John M. O Connor, Esq. ANDERSON KILL & OLICK, P.C.
|
|
- Isabel Natalie Simon
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 John M. O Connor, Esq. ANDERSON KILL & OLICK, P.C. Edward Barocas, Legal Director American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey Foundation P.O. Box 750 Newark, NJ Attorneys for Plaintiffs RANDAL and CARMEN YORKER, as parents and natural guardian of DIAMOND YORKER, a minor, RANDY REINA, and PRESTON and BARBARA ANDERSON, as parents and natural guardian of SEAN ANDERSON, a minor, vs. Plaintiffs, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MONMOUTH COUNTY DOCKET NO. TOWNSHIP OF MANALAPAN, MANALAPAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, STUART BROWN, in his capacity as Chief of the Manalapan Police Department, PETER CHAFLIN, individually and in his official capacity as Police Officer of the Manalapan Police Department, and STEVE TURNER, individually and in his capacity as Police Officer of the Manalapan Police Department, CIVIL ACTION COMPLAINT, JURY DEMAND, AND DESIGNATION OF TRIAL COUNSEL Defendants. NYDOCS
2 For their complaint for discrimination based upon race and for improper search and detention by police officers, and seeking monetary and injunctive relief, Plaintiffs state as follows: THE PARTIES 1. Diamond Yorker ( Diamond ) is a minor and resides at Manalapan, Monmouth County, New Jersey. On or about June 21, 2003, the time of the incident described below, Diamond was a minor, 16 years old. 2. Randy Reina ( Randy ) resides at Edison, Middlesex County, New Jersey. On or about June 21, 2003, the time of the incident described below, Randy was a minor, 17 years old. He is now 18 years old. 3. Sean Anderson ( Sean ) is a minor and resides at Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey. On or about June 21, 2003, the time of the incident described below, Sean was a minor, 11 years old. 4. Randal and Carmen Yorker are Diamond s parents and reside at Manalapan, Monmouth County, New Jersey. 5. Preston and Barbara Anderson are Sean s parents and reside at Jersey City, Middlesex County, New Jersey. 6. Defendant Manalapan Police Department is a department of the defendant Township of Manalapan (collectively Manalapan ) and polices the township of Manalapan. Manalapan employed the defendants Peter Chaflin and Steve Turner on or about June 21, NYDOCS
3 7. Defendant Stuart Brown is the Chief of the Manalapan Police Department and is named as a defendant in his official capacity as Chief of Police in connection with plaintiffs claims for injunctive relief. 8. Defendant Peter Chaflin ( Chaflin ) at all relevant times was a police officer employed by Manalapan. Upon information and belief, Chaflin is a resident of the State of New Jersey. 9. Defendant Steve Turner ( Officer Turner ) at all relevant times was a police officer employed by Manalapan. Upon information and belief, Turner is a resident of New Jersey, 10. Diamond, Randy, and Sean (the Minor Plaintiffs ) are black African-Americans. 11. Defendants Chaflin and Turner are white. 12. Diamond and Sean are cousins; Randy and the Reinas are family friends of the Yorkers. VENUE 13. Venue is proper in Monmouth County pursuant to R. 4:3-2(a) because the Township of Manalapan and the Manalapan Police Department are located in Monmouth County and the events giving rise to the causes of action occurred in Monmouth County. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 14. On or about June 21, 2003, Randy and Sean were visiting Diamond in Manalapan. NYDOCS
4 15. At about 9:45 p.m. or 10:00 p.m., on or about June 21, 2003, the Minor Plaintiffs, Diamond, Randy, and Sean, were with three friends - Vincent Lynch, Brett Ecker, and Nicholas Rodriguez all of whom are, or appear to be, white. 16. The Minor Plaintiffs and their three friends were standing in a group talking on a sidewalk along Park View Way near Bucks Head playground in Manalapan. 17. Two white police officers stopped their police cars across the street from where the boys standing, stepped out of the cars, and approached the plaintiffs and their friends. 18. Upon information and belief, the two white police officers were the defendants Chaflin and Turner. 19. Upon information and belief, the shorter of the two police officers was the Defendant Chaflin and the taller was the Defendant Turner. 20. At the time the officers arrived, the Minor Plaintiffs and their three friends had only been there a short time and were not making any excessive noise. 21. Upon approaching the boys, the shorter police officer asked Diamond why he had his hands in his pockets and demanded that he take his hands of his pockets. 22. Diamond questioned why he had to take his hands out of his pockets since he had done nothing wrong, but complied with the shorter police officer s demand. 23. The shorter police officer then grabbed Diamond, pushed him against the police car, and ordered him to stand against the police car with his arms and legs spread. NYDOCS
5 24. Diamond complied but the shorter police officer nevertheless kicked his legs apart. 25. The shorter police officer patted down Diamond and put his hands in Diamond s pockets. 26. The shorter police officer removed the contents of Diamond s pockets, which included a mobile phone and some money. 27. The shorter police officer also placed his hand inside the rim of Diamond s under shorts, i.e., between Diamond s skin and the shorts in the front of his body. 28. While conducting the search of Diamond, the shorter police officer referred to Diamond in derogatory terms, for example, calling him a punk several times, and telling him to stop acting like a punk. 29. While Diamond was being searched by the shorter police officer, the taller police officer approached Randy. He asked Randy his name and where he was from. 30. Randy responded that he was from Edison. 31. The taller police officer said to Randy, in substance, that I better not see you in Manalapan again. 32. The taller police officer then ordered Randy to face the police car, put both his hands on the police car and spread his legs apart. 33. The taller police officer went through Randy s pockets, which were empty. NYDOCS
