Power Match opponent has the same win/loss record as you
|
|
- Reynard Gibson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 LD Basics Terms to know 1. Value Foundation for your case Clash of value and support of value is imperative to your case. Ex. Morality, justice, freedom of speech 2. Criterion- Supporting thesis statement 3. Resolution Make sure you know the resolution this should be stated in your case. Fall UIL LD Resolution This will change in early December to the UIL Spring Topic which will be used as the resolution through May. 4. Contentions 2or 3 supporting points (5 ½ to 6 mins.) that directly support Value in the affirmative case. The negative case should only include 1 or 2 supporting points (3 ½ mins. max) Bye odd number of participants or a no show of your opponent. Byes can be a positive but also can be a negative to the overall speech meet. Flights most tournaments have two flights per round. These are flight A and flight B. A LD round last 45 mins. Therefore, if you are a flight B debater, you need to be outside your room 30 minutes after flight A began. Break advance to the next round of competition. Most tournaments will run one of two formats. 1) Round robin of 5 rounds where you debate every debater 2) 3 rounds which are either preset or the last round power matched, there will then be a break for octas or quarters or semis Power Match opponent has the same win/loss record as you Flip for sides the round is not preset and the aff and neg sides will be selected by a flip of a coin Prep time There is four minutes for the debater to use as prep time within the round. Usually the judge will keep this time in increments of 30 seconds.
2 Voters Reasons to vote for your case based on argumentation presented in the round Tag Lines- Sentence which makes up your contention LD Timing Break Down 6,3,7,3,4,6,3 EVERY LD debater should have this time frame memorized 6 mins.- Aff. Constructive 3 mins. Neg. CX of aff. 7 mins. Neg. constructive (present neg. case and attack aff. case) 3 mins.- Aff. CX of neg. 4 mins. Aff. rebuttal (rebuild aff. Case and attack neg. case) 6 mins Neg rebuttal (rebuild neg. case and continued presented arguments against aff. Case) VOTERS given 3 mins. Aff. Final rebuttal continued presented arguments against neg case Dos and Don ts Aff constructive will use the entire six minutes. Negative constructive needs to be 3-4 mins. Neg begin with your case. In the remaining time, you should hit the aff, point by point and argue each area. It is important to have specific evidence to defeat these arguments. If you have no evidence, still logic argue the points. The debate and case should ALWAYS center on VALUES. Every argument should be hit in every speech. You may not bring up new arguments in the rebuttals. You may bring up new evidence, but not a brand new argument. Don t get bogged down on irrelevant arguments. This wastes precious time and will not win you the round.
3 Be nice, firm but never rude! Don t be rude in CX. Don t sound pushy or overbearing, but firm. Negative will probably not refute definitions unless they are radical, but always be prepared to present the source of your definitions. I. Writing a case: A. The first step is to write the introduction. To do so use an attention getting device. Ex Historical fact, statistics, quotes, rhetorical fact, analogy B. Introduce value. Based on the value of we must affirm/negate the resolution that. The value premise (VP) is generally an abstract concept like equality, morality, justice or liberty. This years fall topic may use value such as social contract, or freedom of expression, or freedom of speech, or safety C. Define the key terms of the resolution. It is not necessary to define every word in the resolution. 1. The purpose of defining the terms is to set the boundaries or parameters of the resolution, not to define the terms in a unfair or abusive manner. 2. Never use a form of the term being defined as the definition or part of the definition. Ex Justice is defined as something that is just. 3. Be clear and specific. based on the following contention the negative/affirmative will prove/disapprove the resolution and prove the value of with the following definitions. D. Establish the value criterion/criteria. This is sometimes called the voting criterion/criteria.
