Notebook 2. Thor Fabian Pettersen pages; words.

Transcription

1 Notebook 2. Thor Fabian Pettersen pages; words. Notebook 2 (ebok) Thor Fabian Pettersen (2017) ISBN PREFACE: I have kept my old things for history s sake. Things you read about in this notebook are things from my past and recent past, and I personally do not believe all the things that I once believed. We change and evolve. However, I do believe a great deal of it. Do not take anything you read in this notebook as fact. It is, What if? I do not want to mislead anyone. Do not believe in anything. Keep your mind sharp. Please save this work to your computer so that the material lasts forever. Please share with everyone. It contains the Philosopher s Stone and a novel idea on free energy. It also contains the Holy Grail + Buddha s secret. And so much more. Thank you. 1

2 Me and Lilli. She was one of the few willing to read my free energy work. I dedicate this notebook to her. 2

3 Free energy by Thor Fabian Pettersen, my final work, AUGUST 2017 The hexagon is the key to all understanding. 3

4 101 pages (including front cover); words. This work contains new but mostly older material and it is a mess. And, it is a bit repetitive. Therefore, I dedicate this work to the wine god. This work has been a 10 year long journey into some amazing realms. This work may have inconsistencies, spelling errors and so forth, but I leave it as it is because, in reality, it is just my notebook where I scribble down the thoughts as the form in my brain which is why this work is a bit messy. But, if you read it once or twice, you will get my new notion of free energy, why there is something rather than nothing, and what the real Philosopher s Stone is all about. The inconsistencies occur because your thoughts evolve over time, and then old notions turn out to be false, and then new notions turn out to be false while the older notions were in fact not false and so on. But if you read this work as a journey, then there are no inconsistencies. For example: I thought that the Big Crunch was the final fate of the universe. But I might be wrong. That is, on further inspection, the torusmodel requires the Big Freeze. That is, the torus is a doughnut, not a yoyo! (However, I might be wrong because, in some sense, a yoyo is a torus.) The torus expands and circles around itself, and eventually ends where it began. The exponential expansion of the universe is due to the torus making copies of itself. This is dark energy. Then the copies make copies and we get the exponential function. This rapid baby-flow will increase the size of the torus-balloon, but eventually, the babies end up in the womb again as the torus circles around itself. The babies are stuck in the flow, so they have no choice but to go back from whence they began. The womb is the toroidal core, and there the babies are born again a process we can discuss later. Which means that our universe is eternal yet expanding. That is, the Big Freeze and the Big Bang happen simultaneously. There was an original Big Bang that caused it all, but then the stuff in this gushing fountain found its way back to the source while, simultaneously, new stuff sprang from the source, producing an eternal universe that is non-static. It is finite in scope, yet infinite in duration. How large the universe grows depends on the ratio of baby-making divided by the duration of one complete universal torus rotation. That is, how long it takes for the universal torus to make one complete round 4

5 divided by the scaling and the speed of the cuboctahedron. You see, the cuboctahedron can be scaled like the octaves on your piano (sacred knowledge went into the making of the piano). Which means that the basic building block of matter can be as small as a particle and as large as a universe. Which means that our universe is a basic building block that blew up. The universal torus is the torus that birthed the universe, that is to say, it is a vessel that carries all the other tori. The next round, another torus may birth the universe. And so forth. Update: When did the first Big Bang take place? If the nothingness is fast spin and, it spins so fast as to create a zero-dimensional point and, this point becomes so jammed that the motion is now fighting for a place in the center (in the zero-dimensional point), then, the first Big Bang occurs where the geometry of this tiny whirlpool says that, Sorry, you are not fast enough to be nothingness, you are now something extraordinarily peculiar: you are a space-time. You are a by-product of nothingnessgeneration). Therefore the nothingness has ever spun, the question, When the Big Bang take place? should be replaced by, Where did the Big Bang take place? If the nothingness is a zero-dimensional point, then the eternal spin of the nothingness is not a mystery when, from the point of view of nothingness, there is no motion/spin. Just imagine sitting on a beam of light, if you disagree. And a zero-dimensional point can always exist because it is so simple and contains no infinite regress paradox. No matter how you define Existence or Nonexistence, you end up with a zerodimensional point, so maybe I have answered the question, Why is the universe here? When did the first Big Bang take place? only makes sense if time is real. But time is not real. Time is a survival tool of the animal brain. Our brain makes space-time, just like your Playstation makes the game world as you move in it. Where did the whirlpool that caused the Big Bang come from? It always was. But this is not a problem because the initial state of the nothingness is a zero-dimensional point, and such a point can exist because no matter how you define existence or nonexistence, you are stuck with a point. You could define nonexistence as that which is not a 5