6 34. The taller police officer patted Randy down several times and placed his hand inside the rim of Randy s under shorts, i.e., between Randy s skin and the shorts in the front of his body. 35. The taller police officer called Randy a punk several times. 36. Sean, who was 11 years old at the time, began crying. 37. Sean was crying because he was upset at the police treatment of Diamond and Randy. 38. The shorter police officer called Sean a little punk and a baby and ordered him to stop crying. 39. During the searches of Diamond and Randy, one of the defendant police officers said to the three boys who appeared to be white, in substance, You three go home. You don t have to see this. 40. The three white children did not leave. 41. The defendant police officers did not search, interrogate, or detain the three white boys who were with the Minor Plaintiffs. 42. When the police had finished searching Diamond and Randy, they shone their flashlights in their faces. 43. After he had been searched and his mobile phone was returned to him, Diamond immediately telephoned his father, Randal Yorker. 44. Diamond asked for the names of the police officers, but they refused to give their names. NYDOCS
7 45. Diamond then asked again for their names and, while they continued to refuse to give their names, one of the police officers gave his badge number. 46. As the group of six children was leaving together, one or more of them commented to the police that they were racists. 47. One or both of the defendant police officers, responded, in substance, Yeah, we are. 48. After receiving Diamond s call, his parents Randal and Carmen Yorker, went to meet him, Randy, and Sean. They met on the street and returned to the Yorker house. 49. After further discussion of the incident, Diamond s parents, Randal and Carmen, along with Randy s mother, Deborah Reina, took Diamond and Randy to the Manalapan police station to lodge a complaint about the actions of the two police officers. 50. The Yorkers spoke to a sergeant at the Manalapan police station. 51. Upon information and belief, the sergeant was Kevin Dunckley ( Dunckley ). 52. Sergeant Dunckley s actions in receiving the complaint indicated a disdain for the Yorkers and for their complaint concerning the treatment of Diamond, Randy, and Sean. 53. For example, Sergeant Dunkeley took the statement written by Randal Yorker, rolled it up into a funnel shape and put it in his back pocket. NYDOCS
8 54. Sergeant Dunckley s actions in receiving the Yorker s complaint would indicate to a reasonable person in the Yorkers position that their complaint would not be taken seriously. 55. The following day, i.e., on or about June 22, 2003, Preston Anderson, Sean s father, went to the Manalapan police station to lodge a complaint concerning the above-described actions of the Manalapan police officers. 56. Upon information and belief, Mr. Anderson s complaint was made to Detective Denis Brady. 57. Subsequently, Randal Yorker revisited the Manalapan police station to make an additional complaint concerning the actions of the Manalapan police in processing his and Mr. Anderson s complaints. 58. A Notice of Tort Claim was filed with the Township of Manalapan by the Yorkers, Reinas, and Andersons on or about September 8, 2003, September 17, 2003, and September 16, 2003, respectively. 59. As a result of the efforts of the parents of the plaintiffs, the Manalapan police Internal Affairs unit apparently began an investigation concerning the actions of the Manalapan police officers in dealing with the Minor Plaintiffs. 60. In the subsequent course of that apparent investigation, statements were provided by the Minor Plaintiffs to the Manalapan Police Department s Internal Affairs Unit. 61. By letter dated April 2, 2004, the defendant Brown informed Mr. Yorker that the Internal Affairs Unit of the Manalapan Police Department had NYDOCS
9 completed an investigation and that its review did not disclose sufficient evidence to clearly prove or disprove the allegation. COUNT 1: VIOLATION OF NEW JERSEY STATE CONSTITUTION [Racial discrimination; against Manalapan and Chaflin and Turner] 62. Plaintiffs repeat the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 61 as if set forth in full here. 63. The defendant Manalapan employed the defendants Chaflin and Turner at all relevant times, including on or about June 21, By discriminating against the plaintiffs on the basis of race, the defendants Chaflin, Turner, and Manalapan have violated plaintiffs rights under Article 1, paragraphs 1 and 5, of the Constitution of the State of New Jersey. 65. The defendant Manalapan also employed Dunckley in June The defendant Manalapan discriminated against the plaintiffs in the processing, including the actions of Dunckley, of plaintiffs complaint of racial discrimination and unlawful search and detention. 67. As a result of the described conduct of defendants Chaflin, Turner, and of other employees of Manalapan, the plaintiffs have suffered damages, including emotional distress. 68. The defendants Manalapan, Chaflin, and Turner have violated Article 1, sections 1 and 5 of the Constitution of the State of New Jersey and are liable to the plaintiffs for their resulting damages. NYDOCS
10 COUNT 2: VIOLATION OF NEW JERSEY STATE CONSTITUTION [Unlawful search and detention; against Manalapan and Chaflin and Turner] 69. Plaintiffs repeat the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 68 as if set forth in full here. 70. By searching and detaining the plaintiffs without sufficient basis, the defendants Chaflin and Turner have violated plaintiffs rights under Article 1, paragraphs 1 and 7, of the Constitution of the State of New Jersey. 71. The defendant Manalapan employed the defendants Chaflin and Turner at all relevant times, including on or about June 21, As a result of the described conduct of Officers Chaflin and Turner, the plaintiffs have suffered damages, including emotional distress. 73. The defendants Manalapan, Chaflin, and Turner are liable to the plaintiffs for the damages resulting from the defendants violation of Article 1, sections 1 and 7, of the Constitution of the State of New Jersey. COUNT 3: LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION [Racial Discrimination; against Manalapan, Chaflin, and Turner] 74. Plaintiffs repeat the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 73 as if set forth in full here. 75. The defendant Manalapan Police Department and the Township of Manalapan are public accommodations within the meaning of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination. ( LAD ). NYDOCS
