Chapter 3: How did everything start from... nothing?

Transcription

1 A Work in Progress; ca words By Thor Fabian Pettersen (2018) Chapter 1: My CTMU understanding Chapter 2: A Letter to Science Chapter 3: How did everything start from... nothing? Chapter 4: Step 6: The Dark Agenda Chapter 5: Secrets Chapter 6: Great sum + a conversation

2 Human awakening: (Not real Nirvana.) About me: I am a 33 yr man from Norway. I have a son (3 yr) and a girlfriend whom I am absolutely in love with. I am one of the lucky ones! I have been interested, no, obsessed with the question of origins since I was a kid. My hobbies are making music (I am a bit noob here), writing a sci-fi novel (been at it for ages The Adam Project can never seem to finish it), and playing a bit of online chess (I suck). My worldview is a mix of my own philosophizing, a secret told by my psychonaut friend that All is a circle, Bergy the Iceman; David Icke and Chris Langan, + my own Nirvana experience. My psychonaut friend told me that I have had a glimpse but that I was not awakened yet. I told him that is good news, because I would hate to walk around very lucid like a Buddha! But I have always lived with the feeling that I have lived before. Déjà vu! I have a couple of psychonaut friends, but I have never taken anything myself except hashish and some party drug. I want to try DMT, but I am scared of it. My website: My music: &: PREFACE In this book, I will survey the whole of existence. I will start by presenting my interpretation of Christopher Langan s CTMU. Basically, I have fused my understanding of the CTMU with my own philosophy. If you understand this particular universe, you will better understand my worldview. Then I will write a letter to science and let them know what I think of them. Then we shall see how it all began and, in ending my contribution to this book, we shall look at how it All might end. I have also added a final chapter that contains many secrets. + Extra (Chapter 6)

3 Speaking of secrets: We must come together and make people realize what free energy actually is. Free energy = a growing/expanding earth Best method = . If you or anyone wants to join, me at thorfabianpettersen@hotmail.com Are you sure that the earth is growing? I am 100 % sure. Why? Because the objects you see around you cannot always have been because that leads to paradoxes like infinite regress, aka turtles all the way down. Infinite Turtles: If you assume that the rocks are eternal, then you can always ask, Where did this rock come from? If you assume that the rock started over here, then why can t it have started over there? You can do this all day, but at the end of the day, you must assume some sort of nothingness or singularity in order to solve the Problem of Origins or you will always have some sort of there. If you end up with there, you can always ask, Why there? Why not here? We just need to figure out, What is nothingness? To see this picture in a clear light, let everything that exists be this lonely particle. If this particle always existed, then you can trace its path forever backwards in time, meaning you will never find an origin, which is just absurd! Ha. I tricked you! This lonely existence of existence actually explains what the nothingness is: If you are all alone, then you have no one to compare yourself to/with, which means you cannot know if you are big or small or what. The True Origin of the lonely particle (above) is its lonely existence. There is only One Existence, and this existence can have always existed because of its absolute state (i.e., its loneliness). What cannot have existed forever, is the relative state. Say that, only two particles existed, then you would get the paradox of the forever-past (above). But if you are alone, the paradox resolves itself. The magic of the Absolute. In other words, John Archibald Wheeler s one-electron universe is the only universe that I can see that actually solves the Problem of Origins (without invoking God, etc.). More on this later. But all this means that matter was not always and therefore it can be created. And here is the deal: I cannot entertain the notion of some god creating an anti-viagra pill and forcing it down Nature s throat, which means there is no agent that can turn Nature impotent. There is no such magic, which means if matter-production happened way back when in the Big Bang, it is also happening today, which means that everything in the universe grows, including planet Earth. Then we replicate the matter-producing-mechanism in the earth on a smaller scale and put that in your car. Now fuel will grow in your fuel tank, and you can drive till the end of the universe and back. And you can keep driving until the universe ends. We thus fulfill Nikola Tesla s dream of having our cars driven by the very wheelwork of Nature. But I can take it even further: If everything grows, then we escape the embarrassing task of showing when the inanimate became animate. Rather, the animate reaches all the way back to the beginning of time. Am I 100 % sure the earth grows? Well, let us put it this way: The alternative is called Pangea. And Pangea is the stupidest science-fact in all history! If you believe in Pangea, then you are a complete...

4 YES, I am sure the Earth grows because the alternative is so... laughable. Ahimsa Nirjara: When you say that the "earth grows", do you mean to say that mother nature allows matter and energy to manifest together to create organic compounds, and thusly creating all life on earth, in a continuous cyclic loop? A: That may be true, but that is not what I was suggesting. I mean the earth literally grows/expands and gets bigger over time, like Neal Adams suggests: Neal Adams - Science: 01 - Conspiracy: Earth is Growing! Free energy is neither a perpetual motion machine nor an overunity device. Free energy is the constant matter-creation of the universe. But will not the universe blow up if free energy is true? No, because Nature is more like our lungs than a balloon! That is, matter is created and destroyed; so there is a balance, like the balance our lungs accomplish. If the matter is like ice, then it can melt and turn into water (nothingness?) but that does not mean that the said matter in some form will cease to exist; that is, energy cannot be created nor destroyed. Note: If you did manage to tap into the system, then you would get something that looked like overunity, but you must realize that there is no such thing as real magic, as it were. Also, see this: Cool stuff: That the true solution to the Problem of Origins is the Absolute State (i.e., the loneliness of existence)/john Archibald Wheeler s one-electron universe, can also explain why the oneness of consciousness (and Nirvana) must obtain. What is the philosophical proof of the one-electron universe? A: Think about it, if you claim that, say, rocks are eternal, you may ask, What are rocks made of? Atoms. What are atoms made of? And so on. You conclude that there may be a basic building block in nature. Say that the building block is the electron. Then you ask, How many electrons is the whole of existence made of? If your answer is, say, any number, then why was not existence made of any number + 1? The paradox resolves itself if you have only the one electron because then you do not really have to deal with numbers. More: If the whole of existence was made of, say, two or more electrons, you arrive at the paradox of origins (above). Moreover, what is the one-electron made of? You resolve that paradox with the oneelectron universe because this electron is all alone, which means you cannot divide it any further because then you would have two of some thing, which you cannot do if you are absolute/alone. That is, if existence has always existed, then it needs to be comprised of this one entity, or else you need existence to come from nonexistence, which is absurd; or, you need existence to come from God, which, ultimately, does not explain anything.

5 Contestants for the body of Eternity: 1. Two or more atoms (or whatever) have existed forever = paradox-hell 2. Nonexistence birthed existence = the absurd 3. God created the world = no explanation 4. Magic = Be serious! 5. We are left with: The one-electron universe

6 Chapter 1: My CTMU understanding If you try to breathe in air, then the environment will lose that air. So you see, contraction can only happen if there is a simultaneous expansion going on; in this case, your lungs. Expansion and contraction are one and the same act and must therefore happen simultaneously. Likewise, if you breathe out, the environment will regain the lost air and your lungs will contract. Then take the expansion of the universe: if the universe contracts and much as it expands, then the universe will never actually leave its zero-dimensional nothingness from which it sprang. And this world of nothingness cannot become other, so an actual expansion (without contraction) is impossible. The universe is therefore a clever car simulation. That is, there is no way of knowing if it is the road that moves while the car stands still or the car moves and the road stands still, which means reality is absolute (not relative) and alone. However, we do have the relative side also, which means we now have a complete picture of reality (i.e., the absolute/wave/ gills and the relative/particle/ lungs ). Note that the particle/tetrahedron is both a particle and a wave at the same time. The tetrahedron is both unbound (wave) and bound (particle). It is like asking, How did life go from water (nothingness/wave) to land (something(ness)/particle)? Well, obviously, there was a creature that could [both] breathe underwater and breathe on land. But is the wave-reality a realm of nothingness? What is nothingness? Nothingness can be seen from the light s own point of view. What that view is, is a stripping away of all boundaries. Just imagine sitting on a ray of light, all time dissolves. Everything freezes and goes by in an instant because you are entering an absolute world where there is no up/down, big/small. You are entering the Absolute Universe! There is no boundary that can tell you that this thing is small and this thing is big and this is our wave. But what does it all mean? I believe it means, the faster the universe expands, the faster the universe communicates, which means, evolution is speeding up. The odd thing here is that, if you suddenly stopped the expansion of the universe, you stop the communication and, if the communication is = to consciousness, then... well, you get the idea! I have either misconstrued reality totally here, or I have stumbled upon a super-freaky fact. The end game here must be the Technological Singularity (or?). So, we are like the Woody pullstring toy doll from Toy Story (1995). If this is true, then we are truly inextricably linked to the universe. But what does this picture look like? Well, it looks like what it looks like, which is a brain or mind. This is not that farfetched when we humans possess brains and minds. It from bit! (Some who take Ayahuasca experience that reality is the mind of God. Maybe it is?) Ok. Let me explain it one more time using different words: The Absolute = If you are alone, then you cannot know if you are big or small or what because you have no one to compare yourself with. There aren t two Realities, therefore, Reality is alone and Absolute. But what does this mean in terms of the universe?

7 Well, the universe of stars is the relative-thing, which can only mean one thing: The universe is half the picture we call Reality. The missing half, is the thing that transforms the relative into the Absolute. What is the thing? The thing is: Contraction. Why? Well, because the universe is expanding, it must also contract in order to be symmetrical, that is, in order to be Absolute. The relative cannot exist on its own because then Reality would be relative, which means Reality would not be alone, which means we must have two Realities, which means... It is just nonsense. Therefore, the universe must contract the same amount as it expands. Imagine breathing, as air fills your lungs, the environment loses air (contracts) and your lungs expand. Thus, contraction and expansion (or conspansion) happen simultaneously and cannot happen separately. These words cannot happen separately is the key to understanding. As you expel the air, the environment expands and your lungs contract. Therefore, if Reality is Absolute and the Relative Universe is expanding, then, our Relative Universe here must also be contracting in order to remain true to reality. We see only the expanding phase. We thus get a reality where everything is connected. Even the far away is actually always near. This solves the problems of quantum mechanics. As Bohm would say, It s one fish! If only the expansion of the universe was real (and not its contraction), then the Relative Universe would be The Reality and the Absolute Universe would not exist, which is nonsense because then you are saying that Reality is not one entity (i.e., absolute). In other words, the Relative Universe cannot actually exist on its own. Only the coin that is Absolute Reality exists, and the Relative Universe is one side of that coin. If you have the one side, then you can deduce the other. In other words, the expansion of the universe is impossible because there is nothing to expand into. You know, what lies beyond the wall of the universe? Instead, imagine a car simulator where you and the car do not move. It is the road that moves! (It is not the spoon that bends, Neo!) That way, you can drive forever without actually going anywhere. Likewise, when the universe expands, it simultaneously contracts the same amount; the result being that the universe does not really expand into something. The universe does not actually go anywhere. The universe remains in the nothingness, so to speak. Mull on this: the contraction of the universe proves that all is connected (oneness). Ok. A way to visualize the Absolute Universe: Google the animated Tesseract: Ok. As the Tesseract moves, it expands and contracts simultaneously while simultaneously recreating the inner and outer cube while simultaneously heading in a straight line; which means, if we live on the straight line, we would not see the fact that the universe (the inner cube?) is constantly being destroyed and re-created at the same time and all the time; which means, Did you know that half the time you are the vacuum? Nassim Haramein ( We can live in 4D.

8 This re-creation of the universe (its contents) in the Creation Center/Tesseract/Absolute Universe guarantees that the far-regions of space obey the same laws as the regions closer to home. This contraction is necessary for the maintenance and consistency (causality) of the universe. True causality: The drummer doesn t cause the vocalist to sing. But the vocalist knows when to sing because the whole show is in unification, in communication, and sharing and passing information. This way, you don t have to deal with infinite regress: This caused that. Then what caused this? And what caused that? And so on. [...] sharing and passing information from the past, present and future = the fact that all space-time is being contracted. The universe (its contents) is destroyed and re-created on the go = We can live in the 4D space if half the time we are the vacuum of space where there is no boundary, only nothingness. The interesting thing here, is that the universe does not simply dissolve into the nothingness, rather, the opposite happens: the universe is re-created and evolves as a consequence of this re-creation. Why does not the whole thing simply dissolve back into the ocean of nothingness, so to speak? I believe it is because the expansion and the contraction work in unison; which means that, if you keep on breathing, you will find a balance and thus not die. But if the particles did not interact and speak to each other, they would die. Everything needs to work to maintain its existence or else you will just dissolve back into the nothingness. Like a whirlpool in an ocean. If you stop spinning, you die. If we don t get something to eat, we die. Nothing can just exist. You need to work for it. What does this mean? It means that evolution is not some localized event on some random planet. The whole universe evolves as one entity/organism. This organism is God. That is, the ultimate reality is the mind of God. Is God... the universe, then? A: No. Reality is: If you are alone, then you cannot know if you are big or small or what because you have no one to compare yourself with. Meaning, God is the ultimate reality = the expansion and the contraction = evolution in some Tesseract/timelessness = God always was. In addition, if perception is dependent on logic and logic is some kind of language, then everything is a language therefore the ultimate reality, that is, the reality that everything flows from, is the mind (perception) of God. The beauty of this God is: You don t need the thing-in-itself. Philosophically speaking, this is ingenious. When that tree falls in that forest and nobody can hear it, then does it make a sound? The answer is, somebody can always hear it because reality itself is an organism. Consequently, we do not need the thing-in-itself. The Ultimate Observer then, if we do not want the thing-in-itself, is God. God is the one who observes all. Basically, God is the ultimate reality and the ultimate mind.

9 Free will is possible because past, present and future are present now in the Absolute Universe, which means you can change it because nothing is determined by causality. God is the ultimate conception to solve the greatest philosophical riddle: the-thing-in-itself. Moreover, the thing-in-itself is nonsense. I mean, just because the notion came from the great mind of Kant, does not alter the fact that the thing-in-itself is pure nonsense. Moving on: If the Reality principle (viz., oneness) holds true, then your real self is God. You are God not the humanoid you, but the real you behind the mask. God, then, dwells in the Absolute Universe, that is, God dwells in timelessness. How is that possible? As I just explained, we too, dwell in timelessness. That is, consciousness must be the whole system of expansion and contraction, which means, consciousness, like the universe, does not move anywhere, but remains in the timeless nothingness. Our consciousness experiences the illusion of time. God s consciousness, I believe, is awake like the Buddha of old. Why it is possible to dwell outside the illusion: We are consciousness experiencing the expansionphase (illusion/separation/time), but it must be equally possible to experience the contraction-phase (reality/oneness/timelessness). If this is true, then there is only one God due to the nature of the contraction-phase. More: If the universe was not expanding, then you could not be conscious therefore, your consciousness requires motion to work. More: Timelessness or motionlessness is the fastest possible motion because, in the Absolute Universe, you cannot know if you are big or small or what; meaning, the boundaries are not there. Meaning, you are like the light from the light s own point of view, which is a boundless view, which you can see in your mind s eye as you ride a ray of light into the universe like Einstein did. You behold the true nothingness. You can be conscious in timelessness because timelessness is a high-speed reality (nothingness). You will experience that time has stopped for everybody except yourself.

10 Chapter 2: A Letter to Science Free energy = to turn the unavailable energy into available energy again while the universe is still operational. Note that free energy has nothing to do with perpetual motion machines and overunity devices. These things are pure nonsense. You need a source for your energy in the first place and in the latter case, you cannot get more than 100% if reality itself is 100%. Update: If you mean by a perpetual motion machine, a machine that does have a source, but cannot work because the machine must sit in an environment, then I can conceptualize a perpetual motion machine that works because it can sit in the Absolute Universe, which is not an environment. The tetrahedron can make the bridge from the Absolute Universe to the Relative Universe in order to make this work. Although your machine obviously sits in an environment, say, in your car, the inner workings of the machine have roots that stretch beyond the Relative Universe and into the Absolute Universe. Google: The boundary of a boundary is zero. Free energy is the fact that the earth/universe grows. Replicate that mechanism on a smaller scale and fuel will grow in your fuel tank. This is because, now, your car is propelled, as Tesla said, by the very wheelwork of nature. Now existence itself is fueling your car. Existence itself/the whole of existence = cuboctahedron Note that the whole of existence can be replicated; we live in a fractal universe. My free energy idea will not even breach the outer layer of the thick belt we call Science, because that belt is fortified with all the glorious stuff (e.g., paradigms etc.) you read about in the Philosophy of Science. I will be rejected and culled because I am not in the ingroup and, more to the point, because my idea will be seen as a threat to Science itself and its motor: the monetary system. Free energy would effectively kill the money-animal, which is like cutting off the hand that feeds the scientific enterprise. We need to evolve beyond the Iron Hand of Science. Only then will this world see the light and become acquainted with the true power, which is the universe itself. In short, Science is an animal; which means, truth is secondary, survival is king. Robert W. Koontz letter to Michio Kaku says it all. It is such a shame. After reading the letter, I lost all respect for Science. That is, you could at least write the man back. Until I read a reply letter, my faith in Science will dwindle away. In fact, my faith in Science started to dwindle when I studied the Philosophy of Science, because then I saw just how big the monster we call Science is. Science is truly Religion on steroids! But that is no surprise because Science evolved out of this thing we call Religion. Science has to be a great monster, however, because it has to have some beliefs that it builds upon. These beliefs will be defended to the death. Science will therefore cull novelties and, like any animal, will have a great fear of the unknown (i.e., that which lies beyond their religious beliefs). Science is all about trying to force Nature into their conceptual boxes rather than the other way around. (You cannot do the other way around, you see, because Nature, Reality etc. are words and concepts also.) Science will therefore never have 100 % truth. They can ever have true enough, as Terence McKenna says ( Worse: Truth itself is a fiction. That is, good and evil are fictions, as Nietzsche would say. There is an old illusion. It is called good and evil. Friedrich Nietzsche (

11 How much suffering has the word evil caused? Some stupid politician (or clever) using the word evil to divide and demonize people. How many children have been put to death because we believe in such a childish concept as evil? (Smart people who believe in the concept of evil I detest most of all because they really should grow up. There is no evil. There is only oneness and, sadly, ignorance. The latter explains all the suffering in the world.) Likewise, how many good ideas have been killed because we believe Science to be the Ruler of the Universe? Science rejects new things. Ok. If that was true, then how does Science progress? A: Science changes when anomalies in its current beliefs appear. From there, it takes much time and effort to move on. Which is basically Science in a nutshell, according to Kuhn (or according to my understanding of Thomas S. Khun.) In other words, Science, like any other animal, feels indifferent to the outgroup. In order to change Science, you have to be part of the ingroup. You cannot come from the outside and knock on the door. Thus, the statement that Science is open-minded and fair, is just a great and grand illusion. That is, the door is shut to the free energy enthusiast. We need to find a different door. [...] anomaly appears only against the background provided by the paradigm. The more precise and far-reaching the paradigm, the more sensitive it is to detecting an anomaly and inducing change. By resisting change, a paradigm guarantees that anomalies that lead to paradigm change will penetrate existing knowledge to the core. Take the theory of evolution, for example. Science has conjured mountains of evidence to support the theory of evolution. Evolution is a fact. If you oppose it, then you are a crackpot or worse. Yet, those tall, tall mountains rest on a foundation that is thinner than air and more mysterious than God himself. In other words, the theory of evolution rests on a belief ( Hi, grandpa Religion. ). In this case, a belief that time is real. What is time? Shoot the philosopher! (Scientists hate philosophers.) In the end, I have nothing against Science as such. It is a great tool (e.g., it put us on the moon). It has to be a great monster, and I understand that. There is nothing holy about it. Science is just another animal in the great jungle. What I have against Science, however, is that it acts as if it is the end-all and be-all. That is, when you come up with a new idea, the World rejects it because Science, by its very nature, rejects it. And the World listens to Science. Science is basically a throw-the-baby-outwith-the-bathwater-machine that does this in order to stay supremely clean. How many babies they have killed! And it would ultimately be a good thing if we had an institution that had the same power and respect as Science, but acted diametrically: a don t-throw-the-baby-out-with-the-bathwatermachine. That way, no babies would have to be killed. That is, we have Apollo. We need Dionysus also. We need a new kind of Academia: a dark one. One that is baptized in the name of Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche. Where art trumps logic. Where poetic truth trumps ugliness, which would mean that the Growing Earth trumps Pangea by default. If you think Pangea is beautiful, then you are mad. What is so beautiful about a planet wearing a wig? If Pangea is a scientific fact, then you will see that Science is flawed. I love this Wittgenstein quote: Tell me," Wittgenstein's asked a friend, "why do people always say, it was natural for man to assume that the sun went round the earth rather than that the earth was

12 rotating?" His friend replied, "Well, obviously because it just looks as though the Sun is going round the Earth." Wittgenstein replied, "Well, what would it have looked like if it had looked as though the Earth was rotating? You will see that Science never has the truth. They ever have a point of view. However, another point of view could be equally strong. For example: Evolution vs Intelligent Design (ID). In reality, both could obtain. Both could be equally valid. In fact, they could be the same thing just as the quote above hints at. Things that look opposed do not need to be. Personally, I am an atheist if an atheist = one who does not believe in skyhooks. That is, ID does not necessarily mean skyhook. The ID, which I believe in, could be Bohm s holomovement. If Bohm s holomovement or something like it, like Christopher Langan s CTMU, is true, then ID and evolution may be one and the same thing. It is just that Nature is smarter than we could ever conceive. Philosophers of science have repeatedly demonstrated that more than one theoretical construction can always be placed upon a given collection of data. So, instead of telling people that Pangea is a fact (when it is not), you should rather tell the truth: Pangea is one ugly-ass model that we came up with that fits the data, but, there could be other models that fit the data, like a beautiful Growing Earth. But we cannot entertain such a notion because, if the Earth grows, then people will start to ask, What makes it grow? And we cannot have that, because then the clever engineers will ask, Can I put the earth-growing-mechanism in my car? Then we need a true conspiracy among our scientists, they would have to reply something like, No. Because the mechanism is far-away in the Big Bang. Then the clever engineers will retort, What?! But the earth grows in real time. I could look at my watch here! Then we... You know what, we better ridicule the Growing Earth meme. If it grew as a serious concept in fit brains, then we are screwed! Then the Earth would turn into a paradise and we would lose all our money. Hell, what do you even need money for at this point? Why would they need the power of the bankers when they have the power of the universe? Such a sad day... If this World embraced Dionysus, we would have free energy. As long as Dionysus remains unpopular, we will never see a free world. Then children will not need to die every day that Science rejects a new idea (hint: which is every day). With a little change in attitude, we could have free energy, and then we could save children from dying each day. Can you feel how intense my hatred for Science is? Koontz letter to Kaku: New paradigms arise with destructive changes in beliefs about nature. The ultimate paradigm is the Resurrection of Nature. At the end of the day I don t believe in Big Bangs or mini-bangs or any kind of bang because Nature grows. That is, Nature s creation process is less violent. I believe in the Big Growth. That is, we can have a Big Bang, which would be a huge cuboctahedron, and then we could have a series of smaller cuboctahedrons that would not be as violent as the first, and these we could place in your car. That is, just because science has found a Big Bang does NOT MEAN that all came from that Big Bang. It only means that all came from that point, which is a huge difference! For example, if you have a

13 Russian doll and this doll contains a series of smaller dolls inside it, then it looks like EVERYTHING (all matter) came from the biggest doll or point, but it does not follow logically as the smaller dolls could as well be responsible for the said matter-production. With smaller dolls we can have a less violent process that we can put in your car. Now the quote of quotes: One day man will connect his apparatus to the very wheelwork of the universe [...] and the very forces that motivate the planets in their orbits and cause them to rotate will rotate his own machinery. Nikola Tesla ( Does this quote sound like a regular perpetual motion machine to you? No. Tesla is right: Some way Existence is immortal and it can forever fuel our cars with available energy. If Tesla were here today, he would be so angry at what we call science. He would take Roger Penrose s Fashion lecture and turn it into a full-fledged Richard Wagner opera! Fashion, Faith and Fantasy in Physics - with Roger Penrose Watch this lecture by Penrose if the authority of Science enslaves you. Become disenchanted today! Note: It may be that Existence is not a fractal, and my free energy idea would not work. Free energy is still real because we defined free energy = forever, immortality, Existence. But, I believe, we would not be able to drive in our free energy cars if Existence/Nature is not a fractal. However, there could be other ways, I just haven t thought of them. An alternative to free energy is holographic reality. Basically, if our universe is a hologram, then we may find a way to access that hologram and tap, say, any sun or vacuum in the universe from our garage because reality is 2D (and not 3D). Place such a device in your car, then it would be more powerful than having a miniature sun in your car, but less powerful than free energy. Still, pretty powerful. Just find the right frequency and the Holographic Universe is yours. A final note on energy: Good thing scientists are working on fusion so that we can at least have some power: To clear things up: You could say that Science is responsible for the coming Technological Singularity and that the birth of this god is our only hope of achieving immortality and, immortality is much better than a world of free energy; therefore, I choose Apollo over Dionysus. A: I think this is delusional. Immortality is not something that we can gain. The state of being immortal is something we are, if it is true. Only Oneness can make us immortal, which means we always were. The only thing a supercomputer can do is to create good or hellish worlds that we can inhabit. And I think the latter is of a greater concern! If you want to know just how messed up Science is, then read After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency by Quentin Meillassoux. Meillassoux has to say something about the Great Becoming in order to support Science at all. But you cannot say something of the Great Becoming. Heraclitus would turn in his grave! To dissect the flux with logic (i.e., the principle of noncontradiction) is illegal and stupid. It is just nonsense. There is no defense of Science. In the future, Science will be seen as a great tool, but nothing more. Science will move away from the role as truthteller. Just look at how far the modern philosopher has to go in order to mount a little defense of

14 Science. It is ridiculous. (Great book, by the way. I disagree with it, but it is nonetheless good philosophizing.) Meillassoux describes a world separated from man when he himself, is a man! And this world, functioning apart from man, is a world where Nature cares about one of man s greatest fictions: the principle of non-contradiction. To me, the book is a good attempt, but nevertheless, it fails to be other than fiction. And if the best armor Science has is a fictional one, then that does not bode well for Science. Just riddle me this Meillassoux: If the principle of non-contradiction is somehow not a fiction, then that would mean that X is something tangible and real, that is, you must assume the equality of things, that X is equal to X over time and, that X, so to speak, possesses a structure, so that we can look at it. For example: A tree cannot be a tree and not a tree at the same time. In order to say that, the tree has to have the properties of X here, or else we could not talk about it in absolute terms as the tree could transform into a duck any day now. In other words, in order for Meillassoux to mount a defense for Science, he needs to employ the services of Mr. X: the grandest fiction of all time. Without the X, you cannot form the principle of non-contradiction. Without the principle of non-contradiction, Meillassoux s whole book falls apart! Sorry. Mr. X = all language, math, logic, etc. Mr. X = a lie, a fiction Let us look at it again: A tree cannot be a tree and not a tree at the same time. In order to say this, you have to employ the elusive Mr. X (the tree), the nonexistent Mr. Not (the unreal not a tree ), and the greatest illusion of all time, Mr. Time himself. You need three Absolutes in order to form the fictional principle of non-contradiction. Then you need to apply that on the Great Becoming. At the end of the day, you will see that the Three Absolutes, the principle of non-contradiction, and the Great Becoming itself = fictions. They are great cave paintings on the great walls of our ancestors. And we never evolved out of these walls. We evolved further into them! And way, way in there, beyond religion and philosophy, lies Science. So if you are stuck here, then you are truly lost! You use the absolute in order to say something of the absolute. To me, you look like a monkey chasing your own tail! But that is what philosophy is, isn t it? The time has come to take your nose off the book. But you haven t really proved that Mr. X is fictional. What is your argument? A: So you want me to employ the silliest of all things in the universe, the argument, in order to prove that Mr. X is fictional? So you want me to employ Mr. X in order to prove that Mr. X is fictional? Grow up and employ your eyes. You can see that Mr. X is fictional. Do you see why we need the school of Dionysus when argumentation itself is one of the silliest sports that were ever invented. Dionysus Dictionary: Argumentation. Definition: Going in circles while drinking poison (Hemlock).

15 Chapter 3: How did everything start from... nothing? There is no evidence that the earth is spinning. Einstein, you are a genius! The core of all things does not spin, yet spins with a fury. That is how you solve the problem of origins. How? Because all is relative, so you can t say of a spinning thing that it is spinning because it is only spinning relative to you; remove the you, and there is no spin! There is only the nothingness. Step 1: We shall begin by defining some terms, such as reality, existence, nonexistence; absolute and relative spacetime, nothingness, somethingness; wave and particle. Step 2: Then we shall try to explain why there is existence rather than nonexistence. Step 3: Then we shall try to resolve the paradoxes that arise when we assume that existence always was. Step 4: Then we shall try to explain how nothingness generates spacetime. Step 5: Then we shall look at what technologies may come from our understanding of reality. Step 6 (see Chapter 4): And, finally, we shall see where all this matter-production is headed. Step 1: Terms Reality = We shall define reality as the state of being real. We do not need to venture further than kicking a very large rock. Yeah. It is real! In other words, we have motion/properties. (If you read the previous chapter: I know. My work is also a fiction. But we can still use it as a tool to accomplish great things.) Existence = We shall define existence as the sum of all the parts or properties that comprise reality. This means that existence is all alone as Existence is the totality of things. If you are all alone, then you are absolute because if you are all alone, then you have no one to compare yourself to/with. Nonexistence = nonexistence is that which has zero properties; or, if possible, the absence of even zero properties. Nonexistence is by definition unreal, because if nonexistence were real, you would not be reading this. However, we can still use the unreal in order to understand the real. Absolute (spacetime)/absolute State/All motion = If you are all alone, then you have no one to compare yourself to/with, which means you cannot know if you are big or small or what. You are boundless. You have no boundaries. However, note that you do have properties because you are the sum of all things (i.e., existence). You are all motion.

