Christianity is the most dominant religion in the United States, with over 70% of the population 1
|
|
- Francis Roberts
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Introduction Christianity is the most dominant religion in the United States, with over 70% of the population 1 identifying as Christian. While there is no state sponsored religion, Christianity still has a great deal of influence on American politics and social life. It is only recently that same sex marriages have become legal, and the primary opposition to such marriages was religious. In many parts of the country, stores are still closed on Sundays, a remnant of blue laws. The stock market closes on Christmas, Easter, and many other Christian holidays. It is not surprising that movements opposing Christianity in public life, especially in politics, have emerged. What is perhaps a bit more surprising is that some of these movements may have resulted in the emergence of a new religion, or class of religions. The following paper analyses a combination of personal discussions and published documents by some of the more prominent members of these movements, and shows that these movements are indeed reasonably classified as 2 religious ones, based on the definition of religion established in previous work. For the purpose of this paper, the proposed religion will be called Religious Rejectionism. Once the initial evidence for the existence of Religious Rejectionism is presented, the paper finishes with suggestions for additional research necessary to fully understand this new religion. Religioid Belief In order to show the presence of a religion, the first step is to identify a candidate for a religioid belief. In the case of the aforementioned movements, such beliefs may include the belief that there are no gods, the belief that there is no afterlife, and in the extreme, the belief that all religion is false. For this paper, the focus will be on the belief that there are no gods. While the belief that all religion is false would incorporate that belief, it is a bit more difficult to find data and provide a detailed argument. The no-god belief is also enough to justify the initial conclusion of religiosity. Over time, it should be possible to tie both beliefs together and show more details on the nature of Religious Rejectionism. To show that Religious Rejectionism is truly a religion, it is first necessary to provide justification that the core beliefs are indeed religioid. Sam Harris fmri study on religious and non-religious belief acts as a foundation for the argument. Harris paper analyzes the reaction to religious and non-religious stimuli, for two separate groups. One group was Christian, and the other group 1 Wormald, Benjamin. "Religious Landscape Study." Pew Research Centers Religion & Public Life Project. May 11, Accessed April 05, Goldman, Daniel S., A Unified Psychological and Anthropological Model of Religion. SocArXiv. March 31. doi: /osf.io/xqduv.
2 was labeled as non-believers. The results indicate that there is a difference between the way 3 the brain responds to religious and non-religious stimuli. However, there is also another interesting result. When the Christian group has their belief in a god affirmed, the response is almost the opposite of the non-believer group s reaction to having the god claim affirmed. The signal is however weaker in the non-believer group. A similar result occurs when the existence of god is rejected. Harris suggested that some alternative mechanism was responsible for the non-believer group s reaction. Yet there is no explanation as to why the fmri results would 4 show nearly equal but opposite reactions. A simpler explanation is that the non-believer group included both those who simply lacked a belief in gods, and those who believed that none exist, and that the belief that no god exists is a religioid belief. If both the belief in a god and the belief that none exist are the same, we should see equal and opposite signals, if the non-believer group were really believers of nonexistence. A failure to separate believers in nonexistence of gods, from those who simply lack a belief in gods should result in a weakened signal, because there should be little to no response, if there is no belief being affirmed or rejected. 5 Wiech et al gives another hint at the nature of belief in absence of gods. This study was 6 used, alongside Harris work, to construct the initial model of religioid belief. While the study suggested that religious belief helped induce analgesic effect, when the non-religious group was confronted with religious images, it seemed to actually resulted in a decrease in tolerance for 7 8 pain. Newer research suggests that disgust may reduce pain tolerance. If so, it could be that the non-religious group is actually having a disgust reaction in response to a religious position which contradicts their own religioid beliefs. Dimensions of Religion Further research is needed to investigate these topics, and by themselves, these results are very weak justification for the presence of a religion. However, if this candidate belief can be integrated with the cultural framework of Smart s seven dimensions of religion, then it becomes 3 Harris, Sam, Jonas T. Kaplan, Ashley Curiel, Susan Y. Bookheimer, Marco Iacoboni, and Mark S. Cohen. "The Neural Correlates of Religious and Nonreligious Belief." PLoS ONE 4, no. 10 (2009). doi: /journal.pone Ibid. 5 Wiech, Katja, Miguel Farias, Guy Kahane, Nicholas Shackel, Wiebke Tiede, and Irene Tracey. "An FMRI Study Measuring Analgesia Enhanced by Religion as a Belief System." Pain 139, no. 2 (2008): doi: /j.pain Goldman, Daniel S., A Unified Psychological and Anthropological Model of Religion. SocArXiv. March 31. doi: /osf.io/xqduv. 7 Wiech, Katja, Miguel Farias, Guy Kahane, Nicholas Shackel, Wiebke Tiede, and Irene Tracey. "An FMRI Study Measuring Analgesia Enhanced by Religion as a Belief System." Pain 139, no. 2 (2008): doi: /j.pain Oaten, Megan J., Richard J. Stevenson, and Trevor I. Case. "The Effect of Disgust on Pain Sensitivity." Physiology & Behavior 138 (2015): doi: /j.physbeh