6 zero-dimensional point, but then you end up with something that has an extension. If you say that nonexistence is neither the extension of something nor a zero-dimensional point, then you must define what it means to have this supernatural geometry you have in mind. No. Existence is because a zero-dimensional point is motion, that is, fast moving motion. But how did the motion pick up speed? That is like asking, How did the zero-dimensional point become a zero-dimensional point? You know the answer. The zero-dimensional point always was a zerodimensional point. Likewise, if the fast motion (the nothingness) is the zero-dimensional point, then it does not need to pick up speed. How did the zero-dimensional point become a zero-dimensional point, again? The zero-dimensional point always was a zero-dimensional point because it s like asking, How can a clean slate stay clean? and the answer is, Well, you didn t write on it. But who created the zero-dimensional point? How can it always be? Well, the zero-dimensional point did not need to become a zero-dimensional point therefore becoming requires time and the zero-dimensional point is timeless. And the zero-dimensional point does not need to be created because the zero-dimensional point is eternal: A titan ran so fast that time stopped for him, so... if time has stopped, then he has always been eternal because once you are frozen, then you cannot unfreeze and, if you cannot unfreeze, then you could not be free in order to become frozen in the first place, therefore, if you become frozen, then you have always been frozen. Which means, there is no difference in becoming frozen and having always been frozen. That is, the zero-dimensional point can just be therefore it is eternal, meaning, it was never touched, moved, or what have you. It is existence in isolation. It is what you get when nothing happens, which is a zerodimensional point. But I still don t understand how it can just be? 6

7 It is simple, you can understand if nonexistence always applied, because it would not require much of the total blackness of nonexistence to not exist! If you try to define this state, I believe you would end up with a zero-dimensional point. But here existence comes creeping in because the zero-dimensional point is fast motion. But how can the fast motion always be? We have answered that, it can be the same way that the zero-dimensional point can always be because, the zero-dimensional point does not contain the fast motion, no, the fast motion is the zero-dimensional point! A very different kind of realization. If this can be proven mathematically, then we have a great answer to the biggest question of all, Why is it? But I still don t understand how it can just be? That is true. Even if we knew for certain, existence would still baffle us with its ability to show up. 7

8 A Word Dear Reader, I will say it out loud: I am passionately interested in free energy because it can solve all of our problems and, with children dying each day on our planet, the need for free energy is so great that it boggles the mind that the scientific world claims its impossibility and that the political world does not spend a dollar pursuing free energy, especially in this day and age with Global Warming descending upon us. When I think about all the children we can help with a change in attitude, tears clog my mind! And when I talk to people about it, nobody seems to care. I get very upset. It is not a good place to be in. If I strap a bomb to a child, then the whole wide world would watch! If I say I can save children from dying from starvation each and every day, nobody raises as much as a few eyebrows. The child strapped to a bomb we label ingroup, while the other , we label outgroup. We did not evolve to care for the latter group. Similarly, the label free energy is in the world s outgroup. This must change! A paradigm shift must occur. Free energy has absolutely nothing to do with the infinite. Infinity is hogwash! Scientists say that free energy is impossible because they, for whatever reason, believe that free energy = infinite energy. Energy is always finite. It comes in finite packets. Free energy is resurrected energy. Why the world does not pursue free energy boggles the mind when the man who gave us electricity and the modern world said it was possible! That man is Nikola Tesla. I get angry. I get frustrated. But then the calm voice inside my head tells me it s ok; it says, The reason why the world is not in pursuit of free energy is simple: It is just evolution. The world is an animal that is dependent on the phenomenon of money in order to survive. Free energy would effectively kill that money-animal. Thus, the money-animal, who controls the voice of politics, science and etc., will ridicule and cull the meme free energy at any cost in order to survive. It is all simple. 8

9 Another idea which the gods pressed upon my brain was that, evolution is not really about survival. Evolution is about recreation. That is, when the cuboctahedron folds, new toruses are created and this happens ad infinitum. You see, this folding of the cuboctahedron (i.e., the pumping mechanism of the cuboctahedron/torus) is all there ever was and all there ever will be. Nature cannot become something she is not. Nature is the cuboctahedron, therefore, she cannot become a different animal. If the cuboctahedron which is the black heart of nothingness whence we all came is all there is, then evolution is not about survival. Nature is all about breathing (i.e., the pumping mechanism of the cuboctahedron/torus), which is an act of recreation or resurrection. Nevertheless, is not this grand word resurrection just another word for survival? No. The difference is day and night: Tell me, Wittgenstein s asked a friend, why do people always say, it was natural for man to assume that the sun went round the earth rather than that the earth was rotating? His friend replied, Well, obviously because it just looks as though the Sun is going round the Earth. Wittgenstein replied, Well, what would it have looked like if it had looked as though the Earth was rotating? Do you see the difference? It looks like evolution is all about survival, but the opposite is true: Evolution is about resurrection, which means that the gods would rather commit suicide and be born again than survive for all eternity. Just like breathing, in order for you to breathe out, you first have to breathe in. Nature is all about breathing because she is the dual torus. Nature is not about survival because she is immortal. But back to free energy: Why does not our sun utilize free energy and burn forever? Why do stars die if free energy is true? This simple observation testifies to the fact of the impossible nature of free energy. Answer: Because free energy happens in the microworld where the toroidal center is so tight that energy fed into it becomes ordered again. On a larger scale, we do not accomplish free energy because of the larger dimensions of the macroworld and this is the reason why our stars die. It is all about geometry. Like in the movie 300 (2006): At the battle of 9

