Is Negative Corpus Really a Corpse? John W. Reis, of Smith Moore Leatherwood P: E:

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Is Negative Corpus Really a Corpse? John W. Reis, of Smith Moore Leatherwood P: E:"

Transcription

1 Is Negative Corpus Really a Corpse? John W. Reis, of Smith Moore Leatherwood P: E:

2 What is Negative Corpus? Twist on corpus delicti. In crime cases, corpus delicti is the Latin term for the body of a crime. In cases of no body or instrumentality fire investigators developed a shorthand of negative corpus to describe the process of elimination to establish the cause. The term has been used to establish the theory of a fire that remains after eliminating other theories, e.g., incendiary or accidental.

3 Corpus Delicti

4 What is the Negative Corpus Problem? The problem is not in the name. The problem is in the less than rigorous application of the theory of elimination. Some fire investigators have given the term a bad name by simply eliminating causes other than arson and then, ispso facto, concluding it must have been arson since they can t say it was anything else.

5 I Know This is Hard to Believe

6 2011 Change to NFPA * Inappropriate Use of the Process of Elimination. The process of determining the ignition source for a fire, by eliminating all ignition sources found, known, or believed to have been present in the area of origin, and then claiming such methodology is proof of an ignition source for which there is no evidence of its existence, is referred to by some investigators as negative corpus. Negative corpus has typically been used in classifying fires as incendiary, although the process has also been used to characterize fires classified as accidental. This process is not consistent with the Scientific Method, is inappropriate, and should not be used because it generates un-testable hypotheses, and may result in incorrect determinations of the ignition source and first fuel ignited. Any hypothesis formulated for the causal factors (e.g., first fuel, ignition source, and ignition sequence), must be based on facts. Those facts are derived from evidence, observations, calculations, experiments, and the laws of science. Speculative information cannot be included in the analysis.

7 Does this mean process of elimination is inappropriate? Can we no longer use process of elimination to prove a fact that cannot be physically uncovered? How will we ever prove what we have proved for years? Who took the cookie from the cookie jar? Assume only I was in the house for two days. Assume the cookies are gone from the cookie jar. Assume I defend myself on grounds that is her burden of proof and she has no evidence that I ate those cookies. Will NFPA 921 be my saving grace?

8 2014 Another NFPA Change Introduction: The 2014 edition is the first NFPA Code or Standard document to be published in color. The color photographs greatly enhance the effectiveness of the document, and no chapter will exemplify this change more than the Fire Patterns chapter. Now, the contrast and color changes are much more clearly visible. Also, there has been a lot of debate and discussion in the fire investigation community concerning negative corpus since it was addressed in the 2011 edition, and the committee has added information to better clarify the actual intent. Before showing you that change, let s discuss a case that hits close to home.

9 Recent Negative Corpus Case Manuel v. MDOW Insurance Company (8 th Cir. AK June 29, 2015) Fire of 9/14/11 to the West Helena, Arkansas home of Kirk Manuel while he and his family were on vacation in Las Vegas, NV. Rick Eley investigated for Manuel s insurer and was able to eliminate all causes but one: arson. MDOW denied the claim and Manuel sued for breach of contract. At trial, Manuel s lawyer attacked Eley for having used negative corpus in his analysis.

10 Manuel Case Court opinion noted that defense attorney vigorously attacked Eley, referring heavily to 921, 2011 Edition: Counsel for Manuel questioned Eley extensively about his methods, comparing them to those detailed in the National Fire Protection Association 921 Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations (NFPA 921). Counsel noted that NFPA 921 recommends against using a negative corpus method, which involves eliminating all ignition sources found, known, or believed to have been present in the area of origin to prove the fire was set intentionally. NFPA (2011). Eley insisted that everything he did was scientific, and it followed NFPA 921.

11 Manuel Case But Eley also disagreed with some parts of NFPA 921, including its description of negative corpus: And what I believe negative corpus would be is if I came into this room and all I had was the light fixtures and the switches and things like that, I did not have a chance to talk to the owner or the last person in, and just from just looking around and saying, well, I don t see anything that could have caused it, well, boom, you know, that in my mind might be negative corpus. On the other hand, if you do a physical examination of everything in the area where the fire started and you can t find anything in that area that shows evidence that it caused a fire, and then I m able to talk to the owner, like Mr. Manuel, or whoever the last person was in the house at the time of the fire, and they gave me all the information that I ve talked about already from him, that nothing was on, there was no problems, nothing stored in the house of a flammable nature, I believe that goes beyond the negative corpus That additional human element, Eley posited, led him to the only possible conclusion: The fire had been intentionally set.

12 Manuel case Jury found against Manuel and for MDOW. Manuel filed a motion for new trial on two main grounds Implied bias of the jurors in that many knew him or his witnesses and were even related as cousins. Eley s use of negative corpus. Court rejected the implied juror bias theory. How do you think the court found as to Eley s use of negative corpus?

13 Manuel case Following NFPA 921 is not the only method of fire investigation that we have approved. But if an expert purports to have followed NFPA 921, he must have followed it reliably, or his testimony may be excluded. During direct examination, Eley did not acknowledge NFPA 921 nor did he say he followed it. Counsel for Manuel first mentioned NFPA 921 on cross examination and asked Eley whether he followed NFPA 921. Eley responded that his method was scientific, and it followed NFPA 921. But Eley also testified that he considered NFPA 921 a guide and not accurate in every case.

