1 Ethics and Morality Ethos (Greek) and Mores (Latin) are terms having to do with custom, habit, and behavior. Ethics is the study of morality. This definition raises two questions: (a) What is morality? (b) What is the study of morality?
2 What is Morality? Morality can be defined as: A system of rules for guiding human conduct, and principles for evaluating those rules. Two points are worth noting in this definition: (i) Morality is a system; and (ii) It is a system comprised of moral rules and principles. Moral rules can be understood as "rules of conduct," which are very similar to "policies." Rules of conducts Principles
3 Rules of Conduct as Policies Policies range from formal laws to "informal, implicit guidelines for actions" (Moor, 1999) Moor suggests that every act can be viewed as an instance of a policy. There are two kinds of rules of conduct: (1) Directives for guiding our conduct as individuals (at the micro-level) Don t Steal, Do not harm others (2) Social Policies framed at the macro-level Software that used to invade the privacy of others
4 Directives Directives are rules (of conduct) that guide our actions and thus direct us to behave in certain ways. Rules such as "Do not steal" and "Do not harm others" are both examples of rules of conduct that direct us in our individual moral choices at the "micro-ethical" level (i.e., the level of individual behavior). micro-ethical level Rules that guide our action
5 Social Policies Other rules of conduct guide our actions at the "macro-ethical" level by helping us frame social policies. Rules such as "proprietary software should not be copied" or "software that can be used to invade the privacy of users should not be developed" are examples of rules of conduct that arise out of our social policies. A correlation between directives and social policies (e.g., rules involving stealing). macro-ethical level Rules that help us frame our social policies
6 Principles The rules of conduct in a moral system are evaluated against standards called principles. For example, the principle of "social utility," which is concerned with promoting the greatest good for the greatest number, can be used to evaluate a social policy such as "proprietary software should not be copied without permission." Rules of conduct (proprietary information) Rules of conduct Rules of conduct Social utility Principles of evaluation
7 Principles (continued) In the previous example, the social-utility principle Example: Policy pertaining to proprietary software can be justified on the above moral grounds. A certain policy could be justified (on utilitarian grounds) by showing that following the rule for not allowing the unauthorized copying of software would produce more overall social utility (greater good for society). Rules of conduct (proprietary information) Rules of conduct Rules of conduct Social utility Principles of evaluation based on Utilitarian ground
8 Figure 2-1: Basic Components of a Moral System Rules of Conduct (Action-guiding rules, in the form of either directives or social policies) two types Principles of Evaluation (Evaluative standards used to justify rules of conduct) Examples include principles such as of social utility and justice as fairness Rules for guiding the actions of individuals (micro-level ethical rules) Examples include directives such as:"do not steal" and "Do not harm others." Rules for establishing social policies (macro-level ethical rules) Examples include social policies such as: "Software should be protected and "Privacy should be respected."
9 Four features of a moral s system Public: everyone must know what the rules are Informal: No formal authoritative judges presiding over it Rationality: A moral system is rational and accessible to ordinary peoples Impartial: Morals rules are ideally designed to apply equitably to all participants
10 Values The term value comes from the Latin valere, which translates roughly into having worth or being of worth. Values can be conceived as objects of our desires or interests. Examples of values include very general notions such as: happiness, love, freedom, etc. Moral principles are ultimately derived from a society's system of values.
11 Intrinsic vs. Instrumental Values Philosophers distinguish between two types of values: intrinsic instrumental values. Any value that serves some further end or good is called an instrumental values are tied to some external standard. Example: Automobiles, computers, and money. Intrinsic values are valued for their own sake Examples: life and happiness.
12 Core Values Another approach to cataloguing values is to distinguish core values, some of which may or may not also be intrinsic values, from other kinds of values. Moor (1998), for example, believes that values such as life, happiness, and autonomy are core values Not all core values are also moral values. Core values None Core values
13 Moral vs. Non-Moral Values Morals and values are not necessarily identical. Values can be either moral or non-moral. Reason informs us that it is in our interest to promote values that consistent with our own survival, happiness, and flourishing as individuals. When used to further only our own self-interests, these values are not necessarily moral values.
