SYSTEM Background of Public Distribution System (PDS) 10.3 Central Issue Price for Rice and Wheat AntyodayaAnna Yojana

Similar documents
QURBANI 1432 A.H. (2011)

Measurement of employment, unemployment and underemployment of agricultural labour in tarai regions of Uttaranchal State and Uttar Pradesh

Presented To: Standing Advisory Committee (Twentieth Meeting) held on 20 th June, 2012

Scheme for Home Delivery of Foodgrains

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD & PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

Sai Om Journal of Commerce & Management A Peer Reviewed National Journal EMPOWERMENT OF BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCY OF WOMEN IN KERALA- A KUDUMBASHREE MODEL

India s Muslims. Social, Economic and Political Status

LEFT FRONT GOVERNMENT & THE DEVELOPMENT OF MUSLIM MINORITIES IN WEST BENGAL CPI (M) CAMPAIGN MATERIAL WEST BENGAL ASSEMBLY ELECTION APRIL-MAY 2011

District Rural Development Agency, Kishanganj. - : MGNREGA :- Best Practices in Kishanganj District (BIHAR) Its all about PHASE - II

ZAKAT AS A SOCIAL SAFETY NET Exploring the Impact on Household Welfare in Pakistan

Market Update. Micro Irrigation

Reform and Renewal in every generation Diocese of Rochester

CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAN DESCRIBE A SANGHA AS "GOOD"

KUDUMBASHREE (Field visit report)

CBeebies. Part l: Key characteristics of the service

Welfare Potential of Zakat: An Attempt to Estimate Economy wide Zakat Collection

Nitsa (Kaliner) Kasir

A study on the changing population structure in Nagaland

Hidden cost of fashion

PRASHANT MAVANI. MSc. in Management, University of Surrey (UK) Senior Faculty: StudyIQ

Haredi Employment. Nitsa (Kaliner) Kasir. Deputy Chair, the Haredi Institute for Public Affairs. Jewish Funders Network

THE PRESBYTERIAN HUNGER PROGRAM

Islam & Welfare State: Reality Check & The Way Forward

Co-relating religious faith and community mobilization as a strategy for the economic empowerment of Muslim Women: A case study

Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada Congregational Mission Profile

A Socio-economic Profile of Ireland s Fishing Harbours. Greencastle

EXPLORING AND EXECUTING CONVERGENCE AVENUES IN DDU-GKY

Key-note Address. By Dr. Mohammad Manzoor Alam Chairman, Institute of Objective Studies, New Delhi

GENERAL SYNOD. Resourcing Ministerial Education in the Church of England. A report from the Task Group

Zakat in Sudan Alamin Ali Abdelgadir, General director of Information center at Zakat Chamber

Recruitment and Enlistment

Jagdish Bhagwati and Arvind Panagariya in their recent

Inauguaration of Satya Bharti School Programme in Murshidabad by Hon ble Union Finance Minister: A CSR initiative of SPMCIL PRESS RELEASE

Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Matthew 11:28

COMMITTEE HANDBOOK WESTERN BRANCH BAPTIST CHURCH 4710 HIGH STREET WEST PORTSMOUTH, VA 23703

Block Development Officer

OGCF 2016 in various States/UTs

Haredi Employment. Facts and Figures and the Story Behind Them. Nitsa (Kaliner) Kasir. April, 2018

Café Kudumbashree Café Kudumbashree

Do you renounce the spiritual forces of wickedness, reject the evil powers of this world, and repent of your sin?

Equirus Securities Pvt Ltd Genus Power-2QFY17 Results 28 th November, 2016

ABOUT THE STUDY Study Goals

GOAL 2 - END HUNGER, ACHIEVE FOOD SECURITY AND IMPROVED NUTRITION AND PROMOTE SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE

#TheHub St Mark s Church, Newtown The new post of Engagement Manager

A Research Study on Overall Performance of Kudumbashree Unit With Reference To Beeranthabail of Kasargod District, Kerala state

Healthy Food Pantries Fuel Healthy Communities. Key Highlights from the 2017 Southeastern Pennsylvania Food Pantry Coordinator Survey

EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN IN THE INFORMAL SECTOR IN KERALA: A STUDY WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO KUDUMBASHREE PROJECT

Partnership Precepts for Church Planting

Welfare and Standard of Living

Sri Kanchi Mahaswami Peetarohana Shatabdi Mahotsava Trust. vidyamandir EDUCATE ENLIGHTEN EMPOWER. Oru Pidi Arisi Thittam.

