The Mind/Body Problem Questioning Assumptions about the Nature of Our Own Being By Rev. Dr. Todd F. Eklof August 16, 2015
|
|
- Hannah Townsend
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Questioning Assumptions about the Nature of Our Own Being By Rev. Dr. Todd F. Eklof August 16, 2015 Majoring in philosophy had already made me fairly skeptical thirty years ago, even as I was preparing for the Southern Baptist ministry at Howard Payne University in Brownwood, Texas (the heart of the Bible Belt). I openly professed my disbelief in miracles, for example, and challenged those who disagreed by asking them to simply point one out. One day, while walking across campus with a friend who suffered terrible back pain, we met Charles Doolittle, a Pentecostal student who insisted God continues to work great miracles to this day. He told my friend that if he only had enough faith his back would be healed. Now it happens that Charles had come to HPU on an athletic scholarship but injured his leg so badly the first season that he walked with a severe limp and could no longer play sports. I was bothered that he blamed my friend s chronic pain on his lack of faith, so I asked, If that s all it takes, why don t you use it to heal your leg? Don t you have enough faith? Charles snapped back, Let me tell you something, this leg may not look healed, but this leg is healed because the Bible says it s healed! He then turned and limped away. Charles response, odd as it may seem, represents the usual solution to what is referred to in Philosophy as the mind/body problem; to the unanswerable questions, do both mind and body really exist? If so, how do they differ? If they are completely different, how can they interact at all? 2400 years ago, Plato resolved the problem much like Charles Doolittle, with his mind over matter philosophy of Idealism. He suggested, in brief, that an ideal realm exists apart from and is superior to the material realm, because the latter contains only imperfect reflections of perfect ideals. The individual trees we encounter in the material realm, for example, are all flawed likenesses of the perfect Tree that exits in the ideal realm, just as Charles injured leg was but a chimerical distortion of the leg that had already been healed in his mind. His stiff leg was but a materialistic illusion. Those of us who were not spiritual enough, or did not have enough faith, in his terms, could not perceive his real leg. Plato s Idealism became the foundation of Hellenistic society and the dualism that continues to influence and underlie our own cultural mindset. The a priori assumption that mind and body, matter and spirit, are separate realities, and that the ethereal is superior to the mundane, is so paradigmatic in our culture that it almost goes without saying. We don t think about it anymore than we think about the air we breath. It s just how we generally tend to look at things, with no thought of its potential folly until we re presented with examples so outrageous we can t help but notice.
2 The idea that the mind is a nonmaterial reality was made even more commonplace by the 17 th century philosopher, Rene Descartes who famously questioned every assumption he had until he found one he could not doubt, cogito ergo sum, I think, therefore I am. For Descartes the material realm may be nothing more than a dream, he can t be sure, but he cannot doubt the existence of the dreamer. Whatever else, he was sure his consciousness was real. Of course, he could not be as certain the consciousness of others are real, which has led to an extremist view called, solipsism, the belief that other minds don t exist at all. It s not a very commonly expressed belief, although far too many seem to act like they agree with it. The main point here, however, is that Cartesian Dualism, right or wrong, considers the mind not only something altogether different than matter, but the only thing we can be sure of. It wasn t that Descartes didn t have perceptions; he just didn t know how to be sure his perceptions weren t just a dream or an illusion. Since sensual perceptions cannot be trusted, he built a philosophy based upon his one indubitable premise, the existence of mind. He rejected Empiricism to become the father of Rationalism, the notion that true knowledge is to be derived from reason alone, from the mind. When put in these terms, it seems almost strange that anyone could dismiss the existence of empirical reality, and most of us don t. What we do accept, however, is Cartesian duality, that mind and matter are separate things and that mind, reason, spirit, or what have you, are superior to the physical world. Again, from my perspective, our cultural paradigm remains dualistic with this mind over matter preference. In addition to being the father of rationalism, Descartes is considered the father of modern philosophy. In other words, modern philosophy is Cartesian. Western religion also has a history of shunning science in favor of dogma, of empirical evidence in favor of its theological ideas and arguments. It also maintains a disdain for what it considers a fallen world and sinful bodies, along with a preoccupation for saving souls trapped in flesh so they can be resurrected in a perfect heavenly afterlife (Idealism). Today, especially, pundits and politicians who openly ignore hard facts in favor of their unfounded ideas are often extremely popular and successful. It may look like the Earth is heating up, but Global Warming isn t real because my mind says it s not real! It may look like Obamacare is working, but it s not working because my mind says it s not working! It may look like Supply Side economics has destroyed the Middle Class and given everything to the top one percent, but making the rich richer and the poor poorer still works best for everyone because my mind says it does! And, by the way, please don t dispute what I believe because beliefs are sacred and disagreeing with me makes you intolerant of others, and intolerant people should be silenced and shunned. This leg may not look healed, but this leg is healed because the Bible says it s healed! In addition to these negative environmental, social, economic, and ideological consequences of dualistic ignorance, the philosophical problem remaining to be resolved is how, if mind is nonmaterial something that can exist without a brain how is possible for two things that are so fundamentally different to influence each 2
