Bringing sociology back to the sociology of religion. Matthew T. Loveland Graduate Student University of Notre Dame
|
|
- Ethan Jonah Norris
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Bringing sociology back to the sociology of religion Matthew T. Loveland Graduate Student University of Notre Dame Eric K. Sartain Graduate Student University of Notre Dame Authors are listed in alphabetical order. The contribution of each to the manuscript is equal. In case of questions, please contact Matthew T. Loveland, 810 Flanner Hall, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN
2 Sociologists have long attempted to understand religious behavior. Early work in the discipline often took the rise of modernity and the declining significance of religion as a given, theorizing that it would eventually disappear (Hadden 1987). In modern times, however, scholars have shown that religion has not vanished, and some have gone so far as to argue that religious life has instead flourished (Butler 1990; Cassanova 1994; Finke and Stark 1992, Hatch 1989). Given this insight, an effort has been made to improve sociological theory of religion. In the last two decades, much of the work has been done by scholars applying the rational choice perspective (Finke and Stark 1992; Iannaccone 1988, 1990, 1994, 1995; Stark and Bainbridge 1985, 1987; Warner 1993; Young 1997). The result is an economic understanding of the religious actor that focuses on the self-interested part human behavior. For the rational choice approach to religion, religious life is about producing religious satisfaction, and individual religious behavior is motivated by self-interest. In the following paper, we argue that the ontological assumptions of rational choice theory limit its sociological utility. It is not our intent to argue that the assumption of rational economic action does not help to explain religious behavior, but to make the case that it does not do justice to the whole of religious experience. Further, we argue that what is missing is necessary for a full sociological explanation of religion. Review of literature Iannaccone (1988, 1990, 1994, 1995, 1998) has done much of the work establishing and defending the rational choice perspective, and has applied the household production model to individual religious behavior (1990). The household production model postulates that individuals use religious capital to produce religious satisfaction. 1
3 Religious capital consists of the skills and knowledge one can turn into religious satisfaction. For example, in a Catholic RCIA program, new converts are taught the basics of the genuflect (Yamane and MacMillen, Forthcoming). Viewed in the light of the household production model, these converts are being taught the skills used to produce Catholic religious satisfaction. While this is a persuasive argument, it does not address the main concern of many rational choice critics: that the theory does not take into account the cultural, normative side of religious behavior (Bruce 1993, 1999). Why, for example, has the convert chosen to convert to Catholicism in the first place? Others have attempted to address this concern by investigating the social sources of religious preferences (Ellison 1995; Loveland 2003; Sherkat 1998; Sherkat and Ellison 1997, 1999; Sherkat and Wilson 1995). Sherkat embeds religious choices within a framework of normative constraints which include status, childhood socialization, and social relationships (Sherkat 1997, Sherkat and Wilson 1995). According to Sherkat and Wilson (1995), some religious choices are made in sympathy with, or perhaps in spite of, the desires of others. For example, a college age student who has begun to doubt his or her religious upbringing may continue to attend church simply to avoid conflict with his or her parents. Stark (1999) takes a different approach when applying rational choice theory to the individual religious actor, beginning with the foundational proposition that humans instinctively desire explanations about the natural world. Some of life s questions are beyond the scope of empirical observation; therefore, explanations that refer to the supernatural (forces outside of nature that can affect nature) will be attractive. In a hypothetical account of religious evolution, Stark posits that supernatural forces often 2
4 seemed intentional and early humans would have concluded that conscious beings controlled these forces (1999). These supernatural beings are gods, and humans develop methods of interacting with the gods this is religion. Religion, thus, is a standardized approach for rational individuals to maximize benefits and decrease costs in their interactions with gods. While its proponents have been plentiful, the rational choice approach to religious behavior has certainly not gone without criticism. Wildavsky (1994) suggested that rational choice theory downplays the significance of social institutions and effectively divorces the self from its surroundings. In this way, the rational choice conception of the self is incomplete, and in turn its reliance on self-interest becomes untenable. Mellor (2000) rejects rational choice theory on the grounds that it is non-social, and that in its application the sociological significance of religion is ignored. For Mellor, the Durkheimian collective is the fundamental unit of religious analysis, while rational choice theory begins with a methodological individualism that gives primacy to selfinterest. The Durkheimian approach makes clear the importance of the experience of transcendence that is the essence of religion (Mellor 2000: 281). Rational choice theory, according to Mellor, has difficulties explaining cooperation and altruism, two forms of social behavior that are cornerstones of religion. In a similar vein, Shilling and Mellor point to Durkheim s insight that individuals are internally divided between their egoistic impulses and their capacity for reaching beyond these asocial passions to the realm of conceptual thought and moral activity held in common by a society (1998: 196). Citing the work of Durkheim, Shilling and Mellor (1998) demonstrate that human 3
5 religious behavior is not necessarily motivated by self-interest, and that, by denying the collective, rational choice limits a full description of religious life. Precursors to a new approach A fundamental problem with the market approach is that it forces religion to be useful in an exchange sense - religion is something used to get something else. Religious actors exchange religious capital in hope of satisfying personal needs. Previous theoretical work has focused on a distinction the rational choice approach ignores, and, by way of introduction to our critique, we review these insights. Weber (1978) famously discussed two separate forms of rationality instrumental and value. Instrumental rationality is teleological, meaning that the actor calculates the course of action best suited to reach a desired end. Value rationality, as its name suggests, is based on fundamental values doing something because it is right. For this type of rationality, the course of action is not chosen relative to some desired end, but rather according to a moral code that the actor believes should be followed above other considerations. In its purest sense, religious behavior would seem to fit under the umbrella of value rationality better than that of instrumental rationality as rational choice logic would suggest. For the value rational actor, time and resources spent engaged in value rational action are the end, in and of themselves, and are not undertaken to achieve a separate end. Moreover, since the valued action is itself the goal, it cannot be framed as a cost as the rational choice model would suggest. Said another way, the costs of the economic approach are not costs because nothing is being sacrificed as far as the individual is 4