10 Thermopylae, King Leonidas and his brave men defended majestically against a huge Persian army because the topography of the Hot Gates allowed it. Free energy is similar. The tight center of the torus in the microworld allows dead energy to be resurrected; in the macroworld, this terrain is simply not there, and therefore, our suns die. Nevertheless, a sun is a big thing compared to, say, a car. We can harness the power of the microworld and power our cars. Free energy is so simple: The microworld, and thus nature as a whole, cannot die. Professors like Robert W. Koontz says free energy is possible, so it is not that scientists do not believe at all in its possibility. It is more like the money-animal is at work. I want the information out there because it is vital and important information. And YOU are the key to all of it because, without you, the word will not spread. Imagine your power! The power to bring forth a new world. You can find my free energy book (for free, of course!) at this website (zorabia.com) or look up the ISBN number ( ). Please share my free energy book with everyone and store it for the future so that it does not perish. Thank you. Thor Fabian Pettersen 10

11 Introduction: The beginning of time is the nothingness. The nothingness is the dual torus spinning so fast that it generates a frame where time stands still, which means that the nothingness contains all speeds; and, therefore, more speed will not make a difference, that is, the frame cannot become more frozen, as that would not make sense. Because our frame stands still, it means that our frame is immovable, which means that no amount of work can move it, which means that it is so massive that it contains all the mass that can ever be as mass is defined as the resistance to change and, our object will not change. Nothing remains nothing. As we all know, our nothingness here, which contains all speed and all mass, can be converted to energy. E = mc2. Which means that the nothingness contains all the energy in existence. However, there might not be a single drop of energy in the nothingness. If the nothingness is a whirlpool, then energy might be foam in that whirlpool. Further, it might be required of the foam bubbles to work together to accomplish a task in order to call it energy at all. A single bubble might not be called energy. Energy is synergy. Force is the nothingness itself that will keep on moving, that is, keep on being the frame where time stands still, the timelessness. Energy is different; energy is the body of the nothingness itself, that is, the mass and the speed. Again, force is the fact that the dual torus will never slow down therefore there is no object that can slow it down as the dual torus is all there is. 11

12 The dual torus is all there is because there does not exist something beyond the dual torus/nothingness therefore you cannot go beyond a zero-dimensional dot/nothingness as that would entail going beyond the more frozen point; which cannot be done because, when you are frozen, you are immobile; which makes going beyond a hard thing to do. Thus, the force is everlasting. The mass-speed/energy cannot be created nor destroyed. Neither can the force. The nothingness exists because the resistance to change is what it means to have no extension in space and time and, resistance to change is this body of mass and speed. That is, if you had a little less mass and speed, you would get space-time, which is a paradox, that is, you cannot have space and time at the beginning of time. You cannot have time at the beginning of time. Time comes out of the beginning of time. Nothing generates something. In other words, the only way to have a state that is totally black, nothing, neat, clean, and there is no other way, is to have our massive nothingness here. Nevertheless, that does not explain why it exists, you say. Yes, it does. You cannot have a nonexistence that is both zero-dimensional and speed-less. There was obviously no space-time at the beginning of time, as that would be paradoxical, namely, Where did the space-time come from? You cannot say that of the nothingness because the nothingness has no dimension which can form the notion of from. Rather, we can ask, How can nothingness just exist? And the answer would be something like, How can a dot that has no extension exist? One way to answer it would be, It is so simple, it can just exist. Another, It has no structure that can keep it from just existing, that is, it is formless, that is, zero-dimensional. I opt for the latter because formlessness is movement and movement is the reason why we are here. Therefore, we have answered the Big question. Ok. So, how came the universe and how is free energy possible? The dual torus is the manifestation of formlessness, read Buckminster Fuller, and formlessness is timelessness (no form, no clock) is nothingness (i.e., no extension) is the beginning of time. That is, at the beginning of 12