3 other at all? How, if Mind is totally cut off from the physical world, can it interact with the brain? In philosophy this is called the interaction problem and it has been tackled in some ways that are as peculiar as a man with an obvious limp who claims he s been healed. Descartes argued the pineal gland is the point of interaction between mind and matter, functioning kind of like a transmitter and receiver between the two realms. In his Treaties on Man, he said people, are composed of a soul and a body. First I must describe the body on its own then the soul, again on it s own [there s the dualism]; and finally I must show how these two natures would have to be joined and united in order to constitute men who resemble us [there s the interaction problem]. 1 His explanation of how these two natures are joined and united is just plain weird. He believed the pineal gland to be the seat of the soul, surrounded by ventricles in which animal spirits continually flow in and out, creating physical impressions, ideas, and memories. Subsequent solutions to dualism are equally as strange, and are as theological as they are philosophical, if not more so. Occasionalism, for example, suggests God is the link between the body and mind. In his book, Philosophy of Mind, Edward Feser says, observing that light from the cheeseburger has impacted your retinas and set up a series of neural firing patters in your brain, God causes your mind to have an experience of seeing the burger; observing that that experience has led you to decide to eat the burger, he then causes a set of neural firing patterns to occur in your brain that result in you picking up the burger, putting it in your mouth and eating it. 2 In addition to making God extremely busy, this has the same problem as Descartes pineal gland theory; neither actually answers the question as to how two things that are so utterly different can interact. Parallelism, another solution to the problem, is no less bizarre. It suggests that body and mind, the material and the mental realms, run beside each other like parallel tracks, but never interact. It s just that God, the master clock maker, has made them run with such perfect timing that when the light from a cheeseburger does strike our retinas and stimulates our neurons, the image of a cheeseburger just so happens to come to mind at that precise moment. The image isn t caused by the light, it just coincides with it. By now your probably wondering, with feeble explanations like these, how dualism continues to be such a predominant paradigm in our culture. It may help you to know that a majority of philosophers today have made and about face by turning from dualism to Materialism. Materialism responds to dualism by rejecting it entirely. In other words, the materialistic view is that there is no problem because the mind is not separate from the body, but is part of the physical processes of the brain, that, without a brain, mind cannot exist. Materialism is, as Feser explains, the theory that reality, or at least human reality, consists of purely material or physical objects, processes, and properties, operating according to the same basic laws and thereby susceptible of explanation via physical science. There is, in short, 1 Descartes, Rene, Treaties on Man, (AT XI:119, CSM I:99) Feser, Edward, Philosophy of Mind: A Beginners Guide, Oneworld Publications, Oxford, England, 2006, 2011, p
4 no such thing as immaterial substance, or soul, or spirit, nor any aspect of human nature which, in principle, eludes explanation in purely physical terms. 3 This definition is precisely why, in my opinion, despite its absurd explanations, so many of us prefer dualism to materialism today, because we cannot bare the thought we aren t somehow spiritual beings or nonmaterial souls unbound by our physical limitations. This leg may not look healed, but this leg is healed because the Bible says it s healed! And just think what would happen to our society if we all suddenly had to give up our purely mental concepts, like the value of money, borders between nations, race, religion, and so on? What would happen if we had to admit that Descartes likely got it wrong, that mind, in fact, is the stuff our dreams are made of, not physical reality? Nevertheless, instead of mind over matter, materialism sees mind as matter. There aren t two realms, a material and a mental realm, only the physical realm of which consciousness is a part. Consciousness is as much a physical reaction as is the creation of carbon dioxide resulting from the chemical reaction between baking soda and vinegar. This makes a lot more sense than claiming a limp leg has been mended despite all appearances, or that God puts the image of cheeseburger in our minds every time certain photons hit our retinas, or that it s image is entirely coincidental. Maybe that s why materialism dominates the field today. Even so, materialism has many problems, the foremost of which is that it s unable to prove the mind, the existence of which it doesn t deny, is entirely physical. How does reducing everything to physics explain the existence of mind? How does objective reality explain subjective experience? In fact, the world, we know from science, Feser says, [is] composed ultimately of fundamental particles which have none of the features presented to us in experience, but are colorless, odorless, tasteless, and best described in the abstract mathematical language of science. 4 Materialism, he says, claims, the mind is identical to the brain, 5 yet, as Bertrand Russell argued, there is a gap between appearance and reality, all perception remains subjective and what the physiologist sees when he looks at a brain is part of his own brain, not part of the brain he is examining! 6 So materialism, while seemingly more rational, ironically, than rationalism itself, remains an unproven solution to the mind/body problem. There have been a few other attempts to resolve it, especially in recent years, but most of them fall between these two extremes, dualism and materialism. Dualism claims mind is different than anything in the material realm and exist independently from it, and is the only thing we can be certain really does exist. Materialism is the view that mind, or consciousness, is but an adaptive result of evolution that occurs from physical 3 Ibid., p Ibid., p Ibid., p Ibid., p