4 1. To distinguish the criteria from the value, think of the value as the keyhole and the criteria as the key. 2. The criterion/criteria is the standard by which the value is both defined and weighed in the debate. 3. The criteria must be directly linked to the value. 4. The value chosen by the affirmative must also be fair to the negative and allow for an equal opportunity to win the debate. E. Develop contentions: areas to be discussed that will uphold your value and criteria. Contentions are main points that are documented with evidence. 1. There should be 3 well- developed points in the affirmative case, and 3 well- developed points in the negative case. 2. These developments should include strong supportive evidence, along with specific support from your philosophers. F. Conclusion: should sum up the case, Should be clear and precise, lasting no more than 45 seconds. Affirmative will state at the end because of the value, and my criteria of the affirmative has shown and therefore I can see no other ballot than an affirmative ballot. I stand open for CX. Negative would state3: because of my value defeating the affirmative value and the negative has shown I see no other than a negative ballot. I am now open for CX. Both your aff case and neg case are pre- written and read aloud as your presentation. CX time if you are being CXed eat up as much of the 3 minutes as you can. If you are in CXing, keep control of this time. This is your 3 minutes to CX the opponent s case. ADD Structuring an Affirmative LD Case Structuring a Negative LD Case
5
INTRODUCTION TO LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE
INTRODUCTION TO LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE What is LD Lincoln-Douglas is a one-on-one debate between two people, one of them affirming and the other negating a resolution: that is, you re either for it or
More informationAn Introduction to Parliamentary Debate
What is Parliamentary Debate? At the most basic level, Parli is a form of debate in which you and a partner from your own team debate 2 people from another team. You are debating to support or oppose a
More informationRULES FOR DISCUSSION STYLE DEBATE
RULES FOR DISCUSSION STYLE DEBATE Junior High Discussion (2 Person Teams) Beginner Level Open Level 1 st Affirmative Constructive 5 min 6 min 1 st Negative Constructive 5 min 6 min 2 nd Affirmative Constructive
More informationJUDGING Policy Debate
JUDGING Policy Debate Table of Contents Overview... 2 Round Structure... 3 Parts of an Argument... 4 How to Determine the Winner... 5 What to Do After the Round... 6 Sample Ballot... 7 Sample Flow Sheet...
More informationCorporate Team Training Session # 2 May 30 / June 1
5 th Annual Great Corporate Debate Corporate Team Training Session # 2 May 30 / June 1 Stephen Buchanan Education Consulting Outline of Session # 2 Great Corporate Debate Review Contest, Rules, Judges
More informationCorporate Team Training Session # 2 June 8 / 10
3 rd Annual Great Corporate Debate Corporate Team Training Session # 2 June 8 / 10 Stephen Buchanan Education Consulting Outline of Session # 2 Persuasion topics Great Corporate Debate Review Contest,
More informationDebate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25
Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25 Like this study set? Create a free account to save it. Create a free account Accident Adapting Ad hominem attack (Attack on the person) Advantage Affirmative
More information2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development of the following skills in the debaters: d. Reasonable demeanor and style of presentation
VI. RULES OF PUBLIC FORUM DEBATE A. General 1. Public Forum Debate is a form of two-on-two debate which ask debaters to discuss a current events issue. 2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development
More informationb. Use of logic in reasoning; c. Development of cross examination skills; d. Emphasis on reasoning and understanding; e. Moderate rate of delivery;
IV. RULES OF LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE A. General 1. Lincoln-Douglas Debate is a form of two-person debate that focuses on values, their inter-relationships, and their relationship to issues of contemporary
More informationBreaking Down Barriers: How to Debate Sample of The Basics Section
Breaking Down Barriers: How to Debate Sample of The Basics Section Written by Jim Hanson with Brian Simmonds, Jeff Shaw and Ross Richendrfer Breaking Down Barriers: How to Debate Sample of The Basics Section
More informationHOW TO JUDGE LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE
HOW TO JUDGE LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE Judging in a nutshell You are the judge. The debaters job is to convince you. The activity is specifically designed for presentation to lay audiences; if a debater is
More informationFigures removed due to copyright restrictions.
Lincoln/Douglas Debate Figures removed due to copyright restrictions. Debating is like Fencing Thrust Making assertions backed by evidence Parry R f Refuting opponents assertions Burden of Proof In a formal
More informationDEBATING - First Speaker Guide. We, the team, believe that this statement is true/false.
DEBATING - First Speaker Guide Topic Position Team-line Affirmative/Negative Greeting and Introduction Good chairperson, opposition and audience. The topic for today's debate is that We, the team, believe
More information1) What is the universal structure of a topicality violation in the 1NC, shell version?
