Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Similar documents
Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

RECONSIDERING EVIL. Confronting Reflections with Confessions PROEFSCHRIFT

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Clashes of discourses: Humanists and Calvinists in seventeenth-century academic Leiden Kromhout, D.

Seeing through the archival prism: A history of the representation of Muslims on Dutch television Meuzelaar, A.

BECAUSE WE NEED THEM German-Dutch relations after the occupation: economic inevitability and political acceptance, Martijn Lak

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Tribes and Territories In Transition

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Gradability in the Nominal Domain

Applied. legal. epistemology. Building a knowledge-based ontology of the legal domain. Laurens Mommers

QUESTION 8. The Objects of the Will

On the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Policy Instruments for the Procurement of Environmental Services. Justin Dijk

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

This research was funded by the Research School CNWS (Leiden University)

QUESTION 28. The Divine Relations

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

University of Groningen. The force of dialectics Glimmerveen, Cornelis Harm

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Responses to the incidental parameter problem Pua, A.A.Y. Link to publication

Cover Page. The following handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation:

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

THE PEASANTS' REVOLT OF BANTEN IN 1888

The interpretation of artifacts : a critique of Dennett's design stance van Amerongen, M.

WALTER CHATTON. Lectura super Sententias

Disengaging culturalism: Artistic strategies of young Muslims in the Netherlands Termeer, B.M.H.

Quaestiones Infinitae

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

The Many Faces of Religious Truth.

VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT CANONICAL TEXTS: THE ONLY MEANS TO RELEASE!? ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT

Universal Features: Doubts, Questions, Residual Problems DM VI 7

Tilburg University. Art of hosting worldview Nagel, J.L. Document version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record. Publication date: 2015

Emanuel Rutten. Towards a Renewed Case for Theism

The use of conditionals in argumentation : a proposal for the analysis and evaluation of argumentatively used conditionals Gerlofs, J.M.

Between Grammar and Rhetoric

QUESTION 59. An Angel s Will

Rules, Reasons, Arguments. Formal studies of argumentation and defeat

Scripture between Identity and Creativity

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

University of Groningen. Autopistia van den Belt, Hendrik

Warfare and Politics in Medieval Germany, ca. 1000

QUESTION 53. The Corruption and Diminution of Habits. Article 1. Can a habit be corrupted?

QUESTION 55. The Essence of a Virtue

University of Groningen. The rise of the warriors goddess in ancient India Yokochi, Yuko

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Maneuvering strategically in a political interview: analyzing and evaluating responses to an accusation of inconsistency Andone, C.

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

QUESTION 11. Enjoying as an Act of the Will

QUESTION 67. The Duration of the Virtues after this Life

SOVIET RUSSIAN DIALECTICAL MA TERIALISM [DIAMAT]

Impediments to Traditional Logic

Resolutio secundum rem, the Dionysian triplex via and Thomistic Philosophical Theology

QUESTION 34. The Person of the Son: The Name Word

QUESTION 76. The Union of the Soul with the Body

Tilburg University. Protection of women victim of rape Azari, Hajar. Document version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

High Strength Fibre Reinforced Concrete

QUESTION 34. The Goodness and Badness of Pleasures

SAMPLE. Introduction. xvi

IN THE MIDDLE: of an Individualist Ministerial Stance. and a Relational Ministerial Stance ELAINE BETH PERESLUHA

PHIL 399: Metaphysics (independent study) Fall 2015, Coastal Carolina University Meeting times TBA

University of Groningen. Circularity and arbitrariness Engelsma, Jacobus

Members and Friends of our Academic Community, Ladies and Gentlemen,

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages of this question paper until instructed that you may do so by the Invigilator

Citation for published version (APA): Hermans, A. M. (2017). Latin cults through Roman eyes: Myth, memory and cult practice in the Alban hills

Ask and you shall be given : Pentecostalism and the economic crisis in Cameroon

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Acknowledgements 8. Abbreviations 10

PHIL 399: Metaphysics (independent study) Fall 2015, Coastal Carolina University Meeting times TBA

AN IDEALISTIC PRAGMATISM

THE FOUNDATIONS OF MODERN SCIENCE IN THE MIDDLE AGES

Reviewed by Mauro Zonta Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza

Proofs, intuitions and diagrams. Kant and the mathematical method of proof

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages of this question paper until instructed that you may do so by the Invigilator

Harming Others. Universal Subjectivism and the Expanding Moral Circle. Harming others is bad because it s harmful, and what s harmful is bad.

