IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv RJS Document 8 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Case 2:11-cv GP Document 12 Filed 09/29/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

2:13-cv RMG Date Filed 08/15/17 Entry Number 83-1 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NO.

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/09/ :30 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/09/2016

Case 3:16-cv RLY-MPB Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY, COUNTY, ALABAMA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT. Doe 2 s next friend and parent, Doe 3; and Doe 3, Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA COMPLAINT. I. Preliminary Statement

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT SECOND MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD ON APPEA L

Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 42 Filed 09/15/11 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

SOUTH TEXAS DISTRICT AFFILIATED POLICY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 11, 2009 Session

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/ :21 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 152 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2018

John M. O Connor, Esq. ANDERSON KILL & OLICK, P.C.

Case 8:16-cv CEH-AAS Document 8 Filed 09/30/16 Page 1 of 25 PageID 210

6:13-cv GRA Date Filed 09/11/13 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 25. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Greenville Division

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY AT INDEPENDENCE, MISSOURl

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

BY-LAWS OF THE DIOCESE OF THE SOUTH ORTHODOX CHURCH IN AMERICA

Employment Agreement

ST. OLYMPIA ORTHODOX CHURCH OF POTSDAM BYLAWS PREAMBLE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 16, 2009 Session

Present: Hassell, C.J., Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, and Lemons, JJ., and Russell, S.J.

Case3:11-cv RS Document60-5 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 39

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 3:16-cv-1267 (SRU) : DEPARTMENT OF : CORRECTION, et al., : Defendants.

Case 1:01-cv RGS Document 56 Filed 05/26/05 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

RESPONSE OF DEFENDANT DOUGLAS WRIGHT TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SERVICE BY PUBLICATION ON LINDA WALL

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

INTERNATIONAL CHURCHES OF CHRIST A California Nonprofit Religious Corporation An Affiliation of Churches. Charter Affiliation Agreement

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RONNIE AND DIANNE ROBERTSON APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO CA BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BLUEFIELD DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Smith v United Church of Christ 2011 NY Slip Op 30205(U) January 19, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Milton A.

Case 3:04-cv SC Document 158 Filed 11/09/2005 Page 1 of 5

2017 Constitutional Updates. Based upon ELCA Model Constitution adopted 2016 at 14th Church Wide Assembly

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/06/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2012 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2012

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Roanoke Division ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT.

Reconciliation and Dismissal Procedure

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BLUEFIELD DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT

Presbytery of Missouri River Valley Gracious Reconciliation and Dismissal Policy

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 8:19-cv Document 1 Filed 03/25/19 Page 1 of 31 PageID 1

THE SYNOD OF THE ANGLICAN CHURCH OF AUSTRALIA IN THE DIOCESE OF WILLOCHRA INCORPORATED

BYLAWS CHURCH ON MILL FIRST SOUTHERN BAPTIST CHURCH OF TEMPE TEMPE, ARZONA ARTICLE I ORGANIZATION ARTICLE II MEMBERSHIP

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE FILE NO: 08 CVS Plaintiffs, Defendants.

The Constitution and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Episcopal Diocese of Minnesota

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA No.

CONSTITUTION OF THE NORTHWEST WISCONSIN ASSOCIATION UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST

MATT COCHRAN and MINDY GANZE COURT USE ONLY

Case: 1:11-cv DCN Doc #: 2 Filed: 11/03/11 1 of 12. PageID #: 13

(Article I, Change of Name)

Affiliated Agreement

VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR FAIRFAX COUNTY

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellant, Appeal No v.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 17 November 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 1:07-CV-00953

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT MOUNT ZION MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH **********

Case 8:13-cv JDW-TBM Document 198 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID 3859

CANON XVII. The Licensing of Clergy. I. The Issue of Licenses; Registers, Inhibitions and Transfers

Case 4:16-cv SMR-CFB Document 27 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

The Sunrise Association of Churches and Ministers Maine Conference United Church of Christ

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

The State of West Virginia, by and through its duly elected Attorney General, Patrick

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP PETITION FOR INITIATION. To the Worshipful Master, Wardens and Brethren of Lodge No. F &A.M.