6 concerned. If this conclusion is accepted the idea of costs and benefits becomes a mute point. Intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity The concept of motivation is the key to understanding Allport s two types of religious commitment. Based on different motivations for religious devotion, Allport (1950, 1966, Allport and Ross 1967) developed a scale designed to make the distinction between those who use religion and those who live religion. Those who use religion to meet personal psychosocial needs are referred to as extrinsically religious, and those for whom religion is a master motive are the intrinsically religious. In the former, the individual is thought to be the master of religion, in the latter, religion is thought to be the master of the individual. A long history of significant findings exists in the psychology of religion utilizing the distinction between using and having one s religion. In fact, since its introduction, Allport s conception of religious orientation as a primary distinguishing characteristic has been a dominant paradigm within the psychology of religion, and empirical support has been plentiful (Donahue 1985a, 1985b; Fulton, Maynard and Gorsuch 1999; Gorsuch and McPhereson 1989; Hoge 1972; Hood 1985; Kahoe 1985; King and Hunt 1972; Kirkpatrick 1993; Koenig, Parkerson, and Meador 1997; Masters 1991). Extrinsic religiosity involves turning toward the supernatural, but doing so without turning away from the needs of self. The needs that one seeks to satisfy through religion can broadly be classified into two categories: social and personal (Gorsuch and McPhereson 1989). Religion satisfies social needs by providing a forum for meeting people, and the social gatherings for cultivating those relationships. Religion also 5
7 satisfies personal needs by offering answers to life s unanswerable questions, providing solace in times of pain, and by empowering the individual through direct access to God. It is clear that the rational choice model of religious behavior addresses this religious orientation well. The intrinsic orientation, however, presents a much tougher challenge to the rational choice conception of individual religiosity. The concept of intrinsic religiosity takes as its touchstone the idea that individuals live religion. Said another way, religion becomes the meta-narrative of one s approach to life. It is the lens through which all else is seen and interpreted. Intrinsic motivation relies on a set of non-malleable truths, which are conceived of as being prior to selfinterest. Economic rationality is trumped as the individual chooses the value-determined right course of action as defined by religious belief, regardless of personal cost or benefit. For the intrinsically religious, decisions are predetermined by the tenets of faith. Rational choice theorists may claim this is simply the manifestation of a unique preference set. However, we suggest that the logic behind the decision making process relative to intrinsic motivation represents a radical departure from the rational, endoriented, calculations suggested by the rational choice model. In summary, extrinsically oriented people view their religion as one of a number of influences on their life and tend to use it as a means of social or psychological support. Intrinsically oriented people, on the other hand, view religion as the central guiding principle of life, and make efforts to bring all aspects of their lives into line with their religious beliefs. What implications does this have for the rational choice approach to the sociology of religion? 6
8 Developing a new approach While it is true that some sociologists have begun to move beyond the basic rational choice model (Loveland 2003; Sherkat and Wilson 1995), the shortcomings of the early incarnation continue to create problems for current understandings. Iannacconne defines religious practice as a self-interested process of producing religious satisfaction (1990). This sentiment continues to pervade the rational choice literature. As outlined above, Sherkat and Wilson (1995) attempted to embed the rational choice framework within a cultural context of institutions and social networks, but in using the rational choice framework they are forced to maintain a self-referential causal mechanism. While this approach begins to overcome the critique that rational choice presents a preference driven actor divorced from the social environment (Wildavsky 1994), it still implies that religious choices are about satisfying individual preferences. Returning to the previous example, the college student is satisfying a non-conflict preference by attending solely to placate his or her parents rather than being impacted by religious sentiments. While we are in agreement with Stark s (1999) inclusion of a notion of the supernatural in a theory of religious activity, we feel that his explanation of religion suffers from the constraints of the rational choice assumptions. Rational choice theory requires individual religious behavior to be self-centered, that religious activity is an exchange resulting in added value. Stark s (1999) version of religious behavior takes on the tone of people trying to out wit the gods, to play the game of religion successfully. This, we feel, is a necessary result of basing a theory of religion on the rational choice assumptions. Religion as a cultural form, encouraging a collective orientation and providing the resources for socially transformative thinking (such as the social gospel), is 7
9 imperceptible from the rational actor approach. In the end, it is this necessary aspect of rational choice theory, the pre-eminence of the self, that we feel limits a complete sociological understanding of religious life. It is our contention that rational choice addresses only one of at least two dimensions of religious life. In Allport s (1950) terms, the rational choice approach, with its emphasis on maximization of a cost-benefit equation explains the extrinsic orientation, but falls short when applied to the intrinsically religious. Weber s conception of the separate logics behind the two differing rationalities, instrumental and value, shows a striking parallel to Allport s conception of the motivations behind the two distinct orientations toward religion. Rational choice theory explains Weber s instrumental rationality, but again falls short when one tries to understand value rationality. Following the lead of these two theorists, then, we focus our attention on the motivations of religious actors. Rational choice theorists may argue that the assumption of stable preferences accomplishes this task. It should be noted, however, that refocusing theoretical attention on motivations and away from preferences is more than a semantic argument. Embedded in the idea of preference is a portrait of a needful being that seeks to satisfy personal desires through participation in religion. A preference oriented approach frames religious action as self-centered, meant to increase personal benefit. A focus on motivations, on the other hand, casts action as a projection of values, which may or may not have anything to do with individual gain. In short, rational choice theory, by ignoring religion s capability to encourage self-less behavior, denies an aspect of religion that distinguishes it from other social forms. 8