A Companion to the Theology of John Mair

Quaestiones Infinitae

Quaestiones Infinitae. publications of the department of philosophy and religious studies Utrecht University volume lxxxvi

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

QUESTION 90. The Initial Production of Man with respect to His Soul

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY PRECEPTS IN THOMISTIC NATURAL LAW TEACHING

STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGION

PROLOGUE TO PART 1-2

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

QUESTION 63. The Cause of Virtue

SCHEDULE OF SEMINAR READINGS First Semester, DATE FRESHMAN SOPHOMORE JUNIOR SENIOR. Cervantes: Don Quixote, Part I. Cervantes: Don Quixote

QUESTION 87. How Our Intellect Has Cognition of Itself and of What Exists Within It

Henry of Ghent on Divine Illumination

Class Meetings Class will meet Fri 11:10am -2:00pm

QUESTION 58. The Mode of an Angel s Cognition

Truth as Relation in Aquinas

ON EFFICIENT CAUSALITY: METAPHYSICAL DISPUTATIONS 17,18, AND 19. By FRANCISCO SUAREZ. Translated By ALFRED J. FREDDOSO. New Haven:

Thomism The Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas

Thomas Aquinas on the Metaphysical Nature of the Soul and its Union with the Body

Wisdom in Aristotle and Aquinas From Metaphysics to Mysticism Edmond Eh University of Saint Joseph, Macau

The question is concerning truth and it is inquired first what truth is. Now

NUTRIX STUDIES IN LATE ANTIQUE MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE THOUGHT STUDI SUL PENSIERO TARDOANTICO MEDIEVALE E UMANISTICO. Directed by Giulio d Onofrio

PHENOMENOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF WITTGENSTEIN'S PHILOSOPHY

Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologiae la Translated, with Introduction and Commentary, by. Robert Pasnau

QUESTIONS ON THE SOUL BY JOHN BURIDAN AND OTHERS

Transcription:

Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/18607 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Dijs, Judith Title: Hervaeus Natalis, De secundis intentionibus, Distinctiones I&II : critical edition with introduction and indices Issue Date: 2012-03-20

Hervaeus Natalis De secundis intentionibus Distinctiones i & ii

Hervaeus Natalis De secundis intentionibus Distinctiones i & ii Critical edition with introduction and indices Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van Rector Magnificus prof.mr. P.F. van der Heijden, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties te verdedigen op dinsdag 20 maart 2012 klokke 16.15 uur door door Judith Dijs geboren te s-gravenhage in 1962

Promotiecommissie Promotores: Prof.dr. E.P. Bos Prof.dr. F.A.J. de Haas Overige commissieleden: Prof.dr. Fabrizio Amerini (Università degli Studi di Parma) Prof.dr. P.J.J.M. Bakker (Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen) Dr. R. van der Lecq (Universiteit Utrecht) Prof.dr. B.G. Sundholm 2012, J. Dijs Printed by Koninklijke Wöhrmann, Zutphen Typesetting by TAT Zetwerk, Utrecht Cover design by Th. Kerkhove/Ivo Geradts On the cover: a fragment of the manuscript Wien Ö.N. 2411, reprinted with permission by the Österreichische Nationalbibliothek

To the memory of my mother ( 4 August 1986)