13 time we have the dual torus. This torus spins so fast that it generates nothingness, but because it does spin, it must create a net, which is essentially a whirlpool where the center is the fastest part, and this center is the nothingness. That is, you cannot have the whole whirlpool spinning equally fast everywhere. Try to make a little whirlpool in your glass with a spoon and make all the parts spin equally fast, you cannot do it because the geometry will not allow you to. Geometry is the Creator of the Universe. These slower parts of the whirlpool we see as the Big Bang. Free energy is to always have access to available energy. Available energy is when energy is transformed from one state to the other and we make use of the transformation. However, the transformations make things disordered because it is much easier to fly anywhere than your starting point. That is, it is much easier for a broken vase to stay broken or a particle in a can to fly anywhere than back into the can. Which means that energy is dying as the universe grows older, which means that all will be dead in the future. That is, the energy is always there, but in a dead form to us humans. Free energy then, it to resurrect the dead without using energy to do so. This the torus does for free (hence free energy) because the torus perpetually spins by the aid of the force (above) and, as the torus spins, the torus must contract and expand due to its geometry and, as the dead are contracted, the dead find their original starting point, which is the beginning of time itself, which is the toroidal core; which means that the dead are now alive again, that is, the disordered has once more become ordered; and we can use them anew. This does not mean that you can fix a broken vase this way, however, the broken vase is not the original state of the universe either. However, the particle does fly back into the can, that is, the original can! In other words, free energy happens in the world of the very small, in the zero-dimensional heart of nothingness. Therefore, Geometry is the Creator of the Universe and, Geometry is the Jesus of the Universe. The Creator and Jesus are one! (Just because I make such references does not mean that I am religious. I do not believe in skyhooks. Free energy is not a skyhook.) Roger Penrose proposes in spirit what I propose, namely that energy is recyclable. For Penrose, this can happen for the universe as a whole, google his Aeons before the Big Bang. For me, every atom is a universe, which means that we get recycling while our universe is still operating, which means, free energy. Free energy is not energy from nonexistence. Free energy is old energy that is recycled in the heart of the beginning of time, which is, as we said, the toroidal core. 13

14 Aeons before the Big Bang: Nothingness is existence. Existence is space-time that is curled up and space-time that is not curled up. When it is not curled up, nothing becomes something, like ice becomes water. Note: Note that the no extension of space-time is not the opposite of spacetime. No extension of space-time is space-time that is curl up into a knot of zero propagation by the aid of fast spin which the torus provides. 14

15 Musings on the beginning of time: If Motion = the cuboctahedron and, the cuboctahedron = two opposite sitting toruses (aka the dual torus), then we get the picture of the particle and the antiparticle. Now, if Motion is uncreated, that is, if Motion is ever on the move and cannot be stopped, then we get the picture of two sine waves that are ever beating in the background of Eternity and canceling each other out, which is to say, we get nothingness. However, since Motion is not perfect all the time, and the sine waves ever travel next to each other (as seen in the dual torus), what if, from time to time, one wave does not hit the other wave perfectly, and we get space-time, which is the separation of the particle from its twin, the antiparticle? 15

16 Preface: This work is a summary into my philosophizing on the topic of free energy. I will try to be concise and write in plain English. I will start by giving you a short account of my idea, and then I will try to defend my idea by setting up propositions that can be accepted or rejected. Then, we will philosophize around the propositions in order to understand them better. If you find this work difficult, then try to read my older version (below) first in order to get the context and familiarize yourself with the concepts. Then I will add a personal and angry note. Then I will give you my answer to the Philosopher s Stone. Lastly, I will give you an older version of my work in order to pack meat on skinny bones. Note: This older version is a bit messy and contains some repetitions. However, I leave most of it as it is because I do not want to tear into my heart. A note to the reader: When we philosophize, we like to say things many times using different words in order to convey our messages with as many senders as possible. That is just a trick we learned from Nature. Why plant a seed when you can plant a hundred thousand million? That is, if the first 16

17 explanation fails, we have others. That is to say, in this work you will encounter some repetitions. Be patient. To the physicist reading my free energy proposal: Entropy is the very essence of my hypothesis. Entropy, in the last instance, points to an ordered beginning. It is this order that allows for free energy. That is, entropy is the greatest evidence we have for free energy. A short account: Free energy is not about creating energy. Free energy is not about creating energy out of nothing. Free energy is all about the toroidal core. In my hypothesis, the toroidal core is constant, which means that we do not need enormous amounts of energy in order to create such a core. We already possess it. The toroidal core is space-time that is shrunken down into a knot that is, as far as we are concerned, a zero-dimensional point. This point is what I call nothingness. This point is spinning really fast. It is forever hot. It is forever ordered. It is the origin of spin. It is the origin of the Big Bang. Our toroidal core is constant due to the fact that... a body either remains at rest or continues in a straight path with a constant velocity if no force acts on the body or if the sum of the forces that acts on the body equals zero. The sum, which is all the energy in the universe, equals zero and can therefore not perturb the spin of the toroidal-core. The toroidal-core will thus continue to spin forever as there is no thing or no one that can change the fact/picture. An objection here might be that I apply the law of Newton in an inappropriate manner; however, reason alone will tell you that no thing can change the eternally spinning core if we have no thing to change the 17

18 core with. So the picture remains the same, which is to say, the core will spin forever. Energy = toruses that are working/clustered together. Over time, these clusters tend to break apart as dictated by the second law of thermodynamics. The arrow of time goes one way, and it cannot turn back. That is, the clusters break apart, which is equal to a sun dying, for example. Free energy is this: How do we get the sun back without reversing the arrow of time? If we could do that, then we would have free energy. Free energy is equal to the resurrection of the energy clusters. My idea is this: Therefore the toroidal core is constant, it can suck in dead toruses and order them again. Because the toroidal core/the zerodimensional point is there, toruses can fall into them. When the core spews the toruses out again (a process which I will describe), the toruses are in the same location and can thus cluster (again). Dead toruses = toruses that are spatially spread apart from each other and can thus not work together. This spreading apart is the job of the second law of thermodynamics. Free energy then, is dead energy which can resurrect by the aid of the toroidal core. The idea of free energy is very simple: Energy which is out here in space, dies. If it fell into the abyss from whence it came, it will live again. Then the abyss can once more spew the energy out. Then the energy can once more die. Ad infinitum. The abyss is the toroidal core. Dead energy is cold (i.e., spread apart). The toroidal core is forever hot (i.e., ordered). Once the cold energy falls into the core, it will become hot again. But note that it is not the energy that falls into the core. It is the toruses that fall in. No energy actually goes into the core. 18