10 Adherence to religion carries with it the impetus to look beyond the self in favor of that which transcends the self. Perhaps the best description of the side of religion rational choice misses is that of Smith (1996a). Smith explains how religion can encourage political action by providing transcendent motivation. Religion provides sets of beliefs and practices grounded not in the ordinary, mundane world, but in the divine, the transcendent, the eternal, the holy, the spiritual. Religious meaning-systems operate with reference to supernatural beings, timeless truths, celestial realities. This is what sets religion apart from non-religious cultural meaning systems (Smith 1996a: 7). In this way, religious life is not about satisfying personal preferences, but it is about living a life in accordance with transcendent ideals. Where rational choice theorists in the style of Becker and Iannacconne see religious behavior as a way to satisfy individual needs, we see a missing piece of the puzzle, that of a transcendent ideal. The transcendent motivation approach Our critique of a rational choice understanding of individual religious behavior is best thought of in terms of motivation. Reviewing Allport s original conception of the intrinsic/extrinsic distinction draws attention to the fact that religious behavior can have different motivations. While extrinsic religiosity centers on satisfying selfish needs, intrinsic religiosity is not motivated by a self-satisfying mechanism. Religious actors often understand their own behavior as satisfying a greater, transcendent purpose (Smith 1996a, 1996b; Walzer1966). This form of religious behavior is not about satisfying personal needs, but rather is about transforming the world to conform to the standards of a transcendent truth. While a rational choice conception forces us to view individual religious behavior as a function of personal tastes, a transcendent motivation perspective 9
11 allows a religious actor to act on behalf of something greater than the self. This is important because it draws attention to a truth that makes religion a unique social reality religion has the power to make actors sacrifice individual satisfaction in pursuit of a greater good. A rational choice argument does not easily direct us to this conclusion, and in fact reduces religion to self-oriented teleological pursuit. [Figure 1 About Here] Figure 1 presents a diagram of the transcendent motivation approach. An oval represents the transcendent, while two rectangles represent the actor, and the goal of religious behavior. The arrow from the transcendent to the actor represents the source of the individual s goal, the arrow from the actor to the goal represents the religious action itself, and the arrow from the goal to the transcendent represents completion of the religious behavior. While the rational choice conception involves an actor producing religious satisfaction to satisfy personal needs (Iannaccone 1990), the transcendent motivation perspective allows for the end result of the action to be directed toward the completion of a transcendent directive. In the pure form of the transcendent motivation approach, the self is only a minor player in the act, and certainly not the center of activity it is in the rational choice conception. The primary sociological advantage of a theoretical focus on the transcendent nature of religion is that the individual is no longer the driving force of religious life. The transcendent is above and beyond the individual, a subject matter well suited to sociological analysis. While the methodological individualism of rational choice theory forces us to understand religious behavior as an aggregate of individual behavior (Mellor 2000), a transcendent motivation approach forces us to be aware of that which is outside the self. The collective nature of religious life, an insight of sociological understandings 10
12 of religion since Durkheim, is more easily drawn out by a focus on that which transcends the self. As a more specific example, we are able to understand how religious standards can motivate altruistic, cooperative behavior. Since the self is not the source of religious behavior, behaviors that do not directly result in individual gain are more easily understandable. The best empirical examples may come from the literature on religion and social activism, which suggests that sacred standards can both generate material and political goals and provide commitment to collective action when personal costs are high (Harris 1999; Morris 1984; Smith 1996a 1996b; Walzer 1966;). Finally, as sociology as a discipline has recently rediscovered context as seen with the sudden growth in the use of contextual modeling and the launch of the journal Contexts from the American Sociological Society, the prevalence of methodological individualism in the sociology of religion is surprising. Perhaps modern methodology has finally caught up with the insight of Emile Durkheim who claimed that religion is an eminently social thing (1995: 9). Taking advantage of techniques in contextual modeling, researchers will now be able to operationalize individual religious behavior as action nested within the collective. A theoretical approach designed explicitly to emphasize aspects of religion beyond the self will help sociologists of religion take advantage of methodological advances, and see old questions in a new way. Conclusion Rational choice theory is the foundation of what has become known as the new paradigm in the sociology of religion (Warner 1993). Although it is presently the dominant theoretical approach, critics have called both its propositions and empirical support into question (Chaves and Gorski 2000). Unfortunately, the critics have not 11
13 begun to formulate a coherent body of theory to counter the rational choice perspective. The antecedents of a new theory are present in the work of both classical theorists and more recent scholars. Perhaps the loudest objection is that rational choice theory reduces religion to mere self-interest and ignores the collective, cultural, transcendent aspects of the religious form. Tracing a focus on religious motivations from Weber, through Allport, and into today s examinations of religion and activism we call for a new sociological theory of religion that focuses not on self-interest, but rather on that which transcends the self. 12
14 REFERENCES Allport, Gordon The Individual and His Religion: A psychological interpretation. New York: Macmillan The Religious Context of Prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 5: Allport, Gordon and J. Ross Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 5: Bruce, Steve Religion and Rational Choice A critique of economic explanations of religious behavior. Sociology of Religion 54: Choice and Religion: A Critique of Rational Choice Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Butler, Jon Awash in a Sea of Faith: Christianizing the American People. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Casanova, Jose Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Chaves, Mark and Phillip Gorski Religious Pluralism and Religious Participation. Annual Review of Sociology 27: Donahue, Michael. 1985a. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Religiousness: The Empirical Research. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 24(4): b. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Religiousness: Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 48(2): Durkheim, Emile The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: The Free Press. Ellison, Christopher Rational Choice Explanations of Individual Religious Behavior: Notes on the Problem of Social Embeddedness. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 34(1):
