Ancient Philosophy. Aristotle Logic II. Propositional Attitudes. Intellectual Virtues. Virtues & Non-virtues among Propositional Attitudes
|
|
- Daniel Rodgers
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2 Propositional Attitudes There are various possible states of mind that one can have relative to any particular proposition States of Mind Ancient Philosophy Without Conscious Awareness of the Proposition = Ignorance With Conscious Awareness Without Judgment about Truth = Doubt With Judgment about Truth = Judgment Aristotle Logic II Without the Recognizing the Possibility of Error Possibility of Error = Knowledge Not on the basis of On the basis of argument some argument = Conjecture = Opinion (Suspicion) 3 4 Intellectual Virtues One of these states (knowledge) is an intellectual virtue; others are not A virtue is a quality that perfects an individual Human beings can be perfected in two ways Kind of virtue perfect our leading to goodness with respect to our moral character choices & actions intellectual intellect knowledge Virtues & Non-virtues among Propositional Attitudes Νot just any judgment perfects the human intellect A judgment might be made on little evidence (ὑπολέψις, suspicio, suspicion or conjecture) That is not the best that the human mind can do A judgment on the basis of good evidence is better (δόχα, opinio, opinion) But a good argument does not provide certainty The human mind is perfected when it makes a certain judgment, one in which there is no possibility of error (ἐπιστήμη, scientia, knowledge) Jonathan Swift on Opinion As these Noble Houyhnhnms are endowed by Nature with a general Disposition to all Virtues, and have no Conceptions or Ideas of what is Evil in a rational Creature, so their grand Maxim is, to cultivate Reason, and to be wholly governed by it. I remember it was with extreme Difficulty that I could bring my Master to understand the Meaning of the Word Opinion, or how a Point could be disputable; because Reason taught us to affirm or deny only where we are certain, and beyond our Knowledge we cannot do either. Gulliver s Travels, A Voyage to the Country of the Houyhnhnms, ch. 8 Mortimer Adler makes a contrast between the Houyhnhnms & modern man here; we have trouble accepting the concept of knowledge! Sawrey Gilpin, Gulliver Addressing the Houyhnhnms (1771) 5 A place can be made for faith here: St. Thomas defines faith as Faith a habit of the mind which causes the intellect to assent to things not seen (S.T., 2a2ae, 4.1) Aristotle defends the place of a kind of natural faith: we ought to attend to the undemonstrated sayings and opinions of experienced and older people or of people of practical wisdom not less than to demonstrations; for because experience has given them an eye they see aright. (Eth.Nic. VI.11) St. Thomas mentions elsewhere (S.T., 2a2ae, 4.1) faith commonly so called, which has no reference to the beatitude we hope for as does St. Augustine (see next slide) 6
2 7 8 St. Augustine on Faith The Five Intellectual Virtues Aristotle identifies five intellectual virtues (Ethics, bk. 6.3 ff.), all of which would be included in the box labeled knowledge above: For if we attain the knowledge of present objects by the testimony of our own senses, whether internal or external, then, regarding objects remote from our own senses, we need others to bring their testimony, since we cannot know them by our own, and we credit the persons to whom the objects have been or are sensibly present. Accordingly, as in the case of visible objects which we have not seen, we trust those who have, (and likewise with all sensible objects,) so in the case of things which are perceived by the mind and spirit, i.e., which are remote from our own interior sense, it behoves us to trust those who have seen them set in that incorporeal light, or abidingly contemplate them. City of God XI.3 Concerned with that which can be otherwise Concerning things made = Art Concerning things done = Prudence Intellectual Virtues Of ordinary objects Concerned with that which cannot be otherwise Of the highest objects = Wisdom Known discursively = Scientific Knowledge Known intuitively = Intuitive Reason Greek Latin Terminology Common English Translations τέχνη ars art φρονήσις ἐπιστήμη νοῦς prudentia scientia intellectus prudence, practical wisdom science, knowledge, scientific knowledge, understanding intuition, intuitive knowledge, comprehension σοφία sapientia wisdom 9 Comments Of all these, ἐπιστήμη seems to be focal for Aristotle About τέχνη he has little to say. It is the possession of productive knowledge. The person who has it can make things. Some arts cooperate with nature (teaching, medicine, agriculture); Some do not (engineering, architecture, painting). He has much more to say about φρονήσις, concerned with practical knowledge. It is also a moral virtue and is the focus of Ethics VI. The other three are centered on speculative (or theoretical) knowledge. Of these, σοφία is distinct from the other two with respect to its object Of the remaining two, he begins with ἐπιστήμη and then introduces νοῦς once he shows that ἐπιστήμη presupposes νοῦς ( All teaching and learning that involves the use of reason comes from pre-existent knowledge. Post.An. I.1) Ἐπιστήμη & its Source So, what is ἐπιστήμη and how do we get it? Aristotle begins both the Posterior Analytics & the Topics by distinguishing two kinds of argument. These begin with different kinds of premises and produce different products. demonstration (ἀποδείχις, from which we get the word apodictic). dialectic argument Demonstration & the Posterior Analytics The Posterior Analytics takes up two topics Book I discusses demonstration. Its thesis, according to J. Barnes: the sciences are properly expounded in formal axiomatized systems. Aristotle is not the first proponent of such systems, but gives the first full philosophical account of them. Book II discusses definition. It is, on any account, one of the most brilliant, original, and influential, works in the history of philosophy; it determined the course of the philosophy of science and to some extent of science itself for two millennia; it published, developed, and explored the notion of axiomatic science Jonathan Barnes (Introduction to the 2d edition of Aristotle: Posterior Analytics, p. xii)