5 interactions between particles like those comprising neurons in the brain, and that a mind cannot exist without a brain. I personally favor a materialistic view to a dualistic one, although the arguments for and against both remain unconvincing. My intuition that Materialism is more correct, bares not more weight than another s intuition that Dualism is true. I also hold many beliefs and have had experiences of my own that would contradict a strictly materialistic view of reality, and would support the existence of nonlocal, disembodied mind. During the past few years, with advances in neuroscience, the Science of Consciousness has become an enormous field, for both philosophers and scientists finally hoping to solve the mind/body problem. In fact, the University of Arizona has a Center for Consciousness Studies that has been hosting an annual Science of Consciousness Conference for the past twenty years. Yet, today, nobody seems any closer to resolving the problem. During the most recent conference, Robert Lawrence Kuhn, host of the TV show, Closer to Truth, interviewed two of its most prominent participants, Deepak Chopra, for the dualist side, and, renowned philosopher, Daniel Dennett, for the materialist side. I m going to quote what each had to say at length, beginning with Deepak Chopra: As people have tried to solve the so-called, hard problem through neuroscience they end up being stymied, they get frustrated. The two most open questions in science; number one, what is the stuff of the universe, what is it made of? And number two what s the biological basis of Consciousness? So my response [is that] the stuff of the universe is non-stuff and it is consciousness. And the answer to the second question, what is the biological basis of Consciousness, is the wrong question. Biology is an emergent property of Consciousness. There are only two experiences, two things we can say categorically, which I think no one can deny, number one, there is existence, number two, there is awareness of existence. Could they be the same thing? There is only consciousness. The universe is consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Where is imagination? Where is intention? Where is insight? Where is intuition? Where is creativity? Where is time? These are very fundamental questions and you can t get behind the fact these are experiences in consciousness. We have no theory today that tells us how we experience anything. And here s what Dennett had to say: We re working on very good theories of Consciousness that don t consider consciousness to be the ultimate distinction in the whole universe, which I think is a bit of anthropocentric hubris if ever there was one a struggle by smart people not satisfied with a biological explanation. It would be foolish of me to just give the back of my hand to them and say they can t possibly be right, they could. I just think they re under-motivated. What motivates them is a sort of moral anxiety with what they see as the poverty of a straightforward conservative scientific theory of Consciousness. They don t want that to be the case. Why don t they want that to be the case? Because they re afraid that if it s the case then life has no meaning or 5
6 morality will disappear. I think that s a poverty of imagination on their part. I find that more and more of my time is trying to show people that the amount of free will and love and dignity and emotion that you get from the conservative scientific materialistic approach is plenty rich. It s predictive. It s explanatory. [Yet] people say, Then we re just meat machines. We re the most fantastic meat machines you can imagine! [They] have an impoverished view of the possibility of meat machines. In truth, I resonate with both these explanations even though it s difficult to imagine how both can be true. But none of this has been about resolving the mind/body problem, something our best thinkers have been unable to accomplish for centuries. It s not about finding an answer, but owning the question. It s about getting out of our paradigms and assumptions about the nature of our existence so that, by admitting we can t be sure, we become more open to other possibilities. Today, our mind-over-matter bias, that there is an invisible reality better than our material experience, and that there s something inferior, flawed, and untrustworthy about our bodies and the Earth, and that our ideas are sacred and cannot be questioned and are of more value than people and other beings, and that they should be maintained no matter their consequences upon the mundane physical world, has caused too many of us to ignore what s really happening around us. Like Charles Doolittle, we re walking around with a limp but think that everything is perfectly okay, at a time in human history that requires the full attention of our minds, no matter what they are, on issues that are entirely down to Earth. In his book, Explaining Consciousness, Daniel Dennett says, Human consciousness is just about the last surviving mystery. 7 I don t know if it s one of those mysteries best left unsolved, but until any of us can know for sure, let s keep the question open. 7 Dennett, Daniel C., Consciousness Explained, Little, Brown and Company, New York, NY, 1991, p
Mind and Body. Is mental really material?"