14 Moral Values Once we bring in the notion of impartiality, we begin to take the "moral point of view." We articulate a system of values having to do with notions such as autonomy, fairness, justice, etc., which are moral values. Our core moral values are, in turn derived from certain core non-moral values.
15 Figure 2-2: Components of a Moral System Grounds for justifying moral principles Religion Philosophy Law Moral principles and rules Principles of Evaluation Rules of Conduct Source of moral rules Core Values
16 Figure 2-3: Components of a Moral System: An Expanded View Grounds for Justifying the Moral Principles Religion (Obedience to Divine Command) Philosophical Ethics (Ethical Theory and Logical Argumentation) Law (Obedience to (a legal system) Moral Principles Source of the Moral rules Moral Principles Principles such as social utility, duty, obligation, etc. are used as standards to evaluate and justify rules of conduct. Rules of Conduct Moral rules are derived from basic moral values (macro-level rules or policies such as "protect privacy ; micro-level rules or directives such as "do not cheat"). Basic Moral Values Moral values are derived from core non-moral values by using the notion of impartiality. (Examples include autonomy and respect for persons. Core Non-Moral Values Non-moral values originate from desires and typically involve rational self interests. (Examples include: survival, security, pleasure, etc.)
17 Three Schemes for Grounding the Evaluative Rules in a Moral System The principles are grounded in one of three different kinds of schemes: Religion Law Philosophical Ethics. Consider how a particular moral principle can be justified from the vantage-points of each scheme. Example: do not steal.
18 Approach #1: Grounding Moral Principles in a Religious System Consider the following rationale for why stealing is morally wrong: Stealing is wrong because it offends God or because it violates one of God's (Ten) Commandments. It violates the commands of a divine authority.
19 Approach #2: Grounding Moral Principles in a Legal System An alternative rationale would be: Stealing is wrong because it violates the law. Here the grounds for determining why stealing is wrong are not tied to religion. If stealing violates a law in a particular nation or jurisdiction, The act of stealing can be declared to be wrong independent of any religious beliefs that one may or may not happen to have.
20 Approach #3: Grounding Moral Principles in a Philosophical System of Ethics A third way of approaching the question is: Stealing is wrong because it is wrong independent of any form of external authority or any external sanctions. On this view, the moral "rightness" or "wrongness" of stealing is not grounded in some external authoritative source. Does not appeal to an external authority, either theological or legal, for justification.
21 Approach # 3 Continued Many philosophers and ethicists argue that, independent of supernatural or legal authorities, reason alone is sufficient to show that stealing is wrong. They argue that reason can inform us that there is something either in the act of stealing itself or in the consequences that result from this kind of act that makes stealing morally wrong.
22 Approach # 3 Continued In the case of both law and religion, specific sanctions against stealing exists in the form of punishment. In the case of (philosophical) ethics, the only sanction would be in the form of social disapprobation (disapproval) and possibly social ostracism. But there is no punishment in a formal sense. External conditions or factors, in the form of sanctions, are irrelevant.
23 Ethicists vs. Moralists Ethicists study morality from the perspective of philosophical methodology; they appeal to logical arguments to justify their positions. Moralists often claim to have all of the answers regarding morality. Many moralists also exhibit characteristics that have been described as "preachy" and "judgmental." Some moralists may have a particular moral agenda to advance.
24 Ethicists and Moralists (Continued) Ethicists, who use the philosophical method in their analysis and investigation of moral issues, must remain open to different sides of a dispute. An ethicist s primary focus is on the study of morality and the application of theories. Ethicists approach the study of moral issues and controversies by way of standards that are both rational (based on logic) and impartial (open to others to verify).
25 Bernard Gert s Scheme of a Moral Morality is a system. System It is like a game, but more like an informal game (e.g., a game of cards) It is public (open and accessible to all) It is rational (open to reason) It should be impartial (e.g., a blindfold of justice ).
