IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

Similar documents
IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH. Civil No.: Judge

IN THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT WASHINGTON COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

Case 3:16-cv RLY-MPB Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR WEBER COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

Case No.: Honorable Judge Commissioner. COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, LORIE JEAN KENDALL RICKS, individually and as

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA. Plaintiff, for his complaint, states and alleges the following:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

John M. O Connor, Esq. ANDERSON KILL & OLICK, P.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SAN JUAN COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH. Case No. v. Judge WILLIE GRAYEYES,

Case 3:18-cv SB Document 1 Filed 08/22/18 Page 1 of 16

Case 2:11-cv GP Document 12 Filed 09/29/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv BCW Document 2 Filed 04/04/18 Page 1 of 20

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/09/ :30 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/09/2016

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

Case 1:05-cv RMU Document 1 Filed 01/31/2005 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

(Article I, Change of Name)

Case: 1:11-cv DCN Doc #: 2 Filed: 11/03/11 1 of 12. PageID #: 13

6:13-cv GRA Date Filed 09/11/13 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 25. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Greenville Division

STATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD. Decision No. 35

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI VERIFIED PETITION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Application Form Non Teaching Position

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA COMPLAINT. I. Preliminary Statement

Case 1:12-cv RJS Document 8 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/06/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:04CV-338-H ELECTRONICALLY FILED

Page 1. Page 2. Page 4 1 (Pages 1 to 4) Page 3

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT. Doe 2 s next friend and parent, Doe 3; and Doe 3, Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellant, Oral Argument Requested

MATT COCHRAN and MINDY GANZE COURT USE ONLY

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/ :21 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 152 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2018

DANIEL F. MONAHAN, ESQUIRE Attorney I.D. No North Pottstown Pike, Suite 210 Exton, PA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR OPERATION OF THE COLUMBARIUM of Highland Park United Methodist Church Dallas, Texas DEFINITIONS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY OF COOK, LAW DIVISION COMPLAINT AT LAW

COACHING EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION

PROPOSALS MUST BE RECEIVED NO LATER THAN: 5:00 p.m., April 30, Proposals received after this time will not be evaluated.

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

FAITH EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH MEMORIAL PRAYER GARDEN 886 North Shore Drive Forest Lake, Minnesota RULES AND PROCEDURES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

MEMORANDUM. Interested Parishes in the Episcopal Diocese of Louisiana. From: Covert J. Geary, Chancellor of the Diocese

CEDAR PARK CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS

Case 2:18-cr RJS Document 1 Filed 01/03/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Protocol for the Development of Columbaria Niche Spaces or Memorial Gardens in the Archdiocese of Atlanta

Revision: DRAFT 0622 BYLAWS. Revision Bylaws: Vancouver First Church of God Page 1

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO CV

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 93 ( CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS ) OF THE MANALAPAN TOWNSHIP CODE Ordinance No.

BEFORE THE HEARING BOARD OF THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

Articles of Incorporation SOLITUDE BAPTIST CHURCH (ORIGINAL)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY AT INDEPENDENCE, MISSOURl

Case: 4:15-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 06/25/15 Page: 1 of 32 PageID #: 1

Case 8:16-cv CEH-AAS Document 8 Filed 09/30/16 Page 1 of 25 PageID 210

and sexuality, a local church or annual conference may indicate its desire to form or join a self-governing

MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENTS

APPLICATION AGAPE ACADEMY

THE FAIR OAKS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH (FOPC) APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT SCHOOL OFFICERS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. CIVIL No.

AFFIDAVIT FOR SEARCH AND SEIZURE WARRANT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Roanoke Division ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT.