Mind and Body Is mental really material?" René Descartes (1596 1650) v 17th c. French philosopher and mathematician v Creator of the Cartesian co-ordinate system, and coinventor of algebra v Wrote Meditations
More informationMind s Eye Idea Object
Do the ideas in our mind resemble the qualities in the objects that caused these ideas in our minds? Mind s Eye Idea Object Does this resemble this? In Locke s Terms Even if we accept that the ideas in
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 4 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 4 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M AGENDA 1. Quick Review 2. Arguments Against Materialism/Physicalism (continued)
More informationMetaphysics & Consciousness. A talk by Larry Muhlstein
Metaphysics & Consciousness A talk by Larry Muhlstein A brief note on philosophy It is about thinking So think about what I am saying and ask me questions And go home and think some more For self improvement
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 3 : N A T U R E O F R E A L I T Y
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 3 : N A T U R E O F R E A L I T Y AGENDA 1. Review of Personal Identity 2. The Stuff of Reality 3. Materialistic/Physicalism 4. Immaterial/Idealism PERSONAL IDENTITY
More informationNancey Murphy, Bodies and Souls, or Spirited Bodies? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006). Pp. x Hbk, Pbk.
Nancey Murphy, Bodies and Souls, or Spirited Bodies? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006). Pp. x +154. 33.25 Hbk, 12.99 Pbk. ISBN 0521676762. Nancey Murphy argues that Christians have nothing
More informationThe Self and Other Minds
170 Great Problems in Philosophy and Physics - Solved? 15 The Self and Other Minds This chapter on the web informationphilosopher.com/mind/ego The Self 171 The Self and Other Minds Celebrating René Descartes,
More informationDebate on the mind and scientific method (continued again) on
Debate on the mind and scientific method (continued again) on http://forums.philosophyforums.com. Quotations are in red and the responses by Death Monkey (Kevin Dolan) are in black. Note that sometimes
More information! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! Key figure: René Descartes.
! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! What is the relation between that knowledge and that given in the sciences?! Key figure: René
More informationSession One: Identity Theory And Why It Won t Work Marianne Talbot University of Oxford 26/27th November 2011
A Romp Through the Philosophy of Mind Session One: Identity Theory And Why It Won t Work Marianne Talbot University of Oxford 26/27th November 2011 1 Session One: Identity Theory And Why It Won t Work
More informationCartesian Dualism. I am not my body
Cartesian Dualism I am not my body Dualism = two-ism Concerning human beings, a (substance) dualist says that the mind and body are two different substances (things). The brain is made of matter, and part
More informationRené Descartes ( ) PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since Descartes
PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since 1600 René Descartes (1596-1650) Dr. Peter Assmann Spring 2018 French mathematician, philosopher, and physiologist Descartes
More informationEMPIRICISM & EMPIRICAL PHILOSOPHY
EMPIRICISM & EMPIRICAL PHILOSOPHY One of the most remarkable features of the developments in England was the way in which the pioneering scientific work was influenced by certain philosophers, and vice-versa.
More informationDualism: What s at stake?
Dualism: What s at stake? Dualists posit that reality is comprised of two fundamental, irreducible types of stuff : Material and non-material Material Stuff: Includes all the familiar elements of the physical
More informationToday we re gonna start a number of lectures on two thinkers who reject the idea
PHI 110 Lecture 6 1 Today we re gonna start a number of lectures on two thinkers who reject the idea of personhood and of personal identity. We re gonna spend two lectures on each thinker. What I want
More informationWhat am I? An immaterial thing: the case for dualism
What am I? An immaterial thing: the case for dualism Today we turn to our third big question: What are you? We can focus this question a little bit by introducing the idea of a physical or material thing.
More informationSupplemental Material 2a: The Proto-psychologists. In this presentation, we will have a short review of the Scientific Revolution and the
Supplemental Material 2a: The Proto-psychologists Introduction In this presentation, we will have a short review of the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment period. Thus, we will briefly examine
More informationExamining the nature of mind. Michael Daniels. A review of Understanding Consciousness by Max Velmans (Routledge, 2000).
Examining the nature of mind Michael Daniels A review of Understanding Consciousness by Max Velmans (Routledge, 2000). Max Velmans is Reader in Psychology at Goldsmiths College, University of London. Over
More informationPhilosophy 1100 Introduction to Ethics. Lecture 3 Survival of Death?
