Market Update Micro Irrigation
Micro Irrigation Penetration Rate India China 5.5% 10.0% Brazil U.S. 52.0% 55.0% Spain 65.0% Russia 78.0% Israel 90.0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Penetration Rate (%)
Million Hectare All India Area Covered Under Micro Irrigation; 2005-2015 9 All India Area Covered Under Micro Irrigation by Segments; 2015 (Million Hectare) 8 7.73 7 6 5 4.94 3.37, 43.62% Drip Irrigation 4 3 3.09 4.36, 56.38% Sprinkler Irrigation 2 1-2005 2010 2015
Top 10 States with Micro Irrigation Area Covered; 2015 (Million Hectare) 0.10, 1.32% 0.26, 3.32% 0.33, 4.25% 0.32, 4.15% 0.35, 4.56% 0.57, 7.42% 1.68, 21.80% Rajasthan Maharashtra Andhra Pradesh Karnataka Gujarat 0.83, 10.73% 0.85, 10.96% 1.16, 15.05% 1.27, 16.45% Madhya Pradesh Tamil Nadu Chhattisgarh Bihar Others
000' Hectare Year Wise Micro Irrigation Area Covered of Major States; 2009-2015 1,200 1,000 1,021.48 800 600 400 200-575.08 515.31 397.65 391.26 243.17 261.10 212.54 144.54 200.72 192.62 12.60 161.33 181.13 12.33 310.23 195.66 202.78 130.95 146.62 44.16 37.60 23.25 64.66 54.09 32.41 13.60 2009-11 2011-13 2013-15
000' Hectare Major States Area Covered Under Micro Irrigation by Segments; 2015 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200-1,514 170 375 328 896 835 417 418 430 411 550 186 23 166 30 290 241 97 16 5 Drip Irrigation Sprinkler Irrigation
Major States Micro Irrigation Systems Penetration Rate; 2015 Manipur Himachal Pradesh Uttar Pradesh West Bengal Nagaland Kerela Bihar Odisha Chhattisgarh Maharashtra Karnataka Andhra Pradesh 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 1.0% 1.0% 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 1.5% 1.9% 2.2% 2.3% 2.3% 5.5% 6.4% 7.3% 8.1% 8.5% 9.3% 10.4% 10.8% 16.3% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% Penetration Rate (%)
Total Tamil Nadu Uttar Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Odisha Karnataka Uttarakhand Maharashtra Sikkim Chhatisgarh Gujarat Bihar Rajasthan Energy Consumption; 2015 Fertilizer Consumption; 2015 30.5% 15.1% 18.1% 22.2% 22.4% 26.8% 29.9% 33.4% 35.1% 37.8% 40.0% 40.0% 42.0% 49.3% 0% 20% 40% 60% Energy Consumption Savings (%) Total Bihar Uttarakhand Odisha Uttar Pradesh Maharashtra Tamil Nadu Karnataka Andhra Pradesh Chhattisgarh Sikkim Gujarat Rajasthan 7.6% 18.0% 20.9% 22.8% 23.0% 28.5% 27.1% 28.2% 28.8% 37.5% 40.4% 40.9% 42.7% 43.8% 0% 20% 40% 60% Ferilizer Consumption Savings (%)
Fruit Crops Productivity; 2015 Vegetable Crops Productivity; 2015 Total 42.4% Sikkim 6.8% Bihar 15.4% Tamil Nadu 17.3% Andhra Pradesh 19.4% Karnataka 28.2% Uttarakhand 32.5% Uttar Pradesh 34.2% Odisha 35.0% 38.2% Maharashtra 49.2% Chhattisgarh 66.7% Rajasthan 70.4% Gujarat 73.4% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Productivity Increase (%) Total 52.7% 22.1% Tamil Nadu 26.4% Odisha 28.2% Maharashtra 28.7% Karnataka 28.9% Uttar Pradesh 30.8% Bihar 31.0% Andhra Pradesh 34.1% Rajasthan 39.4% Uttarakhand 49.8% Sikkim 66.7% Gujarat 68.7% Chhattisgarh 98.8% 0% 50% 100% 150% Productivity Increase (%)