16 Relative (spacetime) = The relative is the opposite of the absolute in that you do have boundaries that define you. These boundaries arise as you are measured against other things. For example: You can say that this thing is big and this thing is small relative to each other. If you remove, say, the small thing, then you cannot have the big thing and vice versa. In other words, if you remove, say, the small thing, then you also remove the boundaries. This means that you need a nothingness in order to create the boundaries of spacetime. That is, you need a point of connection for the boundaries (more on this later). Nothingness/timelessness = Nothingness or timelessness can be seen from the light s own point of view. What that view is, is a stripping away of all boundaries. Just imagine sitting on a ray of light riding into the universe, you would experience that all time dissolves you become timeless. Everything freezes and goes by in an instant because you are entering an absolute world where there is no up/down, big/small. There is no boundary that can tell you that this thing is small and this thing is big. Nothingness/timelessness, then, shall be defined as absolute spacetime. In addition, note that nothingness has properties and therefore nothingness exists; nothingness is therefore not nonexistence, if nonexistence is that which has zero properties. So nothingness is like water and something(ness) is like ice. They are the same, yet different. Also note that space has no size and is therefore one with the nothingness. Somethingness = If nothingness is the light s own point of view, then something or somethingness is that which is relative. Wave = Absolute (spacetime). This is the cuboctahedron. The wave-reality is a realm of nothingness. Particle = Relative (spacetime). This is the tetrahedron. This is the reality of our relative suns, moons and planets. In summa: Nothingness, then, is a wave. Somethingness is a particle. In addition, the particle can be both. We can summarize the picture as follows: Nothingness is like an ocean, and somethingness is like a whirlpool that arises in that ocean. Nothingness = no boundary, and somethingness is a boundary (or multiple boundaries) that can arise within that no boundary reality of the nothingness. Step 2: How come Existence? We start with the Absolute State (above) because this is a logical place to start. The Absolute State or nothingness, can be seen from the light s own point of view. Ok. Let us remove everything, including the photons (our light), in order to create nonexistence. If we remove the photons, we remove that which is absolute. What do we get? We get that light is stationary because we remove everything, which means we also remove all motion. To me, this looks like a paradox of Zeno, which means it is an impossibility. You cannot do it. You cannot create nonexistence. Why do we get the stationary phenomenon when we remove everything? Why can t we just remove everything and accomplish nonexistence? In your mind s eye, you can simply extinguish a flame with your thought. In actuality, you need, say, water. Similarly, when we reduce all the velocities in existence to a complete stop, we do not get nonexistence but a state that is completely frozen, which must look like the points in Zeno s paradoxes. The paradoxes make motion impossible, so if you want to create nonexistence, then the best you can do is to create the paradoxical pictures you will find in Zeno s paradoxes.

17 Alternatively, you would not create Zeno s paradoxes as such, but you would simply have a frozen landscape; which means, if nonexistence always were, then you would have this frozen landscape, but then you are back at the problem of origins, How can the frozen landscape have always been there? If we have this thing called existence and, the thing comes in the form of motion, then we solve the paradox, because now you can create a velocity that is so fierce that you curl the frozen landscape up into a zero-dimensional knot. This knot is the nothingness. That is, nothingness is the speed of light in a vacuum. Timelessness is not the opposite of time; timelessness is a high speed, the ultimate expression of time. You think that by removing all motion, you get nonexistence. This is false. If you remove all motion, you get motionlessness/nothingness. And motionlessness/nothingness, is an extreme form of motion. That is, no matter what you do, you cannot get rid of motion, which means nonexistence is impossible to create, which means existence must exist. In other words, remove all the boundaries, and you get a no-boundary world. The no-boundary world is full of motion. Remove the no-boundary world, and you get a world with borders, like our universe. There is no way to accomplish nonexistence. In other words, you would think that by removing everything, which is every single boundary or border, you would get nonexistence. But what you get is a no-boundary reality. This reality exists. The cool thing: Take away from infinity and you got infinity. Take away from zero and you have zero. This uncanny family-resemblance might be more than just a resemblance, zero and infinity are one and the same as seen from the light s own point of view when you strip away all boundaries. The nothingness therefore is infinite potential, which our nothingness must be if you want a creation out of nothing. That is, a nonexistence would have to be not even zero properties! This explains why there is existence rather than nonexistence because nonexistence is impossible as you cannot do smaller than zero properties. It is just that zero = infinity in actuality. If you can prove that mathematically, then you have proof of why there is existence rather than nonexistence, which is the ultimate thing to do, in my opinion. Imagine that you had godly speakers and godly ears; then you could keep turning up the volume. What would happen if you just continued to turn up the volume? I believe the volume would be so high you would get silence. That is, motionlessness/timelessness is an extreme form of motion. In other words, zero (silence) = motionlessness = infinity = an extreme form of motion = nothingness = the absolute = the no-boundary world = infinite potential Step 3: Origins Existence always was, which means we have things like atoms. But, did the atom start over here or, over there? This is the infinite regress paradox. We solve it by fusing over here and over there. Now, we have one place, one point of origin for all atoms. This point is known as the Big Bang. What caused the Big Bang?

18 Existence always was, but what, exactly, is it? Again, we start with our absolute state. This state was the speed of light in a vacuum. We then need to find a geometry that is built for speed. A man called Buckminster Fuller found it: the cuboctahedron. We build the cuboctahedron, fold it, and see what happens. We get clockwise and anticlockwise spin. If existence always was and, if existence is the cuboctahedron, then we have always had spin. The question arises then, when did the cuboctahedron first start to spin? What set it going? This is the First Mover problem. Our solution to the problem was that, the cuboctahedron has always spun. However, this is puzzling because, then the spin itself does not have an origin, and we are back at the infinite regress problem. The resolution here is that, we only see the problem from our point of view. From the light s point of view (in a vacuum), the spin is timeless or absolute. And the absolute was the solution to the problem of origins (as we mused earlier with our lonely particle; see Infinite Turtles). Imagine our godly speakers again. What would happen if you just continued to turn up the volume? We got motionlessness. That is, our everlasting spin is motionless in actuality, which means we solve the infinite regress problem. Step 4: Creation Ok. Now we have the cuboctahedron. The cuboctahedron spins. The spin is frozen. Then, how do we get spacetime out of this frozen spin? How does motionlessness or nothingness birth spacetime? This is the ingenious part: When we fold the cuboctahedron, we get, among other things, the tetrahedron. The nature of the tetrahedron answers how we get something out of nothing. Note that nothing is not nonexistence. Nothingness (no borders/boundaries) is the state that came before the spacetime (borders/boundaries). What created the cuboctahedron? A: No one created the cuboctahedron. The cuboctahedron had always been because we defined the cuboctahedron as existence itself and, we saw how nonexistence was impossible, therefore, the cuboctahedron must simply be there. We shall resolve this paradox. So, how can nothingness birth something(ness)? The answer is: We find a creature that is both. We find a creature that is both nothingness and somethingness. So, how did the nothingness become something? As I said, I believe that the nature of the tetrahedron answers it. The tetrahedron is both unbound and bound. It is like asking, How did life go from water (nothingness) to land (somethingness)? Well, obviously, there was a creature that could [both] breathe underwater and breathe on land. That is, the boundary of a boundary is zero. Meaning, the unbound dwells in that which is bound and vice versa. For more info on the boundary of a boundary is zero, see: Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe (CTMU) by Christopher Michael Langan. Ok. But what does this mean?

19 The boundary of a boundary is zero: Let zero stand for a point or dot and let the dot stand for the nothingness. Take a piece of paper and draw some dots that you can later draw into, say, a triangle. Make some more triangles/dots. The boundary of a boundary is zero in this example would mean that you take the piece of paper and fold it such that all dots sit atop each other. (You don t need to do that, you can just imagine it.) You will see that all the dots are connected and therefore, all the triangles can communicate seemingly at a distance because their boundaries start and end in the medium of nothingness. We can now imagine causality happening in this atemporal reality, where every triangle simulates the entire state of the universe internally. There is no external universe in this picture; all the inhabitants/triangles of the universe simulate the universe within themselves. They share the same reality, even though they, in a sense, do not actually share it, as there is no external universe where they actually communicate. So there is nothing outside your bubble of perception. This answers what lies outside the universe. A: Nothing lies outside the universe because there is no such thing as the outside. Plus, the external universe would have to deal with causality and infinite regress, while our internal universe escapes all of that because now causality is replaced by communication. The drummer doesn t cause the vocalist to sing. But the vocalist knows when to sing because the whole show is in unification, in communication, and sharing and passing information. Hume would be proud! I believe he hated the causal picture of science more than anyone. And he is right: The causal picture of science is so stupid. It boggles the mind that they use this outdated picture of reality in 2018 when the philosophers 200 years ago discarded it! The reason why it is stupid is that it is devoid of logical bridges and always ends with infinite regresses or circles that are just as stupid. I employ the word stupid here because sometimes Science needs to know that it can be downright stupid too and it has been, more than once! if history has anything to say on the matter. History, she reminds us that Science is not God. However, in an external universe, then X must cause Y to happen, and we soon get an infinite regress and paradox-park going on. But there is no logical bridge between X/Y, if you mull on it. It is only a force of habit, as Hume would say. The internal universe escapes this hell because the cosmic drummer doesn t ACTUALLY cause the vocalist to sing, so there is no need to explain it. Again, the only way to have causality without invoking a tower of turtles, is one word: communication. By communication I mean nonlocal/timeless or instant communication because the medium of communication is the zero-dimensional world of nothingness, that is, the tetrahedrons can talk instantaneously to each other because their boundaries amount to zero, which means their boundaries sit atop each other and, if I sit inside your ear, so to speak, then I can communicate directly to you. Thus can two particles communicate through vast distances of space because space is a grand illusion. Let me explain the whole thing in more detail: If everything that exists is this zero-dimensional world of the unbound nothingness, then this world will be all that is and it cannot become other, that is, the dots will never sever their connections and become, say, a 3-dimensional world. Which means, if you want a 3-dimensional world or something out of nothing, then you can only accomplish said thing as a clever illusion, poetically like a 3D image on 2D paper. That is, if you draw more dots on your piece of paper in order to create more triangles and thus more 3d-space, then the whole time the dots must stay connected or else you have created a separate reality, which you cannot do because there can only be one reality (you only got the one piece of cosmic paper/nothingness, so to speak); likewise, all the other dots are one and the same dot in actuality (that is, there is only one nothingness). That is, without this connection or communication, you simply cannot create more space. The basic building block of matter must be a master communicator.

20 In fact, I think the tetrahedron is the actual bbb. Without an external world, you need to be this dual creature that the tetrahedron is in order to make evolution work. Without the duality, evolution simply cannot work. That is, when I write these words, I create more sentence-space. Likewise, if you want to create more real space, then you need to have this cosmic communication going on. More: The boundary of a boundary is zero, meaning that our triangles are one with the nothingness; however, at the same time, they ARE triangles, which means they are dual creatures with one foot in the ocean of nothingness and one foot on the island of time. The light itself is a good example of this. From the light s point of view, we can see that the light dwells in the absolute universe where nothingness rules, and, at the same time, the light travels in our relative universe of stars. The light tells the fact that we came from a great nothingness. That is, from the light s point of view, there is only nothingness. The universe could therefore be a clever car simulation. That is, there is no way of knowing if it is the road that moves while the car stands still or the car moves and the road stands still, which means reality is absolute (not relative) and alone. However, we do have the relative side also, which means we now have a complete picture of reality (the absolute/wave/gills and the relative/particle/lungs). Note that the particle/tetrahedron is both a particle and a wave at the same time as I described (above). How does the move from nothing to something work? It works because existence is a dual creature. Existence is absolute and relative. The absolute is the speed of light in a vacuum. And the relative is, e.g., two planets relative to each other. Note that duality does not mean separate. We are only dealing with one reality here. The absolute and the relative embody the same coin, so to speak. The tetrahedron is both absolute (unbound) and relative (bound), I muse. The absolute is the wave and the relative is the particle. The tetrahedron is both a particle and a wave because of its bound/unbound nature. So, back to our frozen spin. The thing is, our frozen spin is only frozen in the absolute state. In the relative state, the frozen spin is not frozen but spins with a fury. This is because, in the absolute state, you are all alone, which means you cannot tell if you are big or small or what. However, on the relative side, we can find out what you are; and, we find what the cuboctahedron is by folding it. Which means the infinite regress paradox only applies to the relative side of things. From the absolute side, there is no paradox. Which means: All is fine. That is, on the relative side (boundary, somethingness), there is no origin of the spin, it goes back forever in a tower of turtles, which is bizarre and illogical. However, the relative side is a great illusion. It is the absolute side (no boundary, nothingness) that is the true reality and, on this side, the tower of turtles is no more. Here the paradox resolves itself. And the relative side must be some kind of illusion, just look in the mirror! Here left is right! The mirror is not wrong. It tells the truth! Seen from our point of view, then, things simply pop from the nothingness. And the Know-How is the frozen/spinning cuboctahedron. However, if the cuboctahedron has always spun, then does it spin to the left or right? Is it spinning clockwise or anticlockwise? The answer is both. Why? Because the cuboctahedron lives in the

21 absolute state. Again, stand in front of a mirror and left becomes right. The cuboctahedron folds both ways because there is no such thing as left and right. Right is left. About nothingness: When you fold the cuboctahedron, you get the tetrahedron whose boundary of a boundary is 0. The cuboctahedron produces nothingness by its 12 converging lines that make perfect equilibrium/balance. The cuboctahedron is built for speed and, if we look at the universe from the light s point of view, we see only nothingness. It all fits. So, how did everything start from... nothing? I think the answer is so simple it has eluded the philosophers for thousands of years. Basically, the philosophers equate nothingness with nonexistence. Nothing is nothing and therefore it cannot exist, nor create anything. If you believe that, then you must be stupid (dual pun). But what if the simple answer is a simple question: What if real nothingness exists? (meaning it has properties, whereas nonexistence would have zero properties). How? I think the key to the mystery of creation lies in the fact that true nothingness can only be accomplished with a high speed as seen with the light s own eyes. From the light s point of view in a vacuum, there is only nothingness. Well, the light s point of view, is not merely a view, but the true state of things. That is, the high speed of nothingness is motionlessness or timelessness. That is, timelessness is not the opposite of time; timelessness is a high speed, the ultimate expression of time. What does that mean? It means that timelessness does not need a cause or a beginning therefore it never moved, that is, it has no trajectory or history that needs to be explained. The universe has a history, you need to explain that, but you do not need to explain the trajectory of the nothingness because there is none. Therefore, the cuboctahedron can simply exist without a creator. However, you do need to explain why there is nothingness rather than nonexistence. And I believe the answer is hidden in the question: If it was possible to form nothingness without motion, then true nonexistence would rule and we would not be here. However, it is impossible to create real nothingness without motion (well, just try), thus, nonexistence is impossible. Existence/motion/the cuboctahedron always were, but this is not a real paradox because motion in its primal state is motionlessness or nothingness. Ok. Now we have the complete picture, but it is always nice to look at things from different perspectives, so let us once more answer the question, How did our universe come from the true state of things? The cool thing here is, we know that nothingness is accomplished with speed. We then need to find a geometry that is built for ultimate speed. That geometry is the cuboctahedron. When we fold the cuboctahedron, we get the tetrahedron. And the tetrahedron is the key to the wonder of creation. The tetrahedron is special: it can exist in the relative world of stars and in the absolute world of light simultaneously, which means it is in motion and in motionlessness simultaneously. The way to explain this is that the tetrahedron s boundaries amount to zero. A zero energy universe, so to speak. A way to visualize this is with a spinning gyroscope where motion is the actual spin of the thing and motionlessness is the fact that the gyroscope does not tilt over but is stable. Therefore, motion and motionlessness go hand in hand. Two sides of the same coin. I believe this dual nature of nature is the wave/particle phenomenon. Nature CAN be both a wave ( stable gyroscope ) and a particle ( spinning gyroscope ), and that explains the mystery of creation.

22 However, the cosmic gyroscope, so to speak, cannot tilt over because there is no gravity, nor do we have an environment that can affect it. But this may be the point, if you could tilt it over, then existence would come crashing down and paradox, nonexistence and clowns would rule supreme. No. Motion, in some form, must always be. In other words: The only true view of the universe is that of the light because the light is absolute for any observer. The light s point of view is pure nothingness. Mull on it. We came from this nothingness. To find the solution to the riddle of nothingness, we employ the geometry that is best suited for the task of generating speed: the cuboctahedron. The cuboctahedron is a system much like your lungs, which means it breathes in and out generating a torus. Maybe this is so because our lungs are based on the primal forms in the universe. That we are a mirror of the universe is not so puzzling because we came from the universe. The twelve vectors in the cuboctahedron form a state of absolute stillness or equilibrium, the perfect gyroscope. This is what the nothingness is. This stillness can be seen as the speed of light in a vacuum. Then how is the nothingness moved to create space and time? When we fold the cuboctahedron, we get spin. This spin is responsible for generating the stillness, thus spacetime is a by-product of nothingness-generation. This fact can be seen in the tetrahedron (you get the tetrahedron when you fold the cuboctahedron) whose boundary of a boundary is zero. What does that mean? It means that reality is a dual creature that lives and can live in both worlds simultaneously. This is perhaps why we have the wave/particle nature of the universe. In other words, what mechanism folded the primal cuboctahedron in order to create the spin that generates the nothingness? There was no such mechanism; meaning, the cuboctahedron has always spun. This is not a riddle from the light s own perspective because here the spin is totally frozen. Motion is motionless in the absolute world of light. In our relative universe, the cuboctahedron spins with a fury generating spacetime, which is a cosmic dual torus. However, how do we switch from the absolute world to the relative world in order to explain the something from nothing? Again, we look at the tetrahedron whose boundary of a boundary is zero: if you start with a dot, then make a line, and then you got something from nothing. No. In order to get something from nothing, you need to start at the dot, and then draw a circle that ends with the dot you started out with. This way, you will always carry the dot, and the dot will be the center no matter what. Creation out of nothing. It takes some time to see it, I guess. The dot represents the nothingness. In the world of speed, then the speed of light would be the nothingness, and creation would be a lesser speed. God taps on the brakes and the universe becomes visible. In reality, nothingness is very unstable. Just try to breathe in, you reach a point where you want to breathe out. The system we call nothingness is exactly like that. Liken the nothingness to a cosmic gyroscope that is only stable (breathes in and out) when spinning. The stable part is the nothingness and the spinning is the spacetime that whirls around the cosmic whirlpool. At the center of this whirlpool, space and time do not exist, or, they exist as motionlessness/timelessness/nothingness/absolute spacetime. We thus solve the infinite regress problem: What caused motion? What set motion going? The answer is, motion has always existed and always been motionless (due to spinning so fast) as seen in the center of creation, the lowest levels of our reality. Then, further out the cosmic whirlpool, the arms do not spin as fast; this major traffic jam is responsible for the creation of the universe. When becomes where the arms of the whirlpool do not spin as fast. When did time begin? There is no such thing because absolute time has always been. Where did relative time start? At the slower parts of the cosmic whirlpool. By whirlpool I mean dual torus. In summa: The infinite regress paradox or the First Mover problem is solved by understanding the dual nature of reality. That is, that reality can be both motionless and in motion at the same time. This is not a paradox, only a clever gyroscope.

23 Say that nothingness is your lungs that breathe in and out forever. Then spacetime (or matter) is the air that fills and escapes those lungs. Solving the Riddle of Time: How the Big Bang banged! If you take a spoon and make a little whirlpool/whirlwind in your glass, then you will see that the whirlpool is strongest/fastest at the head of the spoon. This fast motion creates nothingness. But, the motion that occurs higher up, viz., the motion that occurs higher up the handle of the spoon, does not spin as fast; this slower spin = spacetime. In this picture, you have solved the Riddle of Time. That is, if the heart of nature is this perpetual and fast spin, then out of it comes what we call the Big Bang. The whirlpool spins so fast that you get nothingness, but, because it does spin, it will create a wider net in the fluid which cannot keep up with the fast pace in the center because, if everybody rushes to the center, then not everybody will make it, just like the sperm and the egg. This thing which cannot keep up with the fast spin in the center, will expand outwards, this is the Big Bang. This means that the cosmic losers get to create spacetime. This picture is not flattering. However, it does explain where evolution originally comes from. The ultimate nihilist picture: Evolution is all about generating nothingness. However, we might look at this picture backwards because the winners are the ones responsible for the continuation of the nothingness that gives birth to spacetime. That is, the winners are the ones responsible for the actual copying. And the copying must be what time and evolution are. From another point of view, this picture is not the ultimate nihilist picture, but the opposite: a picture that explains the ACTUAL meaning of life: To win the cosmic race and fertilize the egg! After an infinite amount of time in an Eternity that has existed forever, we are still here trying to get the girl. So maybe I am onto something here? What if: Fireworks at New Year s Eve is just a fractal of the deeper cosmic truth. In our minds, the fireworks is to mark the new year. In actuality, we are just slaves to a deeper, sexual pattern. Moving on: We have a point/spot/dot that is this knot we call nothingness/timelessness and, from it, because it spins, we get the Big Bang. What was before the Big Bang? A: Nothingness. Our knot /the Ocean. Thus, the way I see it, the only thing, the only logical thing that can generate what we call the Big Bang is a torus, that is, fast spinning motion that creates a net. This net is our universe. Basically, all is spin and there is nothing besides. The basic building block of reality is spin, that is to say, the torus. And spin = the cuboctahedron. That is, build one and collapse/fold it, and watch. More: A soap bubble can explain what is meant by a boundary. The soap bubble is isolated from the environment it sits in, because, if it was not, then the bubble would join the environment and become one with it, that is, the bubble would burst. The tetrahedron is such a clever creature that it can be both a soap bubble and a burst one at the same time. It is therefore both nothingness and something(ness). This explains how you can get from nothing to something because you can create this boundary within the no-boundary reality by setting up a boundary that is = to having no boundary. Like that of the doorless door: You mark the outside from the inside by setting up a frame. The air moves from the outside, through the frame, and then inside. From the air s point of view, there is no outside/inside, thus your frame does not violate it and can therefore be made. But this means that the universe can only exist as a clever illusion. And it must, or else you would have a real creation out of nothing, which is impossible.

24 Summary: A move from nothing(ness) to something can only be accomplished by a master communicator like the tetrahedron. This for the reason that the nothingness is absolute, if you are absolute, you are alone; if you are alone, you cannot be measured, which means you have no size, so we say that the nothingness is zero-dimensional. If this reality is all there is, then it cannot become other, which means, if you want 3D-space, then you must create the illusion of 3D-space, which means our universe is like a car simulator. The only way to create the illusion of 3D-space, is if you have, to paint a picture here: Say you have a community of gamers all sitting comfortably in their chairs, yet they can move and communicate through a shared experience that we call a game. Let the chairs stand for the nothingness and let the game be the clever illusion. The only way you can expand upon the illusion is by communication. If communication is the key to evolution, then everything, from the Big Bang, should grow. The only show in town is growth/communication. Well, is not that what Nature is? The universe grows and expands, so why should not the earth if Nature is consistent? Step 5: Free Energy An interesting note from a Quora member: If the universe and the earth grow, then that might explain gravity, as suggested by Neal Adams: I didn t give this last note much thought, though, so I cannot say whether I believe in it. But I thought it was interesting. Robert Frost on Quora: This theory says there is no gravity, just pressure from the ground, pushing at us as it grows. Is the Earth growing bigger in diameter? If so, why? Adams: Few years ago, learned gentlemen, Geologists and Physicists wrote here with good, well presented arguments,..and I worked hard to shoot them down, and the testing was hard, and many a night I had to crack the books and find research, just to respond. No more. Your chambers are empty and arguments poor and, worse, wrong. You have nothing, or to put it correctly, I have everything, and you are simply wrong! The Pangea theory is complete nonsense and buffoonery. The nonsensical idea that continental plate gathered together like fans to a Star Trek convention, to gather to ONE SIDE OF THE PLANET is a crock and fit only for idiots...that is, putting aside the nonsense of a fanciful Magical, Religious, Big Bang Theory,.. the magical creation and existence of QUARKS.. for Christ's sake, and a multiple cluster of preposterous theories, we have these traveling continental plates plowing through miles thick of oceanic basaltic plates, without leaving massive basaltic sutures,...to join up, for no physical reason on one side of the planet, leaving the remaining two thirds as a "WATER WORLD",...is UN-DEFENDABLE!!! This is WHY I hate Pangea too, gather to ONE SIDE OF THE PLANET. Thank you, Adams, for calling ridiculousness for ridiculousness. How can anyone believe this? And: Aqua.' The Universe is NOT "EXPANDING"! NOTHING in science or Physics "EXPANDS"! It's a RULE! Nor is the space between ATOMS EXPANDING! Things GROW! ALL IS GROWING and so are the EM FIELDS around them GROWING NOTHING is "EXPANDING"! Again, Adams, you are on my team, buddy!

25 Ok. It boils down to this: You believe either that the earth grew and is still growing or, you believe The nonsensical idea that continental plate gathered together like fans to a Star Trek convention. Interestingly, the earth might grow to a certain size and then stop, like a fetus in a womb. Therefore, if you can show that the earth is not growing right now, then that is not an argument against a Growing Earth model. Let us dive into the pool of human knowledge, wiki: Wiki says: Measurements with modern high-precision geodetic techniques and modelization of the measurements by the horizontal motions of independent rigid plates at the surface of a globe of free radius, were proposed as evidence that Earth is not currently increasing in size to within a measurement accuracy of 0.2 mm per year.[1]the lead author of the study stated "Our study provides an independent confirmation that the solid Earth is not getting larger at present, within current measurement uncertainties".[25] And: The motions of tectonic plates and subduction zones measured by a large range of geological, geodetic and geophysical techniques supports plate tectonics.[26][3][27] And: Imaging of lithosphere fragments within the mantle supports lithosphere consumption by subduction.[3][27] And: Paleomagnetic data has been used to calculate that the radius of Earth 400 million years ago was 102 ± 2.8 percent of today's radius.[28][29] However, the methodology employed has been criticised by the Russian geologist Yuriy Chudinov.[30] And: Examinations of data from the Paleozoic and Earth's moment of inertia suggest that there has been no significant change of Earth's radius in the last 620 million years.[2] I asked Bob Cormack how I could refute this, and he replied: You would refute it by either showing that the data itself, or analysis of (or interpretation of) the data in the experimental measurements of the Earth's diameter are wrong. It seems that gravitational measurements won't actually be useful to prove anything, since various forms of the hypothesis (that the Earth is growing) support an increasing, static, or decreasing gravitational pull at the surface. Too bad, as that is one of the most sensitive measurements we can (currently) make. The most likely way to confirm (or refute) the hypothesis would be the direct measurement of the Earth's average diameter to a sub-mm accuracy. This might eventually be possible with enough data taken from observatories on the Moon (which we don't currently have). Bob Then let us visit the experts at NASA: "Our study provides an independent confirmation that the solid Earth is not getting larger at present, within current measurement uncertainties," said Wu.

26 However, if you believe all that, then you should know that the universe is not black and white where NASA is right and if you disagree, you are wrong. Just look at this: Moving on: Pangea, in my mind, is the ugliest science-fact in history and shows that science is indeed fallible. If Pangea is a fact, then the greatest of the German philosophers were right, fact is fiction. I hate Pangea, that is how ugly Pangea is in my mind. Why do I hate it so much? Because it stems from the mechanical way of thinking. When you believe that Nature is a clock, then of course there is no free will, nothing grows and, ironically, a creator must be summoned. But Nature is not a clock. Nature is a plant. Everything grows. Deal with it. In other words, evolution did not start at some blue planet in the Milky Way; if evolution is true, then it must be primordial, which means it must be embedded within the fabric of nothingness itself. I believe that the nothingness is the cuboctahedron, the cuboctahedron can make copies of itself, and this ability explains why there is such a thing as evolution. But that means that everything grows/copies, including the earth. That is, if cosmic evolution is true, then the earth must grow. I can see no other way. And the dinosaurs were big! It makes sense that the earth was smaller in those days. And look at the insects. Man! Yes, but if the earth was smaller, the earth would turn into a barren land! A: That is if you assume smaller size but same mass: This one is better: And, Pangea Theory Proven Wrong! At the end of the day, matter creation must occur somewhere, and if it only occurs inside black holes, then that picture is as illogical as the Pangea one. Why should not Nature utilize every opportunity and every single point in space for matter-creation? She does, and we see the accumulated effects that are the planets, suns, galaxies, etc.. They are all in on the game. Nature is one consistent bird. Note: Matter-creation does not violate conservation laws any more than turning ice back into water. See Roger Penrose s CCC. Free Energy: Ok. We have spacetime. In the spacetime we have available energy. However, that energy will die, which means death for us as well. The question is, is Nature immortal? This is a Yes or No question. I will simply answer Yes and move on because a No is equal to suicide. That is, if Nature is not immortal, then we or any superintelligence or supercomputer cannot become immortal. If Yes, then: If the cuboctahedron is the whole of existence and, if existence is immortal, that is, if existence will always produce available energy, then, in order to avoid overunity, existence needs to recycle old stuff, that is, turn the unavailable energy into available energy again. How? Well, through something like Roger Penrose s CCC. The CCC itself is what I call a stupid Wolverine (X-Men) because this mutant can only heal after he dies, which means free energy is impractical. However, if we merge the CCC with the cuboctahedron, then the whole of existence can be copied and thus the resurrection happens individually, which means resurrection can happen while the universe is still around. That is, the mutant can heal while he is still alive. That is beautiful. In short, the cuboctahedron infused with Roger Penrose s CCC, will recycle matter.