Otium sine litteris mors est et hominis vivi sepultura Seneca, Epistulae 82 * * * Here, then, at home, by no more storms distrest, Folding laborious hands we sit, wings furled; Here in close perfume lies the rose-leaf curled, Here the sun stands and knows not east nor west, Here no tide runs; we have come, last and best, From the wide zone through dizzying circles hurled, To that still centre where the spinning world Sleeps on its axis, to the heart of rest. Lay on thy whips, O Love, that we upright, Poised on the perilous point, in no lax bed May sleep, as tension at the verberant core Of music sleeps; for, if thou spare to smite, Staggering, we stoop, stooping, fall dumb and dead, And, dying, so, sleep our sweet sleep no more. Dorothy L. Sayers, Gaudy Night, ch. 18

Contents List of tables............................................................ xiii Acknowledgements.................................................... xv INTRODUCTION 1. Background........................................................ 3 1.1. Intentions: historical and philosophical context............. 3 1.2. Hervaeus Natalis: life and works............................. 6 1.3. Hervaeus De secundis intentionibus: importance........... 7 1.4. Hervaeus De secundis intentionibus......................... 12 1.4.1. Outline of De secundis intentionibus.................. 12 1.4.2. Outline of the introduction to De secundis intentionibus i ii....................................... 13 2. De secundis intentionibus i v: overview.......................... 15 3. De secundis intentionibus i ii..................................... 21 3.1. What is an intention?......................................... 21 3.2. First intentions................................................ 26 3.2.1. Is a first intention an intelligible species?............. 26 3.2.2. Is a first intention nothing but an act of the intellect?............................................... 29 3.2.2.1. Hervaeus own answer....................... 30 3.2.2.1.1. Intention........................... 30 3.2.2.1.2. Order............................... 31 3.2.2.2. Two other opinions........................... 32 3.2.3. Do words that refer to particular things indicate first intentions?........................................ 35 3.2.4. Are privations, negations and figments first intentions?............................................. 37 3.3. Second intentions............................................. 39 3.3.1. Is a second intention the very act of knowing?....... 39 3.3.1.1. Objections.................................... 41

viii contents 3.3.2. Is a second intention something really existing in the intellect as in a subject?........................... 43 3.3.3. Is a second intention something really existing outside the mind?...................................... 44 3.3.4. Is a second intention a mere rational relation?....... 45 3.3.5. Is the relation of the known thing to the intellect a mere second intention?................................ 46 3.3.6. Is only the relation of the known thing to the intellect a second intention?.......................... 46 4. Tradition and innovation in De secundis intentionibus i ii...... 49 4.1. Thomas Aquinas.............................................. 50 4.1.1. The process of cognition in Thomas Aquinas........ 50 4.1.2. Intention in Thomas Aquinas......................... 53 4.1.3. Thomas on privations, negations and fictions........ 54 4.1.4. Thomas on relations, intentions and the subject of logic.................................................... 55 4.1.5. Thomas and Hervaeus compared..................... 58 4.2. Definitions of the intelligible species in Hervaeus contemporaries............................................... 61 4.2.1. Jacob of Metz, Durandus of St.-Pourçain, and Hervaeus............................................... 61 4.3. Radulphus Brito.............................................. 66 4.3.1. Radulphus on intelligible species, intentions and the subject of logic..................................... 68 4.3.2. Radulphus and Hervaeus compared.................. 75 5. Concluding remarks............................................... 77 6. Dating, authorship, editions, and manuscripts................... 81 6.1. Dating and authorship........................................ 81 6.2. Editions and manuscripts.................................... 82 6.2.1. Description and evaluation........................... 82 Wien, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek 2411... 82 Avignon 300........................................ 83 Vaticanus Latinus 847.............................. 84 Basel B iii 22........................................ 85 Klosterneuburg 274................................. 86 Vaticanus Latinus 4584............................. 86 Roma, biblioteca Angelica 104..................... 87

