Reprimand recommended since respondent acted out of a misunderstanding of his shop steward role and was not otherwise disruptive.
|
|
- Derrick Thornton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Bd. of Education v. Murphy OATH Index No. 1432/97 (Oct. 7, 1997), modified on penalty, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Item No. CD M (June 2, 2000), appended. Summary: Union shop steward held to the position that he was not required to obtain permission to engage in union activities during work hours based on Executive Order 75. He refused direct order to report to a work site instead of engaging in the distribution of union materials. Respondent thereafter refused to attend two conferences to discuss his shop steward role because he was not informed of the attendees and subject of the meetings. ALJ found respondent insubordinate for refusing to obey orders of supervisor under obey now grieve later principle. Moreover, the Executive Order 75 contemplates that time to engage in union activities may be reasonably regulated by employer and that permission to do so is required. Reprimand recommended since respondent acted out of a misunderstanding of his shop steward role and was not otherwise disruptive. Report and Recommendation, October 7, 1997 CHARLES D. McFAUL, Administrative Law Judge This disciplinary proceeding was referred to me pursuant to section 75 of the Civil Service Law. Petitioner, the Board of Education, charged respondent, James P. Murphy, a carpenter, with disobeying a supervisor s order to report directly to a work assignment on October 18, , and refusing to attend supervisory conferences on October 30 and November 6, Respondent did not deny the facts underlying these charges, but argued that he was acting within his rights as the union shop steward. Trial was originally scheduled for May 12, 1997, but was adjourned because petitioner failed to serve notice of the hearing on respondent who was not present (Tr. 4-5). 2 The trial was conducted on June 13, 1997, at which respondent elected to represent himself. 3 Each side called three witnesses and respondent testified on his own behalf. The evidence established the charged misconduct and I recommend a penalty of a reprimand. 1 The charges alleged this incident occurred on October 21, At trial, petitioner moved to amend the charges to conform to the proof that the incident occurred on October 18, On May 15, 1997, petitioner served a motion to make substituted service of the notice of hearing on respondent. Inasmuch as service by mail is authorized by OATH s rules of practice, the motion was dismissed as unnecessary. See 48 RCNY 1-28 (May 31, 1997) (Lenz & Riecker CD-ROM 1997). The motion papers, including respondent s opposition thereto, have been marked into the record as ALJ Ex Respondent decided to appear pro se since his union did not provide free legal counsel and the union representative who was present was expected to be called as a witness by respondent (May 12, 1997 Tr. 4-10).
2 ANALYSIS This case arose due to Mr. Murphy s misunderstanding of the relationship between his role as a shop steward and his responsibilities to his employer. Specifically, Mr. Murphy objected to the requirement that he obtain permission from his supervisor to take care of union business during work hours. It was undisputed that on October 18, 1996, Barry Apple, supervisor of carpentry and Mr. Murphy s immediate supervisor, directed respondent to report to PS 125 to repair doors damaged during a weekend robbery. Mr. Murphy had just returned from an approved three-day leave without pay, during which he attended a union convention. Mr. Murphy told Mr. Apple that he had union information he wanted to give to the assistant shop steward at PS 154, which was only six blocks away from PS 125. Respondent told Mr. Apple that he would stop at PS 154 on his way to PS 125. Mr. Apple disagreed and instructed Mr. Murphy to report directly to PS 125. Mr. Apple told respondent to take care of the union business during lunch or after work (Tr. 18). According to respondent, Mr. Apple said, I m giving you an order. You go there [PS 125] directly. (Tr. 102). Respondent told Mr. Apple that he was going to stop at PS 154 anyway and that if he had to write him up, to go ahead and do so (Tr. 19, 21). Mr. Murphy went to PS 154 first and spent about five minutes there before heading to PS 125. As a result of this incident, a supervisor s conference was scheduled for October 30, Mr. Apple informed respondent about the conference orally and in writing on October 23 (Pet. Ex. 1; Tr. 21). Mr. Apple told respondent the conference was regarding his role as shop steward and the incident on October 18 (Apple: Tr ; Murphy: Tr. 104). The next day respondent faxed Mr. Apple a letter asking what the meeting was about, who would be attending it and other questions, for which respondent wanted written answers. Mr. Apple testified that his supervisor informed him that he did not have to respond to the questions (Tr. 22). Mr. Murphy did not attend this conference. A second supervisor s conference was scheduled for November 6, On October 30, 1996, Mr. Apple gave respondent a written notice from Reinhold Stalzer, supervisor of mechanics, directing respondent to attend the conference or risk formal disciplinary action (Pet. Ex. 2; Tr. 24). On the morning of November 6, Mr. Apple spoke with respondent on the telephone before the meeting and urged him to attend it (Tr. 24). Mr. Murphy refused to do so and did not attend the conference. These incidents arose from Mr. Murphy s interpretation of his responsibilities as a shop steward with the New York District Council of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America. Respondent has been a shop steward since 1991 (Tr. 66). Respondent s former supervisor, Edward Marencik, permitted him to attend to union business during work hours without docking his pay or requiring that he take time off (Murphy: Tr. 94; Marencik: Tr ). Mr. Murphy found Mr. Apple s approach difficult to accept and suspected an anti-union animus. Mr. Murphy argued that requiring him to seek and obtain permission to take time off for union activities was inconsistent with his rights as a shop steward under Executive Order 75 (Resp. Ex. A). The provision relied upon by Mr. Murphy states under union activities, as follows:
3 Employee representatives, duly designated by certified employee organizations, shall be permitted to take time off without pay for or to charge to their annual leave allowance or compensatory time credits, time spent in the following activities performed in behalf of an affected union and its members.... Executive Order No. 75 3, 1 (Mar ). Mr. Murphy asserted that his shop steward role was compromised if he must obtain prior approval to engage in union activities at work (Tr. 76). Presumably, respondent s alternative position is that if he asks permission, it must be granted. Mr. Murphy s rationale was the Executive Order s provision authorizing time to be deducted from annual leave or compensatory time. While the introductory paragraphs of the Executive Order make clear that it is often necessary for union activities to be conducted during work hours, there is nothing in the Executive Order that supports the proposition that engaging in union activities during work hours is in the sole discretion of the shop steward. Such an interpretation would be disruptive to the workplace, as the employer would be unable to manage and effectively utilize its workforce. Indeed, Executive Order 75 recognizes this and requires agency heads to, among other things, establish reasonable limits on the number of employee representatives who may be permitted and the amount of time required to participate on an ad hoc basis in the activities enumerated under Section [sic] 2 and 3 of this Order. Id. at 4 2. In addition, the Executive Order provides that, [a]ll time spent on the conduct of labor relations granted pursuant to this Order including ad hoc, full and part-time assignments, and leaves without pay, must be approved in advance by authorized officials. Id. at 4 3(3) (emphasis added). The collective bargaining relationship is based on a framework of reasonableness, cooperation and consensus. Mr. Murphy s position does not fit well within this framework. While the employer is obliged to allow for and may not impede legitimate union activities, the union is not an equal player in the operation of the agency. Executive Order 75 acknowledges as much by requiring prior agency approval for union activities at work. Mr. Murphy holds to the rather unreasonable position that his decision when to engage in union business at work cannot be second-guessed by management. The issue is whether the employer can have any say in whether and when a union representative can engage in union activities during work hours. Clearly, the answer is that the employer can determine whether time away from work is acceptable or not. Michael Power, the civil service director with respondent s union, explained to respondent in a letter dated October 22, 1996, that you cannot at any time leave your assigned work location without the permission of your Supervisor; even if it is, as you say, for Union business. Mr. Power went on to state that [t]he distribution of pamphlets or other Union materials should be accomplished at lunch-time or before and after regular working hours (Pet. Ex. 4). While this letter was issued after the October 18 incident, it nonetheless makes clear that the union acknowledged that union business may only take place during work hours with the employer s permission. Should Mr. Murphy encounter persistent refusals to allow him to pursue union activities at work, he should confer with his union regarding the filing of an unfair labor practices petition. See Administrative Code (a) (Lenz & Riecker CD-ROM 1997).
4 In this instance, Mr. Murphy refused to report to a work location at PS 125 where emergency repairs were underway. Although Mr. Apple could have gone along with respondent s proposal to stop by PS 154 on the way to PS 125, he need not have done so. There was nothing urgent about the materials respondent wanted to distribute that would in any way justify his refusal to obey his supervisor s order to report to work. Mr. Apple determined that the work assignment was more urgent and took priority over respondent s union business. Mr. Apple was clear in directing Mr. Murphy to report to PS 125. Mr. Murphy refused that direction and in doing so, was insubordinate. Similarly, Mr. Murphy s refusals to attend the two supervisory conferences were insubordinate. Mr. Murphy claimed justification for not attending because his supervisors declined to tell him the subject of the meetings and who would be present. I find no justification in the fact that respondent s questions were not addressed by his supervisors before the meetings. Mr. Murphy cited no rule or regulation requiring that the subject of or attendees at a supervisory conference be revealed beforehand. The two notices of the meetings conveyed all the information required by the Civil Service Law. See Civil Service Law 75(2) ( 2. Procedure. An employee who at the time of questioning appears to be a potential subject of disciplinary action shall have a right to representation by his or her certified or recognized employee organization under article fourteen of this chapter and shall be notified in advance, in writing, of such right. ) (McKinney CD-ROM 1997). Mr. Murphy admittedly knew what the subject of the meeting was about and the written notices informed him of his right to representation at those meetings (Pet. Exs. 1 & 2). Although he might not have known who would be present, that in itself was insufficient justification for not attending. Mr. Murphy said that he was concerned that he might be overwhelmed at the meeting if Board of Education lawyers were present. While this is understandable, respondent had the right to bring a representative with him, but elected not to do so. Instead, he twice refused directions of his supervisors and boycotted the supervisory conferences. Mr. Murphy was obligated to attend these meetings and refused to do so at his peril. The prevailing principle governing disputed orders in the workplace is that the employee is obligated to obey the order and file a grievance at a later time where there are established grievance mechanisms in place. This principle, known as obey now, grieve later, has been consistently applied to ensure an orderly workplace. Ferreri v. New York State Thruway Authority, 62 N.Y.2d 855, 477 N.Y.S.2d 616 (1984); Strokes v. City of Albany, 101 A.D.2d 944, 475 N.Y.S.2d 635 (3d Dept 1984); Allen v. New York City Housing Authority, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Item No. CD (June 6, 1984); Nocita v. Department of Sanitation, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Item No. CD (Apr. 16, 1981); Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority v. Simmons, OATH Index No. 609/97, report and recommendation at 9 (Sept. 18, 1997); Department of Probation v. James, OATH Index No. 535/90 (Feb. 6, 1990); Department of Correction v. Barber, OATH Index No. 223/84, report and recommendation at 30 (Oct. 11, 1984). Here, however, there is no formal grievance mechanism and the principle is not as applicable. In any event, having found the orders to be proper and well within management s rights, respondent s disobedience of those orders was at his peril. In concluding that Mr. Murphy acted insubordinately, I also find that he was genuinely concerned about how best to fulfill his role as shop steward. This and the absence of a formal grievance mechanism were the dominant influences for respondent s actions. According to the evidence, Mr. Murphy s union does not have a comprehensive collective agreement with the Board of Education,