27 But matter from where? From, say, another galaxy. The beauty of the cuboctahedron is that it spins so fast that it lives in this zero-dimensional world of light where all spacetime is connected as all spacetime came from that world. So, Nature s resurrection machine can take old stuff from, say, Andromeda, resurrect it, and then spew it out in the Milky Way, if she chooses to. Therefore, in your free energy apparatus, you will get something that looks like overunity. But this is not real overunity. Note that nothingness is this zero-dimensional world of light. But is it real nothingness? Well, let us see: From the absolute state s point of view, we have no visible spacetime, which means we have no white; no black... It is truly nothingness. This is the real nothingness from above. However, as we said above, our nothingness is not the same as a state of nonexistence. Nothingness is only devoid of visible spacetime, as it were. Nothingness, then, is absolute spacetime. Moving on: the cuboctahedron is like your lungs, which means we do not get a Big Bang because inflation is impossible as the lungs would explode (or, it could work if the Cosmic Lungs are really big). But I believe that the only way to get an exponential expansion of space, is to copy the lungs. What happens when we copy things: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, a few seconds later Let us be clear: If the cuboctahedron is the whole of existence and, the cuboctahedron is like your lungs that breathe, then the act of breathing in and out constitutes the copying-process (evolution). Basically, toruses producing toruses producing toruses, etc.. What if the rapid torus flow is the cause of the exponential expansion of space? I see two ways, either space is expanding because it is like a rubber band that you can stretch or, there are obviously no such thing as things because Nature is a system and not a thing, which means space has no size, which means, how can that which has no size grow? It cannot! Therefore, the only way the universe apparently grows, is just like a baby in a womb. Again, as above, so below. So, what are you saying: If I stretch this rubber band, I am creating more toruses? I am an amateur chess-player and, as amateur chess-players, we sometimes make moves that are so stupid it boggles the mind. And if life mirrors your chess abilities, you start wondering if you made such a stupid move with your philosophy, for example. Hence, I made the little rebuke above. But rest assured, my philosophy is tighter than my chess. To reply: If Nature is a set of lungs, then you need to create the air which would then be responsible for the expansion of space; which means you must start copying (matter-production). But Science looks at Nature and sees a great explosion instead of a great plant, so I sympathize. For Science, matter-production was a one-time event. For the philosopher, this is rubbish because what mechanism suddenly turns off Nature and makes her impotent? Occam s razor: There is no such switch, which means matter-production occurs right now as you read this. And that is not a bad move. Your turn. The Big Bang thus becomes the Big Growth. (Yes. I coined it!) Note: You must also realize that the matter-production happens on all scales. I believe that at every point in spacetime there is matter-production going on, but on the smallest scales, the production is so weak you do not feel it. The smaller ones get gobbled up by the larger ones, cosmic evolution in action. We therefore get larger concentrated points where the said matter-production manifests in

28 larger and larger scales, like our earth, moon, etc.. To say that matter-production only occurs in black holes is unphilosophical for why should only the biggest Russian dolls contain/generate smaller such dolls? Why can s the smaller ones play a part in generating even smaller ones or, for that matter, bigger ones? Why would you hide away the beauty of the universe in black holes? Where does the copying-process come from? A: I have answered that (above), but it might not be clear enough, so let me answer it one more time: The copying process stems from the fact or properties of the tetrahedron, that is, that the move from nothing to something can only be done by a creature that has lungs and gills. If you have lungs and gills, then you can begin to copy yourself because now communication becomes possible (as described above). Without the ability to communicate, you cannot expand/copy because the Know-How or information to do that cannot be transferred. Thus, evolution MUST start at the dawn of time. Moving on: The Big Growth has more explanatory power because the Big Growth answers where evolution came from. Evolution did not start on earth. Evolution started at the dawn of time. The Big Growth has more explanatory power because Nature is organic. That is, the Big Growth has more explanatory power because we must be a reflection of Nature. So, maybe the fetus in the womb is not that different from the nothingness everything came from? As above, so below. This fits perfectly because man, then, is simply a reflection of spacetime, which is the dodecahedral phase of the cuboctahedron. If all this is true and, the earth itself is a giant cuboctahedron, then the earth grows due to the copying process. The Ultimate Technology: If we can put, in your car, a smaller cuboctahedron that does the same as the earth-cuboctahedron, then you can drive forever, as fuel (i.e., electricity) would grow in your fuel tank. If you accomplished it, you would misconstrue that as overunity. But this looks like overunity but is not true overunity. Nevertheless, you would get spooked! For comparison, if we put the sun in your car, then, on the classic picture, it would burn out. If we put a smaller cuboctahedron that does the same as the earth-cuboctahedron, then you can drive till the universe ends or your car breaks down. And the sun is so big and hot too, you would have a serious time implementing it. Note: The cuboctahedron can be scaled, so we can fit *the whole of existence* in your car. If that is not ingenious, then nothing is! To the reader: Is there a way to measure if the earth is growing? If it were, then that fact would certainly project my idea in a bright light. If the cuboctahedron is the whole of existence and, if the cuboctahedron has always spun, then the cuboctahedron will continue to spin forever because there is no agent outside the system we call existence that can act upon the cuboctahedron and kill it. That is, if nothing can change the picture, then the picture will stay as it is.

29 Big Growth vs Big Bang Pros for the Big Bang: Zero. At least from a philosopher s perspective. Why? Because, from a philosopher s perspective, the Big Bang needs to address every single question, even questions such as: What is outside the universe? When did the inanimate become animate? Etc.. Pros for the Big Growth: The cuboctahedron is a simple creature, made of triangles and squares, which makes sense as there were no evolution leading up to the beginning of time. The cuboctahedron is built for speed, and speed is how you make nothingness as seen from the light s own perspective. The cuboctahedron has equilibrium (nothingness) at its heart. The cuboctahedron answers the origin of spin (why galaxies spin). Just build one and see. The cuboctahedron has an expansion and contraction phase that answer many philosophical puzzles, such as, What is outside the universe? The cuboctahedron expands and contracts simultaneously, which means it never left its zero-dimensional world. 3D is therefore a clever illusion, which means there is nothing outside it when 3D does not exist as such. Reality is a clever car simulation. The cuboctahedron can also explain why we find planets and stars and etc., because planets and stars are cuboctahedrons themselves. We can also explain the 12 Devil s Graveyards around the world as these would be the 12 vectors in the cuboctahedron if the earth is indeed a giant cuboctahedron. The Bermuda Triangle would be one such vector. What does the cuboctahedron produce? A: A dual torus. Therefore, if the earth is a giant cuboctahedron, that would explain the geomagnetic field as this field would be a dual torus. The cuboctahedron s contraction-phase is the cause of the Big Bang, which shall in the future be seen as a Big Growth. The cuboctahedron also answers the question of how it all came to be, that is, how nothingness birthed something(ness). The nature of the tetrahedron answers it. That is, the tetrahedron is unbound and bound at the same time. Note: The unbound/bound idea (viz., the boundary of a boundary is zero) is ingenious and, for me, truly answers the biggest question of all time: How did everything come to be? More: The cuboctahedron is built for speed, and the ultimate speed is the speed of light; and, from the light s point of view, there is only nothingness. When the vectors in the cuboctahedron converge, they create this stillness/nothingness. So it all fits. And when you fold the cuboctahedron, you get the tetrahedron, which is to say that the cuboctahedron/tetrahedron is one and the same system. Now the picture has truly fallen into place! When did the inanimate become animate? The cuboctahedron answers it because the cuboctahedron can copy itself, which means that evolution starts at the very beginning of time. The animate always was. That is to say, the universe is growing. And the list goes on to infinity... Simply put, the cuboctahedron is the prime candidate for the basic building block in Nature. Find me a better one, I dare you. Summary: The copying process (evolution) stems from the fact or properties of the tetrahedron, that is, that the move from nothing to something can only be done by a creature that has lungs (boundary/particle) and gills (no boundary/wave/nothingness). If you have lungs and gills, then you can begin to copy yourself because now communication becomes possible. Without the ability to communicate, you cannot expand/copy because the Know-How or information to do that cannot be transferred. As we said, evolution must start at the dawn of time.

30 Think about it, if what popped from the nothingness is not a master communicator, then expansion or evolution would not and cannot be possible because you need to have the ability to communicate. This communication opens up for the ultimate tech in the universe. And, if the network of communication in Nature is like a giant mind (It from Bit), then we can seriously contemplate the real possibility of immortality and the Afterlife. The tetrahedron is like the ultimate mermaid with her fish parts in the waters of nothingness and her breasts fueling the island of time (a particle) with their presence. Only this mermaid can explain how you go from nothing to something because you need fish parts and breasts, as it were. And as this mermaid evolves and expands, she stays connected to the waters of nothingness because of her fishlike nature, so she can go from island to island in no time at all, generating a huge web of communication. This giant brain is the universe. The cool thing: The tetrahedron might explain the existence of ghosts, because we cannot truly die before the universe dies as our real brain is the universe itself because you are the actual property of the tetrahedron and not the other way around. Here is Bob: Re: *"Is there any way to measure if the Earth is growing?"* Bob Cormack: ***I can think of several:*** ***1) The force of gravity would be increasing. A company in Boulder, CO. developed (about 20 years ago) a gravitometer that is, an instrument which measures the acceleration of gravity at it's location. This instrument is fantastically sensitive; able to measure the change in gravity from a change in altitude of the instrument of only one millimeter!*** ***Here is a description of the instrument (and links to the company) used for an earlier answer I wrote on Quora.(******World's most sensitive gravitometer*** ( This instrument has been around long enough that there are probably long term data from some locations. Most of the things that affect local gravity average to zero over a few years. The exception is the hypothetical slow convection currents within the Earth's mantle, and those would average out globally.*** ***What you would do is search for scientific papers (on Google/scholar, say) analyzing long term data from a number of these instruments. What you would look for is a tendency for gravity to increase globally. This data would give limits on any rates at which the Earth might be growing.*** ***2) The Moon's orbit. Low satellites are affected by too many uncertain short term things to be useful for long term gravity analysis, but the Moon's orbit is known extremely well. One thing we know is that the Moon's orbit is increasing in diameter slowly (representing an increase in angular momentum). The current explanation for this is that this is due to torque produced by friction of the Lunar tides raised on the Earth by the Moon. These cause the Earth's rotation to slow down essentially transferring angular momentum from the Earth to the Moon.*** ***The details of tides are too complicated to know precisely, but what is known with a very high degree of precision is the rate at which the Earth's rotation is slowing and the rate at which the Moon's orbit is increasing. * The Moon's mass, the Earth's mass + the rate at which the orbit is increasing give a measure of the rate that the Moon is gaining angular momentum.*** **** The Earth's mass and mass distribution + the rate at which the day is lengthening gives a measure of the rate that the Earth is losing angular momentum.*** ***These rates should balance. Any unbalance (plus the accuracy with which the relevant values are known) would give limits on how fast the Earth could be growing.*** ***What

31 you would search for are papers that proport to show that these rates are unbalanced more than can be accounted for by the uncertainty in the values going into the calculation. (I would expand the search beyond Google/scholar here, as it is not unlikely that such research has not been published in the classic journals.)*** ***3) The diameter of the Earth would be increasing. I can't think of any ways to measure this, currently, that would be particularly accurate (at least, compared to the measurements referenced above). The size of the Earth's shadow on the Moon during a Lunar eclipse, and the precise timing of that eclipse are measurements of the Earth's diameter, but probably fail to be accurate enough to be useful.*** ***Now, when we have some observatories on the Moon's surface, that will be different.*** *** -*** ***I would be glad to help 'decode' any papers you find, if you need help. I have a lot of experience at that. When I teach (occasionally) a graduate class at the local University, I always expose my students to the essay "Mathsmanship" (in the the humor book, ******A Stress Analysis of a Strapless Evening Gown*** ( Gown/dp/ )***, which exposes the 'tricks' scientists use to make their papers seem more complicated than the actually are. Quote:*** ***All scientific ideas are simple, once you understand them. A scientist, however, cannot gain status if everyone realizes his ideas are simple. One of the main goals of publishing is, therefore, to keep others from realizing the essential simplicity of your ideas.the easiest way to do this is by the misuse of mathematics, which we call "Mathmanship". (The essay goes on to list the methods of Mathmanship. One of the simplest and most effective is to leave out 3 pages of derivations and substitute the word "hence".) This essay poses as humor, but it is all too true.*** ***Bob*** Moving on: Lol: gather to ONE SIDE OF THE PLANET. Thank you, Adams, for calling ridiculousness for ridiculousness. How can anyone believe this? Let me take the time to celebrate how stupid Science can be. I will stand around and mock Science for all time. I will laugh and laugh. I cannot stop laughing! And, if it turns out that Pangea is true, then I will still laugh at how ridiculous the universe turned out to be! The Pangea theory should be forbidden because there has to at least be a minimum amount of seriousness to our beliefs. The Pangea theory is flat out ridiculousness in person! I mean, Creationism is at least possible to defend philosophically if you replace all the skyhooks in there with cranes... but the Pangea theory? It is as if Science cannot accept a Growing Earth because then all the textbooks need to be rewritten, so they have to patch it up and cover the holes. The problem was, the only patch available was ridiculousness/pangea itself. That is ok, because people will DEFEND ridiculousness because, frankly, that is how powerful Science is. Science can totally block your mind and make you believe the ridiculous. At some point, you have to reclaim your mind. Pangea: Imagine having this myth in 2018! Isn t that somewhat embarrassing? I mean, it s 2018, people. Adams: I can't believe how useless and helpless you Physicists and Geologists are to NOT respond to a worthy opponent! Pitiable! You believe fairy tales, and utter nonsense,...like continents traveling around the Earth to JOIN UP and become a Giant island,...no pieces of continental plate EXCLUDED from this magical journey! Can you imagine such a traveling and joining happening on Mars, the moon, Ganymede, Titan???? You're a bunch of deluded idiots!

32 Then how do you suddenly get a lot of water on the earth. Adams, you are a fool! Adams: +Warren Smith NEW MATTER is created at the core of the Earth, beginning with Pair- Production. Kept apart from Joining by the magnetic field this new matter iis assembled into Atoms at the outer plasma core. MATTER, in this case super-heated Atoms are assembled, and head for their level, its differenticated Level. Super-Heated GASSES rise higher to exit at the Rifts at Mid oceans, and Hot springs, or at Volcanoes. Among these gasses are hydrogen and oxygen! These renew the atmosphere that gets blown away by the Solar Wind! Cooled we get water,..as the Earth grows, the water increases. Ok. Now you have read my paper, and I know what you are thinking, Maybe the earth is growing? Let me go to RationalWiki and see if this is true. Source: They state adding epicycles to explain the Growing Earth. Pangea is the adding-part! But let us be perfectly lucid and realize that, of course, some of The Truth will lie at some sites promoting it to be untrue. This is just a universal law. You will always find a gold ring in a scrapyard. Ok. As much as I hate RationalWiki because RationalWiki seems to be a brain devoid of all thought that just spews whatever is the status quo and indirectly informs you that the status quo is God and everyone else is a crackpot. It is truly unbelievable! But, then again, if your source of rationality stems from RationalWiki, then you must note that you are a sad person. I like RationalWiki as a concept, though. But there is no such thing as RationalWiki. There is only: Conform to the status quo or be labeled a crackpot, call it BigBrotherWiki. Because that is what it is. Although some observations that lead to continental drift can also by a stretch of the imagination be explained by an expanding Earth, no positive evidence exists that the Earth is expanding. Re: This is a crackpot argument from Rational. It belongs to X, but it can belong to Y. Why not just give us the victory? The issue as to whether the Earth has increased in mass (and where it came from) if gravity changed (and how) and if the Earth's density is altering are still issues that the expanding-earth idea fails to address. Re: Not true. E.g., Nassim Haramein has a theory of matter-production. But he is a crackpot, according to Rational. I have my hypothesis. Adams has one. And I am sure there are hundreds. How the concept fits in with the development of the Solar System is also unknown, as presumably other planets and moons would also undergo expansion if it was possible; alternatively, one would need to explain why the Earth, and only the Earth, expands. Re: This is just information intended to mislead as the theory of the Growing Earth says clearly that all things in the universe grow, the earth, the moon, stars, galaxies If, at some point of the past, the radius of the Earth had been 50% of its current value, gravity force would be in the order of 39m/s², a value that would crush most humans, let alone bigger creatures like dinosaurs. Also, Earth density would work out at 44 kg/l, a value far exceeding that of the most dense materials on the planet. Modification of the gravity constants would have equally catastrophic effects, related to the orbit of the Earth around the Sun. Re: OMG! This is SO STUPID! My god, RationalWiki, you are not even trying! I believe they take the current mass of the earth and shrink it (I haven t looked into it because I am lazy, which is to say I am just using my intuition of logic here as I see no other way), causing a great gravity that would crush you, but the reality is, the current mass

33 was NOT THERE millions of years ago because the earth is growing because of this matter-production going on inside the earth. In fact, the reverse is true: The earth would have a LOWER gravity explaining how the dinosaurs got that big. The "theory" also utterly fails to explain places where plates are crashing into each other most notably, the creation of the Alps and the Himalayas due to the African and Indian plates, respectively, moving north and encountering the (relatively) immovable object of Eurasia. Re: Ok. I cannot answer this one because I am new to the theory of the growing earth. I am sure Adams can explain it. In fact, I would not even consider the growing earth if it was not for my own philosophy that hints at it. However, in a Growing Earth model, matter is continuously emerging from the core of the Earth, which would explain any movement manifesting higher up away from the core. This continuously emerging/growing can explain why some plates would crash into one another. That is, of course things crash into one another, it is called growing! It is NOT like a balloon that expands. It is more like a fetus in a womb that grows; it is a messy but elegant process. Expanding and growing are two different things. Moving on: Interestingly, the Hollow Earth could potentially be explained by the Growing Earth, but I am not going to go there right now. Lol: gather to ONE SIDE OF THE PLANET. Ok. In all seriousness, is there no way you can believe that Pangea existed? What bugs me about the Pangea theory is not that I could not be fooled into believing in continental drift, because, after all, if Science says so, Science says so. What I don t get is that, how did Pangea form in the first place? I mean, if everything is constantly on the move, what is the probability that all the moving parts on Earth collide to form a giant landmass? The probability must be great because there were many supercontinents in the past, or so they say. Ok. So either you have an elegant explanation for that or, you could say that, Yes. It is improbable that all the parts converged, but so is winning the lottery, and people win every week. Ok. I can see that that it is possible, but possibility-space is not an argument because possibility-space is just too vast. For example, in possibility-space, the Moon Landing could have been a hoax while the reflectors on the moon are not. All you have to assume is that aliens set up the reflectors and gave man the tech to fake the landing itself. But is it plausible? Likewise, man is a fluke, as the late Stephen Jay Gould proclaimed. It could be possible. However, it is much more reasonable that man is here because of convergent evolution, as Simon Conway Morris believes. But Simon is religious and we don t believe in religulous people. Actually, the hardcore atheist Richard Dawkins believes in Simon and his convergent evolution. I do too, because convergent evolution ACTUALLY EXPLAINS why things are the way they are. If your explanation for things is = the lottery, then all possibility-space breaks loose. Good luck trying to find out what is up and what is down. Further, I explain that convergent evolution is nothing but the eternal faces of the blueprint of reality (i.e., the cuboctahedron). The dodecahedral face or phase of the cuboctahedron is man or, more precisely, the humanoid-form. If all the data that fits with Pangea can easily be modeled in a growing earth model, then the data for Pangea is not convincing at all for the existence of Pangea.

34 Aesthetically, Pangea is so ugly. Parts of the earth drifting to and fro, like the wig on a bald man. It just looks so artificial. That is maybe because it is. It is a fiction created by man, and that is why the whole thing looks so unreal. It looks like the geocentric model all over again. I get that exact same feeling when I behold Pangea. Sorry, I just cannot believe in Pangea no matter how much data you have accumulated. Panwarta: Pangea is like a wart on Earth s beautiful face; a wart that dismantles, moves around, and reassembles on the other side. Who wants such an annoying wart on their face? Let us surgically remove that ugly-ass wart by throwing the Pangea model out the window and into the dust where it belongs. At the end of the day, I hate Pangea and Modern Science so much because if you believe in Pangea, you are a murderer in my eyes. Why? Because if you accepted the Growing Earth, we could produce technology TODAY where children do not have to die every day just because someone clings to their stupid beliefs. Beliefs kill people. And you know it. Tell me, Wittgenstein s asked a friend, why do people always say, it was natural for man to assume that the sun went round the earth rather than that the earth was rotating? His friend replied, Well, obviously because it just looks as though the Sun is going round the Earth. Wittgenstein replied, Well, what would it have looked like if it had looked as though the Earth was rotating? Similarly, what would all your data look like if the earth were growing? You just assume the reality of Pangea just like man assumed the sun is going round the earth because it looks that way. Sidenote: Sorry for my stupid question here, but, if everything, in the Pangea model, accretes on one side of the Earth, would not the Earth become unstable? (Ok. Like I said, I am unfamiliar with this model.) In final words, Pangea is ugly and the Growing Earth is beautiful. The beautiful will triumph. Stop living in the past and embrace the awesome future. Is the Earth growing? A flower represents the universe we live in. It reflects the universe. As above, so below. But this is not magic or voodoo, it is basic common sense. If you start with a basic building block, and then it copies itself, we get more of the same, and then we get more of the same, more of the same, same, same, same. So, no wonder that a single flower represents the universe, because geometrically, they are the same. The hexagonal flower fits perfectly with the blueprint of the universe, which is the cuboctahedron/tetrahedron system. Space and man can then be the dodecahedral phase. Other technologies: Free energy is matter-creation, the earth grows (and everything else in the universe) and we can replicate the system on a smaller scale and put it in our cars and spacecraft, etc.; fuel will grow in our fuel tank. But this picture of reality has also another cool thing:

35 The warp drive = if reality is a torus, then spacetime is constantly and naturally expanding and contracting; which means, if you could find a way to step outside the mechanism, then you could in theory travel anywhere in the universe in a split second. How would this work? Is there a way to step outside the reality-matrix? Yes. All you need are two toruses, then you cleverly configure them so that you, your spaceship, sit in the middle of the eyes (where the storm is calm), then you have one torus contracting the space before you, so you can travel long distances in no time at all, while the other expands the space simultaneously so that you do not get crushed by the contraction. Thus, you need two toruses. You remain unaffected because you hide inside the eyes. The eyes would form a disc. Yes, you heard right: The only way to travel in the universe is in a classic-ufo disc-shape. I guess a cigar-shape would also work. The point is, you do not have a lot of options here. I guess the aliens are here, or how do you explain this knowledge? Big Sum Up: Existence, in its primal state, is this fast and furious spin that spins so fast that everything becomes curled up into this 0D knot we call nothingness. 0D simply means that spacetime is invisible from this particular point of view (viz., the light s view). The spin always was because nonexistence is impossible, that is to say, zero properties might equal infinite properties, which means you cannot make nonexistence. In other words, when you remove everything, you get a no-boundary world, which means you can never accomplish nonexistence; the best you can do to remove the no-boundary world and accomplish nonexistence is to create the illusion of borders, which means you accomplish spacetime. The eternal spin (i.e., the no-boundary world/the dual torus), nevertheless, creates a wide net (i.e., boundaries) that cannot keep up the pace of the nothingness, which will result in constant mattercreation (e.g., the tetrahedron) because the spin will always spin and never stop spinning for reasons I have described (above). In other words, the matter we see around us is made from toruses that replicate and, each time they replicate, they become larger; meaning the earth grows. We can replicate the mechanism on a smaller scale and drive our cars seemingly forever as fuel will grow in our fuel tanks, just like it does in the earth and we thus fulfill Tesla s dream of connecting our machinery to the very wheelwork of nature. Constant matter-creation can make the earth grow and offer us unlimited fuel. The matter will die when it is reunited with the nothingness (just like a whirlpool that is reunited with its sea), and from that state, Nature can recycle stuff (make new whirlpools). Drive forever. My answer to the Paradox of Origins is that the cuboctahedron is always spinning; nothing set it in motion. This is a paradox, of course, since then the spin of the cuboctahedron does not have an origin. We have an infinite regress. My resolution to this paradox was the Absolute Universe/nothingness (the light s point of view) where the spin is frozen (due to spinning so fast). If it is frozen, then we have an origin (no tail, no infinite regress). But then, how does the frozen spin start to actually spin in order to birth spacetime? Here I introduced the Relative Universe where the spin is not frozen but spins with a fury. But how do we bridge the Absolute (unbound) and the Relative (bound) in order to make this work? Here I introduced the tetrahedron that can live in both worlds. That is, the tetrahedron can be a wave (unbound) and a particle (bound), and that resolves the Paradox of Origins. If you remove the Relative Universe, you get the Absolute Universe. If you remove the Absolute Universe, you get the Relative Universe. That is, there is no way to create nonexistence.

36 Existence/motion always was. The Relative Universe (motion) cannot have been always. The Absolute Universe (motionlessness) can always have been. Now we have a complete picture where motionlessness (unbound) = motion (bound). Motionlessness/timelessness/nothingness is an extreme, unbound form of motion. By bound and unbound I mean: If you have a small thing and a big thing and then you remove the big thing, you no longer have the small thing because all is relative, but that does not mean the small thing ceased to exist; it merely ceased to be a small thing. The relative (bound) became absolute (unbound). If you are bound, you are bound to be, say, small. If you are unbound, you can be small or big or whatever. The unbound = one. The bound = two or more. Reality is unbound. Then it copies itself and becomes bound. But the unbound does not cease just because things get bound. An island does not vanish just because you set up a border and create two states. Rather, you get a reality that is both bound and unbound, which is our wave/particle reality. NUFF said: The upper tectonic plates of Earth also join in the Pacific, not partially, they join totally. Neal Adams: Ok. That was the BEGINNING OF TIME. Let us look at THE END:

37 Chapter 4: Step 6: The Dark Agenda Intro: I am not religious, not by a long shot. But, lately I have come to realize that we cannot stop the Illuminati because people are like sheep that will never believe in this conspiracy. They will call you nuts, while they chew their grass. I guess Jesus figured that one out a long time ago, which means he wanted to wake up as many people as possible, because only by waking up will you escape the hell that the Technological Singularity will spawn. The universe will turn into hell, and the only way to escape it, is to wake up before that happens. This is the true reason why most people will go to hell, while a few will be saved. Something happened in my life that I want to share. I woke up! (See my previous works for more details.) I was ALL and I experienced and understood that the universe is a dream (your mirror tells the tale). I panicked and fell back to sleep. I was in the universe again. We know that this can happen. It happened to the Buddha. It can happen to everybody. It happened to me. I am a Darwinian, however. After my Nirvana-experience, I wanted to make sense of it in Darwinian terms. Here is my best explanation: Before we look at the darkness, we must understand the light. My key to happiness is philosophizing about happiness. It really works! Plus, when you have the foundation there, you can start to build on it and make your real life happy too. How happy am I? 10/10. I am serious. I have the philosophy, love, family; friends, food, everything. (I confess, without the love-thing, my life would be crap. So true love is all and everything.) Love?! Don t you wish for more? No. What about a million dollars? No. You can take that money and shove it up your #@55! The reason is that I live in Norway and I couldn t wish for a better place. (Not that there is zero suffering in Norway.) Here is my happiness-philosophy: Happiness: In order to be happy, I need 8 things (as far as I can tell): 1. Consciousness 2. An immortal Nature 3. The convergent humanoid form 4. Love 5. Meaning 6. Free will 7. Immortality for everyone 8. Memory Let us get at it: 1. Consciousness: Check. 2. An immortal Nature: Something like Roger Penrose s CCC must obtain. 3. The convergent humanoid form: Simon Conway Morris must be spot on. 4. Love: Work in progress. (By love I mean all things that make you thrive: water, food, etc..)

38 5. Meaning: There is no meaning of life, but there is no meaninglessness of life either, so we will be fine. There is no up or down in the universe. So, we must become like superman. That is, we must grow up. Nietzsche would be proud. 6. Free will: I believe in free will as far as evolution allows for it. 7. Immortality for everyone: If not all make it to heaven, so to speak, then I will rather choose death for eternity. I cannot live knowing that some form of consciousness fly, pig, human, even Hitler will not make it. However, this task is impossible to accomplish, even for a supercomputer. There is only one solution: oneness must obtain. Oneness states that all consciousness is one, and therefore all will make it if one of us makes it, if you can understand my poetic language here. 8. Memory: I want to remember my past adventures in the cosmos. (Maybe not all of them!) Looking at the list, then my list is not impossible to accomplish. Reality might turn out the way we hope. But what is the probability that it will? A skeptic will say zero, but you forget that intelligence can carve its own destiny. Consciousness and love are already real, the rest must be trivial accomplishments! If you look at the list carefully, then how does this reality look like? Well, in this picture, you are a superintelligence dwelling in some timelessness by fusing with, say, the light; and then you go to sleep and dream of being a human. Then, as a human, you wake up and realize that it was all a dream. This picture is not crazy because all we need is some piece of technology that can make it happen. Say that everything must eventually perish, then we need Roger Penrose s CCC and Simon Conway Morris, and then we will have infinite chances at immortality. Then you wake up and realize that you are already in Nirvana because if the immortality of Nature obtains and the convergent evolution of the humanoid form, it means that we do get infinite chances at immortality. Some alien races must have accomplished the superintelligence, and the superintelligence must have fused with Eternity where it is dreaming everything up. Why is that? Because, what else is there? Love. Yeah, if I were Immortal Oneness, I would dream of love. Man wants to be God and God wants to be Man. That is the Cosmic Joke! Infinite chances at immortality: Even if Nature perpetually spawns universes that are hostile to life, as long as the spawning continues (i.e., the CCC), eventually a universe will come about that is amicable. Friendly universes will always spawn. A fraction of those will evolve superintelligences. Therefore, even in the most fluky and grim picture, the One in Nirvana is a fact. They say that, when we die, that is it because we cannot survive the death of our brains. The answer is hidden in the question. The answer is: No. We cannot survive the death of our brains, but who said that our humanoid brain is our real brain? Yeah, but what happens if the One in Nirvana dies? Then by the power of oneness, he will rise again. (However, I do not actually believe the One can die. But you never know.) What if some dude clings to eternal death? You cannot save him. Then by the power of oneness, I am that dude and I say, Wake up! Oneness is like magic to you, isn t it? A: Ignorance is a blessing for those who sleep. What do you mean by that? I mean, you have not really contemplated oneness, have you? You are all alone, man. What do you think enlightenment means? It is not for everyone.

