CHAPTER 1 KNOWLEDGE : ITS FORMATION PROCESS AND SOURCES
|
|
- Christal Pierce
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CHAPTER 1 KNOWLEDGE : ITS FORMATION PROCESS AND SOURCES
2 11 The concept of knowledge has occupied the minds of philosophers throughout the history of the discipline. No attempt has been made in this chapter to chronicle the debate nor even to refer to all the eminent writers on the topic. It is intended, however, to examine briefly the nature of knowledge; its sources and the physiological and psychological processes involved in its formation. 1.1 Nature of Knowledge: Collins Dictionary of the English Language"*defines knowledge as: 1. the facts, feeling and experiences known by a person or a group of people, 2. the state of knowing, ; 3. awareness, consciousness or familiarity gained by experience or learning, 4. evaluation or informed learning, 5. specific information about a subject. Out of these definitions, 3-5 throw good light and offer a useful starting point. The third and fourth definitions imply that knowledge is gained through the senses as a result \
3 12 of individual_and^social experiences and as such is subjective# The fifth definition offers the possibility of objective knowledge. This leads to a question whether information about a subject stored in a book or on a computer file is acually knowledge# or therefore# whether knowledge can exist without the human mind to know it# The answer to the question is that f knowledge is the product of the mind and as such until information has been processed by the human mind# it is not knowledge# Knowledge only becomes knowledge for an individual when he or she has processed it# The information recorded in a book is the codification of a writer's knowledge and data that might become knowledge for a reader, 2 Berger and Luckmann state that knowledge "is the certainity that phenomena are real and that they possess certain characteristics." In this definition the two words "certainity" and "real" pose following problems: 1# how the certainity was reached? 2# what reality means? Whether it includes only actual# almost tangible and objectified items or also conceptual statements. 3 By contrast Hirst suggests that the domain of knowledge is not the certainity of phenomena but 'true propositions or
4 13 I statements*. This definition of Hirst raises following problems: 1. Must knowledge always be true? 2. Is truth absolute or relative? 3. If the knower is certain but found to be wrong, did he actually possess knowledge? i 4 According to John Hospers "knowledge is expressed in propositions like *1 know that I am now reading a book*. 'I know that 2 plus 2 equals 4', and so on". Taking knowledge as propositional statement, the question arises what requirements must be met in order for one to assert truly that he knows the proposition or how one can separate the rightful claims to know from the mistaken ones. In this connection John Hospers have enumerated the following requirements: 1. Proposition must be true? 2. Hot only must proposition be trues we must believe that proposition is true; and 3. We must have evidence for proposition (reason to believe proposition) 5 Ayer lays down that "the necessary and sufficient conditions for knowing that something is the case are first
5 14 that one is said to know to be true, secondly that one be sure of it, and thirdly one should have the right to be sure." 1.2 Constituents of Knowledge: Another way to understand the nature of knowledge is to look into the constituents of propositions in which knowledge is expressed. For example a proposition like "Library is a growing organism" cannot be understood until and unless the meaning of the terms 'Library' and 'growing organism' is clear to us. Meaning becomes clear when we understand the concepts or ideas involving the terms 'Library* and 'growing organism'. It therefore leads us to infer that terms involve concepts and the constituents of knowledge are concepts or ideas. The next question arises as how do we acquire the concepts that we have 7 It was once thought that concepts are innate and wired into us. However, the theory of innate concepts is no longer held. The modern thinking is that concepts are acquired through experience. The main proponents of this view were three British philosophers* John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume, These philosophers used the word 'ideas' instead of 'concepts'. They proponded that "All the ideas we have or ever shall have come from experiences (1) some through the "outer" senses, such as sight, hearing, and touch, and from
6 15 these all our concepts ilivolving the physical world are drawn/ and (2) some from the "il'iner" senses, such as experiences of pain and pleasure, feeljlngs of love and hate, pride and remorse, experience of thinking and willing- from these we get all the ideas about our inner life. All our concepts are derived from these two kinds of experience, Locke called the first 'ideas of sensation' and the second 'ideas of reflection, Hume's main thesis was that there can be no idea without sense impression. However, cannot we have ideas of lots of things of which we have never had any impression? This led Locke to distinguish between simple ideas and complex ideas, "We can imagine golden mountains and black roses without ever seeing them because, after all, we have seen the colours of gold and black in other things. The ideas of golden mountains and black roses are complex ideas / we simply take ideas we have already acquired through other experiences and put them together in our imagination in new combinations. The human mind can create all sorts of complex ideas from simple ideas v gleaned from experience; but the human mind cannot create a Wingle simple idea. The relation of simple to complex ideas is somewhat like the relation of atoms to molecules. Without atoms, cannot have molecules and atoms can be combined in different ways to form different molecules. Without simple ideas *Twe_7 cannot form complex ideas? but once have a number of simple ideas /""we^j? can combine then in our imagination
