Emotions and Epistemic Value: How Our Hearts Tell Us What Our Minds Cannot Jason Sangiamo Spring Introduction
|
|
- Barnaby Rose
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Emotions and Epistemic Value: How Our Hearts Tell Us What Our Minds Cannot Jason Sangiamo Spring Introduction Philosopher Adam Pesler has recently argued that emotions can be a source of epistemic justification. Epistemic justification is a measure of how likely a belief is to be true. His theory, coined the Justificatory Thesis, contends that beliefs can be non-inferentially justified by emotions themselves. This is to say that it is the very presence of the emotion itself rather than a corresponding inference that serves as an epistemic justifier. In his paper titled Emotion, Evaluative Perception, and Epistemic Justification, Pesler presents a number of arguments in favor of the Justificatory Thesis, the strongest of which is that some beliefs seem impossible to justify without emotions (Pesler, p. 11). One objection that philosopher Michael Brady has raised in response to Pesler s argument is that emotions themselves must be justified by other sources of epistemic justification, such as perceptual experience, and therefore should not count as a form of justification themselves. I believe that Pesler s argument withstands this criticism because there do exist beliefs for which an emotion is the only epistemic justifier and because even in instances of emotions being dependent on other epistemic justifiers, they may still be epistemic justifiers themselves. 2.0 The Justificatory Thesis: Introduction to Thick Evaluative Beliefs Pesler s theory effectively explains our proclivity to trust emotions as justifying evidence for beliefs (Pesler, p. 3). However, he believes that emotions most likely only serve as independent sources of epistemic justification for what he calls thick evaluative beliefs 1
2 (Pesler, p. 1). A thick evaluative belief is one that carries deep and rich content rather than a simple evaluation of something as good or bad. For example, the belief that a painting is good would be a thin evaluative belief whereas the belief that a painting is innovative would be a thick evaluative belief. One question upon which Pesler s argument hinges is whether there are some thick evaluative beliefs that require an emotion. If this is the case, this would be strong evidence in support of his thesis that emotions are an independent source of epistemic justification because it would mean that the emotion itself is doing the epistemic work for the belief. 2.1 The Justificatory Thesis: Emotion and Thick Evaluative Beliefs Pesler contends that some beliefs are justified by one s direct experience of the value properties instantiated in the state of affairs the belief is about (Pesler, 8). This is to say that a belief about a certain event might be formed by one relating to it emotionally. For example, I believe that torture is abhorrent, despite my never having experienced it. I hold this belief because I have experienced some of the properties implicit in torture such as intense pain and being stripped of my autonomy, and the emotions associated with these experiences allow me to, in a way, experience torture emotionally. My belief that torture is abhorrent is dependent upon me being able to relate to it emotionally in this way. Pesler takes this argument one step further and goes on to say not only are there beliefs that we may form on the basis of emotion, but in addition, there are beliefs that we must form on the basis of emotion (Pesler p. 10). The example he puts forth is of an autistic scientist overlooking a beautiful mountain range (Pesler, p. 11). As she does so, she is asked if she thinks the mountain range is sublime. When asked this 2
3 question, she simply does not know how to respond because, as Pesler argues, she is unable to form the belief that something is sublime because she is without that belief s associated emotion: awe (Pesler, p. 11). She could however, establish the belief that the mountain range was pretty. What distinguishes an evaluation of something being sublime versus an evaluation of something being pretty such that she can form the latter but not the former? Pesler argues that to believe something is sublime is an inherently emotional belief (Pesler, p. 9). Where the judgement that something is sublime requires one to be able to feel the emotion awe, judgement that something is pretty requires no such emotion; it is simply an evaluation of aesthetic value and therefore the woman can form the belief that the mountain range is pretty. Herein lies one major point in Pesler s favor: the scientist s lack of emotional response to the mountain range preempted her from being able to evaluate it as sublime (Pesler, p. 9). If it is the case that there are beliefs such as these that require emotion to be formed, this would be strong evidence in favor of the Justificatory Thesis. 3.0: The Common Source Objection: Overview The strongest objection put forth against Pesler s Justificatory Thesis is articulated by philosopher Michael Brady who argues that emotions themselves are not capable of doing epistemic work, and instead they merely track certain non-evaluative epistemic justifiers (Brady, p ). If it is the case for all emotion-based beliefs that the emotion is merely serving as a proxy for non-evaluative reasons to hold that belief, this would be strong evidence against the core of Pesler s argument. Referring back to Pesler s core example, if the autistic woman could learn to identify things as sublime or not sublime based solely off of their non- 3