15 Finke, Roger and Rodney Stark The Churching of America : Winners and Losers in our Religious Economy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Fulton, Aubyn, Elizabeth Maynard, and Richard Gorsuch Religious Orientation, Antihomosexual Sentiment, and Fundamentalism Among Christians. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 38(1): Gorsuch, Richard L. and Susan E. McPhereson Intrinsic/Extrinsic Measurement: I/E Revised and Single-Item Scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 28: Hadden, Jeffrey K Towards Desacrilizing Secularization Theory. Social Forces 65: Harris, Fredrick Something Within: Religion in African-American Political Activism. New York: Oxford University Press. Hatch, Nathan O The Democratization of American Christianity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Hoge, Dean R A Validated Intrinsic Religious Motivation Scale. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 11: Hood, Ralph The Conceptualization of Religious Purity in Allport s Typology. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 24(4): Iannaccone, Laurence R A Formal Model of Church and Sect. American Journal of Sociology 94 (Supplement): Religious Practice: A Human Capital Approach. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 29: Why Strict Churches Are Strong. American Journal of Sociology 99: Voodoo Economics? Reviewing the Rational Choice Approach to Religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 34: Introduction to the Economics of Religion. Journal of Economic Literature. 36(3): Kahoe, Richard The Development of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Religious Orientations. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 24(4):
16 King, Morton B. and Richard A. Hunt Measuring the Religious Variable: Replication. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 11: Kirkpatrick, Lee Fundamentalism, Christian Orthodoxy, and Intrinsic Religious Orientation as Predictors of Discriminatory Attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 32(3): Koenig, Harold G., George R. Parkerson, and Keith G. Meador Religion Index for Psychiatric Research: A 5-Item Measure for Use in Health Outcome Studies. American Journal of Psychiatry. 154(6): 885. Loveland, Matthew T Religious Switching: Preference development, maintenance and change. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 42: Masters, Kevin Of Boons, Banes, Babies, and Bath Water: A Reply to the Kirkpatrick and Hood Discussion of Intrinsic-Extrinsic Religious Orientation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 30(3): Mellor, Philip A Rational Choice or Sacred Contagion? Rationality, Nonrationality and Religion. Social Compass. 47(2): Morris, Aldon The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement. New York: The Free Press. Sherkat, Darren E Embedding Religious Choices: Integrating Preferences and Social Constraints into Rational Choice Theories of Religious Behavior. in Rational Choice Theory and Religion. ed. Lawrence A. Young. New York: Rutledge Counterculture or Continuity? Competing Influences on Baby Boomers Religious Orientations and Participation. Social Forces 76: Sherkat, Darren E. and Christopher G. Ellison The Cognitive Structure of a Moral Crusade: Conservative Protestantism and Opposition to Pornography Social Forces 75: Recent Developments and Current Controversies in the Sociology of Religion. Annual Review of Sociology 25: Sherkat, Darren E. and John Wilson Preferences, Constraints, and Choices in Religious Markets: An Examination of Religious Switching and Apostasy. Social Forces 73: Shilling, Chris. and Philip A. Mellor Durkheim, Morality and Modernity: Collective Effervescence, Homo Duplex and the Sources of Moral Action. British Journal of Sociology. 49(2):
17 Smith, Christian (ed.). 1996a. Disruptive Religion: The Force of Faith in Social Movement Activism. New York: Routledge. Smith, Christian. 1996b. Resisting Reagan : the U.S. Central America Peace Movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Stark, Rodney Micro Foundations of Religion: A Revised Theory. Sociological Theory 17: Stark, Rodney and William S. Bainbridge The Future of Religion. Secularization, Revival and Cult Formation. Berkeley: University of California Press A Theory of Religion. New York: Peter Lang Publishers. Walzer, Michael The Revolution of the Saints. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. Warner, Stephen R Work in Progress toward a New Paradigm for the Sociological Study of Religion in the United States. American Journal of Sociology 98: Weber, Max Economy and Society. eds. Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkley: University of California Press. Wildavsky, Aaron Why Self-Interest Means Less Outside of a Social Context. Journal of Theoretical Politics. 6: Yamane, David and Sarah MacMillen. Forthcoming. Becoming Catholic: Finding Rome in the American Spiritual Marketplace. Young, Lawrence A. (ed.) Rational Choice Theory and Religion. New York: Routledge. 16
18 Figure 1. Theoretical Model of Religious Motivation Transcendent Individual Goal 17
Religious Switching: Preference Development, Maintenance, and Change
Religious Switching: Preference Development, Maintenance, and Change MATTHEW T. LOVELAND Up to one-third of Americans switch religions at some time during their lives. What are the predictors of this religious
More informationRoger Finke Penn State University
Spiritual Capital: Definitions, Applications, and New Frontiers Roger Finke Penn State University Prepared for the Spiritual Capital Planning Meeting, October 10-11, 2003. Spiritual Capital: Definitions,
More informationSOCIOLOGICAL THEORY (Michaelmas 2017) Dr Michael Biggs
SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY (Michaelmas 2017) Dr Michael Biggs Theoretical Perspectives 1. Rational Choice http://users.ox.ac.uk/~sfos0060/ SociologicalTheory.shtml! 1. Rational choice 2. Evolutionary psychology
More informationSOCIOLOGICAL THEORY Michaelmas 2018 Dr Michael Biggs
SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY Michaelmas 2018 Dr Michael Biggs Theoretical Perspectives 1. Rational Choice http://users.ox.ac.uk/~sfos0060/ SociologicalTheory.shtml! 1. Rational choice 2. Evolutionary psychology
More informationReading assignment: Methodological perspectives - Stark 281b-283, 1-24
Theo 425 American Christianity Session 1: Methodological Perspectives Page 1 Reading assignment: Methodological perspectives - Stark 281b-283, 1-24 I. Finke & Starke Methodology (281-3; 1-24) A. Churching
More informationRELIGION AND SOCIETY SSP171/REL171
RELIGION AND SOCIETY SSP171/REL171 Spring 2006 Tuesdays and Thursdays, 10:45am-12:00pm Maginnes 475 Instructor: Ziad Munson office: Price Hall 8G email: munson@lehigh.edu, AIM: zmunson, phone: 758-3821
More informationattitudes in respect to religious and other norms, rites, between people with different degrees of religiousness
RELIGIOUS ATTITUDES Differences in personality variables and religious and non-religious attitudes between people with different degrees of religiousness Persons with same faith may differ, for example:
More informationMODELS CLARIFIED: RESPONDING TO LANGDON GILKEY. by David E. Klemm and William H. Klink
MODELS CLARIFIED: RESPONDING TO LANGDON GILKEY by David E. Klemm and William H. Klink Abstract. We respond to concerns raised by Langdon Gilkey. The discussion addresses the nature of theological thinking
More informationSociology of Religion Grad seminar Fall 2016
Please note that this syllabus should be regarded as only a general guide to the course. The instructor may have changed specific course content and requirements subsequent to posting this syllabus. Last
More informationSociological Theory Sociology University of Chicago Graduate Class: Fall 2011 John Levi Martin. Tuesdays and Thursdays, 10:30 11:50, SS 404
1 Sociological Theory Sociology 30001 University of Chicago Graduate Class: Fall 2011 John Levi Martin Tuesdays and Thursdays, 10:30 11:50, SS 404 Course Description This is a required class in classical
More informationPURPOSE OF COURSE. York/London: The Free Press, 1982), Chapter 1.