26 Table 2-1 Four Features of Gert s Moral System Public Informal Rational Impartial The rules are known to all of the members. The rules are informal, not like formal laws in a legal system. The system is based on principles of logical reason accessible to all its members. The system is not partial to any one group or individual.
27 Discussion Stoppers as "Roadblocks" to Moral Discourse Discussion stoppers can be articulated in terms of the following four questions: 1. People disagree about morality; so how can we reach agreement on moral issues? 2.Who am I/Who are we to judge others and to impose my/our values on others? 3. Isn't morality simply a private matter? 4. Isn't morality simply a matter that different cultures and groups should determine for themselves?
28 Discussion Stopper # 1: People Disagree on Solutions to Moral Issues People who hold this view fail to recognize: (i) Experts in other fields of study, such as science and math., also disagree on what the correct answers to certain questions are. (ii) There is common agreement about answers to some moral questions. (iii) People do not always distinguish between "disagreements about factual matters" and "disagreements on general principles" in disputes involving morality.
29 Discussion Stopper # 1: People Disagree on Solutions to Moral Issues Experts in may field disagree on fundamental issues Example: Linux is a better OS than Window C++ is a better programming language than JAVA Light is composed of particles and other claim that light is composed of waves Parameters and rules must be satisfied in order for a particular claim to qualify as acceptable in debates
30 Common agreement on some moral issues Common agreement on some moral issues: People have demonstrated considerable agreement on answers to some moral principles Example: death penalty abortion Disagreement about principles vs. disagreement about facts Richared De George (1999) has pointed out that is analyzing moral issues we need to be very careful to distinguish our disagreement about moral principles and factual values Example: Unauthorized exchange of proprietary information is a form of stealing
31 Discussion Stopper # 2: Who am I to Judge Others? We need to distinguish between: Persons Making Judgments and Persons Being Judgmental, and Judgments Involving Condemnations vs. Judgments Involving Evaluations Also, we are sometimes required to make judgments about others.
32 Discussion Stopper # 2: Who am I to Judge Others? Person making a judgment about Linux is a better operating system than window. Judgmental is a behavioral trait exhibited by those who strongly opinionated or who tend to speak disparagingly of anyone who holds a positions on some topic that is different from their own Two types of judgments: Involving condemnation Involving evaluation
33 Discussion Stopper # 3: Ethics is Simply a Private Matter Many people assume that morality is essentially personal in nature Morality must be simply a private matter. Private morality" is essentially an oxymoron or contradictory notion. Morality is a public phenomenon (Gert). Example: stealing is morally wrong
34 Discussion Stopper # 4: Morality is Simply a Matter for Individual Cultures to Decide According to this view, a moral system is dependent on, or relative to, a particular culture or group. There are some very serious problems with this view, which is called ethical relativism. Two positions involving relativism: cultural relativism and moral relativism.
35 Discussion Stopper #4 Continued - Cultural Relativism At the base of cultural relativism is the following assumption: (A) Different cultures have different beliefs about what constitutes morally right and wrong behavior. This assumption (A) is essentially descriptive in nature.
36 Cultural Relativism Continued (the view that different groups have different conceptions about what is morally right and morally wrong behavior) is widely accepted Other social scientists have suggested that all cultures may possess certain universal core moral values.
37 Cultural Relativism Continued Even if Cultural Relativism (assumption A) is true, does it logically imply the further claim? (B) What is morally right or wrong for members of a culture or group can be determined only by that culture or group. Note that (B), unlike (A), is a normative claim. Also note that to move from (A) to (B) is to move from cultural relativism to moral relativism.
38 Moral Relativism Moral relativism asserts that no universal standard of morality is possible because Different people have different beliefs about what is right and wrong. From this inference, relativists appear to further suggest that, in matters of morality, anything goes. But this principle of reasoning is problematic because it is essentially incoherent and inconsistent.
