Braithwaite'sAnalysis of Religious Belief; AnInstrumentalist Approach to Religion
|
|
- Cody Parker
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 2013 Available online at ISSN X / Vol, 4 (10): Science Explorer Publications Braithwaite'sAnalysis of Religious Belief; AnInstrumentalist Approach to Religion Mohammad HosseinMahdavinejad Assistant Prof. and Faculty Member, Department of Theology and Islamic Sciences, Payame Noor University (PNU), I.R. Iran. Corresponding Author h_mahdavinejad@yahoo.com ABSTRACT:The contemporary philosopher and physician, Richard Bevan Braithwaite ( ), is among the proponents of instrumentalist attitude.he wrote an essay in 1955 under the heading An Empiricist's View of the Nature of Religious Belief which drew much attention. He has tried from the position of a religious and empirical physician to hold religious beliefs along with his philosophical and positivistic thought. Braithwaite holds that the function of religious utterances is essentially the same of the moral statements. Religion involves stories that provide a picture of moral life and encourage to that moral life. According to him, the moral and religious statements reflect prescription for and commitment to a special way of behavior and conduct. Consequently, truth and falsity about religious statements are meaningless and essentially religious stories and statements appearing in narrative form, invite their addressees to a proper pattern of life, without being factual. Braithwaite who views the role of religion as moral and expects the religion to offer prescriptions for a proper form of life, has arrived at such a view following a fully positivistic attitude. Keywords:Religious belief, Language of religion, Positivism, Instrumentalism, Morality, Braithwaite. INTRODUCTION According to instrumentalism in religion, the set of religious teachings has been offered for human beings to satisfy a proper purpose and indeed these teachings are means for meeting that purpose. The notification of these teachings is not aimed at demonstrating an affair, but satisfying it. Thus, one should consider the religious statements from instrumental aspect and should consider them as nothing but instrument for meeting the purpose of the holy religions. The divine religions have descended to communicate the earthly creature (human) with the heavenly being (God) and all the teachings of religions follow this holy purpose. Thus, the doctrines of religions concerning heaven, earth, human, angels, and the other phenomena of universe all are accounts to satisfy thatpurpose and it is not necessary for all of these accounts to correspond exactly with what is stated by them. Instrumentalism in religion removes the conflict between religion and science ignoring the feature of realism in scriptures and developing them into useful stories. In this view, the problem of resurrection, punishment and reward are useful fiction and stories that are necessary for creating and supporting the morality in society and we should consider the individual and social functions of this kind of stories and should not take into account their truth and falsity. Instrumentalism in religion emphasizes more the usefulness of religious utterances than their truthfulness and more theethical, psychological, individual and social functions of religious beliefs than their logical aspects. (Austin, 1976: pp ) Instrumentalism in religion has been interpreted in different ways and we consider it sufficient to mention Braithwaite's approach. Braithwaite and Logical Positivism According to logical positivists, the meaningfulness criterion of a statement is the verification possibility of truth and falsity of it. (Lycan, 2000: p. 116) Following Ludwig Wittgenstein ( ) in his first book "TractatusLogico-Philosophicus", the principal doctrine of positivism is: The sense of a proposition is the method of its verification. (Waismann, 1979:p. 79) Similarly, Friedrich Waismann ( ) records this remark from conversations between Wittgenstein and him and MoritzSchlick ( ): In order to determine the sense of a proposition, I should have to know a very specific procedure for when to count the proposition as verified. (Waismann, 1979:p. 47) Thus, if one cannot show the verification and confirmation of a speech, it will be nonsensical. A speech about external world is meaningful if there is a way for its truth and falsity. According to meaningfulness theory, meaningful sentences are exclusively of three types: (Braithwaite, 1971: p. 73)
2 1. Personal sentences (observation-statements)about particular matters of empirical fact; 2. Scientific universal propositions that are verifiable or falsifiable outside; 3. Mathematical and logical tautologies and their contradictories. Moral statements that there were no way for showing their truth and falsity were viewed as meaningless. Thus, some of logical positivists considered moral concepts and sentences as nonsensical and for the other the function of moral and religious statements were to express personal emotions. Alfred Jules Ayer ( ) emphasized an emotive approach to ethics. He suggested that ethical statements express the feelings of the speaker. For example, When I say, Stealing money is bad. this is just another way of saying Stealing money!! with a particularly strong show of feeling. Since no factual statement is being made, you can disagree with my moral feelings but you cannot contradict me. (Stiver, 1996: p. 45) ButBraithwaite believed that in addition to the expression of emotion there is a kind of motivation in these statements. According to him, the function of religion is not merely emotive; because religion states the intention of performing the action in a certain way. Braithwaite emphasizes moral intentions and encouragement to moral behavior in his analysis and states: A religious assertion, for me, is the assertion of an intention to carry out a certain behavior policy, subsumable under a sufficiently general principle to be a moral one, together with the implicit or explicit statement, but not the assertion, of certain stories. (Braithwaite, 1971: p. 89) Thus, the criterion in the preference of one religion over another religion is not the distinction between the truth in the stories of one religion and the falsity in the stories of the another, but the criterion of being or not being preferable is a way of behavior or life that religion encourages in it. If the way of life in question is the same in two religions, then the criterion will be the degree of success in encouraging of humans in commitment to that way of life. For some positivists, ethics were not nothing but personal emotions and feelings. For example, Stealing is wrong. means I hates stealing., not as a universal rule but as a personal feeling. However, for Braithwaite, Stealing is wrong. Means I am determined never to steal. This decision is not a proper intention for a certain case, but it is an intention for following a universal rule. Thus, moral assertions are the external forms of asserter's intention for acting in a way asserted to it in assertion content. According to Braithwaite, if this were so, it would follow that it would be logically impossible to intend to act wrongly. He views action and faith as one thing and says: action is a sign of faith sincerity. Thus, it is unacceptable that one professes faith, but he is not a believer in practice. Although many positivists try to give a cognitive aspect to moral statements to express the emotions and feelings of individuals, Braithwaite finds out in an exact view that moral statements are not essentially statements with the cognitive aspect and they don't speak about something to be a way empirically for their verification or falsification. In the positivistic course, he understood that moral statements are neither verifiable nor