Varsity Debate Coaching Training Course ASSESSMENT: KEY Name: A) Interpretation (or Definition) B) Violation C) Standards D) Voting Issue School: 1) What is the universal structure of a topicality violation
More informationThe Criteria Handbook
The Criteria Handbook What is Justice? How do I know if I am being just? What makes an action moral? How do I evaluate a value? Why should I worry about criteria? How do I argue criteria? What s the difference
More informationChapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics
Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics TRUE/FALSE 1. The statement "nearly all Americans believe that individual liberty should be respected" is a normative claim. F This is a statement about people's beliefs;
More information2013 IDEA Global Youth Forum in Ireland
2013 IDEA Global Youth Forum in Ireland Coaches and Judges Track Participant packet August 13 th 26 th Ireland, Galway Curriculum Prepared by: Lazar Pop Ivanov Mark Woosley Dovile Venskutonyte Sergei Naumoff
More informationChp 5. Speakers, Speeches: The British Parliamentary Format
Chp 5 Speakers, Speeches: The British Parliamentary Format Three Ways to Win in B.P. Know things! Talk pretty! Fulfill your role! But first a quick review... Types of Argumentation (Chp 4) Framing Construction
More informationThe Robins Debate 2017 Version /17/16 Table of Contents
The Robins Debate 2017 Version 1.0 10/17/16 Table of Contents I. General Information Page 2 II. Debate Format Page 3 III. Day of Event Timing Page 4 IV. Judging Guidelines Pages 5-7 V. Judging Ballot Page
More informationVarsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26
Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26 Session will discuss on how to refute arguments more effectively. Tim Cook Salado High School Tim.cook@saladoisd.org Attention All Attendees:
More informationRESEARCH. In order to understand a topic one must read current material about it.
RESEARCH In order to understand a topic one must read current material about it. Such current material may be found by both electronic or print means. www.google.com Electronic: Access good search engine
More informationStatement. Assertion. Elaboration. Reasoning. Argument Building. Statement / Assertion
Argument Building Statement Assertion Elaboration Reasoning Example Example Statement / Assertion Is the title/ lable of your argument. It should be precise and easy to understand. Better assertions help
More informationResolved: Connecticut should eliminate the death penalty.
A Coach s Notes 1 Everett Rutan Xavier High School everett.rutan@moodys.com or ejrutan3@acm.org Connecticut Debate Association AITE October 15, 2011 Resolved: Connecticut should eliminate the death penalty.
More informationIII. RULES OF POLICY (TEAM) DEBATE. A. General
III. RULES OF POLICY (TEAM) DEBATE A. General 1. All debates must be based on the current National High School Debate resolution chosen under the auspices of the National Topic Selection Committee of the
More informationRhetorical Analysis Help:
Rhetorical Analysis Help: Understanding metaphorical language and its effectiveness in Jonathon Edward s sermon Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God Prompt: Edwards s sermon is rich in figurative language,
More informationCHRISTIAN COMMUNICATORS OF OHIO SPEECH AND DEBATE PROGRAM
CHRISTIAN COMMUNICATORS OF OHIO SPEECH AND DEBATE PROGRAM There are a variety of competitive speech and debate programs in which young people may participate. While the programs may have some similarities,
More information8/12/2011. Facts (observations) compare with. some code (standard) resulting in a. Final Conclusion. Status Quo the existing state of things
DEBATE ISSUES What is debate actually about? What is the terminology? How is it structured? FORENSIC REASONING Facts (observations) compare with some code (standard) resulting in a Final Conclusion DEFINITIONS
More informationBuilding Your Framework everydaydebate.blogspot.com by James M. Kellams
Building Your Framework everydaydebate.blogspot.com by James M. Kellams The Judge's Weighing Mechanism Very simply put, a framework in academic debate is the set of standards the judge will use to evaluate
More information2014 Examination Report 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS
2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS The Extended Investigation Critical Thinking Test assesses the ability of students to produce arguments, and to analyse and assess
More informationToastmasters International Debate Organizer (Summarized)
General Information Toastmasters International Debate Organizer (Summarized) Location: Date/Format: Resolved: Judge 1: Judge 3: Judge 2: Judge 4(?): Affirmative Speaker 1: Negative Speaker 1: Affirmative
More informationResolved: The United States should adopt a no first strike policy for cyber warfare.