3 more reasonable to conclude that the belief is a religioid belief, and the combined system is a religion. The following includes a list of potential elements of each dimension, based on a combination of private discussions, writings by prominent authors on the topic, and less formal discussions, including a number of atheist and secular websites. Doctrinal or philosophical : The doctrinal or philosophical dimension of Religious Rejectionism is quite well developed. One of the key elements of the doctrine is related to negative claims: claims of nonexistence. A common response, to requests for evidence when a claim of nonexistence of gods is made, is that one cannot prove a negative claim, or that the burden of proof is on those claiming existence. While the purpose of this paper is not a philosophical discussion on proving negatives, it is important to go over the logical issues with such a claim. Science investigates negative claims all the time. Whenever the FDA requests that a new drug be tested, one of the requirements is that the drug be tested for side effects. When a drug is claimed to be safe, the claimant is stating that there is evidence that there are no significantly harmful side effects. Furthermore, looking at the topic of negative and positive claims from a logical perspective, one can take any claim of existence, and find a claim of nonexistence which implies it: although such a claim may be verbally obtuse, the difference between claims of nonexistence and claims of existence is linguistic, not logical. It is uncertain where the doctrinal component originates, however it may be a misunderstanding of Russel s allegory of a teapot existing somewhere between the Earth and Mars. The allegory exists to explain why shifting of burden of proof is not reasonable. If a theist claims that a god 9 exists, the burden of proof is on that person. However, that does not absolve anyone of burden of proof when claiming nonexistence. To finalize the argument here, one could state that a universe without a god does not exist. Such a claim is a claim of existence, but it implies that there is a god. Given that claims of nonexistence do suffer burden of proof, and that it is likely that people would demand satisfaction of burden of proof, when making a mundane claim of nonexistence, such as this drug is free of dangerous side effects, it becomes increasingly clear that the function of this doctrine is to absolve the Religious Rejectionist of recognition of burden of proof. Therefore, the doctrine makes sense, only in light of the belief that there are no gods. Another component of doctrine is the idea that religion is inherently irrational. This view is even embedded in some of the scientific literature on the topic of religion, but that view is largely 9 Is There a God. Accessed April 04,
4 10 opposed by anthropological theory on the topic. The following is one example of such a view being expressed. It is because religion and many other dark ideologies warp reason, reason is thinking carefully and clearly and avoiding contradictions, and thereby make a virtue out of woolly thinking that this page has been written. It offers you the chance to feel confident in your thinking and to learn how to think and how to protect yourself against the disciples of 11 reason who are anything but. Ethical and legal: Humanism and secularism seem to be common elements within Religious Rejectionism. Partially in response to the argument that there cannot be any morality without a god, there has been an attempt to define a godless moral system, and one argument used is 12 that morality comes from nature itself. Experiential and emotional: A common theme among Religious Rejectionists is the experience of leaving religion. As an example, the following summarizes a story of leaving 13 religion, discussed by one of the many godless bloggers. Armin Navabi, the founder of Atheist Republic had a similar experience. According to Why There Is No God, Navabi was born in Iran, and indoctrinated into Islam. But after an extremely traumatic experience, he began to question his religion, losing his faith, and becoming an atheist. He then sought out groups where 14 he could share his experience, and eventually founded Atheist Republic. There are also entire 15 organizations dedicated to sharing the experience of leaving one s religion. Material: These same institutions give rise to an example of the material dimension of Religious Rejectionism. The material dimension includes any physical object which is tied to the religion. The material dimension includes, among other elements, symbols and books related to the religion. One recognized symbol is the atomic whirl, which is the logo of American Atheists. There are also a number of books, such as The God Delusion, Fighting God, and others by prominent atheist authors. These symbols relate, not just to atheism, but also to attempts to disprove the existence of gods, reinforcing the religioid belief that there are no gods. 10 Goldman, Daniel S., A Unified Psychological and Anthropological Model of Religion. SocArXiv. March 31. doi: /osf.io/xqduv. 11 Religious Faith Is Illogical. Accessed April 04, "Ethics Without Gods." American Atheists. Accessed April 04, Carter, Neil. "What Leaving My Religion Did for Me." Godless in Dixie. September 14, Accessed April 04, Navabi, Armin. Why There Is No God: Simple Responses to 20 Common Arguments for the Existence of God. Place of Publication Not Identified: Atheist Republic, "Welcome." Recovering from Religion. Accessed April 04, Smart, Ninian. The Worlds Religions. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, "Our Logo." American Atheists. Accessed April 04,
5 Ritual: There are a few rituals connected to Religious Rejectionism, including the National Day 18 of Reason, which largely exists as a response to the National Day of Prayer. But it does connect to the earlier addressed doctrinal elements, including the idea that religion is inherently irrational. Social or institutional: The social or institutional dimension is satisfied by numerous atheist groups. Atheism is simply a lack of belief in gods. There are many atheists of all walks of life, 19 including devoutly religious Zen Buddhists, which is essentially agnostic towards god claims. A lack of belief in gods does not constitute a unifying trait, and yet these institutions exist. Many of them are spearheaded by vocal anti-theists like Richard Dawkins and David Silverman. Part of their existence is simply to act as institutions which fight against the religious impositions of Christianity in politics. But they do far more than that. The Richard Dawkins Foundation clearly 20 states