5 as it lacks a formal grievance mechanism. See Resp. Ex. B; cf. Administrative Code (f) ( It is hereby declared to be the policy of the city that written collective bargaining agreements... contain provisions for grievance procedures and impartial binding arbitration.... ). The supervisory conferences were described by Mr. Grassini as a substitute for a formal grievance system. Unfortunately, Mr. Murphy rejected this opportunity to discuss and perhaps resolve some or all of the issues regarding his shop steward role. To a large extent, Mr. Murphy felt obliged to pursue the issue of his shop steward role in order to obtain a formal ruling from this disciplinary proceeding. Mr. Murphy hoped that this formal disciplinary proceeding would confirm his understanding of the prerogatives of a union shop steward. I trust that this process has provided an answer Mr. Murphy will accept: he is obligated to abide by time and leave requirements if he seeks to engage in union activities at work. It is not unreasonable to require Mr. Murphy to obtain permission to engage in union activities during working hours. If his employer does not release him from work to attend to union business, then he is obligated to comply with his employer s directions. Mr. Murphy s conduct, while insubordinate, was not disorderly, disruptive or abusive. His actions were based on a misguided interpretation of his union responsibilities under a new supervisor, Mr. Apple, who adopted a less accommodating policy regarding respondent s union functions than had Mr. Marencik. These considerations should temper the disciplinary penalty to be imposed. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. On October 18, 1996, respondent refused an order to report directly to a work assignment at PS 125. Respondent went first to PS 154 to distribute union literature and then reported to PS 125. Respondent was not permitted to do so without the permission of his supervisor. 2. On October 30 and November 6, 1996, respondent refused directions to attend supervisory conferences. Respondent was not entitled to be informed of the subject matter or attendees at the conferences beforehand. Therefore, petitioner established the charged misconduct by a preponderance of the evidence. RECOMMENDATION Mr. Murphy has been a carpenter with the Board of Education for more than ten years and has been a shop steward for six years. He has no prior disciplinary record and has been commended in nine letters commenting favorably on his work ethic and carpentry skills during his tenure at the Board of Education. Such complimentary letters are not often found in the personnel files of public employees. In weighing the factors bearing upon a penalty in this case, it is to be noted that Mr. Murphy did not act with personal disrespect or antagonism toward his supervisors. He was neither loud nor abusive in making his point. Rather, he advocated a standard that he believed defined the parameters of his role as a shop steward. Despite the contrary understanding of his supervisors, Mr. Murphy stood by
6 his position because he sincerely believed he was correct in his views. As Mr. Murphy revealed himself to be sincere, dedicated and mature, I have confidence that this proceeding will be sufficiently instructive to him so that in fulfilling his union functions he will hereafter abide by this decision s conclusions. Accordingly, I recommend a reprimand as the penalty in this case. I believe it is unnecessary to impose a harsher penalty on respondent since the misconduct was rooted in a misunderstanding of labor relations practices. Moreover, respondent s pre-hearing suspension for thirty days serves as a sufficiently severe administrative sanction such that no further penalty is appropriate. P R E S E N T : CHARLES D. McFAUL, Administrative Law Judge T O : WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, JR., President, Board of Education A P P E A R A N C E S : SUSAN L. MANDEL, Attorney for Petitioner JAMES P. MURPHY, Respondent Pro Se Civil Service Commission's Decision, June 2, 2000 VINCENT A. MARCHISELLI, Commissioner/Chairman STATEMENT On Thursday, February 10, 2000, the City Civil Service Commissioner heard oral argument in the appeal of JAMES MURPHY, Carpenter, New York City Board of Education, from a determination by the New York City Board of Education, finding him guilty of charges of misconduct and imposing a penalty of SUSPENSION following an administrative hearing conducted pursuant to Civil Service Law Section 75. COMMISSIONER'S FINDINGS: JAMES MURPHY appeal from a determination of the New York City Board of Education (BOE) finding him guilty of misconduct and imposing a penalty of 30-day suspension and a letter of reprimand following disciplinary proceedings conducted pursuant to Civil Service Law Section 75. Appellant, a Carpenter, was found guilty of refusing an order to work and, instead, going to a different location to distribute Union-related literature without permission from his supervisor. He was also found guilty of refusing to attend supervisor conferences on two occasions. On appeal, appellant in essence concedes to the infractions but contends that the penalty is excessive and unwarranted. He claims that the first of the two charges, refusing to report to work, merely
7 involved a ten-minute deviation from his normal work routine in order to drop-off Union-related literature to a fellow Union member. In relation to the second charge of failing to attend two meetings, he claims that his decision to not attend resulted from his belief that as a Union representative he was entitled to be informed beforehand what the meetings related to. Given that he was not informed of the reason for the meetings he felt that it would not be appropriate for him to attend. He agrees that he was wrong in his assumptions and that he has now been informed of the correct procedures. He argues that given his clean disciplinary record and the non-egregious nature of his infractions, the 30-day suspension is excessive. The BOE takes the position that appellant's infractions are serious given that they amount to insubordination. It also argues that given appellant's long tenure with the BOE, he should be held to an appropriate standard of conduct. The Commission has carefully reviewed the record adduced below and considered the arguments on appeal. Pursuant to this review we agree with the findings of guilt but find the penalty to be excessive. Appellant represented himself at the hearing before this Commission. He was candid and forthright in his admission of guilt. His explanation concerning his misunderstanding of his Union position, to which he had recently been appointed during the events in question, were reasonable and credible. Considering the nature of the offense, appellant's 10-year work history, and the notion of progressive discipline, the Commission finds the penalty to be excessive. Therefore, the Commission hereby modifies the determination of BOE to a reprimand. Appellant is to be reimbursed for the 30 days of suspension withing sixty days of the date of this decision. VINCENT A. MARCHISELLI, Commissioner/Chairman, Civil Service Commission BERNARD H. JACKSON, Commissioner, Civil Service Commission STANLEY K. SCHLEIN, Commissioner, Civil Service Commission COMMISSIONER DAVID S. LANDE DISSENTS After a thorough review of the record and argument on appeal, I would AFFIRM the determination below. DAVID S. LANDE, Commissioner, Civil Service Commission
Dep t of Environmental Protection v. Moriates OATH Index No. 1633/14 (July 8, 2014)
Dep t of Environmental Protection v. Moriates OATH Index No. 1633/14 (July 8, 2014) Evidence failed to show that respondent was absent without leave or insubordinate when she mistakenly appeared at 10:00
More informationCivilian Complaint Review Board v. Smith OATH Index No. 662/04 (May 20, 2004)
Civilian Complaint Review Board v. Smith OATH Index No. 662/04 (May 20, 2004) Clerical associate guilty of insubordinate conduct and giving false and misleading information. ALJ recommended five-day suspension.
More informationNEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS
Dep t of Environmental Protection v. Berlyavsky OATH Index No. 181/14 (Nov. 26, 2013), rejected in part, Comm r Dec. (Dec. 26, 2013)*, appended, modified, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Case No. 2014-0060 (Sept.
More informationBEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY. and MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFF S ASSOCIATION
BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY and MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFF S ASSOCIATION Case 625 No. 67051 (Michalski Grievance) Appearances: Timothy R.
More informationENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO JULY TERM, 2011
Note: Decisions of a three-justice panel are not to be considered as precedent before any tribunal. ENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 2010-473 JULY TERM, 2011 In re Grievance of Lawrence Rosenberger
More informationNEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS. In the Matter of DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION Petitioner - against - ANGEL AQUINO Respondent
Dep t of Correction v. Aquino OATH Index No. 1425/14 (Apr. 25, 2014), modified on penalty, Comm r Dec. (Mar. 8, 2016), appended, aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Case No. 2016-0253 (Aug. 4, 2016), appended
More informationIN THE MATTER OF : NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE CERTIFICATES OF : STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS JOSEPH MAZZARELLA : ORDER OF REVOCATION
IN THE MATTER OF : NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE CERTIFICATES OF : STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS JOSEPH MAZZARELLA : ORDER OF REVOCATION : DOCKET NO: 0405-276 At its meeting of June 9, 2005, the State
More informationNEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS. In the Matter of DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION Petitioner - against - JASON NORRIS Respondent
Dep t of Sanitation v. Norris OATH Index No. 2352/08 (Aug. 11, 2008), aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Item No. CD-08-63- SA (Dec. 12, 2008), aff d sub nom. Norris v. Burges, Index No. 401420/09 (Sup. Ct.
More informationAnthony Mangan an Order to Show Cause. The Order was predicated on charges of
IN THE MATTER OF : NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE CERTIFICATES OF : STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS ANTHONY MANGAN : ORDER OF SUSPENSION : DOCKET NO: 0506-142 At its meeting of April 11, 2002, the State
More informationSUPREME COURT SECOND DIVISION
SUPREME COURT SECOND DIVISION DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER AND COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, Petitioner, -versus- G.R. No. 102084 August 12, 1998 HON. BIENVENIDO E. LAGUESMA, Undersecretary of Labor and
More informationARBITRATION DECISION AND AWARD. In the Matter of the Arbitration ) GRIEVANT : Class Action Class Action -between ) Donald Hynes
ARBITRATION DECISION AND AWARD A-c In the Matter of the Arbitration ) GRIEVANT : Class Action Class Action -between ) Donald Hynes POST OFFICE : UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ) Pomona, CA and ) Case Nos
More informationIN THE MATTER OF a Proceeding under the Certified General Accountants of Ontario Act, 1983 and By-Law Four
IN THE MATTER OF a Proceeding under the Certified General Accountants of Ontario Act, 1983 and By-Law Four IN THE MATTER OF Alan Hogan, a member of the Certified General Accountants of Ontario BETWEEN:
More informationJUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH DECISION 1315
JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH DECISION 1315 IN RE: Appeal of the Opinions and Decision of the Western Jurisdiction Committee on Appeals in the Matter of Filimone Havili Mone LDIGEST The
More informationDecember 12, Re: Adrian Peterson Appeal
Jeffery L. Kessler Winston & Strawn, LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166 Akin Gump 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 200036-1564 Re: Adrian Peterson Appeal Gentlemen: Adrian Peterson, a
More informationREPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Dep't of Correction v. Parrish OATH Index No. 1386/03 (Aug. 6, 2003), aff'd, Comm'r Dec. (Sept. 23 2003), aff'd, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm'n Item No. CD04-37-SA (July 8, 2004). Officer convicted of third degree
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
REL: 04/17/2009 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationINTERNATIONAL CHURCHES OF CHRIST A California Nonprofit Religious Corporation An Affiliation of Churches. Charter Affiliation Agreement
INTERNATIONAL CHURCHES OF CHRIST A California Nonprofit Religious Corporation An Affiliation of Churches Charter Affiliation Agreement I PARTIES This Charter Affiliation Agreement dated June 1, 2003 (the
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 18, 2013 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 18, 2013 Session KENNER D. ENSEY v. KARLA DAVIS, COMMISSIONER OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT ET AL. Appeal from
More informationit had received from the Willingboro School District (Willingboro) regarding Craig Bell. Willingboro
IN THE MATTER OF : NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE CREDENTIAL OF : STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS CRAIG BELL : ORDER OF REVOCATION : DOCKET NO: 1112-137 At its meeting of November 1, 2011, the State Board
More informationand proceedings previously filed and had herein, and good and sufficient cause appearing,
FAMILY COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------X In The Matter of SMITH CHILDREN Children Under EighteenYears of
More informationSUPPORT STAFF APPLICATION (For all positions other than teaching) Position applied for: Date:
43065 Joy Road (734) 459.3505 SUPPORT STAFF APPLICATION (For all positions other than teaching) Position applied for: Date: PLYMOUTH CHRISTIAN ACADEMY considers all applicants for employment without regard
More informationName: First Middle Last. Other names used (alias, maiden, nickname): Current Address: Street/P.O. Box City State Zip Code
Grace Evangelical Presbyterian Church Children s Ministry Application Please answer each question. The information on this application will not be disclosed to unauthorized persons. Name: First Middle
More informationIntroduction. Foursquare covenants to support the ministry of its local churches, including Local Church, by:
Introduction Covenant Agreement ( Agreement ) between, a corporation ( Local Church ) and International Church of the Foursquare Gospel, a California nonprofit religious corporation ( Foursquare ) The
More informationEVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINE HEARING COMMITTEE
EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA In the Matter of Disciplinary * Proceedings Against the Rev. * Bradley E. Schmeling * DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINE HEARING COMMITTEE On August 8, 2006, Bishop Ronald
More informationCOOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD. Docket # 1850 DECISION
COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD Sheriff of Cook County vs. Jacquelyn G. Anderson Cook County Deputy Sheriff Docket # 1850 DECISION THIS MATTER COMING ON to be heard pursuant to notice, the Cook County
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Cute Little Cake Shop v. State of Ohio Unemp., 2015-Ohio-527.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101691 CUTE LITTLE CAKE SHOP
More informationGrievance and Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Congregations
Grievance and Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Congregations 1.0 Introduction The Congregation is committed to providing a safe environment where the dignity of every individual is respected and therefore
More informationEmployment Agreement
Employment Agreement Ordained Minister THIS AGREEMENT MADE BETWEEN: (Name of the Congregation) (herein called Congregation ) OF THE FIRST PART, -and- (Name of the Ordained Minister) (herein called Ordained
More information/10/2007, In the matter of Theodore Smith Associated Reporters Int'l., Inc. Page 1419
1 2 THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 3 4 In the Matter of 5 NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION v. 6 THEODORE SMITH 7 Section 3020-a Education Law Proceeding (File
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC12-2495 INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE, RE: JUDITH W. HAWKINS NO. 11-550 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationRespondent. PETITIONERS Vickers, UCE, Ready
SUPREME COURT DAVID VICKERS as PRESIDENT OF UPSTATE CITIZENS FOR EQUALITY, INC.; DOUG READY Petitioners, COUNTY OF ONEIDA STATE OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PETITION Pursuant to Article 78 of NY CPLR -vs- Index
More informationBEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SOUTH MILWAUKEE. and COUNCIL #10
BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SOUTH MILWAUKEE and COUNCIL #10 Case 46 No. 59774 (Grievance Regarding One-day Suspension of R_ C_) Appearances:
More informationASSEMBLIES OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST
ASSEMBLIES OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST JUDICIAL PROCEDURE Printed: February 2006 ASSEMBLIES OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST JUDICIAL PROCEDURE Printed: February 2006 JUDICIAL PROCEDURE INTRODUCTION The purpose of
More informationHELD AT PORT ELIZABETH CASE NO. P123/98
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT PORT ELIZABETH CASE NO. P123/98 In the matter between : SUPERSTAR HERBS Applicant and DIRECTOR, CCMA & OTHERS Respondent JUDGEMENT MLAMBO J : [1] There are two
More informationAN ECCLESIASTICAL POLICY AND A PROCESS FOR REVIEW OF MINISTERIAL STANDING of the AMERICAN BAPTIST CHURCHES OF NEBRASKA PREAMBLE:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 AN ECCLESIASTICAL POLICY AND A PROCESS FOR REVIEW OF MINISTERIAL STANDING of
More informationI N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Donald J. Frew Fort Wayne, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Attorney General of Indiana Caryn N. Szyper Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana I N T H E
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG Not reportable Case no: JR 2676/13 In the matter between: THOHOYANDOU SPAR Applicant and COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION, MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION (CCMA) DANIEL
More informationBOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
-. RI^ NIAL In Re: Complaint against BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 13-0569 Steven James McBeth Attorney Reg. No. 0063426 Respondent Cincinnati Bar Association
More informationA Response from the ACELC to CCM Opinion dated September 3-4, 2011
A Response from the ACELC to CCM Opinion 11-2589 dated September 3-4, 2011 In a letter dated April 4, 2011, a pastor of the LCMS was prompted by the July 15, 2010, "Letter of Fraternal Admonition" issued
More informationGERALD COHEN ATTORNEY I ARBITRATOR 745 CRAIG RD. SUITE 105 CREVE COEUR (ST. LOUIS) MISSOURI Aprilj,$' Bill
PHONE: (314 432-2662 FAX: (314 432-6336 GERALD COHEN ATTORNEY I ARBITRATOR 745 CRAIG RD. SUITE 105 CREVE COEUR (ST. LOUIS MISSOURI 63141 Aprilj,$' 2014 Douglas S. Goldring Assistant General Counsel Federal
More informationCOACHING EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION
Hillcrest Christian School dba HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 17531 Rinaldi Street Granada Hills, CA 91344 818-368-7071 COACHING EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Your interest in Heritage Christian School is appreciated.
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,387 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. DAVID SMITH, Appellant, REX PRYOR, Warden, Appellee.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 117,387 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS DAVID SMITH, Appellant, v. REX PRYOR, Warden, Appellee. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Leavenworth District Court;
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION. Liquor License Appeal of Citation Notice to Bar- 40 Pa.Code 5.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION JENNY S TAVERN, INC., Appellant v. No. 09-1453 PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT, Appellee Donald G.
More informationMissionary Discipline Policy
Missionary Discipline Policy Assemblies of God World Missions Board April 7-8, 2004 Page 2 MISSIONARY DISCIPLINE Our greatest resources are our missionaries who have effective Pentecostal ministry and
More informationThe Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report
The Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, and in the matter of a hearing regarding the conduct of Mary Jo Rothecker, a member of the Law Society of
More informationChapter 33 Fr Quinton* 100
Chapter 33 Fr Quinton* 100 Introduction 33.1 Fr Quinton is a member of a religious order. He was born in 1935 and ordained in 1960. He worked abroad for a number of years and then returned to Ireland.
More informationAN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 93 ( CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS ) OF THE MANALAPAN TOWNSHIP CODE Ordinance No.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 93 ( CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS ) OF THE MANALAPAN TOWNSHIP CODE Ordinance No. 2008-02 Adopted February 27, 2008 WHEREAS, the Township of Manalapan
More informationMaranatha Christian Schools
Maranatha Christian Schools Transformed lives Transforming the World Employment Application Name: Last Name First Name Middle Present Address: No. & Street City State Zip Code Permanent Address (if different
More informationCONSTITUTION CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH WASHINGTON, D.C. of the
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 CONSTITUTION of the CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH WASHINGTON, D.C. Adopted by the membership on May 1, 1 Revised by the membership on May 1, 00, September 1, 00, November 1, 00,
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 16-111 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD. AND JACK C. PHILLIPS, v. Petitioners, COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS
More informationINTRODUCTION TO GUIDELINES FOR CHURCH DISCIPLINE
INTRODUCTION TO GUIDELINES FOR CHURCH DISCIPLINE We believe that loving church discipline is one of the greatest blessings and privileges of belonging to a Christian church. The following Guidelines were
More informationUNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST BOARD STANDING RULES Reviewed and Revised October 9, 2015
UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST BOARD STANDING RULES Reviewed and Revised October 9, 2015 PREAMBLE The United Church of Christ Board is ordered first of all by the Constitution and Bylaws of the United Church
More informationSent via U.S. Mail and Facsimile ( )
April 22, 2011 President Wim Wiewel Portland State University 341 Cramer Hall 1721 SW Broadway Portland, Oregon 97201 Sent via U.S. Mail and Facsimile (503-725-4499) Dear President Wiewel: The Foundation
More informationMissouri Court of Appeals
Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District Division Two BRIAR ROAD, L.L.C., ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) No. SD29930 ) vs. ) ) LEZAH STENGER HOMES, INC., ) ) Defendant-Appellant. ) AFFIRMED APPEAL FROM
More informationCARING FOR CHURCH LEADERS
CARING FOR CHURCH LEADERS P A S T O R A L W E L L - B E I N G A CODE OF BEST PRACTICE Introduction HEBREWS 13:17 Have confidence in your leaders and submit to their authority, Churches that thrive spiritually
More informationPITTSBURGH. Issued: March 1993 Revised: October 2002 Updated: August 2003 Updated: August 2006 Updated: March 2008 Updated: April 2014
Issued: March 1993 Revised: October 2002 Updated: August 2003 Updated: August 2006 Updated: March 2008 Updated: April 2014 CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH Clergy Sexual Misconduct The teaching of the Church,
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, CAPE TOWN JUDGMENT
Not reportable Of interest to other judges THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, CAPE TOWN JUDGMENT Case no: C 241/16 In the matter between: CITY OF CAPE TOWN Applicant and IMATU OBO D BRONKHORST SALGBC A
More informationGUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR THE USE OF
,_....,.,._,..,,~,-"'""'',_...,,._.,.,_,~"""'""""""' ~-""""""'"""""--- ------.-_...,..,~,,...,..1~~-...,.,..,~'-_.~~-v- ~."""""'~-- ~ -~, 1-t --...,...--- -"-...-""""'""""'-'--'"' GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR
More informationApplication Form for Ecclesiastical Endorsement for Professional Organizations
Ministerial Excellence, Support and Authorization / Local Church Ministries United Church of Christ, 700 Prospect Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44115-1100 Application Form for Ecclesiastical Endorsement for
More informationARBITRATION AWARD. Panellist: Gail McEwan Case Reference No.: WECT Date of award: 31 January In the arbitration between: and
ARBITRATION AWARD Panellist: Gail McEwan Case Reference No.: WECT10067-14 Date of award: 31 January 2015 In the arbitration between: DAKALO MATEMBEIE Union/Employee party and TOTAL SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LIMITED
More informationIN COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED NOTICE. August 19, No STAN SMITH, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED August 19, 1997 A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS.
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE KOREAN METHODIST CHURCH OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme
More information90 South Cascade Avenue, Suite 1500, Colorado Springs, Colorado Telephone: Fax:
90 South Cascade Avenue, Suite 1500, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903-1639 Telephone: 719.475.2440 Fax: 719.635.4576 www.shermanhoward.com MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Ministry and Church Organization Clients
More informationSTATEMENT OF BISHOP EMERITUS DONALD TRAUTMAN As he has done his entire career, Bishop Trautman sends his prayerful support to all victims of clergy
STATEMENT OF BISHOP EMERITUS DONALD TRAUTMAN As he has done his entire career, Bishop Trautman sends his prayerful support to all victims of clergy sexual abuse. Bishop Trautman shares the Grand Jury s
More informationAdditions are underlined. Deletions are struck through in the text.
Amendments to the Constitution of Bethlehem Evangelical Lutheran Church of Encinitas, California Submitted for approval at the Congregation Meeting of January 22, 2017 Additions are underlined. Deletions
More informationConstitution Updated November 9, 2008
Constitution Updated November 9, 2008 Preamble Since, as we believe, it pleased Almighty God, by His Holy Spirit, to unite certain of His servants here under the name Treasuring Christ Church of Raleigh,
More informationTHE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF SALT LAKE CITY. Petitioner Martha Ellis ( Ellis ) appealed her May 3, 2016, demotion from Battalion Chief
THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF SALT LAKE CITY IN RE: MARTHA ELLIS FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, DECISION AND ORDER OF THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Petitioner Martha Ellis ( Ellis ) appealed her
More informationAMENDMENTS TO THE MODEL CONSTITUTION FOR CONGREGATIONS
AMENDMENTS TO THE MODEL CONSTITUTION FOR CONGREGATIONS AS APPROVED BY THE 2016 CHURCHWIDE ASSEMBLY Prepared by the Office of the Secretary Evangelical Lutheran Church in America October 3, 2016 Additions
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ROBERT MARTIN HANNEWALD, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED March 1, 2011 v No. 295589 Jackson Circuit Court SCOTT A. SCHWERTFEGER, RONALD LC No. 09-002654-CZ HOFFMAN,
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD. Decision No. 35
35 PRB [17-May-2002] PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD In re: Thomas A. Bailey, Esq. - Respondent PRB Docket No. 2002-118 Decision No. 35 Upon receipt of the Affidavit of Resignation submitted to the Board
More informationStatements not discoverable or admissible in disciplinary cases. Diocesan Canons apply. Examinations and evaluations. Evidence of training.
CANON III.10.1 of the Bishop as a Mission until it has complied with the judgment. (f) For cause, the Bishop may extend the time periods specified in this Canon, provided that all be done to expedite these
More informationNOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 17a0542n.06. No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 17a0542n.06 No. 17-3327 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT STEVE FLETCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. RENAL CARE, Defendant-Appellee. ON APPEAL
More informationCONSTITUTION OF THE NORTHWEST WISCONSIN ASSOCIATION UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 CONSTITUTION OF THE NORTHWEST WISCONSIN ASSOCIATION UNITED CHURCH
More information2017 Constitutional Updates. Based upon ELCA Model Constitution adopted 2016 at 14th Church Wide Assembly
2017 Constitutional Updates Based upon ELCA Model Constitution adopted 2016 at 14th Church Wide Assembly The Model Constitution for Congregations was adopted by the Constituting Convention of the Evangelical
More informationARBITRATION DECISION NO.:
ARBITRATION DECISION NO.: 298 UNION: OCSEA, Local 11, AFSCME, AFL-CIO EMPLOYER: Department of Transportation DATE OF ARBITRATION: September 20, 1990 DATE OF DECISION: October 18, 1990 GRIEVANT: Dominic
More informationDIOCESE OF WILLOCHRA. Churchwarden / Secretary. of congregation. do hereby certify that the number of persons from this congregation
SCHEDULES TO THE REGULATIONS PAGE 1 SCHEDULE "A" RETURN OF COMMUNICANTS [Regulation One. Clause 2(1)] I,, Churchwarden / Secretary of congregation at do hereby certify that the number of persons from this
More informationCONSTITUTION AND RULES OF PROCEDURE OF CHRIST CHURCH HILLCREST. (Church of England in South Africa)
CONSTITUTION AND RULES OF PROCEDURE OF CHRIST CHURCH HILLCREST (Church of England in South Africa) 1 To the glory of God. It is hereby declared that the congregation of Christ Church, Hillcrest, is a Constituent
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Alca Condominium Association, Inc., Petitioner
More informationApplication for Member in Discernment
Application for Member in Discernment Covenant of Discernment and Formation Committee on Ministry Fox Valley Association Illinois Conference U.C.C. 1 The Call to Authorized Ministry One of the distinguishing
More informationSUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA RECORD No. 110754 TRAVIS BURNS, JAMES NEWSOME and CHRISTINE NEWSOME, v. Appellants/Cross-Appellees, GREGORY JOSEPH GAGNON, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. =========================================================
More informationMEMORIAL NO Sin: Original, Willful, and Involuntary
MEMORIAL NO. 54 CONSTITUTION: DOCTRINE OF SIN Whereas, The Articles of Religion in The Discipline proclaim the wonderful benefits of the atonement that bring hope, forgiveness, healing, and holiness for
More informationKevin T. Snider. Page 1 of 12
CAPITAL OFFICE: P.O. Box 276600, Sacramento, CA 95827 916.857.6900 FAX 916.857.6902 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OFFICE P.O. Box 11630, Santa Ana, CA 92711 714.796.7151 FAX 714.796.7182 SF BAY AREA OFFICE: 212
More informationAS APPROVED BY THE 2016 CHURCHWIDE ASSEMBLY Official Notice of Required Provisions
AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION FOR SYNODS AS APPROVED BY THE 2016 CHURCHWIDE ASSEMBLY Official Notice of Required Provisions Prepared by the Office of the Secretary Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
More informationAppealed from the 23rd Judicial District Court in and for the Parish of Assumption State of Louisiana Docket Number Jeffrey Michael Heggelund
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2007 CA 2535 PATRICIA BROOKS AND LEO BROOKS VERSUS FATHER OLIVER OBELE AND CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BATON ROUGE Judgment
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN BEFORE THE WISCONSIN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION. Complainant, Respondents.