C-660 Sociology of Religion #160 Semester One 2010-2011 Rufus Burrow, Jr., Indiana Professor of Christian Thought Office #208 317) 931-2338; rburrow@cts.edu PURPOSE OF COURSE This course will examine sociological
More informationReligion & Religious Institutions. December 19 th, 2016
Religion & Religious Institutions December 19 th, 2016 Sociology on Religion Not about studying God or Gods or the existence of God that s theology or philosophy It s about studying people, patterns of
More informationSOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS Michaelmas 2018 Dr Michael Biggs. 0. Introduction. SociologicalAnalysis.shtml!
SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS Michaelmas 2018 Dr Michael Biggs 0. Introduction http://users.ox.ac.uk/~sfos0060/ SociologicalAnalysis.shtml! We want to explain 1. Variation across cases why in UK do 3/4 of ethnic
More informationThe Sociological Approach to
The Sociological Approach to Religion Bởi: OpenStaxCollege From the Latin religio (respect for what is sacred) and religare (to bind, in the sense of an obligation), the term religion describes various
More informationPHD THESIS SUMMARY: Rational choice theory: its merits and limits in explaining and predicting cultural behaviour
Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, Volume 10, Issue 1, Spring 2017, pp. 137-141. https://doi.org/ 10.23941/ejpe.v10i1.272 PHD THESIS SUMMARY: Rational choice theory: its merits and limits in
More informationIn What Is Religious Human Capital Fixed? Paul Firenze Special Lecturer in Philosophy Providence College
In What Is Religious Human Capital Fixed? Paul Firenze Special Lecturer in Philosophy Providence College April 2013 Preliminary Daft Please do not circulate or cite without permission
More informationSECULAR ELITES - RELIGIOUS MASSES; RELIGIOUS ELITES - SECULAR MASSES: THE TURKISH CASE
SECULAR ELITES - RELIGIOUS MASSES; RELIGIOUS ELITES - SECULAR MASSES: THE TURKISH CASE Dr. Resit Ergener Bogazici University resit.ergener@boun.edu.tr Abstract: Secularism is often associated with the
More informationSOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION (sample lower level undergraduate course)
SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION (sample lower level undergraduate course) Term: Fall 2015 Time: Thursdays 1pm 4pm Location: TBA Instructor: Samuel L. Perry Office hours: XXX Office: XXX Contact: samperry@uchicago.edu
More informationTempleton Fellowships at the NDIAS
Templeton Fellowships at the NDIAS Pursuing the Unity of Knowledge: Integrating Religion, Science, and the Academic Disciplines With grant support from the John Templeton Foundation, the NDIAS will help
More informationHume s Is/Ought Problem. Ruse and Wilson. Moral Philosophy as Applied Science. Naturalistic Fallacy
Ruse and Wilson Hume s Is/Ought Problem Is ethics independent of humans or has human evolution shaped human behavior and beliefs about right and wrong? In every system of morality, which I have hitherto
More informationMoral Objectivism. RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary
Moral Objectivism RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary The possibility, let alone the actuality, of an objective morality has intrigued philosophers for well over two millennia. Though much discussed,
More informationAre Humans Always Selfish? OR Is Altruism Possible?
Are Humans Always Selfish? OR Is Altruism Possible? This debate concerns the question as to whether all human actions are selfish actions or whether some human actions are done specifically to benefit
More informationLimitations of Religious Economy Model in Korean Religious Market
종교와문화제23호 서울대학교종교문제연구소, 2012, pp. 177-197 Limitations of Religious Economy Model in Korean Religious Market Kwangsuk Yoo *1) I. Introduction The Religious Economy Model (REM) here refers to a type of sociological
More informationReligious Studies. Name: Institution: Course: Date:
Running head: RELIGIOUS STUDIES Religious Studies Name: Institution: Course: Date: RELIGIOUS STUDIES 2 Abstract In this brief essay paper, we aim to critically analyze the question: Given that there are
More informationReligion and Science: The Emerging Relationship Part II
Religion and Science: The Emerging Relationship Part II The first article in this series introduced four basic models through which people understand the relationship between religion and science--exploring
More informationR. Keith Sawyer: Social Emergence. Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge University Press
R. Keith Sawyer: Social Emergence. Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge University Press. 2005. This is an ambitious book. Keith Sawyer attempts to show that his new emergence paradigm provides a means
More informationClass XI Practical Examination
SOCIOLOGY Rationale Sociology is introduced as an elective subject at the senior secondary stage. The syllabus is designed to help learners to reflect on what they hear and see in the course of everyday
More informationMaster of Arts Course Descriptions
Bible and Theology Master of Arts Course Descriptions BTH511 Dynamics of Kingdom Ministry (3 Credits) This course gives students a personal and Kingdom-oriented theology of ministry, demonstrating God
More informationIrrational Beliefs in Disease Causation and Treatment I
21A.215 Irrational Beliefs in Disease Causation and Treatment I I. Symbolic healing (and harming) A. Fadiman notes: I was suspended in a large bowl of Fish Soup. Medicine was religion. Religion was society.
More informationTocqueville s observations of religion in Democracy in America are similar
143 Emily Hatheway Religion as a Social Force Tocqueville s observations of religion in Democracy in America are similar to the issues pertinent to Weber s Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism,
More informationMoral Argumentation from a Rhetorical Point of View
Chapter 98 Moral Argumentation from a Rhetorical Point of View Lars Leeten Universität Hildesheim Practical thinking is a tricky business. Its aim will never be fulfilled unless influence on practical
More informationSociology 475 Classical Sociological Theory. Office: 8103 Social Science Bldng
Sociology 475 Classical Sociological Theory Bob Freeland Email: freeland@ssc.wisc.edu Office: 8103 Social Science Bldng Office hours: TR, 4-5 or by appt. This course is a basic introduction to the writings
More information4 Liberty, Rationality, and Agency in Hobbes s Leviathan
1 Introduction Thomas Hobbes, at first glance, provides a coherent and easily identifiable concept of liberty. He seems to argue that agents are free to the extent that they are unimpeded in their actions
More informationOn the Origins and Normative Status of the Impartial Spectator
Discuss this article at Journaltalk: http://journaltalk.net/articles/5916 ECON JOURNAL WATCH 13(2) May 2016: 306 311 On the Origins and Normative Status of the Impartial Spectator John McHugh 1 LINK TO
More informationOn the Rationality of Metaphysical Commitments in Immature Science
On the Rationality of Metaphysical Commitments in Immature Science ALEXANDER KLEIN, CORNELL UNIVERSITY Kuhn famously claimed that like jigsaw puzzles, paradigms include rules that limit both the nature
More informationProof as a cluster concept in mathematical practice. Keith Weber Rutgers University
Proof as a cluster concept in mathematical practice Keith Weber Rutgers University Approaches for defining proof In the philosophy of mathematics, there are two approaches to defining proof: Logical or
More informationREASON AND PRACTICAL-REGRET. Nate Wahrenberger, College of William and Mary
1 REASON AND PRACTICAL-REGRET Nate Wahrenberger, College of William and Mary Abstract: Christine Korsgaard argues that a practical reason (that is, a reason that counts in favor of an action) must motivate
More informationReligion and Spirituality: A Necessary Distinction?