3 13 14 Genuine & Accidental Knowledge There are two features that distinguish genuine knowledge from a kind of accidental knowledge ἐπιστήμη is cognition (1) that the cause of the fact is indeed the cause, & (2) that things could not have been otherwise For example one does not really know that the sky is blue until one knows why the sky is blue high-energy light rays from the sun [reds & yellows] come straight through the atmosphere, but low-energy rays [blues] get scattered and end up reaching the observer from all directions & one does not fully know why a given person died if all one knows is that they got a disease from which many (but not all) people die The Source of Ἐπιστήμη Such knowledge can come from demonstration Demonstration is a kind of syllogism (that s the genus) A syllogism Aristotle defines as a discourse in which, certain things being stated, something other than what is stated follows of necessity from their being so (Pr.An. I.1 & Topics I.1) The theory of the syllogism is the topic of the Prior Analytics. The foundation of syllogistic is subsumption of a case under a rule in accordance with the dictum de omni & nullo: Derivation & Proof A demonstration is a syllogism productive of scientific knowledge. What does a syllogism have to do to produce scientific knowledge? In answering this question, Aristotle makes an important distinction, ignored by most modern logicians, between derivation from true premises and proof. The standard account of goodness in arguments is that a good argument has two features, which make the argument sound valid form true premises. Examples of sound arguments would thus include Barack Obama is president, therefore Barack Obama is president! But that s not a good argument. It begs the question it asks one to grant precisely what was supposed to be proven. Criteria of a Demonstration Demonstration is a syllogism whose premises are true that makes the argument sound, but is not enough to make it a demonstration first & immediate with respect to the conclusion prior to it better known than it (or, more knowable (intelligible) than it) & cause of it (or, explanatory of it) Two Kinds of Priority Two of these criteria prior to & better known than are ambiguous, depending on what order one has in mind. Priority can be in any order (cf. Categories 12). In the order of knowing, what we see is better known to us (& thus also prior relative to us) than the cause of what we see. For example, the blueness of the sky is better known to us than the laws of the diffraction of light. In the order of being, the universal causes are prior to &, according to Aristotle, in some sense ( naturally or absolutely ) better known than the effect (which we see). For example, the laws of diffraction are prior to the blueness of the sky, which is just an application of them to a particular situation. Two Kinds of Demonstration On the basis of that ambiguity, two kinds of syllogism must be distinguished. Based on the order of knowing demonstration of the fact (ὅτι, quia) from what is better known in itself (the cause) to what is better known to us Based on the order of being demonstration of reasoned fact (διότι, propter quid) or explanatory demonstration from what is better known to us to the cause (which is better known in itself) Examples Aristotle s classic example facts about planets Another example the sphericity of the earth
4 Aristotle on Planets Demonstration of the fact that the planets are near 1. All non-twinkling lights are near to us. 2. All planets are non-twinkling lights. 3. So, all planets are near to us. Explanatory demonstration of why planets don t twinkle 1. Νο light that is near to us twinkles. 3. All planets are near to us. 2. So, nο planets twinkle. 19 Sphericity of the Earth: Demonstration of the Fact Surface of the Sea Spherical. That the water has a bulge and is approximately round is shown thus: Let a signal be set up on the seacoast and a ship leave port and sail away so far that the eye of a person standing at the foot of the mast can no longer discern the signal. Yet if the ship is stopped, the eye of the same person, if he has climbed to the top of the mast, will see the signal clearly. Yet the eye of a person at the bottom of the mast ought to see the signal better than he who is at the top, as is shown by drawing straight lines from both to the signal. And there is no other explanation of this thing than the bulge of the water. For all other impediments are excluded, such as clouds and rising vapors. John Sacrobosco, Tractatus on the Sphere (c.1230) Any body on which ships lose sight of a tower on the shore this way are spherical. The earth is a body on which lose sight of a tower on the shore this way. So, the earth is spherical Demonstration of the Reasoned Fact Any bodies composed of parts all of which have an equal tendency to move to its center are spherical The earth is a body composed of parts all of which have an equal tendency to move to its center So, the earth is spherical. On the Heavens II.14 Note that in 2006, the IAU defined a planet as a body which: 1.is in orbit around the Sun. 2.is massive enough to be a sphere by its own gravitational force; & 3.has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit. The Insufficiency of Demonstration But not all knowledge can come from demonstration (Post.An. I.3) Aristotle rejects two alternatives That there is no knowledge. The argument for this thesis would be: 1. All syllogisms that have premises that are themselves undemonstrated do not secure their foundations. 2. No syllogisms that do not have secure foundations provide knowledge. 3. So, No syllogisms that have premises that are themselves undemonstrated provide knowledge. 4. Any argument all of whose premises are demonstrated without reliance on undemonstrated premises is an argument which leads to an infinite regress, which is impossible. 5. So, there is no knowledge That there is knowledge, but that all truths are demonstrable. This depends upon demonstration being circular or reciprocal, which Aristotle rejects. He argues that not all knowledge depends on demonstration. This makes another access to principles necessary. Hence, another virtue νοῦς (intuitive understanding) the virtue by which we know the postulates of geometry Euclid s Elements the great success story Demonstration & Mathematics From a few basic distinctively geometrical postulates & common notions, Postulates 1. To draw a straight line from any point to any point. 2. To produce a finite straight line continuously in a straight line. 3. To describe a circle with any center and distance. 4. That all right angles are equal to one another. 5. That, if a straight line falling on two straight lines make the interior on the same side less than two right angles, the two straight lines, if produced indefinitely, meet on that side on which are the angles less than the two right angles. Common Notions 1. Things which are equal to the same thing are also equal to one another. 2. If equals be added to equals, the wholes are equal. 3. If equals be subtracted from equals, the remainders are equal. 4. Things which coincide with one another are equal to one another. 5. The whole is greater than the part. he deduced many amazing geometrical truths Demonstration & Mathematics (cont d.) I.47 [The Pythagorean Theorem:] In rightangled triangles the square on the side opposite the right angle equals the sum of the squares on the sides containing the right angle. Remark to XIII.18 No other figure, besides the said five figures [sc., pyramid, octahedron, cube, icosahedron, & dodecahedron; cf. XIII.13-17], can be constructed by equilateral and equiangular figures equal to one another.