WSS GSG UTILITY TURNAROUND SERIES. Population covered: 284,072 inhabitants for water

Church Based Development Project Proposal

Our Statement of Purpose

SYED WASEEM AHMAD ASHRAF Associate Professor Department of Geography Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh

PRASHANT MAVANI. Senior Faculty: StudyIQ

SPEECH. Over the past year I have travelled to 16 Member States. I have learned a lot, and seen at first-hand how much nature means to people.

Muslim and Pasmanda Education: Affirmative Action Issues

CBeebies. Part l: Key characteristics of the service

The Church in Wales. Membership and Finances 2015

SPATIAL PATTERNS OF WORK PARTICIPATION AMONG THE MUSLIMS IN INDIA: 2011

Kudumbashree Activities

Faith-sharing activities by Australian churches

IV. Economics of Religion

Peterborough Diocese Youth Work Internships Information Pack for Placement Providers 2013

Print-out 1: Party Invite; Print-out 2: Shima Print-out 3: Prayer For Justice

INSTITUTE OF HAZRAT MOHAMMAD (SAW)

1. After a public profession of faith in Christ as personal savior, and upon baptism by immersion in water as authorized by the Church; or

What happened to the Christians of Andhra Pradesh

Anglican Diocese of Bendigo. Strategic Plan We see a diocese where. Living faith Building community Healthy churches

A Resurgent Muslim Community Asserts Itself: Sachar Committee provides the Forum

Does your church know its neighbours?

Socio-Economic and Cultural Disparity: A Study on Gender Gap in Mirzapur Village of Aligarh District in Uttar Pradesh, India

UK to global mission: what really is going on? A Strategic Review for Global Connections

Information Booklet for Donors

A Study on Market Potential for Mangalam Newspaper Private Limited, Kottayam

Côte d Ivoire National Public Opinion Survey

Downloaded from

Near and Dear? Evaluating the Impact of Neighbor Diversity on Inter-Religious Attitudes

URBAN CHURCH PLANTING STUDY Stephen Gray & LifeWay Research

unjustified. Similarly 66 percent women felt that the practice of triple talaq was incorrect and unjustified.

REQUIRED DOCUMENT FROM HIRING UNIT

Peter Singer, Famine, Affluence, and Morality

Guide to Family Finance

Official Response Subject: Requested by: Author: Reference: Date: About the respondents

XAVIER CATHOLIC COLLEGE PASTORAL BOARD POLICY STATEMENTS

Khirbet Al Malih profile

AM: Sounds like a panic measure.

Limited Tender Enquiry

INTRODUCTORY LETTER ON SALARIES, STIPENDS AND FEES FOR 2018

An Update on Resourcing Ministerial Education, and Increases in Vocations and Lay Ministries

Create a Task Force on Theology of Money House of Deputies Committee on the State of the Church Stewardship

POLICIES FOR LAUNCHING A MULTI-SITE FAITH COMMUNITY

Generous giving to parish ministry will enable God s church to grow and flourish, now and in the future

This report is organized in four sections. The first section discusses the sample design. The next

Metropolitan Chicago Synod Part-time Ministry Guidelines

Usage of Islamic Banking and Financial Services by United States Muslims

THE TRUTH ABOUT WORLD VISION

CHAPTER VIII COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VAISHNAVITES AND BAPTISTS SECTS

The Stewardship Development Team

THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN CANADA MINISTRY AND CHURCH VOCATIONS INSTRUCTION GUIDE CONGREGATIONAL PROFILE FORM

Transcription:

UNIT 10 PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Structure 10.0 Objectives 10.1 Introduction 10.2 Background of Public Distribution System (PDS) 10.3 Central Issue Price for Rice and Wheat 10.4 AntyodayaAnna Yojana 10.5 Quantity of Food grains Issued under Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) 10.6 Implementation Related Shortcomings oftpds 10.7 Measures Taken to Strengthen TPDS and Check Diversion of Food grains 10.8 LetUsSumUp 10.9 Key Words 10.10 Some Useful Books/References 10.11 AnswerslHints to Check Your Progress 10.0 OBJECTIVES After going through this unit, you should be in a position to: define the Public Distribution System (PDS) and discuss how an efficient PDS ensures food security; learn about the Central Issue Price (CIP) offoodgrains; discuss the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS), shortcomings of TPDS and measures taken to strengthen TPDS; and explain how to check diversion of foodgrains. 10.1 INTRODUCTION 34 India's, food security policy has an important objective to ensure availability of foodgrains to common and poor people at an affordable price. The policy has been successful in the sense that foodgrains have been made available to the poor. consumers living in remote and inaccessible areas. The efficient Public Distribution System (PDS) introduced in the country has ensured the food securityand nutritional requirements of the people. The PDS was introduced by the Government of India. with the assistance of State Governments asa system of management of scarcity and for"distribution of foodgrains and other items at cheaper prices to a large number of population living in the different parts of the country.

