IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Case 3:16-cv RLY-MPB Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

Case 8:16-cv CEH-AAS Document 8 Filed 09/30/16 Page 1 of 25 PageID 210

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA COMPLAINT. I. Preliminary Statement

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/06/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case: 1:11-cv DCN Doc #: 2 Filed: 11/03/11 1 of 12. PageID #: 13

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NO.

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT. Doe 2 s next friend and parent, Doe 3; and Doe 3, Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys

Case 8:19-cv Document 1 Filed 03/25/19 Page 1 of 31 PageID 1

Case 3:18-cv BRM-TJB Document 1 Filed 01/23/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

6:13-cv GRA Date Filed 09/11/13 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 25. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Greenville Division

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BLUEFIELD DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT

Case 1:01-cv RGS Document 56 Filed 05/26/05 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv RJS Document 8 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8

John M. O Connor, Esq. ANDERSON KILL & OLICK, P.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA No.

EMPLOYEE RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION AT WORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Roanoke Division ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BLUEFIELD DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 93 ( CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS ) OF THE MANALAPAN TOWNSHIP CODE Ordinance No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 3:16-cv-1267 (SRU) : DEPARTMENT OF : CORRECTION, et al., : Defendants.

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH. Civil No.: Judge

Case 2:11-cv GP Document 12 Filed 09/29/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 4:16-cv SMR-CFB Document 27 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Employment Agreement

1. After a public profession of faith in Christ as personal savior, and upon baptism by immersion in water as authorized by the Church; or

RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR OPERATION OF THE COLUMBARIUM of Highland Park United Methodist Church Dallas, Texas DEFINITIONS

IN THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SAN JUAN COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH. Case No. v. Judge WILLIE GRAYEYES,

Oneida County Title VI Policy Statement

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

INTERNATIONAL CHURCHES OF CHRIST A California Nonprofit Religious Corporation An Affiliation of Churches. Charter Affiliation Agreement

Present: Hassell, C.J., Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, and Lemons, JJ., and Russell, S.J.

F I L E II. IN THE DISTRICT COURT, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN AND FOR LARAMIE COUNTY, STATE OF WYOMING Docket No. I( \ COMPLAINT

Powell v. Portland School District. Chronology

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. CIVIL No.

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

Contract Year

BYLAWS OF WHITE ROCK BAPTIST CHURCH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

In Inter-America, students put away books for day of prayer Division-wide initiative is part of denomination s Revival and Reformation

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

Affiliated Agreement

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Contract Year

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

MEMORANDUM. Interested Parishes in the Episcopal Diocese of Louisiana. From: Covert J. Geary, Chancellor of the Diocese

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/09/ :30 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/09/2016

SC COSA Fall Legal Summit August 26, 2016 Thomas K. Barlow, Esq. Childs & Halligan, P.A.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2017 Constitutional Updates. Based upon ELCA Model Constitution adopted 2016 at 14th Church Wide Assembly

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

CENTRAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COLUMBARIUM II. RULES AND PROCEDURES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY, COUNTY, ALABAMA

Contract Year

L A W ON FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND LEGAL POSITION OF CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. Article 1

AGREEMENT REGARDING INURNMENT RIGHTS IN THE IMMANUEL LUTHERAN COLUMBARIUM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Civil Action No.:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

(Article I, Change of Name)

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012

KIRTLAND BOARD OF EDUCATION ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING AGENDA KIRTLAND HIGH SCHOOL CAFETERIA

CONSTITUTION AND BYLAWS OF THE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF NEEDHAM

County of Kane Office of County Board Kane County Government Center. DOCUMENT VET SHEET for Karen McConnaughay Chairman, Kane County Board (1J I6 A

Case 4:17-cv Document 11 Filed in TXSD on 09/12/17 Page 1 of 22

Florida Constitution Revision Commission The Capitol 400 S. Monroe Street Tallahassee, FL Re: Vote No on Proposals Amending Art.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Case 6:15-cv JA-DCI Document 97 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID 4760

Respondent. PETITIONERS Vickers, UCE, Ready

Case Doc 279 Filed 07/07/15 Entered 07/07/15 16:21:45 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