7 16 In-aJLl sorts of different ways to form the ideas of countless -=-^ 7 things that never existed_on-jland ~or sea." - " 1.3 Roads to Knowledges Yet another way to understand the 'nature of knowledge is to probe~d.njto~jthe- question what are the means by which we come to knowledge? or what are various roads to knowledge?» Q Scheffler highlights the three broad philosphical approaches to knowledge; rationalist, empiricist and pragmatic. Knowledge arrived at through principles of rationalism rests upon the process of pure reason. The mathematician for instance, requires no empirical evidence nor does he need quantitative data. Through the logical processes of reason he may probe from his initial premise until he reaches a conclusion provided the original premise was demonstrably true and the -logical process correct then the conclusions must be true knowledge., Empiricists approach i to knowledge depends upon empirical evidences. Here natural and social phenomena are explored by experience. Knowledge based upon empirical evidence may reflect an understanding of a past phenomena but may never logically be employed to predict a future one. t Pragmatism implies that knowledge is gained as a result of experimentation. The individual may reach a certain level of belief as a result of his observation of a phenomenon, but
8 17 the hypothesis has to be tested and tried. Experimentation, trial and error, are the experiences through which the validity of knowledge is examined* Eactr'bf'these approaches to knowledge is different. Each depends upon a correct use of the method of acquiring the data and processing it into knowledge. If the method is inadequate or the process incorrect then the resulting conclusions may be false knowledge. Hence the context in which knowledge is acquired is relevant to its expression. 9 John Hospers has enumerated the following roads to knowledge: Sense-experience Reason Authority -Intuition Revelation Faith Of all these, sense experience is the most obvious. But before sense-experience can become embodied in knowledge, it requires judgement. Sense experience itself is neither true
9 18 nor false. It is used to test the validity of a proposition which we want to judge to be true or false. As such sense experience forms the basis of a perceptual judgement, but alone is not enough to constitute that judgement. Reason is the ability to think. This ability is indispensable to having knowledge of any sorth, including knowledge acquired through sens e-percept ion. _ ense experience may provide-the raw material for our judgement but without reason we cannot f omul ate the judgement at all. Thus reason is a prerequisite for all knowledge. The most familiar kind of reasoning, which is often taken as the model for all reasoning, is deductive reasoning. In a deductive argument, the conclusion must logically follow from the premises: or in other words if the premises of the argument are true, the conclusion must be true. It means that if we want to know that a conclusion is true we have to be sure that the premises are true and the arguments,_valid. But all reasoning is not deductive. We also argue inductively i.e. from evidence to conclusion. However, the con c lusion s in-indue tive reasoning are not certain but only probable to one degree or another. Authority is accepting a statement by invoking an authority like "I know it Is true because Ranganathan has said so, and Ranganathan is an authority on the subject." "The statements we hear or read are nearly infinite in number, and many of them would require years of investigation before their truths
10 19 could be ascertained, on the^ather hand, life is short, and it is impossible to check the truth of every assertion we encounter. Consequently, we either take on authority the vast majority of the claims to truth that come our way, or suspend our judgement about them.however, the following are certain precautions to be observed: 1. The person whose words are taken as authority, must be a specialist in his field of knowledge. ^-2. - When the authorities are at variance with one another, it is better to suspend judgement for the time-being. 3. One should try to find out for himself whether the authority's statement is true by devoting time and trouble. "Thus no matter how reliable an authority may be, and no matter how often his statements have turned out to be true when cleared and checked, authority cannot be a primary source of knowledge". 1 r_^ - Intuition "is merely the label for a certain kind of experience, one that is not easily described, A conviction of, / certainity comes upon us suddenly like a light going on inside and instantly we are convinced that what comes to us in this flash is true. The experiences commonly spoken of as intuition