STATEMENT OF BISHOP EMERITUS DONALD TRAUTMAN As he has done his entire career, Bishop Trautman sends his prayerful support to all victims of clergy

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SUMMIT COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

Employment Agreement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Model Policies and Procedures for Response to Allegations of Sexual Abuse 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BLUEFIELD DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

CCYM Application Packet for Adults Meeting and Event Dates

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT MOUNT ZION MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH **********

The First Church in Oberlin, United Church of Christ. Policies and Procedures for a Safe Church

Full Gospel Assemblies 3018 E. Lincoln Hwy. P. O Box 337 Parkesburg, PA 19365

EXHIBIT 4 FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 11/07/ :40 PM. the. Affirmation of Laurel J. Eveleigh

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

INTERNATIONAL CHURCHES OF CHRIST A California Nonprofit Religious Corporation An Affiliation of Churches. Charter Affiliation Agreement

Belize 2016 Short-Mission Trip Application

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION

THE SYNOD OF THE ANGLICAN CHURCH OF AUSTRALIA IN THE DIOCESE OF WILLOCHRA INCORPORATED

IN THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT, WEST JORDAN DEPARTMENT IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SALT LAKE, STATE OF UTAH DAO #

THE VILLAGE OF SAUK VILLAGE COOK AND WILL COUNTIES, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NUMBER

DIOCESE OF CORPUS CHRISTI DIOCESAN CONFIRMATION RETREATS

Affiliated Agreement

Endowment Fund Charter

Cooloola Christian College

On June 26, 2014, Waleed ( "Wally ") Hamed (referred to as "Counterclaim

T HE M A S T E R S A C A D E M Y 1500 Lukas Lane Oviedo, FL Employment / Volunteer Application Stage I

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BLUEFIELD DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street, Denver, CO 80202

Case 3:18-cv BRM-TJB Document 1 Filed 01/23/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Respondent. PETITIONERS Vickers, UCE, Ready

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT POSITION: CLASSROOM TEACHER

REGISTRATION AND OPT OUT NOTICE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES. DICK SMITH REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS (NOS. 2017/ and 2018/52431)

A FULL TIME PASTOR OPENING

Transcription:

Michael A. Worel (12741) Alan W. Mortensen (6616) Lance L. Milne (14879) DEWSNUP KING OLSEN WOREL HAVAS MORTENSEN 36 South State Street, Suite 2400 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 533-0400 Fax: (801) 363-4218 mworel@dkowlaw.com amort@dkowlaw.com lmilne@dkowlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH R.H., v. Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT and JURY DEMAND (Tier 3 Discovery) WARREN JEFFS, LYLE JEFFS, SETH JEFFS, WENDELL LEROY NIELSEN, THE FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS, formerly known in part as The Work or the Priesthood Work and also known as the CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS, THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS, THE UNITED EFFORT PLAN TRUST, and DOES 1 THROUGH 20, WHOSE TRUE NAMES ARE UNKNOWN, Civil No.: 170908165 Judge Vernice Trease Defendants. -1-

Plaintiff, R.H., by and through her undersigned counsel of record, complains against Defendants, Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, the Corporation of the President of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, the Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (collectively the FLDS Church ), and the United Effort Plan Trust (the UEP Trust ) as follows: PARTIES 1. Defendant Warren S. Jeffs is an individual currently incarcerated in the State of Texas, who was at all times material hereto a Trustee or the President of Defendant UEP Trust. 2. Defendant Warren S. Jeffs, at times material hereto, was also the President of the FLDS Church or was a counselor in the First Presidency of the FLDS Church, which emerged in the early 1990s out of a religious organization known as the Work or Priesthood Work. 3. Defendant Lyle Jeffs is an individual residing in the State of Utah, who at the time of the original filing of this matter was incarcerated in Salt Lake County, Utah and is currently incarcerated in Farmington, Davis County, Utah, and who was at all times material hereto a Trustee of Defendant UEP Trust and was also a Priesthood Leader in the FLDS Church, which emerged in the early 1990s out of a religious organization known as the Work or Priesthood Work. 4. Defendant Seth Jeffs is an individual residing in the State of Utah, who was at all times material hereto a Trustee of Defendant UEP Trust and was also a Priesthood Leader in the FLDS Church, which emerged in the early 1990s out of a religious organization known as the -2-