4 evaluative properties, Brady would argue that one s feeling of awe is merely a proxy for whatever these properties are (Brady, ). 3.1 The Common Source Objection: Relevant Features of Emotional Justification An integral component of Brady s argument is that unlike perceptual experiences, which are direct justifiers, meaning they do not need to be justified themselves, emotional experiences are indirect justifiers, meaning they themselves need to be justified (Pesler, p. 16). Borrowing an example from Pesler, consider a man who, based on little evidence, believes that his wife is cheating on him and feels jealous because of it (Pesler, p. 16). Clearly, this emotion is in some way unjustified because the man is without good reason to believe that his wife is cheating. As Pesler observes, in order for an emotion to be justified, the beliefs about the object of that emotion must be justified (Pesler, p. 16). In the case of the man who believes his wife to be cheating based off of insufficient evidence, clearly the beliefs foundational to his belief are unjustified and this is why the emotion is unjustified. If it is the case that all emotions are indirect justifiers, then Brady can go on to make the case that this disqualifies them from doing real epistemic work. 3.2 The Common Source Objection: Emotions as Proxys The core of Brady s argument is that as indirect justifiers, emotions are reliant upon certain non-evaluative properties in their formation and we should therefore attribute the epistemic work being done in the creation of these supposedly emotion-based beliefs to the non-evaluative properties rather than the emotion itself (Brady, p ). His most cogent example of an emotion not doing epistemic work involves a dog that has sharp teeth, a rapid 4
5 gait, and is very large that is rapidly approaching a man (Brady, p ). As the dog approaches, the man feels fear and forms the belief that the dog is dangerous (Brady, p. 143). Brady argues that our emotional response is necessarily based off of the non-evaluative properties of the dog; the man s fear is based off of the sharpness of the dog s teeth, speed of approach, and size (Brady, p. 143). But, he argues, these non-evaluative reasons are, in and of themselves, reasons to belief that the dog is dangerous (Brady, p. 143). These emotion-relevant features of the object of the emotion are also reasons to form the same evaluative judgement that the emotion causes (Brady, 143). Since it is possible to form the same evaluative belief on the basis of non-evaluative direct epistemic justifiers, Brady argues that it isn t just the case that emotion might track these non-evaluative properties, but rather that they should, in all cases, be reducible to such properties and therefore are never really doing any epistemic work (Brady, p. 143). 4.0 Pesler s Response: Overview Pesler responds to Brady s objection that there are non-evaluative properties underlying emotions such that they should not be viewed as doing epistemic work in two ways. First, he demonstrates that there are instances in which an emotion does direct epistemic work meaning it exists independent of underlying non-evaluative properties. Second, he argues that even in the case of emotions that are justified by non-evaluative properties, we should still consider these emotions as doing epistemic work. 4.1 Pesler s Response: Emotions as Direct Epistemic Justifiers 5
6 In response to Brady s claim that emotions do not serve as direct epistemic justifiers, Pesler argues that there are instances in which beliefs are justified solely and non-inferentially on an emotion (Pesler p. 17). The example he puts forth is that of an estranged father discovering that his daughter has died. Prior to her passing, the father believed that she was of little value to him and therefore did not anticipate her passing to affect him so strongly (Pesler, p. 17). Now, after his daughter has passed, the father feels intense grief over her loss (Pesler, p. 17). However, the belief consequent to grief is that one has experienced an irrevocable loss of someone valuable. The father had no prior reason to believe that his daughter was so valuable to him but, because of his grief, he comes to realize that her passing is a great loss to him (Pesler, p. 17). In this instance, it would seem that the emotion is a direct epistemic justifier for the belief that the daughter was valuable and, in fact, it is the only epistemic justifier for that belief (Pesler, p. 17). This example demonstrates that there are instances in which an emotion is doing direct epistemic work. 4.2 Pesler s Response: The Value of Indirect Epistemic Justifiers One major question that remains is whether emotions that are indirect epistemic justifiers can be viewed as doing epistemic work. To answer this question, Pesler invokes an example of a color-blind man sorting socks (Pesler, p ). Say, for the sake of argument, that his socks are either red or green; two colors between which the man is unable to distinguish. However, all of the red socks have stripes and all of the green socks do not. On the basis of the socks being with or without stripes, the man is able to sort the socks whereas anyone who is not color blind would merely sort the socks on the basis of their color. However, we would never say that the perception-based belief of someone who is not color blind of the 6
7 socks being red or green is not an epistemic justifier just because there are other ways of justifying the belief. Analogously, there may be an emotionless way of forming certain beliefs, but this does not mean we should attribute the justification of evaluative beliefs to this emotionless evidence (Pesler, p, 19). Borrowing the example from section 2.1, perhaps the autistic woman could learn to categorize the mountains as sublime based on certain emotionless evidence, but this doesn t mean that we should say that the beliefs of everyone who thought the mountains were sublime based on emotional evidence were really justified by the non-evaluative properties of the mountain. 5.0 Conclusion I believe that Pesler s argument that emotions can be epistemic justifiers for thick evaluative beliefs withstands the forceful objection put forth by Brady. Brady s objection is entirely undone by Pesler s example of the estranged father s daughter passing and, even in cases for which the emotion is an indirect epistemic justifier, Pesler makes a convincing argument that this doesn t mean we should dismiss the emotion as having done epistemic work. As Pesler points out, just because emotions may be tracking or correlated with these nonevaluative properties, this does not entail that they do no epistemic work. Brady only provides softball examples, such as that of the dog approaching the man, when arguing that emotions track non-evaluative features to the extent that we ought to consider them as having not done epistemic work. If presented with some of Pesler s examples and arguments, Brady would likely find that his argument is indefensible. For these reasons, I believe that Pesler s Justificatory Thesis is correct and more than capable of addressing every concern brought up in Brady s objection. 7
Robert Audi, The Architecture of Reason: The Structure and. Substance of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Pp. xvi, 286.
