent to the Minister of (10J Justice on the 3rd March, 1982, paragraph 4.3, in spite of the fact that Section 3 of the Inquest Act places a duty on the police to investigate the circumstances of the death. When the Inquest was resumed before us on the 13th of April 1982, no affidavit by an ex-detainee or a detainee had been submitted for consideration. by Mr Maurice Smithers was handed in. On this date an affidavit Nevertheless, we began to hear evidence. During the proceedings it became obvious that a decision under the notion of similar facts, whether admitted or not, (20 would greatly affect the course of the proceedings expressly the scope of explanation of the witnesses. In spite of this, and in spite of undertakings by the legal advisers, these affidavits were then still not submitted. I then postponed the proceedings for a number of days, to afford the lawyers for the Aggett family the opportunity to submit the affidavits for consideration. A number of affidavits by detainees or ex-detainees were then submitted. All the persons aforementioned, except Auret van Heerden submitted affidavits. I was then in- (31 formed that Auret van Heerden was not prepared to submit a written/
3 written statement at that stage. There was no specific mention of affidavits by any other detainee intended to be handed in, in future. After hearing the argument of both Counsel I announce my ruling on the admissibility on each one of the affidavits. Some of.the affidavits, including those of Phiros Kgatshalia, Samson Ndao and Montgomery Narsoo were not admitted and it was not directed that they be called to give oral evidence. The proceedings were then proceeded with, and examina- (1C tion allowed in accordance with these rulings. June, 1982 the matter was postponed to the 13th On the 29th September, The attorneys for the Aggett family thereafter submitted the following further affidavits; on the 13th September, 1982 an affidavit by Eric Ntonga, on the 15th September, 1982 a supplementary affidavit by Montgomery Narsoo. On the 20th September, 1982 a supplementary affidavit by Phiros Kgatshalia, and another one by Samson Ndao, and an affidavit by Frnk Chikani and another affidavit by Auret van Heerden. On the 23rd September, 1982 an affidavit by (20 Barbara Anne Hogan. On the 5th of October, 1982 an affidavit by Gilbert John Marcus, affidavits by Denis Anthony van Heerden, Ruth Estelle Becker, and Gilbert John Marcus attached to it. On the 13th of October, 1982 an affidavit by Dr Ivan Cohen. It may be mentioned that recently I also received affidavits by policemen implicated by the ex-detainees who testified, Dr Jacobson and Advocate Swanepoel. But the circumstances of these affidavits are clearly different from those submitted by the attorneys, and it is not (30 necessary to deal with them in detail in the present context. It/
4 affecting/ It goes without saying that this delay, the submission of affidavits by the attorneys, whether done deliberately or not, cannot be approved of. It might serve the purpose of the deponent or somebody else, but it certainly causes at least much inconvenience to the others who are taking part in the proceedings. I n Timol & Ano vs The Magistrate, Johannesburg ( 2 ) 5A 7B1 T the Learned Judges observed at page 290 C - "The magistrate must have all the documents in his possession, not only to decide on whether he should (loj hold an Inquest, but also to take various other decisions and to exercise his discretion in a number of respects. " And at page 292 B - "Other duties of the magistrate such as ensuring that the conduct of the Inquest does not pass out of his hands, have already been mentioned". The procedure adopted by the attorneys, tends to ignore these observations and to make it very difficult for the presiding officer to exercise his function properly. It also tends (20 to frustrate the policy expressed in the maximum interest res publicae ut cit finis litium(?). However, I receive the affidavits, again I afforded both Counsel the opportunity to address me on the question me on whether the deponents should be called to give evidence or not. Again I considered each affidavit on its merits in the light of the information available to me. I will now deal with each one of the affidavits. Phiros Kqatshalia : It appears that the supplementary affidavit submitted by Mr Kgatshalia, is done with the in- (30 tent to manoeuvre around the Ruling I have made previously
5 would/ affecting him. It must be borne in mind that he was in detention when he compiled the initial affidavit, apparently with the assistance of an attorney. On his own admission he withheld vital information in his initial affidavit to serve his own purposes. When I ruled the information coming from him inadmissible I remarked, inter alia, he does not mention the names of the person or the persons responsible. In his supplementary affidavit he stated, and I quote : "..In paragraph 13 of my previous affidavit I described the unlawful treatment to which I was submitted by members of the Security Police while I was under interrogation at John Vorster Square. However, I purposely did not name the members of the Security Police who committed the unlawful acts, for the following reasons - 1. At the time of making my previous affidavit the legal representatives of the Aggett family who were unable to advise me with any degree of certainty, that I would be called upon to give evidence at the Inquest, 2. Having already been detained three times, I could not discount the possibility that I would have future contact with the Security Police, and in particular I could not discount the possi bility of being detained and interrogated by the Security police at some time in the future. 3. At the time of making my previous affidavit, I was of the view that by naming the Security policemen whose unlawful conduct is described in paragraph 13 of my previous affidavit I -