14 How is it sounding so far?

15 Manuel Case He [Eley] explained that his method of investigating this fire was not negative corpus as NFPA 921 defines it. Instead, he conducted a physical examination of everything in the area where the fire started and then talked to Manuel. Manuel told Eley that nothing was on, there was no problems, nothing stored in the house of a flammable nature. It was only with Manuel s added information, Eley testified, that he was able to conclude that the fire was incendiary.

16 Manuel Case We have some concern about Eley s testimony. On direct examination, he did not say that he followed NFPA 921 when conducting his investigation; but later, on cross examination he said that his investigation did follow that guide. Eley also testified at trial that he disagreed with the NFPA 921 definition of negative corpus and said he did not apply negative corpus methodology as he understood it. He then proceeded to supply his own definition of negative corpus, as well as a description of why he believed the methodology he used in the investigation of the Manuel fire was not negative corpus. But the only difference Eley gave between NFPA 921 s description of negative corpus and his own applied method was the human element of speaking to Manuel about the condition of his home before he had left for Las Vegas. And Manuel told Eley only that no appliances were left on and nothing flammable was left in the house, allowing Eley to eliminate those additional potential sources of the fire s origin. Viewed in this way, the additional information Eley relied on does not go[] beyond the negative corpus as 2015 Eley Smith Moore purported. Leatherwood LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

17 Is Eley in the Negative? Court is saying Eley applied negative corpus, the forbidden thing. And they didn t like that he questioned 921. Does not sound too good for Eley, does it?

18 Manuel Case But even with these concerns, the admission of Eley s testimony did not amount to plain error for two reasons. First, Eley determined the origin of the fire based on his observations at the scene and nearly 40 years of experience investigating fires. We have held that an expert may base his final determination of a fire s cause on those two factors. Eley testified that after speaking with Manuel, he examined the house while taking photographs of the damage. He determined that the area of origin was in the southeast corner of the house near the kitchen where the damage was heaviest because, as he explained, it burns hotter there. It burned longer there, the combustible materials would. The wall studs also were missing, a sign of intense heat; there was oxidation on one side of the stove and refrigerator, suggesting the direction of the flames; and the wiring had melted and shorted. Because Manuel assured Eley that nothing had been left on, there were no problems in the house, and no new appliances were in the home, Eley concluded that the fire had been set intentionally. (citations omitted).

19 Manuel Case Second, despite framing his argument on appeal as one against Eley s expert opinion, Manuel s actual argument is that the jury should not have credited Eley s testimony. Manuel did not object to any part of Eley s testimony describing his methodology, his qualifications as an expert witness, or his observations and ultimate conclusions. Instead, Manuel chose to cross examine Eley by pointing out possible inconsistencies between the methods Eley used and what NFPA 921 prescribes. In particular, the jury heard how Eley defined negative corpus and that his definition differed from that in NFPA 921. It is possible the jury could have found that Eley s definition was no different than the NFPA 921 definition, that he improperly applied negative corpus methodology, and that MDOW had failed to offer any evidence that the fire was intentional.

20 Manuel Case That is likely the result Manuel had in mind when adopting his strategy of challenging Eley s testimony through cross examination rather than a motion to exclude his expert testimony. Yet despite the vigorous cross examination, the jury apparently credited Eley s testimony sufficiently to find in favor of MDOW. Thus, even if Eley s conclusion regarding the source of the fire was improper under NFPA 921 s definition of negative corpus, we cannot conclude that allowing his testimony, without any objection from Manuel, prejudiced Manuel and thus constituted plain error.

21 Plain Error Plain error standard was key. Defendant never filed a Daubert motion. Defendant s only challenge was live at trial. This was the very thing Daubert was written to prevent. Why do you think defense counsel did not file a Daubert motion? Why do you think he didn t object to any part of Eley s testimony describing his methodology, his qualifications as an expert witness, or his observations and ultimate conclusions?

22 Questioning NFPA 921 Was Eley right to question 921? Was Eley s conclusion regarding the source of the fire improper under NFPA 921 s definition of negative corpus? Trial apparently took place in 2014 Would this decision have been different if the 2014 change to 921 had been considered?

23 2014 Change to NFPA * Appropriate Use. The process of elimination is an integral part of the scientific method. Alternative hypotheses should be considered and challenged against the facts. Elimination of a testable hypothesis by disproving the hypothesis with reliable evidence is a fundamental part of the scientific method. However, the process of elimination can be used inappropriately. The process of determining the ignition source for a fire, by eliminating all ignition sources found, known, or believed to have been present in the area of origin, and then claiming such methodology is proof of an ignition source for which there is no supporting evidence of its existence, is referred to by some investigators as negative corpus. Negative corpus has typically been used in classifying fires as incendiary, although the process has also been used to characterize fires classified as accidental. This process is not consistent with the scientific method, is inappropriate, and should not be used because it generates untestable hypotheses, and may result in incorrect determinations of the ignition source and first fuel ignited. Any hypotheses formulated for the causal factors (e.g., first fuel, ignition source, and ignition sequence), must be based on the analysis of facts. Those facts are derived from evidence, observations, calculations, experiments, and the laws of science. Speculative information cannot be included in the analysis.

24 2014 Change to NFPA Cause Undetermined. In the circumstance where all hypothesized fire causes have been eliminated and the investigator is left with no hypothesis that is evidenced by the facts of the investigation, the only choice for the investigator is to conclude that the fire cause, or specific causal factors, remains undetermined. It is improper to base hypotheses on the absence of any supportive evidence. That is, it is improper to opine a specific fire cause, ignition source, fuel or cause classification that has no evidence to support it even though all other such hypothesized elements were eliminated.