5 The Appeal of Euclid: Thomas Hobbes 25 The Appeal of Euclid: Bertrand Russell 26 He was 40 years old before he looked in on Geometry; which happened accidentally. Being in a Gentleman s Library, Euclid s Elements lay open, and twas the 47 El. libri I [the Pythagorian Theorem]. He read the Proposition. By G, sayd he (he would now and then swear an emphaticall Oath by way of emphasis) this is impossible! So he reads the Demonstration of it, which referred him back to such a Proposition; which proposition he read. That referred him back to another, which he also read. Et sic deinceps that at last he was demonstratively convinced of that trueth. This made him in love with Geometry. At the age of eleven, I began Euclid, with my brother as tutor. This was one of the great events of my life, as dazzling as first love. John Aubrey on Thomas Hobbes in his Brief Lives The Appeal of Euclid: Albert Einstein 27 The Appeal of Euclid: Edna St. Vincent Millay 28 At the age of 12 I experienced a second wonder of a totally different nature: in a little book dealing with Euclidean plane geometry, which came into my hands at the beginning of a school year. Here were assertions, as for example the intersection of the three altitudes of a triangle in one point, which though by no means evident could nevertheless be proved with such certainty that any doubt appeared to be out of the question. This lucidity and certainty made an indescribable impression upon me. For example I remember that an uncle told me the Pythagorean theorem before the holy geometry booklet had come into my hands. After much effort I succeeded in proving this theorem on the basis of the similarity of triangles for anyone who experiences [these feelings] for the first time, it is marvelous enough that man is capable at all to reach such a degree of certainty and purity in pure thinking as the Greeks showed us for the first time to be possible in geometry. Euclid alone has looked on Beauty bare. Let all who prate of Beauty hold their peace, And lay them prone upon the earth and cease To ponder on themselves, the while they stare At nothing, intricately drawn nowhere In shapes of shifting lineage; let geese Gabble and hiss, but heroes seek release From dusty bondage into luminous air. O blinding hour, O holy, terrible day, When first the shaft into his vision shone Of light anatomized! Euclid alone Has looked on Beauty bare. Fortunate they Who, though once only and then but far away, Have heard her massive sandal set on stone Demonstration & Theology Can there be a demonstrative knowledge of nature? St. Thomas asks (Summa Theologiae, 1a, 1.2) whether sacred doctrine is a science He means, does it provide knowledge by demonstration? He answers that it is like a science in some ways It does demonstrate conclusions from premises. But it is unlike it in others Its premises are known by faith, not by νοῦς. Aristotle s biological works are not organized this way, which has been the cause of much comment. Aristotle wrote (Part.An. I.6): These preceding statements, then, have been put forward thus in a general way, as a kind of foretaste of the number of subjects and of the properties that we have to consider in order that we may first get a clear notion of distinctive character and common properties. By and by we shall discuss these matters with greater minuteness. After this we shall pass on to the discussion of causes [explanations]. For to do this when the investigation of the details is complete is the proper and natural method, and that whereby the subjects and the premisses of our demonstration will afterwards be rendered plain. Barnes suggests that the History of Animals does the collection of facts. the Parts of Animals & the Generation of Animals offer explanations Aristotle does not get to demonstrations.
6 31 32 Hypothetico-deductive Reasoning & the New Science Galileo, Demonstration & the Hypothetico-Deductive Method In attempting to explain a set of facts, one proposes an hypothesis (theory) that explains the facts (i.e., a simple coherent account from which the facts can be predicted) what was really needed [in the nineteenth century] was a logical system that would allow physicists to truly understand why the atom behaved as it did, so that they could successfully predict not only the atom s observed behavior but new phenomena that had not yet been observed. Physicists call such a logical system a theory. This word is much misunderstood by non-scientists. When a physicist talks about a theory, he does not mean a hunch, guess, or unproven hypothesis. He means a logical system of ideas that ties together a large number of observations of the real world into a coherent and understandable pattern. Galileo makes early use of this method. One of the causes of his problems was that the Church still subscribed to the Aristotelian standard as a criterion for when a non-literal (i.e., metaphorical) interpretation of Scripture was to be preferred to a more literal interpretation found in the Church Fathers. Galileo first offered only a hypotheticodeductive argument for Copernicanism. He later attempted to meet the higher standard, but his arguments were not demonstrations Sheldon Glashow, Interactions, p. 51 St. Robert Bellarmine & Scientific Reasoning 33 Another Challenge to the Demonstrative Ideal 34 Second, I say that, as you know, the Council [of Trent] prohibits expounding the Scriptures contrary to the common agreement of the holy Fathers. And if Your Reverence would read not only the Fathers but also the commentaries of modern writers on Genesis, Psalms, Ecclesiastes and Josue, you would find that all agree in explaining literally (ad litteram) that the sun is in the heavens and moves swiftly around the earth, and that the earth is far from the heavens and stands immobile in the center of the universe. Third, I say that if there were a true demonstration that the sun was in the center of the universe and the earth in the third sphere, and that the sun did not travel around the earth but the earth circled the sun, then it would be necessary to proceed with great caution in explaining the passages of Scripture which seemed contrary, and we would rather have to say that we did not understand them than to say that something was false which has been demonstrated. But I do not believe that there is any such demonstration; none has been shown to me. It is not the same thing to show that the appearances are saved by assuming that the sun really is in the center and the earth in the heavens. I believe that the first demonstration might exist, but I have grave doubts about the second, and in a case of doubt, one may not depart from the Scriptures as explained by the holy Fathers. The significance of micro-structure suggests another problem for the complete adequacy of Aristotle s method The principles of atomic theory are not known by direct experience of atoms. 