Religion and Spirituality: A Necessary Distinction? Professor Patricia Casey Introduction There is increasing interest within psychiatry on the role of religion and spirituality in mental health. Perusing
More informationChapter 15. Elements of Argument: Claims and Exceptions
Chapter 15 Elements of Argument: Claims and Exceptions Debate is a process in which individuals exchange arguments about controversial topics. Debate could not exist without arguments. Arguments are the
More informationEmergent Religious Mobility: Evidence from a Recent Young Cohort
University of Colorado, Boulder CU Scholar Sociology Graduate Theses & Dissertations Sociology Spring 1-1-2014 Emergent Religious Mobility: Evidence from a Recent Young Cohort Kari Bane Alexander University
More informationOn the futility of criticizing the neoclassical maximization hypothesis
Revised final draft On the futility of criticizing the neoclassical maximization hypothesis The last couple of decades have seen an intensification of methodological criticism of the foundations of neoclassical
More informationSECULARIZATION AS A PROCESS OF LESS RELIGIOSITY
International Journal of Research in Social Sciences Vol. 8 Issue 8, August 2018, ISSN: 2249-2496 Impact Factor: 7.081 Journal Homepage: Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International Journal
More informationRS 200A: Proseminar in the History and Theory of Religion
1 RS 200A: Proseminar in the History and Theory of Religion Professor Ann Taves Fall 2011 taves@religion.ucsb.edu W 12:00-2:50 Office: HSSB 3085 HSSB 3041 Office Hours: Monday 1-3 and by appointment Purposes
More informationGilbert. Margaret. Scientists Are People Too: Comment on Andersen. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017):
http://social-epistemology.com ISSN: 2471-9560 Scientists Are People Too: Comment on Andersen Margaret Gilbert, University of California, Irvine Gilbert. Margaret. Scientists Are People Too: Comment on
More informationJohn Stuart Mill ( ) is widely regarded as the leading English-speaking philosopher of
[DRAFT: please do not cite without permission. The final version of this entry will appear in the Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Religion (Wiley-Blackwell, forthcoming), eds. Stewart Goetz and Charles
More informationTruth and Evidence in Validity Theory
Journal of Educational Measurement Spring 2013, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 110 114 Truth and Evidence in Validity Theory Denny Borsboom University of Amsterdam Keith A. Markus John Jay College of Criminal Justice
More informationROGER FINKE Department of Sociology The Pennsylvania State University 211 Oswald Tower University Park, PA
ROGER FINKE Department of Sociology The Pennsylvania State University 211 Oswald Tower University Park, PA 16802-6207 EDUCATION B.A.: Concordia College, Seward, Nebraska, 1976, Social Work. M.A.: University
More informationRevista Economică 66:3 (2014) THE USE OF INDUCTIVE, DEDUCTIVE OR ABDUCTIVE RESONING IN ECONOMICS
THE USE OF INDUCTIVE, DEDUCTIVE OR ABDUCTIVE RESONING IN ECONOMICS MOROŞAN Adrian 1 Lucian Blaga University, Sibiu, Romania Abstract Although we think that, regardless of the type of reasoning used in
More informationLegal positivism represents a view about the nature of law. It states that
Legal Positivism A N I NTRODUCTION Polycarp Ikuenobe Legal positivism represents a view about the nature of law. It states that there is no necessary or conceptual connection between law and morality and
More informationFUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS. by Immanuel Kant
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS SECOND SECTION by Immanuel Kant TRANSITION FROM POPULAR MORAL PHILOSOPHY TO THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS... This principle, that humanity and generally every
More informationHume's Is/Ought Problem. Ruse and Wilson. Moral Philosophy as Applied Science. Naturalistic Fallacy
Ruse and Wilson Hume's Is/Ought Problem Is ethics independent of humans or has human evolution shaped human behavior and beliefs about right and wrong? "In every system of morality, which I have hitherto
More informationUC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works
UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Disaggregating Structures as an Agenda for Critical Realism: A Reply to McAnulla Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4k27s891 Journal British
More informationFive Great books from Rodney Stark
Five Great books from Rodney Stark Rodney Stark is a Sociologist from Baylor University. He has mostly applied his craft to understanding religious history in over 30 books and countless articles. Very
More informationUnless indicated otherwise, required texts on the syllabus will be available at the Yale University Bookstore.
Revised 01-22-2015 PLSC 630/332; EP&E 473 Philosophy of Science for the Study of Politics Spring 2015 Ian Shapiro Class meetings: Tuesdays 3:30 5:20 PM, 102 Rosencrantz Hall, 115 Prospect Office Hours:
More informationThe tribulations of Rationality in Philosophy, Economics and Biology by Alex Kacelnik University of Oxford
The tribulations of Rationality in Philosophy, Economics and Biology by Alex Kacelnik University of Oxford Cogito Foundation, Zurich, October 20 2004 1 Human uniqueness and rationality Intuition tells
More informationComments on Seumas Miller s review of Social Ontology: Collective Intentionality and Group agents in the Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (April 20, 2
Comments on Seumas Miller s review of Social Ontology: Collective Intentionality and Group agents in the Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (April 20, 2014) Miller s review contains many misunderstandings
More informationRadical Centrism & the Redemption of Secular Philosophy
Radical Centrism & the Redemption of Secular Philosophy Ernest N. Prabhakar, Ph.D. DrErnie@RadicalCentrism.org Radical Centrism is an new approach to secular philosophy 1 What we will cover The Challenge
More informationWorld without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Natural- ism , by Michael C. Rea.