25 New NFPA 921 They are making clear that the process of elimination is alive and well. You just have to develop the evidence. But what about absent evidence? Can evidence that should be there but isn t serve as evidence. That is, if something is missing that should not be missing, is that, itself, evidence? Think of the missing cookies. NFPA 921 provides us tools to get to yes.

26 NFPA 921 and Use of Evidence You have likely heard of direct evidence and circumstantial evidence. Direct Witness testimony that it is not raining Circumstantial Man enters house with dry umbrella Your case of the missing cookies is purely circumstantial. NFPA 921 does not use those terms. Neither do courts.

27 Courts and Use of Evidence 8 th Circuit Model Civil Jury Instructions, Preliminary Instructions for Use at Commencement of Trial, 1.4 EXPLANATORY: EVIDENCE; LIMITATIONS. Some of you may have heard the terms direct evidence and circumstantial evidence. You should not be concerned with those terms, since the law makes no distinction between the weight to be given to direct and circumstantial evidence. Criminal instruction 1.3 is identical

28 NFPA 921 and Use of Evidence NFPA also makes no distinction between direct evidence and circumstantial evidence. NFPA 921 talks of evidence in the Chapter on Legal Considerations What chapter is that in NFPA 921?

29 Chapter Types of Evidence. There are basically three types of evidence, all of which in some manner relate to fire investigations. They are demonstrative evidence, documentary evidence, and testimonial evidence. They are described in detail in , , and Demonstrative Evidence: tangible items as distinguished from testimony (includes physical evidence and photographs) Documentary evidence includes documents Testimonial evidence includes lay witnesses and experts

30 What Type of Evidence Is This?

31 Evidence Not Otherwise Discussed NFPA 921 does not get deep into the law or rules of evidence or evaluation of the types. It gets deep into the scientific method. The key to understanding the proper use of the process of elimination is not to focus on the type of evidence, but to understand the need to gather all types of data. Even missing data can be data. That is the key to the scientific method, as we seen in these flow charts from NFPA 921.

32 The Scientific Method 4.3

33 NFPA 18.2 Origin analysis

34 NFPA 19.2 Cause analysis

35 Absent Evidence Consider absent ignition sources!

36 Recovering Your Ability to Make the Case

37 Absent Evidence If a thing is missing that should be there, is that evidence, or data? If the cookies are no longer in the cookie jar, but I was the only one in the house, is that data? NFPA Chapter 24, on Incendiary Fires, has tools to get you to yes.

38 NFPA 921, Chapter 24 Several provisions highlighting missing items as important evidence in the process of elimination in incendiary fire case Lack of Expected Fuel Load or Ignition Sources Removal or Replacement of Contents Prior to the Fire Absence of Personal Items Prior to the Fire

39 NFPA 921, Chapter 24 Other factors Trailers Unusual Fuel Load or Configuration Burn Injuries Incendiary Devices Delay Devices Presence of Ignitible Liquids in Area of Origin Assessment of Fire Growth and Fire Damage Remote Locations with View Blocked or Obscured Fires Near Service Equipment and Appliances Entry Blocked or Obstructed Sabotage to the Structure or Fire Protection Systems Damage to Fire-Resistive Assemblies

40 NFPA 921, Chapter Open Windows and Exterior Doors Evidence of Other Crimes, Crime Concealment Indications of Financial Stress Existing or History of Code Violations Owner with Fires at Other Properties Overinsurance Timed Opportunity Fires During Severe Natural Conditions Fires During Civil Unrest Fire Department Unavailable * Motives for Firesetting Behavior. (1) Vandalism (2) Excitement (3) Revenge (4) Crime concealment (5) Profit (6) Extremism

41 Is Negative Corpus Really Dead? Use of the term is, or should be. Not wise to use it. Not wise to blatantly disagree with 921 about it. Use what is in 921 to your advantage Although the term is dead, the process of elimination has not been eliminated.

42 Bottom Line Don t be like Larry and Richard in Weekend at Bernie s If you just pretend negative corpus is not dead, you won t believe what will happen to you.

43

44 Questions? John W. Reis, of Smith Moore Leatherwood P: E:

The State s Case. 1. Why did fire investigators believe the cause of the fire wasn t accidental?

The State s Case. 1. Why did fire investigators believe the cause of the fire wasn t accidental? The State s Case Directions: Complete the questions below as you watch Chapter 2: The State s Case from the FRONTLINE film Death by Fire. Then discuss the questions that follow with your group. As soon

More information

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia SECOND DIVISION DOYLE, C. J., MILLER, P. J., and REESE, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely

More information

Of Mice and Men Mock Trial Expert Witness Packet

Of Mice and Men Mock Trial Expert Witness Packet Of Mice and Men Mock Trial Expert Witness Packet Responsibilities: You will review the activity and the perspectives we learned and discussed when we asked whether we trusted people to decide whether a

More information

GENERAL DEPOSITION GUIDELINES

GENERAL DEPOSITION GUIDELINES GENERAL DEPOSITION GUIDELINES AN ORAL DEPOSITION IS SWORN TESTIMONY TAKEN AND RECORDED BEFORE TRIAL. The purpose is to discover facts, obtain leads to other evidence, preserve testimony of an witness who

More information

I Don't Believe in God I Believe in Science

I Don't Believe in God I Believe in Science I Don't Believe in God I Believe in Science This seems to be a common world view that many people hold today. It is important that when we look at statements like this we spend a proper amount of time

More information

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2006

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2006 TAYLOR, J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2006 ANDRE LEON LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D05-1958 [ June 21, 2006 ] Andre Lewis appeals

More information

Seth Penalver v. State of Florida

Seth Penalver v. State of Florida The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JOHN MOSLEY Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL NO. C-150627 TRIAL NO. 15CRB-25900 JUDGMENT

More information

1 EVALUATING CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE

1 EVALUATING CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE 1 EVALUATING CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE In this paper, we study something called corroborative evidence. A typical example would be a case where a witness saw the accused leaving a crime scene, and physical

More information

COACHING THE BASICS: WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT?