Over the years, PDS has become important part of Government of India's food policy and economy. It is important to clarify that PDS is only supplemental in nature and is not intended to provide the entire requirements of foodgrains or other commodities distributed under this programme to a household or a section of society. Public Distribution System As mentioned above, PDS is operated jointly by the Central Govenunent and State Governments. The Central Government, through its nodal agency, the Food Corporation of India, established under Act of Parliament in 1965, has assumed the responsibility of'procurement, storage and transportation of foodgrains to the State Governments. The operational responsibility of Central Government includes allocation of monthly quota of foodgrains to the State Governments and issue of the same to the States' Food Supply Departments. On the other hand, lifting of foodgrains from FCI's godowns, distribution tu Fair Price Shops (PPS) and further distribution of foodgrains through FPS to consumers is the responsibility of the State Governments. In addition to this, identification of families below poverty line and very poor families, issue of ration cards to different categories of beneficiaries and supervision and monitoring the function of fair price shops is also being done by the State Governments. Under the Public Distribution System, this has now been designated as Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS), the commodities viz., wheat, rice, sugar and kerosene are being allocated to the State GovernmentslUnion Territories for distribution. Some of the State Governments and Union Territories also distribute salt and match boxes etc., under TPDS. 10.2 BACKGROUND OF PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (PDS) The Public distribution of essential commodities particularly foodgrains was introduced in India during the inter-war period. In 1960, there was acute food scarcity in the country and it was decided that essential cornmodities should be made available at cheaper prices to the consumers in urban- areas. Since then, the system has substantially contributed to check the rising prices of foodgrains and ensured the availability of foodgrains particularly in urban and semi-urban areas. Due to increase of foodgrains production as a result of green revolution, the area ofpds was extended to villages, particularly, in tribal areas in 1970s and 1980s. Up to 1992, Public Distribution System (PDS) was a general scheme for all consumers without any specific target. However, in June, 1992, Revamped Public Distribution System (RPDS) was launched in 1775 blocks of the country. From June, 1997, the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) was introduced with a view to serve the population below poverty line living in rural and urban areas. The consumers were divided in two categories below poverty line and above poverty line based on certain norms prescribed by the Planning Commission. The RPDS was launched to strengthen and streamline the PDS as well as to make available foodgrains to consumers living in far-flung, hilly, remote and inaccessible areas. The areas where Drought Prone Area Programme (DPAP), Integrated Tribal Development Project (ITDP) and Desert Development Programme were running were included in revamped PDS. The prices of foodgrains in RPDS were kept Rs. 50 paise per kg below the Central Issue Price(CIP) and foodgrains up to 20 kgs per month per ration card were issued. 35