11 76. The defendants Chaflin and Turner unlawfully discriminated against the plaintiffs on the basis of race and violated LAD by searching and detaining the plaintiffs without sufficient basis and by their derogatory remarks directed at plaintiffs. 77. Chaflin, Turner, and Dunckley were employed by the Manalapan Police Department at all relevant times. 78. The Manalapan Police Department discriminated against the plaintiffs on the basis of race and violated LAD in the search, detention, and treatment of the Minor Plaintiffs and in the processing of the complaint lodged with the defendant Manalapan Police Department concerning the search, detention, and treatment of the Minor Plaintiffs. 79. As a result of the unlawful racial discrimination and violation of LAD by the Manalapan Police Department and by Chaflin and Turner, the plaintiffs have suffered damages, including emotional distress, for which the defendants Manalapan, Chaflin, and Turner are liable. COUNT 4: NEGLIGENCE [Against Manalapan] 80. Plaintiffs repeat the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 79 as if set forth in full here. 81. The defendant Manalapan owed a duty to the plaintiffs to properly supervise and train its police officers, including the defendants Chaflin and Turner, with respect to unlawful racial discrimination and unlawful searches and detentions. 82. The defendant Manalapan owed a duty to the plaintiffs to establish an appropriate procedure for the receipt of complaints concerning unlawful racial NYDOCS
12 discrimination by Manalapan police officers and concerning unlawful searches and detentions by Manalapan police officers. 83. The defendant Manalapan owed a duty to the plaintiffs to properly supervise and train police officers to receive, record, and investigate, in an appropriate and reasonable manner, information concerning complaints of unlawful racial discrimination and unlawful searches and detentions. 84. Upon information and belief, Manalapan was negligent in that it did not properly supervise and train Officers Chaflin and Turner, did not establish a reasonable procedure for receiving complaints of unlawful discrimination and unlawful searches and detentions against Manalapan police officers, and did not properly train and supervise police officers concerning the receipt, recordation, and investigation of such complaints. 85. Because of Manalapan s negligence, the plaintiffs have been damaged, including the suffering of humiliation and emotional distress, in an amount to be determined at trial. COUNT 5: VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C [Racial discrimination; against all Defendants] 86. Plaintiffs repeat the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 85 as if set forth in full here. 87. The Minor Plaintiffs have a right to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens. NYDOCS
13 88. The Minor Plaintiffs have a right to be subject only to the punishments, penalties, and exactions that white citizens are subject to. 89. By their search of the Minor Plaintiffs Diamond and Randy and their derogatory references to the Minor Plaintiffs Diamond, Randy, and Sean, the defendants Chaflin and Turner discriminated on the basis of race and denied the plaintiffs the equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons as is enjoyed by white citizens. 90. By their search of the Minor Plaintiffs Diamond and Randy and their derogatory references to the Minor Plaintiffs Diamond, Randy, and Sean, the defendants Chaflin and Turner discriminated on the basis of race and subjected the Minor Plaintiffs to punishments, penalties, and exactions different from those that white citizens are subject to. 91. Upon information and belief, by its treatment of the complaints concerning the conduct of the police with respect to Diamond, Randy, and Sean, the defendant Manalapan discriminated on the basis of race and denied the plaintiffs the equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons as is enjoyed by white citizens. 92. By the actions of its employees, including defendants Chaflin, Turner, and Dunckley, the defendant Manalapan denied all plaintiffs the equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons as is enjoyed by white citizens and subjected the plaintiffs Diamond, Randy, and Sean to punishments penalties, and exactions different from those that white citizens are subject to. NYDOCS
14 93. As a result of the described conduct of the defendants Chaflin, Turner, and Manalapan, the plaintiffs have suffered damages, including emotional distress, and are entitled to damages against the defendants Manalapan, Chaflin, and Turner, and to injunctive relief against those defendants and the defendant Brown. COUNT 6: VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C [Racial discrimination; against Defendants Chaflin, and Turner] 94. Plaintiffs repeat the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 93 as if set forth in full here. 95. The plaintiffs have a right, privilege, and immunity secured by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the laws of the United States to equal protection under law and to be free from racial discrimination by the police of Manalapan. 96. By their conduct in searching the Minor Plaintiffs and in referring to the Minor Plaintiffs in a derogatory manner, the defendants Chaflin and Turner denied the Minor Plaintiffs equal protection of the law and discriminated against the Minor Plaintiffs on the basis of race. 97. The defendants Chaflin and Turner acted under color of law, regulation, custom, or usage of the State of New Jersey in searching and detaining the plaintiffs Diamond and Randy. 98. The defendants Chaflin and Turner acted under color of law, regulation, custom, or usage of the State of New Jersey in stopping, questioning, NYDOCS
15 detaining, addressing, and otherwise interacting with the plaintiffs Diamond, Randy, and Sean. 99. By denying the plaintiffs equal protection of law and discriminating against the plaintiffs on the basis of race, the defendants Chaflin and Turner deprived the Minor Plaintiffs of rights, privileges, and immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States and violated section 1983 of Title 42 United States Code As a result of the above described conduct of defendants Chaflin, and Turner, the plaintiffs have suffered damages, including emotional distress. COUNT 7: VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C [Unlawful search and detention; against Officers Chaflin and Turner] 101. Plaintiffs repeat the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 100 as if set forth in full here The plaintiffs Diamond and Randy have a right, privilege, and immunity secured by the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and by the laws of the United States to be free from unlawful searches and detentions by the police of Manalapan By searching the plaintiffs Diamond and Randy and in detaining the plaintiffs Diamond, Randy, and Sean without sufficient basis, defendants Chaflin and Turner deprived the Minor Plaintiffs of rights, privileges, and immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States and violated section 1983 of Title 42 United States Code. NYDOCS