6 would be exposing myself to the additional risk of being maltreated by the Security police, so named, during my future period of detention which I could undergo." After this supplementary affidavit was submitted, I requestion the senior.pub1ic Prosecutor to make a statement, made by Mr Kgatshalia to Sergeant Blom and referred to in paragraph 10.(b) of his affidavit available. In this statement, he related to his treatment during his detention and stated inter alia; (11 "The person who assaulted me is the same person who brought me to Detective-sergeant Blom who took my statement on the 9th of January, I don't know what his name is and I will(won't? - not clear aeroplane flying overhead)... be able to identify him again if I should see him." And further, in his statement, "I want to say that the first assault was not as bad as the second occasion, and that Captain Swanepoel was present on the second occasion as well as another(2 person whom I can't remember, as well as the officer in question, whom I was assaulted by." Now it is remarkable that firstly Mr Kgatshalia did not know the name of his assaillant when he made the statement to Sergeant Blom, contra; his supplementary affidavit where he did mention it without explaining how he got to know it. And secondly, he did give a clear indication of the identity of his assaillant, and later mentioned Captain Swanepoel as being present when he was assaulted. This tends to make nonsense of the reasons advanced for not naming the police- (3 men involved. Notwith-/
7 Notwithstanding the aforementioned observations, I again consider the information coming from Mr Kgatshalia.. Samson Ndao : This appears to be another case where a supplementary affidavit was filed to manoeuvre around the Ruling I have made previously affecting him. When I announced that ruling, I remarked inter alia, 'he mentions assaults but doesn't state where and by whom." In his supplementary affidavit, the names I have mentioned - and he says, I quote : "..In paragraph 10 of my previous affidavit I de- (1C scribed the unlawful treatment to which I was submitted by members of the Security police while.in detention. However, I purposely did not name the members of the Security police who committed the unlawful acts, because at the time of making my previous affidavit I was not certain whether my affidavit would be used in the proceedings and was accordingly of the opinion that to risk making any mention of the Security police that some certainty that I would make a meaningful contribution (2 to the Inquest, would not be in my interest." After this supplementary affidavit was submitted, I requested the Senior Public Prosecutor to make a statement referred to in paragraph 9(b) of the initial affidavit by Mr Ndao, available. In this statement, dated the 25th January, 1982, he stated inter alia: "..On Tuesday 12th January, 1982 at approximately 7.00 a.m. three of the investigating officers came to me at my cell, and took me to the 4th floor of (3 the same police station. They were all White
8 males and their names are unknown to me." And further on - ".. The said persons had no right to assault me, and I will be able to identify them at any time. I desire police investigation and prosecution against the matter." Now it is clear that Mr Naisoo said firstly he did not know the names of the persons involved, contra: In his supplementary affidavit where he did mention the names without explaining how he got to know them, and secondly he did give a (10 clear indication that he is able and prepared to identify them, and that he wanted steps to be taken against them. This is hardly reconcileable with the reasons given in the supplementary affidavit, for not naming the persons in his initial aff idavit. The striking similarity between the reasons advanced by Mr Naisooand Mr Kgatshalia as aforementioned, is remarkable. On his own admission, MrNaisoo witheld vital information in his initial affidavit, to serve his own purposes, notwithstanding this observation, I again consider the information (20 coming from Mr Naisoo. Montgomery Naisoo : Mr Narsoo is one of the persons I previously decided not to call to give oral evidence. In a supplementary affidavit he gives more details, and seems to give full reasons why my ruling affecting him should be reconsidered. Both the affidavits by Mr Naisoo are again considered. Eric Ntonqa: I perused his affidavit carefully. Some of the information here is clearly hearsay and of no evidential value, and furthermore he has nothing new to say (30 which might assist us on the legal issues before us. He was not/
9 and/ not assaulted but alleged that he was threatened. Frank Chikani: It appears from his statement that he has nothing new to say about the late Dr Aggett. Barbara Anne Hogan: Her name was frequently mentioned during the proceedings before us. She alleges that she was assaulted on the. 22nd of October, 1981 and the 14th. November that's prior to the detention of Dr Aggett. It is well known that two policemen were tried on these allegations in a criminal court, and that they were acquitted. It is also now known that she is at present serving a sen- (10 tence of imprisonment resulting from a conviction in the Supreme Court, of inter alia High Treason. There is nothing in her affidavit indicating that she ever saw Dr Aggett in person, and that she knows anything about treatment he received at John Vorster Square. It appears from the affidavits by Messrs Chikani, Ntonga, Narsoo, Ndao, Kgatshalia and M i s s Hogan, that none of them witnessed and assault of any kind of illtreatment onr.dr Aggett. It is obvious that their affidavits are tendered to give evidence on their own treatment, and in some cases to give (2C an account of observations of Dr Aggett. It must be pointed out that we have already heard a number of ex-detainees testifying on the condition of Dr Aggett, and of their observations of him, and I intend to call another one, one who seems to have had close contact with Dr Aggett during his detention. I want to emphasize that I consider every kind of information which they can possibly give. That was also the case when I previously considered their admissibility. I think it is not necessary to stress the fact that when I (3C exercise my discretion on what to admit, not only the nature
