NO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO NO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee.
|
|
- Blaze McKenzie
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 [ NO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO NO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- JAMES MARQUAND, Defendant-Appellant MEMORANDIJM IN RESPONSE TO JURISI7ICTION' Counsel for Plaintiff-Appellee TIMOTHY J. McGINTY Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Counsel for Defendant-Appellant DANIEL T. VAN ( ).A.ssi stant Prosecuting Attorney The Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio (216) CULLEN SWEENEY 310 Lakeside Avenue, 2d Floro f.. m A t^^^^z 0, i ^ t ^^^^^ ^f t,'^l^aa T / LE^". p ^ i } ^ ( > ^ ts 3 Y,3 E,f ^# 3IUP ^f^^^g^^ kcgs{lt?y^ n..#ii^,..^ f '.S f 1:'c.f
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS WHY THIS FELONY CASE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OR AN ISSUE OF GREAT PUBLIC OR GENERAL INTEREST...1 STATEMEI^TT OF THE CASE AND FACTS LAW AND ARGUMENT PROPOSITION OF LAW I' : ,...6 ATTEMPTED IMPORTUNING IN VIOLATION OF R.C (A), IS A LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE OF ATTEMPTED STATUTORY RAPE IN VIOLATION OF R.C (A)(1)(b) AND R.C PROPOSITION OF LAW 11: ,......,...6 ATTEMPTED IMPORTUNING, IN VIOLATION OF R.C (B)(1), IS A LESSER INCLtJDED OFFENTSE OF ATTEMPTED UNLAWFUL SEXUAI, CONDUCT WITH A MINOR IN VIOLATION OF R.C (A) AND (B)(3) AND R.C PROPOSITION OF LAW III:...9 IN DETERMINING WHETHER TO INSTRUCT A JURY ON A LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE, THE COURT MUST VIEW THE EVIDENCE IN A LIGHT MOST FAVORABLE TO THE DEFENDAIti^T. C ON C LU S I ON : SERV ICE
3 WHY THIS FELONY CASE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OR AN ISSUE OF GREAT PUBLIC OR GENERAL INTEREST. James Marquand travelled over 200 miles from Flint, Michigan to Cleveland, Ohio to have sex with whom he believed were a 14 year old and 12 year old girl. I-Ie had made several inquiries, commented about what he would do to the 14 year old and 12 year old girl. and had purchase two thongs for them to wear. Marquand would argue to this Court that a,jury could reasonably find that Marquand was not guilty of attempting to engage in sexual conduct with a child under 13 in violation of R.C (.A)(1)(b) and not guilty of attempting to engaging in sexual conduct with a child over 13 but under 16 in violation of R.C In general, the three step approach to determine whether an offense may be a lesser included offense of the other is (1) the offense is a crime of lesser degree than. the other, (2) the offense of the greater degree cannot be committed without the offense of the lesser degree also being committed and (3) some element of the greater offense is not required to prove the commission of the lesser offense. This portion of the test is the "statutory-elements step," a purely legal question that does not analyze the particular facts of the case. State v, Deanda, 136 Ohio St.3d 18, 2013-Ohio-1722, 989 N.E.2d 986, T15-6. If this prong is met, then courts move into the second tier that requires an analysis of the particular facts of the case. The first and second proposition of law related to Marquand's argument that the Eighth District erred in determining that the first tier was not met. The Eighth District properly determined that attempted rape could be committed without attempted importuning be committed and correctly determined that attempted unlawful sexual conduct with a minor could be committed without attempted importuning be comnutted as well.
4 Marquand also asks this Court to adopt his proposition of law that in determining whether the evidence supports a lesser included instruction, the evidence must be viewed in a light most favorable to the defendant. I3ut this is already law, as well as the law that a lesser-included instruction is not warranted every time some evidence is presented to support the lesser. See State v. Wynn, 2"d Dist. Montgomery App. No , 2014-Ohio-420, T103. However, this rule of law need not be addressed to the extent that this would involve a review of the second prong of the lesser-included offense test, a prong that was not reached due to the Eighth District's resolution that the first prong was not met. In this case however, Marquand engaged in a conversation with an undercover police officer. During one portion of the conversations and exchange of communications: {^( 81 [the undercover officer] and [Marquand] continued to back and forth. [Marquand] asked [the undercover officer], "so you're setting this up for me to play with both of them?" [the undercover officer] responded, "whatever you are interested in. I just need to know." [Marquand] asked [the undercover officer] s if the girls "had ever [done] this before?" [Marquand] further told [the undercover officer] that he would want to give them both "oral pleasure," and have them. "try oral" on him. [Marquand] said that he "would like to try and slowly have sex with the 14-year-old," but said that he would "take it slow" because he was "not out to put them in pain." [Marquand] further stated that he would "maybe work at the 12-year-old and see if it could happen." [Marquand] asked [the undercover officer] if the girls wanted "dick pics," and [the undercover officer] replied, "if you want to, sure." [Marquand] subsequently sent photos of his penis so that the "girls" could see what it looked like. State v. Marquand, 8t1' Dist. Cuyalaoga No , 2014-Ohio-698, % Marquand would subseqtiently travel from Flint, Michigan to the Cleveland area and arrived at a hotel. After he was arrested, Marquand told officers that he expected that the "girls" would perforrn oral sex on each other but the bottom line was sex and that he expected to have sex with the 14-year old but was unsure about 12-year old. Given the facts, it was clear why 2