falsifiable. According to Braithwaite, moral statements are not factual; because otherwise, since there is not a way for their verification and falsification, they become meaningless. Denying cognitive content, Braithwaite holds the meaningfulness of moral statements. He lambastes the criterion of positivism meaningfulness and rules out the implication between the non-cognitivism of moral statements and their meaninglessness and holds that positivists have considered denying the cognitive content as denying the content absolutely, falling into the morass of fallacy. According to the verifiability principle,positivists should have said that moral statements lack cognitive meaning and concept, but not they lack any meaning and concept. Braithwaite and positivists are of the same opinion that if a statement had the cognitive content, it would be factual and should have a way of verification and falsification, that is, he accepts their criterion in cognitive meaning exclusively, but he holds that meaning doesn't depend upon verification and falsification absolutely. The Meaningfulness oflanguage of Religion Instead of the empirical verifiability criterion, Braithwaite directs his attention to the usability and serviceability. Making use of Wittgenstein's use theory, he concentrates on the meaningfulness of moral statements. One of the linguistic foundations of Braithwaite's view is Wittgenstein's use theory concerning meaningfulness on the basis of that if a discourse has usability and serviceability, it will be meaningful and if a speech has not any use, it will be meaningless; just as if a coin has no use, it will be worthless and valueless. (Stiver, 1996: p. 72; Alizamani, 1996: p. 160)In this theory, worthiness is not intrinsic for the moral and religious statements, but they become worthy or valuable through use and usage. Therefore, moral statements become meaningful. In summary, first, language of religion is a meaningful language because this language has a proper use and usage. Second, language of religion is like language of ethics. Third, in language of religion, one should focus more on the functions of this language rather than the verification of its content. Fourth, the principal function of language of religion is to createa kind of commitment sense to a moral universal behavior or conduct in life and prescription of others for it. (Peterson, 1991: p. 146) God is love. Means I intend always to have a
3 lovely life and prescribe you to choose such form of life. Braithwaite takes advantage of some points about religious knowledge to affirm his theory. Religious Knowledge and Functional Approach Every religion includes a range of thoughts, values, acts, liturgical rites (rituals) and teachings about the form of life and tendencies and moral characteristics. A religious person is a person to whom some qualities are attributed and does some acts. Given belief in God and non-material objects, what is their role in encouraging in act.according to Braithwaite, religious statements explain moral truths attractively narrating stories that include a certain form of life. Religions narrate these stories for their audience appealingly and capture their spirit and imagination and lead them to a form of moral conduct by causal-psychological effectiveness. Stories are the group of doctrines which can be experienced, but it is not necessary to believe in their truth because their role is to arouse practical commitment in person. Braithwaite states: Next to the Bible and the Prayer Book the most influential work in English Christian religious life has been a book whose stories are frankly recognized as fictitious- Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress; and some of the most influential works in setting the moral tone of my generation were the novels of Dostoevsky. It is completely untrue, as a matter of psychological fact, to think that the only intellectual considerations which affect action are beliefs: it is all the thoughts of a man that determine his behavior; and these include his phantasies, propositions, ideas of what he would wish to be and do, as well as the propositions which he believes to be true. (Braithwaite, 1971: p ) Starting point of Braithwaite's instrumentalism is in his position that says: on my view, a person is not a true Christian unless he intends to live in accordance with Christian moral principles and links his intention to thought about Christian stories as well. However, it is not necessary for him to hold that experimental statements presented by stories correspond with experimental fact and are true. He claims that we should take psychological effectiveness into consideration instead of constantly trying to find logical causes. Such effectiveness provokes humans and leads them to action and in this respect, the role of religion is like art and literature role and changes the life of humans efficiently and influentially. Therefore, apostasy and the conversion of religion mean the alteration of decision and will for following a form of life rather than the change in philosophical and rational arguments. (Austin, 1976: p. 45) Those who appeal to religion usually choose a proper form of life and reject another form of life. When a prophet invites, more than all, the life of followers are changed. According to Braithwaite, a believer without act is unjustifiable and unacceptable and the principal message of religion is that it teaches a new form of life to humans, that is, the very moral teachings. All stories in scriptures are instruments for reinforcement, stabilization and prescription for a kind of moral conduct and a proper form of life. For example, stories that narrate the toleration of Jesus' suffering and hardships and his Crucifixion teach self-sacrifice lesson and stories that narrate Jesus' sympathy for people teach love of the public. Religious beliefs and thoughts are evolving, that is, their meaning and concept change. The followers' thought of religions concerning creation, devil, human and God, angels, paradise and hell, resurrection and etc. evolve continually. The truth of these matters is not necessary but it is sufficient for them to have a role in arousing practical commitment. It is enough for thestory of the city destruction of Lut's folk to make some people avoid from sodomy. The aim of the prophets is the provoking of moral decisions. God, paradise, hell, and etc. are aimed at giving more influence and insistence to ethical commands so as to lead the people to action and all religious narrations are instructive and advice-oriented and invite to purity. According to Braithwaite, one cannot explain the changeability of religion regarding the religious concepts and teachings as true. However, instrumentalism in religion not only recognizes this changeability but also deems it as necessary. For Braithwaite, non-empirical religious statements are not problematic because scientific theories have unobservable concepts too, like atomic theory. The existence of such theories in itself is not a sign of being unscientific and meaninglessness. God, paradise, hell, angels, and etc. are declared as non-empirical when one cannot derive other empirical theories from them, or the assumption of their existence or nonexistence is the same outside. As atom and intelligence and etc. are not observable and the theories requiring the existence of atom and intelligence, have empirical effects and results, religion has empirical results too, that is, it creates commitment to a proper way in the person's life. According to Braithwaite, conversion to another religion is not appealing to a philosophical or scientific school or set of beliefs, but is appealing to another way of life. It indicates that the nature of religion is the very orientation in life rather than beliefs and doctrines. An apostate leaves a form of life and chooses the another form. Thus, the whole of religion and its principal message is to inculcate a proper way of moral behavior in humans in life. Therefore, the religion is interpreted selectively. The clergies of religions offer a part of religious teachings to people every time that serve for their life.in this direction, some times some secondary problems become so principal and fundamental that person's fidelity and faith depend on it. Braithwaite states: this fact is explained with instrumentalism in religion. One can say that in every times we select a story among religious stories to be appropriate and useful for the life of people. If today the light in the story of the companions of the