COACHING THE BASICS: WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT? COACHING THE BASICS: WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT? Some people think that engaging in argument means being mad at someone. That s one use of the word argument. In debate we use a far different meaning of the term.

More information

Daniel Lugo v. State of Florida SC

Daniel Lugo v. State of Florida SC The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

More information

Being a Scientist. A year 1 scientist. Working scientifically (Y1 and Y2) Physics. Biology. Chemistry

Being a Scientist. A year 1 scientist. Working scientifically (Y1 and Y2) Physics. Biology. Chemistry A year 1 scientist (Y1 and Y2) I can ask simple scientific questions. I can use simple equipment to make observations. I can carry out simple tests. I can identify and classify things. I can suggest what

More information

TESTIMONY FROM YOUR OWN WITNESSES: DIRECT EXAMINATION STRATEGIES

TESTIMONY FROM YOUR OWN WITNESSES: DIRECT EXAMINATION STRATEGIES TESTIMONY FROM YOUR OWN WITNESSES: DIRECT EXAMINATION STRATEGIES JAMES L. MITCHELL Payne Mitchell Law Group 2911 Turtle Creek Blvd, Suite 1400 Dallas, Texas 75219 214/252-1888 214/252-1889 (fax) jim@paynemitchell.com

More information

AN ECCLESIASTICAL POLICY AND A PROCESS FOR REVIEW OF MINISTERIAL STANDING of the AMERICAN BAPTIST CHURCHES OF NEBRASKA PREAMBLE:

AN ECCLESIASTICAL POLICY AND A PROCESS FOR REVIEW OF MINISTERIAL STANDING of the AMERICAN BAPTIST CHURCHES OF NEBRASKA PREAMBLE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 AN ECCLESIASTICAL POLICY AND A PROCESS FOR REVIEW OF MINISTERIAL STANDING of

More information

EXPOSING THE MONSTER: EFFECTIVE CROSS-EXAMINATION

EXPOSING THE MONSTER: EFFECTIVE CROSS-EXAMINATION EXPOSING THE MONSTER: EFFECTIVE CROSS-EXAMINATION No one has instructed more articulately or entertainingly on the subject of cross examination than Irving Younger. No paper written on cross-examination

More information

They were all accompanied outside the house, from that moment on nobody entered again.

They were all accompanied outside the house, from that moment on nobody entered again. TRIBUNALE DI PERUGIA CORTE D ASSISE, HEARING OF 7 FEBRUARY 2009 Confrontation in Court between Inspector Michele and Luca whose testimonies differed on whether the former entered the room of Meredith Kercher

More information

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2010

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2010 STEVENSON, J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2010 MICHAEL A. WOLFE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D07-4555 [May 12, 2010] A jury convicted

More information

Sabbatical, Study and Services Leaves for Pastors

Sabbatical, Study and Services Leaves for Pastors Sabbatical, Study and Services Leaves for Pastors Why should a pastor take a leave? Sabbatical, study and service leaves for pastors are good for the pastor, good for the congregation, and good for the

More information

Some Final Thoughts on Rapture Theories Sam A. Smith

Some Final Thoughts on Rapture Theories Sam A. Smith Some Final Thoughts on Rapture Theories Sam A. Smith [This is the fourth in a series of four papers on the problems of pretribulationism. It draws heavily on conclusions presented in the previous three

More information

Ethics is subjective.

Ethics is subjective. Introduction Scientific Method and Research Ethics Ethical Theory Greg Bognar Stockholm University September 22, 2017 Ethics is subjective. If ethics is subjective, then moral claims are subjective in

More information

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas Opinion issued May 26, 2011 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-10-00680-CR JOSE SORTO JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 412th District Court

More information

COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD. Docket # 1850 DECISION

COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD. Docket # 1850 DECISION COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD Sheriff of Cook County vs. Jacquelyn G. Anderson Cook County Deputy Sheriff Docket # 1850 DECISION THIS MATTER COMING ON to be heard pursuant to notice, the Cook County

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 07-349 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CHARLES GREGORY ANDRUS, AKA ROBERT CHARLES ANDRUS, AKA CHARLES GEORGE ANDRUS, AKA CHARLES

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION. Liquor License Appeal of Citation Notice to Bar- 40 Pa.Code 5.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION. Liquor License Appeal of Citation Notice to Bar- 40 Pa.Code 5. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION JENNY S TAVERN, INC., Appellant v. No. 09-1453 PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT, Appellee Donald G.