Increase in Farmer s Income; 2015 Introduction of New Crop; 2015 Total Uttarakhand Karnataka Andhra Pradesh Bihar Tamil Nadu Sikkim Odisha Maharashtra Uttar Pradesh Rajasthan Chhattisgarh Gujarat 42.0% 20.1% 27.7% 32.6% 32.8% 33.3% 37.3% 38.5% 45.8% 49.4% 52.5% 59.0% 67.3% 68.0% 0% 50% 100% Farmer's Income Increase (%) Total 30.4% Rajasthan 0.5% Bihar 1.6% Uttarakhand 2.2% Tamil Nadu 11.6% Gujarat 11.6% Maharashtra 18.8% Karnataka 26.7% Andhra Pradesh 41.4% Odisha 46.0% Sikkim 52.0% Chhattisgarh 53.6% Uttar Pradesh 62.6% 98.4% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% % of Farmers Introduced New Crops
Irrigation Savings; 2015 Andhra Pradesh Uttarakhand Tamil Nadu Karnataka Odisha Uttar Pradesh Sikkim Bihar Maharashtra Chhattisgarh Rajasthan Gujarat 20.8% 23.3% 24.7% 24.7% 26.5% 27.6% 27.9% 28.6% 31.0% 36.5% 45.4% 49.0% 49.3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Irrigation Cost Savings (%)
Billion Utilization (%) Year-Wise Total Fund Allocation and Utilization; 2012-17 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2-80.5% 75.1% 85.9% 14.9 15.6 93.1% 11.2 10.8 17.0 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Allocation ( Billion) Utilization (%) State-Wise Fund Allocation and Utilization; 2015-17 S. No States Allocation ( Crore) 2015-16 2016-17 Utilization (%) Allocation ( Crore) 1 Maharashtra 176.75 50% 330 2 Gujarat 146.75 139% 250 3 Andhra Pradesh 131.75 135% 260 4 Karnataka 111.75 100% 169 5 Rajasthan 104.75 50% 120 6 Telangana 92.75 103% 165 7 Madhya Pradesh 82.75 162% 140 8 Tamil Nadu 72.75 100% 110 9 34.5 49% 40 10 Bihar 20 50% 0 11 Others 100.93 119 Total 1075.43 1703
State-Wise Potential for Micro Irrigation in India 1.12, 3% 2.00, 5% Uttar Pradesh 1.23, 3% Madhya Pradesh 1.44, 3% Rajasthan 1.85, 4% Punjab 2.39, 6% 2.71, 6% 3.28, 8% 3.38, 8% 5.66, 13% 10.79, 26% 6.39, 15% Gujarat Maharashtra Bihar Karnataka West Bengal Andhra Pradesh Others Crop-Wise Potential for Micro Irrigation in India Crops Cereals Cotton Pulses Vegetables Oil Seeds Sugarcane Million Hectare 27.6 8.8 7.6 6.0 4.9 4.3 Fruits 3.9 Coconut, Plantation Crops and Oil Palms 3.0 Spices and Condiments 2.4 Flowers, medicinal and aromatic plants 1.0
There is no dedicated scheme on MI. It s just a component of PMKSY. Lack of dedicated team and IT-backed operations Delay in release of guidelines/government orders, uncertainty and sporadic changes in scheme guidelines Delay in Subsidy disbursement Absence of easy financing mechanisms for farmers High cost of maintenance and repairing of MI instrument
Government should initiate an awareness campaign to sensitize farming community about MI It should be made mandatory for firms providing infrastructure for micro irrigation to train the beneficiary about usage and handling of system with proper manual. To safeguard the investment made by farmer on MI system, provision for ensured maintenance service of MI system by the firm for at least 3 years should be made to provide hassle free service to farmers. SAUs and other institutes should initiate diploma courses for imparting skill of operating and maintaining micro irrigation systems to rural youth, this will provide employment to youth as well as create local service providers. Schemes like Credit Linked, Back-Ended Subsidy and Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises should be promoted and extended with the help of state and central agenesis along with the industries, cooperatives, NGOs.