5 Marquand travelled 200 miles. Attempted imporhzning instructions were not warranted in this case. This case does not call for this Court to consider a substantial constitutional claim nor does it call for this Court to consider an issue of great public or general interest. Nor does error exists within the opinion. Instead, Marquand asks this Court to review the Eighth District's particular determination, under the facts of this case, that a lesser-included offense instruction should have been granted. follows: STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS The Eighth District summarized the procedural history and the facts presented at trial as J^ 3} In December 2012, Marquand was indicted on five counts: one count of attempted rape in violation of R.C and (A)(1)(b) (with a girl less than 13 years old); one count of attempted unlawful sexual conduct with a minor in violation of R.C and (A) (with a girl between the ages of 13 and 16 years old), with a furthermore clause that he was ten or more years older than the victim; one count of possessing criminal tools in violation of R.C (A); and two counts of attempted kidnapping in violation of R.C and (A)(4). All counts had forfeiture specifications attached to them. The following facts were presented to the jury. { 4} Rick 1vlcGinnis, investigator with the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor's Office and the Ohio Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, testified that he monitors Craigslist ads in Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. He searches for personal ads that state that a person is looking for sexual encounters with young people. On the morn'zng of December 12, 2012, he found an ad from Flint, Michigan, posted that day at 2:47 a.m., that was titled "Younger Girls Please For Fun - m4w 28." The ad read: Looking for younger girls that have no experience or not much experience and need practice sucking my cock and want to learn what it's all about;) if this is you please respond! I would love to help you out! I will do whatever you want to make you feel really good! I'm very discreet and you don't have to worry about a thing cause its just for fun(d send me a pic so I know your [sic] real with how old you are, the younger the better;) text me sixthreeone fouroneseven sevenonethree if you don't want to .
6 {i( 5} Investigator McGinnis said that he was drawn to the ad because it did not reference a specific age or age range and because the title contained the word `"young" in it. He also explained that the ad contained references to "young" throughout it, as well as "no experience or not much experience." {^( 6} Investigator McGinnis testified that he assumed an undercover persona of "Cliff Barton," the father of 12-and 14-year-old daughters. Using an undercover address of "dadanddaul l2 agmail.com," he responded to the ad with "what age are you looking for?" He received a reply from "James," who was using an address of James responded, "how's it going. Let's just start off by telling me how old you are@[.]" Investigator McGinnis asked James again what age he was interested in. James responded, "it all depends on the girl. I guess I just need to know the age and a pie, if possible. I'm open to whatever but I just would like to know." Investigator McGinnis replied: "have different ages what [are] your limits?" James responded that he "guessed" he had "no limits." ['(j 7} Investigator McGinnis went on to explain to James that he was the father of two girls ages 12 and 14. James asked to see photos of the girls. Investigator McGinnis sent James two photos of female law enforcement officials that had been digitally altered to make them look younger. Investigator McGinnis told James that "Katie" was the 12-year--old and "Tatiana" was the 14-year-old. James asked for nude photos of the girls, but Investigator McGinnis responded that he would not send nude photos of them. z^, $) Investigator McGinnis and James continued to back and forth. James asked McGinnis, "so you're setting this up for me to play with both of them?" McGinnis responded, "whatever you are interested in. I just need to know." James asked McGinnis if the girls "had ever [done] this before?" James further told McGinnis that h:e would want to give them both "oral pleasure," and have them "try oral" on him. James said that he "would like to try and slowly have sex with the 14-year-old," but said that he would "take it slow" because he was "not out to put them in pain." James further stated that he would "maybe work at the 12- year-old and see if it could happen." James asked McGinnis if the girls wanted "dick pics," and McGinnis replied, "if you want to, sure." James subsequently sent photos of his penis so that the "girls" could see what it looked like. {T 9} Eventually, Investigator McGinnis and James began talking on "Google chat." They discussed where to meet. lnvestigator McGinnis told James that he was in Cleveland. James responded that he lived in Flint, Michigail, but said that he was fine with the encounter occurring in Cleveland. McGinnis told James that he booked a hotel room for Friday, December 14, 2012, at the Holiday Inn Express in Brook Park, Ohio. James asked if the girls would "already be naked" when he got there. McGinnis replied, "whatever you want." James then asked, "well do they have anything sexy to wear?" McGinnis responded, "bring them something lol." James asked what size the girls wore and what their favorite color 4
7 was. James also asked if the 14-year-old had "some breast size yet," and if she "shaved." James then asked if the 12-year-old had breasts yet. James later sent photos to McGinnis of two small thongs that he had bought for the "girls" to wear. {^[ 10) On the morning of December 14, 2012, Investigator McGinnis and James continued to maintain contact. As James was driving to Ohio from Michigan, James informed McGinnis of his location along the way. As James got close to the hotel in Brook Park, Investigator McGinnis testified that officers set up surveillance outside and inside the hotel room where James was supposed to meet the two "girls." James arrived at the hotel around 2:00 p.m. IN'hen James knocked on the hotel room door, he was arrested. {T 11 } Investigator McGinnis and Detective Jamie Bonnette of the Cuyahoga County Sheriff s Office interviewed James (later identified to be Marquand) in the back of a mobile forensic vehicle. At the time of the interview, Marquand was unaware that he had been corresponding with an undercover law enforcement official. The interview was audio and video recorded. Marquand admitted to corresponding with "Cliff Barton." When asked what his understanding was as to what was going to happen at the hotel, Marquand said that he and the "girls" would perform oral sex on each other, but that the "bottom line" was sex. Marquand further told the officers that he was going to try to have sex with the 14-year-old, but