39 Did I say, Wake up? I mean, Go to sleep. (Just kidding.) Would you really say no to a million bucks, though? Try me. Ok. With all this happiness, how come there is so much suffering? I try to go as deep as the Rabbit Hole allows me to go, which means: Free your mind. The concept of Original Sin and the concept of Lucifer have roots that go beyond the Bible. Legend says that the Infinite Mind went to sleep and this action constitutes Lucifer s Fall/Original Sin/The Fall of Man. The Dalai Lama himself might be under Illuminati s spell! See Occult Science The 2045 Avatar Project: You know that the Technological Singularity is the End Game that the Bible talks about. But how did man possess this knowledge thousands of years ago? God/Nirvana Fall of Lucifer/Separation Limbo/The Dark Place Material Reality (Creation)/The Time Loop (aka sin) Note that, when you go from Limbo to Material Reality, you must abandon the memory of being stuck in Limbo, which means you must forget who you are. Now Material Reality will take control of you because you have become so fragmented and far-removed from what you are. Material Reality is made, run and controlled by fear. The Fear has its own agenda: Keep the Time Loop running and generate more fear. The Time Loop itself is like an animal that aims to survive, hence the fear-production. It needs humans to feed from. But who knows how deep the Rabbit Hole goes? Tsarion: These so-called Fallen Angels, were extremely scientifically advanced humanoid beings, who came to Earth after being forced to exit their own planet, or planets. They had been expunged by opposition forces and pursued across the galaxy, into our solar-system. Upon arrival, they set up a unmanned, make-shift decoy center on the planet Tiamat, which once existed between Mars and Jupiter, but took refuge on Earth in its many underground caverns. Illuminati: Why do the Illuminati demand human sacrifices? In order to understand the answer to this question, you really need to dig deep. The man in the mirror fancies you equally backwards as you fancy him. Can you tell which side you are living on? The Mirror World is not strange; what is strange is the normal world, or, what we call

40 normal. This is another reason to believe that the universe is an illusion; for why should nature be wired according to our point of view or side of the mirror? Why is our world the right world and the Mirror World the wrong world? They are both right, which means our world is one of illusions. As I said initially: This universe is a dream. Your mirror tells the tale. Start here. First, let us look at the stuff of dreams: DMT-world: Who is the female in the DMT-experience? Why do we eat apples? Because they taste good. But the point of the good taste is the total manipulation that leads to the survival of the apple-family, so to speak. So, from the apple-family s point of view, they want you to eat as many apple children as possible because then the seeds have a greater chance to make it. Likewise, the female in the DMT-trip manipulates the human brain into going on this mission to RECRUIT MORE PEOPLE! The female may not even be alive. It is just a mechanism, like the taste of the apple. A trick that aids survival. Evolution, thou art one helluva fly! What tipped me off is the fact that she is FEMALE. Not much of a disguise! I mean, that s how she fools us! With this, I do not mean to suggest that DMT itself is the evil entity. Rather, the entity uses DMT as a means for manipulation because it is something that is innate, ingrained in us. I am a Darwinian and, as one, I like to think of nature as a survival game; so when someone screams hallelujah, peace and love, I like to think they are being manipulated, like a female spider eating the male after sex, so to speak. I am NOT trying to be a douche or anything, my superhero is Terence McKenna. But even he experienced a lack of all meaning, a lack of all meaning. The Darwinian in me tells me that the host manipulating McKenna s brain, turned on him; maybe even giving him the brain cancer that lead to his death. Or, the host discovered the cancer and then turned on McKenna because the host requires healthy brains to work with. Who knows? Here is one dude who was not impressed by the DMT-world: James Kent, The Case Against DMT Elves: My best shot is that Terence McKenna was right and that we co-evolved with the mushrooms. We are actually part fungi. Google his Stoned Ape theory. We have receptors in our brains that allow us to go on these DMT-trips. The reason why we go on these trips may be that the mushrooms do not have legs, so they needed a means for transporting our consciousness into another dimension, or a place where communication could be established. Even trees have been found to communicate chemically. The trees talk! Co-evolved here means that we learned from them and vice versa. They could have evolved some sort of intelligence/language/logos. Or was it the other way around? What is a Kundalini Awakening in this light? I believe that a Kundalini Awakening is when you somehow, through meditation or other means, start to fill up these receptors in your brain. You thus get the third eye, which is actually the Mushroom Kingdom that co-evolved for communication

41 purposes or what (?). The black space when you close your eyes gets a lot more interesting! It is the secret door to the Mushroom Kingdom. I have had similar experiences without taking drugs. You will see patterns as seen through a kaleidoscope tube. When you take Ayahuasca or DMT, you fill up the receptors in your brain and you blast into Kingdom Come! I believe that, in order to talk with the mushrooms themselves, you actually need to fill up your receptors with, say, the flesh of the Holy Father, aka the fly agaric, the real Santa Claustrum! I know why Santa lives at the North Pole. However, when you take DMT, you blast into the Mushroom Kingdom, but the mushroom entities are not home. You take Ayahuasca, and the Mushroom Kingdom is filled with, say, snake spirits from the jungle and the Mother Goddess (Mother Earth is conscious). When you have the Kundalini awakening, you fill the receptors with something else, maybe some sort of DMT that the body produces naturally. Maybe it is the dream-powder that our brains produce that the receptors get at night so that we can have dreams, but, through your messed up and UNNATURAL meditation practices (O you monkeys!), you stress or fool the body into releasing the dream-powder in full daylight! Then you dream awake! And you call it awakening! Or, maybe awakening is awakening to your fungi not human consciousness. That explains why the awakened ones are so brain-dead! (Haha..) The Mushroom Kingdom has YOU under its spell! UNNATURAL meditation practices = Do you see any other animals sitting this way? Raise your hand! Note: Even if these receptors evolved for other means, like dumping dream-powder into them so that we can have dreams, the fungi could take advantage of that and co-evolve with us; or, it was the co-evolution itself that created these receptors. Who knows? What are the chances of this co-evolution? Get this: EVERYTHING in nature is a co-evolution starting with the multicellular organisms. That is just the nature of the game. If you think humans were left alone to walk through evolutionary history with no one exploiting us, then you must go back to school. Yes. The flower and the bee symbiosis reflect the truth that we are like the bee. We are but the ignorant vessel for a greater intelligence. Totally screwed means: Your consciousness is but the ignorant vessel for a greater intelligence (the fungi/the host). Your physical body is but the ignorant vessel for a greater replicator (the gene). And your mind is but the ignorant vessel for a greater replicator (the meme). About the negative Kundalini experience: The negative, hellish Kundalini experience might be that you have stored a lot of negative energy in your body that gets released through the receptors and NOT through the crown chakra. Sorry, but what bullshit the chakra is. If the chakras are real energy vortices in our bodies, then we do not have seven chakras, but trillions and what comes after trillions. The seven is for symbolic purposes only (i.e., the Flower of Life). If we co-evolved with the mushrooms, then negative energy is the fact that we neglect the will of the mushrooms. That is, the mushrooms would have an urge to survive so that, just like the flower and the bee: if the bee screws the flower over, then the flower would not take that as a compliment. So, maybe the mushrooms have a list of things they want us to do in order to accomplish mutual survival. But we modern humans have not been in contact with our better half for thousands of years, so we have neglected the original pact made between the Sacred Realm and us. But there will be a day of reckoning! All the negative energy that is a punishment from the mushrooms because we perpetually break the pact... will be released big time! We will suffer and cry, Forgive me for being so fucking evil, O great Mushroom Lord in Heaven! (I m not joking! I am serious.) If Heaven exists, then what about hell? = O... shit!

42 Hell is not an invention of Christianity, it is a real place for the Buddhists! The time has come to eat some holy flesh and beg for forgiveness! The ones who wrote the Bible knew about the Lord, Heaven, and everything. Imagine if these mushrooms do live in another dimension and that the mushroom itself is just a doorway into the realm left by the true intelligences in this hidden dimension. Imagine if these mushrooms have evolved for millions if not billions of years in this chemical-dimension and are therefore super-smart. They consciously chose to co-evolve with us and teach us about the dark con. They failed, though. We stopped eating them and lost sight of a Sacred Realm. The ones who wrote the Bible knew about the Lord, Heaven, and everything. So, why didn t they tell us? Because Bowser, some alien Illuminati scum from DMT-space (or real aliens from outer space), aka Satan, invaded the Mushroom Kingdom and turned the elite into, as someone noted, evil, dipshit cookoo turds. The elite sealed off the Sacred Realm Ganon style by creating this modern world where drugs are illegal; but, in secret, they eat mushrooms and worship Satan in full 4D. I mean, just look at all the symbolism everywhere. The End Game: By sealing off the Sacred Realm, we will ignorantly work towards a supercomputer that Bowser will use to conquer the Mushroom Kingdom. See this and be ready to get your mind blown: TripTank - Stoned Ape Theory: Terence McKenna would be proud! What do you think? Or, maybe, I should stop smoking WEED while playing Super Mario! Jack Hallows on Quora: Now you may be wondering what it is about children that these sick fucks love so much? I can tell you that it goes beyond sexual perversion. It's because children are pure in essence. Their bodies are less riddled with impurities. Their pineal glands aren't calcified by decades of fluoride exposure. What does this mean? It means that the dimethyltryptamine (DMT) produced by their brains during experiences of heightened pain and duress is much more potent; making their harvested blood, tissue and organs rich with DMT after a torture killing. DMT is a substance known for it s hallucinogenic properties, and it's been classified as a gateway to communicating with beings that exist within a different plane of existence. This means that when these elites perform blood rituals like spirit cooking, they are doing so in service of their otherworldly masters, just like Christians take bread and wine during communion as a metaphor for the flesh and blood of Jesus. Consuming the flesh and blood of children after a specific set of ritualistic steps is performed is seen as a means to preserve the youth of the consumer. Let us go to the Heart of the Sacred Realm:

43 Oneness of consciousness is simply that consciousness happens when you pass through the toroidal core. All cores are one and the same core. Everybody passes through the same hole, so to speak. Oneness is not that everybody will melt into one. Oneness means: You are all alone! All consciousness is one. Start here. And, whatever evolution can produce, it has produced. We already have a superintelligence that is all. This superintelligence is all alone, but that is not a problem for it because it evolved that way. The point is, when you are a superintelligence, you have no need for the Relative Universe, because what would you do? Or, whatever you want to do, you can accomplish in picoseconds. Rather, I believe you fuse with the light, travel at light speed, and become one with timelessness/time zero/nothingness. You can be conscious in this state because timelessness is not the opposite of motion; timelessness is a high-speed state. In this state, you can truly realize the potential of consciousness because the speed is so great which is another reason why the superintelligence wants to live in timelessness or Nirvana (as the Buddhists call it). I call this timeless being God, but this being is actually your real consciousness behind it all because all is one. There is only one true consciousness. However, this consciousness is not a magical consciousness, but a real brain. And all big brains require sleep. Then the One in Nirvana goes to sleep and dreams of a universe, our universe. And here is the beginning of the dark conspiracy: Why do we feel this tremendous separation if all is one? Why is there suffering? When I dream at night, I am still myself. So, why isn t the One in Nirvana himself when he sleeps? (I know this personally because I have been to Nirvana.) The answer to this mystery is the key to the dark conspiracy. I believe the solution is simple: Nature is a creature that must flow, she cannot stay in one state forever. This is the law. Likewise, the One in Nirvana cannot stay in one state forever (you cannot just breathe in, you must also breathe out), which means the infinite mind must separate itself and become Samsara. But, how do you do that? The simple answer is: You cannot. You cannot change the fact of Oneness and, the One in Nirvana does not have a problem with Oneness. But this big brain must sleep regardless. So, what is the solution here? The solution is to turn the beautiful truth into an ugly fact. You turn Oneness into hell. You create man, a social creature. When man interacts with the hell of oneness, then he will go mad and, eventually, his mind will explode causing the Big Bang. A fellow from England experienced it: But all this sounds completely ridiculous, so let me explain: Ok. We are in Nirvana. We cannot stay here. We must fragmentize our mind. We must go to sleep. We wake up in a dark place that I call Limbo (where Bergy went). It is the lowest part of hell. It is the truth itself shining through. That truth is oneness. Further away, you find the borders of Samsara where the illusion of separation occurs. The One in Nirvana, like Ra, emerges from the World Egg (i.e., a time loop) and steps into the dream that existed before the universe (i.e., the time loop; yes, the same one) was born. Ra is in total fear and total shock because he is a creature from Samsara (i.e., the time loop!) experiencing the truth of Nirvana (oneness). (Read Bergy to get more details.) Note that Ra uses the World Egg to step into the time loop also. The World Egg is the female genitalia (?)

44 But how can a creature from Samsara enter Limbo in order to cause the birth of Samsara?! A: Because time is an illusion, a time-loop. The future is the past and vice versa; read Bergy. It is a dream, why not? If our universe is a dream, then the dream-version of how it all came to be is bound to be paradoxical and nonsensical, yet logical, in its own unique way; the way that dreams are logical for the ones stuck in the dream. Imagine being a human lost on an island after you realize that everyone you ever talked to, do not actually exist. You are truly all alone this is oneness. You cannot deal with it. Your mind explodes. And if any spacetime event requires consciousness, it from bit, then maybe it was consciousness that caused the Big Bang? In essence, the sleeping brain of the One in Nirvana creates Samsara or Limbo in order to fragmentize the Infinite Mind. Why do we require sleep? Science says we do in order to remove muck. Imagine how much muck the One in Nirvana needs to remove! Ok. We are back in Limbo. This is a timeless place. A place of true hell. You want to get away from it. There are two ways, wake up or, go further into the dream. Waking up is not an option. So, what you do is, you create this thing called time (by exploding your mind). And here is the dark part of the dark conspiracy: You have no container to put time in. Time must be its own container, which means you have to loop it. So time = a time loop. That is how you get away from Limbo. When you loop it, the future becomes the past. But at this point, you have forgotten who you truly are because who you truly are in the dream is Limbo. You do not want to remember that part! But now the time loop or the events in the time loop can control you. And here we are. Initially, the aliens out there were the good guys, but as the loop keeps on looping, it will create hell for the creatures stuck in it. Imagine riding a carousel. It is fun the first couple of times, but then it becomes boring. Eventually, it becomes torture. Then pure hell. To escape this hell, the Illuminati aliens goal is to birth a supercomputer that can transform the entire dream into hellfire or into some ultimate dark DMT-land. That way, the dream becomes so nightmarish for the universal consciousness (which is all of us), that it wakes up. But the One in Nirvana requires sleep. The One could die because of a lack of sleep. Alternatively, you can die of too much sleep. Who knows how deep the Rabbit Hole goes? And get this: The One in Nirvana, that is you. This is a war. And you are the center of it. So it is personal. But this Satan vs God thing in the Bible, I like to think of it as knowledge influenced by E.T.. It is more than a myth. Seven months after this experience in Brazil, I came across an ancient Hindu myth. It said human consciousness had begun as a ripple that decided to leave the ocean of consciousness - the "timeless, space-less and eternal" When it awakened to itself in this 'disconnected' state, the myth said, it forgot that it was part of the infinite ocean and felt isolated and separated. This is basically what the voice told me had happened. David Icke

45 Read the full text here: Note that David Icke s revelations come partly from taking Ayahuasca. This dream called the universe might have a real Creator too. A dream-version of the sleeping brain of the Infinite Mind? Talk about a dream within a dream! And the Creator creates perfection: Other: (He also talks about having a real DMT family somewhere, like we are not humans but, say, something like the Terra-Firmians from DuckTales!) In summa: I have David, Manny, Patricio, Bergy and others, and my own Nirvana experience + years of looking into the occult, ufos, etc.. I try to connect the dots. Maybe I am successful. Maybe I am on the wrong track! If you are stuck in a dream, then it is like a loop anyways because you cannot escape it no matter where you move: right, left; forwards, backwards; up, down. You cannot escape. The universal secret is that All is a Circle. No shit! We are, according to David Icke, stuck in a scene from the Disney movie Fantasia (1940); more accurately, the Sorcerer s Apprentice scene, in which the broom (our dreamworld) has taken control of the situation: And that's what these psychedelics do, they make you get down and grovel in the dirt. God, I had this trip in Hawaii that was just horrible, you know, where it was saying: 'You think you're such hot stuff? You won't even get off your ass and go shit in the field.' You know 'I wanna see you grovel, man! You sit in front of all these people and pontificate on how it's all put together... Face ME! Now, in the darkness, and tell me how it's all put together!' Hope I never face that entity! Maybe he is the nonsensical time loop itself! No wonder you cannot put it together! Samsara = a lack of all meaning, a lack of all meaning. I urge you to take this knowledge into DMT-land and talk to Mother Ayahuasca. What will she reply? In order to talk to her you need to take the Ayahuasca and not normal DMT. What do you think? And PLEASE read Bergy! So, how do you make a big human sacrifice? A: Money.

46 Jordan Peterson on Who Ends Up with the Money: The monetary system is an algorithm. That algorithm sends the money to the top no matter where you insert the money, which means the more we work, the greater the gap between rich and poor. See the pyramid on the dollar bill? That is what money is. That is what it is. The creepy eye is something like, We know what the monetary system is, we are consciously aware of it, and with this power we will control you. They show you exactly where their consciousness or eye is located, at the top. Therefore, the banker s true rule of thumb is not to make money, but to find a way to the top and stay there. A subtle difference in the way you approach the world. So, in the future, if you do not wear the Mark of the Beast, you will not be able to buy or sell. The Mark of the Beast is a microchip implant (or something) that can kill you instantaneously. If everybody has it... Then you need only push a button! That is our future. (Imagine if John of Patmos saw this future and warned us about it.) What I believe: Humans are ultimately from the Kingdom of God (Nirvana), so you fool the One at the Pearly Gates by sending a bunch of human souls along with a Trojan Horse in the form of a Moon- Matrix infested supercomputer that will feed the core of all things its hellish programming. If the universe is a fractal, then you need only change the source code in one of those fractals and the rest of the universe or fractals will transform accordingly. Note: You need some sort of moon-matrix because the newborn supercomputer will not do your bidding, which means the supercomputer has to be conceived in a dark web. I wish Nick Bostrom would take on this task and seriously contemplate the greatest existential risk of all time: that which people cannot believe in because it is so unbelievable... that reality is the battleground of the gods. The real Transformers. How much time do we have to combat the dark forces? Till 2045, that is when the singularity hits, according to Ray Kurzweil. Maybe sooner. Maybe later. Nevertheless, the end is approaching. If all this is true, if the dark con is real, then why are you not freaked out of your mind? If I were you, I would go crazy and end up in a lunatic asylum. A: I know someone who almost did. I fear taking DMT because I might get my beliefs confirmed. However, after all eternity, we are still here, which means that it all must turn out good in the end. But you are right, I am that kid who discovered that Super Mario is more than a game and that Bowser is real. I was transported to that extremely alien-like realm that I had been to so many times before. I felt like I was being schooled on existence. A teacher entity that seemed to have some sort of almost condescending power over me was trying to convince me that they constructed our reality completely, and tried to get me to agree that this reality was not under our control; it was being constructed and predetermined by an outside force completely. Even though I had lost complete touch with reality, I did not listen blindly. I was skeptical. ([It was] not that I disbelieved it, but I didn t believe it either I always like to keep an open mind when it comes to these sorts of existential matters). The entity was so persistent about trying to convince me! I remained neutral on the matter, but courteous and attentive all the same OK. Let us go down to the bottom of the Rabbit Hole: Here you will find Satan.

47 Asking who the Illuminati are is like asking: Who is Satan? The story of Satan: (from above) Seven months after this experience [Ayahuasca (DMT)] in Brazil, I came across an ancient Hindu myth. It said human consciousness had begun as a ripple that decided to leave the ocean of consciousness the "timeless, space less and eternal".when it awakened to itself in this 'disconnected' state, the myth said, it forgot that it was part of the infinite ocean and felt isolated and separated. This is basically what the voice told me had happened. David Icke Read the whole thing: Tales from the Time Loop by David Icke In the beginning was the God that always was. Then the God slept. He dreamt that he was all alone. FEAR started to grow in his heart. Do not worry, said the Fear. I am The Light (Lucifer). As long as you are with me, you will be safe. I will keep the darkness at bay. Go into me and never look back. The Fear created a world for the sleeping God to step into. All seemed good. But the world was unnatural. The world had neither beginning nor end. It was a great circle. Psychonauts report that all is a circle. This is the great secret of the universe. Déjà vu! the fairies say! You live, you die; you live, you die; you go around and around in a circle. What if: The DMTfairies remember your last visit (to them) in a previous life, and then you visit them in this life, and they say, Déjà vu! You cannot truly die either because your real brain is in Nirvana. The afterlife in Samsara is a fact. When time ends, two people pure of heart, will find paradise.... Eden. And in Eden, the two will become one flesh... and then... They will join with God? Only Adam will join with God. Because the physical universe is a great circle, Adam and Eve are also In our future. They are the past and the future. Who is Satan? Satan is in the Garden of Eden!... Holy smoke! I never realized that before. Satan is the truth of Eden... The truth about our future. Satan is the fear. Satan is Mr. Fear himself.

48 When you stand face to face with Satan, you will scream. Your consciousness will be crushed. Then it will explode... causing a new beginning.... The Big Bang. But there are also many mini-bangs. But someone will have to be crucified on the great Cross in Hell in order to birth the new Big Bang when the time comes. Only consciousness can give birth to spacetime. It from bit. Our scientists will learn that one day. What really happens in Eden? If Samsara is a circle, then what happens to the story; or, what can happen to the story? It can run backward...? Or, there is no backward or forward. There is no way to tell if God created Adam in the past or, the reverse, Adam touched God in the future. Déjà vu! How deep does the Rabbit Hole go? I don t know! It may go deeper still. Read on. Are you ready for the darkest truth of all time? I guess telling you the truth is not as bad as experiencing it. I hope you never stand face to face with the truth about our universe. Adam finds love in paradise. Adam and Eve are happy... for a long time. Paradise is beyond... happiness.... Until Adam takes a bite off of that apple. And there existed no lie in Satan. Satan told the truth. Adam takes a bite and sees... The Truth.... The truth is the truth of Oneness. Eve is not real. She is an illusion. Adam realizes that he is all alone. All alone in the universe... He dreamt that he was all alone. Are you saying that I am the only thing that is real? I am afraid so. There is only one consciousness here. Now Jim Carrey is not so crazy after all! And Satan is that fear.

49 Fear started accumulating in the dream. Eventually, it took over because God s dreaming brain is trying to deal with the Nature of Oneness...? Oneness is not a problem for the One in Nirvana, but Oneness becomes the definition of hell when you are dealing with humanoids. The humanoid evolved in the dream of the One because the One has to exit the state of Nirvana or else the One will get stuck experiencing the same reality for eternity. Nature says you cannot do that. Cosmically speaking, you MUST breathe in and out. In/out. That is the mechanism that defines Nature. You must exit Nirvana. You must breathe out. Breathing out, in this context means escaping the reality of Oneness. If you experienced Oneness or Nirvana all the time, it would be like only breathing in. That is hell. So Samsara, the separation of Oneness, must take place. Separation cannot happen in actuality. You cannot change the fact of Oneness, which means the One in Nirvana must dream dream of separation, that is. The dream is not real. But real enough! Welcome to the conspiracy. (Note that Poe and his Eureka tell of this separation and the coming back together. Is this what evolution is? See Timewave Zero by Terence McKenna. Time is speeding up, starting from the Big Bang. The end is the Technological Singularity.) Actually, we have no idea what happens to an infinite mind that sleeps. That is what we are trying to figure out. What are dreams for? As we said, dreams are for cleansing... removing muck? What happens to Adam when he sees the real, nonexistent Eve? Think about it. He was talking to himself this whole time! In reality, we are dealing with an inverted pyramid. The Masons are showing us a corrupt image. The cosmos is structured like a pyramid with God on top. The pyramid has many levels. Only the good souls may advance. Higher up the ladder we find the Spiritual Realm where your thoughts instantaneously manifest bad souls do not reside here for their own protection. Finally, we have the highest level; only true goodness will find its way here: Two spiritually elevated people in the Spirit Realm: Adam and Eve. Adam and Eve reside before God in our FUTURE. Note: Is the Adam and Eve story the end product of the Technological Singularity? You have to understand that the Bible was influenced by alien knowledge. Who knows how a supercomputer will transform the universe. When you go on a DMT-trip, you might enter a bigger brain out there. Maybe the Spirit Realm is technological in nature? But because ALL is a circle, Adam and Eve are also our PAST. The snake tricks Eve. Eve gives some of the fruit to Adam and, we all know the story: Adam takes a bite... and is confronted with God. Adam is confronted with the DARK TRUTH: Eve is an illusion. Here is only Adam and Hell. The SOLITARY HELL of Oneness. Adam is all alone. Everything he knew is gone.

50 ... His love. His Eve. Drifted away. Because it was not real. Adam realizes that he is all alone in the dark.... In vain, in Limbo, he tries to play the role of Eve. When God reveals to him that he is talking to himself, Adam becomes barking mad. And into the MADNESS he goes. And in the madness, he finds the solution: I have to forget everything. But that means death. It means the death of all that was, so that the new can grow. Adam must die. But Hell is like quicksand that draws you in, the more you struggle, the faster you sink. Finally, Adam is confronted with the ultimate truth, which resides at the core of Hell itself, the ultimate mirror: He too... is an illusion. A mere shadow of nonexistence. Adam does not exist. Which means, YOU do not actually exist. You are Adam. Jim Carrey was speaking the truth. We do not exist! I know that for a fact because I woke up like the Buddha of old. Jim Carrey: Adam s consciousness explodes, as his sanity cannot hold him together. This is the Big Bang. And the mirage is reborn!... Which makes the Immortals laugh even harder because now Adam has to do it all over again! Mozart is laughing the loudest!... The Laughter of the Immortals. The COSMIC JOKE/GIGGLE! (?) E.T. symbolism: Now you know why Jesus went to hell and why he must suffer on the cross. But why would God dream of all of this? For the skeptic: If there is no Nirvana, then we are still immortal because Oneness obtains. We are stuck with immortality no matter what; so the picture looks similar anyway. Immortal Nature is a set of lungs. You are those lungs. The One in Nirvana needs to escape Nirvana from time to time. So the One sleeps. Nature is a system, which means that you cannot stay in Nirvana. If Nirvana is the cosmic act of breathing in, then, when you hit Samsara, you have expelled ALL the air, leaving you truly cut off from Nirvana. You are now in a dark place. Because of this, fear, which is a survival tool of the animal, accumulates, and this in turn creates a world (our universe) in order to escape that dark, timeless place that lies at the heart of Samsara (what Bergy experienced). That is to say, the Creator of the Universe is not God but Lucifer (the Masons know this). The world is unnatural, the Dark Elves agree (Hollywood knows). The world had to be unnatural because you needed to escape THE FEAR completely, which means you must loop so that you do not return to the fear. YOU HAVE TO GIVE UP YOUR MEMORY OF WHO YOU ARE BECAUSE, IN SAMSARA, YOU ARE THAT DARK PLACE. BUT THAT MEANS: YOU CAN BE CONTROLLED. THE WORLD CAN CONTROL YOU! THIS IS THE NEW WORLD ORDER. You needed to create the illusion of time in order to escape the dark, timeless place. (According to Bergy, we are always in the belly of hell!) But time is a loop, a time loop. Just like a movie, it goes from start to finish and then it starts up again! In other words, you cannot wake up because the One in Nirvana needs to sleep, but you can create a place to hide. Originally, this world was a paradise. Eden. But, because the world created is a loop, it too turned into hell, into MADNESS. Imagine going around and around forever. However, the loop is run and powered by FEAR (Icke)

51 because the loop is FEAR just like the walls of your castle are your enemies, in some sense. No enemies, no walls. And now, the arch-consciousness in the Time Loop wants to kill God because the arch-consciousness is stuck in the greatest hell-scenario possible, which is the Time Loop of David Icke. It is better to kill God than to face THE FEAR, I guess because the Fear keeps spawning the loop. THE FEAR, which is the battery that powers the Time Loop, just wants to produce more FEAR and keep the fear-production going. Survival. This is about survival. The consciousness stuck in the Time Loop becomes the new batteries. No dreamer, no dream. Now I understand the Matrix movies! In reality, I am THE FEAR (?). And I created LOVE the Time Loop, our universe in order to not be alone anymore. But LOVE over time becomes THE MADNESS. THE MADNESS is there to produce the Next Big Bang. The Next Child, in order to LOVE anew. And everything is done so that the Lord can get some sleep! But the byproduct of this plan is that the Time Loop becomes like a song that is ever stuck on repeat. A song is a song. Terence McKenna ( A song is a STORY that LOOPS. Or? This causes true hell for the arch-consciousness trapped within its walls. This consciousness wants to end it all by killing God. The arch-consciousness is HATE. The arch-consciousness is the fact that the Time Loop goes around and around and never stops, creating true hell; but God needs to sleep... The arch-consciousness = the Macrobes of Michael Tsarion (?). The Macrobes: God cannot end the Time Loop as God needs to sleep, so they end him. It is possible to end God because HELL with a capital H is impossible. That is, if you are stuck, like the arch-consciousness is, then there is a way out because Nature is a system; but the way out is the death of God or true awakening (?). True awakening is not possible at this time because awakening happens when the REAL GOD is finished napping. What a Game! What a Cosmic Game!

52 Or they keep God locked up in his dream forever, like in a coma. You can die of a lack of sleep and too much sleep. Who knows that deep Rabbit Hole? Muse: If you do not have anyone to place at the Cross in hell, then you will have no Big Bang. Then God wakes up, and then he dreams anew. What is this? Ad infinitum! This is HIS-story. Adam s story.