90 South Cascade Avenue, Suite 1500, Colorado Springs, Colorado Telephone: Fax:

FAITH EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH MEMORIAL PRAYER GARDEN 886 North Shore Drive Forest Lake, Minnesota RULES AND PROCEDURES

Contract Year

Case 2:17-cv NBF Document 1 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 38 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT MOUNT ZION MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH **********

SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL TO DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF GRAYSON

ARTICLE I.1-3 CONSTITUTION

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

The Admissions process cannot be completed without CCA's receipt of these documents. Mother's Name: Statement of Purpose

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/10/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI VERIFIED PETITION

February 3, Lori Simon Executive Director of Academics. RE: Unconstitutional Fieldtrip to Calvary Lutheran Church

INTRODUCTION to the Model Constitution for Congregations

IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR WEBER COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

IN THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT WASHINGTON COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

King s Academy Christian School

Veritas Evangelical Seminary

A Family Membership Form VALLEY HOME SCHOOL ASSOCIATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 11, 2009 Session

Transcription:

Mirwis et al v. Mansfield Independent School District et al Doc. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ISAAC MIRWIS, ETAN MIRWIS, ISAAC BUCHINE, MARK BUCHINE, ISAAC JACOBSON, and MYRA WEISFELD, v. Plaintiffs, MANSFIELD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT and TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF PRIVATE AND PAROCHIAL SCHOOLS, Defendants. Civil Action No. PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT, APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Plaintiffs Isaac Mirwis, Isaac Buchine, and Isaac Jacobson ( Student Plaintiffs ), Etan Mirwis, Mark Buchine, and Myra Weisfeld ( Parent Plaintiffs ), make this their Original Complaint, Application for Temporary Restraining Order, and Application for Temporary and Permanent Injunction, complaining of Mansfield Independent School District ( MISD ) and Texas Association of Private and Parochial Schools ( TAPPS ). Plaintiffs Application is supported by the declarations of Isaac Mirwis and Richard Rohan, attached hereto, and Plaintiffs Brief in Support of its Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, which is also being filed contemporaneously herewith. I. PARTIES 1. Plaintiffs Isaac Mirwis, Isaac Buchine, and Isaac Jacobson are individuals residing in Houston, Texas, and are members of the Beren boys basketball team. Mirwis is a 1 Dockets.Justia.com

captain of the team. Collectively, these Plaintiffs are sometimes referred to herein as the Student Plaintiffs. 2. Plaintiffs Etan Mirwis, Mark Buchine, and Myra Weisfeld are individuals residing in Houston, Texas, and are the parents of the Student Plaintiffs described in paragraphs 2 and 3 above. Collectively, these Plaintiffs are sometimes referred to herein as the Parent Plaintiffs. 3. MISD is a school district and political subdivision of the State of Texas that operates, oversees and administers public schools in the City of Mansfield, Texas. MISD is a government agency within the meaning of the Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act ( TRFRA ), Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code 110.001 et seq., as it is an agency of the State or of a municipality or other political subdivision of the State of Texas. Pursuant to Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code 17.024(c), MISD may be served with process by serving its Superintendent, Dr. Bob Morrison, at Mansfield ISD, 605 East Broad Street, Mansfield, TX 76063. 4. TAPPS is a not-for-profit corporation organized under the laws of the State of Texas, and with its principal place of business at 601 N. Main, P.O. Box 1039, Salado, Texas 76571. TAPPS may be served by service upon its President, Mr. Edd Burleson, at 601 N. Main, Salado, Texas 76571. II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 5. This court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1343, as the Plaintiffs claims arise under the Constitution and laws of the United States and concern, under 42 U.S.C. 1983, the deprivation of rights secured by the Constitution of the United States. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367 over Plaintiffs claims under the TRFRA and for breach of contract. 2