16 104. In searching the plaintiffs Diamond and Randy and in detaining the plaintiffs Diamond, Randy, and Sean, the defendants Chaflin and Turner were acting under color of law, regulation, custom, or usage of the State of New Jersey As a result of the described conduct of defendants Chaflin and Turner, the Minor Plaintiffs have suffered damages, including emotional distress. REQUEST FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against the defendants as follows: (1) awarding a permanent injunction enjoining all defendants, their agents, servants, and employees from discriminating on the basis of race in violation of the Constitution of the State of New Jersey, the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, and sections 1981 and 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code; and (2) awarding a permanent injunction directing: (a) the defendant Brown and (b) the defendants Manalapan Police Department, and defendant Township of Manalapan, and their directors, officers, agents, and employees, to take all affirmative steps necessary to: (a) remedy the effects of the unlawful, discriminatory conduct described in this complaint and to prevent similar occurrences in the future; and (b) establish proper and reasonable training and supervision with respect to unlawful racial discrimination and with respect to proper and reasonable procedures for the receipt, recordation, investigation, and, where warranted, remediation of complaints of unlawful racial discrimination and unlawful search and detention; and NYDOCS
17 (3) awarding compensatory damages for pain, suffering and humiliation, and punitive damages against the defendants Manalapan Police Department, Township of Manalapan, Chaflin and Turner; reasonable. (4) awarding attorneys fees, interest, and costs of suit; and (5) awarding any other relief which this Court deems just and Dated: Newark, New Jersey August, 2004 ANDERSON KILL & OLICK, P.C. By: John M. O Connor -and- Edward Barocas, Legal Director American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey Foundation P.O. Box 750 Newark, NJ Attorneys for Plaintiffs NYDOCS
18 JURY DEMAND Demand is made for a trial by jury of all issues. ANDERSON KILL & OLICK, P.C. August, 2004 By: John M. O Connor DESIGNATION OF TRIAL COUNSEL Plaintiffs hereby designate John M. O Connor as trial counsel in this matter. ANDERSON KILL & OLICK, P.C. August, 2004 By: John M. O Connor NYDOCS
19 CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH R. 4:5-1 Pursuant to Rule 4:5-1, the undersigned hereby certifies that the matter in controversy is not the subject of any other action pending in any other court or of a pending arbitration proceeding, and no other action or arbitration is contemplated. On the basis of present knowledge, the undersigned is unaware of any other party who should be joined in this action. August, 2004 John M. O Connor NYDOCS
Case: 1:11-cv DCN Doc #: 2 Filed: 11/03/11 1 of 12. PageID #: 13
Case: 1:11-cv-02374-DCN Doc #: 2 Filed: 11/03/11 1 of 12. PageID #: 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION WILLIAM T. PHELPS, 464 Chestnut Drive Berea,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO SAM DOE 1, SAM DOE 2, (A MINOR BY AND THROUGH HER PARENT AND NEXT FRIEND,) AND SAM DOE 3, C/O ACLU OF OHIO 4506 CHESTER AVENUE CLEVELAND, OHIO
More informationIN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH
Richard D. Burbidge (#0492) rburbidge@bmgtrial.com Jefferson W. Gross (#8339) jwgross@bmgtrial.com Aida Neimarlija (#12181) aneimarlija@bmgtrial.com BURBIDGE MITCHELL & GROSS 215 South State Street, Suite
More informationCase 1:12-cv RJS Document 8 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8
Case 112-cv-08170-RJS Document 8 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------- X U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. SEAN SHIELDS; and ASHLEE SHIELDS, by and through her father and next friend, SEAN SHIELDS, v. Plaintiffs, KIOWA COUNTY
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION E. Kwan Choi, individually and on behalf of Urantia Foundation, Urantia Corporation, Urantia Brotherhood Association,
More informationCase 3:16-cv RLY-MPB Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1
Case 3:16-cv-00054-RLY-MPB Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA EVANSVILLE DIVISION KIMBALL INTERNATIONAL, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, )
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NO.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NO. NIKKI IACONO, in her individual ) capacity, and on behalf of her minor child, ) ARIANA IACONO, ) ) Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 3:18-cv BRM-TJB Document 1 Filed 01/23/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 3:18-cv-00941-BRM-TJB Document 1 Filed 01/23/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY OHEL YIS HAK SEPHARDIC SYNAGOGUE OF ALLENHURST, and RABBI MOSHE SHAMAH,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION AT THE CROSS FELLOWSHIP BAPTIST CHURCH INC ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. ) CITY OF MONROE, NORTH CAROLINA,
More information6:13-cv GRA Date Filed 09/11/13 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 25. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Greenville Division
6:13-cv-02471-GRA Date Filed 09/11/13 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Greenville Division American Humanist Association, CA No. John Doe and Jane Doe,
More informationMOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENTS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 16-2013-CF-005781-AXXX-MA DIVISION: CR-D STATE OF FLORIDA vs. DONALD SMITH MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENTS
More informationAN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 93 ( CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS ) OF THE MANALAPAN TOWNSHIP CODE Ordinance No.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 93 ( CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS ) OF THE MANALAPAN TOWNSHIP CODE Ordinance No. 2008-02 Adopted February 27, 2008 WHEREAS, the Township of Manalapan
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA COMPLAINT. I. Preliminary Statement
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JAMES W. GREEN, an individual, and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OKLAHOMA, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Case No.:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 3:16-cv-1267 (SRU) : DEPARTMENT OF : CORRECTION, et al., : Defendants.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT JA-QURE AL-BUKHARI, : also known as JEROME RIDDICK, : Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 3:16-cv-1267 (SRU) : DEPARTMENT OF : CORRECTION, et al., : Defendants.
More informationCOOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD. Docket # 1850 DECISION
COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD Sheriff of Cook County vs. Jacquelyn G. Anderson Cook County Deputy Sheriff Docket # 1850 DECISION THIS MATTER COMING ON to be heard pursuant to notice, the Cook County
More informationIN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH. Civil No.: Judge
Michael A. Worel (12741) Alan W. Mortensen (6616) Lance L. Milne (14879) DEWSNUP KING OLSEN WOREL HAVAS MORTENSEN 36 South State Street, Suite 2400 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 533-0400
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/06/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-00849 Document 1 Filed 10/06/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION U.S. Pastor Council, Plaintiff, v. City of Austin; Steve Adler, in
More informationIN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH
Michael A. Worel (12741) Alan W. Mortensen (6616) Lance L. Milne (14879) DEWSNUP KING OLSEN WOREL HAVAS MORTENSEN 36 South State Street, Suite 2400 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 533-0400
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :-cv-0-jws Document Filed 0// Page of N. TH STREET, SUITE PHOENIX, ARIZONA 0 0 Robert E. Trop (SBN 0) Law Office Robert Evan Trop PLLC N. th Street, Suite Phoenix, Arizona 0 Tel.: (0) - Fax: (00)
More informationPowell v. Portland School District. Chronology
Powell v. Portland School District Chronology October 15, 1996 During school hours, a Boy Scout troop leader is allowed to speak to Harvey Scott Elementary school students, encouraging them to join the
More informationIN THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SAN JUAN COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH. Case No. v. Judge WILLIE GRAYEYES,
PETER STIRBA (Bar No. 3118) MATTHEW STROUT (Bar No. 16732) STIRBA, P.C. 215 South State Street, Suite 750 P.O. Box 810 Salt Lake City, UT 84110-0810 Telephone: (801) 364-8300 Fax: (801) 364-8355 Email:
More informationCase 2:11-cv GP Document 12 Filed 09/29/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:11-cv-05827-GP Document 12 Filed 09/29/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WEBMD HEALTH CORP. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 11-5827 ) ANTHONY
More informationBEFORE THE HEARING BOARD OF THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
In the Matter of: BEFORE THE HEARING BOARD OF THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION WR - 3 2014 ATTV pen Y ps&p'sc COMM CHICAGO ROBERT VERNON ELDER, Attorney-Respondent, Commission
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. CIVIL No.
Case 1:12-cv-00125-JAP-WDS Document 1 Filed 02/08/12 Page 1 of 19 JANE FELIX, and B.N. COONE, Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO vs. CIVIL No. THE CITY OF BLOOMFIELD,
More informationJoseph Sartori OSPI Case Number: D Document: Final Order of Mandatory Permanent Revocation
RE: Joseph Sartori OSPI Case Number: D12-05-037 Document: Final Order of Mandatory Permanent Revocation Regarding your request for information about the above-named educator; attached is a true and correct
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 1:10-cv-02160-WWC-PT Document 1 Filed 10/20/2010 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ISADORE GARTRELL, v. Plaintiff, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS;
More informationMEMORANDUM. Interested Parishes in the Episcopal Diocese of Louisiana. From: Covert J. Geary, Chancellor of the Diocese
MEMORANDUM To: Interested Parishes in the Episcopal Diocese of Louisiana From: Covert J. Geary, Chancellor of the Diocese Re: Checklist of Procedures for Incorporation of Parishes Check off each item when
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF CALHOUN. JOSEPH CASIAS, Case No CK Hon. Plaintiff,
STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF CALHOUN JOSEPH CASIAS, Case No. 10- -CK Hon. Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.; and TROY ESTILL, Defendants. DANIEL W. GROW, PLLC AMERICAN CIVIL
More informationCase 8:19-cv Document 1 Filed 03/25/19 Page 1 of 31 PageID 1
Case 8:19-cv-00725 Document 1 Filed 03/25/19 Page 1 of 31 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ENGLEWOOD CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE, INC. dba CROSSPOINT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BLUEFIELD DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
Case 117-cv-00642 Document 21 Filed 03/28/17 Page 1 of 22 PageID # 201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BLUEFIELD DIVISION FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION,
More informationSmith v United Church of Christ 2011 NY Slip Op 30205(U) January 19, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Milton A.