that their purpose is to promote scientific literacy and a secular worldview. Narrative and mythic: This dimension is probably the most difficult to identity. Part of the narrative comes from the origin of Religious Rejectionism. Since the religion grew out of an opposition towards Abrahamic tradition, there are remnants of the narrative, adopted for a different purpose. Biblical stories of violence, including the Israelite conquest of Jericho have been used as arguments attacking religion. Yet there is no evidence of a battle of Jericho and according to current anthropological theory, the Israelites were just a tribe of Canaanites that 21 found the region abandoned. Perhaps the most important narrative in Religious Rejectionism is the rise and fall of religion. There seems to be this view that religion came into existence because primitive man could not explain natural phenomena such as thunder and lightning, and that gods were used to explain these phenomena, and now that we have science, there 22 religion is falling by the wayside. 18 "National Day of Reason." National Day of Reason RSS. Accessed April 04, "Beliefs & Dogmas." ZEN BUDDHISM Beliefs Buddhist Beliefs. Accessed April 05, "What We Do." Richard Dawkins Foundation. Accessed April 04, Dever, William G. Who Were the Early Israelites and Where Did They Come From? Grand Rapids (Michigan): William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, "Is Religion Fast Becoming Obsolete In Today's Modern Society?" Relatively Interesting. November 24, Accessed April 05,
6 Research Proposals The second half of this paper focuses on suggested research in order to improve the understanding of Religious Rejectionism. First, the work, conducted by Sam Harris, Katja Wiech, et al., can be expanded upon. The non-religious group should have been separated into two or more subgroups. One option is to divide the group of subjects by level of belief or disbelief. Five subgroups would allow for separation of those who are nearly certain that there are no gods, those who believe that gods are unlikely, those who hold no position, those who believe that the existence of a god is probable, and those who are certain that there is a god. This classification system can be used for both tests. If belief in the absence of a god is indeed a religioid belief, there should be a clear spread across the spectrum, with those who believe strongly having roughly equal and opposite reactions, and those with little to no position on the topic showing very little response. A few additional modifications would have to be made to the analgesia study. In order to identify a similar disgust response within the theistic group, as found in the non-religious group of the initial study, an image contradicting theistic belief would have to be included. Similarly, a symbol common among Religious Rejectionists, such as the atheist A should be included. In the initial study, it was fairly obvious that the theistic group would be familiar with the religious image. It is less certain if the added images would be familiar to the subjects. After the test is complete, the participants should be interviewed to determine whether or not they were familiar with the other images. The examples of each dimension of religion, indicated to be present in Religious Rejectionism, are only candidates. Surveys of the population will allow for a much better understanding of each dimension. But the candidates proposed can be used to form the basis of the questions of such a survey. The results of the study can then be used to characterize a more detailed description of Religious Rejectionism. Alternatively, if there is an apparent lack of correlation between the presence of each proposed religious dimension, or between the proposed religious dimensions and proposed religioid beliefs, then the results would suggest Religious Rejectionism does not exist as a well developed religion. Similarly, if the fmri studies contradict the predictions stated in this paper, that too would help refute the existence of Religious Rejectionism.
7 Conclusion The existence of a belief, which induces a similar response in the brain, as those found in religious individuals, hints at the presence of a religion. However, it is only after linking such a belief to a cultural framework of religious dimensions that it is reasonable to declare that there is indeed a religion present. The clues in fmri studies do suggest that the belief that there are no gods is indeed similar in form and function to the belief that there is a god. Furthermore, it is possible to link that belief to every dimension of religion, discussed by Ninian Smart. While further research should be done, in order to identify the full nature and extent of the religion, it seems that there is reasonable evidence to suggest that Religious Rejectionism is a religion. However, further research should be conducted, in order to identify the existence or absence of such a religion.
8 Bibliography "Beliefs & Dogmas." ZEN BUDDHISM Beliefs Buddhist Beliefs. Accessed April 05, Carter, Neil. "What Leaving My Religion Did for Me." Godless in Dixie. September 14, Accessed April 04, Dever, William G. Who Were the Early Israelites and Where Did They Come From? Grand Rapids (Michigan): William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, "Ethics Without Gods." American Atheists. Accessed April 04, Goldman, Daniel S., A Unified Psychological and Anthropological Model of Religion. SocArXiv. March 31. doi: /osf.io/xqduv. Harris, Sam, Jonas T. Kaplan, Ashley Curiel, Susan Y. Bookheimer, Marco Iacoboni, and Mark S. Cohen. "The Neural Correlates of Religious and Nonreligious Belief." PLoS ONE 4, no. 10 (2009). doi: /journal.pone "Is Religion Fast Becoming Obsolete In Today's Modern Society?" Relatively Interesting. November 24, Accessed April 05, Is There a God. Accessed April 04, Navabi, Armin. Why There Is No God: Simple Responses to 20 Common Arguments for the Existence of God. Place of Publication Not Identified: Atheist Republic, Oaten, Megan J., Richard J. Stevenson, and Trevor I. Case. "The Effect of Disgust on Pain Sensitivity." Physiology & Behavior 138 (2015): doi: /j.physbeh "Our Logo." American Atheists. Accessed April 04, Religious Faith Is Illogical. Accessed April 04,