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Argued October 3, 2017 Decided November

More information

The Principle of Sufficient Reason and Free Will

The Principle of Sufficient Reason and Free Will Stance Volume 3 April 2010 The Principle of Sufficient Reason and Free Will ABSTRACT: I examine Leibniz s version of the Principle of Sufficient Reason with respect to free will, paying particular attention

More information

Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 5d God

Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 5d God Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 5d God No clickers today. 2 quizzes Wednesday. Don t be late or you will miss the first one! Turn in your Nammour summaries today. No credit for late ones. According to

More information

or did not happen. Some questions of fact are easily answered. These include the many

or did not happen. Some questions of fact are easily answered. These include the many Chapter 19: The Persuasive Speech Motivational Principles Questions of Fact Questions of fact concern what is or is not true, what does or does not exist, what did or did not happen. Some questions of

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellee : : v. : : JUSTIN JAMES ROZNOWSKI, : : Appellant : No. 1857 WDA

More information

Third, true prophecy is infallible. Whatever God spoke through His prophets was error-free and utterly unaffected by human fallibility.

Third, true prophecy is infallible. Whatever God spoke through His prophets was error-free and utterly unaffected by human fallibility. Grace to You :: Unleashing God's Truth, One Verse at a Time Prophecy Redefined Scripture: Deuteronomy 18:2022 Code: B140312 In episode 215 of Ask Pastor John, Dr. Piper gets to the crux of the cessationist-continuationist

More information

Argument Visualization Tools for Corroborative Evidence

Argument Visualization Tools for Corroborative Evidence 1 Argument Visualization Tools for Corroborative Evidence Douglas Walton University of Windsor, Windsor ON N9B 3Y1, Canada E-mail: dwalton@uwindsor.ca Artificial intelligence and argumentation studies

More information

Trying to Kill the Dead: De Dicto and De Re Intention in Attempted Crimes. By Gideon Yaffe. Introduction

Trying to Kill the Dead: De Dicto and De Re Intention in Attempted Crimes. By Gideon Yaffe. Introduction Trying to Kill the Dead: De Dicto and De Re Intention in Attempted Crimes By Gideon Yaffe Introduction Melvin Dlugash, Joe Bush and Michael Geller went drinking together one night. Geller repeatedly demanded

More information

Exposing Biased Testimony On Cross. By Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan

Exposing Biased Testimony On Cross. By Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan Exposing Biased Testimony On Cross By Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan Few things are more enjoyable to a cross examiner than destroying a witness who has intentionally lied during direct examination. Catching

More information

BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY. and MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFF S ASSOCIATION

BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY. and MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFF S ASSOCIATION BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY and MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFF S ASSOCIATION Case 625 No. 67051 (Michalski Grievance) Appearances: Timothy R.

More information

Cross Examination: Exposing a Lie

Cross Examination: Exposing a Lie Cross Examination: Exposing a Lie By Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan Often, the objective in cross examination is two-fold: first, to elicit testimony from the witness that will strengthen your case; and

More information

vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 78,460 STEVEN EDWARD STEIN, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [January 13, 19941 PER CURIAM. Steven Edward Stein appeals his convictions of two counts of first-degree murder and one count

More information

From the Greek Oikos = House Ology = study of

From the Greek Oikos = House Ology = study of Chapter 1 - Introduction to Ecology What is Ecology??? From the Greek Oikos = House Ology = study of Ecology = the study of the relationship between organisms and their environment quite a large area of

More information

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S 14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S 1. Demonstrate the importance of ethics as part of the persuasion process. 2. Identify and provide examples of eight common

More information

Jury Service: Is Fulfilling Your Civic Duty a Trial?

Jury Service: Is Fulfilling Your Civic Duty a Trial? Jury Service: Is Fulfilling Your Civic Duty a Trial? Prepared for: The American Bar Association July 2004 Table of Contents Page Background and Methodology 3 Executive Summary 4 Detailed Findings 7 Respondent

More information

On Humanity and Abortion;Note

On Humanity and Abortion;Note Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Natural Law Forum 1-1-1968 On Humanity and Abortion;Note John O'Connor Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/nd_naturallaw_forum Part of

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT. No. SJC-12274

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT. No. SJC-12274 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT No. SJC-12274 GEORGE CAPLAN and others, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. TOWN OF ACTON, MASSACHUSETTS, inclusive of its instrumentalities and the Community

More information

Testify with Boldness IINTRODUCTION

Testify with Boldness IINTRODUCTION Testify with Boldness Background Passage Gospel of John, Chapter 9 Lesson Passages Gospel of John, Chapter 9:8-11, 13-17, 35-41 Lesson for November 9-10, 2013 Dr. James Patterson IINTRODUCTION I had been

More information

THE THIRTY-SIXTH ANNUAL IOWA HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL TOURNAMENT 2018 STATE OF IOWA DEVIN EMERSON

THE THIRTY-SIXTH ANNUAL IOWA HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL TOURNAMENT 2018 STATE OF IOWA DEVIN EMERSON THE THIRTY-SIXTH ANNUAL IOWA HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL TOURNAMENT 2018 STATE OF IOWA V. DEVIN EMERSON A program of The Iowa State Bar Association Center for Law & Civic Education In cooperation with the Young

More information

Argument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job

Argument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job Argument Writing Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job promotion as well as political and personal decision-making

More information

Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc). Affirmed.

Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc). Affirmed. ACKER v. STATE Cite as 787 So.2d 77 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 2001) Fla. 77 Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc). Affirmed. ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., concur.,

More information

Sample Questions with Explanations for LSAT India

Sample Questions with Explanations for LSAT India Five Sample Logical Reasoning Questions and Explanations Directions: The questions in this section are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one

More information

MEMORANDUM. Teacher/Administrator Rights & Responsibilities

MEMORANDUM. Teacher/Administrator Rights & Responsibilities MEMORANDUM These issue summaries provide an overview of the law as of the date they were written and are for educational purposes only. These summaries may become outdated and may not represent the current

More information

DO NOT GO BEYOND THIS PAGE UNTIL THE EXAM ACTUALLY BEGINS.

DO NOT GO BEYOND THIS PAGE UNTIL THE EXAM ACTUALLY BEGINS. TORTS I PROFESSOR DEWOLF SUMMER 2000 July 7, 2000 MID-TERM EXAM Instructions DO NOT GO BEYOND THIS PAGE UNTIL THE EXAM ACTUALLY BEGINS. THIS IS A CLOSED BOOK EXAM! While you are waiting for the exam to

More information

CLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH

CLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH CLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH I. Challenges to Confirmation A. The Inductivist Turkey B. Discovery vs. Justification 1. Discovery 2. Justification C. Hume's Problem 1. Inductive

More information

FINAL ORDER AND OPINION REVERSING TRIAL COURT. Appellant, Donald Dale Smith, Jr. ( Smith ), timely appeals the trial court s judgment for

FINAL ORDER AND OPINION REVERSING TRIAL COURT. Appellant, Donald Dale Smith, Jr. ( Smith ), timely appeals the trial court s judgment for IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA DONALD DALE SMITH, JR., Appellant, CASE NO.: 2015-AP-00006-A-O Lower Court Case: 2014-MM-012298-A-O v. STATE OF FLORIDA,

More information

PHL340 Handout 8: Evaluating Dogmatism

PHL340 Handout 8: Evaluating Dogmatism PHL340 Handout 8: Evaluating Dogmatism 1 Dogmatism Last class we looked at Jim Pryor s paper on dogmatism about perceptual justification (for background on the notion of justification, see the handout

More information

Panel: Mr. Peter Leaver QC (United Kingdom), President; Mr. Hans Nater (Switzerland); Mr. Olli Rauste (Finland)

Panel: Mr. Peter Leaver QC (United Kingdom), President; Mr. Hans Nater (Switzerland); Mr. Olli Rauste (Finland) Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS ad hoc Division (O.G. Salt Lake City) 02/007, Korean Olympic Committee (KOC) / International Skating Union (ISU), Panel: Mr. Peter

More information

INTELLIGENCE UNDER THE LAW

INTELLIGENCE UNDER THE LAW INTELLIGENCE UNDER THE LAW James B. Comey M Y TOPIC TODAY is Intelligence Under the Law. I want to divide my remarks into two parts: First, I d like to start with a plug for lawyers, in a way you may not

More information

In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. SC

In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. SC Filing # 60657585 E-Filed 08/21/2017 11:11:20 AM In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. SC17-1536 MARK JAMES ASAY, Petitioner, v. RECEIVED, 08/21/2017 11:13:30 AM, Clerk, Supreme Court JULIE L. JONES,

More information

1. Introduction Formal deductive logic Overview

1. Introduction Formal deductive logic Overview 1. Introduction 1.1. Formal deductive logic 1.1.0. Overview In this course we will study reasoning, but we will study only certain aspects of reasoning and study them only from one perspective. The special

More information

Thomas Lee Gudinas v. State of Florida

Thomas Lee Gudinas v. State of Florida The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

More information

Guidelines for Handling Abuse Allegations against a Church Leader. A. Why a Procedure for Handling Abuse Allegations Is Necessary

Guidelines for Handling Abuse Allegations against a Church Leader. A. Why a Procedure for Handling Abuse Allegations Is Necessary Guidelines for Handling Abuse Allegations against a Church Leader Note: Following is a consolidation of guidelines that CRC Synods have adopted over time, as a supplement to the Church Order, to equip

More information

Commentary on Professor Tweyman's 'Hume on Evil' Pheroze S. Wadia Hume Studies Volume XIII, Number 1 (April, 1987)

Commentary on Professor Tweyman's 'Hume on Evil' Pheroze S. Wadia Hume Studies Volume XIII, Number 1 (April, 1987) Commentary on Professor Tweyman's 'Hume on Evil' Pheroze S. Wadia Hume Studies Volume XIII, Number 1 (April, 1987) 104-112. Your use of the HUME STUDIES archive indicates your acceptance of HUME STUDIES

More information

THE VITAL IMPORTANCE OF CHRISTIAN EVIDENCE

THE VITAL IMPORTANCE OF CHRISTIAN EVIDENCE THE VITAL IMPORTANCE OF CHRISTIAN EVIDENCE Christianity appeals to the intellect. The Bible repeatedly urges us to seek knowledge and wisdom from God, and to flee ignorance and superstition. Jesus told

More information

FORENSIC SCIENCE vs. JUNK SCIENCE WHAT S THE DIFFERENCE?