A Coach s Notes 1 Everett Rutan Xavier High School ejrutan3@ctdebate.org or ejrutan3@acm.org Connecticut Debate Association Amity High School and New Canaan High School November 17, 2012 Resolved: The
More informationRules for NZ Young Farmers Debates
Rules for NZ Young Farmers Debates All debaters must be financial members of the NZYF Club for which they are debating at the time of each debate. 1. Each team shall consist of three speakers. 2. Responsibilities
More informationThe Great Debate Assignment World War II. Date Assigned: Thursday, June 11 Date Due: Wednesday, June 17 / 32 marks
The Great Debate Assignment World War II Date Assigned: Thursday, June 11 Date Due: Wednesday, June 17 / 32 marks For this task, you will be divided into groups to prepare to debate on an aspect of World
More informationLincoln-Douglas Table of Contents
Lincoln-Douglas Lecture Notes These lecture notes are meant to aid you the student with the information that is taught in class in print form. Having this at your hands helps the content of the lectures
More informationWhat is Debate? Debating vs. Arguing. Formal Debate vs. Informal Debate
What is Debate? Debating vs. Arguing Formal Debate vs. Informal Debate What is Debate? Formal debates are structured exchanges of ideas which adhere to pre-determined rules intended to be fair. Different
More informationMinnesota Debate Teachers Association Public Forum Guide. A student and coach s guide to Public Forum Debate DRAFT
Minnesota Debate Teachers Association Public Forum Guide A student and coach s guide to Public Forum Debate DRAFT Page 2 CHAPTER I: WHAT IS DEBATE?... 5 BEING ON THE DEBATE TEAM... 5 THE BENEFITS OF DEBATE...
More informationTest Item File. Full file at
Test Item File 107 CHAPTER 1 Chapter 1: Basic Logical Concepts Multiple Choice 1. In which of the following subjects is reasoning outside the concern of logicians? A) science and medicine B) ethics C)
More informationSpeaker Roles POI. Refutation. Equity and Etiquette
AGENDA Speaker Roles POI Refutation Equity and Etiquette BP Basics: Speaker Roles SPEAKER ROLES 1st GOV Prime Minister 1 2 Leader of the Opposition 1st OPP Deputy Leader of the Government 3 4 Deputy Leader
More informationEditorial by Anthony McMullen - University of Central Arkansas You must be the change you want to see in the world. --- Mahatma Gandhi
29 IPDA: Where have we been, where do we want to go, and how do we get there? Editorial by Anthony McMullen - University of Central Arkansas You must be the change you want to see in the world. --- Mahatma
More informationHow Subjective Fact Ties Language to Reality
How Subjective Fact Ties Language to Reality Mark F. Sharlow URL: http://www.eskimo.com/~msharlow ABSTRACT In this note, I point out some implications of the experiential principle* for the nature of the
More informationOpposition Strategy. NCFA Rookie Debate Camp
Opposition Strategy NCFA Rookie Debate Camp Agenda A Brief Word on Trichotomy Basic Path to Winning Opposition Strategies by Position* Quick Overview of Refutation Strength Specific OPP Arguments Activity
More informationA R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N
ARGUMENTS IN ACTION Descriptions: creates a textual/verbal account of what something is, was, or could be (shape, size, colour, etc.) Used to give you or your audience a mental picture of the world around
More informationThe SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy
The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy Overview Taking an argument-centered approach to preparing for and to writing the SAT Essay may seem like a no-brainer. After all, the prompt, which is always
More informationAuthor Adam F. Nelson, J.D. 1
TOWARDS A COMPREHENSIVE THEORY OF LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE Author Adam F. Nelson, J.D. 1 This article is an attempt to open a dialogue within our community about how best to resolve these issues, by offering
More informationA Primer on Logic Part 1: Preliminaries and Vocabulary. Jason Zarri. 1. An Easy $10.00? a 3 c 2. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)
A Primer on Logic Part 1: Preliminaries and Vocabulary Jason Zarri 1. An Easy $10.00? Suppose someone were to bet you $10.00 that you would fail a seemingly simple test of your reasoning skills. Feeling
More informationUrban Debate League ft. MC H. Kissinger: International Relations
Urban Debate League ft. MC H. Kissinger: International Relations with a general focus on getting novices up to speed and reviewing fundamentals for everyone else (with a total lack of focus on concise
More informationCritical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments
5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments REMEMBER as explained in an earlier section formal language is used for expressing relations in abstract form, based on clear and unambiguous
More informationDebate British Parliament -Roles, Rules & Regulation. UQP1331 Basic Communication
Debate British Parliament -Roles, Rules & Regulation UQP1331 Basic Communication Roles of Speaker (Government) 1 st Speaker/s 2 nd Speaker/s 3 rd Speaker 1. Defines the motion. 1. Rhetorical introduction.
