Critical Thinking - Wk 3. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Similar documents
Introduction to Logic. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Curtis Solomon What is the difference between a deductive and an inductive argument?

Introduction to Philosophy Crito. Instructor: Jason Sheley

LOGIC LECTURE #3: DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION. Source: A Concise Introduction to Logic, 11 th Ed. (Patrick Hurley, 2012)

Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur. NP-TEL National Programme On Technology Enhanced Learning. Course Title Introduction to Logic

Example Arguments ID1050 Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning

Logic: The Science that Evaluates Arguments

Basic Concepts and Skills!

PHI Introduction Lecture 4. An Overview of the Two Branches of Logic

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

Reason and Argument. Richard Feldman Second Edition

PRACTICE EXAM The state of Israel was in a state of mourning today because of the assassination of Yztzak Rabin.

Instructor s Manual 1

HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ

Test Item File. Full file at

Review Deductive Logic. Wk2 Day 2. Critical Thinking Ninjas! Steps: 1.Rephrase as a syllogism. 2.Choose your weapon

What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing

Critical Reasoning Skillbuilder Exit Quiz

Three Kinds of Arguments

Logical Validity and Soundness

Phil-004 (Galindo): Spring 14 - Quiz #4

Lecture 1: Validity & Soundness

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises

Chapter 3: Basic Propositional Logic. Based on Harry Gensler s book For CS2209A/B By Dr. Charles Ling;

INDUCTION. All inductive reasoning is based on an assumption called the UNIFORMITY OF NATURE.

Introducing Our New Faculty

PHILOSOPHER S TOOL KIT 1. ARGUMENTS PROFESSOR JULIE YOO 1.1 DEDUCTIVE VS INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

Geometry 2.3.notebook October 02, 2015

An Introduction to. Formal Logic. Second edition. Peter Smith, February 27, 2019

Introduction to Logic

Directions: For Problems 1-10, determine whether the given statement is either True (A) or False (B).

1.5 Deductive and Inductive Arguments

Appendix: The Logic Behind the Inferential Test

SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

Chapter 1 Why Study Logic? Answers and Comments

Logic Book Part 1! by Skylar Ruloff!

!Validity!Soundness. Today s Lecture 1//21/10

1.6 Validity and Truth

Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic

Inductive Reasoning. Definition. Basing a conclusion on specific examples.

1/19/2011. Concept. Analysis

! Introduction to the Class! Some Introductory Concepts. Today s Lecture 1/19/10

The antecendent always a expresses a sufficient condition for the consequent

Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims).

Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church September 8, 2011

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

Beyond Symbolic Logic

Introduction to Logic

Academic Writing and Logical Thinking

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

A Brief Introduction to Key Terms

Announcements. Quiz #4. Review, see me before the Final Exam for help. Average? High Score? BUT, everyone will get +1pt!

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.

Evaluating Arguments

1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

A Primer on Logic Part 1: Preliminaries and Vocabulary. Jason Zarri. 1. An Easy $10.00? a 3 c 2. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)

Practice Test Three Spring True or False True = A, False = B

I think, therefore I am. - Rene Descartes

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

HW3- Sets & Arguments (solutions) Due: Tuesday April 5, 2011

2.3. Failed proofs and counterexamples

PHIL2642 CRITICAL THINKING USYD NOTES PART 1: LECTURE NOTES

CHAPTER FOUR ARGUMENTS & INFERENCES. The Basics of Argument

FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS

Philosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 4: Skepticism. Part 1: The Scope of Skepticism and Two Main Types of Skeptical Argument

Logic, Deductive And Inductive By Carveth Read READ ONLINE

Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 6th edition Extra Examples

Lecture 4: Deductive Validity

Worksheet Exercise 1.1. Logic Questions

BASIC CONCEPTS OF LOGIC

A rule that guarantees the right solution to a problem. Usually by using a formula. They work but are sometimes impractical.

Academic Writing and Logical Thinking

Introduction to Philosophy

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

Tutorial A02: Validity and Soundness By: Jonathan Chan

Critical Thinking is:

C. Problem set #1 due today, now, on the desk. B. More of an art than a science the key things are: 4.

Chapter 2: Two Types of Reasoning

Logic for Computer Science - Week 1 Introduction to Informal Logic

Deduction by Daniel Bonevac. Chapter 1 Basic Concepts of Logic

Critical Reasoning 03 Cogency and Analogy

Informalizing Formal Logic

Moon s Day, March 23: Elementary Reasoning

Reading and Evaluating Arguments

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

Statements, Arguments, Validity. Philosophy and Logic Unit 1, Sections 1.1, 1.2

Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference

To better understand VALIDITY, we now turn to the topic of logical form.