9 "Welcome." Recovering from Religion. Accessed April 04, "What We Do." Richard Dawkins Foundation. Accessed April 04, Wiech, Katja, Miguel Farias, Guy Kahane, Nicholas Shackel, Wiebke Tiede, and Irene Tracey. "An FMRI Study Measuring Analgesia Enhanced by Religion as a Belief System." Pain 139, no. 2 (2008): doi: /j.pain Wormald, Benjamin. "Religious Landscape Study." Pew Research Centers Religion & Public Life Project. May 11, Accessed April 05,
Atheism: A Christian Response
Atheism: A Christian Response What do atheists believe about belief? Atheists Moral Objections An atheist is someone who believes there is no God. There are at least five million atheists in the United
More informationImpact Hour. May 15, 2016
Impact Hour May 15, 2016 Why People Don t Believe: 1. The Power of Religion 2. Reason To Fear 3. Religion and Violence: A Closer Look 4. Is Christianity Irrational and Devoid of Evidence? 5. Is Christianity
More informationReligious Studies. Name: Institution: Course: Date:
Running head: RELIGIOUS STUDIES Religious Studies Name: Institution: Course: Date: RELIGIOUS STUDIES 2 Abstract In this brief essay paper, we aim to critically analyze the question: Given that there are
More informationUrsuline College Accelerated Program
Ursuline College Accelerated Program CRITICAL INFORMATION! DO NOT SKIP THIS LINK BELOW... BEFORE PROCEEDING TO READ THE UCAP MODULE, YOU ARE EXPECTED TO READ AND ADHERE TO ALL UCAP POLICY INFORMATION CONTAINED
More informationThe Rightness Error: An Evaluation of Normative Ethics in the Absence of Moral Realism
An Evaluation of Normative Ethics in the Absence of Moral Realism Mathais Sarrazin J.L. Mackie s Error Theory postulates that all normative claims are false. It does this based upon his denial of moral
More informationMeaning in Modern America by Clay Routledge
Research Brief May 2018 Meaning in Modern America by Clay Routledge Meaning is a fundamental psychological need. People who perceive their lives as full of meaning are physically and psychologically healthier
More informationReview of Erik J. Wielenberg: Robust Ethics: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Godless Normative Realism
2015 by Centre for Ethics, KU Leuven This article may not exactly replicate the published version. It is not the copy of record. http://ethical-perspectives.be/ Ethical Perspectives 22 (3) For the published
More informationHuman Nature & Human Diversity: Sex, Love & Parenting; Morality, Religion & Race. Course Description
Human Nature & Human Diversity: Sex, Love & Parenting; Morality, Religion & Race Course Description Human Nature & Human Diversity is listed as both a Philosophy course (PHIL 253) and a Cognitive Science
More informationNON-RELIGIOUS PHILOSOPHIES OF LIFE AND THE WORLD Support Materials - GMGY
People express non-religious philosophies of life and the world in different ways. For children in your class who express who express a non-religious worldview or belief, it is important that the child
More informationAS-LEVEL Religious Studies
AS-LEVEL Religious Studies RSS03 Philosophy of Religion Mark scheme 2060 June 2015 Version 1: Final Mark Scheme Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the
More informationTaking Religion Seriously
Taking Religion Seriously Religious Neutrality and Our Schools The last century has seen a purging of both religious influence and information from our classrooms. For many, this seems only natural and
More informationB.A. in Religion, Philosophy and Ethics (4-year Curriculum) Course List and Study Plan
Updated on 23 June 2017 B.A. in Religion, Philosophy and Ethics (4-year Curriculum) Course List and Study Plan Study Scheme Religion, Philosophy and Ethics Major Courses - Major Core Courses - Major Elective
More informationThe role of the Church in the local community
The role of the Church in the local community Why are churches important for the local community? Use your spider diagram to help you write a paragraph in your book explaining why you think churches are
More informationRonald Dworkin, Religion without God, Harvard University Press, 2013, pp. 192, 16.50, ISBN
Ronald Dworkin, Religion without God, Harvard University Press, 2013, pp. 192, 16.50, ISBN 9780674726826 Simone Grigoletto, Università degli Studi di Padova In 2009, Thomas Nagel, to whom Dworkin s book
More informationWe begin our discussion, however, more than 400 years before Christ with the Athenian philosopher Socrates. Socrates asks the question:
Religion and Ethics The relationship between religion and ethics or faith and ethics is a complex one. So complex that it s the subject of entire courses, not to mention the innumerable books that have
More informationDANIEL AKIN, President, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary
Atheism Remix offers a masterful analysis of and timely response to the New Atheism. Thoughtful and insightful, this readable work illuminates for scholars, pastors, and students alike the key issues that
More informationJohn Paul II Catholic High School The Journey: A Spiritual Roadmap for Modern Pilgrims by Peter Kreeft
John Paul II Catholic High School Moral Theology The Journey: A Spiritual Roadmap for Modern Pilgrims by Peter Kreeft Welcome to the Junior year summer reading program! Our book for this summer prepares
More informationLogical (formal) fallacies
Fallacies in academic writing Chad Nilep There are many possible sources of fallacy an idea that is mistakenly thought to be true, even though it may be untrue in academic writing. The phrase logical fallacy
More information1 Hans Jonas, The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984), 1-10.
Introduction This book seeks to provide a metaethical analysis of the responsibility ethics of two of its prominent defenders: H. Richard Niebuhr and Emmanuel Levinas. In any ethical writings, some use
More informationPhilosophy 1100 Introduction to Ethics. Lecture 3 Survival of Death?
Question 1 Philosophy 1100 Introduction to Ethics Lecture 3 Survival of Death? How important is it to you whether humans survive death? Do you agree or disagree with the following view? Given a choice
More informationWhat s God got to do with it?
What s God got to do with it? In this address I have drawn on a thesis submitted at Duke University in 2009 by Robert Brown. Based on this thesis I ask a question that you may not normally hear asked in
More informationEither God wants to abolish evil and cannot, or he can but does not want to, or he cannot and does not want to, or lastly he can and wants to.