Question 1 Philosophy 1100 Introduction to Ethics Lecture 3 Survival of Death? How important is it to you whether humans survive death? Do you agree or disagree with the following view? Given a choice
More information24.01 Classics of Western Philosophy
1 Plan: Kant Lecture #2: How are pure mathematics and pure natural science possible? 1. Review: Problem of Metaphysics 2. Kantian Commitments 3. Pure Mathematics 4. Transcendental Idealism 5. Pure Natural
More informationJohn Locke. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
John Locke An Essay Concerning Human Understanding From Rationalism to Empiricism Empiricism vs. Rationalism Empiricism: All knowledge ultimately rests upon sense experience. All justification (our reasons
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy
Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2014 Russell Marcus Class #3 - Illusion Descartes, from Meditations on First Philosophy Marcus, Introduction to Philosophy, Fall 2014 Slide 1 Business P
More informationGeorge Berkeley. The Principles of Human Knowledge. Review
George Berkeley The Principles of Human Knowledge Review To be is to be perceived Obvious to the Mind all those bodies which compose the earth have no subsistence without a mind, their being is to be perceived
More informationGeneral Philosophy. Dr Peter Millican,, Hertford College. Lecture 4: Two Cartesian Topics
General Philosophy Dr Peter Millican,, Hertford College Lecture 4: Two Cartesian Topics Scepticism, and the Mind 2 Last Time we looked at scepticism about INDUCTION. This Lecture will move on to SCEPTICISM
More informationLecture 6 Objections to Dualism Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia Correspondence between Descartes Gilbert Ryle The Ghost in the Machine
Lecture 6 Objections to Dualism Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia Correspondence between Descartes Gilbert Ryle The Ghost in the Machine 1 Agenda 1. Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia 2. The Interaction Problem
More informationTo be able to define human nature and psychological egoism. To explain how our views of human nature influence our relationships with other
Velasquez, Philosophy TRACK 1: CHAPTER REVIEW CHAPTER 2: Human Nature 2.1: Why Does Your View of Human Nature Matter? Learning objectives: To be able to define human nature and psychological egoism To
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 3 D A Y 2 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 3 D A Y 2 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M AGENDA 1. Quick Review 2. Arguments Against Materialism/Physicalism
More informationA Posteriori Necessities
A Posteriori Necessities 1. Introduction: Recall that we distinguished between a priori knowledge and a posteriori knowledge: A Priori Knowledge: Knowledge acquirable prior to experience; for instance,
More informationThe Problem of the External World
The Problem of the External World External World Skepticism Consider this painting by Rene Magritte: Is there a tree outside? External World Skepticism Many people have thought that humans are like this
More informationRationalism. A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt
Rationalism I. Descartes (1596-1650) A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt 1. How could one be certain in the absence of religious guidance and trustworthy senses
More informationUnit 2. WoK 1 - Perception. Tuesday, October 7, 14
Unit 2 WoK 1 - Perception Russell Reading - Appearance and Reality The Russell document provides a basic framework for looking at the limitations of our senses. In small groups, discuss and record what
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 1b Knowledge
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 1b Knowledge According to A.C. Grayling, if cogito ergo sum is an argument, it is missing a premise. This premise is: A. Everything that exists thinks. B. Everything that
More informationDo we have knowledge of the external world?
Do we have knowledge of the external world? This book discusses the skeptical arguments presented in Descartes' Meditations 1 and 2, as well as how Descartes attempts to refute skepticism by building our
More informationappearance is often different from reality, and it s reality that counts.
Relativism Appearance vs. Reality Philosophy begins with the realisation that appearance is often different from reality, and it s reality that counts. Parmenides and others were maybe hyper Parmenides
More informationare going to present Descartes view on the mind/body relation. Our methodology will
Introduction The mind/body problem has been a discourse which many philosophers have tried to combat to no avail due to its complex and demanding nature. In this paper however, we are going to present
More informationCommon sense dictates that we can know external reality exists and that it is generally correctly perceived via our five senses
Common sense dictates that we can know external reality exists and that it is generally correctly perceived via our five senses Mind Mind Body Mind Body [According to this view] the union [of body and
More informationREPLY TO BURGOS (2015)
Behavior and Philosophy, 44, 41-45 (2016). 2016 Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies REPLY TO BURGOS (2015) Teed Rockwell Sonoma State University I appreciate the detailed attention Dr. Burgos has given
More informationYou keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. an analysis of Descartes Evil Genius conceivability argument
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. an analysis of Descartes Evil Genius conceivability argument by Forrest Cameranesi In his Meditations, Descartes lays out an argument
More informationClass #13 - The Consciousness Theory of the Self Locke, The Prince and the Cobbler Reid, Of Mr. Locke's Account of Our Personal Identity
Philosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Spring 2012 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #13 - The Consciousness Theory of the Self Locke, The Prince and the Cobbler Reid, Of Mr. Locke's Account of
More information1/10. The Fourth Paralogism and the Refutation of Idealism
1/10 The Fourth Paralogism and the Refutation of Idealism The Fourth Paralogism is quite different from the three that preceded it because, although it is treated as a part of rational psychology, it main
More informationChapter 16 George Berkeley s Immaterialism and Subjective Idealism
Chapter 16 George Berkeley s Immaterialism and Subjective Idealism Key Words Immaterialism, esse est percipi, material substance, sense data, skepticism, primary quality, secondary quality, substratum
More informationAnnotated Bibliography. seeking to keep the possibility of dualism alive in academic study. In this book,
Warren 1 Koby Warren PHIL 400 Dr. Alfino 10/30/2010 Annotated Bibliography Chalmers, David John. The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory.! New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. Print.!