11 20 12 typically come all at~once, as^if^in a blinding flash." The question arises whether the claim of conflicting statements asserted on the basis of intuition should be taken to knowledge. The answer is that we must look beyond intuition to discover the truth of such statements. We could look to sense experience or reason. Revelation is claiming to knowledge by asserting a statement on the basis of revelation in a dream or a vision. However, such a statement cannot be taken as true until and unless its truth has been varified by other means. If the claims made are such that sense experience or reason could substantiate them, then only we can believe that the claims are true.» Faith is belief in something for which there is no evidence. However, people have been found claiming to knowledge on the basis of faith. As such faith cannot be taken as a source of knowledge if it cannot be verified by sense experience or reasoning. 1.4 Psychological and Physiological Processes Involved in Knowledge Formation: After discussing the roads to knowledge, let us now look into the nature of knowledge from the point of view of psychological
12 21 and physiological processes. There are a number of events in sequence leading to the formation of percepts, their association in various ways to foi^loncepts, the association of the latter in various ways to form the appreception mass and further polymerisation through fresh association of concepts 13 to produce ideas, Ranganathan has explained these events in following sequence: 1, Pure Percept: A meaningful impression, produced by any entity through a single primary sense and deposited in the memory. 2, Perception: ^HWHi l ' Reference of a percept to its entity correlate outside the mind, 3, Compound Percept: The impression deposited in memory, as a result of the association of two or more pure percepts formed simultaneously or in a quick succession. 4, Concept: The formation, deposited in memory, as a result of the association of percepts - pure as well as compound-already deposited in the memory, 'S\ J*i
13 c Apperception: The assimilation of newly received percepts and newly formed concepts with the concepts already present in the memory. 6. Apperception Mass: The concepts already present in memory to which newly received percepts and newly received concepts are to be assimilated. 7. Idea: The product of thinking, reflecting imagining etc got by the intellect by integrating with the ai<i of logic, a selection from the apperception mass, and/ or what is directly apprehended by intuition, and deposited in the memory. 8. Knowledge: I. The totality of the ideas conserved by the humans. Ranganathan*s diagram known as Brain Chamber, showing the formation of ideas, is presented in Figure 1.1.
14 1 1 t fsf > /?<- *i, ' * f - *i -* 4 V..» *v ( Figure 1.1 )
15 24 Broadly speaking these processes can be considered as Involving three stages: Sensation, perception and conceptualisation or concept formation. Sensation is the input of stimuli through the sense organs - for example, the sense of vision, hearing, smell, taste and touch. Perception is the organisation of the sensation into an experience. When the sensation is identified, it is known as perception and the things perceived are referred to as percepts*. Conceptuali-» sation requires repeated experiences of the simultaneous occurence of the same set of percepts. The process of concept formation involves two stages - discrimination and grouping and /*V\ t^ierie are further dependent on the ability to abstract and gen er alls e Perception and conceptualisation are interdependent processes. We cannot perceive something unless we have a concept of that thing, and we cannot form concepts of things unless we have the ability to perceive their constituents or properties. 14 Mortensen identifies the following factors which have been found to effect the processes of perception and conceptualisation; 1. Previous experience 2 Time : Concepts change with time because as time passes, the individual gains more and different experiences.
16 25 3, Preconception: Our perceptions tend to be affected by what~we-think-we ought to perceive, 4, Difference in logical thought: Differences in logical thought result in different concepts being developed from the percepts derived from the same object.» 5, Social-factors : Social factors affect our perception and thereby the process of concept formation, 1.5 Knowledge - a Definition: Let us now combine all these approaches on the nature of knowledge and reach a working definition for our purpose. {> An attempt at such a definition results in the following formulations x Knowledge is the totality of systematised and organised ideas produced as a result of sensory intellectual and intuitive experiences of individuals and conserved by human civilisation.
17 26 REFERENCES 1. Collins Dictionary of the English Language, 1979, p «Berger, P.Land Luckmann, T, Social Construction of Reality. Allen Lane, 1967, p Hirst, P.H. Knowledge and the Curriculum. Routledge '^ndpkegan~paul, 1974, p« Hosper, John. Introduction to philosophical analysis. ^-Indian reprint, Allied Publishers, 1986, p Ayer, A.J._Problems of Knowledge, Penguin, 1965, p Hosper, John, opcit. p Ibid, p Scheffler,_I.Conditions of Knowledge, University of JChicago Press, Hosper, John, opcit, !0. Ibid, p Ibid, p Ibid, p Ranganathan, S.R.Prolegomena to Library Classification, Ed.3. Asia Publishing House, 1967, pp Mortensen, C.D. Communication t the study of human interaction. McGraw-Hill, 1972, Chap.7.