FORENSIC SCIENCE vs. JUNK SCIENCE WHAT S THE DIFFERENCE? FORENSIC SCIENCE vs. JUNK SCIENCE WHAT S THE DIFFERENCE? WISCONSIN SPD S S ANNUAL CRIMINAL DEFENSE CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 3, 2010 Mark A. Satawa KIRSCH & SATAWA, PC Examining Forensic Science Take this handkerchief

More information

EVALUATING CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE. Douglas Walton Department of Philosophy, University of Winnipeg, Canada

EVALUATING CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE. Douglas Walton Department of Philosophy, University of Winnipeg, Canada EVALUATING CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE Douglas Walton Department of Philosophy, University of Winnipeg, Canada Chris Reed School of Computing, University of Dundee, UK In this paper, we study something called

More information

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 1, 2006 98719 ERNEST L. et al., Individually and as Parents and Guardians of NATASHA L., an Infant,

More information

William Kramer, Code Enforcement Officer Catherine Wood, Secretary

William Kramer, Code Enforcement Officer Catherine Wood, Secretary PRESENT: John Spooner, Chairman Absent: Mike Campanella, Vice Chairman John Pagliaccio Frank Wilton Mary (Molly) Flynn At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of East Aurora, New York,

More information

Without salvation we are unprepared to face our own trial much less anyone else s.

Without salvation we are unprepared to face our own trial much less anyone else s. Session 8 Supreme Court of Heaven Series Presenting Cases in Heaven s Courts I. Presenting Cases in the Court A. Pre-trial 1. Self-Evaluation i. Born Again 1 Corinthians 2:14 But a natural man does not

More information

Standard Terminology for Expressing Conclusions of Forensic Document Examiners

Standard Terminology for Expressing Conclusions of Forensic Document Examiners Standard Terminology for Expressing Conclusions of Forensic Document Examiners 1. Scope 1.1 This terminology is intended to assist forensic document examiners in expressing conclusions or opinions based

More information

1. From whom have you sought advice? Why have you chosen this person? JAMES 1: What should our response to trials be?

1. From whom have you sought advice? Why have you chosen this person? JAMES 1: What should our response to trials be? Week of January 15 Blessed is the man who remains steadfast under trial, for when he has stood the test he will receive the crown of life, which God has promised to those who love him (James 1:12). One

More information

Powell v. Portland School District. Chronology

Powell v. Portland School District. Chronology Powell v. Portland School District Chronology October 15, 1996 During school hours, a Boy Scout troop leader is allowed to speak to Harvey Scott Elementary school students, encouraging them to join the

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY. : O P I N I O N - vs - 8/17/2009 :

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY. : O P I N I O N - vs - 8/17/2009 : [Cite as State v. Johnson, 2009-Ohio-4129.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2008-06-153 : O P I N I O N - vs -

More information

What We Believe and Why. Study & Teacher Guide

What We Believe and Why. Study & Teacher Guide What We Believe and Why Study & Teacher Guide What We Believe and Why is typically used in a few different ways: by an individual as a way to understand the Christian faith in an organized and deeper way,

More information

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00457-CR Bernard Malli, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 3013458,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CR-0-2027-JF ) 5 Plaintiff, ) ) San Jose, CA 6 vs. ) October 2, 200 ) 7 ROGER VER, ) ) 8

More information

Succession Planning By Sylvan Knobloch, Church Health and Staff Development March 7, 2016

Succession Planning By Sylvan Knobloch, Church Health and Staff Development March 7, 2016 Succession Planning By Sylvan Knobloch, Church Health and Staff Development March 7, 2016 Chuck Swindoll, at age 91, said he would consider it a privilege to die while preaching, collapsing from a heart

More information

With prompting and support, identify the reasons an author gives to support points in a text.

With prompting and support, identify the reasons an author gives to support points in a text. Big Idea: Reading for Argumentation ANCHOR STANDARD: Reading #8 HANDOUT TWO Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the validity of the reasoning as well as the relevancy

More information

PROOF CHRISTIANITY IS TRUE. Download free ebook at

PROOF CHRISTIANITY IS TRUE. Download free ebook at PROOF CHRISTIANITY IS TRUE Download free ebook at www.callup.org/proof Correspondence view of truth. The correspondence view is the correct view. This view states that truth is that which corresponds to

More information

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because. Common Topics for Literary and Cultural Analysis: What kinds of topics are good ones? The best topics are ones that originate out of your own reading of a work of literature. Here are some common approaches

More information

On The Holy Scriptures

On The Holy Scriptures According to 2 Timothy 3:16-17: All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete,

More information

Unit. Science and Hypothesis. Downloaded from Downloaded from Why Hypothesis? What is a Hypothesis?

Unit. Science and Hypothesis. Downloaded from  Downloaded from  Why Hypothesis? What is a Hypothesis? Why Hypothesis? Unit 3 Science and Hypothesis All men, unlike animals, are born with a capacity "to reflect". This intellectual curiosity amongst others, takes a standard form such as "Why so-and-so is

More information

Based on the translation by E. M. Edghill, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak.

Based on the translation by E. M. Edghill, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak. On Interpretation By Aristotle Based on the translation by E. M. Edghill, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak. First we must define the terms 'noun' and 'verb', then the terms 'denial' and 'affirmation',

More information

United States v. John W. Hinckley Jr. (1982)

United States v. John W. Hinckley Jr. (1982) Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review Law Reviews 1-1-2000 United States v. John W. Hinckley

More information

Guide Reading Monster Group Guide Readin

Guide Reading Monster Group Guide Readin Reading Reading Group Group Guide Reading Guide Grou Guide Reading Monster Group Guide Readin Guide Reading By Walter Group Dean Myers Guide Readin Guide Illustrated Reading by Christopher Group Guide

More information

Ordination Procedures

Ordination Procedures Ordination Procedures Motion for Licensing & Ordaining Ministers All ministers must be licensed or ordained. Both of these are cultural practices to signify the individual s calling by God and the church