COURSE SYLLABUS PT522 Reformed Theological Seminary 5422 Clinton Boulevard Jackson, MS

BASIC CONCEPTS OF LOGIC

Introduction to Philosophy. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Introduction to Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments

Establishing premises

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion.

Transcription:

Critical Thinking - Wk 3 Instructor: Jason Sheley

Quick Quiz Give an example of a statement. Give an example of sentence that is not a statement. Give an example of an argument

Validity, Truth, Soundness, Strength, Cogency, and Proving Invalidity

Arguments Factual claim: The claim that there is evidence. Inferential claim: The claim that something follows from this evidence. When we analyze arguments, we look at the inferential claim first, and the factual claim second. That is, we look at the argument structure first and the argument content second.

All arguments Deductive Arguments claim to guarantee the truth of the conclusion. Inductive Arguments claim that the conclusion probably follows.

All arguments Deductive Arguments claim to guarantee the truth of the conclusion. Inductive Arguments claim that the conclusion probably follows. Valid Invalid

Valid Arguments An argument in which it is impossible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are true. The conclusion follows with strict necessity from the premises.

Invalid Arguments An argument in which it is possible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are true. The conclusion does not follow with strict necessity from the premises.

Testing for validity 1. Assume that the premises are true (even when you know they are not). 2. Ask whether the conclusion could be false given 1.

Machine analogy: invalidity

Fountain analogy: invalidity

Buckets of truth Valid

Buckets of truth Invalid

Testing for validity P1: All television networks are media companies. P2: NBC is a television network. C: Therefore, NBC is a media company. Valid

Testing for validity P1: All automakers are computer manufacturers. P2: United Airlines is an automaker. C: Therefore, United Airlines is a computer manufacturer. Valid

Testing for validity P1: All banks are financial institutions. P2: Wells Fargo is a financial institution. C: Therefore, Wells Fargo is a bank. Invalid

Testing for validity P1: All wines are whiskeys. P2: Ginger ale is a wine. C: Therefore, ginger ale is a whiskey. Valid

Table 1-1, p. 46

Sound Arguments Sound argument = Valid argument + All true premises Note: In this class, testing for validity is the hard part. But once you re sure you ve got a valid argument, you just need to determine if the premises are true or false -- that gives you soundness.

All arguments Deductive Arguments claim to guarantee the truth of the conclusion. Inductive Arguments claim that the conclusion probably follows.

Inductive arguments Strong Inductive argument: It is improbable that the conclusion is false given that the premises are true. Weak Inductive argument: The conclusion probably does not follow from the premises, even though it is claimed to.

Testing for strength 1. Assume that the premises are true (even when you know they are not). 2. Ask whether the conclusion is probably true.

Testing for strength P1: All dinosaur bones to this day have been at least 50 million years old. C: Therefore, probably the next dinosaur bone to be found will be at least 50 million years old. Strong

Testing for strength P1: When a lighted match is slowly dunked into water, the flame is snuffed out. P2: Gasoline is a liquid, just like water. C: Therefore, when a lighted match is slowly dunked into gasoline, the flame will be snuffed out. Weak

Table 1-2, p. 50

Cogent argument Strong argument = + All true and relevant premises

Valid or invalid? Sound? Since London is north of Paris and south of Edinburgh, it follows that Paris is south of Edinburgh. Valid. Sound.

Valid or invalid? Sound? If George Washington was beheaded, then George Washington died. George Washington died. Therefore, George Washington was beheaded. Invalid; true premises, false conclusion.

Valid or invalid? Sound? All leopards with lungs are carnivores. Therefore, all leopards are carnivores. Invalid; true premise, true conclusion.

Valid or invalid? Sound? If Senator Hillary Clinton represents California, then she represents a western state. Hillary Clinton does not represent a western state. Therefore, she does not represent California. Sound.

Valid or invalid? Sound? Since some fruits are green and some fruits are apples, it follows that some fruits are green apples. Invalid.