19 If you tried to create such a core with energy/torus-clusters, I imagine that you would need near infinite amounts. But you do not need to create the core. The core is always there. Living energy = a cluster of tori (toruses). Dead energy = tori which are not clustered. So when a dead torus falls into the core of a bigger torus, the dead torus can be ejected at the location of the torus (big) it fell into. This big torus will also suck in other dead toruses in the environment. Then all the toruses together can be ejected at the location of the big torus and thus, our toruses can once more cluster and become alive (again). Thus, the force in Proposition 2 that drive the tori works as a collector, collecting up the dead and reviving them. Say that 1 unit of energy = 2 toruses working together, then you will see that the toroidal core itself contains zero energy. That is, the big torus that sucks in other dead toruses in the environment still contains zero energy after sucking in the dead toruses therefore the cluster that is the definition of energy will get dismantled in the toroidal core. Then the toruses that are in the core can be ejected from the core at the location of our big torus, and then our toruses can once more cluster and gain new energy. The reason why I defined energy in this way is because Motion is eternal. Motion was not created and will never die. So there is always energy, as it were. The only difference is the availability of the energy. Thus, I defined energy in the context of availability. 19

20 Propositions: Proposition 1: Nature is a boneless animal. (I.e., the cuboctahedron is the lack of solidity.) Due to the lack of evolution (structure) in the cosmic dawn (viz., the beginning of time), we can find no dam (structure) that can prevent motion from existing. This lack of structure is, by default, the cuboctahedron (the dual torus). The cuboctahedron = Motion. That is what the cuboctahedron is. The cuboctahedron is the lack of solidity. Thus, motion is inherent in nature. Motion always was. Proposition 2: Motion always was. If motion ever was, then the universe is eternal. It follows. No. The universe is not eternal because that would imply infinite regress (e.g., The atom started over here. No. The atom started over there. No. ad infinitum), which is a paradox. Nature knows no paradox, therefore, the eternal static universe cannot be. That is, there is something else besides the universe that resolves the inherent logic in proposition 2; and that something else is also eternal. That something must necessarily resolve the issue of the infinite regress. The only player we have is Motion. Therefore, Motion must solve the issue of infinite regress. Proposition 3: Nature knows no paradox. Proposition 4: The eternal static universe cannot be. (Below you will encounter a universe that can be eternal.) Proposition 5: There is something besides the universe. 20

21 Proposition 6: Motion must solve the issue of infinite regress. Motion, which is really the cuboctahedron, solves the issue by spinning. The cuboctahedron spins so fast that, from the point of view of the fastest spin, there is no universe; there is only blackness or nothingness. In other words, the atom(s) started in a state that knows no extension of spacetime and therefore the question, Did the atom start over here? falls apart as there is no here as here requires the extension of space-time. Nothingness is therefore space-time that is curled up into this knot of zero propagation. The knot is being held that way by the fast spin. Nothingness is the fastest spin in existence therefore you cannot exceed the zero propagation of space-time. Alternatively, if you did, you would get more than zero propagation, which is meaningless. Proposition 7: We came from nothingness. We are the froth of nothingness. Proposition 8: Nothingness is the fastest spin in existence. How did the spin start to spin? It never started. It was always so. Nevertheless, this is not a paradox when viewed from the point of view of nothingness, as there is no spin in that picture. What the picture does contain, however, is something that is extremely hot, and note, hot forever. It has been hot forever. In addition, this core cannot become cold. That is, it cannot die. Nature has always been animate. That is, nothingness has real eternal properties; which is not that puzzling therefore forever is not really a long time as far as timelessness is concerned. That is, the long stretch of time is curled up into this tiny knot. In this sense, we can see how the nothingness/the Motion can just be/exist when it is, in its core, motionless (due to spinning so fast). This state of motionlessness/timelessness has no spatial extension and 21