Robert Audi, The Architecture of Reason: The Structure and Substance of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Pp. xvi, 286. Reviewed by Gilbert Harman Princeton University August 19, 2002
More informationSUPPOSITIONAL REASONING AND PERCEPTUAL JUSTIFICATION
SUPPOSITIONAL REASONING AND PERCEPTUAL JUSTIFICATION Stewart COHEN ABSTRACT: James Van Cleve raises some objections to my attempt to solve the bootstrapping problem for what I call basic justification
More informationPhilosophy 5340 Epistemology. Topic 6: Theories of Justification: Foundationalism versus Coherentism. Part 2: Susan Haack s Foundherentist Approach
Philosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 6: Theories of Justification: Foundationalism versus Coherentism Part 2: Susan Haack s Foundherentist Approach Susan Haack, "A Foundherentist Theory of Empirical Justification"
More informationPERCEPTUAL INTUITIONISM WITHOUT ETHICAL PERCEPTION
PERCEPTUAL INTUITIONISM WITHOUT ETHICAL PERCEPTION by Lesley Jamieson A thesis submitted to the Department of Philosophy In conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Philosophy
More information1 Hans Jonas, The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984), 1-10.
Introduction This book seeks to provide a metaethical analysis of the responsibility ethics of two of its prominent defenders: H. Richard Niebuhr and Emmanuel Levinas. In any ethical writings, some use
More informationALTERNATIVE SELF-DEFEAT ARGUMENTS: A REPLY TO MIZRAHI
ALTERNATIVE SELF-DEFEAT ARGUMENTS: A REPLY TO MIZRAHI Michael HUEMER ABSTRACT: I address Moti Mizrahi s objections to my use of the Self-Defeat Argument for Phenomenal Conservatism (PC). Mizrahi contends
More informationInterest-Relativity and Testimony Jeremy Fantl, University of Calgary
Interest-Relativity and Testimony Jeremy Fantl, University of Calgary In her Testimony and Epistemic Risk: The Dependence Account, Karyn Freedman defends an interest-relative account of justified belief
More informationCommon Morality: Deciding What to Do 1
Common Morality: Deciding What to Do 1 By Bernard Gert (1934-2011) [Page 15] Analogy between Morality and Grammar Common morality is complex, but it is less complex than the grammar of a language. Just
More informationEpistemic Consequentialism, Truth Fairies and Worse Fairies
Philosophia (2017) 45:987 993 DOI 10.1007/s11406-017-9833-0 Epistemic Consequentialism, Truth Fairies and Worse Fairies James Andow 1 Received: 7 October 2015 / Accepted: 27 March 2017 / Published online:
More informationSkepticism and Internalism
Skepticism and Internalism John Greco Abstract: This paper explores a familiar skeptical problematic and considers some strategies for responding to it. Section 1 reconstructs and disambiguates the skeptical
More informationWilliamson on Knowledge, by Patrick Greenough and Duncan Pritchard (eds). Oxford and New
Williamson on Knowledge, by Patrick Greenough and Duncan Pritchard (eds). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. Pp. ix+400. 60.00. According to Timothy Williamson s knowledge-first epistemology
More informationEpistemic Normativity for Naturalists
Epistemic Normativity for Naturalists 1. Naturalized epistemology and the normativity objection Can science help us understand what knowledge is and what makes a belief justified? Some say no because epistemic
More information(i) Morality is a system; and (ii) It is a system comprised of moral rules and principles.
Ethics and Morality Ethos (Greek) and Mores (Latin) are terms having to do with custom, habit, and behavior. Ethics is the study of morality. This definition raises two questions: (a) What is morality?