More information

John Locke. British Empiricism

John Locke. British Empiricism John Locke British Empiricism Locke Biographical Notes: Locke is credited as the founder of the British "Common Sense" movement, later known as empiricism - he was also the founder of the modern political

More information

Truth and Evidence in Validity Theory

Truth and Evidence in Validity Theory Journal of Educational Measurement Spring 2013, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 110 114 Truth and Evidence in Validity Theory Denny Borsboom University of Amsterdam Keith A. Markus John Jay College of Criminal Justice

More information

Self-Evidence and A Priori Moral Knowledge

Self-Evidence and A Priori Moral Knowledge Self-Evidence and A Priori Moral Knowledge Colorado State University BIBLID [0873-626X (2012) 33; pp. 459-467] Abstract According to rationalists about moral knowledge, some moral truths are knowable a

More information

KILLER CROSS-EXAMINATION

KILLER CROSS-EXAMINATION KILLER CROSS-EXAMINATION Presented by LightStream Communications At Church of the Redeemer 200 Pennswood Road Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania 19010 Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:30 a.m. 1:00 p.m. (Registration

More information

On Interpretation. Section 1. Aristotle Translated by E. M. Edghill. Part 1

On Interpretation. Section 1. Aristotle Translated by E. M. Edghill. Part 1 On Interpretation Aristotle Translated by E. M. Edghill Section 1 Part 1 First we must define the terms noun and verb, then the terms denial and affirmation, then proposition and sentence. Spoken words

More information

ASA below 40 and DIS 40 Seminar

ASA below 40 and DIS 40 Seminar ASA below 40 and DIS 40 Seminar Cross-Examining Witnesses: A Practical Toolbox Zurich, 4 April 2008 Reza Mohtashami, Paris Stage One Strategic and preparatory work Stage one: case theory Formulate a case

More information

Punishment at all Costs: On Religion, Convicting the Innocent, and Supporting the Death Penalty

Punishment at all Costs: On Religion, Convicting the Innocent, and Supporting the Death Penalty William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal Volume 9 Issue 1 Article 14 Punishment at all Costs: On Religion, Convicting the Innocent, and Supporting the Death Penalty Robert L. Young Repository Citation Robert

More information

Chapter 3 Disputes and Definitions

Chapter 3 Disputes and Definitions Logic: A Brief Introduction Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University Chapter 3 Disputes and Definitions 3.1 Disputes I: Attitudes and Beliefs At this point we must deal with one more consequence that the recognition

More information

Wears Valley Ranch Mentor Application Process

Wears Valley Ranch Mentor Application Process Wears Valley Ranch Mentor Application Process Step One: Fill out and submit the application Thank you for your interest in serving the Lord at Wears Valley Ranch. In order to help us get to know you better,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Plaintiff, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, et al., Defendant. 88 Civ. 4486 (DNE) APPLICATION XXII OF THE

More information

Rosalyn Ann Sanders v. State of Florida

Rosalyn Ann Sanders v. State of Florida The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

More information

Creation & necessity

Creation & necessity Creation & necessity Today we turn to one of the central claims made about God in the Nicene Creed: that God created all things visible and invisible. In the Catechism, creation is described like this:

More information

Moving Members into Ministry. Chuck Lawless. Maybe you know someone like Sam, who attends his church faithfully every

Moving Members into Ministry. Chuck Lawless. Maybe you know someone like Sam, who attends his church faithfully every 1 Moving Members into Ministry by Chuck Lawless Maybe you know someone like Sam, who attends his church faithfully every Sunday but he is not involved in doing ministry through his church. He soaks in

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 1 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AFFINITY WEALTH MANAGEMENT, : INC., a Delaware corporation, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action : No. 5813-VCP STEVEN V. CHANTLER, MATTHEW J. : RILEY

More information

Welcome to the healthcare choice believers can believe in.

Welcome to the healthcare choice believers can believe in. Welcome to the healthcare choice believers can believe in. Your guide to the experience What Is? It s a New Testament Way of Thinking About Healthcare. is a modern-day version of what the church started

More information

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH Richard D. Burbidge (#0492) rburbidge@bmgtrial.com Jefferson W. Gross (#8339) jwgross@bmgtrial.com Aida Neimarlija (#12181) aneimarlija@bmgtrial.com BURBIDGE MITCHELL & GROSS 215 South State Street, Suite

More information

Lesson 1 Welcome. Pour out Your Spirit Lord, I want to be like Jesus I want to be Your servant - Evan Wickham

Lesson 1 Welcome. Pour out Your Spirit Lord, I want to be like Jesus I want to be Your servant - Evan Wickham Lesson 1 Welcome Introduction Pour out Your Spirit Lord, I want to be like Jesus I want to be Your servant - Evan Wickham Welcome to our study of the book of Acts. Written in the pages of this book is

More information

CH501: The Church to the Reformation Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, Charlotte Dr. Don Fairbairn Fall 2014

CH501: The Church to the Reformation Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, Charlotte Dr. Don Fairbairn Fall 2014 CH501: The Church to the Reformation Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, Charlotte Fall 2014 Professor s Contact Information: Email: dfairbairn@gordonconwell.edu Phone: (704) 940-5842 Schedule: The assignments

More information

HONOR CODE. We will strive to build a community based on respect, honesty, and courage.

HONOR CODE. We will strive to build a community based on respect, honesty, and courage. HONOR CODE We will strive to build a community based on respect, honesty, and courage. Table of Contents Mission... 1 Honor Code... 2 Honor System... 3 Values Education... 9 Mission The mission of The

More information