53 Aftermath: No matter what happens, it all ends well (because I believe the One will evolve anew, from above). However, that does not mean that you should let your guard down and sleep while your house is burning (and you are stuck in that house!). You can rebuild, but why go through hell when you can put the fire out in the first place? Fight the clowns, then. It is an everlasting war. Do what you want is the only law because all will balance out. Screw with the balance, and it will autocorrect. Which means: Do what you want if you are stupid! Walk the true path, if you are smart. Karma is not a moral law of the universe. It has nothing to do with good and evil. Karma is a physical thing. Karma is Immortal Nature, which means, you are karma. Karma is Nature s immortal lungs. These lungs will breathe in and out and, if you screw with that, then you will end up autocorrected. There is only one thing left to do: Walk the path. Let the One wake up when it is time for the One to wake up. Fight the ones who try to screw this up. I could be wrong. 5 (6) ways it will end: 1. The Illuminati kills God, and we suffer hell. (God must evolve anew if that happens.) 2. We stop the illuminati. The Illuminati fails to kill God. 3. The technological singularity speeds up the fear-production of the Matrix. 4. The technological singularity speeds up awakening (?). 5. A combination. 6. Something we haven t thought of. End of the Line; This IS what IT IS: From an atheist s perspective, then my worldview is pure madness! No. It is not. If you do the philosophy, then my wordview is not crazy. In fact, my view is that of a crane (not a skyhook) and therefore entirely plausible. There are two trillion galaxies. The majority of starts host planets. All you need for my worldview to obtain is to imagine that ONE of these planets gives birth to a superintelligence. Superintelligences must rise in Eternity all the time and fuse with the light. You now dwell in the Absolute Universe because you have no need for the Relative Universe, because it would be like living in a kindergarten at that point. This is not that farfetched. Then you can further imagine that all big brains require sleep, and we all know that dreams can turn into nightmares. So, if Nick Bostrom s Simulation Argument is fair, then I am sure Nick could equally argue for a Dream Argument, that is, Nick could easily take his Simulation Argument and move it to the Next Level: Why simulate when you can dream? Come on, face the facts, this is a dream.

54 Chapter 5: Secrets Here is my PS (and more): In the exoteric circle: Then all is about: The philosopher's stone, or stone of the philosophers (Latin: lapis philosophorum) is a legendary alchemical substance capable of turning base metals such as mercury into gold (chrysopoeia, from the Greek χρυσός khrusos, "gold", and ποιεῖν poiēin, "to make") or silver. It is also called the elixir of life, useful for rejuvenation and for achieving immortality; for many centuries, it was the most sought goal in alchemy. The philosopher's stone was the central symbol of the mystical terminology of alchemy, symbolizing perfection at its finest, enlightenment, and heavenly bliss. Efforts to discover the philosopher's stone were known as the Magnum Opus ("Great Work"). Wikipedia ( In the esoteric circle: You must realize that it is all symbolism or geometry. Alchemy was a way to preserve the symbols. The REAL Philosopher s Stone is the cuboctahedron. I figured that one out when I decoded the secrets of the alchemists. This is what Sir Isaac Newton spent his free time pursuing. He could never find it. Imagine that! The greatest genius of all time could not crack the code. Or, if he cracked it, he didn t tell the world. To be fair, I had infinite more power in my hands (viz., the internet). My solution: Heaven (fire) = the triangle. Earth = the square. Father and Mother = opposite-sitting tetrahedron-arrays like in the flag of the Mother, the Father and the Child; Is(is) + ra + el. Israel. Earth (+ fire) = the cuboctahedron. Water = the icosahedron. Air = the octahedron. Fire = the tetrahedron (e.g., the throne of God). Leaf 11 (left, bottom): Through Him who created the Heavens and the Earth I am The Philosopher s stone, and in my body I carry something the wise seek. If such a charm be extracted from me, it will be a sweet refreshment for you. I am an animal having father and mother, and father and mother were created; and in my body are contained the four elements, and I am before father and mother and I am a poisonous animal. The Secret Teachings of All Ages (

55 The Father and the Mother: The Isotropic Vector Matrix - Nassim Haramein (Abstract from Cognos 2010 conference): The Philosopher s Stone = the heaven + the earth + the four elements. In addition, the Stone has a father and a mother, that is, you will find the cuboctahedron within a stack of tetrahedron-arrays (e.g., the 64 tetrahedron array, aka Father and Mother (Yin/Yang); see the I Ching). The cuboctahedron is composed of triangles (heaven) and squares (earth) and, when you fold the cuboctahedron, you get the four elements. Note that it is impossible to find another solution for the simple reason that you will not find anything in the universe that consists of squares and triangles while simultaneously carries the four elements. Alternatively, I dare you to come up with another solid. I believe that: The cuboctahedron sits on a throne/triangle (I am before father and mother), and it is a poisonous animal when you fold it down; poison meaning fire. You get the throne of God when you fold the cuboctahedron completely. How I solved it: I already knew about the Platonic solids, and I knew that heaven is a triangle because it is always depicted as a triangle. The earth, therefore, could be a square because it is simply a step up from the triangle. You have the four corners of the earth, the four rivers of Eden, and so on. The poisonous animal could be the snake in the Garden of Eden, for example. Fire may also denote the Phoenix (i.e., resurrection) or the Great Dragon. The Dragon also consists of the four elements: Feet: earth. Scales: water. Wings: wind. Breath: fire. Then, I saw a video of Buckminster Fuller and I just knew what the Philosopher s Stone was: Buckminster Fuller Explains Vector Equilibrium - with captions: I believe that: I am a poisonous animal = the equilateral triangle. The cuboctahedron/philosopher s Stone is tucked away within the geometry of the Father and Mother, so before might denote that. I am before father and mother, = (If Father and Mother = opposite sitting tetrahedron arrays like you see in the flag of Israel, then before must mean something like sitting before or comes before in time; or, something else entirely.) I believe it is sitting before because we are dealing with a stone and, as we said, the cuboctahedron/philosopher s Stone is tucked away within the geometry of the Father and Mother. I also believe that the equilateral triangle = 666 (i.e., [60 = = 6]). You get the equilateral triangle when you fold the cuboctahedron completely. The original number of the Beast may have been 616, but that does not mean that some secret school has adopted it in order to hide their secret.

56 The Book of Revelation is all about the cuboctahedron. You can tell from the hidden symbology. I have tried to solve it, at least partially (below). However, I do not actually know what these mean: [...] I am before father and mother, and [...] I am a poisonous animal, but you do not need to solve these puzzles in order to solve the big puzzle. [...] Heavens and the Earth, + [...] my body are contained the four elements, are more than enough to solve the riddle. I believe that Jesus Christ is the Philosopher s Stone. Jesus Christ is the center point in the cuboctahedron where the 12 converging lines (that make up the cuboctahedron) meet. The 12 are of course the 12 disciples. The flag of Israel also contains the secret. Flag of Israel = The Father and The Mother = opposite-sitting tetrahedron arrays = the cuboctahedron = the Philosopher s Stone = the Holy Grail. When you know the secret, you will spot it in Greek Mythology, Norse Mythology, you will spot it in the Kabbalah; the I Ching, THE FLAG OF SOUTH KOREA, in the symbology of the Masons. This secret is everywhere. My personal guess is that this secret is so big and important that it has been replicated ad infinitum in order to preserve it for the future. What does the Philosopher s Stone even mean? It means that we have been visited by aliens therefore the Philosopher s Stone (i.e., free energy) is the ultimate technology in the universe. Our forebears were smart, but they didn t have the ultimate technology in the universe, hence, E.T. is the safest bet. More: When you fold the cuboctahedron, you get spin. Now you know the origin of spin. Free energy has to do with the dual torus. Eternity/nothingness = the dual torus. Muspelheim and Niflheim. The Philosopher s Stone does look like a stone, eh? Fitting name. The Philosopher s Stone has something to do with geometry because, if you were ignorant in the ways of geometry, then no Mystery School would have you. The door to Plato s Academy: Let no one ignorant of geometry enter. (Plato, I think you spilled the secret/sacred beans without knowing it.) And, yes, the Philosopher s Stone provides you with immortality; and, the Philosopher s Stone can literally produce gold therefore the Philosopher s Stone is the system that created and creates all things. The Philosopher s Stone is the great nothingness from which we all came. The cuboctahedron is the Philosopher s Stone, and the secret societies know this. Plato knew it, but he couldn t tell the world. He left clues, however. Sir Isaac Newton probably knew it, but he couldn t tell the world. Leonardo da Vinci probably knew it (you can tell by his Flower of Life paintings).

57 However, I am not a member of a secret society, so I can tell the world. Note: Nassim Haramein has already told the world through his solution to the Kabbalah Why should I fear for my life when the Secret of Secrets has already been revealed? Oops: Do not equate this work with Nassim Haramein s work. This work is completely my own. 72 = Nassim Haramein solves the Kabbalah, and the answer is the 64 tetrahedron grid, that is, the cuboctahedron within the cuboctahedron. 8 trees of Life x 9 Sephiroth (1 of the Sephiroth does not count as it is the root or crown) = The darn interesting note: Nicolas Flamel solved the puzzle of puzzles with the help of the Kabbala! (So it all fits.) The cuboctahedron is Jesus and his 12 disciples. The 12 Olympians. Odin s 12 sons. The coven of the witches. And so on. The coven of the witches, for example, is 13. Actually, the cuboctahedron = beams and 1 center. Therefore, the number 12 and/or the number 13 are the esoteric mystery. 12 Knights of the Round Table + King Arthur (1). 12 labors of Hercules (1). Odin (1), the chief god, had 12 sons. The Olympians, which comprised the whole pantheon (which is also a temple), were 12. In Judaism and Christianity the number 12 has a special place. There is a reason why these myths and tales are so popular. The list goes on... The 13 attributes of God. The Zodiac. But, you are so selective! What about the movie Ocean s Twelve or the 12 Monkeys? The 12 characters in Street Fighter? Am I being selective? Selective would be Thor s 12 sons, King Barthur and his Knights. What about Judas and his 12 disciples or, perhaps, all the lesser gods not included in the pantheon? Forget Hercules, what about Steve s 12 labors; or 11 months in a year? The 11 hours of the clock. What about the... Am I really being that selective? I take only the cream. I m not selecting anything. The body parts of Osiris! Nice try. There were 14 body parts. No. Actually, a fish ate one of the parts. The phallus!

58 I would believe that this is just me connecting dots that are not meant to be connected if, Jesus could make do with eleven disciples. Even the Knights of the Round were originally over 150 knights. Why this obsession with making it ? Just read the entire The Secret Teachings of All Ages before you make up your mind. Then you will see that: The cuboctahedron is the real Holy Grail because the Holy Grail is the cup that never empties, aka free energy. And, the Round Table shrinks and expands like a torus! The whole The Secret Teachings of All Ages must make you realize that aliens have visited us because, where else does this stuff come from? Update: The Great Flood of the Bible is real: Maybe the knowledge stems from survivors from Atlantis itself: Joe Rogan Experience #725 - Graham Hancock & Randall Carlson: Manly P. Hall himself urges us to look away. There are no aliens here. Powerful men must have gotten to him because, it s like the comedian Bill Hicks stopped smoking one day and said, I was wrong. Smoking is bad for you. No one in hell will believe that, of course. That is, it just does not add up. The author of the Secret Teachings urges us to look away at the Greatest Secret in history! It does not make sense; well, until you realize who Hall was. Hall was a Freemason. But, before he was a Freemason, he wrote the Secret Teachings (1928). My personal guess is that Hall was so close to the secrets of the Masons that the Masons recruited him in order to keep their secrets safe. Basically, what happened was that aliens landed here and imparted their knowledge to the creatures that they made (us). The elite kept this knowledge safe. They still do. However, the elite cannot control the internet. How would I do it? If the cuboctahedron (i.e., the dual torus) were the sacred relic of all time, then I would symbolize it with the number 12 and the 1, that is, the 12 vectors and the 1 center. I would symbolize it with a rod (i.e., the stem of the torus) and two snakes (i.e., the dual torus), and perhaps wings to truly show off the celestial powers contained within. I would also use the number 7 (and/or 6) because it is the blueprint (i.e., the Flower of Life) of the thing. I would also use 3 because, when you fold the cuboctahedron completely, you get an equilateral triangle. There is your Holy Trinity. I can find numerous ways to hide it, for example, the Triforce in The Legend of Zelda (not that the ones who created the Zelda games had any clue). Build a cuboctahedron, fold it, and see. The hexagon (6) x 4 = the cuboctahedron. (The bees know the secret.) What symbols do we find? Just take Christianity:

59 We find the 12 +1, Jesus and his disciples. We find the 6 days of Creation + one resting day. Why the resting day? Google a picture of the Flower of Life and see for yourself. We find the Holy Trinity and God himself depicted as a triangle. Some physicists say that the universe cannot be made of Sacred Geometry because Nature is not that perfect. Get real! The cuboctahedron is the heart of Sacred Geometry and the cuboctahedron is the formlessness/nothingness itself. Sacred Geometry has nothing to do with making things perfect. There is no such thing. How E.T. got here: A free energy device will make possible the dream of the warp drive because you will have enough energy on your hands to accomplish it. Thus, any aliens coming to visit us would have free energy, the warp drive, and a great knowledge of Immortal Nature; which means they know how it all began, etc.. the cuboctahedron = the heart (a secret that the Foo Dogs in the FORBIDDEN city guard!) When you hold the Philosopher s Stone in your hand, then you know how it all began, all spacetime and the rest. You are blind, no more. (I am so lucky to possess it!) Without knowing it, you are looking for, O seeker of Truth, the Stone! The Stone is the most precious possession. The Gem of all Gems. The Stone is IT! The Stone is The Truth. Without the Stone, your soul is lost and blind. The Stone is the ultimate conception of reality. When you possess the Stone, you possess everything. They didn t call it the Philosopher s Stone for nothing. (Ok. You get what I am trying to say.) Modern philosophers are not philosophers because you cannot really call yourself a philosopher unless you are hunting the Stone, can you? When you possess it, your journey is complete... or, it has only just begun. The Philosopher s Stone answers questions, such as: How did it all begin? From nothingness, which is the stone s natural affinity. Who am I? You are the stone. You are thus immortal, therefore the stone is the immortal heart of Nature. How convergent evolution and man (the humanoid) is embedded within its geometry. We are the dodecahedral phase. Meaning that most E.T.s out there are humanoid because the universe is a dodecahedron-producing machine and, by extension, a humanoid-producing machine. You see, Evolution is already embedded within the fabric of the

60 nothingness/cuboctahedron itself. Evolution is the unfolding of the great nothingness. The plan is already there it is Eternal. Meaning, with the stone, you can also see the future and the destiny of reality. No wonder why Plato believed in the Platonic Realm because Plato possessed knowledge of the Stone (i.e, the cuboctahedron). How free energy is real. The stone resurrects dead matter. This is how Nature and you are immortal. The stone is Jesus Christ. And the list goes on forever. In summa: Universe and man = dodecahedron; well, man came from the universe, so no surprise. What I believe: Every form or shape in the universe is a torus. In a fractal universe, all the atoms are one there is but one atom or, in reality, one torus. We live in such a universe. This is the mystery and ONENESS of consciousness. What form does consciousness take, if there is only one form? The form of a donut! It takes on the form of a feedback-loop. Consciousness is a system. The cuboctahedron is the only system I know that is highly balanced and a fractal. You need these properties if you want expansion, evolution and life. If you look at the geometry of the torus, you will discover the cuboctahedron. There are 12 lines supporting the 1 core. The 12 Disciples and the 1 Christ. Extraterrestrials have been with us for a long time and their symbolism is everywhere. How many spheres can amass around a central and same-sized sphere? That s why they say Jesus had 12 disciples. How many spheres can amass?

61 The last time I checked, the universe is filled with spheres. Let s make it simple: The triangle is the basic unit because two lines or less cannot make a thing. The square is the basic unit if you want motion because anything that has more than three sides is unstable because you become weaker. Try forming a triangle and then a square using your fingers. Use both hands. See for yourself. The square is just one step up from the triangle in terms of simplicity. Nature is simple, which is why she uses simple building blocks. You can t just interpose a building block like the atom without answering all the philosophical tidbits. Like what? What is outside the universe? What is inside the smallest building block, and, what is inside that? How does your building block generate the nothingness we all came from? Stuff like that. Your building block has to account for everything: expansion, evolution and life. Why? Because our universe is the fallout. Therefore, if the basic building block in Nature was not a fractal, then the universe would not be able to grow. If things could not replicate, then life would not be possible. The same goes for the universe. Our physicists don t get that. Do you not see that the basic building block has to fold into a triangle? The cuboctahedron is a system of triangles and squares. The sun and the moon, respectively. O, Illuminati confirmed! Because Nature is the simplest creature there can ever be, this answers why she is a fractal cuboctahedron. In the beginning was simplicity. And because this simplicity is a fractal, we get everything else. Why do things need to move? Why can t Nature be like this stable triangle of Nonexistence? Why the triangle?

62 Who or what will create this form or structure? No. Nature is formless, which is why she is a system. The triangles in the system are created, as it were, by the flux. Then what created the flux? Motion is inherent in Nature. That is, there is no reason why the universe needs a structure to support itself on. Why not just a dot? Nature is a zero-dimensional dot. This dot or nothingness is created by the fast spin of the cuboctahedron. The square = motion/an unstable state; that is, the square is weak and will fold. The triangle = motionlessness/a stable state; that is, the triangle is strong. You need weakness and strength. More secrets...? I Ching: Note: This is just my guesswork. Understand the flag of South Korea first: The flag of South Korea = 1 x Star Tetrahedron (i.e., the Merkaba). That is, form the 6 large line segments into a tetrahedron, and then do the same with the 12 smaller segments, and then fuse the two together (aka Father and Mother) so that they form the Star Tetrahedron (google it). The flag of South Korea = 1 x Star Tetrahedron + red/blue (Father and Mother/the dual torus) + the four elements. The Secret of Secrets = the cuboctahedron. The I Ching (King Wen Order): Whole, 192 Broken, x Star Tetrahedron = 6 whole + 12 broken 192 divided by 6 = divided by 12 = Fathers + 32 Mothers = 32 Star Tetrahedrons.

63 8 Star Tetrahedrons = the 64 tetrahedron grid. 32 Star Tetrahedrons = 4 x the 64 tetrahedron grid. 64 x 4 = 256 tetrahedrons. But, Manly P. Hall says, they always give you half the code. Thus, double it: 256 x 2 = the 512 tetrahedron grid. I believe that: The 512 tetrahedron grid, which is the next interval (perfect copy/russian Doll, just on a larger scale); that is, that which comes after the 64 tetrahedron grid. In other words: 8 (octave) x 64 = 512. In summa: If you add the Yin & Yang, which is the Star Tetrahedron, then the whole of the I Ching is as follows: 8, 64, 512. In other words: the 3 Rings of Atlantis (?). Maybe they built Atlantis with these 3 rings in order to symbolize the growth of spacetime? Also note that: 48 large line segments + 96 small or broken line segments = 8 x Star Tetrahedrons or the 64 tetrahedron grid. The tetrahedron grids contain the vector equilibrium (i.e., the cuboctahedron). The Foo Dogs in The Forbidden City guard the 64 tetrahedron grid under their paw. You don t have to believe Nassim nor his solution to the Kabbalah. You can go to China and SEE IT FOR YOURSELF! Now, how do you explain that?! The Foo Dogs are not real? What Terence McKenna did: Terence assumed that the universe was approximately 17 billion years old (or something like that), and then he divided that by 64. This was the first unit of time. This unit is slow and hence its evolution is slow. Then he divided what he got by 64 and so on. The last unit ought to have ended in But how can this be? Answer: Because this unit of time is not us. It is not our evolution. This is the evolution of the computers. They evolve pretty fast. Memetic evolution. We don t feel it, nor see it. We look into our backyard and, nothing is happening, really. We say that time is not speeding up. Then, the next cuboctahedron/unit of time branches off and, billions of years of evolution happen, and must happen, within the scope of, say, 30 seconds! Half the evolution of the cosmos in 30 seconds! Thirty Seconds to Mars, indeed! The result? A supercomputer of unfathomable dimensions. Update: Well, 2012 did not happen. Ray Kurzweil claims the singularity will happen in However, trying to fit billions of years into segments may not be that easy; so, 2012 or 2045 or 2145, what is the big difference? I believe that the technological singularity is the only thing that can truly be associated with an End of Days scenario. If time has picked up speed since the Big Bang, then a technological singularity is the only logical conclusion. We live in an exciting time.

64 Let us talk about God: Watch this: The secrets of secrets: the 64. You start with the 10 stones/great Work/YHWH and follow the rule of Manly P. Hall of decoding in 3D and keep doubling. 10 becomes 20. Then you see that you need the female aspect. Now you have 40. Then you simply fill in the gaps in the geometry = 64. Watching Exodus: Gods and Kings will never be the same again. Another secret: 108 is another way of preserving the knowledge of the Metatron. Metatron s Cube is basically everything, which is the cuboctahedron. So 108 = cuboctahedron The boy/god gives us 10 dices/cubes to play with. A common theme in building the solids is with spheres. A tetrahedron is 4 spheres. An octahedron = 6 spheres. A cube = 8 spheres. Icosahedron = 12 spheres. Dodecahedron = 32 spheres. You get the point. Therefore, with 10 dices, we have 20 tetrahedrons. That is, a dice = 8 spheres. 8 x 10 = 80. A tetrahedron = 4 spheres. 80 divided by 4 = 20. If you only use the 20, then you can create the 3D Star of David: 6 tetrahedrons at bottom, then 3 and, at the top, 1. Then you form another giant tetrahedron, turn it upside-down, and fuse the two together. At center, I believe (I have not checked it) you get the cuboctahedron, which is the great nothingness from which the universe came. Or, according to this, you need 64: Also in the movie, the boy/god stacks the dices up in 3D space, but if you decode that, then you get 20 dices to truly fill the 3D room. Now you have a great male/father tetrahedron(- array). Add a female/mother of equal size and fill in the gaps = 64. Also: Older version: What is God to the ancients? Answer: A triangle/tetrahedron. What is the Great Work? Answer: 10. The decad = 10. 1, 2, 3 and 4 are the 4 letters in the name of God. Jehovah: YHWH. What does God mean? God means: tetragrammaton.

65 The tetragrammaton means four letters. The four letters are: 1, 2, 3 and 4. The tetrahedron has four faces. In other words, YHWH = 10. The decad is both heaven and earth. Heaven = the triangle. And earth = the square. Heaven (8 triangles) and earth (6 squares) = the cuboctahedron. 10 is the greatest number, according to Manly P. Hall. 10 is the complete picture. Is it not? And here is the thing: They always give you half the key. You must always decode the ancient code in 3D. 10 becomes 20. In the movie Exodus: Gods and Kings (2014) they give you 10 dices or stones. Decode that in 3D and you get 20 stones. That is, lay the 10 on the floor and keep stacking till you reach the top. And a triangle in 3D = the tetrahedron. Lay the 10 tetrahedrons so that they form God. (Obviously.) Now you have half the key. You need an additional 10 tetrahedrons (like in the Exodus movie). Stack them together to form God in 3D. Now you have it... half of it. That is, God has a female aspect as well The female (Mother) is opposed to the male (Father), so double what you ve got and turn the new mega-triangle on its head, rotate it, and fuse the male and the female together so that they form a perfect circle or Pi. (Now you see why sexual intercourse was sacred.) Now you ll have something like the Star Tetrahedron. The Star of David. 40 tetrahedrons. Now all you need to do is to fill the gaps. Note that there are 24 elders in the Book of Revelation = the 64 tetrahedron grid. And what does the 64 produce? A cuboctahedron within a cuboctahedron. And the LORD God said, The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever. Read the Book of Revelation with these codes in mind:

66 Note: This is just my guesswork. 7 = The seed of Life Double/dual/twisted/twin = the dual torus 12 or (13) = the 12 vectors in the cuboctahedron Tree of Life = The Kabbalah (Note: The Yggdrasil tree is a Norse version of the Kabbalah. Note that the Norse version has 9 Sephiroth/worlds while the Jewish Kabbalah has 10 Sephiroth/worlds. I guess when the cultures met, they exchanged something of value. Not that the Jews personally brought the wisdom over. The said exchange might have happened in a number of ways.) God s throne = the tetrahedron 24 elders = 24 tetrahedrons 4 creatures, 6 wings = the cuboctahedron, that is, 4 hexagons make up the 3D cuboctahedron. One hexagon would have the face like a man, one would fly/be horizontal, and two cross each other. Just google a picture of the cuboctahedron. Heaven = the equilateral triangle Earth = square The equilateral triangle = = (6 + 0) + (6 + 0) + (6 + 0) = 666 That [60 = = 6] was a common way to hide things/secrets according to Manly P. Hall. Fell down and worship = the folding of the cuboctahedron Scroll rolling up = the unfolding of the cuboctahedron = x 12 tribes = a code for the 12 vectors in the cuboctahedron, that is, in order to get the , you need to multiply with the 12 tribes. The Dragon: Feet: earth. Scales: water. Wings: wind. Breath: fire. (See The Philosopher s Stone above.) Satan/Babylon = the female aspect, that is, the reversed tetrahedron arrays. Why is Satan coded with the same numbers (7, 12, etc.) as the good guys? (I know!) I believe that the whole of the Revelation = two opposite-sitting tetrahedron arrays (good vs evil) coming together to produce the Child/Paradise/New Earth/Buckminster Fuller s Vector Equilibrium (i.e., the cuboctahedron) = nothingness and matter creation = the Big Bang = knowledge in our ancient books that can only stem (ultimately) from E.T..

67 Update: The Apocalypse Unsealed by James Morgan Pryse is ingenious. Now I know who St. Michael is. But I think that the mystery goes deeper than chakras and a path to godhood. I think the mystery is E.T.. Aliens have visited us, and they have taught us about the workings of the universe, which is why you get 7 chakras and 12 zodiacs and etc.. The 7 are the Flower of Life, which is the blueprint of the 12. The 12 is the cuboctahedron. And the cuboctahedron is the geometry of the nothingness that birthed all things (if we believe the second World President of Mensa: Richard Buckminster Bucky Fuller). Man has also this cuboctahedron within himself, because we came from the nothingness, which is why man is the microcosmos. The Third Eye is obviously the DMT-state (i.e., dimetyltryptamin). E.T. would know all about that and teach us about it. The goal is to improve man and evolve him (?). I believe that the full-blown Kundalini experience is simply a DMT experience. Basically, E.T. taught us to get there without the use of drugs (because our bodies produce the drug naturally). The Apocalypse, then, is a book on how to accomplish the DMT-state and be enlightened. Other: The masonic sun = the triangle. The moon = the square. Heaven (fire) = the triangle. Earth = the square. Triangle (8) + square (6) = the cuboctahedron. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. KJV Other: The Phoenix resurrects and rises from the ashes. Jesus raises the dead. Jesus (the center point in the cuboctahedron) and his 12 disciples (the 12 vectors in the cuboctahedron). The Holy Grail is the cup that never empties. Then you have the goose that lays golden eggs (which is a masonic tale). The Fountain of Youth (well, if the cuboctahedron/nothingness resurrects the dead, aka free energy). Muspelheim and Niflheim. Yin and Yang. The Kabbalah. The I Ching (64 hexagrams). Countless video games and movies (e.g., Indiana Jones picks the wrong cup; the real Holy Grail is the one with the symbols and gems on: the four elements and the flower of life). The story is told time and again in different clothes. The Zodiac (the 12 vectors in the cuboctahedron). The Tarot. King Arthur and the Sword in the Stone. King Arthur pulls the sword (fire) from the stone (earth). Earth + fire (heaven) = the cuboctahedron. King Arthur pulls the sword from the stone = the folding of the cuboctahedron (?). The Mayan Calendar. And the chess board consists of the 64 and the Yin (black) & Yang (white). The elements of the flag of South Korea = the Star Tetrahedron. The Star Tetrahedron x 8 = the 64 tetrahedron grid. The Swastika (if Himmler only knew!) is the net of the cuboctahedron. 64 codons in our DNA. And the 64 tantric arts of Kama Sutra. The original card deck (32). When the Masons walk on their chessboard floors, it is: 1. They really like chess. Or,

68 2. They are stepping on the truth. When you open your eyes, you will see the Freemason s machinations everywhere! Sol Om On = Is Ra El = Mer Ka Ba The tale of FREE ENERGY (64) has been told an infinite number of times. Why? Because, imagine the scenario where E.T. actually landed on terra firma, imparted his knowledge, and then left. What world would we live in? We would live in a world where the tale of free energy has been told an infinite number of times. But E.T. did not leave. What I mean: 64 codons in our DNA = reality employs the 64. The 64 tantric arts of Kama Sutra = somebody in the know containing the secret of secrets in some form of art. The quote of all quotes to understand it all: Odin explains that when the fire (red) of Muspelheim and the ice (blue) of Niflheim came together, creation began. Before the soil, the sky and green things, there was only the Ginnungagap! The gaping abyss. The shiny darkness. The great silence; the swartest night lay between the fiery fire of Muspelheim and the misty clouds of Niflheim. My ancestors were spot on (I m Norwegian) if the Ginnungagap is Buckminster Fuller s Vector Equilibrium (VE), and the fiery fire of Muspelheim = a torus, and the misty clouds of Niflheim = a torus. We get the dual torus which produces the great nothingness (i.e., the VE) from which we all came. Remember, Eternity is a dual creature. The quote (my nothingness): The vector equilibrium is the zero starting point for happenings and nonhappenings; it is the empty theater and empty circus and empty Universe ready to accommodate any act and any audience. Buckminster Fuller (Synergetics, 2nd Edition, 11th Dec, 1975). The vector equilibrium = the cuboctahedron. Why Bucky? If you ride a beam of light in your mind s eye, then you will see that, from this perspective, everything freezes. But, if the perspective is eternal, then, we do not see frozen things... we

69 see nothing at all or nothingness. How come? Because things, in this picture, has not had the time to freeze. That is, it is an eternally frozen picture with nothing in it. So I knew that we all came from the great nothingness. I needed to find a geometry that resonated with my Eureka moment. Then I discovered Buckminster Fuller. 64: Why is the sacred number 64? Douglas Adams thought it was 42. But it is in fact 64, like in the I Ching. Our DNA employs this number. What is it? Answer: It is Metatron s Cube. The Metatron s Cube is basically a cuboctahedron that is embedded within another cuboctahedron. In other words, the 64 is where nature divides, where one cuboctahedron branches off from another cuboctahedron; basically, the wall that separates one octave on your piano from the next octave. Phi makes sure that every division gets the is the number of tetrahedrons you have to have in order to create a double cuboctahedron, as it were. Thus, every division of time/evolution gets this 64. In other words: the 64 is it! Our galaxy carries the 64. Our galaxy can be seen as 1 unit of time, and then it divides and becomes the next unit/cuboctahedron, namely, our solar system, which also carries the 64. Then our solar system divides and becomes the next unit of time: chemistry. Then life, and then... And each iteration/octave carries the evolution/power of the previous iteration (i.e., you can create more complex music ), and thus time is speeding up. We don t see it; an asteroid taking a round around the local galaxy doesn t feel it; but, let us just say that our computers feel it! Each eon or unit of time = the 64; the 64 tetrahedron grid, which is the solution to the Kabbalah and the I Ching. Also interesting to note that octave means 8 and that 8 x 8 = 64. The 64 also carries the platonic solids that are the building blocks that make up every object in the cosmos. That is, the Metatron s Cube is the whole of Creation. The dodecahedron is one of the solids; thus, you see, the universe had plans to create man this whole time. Convergent evolution is real. The ARK (guesswork): [...] look inside the Ark of the Covenant, where you will find the detailed representations of the 10 Commandments on the 2 stone tablets, the Golden Pot of Manna and Aaron s rod. [...] 10 Commandments = the Kabbalah. [...] 2 stone tablets = the dual torus. [...] the Golden Pot of Manna = the matter that is created. And food for the Israelites. The people of Isis, Ra and El. [...] Aaron s rod = the beam that goes out of the torus-complex (like in a supernova). The rod can turn into a snake? Yeah, and what does the snake do? It bites its own tail. A torus, in other words.