1. Scientific Proof Against God In God: The Failed Hypothesis How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist, Victor J. Stenger offers this scientific argument against the existence of God: a) Hypothesize a
More informationRalph K. Hawkins Averett University Danville, Virginia
RBL 11/2013 Eric A. Seibert The Violence of Scripture: Overcoming the Old Testament s Troubling Legacy Minneapolis: Fortress, 2012. Pp. x + 220. Paper. $23.00. ISBN 9780800698256. Ralph K. Hawkins Averett
More informationIvan and Zosima: Existential Atheism vs. Existential Theism
Ivan and Zosima: Existential Atheism vs. Existential Theism Fyodor Dostoevsky, a Russian novelist, was very prolific in his time. He explored different philosophical voices that presented arguments and
More informationUnderstanding the burning question of the 1940s and beyond
Understanding the burning question of the 1940s and beyond This is a VERY SIMPLIFIED explanation of the existentialist philosophy. It is neither complete nor comprehensive. If existentialism intrigues
More informationWorld Religions. These subject guidelines should be read in conjunction with the Introduction, Outline and Details all essays sections of this guide.
World Religions These subject guidelines should be read in conjunction with the Introduction, Outline and Details all essays sections of this guide. Overview Extended essays in world religions provide
More informationIS IT IMMORAL TO BELIEVE IN GOD?
CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE PO Box 8500, Charlotte, NC 28271 Feature Article: JAF7384 IS IT IMMORAL TO BELIEVE IN GOD? by Matthew Flannagan This article first appeared in the CHRISTIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL,
More information1. Atheism We begin our study with a look at atheism. Atheism is not itself a religion.
1 1. Atheism We begin our study with a look at atheism. Atheism is not itself a religion. What is atheism Atheism is the view that God does not exist. The word comes from the Greek atheos which when we
More informationScience and Religion: Exploring the Spectrum
Science and Religion: Exploring the Spectrum Summary report of preliminary findings for a survey of public perspectives on Evolution and the relationship between Evolutionary Science and Religion Professor
More informationWho Has the Burden of Proof? Must the Christian Provide Adequate Reasons for Christian Beliefs?
Who Has the Burden of Proof? Must the Christian Provide Adequate Reasons for Christian Beliefs? Issue: Who has the burden of proof the Christian believer or the atheist? Whose position requires supporting
More informationA-level Religious Studies
A-level Religious Studies RST4B June 2014 Exemplars with Commentaries Contents: General Guidance Page 2 Candidate A Page 3 Candidate B Page 8 Candidate C Page 13 Candidate D Page 17 Candidate E Page 25
More informationIs this how we decide what to believe? Do I choose a belief system based on what I already want?
? Is this how we decide what to believe? Do I choose a belief system based on what I already want? Desires Beliefs ? Desires Beliefs What if this belief system reinterprets my desires? E.g. What if the
More information2 FREE CHOICE The heretical thesis of Hobbes is the orthodox position today. So much is this the case that most of the contemporary literature
Introduction The philosophical controversy about free will and determinism is perennial. Like many perennial controversies, this one involves a tangle of distinct but closely related issues. Thus, the
More informationFrom: Michael Huemer, Ethical Intuitionism (2005)
From: Michael Huemer, Ethical Intuitionism (2005) 214 L rsmkv!rs ks syxssm! finds Sally funny, but later decides he was mistaken about her funniness when the audience merely groans.) It seems, then, that
More informationThe Consequences of Opposing Worldviews and Opposing Sources of Knowledge By: Rev. Dr. Matthew Richard
The Consequences of Opposing Worldviews and Opposing Sources of Knowledge By: Rev. Dr. Matthew Richard What happens when two individuals with two opposing worldviews (i.e., lenses) interact? Paul Hiebert
More informationUNITY OF KNOWLEDGE (IN TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH FOR SUSTAINABILITY) Vol. I - Philosophical Holism M.Esfeld
PHILOSOPHICAL HOLISM M. Esfeld Department of Philosophy, University of Konstanz, Germany Keywords: atomism, confirmation, holism, inferential role semantics, meaning, monism, ontological dependence, rule-following,
More informationCommon Ground On Creation Keeping The Focus on That God Created and Not When
Common Ground On Creation Keeping The Focus on That God Created and Not When truehorizon.org COMMON GROUND ON CREATION Christian theism offers answers to life s most profound questions that stand in stark
More informationTHE IMPACT OF DARWIN S THEORIES. Darwin s Theories and Human Nature
Darwin s Theories and Human Nature I. Preliminary Questions: 1. Is science a better methodology to discover truth about human nature? 2. Should secular, scientific, claims to a prescription of what is
More informationONTOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF PLURALIST RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES
ONTOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF PLURALIST RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES Donald J Falconer and David R Mackay School of Management Information Systems Faculty of Business and Law Deakin University Geelong 3217 Australia
More informationChristianity and Science. Understanding the conflict (WAR)? Must we choose? A Slick New Packaging of Creationism
and Science Understanding the conflict (WAR)? Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, is a documentary which looks at how scientists who have discussed or written about Intelligent Design (and along the way
More informationRecoding of Jews in the Pew Portrait of Jewish Americans Elizabeth Tighe Raquel Kramer Leonard Saxe Daniel Parmer Ryan Victor July 9, 2014
Recoding of Jews in the Pew Portrait of Jewish Americans Elizabeth Tighe Raquel Kramer Leonard Saxe Daniel Parmer Ryan Victor July 9, 2014 The 2013 Pew survey of American Jews (PRC, 2013) was one of the
More informationThe Mind/Body Problem
The Mind/Body Problem This book briefly explains the problem of explaining consciousness and three proposals for how to do it. Site: HCC Eagle Online Course: 6143-PHIL-1301-Introduction to Philosophy-S8B-13971
More informationCJR: Volume 1, Issue Book Reviews. Sam Harris, Lying. Edited by Annaka Harris Kindle Edition. 26 pages. $1.99.