Institutional Infrastructures: Public, Private and Public- Private Partnerships In June, 1997, the Government ofindia decided to focus on the poor of the country and they were supposed to be the main target for making available foodgrains at cheaper prices. Therefore, the scheme was named as Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS). Under this programme, the States were required to identify the below poverty line population and make foolproof arrangement for distribution of foodgrains to them through fair price shops at affordable cheaper prices. Initially, the scheme was formulated for the benefit of about 6 crores ~00r family for whom a quantity of 72 lakh metric tonnes of foodgrains was allocated annually. The identification ofbpl population was done by the State Governments as per the State-wise poverty estimate of the Planning Commission for 1993-94 based on the methodology of the "Expert Group on Estimation of Proportion and Number of Poor" headed by Late Prof. Lakdawala. The allocation offoodgrains to the State Governments/UTs was made on the basis of average consumption in the past, i.e., average annual offtake offoodgrains under the PDS during the past 10 years at the time of introduction oftpds. In addition to this, transitory allocation to the tune of 103 lakh metric tonne annually was also made to States for distribution of foodgrains at subsidized prices to the Above Poverty Line (APL) population as it was considered that this segment of population should not be suddenly deprived from cheaper foodgrains being distributed through fair price shops by the State Governments. Later on, it was requested by the State Governments that allocation of foodgrains to Below Poverty Line (BPL) families should be increased. Therefore, the Government of India increased the allocation to BPL families from 10 kg to 20 kg of foodgrains per family per month at 50 per cent of the economic cost. The allocation to APL families was made at economic cost with effect from 1st April, 2000. The quantity of allocation to APL family was retained at the same level as at the time of introduction oftpds. The number ofbpl families has been increased with effect from 1st December, 2000 by shifting the base to the population projections of the Registrar General as on 1st March, 2000 instead of the earlier population projection of 1995. With this increase, the total number of 13PL families are.652.03 lakh as against 596.23 lakh families originally estimated when TPDS was introduced 1997. Under these PDS schemes, the end retail price is fixed by the State Governmentsl UTs after taking into considerationthe margins of wholesalers/retailers,transportation charges, levies, local taxes, etc. 36 Under the TPDS, the States are requested to issue foodgrains at a difference of not more than 50 paise per kg over and above the CIP for BPL families. Flexibilities h...::,ltegovernmentsluts have been given in the matter of fixing the retail prices by removing the restrictions of 50 paise per kg over and above the CIP for distribution of foodgrains under TPDS, except with respect to Antyodaya Anna Yojana where the end retail prices is to be retained at Rs.2/- per kg for wheat and at Rs.3/- per kg for rice.

10.3 CENTRAL ISSUE PRICES FOR RICE AND WHEAT Public Distribution System Wheat and rice are issued by the Central Government from its Central Pool Stock to State Governments/U'Is at uniform Central Issue Price (CIP) for TPDS. The CIPs offoodgrains for TPDS are generally fixed below the economic cost. The Central Government incurs a huge expenditure in the form of food subsidy on this account. It is important to mention that as a social obligation the foodgrains are supplied to Below Poverty Line (BPL) families and Antyodaya Anna Yojana beneficiaries at highly subsidized rates. After streamlining and restructuring the Public Distribution System (PDS) with focus on poor (Targetted PDS), two different CIPs.have been fixed, one for the BPL families and another for the APL families. The CIPs of Rice and wheat issued under TPDS for various categories of beneficiaries are given in Tables 10.1 and 10.2. Table 10.1: Central Issue Prices of Common and Grade 'A' Rice for TPDS With effect from Rice APL,(Rs. per quintal), t. BPL 1.12.97 Common 550 350 1.12.97 Grade 'A' 700 350 29.01.99 Common 700 350 29.01.99 Grade 'A' 905 35il 1.04.2000 Common II35 590 1.04.2000 Grade 'A' II80 590 25.07.2000 Common. 1087 565 25.07.2000 Grade 'A' 1130 565 12.07.2001, Common 795 565 12.07.2001 Grade 'A' 830-1.4.2002, Common 695 565 Grade 'A' 730-1.7.2002 Common 795 565 Grade'iI.' 830 - Source: Department of Food & Public Distribution, Govt. of India. The CIP of common rice to APL families is applicable to J&K., H.P., North Eastern States, Sikkim and Uttaranchal. From the Table 10.1, it is known that the CIPs of common and Grade' A' rice for BPL families are much less than that for the APL families. From the year 2000 till date, there is not much change in the CIP of common rice and the price hag surdy been reducec:.. 37

- 0 0 0 0 Institutional Infrastructures: Public, Private and Public- Private Partnerships Table 10.2: Central Issue Price of Wheat (Rs. perquintal) Effective from BPL APL 1.6.97 250 450 29.1.99 250 650 1.4.99 250 682 1.4.2000 450 900 25.7.2000 415 830 12.7.2001 415 610 1.4.2002 415 510 1.7.2002 415 610 Source: Department of Food & Public Distribution, Govt. of India. From the Table of CIP of wheat,it is clear that price for BPL families are much less - than the price for APL families. Further, the BPL price of wheat has not been increased from the year 2000 to till date. Check Your Progress 1 "Note: a) b) Use the spaces given below for writing your answers. Check your answer with those given at the end of the unit. 1). What are the main aims and objectives of food policy of India? 2) What is the Targeted Public Distribution System?.-. ~8

