Formal Reasoning 2-Logic

Similar documents
A rule that guarantees the right solution to a problem. Usually by using a formula. They work but are sometimes impractical.

How can you combat your mental set? With lateral thinking.

Rule Rationality: A Synthesis of Behavioral and Mainstream Economics

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

Inductive Reasoning.

The paradox we re discussing today is not a single argument, but a family of arguments. Here are some examples of this sort of argument:

Inductive Reasoning. Inductive Reasoning Example #1

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion.

Example Arguments ID1050 Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning

Logical (formal) fallacies

Quick Write # 11. Create a narrative for the following image

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument?

Chapter 2 Science as a Way of Knowing: Critical Thinking about the Environment

Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language,

Thinking and Reasoning

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

Rhetoric and Argument. Techniques of and definitions associated with persuasive speaking and writing.

Critical Reasoning for Beginners: Four. Marianne Talbot Department for Continuing Education University of Oxford Michaelmas 2009

Introduction to Logic. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Reading and Evaluating Arguments

Topics and Posterior Analytics. Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey

Introduction to Philosophy

CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior.

x Philosophic Thoughts: Essays on Logic and Philosophy

Unit VI: Davidson and the interpretational approach to thought and language

Nested Testimony, Nested Probability, and a Defense of Testimonial Reductionism Benjamin Bayer September 2, 2011

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

Lecture 1: Validity & Soundness

PRINCE OF PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH

TESTIMONY FROM YOUR OWN WITNESSES: DIRECT EXAMINATION STRATEGIES

! Introduction to the Class! Some Introductory Concepts. Today s Lecture 1/19/10

The Myth of Rationality. by Robert Stone

1.5 Deductive and Inductive Arguments

2014 Examination Report 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS

I Don't Believe in God I Believe in Science

Live Deeply-Live the Claim!

1/7. The Postulates of Empirical Thought

Proof as a cluster concept in mathematical practice. Keith Weber Rutgers University

Announcements. Quiz #4. Review, see me before the Final Exam for help. Average? High Score? BUT, everyone will get +1pt!

Heilewif s Tale Teacher s Guide SE. Thomas Aquinas and Scholasticism by Mary Waite

Categorical Logic Handout Logic: Spring Sound: Any valid argument with true premises.

Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference

Moore on External Relations

John Locke. British Empiricism

Philosophy (PHILOS) Courses. Philosophy (PHILOS) 1

IS THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD A MYTH? PERSPECTIVES FROM THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

What is a distributed system? A first course in Distributed Computing... A first course in Distributed Computing... Principle of Distributed Computing

Basic Concepts and Skills!

Does the Skeptic Win? A Defense of Moore. I. Moorean Methodology. In A Proof of the External World, Moore argues as follows:

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

1/6. The Resolution of the Antinomies

The Greatest Mistake: A Case for the Failure of Hegel s Idealism

Evolution: The Darwinian Revolutions BIOEE 2070 / HIST 2870 / STS 2871

Also, in Argument #1 (Lecture 11, Slide 11), the inference from steps 2 and 3 to 4 is stated as:

Understanding Truth Scott Soames Précis Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Volume LXV, No. 2, 2002

However, the corollary to avoiding the problems is to do things successfully and this is really what this book is about.

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

Inductive Reasoning. Definition. Basing a conclusion on specific examples.

Calm Living Blueprint Podcast

The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism

The paradox we re discussing today is not a single argument, but a family of arguments. Here s an example of this sort of argument:!

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

SCAMMED! Assignment: Identify main claim (conclusion) in three different scams and outline argument.

Martha C. Nussbaum (4) Outline:

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

Mètode Science Studies Journal ISSN: Universitat de València España

Discussion Notes for Bayesian Reasoning

Let our Wounded Heroes know that you care...

A Logical Approach to Metametaphysics

Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic

Know the Mysteries. Bible Study July 4, 2015 The Church of God, International (Philippines)

HW3- Sets & Arguments (solutions) Due: Tuesday April 5, 2011

Brandi Hacker. Book Review. Wilson, E. O. The Creation: An Appeal to Save Life on Earth. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2006.

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

Reviewed Work: Why We Argue (and How We Should): A Guide to Political Disagreement, by Scott Aikin and Robert Talisse

ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments

2017 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions

Logic for Computer Science - Week 1 Introduction to Informal Logic

UNIT 1 January 15, 2013

Critical Thinking - Wk 3. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Rawlsian Values. Jimmy Rising

Notes on Bertrand Russell s The Problems of Philosophy (Hackett 1990 reprint of the 1912 Oxford edition, Chapters XII, XIII, XIV, )

2016 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions

Logic, Inductive And Deductive By William Minto READ ONLINE

This report is organized in four sections. The first section discusses the sample design. The next

Instructor s Manual 1

Logic & Philosophy. SSB Syllabus

Introducing Our New Faculty

LOGIC. Inductive Reasoning. Wednesday, April 20, 16

The Power of a Peaceful Mind: Let Go of Judgment and Let In Joy

Critical Thinking is:

Born Free and Equal? On the ethical consistency of animal equality summary Stijn Bruers

Epistemic Utility and Theory-Choice in Science: Comments on Hempel

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT

Louisiana English Language Arts Content Standards BENCHMARKS FOR 5 8

Lecture 4.2 Aquinas Phil Religion TOPIC: Aquinas Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God. Critiques of Aquinas arguments.