More informationW H A T I T M E A N S T O B E R E A L : T H E A N C I E N T S, T H E B I B L E, A N D U S
301 APPENDIX D W H A T I T M E A N S T O B E R E A L : T H E A N C I E N T S, T H E B I B L E, A N D U S We moderns have a very different concept of real from the one that has prevailed throughout most
More informationIn his pithy pamphlet Free Will, Sam Harris. Defining free will away EDDY NAHMIAS ISN T ASKING FOR THE IMPOSSIBLE. reviews/harris
Defining free will away EDDY NAHMIAS ISN T ASKING FOR THE IMPOSSIBLE Free Will by Sam Harris (The Free Press),. /$. 110 In his pithy pamphlet Free Will, Sam Harris explains why he thinks free will is an
More informationThe Mind/Body Problem
The Mind/Body Problem This book briefly explains the problem of explaining consciousness and three proposals for how to do it. Site: HCC Eagle Online Course: 6143-PHIL-1301-Introduction to Philosophy-S8B-13971
More informationIntro to Philosophy. Review for Exam 2
Intro to Philosophy Review for Exam 2 Epistemology Theory of Knowledge What is knowledge? What is the structure of knowledge? What particular things can I know? What particular things do I know? Do I know
More informationPhilosophy of Mind. Introduction to the Mind-Body Problem
Philosophy of Mind Introduction to the Mind-Body Problem Two Motivations for Dualism External Theism Internal The nature of mind is such that it has no home in the natural world. Mind and its Place in
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALICUT QUESTION BANK
UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT SCHOOL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION B.A PHILOSOPHY (2011 ADMISSION ONWARDS) VI SEMESTER CORE COURSE MODERN WESTERN PHILOSOPHY QUESTION BANK Unit-1: Spirit of Modern Philosophy 1. Who among
More informationCartesian Dualism. I am not my body
Cartesian Dualism I am not my body Dualism = two-ism Concerning human beings, a (substance) dualist says that the mind and body are two different substances (things). The brain is made of matter, and part
More informationG.E. Moore A Refutation of Skepticism
G.E. Moore A Refutation of Skepticism The Argument For Skepticism 1. If you do not know that you are not merely a brain in a vat, then you do not even know that you have hands. 2. You do not know that
More informationNew Chapter: Epistemology: The Theory and Nature of Knowledge
Intro to Philosophy Phil 110 Lecture 14: 2-22 Daniel Kelly I. Mechanics A. Upcoming Readings 1. Today we ll discuss a. Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding b. Berkeley, Three Dialogues Between
More informationWhat I am is what I am, Are you what you are, Or what?
What I am is what I am, Are you what you are, Or what? Minds and Bodies What am I, anyway? Can collections of atoms be the subjects of conscious mental states? The Big Question Mind and/or Matter? What
More informationDescartes to Early Psychology. Phil 255
Descartes to Early Psychology Phil 255 Descartes World View Rationalism: the view that a priori considerations could lay the foundations for human knowledge. (i.e. Think hard enough and you will be lead
More informationK.V. LAURIKAINEN EXTENDING THE LIMITS OF SCIENCE
K.V. LAURIKAINEN EXTENDING THE LIMITS OF SCIENCE Tarja Kallio-Tamminen Contents Abstract My acquintance with K.V. Laurikainen Various flavours of Copenhagen What proved to be wrong Revelations of quantum
More informationClass #3 - Illusion Descartes, from Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes, The Story of the Wax Descartes, The Story of the Sun
Philosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Fall 2014 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #3 - Illusion Descartes, from Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes, The Story of the Wax Descartes, The
More informationPlease remember to sign-in by scanning your badge Department of Psychiatry Grand Rounds
AS A COURTESY TO OUR SPEAKER AND AUDIENCE MEMBERS, PLEASE SILENCE ALL PAGERS AND CELL PHONES Please remember to sign-in by scanning your badge Department of Psychiatry Grand Rounds James M. Stedman, PhD.
More informationFrom Descartes to Locke. Consciousness Knowledge Science Reality
From Descartes to Locke Consciousness Knowledge Science Reality Brains in Vats What is the point? The point of the brain in a vat story is not to convince us that we might actually be brains in vats, But
More informationThe Qualiafications (or Lack Thereof) of Epiphenomenal Qualia
Francesca Hovagimian Philosophy of Psychology Professor Dinishak 5 March 2016 The Qualiafications (or Lack Thereof) of Epiphenomenal Qualia In his essay Epiphenomenal Qualia, Frank Jackson makes the case
More informationWritten by Rupert Sheldrake, Ph.D. Sunday, 01 September :00 - Last Updated Wednesday, 18 March :31
The scientific worldview is supremely influential because science has been so successful. It touches all our lives through technology and through modern medicine. Our intellectual world has been transformed
More informationPersonal Identity and the Jehovah' s Witness View of the Resurrection
Personal Identity and the Jehovah' s Witness View of the Resurrection Steven B. Cowan Abstract: It is commonly known that the Watchtower Society (Jehovah's Witnesses) espouses a materialist view of human
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 4b Free Will/Self
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 4b Free Will/Self The unobservability of the self David Hume, the Scottish empiricist we met in connection with his critique of Descartes method of doubt, is very skeptical
More informationEpistemology. Diogenes: Master Cynic. The Ancient Greek Skeptics 4/6/2011. But is it really possible to claim knowledge of anything?