More informationWoodward Academy Novice Curriculum st Semester
Woodward Academy Novice Curriculum 2012-2013 1 st Semester Woodward Academy Novice Curriculum 2012-2013 1 st Semester Debate Basics Woodward Academy Novice Curriculum 2012-2013 1 st Semester Format of
More informationExplanations. - Provide an explanation of how your evidence supports your point
Claim - Expresses your position or stand on the issue (YOUR OPINION ON A TOPIC) - States precisely what you believe (and perhaps WHY you believe it) - This is the viewpoint you want readers to accept or
More informationBlueprint for Writing a Paper
Khalifa Blueprint for Papers 1 Blueprint for Writing a Paper Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College The following is my best attempt to give you a color-by-numbers approach to writing
More informationMPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic
MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic Making and Refuting Arguments Steps of an Argument You make a claim The conclusion of your
More informationWriting the Persuasive Essay
Writing the Persuasive Essay What is a persuasive/argument essay? In persuasive writing, a writer takes a position FOR or AGAINST an issue and writes to convince the reader to believe or do something Persuasive
More informationThe Manitoba Speech and Debate Association. A Brief Guide to Debate
The Manitoba Speech and Debate Association A Brief Guide to Debate What is a debate? A debate is an argument about a topic or resolution. It is conducted according to a set of rules designed to give each
More informationResearch Package #1. Canadian National Style
Research Package #1 Canadian National Style (Canadian National Style is a type of debate inspired by the style of debate used at the World Schools Debating Championships. National Style is Worlds Style
More information!1 of!8 Nest+M Debate. Nest + M Debate
!1 of!8 Nest+M Debate Nest + M Debate !2 of!8 Nest+M Debate Table of Contents 1: Cover Page 2: Table of Contents 3: Debate Tryouts Information 4: Debate Videos 5-8: Basic Debate Speech Breakdown (AREI)
More information1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims
1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims In the previous tutorial we saw that the standard of acceptability of a statement (or premise) depends on the context. In certain contexts we may only require
More informationVideo: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?
Page 1 of 10 10b Learn how to evaluate verbal and visual arguments. Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me? Download transcript Three common ways to
More informationNDT Final Round 2017 Marquis Ard
NDT Final Round 2017 Marquis Ard I want to take a second before I get into my decision to thank the University of Kansas for hosting a wonderful NDT. Getting a chance to enjoy amazing food, even better
More information2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.
Lecture 8: Refutation Philosophy 130 October 25 & 27, 2016 O Rourke I. Administrative A. Schedule see syllabus as well! B. Questions? II. Refutation A. Arguments are typically used to establish conclusions.
More informationC. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities
Lecture 8: Refutation Philosophy 130 March 19 & 24, 2015 O Rourke I. Administrative A. Roll B. Schedule C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know D. Discussion
More informationDEBATE HANDBOOK. Paul Hunsinger, Ph.D. Chairman of Speech Department. Alan Price, M.A. Assistant Director of Debate
DEBATE HANDBOOK DEBATE HANDBOOK Paul Hunsinger, Ph.D. Chairman of Speech Department Alan Price, M.A. Assistant Director of Debate Roy Wood, Ph.D. Director of Forensics Printed with permission of the copyright
More informationPHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE
PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE One: What ought to be the primary objective of your essay? The primary objective of your essay is not simply to present information or arguments, but to put forward a cogent argument
More informationArgumentative Writing
Argumentative Writing Anca T-Hummel NBCT-AYA/ELA taus-hummel@phoenixunion.org Joanna Nichols I.L. English jnichols@phoenixunion.org ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY The argumentative essay is a genre of writing that
More informationPersuasive/ Argumentative writing
Persuasive/ Argumentative writing Learning targets I can write arguments to support claims using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence. I can introduce precise claims, distinguish the claim
More informationThe Heritage of Lincoln
James Seaton Michigan State University In The Problem of Lincoln in Babbitt s Thought, 1 his scholarly rejoinder to my Irving Babbitt on Lincoln and Unionism, 2 Richard Gamble argues that Babbitt was wrong
More informationA Compatibilist Account of Free Will and Moral Responsibility
A Compatibilist Account of Free Will and Moral Responsibility If Frankfurt is right, he has shown that moral responsibility is compatible with the denial of PAP, but he hasn t yet given us a detailed account
More informationVictory Briefs. How To... Lincoln-Douglas Debate A tutorial for novice and intermediate debaters. Written by Victor Jih
Victory Briefs How To... Lincoln-Douglas Debate A tutorial for novice and intermediate debaters. Written by Victor Jih Copyright (c) 1991, 1999, Victory Briefs. All rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication
More informationReport on the Examination
Version 1.0: 0112 General Certificate of Education January 2012 History 1041 Unit HIS1D Report on the Examination Further copies of this Report on the Examination are available from: aqa.org.uk Copyright
More informationWas the French Revolution Worth Its Human Cost?