that he was unsure about the 12-year-old. {^j 121 Police recovered several items from Marquand when he arrived at the hotel, including the two thongs, an iphone, and a Hewlett Packard laptop, Jeffrey Rice, an investigator for the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor's Office and the Ohio Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, testified that he examined Marquand's computer and iphone. He discovered that Marquand had set up a profile on a "teen dating" website, with the username "Gbdirtyboy." Investigator Rice found that in December 2012, Marquand had accessed the profile pages of several teenage females on "mylol.net," ranging in age from 13 to 16 years old. Marquand had 31 "friends" on the site, all females ranging in age from 13 to 16 years old. Investigator Rice also found five images of suspected child porilography on Marquand's iphone. Marquand had also searched Google for "dating sites for preteens," "dating sites for year olds," and "dating sites for 16 year olds." {^ 131 Investigator Rice did not find the Craigslist ad on Marquand's computer that Investigator McGinnis had responded to, but he found two other similar Craigslist ads: "Daddy seeks Younger Girl to Spoil" and "Fulfill my Fantasy of a Younger Girl." Investigator Rice also found "titles" of suspected child pornography movies in Marquand's "drive free space," but he did not find the actual movies on Marquand's computer. 5
8 {T, 14} The jury found Marquand guilty of attempted rape with a girl less than 13 years old, attempted unlawful sexual conduct with a minor of a girl between the ages of 13 and 16 years old, and possessing criminal tools. It found him not guilty of the two counts of attempted kidnapping. {T 151 The trial court sentenced Marquand to a total of five years in prison: five years for attempted rape, 18 months for attempted unlawful sexual conduct, and 12 months for possessing criminal tools, all to be served concurrent to one another. The trial. court notified Marquand that he would be subject to a mandatory five years of postrelease control upon his release from prison, and further notified Marquand that he would be classified a Tier III sex offender for the attempted rape and a Tier II sex offender for the attempted unlawful sexual conduct. It is from this judgment that Marquand appeals. State v. Marquand, 8t1i Dist. Cuyahoga No , 2014-Ohio-698, LAW AND ARGUMENT PROPOSITION OF LAW I: ATTEMPTED IMPORTUNING IN VIOLATION OF R.C (A)3 IS A LESSER INCLIJDED OFFENSE OF ATTEMPTED STATUTORY RAPE IN VIOLATION OF R.C (A)(1)(b) AND R.C IN VIOLATION OF SEXUAL CONDUCT WITH A MINOR IN VIOLATION OF R.C (A) AND {B)(3) AND R.C The above two propositions of lanv are addressed together. In State v. Deanda, 136 Ohio St.3d 18, 2013-Ohio-1722, 989 N.E.2d 986, this Court reiterated the background and analysis for lesser included offenses. This Court explained: {T 5} Although the concept of lesser included offenses is easily understood in theory, it can be downright baffling in practice. See Bandy v. State, 102 Ohio St. 384, 386, 131 N.E. 499 (1921). The origin of the lesser-included-offense doctrine rests in the common law. Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625, 633, 100 S.Ct. 2382, 65 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980), The rule was intended to protect the state from a complete acquittal when the evidence was inadequate to support a conviction on the offense charged but supported a conviction on some lesser, uncharged offense. Keeble v. United States, 412 U.S. 205, 208, 93 S.Ct. 1993, 36 L.Ed.2d 844 (1973). Inherent in the lesser-included-offense doctrine is the defendant's constitutional right to receive notice before trial of all charges against him. Ex parte Bain, 121 U.S. 1, 7 S.Ct. 781, 30 L.Ed. 849 (1887). "It is ancient doctrine of both the common law and of our Constitution that a defendant cannot be held to answer a charge not contained in the indictment brought against him." Schmuck v. United States, 489 6
9 U.S. 705, 717, 109 S.Ct. 1443, 103 L.Ed.2d 734 (1989). The lesser-includedoffense doctrine is codified in Ohio law in R.C and Crim.R. 311, which are substantially similar. R.C provides: The jury may find the defendant not guilty of the offense charged, but guilty of an attempt to commit it if such attempt is an offense at law. When the indictment or information charges an offense, including different degrees, or if other offenses are included within the offense charged, the,jury may fiiid the defendant not guilty of the degree charged but guilty of an inferior degree thereof or lesser included offense. { 6} The question of whether a particular offense should be submitted to the finder of fact as a lesser included offense involves a two-tiered analysis. State v. Evans, 122 Ohio St.3d 381, 2009-Ohio-2974, 911 N.E.2d 889, ^f 13. The first tier, also called the "statutory-elements step," is a purely legal question, wherein we deterinine whether one offense is generally a lesser included offense of the charged offense. State v. KiddeY, 32 Ohio St.3d 279, 281, 513 N.E.2d 311 (1987). The second tier looks to the evidence in a particular case and determines whether "`a jury could reasonably find the defendant not guilty of the charged offense, but could convict the defendant of the lesser included offense.' " Evans at 1, 13, quoting Shaker Hts. V. Mosely, 113 Ohio St.3d 329, 2007-Ohio-2072, 865 N.E.2d 859, ^J 11. Stale u. Deanda, 136 Ohio St.3d 18, 2013-Ohio-1722, 989 N.E.2d 986, 1j5-6 In general the three step approach to determine whether an offense may be a lesser included offense of the other is (1) the offense is a crime of lesser degree than the other, (2) the offense of the greater degree cannot be comniitted without the offense of the lesser degree also being committed and (3) some element of the greater offense is not required to prove the commission of the lesser offense. This portion of the test is the "statutory-elements step," a purely legal question that does not analyze the particular facts of the case. Deanda, 6. Here the Eighth District, correctly determined that a lesser-included instruction was not warranted because it is plausible that attempted rape be committed without attempted importuning be comxnitted as well. With regards to the attempted rape and the attempted importuning: 7