4 Cave is twinkling and it is about to die out, tomorrow it is possible that its burner will be pulled up and its light and heat will be used for utility and expediency. The Assessment and Criticism of Braithwaite's Theory Critique1 The first critique ofbraithwaite's theory is that his analysis from religious statements as useful fictions is very different from what is common in religious society and believers' convention because the faithful believe in real entity and objective existence of God, paradise and etc. and even accept objectivity in religious stories. Braithwaite in this claim that religious beliefs cause to change the way of people's life and the ontological orientation of humans is right, but he has failed to explain and analyze this change. The reason that religious beliefs cause to change the form of people's life is not purely on the basis of their imaginative and psychological effectiveness, but it is for the belief of their truth. For the faithful, religious beliefs originate from the reality. Otherwise, if one deems them as mere fiction, how religious beliefs will be the agent of ontological orientation and the change in the form of people's life, whereas even they sometimesare willing to devote their life for these beliefs. Our purpose is not to deny the effectiveness of imaginative and artistic attractions in audience, but what is the case is that if religious beliefs and stories are not real, how can they have so profound and comprehensive effectiveness over the centuries and long periods? The cause of the effectiveness of the prophets' teachings in changing the ontological orientation of humans is primarily the truthfulness of these teachings and in the second their literary and artistic attractions. Critique2 Scientific advances can wipe out the moral effectiveness of religious stories indirectly. Theory of evolution and its theological implications are a clear evidence for this claim. When the falsity of religious stories is revealed by the development of science, it will be difficult to obligate people to act. On the other hand, given if we look at religious stories that belief in their truth is not a required condition for their effectiveness instructively, then first, besides religious stories, there are other false stories to be all ears for them. Second, we can find other true stories that may be more effective and efficient. Critique3 Indeed, Braithwaite has laid the theory of non-cognitivism of religious language on the basis of positivists' foundations. Accepting their foundations about theological statements, he says: if we don't regard theological statements as moral statements, they won't have any concept and meaning. Unless religious principles are moral principles, it makes no sense to speak of putting them into practice. (Austin, 1976: p. 42)Braithwaite's reason is that if theological statements are meaningful, they should be verifiable and empirical. This is the very primal core of positivists' discourse. On the other hand, the only way of meaningfulness of religious knowledge is not to connect it to moral thoughts. The linguistic foundation of Braithwaite's view is Wittgenstein's use theory about meaningfulness, whereas the usage are secondary to the understanding of discourse meaning. One of the assumptions of such theories is that the criterion of meaningfulness should merely be one criterion, whereas we can mention various criteria for meaningfulness. Thus, the confinement of meaningfulness criterion to a proper criterion is groundless and misleading. Critique4 Braithwaite has reduced religion to morality incorrectly. Religion is broader than morality and moral statements consist of only a part of religion. Another part concludes statements that have cognitive aspect as compared with existence and finally the third part as jurisprudence states our relations. Braithwaite's analysis about the metaphysical attributes of God is incomplete and imperfect and does not cover all of them. Although we can accept that the statement of God is love. is denoting asserter's intention for following a kind of form of life together with love and means Live lovingly., the statement of God is eternal. don t include the commitment and prescription for audience because the pre-eternity and post-eternity are not possible for audience to be prescribed for them. Thus, Braithwaite's analysis about many of the religious statements is not true. Furthermore, his definition of the language of religion only is applied toa small part of religious statements and is not applied to the great part of religious statements. According to John H. Hick: The Christian stories to which Braithwaite refers in the course of his lecture are of very diverse logical types. They include straightforward historical statements about the life of Jesus, mythological expressions of belief in creation and a final judgment, and belief in the existence of God. Of these, only the first category appears to fit Braithwaite's own definition of a story. (Hick, 1991: p. 94) Critique5 Religious statements don't only state moral purposes and intentions. Language of religion and even religious language is a phenomenon with hidden meanings and can simultaneously bear several contents. It is
5 impossible that a religious statement indicates both reality and our moral intentions. For example, among the theological statements of the language of religion, the statement of There is no god but Allah. is a case in point. This sentence bears two contents; cognitive and informative content that indicates the fact and functional content that includes the moral purposes. Religious statements have both doctrinal and cognitive aspect and moral aspect in religious society and believers' practice. Indeed, Braithwaite has fallen into the morass of false disjunction fallacy because he has thought that religious sentences have either cognitive or moral aspect as an exclusive proposition. (Mahdavinejad, 2011: p. 206) Critique6 We should ask Braithwaite: is your analysis about religious statements a description of reality or it is nothing but a proposal? In the first case, we will say that this description is false. The faithful regard theological statements as comprising informative content. According to them, religious beliefs are true and religious stories are free of falsity. In the second case, there is no reason to accept your proposal and essentially the task of philosophy of religion is description, notproposal. Critique7 According to Braithwaite's analysis of moral statements denoting person's decision for acting, the statement of Lying is wrong. means I intend never to lie. Logical criterion for the recognition of two equivalent propositions is that from the falsity of one results the falsity ofanother because the negation of one and the affirmation of the anotherwill be a contradiction. If Lying is wrong. is equivalent to I intend never to lie. then the expression of Lying is wrong, but I intend to tell a lie is contradictory. (Hick, 1991: p. 94) Whereas such expressions don't include a contradiction with attention to common sense and everyday life of people. It