INTRODUCTION TO GUIDELINES FOR CHURCH DISCIPLINE

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE DIOCESE OF CALIFORNIA OF THE ECUMENICAL CATHOLIC COMMUNION

STATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD. Decision No. 35

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:04CV-338-H ELECTRONICALLY FILED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 12/13/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

GUIDELINES ON ISSUES OF SEXUAL MISCONDUCT. Synod of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia

U.S. District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA (Western Division) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:04-cv BO

FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 05/20/ :33 PM INDEX NO. 2014EF5188 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/20/2016. Exhibit E

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

MANUAL OF ORGANIZATION AND POLITY

Attorneys for Defendants THE J. PAUL GETTY MUSEUM AND THE J. PAUL GETTY TRUST SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 11/16/ :25 AM

On June 26, 2014, Waleed ( "Wally ") Hamed (referred to as "Counterclaim

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION THOMAS C. AND PAMELA MCINTOSH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION COMPLAINT

Powell v. Portland School District. Chronology

THE BOOK OF CHURCH ORDER OF THE ORTHODOX PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH STUDY QUESTIONS

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MANUFACTURED HOUSING DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. THOMAS C. and PAMELA McINTOSH

Constitution First Baptist Church Camden, Arkansas. Preamble. Article I. Name. Article II. Purpose Statement (amended May 10, 2006)

Transcription:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA KIDIST MARIAM ETHIOPIAN ORTHODOX TEWAHEDO CHURCH, INC., v. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 16CV11400-3 ABBA YAKOB a/k/a ABBA GEBREMARIAM AYALEW, EYOB W/TEGEGN, FASIL BEKELE, KEBEDE GESSESSE, MEKONNEN YAYNE, MISGANAW ABEBE, NEGA WONDIMU, NEGUSSE DEMIE, WOSSENSEGED KEBEDE, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-30, Defendants, MULEGETA ZELEKE, BENIAM SHAREW, and MANDEFRO NEGUSSE, Intervenors. LEGITIMATE HOLY SYNOD OF THE ETHIOPIAN ORTHODOX TEWAHEDO CHURCH, Inc. Applicant for Intervention. INTERVENOR COMPLAINT OF THE LEGITIMATE HOLY SYNOD OF THE ETHIOPIAN ORTHODOX TEWAHEDO CHURCH, INC. The Legitimate Holy Synod of the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, Inc. ( Holy Synod ) files this Intervenor Complaint to protect its religious interests under the U.S. and Georgia Constitutions, and states as follows: 1. The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church (the Ethiopian Church ) is the largest of the Oriental Orthodox Christian churches, with an estimated membership of between 45-50 million people. It is among the oldest continually existing Christian churches in the world. 1

2. In the United States, the Holy Synod of the Ethiopian Church has incorporated in Maryland, under the corporate name The Legitimate Holy Synod of The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, Inc. 3. The Ethiopian Church has a hierarchical organization, headed by a Patriarch currently His Holiness Abune Merkorios. 4. The Ethiopian Church is governed by the Fetha Nagast or The Law of Kings an ancient compendium of Ecclesiastical and Canon Law to which all churches and church members within the Ethiopian Church are subject (the Canon Law ). 5. Abune Merkorios leads the Holy Synod, which is a council of twenty (20) Archbishops under the authority of the Patriarch. The Holy Synod is the highest ecclesiastical council of the Ethiopian Church, subject only to the Patriarch. 6. Each Archbishop has responsibility local churches within a defined geographical area. Defendant Abune Yaekob is a member of the Holy Synod, and the Archbishop over Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, and Tennessee. 7. Under the Canon Law, an individual appointed as Archbishop serves only in that role. An Archbishop cannot also be a priest, which is a different defined role. An Archbishop does not become or serve in the role as a priest when he performs religious services. Rather, he performs those services as Archbishop only. 8. Under the Canon Law, priests are subordinate to the Archbishop in all matters. 9. Disputes exists among individuals claiming to be members of the Kidist Mariam Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, Inc. (the Atlanta Church ), as set forth in the pleadings of the parties and other intervenors in this case. 2

10. The Atlanta Church has been designated by the Holy Synod as a Cathedral, and is the seat of the local Archbishop, Defendant Abune Yakob. 11. The Atlanta Church, through its Bylaws and Internal Guidelines, has submitted itself to the ecclesiastical and spiritual authority of the Ethiopian Church. 12. The Ethiopian Church s ecclesiastical and spiritual authority covers, among other things, church membership, the role of clergy, the appointment or suspension of clergy, who can perform church services (and when), and how disputes within the Atlanta Church are to be resolved. 13. The Holy Synod has, until recently, exercised its authority over matters affecting the Atlanta Church sparingly and indirectly, in the hopes that the disputants would be able to resolve their differences without its intervention. 14. The recent submission of the Report and Recommendation from the Special Master in this case, however, has necessitated that the Holy Synod intervene to protect its ecclesiastical authority, and to oppose the interference with that authority under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and under Article 1, Section 1, Paragraph IV of the 1983 Constitution of Georgia. 15. On November 22, 2017, the Holy Synod suspended, and then on December 8, 2017 excommunicated, three (3) priests: Aba Haile Giorgis Teshome, Kesis Abraha Bogale, and Kesis Alemeshet Abraha, all of whom formerly served at the Atlanta Church (the Excommunicated Priests ). The Excommunicated Priests support the Plaintiffs in this case. 16. On December 20, 2017, the Holy Synod suspended the membership in the Atlanta Church of any individual who attended services presided over by the Excommunicated Priests after their suspension on November 22, 2017, including Plaintiffs. 3