The British Empiricism
The British Empiricism Locke, Berkeley and Hume copyleft: nicolazuin.2018 nowxhere.wordpress.com The terrible heritage of Descartes: Skepticism, Empiricism, Rationalism The problem originates from the
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 21 Lecture - 21 Kant Forms of sensibility Categories
More informationChapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge
Key Words Chapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge Empiricism, skepticism, personal identity, necessary connection, causal connection, induction, impressions, ideas. DAVID HUME (1711-76) is one of the
More informationEmpiricism. HZT4U1 - Mr. Wittmann - Unit 3 - Lecture 3
Empiricism HZT4U1 - Mr. Wittmann - Unit 3 - Lecture 3 What can give us more sure knowledge than our senses? How else can we distinguish between the true & the false? -Lucretius The Dream by Henri Rousseau
More informationJohn Locke. British Empiricism
John Locke British Empiricism Locke Biographical Notes: Locke is credited as the founder of the British "Common Sense" movement, later known as empiricism - he was also the founder of the modern political
More informationFunctions of the Mind and Soul
Sounds of Love Series Functions of the Mind and Soul Now, let us consider: What is a mental process? How does the human mind function? The human mind performs three functions. The lower part of the mind
More informationIDHEF Chapter 2 Why Should Anyone Believe Anything At All?
IDHEF Chapter 2 Why Should Anyone Believe Anything At All? -You might have heard someone say, It doesn t really matter what you believe, as long as you believe something. While many people think this is
More informationFalsification or Confirmation: From Logic to Psychology
Falsification or Confirmation: From Logic to Psychology Roman Lukyanenko Information Systems Department Florida international University rlukyane@fiu.edu Abstract Corroboration or Confirmation is a prominent
More informationThe Unbearable Lightness of Theory of Knowledge:
The Unbearable Lightness of Theory of Knowledge: Desert Mountain High School s Summer Reading in five easy steps! STEP ONE: Read these five pages important background about basic TOK concepts: Knowing
More informationRationalism. A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt
Rationalism I. Descartes (1596-1650) A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt 1. How could one be certain in the absence of religious guidance and trustworthy senses
More informationWhy There s Nothing You Can Say to Change My Mind: The Principle of Non-Contradiction in Aristotle s Metaphysics
Davis 1 Why There s Nothing You Can Say to Change My Mind: The Principle of Non-Contradiction in Aristotle s Metaphysics William Davis Red River Undergraduate Philosophy Conference North Dakota State University
More informationPhilosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Science Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy
Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2014 Russell Marcus Class #3 - Illusion Descartes, from Meditations on First Philosophy Marcus, Introduction to Philosophy, Fall 2014 Slide 1 Business P
More informationDirect Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument by Michael Huemer (2000)
Direct Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument by Michael Huemer (2000) One of the advantages traditionally claimed for direct realist theories of perception over indirect realist theories is that the
More informationHas Logical Positivism Eliminated Metaphysics?
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 7714 Volume 3 Issue 11 ǁ November. 2014 ǁ PP.38-42 Has Logical Positivism Eliminated Metaphysics?
More informationPhilosophy Epistemology. Topic 3 - Skepticism
Michael Huemer on Skepticism Philosophy 3340 - Epistemology Topic 3 - Skepticism Chapter II. The Lure of Radical Skepticism 1. Mike Huemer defines radical skepticism as follows: Philosophical skeptics
More informationRussell s Problems of Philosophy
Russell s Problems of Philosophy KNOWLEDGE: A CQUAINTANCE & DESCRIPTION J a n u a r y 2 4 Today : 1. Review Russell s against Idealism 2. Knowledge by Acquaintance & Description 3. What are we acquianted
More informationClass #3 - Illusion Descartes, from Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes, The Story of the Wax Descartes, The Story of the Sun
Philosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Fall 2014 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #3 - Illusion Descartes, from Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes, The Story of the Wax Descartes, The
More informationHow Do We Know Anything about Mathematics? - A Defence of Platonism
How Do We Know Anything about Mathematics? - A Defence of Platonism Majda Trobok University of Rijeka original scientific paper UDK: 141.131 1:51 510.21 ABSTRACT In this paper I will try to say something
More informationEvery simple idea has a simple impression, which resembles it; and every simple impression a correspondent idea
'Every simple idea has a simple impression, which resembles it; and every simple impression a correspondent idea' (Treatise, Book I, Part I, Section I). What defence does Hume give of this principle and
More informationChapter I. Introduction
Chapter I Introduction The philosophical ideas propounded by John Locke have far-reaching consequences in the field of classical philosophy. However, his writings have been studied exhaustively by only
More informationLecture 18: Rationalism
Lecture 18: Rationalism I. INTRODUCTION A. Introduction Descartes notion of innate ideas is consistent with rationalism Rationalism is a view appealing to reason as a source of knowledge or justification.