can be said as a reply to this criticism: Contradiction is proper to cognitive language and there is not any contradiction in non-cognitive language. At most, it is possible for it to include contrast or contrariety. Second that the condition of contradiction realization is ten unities. The two sentences Lying is wrong. and Lying is not wrong. are contradictory, but for Braithwaite the sentence of Lying is wrong, but I intend to tell a lie. is not self-contradictory. As if in the first part we have declared our commitment to moralities universally and in the second part we have particularized it. Thus, there is no contradiction between a universal matter like I intend never to lie. and its particularization I intend to tell a lie (now and in these circumstances). Although we reprimand those who intend on purpose to act wrongly, we don't regard their speech as self-contradictory. CONCLUSION Braithwaite doesn't accept the meaningfulness criterion of logical positivists in the realm of ethics and religion and doesn't regard the positivists' justification as being correct concerning ethics as the expression of personal feeling. Instead of empirical verifiability criterion, he puts forward the criterion of use and justifies the meaningfulness of religious and moral statements on the basis of it. According to his view, religious statements are not informative, but they are regarded as moral statements that have two kinds of function disjunctively negation. First, they indicate asserter's intention for and commitment to following a general moral rule and a conduct according to a universal policy. Religious statements indicate asserter's intention and commitment to following a universal policy and prescribe to the audience. Thus, the meaning of God is love. is that I intend to have a lovely life and prescribe you to choose a kind of form of life and live lovingly. Religious statements narrate moral truths with the use of stories more attractively and appealingly and deal more and more with internal behaviors and inmost feelings. The effectiveness of the stories of religions on human souls is a psychological effectiveness and the belief in their correspondence to the facts is not necessary and the condition of their effectiveness on the audience doesn't pertain to their cognitive enjoyment from the facts. The meaning of apostasy and conversion is the change of decision and intention for following by a form of life rather than the change of philosophical and rational arguments. The diversity of religions of the same substance pertains to both the stories that these religions narrate and their effectiveness degree on the souls. REFERENCES Alizamani, Amir A The Language of Religion. Qom: The Center of Publication of the office of Islamic Propagation. Austin,WilliamH The Relevance of Natural Science to Theology.The Macmillan Press Ltd. Braithwaite, R.B An Empiricists View of the Nature of ReligiousBelief in ThePhilosophy of Religion. ed. Basil Mitchell,Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6 Hick, John H.1991.Philosophy of Religion.Fourthedn, India: New Delhi. Lycan, William G Philosophy of Language: A ContemporaryIntroduction.London & New York: Routledge. Mahdavinejad, M.H.2011.Religion and Science.2nd edn, Tehran: Imam Sadegh University. Peterson, M. et al Reason and Religious Belief: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stiver, Dan R The Philosophy of Religious Language; Sign, Symbol &Story. Oxford: Blackwell. Waismann, F Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle, ed. Brian McGuinness, trans. Joachim Schulte and Brian McGuinness, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Ayer on the criterion of verifiability
Ayer on the criterion of verifiability November 19, 2004 1 The critique of metaphysics............................. 1 2 Observation statements............................... 2 3 In principle verifiability...............................
More informationHas Logical Positivism Eliminated Metaphysics?
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 7714 Volume 3 Issue 11 ǁ November. 2014 ǁ PP.38-42 Has Logical Positivism Eliminated Metaphysics?
More informationWittgenstein on The Realm of Ineffable
Wittgenstein on The Realm of Ineffable by Manoranjan Mallick and Vikram S. Sirola Abstract The paper attempts to delve into the distinction Wittgenstein makes between factual discourse and moral thoughts.
More informationVerificationism. PHIL September 27, 2011
Verificationism PHIL 83104 September 27, 2011 1. The critique of metaphysics... 1 2. Observation statements... 2 3. In principle verifiability... 3 4. Strong verifiability... 3 4.1. Conclusive verifiability
More informationVERIFICATION AND METAPHYSICS
Michael Lacewing The project of logical positivism VERIFICATION AND METAPHYSICS In the 1930s, a school of philosophy arose called logical positivism. Like much philosophy, it was concerned with the foundations
More informationA Priori Knowledge: Analytic? Synthetic A Priori (again) Is All A Priori Knowledge Analytic?
A Priori Knowledge: Analytic? Synthetic A Priori (again) Is All A Priori Knowledge Analytic? Recap A Priori Knowledge Knowledge independent of experience Kant: necessary and universal A Posteriori Knowledge
More informationTheological Discourse and the Problem of Meaning
ROBERT H. AYERS Theological Discourse and the Problem of Meaning In the thirteenth century St. Thomas, with a certain amount of equanimity, declared that philosophy was one of the handmaidens of the science
More informationEmotivism. Meta-ethical approaches
Meta-ethical approaches Theory that believes objective moral laws do not exist; a non-cognitivist theory; moral terms express personal emotional attitudes and not propositions; ethical terms are just expressions
More informationAyer s linguistic theory of the a priori
Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori phil 43904 Jeff Speaks December 4, 2007 1 The problem of a priori knowledge....................... 1 2 Necessity and the a priori............................ 2
More informationChapter 31. Logical Positivism and the Scientific Conception of Philosophy
Chapter 31 Logical Positivism and the Scientific Conception of Philosophy Key Words: Vienna circle, verification principle, positivism, tautologies, factual propositions, language analysis, rejection of
More informationMoral Objectivism. RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary
Moral Objectivism RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary The possibility, let alone the actuality, of an objective morality has intrigued philosophers for well over two millennia. Though much discussed,
More informationPHI2391: Logical Empiricism I 8.0
1 2 3 4 5 PHI2391: Logical Empiricism I 8.0 Hume and Kant! Remember Hume s question:! Are we rationally justified in inferring causes from experimental observations?! Kant s answer: we can give a transcendental
More informationTHE ELIMINATION OF METAPHYSICS
THE ELIMINATION OF METAPHYSICS Alfred Jules Ayer Introduction, H. Gene Blocker IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY the Scottish philosopher David Hume argued that all knowledge must be of one of two kinds: either
More information"Can We Have a Word in Private?": Wittgenstein on the Impossibility of Private Languages
Macalester Journal of Philosophy Volume 14 Issue 1 Spring 2005 Article 11 5-1-2005 "Can We Have a Word in Private?": Wittgenstein on the Impossibility of Private Languages Dan Walz-Chojnacki Follow this
More informationAyer and Quine on the a priori
Ayer and Quine on the a priori November 23, 2004 1 The problem of a priori knowledge Ayer s book is a defense of a thoroughgoing empiricism, not only about what is required for a belief to be justified
More information(i) Morality is a system; and (ii) It is a system comprised of moral rules and principles.
