FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/09/ :30 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/09/2016

Similar documents
Case 1:12-cv RJS Document 8 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:11-cv GP Document 12 Filed 09/29/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/ :21 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 152 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2018

Attorneys for Defendants THE J. PAUL GETTY MUSEUM AND THE J. PAUL GETTY TRUST SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR WEBER COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

L. Deny knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

Case 3:16-cv RLY-MPB Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY OF COOK, LAW DIVISION COMPLAINT AT LAW

Smith v United Church of Christ 2011 NY Slip Op 30205(U) January 19, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Milton A.

FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 11/16/ :25 AM

Case 2:09-md JD Document 120 Filed 01/14/11 Page 1 of 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Case 3:16-cv DJH-HBB Document 32-1 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 27 PageID #: 327

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/11/ :09 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/11/2016

FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 05/20/ :33 PM INDEX NO. 2014EF5188 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/20/2016. Exhibit E

EXHIBIT 4 FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 11/07/ :40 PM. the. Affirmation of Laurel J. Eveleigh

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH. Civil No.: Judge

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License with the following exceptions:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NO.

Case: 1:11-cv DCN Doc #: 2 Filed: 11/03/11 1 of 12. PageID #: 13

Case No.: Honorable Judge Commissioner. COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, LORIE JEAN KENDALL RICKS, individually and as

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

My Vacation Journal. Written and illustrated by

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/23/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2016 EXHIBIT F

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED NOTICE. August 19, No STAN SMITH, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012

IN TI-tE COURT OF CttANCER OF TI-tE gtate OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY ANSWER

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

STATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD. Decision No. 35

John M. O Connor, Esq. ANDERSON KILL & OLICK, P.C.

PLAINTIFF FFRF'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 3:16-cv-1267 (SRU) : DEPARTMENT OF : CORRECTION, et al., : Defendants.

Respondent. PETITIONERS Vickers, UCE, Ready

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA COMPLAINT. I. Preliminary Statement

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2012 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2012

HALIFAX DRAINAGE DISTRICTOF VOLUSIA COUNTY v. GLEATON, 188 So. 374, 137 Fla. 397 (Fla. 1939)] HALIFAX DRAINAGE DISTRICT OF VOLUSIA COUNTY

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2013 EXHIBITB

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. CIVIL No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Roanoke Division ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 01/24/ :11 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

On June 26, 2014, Waleed ( "Wally ") Hamed (referred to as "Counterclaim

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, LAW DIVISION COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

At Home with the Word

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT WASHINGTON COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

6:13-cv GRA Date Filed 09/11/13 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 25. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Greenville Division

Will of Daniel Byrnes,Jr. May 27, 1797

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA No.

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BLUEFIELD DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/06/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BLUEFIELD DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT

Case 8:16-cv CEH-AAS Document 8 Filed 09/30/16 Page 1 of 25 PageID 210

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

BEFORE THE HEARING BOARD OF THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

Case No D.C. No. OHS-15 Chapter 9. In re: CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA, Debtor. Adv. No WELLS FARGO BANK, et al.

Case 8:19-cv Document 1 Filed 03/25/19 Page 1 of 31 PageID 1

RESPONSE OF DEFENDANT DOUGLAS WRIGHT TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SERVICE BY PUBLICATION ON LINDA WALL

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI VERIFIED PETITION

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT MOUNT ZION MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH **********

Missouri Court of Appeals

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

COVENANT OF GRACIOUS SEPARATION AND DISMISSAL BY AND BETWEEN THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH AT NEW PROVIDENCE AND THE PRESBYTERY OF ELIZABETH

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT. Doe 2 s next friend and parent, Doe 3; and Doe 3, Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys

MATT COCHRAN and MINDY GANZE COURT USE ONLY

FILED: ROCKLAND COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2012

1. Responding to Paragraph 1 of the Petition, Respondent lacks information or belief

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer.