39 Moral Relativism Continued Two cultures, Culture A and Culture B, adjoin each other geographically. The members of Culture A are fairly peaceful people, tolerant of the diverse believe found in all other cultures. And they believe that all culture should essentially mind their own business when it comes to matters involving morality. Those in Culture B, on the contrary, dislike and hostile to those outside their culture. Culture B has recently developed a new computer system for delivering chemical weapons that it plans to use in military attacks on other cultures, including Culture A
40 Table 2-2 Summary of Logical Flaws in the Discussion Stoppers Stopper #1 Stopper #2 Stopper #3 Stopper #4 People disagree on solutions to moral issues. Who am I to judge others? Ethics is imply a private matter. Morality is simply a matter for individual cultures to decide. 1. Fails to recognize that experts in many areas disagree on key issues in their fields. 1. Fails to distinguish between the act of judging and being a judgmental person. 1. Fails to recognize that morality is essentially a public system. 1. Fails to distinguish between descriptive and normative claims about morality. 2. Fails to recognize that there are many moral issues on which people agree. 3. Fails to distinguish between disagreements about principles and disagreements about facts. 2. Fails to distinguish between judging as condemning and judging as evaluating. 3. Fails to recognize that sometimes we are required to make judgments 2. Fails to note that personally-based morality can cause major harm to others. 3. Confuses moral choices with individual or personal preferences. 2. Assumes that people can never reach common agreement on some moral principles. 3. Assumes that a system is moral because a majority in a culture decides it is moral.
Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System Ethics and Morality Ethics: greek ethos, study of morality What is Morality? Morality: system of rules for guiding
Philosophical Ethics The nature of ethical analysis Discussion based on Johnson, Computer Ethics, Chapter 2. How to resolve ethical issues? censorship abortion affirmative action How do we defend our moral
Critical Reasoning and Moral theory day 3 CS 340 Fall 2015 Ethics and Moral Theories Differences of opinion based caused by different value set Deontology Virtue Religious and Divine Command Utilitarian
CS305 Topic Introduction to Ethics Sources: Baase: A Gift of Fire and Quinn: Ethics for the Information Age CS305-Spring 2010 Ethics 1 What is Ethics? A branch of philosophy that studies priciples relating
Henrik Ahlenius Department of Philosophy email@example.com ETHICS & RESEARCH Why a course like this? Tell you what the rules are Tell you to follow these rules Tell you to follow some other
Autonomous Machines Are Ethical John Hooker Carnegie Mellon University INFORMS 2017 1 Thesis Concepts of deontological ethics are ready-made for the age of AI. Philosophical concept of autonomy applies
ON NORMATIVE ETHICAL THEORIES: SOME BASICS From the dawn of philosophy, the question concerning the summum bonum, or, what is the same thing, concerning the foundation of morality, has been accounted the
Degree Applicable Glendale Community College November 2013 I. Catalog Statement COURSE OUTLINE Philosophy 116 (C-ID Number: PHIL 120) Ethics for Modern Life (Title: Introduction to Ethics) Philosophy 116
Psychological and Ethical Egoism Wrapping up Error Theory Psychological Egoism v. Ethical Egoism Ought implies can, the is/ought fallacy Arguments for and against Psychological Egoism Ethical Egoism Arguments
Chapter 12: Areas of knowledge Ethics (p. 363) Moral reasoning (p. 364) Value-judgements Some people argue that moral values are just reflections of personal taste. For example, I don t like spinach is
Relativism and Subjectivism The Denial of Objective Ethical Standards Starting with a counter argument 1.The universe operates according to laws 2.The universe can be investigated through the use of both
QUIZ 1 ETHICAL ISSUES IN MEDIA, BUSINESS AND SOCIETY WHAT IS ETHICS? Business ethics deals with values, facts, and arguments. Q2) The test of an ethical argument lies in the fact that others need to be
Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics TRUE/FALSE 1. The statement "nearly all Americans believe that individual liberty should be respected" is a normative claim. F This is a statement about people's beliefs;
A. The Three Main Branches of the Philosophical Study of Ethics 1. Meta-ethics 2. Normative Ethics 3. Applied Ethics 1 B. Meta-ethics consists in the attempt to answer the fundamental philosophical questions
Moral Objectivism RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary The possibility, let alone the actuality, of an objective morality has intrigued philosophers for well over two millennia. Though much discussed,