Work or Priesthood Work. His current residence is unknown, and it is believed that he is about to leave the state of Utah. 5. Defendant Wendell L. Nielsen is an individual residing in the State of Utah, who was at all times material hereto a Trustee of Defendant UEP Trust and a Priesthood Leader in the FLDS Church which emerged in the early 1990s out of a religious organization known as the Work or Priesthood Work. His current residence is unknown, and it is believed that he is about to leave the State of Utah. 6. Defendant Does 1 through 20 ( Defendant Does ) are individuals or entities who are agents of or controlled by and/or alter egos of Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, and Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, the FLDS Church and the UEP Trust (prior to its court-ordered reformation on October 25, 2006) and who acquired and/or hold property in their names or in the names of third parties for Defendants Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, and Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, the FLDS Church, The Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the FLDS Church, The Corporation of the President of the FLDS Church, and the UEP Trust and who participated in the abuse set forth below. 7. On January 23, 2018, the UEP Trust Web Page provided a 2016 Annual Report of the United Effort Plan Trust that affirms that the UEP Trust continues to be managed under the authority of the court in the probate case of In the Matter of the United Effort Plan Trust, Case No. 053900848 in the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, Utah. -3-

8. The UEP Trust designates the principal place of administration being the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, as set forth by the Honorable Denise Lindberg on October 25, 2006. 9. The fact that the UEP Trust continues to be administrated in Salt Lake County is found in a document located on the UEP Trust webpage, whereby on January 3, 2018, the UEP Trust filed a Notice of Intent to Distribute Property in the Third District Court of Salt Lake County, Utah. 10. The UEP Trust s web page states that the express purpose of the UEP Trust (as reformed by the Third District Court for the State of Utah) is to provide for the just wants and needs of the class of persons who are the intended beneficiaries of that charitable trust. In the spirit of the common interest of its participants, the UEP Trust will administer housing solutions and other benefits to those who qualify as participants in this charitable trust. Since the UEP Trust is the continuation of the entity created in 1942 by the pioneers and patriarchs of the Short Creek community, the management of the trust has adopted the mission and purpose outlined in the original trust as reformed by the Third District Court. 11. As of January 23, 2018, Petitions for Benefits to the UEP Trust must be made in Salt Lake County, 132 West Pierpont Avenue, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101. 12. Defendant the Corporation of the President of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is a Utah Corporation located in Hildale, Utah. 13. Defendant Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is a Utah Corporation located in Hildale, Utah. -4-

14. The Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is a Church located in Hildale, Utah. 15. Plaintiff, R.H., is a young woman known to Defendants. At all times material hereto she was a participant and beneficiary of the UEP Trust and a member of the FLDS Church. She currently resides in the Third Judicial District boundaries. 16. Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. 77-38-6, Plaintiff is a sexual abuse victim entitled to certain protections, and shall be known as R.H. for purposes of this litigation. Plaintiff requests that her identity not be disclosed except under seal to the court and that pending public disclosures, she be known only as R.H. in this action. 17. Venue is proper in this matter pursuant to Utah Code Ann. 78B-3-307, Utah Code Ann. 75-7-108 (1)(a) and/or Utah Code Ann. 75-7-205 GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 18. The Priesthood Work originated for the purpose of preserving and perpetuating the practice of sex with underage and multiple women. 19. To maintain that practice, the UEP Trust was established under Utah law in 1942 by followers of The Priesthood Work. 20. Until the appointment of a Special Fiduciary on June 16, 2005, there was no practical distinction between the Priesthood Work, the FLDS Church, and the UEP Trust. 21. Prior to the UEP Trust s court-ordered reformation on June 16, 2005, the UEP Trust existed to preserve and advance the religious doctrines and goals of the FLDS Church or Priesthood Work. -5-