17. Because they are no longer members of the Atlanta Church, Plaintiffs have no standing to pursue their claims in this matter, and it this matter should immediately be dismissed. 18. The Holy Synod seeks a declaratory judgment pursuant to O.C.G.A. 9-4-2, holding that: (i) The Holy Synod has the authority to determine who is a member of the Atlanta Church; (ii) The Holy Synod has the authority to determine who can act as clergy at the Atlanta Church; (iii) The Holy Synod has the authority to determine when and by whom church services are held at the Atlanta Church; (iv) The Holy Synod has the authority to define the roles and titles of its clergy; (v) As a result of the Holy Synod s decisions, Plaintiffs are no longer members of the Atlanta Church; (vi) As a result of the Holy Synod s decisions, Plaintiffs can no longer hold offices for the Atlanta Church; and (vii) As a result of the Holy Synod s decisions, Plaintiffs are not entitled to participate in any General Assembly of the Atlanta Church. 19. To the extent necessary, the Holy Synod pleads, as affirmative defenses, the following: A. Any action by the Court or the Special Master in this case that infringes upon the Holy Synod s ecclesiastical authority violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution; 4

B. Any action by the parties, Court or Special Master in this case that infringes upon the Holy Synod s ecclesiastical authority violates the 1983 Georgia Constitution, Article 1, Section 1, Paragraph IV; and C. The Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate any issue that is spiritual or ecclesiastical in nature. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth herein, the Holy Synod requests as follows: (a) That it be allowed to intervene as a matter of right in this action, or alternatively by permission; (b) That the Court not take any action or enter any order that interferes with the Holy Synod s exercise of its ecclesiastical and spiritual authority; (c) That the Court immediately withdraw and rescind any currently-entered Order in this case that interferes with the Holy Synod s exercise of its ecclesiastical and spiritual authority; (c) That the Court protect the Holy Synod s religious rights and privileges under the U.S. and Georgia Constitutions, including through preliminary and permanent injunctions; (d) (e) (f) That the Special Master s Report and Recommendation not be considered; That the Plaintiffs complaint be dismissed for lack of standing; and That the Holy Synod has such further relief as the Court deems just and appropriate. [signature on following page] 5

Respectfully submitted this 21st day of December, 2017. HAWKINS PARNELL THACKSTON & YOUNG LLP /s/ Matthew A. Boyd Jack N. Sibley Georgia Bar No. 644850 jsibley@hptylaw.com Matthew A. Boyd Georgia Bar No. 027645 mboyd@hptylaw.com 303 Peachtree Street, N.E. Suite 4000 Atlanta, Georgia 30308 Telephone: (404) 614-7400 Facsimile: (404) 614-7500 Attorneys for The Legitimate Holy Synod of the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, Inc. 6

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA KIDIST MARIAM ETHIOPIAN ORTHODOX TEWAHEDO CHURCH, INC., v. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 16CV11400-3 ABBA YAKOB a/k/a ABBA GEBREMARIAM AYALEW, EYOB W/TEGEGN, FASIL BEKELE, KEBEDE GESSESSE, MEKONNEN YAYNE, MISGANAW ABEBE, NEGA WONDIMU, NEGUSSE DEMIE, WOSSENSEGED KEBEDE, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-30, Defendants, MULEGETA ZELEKE, BENIAM SHAREW, and MANDEFRO NEGUSSE, Intervenors. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that I have this day served the within and foregoing Intervenor Complaint, by mailing a copy of same to all counsel of record via United States Mail and with adequate postage attached addressed as follows: James E. Holmes, Special Master SHEWMAKER & SHEWMAKER 2845 Henderson Mill Road, N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30341-5772 jimh@twinjehlaw.org R. Edward Furr, Jr. 2316 Candler Road Decatur, Georgia 30032 edwadfurr@yahoo.com Forrest A. Norman DICKIE, MCCAMEY & CHILCOTE, P.C. 600 Superior Avenue East Fifth Third Center, Suite 2330 Cleveland, OH 44114 fnorman@dmclaw.com George A. Koenig KOENIG LAW GROUP, P.C. Peachtree 25 th, Suite 599 1718 Peachtree Street, N.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30309 george@koeniglawgroup.com 7

John J. Richard Kyle M. Baker Sean R. Smith TAYLOR ENGLISH DUMA, LLP 1600 Parkwood Circle, Suite 400 Atlanta, Georgia 30339 jrichard@taylorenglish.com kbaker@taylorenglish.com ssmith@taylorenglish.com This 21st day of December, 2017. /s/ Matthew A. Boyd Matthew A. Boyd Georgia Bar No. 027645 8