UTILITARIAN ETHICS Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule A dilemma You are a lawyer. You have a client who is an old lady who owns a big house. She tells you that
MIDTERM EXAMINATION MGT610 Business Ethics BY VIRTUALIANS.PK Question # 01 Mark: 1 The three major types of ethical issues include except? Communication issues Systematic issues Corporate issues Individual
A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7 Kantian Deontology Deontological (based on duty) ethical theory established by Emmanuel Kant in The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Part of the enlightenment
Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development Volume 31 Issue 1 Volume 31, Summer 2018, Issue 1 Article 5 June 2018 What is the "Social" in "Social Coherence?" Commentary on Nelson Tebbe's Religious
An Introduction to Ethics / Moral Philosophy Ethics / moral philosophy is concerned with what is good for individuals and society and is also described as moral philosophy. The term is derived from the
Preliminary draft, WHY RELATIVISM IS NOT SELF-REFUTING IN ANY INTERESTING WAY Is relativism really self-refuting? This paper takes a look at some frequently used arguments and its preliminary answer to
Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics 2012 Cengage Learning All Rights reserved Learning Outcomes LO 1 Explain how important moral reasoning is and how to apply it. LO 2 Explain the difference between facts
Chapter Two Determining Moral Behavior Quote Integrity is doing the right thing--even if nobody is watching - Unknown Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas 1 - Identify the facts 2 Identify relevant values and concepts
No Love for Singer: The Inability of Preference Utilitarianism to Justify Partial Relationships In his book Practical Ethics, Peter Singer advocates preference utilitarianism, which holds that the right
5 [name] [course] [teaching assistant s name] [discussion day and time] [question being answered] [date turned in] Cultural Relativism In James Rachels s chapter The Challenge of Cultural Relativism, he
Introduction to Cognitivism; Motivational Externalism; Naturalist Cognitivism Felix Pinkert 103 Ethics: Metaethics, University of Oxford, Hilary Term 2015 Cognitivism, Non-cognitivism, and the Humean Argument
The Linacre Quarterly Volume 53 Number 1 Article 9 February 1986 Ethical Theory for Catholic Professionals James F. Drane Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq Recommended
Common Morality: Deciding What to Do 1 By Bernard Gert (1934-2011) [Page 15] Analogy between Morality and Grammar Common morality is complex, but it is less complex than the grammar of a language. Just
THE ALLYN & BACON GUIDE TO WRITING SEVENTH EDITION JOHN D. RAMAGE, JOHN C. BEAN, AND JUNE JOHNSON PART 2: WRITING PROJECTS CHAPTER 13 WRITING A CLASSICAL ARGUMENT Chapter 13 Learning Objectives In this
Chapter Summaries: A Christian View of Men and Things by Clark, Chapter 1 Chapter 1 is an introduction to the book. Clark intends to accomplish three things in this book: In the first place, although a
24.251: Philosophy of Language Paper 2: S.A. Kripke, On Rules and Private Language 21 December 2011 The Kripkenstein Paradox and the Private World In his paper, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Languages,
Fr. Copleston vs. Bertrand Russell: The Famous 1948 BBC Radio Debate on the Existence of God Father Frederick C. Copleston (Jesuit Catholic priest) versus Bertrand Russell (agnostic philosopher) Copleston:
Thinking Ethically: A Framework for Moral Decision Making Developed by Manuel Velasquez, Claire Andre, Thomas Shanks, S.J., and Michael J. Meyer Moral issues greet us each morning in the newspaper, confront
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CD5590 LECTURE 1 Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic Department of Computer Science and Engineering Mälardalen University 2005 1 Course Preliminaries Identifying Moral
From: Michael Huemer, Ethical Intuitionism (2005) 214 L rsmkv!rs ks syxssm! finds Sally funny, but later decides he was mistaken about her funniness when the audience merely groans.) It seems, then, that
Naturalist Cognitivism: The Open Question Argument; Subjectivism Felix Pinkert 103 Ethics: Metaethics, University of Oxford, Hilary Term 2015 Introducing Naturalist Realist Cognitivism (a.k.a. Naturalism)
Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? - My boss - The shareholders - Other stakeholders - Basic principles about conduct and its impacts - What is good for me - What
A Framework for Thinking Ethically Learning Objectives: Students completing the ethics unit within the first-year engineering program will be able to: 1. Define the term ethics 2. Identify potential sources
Notes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning The final chapter of Moore and Parker s text is devoted to how we might apply critical reasoning in certain philosophical contexts.