1. Compounds are an assemblage of discrete units called molecules. 2. There is a smallest unit of any element that may enter into chemical combinations (atoms). a. Atoms of the same element are all alike. b. Atoms of different elements have different masses and differ in their chemical and physical behavior. 3. Every molecule is a combination of a definite number of particular kinds of atoms. a. Molecules of the same compound have the same composition. b. The mass of a molecule is the sum of the masses of the atoms that it contains. 4. In chemical reactions, atoms are combined, separated, or reshuffled, but never created or destroyed. John Dalton ( ) Another Challenge to the Demonstrative Ideal 35 Dialectic & the Topics 36 But scientific explanation in terms of microstructure approximates the demonstrative ideal. In atomic theory, the facts of chemical combination, &c. are deduced from the principles of atomic theory. These principles are consistent with other things we know about the world as fundamental as we can think of prior in the order of being in some sense simpler true first & immediate prior to the facts more intelligible than the facts Dialectic argument takes generally accepted propositions as premises Dialectic argument produces either of two things Ideally, it lays the foundation for νοῦς. Falling short of that it produces opinion. It takes a proposition beyond the quality of conjecture (assent based on slight causes), but does not turn it into knowledge (as it leaves open the possibility of error). Much of what one sees by νοῦς would be the defintions of things (statements of their natures). So, much of the Topics is devoted to securing definitions. It is in that context that Aristotle distinguishes definitions from other things that can be predicated. cause of the facts cause of the facts
7 37 38 The Five Predicables The Predicables Definition Specific Difference Property Genus Accident Definition According to Aristotle, a definition is a statement of the essence of a thing. Its form is always genus + specific difference. In a definition, the term being defined and the definition convert. E.g., man is (by definition) a rational [specific difference] animal [genus]. Specific Difference This is a part of the definition. Genus Something in the category of substance & predicated of several things of different kind. For example, animal is in the category of substance & is predicated of man, sheep, & ox, 39 Property The Predicables (cont d.) Something that does not show a thing s essence but belongs to that thing alone (& therefore is convertible with it) Some properties are absolute, being grounded in the thing s essence For example, being a used of language is a property of man Accident Aristotle offers two definitions of accident (1) anything which is not definition, property, or genus (2) anything that can belong or not belong to the thing These definitions are not equivalent. Aristotle prefers the second because it is not negative it tells what an accident is, rather than what it is not.
Lecture #32. Aristotle. Intellectual Virtues. Ultimate Human Goods & the Two Kinds of Virtue. A Three-Fold Division. Arts
Lecture #32 Aristotle Intellectual Virtues Ultimate Human Goods & the Two Kinds of Virtue Moral Virtues Moral virtues are excellences of character. They perfect our wills or, perfect us with respect to
More informationAnthony P. Andres. The Place of Conversion in Aristotelian Logic. Anthony P. Andres
[ Loyola Book Comp., run.tex: 0 AQR Vol. W rev. 0, 17 Jun 2009 ] [The Aquinas Review Vol. W rev. 0: 1 The Place of Conversion in Aristotelian Logic From at least the time of John of St. Thomas, scholastic
More informationPeter L.P. Simpson January, 2015
1 This translation of the Prologue of the Ordinatio of the Venerable Inceptor, William of Ockham, is partial and in progress. The prologue and the first distinction of book one of the Ordinatio fill volume
More informationHenry of Ghent on Divine Illumination
MP_C12.qxd 11/23/06 2:29 AM Page 103 12 Henry of Ghent on Divine Illumination [II.] Reply [A. Knowledge in a broad sense] Consider all the objects of cognition, standing in an ordered relation to each
More informationCONTENTS A SYSTEM OF LOGIC
EDITOR'S INTRODUCTION NOTE ON THE TEXT. SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY XV xlix I /' ~, r ' o>
More informationSelections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5
Lesson Seventeen The Conditional Syllogism Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5 It is clear then that the ostensive syllogisms are effected by means of the aforesaid figures; these considerations
More informationDescartes and Foundationalism
Cogito, ergo sum Who was René Descartes? 1596-1650 Life and Times Notable accomplishments modern philosophy mind body problem epistemology physics inertia optics mathematics functions analytic geometry
More informationVol 2 Bk 7 Outline p 486 BOOK VII. Substance, Essence and Definition CONTENTS. Book VII
Vol 2 Bk 7 Outline p 486 BOOK VII Substance, Essence and Definition CONTENTS Book VII Lesson 1. The Primacy of Substance. Its Priority to Accidents Lesson 2. Substance as Form, as Matter, and as Body.