6. Venue is appropriate in the Northern District of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391, because Defendant TAPPS resides in this judicial district within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 1391(d). III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 7. Robert M. Beren Hebrew Academy ( Beren ) is a not-for-profit corporation that operates a school in Houston, Texas, providing religious and secular education for grades pre-k through 12th grade in accordance with the tenets of Orthodox Judaism. 8. Plaintiffs are current members, and parents of current members, of Beren s boys high school basketball team who are being denied, solely on account of their religious observance, a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to compete in their athletic conference s state basketball championship tournament scheduled to take place on Friday and Saturday, March 2 and 3, 2012. 9. Defendant TAPPS is the association that organizes and administers the athletic conference in which Beren competes and which organizes the State championship basketball tournament. TAPPS is a membership association consisting of private and parochial schools throughout the State of Texas. TAPPS organizes competitions for its member schools in athletics and in the fine arts. Schools apply and pay a fee to become members of TAPPS. 10. Defendant MISD is the public governmental agency that is providing the facilities where the TAPPS championship basketball tournament will be taking place on March 2-3, 2012. 11. The concerted actions of TAPPS and MISD (a) burden and interfere with the sincere religious beliefs and observances of Beren and its students and the sincere religious beliefs and observances of current and future students of the Burton Adventist Academy, (b) prefer Sunday-observing religions and religious beliefs over Saturday-observing religions, and (c) violate TAPPS s own rules and regulations. Plaintiffs seek a Temporary Restraining Order, 3

Temporary Injunction, and Permanent Injunctive Relief enjoining MISD from permitting its public facilities to be used by TAPPS to discriminate in violation of the Constitution and laws of the United States and in violation of the TRFRA against Jewish and Christian students who observe Saturday as their religiously-mandated day of rest. 12. Prior to the 2010-2011 academic year, Beren registered as a member of TAPPS, paid the required fee, and was accepted as a member of TAPPS. Beren applied to compete in boys basketball, and, based on its size, was assigned to compete in TAPPS s 2-A Division against schools with comparably-sized student enrollments. 13. Although, at the time Beren applied for membership into TAPPS, it was made aware of the potential that Beren s Sabbath observance may conflict with scheduled competitions, the TAPPS rules expressly provide that game schedules, and specifically playoff game days and times, may be set by mutual agreement of the two competing teams. Consequently, any advanced warning that Beren received regarding potential playoff scheduling conflicts was also tempered by TAPPS s own rules that allow for the scheduling of such contests by mutual agreement. In this case, as set forth elsewhere, Beren and its scheduled semifinal opponent, Covenant, did in fact agree to make an accommodation to the schedule. Nevertheless, TAPPS, in violation of its own rules, denied Beren s request to reschedule the game. 14. The 2011-2012 school year is the second year of Beren s membership in TAPPS. Beren has had a successful boys basketball season, and it accordingly qualified to compete in the TAPPS post-season playoffs. 15. Following the Orthodox Jewish beliefs and observances that it teaches to its students, Beren does not desecrate the Sabbath, observed by Jewish Law on Saturdays, by 4

participating on that holy day in athletic competitions. By Orthodox Jewish Law and observance, the Jewish Sabbath begins at sundown on Friday evening and concludes 25 hours later, at nightfall on Saturday. (Mirwis Decl., attached hereto as Exhibit A, at 4) 16. During the initial rounds of the TAPPS 2-A boys basketball competition, some playoff games were originally scheduled for times between sundown on Friday and nightfall on Saturday. On each occasion, in accordance with TAPPS s own Bylaws and rules, Beren successfully arranged with its scheduled opponent to play the game at a time other than during the Jewish Sabbath. For example, Kerrville Our Lady of the Hills ( Kerrville ), agreed to play a game that had originally been scheduled to begin on Friday night, February 24, 2012, at noon on Friday, February 24. That game therefore concluded before the Jewish Sabbath began. The members of the Beren team, including the Student Plaintiffs, defeated Kerrville by the score of 69-42, thereby earning the right to advance to the TAPPS 2-A State semifinals against Dallas Covenant Christian School ( Covenant ). 17. On Friday, February 24, Beren requested that TAPPS adjust certain game times on Friday, March 2, 2012 and Saturday, March 3 in order to accommodate Beren s observance of the Jewish Sabbath. (Rohan Decl., attached hereto as Exhibit B, at 5 and Exhibit 4 thereto) Beren s semifinal game against Covenant was scheduled to take place at 9:00 p.m. on Friday night, March 2, 2012 in Mansfield, Texas, at Mansfield High School, a public high school that is a member of the MISD. (Id. at 3; Mirwis Decl. at 3) 18. Beren and the Student Plaintiffs cannot participate in a basketball game during the hours of the Jewish Sabbath because of their religious beliefs, tenets, and observances. (Mirwis Decl. at 4-5) Consequently, a representative of Beren asked the coach of its prospective opponent Covenant whether Covenant would agree to begin the semifinal game earlier on 5