More informationPHILOSOPHY 5340 EPISTEMOLOGY
PHILOSOPHY 5340 EPISTEMOLOGY Michael Huemer, Skepticism and the Veil of Perception Chapter V. A Version of Foundationalism 1. A Principle of Foundational Justification 1. Mike's view is that there is a
More informationReason and Explanation: A Defense of Explanatory Coherentism. BY TED POSTON (Basingstoke,
Reason and Explanation: A Defense of Explanatory Coherentism. BY TED POSTON (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Pp. 208. Price 60.) In this interesting book, Ted Poston delivers an original and
More informationTwo Kinds of Ends in Themselves in Kant s Moral Theory
Western University Scholarship@Western 2015 Undergraduate Awards The Undergraduate Awards 2015 Two Kinds of Ends in Themselves in Kant s Moral Theory David Hakim Western University, davidhakim266@gmail.com
More informationIn Defense of Radical Empiricism. Joseph Benjamin Riegel. Chapel Hill 2006
In Defense of Radical Empiricism Joseph Benjamin Riegel A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
More informationVideo Reaction. Opening Activity. Journal #16
Justification / explanation Interpretation / inference Methodologies / paradigms Verification / truth / certainty Argument / evaluation Evidence / data / facts / support / proof Limitations / uncertainties
More informationTestimony and Moral Understanding Anthony T. Flood, Ph.D. Introduction
24 Testimony and Moral Understanding Anthony T. Flood, Ph.D. Abstract: In this paper, I address Linda Zagzebski s analysis of the relation between moral testimony and understanding arguing that Aquinas
More informationReceived: 30 August 2007 / Accepted: 16 November 2007 / Published online: 28 December 2007 # Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
Acta anal. (2007) 22:267 279 DOI 10.1007/s12136-007-0012-y What Is Entitlement? Albert Casullo Received: 30 August 2007 / Accepted: 16 November 2007 / Published online: 28 December 2007 # Springer Science
More information4/30/2010 cforum :: Moderator Control Panel
FAQ Search Memberlist Usergroups Profile You have no new messages Log out [ perrysa ] cforum Forum Index -> The Religion & Culture Web Forum Split Topic Control Panel Using the form below you can split
More informationWho Has the Burden of Proof? Must the Christian Provide Adequate Reasons for Christian Beliefs?
Who Has the Burden of Proof? Must the Christian Provide Adequate Reasons for Christian Beliefs? Issue: Who has the burden of proof the Christian believer or the atheist? Whose position requires supporting
More informationThe Power of Critical Thinking Why it matters How it works
Page 1 of 60 The Power of Critical Thinking Chapter Objectives Understand the definition of critical thinking and the importance of the definition terms systematic, evaluation, formulation, and rational
More informationPhenomenal Conservatism and Skeptical Theism
Phenomenal Conservatism and Skeptical Theism Jonathan D. Matheson 1. Introduction Recently there has been a good deal of interest in the relationship between common sense epistemology and Skeptical Theism.
More informationTAKE MY WORD FOR IT: A NEW APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM OF SINCERITY IN THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF TESTIMONY. Masters in Philosophy. Rhodes University.
TAKE MY WORD FOR IT: A NEW APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM OF SINCERITY IN THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF TESTIMONY A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the of Masters in Philosophy Rhodes University
More informationKorsgaard and Non-Sentient Life ABSTRACT
74 Between the Species Korsgaard and Non-Sentient Life ABSTRACT Christine Korsgaard argues for the moral status of animals and our obligations to them. She grounds this obligation on the notion that we
More informationIntro to Philosophy. Review for Exam 2
Intro to Philosophy Review for Exam 2 Epistemology Theory of Knowledge What is knowledge? What is the structure of knowledge? What particular things can I know? What particular things do I know? Do I know
More informationWhat asymmetry? Knowledge of self, knowledge of others, and the inferentialist challenge
DOI 10.1007/s11229-015-0772-7 S.I.:FUTURE OF SOCIAL COGNITION What asymmetry? Knowledge of self, knowledge of others, and the inferentialist challenge Quassim Cassam 1 Received: 26 December 2014 / Accepted:
More informationEvaluating Arguments
Govier: A Practical Study of Argument 1 Evaluating Arguments Chapter 4 begins an important discussion on how to evaluate arguments. The basics on how to evaluate arguments are presented in this chapter
More informationTheories of epistemic justification can be divided into two groups: internalist and
1 Internalism and externalism about justification Theories of epistemic justification can be divided into two groups: internalist and externalist. Internalist theories of justification say that whatever
More informationSaving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy
Res Cogitans Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 20 6-4-2014 Saving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy Kevin Harriman Lewis & Clark College Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.pacificu.edu/rescogitans
More informationEpistemic Responsibility in Science
Epistemic Responsibility in Science Haixin Dang had27@pitt.edu Social Epistemology Networking Event Oslo May 24, 2018 I Motivating the problem Examples: - Observation of Top Quark Production in p p Collisions
More informationWHAT DOES KRIPKE MEAN BY A PRIORI?
Diametros nr 28 (czerwiec 2011): 1-7 WHAT DOES KRIPKE MEAN BY A PRIORI? Pierre Baumann In Naming and Necessity (1980), Kripke stressed the importance of distinguishing three different pairs of notions:
More informationPhilosophy Epistemology. Topic 3 - Skepticism
Michael Huemer on Skepticism Philosophy 3340 - Epistemology Topic 3 - Skepticism Chapter II. The Lure of Radical Skepticism 1. Mike Huemer defines radical skepticism as follows: Philosophical skeptics
More informationPhilosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 4: Skepticism. Part 1: The Scope of Skepticism and Two Main Types of Skeptical Argument
1. The Scope of Skepticism Philosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 4: Skepticism Part 1: The Scope of Skepticism and Two Main Types of Skeptical Argument The scope of skeptical challenges can vary in a number
More informationAre There Reasons to Be Rational?
Are There Reasons to Be Rational? Olav Gjelsvik, University of Oslo The thesis. Among people writing about rationality, few people are more rational than Wlodek Rabinowicz. But are there reasons for being
More informationConference on the Epistemology of Keith Lehrer, PUCRS, Porto Alegre (Brazil), June
2 Reply to Comesaña* Réplica a Comesaña Carl Ginet** 1. In the Sentence-Relativity section of his comments, Comesaña discusses my attempt (in the Relativity to Sentences section of my paper) to convince
More informationLuck, Rationality, and Explanation: A Reply to Elga s Lucky to Be Rational. Joshua Schechter. Brown University
Luck, Rationality, and Explanation: A Reply to Elga s Lucky to Be Rational Joshua Schechter Brown University I Introduction What is the epistemic significance of discovering that one of your beliefs depends
More informationIs Truth the Primary Epistemic Goal? Joseph Barnes
Is Truth the Primary Epistemic Goal? Joseph Barnes I. Motivation: what hangs on this question? II. How Primary? III. Kvanvig's argument that truth isn't the primary epistemic goal IV. David's argument
More informationn Cowan, R. (2015) Clarifying ethical intuitionism. European Journal of Philosophy, 23(4), pp. 1097-1116. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult
More informationIs there a good epistemological argument against platonism? DAVID LIGGINS
[This is the penultimate draft of an article that appeared in Analysis 66.2 (April 2006), 135-41, available here by permission of Analysis, the Analysis Trust, and Blackwell Publishing. The definitive
More informationAn Evaluation of Skeptical Theism
Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift. Årg. 88 (2012) An Evaluation of Skeptical Theism FRANCIS JONSSON Francis Jonsson is a doctoral student at the Faculty of Theology, Uppsala University, working in the field
More informationAndrea Westlund, in Selflessness and Responsibility for Self, argues
Aporia vol. 28 no. 2 2018 Phenomenology of Autonomy in Westlund and Wheelis Andrea Westlund, in Selflessness and Responsibility for Self, argues that for one to be autonomous or responsible for self one
More informationDo we have knowledge of the external world?
Do we have knowledge of the external world? This book discusses the skeptical arguments presented in Descartes' Meditations 1 and 2, as well as how Descartes attempts to refute skepticism by building our
More informationPhilosophical Review.
Philosophical Review Review: [untitled] Author(s): John Martin Fischer Source: The Philosophical Review, Vol. 98, No. 2 (Apr., 1989), pp. 254-257 Published by: Duke University Press on behalf of Philosophical
More informationthe aim is to specify the structure of the world in the form of certain basic truths from which all truths can be derived. (xviii)
PHIL 5983: Naturalness and Fundamentality Seminar Prof. Funkhouser Spring 2017 Week 8: Chalmers, Constructing the World Notes (Introduction, Chapters 1-2) Introduction * We are introduced to the ideas
More informationWelcome to Philosophy!
Welcome to Philosophy! Philosophy begins in wonder. Aristotle (384-322 BCE) Philosophy is what you re doing when you keep asking questions after everyone else is satisfied with their answers. Philosophy
More informationBoghossian & Harman on the analytic theory of the a priori
Boghossian & Harman on the analytic theory of the a priori PHIL 83104 November 2, 2011 Both Boghossian and Harman address themselves to the question of whether our a priori knowledge can be explained in
More informationA-LEVEL PHILOSOPHY 7172/1
SPECIMEN MATERIAL A-LEVEL PHILOSOPHY 7172/1 PAPER 1 EPISTEMOLOGY AND MORAL PHILOSOPHY Mark scheme SAMs 1.0 Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the relevant
More informationDO SENSE EXPERIENTIAL STATES HAVE CONCEPTUAL CONTENT?