22. Historically, the leader or president of the FLDS Church or Priesthood Work served simultaneously as the President of the Board of Trustees of the Trust and the UEP Trust was under the direction of the President of the FLDS Church or Priesthood Work and was known as the Prophet. 23. Prior to the UEP Trust s reformation, the doctrines and laws of the FLDS Church or Priesthood Work, together with the revelations received by the President, were the guiding tenets by which the Trustees of the UEP Trust and the President of the Trust acted. 24. The Presidents of the UEP Trust and the Priesthood Work or FLDS Church have been, in succeeding order: Warren S. Jeffs, Rulon T. Jeffs (who died On September 8, 2002), Leroy S. Johnson (who died on November 25, 1986), and John Y. Barlow (who died on December 29, 1949). 25. As with President Warren S. Jeffs, Presidents Rulon T. Jeffs, Leroy S. Johnson, and John Y. Barlow all drew on their combined power and authority as head of the UEP Trust and the FLDS Church to govern the people and administer the affairs of the Priesthood Work. 26. Prior to reformation, the administration of the FLDS Church and UEP Trust was inseparable, as was the actual power and authority of each President over both. 27. One of the historical purposes of the UEP Trust was to provide housing for faithful, obedient UEP Trust participants and their children. By the same token, its purpose was to support or enforce the directives of the President of the FLDS Church and Priesthood Work. 28. This was manifest for UEP Trust participants by the historical fact that one who disobeyed a religious directive, especially one that involved sex with leaders, stood at -6-

significant risk of losing his or her family, home or opportunity to receive a home because family living arrangements and assignments, including the receipt of homes was controlled by the President of the UEP Trust. 29. Thus, prior to reformation, the UEP Trust and the FLDS Church or Priesthood Work were always administered by the same person to achieve the same purpose: to preserve and advance the religious doctrines and goals of the [FLDS Church.] 30. Since the origination of the Priesthood Work, these fundamental doctrines have included sexual relations involving underage girls. 31. As such, underage sexual abuse has been part of the Priesthood Work since the UEP Trust was organized in 1942, and therefore part of the religious practices advanced by the UEP Trust. 32. Historically, sexual abuse of young girls has included girls as young as eight (8) to 14 years old. 33. Every president since the formation of the UEP Trust, namely Warren S. Jeffs, Presidents Rulon T. Jeffs, Leroy S. Johnson, and John Y. Barlow, have been involved with sexual relations with underage girls with the consent and approval of UEP Trust participants. 34. Although underage sex abuse was seldom openly announced and discussed, members of the Priesthood Work and participants in the UEP Trust knew that underage sex took place with Priesthood leaders. -7-

35. The practice of having sexual relations with underage girls has been consistently sustained by members of the Priesthood Work and participants in the UEP Trust since their inception. 36. In 1998, UEP Trust participants expressly approved and manifested their support for the 1998 Declaration of the UEP Trust in a meeting at the Leroy S. Johnson Meetinghouse and thereby ratified the UEP Trust s purpose of preserving and advancing the doctrines and goals of the FLDS Church, including the sanctioning of having sexual relations with underage girls. 37. After Rulon T. Jeffs suffered a stroke in August of 1998, he remained the President, but much of his power and authority, was delegated to his son, Warren S. Jeffs, who was a Trustee of the UEP Trust and a leader in the FLDS Church. 38. The practice of having sexual relations with underage girls continued after Warren S. Jeffs assumed control of the UEP Trust and FLDS Church and after he later became the President of both entities. 39. However, a new practice of having sex and sexual relations with underage girls in the FLDS Temple and other undisclosed FLDS Church and UEP Trust owned properties with girls, ages eight (8) to 14 years old, was initiated by Warren Jeffs, along with leadership of UEP Trust and the FLD Church, including the Twelve Apostles of the Church (including Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, and Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, and other John Does) witnessing the sexual relations between Warren S. Jeffs and these underage girls, by viewing, watching, taping, participating in, and documenting these sexual encounters with underage girls. 40. Plaintiff was subject to this horrific religious doctrine and religious rituals. -8-

41. This horrific religious doctrine and religious rituals as performed on Plaintiff consisted of Plaintiff, beginning at the age of 8, having a bag placed over her head, led out of her house by representatives of the Defendants, placed in a vehicle, and being driven to an unknown location. 42. Plaintiff was given a number by which she was known during these religious rituals and she was never called by name, but only by number. 43. Once reaching the unknown location, the bag would be taken off Plaintiff s head and she would be disrobed and was required to engage in vaginal, oral, and other types of sexual acts with Defendants Warren S. Jeffs, while Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and others watched as part of the ritual. 44. Defendant Warren S. Jeffs told Plaintiff that if she told anyone of these encounters, God would destroy her and her family immediately. Defendants Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and others, watched and observed these commands from Defendant Warren S. Jeffs. 45. Defendant Warren S. Jeffs told Plaintiff that if she was suffering pain from these encounters, it was because God was unhappy with her and that if cried during these encounters, God would punish her. Defendants Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and others, watched and observed these commands from Defendant Warren S. Jeffs. 46. This religious ritual abuse continued on a regular basis, between five and six times a week, from the age of 8 years-old until the Plaintiff turned 12 years-old. -9-

47. Once Plaintiff turned 14, she was required to become a witness and scribe to these religious rituals between other young girls and defendants Warren S. Jeffs, while Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and others watched. She would document the encounter and the number of the young girl. 48. The existence of this religious doctrine and rituals is verified in the evidence that was found in the FLDS Church s Temple in Eldorado, Texas. 49. Defendant Warren S. Jeffs has been convicted in Texas of engaging in such conduct in the FLDS Church s Temple in Eldorado, Texas. 50. Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and others actions in performing and/or witnessing these religious sexual rituals with underage girls were consistent with the way the UEP Trust was being administered and was endorsed and ratified by the other UEP Trust Trustees ( UEP Trustees ) and the UEP Trust beneficiaries and participants themselves. 51. Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, and Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and others drew on their combined authority as Priesthood Leaders and Trustees of the UEP Trust and later, to gain and exercise absolute control, power, and authority over Plaintiff and the course of her life as a member of the FLDS Church or Priesthood Work and UEP Trust participant. 52. Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and others by virtue of their UEP Trust and FLDS Church authority and apparent authority, exercised supreme and inseparable authority over R.H. to keep her within a closed and -10-

sequestered community on UEP Trust land, made her (and her family) dependent on the UEP Trust for her needs, support, and shelter and otherwise made it virtually impossible for her to leave and live beyond this authority. 53. Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and others, by virtue of their UEP Trust and FLDS Church authority and apparent authority, exercised this absolute control, power and authority over R.H. s life so that he could require her, as an 8-year-old girl, to be subjected to this forced sexual ritual. 54. Beginning when Plaintiff was 16 years-old, she would go to Ladies Class to learn how to be a good wife. 55. Defendant Lyle Jeffs, who was acting many times as the President of the FLDS Church and was at all times, a Priesthood leader in the LDS Church, would come and remove Plaintiff from the Ladies Class and take her to his sound proof office and engage in sexual relations with Plaintiff under the guise of further teachings in the Ladies Class. 56. As a young girl, R.H. learned, through personal experience, that participants in the UEP Trust and members of the FLDS Church who questioned the President s and other FLDS Church and UEP Trust Priesthood Leader s absolute power, control and authority would suffer the loss of their homes, families, and support through expulsion from the UEP Trust and FLDS Church. 57. As with previous leaders of the Priesthood Work, Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and others taught that FLDS Church members -11-

and UEP Trust participants should follow the laws of God, not man, with respect to laws prohibiting sexual relations between underage girls and adult men. 58. As with previous leaders of the Priesthood Work, Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and others taught that the underage girls should engage in sexual intercourse to accomplish the doctrinal goal of the FLDS Church to raise up good priesthood children. 59. The UEP Trust and FLDS Church, through their authorized agents, acting within the course and scope of this authority and apparent authority, directed, aided, and ratified the wrongful conduct alleged herein, and are directly and vicariously liable to R.H., as alleged in the First through Third and Fifth causes of action set forth below. 60. Alternatively, the UEP Trust negligently appointed, hired, supervised and retained Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and others as Trustees and with regard to Warren S. Jeffs, later, as President of the UEP Trust, and thereby facilitated, ratified, acquiesced and caused the wrongful conduct alleged herein for which the UEP Trust is liable as alleged in the Fourth Cause of Action below. 61. At all times material hereto, Defendants constituted a single enterprise or common concern and their wrongful conduct as alleged herein is imputed to one another for which Defendants are each liable to R.H. as alleged in the causes of action set forth below. 62. At all times material hereto, Defendants did not function separately, but rather, integrated their resources as a single enterprise or common concern to achieve a common purpose. -12-