Friday, March 2. Covenant s head of school has publicly stated that Covenant agreed to such an accommodation, but was subsequently made aware that TAPPS refused Beren s request to reschedule the game. (Rohan Decl. at 2 and Exhibit 1 thereto) 19. Upon information and belief, the two other schools in the State semifinals (other than Beren and Kerrville), Abilene Christian and Sugar Land Logos, have stated that they agreed to an accommodation under which the final game would begin after nightfall on Saturday, March 3 in case Beren should advance to the final game. 20. Beren requested from Edd Burleson, and TAPPS that TAPPS agree to permit the semifinal and final games to be scheduled to different times on Friday, March 2 and Saturday, March 3 to avoid the potential conflict with observance of the Jewish Sabbath. (Rohan Decl. at 5 and Exhibit 4 thereto) 21. On February 27, 2012, Mr. Burleson advised Chris Cole, the Beren boys basketball coach, by e-mail that the TAPPS executive board had voted to deny Beren s request that the games be rescheduled. (Id.) Mr. Burleson also advised that the start time of the earliest scheduled TAPPS playoff game was being moved from 3:30 p.m. on Friday to one hour later, and that all Friday games were being rescheduled to one hour later than originally scheduled. (Id.) TAPPS has reiterated its denial of Beren s request on its website on Wednesday, February 29, 2012. (Rohan Decl. at 5) 22. The current Beren team has a number of seniors on its squad. This year s championship tournament represents the last opportunity these students will have to participate in a high school final-four championship tournament. 23. Under compulsion resulting from this denial, Beren communicated to TAPPS that it had no choice and was unable to compete in the semifinal round. Competing at the times 6

inflexibly set by TAPPS and MISD would necessitate violating the Jewish Sabbath. TAPPS then announced that Kerrville Our Lady of the Hills School the team which Beren defeated by 27 points the preceding week would replace Beren in the semifinal game against Covenant. 24. If Beren and its team are denied the relief requested in this action, Beren s players will be forever deprived of the opportunity to compete in the 2011-2012 TAPPS 2-A State Basketball Championship Tournament. That is an irreplaceable opportunity and its deprivation constitutes irreparable harm attributable to disqualification of Beren and its team because of their Jewish religious beliefs and observances. (Mirwis Decl. at 6) 25. The Parent Plaintiffs have had their rights to the free exercise of their religious beliefs burdened by the foregoing actions of Defendants by virtue of the fact that their children, the Student Plaintiffs, are being put to the choice of violating their own religious beliefs and the beliefs imparted by the Parent Plaintiffs to their children, or forfeiting the opportunity to participate in the State basketball championship tournament. As such, the Parent Plaintiffs have had their free exercise rights burdened by Defendants actions as described above. 26. Section 141 of TAPPS s Bylaws provides that playoff game days may be changed by mutual agreement of the opposing teams. (Rohan Decl. at 4) That Section also provides that game times may be set by mutual agreement. (Id.) This procedure is similarly reflected on TAPPS s tournament bracket which may be found as a link on the TAPPS website. (Id. at 3) The concerted decision of TAPPS and MISD deprives Plaintiffs of the opportunity, authorized by the TAPPS Bylaws, to schedule Beren s playoff contests by agreement with opposing teams. 27. Upon information and belief, TAPPS never schedules athletic contests on Sundays. That policy was acknowledged by Mr. Burleson in a published interview with Mr. Brett Haber of the Washingtonian magazine. When asked during the interview why TAPPS 7