22 therefore it has no clocks running for it, so just existing is not a paradox for it. However, it is still puzzling why there is existence rather than nonexistence. The key, I believe, is to understand the nature of motionlessness. That is, if you could make motionlessness with no motion at all, then I imagine that nonexistence would apply and we would be one with oblivion forever. However, I believe that true logic and nature will tell us that that is not possible. It is not possible to create motionlessness/nothingness that way. The only way to create motionlessness is with fast motion (as we have seen). And that answers the Big Question: Why is there anything at all? Or, even deeper: Why is there nothingness? But why can t you create motionlessness without motion or with no motion? If you tried that I imagine that you would get something akin to Zeno s paradoxes, that is, a totally bizarre, illogical, fragmented; dead and paradoxical picture. Nature does not believe in paradoxes and therefore existence is. The philosophers say that nothingness is nothing at all, period. Well, that is absurd because then you are using your will and words to define what nothingness is. Let nature define what nothingness is, just like nature defines what speed limit there is. Proposition 9: Nothingness has properties. But is this nothingness real nothingness? It is. Imagine if you strip away all space-time, then even the darkness is gone. This picture truly contains no thing. That is what nothingness is. If the philosophers say otherwise, then that is fine too. For them, nothingness is more akin to nonexistence. However, nonexistence cannot be because we have no fairies that can build a dam that can contain the 22

23 cuboctahedron. (Paradoxically, if you wanted to create nonexistence, then I imagine you would need some sort of a structure therefore no structure = the cuboctahedron.) We have no fairies that can build a dam that can contain a non-structural thing (viz., motion). Proposition 10: If you truly understand the cuboctahedron, then you know how all things began. The cuboctahedron has spun since eternity. However, a spin requires a net (body) like a whirlpool. And a cosmic whirlpool is exactly what it is. So you see how the space-time is generated from the nothingness because the space-time is simply motion that cannot keep up with the fast pace in the toroidal center. So the universe (we) exists because of a major traffic jam! That should make you feel special! Like in a whirlpool, the center is fast. The edge is slow. This slower pace makes space-time possible. Alternatively, this slower pace is space-time. Proposition 11: Space-time exists because of a cosmic traffic jam. If this picture is correct, then we have a big torus (our universe) in which the center is nothingness. This center/core gives rise to space-time because the motion competes for a place in the (toroidal) center/core. The losers get left out. The losers = space-time, which are the wings of the torus. The space-time returns (competes anew) to the center because of the perpetual spin (motion is inherent in nature) of the nothingness. Then we repeat the cycle for eternity. Therefore, we get a universe that breathes, which is to say that the universe is born, then dies, and then is reborn forever. Nature likes to be nothing. The universe is the big loser. Why does the motion compete for a place in the toroidal center? 23

24 Because the body that is Motion continues to move at a constant velocity unless acted upon and therefore the whirlpool will ever spin and compete. Why does it do that? Imagine if nothingness has spun forever (because there is no dam) and there is no one else. Then, we have nothing or no one else to change the picture with. Therefore, the picture remains as it is. This is the key to free energy. The body that is Motion continues to move at a constant velocity unless acted upon. This is Newton s first law of motion. However, there is nothing besides the nothingness/the Body of Motion, so it spins at a constant velocity all the time and no atom or force in the universe can change the fact, as we have just explained. This is also important to keep in mind. Thus, I believe that the slower moving parts of the body of motion are not actually moving slower, they are like a man on a treadmill: running really fast but not actually going somewhere. Once the cosmic traffic jam clears, the slower moving parts pick up speed again; that is, the man gets off the treadmill and keeps on running. Note: The constant velocity is so fast that we get nothingness. Therefore, in this new picture of the cosmos, the nothingness is the greatest force there is. I believe it is the source of gravity. Alternatively, the nothingness is gravity. Proposition 12: Nothingness spins at a constant velocity for all time. (From the point of view of nothingness, all time is now, which is the knot, and it is hot.) Proposition 13: Nothingness is a force. 24

25 The force of nothingness accomplishes free energy. But how exactly? This is a new picture of the cosmos where the Big Bang is not a bang at all! The universe expands due to evolutionary mechanisms. In other words, the universe grows (I believe that this is dark energy). This is the whirlpool of nothingness making babies or copies of itself like the whirlpools in our oceans. That is, nature will tell you everything. In other words, the cuboctahedron (the torus) can be scaled. This is why the universe grows, like a baby in a womb. That is, evolution did not start at some odd planet in some odd galaxy billions of years ago. No. Evolution is older. Evolution stems from the beginning of time itself (which makes much more sense). The Big Bang and the Big Crunch in this work shall refer to the torus-flow flowing out of the torus center; this is the Big Bang. The Big Crunch is when the torus-flow flows into the center again. Thus, the Big Bang and the Big Crunch have nothing to do with the expansion of the universe. Thus, new mini-bangs added to our universe would not rip open our universe and destroy it. If you pay close attention, then you will also realize that the beginning of time is not far away in some remote past. The beginning of time is with us in the present. This makes free energy available now. The beginning of time is when the torus-flow flows out of the toroidal center. Therefore, there are trillions of beginnings of time as every atom may be a torus. However, our universe also has a true beginning that was located far away in the past as our universe is a torus too. Our universe is the torus that contains all the other tori. You will also note that nothingness may birth new atoms that will arrive in our universe after the initial Big Bang. However, this does not mean that our universe is eternal because our universe is a torus and must therefore return to the state of nothingness, that is, the toroidal center; this is the end of time. Thus, there are many endings also. (Update: If the toroidal-out-flow is equal to the toroidal-in- 25