DO SENSE EXPERIENTIAL STATES HAVE CONCEPTUAL CONTENT? BILL BREWER My thesis in this paper is: (CC) Sense experiential states have conceptual content. I take it for granted that sense experiential states
More informationNotes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning
Notes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning The final chapter of Moore and Parker s text is devoted to how we might apply critical reasoning in certain philosophical contexts.
More informationPhenomenal Conservatism and the Internalist Intuition
[Published in American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2006): 147-58. Official version: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20010233.] Phenomenal Conservatism and the Internalist Intuition ABSTRACT: Externalist theories
More informationREASONS AND REFLECTIVE ENDORSMENT IN CHRISTINE KORSGAARD S THE SOURCES OF NORMATIVITY ERIC C. BROWN. (Under the direction of Melissa Seymour-Fahmy)
REASONS AND REFLECTIVE ENDORSMENT IN CHRISTINE KORSGAARD S THE SOURCES OF NORMATIVITY ERIC C. BROWN (Under the direction of Melissa Seymour-Fahmy) ABSTRACT The Sources of Normativity is lauded as one of
More informationDeontological Perspectivism: A Reply to Lockie Hamid Vahid, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences, Tehran
Deontological Perspectivism: A Reply to Lockie Hamid Vahid, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences, Tehran Abstract In his (2015) paper, Robert Lockie seeks to add a contextualized, relativist
More informationKNOWLEDGE ON AFFECTIVE TRUST. Arnon Keren
Abstracta SPECIAL ISSUE VI, pp. 33 46, 2012 KNOWLEDGE ON AFFECTIVE TRUST Arnon Keren Epistemologists of testimony widely agree on the fact that our reliance on other people's testimony is extensive. However,
More informationDISCUSSION PRACTICAL POLITICS AND PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY: A NOTE
Practical Politics and Philosophical Inquiry: A Note Author(s): Dale Hall and Tariq Modood Reviewed work(s): Source: The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 117 (Oct., 1979), pp. 340-344 Published by:
More informationActing without reasons
Acting without reasons Disputatio, Vol. II, No. 23, November 2007 (special issue) University of Girona Abstract In this paper, I want to challenge some common assumptions in contemporary theories of practical
More informationPart I: The Structure of Philosophy
Revised, 8/30/08 Part I: The Structure of Philosophy Philosophy as the love of wisdom The basic questions and branches of philosophy The branches of the branches and the many philosophical questions that
More informationIf Everyone Does It, Then You Can Too Charlie Melman
27 If Everyone Does It, Then You Can Too Charlie Melman Abstract: I argue that the But Everyone Does That (BEDT) defense can have significant exculpatory force in a legal sense, but not a moral sense.
More informationIn Part I of the ETHICS, Spinoza presents his central
TWO PROBLEMS WITH SPINOZA S ARGUMENT FOR SUBSTANCE MONISM LAURA ANGELINA DELGADO * In Part I of the ETHICS, Spinoza presents his central metaphysical thesis that there is only one substance in the universe.
More informationRATIONALITY AND THEISTIC BELIEF, by Mark S. McLeod. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, Pp. xiv and 260. $37.50 (cloth).
RATIONALITY AND THEISTIC BELIEF, by Mark S. McLeod. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993. Pp. xiv and 260. $37.50 (cloth). For Faith and Philosophy, 1996 DANIEL HOWARD-SNYDER, Seattle Pacific University
More informationIN DEFENCE OF CLOSURE
IN DEFENCE OF CLOSURE IN DEFENCE OF CLOSURE By RICHARD FELDMAN Closure principles for epistemic justification hold that one is justified in believing the logical consequences, perhaps of a specified sort,
More informationCARTESIANISM, NEO-REIDIANISM, AND THE A PRIORI: REPLY TO PUST
CARTESIANISM, NEO-REIDIANISM, AND THE A PRIORI: REPLY TO PUST Gregory STOUTENBURG ABSTRACT: Joel Pust has recently challenged the Thomas Reid-inspired argument against the reliability of the a priori defended
More informationThe Many Problems of Memory Knowledge (Short Version)
The Many Problems of Memory Knowledge (Short Version) Prepared For: The 13 th Annual Jakobsen Conference Abstract: Michael Huemer attempts to answer the question of when S remembers that P, what kind of
More informationCommon Sense: A Contemporary Defense By Noah Lemos Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. xvi
Common Sense: A Contemporary Defense By Noah Lemos Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. pp. xvi + 192. Lemos offers no arguments in this book for the claim that common sense beliefs are known.