CJR: Volume 1, Issue 1 175 Book Reviews Sam Harris, Lying. Edited by Annaka Harris. 2011. Kindle Edition. 26 pages. $1.99. Keywords: Sam Harris, lying, truth, atheism Kyle Thompson Ph.D. student, Claremont
More informationPRESENTATION 19 GUIDE WHY WOULD AN ALL-LOVING GOD ALLOW SUFFERING? From content by: Fr. Robert J. Spitzer, S. J., Ph.D.
CC PRESENTATION 19 GUIDE CREDIBLE CATHOLIC WHY WOULD AN ALL-LOVING GOD ALLOW SUFFERING? From content by: Fr. Robert J. Spitzer, S. J., Ph.D. Adapted by: Claude R. LeBlanc, M.A. 1 Magis Center 2017 Welcome
More informationStudies of Religion II
2013 H I G H E R S C H O O L C E R T I F I C A T E E X A M I N A T I O N Studies of Religion II Total marks 100 Section I Pages 2 11 30 marks This section has two parts, Part A and Part B Allow about 50
More informationBIG IDEAS OVERVIEW FOR AGE GROUPS
BIG IDEAS OVERVIEW FOR AGE GROUPS Barbara Wintersgill and University of Exeter 2017. Permission is granted to use this copyright work for any purpose, provided that users give appropriate credit to the
More informationAnthony P. Andres. The Place of Conversion in Aristotelian Logic. Anthony P. Andres
[ Loyola Book Comp., run.tex: 0 AQR Vol. W rev. 0, 17 Jun 2009 ] [The Aquinas Review Vol. W rev. 0: 1 The Place of Conversion in Aristotelian Logic From at least the time of John of St. Thomas, scholastic
More informationTCA:ICT? Thinking Critically About: "Is Christianity True?"
TCA:ICT? Thinking Critically About: "Is Christianity True?" Thinking Critically About: Is Christianity True? Podcast #3: What is Christianity? Introduction to Your Host My Name: Bradley Bowen My Role:
More informationA CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE. A Paper. Presented to. Dr. Douglas Blount. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. In Partial Fulfillment
A CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE A Paper Presented to Dr. Douglas Blount Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for PHREL 4313 by Billy Marsh October 20,
More informationAtheism For Muslims: A Guide To Questioning Islam, Religion And God For A Better Future By Adam Wadi
Atheism For Muslims: A Guide To Questioning Islam, Religion And God For A Better Future By Adam Wadi Atheism for Muslims: A Guide to Questioning Islam, Religion and God - Atheism for Muslims: A Guide to
More information(i) Morality is a system; and (ii) It is a system comprised of moral rules and principles.
Ethics and Morality Ethos (Greek) and Mores (Latin) are terms having to do with custom, habit, and behavior. Ethics is the study of morality. This definition raises two questions: (a) What is morality?
More informationFour Arguments that the Cognitive Psychology of Religion Undermines the Justification of Religious Belief
Four Arguments that the Cognitive Psychology of Religion Undermines the Justification of Religious Belief Michael J. Murray Over the last decade a handful of cognitive models of religious belief have begun
More informationDifference between Science and Religion? - A Superficial, yet Tragi-Comic Misunderstanding
Scientific God Journal November 2012 Volume 3 Issue 10 pp. 955-960 955 Difference between Science and Religion? - A Superficial, yet Tragi-Comic Misunderstanding Essay Elemér E. Rosinger 1 Department of
More informationQuine s Naturalized Epistemology, Epistemic Normativity and the. Gettier Problem
Quine s Naturalized Epistemology, Epistemic Normativity and the Gettier Problem Dr. Qilin Li (liqilin@gmail.com; liqilin@pku.edu.cn) The Department of Philosophy, Peking University Beiijing, P. R. China
More informationReligious Beliefs of Higher Secondary School Teachers in Pathanamthitta District of Kerala State
IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 22, Issue 11, Ver. 10 (November. 2017) PP 38-42 e-issn: 2279-0837, p-issn: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org Religious Beliefs of Higher Secondary
More informationIrrational Beliefs in Disease Causation and Treatment I
21A.215 Irrational Beliefs in Disease Causation and Treatment I I. Symbolic healing (and harming) A. Fadiman notes: I was suspended in a large bowl of Fish Soup. Medicine was religion. Religion was society.