Book reviews World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism, by Michael C. Rea. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004, viii + 245 pp., $24.95. This is a splendid book. Its ideas are bold and
More informationGlobal Christianity Fall 2010 Lecture 5: Character of Faith of Global South Page 1 Asst. Professor: Jacquelyn E. Winston, Ph.D.
Global Christianity Fall 2010 Lecture 5: Character of Faith of Global South Page 1 Reading Assignment: Jenkins 125-160 I. Characteristics of Christianity in Global South (J 125) A. Enthusiastic B. Concern
More informationThe SELF THE SELF AND RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE: RELIGIOUS INTERNALIZATION PREDICTS RELIGIOUS COMFORT MICHAEL B. KITCHENS 1
THE SELF AND RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE: RELIGIOUS INTERNALIZATION PREDICTS RELIGIOUS COMFORT MICHAEL B. KITCHENS 1 Research shows that variations in religious internalization (i.e., the degree to which one
More informationGlobalization, Secularization and Religion Different States, Same Trajectories?
European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Workshop 01 Globalization, Secularization and Religion Different States, Same Trajectories? directed by Jeffrey Haynes London Metropolitan
More informationMeaning-Making in Everyday Life: A Response to Mark S. M. Scott s Theorizing Theodicy. Kevin M. Taylor
Meaning-Making in Everyday Life: A Response to Mark S. M. Scott s Theorizing Theodicy Kevin M. Taylor Mark S. M. Scott argues that religious studies theory could benefit by shifting analysis of theodicy
More informationSOCIOLOGICAL THEORY (Michaelmas 2017) Dr Michael Biggs
SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY (Michaelmas 2017) Dr Michael Biggs Theoretical Perspectives 3. Values and meaning http://users.ox.ac.uk/~sfos0060/ SociologicalTheory.shtml! (2) Evolutionary psychology conflict (3)
More informationSpirituality: An Essential Aspect of Living
Spirituality: Living Successfully The Institute of Medicine, Education, and Spirituality at Ochsner (IMESO) Rev. Anthony J. De Conciliis, C.S.C., Ph.D. Vice President and Director of IMESO Abstract: In
More informationPerspectives on Imitation
Perspectives on Imitation 402 Mark Greenberg on Sugden l a point," as Evelyn Waugh might have put it). To the extent that they have, there has certainly been nothing inevitable about this, as Sugden's
More informationInstrumental reasoning* John Broome
Instrumental reasoning* John Broome For: Rationality, Rules and Structure, edited by Julian Nida-Rümelin and Wolfgang Spohn, Kluwer. * This paper was written while I was a visiting fellow at the Swedish
More informationSOC 302 SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION. (GEP:G3) 3 credits. Spring Monday, Wednesday, Friday 9:00-9:50 a.m. LAC 342
SOC 302 SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION (GEP:G3) 3 credits Spring 1999 Monday, Wednesday, Friday 9:00-9:50 a.m. LAC 342 Instructor: Lutz Kaelber E-mail: kaelberl@queen.lsc.vsc.edu Office: Vail 467 Phone: (802) 626-6204
More informationFALL 2018 THEOLOGY TIER I
100...001/002/003/004 Christian Theology Svebakken, Hans This course surveys major topics in Christian theology using Alister McGrath's Theology: The Basics (4th ed.; Wiley-Blackwell, 2018) as a guide.
More informationTheory and Methodology in the Study of Religion RE 241, Section Fall 2016
Theory and Methodology in the Study of Religion RE 241, Section 001 - Fall 2016 Meetings: W/F 10:10 11:30 p.m., Ladd 107 Instructor: Dr. David J. Howlett, Visiting Assistant Professor of Religion, dhowlett@skidmore.edu
More informationGrade 8 English Language Arts
What should good student writing at this grade level look like? The answer lies in the writing itself. The Writing Standards in Action Project uses high quality student writing samples to illustrate what
More informationRethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View
http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319532363 Carlo Cellucci Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View 1 Preface From its very beginning, philosophy has been viewed as aimed at knowledge and methods to
More informationReflections on sociology's unspoken weakness: Bringing epistemology back in
Loughborough University Institutional Repository Reflections on sociology's unspoken weakness: Bringing epistemology back in This item was submitted to Loughborough University's Institutional Repository
More informationMax Weber is asking us to buy into a huge claim. That the modern economic order is a fallout of the Protestant Reformation never
Catherine Bell Michela Bowman Tey Meadow Ashley Mears Jen Petersen Max Weber is asking us to buy into a huge claim. That the modern economic order is a fallout of the Protestant Reformation never mind
More informationTHE CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP by Lars Bergström
From: Who Owns Our Genes?, Proceedings of an international conference, October 1999, Tallin, Estonia, The Nordic Committee on Bioethics, 2000. THE CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP by Lars Bergström I shall be mainly
More informationTwo Approaches to Natural Law;Note
Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Natural Law Forum 1-1-1956 Two Approaches to Natural Law;Note Vernon J. Bourke Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/nd_naturallaw_forum
More informationAre There Philosophical Conflicts Between Science & Religion? (Participant's Guide)
Digital Collections @ Dordt Study Guides for Faith & Science Integration Summer 2017 Are There Philosophical Conflicts Between Science & Religion? (Participant's Guide) Lydia Marcus Dordt College Follow
More informationArgumentation and Positioning: Empirical insights and arguments for argumentation analysis
Argumentation and Positioning: Empirical insights and arguments for argumentation analysis Luke Joseph Buhagiar & Gordon Sammut University of Malta luke.buhagiar@um.edu.mt Abstract Argumentation refers
More informationHypocrisy and Hypocrites: A Game-Theoretic Note
Faith & Economics - Number 59 - Spring 2012- Pages 23-29 Hypocrisy and Hypocrites: A Game-Theoretic Note Bruce Wydick University of San Francisco Abstract: Hypocrisy is the feigning of beliefs or virtues
More informationOrienting Social Epistemology 1 Francis Remedios, Independent Researcher, SERRC