Epistemology a branch of philosophy that investigates the origin, nature, methods, and limits of human knowledge (Dictionary.com v 1.1). Epistemology attempts to answer the question how do we know what
More informationWilliam Meehan Essay on Spinoza s psychology.
William Meehan wmeehan@wi.edu Essay on Spinoza s psychology. Baruch (Benedictus) Spinoza is best known in the history of psychology for his theory of the emotions and for being the first modern thinker
More informationSaul Kripke, Naming and Necessity
24.09x Minds and Machines Saul Kripke, Naming and Necessity Excerpt from Saul Kripke, Naming and Necessity (Harvard, 1980). Identity theorists have been concerned with several distinct types of identifications:
More informationThe Quest for Knowledge: A study of Descartes. Christopher Reynolds
The Quest for Knowledge: A study of Descartes by Christopher Reynolds The quest for knowledge remains a perplexing problem. Mankind continues to seek to understand himself and the world around him, and,
More informationI Am Perceived, Therefore I am
I Am Perceived, Therefore I am By MARIA RYBAKOVA He wanted to dream a man: he wanted to dream him completely, in painstaking detail, and impose him upon reality. - Jorge Luis Borges, The Circular Ruins
More informationREFUTING THE EXTERNAL WORLD SAMPLE CHAPTER GÖRAN BACKLUND
REFUTING THE EXTERNAL WORLD SAMPLE CHAPTER GÖRAN BACKLUND 1.0.0.5 Copyright 2014 by Göran Backlund All rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever
More informationSome Theories of Body & Soul in Modern Thought
A2 Religious Studies The Philosophy of Religion The Body/Soul Distinction Sherborne School for Girls Some Theories of Body & Soul in Modern Thought Idealism Dualism & Materialism 1 Introduction This study
More informationA Warning about So-Called Rationalists
A Warning about So-Called Rationalists Mark F. Sharlow Have you ever heard of rationalism and rationalists? If so, have you wondered what these words mean? A rationalist is someone who believes that reason
More informationIN THIS PAPER I will examine and criticize the arguments David
A MATERIALIST RESPONSE TO DAVID CHALMERS THE CONSCIOUS MIND PAUL RAYMORE Stanford University IN THIS PAPER I will examine and criticize the arguments David Chalmers gives for rejecting a materialistic
More informationThe Mind-Body Problem
The Mind-Body Problem What is it for something to be real? Ontology Monism Idealism What is the nature of existence? What is the difference between appearance and reality? What exists in the universe?
More informationTeleological: telos ( end, goal ) What is the telos of human action? What s wrong with living for pleasure? For power and public reputation?
1. Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014 2. Origins of the concept of self What makes it move? Pneuma ( wind ) and Psyche ( breath ) life-force What is beyond-the-physical?
More informationDo you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014
Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014 Origins of the concept of self What makes it move? Pneuma ( wind ) and Psyche ( breath ) life-force What is beyond-the-physical?
More informationHOBBES S DECEIVING GOD: THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THOMAS HOBBES AND RENE DESCARTES. Gabriela Gorescu. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of
HOBBES S DECEIVING GOD: THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THOMAS HOBBES AND RENE DESCARTES Gabriela Gorescu Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2015 APPROVED: Richard
More informationWelcome back to our third and final lecture on skepticism and the appearance
PHI 110 Lecture 15 1 Welcome back to our third and final lecture on skepticism and the appearance reality gap. Because the material that we re working with now is quite difficult and involved, I will do
More informationBERKELEY, REALISM, AND DUALISM: REPLY TO HOCUTT S GEORGE BERKELEY RESURRECTED: A COMMENTARY ON BAUM S ONTOLOGY FOR BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS
Behavior and Philosophy, 46, 58-62 (2018). 2018 Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies 58 BERKELEY, REALISM, AND DUALISM: REPLY TO HOCUTT S GEORGE BERKELEY RESURRECTED: A COMMENTARY ON BAUM S ONTOLOGY
More informationJustification as a Social Activity
Justification as a Social Activity William Riordan O'Connor Fordham University I We have no absolutely conclusive evidence that there is a physical world and we have no absolutely conclusive evidence either
More informationLecture 7.1 Berkeley I
TOPIC: Lecture 7.1 Berkeley I Introduction to the Representational view of the mind. Berkeley s Argument from Illusion. KEY TERMS/ GOALS: Idealism. Naive realism. Representations. Berkeley s Argument from
More informationLesson 2 The Existence of God Cause & Effect Apologetics Press Introductory Christian Evidences Correspondence Course
Lesson 2 The Existence of God Cause & Effect Apologetics Press Introductory Christian Evidences Correspondence Course THE EXISTENCE OF GOD CAUSE & EFFECT One of the most basic issues that the human mind
More informationWhy I Am Not a Property Dualist By John R. Searle
