Welcome to 11AP Language & Composition We hope that this year will be both a productive and rewarding journey of discovery during which you develop the skills to be successful and pursue your academic goals. This summer, we encourage you to consider your goals for the course as you read and annotate the following: 3 Excerpts from Aristotle s Rhetoric, Lincoln s The Gettysburg Address, and Carroll s Jabberwocky Each selection has an accompanying question. Please be sure to answer these to the best of your ability. Your responses should be typed as you will need to submit to www.turnitin.com after you receive the course registration information from your teacher. If you have any questions at all about the assignment or the course in general, feel free to email us: Mr. Amster Robert.Amster@Plainedgeschools.org Mrs. Collins Melissa.Collins@Plainedgeschools.org Thank you and we look forward to working with you this year.
Question 1: Based on the paragraphs below, write a paragraph of your own in which you define and discuss the importance of rhetoric. Aristotle s Rhetoric Book 1 Chapter 1 Rhetoric may be defined as the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion. This is not a function of any other art. Every other art can instruct or persuade about its own particular subject matter; for instance, medicine about what is healthy and unhealthy, geometry about the properties of magnitudes, arithmetic about numbers, and the same is true of the other arts and sciences. But rhetoric we look upon as the power of observing the means of persuasion on almost any subject presented to us; and that is why we say that, in its technical character, it is not concerned with any special or definite class of subjects. Of the modes of persuasion some belong strictly to the art of rhetoric and some do not. By the latter I mean such things as are not supplied by the speaker but are there at the outset witnesses, evidence given under torture, written contracts, and so on. By the former I mean such as we can ourselves construct by means of the principles of rhetoric. The one kind has merely to be used, the other has to be invented. Of the modes of persuasion furnished by the spoken word there are three kinds. The first kind depends on the personal character of the speaker; the second on putting the audience into a certain frame of mind; the third on the proof, or apparent proof, provided by the words of the speech itself. Persuasion is achieved by the speaker's personal character when the speech is so spoken as to make us think him credible. We believe good men more fully and more readily than others: this is true generally whatever the question is, and absolutely true where exact certainty is impossible and opinions are divided. This kind of persuasion, like the others, should be achieved by what the speaker says, not by what people think of his character before he begins to speak. It is not true, as some writers assume in their treatises on rhetoric, that the personal goodness revealed by the speaker contributes nothing to his power of persuasion; on the contrary, his character may almost be called the most effective means of persuasion he possesses. Secondly, persuasion may come through the hearers, when the speech stirs their emotions. Our judgments when we are pleased and friendly are not the same as when we are pained and hostile. It is towards producing these effects, as we maintain, that presentday writers on rhetoric direct the whole of their efforts. This subject shall be treated in detail when we come to speak of the emotions. Thirdly, persuasion is effected through the speech itself when we have proved a truth or an apparent truth by means of the persuasive arguments suitable to the case in question. There are, then, these three means of effecting persuasion. The man who is to be in command of them must, it is clear, be able (1) to reason logically, (2) to understand human character and goodness in their various forms, and (3) to understand the emotions that is, to name them and describe them, to know their causes and the way in which they are excited.
Question 2: After reading Book 1 Chapter 3 (below) and Lincoln s Gettysburg Address (attached), answer the following: Is Lincoln s purpose political, forensic, ceremonial, or a combination of these purposes? Respond in a paragraph in which you develop and support your position using evidence from Lincoln s text. Aristotle s Rhetoric Book 1, Chapter 3 Rhetoric falls into three divisions, determined by the three classes of listeners to speeches. For of the three elements in speech making speaker, subject, and person addressed it is the last one, the hearer, that determines the speech's end and object. The hearer must be either a judge, with a decision to make about things past or future, or an observer. A member of the assembly decides about future events, a juryman about past events: while those who merely decide on the orator's skill are observers. From this it follows that there are three divisions of oratory (1) political, (2) forensic, and (3) the ceremonial oratory of display. Political speaking urges us either to do or not to do something: one of these two courses is always taken by private counsellors, as well as by men who address public assemblies. Forensic speaking either attacks or defends somebody: one or other of these two things must always be done by the parties in a case. The ceremonial oratory of display either praises or censures somebody. These three kinds of rhetoric refer to three different kinds of time. The political orator is concerned with the future: it is about things to be done hereafter that he advises, for or against. The party in a case at law is concerned with the past; one man accuses the other, and the other defends himself, with reference to things already done. The ceremonial orator is, properly speaking, concerned with the present, since all men praise or blame in view of the state of things existing at the time, though they often find it useful also to recall the past and to make guesses at the future.
The Gettysburg Address Abraham Lincoln November 19, 1863 1. Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth, on this continent, a 2. new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men 3. are created equal. 4. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any 5. nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great 6. battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a 7. final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. 8. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. 9. But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate we cannot consecrate we cannot 10. hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have 11. consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little 12. note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they 13. did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished 14. work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather 15. for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us that from 16. these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they 17. here gave the last full measure of devotion that we here highly resolve that 18. these dead shall not have died in vain that this nation, under God, shall have 19. a new birth of freedom and that government of the people, by the people, for 20. the people, shall not perish from the earth.
Question 3: After reading Book 3 Chapter 7 (below), read Carroll s poem Jabberwocky (attached). Aristotle says language is appropriate if it expresses emotion and character. But Carroll s poem is filled with nonsense words. Based on syntax (grammar), sound, and gut feeling identify the parts of speech (below) for five nonsense words from the poem. Explain your reasoning for each of Carroll s non sense words using the logic Aristotle presents in his selection. Here are the eight parts of speech: verbs, nouns, pronouns, adverbs, adjectives, prepositions, conjunctions, and interjections. For example: Slithy is an adjective and it probably means slimy or reptilian. It is an adjective because it precedes a noun (toves), probably. Based on what comes before and after it being brillig and the toves gyring and gimbling in the wabes it is consistent with Aristotle s words that nor must we add ornamental epithets to commonplace nouns that slithy describe the toves as simply as possible. Book 3 Chapter 7 Your language will be appropriate if it expresses emotion and character, and if it corresponds to its subject. "Correspondence to subject" means that we must neither speak casually about weighty matters, nor solemnly about trivial ones; nor must we add ornamental epithets to commonplace nouns, or the effect will be comic, as in the works of Cleophon, who can use phrases as absurd as "O queenly fig tree." To express emotion, you will employ the language of anger in speaking of outrage; the language of disgust and discreet reluctance to utter a word when speaking of impiety or foulness; the language of exultation for a tale of glory, and that of humiliation for a tale of and so in all other cases. This aptness of language is one thing that makes people believe in the truth of your story: their minds draw the false conclusion that you are to be trusted from the fact that others behave as you do when things are as you describe them; and therefore they take your story to be true, whether it is so or not. Besides, an emotional speaker always makes his audience feel with him, even when there is nothing in his arguments; which is why many speakers try to overwhelm their audience by mere noise.
Jabberwocky Lewis Carroll (from Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There, 1872) `Twas brillig, and the slithy toves Did gyre and gimble in the wabe: All mimsy were the borogoves, And the mome raths outgrabe. And, as in uffish thought he stood, The Jabberwock, with eyes of flame, Came whiffling through the tulgey wood, And burbled as it came! "Beware the Jabberwock, my son! The jaws that bite, the claws that catch! Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun The frumious Bandersnatch!" One, two! One, two! And through and through The vorpal blade went snicker-snack! He left it dead, and with its head He went galumphing back. He took his vorpal sword in hand: Long time the manxome foe he sought -- So rested he by the Tumtum tree, And stood awhile in thought. "And, has thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy.