1st Quarter Wrap Up NewsTrends&Stories Part I With Dr. Joseph Farrell

Transcription

1 BUILDING WEALTH IN CHANGING TIMES The Solari Report April 5, st Quarter Wrap Up NewsTrends&Stories Part I With Dr. Joseph Farrell

2 THE SOLARI REPORT CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS 1 st Quarter Wrap Up News Trends & Stories Part I with Dr. Joseph Farrell April 5, 2018 C. Austin Fitts: Ladies and gentlemen, this is Catherine Austin Fitts and this is Part I of News Trends & Stories of the 1 st Quarter 2018 Wrap Up. I am with Dr. Joseph Farrell, and so happy to be with him. Actually, the Solari team has been working very hard for the past month to pull together our assessment of what has happened in the 1 st Quarter, and there is a great deal. Joseph and I have been going back and forth by , but given how many unbelievably amazing things that have happened, we are going to organize this News Trends & Stories into our picks for the Top Ten Stories. What I m going to do is publish them also as chapters so that you can listen to the chapters individually. We have plenty to talk about, and we re going to go as long as we feel is necessary to cover the topic. Let me start with what I think is by far and away the most important story, not only to what has been happening in the last quarter, but it s the most important for you to think about in terms of your personal life where you live, how you live, and how prepared you are to handle the future successfully and navigate the times before us. 2

3 We talked about how to describe it, and decided that we would call Story #1: Marketing the Rape of Russia to North America. We don t mean the Russian canard of trying to start a war with Russia; we ll get to that later. What we mean is that in the 1990 s the US intelligence agencies and banks and law firms went into Russia, and they basically raped the place. We ve had Anne Williamson on The Solari Report, and she has described it in a series of Solari Reports that we will make sure are linked to this News Trends & Stories Part I. We have talked on several occasions about the danger of the Rape of Russia being tried in North America, and now my concerns are at red alert. Before we dive into story #1, Joseph, welcome to The Solari Report. Dr. Joseph Farrell: Thanks for having me back. Fitts: Do you have your cigarettes rolled? Farrell: I have my cigarettes rolled and ready to go Fitts: Maybe you could say a few words about the Rape of Russia and what happened. Farrell: After the collapse of the Soviet Union, I think most people are familiar with the basic story. The state industries under the communist state began to be sold off and privatized. The problem was that the way the oligarchs set it up, largely with American backing, it was backed by Harvard University. 3

4 Fitts: Harvard was set up as the financial advisor, and Harvard led the design? Farrell: Right. Harvard led the design, and what happened was they were picking up all of these state industries for pennies on the dollar much below what they were actually worth. So, it enriched a certain segment of the old communist nomenklatura, and at the same time, it gave an undue American influence over Russian policy and the Russian state. Of course, Putin came along. He was actually mentored by Yeltsin who oversaw the whole process of the rape. Putin put a stop to it, and that has really been the problem ever since. Putin is looking out for Russia first for Russian national interests. In the process, of course, he cracked down on the oligarchs and imprisoned some of them. Fitts: Right, and part of the problem was who controlled the oil. Farrell: Exactly. Gazprom is the big Russian oil company. Fitts: Was it Russian interests, or was it the Anglo-American Alliance? Farrell: At the time that he came into power, I think that it was probably about 50/50. I ve never looked at the exact distribution of the ownership of that, but there was a heavy influence in there. You saw that influence also in the development of some of the Transcaucasia oil fields and pipelines. He put a stop to this, and this is really what is behind all of this anti-russian hysteria. The bankers weren t able to go in there and just rape the country. 4

5 Fitts: I ll tell you a very interesting story. What you were describing and what Harvard set up was an auction process where only a few people had the knowledge and were aware of what was really happening and had the cash and were set up to go. So, you didn t have real proper marketing. So, people picked things up way below market prices, and it was a steal. It was the art of the steal. The group that did this in Russia in the 1990 s did the Iran-Contra fraud in the 1980 s. The financial fraud in the 1980 s really was the first explosive, out of control fraud. My job as Assistant Secretary of HUD was on the RTC Board. A colleague of mine from Salomon Brothers went in to run the RTC, and called me and was hysterical. They were preparing to start the auctions of the interests. He said that Nick Brady, who had been the Chairman of Dillon Read when I was a partner there, and Alan Greenspan, did not want to provide financing to the bidders. He said that it was going to cut the prices in half because the private market won t offer financing. He said, If the government offers it, they will offer and compete. But if the government won t do it, they won t. It will go off on $0.50 on the dollar. Can you come over and help me? We have a board meeting in the cash room. Can you come over and help? 5

6 I came over prepared to help this man, and I was listening to the discussion. It was Greenspan, Nick, and I was there on behalf of the Secretary of HUD. What I realized was, Oh my God They wanted to go off at half because their friends were going to buy. They wanted to go cheaper. Farrell: It s insider trading. Fitts: What was very interesting was, if you fast-tracked back a month, I had a party at my house for my confirmation, and it happened impromptu because we never knew when I was going to be confirmed. It turned out to be the very day that they passed the RTC legislation. So, I called Richard Bree, who was moving over from the White House to be Chairman of the SEC, to invite him. He said, Oh, Bob has a group of people working. Bob Glauber was the Under Secretary of the Treasury. He said, Bob Glauber has a group of people working on the legislation. Why don t you tell Bob to come over because they just finished? So, we ended up celebrating Richard s appointment to the SEC and Gluaber finishing the whatever. So, I called Bob and said, I m having this big dinner party. Do you want to bring your friends and come over? He said, Oh, yeah. That will be fabulous. There is one guy I want you to take really good care of. 6

7 I said, I ll put you both at my table. I had a three-story brownstone, and had these ten-person tables spread throughout the house. I was out on the patio overlooking the park, and Glauber was there. This man sat next to me, and I said, It s nice to meet you. He was a German and I said to him, What have you been doing? He said, I ve been here working on the legislation with Bob. I said, Oh really? What do you do? He said, Oh, I work for Max Warburg in Germany. I was pinching myself. I realized, Here we go again The Warburgs are over here signing our legislation. But when you think about it, you were talking about a major global move, and you needed the G7 to be in accord. So that kind of coordination was coordinating with Deutsche Bank and the complete G7 and the ECB establishment. The ECB hadn t been created yet, but fast-forward to the cash room a month or two later, and Greenspan and Nick are trying to argue for no financing, and things go off at half on the dollar. What you saw at the first auction was they had financed these assets, and these people had done all sorts of different scams, and had sold it at ten times the market value at the high because they were in on the deal. Then the thing drops, and the same people are bidding and buying it back at $0.10 on the dollar. 7

8 You re thinking, Wait a minute. This is a scam. Then fast-forward, and they did it in Russia, but in a much bigger way. Farrell: It was huge; gigantic. Fitts: If you look at the law firms, and at the people and the banks, it was the same group. There is a very famous commentary I wrote called Financial Coup d état. I was in London giving a paper called The Myth of the Rule of Law about what I call the piratization. When you privatize something at market, it s privatization. When you privatize it below market, it s piratization, and it s a scam. It s a way of transferring assets out of the government for pennies on the dollar, so I call it piratization. I was in London in 2001, and was giving my paper on the piratization in the United States. That is where I met Anne Williamson. She got up and started explaining the piratization occurring in Russia. Then John Loughlin stood up, and started explaining. John Loughlin has done several Solari Reports who is amazing, too. I ve had both of them on. John started talking about the piratization happening in Eastern Europe. Then I gave my paper on the US, and we were in shock and so was everyone. John and the people who had launched and everyone realized that these are the same companies. It s Goldman Sachs; it s the same law firm; it s the same covert side of the CIA and Treasury; it s a plan; it s a syndicate, and they are doing it everywhere. 8

9 We were all only looking at our little piece. It was as if we were looking at one foot of the hippo, and they were looking at their foot of the hippo. Everybody is looking at a different foot, or the tail, or the head of the hippo, but it was by coming together and looking at it together that we were able to say, Oh my God There is a financial coup d état occurring. Farrell: Yes, it was a global plan. Fitts: It was a global plan, and part of it was bubbling the US economy so that you could suck all the money out and play this game globally. So, we watched this global plan and we watched it in the fraud. We ve had waves of black budget fraud in the United States, which has really designed much of the financial technology. So, we ve watched this financial technology be used as a weapon of war. It s economic and financial warfare, and it was used in the 1980 s to do the housing bubble and the Iran-Contra fraud. Then it was used in the 1990 s to do the piratization globally, including the Rape of Russia. The Rape of Russia, even though they did it in Eastern Europe, and even though they did it in the United States, the Rape of Russia was particularly hideous because you re talking about shutting the government down overnight. It was a collapse of 50% or more of incomes and the disappearance of pension funds. So, you take your entire world of financially secure people, and you leave them high and dry. 9

10 Farrell: It s important to note that the Rape of Russia also resulted in many Russians dying. There was starvation, food deliveries halted, and much happening that didn t make the Western news. People need to bear that in mind as we proceed here. Fitts: Yes, and the poverty rates skyrocketed. I think you had a die-off of approximately 25 million people. It was genocide. Farrell: It was a significant portion of the population. Fitts: In World War II, 26 million Russians died winning World War II for the allies. Farrell: At least that many. Fitts: You re talking about a similar level of death. If you listen to some of the cover people, it s very interesting. Farrell: Yes, we are going to be talking about marketing schemes done under the guise of being Libertarian, but not genuinely Libertarian. It s a marketing scheme. Fitts: They say that the reason they didn t take it all the way down is they realized that the mafia was going to control the nuclear arsenal, and that is why they didn t take it all the way down, and that s why Putin could bring it back. So, they are rather irritated about that. 10

11 Here is why I bring this up. The person s name was Adam Kokesh. He stood up, and said, Here is what we are going to do. We are going to run for President, and when we become President, we are going to dissolve the US government. Then we re going to create a trust that owns all the assets still remaining owned by the US because we ve stolen everything out the back door. But there are some things that you can t steal. You can t steal the national parks out the back door. Farrell: That and the highways and airports and the whole nine yards. Fitts: He continued, So what we re going to do is put everything in a trust, and auction it off. Farrell: The Rape of Russia comes to North America. Fitts: Yes, the Rape of Russia comes to North America. Farrell: And don t forget how he is financing all this. Fitts: One of the things that he disclosed is that he was being financed by people sending him bitcoin, and didn t know who they were; they were anonymous. Put aside the fact that, under the law if you re running for President, you have to disclose all of your donors. So, you know that there is massive disclosure required. I thought, Fine. The agency is financing this guy. 11

12 It also turns out that he has a felony rap, but the felony never went on his record. It happened in Virginia. I said to myself, It s very likely this guy has a leash. But let s not focus on him because I don t think that is what is important here. The crowd was clapping for him, and I was in shock. He trying to propose this as something fashionable and cool. I ll put the link up. This is all recorded, and you can watch this entire speech and my confrontation and Harry Blazer s confrontation with him. I stood up and said to him, This is very interesting because this is the plan called The Rape of Russia, and they did this in Russia, and 25 million people died. It s genocide. Let me tell you what is going to happen: 50% or more of the cash flows in every county come from the Federal government. So, what you re going to do is stop military pensions, social security, government contracts, government grants, and 50% or more of the income in the county just like that. I didn t go into detail there, but essentially, I will describe what happens. Most people in a county have three weeks of food, three weeks of cash if they re lucky and they can go for three weeks without eating. So that is nine weeks and then they die-off. When that happens, the only way that they can protect themselves is if they have a gun. We ll get back to guns later. 12

13 So, this guy completely blows me off and says, Well, everything will be wonderful because we ll have bitcoin, and he made no sense at all. Then Harry stood up and said, Now I want you to make it clear to everybody about this evidence that you re talking about is cancelling their social security checks and their parents social security checks and their grandparents social security checks. And I had already pointed out that under these circumstances Goldman Sachs would be able to buy everything at pennies on the dollar. I was in a state of shock because I knew that if this man was at the Aspen Institute pushing it, then the intelligence agencies are trying to see if they can get this going. First, they need to pull in the guns because this is the big steal. They can t pull this off unless they pull in the guns. So that is number one. Number two, they have to make it fashionable with the young people. Farrell: And it s important for people to understand what we are saying here. We are saying that this is a marketing scheme. It is going to be pushed to the public, and they are going to appeal, primarily, to the conservative and Libertarian part of the public. They are going to say, This is going to yield smaller government. We are going to privatize a lot of the stuff, and they are even going to pull in the fact that this was part of American history, and you can see this in Libertarian apologetics recently the idea that the country functioned with private roads for the first few decades of its existence, So why not go back to this model and trim the size of the government? We can sell off all these assets. 13

14 That is part of the marketing scheme. The key part of this here is the funding via bitcoin. We have been warning about bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. I ve done blogs on my website about the fact that it s now known that these cryptocurrencies are being used to fund the activities of some very nefarious groups. The fact that they are pushing this marketing scheme with the financing from cryptocurrencies tells you right there that this is a huge, huge scam. Fitts: It was really coincidental because we ve talked much about bitcoin and where it might go in price. The one thing that I ve said, and it has been pumped and dumped and pumped and dumped, but when the price dropped 50%, people said, Bitcoin is going to fail. I said, No, it won t. They would never give this up before they get this done. I think that they want to take it all the way because a digital currency is complete control. But they would never give this up. This is the most beautiful laundering scheme that they ever had to finance political activities. I left Aspen, and we talked a great deal about this when it happened. I had this horrible feeling and was deeply afraid. The more that I kept talking to financial professionals and other people, the more I thought that this is too much to get done in the next fouryear cycle. They will never be able to bust through all of the different internal controls that they need to get this done. So, I m thinking, Maybe I was just a fretter, and got too afraid. 14

15 I got home from the Aspen Institute, and was talking with someone, and the thing that scared me was not what this guy was saying, or the fact that the intelligence agencies and the ziocons were going to try to do this. The thing that scared me was that everyone thought that this person was fine. Oh, I like him. He s nice. It was as though we were having a policy disagreement. It s as if it s not real. What they don t understand is that this is very real, and words matter. Words have meaning. If you allow something which is basically a genocide plan to become fashionable or acceptable to you, they are going to drive a truck through that window. You re giving them a window, and they are going to drive a truck through it. Farrell: And it s important to note this. We ve talked about the four principles, and I want to review these for people so that they have no misunderstandings of what we are saying. This is a marketing scheme, and they are going to market it through appeals to small government, draining the swamp. Fitts: There is a complete marketing plan on the left side, and there is another marketing plan on the right side. Farrell: There is going to be a marketing op on the left side, and they are going to market this as smaller government, draining the swamp, appealing to conservative/libertarian principles on the right side. Fitts: The Q-Anon is definitely part of this. 15

16 Farrell: Oh, yes. We are going to talk about that, too. That is another dot in our thinking. This Adam Kokesh is being anonymously funded through bitcoin. In other words, there is a cryptocurrency aspect to this. As you ve pointed out, in order for this to work, they have to round up the guns. As we ve seen, they are pressing full-time for that. But there is another aspect of this that we ve talked about, which is running concurrently with this, and that is all these calls for Constitutional Convention. In other words, I would put this into it. Fitts: Yes. They ve stolen $21 trillion plus, and they ve stolen more with the bailouts. My number is $50 trillion, but I can take that higher. There is only one way that we can get that money back, and that is to enforce the Constitution. The only way that they can make sure that they keep that money is to tear up the Constitution. Farrell: Tear up the Constitution, legitimize the privatization, and rape of the assets of the country that is what they are trying to do. Fitts: Yes. If you tear up the Constitution, you can keep the $50 trillion, but then you can steal the rest. You can double down on the theft. If you look at the assets that they can spin out, they can make another $50 trillion. 16

17 Farrell: This is big and it makes the most sense. As far as we are concerned, it s connecting the most data points of all the absurd stories that we ve seen lately. Fitts: Let me talk about some more absurd stories. Let s go through all the absurd stories, and then come back to the big picture. When I flew back from the Netherlands and was landing, our Solari website went down. We ve spent six weeks in intense warfare over blockings, over phone and mailing problems, and many other things that I won t go into here. We have full spectrum war, and it s clear to me from a variety of different kinds of feedback, that the first thing we did that gave offense was published the pension fund article. We went down the day after we published that. We were able to demonstrate how they are using the government as a laundry mechanism to take money out of our pension funds and turn back IOUs from ourselves, when they are stealing the money out the back door. I ll tell you something: It s hard to enforce the Constitution through the courts, but it s not hard to say to thousands of pension fund trustees over the country, You should stop buying Treasuries. That is harder for them to control and that is number one. The other thing is that we were putting up many videos on the Parkland gun shooting, and were about to do a Solari Report with Jon Rappoport. I think that in combination and I didn t connect the dots at that time put them over the top. 17

18 Farrell: That is when the dots started to click. Fitts: That is when they declared war on us. That is why my attitude is: I didn t see the full spectrum of the marketing plan to do a Rape of Russia, but they obviously did because they are implementing it. Now I get it. Now the important issue for me is: How do we stop it? We were working on the site and I had a fair amount of very detailed conversations with Dennis Kucinich, who I ve always been a huge fan of. Kucinich had the courage to bring up global spraying, and had the courage to try to impeach Cheney, and has had tremendous courage on important points going up against, what I call, the procentralization team. He has risked his life on many occasions. He has survived many assassination attempts, and is an amazing, amazing guy. I had agreed that I was going to help him run for Governor of Ohio. I met with him when I was in Washington last October. Suddenly, I m working on getting the site back up and dealing with cyber warfare, and Kucinich starts coming out with a series of mailings, making his number one campaign issue gun control, but gun control in a way that is really going to help them do the Rape of Russia. So here is Dennis Kucinich throwing himself into helping the people who he has always tried to stop. I was stunned. Farrell: I am, too. 18

19 Fitts: So I won t go into my discussions with him, but I finally had to say, I assume that you think this is going to help you win, but I don t want anything to do with it. Somebody has to tell the truth. I don t care how unpopular it is. Farrell: I think that this scenario makes the most sense out of the most data points of what we ve been seeing happening for the last two or three years Constitutional Convention, the effort to repeal the 2 nd Amendment, which of course, they can t repeal because those are God-given rights, not government-given rights. Then there is this privatization effort. So, this scenario makes the most sense. Fitts: Last year I flew to Bangladesh to get Cynthia McKinney to do an interview, but I wanted to talk with her about it. She had been a Congresswoman, and has been very passionately vocal about the ziocons and how dangerous they are. So, we did an entire session on Enforce the Constitution, and how you enforce the Constitution, and the fact that you have to enforce the Constitution. It is our one hope. I hate to put everything on one thing, but our hope is to defend and protect the Constitution. We have an historical opportunity to change everything towards a human future, but it comes down to what Alexander Hamilton said, The first duty of society is justice. If there is no justice, there is no society. Then we re talking about slavery. If you look at technology, that is where they want to go with it: They want to go to slavery. 19

20 Farrell: If they succeed in a North American Rape of Russia scenario, you re talking about global slavery. Fitts: I spent a week in Bangladesh with Cynthia, and we recorded Enforce the Constitution, and later did a follow-up and laid out the complete thing. When the Kokesh thing happened, I warned her about it. I told her that somebody is marketing the Rape of Russia, and to be careful. She had tried to do a speaking tour with Robert David Steele, and that didn t work, so she pulled out. I was not comfortable with Steele, so I wasn t involved. She wrote me about two months ago and said, I ve gotten a proposal from a publisher to do a book, and I want to get together all the truth tellers and freedom fighters, and she invited a large number great people many of whom I recommended. Well, the week before I was preparing to come over here to record with you, I got an from her saying that she is now going to accept financing from Adam Kokesh remember his anonymous bitcoin money? It s the same as with Steele anonymous bitcoin money. And Kokesh is writing a chapter in the book. I fell on the floor and couldn t believe it. So, when I came in last night I burned up plenty of your time talking about how upset I was. 20

21 I went back and forth with her, and said, I m out. I want nothing to do with this. If you are going to accept money from Adam Kokesh and you are going to put him in your book, I want nothing to do with the book and I want nothing to do with any of this. Farrell: If the scheme works, it s going to hit the African American people especially the poor ones. Fitts: You re talking about genociding the African American population. If they do this, it s not only going to be pulling their money, the covert operations are going to go after them, and they are not going to have guns or money, and they are going to be targeted. They have done much to lock down those churches. This is really dangerous. If you look at what the die-off is going to be, the African American population is number one for die-off here. Farrell: I agree. Fitts: Every time they have triggered the riots, they have pulled the drug money. So, they are going to shut that flow off, too. So, you re talking about Cynthia helping something which is going to be serious genocide targeted at all Americans, but certainly the African American population. They re the least capable of handling this. 21

22 Farrell: They are the most vulnerable, particularly in the inner cities. They have been going after them for years. This idea of selling off infrastructure is crazy. This is totally mad. They will be able to control food shipments in and out of major cities because those national highways will be privatized. Fitts: So, this was my number one shock because I ve always thought of Cynthia as someone who could see things coming. I haven t had a chance to talk to her in person, but by it s as though the Cynthia McKinney that I knew has had a memory wipe. But it s also as though she thinks that this is just a charming discussion, and words don t have meaning. Farrell: Or any impact. Fitts: I don t think that she understands or she doesn t care and that she is going to make this fashionable. In other words, all that you need in watching the marches on the gun control with the young people although I ve been told that the average age for the marchers was 49 is to put a David Hogg out there and make this fashionable and get activists like Kokesh pulling in people like Cynthia McKinney and the other people who they are involving, and give themselves the patina of respectability, and then they drive the truck through. They re not depending on any of these people; they re only trying to get it going with the young people. So, they need some opinion leaders to make it fashionable on the right side and on the left side, and then they have it. 22

23 What they ve been doing for years is looking for any issue that is going to get them to the point where they can tear up the Constitution. Cynthia sent me the latest one on this woman, Emily, who is saying that we need to rewrite the Constitution for feminine concepts. Farrell: Whatever that means Fitts: Yes, whatever that means. I sent it to Edwin Vieira, and he was so funny. He wrote back and he said, Oh, this is just what we need. Farrell: This idea of the Constitutional Convention and rewriting everything is part of this Rape of Russia as applied to a North America scenario. They only need any excuse. Fitts: They will try re-engineering the Dr. Pepper formula if they think that will get them to enforce the Constitution. It s like Baskin Robbins 57 varieties; they are looking at any excuse they can do. Farrell: This is a marketing op. They are trying to get a broad enough appeal to various lobby groups, cross-sections, feminists, Libertarians, conservatives, environmentalists, people who want a smaller government, and people who want to drain the swamp. In other words, this is a marketing operation that is targeting a broad enough base of the population to get everybody on board with this. Just to clue everybody in, we think that there are other aspects of this scenario that we will get to as we proceed and talk. But this is totally nuts. 23

24 Fitts: Here is the thing that I want to bring up. We are coming into the 2018 elections, so you are going to have marketing, marketing, marketing coming into 2018, but the big marketing is What I m telling everybody, from the point of view of personal planning, is that if they pull this off, you have to be ready on January 20, 2021 to cope with the Rape of Russia in North America. I m not saying that they are going to pull it off because we, and a large number of other people, are going to do everything we can to make sure that the word gets out so that they can t pull this off. So, we have our own marketing campaign. Farrell: As you are listening to this, please share it with other people. Please share this scenario and warn people as much as you can your family, your friends and pass the word around. Fitts: If you think that you have financial security, the military pension is gone, your social security is gone, your pension fund money is stolen. Right now, the number one buyer of US Treasury securities is US pension funds. So, imagine if they default on all of the US pension fund debt. Farrell: A privatization scenario would do that or it could do that. Fitts: They could use the proceeds from the national parks to pay off the treasuries. Given that they are only getting pennies on the dollar, it wouldn t really work. 24

25 Farrell: They are refinancing the debt in this scenario. Fitts: If this is a serious marketing scheme, then the real question is: Should any of us be owning US Treasury securities? Farrell: Yes, that is the other problem. Fitts: The reality is that these folks have refused to obey the laws related to Federal finances whether it s the Constitutional Appropriations clause. We know that there is $21 trillion of undocumentable adjustments. In a private context, you would never lend money to somebody who behaved this way. The stock exchange wouldn t let them trade. The securities dealers wouldn t let them issue securities. The reality is that this is not a credible organization, and now we are seeing a marketing plan that indicates that the bankers and the intelligence agencies think that their way to deal with their refusal to behave in a financially responsible manner is to finish stripping the place. Farrell: That is exactly what it is. It s a debt restructuring plan in a certain sense as well. Fitts: It is exactly that. It is a debt restructuring plan because they have all the leverage when it comes down to it. So, the question is: Should any of us be buying Treasury bills right now? Farrell: I don t and I don t have enough money to do that. 25

26 Fitts: So we ve talked about the guns. Now let s talk about 5G. I m extremely concerned about 5G, and Jason Bawden Smith has been on The Solari Report to talk about 5G. I just published a book review of Elena Freeland s book, Under an Ionized Sky, and it brings together all the different aspects of putting together a global mind control operation that uses the suborbital platform and satellites and the 5G network to basically mind control people. We ve certainly talked plenty about entrainment on The Solari Report, but I think that there is a huge race to get all the 5G towers out and get 5G up and running, and I think that it is because they want to be ready by 2021 to do this. Farrell: I did a story in this connection a couple of weeks ago on my website about how the military is forcing certain states in the West Washington state in particular to pass legislation to alter the eminent domain where the military can come in and say, We want this land. You re going to zone it this way. What I suspect is happening here with this eminent domain grab is, precisely, they are going to use this to bring out the 5G. Fitts: Right, and remember that we saw this between the human trafficking executive order and the omnibus bill. Trump has set up a governance structure for the military to operate domestically and, basically, do whatever they want. You combine that with what happened with the fires in Santa Rosa whether it s the US military who did it or stood down and let it happen. 26

27 What we are talking about with the reshoring of capital in North America is that the people who have physical control through military enforcement are going to re-engineer everything, and they are planning on doing it in whatever way they want. Farrell: If you are going to do this Rape of Russia scenario, you have to inject the military domestically somehow, and I think that this eminent domain business is part of it. What it effectively does is an end-run around posse comitatus. Fitts: They are using human trafficking as the air cover. So, what we are seeing is a group of people who are very afraid, and what they are saying is that they are going to create fortress America and are going to do it in a way where they have lockdown. They are taking no risks, and because they need to be able to bring in so many people and need to be able to breed so many operations, they need entire control of land use. If they need to eradicate 10,000 homes and kill 500 people to burn them all out, they will. If they will do it in Santa Rosa in the fall of 2017, given all of the controls that they are creating and the powers that they are creating, I think that they need Silicon Valley North fast. Farrell: It s a beta test they are prototyping. Fitts: Right, they are testing it. If you look at the design of how they did it, it s very sophisticated relational database management of land use. I think it s three or four years before they are doing it in places in the heartland. 27

28 Farrell: I give it about the same short timeframe. Fitts: Then we re talking about the Phoenix Program. This is their place, and we are in the way. You have to go. This is very dangerous activities. The farmer is coming, we are the chickens and the farmer has a plan. Farrell: That plan involves an axe. Fitts: We talked about 5G, we talked about guns, we talked about the progressives, and we talked about the conservative side. There is one other thing that we need to talk about, and that is this latest attack on the SES system. The SES system as a governance structural matter is a very good system and a very fine system. Basically, what it does is breeds up a Mandarin class whose job is to provide very long-term stability and expertise. It gives the government real muscle. We ve seen over the last 30 years private banks and corporations take over more and more internal control and power within the operations of government all to the bad. The reason the $21 trillion went missing was because banks and private corporations controlled. If the Mandarin class is loyal to the deep state, it s a problem. If the Mandarin class is loyal to the law, it s a problem for the banks and corporations, but it s not a problem. 28

29 So, we ve seen a series of groups come out and attack the SES and say that the SES is the deep state. Well, that is complete ya-ya. The SES is the government Mandarin class, and the question is: Who are they loyal to, and who manipulates them? If there is a problem that way and there always is or if you read Prouty on how the government is manipulated, or if you read my articles or talk to me about how it s manipulated, the SES system is definitely used to manipulate the government to the good and to the bad. So, it s both. Farrell: But if you want to do a Rape of Russia, and want to bring in a Constitutional Convention to shred the Constitution and seize the guns, then one of the things that you don t want is any bureaucratic stability. Fitts: The SES class is not going to go along with the Rape of Russia, and the reason that Putin was able to bring it back is because they never stripped the SES class completely in Russia because they didn t want the nuclear weapons to fall into the hands of the mafia. They learned their lesson in Russia because now they re dealing with Putin, and they don t like it. Now they understand, We have to get rid of the SES class. So, they will have a private company, i.e. Bechtel, ready to take the nuclear arsenal. They ve already put Bechtel into the national labs. 29

30 Now that they have Bechtel in place, they say, Okay, we don t have to worry about the mafia getting it because our mafia has it. Now we can strip the SES because that was their mistake in Russia. Farrell: In other words, the privatization or the rape is across the board. The military s weapons are assets. If you re going to privatize assets, those things get turned over to the corporations, particularly the nuclear weapons. I don t know about other people, but I don t want corporations having nuclear weapons. I really don t. Fitts: Eisenhower threw Stephen Bechtel out of his office in 1954 because Bechtel was lobbying to own a nuclear weapon. Eisenhower went ballistic. The Bechtel s have been trying to get control of the nuclear weapons for a long time. Disclosure: They were the lead investor in Dillon Read at one point when I was working there. Did you hear this story? Peter Flanagan was walking the older Bechtel, Stephen Sr., around Dillon Read. He was in the energy group, and I worked in the energy group at the time. He walked up, and Bechtel had these huge glasses, and he was short. Peter said, I want you to meet Austin Fitts. She s the Vice President in the energy group. Bechtel looked at me and said, Far out A chick investment banker. It was very funny I was laughing intensely. A chick investment banker. He was from San Francisco 30

31 Farrell: Oh my Fitts: It was in the days before we had to be politically correct. I did a great interview last year with Sally Denton about her new book on Bechtel. Obama moved Bechtel in to take control of all the laboratories, and she quoted one of the scientists. The stories of what happened after they got in are frightening, but she quoted one scientist as saying that it was like the worst combination of Goldman Sachs and the parking ticket bureaucracy in a municipality. Farrell: I can believe it. Fitts: So, we ve talked about Santa Rosa and the fires and using the military domestically to re-engineer everything, including land use. We ve talked about the SES, we ve talked about left and right Republicans, we ve talked about 5G mind control, we ve talked about bringing in the guns, but we haven t talked about false flags. Parkland school shooting, one way or another, whatever it was, was a false flag. Farrell: I view all of these school shootings without exception going back to Columbine as false flags. There is now a clear pattern that somebody is financing and weaponizing children for the purpose of rounding up guns. There is no doubt in my mind that it s all part of this Rape of Russia scenario. Sadly, if they are going to make this stick, we can expect more of it. In other words, I will put it very bluntly: The shooting war has begun. 31

32 Fitts: You have to tolerate me because I m going to give you a great compliment. Your great strength is that you can integrate things across many different worlds. You re a master at it. It s almost as though you know how they think, and you know how the leadership operates. You can connect the dots. A great deal has been done to keep the American people from being able to do that. The piece that I bring to the puzzle is the money. I m watching how the money works, and often I drive to see you, and explain how the money connects. Then you connect it with all these other things. That s how we get the full picture. Many years ago, when we figured out this shift from 2.0 to 3.0, you were the one who helped me figure that out because you could connect these dots. So, what we are laying down for our members and subscribers here is inviting you to see the big picture and connect all these different dots. And it s challenging because you have to understand the individual dots, and then you have to connect them. Here is why it is really important: Consciousness can change this. If 5-10% of the population see the game now before we go into 2018 elections, and before we go into 2020 elections, and start talking and doing things to stop this, they can. These people operate in the dark and cannot operate in the light. 32

33 Your consciousness about this and your speaking up about it can make an enormous difference. It can stop them dead in their tracks, and they re not used to getting stopped dead in their tracks when they do this. They ve been successful every time. Every time that they ve done a big takedown stealing assets or money, they pull it off. But I think that there are enough people who see the game. I told you earlier that the response to our pension fund article has been so heartwarming because they get it. They see the game, they see how the pension funds are being used to siphon off their money, and they get it. This is not something that we are talking about to entertain you; this is something that a group of the most powerful people in the world are trying to engineer, and they can t engineer it without the help of the population. Farrell: Yes, this is very important. We re not trying to promote fear porn here. This is our honest assessment of what we think is happening. It s our honest attempt to create a model that connects as many data points as we can connect. Fitts: In fact, I want to mention one other thing before we close on Story #1. If you look at many of the pieces that they are putting together to market the Rape of Russia, Q-Anon is part of it and are marketing it. As they put the different pieces in place, they are telling you that these pieces are cleaning the swamp, and they re not. 33