Ethics and Morality Ethos (Greek) and Mores (Latin) are terms having to do with custom, habit, and behavior. Ethics is the study of morality. This definition raises two questions: (a) What is morality?
More informationSydenham College of Commerce & Economics. * Dr. Sunil S. Shete. * Associate Professor
Sydenham College of Commerce & Economics * Dr. Sunil S. Shete * Associate Professor Keywords: Philosophy of science, research methods, Logic, Business research Abstract This paper review Popper s epistemology
More information145 Philosophy of Science
Logical empiricism Christian Wüthrich http://philosophy.ucsd.edu/faculty/wuthrich/ 145 Philosophy of Science Vienna Circle (Ernst Mach Society) Hans Hahn, Otto Neurath, and Philipp Frank regularly meet
More informationPHILOSOPHICAL RAMIFICATIONS: THEORY, EXPERIMENT, & EMPIRICAL TRUTH
PHILOSOPHICAL RAMIFICATIONS: THEORY, EXPERIMENT, & EMPIRICAL TRUTH PCES 3.42 Even before Newton published his revolutionary work, philosophers had already been trying to come to grips with the questions
More informationON THE PROBLEM OF RELIGIOUS LANGUAGE
ON THE PROBLEM OF RELIGIOUS LANGUAGE Ikechukwu Anthony Kanu (OSA) Department of Philosophy University of Nigeria, Nsukka Abstract Emmanuel Kant, in his work on The Critique of Pure Reason, introduced a
More informationPHD THESIS SUMMARY: Rational choice theory: its merits and limits in explaining and predicting cultural behaviour
Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, Volume 10, Issue 1, Spring 2017, pp. 137-141. https://doi.org/ 10.23941/ejpe.v10i1.272 PHD THESIS SUMMARY: Rational choice theory: its merits and limits in
More informationEach copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.
Tractatus 6.3751 Author(s): Edwin B. Allaire Source: Analysis, Vol. 19, No. 5 (Apr., 1959), pp. 100-105 Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of The Analysis Committee Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3326898
More informationWJEC. WJEC/Eduqas Religious Studies for A Level Year 2 & A2 DRAFT. David Ballard Rhodri Thomas. Peter Cole, Richard Gray, Mark Lambe, Karl Lawson
Philosophy of Religion Theme 4: Religious language WJEC/Eduqas Religious Studies for A Level Year 2 & A2: Philosophy of Religion and Religion and Ethics Illuminate Publishing These pages are uncorrected
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 28 Lecture - 28 Linguistic turn in British philosophy
More informationThis handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first.
Michael Lacewing Three responses to scepticism This handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first. MITIGATED SCEPTICISM The term mitigated scepticism
More informationEXAM PREP (Semester 2: 2018) Jules Khomo. Linguistic analysis is concerned with the following question:
PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE ARE MY PERSONAL EXAM PREP NOTES. ANSWERS ARE TAKEN FROM LECTURER MEMO S, STUDENT ANSWERS, DROP BOX, MY OWN, ETC. THIS DOCUMENT CAN NOT BE SOLD FOR PROFIT AS IT IS BEING SHARED AT
More informationTHE PROBLEM OF CONTRARY-TO-FACT CONDITIONALS. By JOHN WATLING
THE PROBLEM OF CONTRARY-TO-FACT CONDITIONALS By JOHN WATLING There is an argument which appears to show that it is impossible to verify a contrary-to-fact conditional; so giving rise to an important and
More information5: Preliminaries to the Argument
5: Preliminaries to the Argument In this chapter, we set forth the logical structure of the argument we will use in chapter six in our attempt to show that Nfc is self-refuting. Thus, our main topics in
More informationPhil/Ling 375: Meaning and Mind [Handout #10]
Phil/Ling 375: Meaning and Mind [Handout #10] W. V. Quine: Two Dogmas of Empiricism Professor JeeLoo Liu Main Theses 1. Anti-analytic/synthetic divide: The belief in the divide between analytic and synthetic
More informationIntroductory Kant Seminar Lecture
Introductory Kant Seminar Lecture Intentionality It is not unusual to begin a discussion of Kant with a brief review of some history of philosophy. What is perhaps less usual is to start with a review
More informationPhil 435: Philosophy of Language. P. F. Strawson: On Referring
Phil 435: Philosophy of Language [Handout 10] Professor JeeLoo Liu P. F. Strawson: On Referring Strawson s Main Goal: To show that Russell's theory of definite descriptions ("the so-and-so") has some fundamental
More informationEach copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.