Smith v United Church of Christ 2011 NY Slip Op 30205(U) January 19, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 111455/10 Judge: Milton A. Tingling Republished from New York State Unified Court System's
More informationIN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR WEBER COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH
William B. Ingram, #10803 Alan R. Houston, #14206 STRONG & HANNI 102 South 200 East, Suite 800 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 532-7080 Facsimile: (801) 596-1508 bthomas@strongandhanni.com
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION ) JOHN DOE, ) Civil Action ) Plaintiff, ) File No. ) v. ) ) Complaint for Declaratory BARROW COUNTY, GEORGIA;
More informationATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MANUFACTURED HOUSING DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MANUFACTURED HOUSING DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM In the Matter of the NOTICE OF NON-VIOLATION Complaint of Howard Bishop Against RCW 59.30.040 Pleasant Valley
More informationRespondent. PETITIONERS Vickers, UCE, Ready
SUPREME COURT DAVID VICKERS as PRESIDENT OF UPSTATE CITIZENS FOR EQUALITY, INC.; DOUG READY Petitioners, COUNTY OF ONEIDA STATE OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PETITION Pursuant to Article 78 of NY CPLR -vs- Index
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Mirwis et al v. Mansfield Independent School District et al Doc. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ISAAC MIRWIS, ETAN MIRWIS, ISAAC BUCHINE, MARK
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO KATHRYN CHRISTIAN, JILL HAVENS, JEFF BASINGER, CLARE BOULANGER, SARAH SWEDBERG, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF COLORADO,
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/09/ :30 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/09/2016
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/09/2016 08:30 PM INDEX NO. 501142/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/09/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS -------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ACER TO THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ACER:
Warning: This archival document has not been updated, and WE DO NOT KNOW IF IT IS STILL GOOD LAW. We do not warrant the accuracy or currency of the information it contains. We hope you will find it useful
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION IN RE: PRIVATE CRIMINAL : COMPLAINT OF : NO. MD-042-2014 GERALD J. SMITH : Seth Miller, Esquire Cynthia A. Dyrda-Hatton Gerald
More informationFILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 11/16/ :25 AM
FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 11/16/2016 09:25 AM STATE OF NEW YORK CICERO TOWN COURT COUNTY OF ONONDAGA INDEX NO. 2016EF4347 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 36 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/16/2016 TOWN OF CICERO, Petitioner, MOTIONS
More informationCase 1:05-cv RMU Document 1 Filed 01/31/2005 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:05-cv-00220-RMU Document 1 Filed 01/31/2005 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ESTATE OF YAEL BOTVIN by and through its Administrator Russell Ellis, Esq.
More informationMATT COCHRAN and MINDY GANZE COURT USE ONLY
DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF DENVER, STATE OF COLORADO DATE FILED: January 30, 2018 1:08 PM FILING ID: C1C7726B613F4 CASE NUMBER: 2018CV30344 Address: 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 Telephone:
More informationCase No.: Honorable Judge Commissioner. COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, LORIE JEAN KENDALL RICKS, individually and as
D. BRIAN BOGGESS, No. 9990 3610 N. University Ave., Suite 275 Provo, Utah 84604 Telephone: (385)248-5700 Fax: (855)675-2674 Email: bboggess@boggesslawgroup.com Attorney for Plaintiffs IN THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationCase: 4:15-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 06/25/15 Page: 1 of 32 PageID #: 1
Case: 4:15-cv-01008 Doc. #: 1 Filed: 06/25/15 Page: 1 of 32 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION REV. XIU HUI JOSEPH JIANG, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
More informationPAGES: 1-24 EXHIBITS: 0. Sanjeev Lath vs. City of Manchester, NH DEPOSITION OF PATROL OFFICER AUSTIN R. GOODMAN
1 PAGES: 1-24 EXHIBITS: 0 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HILLSBOROUGH SS SUPERIOR NORTH DOCKET NO. 216-2016-CV-821 Sanjeev Lath vs., NH DEPOSITION OF This deposition held pursuant to the New Hampshire Rules of
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Alca Condominium Association, Inc., Petitioner
More informationEXHIBIT 4 FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 11/07/ :40 PM. the. Affirmation of Laurel J. Eveleigh
EXHIBIT 4 to the Affirmation of Laurel J. Eveleigh SUPREME COURT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ONONDAGA INTEGRATED CONSTRUCTION & POWER SYSTEMS, INC., PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET Plaintiff, OF INTERROGATORIES
More informationIN THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT WASHINGTON COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH
Roger H. Hoole (5089) Gregory N. Hoole (7894) HOOLE & KING, L.C. 4276 South Highland Drive Salt Lake City, UT 84124 Telephone: (801) 272-7556 Facsimile: (801) 272-7557 Attorneys for Plaintiff Wallace Jeffs
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ERIC SMITH
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2010-Ohio-4006.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 93593 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ERIC SMITH DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI VERIFIED PETITION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI STEVE WINGFIELD AND FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF FLORISSANT Plaintiffs, v. Cause No. DOUGLAS LAY Serve: 2409 Lavin Court Florissant, MO 63033 TITUS
More informationCase 8:16-cv CEH-AAS Document 8 Filed 09/30/16 Page 1 of 25 PageID 210
Case 8:16-cv-02753-CEH-AAS Document 8 Filed 09/30/16 Page 1 of 25 PageID 210 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ) CAMBRIDGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, INC. ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD. Decision No. 35
35 PRB [17-May-2002] PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD In re: Thomas A. Bailey, Esq. - Respondent PRB Docket No. 2002-118 Decision No. 35 Upon receipt of the Affidavit of Resignation submitted to the Board
More informationCase 2:18-cr RJS Document 1 Filed 01/03/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 2:18-cr-00009-RJS Document 1 Filed 01/03/18 Page 1 of 6 JOHN W. HUBER, United States Attorney (#7226) MARK K. VINCENT, Assistant United States Attorney (#5357) Attorneys for the United States of America
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Roanoke Division ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Roanoke Division DOE 1, by Doe 1 s next friend and parent, DOE 2, who also sues on Doe 2 s own behalf, v. Plaintiffs, SCHOOL BOARD OF GILES
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:18-cv-00966 Document 1 Filed 01/23/18 Page 1 of 30 PageID: 1 Michael P. Hrycak NJ Attorney ID # 2011990 316 Lenox Avenue Westfield, NJ 07090 michaelhrycak@yahoo.com Counsel for Plaintiff IN THE
More informationMCAD ruling supports black Worcester officers passed over for promotion
MCAD ruling supports black Worcester officers passed over for promotion Pat Yancey of Worcester, president of the Worcester chapter of the NAACP, with her husband George. "I feel they need to settle this
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CR-0-2027-JF ) 5 Plaintiff, ) ) San Jose, CA 6 vs. ) October 2, 200 ) 7 ROGER VER, ) ) 8
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/ :21 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 152 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2018
LBBS File No. 50012-3484 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -- ------------------------------------------------X CARLOS PEREZ, Index No.: 159243/13 Plaintiff, RESPONSE TO RIVCO CONSTRUCTION
More informationINTERNATIONAL CHURCHES OF CHRIST A California Nonprofit Religious Corporation An Affiliation of Churches. Charter Affiliation Agreement
INTERNATIONAL CHURCHES OF CHRIST A California Nonprofit Religious Corporation An Affiliation of Churches Charter Affiliation Agreement I PARTIES This Charter Affiliation Agreement dated June 1, 2003 (the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BLUEFIELD DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BLUEFIELD DIVISION FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., and JANE DOE, individually, and on behalf of JAMIE DOE Plaintiffs,
More informationThe State of West Virginia, by and through its duly elected Attorney General, Patrick
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WOOD COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA ex rel. PATRICK MORRISEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. Judge DIOCESE OF WHEELING- CHARLESTON and MICHAEL J.