Relativism Appearance vs. Reality Philosophy begins with the realisation that appearance is often different from reality, and it s reality that counts. Parmenides and others were maybe hyper Parmenides
Radical Centrism & the Redemption of Secular Philosophy Ernest N. Prabhakar, Ph.D. DrErnie@RadicalCentrism.org Radical Centrism is an new approach to secular philosophy 1 What we will cover The Challenge
Draft of 3-21- 13 PHIL 202: Core Ethics; Winter 2013 Core Sequence in the History of Ethics, 2011-2013 IV: 19 th and 20 th Century Moral Philosophy David O. Brink Handout #14: Williams, Internalism, and
AN OUTLINE OF CRITICAL THINKING LEVELS OF INQUIRY 1. Information: correct understanding of basic information. 2. Understanding basic ideas: correct understanding of the basic meaning of key ideas. 3. Probing:
Virtue Ethics I.Virtue Ethics was first developed by Aristotle in his work Nichomachean Ethics Aristotle did not attempt to create a theoretical basis for the good such as would later be done by Kant and
Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008) Module by: The Cain Project in Engineering and Professional Communication. E-mail the author Summary: This module presents techniques
World-Wide Ethics Chapter One Individual Subjectivism To some people it seems very enlightened to think that in areas like morality, and in values generally, everyone must find their own truths. Most of
45 Faults and Mathematical Disagreement María Ponte ILCLI. University of the Basque Country firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract: My aim in this paper is to analyse the notion of mathematical disagreements
Relativism Some Definitions Ethics: The philosophical inquiry into right and wrong and valuation through critical examination of human practices. Ethical universal: An ethical truth that is true at all
2. DO THE VALUES THAT ARE CALLED HUMAN RIGHTS HAVE INDEPENDENT AND UNIVERSAL VALIDITY, OR ARE THEY HISTORICALLY AND CULTURALLY RELATIVE HUMAN INVENTIONS? Human rights significantly influence the fundamental
Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I Participation Quiz Pick an answer between A E at random. What answer (A E) do you think will have been selected most frequently in the previous poll? Recap: Unworkable
From: Who Owns Our Genes?, Proceedings of an international conference, October 1999, Tallin, Estonia, The Nordic Committee on Bioethics, 2000. THE CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP by Lars Bergström I shall be mainly
Charles Saunders Peirce (1839-1914) Few persons care to study logic, because everybody conceives himself to be proficient enough in the art of reasoning already. But I observe that this satisfaction is
The Pleasure Imperative Utilitarianism, particularly the version espoused by John Stuart Mill, is probably the best known consequentialist normative ethical theory. Furthermore, it is probably the most
Ethical Theories A (Very) Brief Introduction Last time, a definition Ethics: The discipline that deals with right and wrong, good and bad, especially with respect to human conduct. Well, for one thing,
Utilitarianism 1. What is Utilitarianism?: This is the theory of morality which says that the right action is always the one that best promotes the total amount of happiness in the world. Utilitarianism
88115604 PHILOSOPHY STANDARD LEVEL PAPER 1 Tuesday 1 November 2011 (afternoon) 1 hour 45 minutes INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES Do not open this examination paper until instructed to do so. Section A: answer
Cabrillo College Claudia Close Honors Ethics Philosophy 10H Fall 2018 Honors Ethics Oral Presentations: Instructions Your initial presentation should be approximately 6-7 minutes and you should prepare
CHAPTER 5. CULTURAL RELATIVISM. I have mentioned earlier that business is embedded in society and that for it and society to flourish, good interdependent relations are necessary. But societies are different,