10 i11 43 } We turn now to the third part of the Evans test, i.e., determining whether "the greater offense as statutorily defined cannot be coinmitted without the lesser offense as statutorily defined also being committed." In discussing this part of the analysis, the Ohio Supreme Court explained after Evans that the specific facts of a particular case are "still irrelevant," but courts should "no longer * * * look at the elements in a vacuum." Deandra, 136 Ohio St.3d 18, 2013-Ohio-1722, 989 N.E.2d 986, jj 18. The Supreme Court made clear that "a menu of uzirelated, factspecific hypotheticals" or "implausibles" should not be considered in the analysis. Id.; Evans, 122 Ohio St.3d 381 at 24, 2009-Ohio-2974, 911 N.E.2d 889. "Rather, it is more instructive to consider the charged crime's relationship witla. potential lesser included offenses, and then follow the language of the applicable statutes in order to ensure the defendant's constitutional right to notice." Deandra at T 18. In clarifying the Deem test, the Ohio Supreme Court explained in Evans that test now "requires a comparison of the elements of the respective offenses in the abstract to determine whether one element is the functional equivalent of the other. If so, and if the other parts of the test are met, one offense is a lesser included offense of the other." Evans at 25. { 44} Here, the greater offense of attempted rape can be committed without the lesser offense of attempted importuning also being committed. It is certainly not an "implausible situation" that attempting to engage in sexual conduct with a person under the age of 13 can occur without attempting to "solicit" a person under 13 to engage in sexual conduct (or sexual activity). Despite Marquand's arguments to the contrary, offenders can attempt to engage in sexual conduct with persons under 13 without "soliciting" them to do so (for example, by force). We simply do not agree with Marquand's argument that one "seeking" to have sex with another includes all forpns of sexual conduct (even forceful sexual conduct) because if someone wants sex, that person is necessarily "seeking" sex. But "seeking" to have sex with someone by force (as Marquand argues) is not the equivalent of "soliciting" someone to have sex within the meaning of the importuning statute. See Jain, 3d Dist. Auglaize No , 2010-Ohio-1712, at T, 10 (set forth supra). Marquand, T The Eighth District applied the same analysis to determine that attempted uz-jawful sexual conduct and attempted importuning were not lesser included offenses. T149. 8
11 PROPOSITION OF LAW III: IN DETERIVIINING WHETHER TO INSTRUCT A JURY ON A LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE, THE COURT MUST VIEW THE EVIDENCE IN A LIGHT MOST FAVORABLE TO THE DEFENDANT. This proposition of law is not reached to the extent that the Eighth District determined that Marquand did not satisfy the first prong of the lesser included test. Even if this prong were reached, he was still not entitled to his requested instruction. The argument that Marquand was not looking to engage in sex with someone who could not consent is of no consequence, since a 12-year old and a 14-year old cannot consent. Marquand's actions included taking pictures of his penis and transmitting them, and purchased two thongs for the "girls" to wear, which Marquand brought with him. Given these actions an acquittal of attempted rape and attempted unlawful sexual conduct with a minor was not warranted. Merely because, a jury could acquit does not mean that an instruction is warranted because in every case it is possible that a jury could acquit of the greater offense. CONCLUSION This Court should not accept review of this case because it does not involve a substantial constitutional question or an issue of great public or general interest. Respectfully submitted, TIMOTHY J. McGINTY CUYAHOGA COUNTY PROSECUTOR -^ ^^ BY: ^^ ^^.^, _ DANIEL T. VAN ( Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 1200 Ontario Street, 8'^' Floor Cleveland, Ohio
12 SERVICE A copy of the foregoing Memorandum in Response has been mailed this 6th day of May, 2014, to Cullen Sweeney, 310 Lakeside Avenue, 2d Floor, Cleveland, Ohio c',a" t'. DANIEL T. VAN ( ) Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 10
STATE OF OHIO ERIC SMITH
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2010-Ohio-4006.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 93593 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ERIC SMITH DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MEIGS COUNTY
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2011-Ohio-965.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MEIGS COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 09CA16 : vs. : Released: February 24, 2011
More informationSTATE OF OHIO DONTA SMITH
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2008-Ohio-6954.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 90996 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. DONTA SMITH DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. McMichael, 2012-Ohio-1343.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 96970 and 96971 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. TREA
More information[Cite as State v. Smith, 2009-Ohio-5692.] Court of Appeals of Ohio. vs. DONNELL SMITH JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2009-Ohio-5692.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92320 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. DONNELL SMITH DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationSTATE OF OHIO DARREN MONROE
[Cite as State v. Monroe, 2009-Ohio-4994.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92291 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs. DARREN MONROE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document May 1 2018 16:12:56 2017-KA-01170-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RODNEY WAYNE SMITH APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-01170 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Cute Little Cake Shop v. State of Ohio Unemp., 2015-Ohio-527.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101691 CUTE LITTLE CAKE SHOP
More informationSTATE OF MAINE CHRISTIAN NIELSEN. [ 1] Christian Nielsen appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2008 ME 77 Docket: Oxf-07-645 Argued: April 8, 2008 Decided: May 6, 2008 Reporter of Decisions Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, ALEXANDER, LEVY, SILVER, and MEAD,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2008-Ohio-2561.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CHRISTOPHER SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. :