does not accommodate the Sabbath observances of Jewish schools, Mr. Burleson replied, Why should we allow 1 or 2 or 3 schools to dictate what 120 other schools do? In response to Mr. Haber s statement, Some would call that being inclusive, Mr. Burleson replied, I don t recall inclusive being in our constitution. (Rohan Decl. at 6) Further, upon information and belief, in a recent conversation between Mr. Burleson, the Head of School of Beren and Beren s head coach, Mr. Burleson stated to Beren s head coach and head of school, Your beliefs and our rules don t mesh. 28. Plaintiffs are prepared to post a bond or security in support of their application for a Temporary Restraining Order. FIRST CLAIM UNCONSTITUTIONAL RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION 29. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs 1 through 28 herein by reference. 30. The Defendants policy and practice of scheduling no basketball games on Sundays deliberately prefers the religious beliefs and observances of Christian religious schools that observe Sunday as the Sabbath because Christian observers attend church and treat Sunday as a holy day. The Defendants refusal to accommodate the religious observances of those schools and students who observe Saturday as their religious day of rest discriminates in favor of most Christian denominations and against Jewish schools and students, as well as against Christian denominations that observe the Seventh Day (i.e., Saturday) as the holy day of the week. 31. Upon information and belief, a Seventh-Day Adventist school in Arlington, Texas, Burton Adventist, experienced similar denials of its free exercise rights when on at least three previous occasions, Burton Adventist was required to forfeit games during TAPPS playoff basketball competitions. Like the Beren students here, Burton students observe their Sabbath on 8

Friday night and Saturday, and therefore were unable to compete in TAPPS playoff contests that were scheduled during their Sabbath. 32. Preferring Sunday-observing Christianity over Judaism and over Saturdayobserving Christianity is discrimination among religions that is prohibited by the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, as made applicable to the States and local governments by the Fourteenth Amendment. Larson v. Valente, 456 U.S. 228 (1982). The Supreme Court has condemned such preference as the clearest command of the Establishment Clause. 456 U.S. at 244. 33. On the above grounds, the Defendants must be directed by this Court to provide equal treatment to Saturday observance as to Sunday observance and to permit Saturdayobserving basketball teams and players to compete in the basketball competition at a time that does not conflict with their religious observance. SECOND CLAIM VIOLATION OF TEXAS RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT 34. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs 1 through 33 herein by reference. 35. The Plaintiffs refusal to play basketball on Friday after sundown and on Saturday before nightfall is an act or refusal to act that is substantially motivated by sincere religious belief within the meaning of 110.001(a)(1) of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code (2005). 36. MISD is a government agency within the meaning of 110.001(a)(2) of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code (2005). 37. MISD s authorization to TAPPS for TAPPS to conduct the basketball semifinals on its premises is an act of a government agency within the meaning of 110.002(b) of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code. 9

38. The concerted conduct of Defendants TAPPS and MISD in refusing to reschedule the TAPPS basketball semifinals for schools and students who cannot, because of their religious beliefs and observances, participate in basketball games between sundown on Fridays and nightfall on Saturdays substantially burdens the free exercise of religion of the Student Plaintiffs and Parent Plaintiffs. 39. Defendants TAPPS and MISD have no compelling governmental interest in refusing to reschedule basketball games to times that will not substantially burden the Plaintiffs free exercise of religion. The absence of such a compelling governmental interest is not limited to, but is augmented, whenever the school that the Plaintiffs play against consents to rescheduling of the game to a time that does not substantially burden the Plaintiffs free exercise of religion. 40. Defendants TAPPS and MISD have not sought or applied the least restrictive alternative to further any governmental interest. 41. For the above reasons, the Defendants TAPPS and MISD have, by their concerted action, violated the Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act (Sections 110.001-.012 of TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE (2005)). 42. Plaintiffs are entitled to declaratory relief, injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and reasonable attorneys fees under the Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act. THIRD CLAIM BREACH OF CONTRACT 43. Plaintiffs reincorporate paragraphs 1 through 42 herein by reference. 44. Pursuant to TAPPS s own rules, playoff game days and times are allowed to be adjusted by mutual agreement of the opposing teams. 45. Beren and Covenant, the teams that were originally scheduled to compete in the tournament semifinal game, agreed to make a schedule accommodation so that the Plaintiffs 10