More informationTopics and Posterior Analytics. Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey
Topics and Posterior Analytics Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey Logic Aristotle is the first philosopher to study systematically what we call logic Specifically, Aristotle investigated what we now
More informationQUESTION 58. The Mode of an Angel s Cognition
QUESTION 58 The Mode of an Angel s Cognition The next thing to consider is the mode of an angel s cognition. On this topic there are seven questions: (1) Is an angel sometimes thinking in potentiality
More informationDuns Scotus on Divine Illumination
MP_C13.qxd 11/23/06 2:29 AM Page 110 13 Duns Scotus on Divine Illumination [Article IV. Concerning Henry s Conclusion] In the fourth article I argue against the conclusion of [Henry s] view as follows:
More informationOn the epistemological status of mathematical objects in Plato s philosophical system
On the epistemological status of mathematical objects in Plato s philosophical system Floris T. van Vugt University College Utrecht University, The Netherlands October 22, 2003 Abstract The main question
More informationLogic: Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read M.A. CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX FORMAL CONDITIONS OF MEDIATE INFERENCE
CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX FORMAL CONDITIONS OF MEDIATE INFERENCE Section 1. A Mediate Inference is a proposition that depends for proof upon two or more other propositions, so connected together by one or
More informationPhilosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2010
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2010 Class 3 - Meditations Two and Three too much material, but we ll do what we can Marcus, Modern Philosophy,
More informationThomas Aquinas on the World s Duration. Summa Theologiae Ia Q46: The Beginning of the Duration of Created Things
Thomas Aquinas on the World s Duration Thomas Aquinas (1224/1226 1274) was a prolific philosopher and theologian. His exposition of Aristotle s philosophy and his views concerning matters central to the
More informationOn Truth Thomas Aquinas
On Truth Thomas Aquinas Art 1: Whether truth resides only in the intellect? Objection 1. It seems that truth does not reside only in the intellect, but rather in things. For Augustine (Soliloq. ii, 5)
More informationCHAPTER THREE ON SEEING GOD THROUGH HIS IMAGE IMPRINTED IN OUR NATURAL POWERS
BONAVENTURE, ITINERARIUM, TRANSL. O. BYCHKOV 21 CHAPTER THREE ON SEEING GOD THROUGH HIS IMAGE IMPRINTED IN OUR NATURAL POWERS 1. The two preceding steps, which have led us to God by means of his vestiges,
More informationReview of Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning: The Posterior Analytics by David Bronstein
Marquette University e-publications@marquette Philosophy Faculty Research and Publications Philosophy, Department of 4-1-2017 Review of Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning: The Posterior Analytics by David
More informationRethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View
http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319532363 Carlo Cellucci Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View 1 Preface From its very beginning, philosophy has been viewed as aimed at knowledge and methods to
More informationP. Weingartner, God s existence. Can it be proven? A logical commentary on the five ways of Thomas Aquinas, Ontos, Frankfurt Pp. 116.
P. Weingartner, God s existence. Can it be proven? A logical commentary on the five ways of Thomas Aquinas, Ontos, Frankfurt 2010. Pp. 116. Thinking of the problem of God s existence, most formal logicians
More information- 1 - Outline of NICOMACHEAN ETHICS, Book I Book I--Dialectical discussion leading to Aristotle's definition of happiness: activity in accordance
- 1 - Outline of NICOMACHEAN ETHICS, Book I Book I--Dialectical discussion leading to Aristotle's definition of happiness: activity in accordance with virtue or excellence (arete) in a complete life Chapter
More informationLogic: Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read M.A. CHAPTER VI CONDITIONS OF IMMEDIATE INFERENCE
CHAPTER VI CONDITIONS OF IMMEDIATE INFERENCE Section 1. The word Inference is used in two different senses, which are often confused but should be carefully distinguished. In the first sense, it means
More informationThomas Aquinas The Treatise on the Divine Nature
Thomas Aquinas The Treatise on the Divine Nature Summa Theologiae I 1 13 Translated, with Commentary, by Brian Shanley Introduction by Robert Pasnau Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. Indianapolis/Cambridge
More informationThe Divine Nature. from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 3-11) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian J.
The Divine Nature from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 3-11) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian J. Shanley (2006) Question 3. Divine Simplicity Once it is grasped that something exists,
More informationSpinoza, Ethics 1 of 85 THE ETHICS. by Benedict de Spinoza (Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata) Translated from the Latin by R. H. M.
Spinoza, Ethics 1 of 85 THE ETHICS by Benedict de Spinoza (Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata) Translated from the Latin by R. H. M. Elwes PART I: CONCERNING GOD DEFINITIONS (1) By that which is self-caused
More informationPeter L.P. Simpson December, 2012
1 This translation of the Prologue of the Ordinatio (aka Opus Oxoniense) of Blessed John Duns Scotus is complete. It is based on volume one of the critical edition of the text by the Scotus Commission
More informationMcKenzie Study Center, an Institute of Gutenberg College. Handout 5 The Bible and the History of Ideas Teacher: John A. Jack Crabtree.
, an Institute of Gutenberg College Handout 5 The Bible and the History of Ideas Teacher: John A. Jack Crabtree Aristotle A. Aristotle (384 321 BC) was the tutor of Alexander the Great. 1. Socrates taught
More informationClass 2 - Foundationalism
2 3 Philosophy 2 3 : Intuitions and Philosophy Fall 2011 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class 2 - Foundationalism I. Rationalist Foundations What follows is a rough caricature of some historical themes
More informationFaith and Reason Thomas Aquinas
Faith and Reason Thomas Aquinas QUESTION 1. FAITH Article 2. Whether the object of faith is something complex, by way of a proposition? Objection 1. It would seem that the object of faith is not something
More informationRichard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING
1 REASONING Reasoning is, broadly speaking, the cognitive process of establishing reasons to justify beliefs, conclusions, actions or feelings. It also refers, more specifically, to the act or process
More informationPosterior Analytics. By Aristotle. Based on the translation by G. R. G. Mure, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak. BOOK I.
Posterior Analytics By Aristotle Based on the translation by G. R. G. Mure, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak. BOOK I Chapter I All instruction given or received by way of argument proceeds from pre-existent
More informationKNOWLEDGE AND OPINION IN ARISTOTLE
Diametros 27 (March 2011): 170-184 KNOWLEDGE AND OPINION IN ARISTOTLE Jarosław Olesiak In this essay I would like to examine Aristotle s distinction between knowledge 1 (episteme) and opinion (doxa). The
More informationQuestions on Book III of the De anima 1
Siger of Brabant Questions on Book III of the De anima 1 Regarding the part of the soul by which it has cognition and wisdom, etc. [De an. III, 429a10] And 2 with respect to this third book there are four
More information1/6. The Resolution of the Antinomies
1/6 The Resolution of the Antinomies Kant provides us with the resolutions of the antinomies in order, starting with the first and ending with the fourth. The first antinomy, as we recall, concerned the
More informationWHAT ARISTOTLE TAUGHT
WHAT ARISTOTLE TAUGHT Aristotle was, perhaps, the greatest original thinker who ever lived. Historian H J A Sire has put the issue well: All other thinkers have begun with a theory and sought to fit reality
More informationWHAT IS HUME S FORK? Certainty does not exist in science.