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1996
NO. 95-181 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1996 APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, In and for the County of Flathead, The Honorable Ted 0. Lympus, Judge presiding.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed October 6, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Webster County, Kurt L.
STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 0-495 / 09-1500 Filed October 6, 2010 KENNETH LEE MADSEN, a/k/a KENNETH LEE DUNLAP, Defendant-Appellant. Judge. Appeal from the
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Bland, 2015-Ohio-2388.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101631 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. CLAUDIUS W. BLAND
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK BERNARD GILES NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Aug 25 2015 17:45:18 2013-KA-01888-SCT Pages: 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK BERNARD GILES APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-KA-01888 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2006 EDDIE MCHOLDER, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D04-3957 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion filed January 13, 2006 Appeal
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JOHN MOSLEY Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL NO. C-150627 TRIAL NO. 15CRB-25900 JUDGMENT
More informationConsidered by DOYLE, P.J., MANSFIELD, J., and MILLER, S.J. FN*
Slip Copy, 2010 WL 3894400 (Table) (Iowa App.) Judges and Attorneys Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. NOTICE: FINAL PUBLICATION DECISION PENDING Court of Appeals of Iowa. STATE of Iowa,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO. v. : T.C. NO. 06 CR 1487
[Cite as State v. Moore, 2008-Ohio-2577.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 2007 CA 40 v. : T.C. NO. 06 CR 1487 MICHAEL MOORE : (Criminal
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,499 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, CLETE ADAM HARGIS, Appellant.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 116,499 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CLETE ADAM HARGIS, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Sedgwick District Court;
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2010
STEVENSON, J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2010 MICHAEL A. WOLFE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D07-4555 [May 12, 2010] A jury convicted
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 11-1326 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JOSEPH SAVOY ********** APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ST. LANDRY, NO. 08-K-5271-B
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 98-CF-273. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (F )
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO. 09CR3532
[Cite as State v. Ahmad, 2012-Ohio-3489.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 24563 v. : T.C. NO. 09CR3532 SHAFIK AHMAD : (Criminal appeal
More informationNo. 104,839 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, CASSIDY LEE SMITH, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
No. 104,839 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CASSIDY LEE SMITH, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Motions to suppress are intended to exclude evidence obtained
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DAVID SMITH, II, Appellant, v. Case No.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO. Criminal Appeal from the Willoughby Municipal Court, Case No. 12 TRC
[Cite as Kirtland Hills v. Kunka, 2013-Ohio-738.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO VILLAGE OF KIRTLAND HILLS, : O P I N I O N Plaintiff-Appellant, : - vs - : CASE NO.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO. v. : T.C. NO. 08 CR 0399
[Cite as State v. Nelson, 2010-Ohio-383.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 2008 CA 97 v. : T.C. NO. 08 CR 0399 DEREK NELSON : (Criminal
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 1, 2006 98719 ERNEST L. et al., Individually and as Parents and Guardians of NATASHA L., an Infant,
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,609 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 115,609 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ANTHONY STEPHEN NICHOLS, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal from Riley
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral
More informationUSA v. Glenn Flemming
2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-22-2013 USA v. Glenn Flemming Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 12-1118 Follow this and additional
More informationA FULL TIME PASTOR OPENING
Christ Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church 317 East Hamilton Avenue Flint, Michigan 48505 (810) 238-9605 (Office) (810) 238-8109 (Fax) A FULL TIME PASTOR OPENING Christ Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE POLICE NO. : 18-000206 PROSECUTOR NO. : 095443345 STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF, vs. BRANDON J. ADAMS 10907 E. 19th St. S., Apt 1, Independence,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ACER TO THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ACER:
Warning: This archival document has not been updated, and WE DO NOT KNOW IF IT IS STILL GOOD LAW. We do not warrant the accuracy or currency of the information it contains. We hope you will find it useful
More informationDifferent people are going to be testifying. comes into this court is going to know. about this case. No one individual can come in and
Different people are going to be testifying during this trial. Each person that testifies that comes into this court is going to know certain things about this case. No one individual can come in and tell
More informationARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CACR09-80 JEFFREY PAUL GOLDEN V. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLANT APPELLEE Opinion Delivered SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, [NO.