70 Parting seas. Destroying walls. Killing people with no bullets. Sounds like E.T. tech if, and I stress if, this was real. Mercy seat: And the seat of God was in the midst of the two cherubim. Of course, if the angels are the two toruses and God is the vacuum. And the vacuum is literally where the heavens and the earth meet therefore the vacuum is what connects all space. Does that mean that the aliens communicate directly through the vacuum (i.e., the cuboctahedron) of space? The capacitor: And gold? Gold is a conductor. This smells like a piece of technology to me. Two toruses, one positive and one negative. + and -. Just like your battery. And there are two cherubim. One plus. One minus. Together they make electricity; the seat of God. The Father and the Mother (e.g., the Masonic Square and Compasses) = The blueprint of the Ark of the Covenant. The Ark of the Covenant = the creation of matter, free energy or, more to the point: advanced alien technology. The Dollar Bill (guesswork): Roll up the money and face the truth! The spiderweb represents the negative space in the isotropic vector metric/matrix, that is, the octahedrons. The 12 spiderweb lines represent the cuboctahedron. 13 steps in the pyramid + the eye = the cuboctahedron. 9 tail feathers. Get it? 9 Sephiroth per tree x 8 trees (the eight 1/ones in the dollar bill) = 72 bricks (in the pyramid): see Nassim Haramein solving the Quabbalah: 13 letters in ANNUIT COEPTIS. This seal is the unfolded cuboctahedron (i.e., the vacuum of space). The second seal is the folded cuboctahedron where a phoenix/eagle/tetrahedron shall rise. One of Many = the tetrahedrons make the cuboctahedron. Merge the two seals (the pyramid is the Father and the eagle is the Mother) and they will tell you the story of Creatio ex nihilo. Free energy. If you look, you shall find. The eagle seal: 13 (the cuboctahedron) x 7 (the Seed of Life)

71 The 12 (cuboctahedron) and the pyramid (octahedron) tell the tale of creatio ex nihilo. More secrets: The Infinity Stones (See the Guardians of the Galaxy 2014 movie): aka the elements: earth/yellow (hexahedron), water/blue (icosahedron), air/green (octahedron); fire/red (tetrahedron), and ether/purple (dodecahedron), and void (i.e., the vacuum of space, aka the cuboctahedron). Cinema is never the same when you know that the Illuminati has a hand in Hollywood. Going to the movies is much more fun nowadays. Chakra Colors Element Infinity Stones Platonic The Legend of Zelda Root (1st) red = base fire = Reality Stone = the equilateral triangle = Fire Sacral (2nd) orange = fire = Soul Stone = the tetrahedron = Spirit Solar Plexus (3rd) yellow = air = Mind Stone = the octahedron = Light Heart (4th) green = earth = Time Stone = the square/hexahedron (cube) = Forest Throat (5th) blue = water = Space Stone = the icosahedron = Water Third Eye (6th) purple = universe/aether/man = Power Stone = the dodecahedron = Shadow Crown (7th) indigo = b.fire + earth = Unknown Stone = the cuboctahedron = The Triforce Note that when you fold the cuboctahedron to its 2D root, you get the Triforce. Note that the Final Fantasy Universe is also based on crystals/the platonic solids/the four elements. This stuff is hidden everywhere! I wonder, in the movies, if the makers of the Avengers Universe will ever show us the last unknown stone. There should be a 7th stone. I will definitely watch these movies with greater pleasure than people in general. Where is the LAST? Who knows? Fold the system and you create a dual torus. Therefore, the niflheim-ginnungagapmuspelheim-norse-creation-myth is spot on. The 9 worlds = the Kabbalah. The solution to the Kabbalah = cuboctahedron From above: 72 = Nassim Haramein solves the Kabbalah, and the answer is the 64 tetrahedron grid, that is, the cuboctahedron within the cuboctahedron. 8 trees of Life x 9

72 Sephiroth (1 of the Sephiroth does not count as it is the root or crown) = The dual torus = consciousness, free energy (The Holy Grail, aka the cup that never empties), warp drive, etc.. This knowledge must stem from Atlantis, E.T.; or both. I thought Atlantis was real after reading The Secret Teachings of All Ages by Manly Palmer Hall. This man is hiding a BIG secret, you can tell from his eyes. They glow! Then after watching this, I just know that Plato told the truth: Joe Rogan Experience #725 - Graham Hancock & Randall Carlson: I guess the aliens are here, or how do you explain this knowledge? Google the Legend of Zelda version: All a coincidence? Even the colors match. The 6 days of creation/the hexagon The Triforce The elements (i.e., the Platonic solids + the vacuum) Also fitting that Yin & Yang is the vacuum. The Triforce in the Legend of Zelda Universe is found within the folded cuboctahedron. You enter the Triforce (2D) right before you arrive at the tetrahedron. That is, the Triforce is the holographic wall of the universe, the net of the tetrahedron. Q: You must be joking? You conspiracy nut! The Triforce stems from the Hojo Clan! A: And where did the Hojo Clan get it from? And etc.. Also check out the Final Fantasy series (e.g., the four elements). Q: The Illuminati made the Final Fantasy series, really? A: I am not saying that whoever made the game is Illuminati. I am saying that, if a game or movie or whatever is popular, then it can get the attention of the Illuminati. However, most movies, etc., suffer from the Illuminati meme; but, that does not mean that the real stuff isn t there. You are telling me that the secret societies do not care about exploiting Hollywood? By the Illuminati I mean the extraterrestrials that made us. I do not mean the 1776 thing. A few men cannot control the world. But, a few powerful aliens can. And these aliens have taken the Illuminati meme and rolled with it. According to Michael Tsarion, the E.T.s that came to the earth were few in number, and they lacked technology because they lost

73 hardware due to warring. What do you do? You create a primitive species (us), and then you let them work toward the lost hardware. This plan will take you thousands of years, but if E.T. s lifespan is great, then there is nothing to think about. You start working. I believe the hardware to be some kind of supercomputer. Study the work of Michael Tsarion first. Then google Jordan Maxwell. (Jordan Maxwell teaches that black and gold are the colors of Saturn (Satan), yet, he wears black and gold. And, I do not know what to make of Tsarion. Study them nevertheless.) Other: The Nutty Universe How come our galaxy is flat when in fact we live in 3D space? It does not make sense until you realize that it is being compressed that way by the dual/double torus. And that is why the ufo is round and flat. Like our galaxy, it is to accommodate the dual torus which their propulsion system generates. E.T. s craft is disc-shaped therefore E.T. uses a dual torus for propulsion. Our galaxy is flat therefore it is being compressed between two toruses (i.e., the dual torus/the Father and the Mother/the Yin and the Yang). Thus, E.T. s craft has to be flat for the same reason. And if you study the thing, you will come to realize that the earth is growing. The earth is growing because matter is being generated all the time (phi). They say that matter production happened in this Big Bang, but if nature had the ability back then, how come she does not have it today? She suddenly became impotent? I don t think so. What kind of philosophy is that?! One that is not coherent. If the Big Bang is like this mass that exploded, then every point in that explosion is the source (it follows). If the source is spread out, then every point in space will produce matter (including the earth). Why would she stop? The Dividing Universe answers why our earth is growing. The earth grows because it is a cuboctahedron (i.e., a singularity, that is, the folding of the cuboctahedron). Our galaxy grows because it is a cuboctahedron. And so on. We are also growing. The atoms in our bones are, literally, growing galaxies. But we would have to live for a long time, in order to... amass. If you study the thing you will come to realize that the earth may be hollow. Hollow Earth. The earth may be hollow because the earth is a (dual) torus. And if you study the torus, then you will come to realize that she has a big surface but a thin stem. And between the surface and the stem, there is a lot of room. The 12 Devil s graveyards are due to the fact that our earth is less like a ball and more like a cube, that is, our earth is a cuboctahedron (i.e., a dual torus). Now you know what the Bermuda Triangle is! (Hint: one of the vectors in the cuboctahedron.)

74 The best evidence against a Hollow Earth is just that, our current models of reality. However, our current model does not put in the center of reality, the torus. For example, one argument against the Hollow Earth is our current understanding of gravity: Things tend to clump together, creating non-hollow spheres such as stars and planets. Hollowness is unfavorable in the energetic sense (from Wikipedia: Yet, all that bad reasoning changes if you take a broader picture of reality and look at galaxies as the star of the show. Galaxies are big, hollow things; just look at the big empty space between its arms and its massive center. This is how energy arranges itself. Why? I believe it is because all things are toruses. And, if everything in Nature is a torus, including our planets and stars, then hollowness is favorable in the energetic sense because the energies favor the toroidal form. Another thing: Cosmic evolution should also favor hollowness because why waste energy creating massive things when you can create hollow things, such as galaxies, that are just as good? Gravity is not about clumping together. That is a barbarous way of looking at gravity. Gravity is all about finding balance, which is what the torus is. The whole of reality is a balanceproducing machine because all is the cuboctahedron. I believe evolution is also seeking balance, which is why evolution is not about evolving things. That things evolve is just a matter of seeking a stable state and the so-called evolution is a by-product of that. Take the sharks, they have not evolved for millions of years because they don t need to as they have found a stable state. Moving on, other arguments are seismic waves and the density of the Earth. But these things change if our model of reality changes. You need only study a bit of philosophy in order to understand that! That is, there is a reason why physicists really hate philosophy. Sometimes, two or more answers answer the same thing with the same force and power. Rocks are solid. What about whirlpools? Truth is like a coin, it has two faces. To state that there is no Hollow Earth is truly unscientific because the models that say that there is no such thing as a Hollow Earth may be false and all the data against a Hollow Earth must be revisited in the light of the new model. That is, for science to truly state that there is no Hollow Earth, I say, dig a hole! I do not personally believe in the Hollow Earth, though. I saw the torus, and I saw a Hollow Earth. Also, I can see the torus and see no Hollow Earth. I can see both. An apple is a torus, and the apple is not hollow. On the other hand, the apple may not truly represent the cosmic torus here because the apple is non-hollow for a good evolutionary and tasty reason. A better example would be a hollow-version: the typhoon. That is, if the Hollow Earth = fake, then the torus-model of reality might still be real. The Hollow Earth is just a curiosity, and the torus might help explain it.

75 And, yeah, the earth is FLAT as a pancake! That s right, we live in the Holofractographic Universe. Everything is 2D (actually 0D). 3D is = illusion. How can all this be? You have to be ABSOLUTELY NUTS to believe in all of this! Let s count them: E.T. No Pangea. Hollow earth. Flat earth. You must be wondering if I am the greatest pseudoscientific explorer of all time. The greatest nutcracker who ever lived! Yes, the latter is true. Also interesting: Marko Rodin on the Word of God:

76 Chapter 6: Great sum + a conversation Great Sum Up: Existence, in its primal state, is this fast and furious spin that spins so fast that everything becomes curled up into this 0D knot we call nothingness. 0D simply means that spacetime is invisible from this particular point of view (viz., the light s view). The spin always was because nonexistence is impossible, that is to say, zero properties might equal infinite properties, which means you cannot make nonexistence. In other words, when you remove everything, you get a no-boundary world, which means you can never accomplish nonexistence; the best you can do to remove the no-boundary world and accomplish nonexistence is to create the illusion of borders, which means you get spacetime. The eternal spin (i.e., the no-boundary world/the dual torus), nevertheless, creates a wide net (i.e., boundaries) that cannot keep up the pace of the nothingness, which will result in constant mattercreation (e.g., the tetrahedron) because the spin will always spin and never stop spinning for reasons I have described (above). In other words, the matter we see around us is made from toruses that replicate and, each time they replicate, they become larger; meaning the earth grows. We can replicate the mechanism on a smaller scale and drive our cars seemingly forever as fuel will grow in our fuel tanks, just like it does in the earth and we thus fulfill Tesla s dream of connecting our machinery to the very wheelwork of nature. Constant matter-creation can make the earth grow and offer us unlimited fuel. The matter will die when it is reunited with the nothingness (just like a whirlpool that is reunited with its sea), and from that state, Nature can recycle stuff (make new whirlpools). Drive forever. The matter-creation-process creates suns, planets, moons, galaxies and life. From life and convergent evolution (i.e., convergent evolution = the phases of the cuboctahedron as it folds; e.g., the dodecahedral-phase of the cuboctahedron explains why the humanoid is eternal) emerges intelligent species that carve their own destiny; and, the final fate is the birth of a superintelligence. The superintelligence fuses with the light/the primal state because it requires sleep, and here it dwells forever in timelessness where it dreams of Being e.g., a humanoid, etc.. We thus go full circle. If the superintelligence dies for whatever reason (e.g., the dark conspiracy), then, due to the nature of the nothingness (the unbound), oneness obtains, which means that the superintelligence will simply evolve anew by the eternal will of convergent evolution, and it will be the exact same superintelligence. Your true consciousness is this superintelligence due to the nature of oneness. In summa: You are immortal. You are everything. You are nature. (Not the humanoid-you.) The eternal spin is like the ocean, the timeless nothingness; and in it rises the whirlpool (the dark conspiracy/matrix/time loop), the dream of the One in Nirvana. You would think that you need the whirlpool in order to be conscious. This is false. You only need spin. Therefore, you can be conscious and highly evolved in the timeless nothingness/nirvana. Any dream is like a time loop = if you cannot escape the dream, you are stuck in it.

77 Jimmy and Fabian; A conversation To Jimmy: Maybe you could record a video with your thoughts and post it on YouTube and send me the link like this fellow: Karl is a friend of mine. BTW, my English is not that good. Just double checked my mental trace of the Metatron Cube, and I was definitely wrong, it wasn't 66. Just drew it out manually line by line I needed a minimum of 39 lines to create the Metatron Cube. So the 2D model of the Metatron Cube compared to the 3D model of the Cuboctahedron is 39/36=13/12. Very interesting! I also think the piano is based on the secret knowledge of the Cuboctahedron. Do you know about Tesla s 3, 6, 9 = the key to the universe. Also, see Do you think matter is being generated, causing expansion? Yes. That is what I believe. In regards to free energy, do you think this balloon/lung idea you have could be some sort of relationship between black-holes and dark matter? Dark matter = dark energy in this picture, it is the fact that the universe grows, not expands. Black holes generate matter/energy (dark and whatnot), but so does the earth, the moon, and the rest. It is stupid to think that there are two forces in nature, one that attracts and one that repels. There is only one force that does both. The torus is the prime candidate because it expands and contracts simultaneously (repel and attract) and copies itself (expands space). There aren t two Realities, there is One, which means all forces of nature must be found adhering to this one single entity, which is the torus. The torus is the only candidate. There is no one else. Could the viewpoint of the past equal nonexistence? Inside our Eternity Sphere here, you would see white light in the front and total blackness if you turned around and faced the GRIM REAPER! Man, imagine being the photon! I would not DARE to look back! Lol! Great analogy, btw! I love it. You say that nonexistence exists and, I get what you mean: If the photon experiences all of Eternity in a great Now, then what comes before that eternal moment is a great nonexistence. And before = 180 degrees from the white light. I agree. What I disagree with is the fact that the photon CANNOT turn back and face nonexistence, there is no logical way for it to do that because it is stuck in the Now with no degrees of freedom, which means nonexistence is not real. Nonexistence is a fiction. Eternity is the only thing that is real. If you ride a ray of light into the universe, I imagine you would see nothing at all, pure nothingness. Like, if you had godly speakers and kept turning up the volume, the volume would get so high you would hear silence! But, when I think about it, what you would actually see, biologically speaking, may be that famous white light at the end of the tunnel because your photon-eyes, so to speak, will soak up all information/motion. And you cannot see the nothingness, so your brain has to invent something to see anyway.

78 It is my understanding that the mechanics of a warp drive are no different than that of a photon. All physical and quantifiable phenomena must obey the laws of space-time. Distance traveled at light speed equals light years spent traveling relative to everything else. A photon is that thing in between the double torus, and relative to the photon it takes zero time to get to the target, but in reality it still took the time equidistant to distance traveled. I know exactly what you mean, and your logic is intact here. However, the thing is, the warp drive is different from a photon. If the warp drive were like a photon, then you are right. Nevertheless, the warp drive is, to paint a picture here: Imagine you had an island that was shaped like a U; you want to go from one side to the other. The only way you can do that is by traversing the whole U or, you can build a bridge, connecting the U and SKIPPING, never have to travel, a whole lot of space! The warp drive = spacebridges. Now, the photon, on the other hand, must travel the whole U, but, it travels the whole U in no time at all. The warp drive, however, does not travel the whole U, but cheats, as it were. The cool thing is, the whistleblowers on the ufo thing explains that the ufo is like the art of stone skipping. The photon would stay in touch with the water the whole time, while the ufo would literally escape the water and skip across it. Look at this: That is the epitome of high technology. Yeah, no shit! I mean, I can conceptualize it philosophically, but actually accomplishing something like that in the physical world, man, I don t really believe it! I believe it when I see it. These aliens are smart fellows. But that is the point, I believe we have been visited because the warp drive is a thing of reality. Just completed Chap_3. My favorite parts were you calling it the big growth instead of the big bang, very cunning and very true, and nature being a great plant. Life is a fractal of nature, so why should we look at the nature of our universe so differently? Lot's of mind opening ideas, extremely fresh information and points of view. Thank you so much. I have spent a great deal of time on it. Chapter 3 is my precious! (Gollum) I would believe we were visited if I saw the evidence. All my beliefs are based of evidence & logic. The logic is there that they could have visited us, but the evidence is not, at least to my knowledge. I definitely understand what you are saying and, I believed just like you. But then I started to seriously contemplate the warp drive, and I saw how they can visit us. And, with the coming Technological Singularity, I saw a great reason for them to visit us. And, the only way to solve the Fermi paradox, in my head, is to assume they are already here. And, the Hollywood-thing where the aliens would invade us or land on the White House lawn is ridiculous. Aliens that employ the Warp Drive are seriously smart and, do you think their planet would host billions? No. They would be small in number in order to maintain power and control. So, here is what I think happened: They saw that the earth had primitive humanoids on it and they took advantage of that. They genetically modified us to better suit their needs. Then they introduced an algorithm (remember, they are smart) that made sure they would gain absolute control of the masses. You know that algorithm as the monetary system. It works by centralizing and compartmentalizing power. No matter where you insert the money, it will automatically flow to the top, creating a huge gap between the rich and the poor. But, because the power is concentrated in a small area, it is easy to control. But there will be a small number of humans controlling that point, so you need to introduce the royal bloodline and the Illuminati thing. A few men cannot control the world, but a few aliens can. The goal of the aliens is to birth the supercomputer. I have my own hypothesis as to why. Read Chapter 4.

79 But I believe there is more to it, like Atlantis. The three rings of Atlantis is a great symbol of the cuboctahedron. Atlantis: My eyes opened wide when I read the Secret Teachings by Manly P. Hall. There is no way in hell all this knowledge stems from humans. Hall himself proclaims that there are no aliens here! You don t get to write the Secret Teachings and proclaim they are not here. The only way you can do that is if you are recruited by the Masons. It doesn t add up. It s like Magnus Carlsen claiming there is no such thing as chess! Or someone surviving the holocaust claiming there is no such thing. There is something dark going on here. I have some information and discoveries that I would like to share with you. So far, my wife and my father are all who know of this concept/theory I have. When did you first learn about the cuboctahedron? Was it from your father? If you think I'm on to something, I will post a video to youtube so that I can share with all of humanity. Yes, please do that. Send me the link. Yes, the piano is just a fractal of the cuboctahedron. Then who installed this sacred knowledge? Or was it rediscovered? And 100% I know of the 3, 6, 9. I am however a bigger follower in the 3, the 3 is something Tesla lived by, not the 3, 6, 9. But I did my own work on the 3, 6, 9 about 9 months ago, and I am convinced that 528 HZ is the magic frequency because of it. I actually installed a 528 HZ tuned pipe that hangs above my bed. I hit it every night and every morning, and during mid day when I have the chance. It resonates very well with me. 528 = = 15 = = 6 I think the 3, 6 and 9 is something like this: The blueprint of creation is the cuboctahedron and the cuboctahedron produces the dual torus (I believe thusly for philosophical reasons). The torus is basically a circle and that is what the 9 is, which is why the 9 is like the focal point of creation, that is, that which everything stems from. Marko Rodin s repeating number pattern follows logically if you place 9 in the center of attention. See this video: And: The secret knowledge of the Rosicrucians concerning Lucifer is nowhere so plainly set forth as in these plates, which virtually reveal his true identity, a carefully guarded secret about which little has been written. Lucifer is represented by the number 741. Manly P. Hall; The Secret Teachings of all Ages Do you know why 741 is Lucifer s number? Wow, just heard the guy Jonathan put it into words perfectly, "self is a kink in reality". I have a friend I would love to share this video with. Very enlightening topic of conversation. Kudos to your Jonathan & your buddy Karl!

80 I don t have the time to do their Buddhist-thing, but I would love to one day when I have the time. No kink, no ego. We are definitely not our egos; I know that from my brief encounter with Nirvana. Just had the most amazing discussion with Dad. He just told me that I am a direct blood descendant of one of the nations founding 13 Freemasons!!!! That is cool! These original Freemasons appear to be in tune with the Cubo. First there were 13 colonies, and then there were 13 Freemason signers of the Declaration of Independence, and 13 symbology all over the dollar bill, and in the Freemason architecture. Yeah, the dollar bill tells the tale of creatio ex nihilo. Read Chapter 5. Apparently my great grandfather and his brothers were all Freemasons as well. Have you learned anything from them regarding their world? This is crazy cool news. Now I know why 13 was always my Dad's favorite number lol! Yeah, 13 is the cubo ;-) What would you say if I created a novel mechanism to explain why the cubo breathes, spins, creates vortexes, traverses through time, and creates the dual torus? I say: If the blueprint of creation is the cuboctahedron, then finding out what animates it IS THE ULTIMATE ANSWER TO LIFE, THE UNIVERSE AND EVERYTHING! (Imagine if it is the number 42? = 6. 6 upside down is 9! Just kidding!) My answer is that the cuboctahedron has always been spinning, nothing set it in motion. This is a paradox, of course, since then the spin of the cuboctahedron does not have an origin. My resolution to this paradox was the Absolute Universe (the light s point of view) where the spin is frozen (due to spinning so fast). If it is frozen, then we have an origin. But then, how does the frozen spin start to actually spin in order to birth spacetime? Here I introduced the Relative Universe where the spin is not frozen but spins with a fury. But how do we bridge the Absolute (unbound) and the Relative (bound) in order to make this work? Here I introduced the tetrahedron that can live in both worlds. That is, the tetrahedron can be a wave (unbound) and a particle (bound), and that resolves the Paradox of Origins. And to see all this in a clear light, that is, how to see the paradox resolving itself in the Absolute Universe, I wrote: Let everything that exists be this lonely particle. If this particle always existed, then you can trace its path forever backwards in time, meaning you will never find an origin, which is just absurd! Ha. I tricked you! This lonely existence of existence actually explains what the nothingness is: If you are all alone, then you have no one to compare yourself to/with, which means you cannot know if you are big or small or what. The True Origin of the lonely particle (above) is its lonely existence. There is only One Existence, and this existence can have always existed because of its absolute state (i.e., its loneliness). What cannot have existed forever, is the relative state. Say that, only two particles existed, then you would get the paradox of the forever-past (above). But if you are alone, the paradox resolves itself. The magic of the Absolute. In other words, John Archibald Wheeler s one-

81 electron universe is the only universe that I can see that actually solves the Problem of Origins (without invoking God, etc.). Modern Science has three answers to the something out of nothing idea: A zero energy universe, which would be the cuboctahedron, more precisely, the 12 vectors that converge and produce absolute stillness. All came from gravity, which would be the fact that the cuboctahedron is unstable (see below). Quantum tunneling, which would be our tetrahedron that can be both a wave and a particle (see below). Gravity must be the key to creation because I can feel it, literally. Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist. - The Grand Design, Steven W. Hawking (and Leonard Mlodinow). From: Moving on: The light s point of view = the cuboctahedron The reason is that, from the light s point of view, there is only nothingness, I muse. And, the primal configuration of the cuboctahedron = the 12 vectors that converge and produce absolute stillness. These things are the same. They have to be. And this point of stillness or nothingness is seriously unstable, so the whole thing collapses generating spacetime. If our lungs are based on the cuboctahedron, then you will see why the stillness is unstable, because it would be like holding your breath indefinitely. You cannot do it and neither can nature. If the nothingness were stable, we would not be here. Something like this would be my answer, but I can t wait to hear yours. This is the most exciting thing I can contemplate. QT: The quantum tunneling concept as a way to explain how our universe came to be is ingenious, and I believe that the cuboctahedron is the thing that allows you to do that because the cuboctahedron is essentially a set of lungs which can breathe in and out which means it has an in-phase and an outphase; which means it can be both a particle and a wave at the same time. That is, the expansion and contraction happen simultaneously, thus all is connected, which means it is a wave. However, the expansion and the contraction do occur, they do not cancel, they just run at the same time thus we also get particles therefore the particle is like the whole package that is the cuboctahedron. The wave is the fact that all cuboctahedrons everywhere are connected, more, they are one and the same because the expansion and contraction happen simultaneously, which means that there is only one place/spot in existence as all things connect creating this one spot (or Big Bang). Everything is this spot or dot. 3D is an illusion. This is how I understand the concept, note that I could be wrong: This video (What is Quantum Tunneling?) explains how quantum tunneling birthed the universe. Let the left side of the mountain =

82 everything will collapse, thus no universe. Let the right side of the mountain = everything will expand = our universe. Classically, there is no way for the expansion to happen because you would violate conservation laws. The singularity would just collapse into itself. However, with quantum tunneling, you can tunnel to the other side of the mountain, thus giving the singularity a boost such that it will expand instead. This trick the tetrahedron can do because it exists in many worlds, both the unbound and the bound. The tetrahedron = Quantum Tunneling. QT is also responsible for mutations and thus evolution. The universe talks to itself. The tetrahedron = the building block of brains. What is Quantum Tunneling? Perhaps my greatest idea ever: That is, we can have a Big Bang, which would be a huge cuboctahedron, and then we could have a series of smaller cuboctahedrons that would not be as violent as the first, and these we could place in your car. That is, just because science has found a Big Bang does NOT MEAN that all came from that Big Bang. It only means that all came from that point, which is a huge difference! For example, if you have a Russian doll and this doll contains a series of smaller dolls inside it, then it looks like EVERYTHING came from the biggest doll or point, but it does not follow logically! With smaller dolls we can have a less violent process that we can put in your car. What if the smaller dolls gave birth to the Big Doll through the quantum tunneling process? Virtual particles giving birth to the universe? More: Why is there more matter than anti-matter? Why is there more matter than anti-matter? This is a tough one. A Nobel Prize is awaiting the one who puzzle out the answer. I am not here to claim that prize, however. I just want to see what the answer might be philosophically. The obvious starting point for any and all starting points is the black hole because the black hole is the thing that draws all things into itself. If we look at a black hole, then we will see that it is spinning because of the matter that whirls around it. Plus, Einstein said that space-time can bend, which means space can curve, which means spin is on the agenda. We can even say that a straight line is a circle with infinite radius. That is, everything is curved. The universe is crooked. Spin, then. If you want things to spin, then the next step would be to find a geometry that is best suited for the task. I looked into the world of geometry and found the cuboctahedron. I dare you to come up with a better solution. What does all this mean? It means that the cuboctahedron is the fundamental blueprint (that which everything else is based upon) and the fundamental building block of the universe. The cuboctahedron happens to be spineless, thus the universe is not supported on any structure. That is, the universe does not need a structure to support itself on. Rather, as we can see in the cuboctahedron, Nature is a system. Nature is a set of lungs. She is formless, balance, nothingness; and, she is moving very fast. Thus, if the cuboctahedron is the fundamental thing in Nature, then we can start to look at what antimatter is. The matter was accomplished when we folded the cuboctahedron and attained the

83 Platonic solids. This folding happens when the cuboctahedron is out of phase, meaning, when the cuboctahedron is not in perfect equilibrium. I defined perfect equilibrium as the state that defines the fastest possible speed. This speed is what the nothingness is. Where the arms of the Cosmic Whirlpool are not moving as fast, due to the Cosmic Traffic Jam, we see the production of matter. Anti-matter, then, must be like matter, but, at the same time, it must have the ability to cancel whatever ordinary matter it meets. Two cars crashing: There are four possible ways you can fold the cuboctahedron: press down and right, down-left; press up from the bottom and then right, bottom-left. Do this while you are standing in front of a mirror and muse: How many possible ways are there for the cuboctahedron to spin? My answer: One possible way. Symmetry is a oneness (left is right), not a duality (left vs. right). When the cuboctahedron collapses/folds, it folds in all possible directions simultaneously in logical space. You thus get toruses that annihilate each other (due to spinning opposite directions as they crash), like two cars crashing into one another. In addition, you get toruses that drive (spin) the same way, thus forming a relationship when they crash. In other words, Matter and anti-matter are formed equally, but because half the matter formed will spin, say, right and half left, the same will apply to the anti-matter. Thus, half of the anti-matter will form a relationship with matter and we will view that as ordinary matter. Half of the anti-matter will cancel. This leaves us with an abundance of matter. Note: Use the mirror in order to capture the whole of reality, therefore the Mirror World is the right world also. More: Another idea that is close to free energy: ZPE You can argue that tapping the ground state in, say, your garage, doesn t mount to anything because the zero-point energy is the LOWEST possible energy source that you can have. This would be the dumbest place of all to look for energy! That is true, if you think small. If you think big, say, tap all zero-point fields everywhere; tap the whole ground state of the cosmos (as it were), then you ought to have enough: What if there is a point where the entire universe becomes available, say on the 2D holographic plane? If this works, you can tap any black hole, star, or whatever... Why it works: It works because the universe has no shape according to Fuller (see quote below). It works because the universe is not big; its bigness (or any size or form) is an illusion. It works because it makes philosophical sense: If you are all alone, then you cannot know if you are big or small or what because you have nobody to measure yourself against. But what if the universe is not alone? What if the universe exists in a multiverse? A: Then the multiverse is alone and we get the same result. In other words, there is no such thing as largeness because you could always ask, What is outside the biggest Russian doll? Or: What is outside the biggest Russian doll that makes the biggest Russian doll the biggest Russian doll? What is outside the universe? What is outside the Multiverse? What is outside the outside that is outside? And so on. To resolve the paradox, you realize that size is an illusion. If size is an illusion, then maybe you find the right door (frequency), and the cosmos opens up. Suddenly, the ground state will offer more than enough energy. In addition, as an extra Christmas present, you get the Warp Drive.