Orienting Social Epistemology 1 Francis Remedios, Independent Researcher, SERRC Because Fuller s and Goldman s social epistemologies differ from each other in many respects, it is difficult to compare
More informationWho or what is God?, asks John Hick (Hick 2009). A theist might answer: God is an infinite person, or at least an
John Hick on whether God could be an infinite person Daniel Howard-Snyder Western Washington University Abstract: "Who or what is God?," asks John Hick. A theist might answer: God is an infinite person,
More informationThe Many Faces of Besire Theory
Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Philosophy Theses Department of Philosophy Summer 8-1-2011 The Many Faces of Besire Theory Gary Edwards Follow this and additional works
More informationReasons With Rationalism After All MICHAEL SMITH
book symposium 521 Bratman, M.E. Forthcoming a. Intention, belief, practical, theoretical. In Spheres of Reason: New Essays on the Philosophy of Normativity, ed. Simon Robertson. Oxford: Oxford University
More informationJeffrey, Richard, Subjective Probability: The Real Thing, Cambridge University Press, 2004, 140 pp, $21.99 (pbk), ISBN
Jeffrey, Richard, Subjective Probability: The Real Thing, Cambridge University Press, 2004, 140 pp, $21.99 (pbk), ISBN 0521536685. Reviewed by: Branden Fitelson University of California Berkeley Richard
More informationExamining Growth: Religious Motivation and Megachurch Behavior. Kevin Bohm. March 6, 2012
Examining Growth: Religious Motivation and Megachurch Behavior Kevin Bohm March 6, 2012 Senior thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics at
More informationEthical Theory for Catholic Professionals
The Linacre Quarterly Volume 53 Number 1 Article 9 February 1986 Ethical Theory for Catholic Professionals James F. Drane Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq Recommended
More informationThe activity It is important to set ground rules to provide a safe environment where students are respected as they explore their own viewpoints.
Introduction In this activity, students distinguish between religious, scientific, metaphysical and moral ideas. It helps to frame the way students think about the world, and also helps them to understand,
More informationMaking Choices: Teachers Beliefs and
Making Choices: Teachers Beliefs and Teachers Reasons (Bridging Initiative Working Paper No. 2a) 1 Making Choices: Teachers Beliefs and Teachers Reasons Barry W. Holtz The Initiative on Bridging Scholarship
More informationUganda, morality was derived from God and the adult members were regarded as teachers of religion. God remained the canon against which the moral
ESSENTIAL APPROACHES TO CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS EDUCATION: LEARNING AND TEACHING A PAPER PRESENTED TO THE SCHOOL OF RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE STUDIES UGANDA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ON MARCH 23, 2018 Prof. Christopher
More informationHow Not to Defend Metaphysical Realism (Southwestern Philosophical Review, Vol , 19-27)
How Not to Defend Metaphysical Realism (Southwestern Philosophical Review, Vol 3 1986, 19-27) John Collier Department of Philosophy Rice University November 21, 1986 Putnam's writings on realism(1) have
More informationOxford Scholarship Online Abstracts and Keywords
Oxford Scholarship Online Abstracts and Keywords ISBN 9780198802693 Title The Value of Rationality Author(s) Ralph Wedgwood Book abstract Book keywords Rationality is a central concept for epistemology,
More informationKihyun Lee (Department of Philosophy, Seoul National University)
Kihyun Lee (Department of Philosophy, Seoul National University) 1 There are two views of the relationship between moral judgment and motivation. First of all, internalism argues that the relationship
More informationReligion in Sociological Perspective Keith A. Roberts and David Yamane Supplementary Web Materials for Chapter 1
Implications of One's Definition of Religion for Conducting for Research by Keith A. Roberts [Excerpted from Religion in Sociological Perspective 4 th edition] One's definition of religion is often related
More informationPOLI 343 Introduction to Political Research
POLI 343 Introduction to Political Research Session 3-Positivism and Humanism Lecturer: Prof. A. Essuman-Johnson, Dept. of Political Science Contact Information: aessuman-johnson@ug.edu.gh College of Education
More informationPrimary and Secondary Qualities. John Locke s distinction between primary and secondary qualities of bodies has
Stephen Lenhart Primary and Secondary Qualities John Locke s distinction between primary and secondary qualities of bodies has been a widely discussed feature of his work. Locke makes several assertions
More informationCan Rationality Be Naturalistically Explained? Jeffrey Dunn. Abstract: Dan Chiappe and John Vervaeke (1997) conclude their article, Fodor,
Can Rationality Be Naturalistically Explained? Jeffrey Dunn Abstract: Dan Chiappe and John Vervaeke (1997) conclude their article, Fodor, Cherniak and the Naturalization of Rationality, with an argument
More information1/8. Leibniz on Force
1/8 Leibniz on Force Last time we looked at the ways in which Leibniz provided a critical response to Descartes Principles of Philosophy and this week we are going to see two of the principal consequences
More informationReligion and Party Politics in the West
Religion and Party Politics in the West Zsolt Enyedi (enyedizs@ceu.edu) Department of Political Science Central European University Winter semester 2016-17 (2 credits, 4 ECTS credits) Class meetings: Wednesdays,
More informationDISCUSSION THE GUISE OF A REASON
NADEEM J.Z. HUSSAIN DISCUSSION THE GUISE OF A REASON The articles collected in David Velleman s The Possibility of Practical Reason are a snapshot or rather a film-strip of part of a philosophical endeavour
More informationWell-Being, Disability, and the Mere-Difference Thesis. Jennifer Hawkins Duke University
This paper is in the very early stages of development. Large chunks are still simply detailed outlines. I can, of course, fill these in verbally during the session, but I apologize in advance for its current
More informationChoosing Rationally and Choosing Correctly *
Choosing Rationally and Choosing Correctly * Ralph Wedgwood 1 Two views of practical reason Suppose that you are faced with several different options (that is, several ways in which you might act in a
More information