More informationUganda, morality was derived from God and the adult members were regarded as teachers of religion. God remained the canon against which the moral
ESSENTIAL APPROACHES TO CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS EDUCATION: LEARNING AND TEACHING A PAPER PRESENTED TO THE SCHOOL OF RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE STUDIES UGANDA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ON MARCH 23, 2018 Prof. Christopher
More informationCOMITÉ SUR LES AFFAIRES RELIGIEUSES A NEW APPROACH TO RELIGIOUS EDUCATION IN SCHOOL: A CHOICE REGARDING TODAY S CHALLENGES
COMITÉ SUR LES AFFAIRES RELIGIEUSES A NEW APPROACH TO RELIGIOUS EDUCATION IN SCHOOL: A CHOICE REGARDING TODAY S CHALLENGES BRIEF TO THE MINISTER OF EDUCATION, SALIENT AND COMPLEMENTARY POINTS JANUARY 2005
More informationWhat is Atheism? How is Atheism Defined?: Who Are Atheists? What Do Atheists Believe?:
1 What is Atheism? How is Atheism Defined?: The more common understanding of atheism among atheists is "not believing in any gods." No claims or denials are made - an atheist is any person who is not a
More informationRational Answers to Ideological Commitments. Jaafar Sheikh Idris. website
Rational Answers to Ideological Commitments الا جوالرشيدة ىلع الالزتامات الا يديولوجية ] إ ل ي - English [ Jaafar Sheikh Idris جعفر شيخ إدر س www.islamreligion.com website موقع دين الا سلام 2013-1434 Rational
More informationTHE QUEEN. on the application of:
Ref:- DRO/AJG/BRI-20409-001 On behalf of the Claimant Witness Statement of David Voas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL
More informationTake Home Exam #1. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert
PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert Name: Date: Take Home Exam #1 Instructions (Read Before Proceeding!) Material for this exam is from class sessions 2-7. Please write your answers clearly
More informationOn the Relationship between Religiosity and Ideology
Curt Raney Introduction to Data Analysis Spring 1997 Word Count: 1,583 On the Relationship between Religiosity and Ideology Abstract This paper reports the results of a survey of students at a small college
More informationPHI 1700: Global Ethics
PHI 1700: Global Ethics Session 3 February 11th, 2016 Harman, Ethics and Observation 1 (finishing up our All About Arguments discussion) A common theme linking many of the fallacies we covered is that
More informationThe New Atheism. Part 1 of 2: Engaging the New Atheism
Part 1 of 2: Engaging the New Atheism with,, Release Date: December 2013 Welcome to The Table, where we discuss issues of God and Culture and today, our topic is the new Atheism, and I m Darrel Bock, Executive
More informationCommon Morality: Deciding What to Do 1
Common Morality: Deciding What to Do 1 By Bernard Gert (1934-2011) [Page 15] Analogy between Morality and Grammar Common morality is complex, but it is less complex than the grammar of a language. Just
More informationA Philosophical Critique of Cognitive Psychology s Definition of the Person
A Philosophical Critique of Cognitive Psychology s Definition of the Person Rosa Turrisi Fuller The Pluralist, Volume 4, Number 1, Spring 2009, pp. 93-99 (Article) Published by University of Illinois Press
More informationPRESENTATION 19 GUIDE WHY WOULD AN ALL-LOVING GOD ALLOW SUFFERING? From content by: Fr. Robert J. Spitzer, S. J., Ph.D.
CC PRESENTATION 19 GUIDE CREDIBLE CATHOLIC WHY WOULD AN ALL-LOVING GOD ALLOW SUFFERING? From content by: Fr. Robert J. Spitzer, S. J., Ph.D. Adapted by: Claude R. LeBlanc, M.A. 1 Magis Center 2017 Welcome
More informationIII Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier
III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier In Theaetetus Plato introduced the definition of knowledge which is often translated
More informationSpeech of H.E. Minister of Endowments and Religious Affairs at the inauguration of Cambridge Inter-faith Program Gentlemen,
Speech of H.E. Minister of Endowments and Religious Affairs at the inauguration of Cambridge Inter-faith Program Gentlemen, When I received the invitation of Professor David Ford to attend this event,
More informationIDEALS SURVEY RESULTS
Office of Institutional Effectiveness IDEALS SURVEY RESULTS Time 2 Administration of the Interfaith Diversity Experiences & Attitudes Longitudinal Survey Presented by Elizabeth Silk, Director of Institutional
More informationMoral Objectivism. RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary
Moral Objectivism RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary The possibility, let alone the actuality, of an objective morality has intrigued philosophers for well over two millennia. Though much discussed,
More informationQué es la filosofía? What is philosophy? Philosophy
Philosophy PHILOSOPHY AS A WAY OF THINKING WHAT IS IT? WHO HAS IT? WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A WAY OF THINKING AND A DISCIPLINE? It is the propensity to seek out answers to the questions that we ask
More informationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH Volume 1, Number 1 Submitted: October 1, 2004 First Revision: April 15, 2005 Accepted: April 18, 2005 Publication Date: April 25, 2005 RELIGIOUS PLURALISM, RELIGIOUS
More informationIntegrating Spirituality into Counseling. Syllabus Spring 2009
Integrating Spirituality into Counseling Syllabus Spring 2009 Contact Information Gordon Lindbloom, Ph.D. Lauren Loos, MA Gordon Lindbloom (503) 768-6070 lndbloom@lclark.edu Office Hours: 2:00 4:00 PM,
More informationInterview. with Ravi Ravindra. Can science help us know the nature of God through his creation?
Interview Buddhist monk meditating: Traditional Chinese painting with Ravi Ravindra Can science help us know the nature of God through his creation? So much depends on what one thinks or imagines God is.