CHY4U Was the French Revolution Worth Its Human Cost? ISSUE SUMMARY YES: Peter Kroptkin (1842-1921), a Russian prince, revolutionary, and anarchist, argues that the French Revolution eradicated both serfdom
More informationKierkegaard As Incomplete Ironist
POLYMATH: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY ARTS AND SCIENCES JOURNAL Kierkegaard As Incomplete Ironist E. F. Chiles Liberty University Abstract The prevalence of irony as both a rhetorical device and a boundary in
More informationComputer Ethics. Normative Ethics and Normative Argumentation. Viola Schiaffonati October 10 th 2017
Normative Ethics and Normative Argumentation Viola Schiaffonati October 10 th 2017 Overview (van de Poel and Royakkers 2011) 2 Some essential concepts Ethical theories Relativism and absolutism Consequentialist
More informationPolicy Debate: An Introduction for Urban Debate League Students and Coaches Written by Andrew Brokos Edited by Eric Tucker and Les Lynn
Policy Debate: An Introduction for Urban Debate League Students and Coaches Written by Andrew Brokos Edited by Eric Tucker and Les Lynn 1 Table of Contents Introduction 4 Policy Debate Basics 11 Overview
More informationPHILOSOPHIES OF SCIENTIFIC TESTING
PHILOSOPHIES OF SCIENTIFIC TESTING By John Bloore Internet Encyclopdia of Philosophy, written by John Wttersten, http://www.iep.utm.edu/cr-ratio/#h7 Carl Gustav Hempel (1905 1997) Known for Deductive-Nomological
More informationCHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND
CHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND I. Five Alleged Problems with Theology and Science A. Allegedly, science shows there is no need to postulate a god. 1. Ancients used to think that you
More informationBreaking Down Barriers: How to Debate SAMPLE Debating Parli. Written by Jim Hanson with thanks to Andrew Stokes for his assistance
Breaking Down Barriers: How to Debate SAMPLE Debating Parli Written by Jim Hanson with thanks to Andrew Stokes for his assistance Breaking Down Barriers: How to Debate Debating Parli Page 1 Breaking Down
More informationHelpful Hints for doing Philosophy Papers (Spring 2000)
Helpful Hints for doing Philosophy Papers (Spring 2000) (1) The standard sort of philosophy paper is what is called an explicative/critical paper. It consists of four parts: (i) an introduction (usually
More informationThe Disadvantage Uniqueness: Link:
The Disadvantage When you think about debating the opposing viewpoint of any situation what comes to mind? Whether you are debating Twinkies versus Ding Dongs or if national missile defense is a good idea,
More informationDebate and Debate Adjudication
Debate and Debate Adjudication Rachmat Nurcahyo,M.A. Yogyakarta State University National Polythecnic English Debate Competition 2012, Tual Maluku Tenggara Overview What is Competitive Debate Understanding
More informationIntro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.
Overview Philosophy & logic 1.2 What is philosophy? 1.3 nature of philosophy Why philosophy Rules of engagement Punctuality and regularity is of the essence You should be active in class It is good to
More informationARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY. Refuting opposing arguments
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY Definition Organization Supporting our ideas Refuting opposing arguments Language Sample argumentative essay Definition: In this kind of essay, we not only give information but also
More informationTake Home Exam #1. PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Prof. Lauren R. Alpert
PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Prof. Lauren R. Alpert Name: Date: Take Home Exam #1 Instructions Answer as many questions as you are able to. Please write your answers clearly in the blanks provided.
More informationISSA Proceedings 1998 Wilson On Circular Arguments
ISSA Proceedings 1998 Wilson On Circular Arguments 1. Introduction In his paper Circular Arguments Kent Wilson (1988) argues that any account of the fallacy of begging the question based on epistemic conditions
More informationPAF 101 Module 1, Lecture 2. If you do good, people will accuse you of selfish, ulterior motives. DO GOOD ANYWAY.???????