More informationTHE ROLE OF APRIORI, EMPIRICAL, ANALYTIC AND SYNTHETIC IN PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS.
American Journal of Social Issues & Humanities (ISSN: 2276-6928) Vol.1(2) pp. 82-94 Nov. 2011 Available online http://www.ajsih.org 2011 American Journal of Social Issues & Humanities THE ROLE OF APRIORI,
More informationIn Defense of Radical Empiricism. Joseph Benjamin Riegel. Chapel Hill 2006
In Defense of Radical Empiricism Joseph Benjamin Riegel A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
More information1/12. The A Paralogisms
1/12 The A Paralogisms The character of the Paralogisms is described early in the chapter. Kant describes them as being syllogisms which contain no empirical premises and states that in them we conclude
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T AGENDA 1. Review of Epistemology 2. Kant Kant s Compromise Kant s Copernican Revolution 3. The Nature of Truth KNOWLEDGE:
More informationThe problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Defining induction...
The problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 2 2.0 Defining induction... 2 3.0 Induction versus deduction... 2 4.0 Hume's descriptive
More informationKant & Transcendental Idealism
Kant & Transcendental Idealism HZT4U1 - Mr. Wittmann - Unit 3 - Lecture 4 Empiricists and rationalists alike are dupes of the same illusion. Both take partial notions for real parts. -Henri Bergson Enlightenment
More informationPHI 1700: Global Ethics
PHI 1700: Global Ethics Session 3 February 11th, 2016 Harman, Ethics and Observation 1 (finishing up our All About Arguments discussion) A common theme linking many of the fallacies we covered is that
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T AGENDA 1. Review of Epistemology 2. Kant Kant s Compromise Kant s Copernican Revolution 3. The Nature of Truth REVIEW: THREE
More informationPrécis of Empiricism and Experience. Anil Gupta University of Pittsburgh
Précis of Empiricism and Experience Anil Gupta University of Pittsburgh My principal aim in the book is to understand the logical relationship of experience to knowledge. Say that I look out of my window
More informationSCIENCE AND METAPHYSICS Part III SCIENTIFIC EPISTEMOLOGY? David Tin Win α & Thandee Kywe β. Abstract
SCIENCE AND METAPHYSICS Part III SCIENTIFIC EPISTEMOLOGY? David Tin Win α & Thandee Kywe β Abstract The major factor that limits application of science in episte-mology is identified as the blindness of
More informationGREAT PHILOSOPHERS: Thomas Reid ( ) Peter West 25/09/18
GREAT PHILOSOPHERS: Thomas Reid (1710-1796) Peter West 25/09/18 Some context Aristotle (384-322 BCE) Lucretius (c. 99-55 BCE) Thomas Reid (1710-1796 AD) 400 BCE 0 Much of (Western) scholastic philosophy
More informationNaturalized Epistemology. 1. What is naturalized Epistemology? Quine PY4613
Naturalized Epistemology Quine PY4613 1. What is naturalized Epistemology? a. How is it motivated? b. What are its doctrines? c. Naturalized Epistemology in the context of Quine s philosophy 2. Naturalized
More informationClass #14: October 13 Gödel s Platonism
Philosophy 405: Knowledge, Truth and Mathematics Fall 2010 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #14: October 13 Gödel s Platonism I. The Continuum Hypothesis and Its Independence The continuum problem
More informationIntroductory Kant Seminar Lecture
Introductory Kant Seminar Lecture Intentionality It is not unusual to begin a discussion of Kant with a brief review of some history of philosophy. What is perhaps less usual is to start with a review
More informationCLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH
CLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH I. Challenges to Confirmation A. The Inductivist Turkey B. Discovery vs. Justification 1. Discovery 2. Justification C. Hume's Problem 1. Inductive
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 4 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 4 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M AGENDA 1. Quick Review 2. Arguments Against Materialism/Physicalism (continued)
More informationIII Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier
III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier In Theaetetus Plato introduced the definition of knowledge which is often translated
More informationRethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View
http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319532363 Carlo Cellucci Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View 1 Preface From its very beginning, philosophy has been viewed as aimed at knowledge and methods to
More informationLogic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Logic, Truth & Epistemology Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationAyer s linguistic theory of the a priori
Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori phil 43904 Jeff Speaks December 4, 2007 1 The problem of a priori knowledge....................... 1 2 Necessity and the a priori............................ 2
More informationFrom Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction
From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction Let me see if I can say a few things to re-cap our first discussion of the Transcendental Logic, and help you get a foothold for what follows. Kant
More informationspring 05 topics in philosophy of mind session 7
24.500 spring 05 topics in philosophy of mind session 7 teatime self-knowledge 24.500 S05 1 plan self-blindness, one more time Peacocke & Co. immunity to error through misidentification: Shoemaker s self-reference
More informationTheory of Knowledge Series
Online Free Resources Theory of Knowledge Series Ways of Knowing info@lanternaeducation.com www.lanternaeducation.com What are Ways of Knowing? Ways of Knowledge All knowledge comes from somewhere. Even
More informationExamining the nature of mind. Michael Daniels. A review of Understanding Consciousness by Max Velmans (Routledge, 2000).