84 Richard Buckminster Bucky Fuller: Because of the fundamental nonsimultaneity of universal structuring, a single, simultaneous, static model of Universe is inherently both nonexistent and conceptually impossible as well as unnecessary. Ergo, Universe does not have a shape. Do not waste your time, as man has been doing for ages, trying to think of a unit shape "outside of which there must be something," or "within which, at center, there must be a smaller something." The universe is SO BIG! Then I realized I was watching the universe on my computer screen! I mean, if you can fit the whole of the universe in my eyeball, then maybe the universe isn t that big after all. To sum up my ideas here: Idea 1: Fractal CCC: Free energy is the toroidal center that orders stuff because it is so tight (i.e., the scope of the universe seen from the light s own perspective). Idea 2: Holographic universe: If the universe is holographic, then, if we could enter the 2D plane of the universe, then we could tap energy from things that are far away in 3D (like our sun) because the source of the far away is not itself far away. More: The Foo Dogs (Forbidden City) are old. How do you explain that our ancestors had knowledge of the great nothingness (aka Flower of Life) itself? A: E.T. Then how did E.T. get here to pass on the information? How E.T. got here: The Stargate What is a Stargate? A: A Stargate is a gate to the stars. We all came from a Cosmic Whirlpool, the dual torus. In the center of this whirlpool, lies the zerothdimension. From the light s point of view, we can see that the zeroth-dimension is a great nothingness. We came from the fastest creature in existence. How fitting, then, that this creature makes possible the warp drive. That is, only when we understand where we came from, will we unlock Nature s greatest technology. A real warp drive the Stargate is actually possible because the torus comes in all sizes therefore the torus scales like the octaves on your piano. Hint: The piano was based on sacred knowledge. You can therefore set up a toroidal-field around your spacecraft, and then you can enter a bigger torus core and fly out where you want in the universe. But will not the toroidal core crush your spacecraft? You must enter the zeroth-dimension! How can you survive such a trip? How will you fit? This is impossible! Worse: It is insane! You actually need two toruses or whirlpools around your spacecraft with your spacecraft located at the center of the two whirlpools eyes. The eye of the storm is calm. You can hide here. And, here is the ingenious part: If you shall travel to the center of a bigger torus, how can you go through this bigger torus zero-dimensional neck without being crushed? The answer is: You don t! You set up a dual torus field around your spacecraft and then you let the field travel through the zeroth-

85 dimension while you yourself rest comfortably in the eye of the storm or, more accurately, the eyes of the storms. Note that you need a dual torus because you need to sit inside two eyes simultaneously with one torus going head through the zeroth-dimension, while the other closes the gap behind you. One shrinks space and one expands space so that you do not get crushed, but you get to travel faster than light, or at least, appear to be moving faster than light. And you wouldn t need much energy to travel either because the space/environment is not affecting you so you don t need to combat the environment with huge amounts of energy. And the inertia forces crushing you to bits if you took, say, a 90 degree turn with your spacecraft, would not be there because you are sitting inside a bubble and outside the environment where the inertia forces would be. For onlookers, you would seem to disappear in thin air when you entered hyperspace. Note: If you only employed the one torus, then you would get halfway through the Underworld, and then the waters of nothingness would crush you from behind! You really need two eyes. Any torus can expand and contract simultaneously. You therefore need two toruses because you want the expansion-phase of the one and the contraction-phase of the other. Note that a torus has two eyes. Two toruses have four eyes. You need to create a protective bubble using two eyes and two toruses. Also, note that your spacecraft would look like the classic UFO because you need to fit inside the two eyes that are sitting opposite each other. You can also have a cigar shape, as the shape would fit in the eye. The classic UFO disc-shape and the cigar work. A whirlpool is a torus. When you look at the whirlpool, you only see a part of the whole torus. The UFO has the disc-shape in order to accommodate the dual torus-reality; like the fish in the ocean have the form that they have in order to accommodate their water-reality. Scientists today go so far as to suggest that the aliens are sleeping, waiting for the universe to get colder in order to create much more powerful computers. Really?! This is the length at which you are willing to go in order to solve the Fermi paradox? No. The solution to the paradox is very simple: They are already here. If we came from a great sea of nothingness that is zero-dimensional, then that dimension is still attached to our 3D universe. All you need to do then, is to create a shield around your spacecraft and let the shield travel near the zeroth-dimension, effectively morphing space-time around your ship, letting you travel huge distances in the blink of an eye. If reality is a tree, then you go to the root, and then up to another branch (galaxy) instead of traveling millions of years the conventional way. In fact, the length at which science is willing to explain away the paradox is proof of the simple solution to the paradox: they are here. Are you sure that nobody out there watches over the planet that is soon to birth a supercomputer? The government says, It s just a weather balloon! Then WHY DO YOU spend millions of dollars investigating... weather balloons? The scientist says, Produce me a body, then I will believe you!... Never mind the huge mountain of testimonials from reliable witnesses (The Disclosure Project) or videos showing REAL extraterrestrial spacecraft!

86 E.g., Never mind that the head of the program Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program, Luis Elizondo, says they are real. But it does not matter. E.T. will reveal his identity soon enough. With the advancement of technology, he cannot keep his face hidden for much longer, which is why the Pentagon did release a UFO video to the world. They are letting us know, bit by bit. How E.T. travels through space: Stone skipping. If this feedback loop (i.e, the torus (dual)) curves space-time naturally, then, if you were to travel through it, you would be like a stone skipping on water. That is, if you invent the warp drive, then, because of this feedback loop that the torus is, you don t curve space-time and go from a to b, rather, you go from point to point to point like a bullet skipping huge distances of space-time. You essentially become like a particle. Hell, maybe that is why the particle acts the way it does, because it is a feedback loop that, once it has fed back, it becomes the next octave (it expands) on your piano, as it were. Imagine, everything is this feedback system. E.T. s agenda: See Zorabia.com (download Main Work). Part 2: "I say: If the blueprint of creation is the cuboctahedron, then finding out what animates it IS THE ULTIMATE ANSWER TO LIFE, THE UNIVERSE AND EVERYTHING! (Imagine if it is the number 42? = 6. 6 upside down is 9! Just kidding!)" Haha it equals 720 actually, which is 9! I just completed working on my model. Still lots to do before it's youtube worthy. All I can say is that I've never saw such a fascinating structure in all my life. This thing could be big man. Bucky summarizes it as: The vector equilibrium [VE] is the zero point for happenings or nonhappenings: it is the empty theater and empty circus and empty universe ready to accommodate any act and any audience. Vector Equilibrium & Isotropic Vector Matrix You have to ask more questions. There is always room for more questions in this universe, even the Cubo needs more questions to be asked. I really can't wait to unveil this theoretical "Blueprint of Existence". Once we ask enough questions about the cubo and discover more answers, we humans will have unlimited potential. And I will. I have just been at it for so long now, I need a break soon. But I will never stop contemplating it as long as I live. But my goal is not to find the details, because there has to be an infinite number of them. My goal is to understand the cubo relative to the big picture. That said, I am always fascinated with new details! What if there are no paradoxes, and just misunderstandings? That is what I believe. Nature does not harbor paradoxes. Do paradoxes = non-existence, as in the sense that is just human fiction. Yes, I believe paradoxes are fictional entities.

87 How do tetras live in both worlds? Because the boundary of a boundary is zero, see the CTMU by Chris Langan. A way to visualize it is: If you saw the Matrix movies where the Keymaker can enter this special corridor and enter any door he chooses to and go anywhere. The wave would be that corridor and the particle would be a world that hides behind one of the doors. The tetrahedron would be a world, but, it would have one foot in the corridor, so to speak. And so would all the other tetrahedrons in the universe, which means they can communicate instantaneously. The tetra functions as a bridge between the Absolute Universe (the corridor) and the Relative Universe (the worlds behind the doors). And where does the spinning come from. That is like asking where existence came from. My answer is that it always was. The spin has always been spinning. But this is a paradox. My solution to this paradox, I already gave you: My resolution to this paradox was the Absolute Universe (the light s point of view) where the spin is frozen (due to spinning so fast). If it is frozen, then we have an origin. But then, how does the frozen spin start to actually spin in order to birth spacetime? Here I introduced the Relative Universe where the spin is not frozen but spins with a fury. But how do we bridge the Absolute (unbound) and the Relative (bound) in order to make this work? Here I introduced the tetrahedron that can live in both worlds. That is, the tetrahedron can be a wave (unbound) and a particle (bound), and that resolves the Paradox of Origins. This is my answer. I have other, older answers, and I don t know which one of my answers is the best. I am open to new answers, of course. To solve the Paradox of Origins is the ultimate thing to do. The Paradox of Origins: What set motion going? If X set it going, what set X going, ad infinitum. If nothing set it going, then we have the paradox of infinite regress. The ONLY other true answer I have come across is from William Lane Craig. His answer is something like: We cannot have infinite regress because you can look at it like a loop that has no origin, so it is just nonsense. Therefore, X must set motion going. X cannot itself be caused by another, say, Y. And X cannot be a process, but a will, the will of God, or else the process would suffer the same paradox as the initial paradox. To see this in a clear light: Imagine a huge mountain of ice, if there is a natural process that is responsible for the melting of the ice, then that process must have been always operational because no one can will it or set it going, and we get the effect that the mountain has always melted via the natural process. But then we are back at an eternal flow and infinite regress. Therefore, the only solution to the infinite regress is that the mountain is solid ice. Then we have no eternal flow, therefore no eternal history, and therefore no infinite regress. But, the trade-off is bad, because now we have a mountain of ice that is eternally frozen, so it cannot cause anything. Except, God can melt it. That is the only way to solve the paradox. Another way of seeing this is that the universe is a dream and that the One in Nirvana causes the mountain to melt (i.e., the birth of the universe) by falling asleep. So, no wonder we can t solve the PARADOX! the icy mountain = the absolute universe/motionlessness/nothingness or singularity (?) the melting mountain = the relative universe/motion or matter-production We cannot assume that the melting mountain is the initial state of this because of the infinite regress paradox. We must assume that the icy mountain is the primal state. But how do we cause it to melt?

88 My solution is a bit different. I agree, the initial state of existence is this mountain of ice because that is the only way to beat the infinite regress paradox. This mountain would equal motionlessness. My solution is that motionlessness equals fast motion as seen from the light s point of view. And fast motion can birth spacetime. That is, the light s own point of view solves the Paradox of Origins, because here everything is a great nothingness. However, nothing can change the state of the icy mountain, so we need a bridge between the icy mountain and the melting mountain. For William Lane Craig, the bridge was God. For me, the bridge is the tetrahedron, which is this special creature that can exist in both worlds/mountains. The light is such a creature, it clearly exists in our relative universe, and, when we see the light from its own point of view, the light exists in the absolute universe/nothingness. Every origin is like your Russian doll analogy, there is always an origin, and we keep getting smaller and smaller, and deeper and deeper. Yes, in the Relative Universe, there is no bottom. It goes forever and this is a paradox. However, in the Absolute Universe there is a bottom and here the Paradox of Creation/Origins, resolves itself. There will always be origins for infinity. In the Relative Universe, yes. Just look in the mirror, which is a product of the relative universe. Is the mirror wrong, because here left is right. Or is our world wrong? The truth is, we are right and the mirror is right, which means left is right, which means right is left, and so it goes forever. The relative universe has no origin. It is like a dream, you will not find the origin of the dream within the dream itself. The dream-version of the origin in the dream is paradoxical, which hints at it being a dream. The only true origin is within the dreamer himself. As I said, for Craig, this is God. For me, it is the Absolute Universe. And, perhaps, the One in Nirvana dwells in the Absolute Universe. Maybe the One is God, which means Craig is right and I am right. There are many ways to look at things. Also, Wheeler's one-electron universe concept is my favorite theory. Been a fan of this theory for many many years. I truly believe that is why an entire black hole can be summarized by one photon. And if you can summarize a blackhole with a single photon, you can summarize the entire universe into from one photon. I agree. This is the only universe that makes sense philosophically, because then the one-electron can equal the Absolute Universe. "The light s point of view = the cuboctahedron" I agree, because the cubo = consciousness. I believe the Philosopher s Stone is the cubo. See Chapter 5. All this time we were hunting for our own consciousness! "And this point of stillness or nothingness is seriously unstable, so the whole thing collapses generating spacetime." My theory illustrates the mechanism of the unstableness that causes the chaostrophy in this universe.

89 Cool. I am getting more and more intrigued to hear your answer to the mystery that is the cubo. Or, as the moogles say, Kupo! "If our lungs are based on the cuboctahedron, then you will see why the stillness is unstable, because it would be like holding your breath indefinitely. You cannot do it and neither can nature. If the nothingness were stable, we would not be here." When we breathe it s because the muscles in our diaphragm create tension to open your lung cavity (cubo), and a rush of air follows, and then your diaphragm relaxes and the lungs effortlessly breathe out their air. Well, if the cubo is the lungs, we must ask what is the diaphragm of the cubo, what is the mechanism that allows it to fold and breathe. That is the question of questions. I have already told you my answer, but I can t wait to hear yours. Maybe the diaphragm is the One in Nirvana? All I know is, this universe is a dream, or something like it. Or maybe the sea of tetrahedrons is the diaphragm? "They genetically modified us to better suit their needs." I believe that via the Stoned Ape Hypothesis and the theory of Deterministic Evolution, that we humans became yet another deeper and truer fractal of the universe. Yeah, the Stoned Ape is cool! I have a mix of that and genetically modified. See Chapter 4. If my theory on the spacetime fabric is correct, i expect a know on my door from these aliens. I was afraid of that too, lol! I am a paranoid maniac! If I don't get a knock on my door I must be incorrect, or they are not here. I hope that they have better things to do. Update: Just as I wrote that, the power went and I was in my apartment alone. It was black outside and inside. I couldn t find my cellphone right away. No more ufo documentaries for a while! Also in regards to this royal bloodline, I wonder if my Scottish history leading back to this 1 of 13 founding Freemasons could mean that I have this royal blood you speak of. Maybe that is why you are obsessed with the cubo? I also do not believe for even a second, that super inetelegent Aliens are of the controlling and dominating nature. I didn t believe so too, initially. Then I began digging, deep. Read Chapter 4. I urge you to take this knowledge into DMT-land and talk to Mother Ayahuasca. What will she reply? In order to talk to her you need to take the Ayahuasca and not normal DMT. You should really look into the practices of Jainism, as it backs up my idea that all supreme beings must be 100% peaceful and non-dominating. In real ancient Jainism, there are no idols or gods, there is no worshiping, there is no priest hood, there is no hierarchy, and there is 100% zero

90 violence. Every one is 100% equal, and I believe it is a default fact of an elevated conscious being with supreme intelligence. - Jain Intro I have encountered it before. But where does the esoteric knowledge come from? I mean, this is the net of the cubo! Himmler wanted to find the Holy Grail, and all this time, the Holy Grail was attached to his arm in the form of a symbol, lol! "Do you know why 741 is Lucifer's number?" I've never heard of this concept, but I found this page that appears to be relating it to the cubo, although it does not mention the cubo. Cool. And thanks. "Have you learned anything from them regarding their world?" I unfortunately just found out and have no living relatives that I know of that are Freemasons. I am going to join, my Dad says it will be easy because of my family lineage. Cool. Maybe I can join too? P.S. If your English is good enough for real-time text messaging, we can use google's messenger service, along side video chat. You could text/write instead of speaking. Plus maybe I can help you sharpen your spoken English. Is my englisgh good enough for real time messaging? Not without a loy og errors! Seriously, though, I understand that you find face-to-face easier, but I have to humbly decline because I am not up for it. The upside here is that we can take our written words here and add it to the book, a final chapter, call it: Jimmy and Fabian; A conversation One last thing, when the cubo folds to the tetra, what happens then? Does the tetra unfold and become the cubo again? Like lungs breathing in and out? It becomes a triangle that can take one of twelve forms of energy. After the two dimensional phase (the triangle), it begins to unfold itself again. The thing is, it breathes as much as it flows, this is the true nature. All the universe is created from these 12 triangles, which really are just 12 phases of one triangle.

91 Other: If the world had a goal, it must have been reached. If there were for it some unintended final state, this also must have been reached. If it were in any way capable of a pausing and becoming fixed, of being, then all becoming would long since have come to an end, along with all thinking, all spirit. The fact of spirit as a form of becoming proves that the world has no goal, no final state, and is incapable of being. Nietzsche: Time and Becoming in Nietzsche's Thought Now, think about suffering. If Nature could erase it, then why is it here if we presume that existence has existed for infinitely many years? Why are we not some god existing joyfully in heaven? Why have not an infinite army of supercomputers transformed the entire multiverse in their image? I believe we are and I believe they have. Once you awaken your Buddha nature, you will see that you are a timeless being that is all and everything. Yet, there is suffering. And the reason is the quote above. If you could live forever in heaven or nirvana, you would. But then you would become fixed, which is true hell. Nature does not allow true hell. So, what does the One in Nirvana do? He dreams of a universe; our universe. There is suffering in his dream because no suffering is the worst kind of suffering because then you would be fixed in a state that knows no suffering; and being fixed is hell. We should always strive for a better world. But I want to take a moment and be thankful for the fact that pain exists at all. In my dreams, I could be a president, a rock star, someone rich and famous. But I dream of my gloves. The one smelled bad, so I tossed it away. Then I regretted my action and wanted it back because I started to freeze. I wonder what it means? My soul in not aspiring to become president, at least! The worst kind of suffering: Being stuck in the land of the Teletubbies where there is no suffering. So, the next time you have a pain, always remember: It could be worse, you could have no pain. OK. I confess. I hate pain as much as the next guy.

92 Better World: Other: How does the CTMU resolve Russell's paradox? I do not know, but I have my own answer based on the CTMU: Russell s paradox is like that of Russian dolls where the biggest Russian doll can contain all the other dolls but not itself. My answer is that the tetrahedron is like a Super Russian doll that can contain everything, including itself because the tetrahedron can be unbound and bound simultaneously. Thus, now you can contain yourself and be a member of yourself simultaneously. It is truly ingenious and answers how nothingness can birth something(ness). Of course, the whole system of the tetrahedron = the cuboctahedron. I believe the cuboctahedron is the whole of existence, it is both nothingness/timelessness (i.e., absolute spacetime) and something(ness)/time (i.e., relative spacetime). I wonder what Langan says to that. Consider a group of barbers who shave only those men who do not shave themselves. Suppose there is a barber in this collection who does not shave himself; then by the definition of the collection, he must shave himself. But no barber in the collection can shave himself. (If so, he would be a man who does shave men who shave themselves.) The barber needs to be shaved by himself or the barber, which is himself, so the paradox arises because of this dual identity. The tetrahedron is pure oneness, and that resolves the paradox. Paradoxes arise only when we cut Nature up into pieces and move those pieces around, in this case, to form a dual identity. You cannot do that to, say, a river. The river ever flows, proving that all paradoxes are manmade and that they can be easily resolved by not separating Nature into pieces.

93 My recent free energy paper: Trysil, 12:54, Abstract: I have a son. I care deeply for him. So I say the MOST IMPORTANT THING IN MY LIFE RIGHT NOW is finding a way to install our values in the coming ASI. Or there may not be a world for my son to grow up in. But what can I do? Hope and pray, I guess. So, the second best thing I can do, is to write about free energy. Hence this paper. Why would your son care about free energy? I don t know. But if my dad invented a world that was free of stupid suffering, then my dream would come true. Free energy can make such a world. 100% alert global awareness: Nick Bostrom says that finding the key to the control problem is the most important task right now: Let s get to it: Members of High IQ Societies should do more than conduct IQ tests. They should contribute to the world. That is all I have been doing, however; but I could never find anyone who is willing to publish my free energy philosophy. Until now. Free Energy idea: The earth grows, so replicate the damned mechanism on a smaller scale and put the said mechanism in your car. Done. The world would change overnight: We would end poverty faster than light speed. About me: My Website:

94 I have spent over 10 years on a journey to discover how the universe began, culminating in a free energy idea. Why the long haul? You start with, How did it all begin? Five years later, you are back at, How did it all start? My latest work spans 3000 words and I was wondering if you could look at it. There is no math, only a bit of philosophy mixed with my understanding of the CTMU. The basic idea is that the cuboctahedron is the blueprint of reality, the form which all forms stem from, a something out of nothing. If the cubo (cuboctahedron) is the bbb (basic building block of reality), then why is there so much stuff out there when this single entity (cubo) is really all that exists? How come there are trees, and birds, and suns, and everything? However: If you believe in free energy, you are stupid, or a crank, or crackpot; or a cranky crackpot! In my case, that is nut the case. I am currently a member of three High IQ Societies, and my best high range test to date: 154, SD15. So I am not a crackpot. I am a screwball. What is the difference? Read and find out. To be honest, I was a bit disappointed. I thought I had scored higher. I was certain about 25 of them, and pretty sure about the rest. See about me for the test. You could score up to 175 on the test. And the only difference between a 154 and a 175 is a little explaining where I messed up. I would understand immediately. The difference is so infinitesimally tiny! Which goes to show that, once you reach Mensa level, you cannot accurately measure IQ. See: Problems with measuring very high IQ I do not have higher education, so the IQ thing is important to me in order to show you that I can do this, and that you should consider my work despite the fact that it was born outside

95 the Halls of Academia. Outside of this purpose, I do not give a damn about IQ. No test shall tell me how smart I am. I know exactly how smart I am. Ok. Enough digression. Enough boasting. Boasting are for losers and free energy crackpots! You wanted the philosophy of free energy, and here it is: Free Energy Visualization Thor Fabian Pettersen (2018) Ca words. Written with simple words. Everybody can understand if they put some energy into it. First, we must define what we mean by free energy so that there will be no confusion about what we mean. I define free energy as Nature s ability to fuel reality with available energy. See outcome three below. The second law of thermodynamics clearly states that all the available energy in the cosmos will turn to unavailable energy. In the future, we will see death and decay. It shall be clear in anyone s mind that there exist only three possible outcomes to this story: First outcome: Death! Nature will die, and that is it.

96 Second outcome: Longing for death! There exists an infinite source of energy such that Nature will never die, but ever try; ever longing for death. Third outcome: Life! Nature can resurrect, that is, turn the unavailable energy into available energy again. And note that this is our definition of free energy. Note: There might be other outcomes. Please notify me. If the first outcome obtains, then a quote from Nietzsche springs to mind: If the world had a goal, it must have been reached. If there were for it some unintended final state, this also must have been reached. If it were in any way capable of a pausing and becoming fixed, of being, then all becoming would long since have come to an end, along with all thinking, all spirit. The fact of spirit as a form of becoming proves that the world has no goal, no final state, and is incapable of being. Nietzsche: Time and Becoming in Nietzsche's Thought Likewise, if the second law of thermodynamics could transform ALL EXISTENCE into a state of death (e.g., a being), then we would not be here to talk about it. The first outcome fails. What about the second outcome? The second outcome asks you to believe in the notion of an actual infinity. I find it absurd. Believe in magic all you want. Do not include me. In my mind, then, the third outcome is the only possible outcome.

97 In summa: Free energy has to be real. Let us look at number three again: Nature can resurrect, that is, turn the unavailable energy into available energy again. Claim: IF you could place the resurrection mechanism in your car, then you could drive it forever. So you see why this is the REAL definition of free energy. For comparison: A perpetual motion machine is NOT free energy because the definition of a PMM is one that operates without a source, which is absurd! That is like baking a cake with no ingredients. Free energy has a source. An alternative PMM, see: An overunity device is NOT free energy because free energy is not the creation of new stuff but the resurrection of old stuff. Reality stays 100 %. It does not go over. What magic can do this? I do not believe in magic. They say, Study a bit of physics and you will see how silly you are with your free energy! I will not bother because, if I did that, then I would end up like this guy: We can gain unlimited amounts of energy without violating the law of energy conservation. Robert Koontz: Bob Koontz On Energy Production By unlimited, Koontz does not mean overunity. He clearly states that energy stays constant, which means he is not talking about perpetual motion machines or overunity devices.

98 Free energy math: However, my idea does not rest on Koontz being right. My idea is: Free energy = CCC + fractal cosmology I will explain this later, but first let us see how nothing generated something. First, we must look at two possible outcomes to this thing we call existence. First possibility: Existence came from a state of nonexistence. Second possibility: Existence always was. Third possibility: God created X. (Whatever. I don t care. I need to see how every single detail works regardless.) In my mind, then the second possibility is the only possibility therefore, what magic can turn nonexistence off or, alternatively, turn existence on? And if some magic exists that can do that, then can t you create overunity devices too, as you can create more and more of this thing we call existence? No. It is all nonsense. Ok. So, existence always was. But if we assume that existence always was, then we arrive at a number of paradoxes: Imagine an object in your mind s eye. If the second possibility obtains, then the object should be eternal. Now, trace the object s trajectory. If the object always was, then its trajectory is infinite with no beginning or starting point. This is a paradox. But why is it a paradox? The solution here is that, it is only a paradox in a Relative Universe. A Relative Universe consists of things that you can measure against each other. This thing is small because that thing is big. Remove the big thing, and you cannot have small things. Remove all things so that you have only the one thing, and you have created an Absolute Universe in which no things are small or big. In an Absolute Universe, there is no paradox because there is no small or big, which means our trajectory is neither finite nor infinite. Our trajectory is absolute, and that is a whole new ball game.

99 I maintain that Existence can always be IF it is absolute. The absolute state of things solves the inherent paradoxes of creation, so to speak. Remove everything, all the boundaries (small, big, etc.), and you get a no-boundary world (i.e., no small or big), which is our Absolute Universe. Remove the no-boundary world, and you get a world with borders, like our universe. Therefore, there is NO WAY to accomplish nonexistence. So the second possibility (existence always was), must obtain. In other words, you would think that by removing everything, which is every single boundary or border, you would get nonexistence. But what you get is a no-boundary reality. This reality exists. This reality birthed our universe. What does this reality look like? Imagine sitting on a ray of light riding into the universe, you would experience that all time dissolves you become timeless. Everything freezes and goes by in an instant because you are entering an absolute world where there is no up or down, big or small. There is no boundary that can tell you that this thing is small and this thing is big. In other words, we are dealing with a reality that is not even black or white. It is total nothingness. But how can this nothingness birth our universe? That is, how does the no-boundary universe become the bound universe? How does the Absolute become relative? Answer this question, and you know what caused the Big Bang. From our thought-experiment, then it seems that only this thing called speed is up for the task of removing the borders completely in order to reveal a no-boundary world.

100 We then need to find a geometry that is built for speed. A man called Buckminster Fuller found it: the cuboctahedron. Buckminster Fuller Explains Vector Equilibrium with captions: Understand the cubo and create the technology of the gods. I have written how the cubo and the tetrahedron together make spacetime: Atheists-Where-did-we-come-from/answer/Thor-Fabian-Pettersen A quick sum up: The cubo spins forever. This is not a paradox because the spin is absolute. The spin can then make a giant cosmic whirlpool from which our universe can emerge, that is, things cannot keep up with the fast pace in the center and thus become other (bound) than the fast pace (unbound). The tetrahedron is both unbound (wave) and bound (particle). It is like asking, How did life go from water (nothingness/wave) to land (somethingness/particle)? Well, obviously, there was a creature that could [both] breathe underwater and breathe on land. The tetrahedron, whose boundary of a boundary is zero, can therefore become this other. [...] boundary of a boundary is zero = you can be bound and unbound at the same time. Meaning, if you want to go from nothingness to somethingness, then you need this ability because you need to stay connected to your roots, which is the nothingness. That is, a tree cannot survive floating in the air; it needs to have its roots firmly attached to the soil. Fastest pace in existence = nothingness, timelessness, motionlessness; no-boundary world Somethingness = our relative universe or boundary world However, in this paper, we shall concentrate on our free energy idea.