More informationCase 2:17-cv NBF Document 1 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 38 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:17-cv-01574-NBF Document 1 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 38 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN DOE, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No. : v. : : JURY TRIAL
More informationF I L E II. IN THE DISTRICT COURT, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN AND FOR LARAMIE COUNTY, STATE OF WYOMING Docket No. I( \ COMPLAINT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN AND FOR LARAMIE COUNTY, STATE OF WYOMING Docket No. I( \ JONMICHAEL GUY and ) AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) ROBERTO. LAMPERT,
More information: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT. Doe 2 s next friend and parent, Doe 3; and Doe 3, Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., DOE 1, by DOE 1 s next friend and parent, MARIE SCHAUB, who also sues on her own behalf,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY, COUNTY, ALABAMA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY, COUNTY, ALABAMA BOARD OF DEACONS OF THE SHILOH MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SHILOH MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH CV: Plaintiffs vs. JUAN D. MCFARLAND,
More informationDANIEL F. MONAHAN, ESQUIRE Attorney I.D. No North Pottstown Pike, Suite 210 Exton, PA
DANIEL F. MONAHAN, ESQUIRE Attorney I.D. No. 28557 300 North Pottstown Pike, Suite 210 Exton, PA 19341 610-363-3888 dmonahan@jdllm.com MARCI A. HAMILTON, ESQUIRE Attorney I.D. No. 54820 36 Timber Knoll
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 1 1 Hector O. Villagra (Bar No. ) ACLU FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 0 W. Chapman Avenue, Suite Orange, CA (Additional Counsel Listed On Following Page) Attorneys for Plaintiff JAMEELAH MEDINA, v.
More informationand proceedings previously filed and had herein, and good and sufficient cause appearing,
FAMILY COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------X In The Matter of SMITH CHILDREN Children Under EighteenYears of
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Atheists of Florida, Inc., and EllenBeth Wachs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Plaintiffs v. Case No: City of Lakeland, Florida and Mayor Gow Fields in his
More informationSC COSA Fall Legal Summit August 26, 2016 Thomas K. Barlow, Esq. Childs & Halligan, P.A.
Overview and Analysis of the Pending American Humanist Association vs. Greenville County School District Case and Current State of the Law on Student- Initiated Religious Speech and School Use of Religious
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA KIDIST MARIAM ETHIOPIAN ORTHODOX TEWAHEDO CHURCH, INC., v. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 16CV11400-3 ABBA YAKOB a/k/a ABBA GEBREMARIAM AYALEW,
More informationGrievance and Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Congregations
Grievance and Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Congregations 1.0 Introduction The Congregation is committed to providing a safe environment where the dignity of every individual is respected and therefore
More informationName: First Middle Last. Other names used (alias, maiden, nickname): Current Address: Street/P.O. Box City State Zip Code
Grace Evangelical Presbyterian Church Children s Ministry Application Please answer each question. The information on this application will not be disclosed to unauthorized persons. Name: First Middle
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION The Protestant Episcopal Church In The Diocese Of South Carolina; The Trustees of The Protestant Episcopal Church in
More informationQualified Immunity Applied to Prosecutors and Police Officers Who Failed to Disclose Inadmissible Evidence About Alternative Murder Suspects
Civil Rights Update David A. Perkins and Melissa N. Schoenbein Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C., Peoria Qualified Immunity Applied to Prosecutors and Police Officers Who Failed to Disclose Inadmissible
More informationIN THE MATTER OF : NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE CERTIFICATES OF : STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS JOSEPH MAZZARELLA : ORDER OF REVOCATION
IN THE MATTER OF : NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE CERTIFICATES OF : STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS JOSEPH MAZZARELLA : ORDER OF REVOCATION : DOCKET NO: 0405-276 At its meeting of June 9, 2005, the State
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, LAW DIVISION COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS COUNTY OF COOK ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, LAW DIVISION COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS DARYL VAN SCHOUWEN, ) Individually and as Father and next ) friend of the minor child,
More information(Article I, Change of Name)
We, the ministers and members of the Church of God in Christ, who holds the Holy Scriptures as contained in the old and new Testaments as our rule of faith and practice, in accordance with the principles
More informationPresent: Hassell, C.J., Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, and Lemons, JJ., and Russell, S.J.