As noted, a deductive argument is intended to provide logically conclusive support for its conclusion. We have certainty with deductive arguments in

Can machines think? Machines, who think. Are we machines? If so, then machines can think too. We compute since 1651.

Transcription:

Formal Reasoning 2-Logic Deductive Reasoning Drawing conclusions from a set of observations or premises. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Inductive Reasoning Draw conclusions but could be conceivably wrong. You draw specific conclusions from general premises. 1

Formal Reasoning 2-Logic Deductive Reasoning Inductive Reasoning Example: All human beings are mortal. I am a human being. If the premises are true Then, I am mortal. Example: Most people with season tickets must love music. John has season tickets. Then, John probably loves music. 2

Formal Reasoning 2- Logic Deductive Reasoning Examples: 1. All oranges are fruits 2. All fruits grow on trees 3. Therefore, all oranges grow on trees The soccer game is on either Thursday or Friday. I just found out that the game is not on Thursday, so the game must be on Friday. If the two premises really are true, then there is no possible way that the conclusion could be false. Inductive Reasoning Example: All the tigers observed in a particular region have yellow black stripes, therefore all the tigers native to this region have yellow stripes My dog has never bitten me, so dogs don t bite. Even if all the premises are true, it is still possible that the conclusion is false.

January has always been cold here in Siberia. Today is January 14, so it is going to be another cold day in Siberia. This argument is inductive. The premises makes the conclusion likely, but they do not guarantee that the conclusion is true. To put the point another way, it is possible that the premises of this argument could be true and the conclusion could still be false. One can, for example, imagine a freak warm day in Siberia on January 14.

Informal Reasoning In informal reasoning problems, there may be no clearly correct solutions. Disagreement may exist about basic premises. Information may be incomplete. Many view points may compete. 6

Informal Reasoning 1-Heuristics A rule-of-thumb strategy that often allows us to make judgments and solve problems efficiently. Who would you trust to A short cut (that can be baby-sit your child? prone to errors). Examples: A doctor who wants to determine the best kind of treatment. A factory owner who wants to boost production.

Heuristics S P L O Y O C H Y G S P S P L Y O C H Y O C L H O G Y Put a Y at the end, and see if the word begins to make sense. 8

Informal Reasoning 2-Dialectical Thinking Consider thesis and antithesis simultaneously to arrive at synthesis. (most advanced critical thought process.) Example: It is what juries are supposed to do in order to arrive to a verdict. You consider argument for and against the defendant s guilt. You consider point and counter point. 9

Barriers to Reasoning What are some obstacles to problem solving?

Barriers to Reasoning 1- Availability Heuristic Exaggerating the Improbable Estimating the likelihood of events based on their availability in memory. We assume such events are common. Vivid cases in the news often cause an availability heuristic. Example: If it happened in the past, then it will happen now. I had an accident on the freeway, then I can t drive on the freeway because I will get in an accident. (The memory of the accident is the most available. ) 11

Does this look good? Wait, what???

Barriers to Reasoning 2- Representativeness Heuristic Who went to Harvard? My friend Dan is a smart dude, but did not go to Harvard (but he looks like he did). If I tell you that Sonia Dara is a Sports Illustrated swimsuit model, you would make certain quick judgments (heuristics) about her like about her interests or intelligence. She is an economics / human evolutionary biology major at Harvard University. Judging a situation based on how similar the aspects are to the prototypes the person holds in their mind. Like thinking everyone from Decatur is preppy, or someone with glasses is nerdy, or a blonde is not smart.

Representativeness Heuristic Linda is 31, single, outspoken and very bright. She majored in philosophy in college. As a student, she was deeply concerned with discrimination and other social issues, and she participated in antinuclear demonstrations. Which statement is more likely? a. Linda is a bank teller b. Linda is a bank teller and a feminist activist. 15

The Availability and Representativeness Heuristics

Barriers to Reasoning 3- Framing and the Tendency to Avoid Loss How an issue is framed can significantly affect decisions and judgments. Examples: If you take chemotherapy, you ll lose your hair. (People will respond cautiously) If you take the medication for high blood pressure, you ll be OK. (People will go for it) 17