Introduction to Logic. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Similar documents
Critical Thinking - Wk 3. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Curtis Solomon What is the difference between a deductive and an inductive argument?

Introduction to Philosophy Crito. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Example Arguments ID1050 Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning

LOGIC LECTURE #3: DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION. Source: A Concise Introduction to Logic, 11 th Ed. (Patrick Hurley, 2012)

Logic: The Science that Evaluates Arguments

PHI Introduction Lecture 4. An Overview of the Two Branches of Logic

Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur. NP-TEL National Programme On Technology Enhanced Learning. Course Title Introduction to Logic

Basic Concepts and Skills!

Instructor s Manual 1

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

PRACTICE EXAM The state of Israel was in a state of mourning today because of the assassination of Yztzak Rabin.

HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT

What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing

Test Item File. Full file at

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ

Lecture 1: Validity & Soundness

Critical Reasoning Skillbuilder Exit Quiz

Geometry 2.3.notebook October 02, 2015

Logical Validity and Soundness

INDUCTION. All inductive reasoning is based on an assumption called the UNIFORMITY OF NATURE.

Chapter 3: Basic Propositional Logic. Based on Harry Gensler s book For CS2209A/B By Dr. Charles Ling;

An Introduction to. Formal Logic. Second edition. Peter Smith, February 27, 2019

Introduction to Logic

Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church September 8, 2011

Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic

1.6 Validity and Truth

1.5 Deductive and Inductive Arguments

SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

Reason and Argument. Richard Feldman Second Edition

Appendix: The Logic Behind the Inferential Test

Phil-004 (Galindo): Spring 14 - Quiz #4

! Introduction to the Class! Some Introductory Concepts. Today s Lecture 1/19/10

Directions: For Problems 1-10, determine whether the given statement is either True (A) or False (B).

Inductive Reasoning. Definition. Basing a conclusion on specific examples.

Review Deductive Logic. Wk2 Day 2. Critical Thinking Ninjas! Steps: 1.Rephrase as a syllogism. 2.Choose your weapon

The antecendent always a expresses a sufficient condition for the consequent

Academic Writing and Logical Thinking

Chapter 1 Why Study Logic? Answers and Comments

Three Kinds of Arguments

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims).

Beyond Symbolic Logic

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.

Introduction to Logic

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

A Primer on Logic Part 1: Preliminaries and Vocabulary. Jason Zarri. 1. An Easy $10.00? a 3 c 2. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS

A Brief Introduction to Key Terms

1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

I think, therefore I am. - Rene Descartes

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

PHILOSOPHER S TOOL KIT 1. ARGUMENTS PROFESSOR JULIE YOO 1.1 DEDUCTIVE VS INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

C. Problem set #1 due today, now, on the desk. B. More of an art than a science the key things are: 4.

Introducing Our New Faculty

!Validity!Soundness. Today s Lecture 1//21/10

Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan

Academic Writing and Logical Thinking

Tutorial A02: Validity and Soundness By: Jonathan Chan

Practice Test Three Spring True or False True = A, False = B

HW3- Sets & Arguments (solutions) Due: Tuesday April 5, 2011

Deduction by Daniel Bonevac. Chapter 1 Basic Concepts of Logic

1/19/2011. Concept. Analysis

Introduction to Philosophy

Reading and Evaluating Arguments

2.3. Failed proofs and counterexamples

Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 6th edition Extra Examples

To better understand VALIDITY, we now turn to the topic of logical form.

Philosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 4: Skepticism. Part 1: The Scope of Skepticism and Two Main Types of Skeptical Argument

Logic Book Part 1! by Skylar Ruloff!

Lecture 4: Deductive Validity

Critical Thinking is:

Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference

MATH1061/MATH7861 Discrete Mathematics Semester 2, Lecture 5 Valid and Invalid Arguments. Learning Goals

A rule that guarantees the right solution to a problem. Usually by using a formula. They work but are sometimes impractical.

Worksheet Exercise 1.1. Logic Questions

Logic for Computer Science - Week 1 Introduction to Informal Logic

Statements, Arguments, Validity. Philosophy and Logic Unit 1, Sections 1.1, 1.2

CHAPTER FOUR ARGUMENTS & INFERENCES. The Basics of Argument

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

Announcements. Quiz #4. Review, see me before the Final Exam for help. Average? High Score? BUT, everyone will get +1pt!