More informationExperience and Foundationalism in Audi s The Architecture of Reason
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. LXVII, No. 1, July 2003 Experience and Foundationalism in Audi s The Architecture of Reason WALTER SINNOTT-ARMSTRONG Dartmouth College Robert Audi s The Architecture
More informationwhat makes reasons sufficient?
Mark Schroeder University of Southern California August 2, 2010 what makes reasons sufficient? This paper addresses the question: what makes reasons sufficient? and offers the answer, being at least as
More informationStout s teleological theory of action
Stout s teleological theory of action Jeff Speaks November 26, 2004 1 The possibility of externalist explanations of action................ 2 1.1 The distinction between externalist and internalist explanations
More informationI assume some of our justification is immediate. (Plausible examples: That is experienced, I am aware of something, 2 > 0, There is light ahead.
The Merits of Incoherence jim.pryor@nyu.edu July 2013 Munich 1. Introducing the Problem Immediate justification: justification to Φ that s not even in part constituted by having justification to Ψ I assume
More informationBelief Ownership without Authorship: Agent Reliabilism s Unlucky Gambit against Reflective Luck Benjamin Bayer September 1 st, 2014
Belief Ownership without Authorship: Agent Reliabilism s Unlucky Gambit against Reflective Luck Benjamin Bayer September 1 st, 2014 Abstract: This paper examines a persuasive attempt to defend reliabilist
More informationCraig on the Experience of Tense
Craig on the Experience of Tense In his recent book, The Tensed Theory of Time: A Critical Examination, 1 William Lane Craig offers several criticisms of my views on our experience of time. The purpose
More informationBootstrapping and The Bayesian: Why The Conservative is Not Threatened By Weisberg s Super-Reliable Gas Gauge
Bootstrapping and The Bayesian: Why The Conservative is Not Threatened By Weisberg s Super-Reliable Gas Gauge Allison Balin Abstract: White (2006) argues that the Conservative is not committed to the legitimacy
More informationWhat Should We Believe?
1 What Should We Believe? Thomas Kelly, University of Notre Dame James Pryor, Princeton University Blackwell Publishers Consider the following question: What should I believe? This question is a normative
More informationCONTEMPORARY MORAL PROBLEMS LECTURE 14 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT PART 2
CONTEMPORARY MORAL PROBLEMS LECTURE 14 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT PART 2 1 THE ISSUES: REVIEW Is the death penalty (capital punishment) justifiable in principle? Why or why not? Is the death penalty justifiable
More information2 FREE CHOICE The heretical thesis of Hobbes is the orthodox position today. So much is this the case that most of the contemporary literature
Introduction The philosophical controversy about free will and determinism is perennial. Like many perennial controversies, this one involves a tangle of distinct but closely related issues. Thus, the
More informationFOUNDATIONALISM AND ARBITRARINESS
FOUNDATIONALISM AND ARBITRARINESS by DANIEL HOWARD-SNYDER Abstract: Nonskeptical foundationalists say that there are basic beliefs. But, one might object, either there is a reason why basic beliefs are
More informationThe Philosophy of Education. An Introduction By: VV.AA., Richard BALEY (Ed.) London: Continuum
John TILLSON The Philosophy of Education. An Introduction By: VV.AA., Richard BALEY (Ed.) London: Continuum John TILLSON II Época, Nº 6 (2011):185-190 185 The Philosophy of Education. An Introduction 1.
More informationPHI Introduction Lecture 4. An Overview of the Two Branches of Logic
PHI 103 - Introduction Lecture 4 An Overview of the wo Branches of Logic he wo Branches of Logic Argument - at least two statements where one provides logical support for the other. I. Deduction - a conclusion
More informationEpistemological Externalism and the Project of Traditional Epistemology. Contemporary philosophers still haven't come to terms with the project of
Epistemological Externalism and the Project of Traditional Epistemology 1 Epistemological Externalism and the Project of Traditional Epistemology Contemporary philosophers still haven't come to terms with
More informationCHAPTER ONE What is Philosophy? What s In It For Me?