More informationChanging Views of Drugs and Consciousness. By Jennifer Mitradarmbidhaks American University Washington, DC May 11, 2005
Changing Views of Drugs and Consciousness By Jennifer Mitradarmbidhaks jm0544a@american.edu American University Washington, DC May 11, 2005 In the beginning of this semester, especially after the first
More informationStudies of Religion II
2017 HIGHER SCHOOL CERTIFICATE EXAMINATION Studies of Religion II General Instructions Reading time 5 minutes Working time 3 hours Write using black pen Write your Centre Number and Student Number at the
More informationUNDERSTANDING UNBELIEF Public Engagement Call for Proposals Information Sheet
UNDERSTANDING UNBELIEF Public Engagement Call for Proposals Information Sheet Through a generous grant from the John Templeton Foundation, the University of Kent is pleased to announce a funding stream
More informationReligious Education in the Early Years. Foundation Stage. RE is fun because we do a variety of different activities. We get a chance to discuss things
Religious Education in the Early Years Foundation Stage EYFS refers to Early Years Foundation Stage, with reference to standards for learning, development and care, from birth to five and is statutory
More informationVol. II, No. 5, Reason, Truth and History, 127. LARS BERGSTRÖM
Croatian Journal of Philosophy Vol. II, No. 5, 2002 L. Bergström, Putnam on the Fact-Value Dichotomy 1 Putnam on the Fact-Value Dichotomy LARS BERGSTRÖM Stockholm University In Reason, Truth and History
More informationFinding God and Being Found by God
Finding God and Being Found by God This unit begins by focusing on the question How can I know God? In any age this is an important and relevant question because it is directly related to the question
More informationVerificationism. PHIL September 27, 2011
Verificationism PHIL 83104 September 27, 2011 1. The critique of metaphysics... 1 2. Observation statements... 2 3. In principle verifiability... 3 4. Strong verifiability... 3 4.1. Conclusive verifiability
More informationThe Fifth National Survey of Religion and Politics: A Baseline for the 2008 Presidential Election. John C. Green
The Fifth National Survey of Religion and Politics: A Baseline for the 2008 Presidential Election John C. Green Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics University of Akron (Email: green@uakron.edu;
More informationThe Oxford Handbook of Epistemology
Oxford Scholarship Online You are looking at 1-10 of 21 items for: booktitle : handbook phimet The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology Paul K. Moser (ed.) Item type: book DOI: 10.1093/0195130057.001.0001 This
More informationSelf-Refuting Statements
Self-Refuting Statements 2016 M. S. Turner Often when Christians are sharing their faith, they are challenged by skeptics, agnostics, and non-believers with statements that are selfrefuting. A self-refuting
More informationCourse Learning Outcomes for Unit III. Reading Assignment. Unit Lesson. UNIT III STUDY GUIDE Thinking Elements and Standards
UNIT III STUDY GUIDE Thinking Elements and Standards Course Learning Outcomes for Unit III Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to: 1. Recognize the traits of the fair-minded thinker.
More informationStudies of Religion II
2008 HIGHER SCHOOL CERTIFICATE EXAMINATION Studies of Religion II Total marks 100 Section I Pages 2 11 30 marks This section has two parts, Part A and Part B Allow about 50 minutes for this section Part
More informationThe Unbearable Lightness of Theory of Knowledge:
The Unbearable Lightness of Theory of Knowledge: Desert Mountain High School s Summer Reading in five easy steps! STEP ONE: Read these five pages important background about basic TOK concepts: Knowing
More informationIs anything knowable on the basis of understanding alone?
Is anything knowable on the basis of understanding alone? PHIL 83104 November 7, 2011 1. Some linking principles... 1 2. Problems with these linking principles... 2 2.1. False analytic sentences? 2.2.
More information2014 THE BIBLIOGRAPHIA ISSN: Online First: 21 October 2014
PROBABILITY IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION. Edited by Jake Chandler & Victoria S. Harrison. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Pp. 272. Hard Cover 42, ISBN: 978-0-19-960476-0. IN ADDITION TO AN INTRODUCTORY
More informationAbdu Murray. Aletheia International Embrace the Truth - No Matter the Cost
Abdu Murray Aletheia International Embrace the Truth - No Matter the Cost - Biography ABDU is a co-founder and the President of Aletheia International, which is an apologetics-based ministry dedicated
More informationOPENING QUESTIONS. Why is the Bible sometimes misunderstood or doubted in contemporary culture?
Unit 1 SCRIPTURE OPENING QUESTIONS Why is the Bible sometimes misunderstood or doubted in contemporary culture? How is the Bible relevant to our lives today? What does it mean to say the Bible is the Word
More informationIntroduction. I. Proof of the Minor Premise ( All reality is completely intelligible )
Philosophical Proof of God: Derived from Principles in Bernard Lonergan s Insight May 2014 Robert J. Spitzer, S.J., Ph.D. Magis Center of Reason and Faith Lonergan s proof may be stated as follows: Introduction
More informationA Graphical Representation of the Reconstructionist World-View (with a Mixture of Science Thrown in for Good Measure) by Ronald W. Satz, Ph.D.
A Graphical Representation of the Reconstructionist World-View (with a Mixture of Science Thrown in for Good Measure) by Ronald W. Satz, Ph.D. Introduction Compared with books or papers in science and
More informationCHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND
CHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND I. Five Alleged Problems with Theology and Science A. Allegedly, science shows there is no need to postulate a god. 1. Ancients used to think that you
More informationAndrew B. Newberg, Principles of Neurotheology (Ashgate science and religions series), Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing, 2010 (276 p.
Dr. Ludwig Neidhart (Augsburg, 01.06.12) Andrew B. Newberg, Principles of Neurotheology (Ashgate science and religions series), Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing, 2010 (276 p.) Review for the
More informationIS ATHEISM A FAITH? REV. AMY RUSSELL FEBRUARY
Atheism is an ancient philosophy. We can look back to the beginnings of our civilization and find philosophers talking about the origin of the universe with various scientific and philosophical beliefs.
More informationAbdu Murray. Embrace the Truth - No Matter the Cost. P.O. Box , Rochester, MI TRUTH
Abdu Murray Embrace the Truth - No Matter the Cost Biography ABDU is the President and co-founder of Embrace the Truth International, an apologetics ministry dedicated to offering the Truth of the Gospel
More informationre:view Worldview Study Topic 06 Theism Dr. Brown Teaching Segment Outline I. Theism: The World from God s Hand God.
re:view Worldview Study Topic 06 Theism Dr. Brown Teaching Segment Outline I. Theism: The World from God s Hand God. Coming to a conclusion about the God question is the central issue in life. More consequences
More information