26 flow, then we can have an eternal universe that experiences a Big Freeze and new Big Bangs (outflows) simultaneously; we thus get an eternal nonstatic ever-flowing universe. Like a set of eternal animated lungs.) Proposition 14: The Big Bang is not a bang. Proposition 15: The bang did occur, but the bang is dark energy. Proposition 16: Dark energy = the fact that the cuboctahedron can make copies of itself; then the copies make copies and we get the exponential function that we call a bang. Proposition 17: Dark energy = evolution. This is what evolution is. Proposition 18: The beginning of time is with us in the present. And so we can use it! Proposition 19: There are many beginnings of time. Proposition 20: New atoms will arrive in our universe after the initial Big Bang. So now we have a nothingness that spins forever. Free energy is simply this: Imagine you place a torus that is the right size into your car. (The cuboctahedron (the torus) can be scaled like the octaves on your piano, so the torus comes in all sizes.) 26

27 Further, imagine that, in order to propel your car, your car ejects, essentially, atoms. These atoms are now the tori. Your car ejects toruses in order to propel forward. These toruses then get blasted into the environment and then picked up by larger tori in the environment, and finally our toruses (our fuel) get sucked into the black heart of nothingness from whence they literally came... once upon a time. The tori must take this path because the force of nothingness sucks all things into itself, that is, all motion competes for a place in the toroidal center. This competition is what nature is all about. Nature s will to nothingness. The by-products of this competition are space-time (the slower parts of the cosmic whirlpool) and dark energy/evolution (the cosmic whirlpool that makes babies or copies of itself). A grip on reality here. What am I saying? I am saying that in order for the toruses to return to the nothingness, then we need to bend space-time completely. Initially, this would cost you all the energy storages in the universe if it were not for our new picture of the cosmos where the force of nothingness with its perpetual spin does this for us for free. Hence, free energy. The beginning of time is eternal order/hotness. So our dead (cold) toruses will get revived again (become hot) in the toroidal center. There they are once more spewed out due to the eternal traffic jam. They can then continue to propel our car. Since, and this is the most ingenious thing in the universe, the center of any torus is the very center of the nothingness, which means that the torus in our car may eject from its center the toruses it once used to propel forward. It does not need to use the exact same tori, of course. It just demonstrates how free energy is possible by the eternal ingenious recycling that the universe actually is. There is only one center/core in the nothingness therefore nothingness is a zero-dimensional point; that is, thus the lack of dimensionality in such a reality, you only get to have one point, which means that all the toruses in the universe share the same center/core. This is the biggest key to free energy. In other words, thus the lack of evolution in the cosmic dawn, all 27

28 things must arise from the same spot/place, which means that all things share the same place/root as they rose from it. Therefore, the tori you once ejected from your car will find their way back to your car therefore your car holds the free energy apparatus which contains the cosmic dawn/spot/toroidal core. Here the tori will be revitalized, and all for free. So you can use your fuel anew. That is some superfuel! Therefore, free energy is not about creating energy. Free energy is not about having this infinite source. Free energy has nothing to do with illogical perpetual motion machines (it is sad that I even have to write that down). Free energy is about recycling, reviving the dead and let the heart of nature (the nothingness/cuboctahedron) do the trick. (The Heart of Nature does not need to work as it is a force.) Proposition 21: The torus comes in all sizes. Proposition 22: Nothingness bends space-time at no cost therefore the body that is Motion (nothingness) continues to move at a constant velocity unless acted upon. Therefore, the force that bends space-time is active all the time and it does not consume energy no more than it costs to move at a constant velocity unless acted upon. Proposition 23: The center of any torus is the very center of the nothingness. This must be so unless we can envision more than 1 nothingness. That there is only one center in the universe might also explain some quantum phenomenon like David Bohm theorized about. He said something like, There is only one fish. (i.e., atom). Well, there might be many fishes (atoms) but only one center, which amounts to the same. Proposition 24: Free energy is about recycling and reviving. 28

29 My definition of free energy: The ability to drive your car forever without adding an external source of energy. In this work, the nothingness supplies your car with fuel. I would call this an internal source of energy. If these propositions are reasonable, then you may see how free energy is accomplished. Also note that the cuboctahedron is actually a dual torus, thus, the secret of free energy might require two toruses. Proposition 25: If not free energy is true, then the recycling universe would die therefore the creation of energy is impossible. Proposition 26: We are not special in any way, and therefore we do not live in the first of all universes that eternity has spawned. Hence, we live in a recycling universe. Proposition 27: The second law of thermodynamics would effectively kill a recycling universe that cannot make new energy. The energy that is there is final and the second law of thermodynamics would kill it. Therefore, the only way we are here is because resurrection/free energy is real. This is how nature is immortal. A note to proposition 27: All energy is final, and the only way to continue using it, is to revive it. But the problem is, we do not have the energy to revive it! So another force must be operating, which I believe is the black heart of nothingness itself. In addition, this heart will never die as it continues to move at a constant velocity unless acted upon. Moreover, no one or no thing can ever act upon it. Space-time cannot act upon it 29