Present: Hassell, C.J., Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, and Lemons, JJ., and Russell, S.J. JOSEPH JAKABCIN, ET AL. OPINION BY SENIOR JUSTICE CHARLES S. RUSSELL v. Record No. 050722 April 21, 2006 TOWN OF
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA
0 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD of ETHICS, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) CASE NO: 0CV-00 ) TERENCE SWEENEY, ) Defendant. ) MOTION FOR COMPLAINT HEARD BEFORE HONORABLE
More informationBEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY. and MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFF S ASSOCIATION
BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY and MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFF S ASSOCIATION Case 625 No. 67051 (Michalski Grievance) Appearances: Timothy R.
More informationBEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA AMENDED NOTICE OF FORMAL CHARGES
BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE: CYNTHIA A. HOLLOWAY NO.: 00-143 / Florida Supreme Court AMENDED NOTICE OF FORMAL CHARGES TO: The Honorable
More informationCase 2:15-cv CJB-JCW Document 17-1 Filed 03/01/16 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:15-cv-05971-CJB-JCW Document 17-1 Filed 03/01/16 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RODNEY HENRY, Civil Action No. 15-cv-5971 Plaintiff, Section
More informationYou Are the Jury - Who Did What to Whom?
6033 WEST CENTURY BOULEVARD, 5 TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90045 T: (310) 981-2000 F: (310) 337-0837 153 TOWNSEND STREET, SUITE 520 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94107 T: (415) 512-3000 F: (415) 856-0306
More informationBuilding Board CITY OF PUNTA GORDA, FLORIDA OCTOBER 24, 2017, 9:00 AM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS W. MARION AVENUE, PUTNA GORDA FL 33950
Building Board CITY OF PUNTA GORDA, FLORIDA OCTOBER 24, 2017, 9:00 AM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 326 W. MARION AVENUE, PUTNA GORDA FL 33950 NOTE: Anyone wishing to address the Council on any agenda item may
More informationCullman Christian School Homeschool Cooperative Programs Application Procedure
Cullman Christian School Homeschool Cooperative Programs Application Procedure Thank you for considering Cullman Christian School to add to the education of your child. In this packet you will find all
More informationPlaintiff. v. CRIMINAL ACTION. 1. I am the mother of Michael Strenko. My son was murdered on May 15, 2003 by
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VICTIMS OF CRIME COMPENSATION BOARD RICHARD D. POMPELIO, ESQ. 50 PARK PLACE NEWARK, NJ 07102 973-877-1436 AMICUS CURIAE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION-CRIMINAL
More informationIN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH
Jerry Salcido (11956) jerry@salcidolaw.com Spencer Benny Salcido (14490) benny@salcidolaw.com SALCIDO LAW FIRM PLLC 43 W 9000 S Ste B Sandy UT 84070 801.413.1753 Phone 801.618.1380 Fax Attorneys for Plaintiff
More informationFEB Upon consideration of the Motion to Proceed filed in the above cause, and. now being sufficiently advised in the premises,
Colorado Supreme Court 2 East 14th Ave., Fourth Floor Denver, CO 80203 Original Proceeding in Unauthorized Practice of Law, 09UPL03 5 Petitioner: The People of State of Colorado, FEB 012010 ATTORNEY REGULATION
More informationINTERVIEW of Sally A. Fields, Esq. SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
INTERVIEW of Sally A. Fields, Esq. for the SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE April 23, 2001 10:00 a.m. Committee Room 2 State House Annex Trenton, New Jersey PRESENT AT INTERVIEW: Michael Chertoff, Esq. (Special
More informationExceptional Education Distinctively Christian
Exceptional Education Distinctively Christian 36-38 Sacandaga Road Scotia, NY 12302 518-370-4272 fax 518-370-4778 www.mekeel.org Dear Applicant: Your interest in Mekeel Christian Academy is appreciated.
More informationCase 3:18-cv SB Document 1 Filed 08/22/18 Page 1 of 16
Case 3:18-cv-01546-SB Document 1 Filed 08/22/18 Page 1 of 16 Kristian Roggendorf, OSB #013990 ksr@vf-law.com 17355 SW Boones Ferry Rd., Suite A Tel. (503) 684-4111 Of Attorneys for Plaintiff Doe 550 IN
More informationNON-TEACHING EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION. Position Desired: Schedule Desired: Full-Time Part-Time Substitute Secondary Position Desired:
NON-TEACHING EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION We consider applicants for all positions without regard to race, color, creed, gender, national origin, age, disability, marital or veteran status, or any other legally
More informationCase 3:16-cv PGS-DEA Document 1 Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 24 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Civ. No.
Case 3:16-cv-00214-PGS-DEA Document 1 Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 24 PageID: 1 KENNY CHASE & COSTA Christopher K. Costa, Esq. 3812 Quakerbridge Road Hamilton, N.J. 08619 Phone: (609) 588-9800 Fax: (609) 588-0588
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed October 6, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Webster County, Kurt L.
STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 0-495 / 09-1500 Filed October 6, 2010 KENNETH LEE MADSEN, a/k/a KENNETH LEE DUNLAP, Defendant-Appellant. Judge. Appeal from the
More informationState of Minnesota County of Olmsted
State of Minnesota County of Olmsted District Court 3rd Judicial District Prosecutor File No. 11005953 Court File No. 55-CR-11-1054 State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, COMPLAINT Order of Detention VS. MICHAEL
More information=======================================X In the Matter of the Proceeding Pursuant to Section 44, subdivision 4, ofthe Judiciary Law, in Relation to
STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT =======================================X In the Matter of the Proceeding Pursuant to Section 44, subdivision 4, ofthe Judiciary Law, in Relation to Lawrence
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC12-2495 INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE, RE: JUDITH W. HAWKINS NO. 11-550 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information