34 Farrell: They only say, Trust the plan. Fitts: They are putting into place the different pieces that they need to do the Rape of Russia. Farrell: And it s an operation that, as far as I can tell and I m glad that you brought this up, and I said this in the interview with Daniel Liszt on Dark Journalist and we have talked about this it makes people utterly passive. The problem is that Q-Anon is not talking about the types of material that we have been discussing here. In other words, as far as I m concerned, it s a massive, massive deflection operation. It s sleight of hand: Look over here. It keeps people from the power lines, and it has them involved for hours. This has turned into a cottage industry. There is channel after channel on YouTube of people going through this Q material, trying to parse it and figure out what it means. What that does is creates shadow work for them. It s making them passive. Meanwhile, all of this is going on over here, and it s right out in the open if you just learn how to connect these dots. I think this is definitely a part of the operation. Fitts: If instead of doing that, you get in front of your state and local representatives and your Congressional representatives and get in the thick of things, you need to be touching the power lines if you re buying Treasury securities while you re reading Q-Anon. 34

35 Farrell: This is the other part of the operation that I think we have to pay attention to- you have many people now running on the Democratic ticket from the CIA. I don t think that they are going to stop there. I think that they are going to start running many CIA people on the Republican ticket. This is all being designed and set up so they can control this rollout of the rape operation when they get ready to roll it out. So be alert, and please get your nose out of the Q materials. Please, please, please. Fitts: So Marketing The Rape of Russia to North America I m reminded of the line in the movie, Rosemary s Baby, where she says, This is really happening. After I got back from the Aspen Institute, I talked myself into believing that this wasn t really happening, but it really is. If you look at the time and money that has been spent to get around a McKinney or a Kucinich or a whatever, there is a big command center on this one. Your money is paying for that command center. This Rape of Russia is being funded by your tax dollars. You and your pension funds are financing this operation to destroy the Constitution and destroy America. So, we are financing the people who are trying to kill us. Make no mistake about it, if they really pull this off in North America, 25+ million Americans will die fast. Farrell: Sadly, they are evil. There is no other way to describe them other than as evil. 35

36 Fitts: This is going to be very inhuman. I believe that is the number one story of the 1 st Quarter, and it s the one that is going to have the biggest impact on your lives, but there are plenty of other things to talk about. Let s move on to Story #2: Rising Interest Rates. I have emphasized this with our subscribers before, but I want to emphasize it again. I think that this is one of the reasons they are eager to do a Rape of Russia they don t know how to handle a rising interest rate scenario, and are afraid of it. I think they are very much coming from a place of fear. Farrell: Definitely. Fitts: It s a fear of how to get fortress America to work for them in a rising interest rate scenario and in a scenario where they lose reserve currency status or they could. Since 1980, we ve been in a falling interest rate environment, and it s been quite spectacular. It s what some people call The Great Bond Bull. We ve had since 1980, almost 40 years of a bull market in bonds. What is financed by bonds? Well, governments are financed by bonds. So, for 40 years governments have issued more and more debt and more and more debt at cheaper and cheaper rates, and they have just spread the money around. 36

37 THE SOLARI REPORT Dr. Joseph Farrell JULY2017 The reality is that it s over. The Fed has said they are going to continually raise interest rates, but the fact is, they are not raising interest rates; they are chasing LIBOR. The inter-loan banking market for banks has been rising steadily, so the Fed is raising it. One of the reasons the Fed has pressure to raise it is because savers have gotten destroyed by this. So, in 1980, we could have gone to a bank and put our money in a bank CD and received 8-9%. Now we get nothing. It s been really a transfer of wealth from the savers to governments. It s financed in government a great amount of assets that they are now looking to steal or have already stolen. When you raise the cost of capital in the general market, you raise the cost of everything. Every business, every product, every service has a higher cost of capital. Low interest rates have resulted in tremendous misallocation of capital. So, there are many people who would say that higher interest rates are good, but one thing that it does mean is that the people who stole all of the money can now make more money on their money. Farrell: Exactly. Fitts: So what are we dealing with? We are dealing with rates of inflation on goods and services which are consistently higher than the rates of inflation on income. 37

38 We ve been dealing with that for years. That is what I call the slow burn, but the slow burn is about to accelerate. I don t know if you remember my description of the whipping machine that they designed to increase productivity in slaves, but what we are looking at are both electromagnetic whether it s the electronics and the physical harassment that is going on through the electronics, or the finances. They have created a financial and electronic whipping machine that is constantly driving more productivity out of the population, but it s not productivity that falls to our income statement; it s the harvesting machine. Farrell: Absolutely. Fitts: We have a financial whipping machine, and it s about to get turbo-charged. So, that is Story #2. Do you have anything else that you want to say on that? Farrell: No. I m waiting for the big one. Fitts: One concern that I want to discuss before we close on Rising Interest Rates is that historically, much of the wealth effect for the last eight years, coming out of 2008, was the stock market rising. Much of that was government forcing profits by regulation or government money into large corporations in ways that are good and not so good. Traditionally in the stock market, as long as the rise in interest rates was within 150 basis points 3% to 4.5%, so 150 is 1.5% added the stock market could digest it. If it was more, the stock market couldn t digest it. 38