BASIC CONCEPTS OF LOGIC

Chapter 2: Two Types of Reasoning

Moon s Day, March 23: Elementary Reasoning

Evaluating Arguments

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

Informalizing Formal Logic

Introduction to Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments

A. Problem set #3 it has been posted and is due Tuesday, 15 November

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion.

PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE

BASIC CONCEPTS OF LOGIC

5.6.1 Formal validity in categorical deductive arguments

Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic The Structure of Arguments

Answers to Practice Problems 6.5

Transcription:

Introduction to Logic Instructor: Jason Sheley

In this section we will learn: What is the difference between Deduction and Induction? Why use different types of logic? What is a valid argument? Invalid? Sound? What is a strong argument?

Deduction and Induction

Arguments Factual claim: The claim that there is evidence. Inferential claim: The claim that something follows from this evidence. When we analyze arguments, we look at the inferential claim first, and the factual claim second. That is, we look at the argument structure first and the argument content second.

All arguments Deductive Arguments claim to guarantee the truth of the conclusion. Inductive Arguments claim that the conclusion probably follows.

All arguments Deductive Arguments claim to guarantee the truth of the conclusion. Inductive Arguments claim that the conclusion probably follows. Valid Invalid

Valid Arguments An argument in which it is impossible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are true. The conclusion follows with strict necessity from the premises.

Invalid Arguments An argument in which it is possible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are true. The conclusion does not follow with strict necessity from the premises.

Testing for validity 1. Assume that the premises are true (even when you know they are not). 2. Ask whether the conclusion could be false given 1.

Machine analogy: invalidity

Fountain analogy: invalidity

Buckets of truth Valid

Buckets of truth Invalid

Testing for validity P1: All television networks are media companies. P2: NBC is a television network. C: Therefore, NBC is a media company. Valid

Testing for validity P1: All automakers are computer manufacturers. P2: United Airlines is an automaker. C: Therefore, United Airlines is a computer manufacturer. Valid

Testing for validity P1: All banks are financial institutions. P2: Wells Fargo is a financial institution. C: Therefore, Wells Fargo is a bank. Invalid

Testing for validity P1: All wines are whiskeys. P2: Ginger ale is a wine. C: Therefore, ginger ale is a whiskey. Valid

Table 1-1, p. 46

Sound Arguments Sound argument = Valid argument + All true premises Note: In this class, testing for validity is the hard part. But once you re sure you ve got a valid argument, you just need to determine if the premises are true or false -- that gives you soundness.

All arguments Deductive Arguments claim to guarantee the truth of the conclusion. Inductive Arguments claim that the conclusion probably follows.

Inductive arguments Strong Inductive argument: It is improbable that the conclusion is false given that the premises are true. Weak Inductive argument: The conclusion probably does not follow from the premises, even though it is claimed to.

Testing for strength 1. Assume that the premises are true (even when you know they are not). 2. Ask whether the conclusion is probably true.

Testing for strength P1: All dinosaur bones to this day have been at least 50 million years old. C: Therefore, probably the next dinosaur bone to be found will be at least 50 million years old. Strong

Testing for strength P1: When a lighted match is slowly dunked into water, the flame is snuffed out. P2: Gasoline is a liquid, just like water. C: Therefore, when a lighted match is slowly dunked into gasoline, the flame will be snuffed out. Weak

Table 1-2, p. 50

Cogent argument Strong argument = + All true and relevant premises

Valid or invalid? Sound? Since London is north of Paris and south of Edinburgh, it follows that Paris is south of Edinburgh. Valid. Sound.

Valid or invalid? Sound? If George Washington was beheaded, then George Washington died. George Washington died. Therefore, George Washington was beheaded. Invalid; true premises, false conclusion.

Valid or invalid? Sound? All leopards with lungs are carnivores. Therefore, all leopards are carnivores. Invalid; true premise, true conclusion.

Valid or invalid? Sound? If Senator Hillary Clinton represents California, then she represents a western state. Hillary Clinton does not represent a western state. Therefore, she does not represent California. Sound.

Valid or invalid? Sound? Since some fruits are green and some fruits are apples, it follows that some fruits are green apples. Invalid.

Quick Quiz Give an example of a statement. Give an example of sentence that is not a statement. Give an example of an argument