The Physical World Author(s): Barry Stroud Source: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. 87 (1986-1987), pp. 263-277 Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The Aristotelian
More informationComments on Scott Soames, Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, volume I
Comments on Scott Soames, Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, volume I (APA Pacific 2006, Author meets critics) Christopher Pincock (pincock@purdue.edu) December 2, 2005 (20 minutes, 2803
More informationTHE STUDY OF UNKNOWN AND UNKNOWABILITY IN KANT S PHILOSOPHY
THE STUDY OF UNKNOWN AND UNKNOWABILITY IN KANT S PHILOSOPHY Subhankari Pati Research Scholar Pondicherry University, Pondicherry The present aim of this paper is to highlights the shortcomings in Kant
More informationNegative Facts. Negative Facts Kyle Spoor
54 Kyle Spoor Logical Atomism was a view held by many philosophers; Bertrand Russell among them. This theory held that language consists of logical parts which are simplifiable until they can no longer
More informationPhilosophical Ethics. Distinctions and Categories
Philosophical Ethics Distinctions and Categories Ethics Remember we have discussed how ethics fits into philosophy We have also, as a 1 st approximation, defined ethics as philosophical thinking about
More informationThe Untenability of Atomistic Theory of Meaning
KRITIKE VOLUME SEVEN NUMBER ONE (JUNE 2013) 138-152 Article The Untenability of Atomistic Theory of Meaning Satya Sundar Sethy Abstract: Atomistic theory of meaning or meaning atomism expresses that each
More informationLecture 6. Realism and Anti-realism Kuhn s Philosophy of Science
Lecture 6 Realism and Anti-realism Kuhn s Philosophy of Science Realism and Anti-realism Science and Reality Science ought to describe reality. But what is Reality? Is what we think we see of reality really
More informationSAMPLE. Religious Language, Reference, and Autonomy
1 Religious Language, Reference, and Autonomy Logical positivism emerged in the early 1920s when Moritz Schlick, around whom it centered, became professor of philosophy at the University of Vienna. The
More informationMistaking Category Mistakes: A Response to Gilbert Ryle. Evan E. May
Mistaking Category Mistakes: A Response to Gilbert Ryle Evan E. May Part 1: The Issue A significant question arising from the discipline of philosophy concerns the nature of the mind. What constitutes
More informationModule 1-4: Spirituality and Rationality
Module M3: Can rational men and women be spiritual? Module 1-4: Spirituality and Rationality The New Atheists win again? Atheists like Richard Dawkins, along with other new atheists, have achieved high
More informationThe Theory of Reality: A Critical & Philosophical Elaboration
55 The Theory of Reality: A Critical & Philosophical Elaboration Anup Kumar Department of Philosophy Jagannath University Email: anupkumarjnup@gmail.com Abstract Reality is a concept of things which really
More informationModule 1: Science as Culture Demarcation, Autonomy and Cognitive Authority of Science
Module 1: Science as Culture Demarcation, Autonomy and Cognitive Authority of Science Lecture 6 Demarcation, Autonomy and Cognitive Authority of Science In this lecture, we are going to discuss how historically
More informationDepartment of Philosophy
Department of Philosophy Module descriptions 2018/19 Level I (i.e. normally 2 nd Yr.) Modules Please be aware that all modules are subject to availability. If you have any questions about the modules,
More informationIntro. The need for a philosophical vocabulary
Critical Realism & Philosophy Webinar Ruth Groff August 5, 2015 Intro. The need for a philosophical vocabulary You don t have to become a philosopher, but just as philosophers should know their way around
More informationChapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge
Key Words Chapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge Empiricism, skepticism, personal identity, necessary connection, causal connection, induction, impressions, ideas. DAVID HUME (1711-76) is one of the
More informationCommon Morality: Deciding What to Do 1
Common Morality: Deciding What to Do 1 By Bernard Gert (1934-2011) [Page 15] Analogy between Morality and Grammar Common morality is complex, but it is less complex than the grammar of a language. Just
More informationLecture 9. A summary of scientific methods Realism and Anti-realism
Lecture 9 A summary of scientific methods Realism and Anti-realism A summary of scientific methods and attitudes What is a scientific approach? This question can be answered in a lot of different ways.
More informationReligious Language. 2+2=4
Religious Language. What is the debate? The basic question behind the religious language debate is what can be said about God? The religious language debate is not concerned with whether or not God exists,
More informationCourses providing assessment data PHL 202. Semester/Year
1 Department/Program 2012-2016 Assessment Plan Department: Philosophy Directions: For each department/program student learning outcome, the department will provide an assessment plan, giving detailed information
More informationTractatus Logico-Philosophicus (abridged version) Ludwig Wittgenstein
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (abridged version) Ludwig Wittgenstein PREFACE This book will perhaps only be understood by those who have themselves already thought the thoughts which are expressed in
More informationWittgenstein on forms of life: a short introduction
E-LOGOS Electronic Journal for Philosophy 2017, Vol. 24(1) 13 18 ISSN 1211-0442 (DOI 10.18267/j.e-logos.440),Peer-reviewed article Journal homepage: e-logos.vse.cz Wittgenstein on forms of life: a short
More informationLaw and Authority. An unjust law is not a law
Law and Authority An unjust law is not a law The statement an unjust law is not a law is often treated as a summary of how natural law theorists approach the question of whether a law is valid or not.
More informationPhilosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Science Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationRussell: On Denoting
Russell: On Denoting DENOTING PHRASES Russell includes all kinds of quantified subject phrases ( a man, every man, some man etc.) but his main interest is in definite descriptions: the present King of
More informationRichard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING
1 REASONING Reasoning is, broadly speaking, the cognitive process of establishing reasons to justify beliefs, conclusions, actions or feelings. It also refers, more specifically, to the act or process
More informationPhilosophy of Ethics Philosophy of Aesthetics. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Ethics Philosophy of Aesthetics Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology
More informationNaturalism vs. Conceptual Analysis. Marcin Miłkowski
Naturalism vs. Conceptual Analysis Marcin Miłkowski WARNING This lecture might be deliberately biased against conceptual analysis. Presentation Plan Conceptual Analysis (CA) and dogmatism How to wake up
More informationKANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire.
KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON The law is reason unaffected by desire. Aristotle, Politics Book III (1287a32) THE BIG IDEAS TO MASTER Kantian formalism Kantian constructivism
More informationA-LEVEL Religious Studies
A-LEVEL Religious Studies RST3B Paper 3B Philosophy of Religion Mark Scheme 2060 June 2017 Version: 1.0 Final Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the relevant
More informationIbuanyidanda (Complementary Reflection), African Philosophy and General Issues in Philosophy
HOME Ibuanyidanda (Complementary Reflection), African Philosophy and General Issues in Philosophy Back to Home Page: http://www.frasouzu.com/ for more essays from a complementary perspective THE IDEA OF
More informationLENT 2018 THEORY OF MEANING DR MAARTEN STEENHAGEN
LENT 2018 THEORY OF MEANING DR MAARTEN STEENHAGEN HTTP://MSTEENHAGEN.GITHUB.IO/TEACHING/2018TOM THE EINSTEIN-BERGSON DEBATE SCIENCE AND METAPHYSICS Henri Bergson and Albert Einstein met on the 6th of
More informationKantian Deontology. A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7. Paul Nicholls 13P Religious Studies
A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7 Kantian Deontology Deontological (based on duty) ethical theory established by Emmanuel Kant in The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Part of the enlightenment
More informationCory Juhl, Eric Loomis, Analyticity (New York: Routledge, 2010).
Cory Juhl, Eric Loomis, Analyticity (New York: Routledge, 2010). Reviewed by Viorel Ţuţui 1 Since it was introduced by Immanuel Kant in the Critique of Pure Reason, the analytic synthetic distinction had
More informationIn Search of the Ontological Argument. Richard Oxenberg
1 In Search of the Ontological Argument Richard Oxenberg Abstract We can attend to the logic of Anselm's ontological argument, and amuse ourselves for a few hours unraveling its convoluted word-play, or
More informationPHILOSOPHY (413) Chairperson: David Braden-Johnson, Ph.D.
PHILOSOPHY (413) 662-5399 Chairperson: David Braden-Johnson, Ph.D. Email: D.Johnson@mcla.edu PROGRAMS AVAILABLE BACHELOR OF ARTS IN PHILOSOPHY CONCENTRATION IN LAW, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY PHILOSOPHY MINOR
More informationUC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works
UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Disaggregating Structures as an Agenda for Critical Realism: A Reply to McAnulla Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4k27s891 Journal British
More information9774 PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY
CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS Pre-U Certificate MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2013 series 9774 PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY 9774/02 Paper 2 (Topics and Key Texts in Philosophy and Theology 1), maximum
More informationKant and Demystification of Ethics and Religion *
University of Tabriz-Iran Philosophical Investigations Vol. 11/ No. 21/ Fall & Winter 2017 Kant and Demystification of Ethics and Religion * Qodratullah Qorbani ** Associate Professor of Philosophy, Kharazmi
More informationThe Representation of Logical Form: A Dilemma
The Representation of Logical Form: A Dilemma Benjamin Ferguson 1 Introduction Throughout the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus and especially in the 2.17 s and 4.1 s Wittgenstein asserts that propositions
More informationChapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System
Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System Ethics and Morality Ethics: greek ethos, study of morality What is Morality? Morality: system of rules for guiding
More informationThe Human Science Debate: Positivist, Anti-Positivist, and Postpositivist Inquiry. By Rebecca Joy Norlander. November 20, 2007
The Human Science Debate: Positivist, Anti-Positivist, and Postpositivist Inquiry By Rebecca Joy Norlander November 20, 2007 2 What is knowledge and how is it acquired through the process of inquiry? Is
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS Cambridge International Level 3 Pre-U Certificate Principal Subject
www.xtremepapers.com UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS Cambridge International Level 3 Pre-U Certificate Principal Subject *1905704369* PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY 9774/02 Paper 2 Key Texts
More informationIs Innate Foreknowledge Possible to a Temporal God?
Is Innate Foreknowledge Possible to a Temporal God? by Kel Good A very interesting attempt to avoid the conclusion that God's foreknowledge is inconsistent with creaturely freedom is an essay entitled
More informationLudwig Feuerbach The Essence of Christianity (excerpts) 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes updated: 10/23/13 9:10 AM. Section III: How do I know? Reading III.
Ludwig Feuerbach The Essence of Christianity (excerpts) 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes updated: 10/23/13 9:10 AM Section III: How do I know? Reading III.6 The German philosopher, Ludwig Feuerbach, develops a humanist
More informationIn Defense of Radical Empiricism. Joseph Benjamin Riegel. Chapel Hill 2006
In Defense of Radical Empiricism Joseph Benjamin Riegel A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
More informationFalsification or Confirmation: From Logic to Psychology
Falsification or Confirmation: From Logic to Psychology Roman Lukyanenko Information Systems Department Florida international University rlukyane@fiu.edu Abstract Corroboration or Confirmation is a prominent
More informationVol. II, No. 5, Reason, Truth and History, 127. LARS BERGSTRÖM
Croatian Journal of Philosophy Vol. II, No. 5, 2002 L. Bergström, Putnam on the Fact-Value Dichotomy 1 Putnam on the Fact-Value Dichotomy LARS BERGSTRÖM Stockholm University In Reason, Truth and History
More informationEpistemology for Naturalists and Non-Naturalists: What s the Difference?