3) What are the central issue prices of wheat and rice for BPL families? Public Distribution System 10.4 ANTYODA A-ANNA YOJANA Since the introduction of Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) in 1997, it was felt that there are some poorest and destitute people in the country who are not able to purchase the foodgrains even at BPL rate. They have very poor purchasing capacity as they have no fixed income and are not able to get employment for most of the period of the year. It was revealed that there is a segment of poorest among the BPL population in some hunger prone areas of the country. ANational Sample Survey (NSS) pointed out that about 5 per cent of the total population in the country is not able to get two square meals a day. It was felt that a scheme for the most destitute population to make available foodgrains at highly subsidized rate is needed and, therefore, a new scheme known as AntyodayaAnna Yojana (AAY) was launched in December, 2000 for one crore poorest ofthe poor families of the country. It was planned that about one crore people who are poorest among the below poverty line (BPL) families covered under TPDS within the states should be identified and foodgrains at highly subsidized rate should be supplied to them through Fair Price Shops. Under this scheme, wheat and rice was made available to these people at highly. subsidized rate of Rs. 2/- per kg and Rs. 3/- per kg respectively. The State Governments and UTs were requested to bear the distribution cost including the margin off air Price Shops dealers as well as the transportation cost. Initially, 25 kgs foodgrains per family per month was issued, which was increased to 35 kg w.e.f. 1st April, 2002. First Expansion of AAY From 2003-2004, the AAY Scheme was further expanded by adding another 50 lakhs BPL households which are headed bywidows, terminally ill people, disabled persons and persons of 60 years age or more with no assured means for their support. With this increase, 1.5 crores families were covered under AA Y. Second Expansion ofaay In the Union Budget of2004-05, it was announced that AA Y was further expanded for another 50 lakhs families whp are at the risk of hunger. Order to this effect was issued on 1st August, 2004. The followingclass of population was covered under AAY. Land-less agricultural labourers, marginal farmers, rural artisans/craftsmen, such as potters, tanners, weavers, blacksmith, carpenters, slum dwellers and persons 39

Institutional Infrastructures: Public, Private and Public- Private Partnerships earning their livelihood on daily basis in informal sector like porters, coolies, rickshaw pullers, hand cart pullers, etc. Families headed by widows terminally ill people, disabled persons, persons aged 60 years or more with no assured means for their support. Third Expansion of AAY In the Union Budget of2005-06, further expansion of AAY to cover another 50 lakhs BPL households was announced. Thus, the total coverage of household families under AntyodayaAnna Yojana increased upto 2.5 crores. 10.5 QUANTITY OF FOOD GRAINS ISSUED UNDER TARGETED PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (TPDS) Since 1997, the quantity of foodgrains issued to BPL families has been gradually increased from 10 kg to 35 kg per family per month. The first increase was made from 1.4.2000 wherein quantity was enhanced up to 20 kg per family per month. This was further increased from 20 kg to 25 kg per family per month with effect from July, 2001. Initially, the Antyodaya families were provided 25 kg of foodgrains per family per. month at the time oflaunching of the scheme. The quantity of the foodgrains issued under APL, BPL and AAY has been increased upto 35 kg per month per family w.e.f. 1st April, 2002 with a view to enhance the food security at the household level and to increase the nutritional requirement. It is important to mention here that 59 per cent of calories (in terms of kilo calories per day per person), 58 per cent of total protein and 13 per cent of total fat are derived from cereals intake. I Achievements of TPDS After June, 1997, the PDS has now become a major food security scheme for the poor families living in different parts of the country, particularly in remote hilly rural areas. i) The TPDS scheme fulfills about 50 per cent of the cereals requirement of the poor family every month. ii) ill) The offtake offoodgrains under BPL scheme has considerably increased and during 2003-04, it was 1991akh metric tonnes which is about 83 per cent of the total PDS offtake. The Central Issue Prices (CIPs) of foodgrains for BPL and Antyodaya families have not been increased much since the year 2000. iv) The total offtake offoodgrains under TPDS was around 2391akh metric tonne in 2003-04, which is the highest level achieved so far. v) The CIf>for AAY category is kept lowest, i.e. Rs.2/- per kg for wheat an.l r~<. 3/- per kg for rice. This is much below the economic cost of these 40 grams.