1 Why I Am Not a Property Dualist By John R. Searle I have argued in a number of writings 1 that the philosophical part (though not the neurobiological part) of the traditional mind-body problem has a
More informationExplanatory gaps and dualist intuitions
02-Weiskrantz-Chap02 4/3/08 5:32 PM Page 55 Chapter 2 Explanatory gaps and dualist intuitions David Papineau 2.1 Introduction I agree with nearly everything Martin Davies says. He has written an elegant
More informationCartesian Rationalism
Cartesian Rationalism René Descartes 1596-1650 Reason tells me to trust my senses Descartes had the disturbing experience of finding out that everything he learned at school was wrong! From 1604-1612 he
More informationAristotle and the Soul
Aristotle and the Soul (Please note: These are rough notes for a lecture, mostly taken from the relevant sections of Philosophy and Ethics and other publications and should not be reproduced or otherwise
More informationLife, Automata and the Mind-Body Problem
TEL-AVIV UNIVERSITY LESTER & SALLY ENTIN FACULTY OF HUMANTIES THE SCHOOL OF PHILOSOPHY Life, Automata and the Mind-Body Problem Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Vered Glickman
More informationHello. Welcome to what will be one of two lectures on John Locke s theories of
PHI 110 Lecture 4 1 Hello. Welcome to what will be one of two lectures on John Locke s theories of personhood and personal identity. The title I have for this lecture is Consciousness, Persons and Responsibility.
More informationCartesian Rationalism
Cartesian Rationalism René Descartes 1596-1650 Reason tells me to trust my senses Descartes had the disturbing experience of finding out that everything he learned at school was wrong! From 1604-1612 he
More informationDepartment of Philosophy TCD. Great Philosophers. Dennett. Tom Farrell. Department of Surgical Anatomy RCSI Department of Clinical Medicine RCSI
Department of Philosophy TCD Great Philosophers Dennett Tom Farrell Department of Philosophy TCD Department of Surgical Anatomy RCSI Department of Clinical Medicine RCSI 1. Socrates 2. Plotinus 3. Augustine
More informationa0rxh/ On Van Inwagen s Argument Against the Doctrine of Arbitrary Undetached Parts WESLEY H. BRONSON Princeton University
a0rxh/ On Van Inwagen s Argument Against the Doctrine of Arbitrary Undetached Parts WESLEY H. BRONSON Princeton University Imagine you are looking at a pen. It has a blue ink cartridge inside, along with
More informationPL-101: Introduction to Philosophy Fall of 2007, Juniata College Instructor: Xinli Wang
1 PL-101: Introduction to Philosophy Fall of 2007, Juniata College Instructor: Xinli Wang Office: Good Hall 414 Phone: X-3642 Office Hours: MWF 10-11 am Email: Wang@juniata.edu Texts Required: 1. Christopher
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 7b The World
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 7b The World Kant s metaphysics rested on identifying a kind of truth that Hume and other did not acknowledge. It is called A. synthetic a priori B. analytic a priori C.
More informationTest 3. Minds and Bodies Review
Test 3 Minds and Bodies Review The issue: The Questions What am I? What sort of thing am I? Am I a mind that occupies a body? Are mind and matter different (sorts of) things? Is conscious awareness a physical
More informationQ1: Lesson 1 Will the Real God Stand Up?
: Lesson 1 Well hello everyone! You ve made it to week one of your forty week transformation! We are going to be tackling the First Big Q, Who is God? during the next eight weeks, and I am so excited to
More informationVerificationism. PHIL September 27, 2011
Verificationism PHIL 83104 September 27, 2011 1. The critique of metaphysics... 1 2. Observation statements... 2 3. In principle verifiability... 3 4. Strong verifiability... 3 4.1. Conclusive verifiability
More informationChapter 2: Two Types of Reasoning
Chapter 2: Two Types of Reasoning In chapter 1, I mentioned deductive and inductive arguments. This chapter goes into more depth on deductive reasoning in particular, but also provides a contrast with
More informationTest 3. Minds and Bodies Review
Test 3 Minds and Bodies Review The Questions What am I? What sort of thing am I? Am I a mind that occupies a body? Are mind and matter different (sorts of) things? Is conscious awareness a physical event
More informationPhilosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Science Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationAyer on the criterion of verifiability
Ayer on the criterion of verifiability November 19, 2004 1 The critique of metaphysics............................. 1 2 Observation statements............................... 2 3 In principle verifiability...............................
More informationIII Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier
III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier In Theaetetus Plato introduced the definition of knowledge which is often translated
More informationBeing and the Hyperverse
Being and the Hyperverse Gabriel Vacariu (Philosophy, UB) Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil. Plato (?) The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, but the illusion of knowledge. Stephen Hawking
More information