PAF 101 Module 1, Lecture 2 If you do good, people will accuse you of selfish, ulterior motives. DO GOOD ANYWAY.??????? Class Agenda Announcements Module 1 Mother Teresa and Doing Good Mr. Jefferson s
More informationDISCUSSION PRACTICAL POLITICS AND PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY: A NOTE
Practical Politics and Philosophical Inquiry: A Note Author(s): Dale Hall and Tariq Modood Reviewed work(s): Source: The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 117 (Oct., 1979), pp. 340-344 Published by:
More informationTerms and Conditions
- 1 - Terms and Conditions LEGAL NOTICE The Publisher has strived to be as accurate and complete as possible in the creation of this report, notwithstanding the fact that he does not warrant or represent
More informationCausation and Free Will
Causation and Free Will T L Hurst Revised: 17th August 2011 Abstract This paper looks at the main philosophic positions on free will. It suggests that the arguments for causal determinism being compatible
More informationCritical Reasoning. Chapter 1 Foundations of Arguments
Critical Reasoning Chapter 1 Foundations of Arguments Chapter covers: The structure of an argument The three parts of an argument issues conclusions reasons An approach to making decisions A critical thinker
More informationAn Introduction to British Parliamentary Debating
An Introduction to British Parliamentary Debating The Oxford Union Schools Competition uses a format known as British Parliamentary (BP) debating. This is the format used by most university competitions
More informationLoving Like Jesus #4 Being Self-Giving
In this current sermon series in Learning to Love Like Jesus, last week we looked at the third aspect and that was being grace-full people, i.e. people filled with God s grace and giving God s grace to
More informationINJUSTICE ARGUMENT ESSAY
INJUSTICE ARGUMENT ESSAY INTRODUCTION Hook Thesis/ Claim Hooks can include: Relate a dramatic anecdote. Expose a commonly held belief. Present surprising facts and statistics. Use a fitting quotation.
More informationCognitivism about imperatives
Cognitivism about imperatives JOSH PARSONS 1 Introduction Sentences in the imperative mood imperatives, for short are traditionally supposed to not be truth-apt. They are not in the business of describing
More information1. Immediate inferences embodied in the square of opposition 2. Obversion 3. Conversion
CHAPTER 3: CATEGORICAL INFERENCES Inference is the process by which the truth of one proposition (the conclusion) is affirmed on the basis of the truth of one or more other propositions that serve as its
More informationWhat is a counterexample?
Lorentz Center 4 March 2013 What is a counterexample? Jan-Willem Romeijn, University of Groningen Joint work with Eric Pacuit, University of Maryland Paul Pedersen, Max Plank Institute Berlin Co-authors
More informationREJECTION Sermon by Peggy Sperber Flanders First Unitarian Universalist Society of Syracuse, January 30, 2000
REJECTION Sermon by Peggy Sperber Flanders First Unitarian Universalist Society of Syracuse, January 30, 2000 Opening Words: From Comstock Review, vol. 13, #2 Fall 1999 (published with permission of author)
More informationSAYING YES, YES, YES TO LIFE!
SAYING YES, YES, YES TO LIFE! Today we re continuing to celebrate our 50th anniversary year with sending forth our precious seniors to bless the world. Hasn t today been inspirational to honor four of
More informationA Coach s Notes 1 Everett Rutan Xavier High School or Introduction. The Persistence of Topics
A Coach s Notes 1 Everett Rutan Xavier High School everett.rutan@moodys.com or ejrutan3@acm.org Connecticut Debate Association State Finals Amity High School March 29, 2008 Resolved: U.S. federal budget
More informationENGLISH 10. December 12 th
ENGLISH 10 December 12 th Warm-up Take out your introductions (or thesis statements if you haven t done the intro yet). Trade with a partner. Read your partner s paper and think about these questions:
More informationWriting a Research Prospectus and Paper
Writing a Research Prospectus and Paper Getting Started 1) Identify a General Topic Ex: political campaigns 2) Narrow the Topic and Identify your Objective Ex: political campaigns during the 1960s or close
More information5: Preliminaries to the Argument
5: Preliminaries to the Argument In this chapter, we set forth the logical structure of the argument we will use in chapter six in our attempt to show that Nfc is self-refuting. Thus, our main topics in
More information