contents ix De primis intentionibus........................... 87 The Florentian abbreviation........................ 88 6.2.2. Comparison and stemma............................. 88 6.2.3. Orthography........................................... 93 7. Complete tabula quaestionum of De secundis intentionibus..... 95 Bibliography........................................................... 97 DE SECUNDIS INTENTIONIBUS I & II: CRITICAL EDITION Sigla codicorum....................................................... 109 Tabula quaestionum................................................... 111 Distinctio prima..................................................... 113 Quaestio prima.................................................. 113 Utrum prima intentio sit ipsa species intelligibilis........ 113 Solutio....................................................... 115 De prima distinctione...................................... 116 De secunda distinctione.................................... 118 De tertia distinctione....................................... 119 Responsio................................................... 120 Ad rationes in oppositum.................................. 123 Quaestio secunda................................................ 124 Utrum prima intentio sit tantum actus intelligendi....... 124 Solutio....................................................... 127 De prima opinione.......................................... 127 De quadam alia opinione................................... 128 De reprobatione istius opinionis: 1. De intentione secunda in concreto.................................. 129 2. De intentione prima vel secunda in abstracto.......... 130 3. De fundamento secundae intentionis................... 132 De vera opinione: 1. De intentione ipsa.................... 132 2. De eius ordine intentionis............................... 135 Ad rationes in oppositum.................................. 138 Quaestio tertia................................................... 141 Utrum nomina significantia res in particulari dicant primam intentionem................................. 141 Solutio....................................................... 143

x contents Ad rationes in oppositum.................................. 148 Quaestio quarta.................................................. 149 Utrum privationes pertineant ad primas intentiones..... 149 Solutio....................................................... 150 Ad rationes in oppositum.................................. 153 Quaestio quinta.................................................. 155 Utrum figmenta pertineant ad primas intentiones........ 155 Solutio....................................................... 156 Ad rationes in oppositum.................................. 159 Distinctio secunda................................................... 163 Quaestio prima.................................................. 163 Utrum secunda intentio sit ipse actus intelligendi........ 163 Solutio....................................................... 167 De quadam opinione....................................... 167 De quadam alia opinione................................... 168 De vera opinione............................................ 170 Ad rationes in oppositum.................................. 175 Quaestio secunda................................................ 179 Utrum secunda intentio sit aliquid reale existens in intellectu sicut in subiecto............................ 179 Solutio....................................................... 181 Ad rationes in oppositum.................................. 185 Quaestio tertia................................................... 188 Utrum secunda intentio sit aliquid reale positivum existens in rerum natura............................. 188 Solutio....................................................... 190 De distinctione intentionis................................. 190 Quod secunda intentio quantum ad ipsam intentionalitatem non dicit aliquam rem existentem in rerum natura formaliter loquendo... 190 Quod secunda intentio concretive dicta non dicit formaliter loquendo aliquam rem existentem in rerum natura.......................................... 196 Quomodo intentio differat ab omnino nihilo............. 199 Ad rationes in oppositum.................................. 205 Quaestio quarta.................................................. 208 Utrum secunda intentio sit tantum relatio rationis....... 208 Solutio....................................................... 210 Ad rationes in oppositum.................................. 214

contents xi Quaestio quinta.................................................. 216 Utrum relatio rei intellectae ad intellectum sit secunda intentio................................................ 216 Solutio....................................................... 218 Ad rationes in oppositum.................................. 221 Quaestio sexta................................................... 223 Utrum sola habitudo rei intellectae ad intellectum sit secunda intentio...................................... 223 Solutio....................................................... 224 Ad rationes in oppositum.................................. 230 Index of names......................................................... 233 Index of subjects....................................................... 237 Nederlandse samenvatting............................................ 243 Curriculum vitae....................................................... 247

List of tables Table 1. Intentions according to Hervaeus Natalis................... 24 Table 2. First and second intentions according to Hervaeus divisions...................................................... 25 Table 3. First and second intentions according to Radulphus of Brito.......................................................... 74

Acknowledgements The work on this thesis started in April 1989. It has been a long and rather rough voyage with many obstacles arising from within and from without, which makes me doubly grateful for all the help and encouragement I received along the way. I wish to thank my teachers, colleagues, students, acquaintances, friends and family members you know who you are who contributed to this result not only in more or less substantial ways, but also by sometimes either tactfully avoiding the subject or bluntly informing me that this project wasn t going anywhere unless I would really, finally sit down and work on it. I wish to dedicate this book to my mother, whose unswerving confidence in me has been the foundation of everything I have ever managed to accomplish.