Examining the nature of mind Michael Daniels A review of Understanding Consciousness by Max Velmans (Routledge, 2000). Max Velmans is Reader in Psychology at Goldsmiths College, University of London. Over
More informationPhilosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 4: Skepticism. Part 1: The Scope of Skepticism and Two Main Types of Skeptical Argument
1. The Scope of Skepticism Philosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 4: Skepticism Part 1: The Scope of Skepticism and Two Main Types of Skeptical Argument The scope of skeptical challenges can vary in a number
More informationAyer on the criterion of verifiability
Ayer on the criterion of verifiability November 19, 2004 1 The critique of metaphysics............................. 1 2 Observation statements............................... 2 3 In principle verifiability...............................
More informationVerificationism. PHIL September 27, 2011
Verificationism PHIL 83104 September 27, 2011 1. The critique of metaphysics... 1 2. Observation statements... 2 3. In principle verifiability... 3 4. Strong verifiability... 3 4.1. Conclusive verifiability
More informationCHAPTER III KANT S APPROACH TO A PRIORI AND A POSTERIORI
CHAPTER III KANT S APPROACH TO A PRIORI AND A POSTERIORI Introduction One could easily find out two most influential epistemological doctrines, namely, rationalism and empiricism that have inadequate solutions
More information1. Introduction Formal deductive logic Overview
1. Introduction 1.1. Formal deductive logic 1.1.0. Overview In this course we will study reasoning, but we will study only certain aspects of reasoning and study them only from one perspective. The special
More informationReid Against Skepticism
Thus we see, that Descartes and Locke take the road that leads to skepticism without knowing the end of it, but they stop short for want of light to carry them farther. Berkeley, frightened at the appearance
More informationAyer on the argument from illusion
Ayer on the argument from illusion Jeff Speaks Philosophy 370 October 5, 2004 1 The objects of experience.............................. 1 2 The argument from illusion............................. 2 2.1
More informationImportant dates. PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since David Hume ( )
PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since 1600 Dr. Peter Assmann Spring 2018 Important dates Feb 14 Term paper draft due Upload paper to E-Learning https://elearning.utdallas.edu
More informationChapter 16 George Berkeley s Immaterialism and Subjective Idealism
Chapter 16 George Berkeley s Immaterialism and Subjective Idealism Key Words Immaterialism, esse est percipi, material substance, sense data, skepticism, primary quality, secondary quality, substratum
More informationMoral Obligation. by Charles G. Finney
Moral Obligation by Charles G. Finney The idea of obligation, or of oughtness, is an idea of the pure reason. It is a simple, rational conception, and, strictly speaking, does not admit of a definition,
More informationCONTENTS A SYSTEM OF LOGIC
EDITOR'S INTRODUCTION NOTE ON THE TEXT. SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY XV xlix I /' ~, r ' o>
More informationWright on response-dependence and self-knowledge
Wright on response-dependence and self-knowledge March 23, 2004 1 Response-dependent and response-independent concepts........... 1 1.1 The intuitive distinction......................... 1 1.2 Basic equations
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 28 Lecture - 28 Linguistic turn in British philosophy
More informationChrist-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking
Christ-Centered Critical Thinking Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking 1 In this lesson we will learn: To evaluate our thinking and the thinking of others using the Intellectual Standards Two approaches to evaluating
More informationEpistemology and sensation
Cazeaux, C. (2016). Epistemology and sensation. In H. Miller (ed.), Sage Encyclopaedia of Theory in Psychology Volume 1, Thousand Oaks: Sage: 294 7. Epistemology and sensation Clive Cazeaux Sensation refers
More informationPsychology and Psychurgy III. PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHURGY: The Nature and Use of The Mind. by Elmer Gates
[p. 38] blank [p. 39] Psychology and Psychurgy [p. 40] blank [p. 41] III PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHURGY: The Nature and Use of The Mind. by Elmer Gates In this paper I have thought it well to call attention
More informationContents EMPIRICISM. Logical Atomism and the beginnings of pluralist empiricism. Recap: Russell s reductionism: from maths to physics
Contents EMPIRICISM PHIL3072, ANU, 2015 Jason Grossman http://empiricism.xeny.net lecture 9: 22 September Recap Bertrand Russell: reductionism in physics Common sense is self-refuting Acquaintance versus
More informationTask 1: Philosophical Questions. Question 1: To what extent do you shape your own destiny, and how much is down to fate?