More informationState of Florida v. Victor Giorgetti
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE POLICE NO. : 19-000426 PROSECUTOR NO. : 095450769 OCN: CW005614 STATE OF MISSOURI, ) PLAINTIFF, ) vs. ) ) CHRISTOPHER J WILSON ) 10825 Gregory
More informationPerjury Warrant Denied Against Former DPD Deputy Chief James Tolbert
KYM L. WORTHY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY COUNTY OF WAYNE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY FRANK MURPHY HALL OF JUSTICE 1441 ST. ANTOINE STREET DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-2302 Press Release July 12, 2016 Five
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2007-Ohio-3786.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. LARRY SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed November 15, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Robert Hanson,
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 6-892 / 05-0481 Filed November 15, 2007 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. ROBERT MONROE JORDAN JR., Defendant-Appellant. Judge. Appeal from the Iowa District Court
More informationHistoric Prosecutions by Gregg Marx and other members of the Fairfield County Prosecutor s Office
Historic Prosecutions by Gregg Marx and other members of the Fairfield County Prosecutor s Office John Theodore Engle, Jr. In March, 1989, John Engle put his son, Christopher Engle, age 4, in scalding
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO CR 3840/2
[Cite as State v. Russell, 2007-Ohio-137.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 21458 v. : T.C. NO. 2004 CR 3840/2 JAMES ANTHONY RUSSELL
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 1, 2011
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 1, 2011 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL HARRIS AND EDDIE HARRIS Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County
More informationDecided: February 6, S16A1781. SMITH v. THE STATE. Appellant Christopher Rayshun Smith was tried and convicted of murder
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: February 6, 2017 HUNSTEIN, Justice. S16A1781. SMITH v. THE STATE. Appellant Christopher Rayshun Smith was tried and convicted of murder and related offenses in
More informationMISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT - TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT (ST. LOUIS CITY) STATE OF MISSOURI )
MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT - TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT (ST. LOUIS CITY) STATE OF MISSOURI VS GINES, AARON M DIV #: CA#: 510528913 CAUSE#: DESTINATION: GRAND JURY D E F E N D A N T I N F O R M A T I O
More informationStatutory Declaration
Commin-Ion d'enquête SUI' IH ret:jrtlom e lu Autochtones et certains servies pcibllcs f"\1 b Dl Dl ue ecee P-1062 Statutory Declaration 1, Qalingo Aire. (Name, first name, address, birth date) 1 do solemnly
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as State v. DiBiase, 2012-Ohio-6125.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : O P I N I O N Plaintiff-Appellee, : - vs - : CASE NO. 2011-L-124 THOMAS
More informationDana Williamson v. State of Florida SC SC
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The mandate for the study was to:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The study of sexual abuse of minors by Catholic priests and deacons resulting in this report was authorized and paid for by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) pursuant
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES LEE JOHNSON, III NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document May 9 2017 14:57:35 2016-KA-01406-COA Pages: 18 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES LEE JOHNSON, III APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-KA-01406 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 07-349 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CHARLES GREGORY ANDRUS, AKA ROBERT CHARLES ANDRUS, AKA CHARLES GEORGE ANDRUS, AKA CHARLES
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY COMPLAINT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY POLICE NO. : 4200758 PROSECUTOR NO. : 095437481 STATE OF MISSOURI, ) PLAINTIFF, ) vs. ) ANDRE CHRISTOPHER BROWN ) 1835 Kensington Ave., )
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,712 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, SAWAN DILIP PATIDAR, Appellant.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 117,712 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. SAWAN DILIP PATIDAR, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal from Dickinson
More information1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH vs. Case No. 05 CF 381
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2 3 STATE OF WISCONSIN, 4 PLAINTIFF, 05 CF 381 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381 6 STEVEN A. AVERY, 7 DEFENDANT. 8 DATE: September 28, 2009 9 BEFORE:
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE COMPLAINT. Count I. Murder 2nd Degree ( Y )
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE POLICE NO. : 17-058838 PROSECUTOR NO. : 095440950 STATE OF MISSOURI, ) PLAINTIFF, ) vs. ) PATRICK L. BARKWELL ) 11409 E. Anderson, ) Sugar
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-08-012-CR GERALD DEWAYNE LUSK APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------
More informationCOLUMBIA'S FIRST BAPTIST FACES LAWSUIT OVER FORMER DEACON'S CONDUCT
1 of 8 1/17/2014 6:06 PM State, The (Columbia, SC) 2002-05-26 Section: FRONT Edition: FINAL Page: A1 COLUMBIA'S FIRST BAPTIST FACES LAWSUIT OVER FORMER DEACON'S CONDUCT RICK BRUNDRETT and ALLISON ASKINS