10 and quality, but also the quantum must be borne in mind. I do not intend to call Messrs Chikani, Ntonga, Narsoo, Ndao, Kgatshalia and Miss Hogan to give evidence in this Inquest, and their affidavits are not accepted as proof of the facts stated therein. It' is my considered opinion that the evidence of the evidence of the aforementioned 6 persons will not assist us to make a finding on the issues before us. I intend to say more on the value, if any, of evidence admitted under the notion of similar facts, at a later stage. That I believe (10 will throw more light on this ruling. Auret van Heerden: I was informed that Mr van Heerden was approached to make a written statement relating to the treatment of Dr Aggett at John Vorster Square. However, after consultations with his legal advisers he declined to do so. He was at that time detained as a prospective witness for the prosecution in a criminal case. He was released on the 9th of July, Only on the 20th of September, 1982 he made and submitted the affidavit now under consideration. (20 Affidavits by Gilbert John Marcus and Denis Anthony van Heerden, Ruth Estell Becker and Dr I Cohen, were also submitted by the legal advisers for the Aggett family in support of the affidavit of Auret van Heerden. An affidavit by Advocate Swanepoel relating to his dealings with Mr van Heerden was also submitted. Now it is clear that information coming from Mr van Heerden1s affidavit can be divided into two categories, namely His contact with and observations of Dr Aggett in detention, and (30 2. Treatments which he received at the hands of the Securi ty/
11 Security police. As regards to the treatment, I have come to the conclusion that further evidence of this nature cannot assist us to decide the issues on which we have to pronounce, and shall therefore not be admitted. However, Mr van Heerden shall be called to give evidence on his encounters with and observations of Dr Aggett at John Vorster Square police station at the time of his detention. His affidavit, paragraphs 1 to 24, that is pages 1-11 is admissible, and may be handed in when he is called to give (10 evidence. The rest is not admissible. It follows that the affidavits by Mr Gilbert John Marcus, Denis Anthony van Heerden, Ruth Estelle Becker, Dr Ivan Cohen and Mr Swanepoel respectively, cannot contribute in any way and are not admitted as evidence in these proceedings. I would also like to add that the name of Dr Jacobson was mentioned when Counsel addressed me on the admissibility of evidence - I have already directed that he also be called to give evidence. Thankyou, I w i l l now adjourn to get the attendance of the testimony. (20 AT THIS STAGE COURT TAKE5 A SHORT ADJOURNMENT ON RESUMPTION : AURET DENIS VAN HEERDEN Sworn, states: EXAMINED BY ADV DE VRIES You were detained from the 24th September, 1981 until the 9th of July, 1982 under various sections of various acts? --- That is correct. Before your initial detention, did you know the deceased DrAggett? --- Idid. How well did you know him? --- Reasonably well. (30 On what basis did you know him? --- I knew him as a friend and/
12 Historical Papers, Wits University Collection Number: AK2216 AGGETT, Dr Neil, Inquest, 1982 PUBLISHER: Publisher:- Historical Papers Research Archive Location:- Johannesburg 2013 LEGAL NOTICES: Copyright Notice: All materials on the Historical Papers website are protected by South African copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, or otherwise published in any format, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner. Disclaimer and Terms of Use: Provided that you maintain all copyright and other notices contained therein, you may download material (one machine readable copy and one print copy per page) for your personal and/or educational non-commercial use only. People using these records relating to the archives of Historical Papers, The Library, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, are reminded that such records sometimes contain material which is uncorroborated, inaccurate, distorted or untrue. While these digital records are true facsimiles of paper documents and the information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be accurate and reliable, Historical Papers, University of the Witwatersrand has not independently verified their content. Consequently, the University is not responsible for any errors or omissions and excludes any and all liability for any errors in or omissions from the information on the website or any related information on third party websites accessible from this website. This document is part of a collection deposited at the Historical Papers Research Archive at The University of the Witwatersrand. 07:52:17 AM]
Now, I want to know, who is in charge of the dockets, who. brings the dockets to the Prosecutor? I do.
- 7189 - Always? Now, I want to know, who is in charge of the dockets, who brings the dockets to the Prosecutor? I do. Always? Never Sgt. Kruger? Well, once it is with the Prosecutor I am finished with
More informationYour Worship, if I may refer the Court to the decision. of the Cape Provincial Division in Bell vs van Rensburq NO
questioning of witnesses. Your Worship, if I may refer the Court to the decision of the Cape Provincial Division in Bell vs van Rensburq NO 1971 (3) 5ALR at p.693, a judgment of Mr Acting Justice Baker,
More information13 SA. C C JOHANNESBURG. 1. Conscientious Objectors' Support Group (COSG) 2. Black Sash. 3. National Union of South African Students (NUSAS)
JOHANNESBURG 1. Conscientious Objectors' Support Group (COSG) 3. National Union of South African Students (NUSAS) 4. National Education Union of South Africa (NEUSA) 5. Catholic War and Peace 6. Young
More information~ &/'!... //. ~N. ~~r"c9~~, ~.9'~~ Aqtq DA.. J3. TSALA EA BECOA~A" (" Friend of the Bec:boaaa ").
TSALA EA BECOA~A" (" Friend of the Bec:boaaa "). Published every Saturday at Kimberley in Sechuana and English. Circulates throughout the Union of ~uth Africa, the Protectorates, Rhodesia, United Kingdom,
More informationMrs. Melitafa and Nombulelo Melitafa LRC Oral History Project 2 September 2008
1 Mrs. Melitafa and Nombulelo Melitafa LRC Oral History Project 2 September 2008 Client erpreter: Rufus Poswa Grahamstown This is an interview with Mrs. Melitafa and Nombulelo (daughter of Mrs. Melitafa)
More informationProfessor Murray,
- 5389 - It arises particularly out of the witness' last answer in regard to the whole of this witness' evidence as it now goes on. This witness is now purporting to interpret to Your Lordships this document.