would not be required to participate on the Jewish Sabbath. However, TAPPS advised Beren that the TAPPS board voted to deny any requested modification of the schedule. 46. As a consequence, TAPPS has breached the contract between it and Beren, thereby injuring the Beren students and team who are third-party beneficiaries. Because monetary damages are inadequate to compensate plaintiffs for the loss of their opportunity to participate in the semifinal contest, plaintiffs seek specific performance of the TAPPS rules under which Beren could reschedule games with the consent of the opposing team. Plaintiffs are third-party beneficiaries of the TAPPS Bylaws, rules, and regulations which govern the relationship between TAPPS and Beren, as the Student Plaintiffs are the individuals directly affected by those Bylaws, rules, and regulations, and TAPPS and Beren were aware of and contemplated that the student athletes of TAPPS member schools would be directly impacted by the matters contained in those Bylaws, rules, and regulations. Many of the TAPPS rules purport to direct the conduct of students at TAPPS member schools. FOURTH CLAIM DECLARATORY RELIEF 47. Plaintiffs reincorporate paragraphs 1 through 46 herein by reference. 48. As a result of the foregoing, an actual controversy has arisen and now exists between Plaintiffs and Defendants concerning whether Defendants have a constitutional, statutory, or contractual obligation to accommodate Plaintiffs religious observance of the Sabbath in scheduling, managing, or operating the TAPPS Division 2 A state basketball tournament. 49. In order to conclusively settle this dispute, Plaintiffs request, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2201, that this Court declare that Defendants refusal to accommodate Plaintiffs observance of the Sabbath in the scheduling, management, and/or operation of the TAPPS 11

Division 2 A state basketball tournament violates the Constitution and laws of the United States and the Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act. IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE Plaintiffs respectfully request the following relief: (1) A declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2201 and 2202 declaring that the actions of TAPPS and MISD in refusing to accommodate the Sabbath observance of the Plaintiffs violate the Constitution and laws of the United States and the Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act; (2) a temporary restraining order and a preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting TAPPS and MISD and its officials, employees, agents and assigns and all those acting in concert with them from conducting any semifinal basketball games on March 2 and 3, 2012, without rescheduling games that, if played as scheduled, would burden the free exercise of religion of any of the plaintiffs, and compelling TAPPS and MISD to honor the rights of Beren and its opponents to schedule game times by mutual agreement in accordance with TAPPS s Bylaws and rules; (3) an order awarding to the plaintiffs costs and attorneys fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988 and section 110.005(a)(4) of TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE (2005), and (4) such other and further relief as this Court deems appropriate. 12

Respectfully submitted, /s/ Richard A. Rohan Tim Gavin State Bar No. 07769800 tgavin@ccsb.com Richard A. Rohan State Bar No. 17203800 rrohan@ccsb.com Alexander More State Bar No. 24065789 amore@ccsb.com Sara Apel State Bar No. 24067488 sapel@ccsb.com CARRINGTON, COLEMAN, SLOMAN & BLUMENTHAL, L.L.P. 901 Main Street, Suite 5500 Dallas, Texas 75202 Telephone: (214) 855-3000 Facsimile: (214) 855-1333 Of Counsel: Nathan Lewin Alyza D. Lewin Lewin & Lewin, LLP 1775 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 850 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: 202-828-1000 Facsimile: 202-828-0909 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE Due to the emergency nature of the relief sought in the form of a temporary restraining order, the undersigned counsel was not required by the Local Rules to confer with Defendants regarding the relief requested herein. To the extent that the joining of the application for a preliminary injunction with the application for a temporary restraining order does call for a certificate of conference, the undersigned will conduct a conference with Defendants upon serving them with notice and copies of the instant filings, and promptly notify the Court if Defendants do not oppose the requested preliminary injunction. /s/ Richard A. Rohan CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing instrument was served upon the Defendants in this action via facsimile in accordance with Rule 5, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on this 1st day of March, 2012. In an effort to provide Defendants with immediate notice, the undersigned is also notifying the Defendants by telephone of the instant filings and providing Defendants with copies via email. /s/ Richard A. Rohan i_4418684v.1 14