Practical Rationality and Ethics Basic Terms and Positions Practical reasons and moral ought Reasons are given in answer to the sorts of questions ethics seeks to answer: What should I do? How should I
Belief, Rationality and Psychophysical Laws Davidson has argued 1 that the connection between belief and the constitutive ideal of rationality 2 precludes the possibility of their being any type-type identities
Proof as a cluster concept in mathematical practice Keith Weber Rutgers University Approaches for defining proof In the philosophy of mathematics, there are two approaches to defining proof: Logical or
Historic Roots Natural moral law has its roots in the classics; o Aristotle, in Nichomacheon Ethics suggests that natural justice is not the same as that which is just by law. Our laws may vary culturally
Unit 1: WHAT IS A BIBLICAL WORLDVIEW? Introduction to Worldview Define worldview and explain how worldviews are developed Compare and contrast secular and Biblical worldviews Ancient Greek Worldview: Government
PROBABILITY IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION. Edited by Jake Chandler & Victoria S. Harrison. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Pp. 272. Hard Cover 42, ISBN: 978-0-19-960476-0. IN ADDITION TO AN INTRODUCTORY
Relativism We re both right. Epistemic vs. Alethic Relativism There are two forms of anti-realism (or relativism): (A) Epistemic anti-realism: whether or not a view is rationally justified depends on your
Contemporary Social and Moral Problems in the U.S. Philosophy 2367 Fall 2013 Ohio State University Instructor: Dr. Lindsay Rettler, Time and Location: Wed/Fri 8:00-9:20 am, 259 Hagerty Hall Contact: email@example.com
Socratic and Platonic Ethics G. J. Mattey Winter, 2017 / Philosophy 1 Ethics and Political Philosophy The first part of the course is a brief survey of important texts in the history of ethics and political
PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert Name: Date: Take Home Exam #2 Instructions (Read Before Proceeding!) Material for this exam is from class sessions 8-15. Matching and fill-in-the-blank questions
3 On the Relevance of Ignorance to the Demands of Morality 1 Geoffrey Sayre-McCord It is impossible to overestimate the amount of stupidity in the world. Bernard Gert 2 Introduction In Morality, Bernard
Louisiana Law Review Volume 35 Number 5 Special Issue 1975 ON GUILT, RESPONSIBILITY AND PUNISHMENT. By Alf Ross. Translated from Danish by Alastair Hannay and Thomas E. Sheahan. London, Stevens and Sons
Chapter 2 Determining Moral Behavior MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. A structured set of principles that defines what is moral is referred to as: a. a norm system b. an ethical system c. a morality guide d. a principled
Aporia vol. 16 no. 1 2006 How Queer? RUSSELL FARR In his book Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, J. L. Mackie agues against the existence of objective moral values. He does so in two sections, the first
Firth and Hill: Two Dispositional Ethical Theories Margaret Chiovoloni A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for
Deontological Ethics From Jane Eyre, the end of Chapter XXVII: (Mr. Rochester is the first speaker) And what a distortion in your judgment, what a perversity in your ideas, is proved by your conduct! Is
Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 20 Number 1 pp.55-60 Fall 1985 Positivism, Natural Law, and Disestablishment: Some Questions Raised by MacCormick's Moralistic Amoralism Joseph M. Boyle Jr. Recommended
Meta-ethical approaches Theory that believes objective moral laws do not exist; a non-cognitivist theory; moral terms express personal emotional attitudes and not propositions; ethical terms are just expressions
Basic Concepts and Skills! Critical Thinking tests rationales,! i.e., reasons connected to conclusions by justifying or explaining principles! Why do CT?! Answer: Opinions without logical or evidential