STATE OF WISCONSIN BEFORE THE WISCONSIN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION PAUL F.X. SCHWARTZ, vs. Complainant, REV. DANE RADECKI; PREMONTRE HIGH SCHOOL, INC.; NOTRE DAME de la BAIE ACADEMY, INC. and the
More informationFACULTY APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT Active for 180 Days
1971 University Blvd., Lynchburg, VA 24502-2269 Telephone: (434) 592-3232 FACULTY APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT Active for 180 Days Please answer all questions Date: 1. PERSONAL Position Applied for: Rank
More informationBylaws Bethlehem United Church of Christ of Ann Arbor, Michigan
Amended 11/11/2018 Bylaws of Bethlehem United Church of Christ of Ann Arbor, Michigan Bethlehem United Church of Christ Bylaws TABLE OF CONTENTS Article I Name 1 Article II Purpose 1 Article III Affiliation
More informationd. terminate the call of a minister of Word and Service in conformity with the constitution of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America;
Yellow is new added to the constitution, all required from ELCA model constitution Red is removed from the constitution, all required from ELCA model constitution Blue is new added to the constitution,
More informationBEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE ALASKA POLICE STANDARDS COUNCIL DECISION
BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE ALASKA POLICE STANDARDS COUNCIL In the Matter of: ) ) THOMAS KAWIKA LEE ) OAH No. 16-0555-POC ) APSC No. 2015-13 I. Introduction
More informationSTATE OF OHIO DONTA SMITH
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2008-Ohio-6954.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 90996 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. DONTA SMITH DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationPART 1 THE CONSTITUTION OF THE ANGLICAN CHURCH OF AUSTRALIA 1 PART I
PART 1 THE CONSTITUTION OF THE ANGLICAN CHURCH OF AUSTRALIA 1 PART I CHAPTER I. - FUNDAMENTAL DECLARATIONS 1. The Anglican Church of Australia, 2 being a part of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church
More informationUNIVERSITY TRIBUNAL THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO. IN THE MATTER OF charges of academic dishonesty filed October 12, 2016
Case No.: 892 UNIVERSITY TRIBUNAL THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO IN THE MATTER OF charges of academic dishonesty filed October 12, 2016 AND IN THE MATTER OF the University of Toronto Code of Behaviour on Academic
More informationCONSTITUTION & BYLAWS OF EAST TENNESSEE BAPTIST ASSOCIATION A nonprofit corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Tennessee.
CONSTITUTION & BYLAWS OF EAST TENNESSEE BAPTIST ASSOCIATION A nonprofit corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Tennessee. ARTICLE 1. NAME 1.1. Name. This body shall be called
More informationMarc James Asay v. Michael W. Moore
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationPowell v. Portland School District. Chronology
Powell v. Portland School District Chronology October 15, 1996 During school hours, a Boy Scout troop leader is allowed to speak to Harvey Scott Elementary school students, encouraging them to join the
More informationWEST POTOMAC HIGH SCHOOL HONOR CODE
WEST POTOMAC HIGH SCHOOL HONOR CODE Statement of Wolverine Pride I am entrusted with the responsibility of upholding and contributing to an atmosphere of mutual respect, honesty, and fairness. My personal
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D05-619
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2005 ANN SMITH, A/K/A ANNIE MAY SMITH, WARD, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D05-619 NATHAN D. SMITH, II, PETITIONER, ET AL., Appellee.
More informationSexual Ethics Policy For Clergy 1 of the Oregon Idaho Annual Conference of The United Methodist Church.
Sexual Ethics Policy For Clergy 1 of the Oregon Idaho Annual Conference of The United Methodist Church. Statement of Policy: Clergy and employees of the Oregon-Idaho Annual Conference of The United Methodist
More informationAPPEARANCES. Law Office of James C. White, P.C Emperor Blvd., Suite 400 Durham, NC 27703
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF DURHAM IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 14DHR04338 Mount Zion Daycare And Kimberly Brandon Petitioner v. NC Department of Health and Human Services Respondent
More informationLAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT. IN THE MATTER OF the Legal Profession Act (the LPA ); and
File No. HE20070047 LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT IN THE MATTER OF the Legal Profession Act (the LPA ); and IN THE MATTER OF a Hearing regarding the conduct of Calum J. Bruce, a Member
More information