63. At all times material hereto, Warren S. Jeffs controlled both the FLDS Church and the UEP Trust and, under that control, all Defendants had unity of ownership, unity of management and unity of operations. The concept of corporate separateness should therefore be disregarded and may not be interposed to conceal the true relation that existed among Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, including others, and the FLDS Church and the UEP Trust. 64. The Defendants conspired with and supported each other to commit the wrongful conduct alleged above. 65. The nominally distinct Defendants should be treated as one. To achieve equity, each Defendant may be held jointly and severally liable for their group conduct and the wrongful conduct pursued as their general or common purpose. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION Conspiracy to Commit Battery and Sexual Abuse of a Child 66. Plaintiff incorporates herein each and every allegation contained in this Complaint and alleges as follows. 67. The Defendants intentionally, knowingly or recklessly, solicited, instructed, commanded, encouraged, and/or intentionally committed battery and the sexual abuse of R.H., a child. 68. The Defendants conspired and combined together for the purpose of having sexual intercourse with R.H. -13-

69. The object of the conspiracy was illegal and carried out as the result of a calculated plan between the Defendants. 70. The Defendants commanded and acted in committing battery and the sexual abuse of R.H. 71. There was a meeting of the minds among Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and the FLDS Church, and the UEP Trust in regard to the object or course of action. 72. Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and others, the FLDS Church, and the UEP Trust committed one or more unlawful and overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy. 73. Unlawful and overt acts were committed by Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and others, the FLDS Church, and the UEP Trust in Utah. 74. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing wrongful conduct, R.H. has suffered severe pain, emotional distress and permanent injury, all to her general damage in a reasonable sum. 75. As a further direct and proximate result of the foregoing wrongful conduct, R.H. has incurred and will yet incur medical and therapy expenses, all to her special damage in a reasonable sum. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for relief as set forth below. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION -14-

Infliction of Emotional Distress 76. Plaintiff incorporates herein each and every allegation contained in this Complaint and alleges as follows. 77. The conduct of Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and others, the FLDS Church, and the UEP Trust, as alleged herein, was outrageous and intolerable in that it offended the generally accepted standards of decency and morality. 78. Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and others, the FLDS Church, and the UEP Trust intentionally and negligently caused, or acted in reckless disregard of the likelihood of causing, R.H. severe emotional distress. 79. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing wrongful conduct, R.H. has suffered severe pain, emotional distress and permanent injury, all to her general damage in a reasonable sum. 80. As a further direct and proximate result of the foregoing wrongful conduct, R.H. has incurred and will yet incur medical and therapy expenses, all to her special damage in a reasonable sum. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for relief as set forth below. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION Outrage 81. Plaintiff incorporates herein each and every allegation contained in this Complaint and alleges as follows. -15-

82. The conduct of Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and others, the FLDS Church, and the UEP Trust, as alleged herein, was so extreme that it went beyond all possible bounds of decency and is regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized society. 83. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing wrongful conduct, R.H. has suffered severe pain, emotional distress and permanent injury, all to her general damage in a reasonable sum. 84. As a further direct and proximate result of the foregoing wrongful conduct, R.H. has incurred and will yet incur medical and therapy expenses, all to her special damage in a reasonable sum. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for relief as set forth below. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION Negligent Hiring, Appointment, Retention, and Supervision 85. Plaintiff incorporates herein each and every allegation contained in this Complaint and alleges as follows. 86. At the time of the wrongful conduct alleged above, Warren S. Jeffs was hired, appointed, retained, and supervised by the UEP Trust. 87. Warren S. Jeffs wrongful conduct in having sexual relations with R.H. notwithstanding the Priesthood Work s history of conducting arranged marriages, including the arranged marriages of underage girls and Warren S. Jeffs continuation of that practice, he was negligently hired, appointed, retained, and supervised by the UEP Trust. -16-