More informationINTERVIEW WITH LARA FOOT 5 TH JULY GRAHAMSTOWN INTERVIEWER VANESSA COOKE
INTERVIEW WITH LARA FOOT 5 TH JULY 2014 1900 GRAHAMSTOWN INTERVIEWER VANESSA COOKE VC: Just relax VC: Lara what first made you interested in theatre? LF: The Market Theatre. VC:Really? LF: Ja, no really.
More informationP, lie IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WITWATERSRAND LOCAL DIVISION) In the matter between:
0 0 0 6 2 8 P, lie IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WITWATERSRAND LOCAL DIVISION) In the matter between: KRUGERSDORP RESIDENTS' ORGANISATION DIKEME JOSHUA MAGOTLA BETHUEL MONGWAKETSI JACOB SAFATSA
More informationT 7 3 H A B A N G U, B. BOKALA, L. VOGELMAN, PROF. MOHAMED. N.PAHAD, D. -HftTHE AND M. - C H I K A N E. C.
THE HEGlOHM. EXECUTIVE qe UPf HfcETX-Wfc Vtftf) OKI PRESENT * :*' - 5s'. «L».: v-'-t 1. executive' Ws. " S ' " u T 7 3 H A B A N G U, B. BOKALA, L. VOGELMAN, PROF. MOHAMED. N.PAHAD, D. -HftTHE AND M. -
More informationYou are welcome to do that. Thank you sir. Ve would like you to receive
H. Muller. PART-HEARD MATTER 159/82 DATE : 25.6.1982 BY THE COURT: I have read through the documents handed in by this witness yesterday and I am. satisfied that the documents may be handed in if anybody
More informationMarc James Asay v. Michael W. Moore
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationCase Name: R. v. Koumoudouros. Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Branita Koumoudouros. [2005] O.J. No Certificate No.
Page 1 Case Name: R. v. Koumoudouros Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Branita Koumoudouros [2005] O.J. No. 5055 Certificate No. 68643727 Ontario Court of Justice Hamilton, Ontario B. Zabel J. Heard:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CR-0-2027-JF ) 5 Plaintiff, ) ) San Jose, CA 6 vs. ) October 2, 200 ) 7 ROGER VER, ) ) 8
More informationOpinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its seventy-third session, 31 August 4 September 2015
United Nations General Assembly Distr.: General 17 September 2015 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
More informationfight the African drivers of the lorries. to ask you to defend me against these. small "boys, (he was referring to the
- 54 - own p-ople. That is what they want to do, the big rasoals". You will have to fight the African drivers of the lorries " "I stand here today not to ask you to defend me against these small "boys,
More information=======================================X In the Matter of the Proceeding Pursuant to Section 44, subdivision 4, ofthe Judiciary Law, in Relation to
STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT =======================================X In the Matter of the Proceeding Pursuant to Section 44, subdivision 4, ofthe Judiciary Law, in Relation to Lawrence
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WITWATERSRAND LOCAL DIVISION)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WITWATERSRAND LOCAL DIVISION) CASE NO. 3464/86 JOHANNESBURG 1986.05.15 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE GOLDSTONE In the matter between: THE KRUGERSDORP RESIDENTS
More informationState of Minnesota County of Olmsted
State of Minnesota County of Olmsted District Court 3rd Judicial District Prosecutor File No. 11005953 Court File No. 55-CR-11-1054 State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, COMPLAINT Order of Detention VS. MICHAEL
More information1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH vs. Case No. 05 CF 381
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2 3 STATE OF WISCONSIN, 4 PLAINTIFF, 05 CF 381 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381 6 STEVEN A. AVERY, 7 DEFENDANT. 8 DATE: September 28, 2009 9 BEFORE:
More informationSTATE OF OHIO DONTA SMITH
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2008-Ohio-6954.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 90996 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. DONTA SMITH DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationInterview with David Maseko. David Maseko
David Maseko Abstract David Maseko was born in 1936. This interview dips into his life and his time in the trade unions from the early 1970s until he retired. Maseko was introduced to trade unions through
More informationCHURCHES ALTERNATIVE NATIONAL SERVICE PROGRAMME
CANSP' CHURCHES ALTERNATIVE NATIONAL SERVICE PROGRAMME C.A.N.S.P P.O.Box 125 OBSERVATORY 7935 12 December 1988 Dear Friend INTRODUCTION OF THE PROGRAMME I am writing to you on behalf of a number of individuals
More informationBEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA AMENDED NOTICE OF FORMAL CHARGES
BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE: CYNTHIA A. HOLLOWAY NO.: 00-143 / Florida Supreme Court AMENDED NOTICE OF FORMAL CHARGES TO: The Honorable
More informationTestimony of Detective Jimmy Patterson (2)
Testimony of Detective Jimmy Patterson (2) THE COURT: Mr. Mosty, are you ready? 20 MR. RICHARD C. MOSTY: Well, that 21 depends on what we're getting ready to do. 22 THE COURT: Well. All right. Where 23
More informationTHE QUEEN S BENCH Winnipeg Centre. - and - THE UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG. APPLICATION UNDER: Court of Queen s Bench Rule 14 AFFIDAVIT OF MARTIN GREEN
QB File No. 13-01-81654 THE QUEEN S BENCH Winnipeg Centre BETWEEN: MARTIN GREEN, applicant, - and - THE UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG respondents. APPLICATION UNDER: Court of Queen s Bench Rule 14 AFFIDAVIT OF
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2014 Fazrat Ali, S/o Late Panaulla Sheikh, Resident of village-chitalkandi, PO & PS-
More informationXABA. Why did you knock at the kitchen door? I thought. that it would not be as safe in the shack as in the house.