More informationI N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Donald J. Frew Fort Wayne, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Attorney General of Indiana Caryn N. Szyper Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana I N T H E
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 114,105 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. TINENE BEAVER, Appellant, STEWART ENSIGN, Appellee.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 114,105 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS TINENE BEAVER, Appellant, v. STEWART ENSIGN, Appellee. MEMORANDUM OPINION 2016. Affirmed. Appeal from Shawnee District
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:04CV-338-H ELECTRONICALLY FILED
Case 3:04-cv-00338-JGH Document 146-1 Filed 04/01/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:04CV-338-H ELECTRONICALLY FILED JAMES H. O BRYAN,
More informationSCIENCE DRIVE AND TOWERVIEW ROAD BOX DURHAM, NC (919) FACSIMILE (919) CO-DIRECTORS
WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS CLINIC DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW SCIENCE DRIVE AND TOWERVIEW ROAD BOX 90360 DURHAM, NC 27708 0360 (919) 613 7133 FACSIMILE (919) 613 7262 JAMES E. COLEMAN, JR. JARVIS JOHN EDGERTON
More informationFINAL ORDER AND OPINION REVERSING TRIAL COURT. Appellant, Donald Dale Smith, Jr. ( Smith ), timely appeals the trial court s judgment for
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA DONALD DALE SMITH, JR., Appellant, CASE NO.: 2015-AP-00006-A-O Lower Court Case: 2014-MM-012298-A-O v. STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued May 26, 2011 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-10-00680-CR JOSE SORTO JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 412th District Court
More informationADULT (18+ years of age) CHILDREN/STUDENT MINISTRY VOLUNTEER APPLICATION Christian Church at Cogan Station
ADULT (18+ years of age) CHILDREN/STUDENT MINISTRY VOLUNTEER APPLICATION Christian Church at Cogan Station Name: Address: I have lived continuously in PA as a resident for Phone: Cell: years. E-mail: Birthday:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CR-0-2027-JF ) 5 Plaintiff, ) ) San Jose, CA 6 vs. ) October 2, 200 ) 7 ROGER VER, ) ) 8
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-07-00019-CR NO. 03-07-00020-CR Paul Douglas Archer, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL
More informationNorman Blake McKenzie v. State of Florida SC >> THE NEXT CASE ON THE COURT'S AGENDA IS MCKENZIE VERSUS STATE. >> MR. QUARLES LET'S HEAR ABOUT
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR 10-936 CLEVELAND EVANS, VS. STATE OF ARKANSAS, APPELLANT, APPELLEE, Opinion Delivered February 3, 2011 APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. CR 2008-5049, HON.
More informationMurphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc). Affirmed.
ACKER v. STATE Cite as 787 So.2d 77 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 2001) Fla. 77 Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc). Affirmed. ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., concur.,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY. : O P I N I O N - vs - 8/17/2009 :
[Cite as State v. Johnson, 2009-Ohio-4129.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2008-06-153 : O P I N I O N - vs -
More informationMOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENTS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 16-2013-CF-005781-AXXX-MA DIVISION: CR-D STATE OF FLORIDA vs. DONALD SMITH MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENTS
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document May 15 2015 07:20:38 2013-KA-01629-COA Pages: 22 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ROBERT BUFFORD APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-KA-01629 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :0-cr-000-SRB Document 0 Filed 0//0 Page of 0 DENNIS K. BURKE United States Attorney District of Arizona MICHAEL T. MORRISSEY Assistant U.S. Attorney Arizona State Bar No. 0 Two Renaissance Square
More informationThe STATE of Ohio, Appellee, KOVAC, Appellant. Court of Appeals of Ohio, No Decided Dec. 6, 2002.
[Cite as State v. Kovac, 150 Ohio App.3d 676, 2002-Ohio-6784.] The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. KOVAC, Appellant. [Cite as State v. Kovac, 150 Ohio App.3d 676, 2002-Ohio-6784.] Court of Appeals of Ohio,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE POLICE NO. : 19-000697 PROSECUTOR NO. : 095451472 OCN: STATE OF MISSOURI, ) PLAINTIFF, ) vs. ) ) CLIFTON L. JACK ) 1404 NE Ivory Lane )
More informationState of Wisconsin: Circuit Court: Milwaukee County: v. Case No. 2008CF Motion to Suppress Statements
State of Wisconsin: Circuit Court: Milwaukee County: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2008CF000534 Mack Smith, Defendant. Motion to Suppress Statements PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on the _16th day
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TERRANCE SMITH Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 3382 EDA 2017 Appeal from the Judgment of
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY MCINNIS APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-KA-1576 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Melton, 2004-Ohio-5483.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 82765 STATE OF OHIO : : JOURNAL ENTRY Plaintiff-Appellee : : and -vs- : : OPINION ROBERT MELTON
More informationTIMELINE DONALD MCGUIRE Donald McGuire is ordained and assigned to Loyola Academy, Wilmette, IL. The Jesuits send McGuire to Europe.
TIMELINE DONALD MCGUIRE 1949 Donald McGuire joins the Society of Jesus. 1961 Donald McGuire is ordained and assigned to Loyola Academy, Wilmette, IL. The Jesuits send McGuire to Europe. Feb 5, 1962 Dec.