88. The UEP Trust knew, or should have known, and ratified through its Trustees and Trust participants, that the UEP Trust facilitated and caused the wrongful conduct as alleged herein. 89. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing wrongful conduct, R.H. has suffered severe pain, emotional distress and permanent injury, all to her general damage in a reasonable sum. 90. As a further direct and proximate result of the foregoing wrongful conduct, R.H. has incurred and will yet incur medical and therapy expenses, all to her special damage in a reasonable sum. FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION Negligence 91. Plaintiff incorporates herein each and every allegation contained in this Complaint and alleges as follows. 92. The UEP Trust and the FLDS Church had a duty not to harm R.H. 93. The UEP Trust and the FLDS Church knew that, pursuant to the doctrines and goals of the FLDS Church, were expected to have children to multiply and replenish the earth and raise up good priesthood children. 94. Accordingly, the UEP Trust and the FLDS Church knew, or should have known that, pursuant to FLDS doctrines and goals, sexual intercourse was likely to take place between R.H. and Warren Jeffs. -17-

95. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing wrongful conduct, R.H. has suffered severe pain, emotional distress, and permanent injury, all to her general damage in a reasonable sum. 96. As a further direct and proximate result of the foregoing wrongful conduct, R.H. has incurred and will yet incur medical and therapy expenses, all to her special damage in a reasonable sum. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for relief as set forth below. PUNITIVE DAMAGES 97. Plaintiff incorporates herein each and every allegation contained in this Complaint and alleges as follows. 98. The conduct of Warren S. Jeffs, Lyle Jeffs, Seth Jeffs, Wendell LeRoy Nielsen, Defendant Does and others, the FLDS Church, and the UEP Trust, including its Trustees, as alleged herein, was willful and malicious or intentional conduct, or conduct that manifests a knowing and reckless indifference toward, and a disregard of, the rights of R.H. 99. The wrongful acts alleged herein were committed, specifically authorized, and ratified by Warren S. Jeffs and/or other managerial agents, Priesthood Leaders of the FLDS Church and the Trustees of UEP Trust. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for relief as set forth below. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands a trial by jury and prays for judgment against Defendants on all causes of action as follows: -18-

1. For general damages in an amount to be proven at trial; 2. For special damages in an amount to be proven at trial; 3. For punitive damages in an amount to be awarded at trial; 4. For costs, interest and reasonable attorneys fees incurred herein; and 5. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and reasonable. JURY DEMAND Pursuant to Rule 38(b), Utah R. Civ. P., Plaintiff demanded a trial by jury and tendered the statutory jury fee in her original file. DATED this 24 th day of January 2018. DEWSNUP, KING, OLSEN, WOREL, HAVES & MORTENSEN /s/ Alan W. Mortensen Michael A. Worel Alan W. Mortensen Lance L. Milne Attorneys for Plaintiff Plaintiffs Address: c/o DEWSNUP KING OLSEN WOREL, HAVAS MORTENSEN 36 South State Street, Suite 2400 Salt Lake City, UT 84111-19-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 24 th day of January 2018, I caused to be served via the Court s Greenfiling system, a true and correct copy of the foregoing PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT and JURY DEMAND to the following: Zachary T. Shields Michael D. Stanger Strong & Hanni 9350 South 150 East, Suite 820 Sandy, UT 84070 Counsel for Defendant the United Effort Plan Trust Jason N. Dixon J. Dixon Law, PC PO Box 842434 Hildale, UT 84784 Counsel for Defendant the United Effort Plan Trust /s/ Natalie Cottam -20-