CHAPTER ONE What is Philosophy? What s In It For Me? General Overview Welcome to the world of philosophy. Whether we like to acknowledge it or not, an inevitable fact of classroom life after the introductions
More informationPost-Islamist Approach to Veiling: Islamic Hijab from an Ethical Perspective. Queen s University, March 2015
Post-Islamist Approach to Veiling: Islamic Hijab from an Ethical Perspective Queen s University, March 2015 . Unlike Islamists such as Ali Shariati and Ruhollah Khomeini, post-islamist reformists do believe
More informationA CONTRACTUALIST READING OF KANT S PROOF OF THE FORMULA OF HUMANITY. Adam Cureton
A CONTRACTUALIST READING OF KANT S PROOF OF THE FORMULA OF HUMANITY Adam Cureton Abstract: Kant offers the following argument for the Formula of Humanity: Each rational agent necessarily conceives of her
More informationPortfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7
Portfolio Project Phil 251A Logic Fall 2012 Due: Friday, December 7 1 Overview The portfolio is a semester-long project that should display your logical prowess applied to real-world arguments. The arguments
More informationThe Oxford Handbook of Epistemology
Oxford Scholarship Online You are looking at 1-10 of 21 items for: booktitle : handbook phimet The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology Paul K. Moser (ed.) Item type: book DOI: 10.1093/0195130057.001.0001 This
More informationPHIL 480: Seminar in the History of Philosophy Building Moral Character: Neo-Confucianism and Moral Psychology
PHIL 480: Seminar in the History of Philosophy Building Moral Character: Neo-Confucianism and Moral Psychology Spring 2013 Professor JeeLoo Liu [Handout #12] Jonathan Haidt, The Emotional Dog and Its Rational
More informationPHL340 Handout 8: Evaluating Dogmatism
PHL340 Handout 8: Evaluating Dogmatism 1 Dogmatism Last class we looked at Jim Pryor s paper on dogmatism about perceptual justification (for background on the notion of justification, see the handout
More informationSeth Mayer. Comments on Christopher McCammon s Is Liberal Legitimacy Utopian?
Seth Mayer Comments on Christopher McCammon s Is Liberal Legitimacy Utopian? Christopher McCammon s defense of Liberal Legitimacy hopes to give a negative answer to the question posed by the title of his
More informationDavid Ethics Bites is a series of interviews on applied ethics, produced in association with The Open University.
Ethics Bites What s Wrong With Killing? David Edmonds This is Ethics Bites, with me David Edmonds. Warburton And me Warburton. David Ethics Bites is a series of interviews on applied ethics, produced in
More informationKnowledge. Internalism and Externalism
Knowledge Internalism and Externalism What is Knowledge? Uncontroversially: Knowledge implies truth S knows that it s Monday > it s Monday Almost as uncontroversially: Knowledge is a kind of belief S knows
More informationKnowledge and Authority
Knowledge and Authority Epistemic authority Formally, epistemic authority is often expressed using expert principles, e.g. If you know that an expert believes P, then you should believe P The rough idea
More informationFlorida State University Libraries
Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2011 A Framework for Understanding Naturalized Epistemology Amirah Albahri Follow this and additional
More informationIs there a distinction between a priori and a posteriori
Lingnan University Digital Commons @ Lingnan University Theses & Dissertations Department of Philosophy 2014 Is there a distinction between a priori and a posteriori Hiu Man CHAN Follow this and additional
More informationLODGE VEGAS # 32 ON EDUCATION
Wisdom First published Mon Jan 8, 2007 LODGE VEGAS # 32 ON EDUCATION The word philosophy means love of wisdom. What is wisdom? What is this thing that philosophers love? Some of the systematic philosophers
More informationHuman rights, universalism and conserving human rights practice
Human rights, universalism and conserving human rights practice Draft 30th May 2016 -do not circulate or quote- Dr. Gerhard Bos, Ethics Institute Utrecht University g.h.bos2@uu.nl One objection to the
More informationKelly and McDowell on Perceptual Content. Fred Ablondi Department of Philosophy Hendrix College
Kelly and McDowell on Perceptual Content 1 Fred Ablondi Department of Philosophy Hendrix College (ablondi@mercury.hendrix.edu) [0] In a recent issue of EJAP, Sean Kelly [1998] defended the position that
More informationThe stated objective of Gloria Origgi s paper Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Trust is:
Trust and the Assessment of Credibility Paul Faulkner, University of Sheffield Faulkner, Paul. 2012. Trust and the Assessment of Credibility. Epistemic failings can be ethical failings. This insight is
More informationIn Defense of Culpable Ignorance
It is common in everyday situations and interactions to hold people responsible for things they didn t know but which they ought to have known. For example, if a friend were to jump off the roof of a house
More informationTHE NATURE AND VALUE OF CRITICAL THINKING
1 THE NATURE AND VALUE OF CRITICAL THINKING This book is a practical guide to critical thinking. It might seem unnecessary to be reading a guide to something you do all the time and are probably already
More informationPHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT
PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT UNDERGRADUATE HANDBOOK 2013 Contents Welcome to the Philosophy Department at Flinders University... 2 PHIL1010 Mind and World... 5 PHIL1060 Critical Reasoning... 6 PHIL2608 Freedom,
More informationHello again. Today we re gonna continue our discussions of Kant s ethics.
PHI 110 Lecture 29 1 Hello again. Today we re gonna continue our discussions of Kant s ethics. Last time we talked about the good will and Kant defined the good will as the free rational will which acts
More information