2013 Revised Common Lectionary for Sundays and Festivals

ORDINANCE

BYLAWS OF WHITE ROCK BAPTIST CHURCH

MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

MEMORANDUM. Interested Parishes in the Episcopal Diocese of Louisiana. From: Covert J. Geary, Chancellor of the Diocese

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY AT INDEPENDENCE, MISSOURl

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

2019 Revised Common Lectionary for Sundays and Festivals

1. After a public profession of faith in Christ as personal savior, and upon baptism by immersion in water as authorized by the Church; or

Traditional Stations of the Cross by St. Alphonsus Liguori

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

CONSTITUTION AND RULES OF PROCEDURE OF CHRIST CHURCH HILLCREST. (Church of England in South Africa)

2:13-cv RMG Date Filed 08/15/17 Entry Number 83-1 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 42 Filed 09/15/11 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

2014 REDSKINS TRAINING CAMP TICKET LOTTERY OFFICIAL RULES

Revised Music List, 2018 Holy Family Catholic Community

Lectionary Year B:

COVENANT OF GRACIOUS SEPARATION AND DISMISSAL BY AND BETWEEN THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH AT LIBERTY CORNER AND THE PRESBYTERY OF ELIZABETH

Present: Hassell, C.J., Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, and Lemons, JJ., and Russell, S.J.

County of Kane Office of County Board Kane County Government Center. DOCUMENT VET SHEET for Karen McConnaughay Chairman, Kane County Board (1J I6 A

Transcription:

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/09/2016 08:30 PM INDEX NO. 501142/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/09/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS -------------------------------------------------------------------X THE FOXSTONE GROUP, LLC, AND VODA BAUER REAL ESTATE LLC, Plaintiffs, against- CALVARY PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, INC., A/K/A CALVARY CATHEDRAL OF PRAISE, MARCUS ROBERTS, AND JOHN DOES AND JANE DOES 1-100, BEING PERSONS WHOSE IDENTITIES ARE CURRENTLY UNKNOWN TO PLAINTIFFS, Index No: 501142/2016 VERIFIED ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIMS AND THIRD- PARTY CLAIMS OF CALVARY PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, INC. Defendants. --------------------------------------------------------------------X CALVARY PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, INC. a/k/a CALVARY CATHEDRAL OF PRAISE, Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff, against- THE FOXSTONE GROUP, LLC and VODA BAUER REAL ESTATE LLC, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants, JASON BAUER and ABRAHAM ZEIGERMAN, Counterclaim Defendants. --------------------------------------------------------------------X Counterclaim-Defendant Jason Bauer, ( Bauer ), by his attorneys Oved & Oved LLP replies to the counterclaims and third-party claims of Defendant/Counterclaim- Plaintiff Calvary Pentecostal Church, Inc. ( Calvary ), dated February 22, 2016 (the Counterclaims ), upon information as belief as follows: 1. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 1 of the Counterclaims. 2. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 2 of the Counterclaims. 3. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 3 of the Counterclaims. 1 1 of 9

4. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 4 of the Counterclaims. 5. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 5 of the Counterclaims. 6. Denies knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 6 of the Counterclaims. 7. Denies knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 7 of the Counterclaims. 8. Denies knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 8 of the Counterclaims. 9. Denies knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 9 of the Counterclaims. 10. Denies knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 10 of the Counterclaims. 11. Denies knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 11 of the Counterclaims. 12. Denies knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 12 of the Counterclaims. 13. Denies knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 13 of the Counterclaims. 14. Denies knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 14 of the Counterclaims. 15. Denies knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 15 of the Counterclaims. 16. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 16 of the Counterclaims. 2 2 of 9

17. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 17 of the Counterclaims. 18. Denies knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 18 of the Counterclaims. 19. Denies knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 19 of the Counterclaims. 20. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 20 of the Counterclaims. 21. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 21 of the Counterclaims, except refer to the Complaint for an accurate recitation of the facts purported to be described therein. 22. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 22 of the Counterclaims, except refer to the Complaint for an accurate recitation of the facts purported to be described therein. 23. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 23 of the Counterclaims, except refer to the Complaint for an accurate recitation of the facts purported to be described therein. 24. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 24 of the Counterclaims. 25. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 25 of the Counterclaims, except refer to the Complaint for a more fulsome recitation of the allegations described therein. 26. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 26 of the Counterclaims. 27. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 27 of the Counterclaims. 28. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 28 of the Counterclaims. 29. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 29 of the Counterclaims. 3 3 of 9

30. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 30 of the Counterclaims. 31. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 31 of the Counterclaims. 32. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 32 of the Counterclaims. 33. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 33 of the Counterclaims. 34. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 34 of the Counterclaims. 35. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 35 of the Counterclaims. 36. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 36 of the Counterclaims. 37. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 37 of the Counterclaims. 38. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 38 of the Counterclaims. 39. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 39 of the Counterclaims. 40. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 40 of the Counterclaims. 41. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 41 of the Counterclaims. 42. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 42 of the Counterclaims. 43. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 43 of the Counterclaims. 44. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 44 of the Counterclaims. 45. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 45 of the Counterclaims. 46. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 46 of the Counterclaims. 47. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 47 of the Counterclaims. 48. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 48 of the Counterclaims. 49. Repeats and realleges each and every admission and denial made in response to those paragraphs of the Counterclaims referred to in paragraph 49 thereof with the same force and effect as if set forth herein at length. 50. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 50 of the Counterclaims. 4 4 of 9

51. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 51 of the Counterclaims. 52. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 52 of the Counterclaims. 53. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 53 of the Counterclaims. 54. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 54 of the Counterclaims. 55. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 55 of the Counterclaims. 56. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 56 of the Counterclaims. 57. Denies knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 57 of the Counterclaims. 58. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 58 of the Counterclaims. 59. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 59 of the Counterclaims. 60. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 60 of the Counterclaims, and specifically Denies that Calvary is entitled to any relief whatsoever from Bauer. 61. Denies each and every allegation set forth in the WHEREFORE clause and specifically Denies that Calvary is entitled to any relief whatsoever against Bauer. 62. Denies each and every other allegation contained in the Counterclaims not expressly admitted in this reply. FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Calvary fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE The Counterclaims are barred by Calvary s misrepresentations, fraud, duress, breaches of fiduciary duty, and/or unclean hands. 5 5 of 9

THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE The Counterclaims are barred by the doctrines of estoppel, waiver, release, ratification, discharge and laches. FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE The Counterclaims fail based on Calvary s bad faith. FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE The Counterclaims are barred based on Calvary s failure to satisfy a condition precedent. SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE The Counterclaims should be dismissed based upon the documentary evidence. SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Calvary s claims are barred, in whole or in part, to the extent that it has not suffered any actual injury or damages as a result of the allegations in the Counterclaims. EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Calvary s alleged injuries and/or damages, its entitlement to which being expressly denied, were caused by Calvary s own actions, omissions or conduct. NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Calvary s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by Calvary s failure to mitigate its claimed damages, its entitlement to which being expressly denied. TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Calvary s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by Calvary s breaches of contract. 6 6 of 9

ELEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Calvary s claims are barred, in whole or in part, on the basis that Calvary would be unjustly enriched if allowed to recover all or any portion of the damages alleged. TWELFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Calvary s claims are barred by facts showing illegality by statute or common law. THIRTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Calvary s claims are barred by the original document rule. FOURTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Calvary s claims are barred because at all times Bauer acted in good faith and did not directly or indirectly commit, control, induce or cause any wrongful acts or omissions and did no unlawful act or thing directly or indirectly through or by means of any other person. FIFTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Although Bauer denies owing any monies to Calvary, if Bauer is found to owe any monies to Calvary, whatever monies are said to be owed should be offset the amounts owed by Calvary to Plaintiffs and/or Bauer. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS Bauer hereby gives notice that he intends to rely on any additional affirmative defenses that become available or apparent during discovery and thus reserves the right to amend his Answer to assert such additional defenses. 7 7 of 9

WHEREFORE, Bauer hereby requests that the Court grant him the following relief: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) dismiss Calvary s Counterclaims in their entirety with prejudice; award Bauer his costs and disbursements incurred in this suit; award Bauer attorneys fees to the full extent permitted by law; and grant Bauer such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. Dated: New York, New York May 9, 2016 /S/ Darren Oved, Esq. Andrew J. Urgenson, Esq. OVED & OVED LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Third- Party Defendant Jason Bauer 401 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10013 8 8 of 9

9 9 of 9