25.52-696 - XABA Why did you knock at the kitchen door? I thought that it would not be as safe in the shack as in the house. So why did you not wait for the door to be opened? Because this Hippo was coming
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT: ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Criminal Appeal (J) No. 119 of 2015 Md. Jamaluddin & Another -Versus- The State of Assam & Another Appellants
More information1. After a public profession of faith in Christ as personal savior, and upon baptism by immersion in water as authorized by the Church; or
BYLAWS GREEN ACRES BAPTIST CHURCH OF TYLER, TEXAS ARTICLE I MEMBERSHIP A. THE MEMBERSHIP The membership of Green Acres Baptist Church, Tyler, Texas, referred to herein as the "Church, will consist of all
More informationCOLUMBIA'S FIRST BAPTIST FACES LAWSUIT OVER FORMER DEACON'S CONDUCT
1 of 8 1/17/2014 6:06 PM State, The (Columbia, SC) 2002-05-26 Section: FRONT Edition: FINAL Page: A1 COLUMBIA'S FIRST BAPTIST FACES LAWSUIT OVER FORMER DEACON'S CONDUCT RICK BRUNDRETT and ALLISON ASKINS
More informationMR. NELSON: Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the Court, counsel: I m somewhat caught up in where to begin. I think perhaps the first and most
MR. NELSON: Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the Court, counsel: I m somewhat caught up in where to begin. I think perhaps the first and most important one of the most important things to say right now
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION IN RE: PRIVATE CRIMINAL : COMPLAINT OF : NO. MD-042-2014 GERALD J. SMITH : Seth Miller, Esquire Cynthia A. Dyrda-Hatton Gerald
More informationJOHNSON TSHEPO CHIRWA Accused 1. DUMISANI SIBUSISO XULU Accused 2. GILBERT MOSADI Accused 3. RONNIE MAZWI KHUMALO Accused 4. CELIWE MBOKAZI Accused 5
SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG Case No. SS118/2008 DPP Ref. No. JPV2007/416 In the matter between: THE STATE and JOHNSON TSHEPO CHIRWA Accused 1 DUMISANI SIBUSISO XULU Accused 2 GILBERT MOSADI
More informationPAGES: 1-24 EXHIBITS: 0. Sanjeev Lath vs. City of Manchester, NH DEPOSITION OF PATROL OFFICER AUSTIN R. GOODMAN
1 PAGES: 1-24 EXHIBITS: 0 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HILLSBOROUGH SS SUPERIOR NORTH DOCKET NO. 216-2016-CV-821 Sanjeev Lath vs., NH DEPOSITION OF This deposition held pursuant to the New Hampshire Rules of
More informationDavid Dionne v. State of Florida
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 98-CF-273. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (F )
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION). THE STATE versus NELSON MANDELA AND OTHERS.
A.H.V. 7. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION). BEFORE: The Honourable Mr. Justice de Wet. PRETORIA: 14 th December, 1963. (Judge President). In the matter of: THE STATE
More informationCase Doc 279 Filed 07/07/15 Entered 07/07/15 16:21:45 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Document Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: The Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Debtor. Case No. 15-30125 Chapter 11 RESPONSE OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAINT
More informationPerjury Warrant Denied Against Former DPD Deputy Chief James Tolbert
KYM L. WORTHY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY COUNTY OF WAYNE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY FRANK MURPHY HALL OF JUSTICE 1441 ST. ANTOINE STREET DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-2302 Press Release July 12, 2016 Five
More informationPOLYGAMIST CONVERTS.
/ POLYGAMIST CONVERTS. Shall we Baptize and receive them into Church Fellowship? B y a M issionary who has spent nearly 40 years among a Polygamous People. This difficult question is one with which every
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Docket No. CR ) Plaintiff, ) Chicago, Illinois ) March, 0 v. ) : p.m. ) JOHN DENNIS
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,609 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 115,609 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ANTHONY STEPHEN NICHOLS, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal from Riley
More informationUNCLASSIFIED/FOUO. Tribunal President: (Indicating to the Recorder) He'll explain that in just a minute.
Summarized Unsworn Detainee Statement The Tribunal President read the hearing instructions to the detainee. The detainee confirmed that he tmderstood the process and had one question. The question is as
More informationEMPLOYMENT APPLICATION - NON TEACHING
2201 Ruth Jackson Road Bogart, GA 30622 (678) 726-2300 FAX (678) 726-2301 EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION - NON TEACHING Name Last First Middle Address_ Street City State Zip Home # Work # Cell # E-mail Address
More informationThe Privilege of Self-examination Rosh Hashanah, Day Two September 15, Tishrei 5776 Rabbi Van Lanckton Temple B nai Shalom Braintree, Massachus
The Privilege of Self-examination Rosh Hashanah, Day Two September 15, 2015 2 Tishrei 5776 Rabbi Van Lanckton Temple B nai Shalom Braintree, Massachusetts The arraignment of Johnny Peanuts was my first
More informationThe State s Case. 1. Why did fire investigators believe the cause of the fire wasn t accidental?