How to philosophise? Question everything and assume nothing! Task 1: Philosophical Questions A key skill in Philosophy is having the ability to think. When answering these questions, please give yourself
More informationSydenham College of Commerce & Economics. * Dr. Sunil S. Shete. * Associate Professor
Sydenham College of Commerce & Economics * Dr. Sunil S. Shete * Associate Professor Keywords: Philosophy of science, research methods, Logic, Business research Abstract This paper review Popper s epistemology
More informationPHI2391: Logical Empiricism I 8.0
1 2 3 4 5 PHI2391: Logical Empiricism I 8.0 Hume and Kant! Remember Hume s question:! Are we rationally justified in inferring causes from experimental observations?! Kant s answer: we can give a transcendental
More informationEpistemology. Diogenes: Master Cynic. The Ancient Greek Skeptics 4/6/2011. But is it really possible to claim knowledge of anything?
Epistemology a branch of philosophy that investigates the origin, nature, methods, and limits of human knowledge (Dictionary.com v 1.1). Epistemology attempts to answer the question how do we know what
More informationGROUP A WESTERN PHILOSOPHY (40 marks)
GROUP A WESTERN PHILOSOPHY (40 marks) Chapter 1 CONCEPT OF PHILOSOPHY (4 marks allotted) MCQ 1X2 = 2 SAQ -- 1X2 = 2 (a) Nature of Philosophy: The word Philosophy is originated from two Greek words Philos
More informationDefinitions of Gods of Descartes and Locke
Assignment of Introduction to Philosophy Definitions of Gods of Descartes and Locke June 7, 2015 Kenzo Fujisue 1. Introduction Through lectures of Introduction to Philosophy, I studied that Christianity
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 20 Lecture - 20 Critical Philosophy: Kant s objectives
More informationAn Epistemological Position: Knowledge by Sensation is the only Knowledge that can be regarded as Truth. Leon Reynolds
An Epistemological Position: Knowledge by Sensation is the only Knowledge that can be regarded as Truth Leon Reynolds Introduction Most Empiricists from Locke through Russell to the present have... taken
More informationReductio ad Absurdum, Modulation, and Logical Forms. Miguel López-Astorga 1
International Journal of Philosophy and Theology June 25, Vol. 3, No., pp. 59-65 ISSN: 2333-575 (Print), 2333-5769 (Online) Copyright The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research
More informationDivisibility, Logic, Radical Empiricism, and Metaphysics
Abstract: Divisibility, Logic, Radical Empiricism, and Metaphysics We will explore the problem of the manner in which the world may be divided into parts, and how this affects the application of logic.
More informationA Quick Review of the Scientific Method Transcript
Screen 1: Marketing Research is based on the Scientific Method. A quick review of the Scientific Method, therefore, is in order. Text based slide. Time Code: 0:00 A Quick Review of the Scientific Method
More informationBusiness Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method
Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method Professor Tim Mazzarol UWA Business School MGMT6791 UWA Business School DBA Program tim.mazzarol@uwa.edu.au
More informationKant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge
Kant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge Statements involving necessity or strict universality could never be known on the basis of sense experience, and are thus known (if known at all) a priori.
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 14 Lecture - 14 John Locke The empiricism of John
More information3. Knowledge and Justification
THE PROBLEMS OF KNOWLEDGE 11 3. Knowledge and Justification We have been discussing the role of skeptical arguments in epistemology and have already made some progress in thinking about reasoning and belief.
More informationLaws are simple in nature. Laws are quantifiable. Formulated laws are valid at all times.
Vedic Vision Laws are simple in nature. Laws are quantifiable. Formulated laws are valid at all times. Formulate Hypotheses. Test hypotheses by experimental observation. Where do hypotheses come from?
More informationWHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL?
WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL? Beliefs don t trump facts in the real world. People almost invariably arrive at their beliefs not on the basis of proof but on the basis of what they find attractive.