WHAT IS HUME S FORK? www.prshockley.org Certainty does not exist in science. I. Introduction: A. Hume divides all objects of human reason into two different kinds: Relation of Ideas & Matters of Fact.
More informationBeing and Substance Aristotle
Being and Substance Aristotle 1. There are several senses in which a thing may be said to be, as we pointed out previously in our book on the various senses of words; for in one sense the being meant is
More informationSemantic Foundations for Deductive Methods
Semantic Foundations for Deductive Methods delineating the scope of deductive reason Roger Bishop Jones Abstract. The scope of deductive reason is considered. First a connection is discussed between the
More information270 Now that we have settled these issues, we should answer the first question [n.
Ordinatio prologue, q. 5, nn. 270 313 A. The views of others 270 Now that we have settled these issues, we should answer the first question [n. 217]. There are five ways to answer in the negative. [The
More informationOn Being and Essence (DE ENTE Et ESSENTIA)
1 On Being and Essence (DE ENTE Et ESSENTIA) By Saint Thomas Aquinas 2 DE ENTE ET ESSENTIA [[1]] Translation 1997 by Robert T. Miller[[2]] Prologue A small error at the outset can lead to great errors
More informationReasoning INTRODUCTION
77 Reasoning I N the tradition of western thought, certain verbal expressions have become shorthand for the fundamental ideas in the discussion of which they happen to be so often repeated. This may be
More informationGeneral Philosophy. Dr Peter Millican,, Hertford College. Lecture 4: Two Cartesian Topics
General Philosophy Dr Peter Millican,, Hertford College Lecture 4: Two Cartesian Topics Scepticism, and the Mind 2 Last Time we looked at scepticism about INDUCTION. This Lecture will move on to SCEPTICISM
More informationIntuitive evidence and formal evidence in proof-formation
Intuitive evidence and formal evidence in proof-formation Okada Mitsuhiro Section I. Introduction. I would like to discuss proof formation 1 as a general methodology of sciences and philosophy, with a
More information5.3 The Four Kinds of Categorical Propositions
M05_COI1396_13_E_C05.QXD 11/13/07 8:39 AM age 182 182 CHATER 5 Categorical ropositions Categorical propositions are the fundamental elements, the building blocks of argument, in the classical account of
More informationChapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge
Key Words Chapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge Empiricism, skepticism, personal identity, necessary connection, causal connection, induction, impressions, ideas. DAVID HUME (1711-76) is one of the
More informationBroad on Theological Arguments. I. The Ontological Argument
Broad on God Broad on Theological Arguments I. The Ontological Argument Sample Ontological Argument: Suppose that God is the most perfect or most excellent being. Consider two things: (1)An entity that
More informationWilliam Ockham on Universals
MP_C07.qxd 11/17/06 5:28 PM Page 71 7 William Ockham on Universals Ockham s First Theory: A Universal is a Fictum One can plausibly say that a universal is not a real thing inherent in a subject [habens
More informationc Peter King, 1987; all rights reserved. WILLIAM OF OCKHAM: ORDINATIO 1 d. 2 q. 6
WILLIAM OF OCKHAM: ORDINATIO 1 d. 2 q. 6 Thirdly, I ask whether something that is universal and univocal is really outside the soul, distinct from the individual in virtue of the nature of the thing, although
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 22 Lecture - 22 Kant The idea of Reason Soul, God
More informationPhilosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2015
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2015 Class #18 Berkeley Against Abstract Ideas Marcus, Modern Philosophy, Slide 1 Business We re a Day behind,
More informationWisdom in Aristotle and Aquinas From Metaphysics to Mysticism Edmond Eh University of Saint Joseph, Macau
Volume 12, No 2, Fall 2017 ISSN 1932-1066 Wisdom in Aristotle and Aquinas From Metaphysics to Mysticism Edmond Eh University of Saint Joseph, Macau edmond_eh@usj.edu.mo Abstract: This essay contains an
More informationConcerning God Baruch Spinoza
Concerning God Baruch Spinoza Definitions. I. BY that which is self-caused, I mean that of which the essence involves existence, or that of which the nature is only conceivable as existent. II. A thing
More informationVerificationism. PHIL September 27, 2011
Verificationism PHIL 83104 September 27, 2011 1. The critique of metaphysics... 1 2. Observation statements... 2 3. In principle verifiability... 3 4. Strong verifiability... 3 4.1. Conclusive verifiability
More informationSt. Thomas Aquinas Excerpt from Summa Theologica
St. Thomas Aquinas Excerpt from Summa Theologica Part 1, Question 2, Articles 1-3 The Existence of God Because the chief aim of sacred doctrine is to teach the knowledge of God, not only as He is in Himself,
More informationNicomachean Ethics. Book VI
Nicomachean Ethics By Aristotle Written 350 B.C.E Translated by W. D. Ross Book VI 1 Since we have previously said that one ought to choose that which is intermediate, not the excess nor the defect, and
More informationKANT S EXPLANATION OF THE NECESSITY OF GEOMETRICAL TRUTHS. John Watling
KANT S EXPLANATION OF THE NECESSITY OF GEOMETRICAL TRUTHS John Watling Kant was an idealist. His idealism was in some ways, it is true, less extreme than that of Berkeley. He distinguished his own by calling
More informationON UNIVERSALS (SELECTION)
ON UNIVERSALS (SELECTION) Peter Abelard Peter Abelard (c.1079-c.1142) was born into an aristocratic military family, and while he took up the pen rather than the sword, use of the pen was just as combative
More informationFr. Copleston vs. Bertrand Russell: The Famous 1948 BBC Radio Debate on the Existence of God
Fr. Copleston vs. Bertrand Russell: The Famous 1948 BBC Radio Debate on the Existence of God Father Frederick C. Copleston (Jesuit Catholic priest) versus Bertrand Russell (agnostic philosopher) Copleston:
More informationKANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire.
KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON The law is reason unaffected by desire. Aristotle, Politics Book III (1287a32) THE BIG IDEAS TO MASTER Kantian formalism Kantian constructivism
More informationThe Names of God. from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 12-13) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian Shanley (2006)
The Names of God from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 12-13) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian Shanley (2006) For with respect to God, it is more apparent to us what God is not, rather
More informationOn Interpretation. Section 1. Aristotle Translated by E. M. Edghill. Part 1
On Interpretation Aristotle Translated by E. M. Edghill Section 1 Part 1 First we must define the terms noun and verb, then the terms denial and affirmation, then proposition and sentence. Spoken words
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy Russell Marcus Queens College http://philosophy.thatmarcusfamily.org Excerpts from the Objections & Replies to Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy A. To the Cogito. 1.
More informationBased on the translation by E. M. Edghill, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak.
On Interpretation By Aristotle Based on the translation by E. M. Edghill, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak. First we must define the terms 'noun' and 'verb', then the terms 'denial' and 'affirmation',
More informationThe Five Ways. from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Question 2) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian Shanley (2006) Question 2. Does God Exist?
The Five Ways from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Question 2) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian Shanley (2006) Question 2. Does God Exist? Article 1. Is the existence of God self-evident? It
More informationPeter L.P. Simpson December, 2012
1 This translation of Book One Distinctions 1 and 2 of the Ordinatio (aka Opus Oxoniense) of Blessed John Duns Scotus is complete. These two first distinctions take up the whole of volume two of the Vatican
More informationImmanuel Kant, Analytic and Synthetic. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics Preface and Preamble
+ Immanuel Kant, Analytic and Synthetic Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics Preface and Preamble + Innate vs. a priori n Philosophers today usually distinguish psychological from epistemological questions.
More informationIt Ain t What You Prove, It s the Way That You Prove It. a play by Chris Binge
It Ain t What You Prove, It s the Way That You Prove It a play by Chris Binge (From Alchin, Nicholas. Theory of Knowledge. London: John Murray, 2003. Pp. 66-69.) Teacher: Good afternoon class. For homework
More informationFrom the fact that I cannot think of God except as existing, it follows that existence is inseparable from God, and hence that he really exists.
FIFTH MEDITATION The essence of material things, and the existence of God considered a second time We have seen that Descartes carefully distinguishes questions about a thing s existence from questions
More informationThe Ethics. Part I and II. Benedictus de Spinoza ************* Introduction
The Ethics Part I and II Benedictus de Spinoza ************* Introduction During the 17th Century, when this text was written, there was a lively debate between rationalists/empiricists and dualists/monists.
More informationThe CopernicanRevolution
Immanuel Kant: The Copernican Revolution The CopernicanRevolution Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) The Critique of Pure Reason (1781) is Kant s best known work. In this monumental work, he begins a Copernican-like
More informationAlexander of Hales, The Sum of Theology 1 (translated by Oleg Bychkov) Introduction, Question One On the discipline of theology
Alexander of Hales, The Sum of Theology 1 (translated by Oleg Bychkov) Introduction, Question One On the discipline of theology Chapter 1. Is the discipline of theology an [exact] science? Therefore, one
More informationDocument A: Galileo s Letter (Excerpted from Original) To the Most Serene Grand Duchess Mother:
Document A: Galileo s Letter (Excerpted from Original) To the Most Serene Grand Duchess Mother: Some years ago, as Your Serene Highness well knows, I discovered in the heavens many things that had not
More informationCh01. Knowledge. What does it mean to know something? and how can science help us know things? version 1.5
Ch01 Knowledge What does it mean to know something? and how can science help us know things? version 1.5 Nick DeMello, PhD. 2007-2016 Ch01 Knowledge Knowledge Imagination Truth & Belief Justification Science
More informationAyer on the criterion of verifiability
Ayer on the criterion of verifiability November 19, 2004 1 The critique of metaphysics............................. 1 2 Observation statements............................... 2 3 In principle verifiability...............................
More informationQUESTION 87. How Our Intellect Has Cognition of Itself and of What Exists Within It
QUESTION 87 How Our Intellect Has Cognition of Itself and of What Exists Within It Next we have to consider how the intellective soul has cognition of itself and of what exists within it. And on this topic
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF NATURE LET THOMAS AQUINAS TEACH IT. Joseph Kenny, O.P. St. Thomas Aquinas Priory Ibadan, Nigeria
PHILOSOPHY OF NATURE LET THOMAS AQUINAS TEACH IT by Joseph Kenny, O.P. St. Thomas Aquinas Priory Ibadan, Nigeria 2012 PREFACE Philosophy of nature is in a way the most important course in Philosophy. Metaphysics
More informationClass 3 - The Cogito, Certainty, and Sense Experience Descartes, Meditations Two and Three
Philosophy 203: History of Modern Western Philosophy Spring 2012 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class 3 - The Cogito, Certainty, and Sense Experience Descartes, Meditations Two and Three 0. Blindsight
More informationSCHOOL ^\t. MENTAL CURE. Metaphysical Science, ;aphysical Text Book 749 TREMONT STREET, FOR STUDENT'S I.C6 BOSTON, MASS. Copy 1 BF 1272 BOSTON: AND
K I-. \. 2- } BF 1272 I.C6 Copy 1 ;aphysical Text Book FOR STUDENT'S USE. SCHOOL ^\t. OF Metaphysical Science, AND MENTAL CURE. 749 TREMONT STREET, BOSTON, MASS. BOSTON: E. P. Whitcomb, 383 Washington
More information3 The Problem of Absolute Reality
3 The Problem of Absolute Reality How can the truth be found? How can we determine what is the objective reality, what is the absolute truth? By starting at the beginning, having first eliminated all preconceived
More informationPhil Aristotle. Instructor: Jason Sheley
Phil 290 - Aristotle Instructor: Jason Sheley To sum up the method 1) Human beings are naturally curious. 2) We need a place to begin our inquiry. 3) The best place to start is with commonly held beliefs.