The State s Case Directions: Complete the questions below as you watch Chapter 2: The State s Case from the FRONTLINE film Death by Fire. Then discuss the questions that follow with your group. As soon
More informationADDENDUM 3 DISCIPLINARY POLICY. Revision Date: 25 August 2014
ADDENDUM 3 DISCIPLINARY POLICY Revision Date: 25 August 2014 This policy is the copyright property of Clovelly Country Club (CCC) and may only be reproduced, duplicated or published for the pursuit of
More informationT HE M A S T E R S A C A D E M Y 1500 Lukas Lane Oviedo, FL Employment / Volunteer Application Stage I
T HE M A S T E R S A C A D E M Y 1500 Lukas Lane Oviedo, FL 32765 407-971-2221 www.mastersacademy.org Employment / Volunteer Application Stage I The Master s Academy provides employment opportunities to
More informationFILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 11/16/ :25 AM
FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 11/16/2016 09:25 AM STATE OF NEW YORK CICERO TOWN COURT COUNTY OF ONONDAGA INDEX NO. 2016EF4347 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 36 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/16/2016 TOWN OF CICERO, Petitioner, MOTIONS
More informationHutchinson Missionary Baptist Church Application Submission Instructions Friday, March 29, 2019 Mail Complete Application Packet to: Preferred -
Hutchinson Missionary Baptist Church Pastor Search Announcement & Qualifications The Hutchinson Missionary Baptist Church has been in existence and serving the community for 119 years and was a pivotal
More informationLAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT. IN THE MATTER OF the Legal Profession Act (the LPA ); and
File No. HE20070047 LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT IN THE MATTER OF the Legal Profession Act (the LPA ); and IN THE MATTER OF a Hearing regarding the conduct of Calum J. Bruce, a Member
More informationEMPLOYMENT APPLICATION - TEACHING
2201 Ruth Jackson Road Bogart, GA 30622 (678) 726-2300 FAX (678) 726-2301 EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION - TEACHING Name Last First Middle Address_ Street City State Zip Home # Work # Cell # E-mail Address Date
More informationDecided: February 6, S16A1781. SMITH v. THE STATE. Appellant Christopher Rayshun Smith was tried and convicted of murder
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: February 6, 2017 HUNSTEIN, Justice. S16A1781. SMITH v. THE STATE. Appellant Christopher Rayshun Smith was tried and convicted of murder and related offenses in
More informationIn-house transcript of the First Pre-Inquest Review in the 2 nd Inquest touching the death of Jeremiah Duggan
In-house transcript of the First Pre-Inquest Review in the 2 nd Inquest touching the death of Jeremiah Duggan Held at: Date Barnet Coroners Court 22 June 2010 at 9.30am In attendance: Coroner, Andrew Walker
More informationSTATE OF MAINE CHRISTIAN NIELSEN. [ 1] Christian Nielsen appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2008 ME 77 Docket: Oxf-07-645 Argued: April 8, 2008 Decided: May 6, 2008 Reporter of Decisions Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, ALEXANDER, LEVY, SILVER, and MEAD,
More informationRECTIFICATION. Summary 2
Contents Summary 2 Pro Life All Party Parliamentary Group: Resolution letter 3 Letter from the Commissioner to Dr Nicolette Priaulx, 24 October 16 3 Written Evidence received by the Parliamentary Commissioner
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On November 30, 2018 On December 7, Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: PA/13137/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On November 30, 2018 On December 7, 2018 Before DEPUTY
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE HONORABLE NEIL V. WAKE, JUDGE
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Joseph Rudolph Wood III, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV --PHX-NVW Phoenix, Arizona July, 0 : p.m. 0 BEFORE: THE HONORABLE
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, 2008
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. NICHOLAS ALLEN MONTIETH Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardeman County 07-01-0431
More informationThe First Church in Oberlin, United Church of Christ. Policies and Procedures for a Safe Church
The First Church in Oberlin, United Church of Christ Policies and Procedures for a Safe Church Adopted by the Executive Council on August 20, 2007 I. POLICY PROHIBITING ABUSE, EXPLOITATION, AND HARASSMENT.
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/01/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 431 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2018
1 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: CIVIL TERM : PART 17 2 -------------------------------------------------X LAWRENCE KINGSLEY 3 Plaintiff 4 - against - 5 300 W. 106TH ST. CORP.
More informationCase No D.C. No. OHS-15 Chapter 9. In re: CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA, Debtor. Adv. No WELLS FARGO BANK, et al.