More informationSIM GILL DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Ralph Chamness Civil Division SIM GILL DISTRICT ATTORNEY Jeffrey William Hall Lisa Ashman Administrative Operations FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Feb. 18, 2014 Contact Sim Gill: (801) 230-1209 or sgill@slco.org
More information>> NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS DEMOTT VERSUS STATE. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT. COUNSEL, MY NAME IS KEVIN HOLTZ.
>> NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS DEMOTT VERSUS STATE. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT. COUNSEL, MY NAME IS KEVIN HOLTZ. I REPRESENT THE PETITIONER, JUSTIN DEMOTT IN THIS CASE THAT IS HERE
More informationCenter on Wrongful Convictions
CASE SUMMARY CATEGORY: DEFENDANT S NAME: JURISDICTION: RESEARCHED BY: Exoneration Steve Smith Cook County, Illinois Rob Warden Center on Wrongful Convictions DATE LAST REVISED: September 24, 2001 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, 2008
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. NICHOLAS ALLEN MONTIETH Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardeman County 07-01-0431
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED June 24, 2014 v No. 315267 Grand Traverse Circuit Court STEVEN RICHARD, LC No. 13-011510-FH Defendant-Appellant.
More informationThe First Church in Oberlin, United Church of Christ. Policies and Procedures for a Safe Church
The First Church in Oberlin, United Church of Christ Policies and Procedures for a Safe Church Adopted by the Executive Council on August 20, 2007 I. POLICY PROHIBITING ABUSE, EXPLOITATION, AND HARASSMENT.
More informationSeptember 10, (1) that Commissioner Hansen s deliberate violations of the law may somehow be cured;
Sara M. Baker, President Rebecca W. Arnold, Vice President Jim D. Hansen, Commissioner Kent Goldthorpe, Commissioner Paul Woods, Commissioner September 10, 2018 Paul Panther Deputy Attorney General Chief,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED October 2, 2003 v No. 239329; 239330 Wayne Circuit Court MANZELL C. SAMPSON, LC No. 01-001208; 01-000390
More informationCOX, Robert Craig (W/M) DC# DOB: 10/06/59
COX, Robert Craig (W/M) DC# 113377 DOB: 10/06/59 Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County, Case # CR88-364 Sentencing Judge: The Honorable Richard F. Conrad Trial Attorneys: Patricia Cashman & Kelly Sims,
More informationThe Murder of Pedro Corzo. January 9, 2004 Dateland, Maricopa County, Arizona
The Murder of Pedro Corzo January 9, 2004 Dateland, Maricopa County, Arizona Dateland, Maricopa Co., Arizona Imagine a lone man driving down a gravel road in the desert country of rural Maricopa County,
More informationRe: Criminal Trial of Abdul Rahman for Converting to Christianity
Jay Alan Sekulow, J.D., Ph.D. Chief Counsel March 22, 2006 His Excellency Said Tayeb Jawad Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Afghanistan Embassy of Afghanistan 2341 Wyoming Avenue, NW Washington,
More informationJohn P. O Donnell, J.:
.U IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO THE STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. CR 16 612584 Plaintiff, JUDGE JOHN P. O'DONNELL -vs- JUDGMENT ENTRY AFTER A BENCH TRIAL KEVIN HOOKS, Defendant. John P.
More informationKirk of Kildaire, Presbyterian Church. Limited Access Agreement in Cases Involving a Convicted/Registered Sex Offender
Kirk of Kildaire, Presbyterian Church Limited Access Agreement in Cases Involving a Convicted/Registered Sex Offender The Kirk of Kildaire, Presbyterian (Kirk) is a safe and gracious community that welcomes
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED May 5, 2005 v No. 252308 Wayne Circuit Court ROBERT JARMEL ANDERSON, LC No. 03-007705-01 Defendant-Appellant.
More informationHutchinson Missionary Baptist Church Application Submission Instructions Friday, March 29, 2019 Mail Complete Application Packet to: Preferred -
Hutchinson Missionary Baptist Church Pastor Search Announcement & Qualifications The Hutchinson Missionary Baptist Church has been in existence and serving the community for 119 years and was a pivotal
More informationSpecial Court Monitoring Program Update #84a Trial Chamber I - RUF Trial 21 July, by Alison Thompson Senior Researcher
Page 1 of 5 U.C. BerkeleyWar Crimes Studies Center Sierra Leone Trial Monitoring Program Weekly Report Special Court Monitoring Program Update #84a Trial Chamber I - RUF Trial 21 July, 2006 by Alison Thompson
More informationDavid Dionne v. State of Florida
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More information[Cite as State v. Conway, 109 Ohio St.3d 412, 2006-Ohio-2815.]
[Cite as State v. Conway, 109 Ohio St.3d 412, 2006-Ohio-2815.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. CONWAY, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Conway, 109 Ohio St.3d 412, 2006-Ohio-2815.] Criminal law Aggravated
More informationNo one was supposed to know about her conviction Kathy had expunged her criminal record so the mistake she made would not continue to haunt her.
1 of 5 6/3/2011 2:34 PM By nate carlisle The Salt Lake Tribune Published: June 3, 2011 11:19AM Updated: June 3, 2011 01:28PM Like many other moms, Kathy was excited when her son started to play football
More information