More informationEarly Russell on Philosophical Grammar
Early Russell on Philosophical Grammar G. J. Mattey Fall, 2005 / Philosophy 156 Philosophical Grammar The study of grammar, in my opinion, is capable of throwing far more light on philosophical questions
More informationIt is not at all wise to draw a watertight
The Causal Relation : Its Acceptance and Denial JOY BHATTACHARYYA It is not at all wise to draw a watertight distinction between Eastern and Western philosophies. The causal relation is a serious problem
More informationCraig on the Experience of Tense
Craig on the Experience of Tense In his recent book, The Tensed Theory of Time: A Critical Examination, 1 William Lane Craig offers several criticisms of my views on our experience of time. The purpose
More informationCartesian Rationalism
Cartesian Rationalism René Descartes 1596-1650 Reason tells me to trust my senses Descartes had the disturbing experience of finding out that everything he learned at school was wrong! From 1604-1612 he
More informationUnit 2. WoK 1 - Perception. Tuesday, October 7, 14
Unit 2 WoK 1 - Perception Russell Reading - Appearance and Reality The Russell document provides a basic framework for looking at the limitations of our senses. In small groups, discuss and record what
More informationFrom the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
From the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Epistemology Peter D. Klein Philosophical Concept Epistemology is one of the core areas of philosophy. It is concerned with the nature, sources and limits
More informationIdeas Have Consequences
Introduction Our interest in this series is whether God can be known or not and, if he does exist and is knowable, then how may we truly know him and to what degree. We summarized the debate over God s
More information1. What is Philosophy?
[Welcome to the first handout of your Introduction to Philosophy Mooc! This handout is designed to complement the video lecture by giving you a written summary of the key points covered in the videos.
More informationTHE MORAL ARGUMENT. Peter van Inwagen. Introduction, James Petrik
THE MORAL ARGUMENT Peter van Inwagen Introduction, James Petrik THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHICAL DISCUSSIONS of human freedom is closely intertwined with the history of philosophical discussions of moral responsibility.
More informationToday we turn to the work of one of the most important, and also most difficult, philosophers: Immanuel Kant.
Kant s antinomies Today we turn to the work of one of the most important, and also most difficult, philosophers: Immanuel Kant. Kant was born in 1724 in Prussia, and his philosophical work has exerted
More informationRussell s Problems of Philosophy
Russell s Problems of Philosophy IT S (NOT) ALL IN YOUR HEAD J a n u a r y 1 9 Today : 1. Review Existence & Nature of Matter 2. Russell s case against Idealism 3. Next Lecture 2.0 Review Existence & Nature
More information1/9. The First Analogy
1/9 The First Analogy So far we have looked at the mathematical principles but now we are going to turn to the dynamical principles, of which there are two sorts, the Analogies of Experience and the Postulates
More informationPHILOSOPHICAL RAMIFICATIONS: THEORY, EXPERIMENT, & EMPIRICAL TRUTH
PHILOSOPHICAL RAMIFICATIONS: THEORY, EXPERIMENT, & EMPIRICAL TRUTH PCES 3.42 Even before Newton published his revolutionary work, philosophers had already been trying to come to grips with the questions
More informationSemantic Foundations for Deductive Methods
Semantic Foundations for Deductive Methods delineating the scope of deductive reason Roger Bishop Jones Abstract. The scope of deductive reason is considered. First a connection is discussed between the
More informationA Studying of Limitation of Epistemology as Basis of Toleration with Special Reference to John Locke
A Studying of Limitation of Epistemology as Basis of Toleration with Special Reference to John Locke Roghieh Tamimi and R. P. Singh Center for philosophy, Social Science School, Jawaharlal Nehru University,
More informationout in his Three Dialogues and Principles of Human Knowledge, gives an argument specifically
That Thing-I-Know-Not-What by [Perm #7903685] The philosopher George Berkeley, in part of his general thesis against materialism as laid out in his Three Dialogues and Principles of Human Knowledge, gives
More informationArgument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals
Argument and Persuasion Stating Opinions and Proposals The Method It all starts with an opinion - something that people can agree or disagree with. The Method Move to action Speak your mind Convince someone
More informationThe Theoretical Model of GOD: Proof of the Existence and of the Uniqueness of GOD
March 2010 Vol. 1 Issue 2 Page 85-97 85 Article The Theoretical Model of GOD: Proof of the Existence and of the Uniqueness of GOD Temur Z. Kalanov ABSTRACT The work is devoted to the 21st century s most
More informationDO WE NEED A THEORY OF METAPHYSICAL COMPOSITION?
1 DO WE NEED A THEORY OF METAPHYSICAL COMPOSITION? ROBERT C. OSBORNE DRAFT (02/27/13) PLEASE DO NOT CITE WITHOUT PERMISSION I. Introduction Much of the recent work in contemporary metaphysics has been
More information