Res Cogitans Volume 3 Issue 1 Article 3 6-7-2012 Epistemology for Naturalists and Non-Naturalists: What s the Difference? Jason Poettcker University of Victoria Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.pacificu.edu/rescogitans
More informationThe poverty of mathematical and existential truth: examples from fisheries science C. J. Corkett
Manuscript in preparation, July, 2011 The poverty of mathematical and existential truth: examples from fisheries science C. J. Corkett Biology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H
More informationContents EMPIRICISM. Logical Atomism and the beginnings of pluralist empiricism. Recap: Russell s reductionism: from maths to physics
Contents EMPIRICISM PHIL3072, ANU, 2015 Jason Grossman http://empiricism.xeny.net lecture 9: 22 September Recap Bertrand Russell: reductionism in physics Common sense is self-refuting Acquaintance versus
More information2 FREE CHOICE The heretical thesis of Hobbes is the orthodox position today. So much is this the case that most of the contemporary literature
Introduction The philosophical controversy about free will and determinism is perennial. Like many perennial controversies, this one involves a tangle of distinct but closely related issues. Thus, the
More informationIntroduction. I. Proof of the Minor Premise ( All reality is completely intelligible )
Philosophical Proof of God: Derived from Principles in Bernard Lonergan s Insight May 2014 Robert J. Spitzer, S.J., Ph.D. Magis Center of Reason and Faith Lonergan s proof may be stated as follows: Introduction
More informationIntroduction to Cognitivism; Motivational Externalism; Naturalist Cognitivism
Introduction to Cognitivism; Motivational Externalism; Naturalist Cognitivism Felix Pinkert 103 Ethics: Metaethics, University of Oxford, Hilary Term 2015 Cognitivism, Non-cognitivism, and the Humean Argument
More informationIntroduction. Bernard Williams
Introduction Bernard Williams Isaiah Berlin is most widely known for his writings in political theory and the history of ideas, but he worked first in general philosophy, and contributed to the discussion
More informationThe Elimination Of Metaphysics
Chapter 1 The Elimination Of Metaphysics The traditional disputes of philosophers are, for the most part, as unwarranted as they are unfruitful. The surest way to end them is to establish beyond question
More informationMethodological criticism vs. ideology and hypocrisy Lawrence A. Boland, FRSC Simon Fraser University There was a time when any university-educated
Methodological criticism vs. ideology and hypocrisy Lawrence A. Boland, FRSC Simon Fraser University There was a time when any university-educated economist would be well-versed in philosophy of science
More informationA theory of adjudication is a theory primarily about what judges do when they decide cases in courts of law.
SLIDE 1 Theories of Adjudication: Legal Formalism A theory of adjudication is a theory primarily about what judges do when they decide cases in courts of law. American legal realism was a legal movement,
More informationLuck, Rationality, and Explanation: A Reply to Elga s Lucky to Be Rational. Joshua Schechter. Brown University
Luck, Rationality, and Explanation: A Reply to Elga s Lucky to Be Rational Joshua Schechter Brown University I Introduction What is the epistemic significance of discovering that one of your beliefs depends
More informationMethods for Knowing Transphysical Truths and Its Obstacles in Transcendent Philosophy
Abstracts 9 Methods for Knowing Transphysical Truths and Its Obstacles in Transcendent Philosophy Ali Allahbedashti * In transcendent philosophy (al-hikmahal-mota aliyah) we encounter with some transphysical
More informationQué es la filosofía? What is philosophy? Philosophy
Philosophy PHILOSOPHY AS A WAY OF THINKING WHAT IS IT? WHO HAS IT? WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A WAY OF THINKING AND A DISCIPLINE? It is the propensity to seek out answers to the questions that we ask
More informationMETHODENSTREIT WHY CARL MENGER WAS, AND IS, RIGHT
METHODENSTREIT WHY CARL MENGER WAS, AND IS, RIGHT BY THORSTEN POLLEIT* PRESENTED AT THE SPRING CONFERENCE RESEARCH ON MONEY IN THE ECONOMY (ROME) FRANKFURT, 20 MAY 2011 *FRANKFURT SCHOOL OF FINANCE & MANAGEMENT
More information1. The basic idea is to look at "what the courts do in fact" (Holmes, 1897). What does this mean?
Contemporary Anglo-American Jurisprudence - Important to remember that these are not just movements, they are ideas, ideas or perspectives on the law which are simultaneously alive in the law today. I.
More informationJeu-Jenq Yuann Professor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University,
The Negative Role of Empirical Stimulus in Theory Change: W. V. Quine and P. Feyerabend Jeu-Jenq Yuann Professor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University, 1 To all Participants
More informationJunior Research Fellow and Lecturer in Philosophy Worcester College, University of Oxford Walton Street Oxford OX1 2HB Great Britain
Essay Title: Author: Meaning (verification theory) Markus Schrenk Junior Research Fellow and Lecturer in Philosophy Worcester College, University of Oxford Walton Street Oxford OX1 2HB Great Britain ESSAY
More informationTHE SEMANTIC REALISM OF STROUD S RESPONSE TO AUSTIN S ARGUMENT AGAINST SCEPTICISM
SKÉPSIS, ISSN 1981-4194, ANO VII, Nº 14, 2016, p. 33-39. THE SEMANTIC REALISM OF STROUD S RESPONSE TO AUSTIN S ARGUMENT AGAINST SCEPTICISM ALEXANDRE N. MACHADO Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) Email:
More informationArgumentation and Positioning: Empirical insights and arguments for argumentation analysis
Argumentation and Positioning: Empirical insights and arguments for argumentation analysis Luke Joseph Buhagiar & Gordon Sammut University of Malta luke.buhagiar@um.edu.mt Abstract Argumentation refers
More informationKey definitions Action Ad hominem argument Analytic A priori Axiom Bayes s theorem
Key definitions Action Relates to the doings of purposive agents. A key preoccupation of philosophy of social science is the explanation of human action either through antecedent causes or reasons. Accounts
More informationKnowledge, Language, and Nonexistent Entities
Acta Cogitata Volume 2 Article 3 Alex Hoffman Huntington University Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.emich.edu/ac Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Hoffman, Alex ()
More informationBased on the translation by E. M. Edghill, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak.
On Interpretation By Aristotle Based on the translation by E. M. Edghill, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak. First we must define the terms 'noun' and 'verb', then the terms 'denial' and 'affirmation',
More information