0 MARC A. LEVINSON (STATE BAR NO. ) malevinson@orrick.com NORMAN C. HILE (STATE BAR NO. ) nhile@orrick.com PATRICK B. BOCASH (STATE BAR NO. ) pbocash@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 00 Capitol
More informationaccount of the meeting. I refer next, my lords, to the meeting of the
22,668. MR. HOEXTER urge hpon your lordships that his explanation about his 1 movements at that meeting may not be reasonably true.' (f) Accused's evidence in cross examination: Accused said he did not
More informationMOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENTS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 16-2013-CF-005781-AXXX-MA DIVISION: CR-D STATE OF FLORIDA vs. DONALD SMITH MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENTS
More informationRe: Criminal Trial of Abdul Rahman for Converting to Christianity
Jay Alan Sekulow, J.D., Ph.D. Chief Counsel March 22, 2006 His Excellency Said Tayeb Jawad Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Afghanistan Embassy of Afghanistan 2341 Wyoming Avenue, NW Washington,
More informationJohn M. O Connor, Esq. ANDERSON KILL & OLICK, P.C.
John M. O Connor, Esq. ANDERSON KILL & OLICK, P.C. Edward Barocas, Legal Director American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey Foundation P.O. Box 750 Newark, NJ 07101 973-642-2084 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE COMPLAINT. Count I. Murder 2nd Degree ( Y )
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE POLICE NO. : 17-058838 PROSECUTOR NO. : 095440950 STATE OF MISSOURI, ) PLAINTIFF, ) vs. ) PATRICK L. BARKWELL ) 11409 E. Anderson, ) Sugar
More informationSan Joaquin Valley Christian School Association Stone Ridge Christian Certified Staff Application
San Joaquin Valley Christian School Association Stone Ridge Christian Certified Staff Application Your interest in Stone Ridge Christian is appreciated. We invite you to fill out this initial application
More informationAlleged victims: The author and other members of the Union of Free Thinkers. Views under article 5 (4) of the Optional Protocol
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Hartikainen v. Finland Communication No. 40/1978 9 April 1981 VIEWS Submitted by: Erkki Hartikainen on 30 September 1978 Alleged victims: The author and other members of the Union
More informationthe Royal Newfoundland Constabulary Public Complaints Regulations
IN THE MATTER OF a complaint pursuant to the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary Public Complaints Regulations AND IN THE MATTER OF a Public Complaint Adjudication pursuant to the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary
More informationSample Cross-Examination Questions That the Prosecutor May Ask
Sample Cross-Examination Questions That the Prosecutor May Ask If you have prepared properly and understand the areas of your testimony that the prosecution will most likely attempt to impeach you with
More informationCase 1:17-mj JCB Document 2-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 10 AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIAL AGENT MICHAEL L. RYAN IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
Case 1:17-mj-07179-JCB Document 2-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 10 AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIAL AGENT MICHAEL L. RYAN IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT I, Special Agent Michael L. Ryan, being duly sworn, depose and
More informationThe Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report
The Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, and in the matter of a hearing regarding the conduct of Mary Jo Rothecker, a member of the Law Society of
More informationReclaiming Easter. Josh D. McDowell. Tyndale House Publishers
Reclaiming Easter 5 TEACHING OUTLINES / TRANSCRIPTS Taken from 8 hours of teaching on the Resurrection BY Josh D. McDowell Regal Books Tyndale House Publishers Harvest House Publishers Release Date: July
More informationHouse&of&Bishops &Declaration&on&the&Ministry&of&Bishops&and&Priests& All&Saints,&Cheltenham:&Report&of&the&Independent&Reviewer&
House&of&Bishops &Declaration&on&the&Ministry&of&Bishops&and&Priests& Introduction All&Saints,&Cheltenham:&Report&of&the&Independent&Reviewer& 1.! On 10 April 2015 the Director of Forward in Faith, Dr
More informationYouth Policy Of Taupo Baptist Church Taupo, New Zealand
Youth Policy Of Taupo Baptist Church Taupo, New Zealand POLICE VETTING Taupo Baptist Church has a commitment to the health and safety of those most vulnerable. Therefore a police check is to be carried
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE POLICE NO. : 19-000426 PROSECUTOR NO. : 095450769 OCN: CW005614 STATE OF MISSOURI, ) PLAINTIFF, ) vs. ) ) CHRISTOPHER J WILSON ) 10825 Gregory
More informationIN THE REGIONAL COURT FOR THE REGIONAL COURT OF GAUTENG
IN THE REGIONAL COURT FOR THE REGIONAL COURT OF GAUTENG HELD AT PRETORIA In the matter between: THE STATE vs OSCAR LEONARD CARL PISTORIUS Accused STATEMENT IN TERMS OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 60(11)
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D CORRECTED MICHAEL THOMAS RAINES,
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2006 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Case No. 5D04-2706 CORRECTED MICHAEL THOMAS RAINES, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ERIC SMITH
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2010-Ohio-4006.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 93593 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ERIC SMITH DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 107 Filed: 04/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1817
Case: 1:13-cv-05014 Document #: 107 Filed: 04/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1817 J. DAVID JOHN, United States of America, ex rel., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
More informationBefore: HIS HONOUR JUDGE CROWTHER QC SITTING WITH JUSTICES R E G I N A. - v - MAURICE KIRK
IN T ROWN OURT AT ARI Indictment No.A20140005 The Law ourts athays Parks ardiff 10 3P 8 th April 2014 efore: IS ONOUR JU ROWTR Q SITTIN WIT JUSTIS --------------- R I N A - v - MAURI KIRK ---------------
More informationFREEDOM CONCERNS RELIGIOUS. OSCE Human Dimension STATEMENT BY THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF JEHOVAH S CHRISTIAN WITNESSES
R U S S I A RELIGIOUS FREEDOM CONCERNS STATEMENT BY THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF JEHOVAH S CHRISTIAN WITNESSES OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL WORLD HEADQUARTERS OF JEHOVAH S WITNESSES OSCE Human Dimension Implementation
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1996
NO. 95-181 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1996 APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, In and for the County of Flathead, The Honorable Ted 0. Lympus, Judge presiding.
More informationFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH, UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST, COLUMBUS, OHIO
FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH, UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST, COLUMBUS, OHIO PREAMBLE As a community of faith, the members of First Congregational Church, United Church of Christ, Columbus, Ohio, are called to
More informationAFFIDAVIT AND COMPLAINT IN FELONY CASE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, MISSOURI ASSOCIATE DIVISION COUNT: I
STATE OF MISSOURl COUNTY OF CLAY AFFIDAVIT AND COMPLAINT IN FELONY CASE NO, llcy-cro 110, Div, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, MISSOURI ASSOCIATE DIVISION THE STATE OF MISSOURI, vs, Plaintiff. Shawn
More informationSALE OF CHURCH REAL PROPERTY FOR DEVELOPMENT In the Episcopal Diocese of Long Island. Policies, Procedures and Practices
SALE OF CHURCH REAL PROPERTY FOR DEVELOPMENT In the Episcopal Diocese of Long Island Policies, Procedures and Practices There are specific procedures that must be followed in order for a parish to sell
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.168/2004 APPELLANTS 1. Md Kurban Ali, S/o- Mofed Ali, Resident
More information- 6 - Brown interviewed Kimball in the police station that evening and Kimball was cooperative and volunteered the following information:
- 6 - CONSTABLE M. BROWN CROWN WITNESS#1 Police Constable M. Brown (Brown) is 35 years old. Brown spent 7 years on traffic duty and for the last seven years has been on the homicide squad. Most of Brown's
More information(RULING FOLLOWS - next page)
(RULING FOLLOWS - next page).sb:wr 0/0/0 TA DISCUSSION (Unrevised) (Eames J) 0 0 0 R U L I N G HIS HONOUR: The defendants are charged on two counts of criminal contempt by scandalizing the court. The offences
More informationThey were all accompanied outside the house, from that moment on nobody entered again.
TRIBUNALE DI PERUGIA CORTE D ASSISE, HEARING OF 7 FEBRUARY 2009 Confrontation in Court between Inspector Michele and Luca whose testimonies differed on whether the former entered the room of Meredith Kercher
More informationTHOMPSON KILLER WAS WHITE, NOT BLACK:
Michael Goodwin, creator of the sport of Supercross, was convicted in 2007 of ordering the murders of Mickey Thompson, 1960 s- 70 s Indy and off road racing legend, and his wife Trudy in 1988. Goodwin
More informationHarry Franklin Phillips v. State of Florida
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationWHEN I WAS BEFORE THE JUDGE. One Teen s Story About Family Court
WHEN I WAS BEFORE THE JUDGE One Teen s Story About Family Court Board of Directors President Stephen McGrath Vice President Martha W. King Treasurer Timothy W. Reeves, CPA Secretary Liberty Aldrich, Esq.
More informationDISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE 13 DHC 11
1 NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAKE BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR 13 DHC 11 E-X-C-E-R-P-T THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, ) ) PARTIAL TESTIMONY Plaintiff, ) OF )
More informationNo Plaintiff and Appellant, Defendant and Respondent.
No. 12593 IN TJ3E SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1974 THE STATE OF MONTANA, -vs - Plaintiff and Appellant, HAROLD BRYAN SMITH, Defendant and Respondent. Appeal from: District Court of the Second
More informationCIRCUIT COURT BRANCH 3 PLAINTIFF, DEFENDANT. Special Prosecutor On behalf of the State of Wisconsin. 15 LEONARD D. KACHINSKY 16 * * * * * * * *
: ' [ I _: l-' I I -' STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT BRANCH MANITOWOC COUNTY STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF, vs. BRENDAN R. DASSEY, DEFENDANT. DECISION Case No. 0 CF 0 DATE: MAY, 00 BEFORE: Ron. Jerome
More informationAN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 93 ( CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS ) OF THE MANALAPAN TOWNSHIP CODE Ordinance No.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 93 ( CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS ) OF THE MANALAPAN TOWNSHIP CODE Ordinance No. 2008-02 Adopted February 27, 2008 WHEREAS, the Township of Manalapan
More informationFACULTY APPLICATION. POSITION DESIRED (Check all that apply.) FULL TIME PART TIME SUBSTITUTE DATE AVAILABLE
FACULTY APPLICATION Name Street Home Phone City State Zip Cell Phone E-Mail Address Application Date POSITION DESIRED (Check all that apply.) FULL TIME PART TIME SUBSTITUTE DATE AVAILABLE Please indicate
More informationUNCLASSIFIED//FOUO. Tribunal President: Translator, please pass the translated copy back and forth.
Detainee's Sworn Statement- ISN 561 I am not an enemy of the United States of America. I am against the Pakistanis. I think they sold me to you and all of these wrong accusations were made by the Pakistanis.
More information