Allocation and OffTake of Food grains undertpds Public Distribution System The details of allocation made under TPDS and off take of food grains are as under: \ Table 10.3: Allocation made undertpds, OffTake and Percentage Off Take, (LakhMTs) Year Total TPDS \ Total TPDS Percentage, Allocation Off Take Off Take.. 1997-98 180.88 l31.53 72.72 1998-99 226.77 184.45 81.34 1999-2000 239.00 168.07 70.32 2~1 274.59 117.89 42.93 2001-02 300.08 l35.65 4521 2002'{)3 74328 198.56 26.71, 2003.{)4 71232 239.31 33.60 2004-05 ". 417.99 157.96 37.79 On carefully examination of the allocation offoodgrains and their offtake, it is revealed that off take was maximum during 1998-99 and it is continuously showing the declining trend. The reasons for less off take needs to be examined, Whether this is due the lack of purchasing capacity of the poorest in rural areas or due to. poor management of the TPDS in some states needs-to be looked on. Sometimes the FPS owners are not able to lift the allocated stocks due to lack of fmance. N onissue of ration cards to the needy people in villages in a number of States is also one of the reasons of poor off take under TPDS. There may also be some implementation related problems, which should be removed. 10.6 lmplementation RELATED SHORTCOMINGS OF TPDS Some of the major deficiencies observed in the functioning oftpds in various States are as follows: Incorrect Identification ofbpl Families There has been large number of complaints that the identification of BPL beneficiaries was not correct and many eligible families have been left out ortne BPL purview. There was a pre-condition of possession of the BPL card' for identification under Antodaya Anna Yojana and a large number of very poor people coming in the category of AAY who were not having BPL cards could,not get the AAY cards. Requirement of permanent address and delay in verification of antecedents made it very difficult for home less and urban destitute to get a BPL I AAY ration cards. 41

Institutional Infrastructures: Public, Private and Public- Private Partnerships Non Issue of Ration Cards In some of the States I UTs like Goa, Himachal Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, A&N ISlands, Chandigarh, Dadra& Nagar Haveli and Lakshdweep, the identification of BPL and AAY families have not been completed and ration cards to all beneficiaries have not been issued. Non-availability of Adequate Foodgrains in the Fair Price Shops (FPSs) Due to shortage of resources, some of the states as well as FPSs dealers are not able to lift the adequate quantity of foodgrains as a result the beneficiaries/consumers particularly in the rural areas are not able to get their foodgrains from FPSs. There are also reports that some quantity of foodgrains meant for TPDS and other welfare schemes are diverted to open market. This needs to be checked by the State Governments. 10.7 MEASURES TAKEN TO STRENGTHE~ TPDS AND CHECK DIVERSION OF FOOD GRAINS It has frequently argued that the PDS system has failed to deliver the desired result for which it was planned due to several shortcoming as discussed above. The following are the some of measures taken to overcome various shortcomings in the PDS system in order to make system effective and target oriented. 1) Citizen Charter This charter contains, inter alia, the basic relevant information for the consumers and a model procedure and time schedule for various services to be provided by the State ICentral Governments. 2) Involvement ofpanchayati Raj Institution Under the guidelines for implementation of the TPDS, the State Governments are supposed to involve Gram Panchayats and Gram Sabha in the identification ofbpl, AAY families. 3) Area Officers Scheme From February, 2000 the Department of Food and Public Distribution, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution had appointed Area Officers for different States/U'Is to coordinate with the State Governments for regular and effecti ve monitoring oftpds. The observations/discrepancies reported by these Area Officers are communicated to the State Governments for taking remedial measures.. 4) Constitution of Task Force Task Force team with senior officers of the Department of Food & PublicDistribution, FCI and Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) had been constituted to check irregularities, if any, in the distribution of foodgrains under TPDS and AAY 5) Monitoring the Quality of Foodgrains 42 Officers of the Quality Control Cell of the Department of Food & Public Distribution aswell as State Government officers regularly inspect the Fair Price Shops and

collect the samples of foodgrains for analysis purposes. Incidences of supply of poor quality of foodgrains are brought to the notice of concerned Organisation for. taking remedial measures. Sealed samples of foodgrains issued from FCI or State Governments' depots are displayed on the fair price shops for the benefit of consumers. Public Distribution System Check Your Progress 2 Note: a) b) Use the spaces given below for writing your answers. Check your answer with those given at the end of the unit. 1) Whatis AntyodayaAnna Yojana(AAY)?... :-. 2) What are the issue prices of wheat and rice under AntyodayaAnna Yojana?... ;......... 3) How many families are covered under this scheme at present?..... 4) What are the short comings oftpds? ""."." ~ o 0 o 0.0 0 o 0.' o "........... 10.8 LET US SUM UP In this Unit we have discussed the basic objective of the food policy of the Government of India,which aims at providing cheaper foodgrains to the largenumber of population living in different parts of the country particularly in the tribal, remote,.hilly and inaccessible areas. The Public distribution system was introduced in 1960. 43