30 therefore space-time is a part of it. Thus, the nothingness will remain a nothingness. In other words, the nothingness is immortal. The nothingness did not become space-time. Only a part of the nothingness became and is constantly becoming space-time; at which point the spacetime is on its way to become nothingness again. The nothingness is with us right now. It does not lie outside the universe. It does not lie beyond the universe. In addition, it is not detached from the universe no more than the center of a whirlpool is detached from the other parts of the whirlpool. Therefore, the nothingness is within our universe, in the center of all atoms and black holes. Proposition 28: The cuboctahedron is immortality in the flesh. Proposition 29: The nothingness is within our universe. Proposition 30: Energy is final and it is = to the zero propagation of space-time. Proposition 31: We cannot change the picture, thus the nothingness is immortal. (Imagine if nothingness has spun forever and there is no one else. Then, we have nothing or no one else to change the picture with. So the picture remains as it is.) Proposition 32: Free energy is real. 30

31 Philosophizing: Free energy does not violate the laws of Nature, or the reason of men. Free energy does not violate the law of conservation of energy therefore the toroidal core is not cut off or separate from the rest of the universe. The heart of nothingness, like a magnet, contains zero energy because the nothingness is a force. The heart does not have an energy output bigger than zero. In fact, ALL is zero. Nothingness is zero. The universe is zero in the last instance. There is no such thing as overunity in that sense. You get what looks like overunity on your side, but that is because, when you get overunity, the universe loses toruses, as it were. That is, as you get a surplus of hot toruses from the toroidal core of your free energy apparatus, the universe loses cold toruses to another toroidal core in the universe. Thus, there is no such thing as real overunity. Liken it to a vacuum cleaner: You get the dust collected in the machine, but that is because the machine has sucked in the said dust from the environment. So energy is always conserved. In addition, you can only get out what you put in (and vice versa). This is common sense. One cake went into the oven, and two cakes came out. That is not what happens. In fusion, this can happen, but that is because the oven already contains many cakes. In the heart/core of darkness/nothingness: Nature puts in dead energy (i.e., toruses) and Nature can get out that same energy, only now the heart/core has revitalized that dead energy. We spend/kill it again. Energy cannot be created. The nothingness simply transforms (at no cost as I have explained) the dead energy into living, available energy. 31

32 Thus, free energy was never about gaining new energy from some wood fairies. More: An astronaut floating in space is not floating in space. He is falling. The way the astronaut falls is by virtue of speed. I believe that speed and gravity are the same thing because Motion (i.e., the cuboctahedron) is all there is in my hypothesis. On earth, you stand under a cosmic waterfall that is the force of nothingness. It is pulling you down like a waterfall. However, the ground stops you from going with the waterfall and you feel the pressure. This pressure you feel as gravity. That is, gravity is speed. If you were to go with the waterfall and have the same speed and no ground to stop you, then you would not feel the pressure and therefore be weightless as weight = the pressure. How can you feel weightlessness if not speed and gravity are the same thing? The force of nothingness is perpetual motion, and literally so, it is motion that never stops moving; but this force has nothing to do with perpetual motion machines. A perpetual motion machine has nothing to do with perpetual motion per se. A perpetual motion machine produces work without the input of energy, which is madness. That is like saying, I m going to cook a delicious meal without adding any ingredients. If you get something tastier than air, let me know. The force of nothingness does not produce work at all. The force of nothingness clumps together the dead energy making it come alive again. Then the energy can once more produce work. Two different realities, in other words. When the universe dies, one can envision the nothingness bringing it together again. So free energy works on the universe as a whole, which is too bad for us. Therefore, for free energy to work for us, we need the force of nothingness to resurrect individual atoms/toruses while the universe is still operating. However, this would amount to asymmetry, and 32

33 we can t have that because Nature is supposed to be symmetrical. The solution is that it looks like asymmetry, but it is not so because every atom/torus is a mini-universe, which can be seen if all atoms/tori (including the universe) is an expression of the cuboctahedron. Thus, when the nothingness acts on a single atom, the nothingness acts as if it was acting on the universe as a whole. Therefore, the force of nothingness can operate on individual toruses without it being asymmetry. Moreover, we accomplish true free energy. My greatest idea ever: If a clump of atoms sits in one corner of the room and then spreads out due to chance, then all we need to do in order to get our atoms in the starting position, is to shrink the room; which the Train to Nowhere does (below). This shrunken room (i.e., the state of nothingness) is the way the light views reality. In other words, my greatest idea is literally nothing! That is, the shrunken room is always there due to the First Law of Motion. Therefore the shrunken room is always there, it can perpetually fuel existence with available energy because the room is so tight that the dead/unavailable energy that falls into it becomes ordered again. In other words, the beginning of time is an ordered state. We can employ that state to drive our cars and spacecraft forever. So you do not need extreme amounts of energy in order to shrink the space-time into a zero-dimensional knot and thus accomplish free energy, because the knot is always there due to the fast spin of the nothingness. This fast spin is reality itself. It always was because there is no dam that can contain the phenomenon we call Motion. 33