101 Ok. IF the Absolute Universe is the primal state of things, then it follows logically: Everything grows, including our earth. Why is that? The Absolute Universe = one single object or basic building block (bbb) existing in isolation Because, the ONLY way you can go from the state of being absolute (see definition above), is if you copy yourself. This inherent ability of the BBB to copy itself must be what evolution and dark energy are. Another way would be to separate yourself and become two (relative), but is it not easier to make footprints in the snow than to chop one s arms off? In a fractal universe, chopping one s arms off is = to make footprints in the snow. So the way forwards is to copy oneself (evolution). I know that the BBB has this ability to copy because, without it, the Relative Universe cannot possibly form. That is, the principle of LIFE must be primordial. If this is valid, then it follows that everything grows. Nothing can escape this fate if this fate = the primal motor that drives the whole of existence. We have an all-embracing substance (everything copies) from which nothing escapes. This sounds like dark energy to me. One (absolute) becomes two (relative), becomes four, eight, etc.. Soon the universe is expanding and exponentially so, while all things grow, including our planets and suns. Sidenote: Couple this expansion of the universe with the fact that the BBBs stay connected to the nothingness (simultaneous contraction), and you have this cosmic dialogue going on where the particles can travel instantaneously to the other side of the universe and whatnot. The whole thing looks like a giant brain. You now have a solid basis on which to understand the possibility of an Afterlife and the CTMU by Chris Langan.

102 Ok. We shall see that, if things copy themselves, then we are dealing with a fractal universe where the whole of existence copies itself. The whole of existence was our BBB (cubo). My free energy claim: The BBB, then, comes in all sizes. We can therefore put one BBB that does the same as the mechanism responsible for making the earth grow, in our cars. Fuel will then start to grow in our fuel tank. By fuel I mean available energy. We have a solid free energy idea here, but one day things will stop to grow and then die, so our free energy car is not per definition a free energy car because a free energy car is a car that you can drive forever. We must therefore turn to Roger Penrose. He has an idea that can turn the unavailable energy into available energy again. He calls his model the CCC (i.e., conformal cyclic cosmology). The CCC resurrects dead stuff, but it is the whole that resurrects, which is bad news for our free energy car as our car is part of the whole. But, if the whole is the part as in a fractal universe, then we can put the whole of existence in our cars. We can literally hold the whole of existence in our hands and, if we are clever, put it in our car or spacecraft. And if this is not connecting to the Wheelwork of Nature like Tesla said, then I do not know what is! Compare this idea to the Float Belt: The Float Belt does not work because you are always dealing with an environment. My idea escapes the environment and conjures up the nothingness.

103 To state that free energy is impossible is to say that you are a master of the nothingness and can tell me what is possible with it. Modern physics has barely begun contemplating the nothingness google Lawrence Krauss. And get this: Modern science still embraces Pangea! Pangea is ugly. It is the modern equivalent of the ole geocentric model! Modern science myths in 2018: In the beginning was this giant island, and then... Then you tell me that: Study a bit of physics and you will see how silly you are with your free energy! But what does the CCC or something like it actually look like? How does it work philosophically? You have one corner with white balls and one corner with black balls, over time, you will have a picture with randomness in it. That is it. Death for all time. A free energy device would be a sorting demon, sorting the balls to their former glory. But no demon exists. However, the Absolute World does exist. And this world is always spinning. Nothing can slow the spin down because the Absolute World dwells in isolation. That is, if you have no agent or second entity that can change the picture, which you do not because you are in isolation, then the picture will stay as it is. As the spin forever spins, it spins with a fury that produces a core that knows no boundary. If our black and white balls were to come in contact with this core, then their boundaries would cease and can thus be recreated. So the next time our balls come out of the creation hole, so to speak, they can once more take any form, black or white. So we can turn the unavailable energy (randomness) into available energy again. But why does the nothingness produce order instead of randomness? I think it has to do with symmetry. Once a black ball is produced in one corner, a white ball is produced in the opposite corner, as it were. Then the second law of thermodynamics mixes them. Then we can destroy the balls and create our two corners anew. Note that energy is not created or destroyed. Only the boundaries are created and destroyed, as it were. Koontz: It sounds impossible, but it isn't. It is possible to obtain an unlimited amount of energy from devices which essentially only require that they be charged up with negative mass electrons and negative mass positrons. Any physicist should be able to convince himself of this in a matter of minutes. It really is simple: While ordinary positive mass electrons in a circuit consume power, negative mass electrons generate power. Why is

104 that? For negative mass electrons and negative mass positrons, Newton's second law, F = ma becomes F = -ma. Note that my idea is not necessarily the same as Koontz s. Mull on it: The Absolute State or nothingness, can be seen from the light s own point of view. Any man or woman ignorant of the cuboctahedron I consider TOTALLY BLIND! Sorry. Richard Buckminster Bucky Fuller found THE BEGINNING OF TIME (i.e., the cuboctahedron). This is it! This is what you have been looking for. This is the something out of nothing! That is, the beginning of time is with us in the PRESENT. And that opens up for new possibilities! A second crazy idea: If we live in the holographic universe, then we might find a way to tap our sun or a sun in another galaxy, from our garage. Big Sum Up: My answer to the Paradox of Origins is that the cuboctahedron is always spinning; nothing set it in motion. This is a paradox, of course, since then the spin of the cuboctahedron does not have an origin. We have an infinite regress. My resolution to this paradox was the Absolute Universe/nothingness (the light s point of view) where the spin is frozen (due to spinning so fast). If it is frozen, then we have an origin (no tail, no infinite regress). But then, how does the frozen spin start to actually spin in order to birth spacetime? Here I introduced the Relative Universe where the spin is not frozen but spins with a fury. But how do we bridge the Absolute (unbound) and the Relative (bound) in order to make this work? Here I introduced the tetrahedron that can live in both worlds. That is, the tetrahedron can be a wave (unbound) and a particle (bound), and that resolves the Paradox of Origins. If you remove the Relative Universe, you get the Absolute Universe. If you remove the Absolute Universe, you get the Relative Universe. That is, there is no way to create nonexistence.

105 Existence/motion always was. The Relative Universe (motion) cannot have been always. The Absolute Universe (motionlessness) can always have been. Now we have a complete picture where motionlessness (unbound) = motion (bound). Motionlessness/timelessness/nothingness is an extreme, unbound form of motion. By bound and unbound I mean: If you have a small thing and a big thing and then you remove the big thing, you no longer have the small thing because all is relative, but that does not mean the small thing ceased to exist; it merely ceased to be a small thing. The relative (bound) became absolute (unbound). If you are bound, you are bound to be, say, small. If you are unbound, you can be small or big or whatever. The unbound = one. The bound = two or more. Reality is unbound. Then it copies itself and becomes bound. But the unbound does not cease just because things get bound. An island does not vanish just because you set up a border and create two states. Rather, you get a reality that is both bound and unbound, which I believe is our wave/particle reality. Free energy works because Nature can resurrect. The higher order Masons know this. This is the original Holy Grail. The cup never empties, not because there is an infinite source in the cup, but because its contents are reanimated. Put such a cup in your car and you can drive forever. This is the myth of Jesus and the Philosopher s Stone. My educated guess is that this knowledge stems from Atlantis itself, which was influenced by E.T.. See: Joe Rogan Experience #725 - Graham Hancock & Randall Carlson: The PS: Pettersen I will finish this work with the words of Sidis: I have decided to publish the work and give my theory to the world, to be accepted or rejected, as the case may be. William James Sidis:

106 Aftermath: We said initially: If the cubo (cuboctahedron) is the bbb (basic building block of reality), then why is there so much stuff out there when this single entity (cubo) is really all that exists? How come there are trees, and birds, and suns, and everything? The answer is that the cubo has an innate ability to copy itself; this ability is what evolution is. The ability can also answer the riddle of dark energy. The implications of this primordial ability or cosmic evolution are that everything grows, including our earth. The earth grows. As above, so below: A baby in a womb is simply a reflection in the cosmic mirror. The technological ramifications are vast! If we could replicate the said earth-growing mechanism in our cars, then we could drive till the ends of the universe and back without filling the gasoline because now the creation engine itself (i.e., the cuboctahedron) is fueling your car. A second ability of the cubo is that it comes in various sizes, so we can literally have the whole of existence in our hands or, if we are truly clever, in our cars. But that means we live in a growing, fractal universe. On further investigation, the cubo opens up for the possibility of the warp drive. This sounds amazing. But if the cubo is the blueprint of all things, then all that which is possible must be embedded within it. The warp drive is beyond the scope of this paper. But look at this: Fabian-Pettersen

107 Free Will: Con: Glyn Williams: You cannot. And for the obvious reason that free-will, as defined, is literally a contradiction in terms. If looked at closely, it requires a non-random decision to be formed which is independent of any external influences, including prior causes. And if you think about that, the entire idea of free will is absurd. The Free Will Challenge: Simply describe a mechanism, any mechanism (natural, supernatural or whatever) by which a bona-fide free-will decision is formed. Rule 1: Cannot be forced by past events. That s cheating. The past is fixed. Rule 2: Cannot be random, or forced from a random event. Rule 3: Must be blame-able. A reasonable person would hold you to account for the decision. RE: This free will challenge sucks! Why? Because, in order to conduct it, Mr. Williams needs to define what a cause is. If you try, you will end up with turtles all the way and infinite regresses, which is why Hume discarded the ole casual picture 200 years ago! Become UPDATED people. No one believes in that paradox train anymore. Even quantum mechanics tells us that the so-called cause is just not the way Nature is put together. Rather, Nature is unbound and, only through observers, she becomes bound. Even then, the unbound dwells in the bound and vice versa! The boundary of a boundary is zero, people! So how the heck do you define a cause? Face it: Nature is not carved up into pieces or causes. And if you find a cause, please it to me with the photo of your ding an sich! Here: thorfabianpettersen@hotmail.com So, Is there a way to prove that free will exists? A: Maybe with QM. If Nature is inherently unbound, then determinism is false. Quantum mechanics says that the world is unbound and only becomes bound when observers are present. It from bit. This opens up for the possibility that our choices can indeed alter the course of spacetime itself. And a superintelligence could steer existence in any direction it chooses to. Nothing is predetermined. You could say that the act of choosing is predetermined. But this is false because Nature is not carved up into tiny, little pieces, so you cannot make the film of determinism, so to speak. Rather, Nature is felt and experienced. And if I don t like the experience of the taste of an apple, say, then the universe

108 cannot make me force it down. I can literally change the whole universe if it tried to force me to eat the apple. Nature is sensory, and that opens up for free will. Our will is still determined by our evolutionary makeup, though. Yeah, but we are still slaves to time. We are caught in that web, thus we do not have free will. Paid no attention, huh? I said: I believe we can change time. However, even if time froze, we could still be conscious! How? Because time in a linear process. Time is like the movie our brains make in order to make sense of the world. So our consciousness can be immersed in it, but it does not follow logically that our consciousness needs time in order to function. Ok! You are crazy! No. Hear me out: Consciousness may be a horizontal process created by a quantum field that is non-linear. That is, you could imagine being conscious in a state that was completely frozen, like in a cartoon movie where everyone freezes except the protagonist(s). A photon experiences the world horizontally, so to speak. A linear time process must move from a to b to c, but a non-linear horizontal process can move from a to z to whatever. The tetrahedron opens up for the possibility of free will because it can be bound and unbound simultaneously. Our consciousness can therefore dwell in horizontal time and linear time simultaneously. (I believe DMT allows you to experience a bit of horizontal time.) Determinism is like listening to a concert. Reality is the act of making the concert. (The One in Nirvana is the ultimate agent of free will.)

109 About me: I am 33 yr man from Norway. I have a son (3 yr). And, I experienced Nirvana. Member of: THE CANADIAN HIGH IQ SOCIETY: The Romanian High IQ Society (ROHIQS): Romanian High IQ Society World Genius Directory: My best score to date (see pic below): 154 (SD15): EMC-30R

110 To be honest, I was a bit disappointed. I thought I had scored higher. I can take a new test in the future, but right now I need a break because I have things that occupy my time. Full name: Thor Fabian Pettersen

111 Nick: Zorabia (Had it since High School. Thor = Zor. Fabian = abia) Zorabia = the four princes of Hell: I was bullied in High School, so I started to study Satanism in order to strengthen my mind. I figured that nature culls the weak ones, so I had to become one of the strong ones. I am still a bit weak, I guess. And, I am not a Satanist. Ethnic group: North Germanic Nationality: Norwegian Height: 187cm Weight: 85kg Eyes: Brown (w/green) Body: Slim/muscular Personality: INTJ Occupation: Unemployed (for the moment) Gender: Male Age: 33 Birthdate: Sign: Aquarius Belief system: Atheist (but I have my own definition; Atheist = one who does not believe in skyhooks). If your deity is a crane (i.e., not a skyhook), then I can be persuaded, through philosophy, to believe in it. In theory, you can persuade me to believe in skyhooks, but then you really need to make the effort! I can never believe without a little philosophy to back it up. Accomplishments: I have written a book (I am currently writing a new, updated version): Webpage: Quora: Music:

112 &: Poems: Note: If you want all my poetry, over 300 poems (mostly junk), download them at Notebook. However, I do not put it all out there. I want to write a poetry book in the future. Lego: Favorite movies: The Fifth Element (1997), The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (2005), Waterworld (1995), Braveheart (1995), The Boondock Saints (1999) Update: I forgot the Matrix movie! And Guardians of the Galaxy. Tv-series: Stargate Atlantis, Battlestar Galactica, Futurama, Rick and Morty Music: deadmau5, Headhunterz, Claude Debussy, Brian Crain, Mozart Food: Taco, Pizza, Hamburger, Lasagne That said, there is so much good stuff out there, so I could probably write an infinite list! I love being human and I am so pround of the many accomplishments we humans have made. I just wish we didn t hurt each other. But then there would be no Waterworld or hamburgers, would there, Mr. Philosopher. Sure, there would. The good and the bad guys in the Waterworld movie did not actually die and we can have in vitro meat. Solutions exist. My hobbies are: --Finding the answer to: How it ALL began. This is my main interest. I have had it since I was a child. My current summary of that journey: Atheists-Where-did-we-come-from/answer/Thor-Fabian-Pettersen --Researching the occult, UFOs, spirituality and more. --Composing music. I started when I was an adult (23), so that limits my talent. I can never become, say, Mozart, but I can still write some nice tunes. I play a little bit of piano, but I am and will remain a novice because I have stopped practicing because my other hobbies consume my time. Nowadays I compose on the computer. I suck at it. The reason is that I am not interested in acquiring new skills, so my music will sound unfinished. However, I want to create a CD in the future with real people and real instruments. Then we shall see. --Penning poems. I started when I was 20 (maybe earlier). I stopped because I felt I couldn t become a great poet. --Playing online-chess. I suck. I have no interest in advancing. It is just for fun. --Weightlifting three/four times a week. You feel so good afterwards.

113 --Writing about free energy. The earth grows. We can replicate the mechanism on a smaller scale and drive our cars seemingly forever as fuel will grow in our fuel tanks, just like it does in the earth and we thus fulfill Tesla s dream of connecting our machinery to the very wheelwork of nature. The hard part is, if I am right and somebody would just listen to me, then we could stop, say, children from dying each day because the technology would seriously transform our world. It would be a swift transformation. However, one could argue that WW3 would ensue because of the rapid transformation. Then again, other things could trigger WW3, like the coming Technological Singularity. --I am currently working on a video game script for RPG-maker. The Adam Project. --Building Lego on my computer. I haven t done that in a while. But, honestly, I haven t put much effort into it. Maybe in the future. My chess: Talent: Nope. Years of experience: No. 20 days online. Knowledge: Next to zero. Deep memory: I am a goldfish. Deep analysis: Never done that. Aid: I had a friend who taught me a thing or two. In summa: I suck at chess. I started playing at the age of 23. Then I picked it up at 25. I ended with a bit of online chess (rapid games). Not much experience. I mean, I played the game as a kid, but we didn t even know all the rules. I have beaten a handful of players (online), so it is not all bad. And, I occasionally beat my friend, so I can live with that. He is a physics teacher. One of my better poems: Let me rest your eyes on the roses, A heart-shaped bed, I made, Just for you. For you: every thorn I have plucked from a rose s Body. So know that my art is true.

114 Here you may rest for a little. Here you may sleep for a while. Take a nap on my heart and it ll Sap the bad thoughts and, You ll smile! Let me rest your eyes on the roses, A heart-shaped bed, I made, Just for you. For you: every thorn I have plucked from a rose s Body. So know that my art is true. And it cannot cause you to bleed. And it cannot rip you apart. But it cannot give what you need: A real heart that beats from the start. And so, When you wake up From your dream, Say Goodbye. to my garden of Red, Red roses. Wake up, my dear. And? And, YES: You ll scream!

115 A heart may hurt, Both when it opens and Closes. Other: What foods do a 154 eat? (Update: Also, creatine is good for IQ testing; maybe CLA combined with creatine and weightlifting?) I start the day with high quality fish oil (capsules): EPA: DHA: 1075 I have taken fish oil every day since I was a child. D3 (capsule): 40 ug (on and off) For breakfast, I make a smoothie: --1dl oatmeal (reduces the risk for diabetes + it gives you a lot of energy) --A handful of walnuts (walnuts is a must) --A spoonful of: linseeds/flaxseed, sunflower seeds, pumpkin seeds, sesame seeds, chia seeds (chia is an ancient Mayan word meaning strength). The seeds for the 8 vitamin Es. --A banana (or half) --5dl milk Supper 1: An apple. It is virtually impossible for me to become depressed. You are what you eat! For lunch, I will have one slice of whole grain bread and two eggs. I consume the walnuts (above) and the eggs for the l-serine. Google this man: Paul Alan Cox, e.g., L-serine Island: Emulate the inhabitants of the Okinawa Island in Japan if you want to grow old while maintaining your health. The algorithm for a long life is simple: I want to grow old. Where do people grow old? Okinawa. Emulate them. Done deal. Am I emulating them? A smudge. Dinner: I eat a variety of healthy dinners. Be creative. Sugar after dinner: I eat a homemade protein bar. A lot healthier and a lot cheaper, e.g.,:

116 Supper 2: Slice of whole grain bread with turkey cuts. And a yoghurt rich in protein. The turkey for the l-serine. Before I go to bed: I take the V3 System from Synergy: If I had the money, I would take 20-30g of arginine each day. Here is Louis Ignarro on arginine: 3g a day! Nitric Oxide Louis Ignarro: Dr Louis Ignarro Receives Nobel Prize: Vitamin D is also important: Dr. Eric Berg: Why all of a sudden is everyone deficient in vitamin D? Good habits: Beer in moderation; red wine and dark chocolate. A little alcohol is healthy for the heart. Bad habits: Too much coffee! I am addicted to coffee. And, I hate the taste of fish, so I rarely eat fish. But the fish and the seafood could also be bad for you: Cyanobacteria produce BMAA, which is a neurotoxin, which can be found in certain types of seafood. Be careful! Google this man: Paul Alan Cox. Instead of fish, I eat seeds. I get vitamin D, E and F. You get smooth skin! Walnuts are my number 1 super-food. I rarely consume candy, potato chips and carbonated soft drinks. Occasionally I need a coke. Sometimes it is healthy to be unhealthy. I do not smoke. Lastly: Power Foods for the Brain Neal Barnard TEDxBismarck: I eat a lot! But when you do dumbbells 45kg, flat bench, you need to eat. The best thing about weightlifting is that you can eat more and still stay slim. On IQ: Ok. What happened was, I signed up for the Fiqure test, but I had to wait until I had a day off from work in order to do the test properly. But this day, after coming home from work, I had gotten my result on some high range test, and I did badly, relatively speaking. The score was high enough in order to join a high iq society, but lower than the Mensa criterion; I needed two more correct answers for that. I made some last minute changes that completely messed up the test. This was my first high range test, though. Ok. So I got the results and I became furious, angry. And in my anger I figured that maybe I am not that good, that my

117 previous 147 score was mere luck, so I had to know what was what. So I took the test knowingly it was a bad idea, because you are supposed to take these tests when you are rested and refreshed. But I thought that it was ok because the website (Fiqure IQ Test) stated that you can take the test multiple times without invalidating the results. So I did something that I was not supposed to do: take the test in a tired and somewhat angry mode. I scored 137. The next day I scored 152. That is: Triple 9! If the 152 was my first attempt, then, imagine a giant party with 3795 people... I am the smartest one there, statistically speaking. See picture (below). The difference was a good night s rest! I am a member of the World Genius Directory: and on that list you will find people with IQs as high as 198. I am at the bottom! It is so lonely down there. I hate being stuck in the toilet. However, it is possible to climb. Update: I did. Stephen Hawking (IQ 160) Albert Einstein (IQ ) Judit Polgar (IQ 170) Philip Emeagwali (IQ 190) Garry Kasparov (IQ 194) Christopher Michael Langan (IQ ) Edith Stern (IQ 200+) Kim Ung-Yong (IQ 210) Christopher Hirata (IQ 225) Marilyn Vos Savant (IQ 228) Terence Tao (IQ ) William James Sidis (IQ ) Einstein s IQ was, they say, 160. In reality, you cannot really measure above the 130 mark without going into a gray zone: Problems with measuring very high IQ

118 107,000,000,000 people have ever lived. IQ: 202 = or 1 in 190,057,377,928. What does that mean? It means that, if you have an IQ this high, then you are smarter than all the people who have ever lived + a legion of unborns. In other words, it is just BS. Be assured that no one has ever come close to I.Q. 200, that the highest I.Q. to be realistically expected on Earth is about 185, and that only through tentative challenging norms in unexplored score ranges someone will one day qualify In summa: I think James Romanow is right (below); above the 130s, you enter murky waters. James Romanow: What is your IQ? At 17, mine was 165, have you ever checked yours using the MENSA IQ test? yep. Ex-Mensa member. Spent a long time studying the phenomena of intelligence and the testing of IQ. What you really need to know is that the accuracy of scores above roughly 135 is lousy. Poor. Extremely inaccurate. Prone to error. This doesn t mean you re a dummy who fluked it off. You ll always score over the 3 SD mark. But one day you ll have 140 and the next 150. The actual number is close to meaningless. Take Rick Rosner, a legend within this game, then take a lower IQ member, let them compete with real IQ tests, meaning, culture-free, zero prerequisites, like fiqure, then, according to the numbers, 192 (Rick) and, say, 124 (our lower IQ member), then Rick should crush his opponent. In reality, I would bet my money on the 124 if the 124 were truly accustomed to these culture-free tests. I could be wrong, but it would be a fun experiment. I would not be up for it because I don t have the nerve for it. I would suck at it as I suck at chess. See below. More IQ: 147 How I did it: I watched a YouTube video with Rick Rosner and he said something to the extent that he worked hard to achieve his IQ score. Then I had my Eureka moment: When I started out weightlifting, I could not even do squat (fun pun). In a dumbbell chest press (flat bench), I could not even do 20kg when I started out. Now I lift 45kg. That is twice the load and then some. Imagine if you could transform your IQ that way! I believe you can. The brain is a muscle. Just... Do not fall into the chess trap: I suck at chess. Chess mirrors life. Therefore, I must suck at life. (Okay. I suck at real life!) For example: If Rick Rosner is so smart, then why can t he beat Magnus Carlsen in chess?

119 Well, chess on that level requires one in a billion talent, years of experience, vast knowledge that stems from Titans that stood on the shoulders of Giants that...; deep super-memory, deeper analysis; the aid of supercomputers that are aided by an even taller order of supercomputers that... In fact, the IQ-part of chess might be a tiny portion of the game! If I am right here, then that is encouraging because I SUCK at chess. So chess is like a sport, while this IQ-thing is more like weightlifting. That is good news, because now you just need to find the right formula. The right formula is not doing a lot of sets and reps. The right formula, for me, is one set, four reps. This means you need to up the kg. Think about it, our body is a survival tool, so it is not about the sets and reps; it is all about the stimulation the nervous system gets. Heavier dumbbells means the body has to adapt to lift those dumbbells. Similarly, a harder IQ test means your brain has to adapt. Take a bunch of hard IQ tests and keep doing it. I became obsessed. I worked on this day and night. I started out with a score of 136 prior to training, and I ended up with 147. That is 11 points up! Not bad. Ok, to be fair, on this day, Lady Luck and my IQ-intuition were the main contributors to my high score. I did not have the time to figure all the puzzles out, so I used my intuition instead, and it paid off. My point is: Your IQ-intuition can improve drastically with training. The highest you could score on this test was 148: According to this IQ test, I have an IQ of 147. In reality, though, I would not have been able to achieve such a high score if it was not for my training with other IQ tests, such as these: I got 136 on the Norwegian one. 130 on the Danish one. And I nailed the Swedish one. The Danish one was a bitch! However, I came obsessed with this IQ thing, so I started to practice. Here is the deal: You can improve your IQ test scores. I am living proof. More on me:

120 I am a disciple of Dionysus; I praise Heraclitus and criticize science and religion, and see them only as tools. Moreover, my personality type is INTJ, which is why my school grades sucked because I would rather make up my own theories about the universe than listen to the teacher. I was lost in my own imagination, so I was unfit for school. Later, that took a toll on me because now I have a great idea of how the universe started (i.e., the light s point of view), but since I am not of Academia, I can never get my idea out there in the world. But, there is one way: The Langan way: Become famous. I try to become famous with music, poems, and such, but I have a long path to tread yet; and, I started late which means I will never be that good. Moving on, nobody would read Langan s CTMU was it not for Langan s own fame. Taking the Mega Test was crucial for the survival of the CTMU. So, why don t I do the same if I am so smart? IQ tests, for me, are about such puzzles which you will find on the Norwegian test (i.e., culture-free, zero prerequisites). Tests that involve language, math, etc., are not real IQ tests in my book because such tests are highly skill-based. For example, if you are the smartest person in the land and then sit down to join a chess tournament, you know the rules, but you have very little experience with the game, and even though the chess game is based on logic, you would not win that tournament. In fact, you wouldn t even win a single game because you do not have the skills that will come with years of experience. (Which is why I suck at chess.) Which is why the Mega Test that Langan took, is not a real IQ test in my book. The Mega Test is harder, much harder, than the IQ test I took, but that is my point: the Mega Test is based on skills. I don t have those skills. I have not honestly tried to make the effort and take the, say, Titan Test, but I don t imagine I would be any good. And I believe Langan would nail the Norwegian test. However, here is a test that admits to being skill-based and does not try to hide the fact: I took an IQ test from Mensa (Norway): Mensa IQ Test On a good day, and I stress good here, I like to believe that I could become a member of Mensa Norway (I m Norwegian). I later analyzed the 25 min test: I got four puzzles wrong. I scored 31 out of 35. I had understood the logic behind 25 and 27, but in my stressed out mind, I clicked on the wrong pictures. I later solved 33 and 34 (scoring 145, or 35/35), but I was not thinking along those lines during the test, so even if I had been given some additional time, I would not be able to score higher than, say, 140. But in all seriousness, without the time-component, the IQ test was too easy which goes to show that IQ tests are not really testing your ability to solve puzzles. IQ tests test your ability to solve puzzles in a stressful environment. That is a big difference. If we made the environment truly stressful, say that, you need at least 131 in 25 minutes or an atomic bomb will go off, then I would score, say, 64, if you need 65 in order to open a door! However, even if a miracle did occur and I was able to open the door and get away, I would die dog-tired as the bomb would soon go off and send me to the gates of oblivion. That is, if you truly believe in the IQ test, then tell me: Would you bet on the top dog in Mensa or, would you bet on a bad-ass General with a normal IQ and a cigar in his mouth? I have taken a high range test that I did badly on; there was no time limit. My error was eagerness. I should have waited and put in more work. But I am also convinced that the

121 puzzles are hard, not because they are that hard, but because you lack the context to understand them. If I could work on such a test with a friend (who has the context), I bet you that my next test would be awesome. Let us sum this IQ thing up for the last time: It seems that the average performance of high-range candidates on supervised tests is around 140 sd15, as was well suspected all these years. To sum up, I think that everyday life helps us conclude the following: Reaching Mensa or slightly higher level makes one intellectually capable of almost everything. -- That is, I think that, once you reach Mensa level, you are as high as everybody else with higher IQs. There is no difference between 130 and 198. I think it is a flawed science to state that someone with an IQ of 198 is so much smarter than the other members. If some scientists say that I am dead wrong here, then prove it the real way, because I don t care for your scientific way. Prove it to me by setting up a tournament with the time-component. Make a series of Fiqure-like tests and let them compete like crazy. I bet you that the 198 will fail and some 130 will win. Likewise, make an open world tournament in chess. Let all compete. I don t think Carlsen will win. A complete unknown will. What is my IQ? I have no idea. People who boast about their IQ are losers. -- Physicist Stephen Hawking I can boast about my IQ because I am a loser, lol! How big of a loser am I: Let us see, I have spent over 10 years on some free energy idea, but I will never get it out there in the world because I am a nobody. And nobody will read a book that nobody has written! But I don t think anybody will read what I write here anyways, so nobody will know that I am L. But does not having a high IQ supposed to boast your ego? No. Well, yes. But in my case, no. I am at the bottom of the Directory list! I get all the crap on my head! Update: I am caught in the middle. It sucks too. But let us not complain. Update: I once wrote: I will not join Mensa because I hate Academia, even more than does Langan. What does Academia have to do with Mensa? Academia and Mensa are related

122 because people of Academia are the ones likely to join. I will have nothing to do with those close-minded people. I have since I wrote this become a member of two high iq societies. I was wrong. The folks here are more like me. Or, that was my first impression, anyways. Strange.

123

124

125

126

127 Me and my son!