Institutional Infrastructures: Public, Private and Public- Private Partnerships This was further strengthened and focused on the targeted group, i.e., poor people in 1997 and known.as Targeted Public Distribution System. It was felt that the benefit oftpds is not reaching to the poorest and destitute people of the country and a scheme for making available foodgrains at highly subsidized rate to these people was needed. Therefore, a new scheme in addition to TPDS, known as, AntyodayaAnna Yojana was launched in December, 2000 for One crore poorest of the poor families of the country. The scheme has been expanded 3 times and now about 2.5 crores people are covered under this scheme. The Central Issue Prices on which the foodgrains under various public distribution schemes are issued are fixed by the Government of India and these prices are much below than the economic cost of the foodgrains. Under AntyodayaAnna Yojana, wheat at the rate ofrs.2/- per kg and rice at Rs.3/- per kg in the scale of35 kg foodgrains per month per family are issued. There are some implementation related shortcomings in TPDS. Due to financial constraints, sometimes State Governments as well as FPS dealers are not able to lift the allocated stocks of foodgrains. The possibility ofleakage and diversion of some foodgrains to open market is not ruled out. Government of India and State Governments have taken a number of measures to remove these shortcomings. Area officers, members of the Task Force Teams constituted by the Government of India regularlymonitor the TPDS and other schemes of the Government and wherever shortcomings are observed, these are brought to the notice of the concerned authorities for ~g the remedial measures. 10.9 KEYWORDS Allocation Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) APL BPL Offtake Targeted Public The quantity of foodgrains (quota) which is issued to the state Governments'. The scheme of distribution of foodgrains amongst poorest of poor people at highly subsidized prices. Above poverty line population. Below poverty line population. The quantity of foodgrains (quota) which is actually lifted by state Governments. The scheme of distribution of foodgrains at cheaper. Distribution System prices focused on the targeted group, i.e., poor is known as Targeted Public Distribution System. 10.10 SOME USEFUL BOOKSIREFERENCES 44 Anonymous (2000). Report ofthe High Level Committee on Long-Term Grain Policy. Published by Department of Food & Public Distribution, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi.

Anonymous (2006). Annual Report 2005-2006 of the Department of Food & Public Distribution, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Published by Department of Food & PD, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi. Chopra, R.N. (198'8). Food. Policy in India -A Survey. Intellectual Publishing House, 23 Daryaganj.Ansari.Road, New Delhi Public Distribution System " Bhandari, I.K. (2002). Public Distribution System: RBSA Publishers. SMS Highway, Jaipur (India);, Kumar, Ashok (1988). FoodgrainProduction in India -Impact of Techno Environment Factors. Criterion Publications, 136 Raja Garden, New Delhi- 110015.. Sharma, P.K. (1997). Foodgrain Economy of India. Shipra Publication, 115A, Vikas Marg, Shakarpur, Delhi-l l 0092. 10.11 ANSWERSIHINTS TO CHECK YOUR PROGRESS Check Your Progress 1, '1) The main aim and objectives of the food policy of the Government of India are I to provide cheaper foodgrains to large number of poor population living in differentparts of the country particularly in tribal, hilly,remote and inaccessible areas. Stabilizingthe market price of foodgrains by making procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrains through various schemes is also an objective of food policy. 2) The targeted public distribution system introduced in 1997 focused on poor people and beneficiaries were categorized in below poverty line and above poverty line segments. The emphasis was to make available foodgrains to below poverty line population. 3) The Central Issue Price of wheat and rice for BPL families are Rs.4.15 per kg aad Rs.5.65 per kg, respectively. Check Your Progress 2 1) The AntyodayaAnna Yojana is meant for poorest among poor (BPL) families wherein wheat and rice are supplied at highly subsidized rates. 2) The issue prices of wheat and rice under AntyodayaAnna Yojana are Rs.2 and Rs.3per kg, respectively. 3) About 2.5 crores families are covered under Antyodaya Anna Yojana. 4) The important shortcomings oftpds are that most of the poor people have not been issued proper ration cards to get the benefit of subsidized foodgrains being issued under these schemes. Besides, some quantity of the TPDS appears to be diverted to open market. 45