More informationSpinoza and the Axiomatic Method. Ever since Euclid first laid out his geometry in the Elements, his axiomatic approach to
Haruyama 1 Justin Haruyama Bryan Smith HON 213 17 April 2008 Spinoza and the Axiomatic Method Ever since Euclid first laid out his geometry in the Elements, his axiomatic approach to geometry has been
More informationTestimony and Moral Understanding Anthony T. Flood, Ph.D. Introduction
24 Testimony and Moral Understanding Anthony T. Flood, Ph.D. Abstract: In this paper, I address Linda Zagzebski s analysis of the relation between moral testimony and understanding arguing that Aquinas
More informationThe Greatest Mistake: A Case for the Failure of Hegel s Idealism
The Greatest Mistake: A Case for the Failure of Hegel s Idealism What is a great mistake? Nietzsche once said that a great error is worth more than a multitude of trivial truths. A truly great mistake
More informationKnowledge in Plato. And couple of pages later:
Knowledge in Plato The science of knowledge is a huge subject, known in philosophy as epistemology. Plato s theory of knowledge is explored in many dialogues, not least because his understanding of the
More informationPhilosophy is dead. Thus speaks Stephen Hawking, the bestknown
26 Dominicana Summer 2012 THE SCIENCE BEYOND SCIENCE Humbert Kilanowski, O.P. Philosophy is dead. Thus speaks Stephen Hawking, the bestknown physicist of the contemporary age and author of A Brief History
More informationQUESTION 44. The Procession of Creatures from God, and the First Cause of All Beings
QUESTION 44 The Procession of Creatures from God, and the First Cause of All Beings Now that we have considered the divine persons, we will next consider the procession of creatures from God. This treatment
More information1/5. The Critique of Theology
1/5 The Critique of Theology The argument of the Transcendental Dialectic has demonstrated that there is no science of rational psychology and that the province of any rational cosmology is strictly limited.
More informationThe Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism
The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism Issues: I. Problem of Induction II. Popper s rejection of induction III. Salmon s critique of deductivism 2 I. The problem of induction 1. Inductive vs.
More informationHonors Ethics Oral Presentations: Instructions
Cabrillo College Claudia Close Honors Ethics Philosophy 10H Fall 2018 Honors Ethics Oral Presentations: Instructions Your initial presentation should be approximately 6-7 minutes and you should prepare
More informationUnit. Science and Hypothesis. Downloaded from Downloaded from Why Hypothesis? What is a Hypothesis?
Why Hypothesis? Unit 3 Science and Hypothesis All men, unlike animals, are born with a capacity "to reflect". This intellectual curiosity amongst others, takes a standard form such as "Why so-and-so is
More informationAQUINAS S FOURTH WAY: FROM GRADATIONS OF BEING
AQUINAS S FOURTH WAY: FROM GRADATIONS OF BEING I. THE DATUM: GRADATIONS OF BEING AQUINAS: The fourth way is taken from the gradation to be found in things. Among beings there are some more and some less
More informationThe Ontological Argument for the existence of God. Pedro M. Guimarães Ferreira S.J. PUC-Rio Boston College, July 13th. 2011
The Ontological Argument for the existence of God Pedro M. Guimarães Ferreira S.J. PUC-Rio Boston College, July 13th. 2011 The ontological argument (henceforth, O.A.) for the existence of God has a long
More informationIn Defense of Radical Empiricism. Joseph Benjamin Riegel. Chapel Hill 2006
In Defense of Radical Empiricism Joseph Benjamin Riegel A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
More informationIII Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier
III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier In Theaetetus Plato introduced the definition of knowledge which is often translated
More informationFUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS. by Immanuel Kant
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS SECOND SECTION by Immanuel Kant TRANSITION FROM POPULAR MORAL PHILOSOPHY TO THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS... This principle, that humanity and generally every
More informationI Don't Believe in God I Believe in Science
I Don't Believe in God I Believe in Science This seems to be a common world view that many people hold today. It is important that when we look at statements like this we spend a proper amount of time
More information1/7. The Postulates of Empirical Thought
1/7 The Postulates of Empirical Thought This week we are focusing on the final section of the Analytic of Principles in which Kant schematizes the last set of categories. This set of categories are what
More information1/12. The A Paralogisms
1/12 The A Paralogisms The character of the Paralogisms is described early in the chapter. Kant describes them as being syllogisms which contain no empirical premises and states that in them we conclude
More informationFirst Treatise <Chapter 1. On the Eternity of Things>
First Treatise 5 10 15 {198} We should first inquire about the eternity of things, and first, in part, under this form: Can our intellect say, as a conclusion known
More informationOpinions on the Posterior Analytics
1 Opinions on the Posterior Analytics By Richard Rufus Translated by John Longeway from the transcription of Erfurt Quarto 312, fol. 29va-32vb, by Rega Wood [Rega Wood, along with a colleague of hers at
More information